alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 205

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the heroic efforts of the

Air National Guard’s 109th Airlift Wing and itsrescue of Dr. Jerri Nielsen from the South Pole.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 205

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 109th Airlift Wing of the Air National Guard

is based at Stratton Air National Guard Base in Glenville, New York;

Whereas the 109th was called upon by the United States

Antarctic Program to undertake a medical evacuation

mission to the South Pole to rescue Dr. Jerri Nielsen, a

physician who diagnosed herself with breast cancer;
2

•HCON 205 EH

Whereas the 109th is the only unit in the world trained and

equipped to attempt such a mission;

Whereas the 10 crew members were pilot Maj. George R.

McAllister Jr., senior mission commander Col. Marion G.

Pritchard, co-pilot Maj. David Koltermann, navigator Lt.

Col. Bryan M. Fennessy, engineer Ch. M. Sgt. Michael

T. Cristiano, loadmasters Sr. M. Sgt. Kurt A. Garrison

and T. Sgt. David M. Vesper, flight nurse Maj. Kimberly

Terpening, and medical technicians Ch. M. Sgt. Michael

Casatelli and M. Sgt. Kelly McDowell;

Whereas the crew departed Stratton Air Base for McMurdo

Station in Antarctica via Christchurch, New Zealand, on

October 6, 1999;

Whereas on October 15, 1999, Aircraft No. 096 departed

McMurdo for the South Pole, where the temperature was

approximately –53 degrees Celsius;

Whereas Major McAllister piloted a 130,000 pound LC–130

Hercules cargo plane equipped with Teflon-coated skis to

a safe landing on an icy runway with visibility barely

above minimums established for safe operations;

Whereas less than 25 minutes later, following an emotional

goodbye and brief medical evaluation, Dr. Nielsen and

the crew headed back to McMurdo Station;

Whereas the mission lasted 9 days and covered 11,410 nautical miles; and

Whereas Major McAllister became the first person ever to

land