alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JUAN BARELA and LYNN BARELA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ELLIS W. JOHNSON, M.D., et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C05-5785RBL

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

IFP APPLICATION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court has broad discretion in determining an application to proceed in forma

pauperis. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 845 (1963). 

As of the date of the filing of this case, Plaintiffs listed among their assets a residence worth

190,000 and reported that, between retirement and Social Security benefits, they have a monthly income of

$1728.00. 

It is apparent that Plaintiff is able to pay the filing fee in this case, and should be required to do so. 

Accordingly, the Court will DENY application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have 90 days

form the date of this order to pay the required filing fee or this matter will be dismissed without further

notice.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2006. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05785-RBL Document 3 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-16556]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0072; FRL-9913-62-OAR]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 
Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Correction

    In rule document 2014-16556, appearing on pages 41437-41438, in the 
issue of Wednesday, July 16, 2014, make the following correction:
    On page 41437, in the first column, the subject heading is 
corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-16556 Filed 7-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Order filed November 1, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00628-CV

____________

In the Interest of J.M.F., Jr., a child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-04346J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a parental termination 

appeal. Appellant’s brief was due October 31, 2022. No brief has been filed. 

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). This accelerated schedule requires greater 

compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, William Leslie 

Shireman, to file appellant’s brief no later than November 10, 2022. If the brief is 

not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be 

held in contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new 

counsel due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.
No. 69685.

#### Ottavia, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/2803, etc. (New York).

*516Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

RICARDO VASQUEZ-MANZANO,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5048M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 March 14, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05205-FDB Document 11 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 66623.

#### James G. Wiley, a/c K. H. Nishi & Son, et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/30902, etc. (Los Angeles).

*390Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of stone lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### Glossary Home > Petroleum > Publications > Refinery Capacity Report



# Refinery Capacity Report Refinery Capacity Report 2009 Released: June 25, 2009 Next Release: June 2010 

### Notice: The Refinery Capacity 2009 Report has a new table titled Table12b Natural Gas Used as Feedstock for Hydrogen Production by PAD District. In addition, isoocta ne production capacity is now being collected. It is included under production capacity of isomers on Tables 2, 4 and 7. Data series include fuel, electricity, and steam purchase d for consumption at the refinery; refinery receipts of crude oil by method of transportation; current and proj ected capacities for atmospheric crude oil distillation, downstream charge, production, and storage capacities. Respondents are operators of all operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new re fineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year, located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Refinery Capacity Report --- Full report in PDF (1 MB) XLS --- Refinery Capacity Data by individual refinery as of January 1, 2009 Previous --- Previous reports are avai lable on the historical page. Source --- Energy Information Administration (EIA ), Form EIA-820, "Annual Refinery Report". Tables 1 Number and Capacity of Operable Petroleum Refineries by PAD Distri ct and State as of January 1, 2009 HTML PDF 2 Production Capacity of Operable Petroleum Refineri es by PAD District and State as of January 1, 2009 HTML PDF 3 Capacity of Operable Petroleum Refineries by St ate and Individual Refinery as of January 1, 2009 PDF 4 Production Capacity of Operable Pe troleum Refineries by State and Indi vidual Refinery as of January 1, 2009 PDF
5 Refiners' Operable Atmospheric Crude Oil Distillation Ca pacity by Individual Refinery as of January 1, 2009 PDF 6 Operable Crude Oil and Down stream Charge Capacity of Petroleum Refineries, January 1, 1981 to January 1, 2009 HTML PDF
7 Operable Production Capacity of Petroleum Refineries, January 1, 1981 to January 1, 2009 HTML PDF 8 Working Storage Capacity at Operable Refine ries by PAD District as of January 1, 2009 HTML PDF 9 Shell Storage Capacity at Operable Refineri es by PAD District as of January 1, 2009 HTML PDF 10 Capacity and Fresh Feed Input to Selected Downstream Unit s at U.S. Refineries, 2007 - 2009 PDF 11 Refinery Receipts of Crude Oil by Method of Transportation by PAD District, 2008 HTML PDF 12a Fuels Consumed at Refineries by PAD District, 2008 HTML PDF 12b Natural Gas Used as Feedstock for Hydr ogen Production by PAD District, 2008 HTML PDF 13 Shutdown and Reactivated Refineries During 2008 PDF 14 Refinery Sales During 2008 PDF 15 Refineries Permanently Shutdown by PAD Dist rict Between January 1, 1990 and January 1, 2008 PDF Explanatory Notes PDF Privacy/Security | Accessibility | Copyright & Reuse • Contact Us | Feedback | Careers | About EIA Fedstats | USA.gov | Department of Energy 

# Page 1 of 1 Refinery Capacity Report

12/3/2009 http ://www.eia.doe. g ov/oil _g as/ p etroleum/data_p ublications/refinery_ cap acit y_ data/refcap

...
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, Kenneth M. Clinebell, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         |  |                         
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2007 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell
|                         |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell    
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:06-mc-05017-FDB Document 3 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-mc-05017-FDB Document 3 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                     TO THE

                                  AMETEK, INC.
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN



         WHEREAS, there was adopted and made effective as of May 1, 1997, the
AMETEK, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Plan provides that theAdministrator of the
Plan (defined as a committee consisting of AMETEK's Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Counsel) may amend the Plan at any time or
from time to time as long as the amendment does not significantly increase the
cost of the Plan to the Company; and

         WHEREAS, AMETEK now desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         FIRST: The second sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended
to read, in its entirety, as follows:

         "Such distribution shall be made (i) within 30 days after the date of
         the Participant's Separation from Employment, or (ii) such other date
         as is mutually agreed upon by the Company and the Participant."

         SECOND: The second sentence of Section 4.2 of the Plan shall be amended
to read, in its entirety, as follows:

         "Such distribution shall be made (i) within 30 days after the date of
         the Participant's death, or (ii) such other date as is mutually agreed
         upon by the Company and the Beneficiary."

         THIRD: The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective as of August
1, 1999.


<PAGE>   2






         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrator of the Plan has caused this
amendment to be executed on this 2nd day of September 1999.

                                         ADMINISTRATOR

                                         /s/ Walter E. Blankley
                                         ------------------------
                                         Walter E. Blankley

                                         /s/ John J. Molinelli
                                         ------------------------
                                         John J. Molinelli

                                         /s/ Donna F. Winquist
                                         ------------------------
                                         Donna F. Winquist
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 21 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 21 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Registration Statement of Baja Mining Corp. the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Mouat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: July 6, 2006



Robert Mouat                           .

Robert Mouat

President, Chief Financial Officer























Baja mining/20F/20F Material Documents/906 Cert - JWG
No. 66129.

#### James Betesh Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/1634, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware eggcups similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 8, C.D. 2226), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 47 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 463
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 47

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 4 (legislative day, June 2), 1998

 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (for himself and Mr. Helms) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

                             July 10, 1998

          Reported by Mr. Roth, without amendment, unfavorably

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That Congress does not approve the extension of the authority contained 
in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President 
to Congress on June 3, 1998, with respect to Vietnam.

                                                       Calendar No. 463

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 10, 1998

                Reported without amendment, unfavorably
```
Lucky Break Wishbone Corporation v. Hot Ideas International Inc Doc. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0570

_____________________________

CLEVELAND MCNAIR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Joshua M. Hawkes, Judge.

July 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, III, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0632 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-044-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 

155B, EC155B1, SA-365C, SA-365C1, SA-365C2, and SA-366G1 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 31 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect corrosion on the main gearbox (MGB) 

casing, which could lead to a crack, failure of the MGB, and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

corrosion repair)

$43

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $43 for the inspection

$680 for the corrosion repair

Total US Fleet Cost $1,318 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Rao Edupuganti
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-BC3
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-BC3


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION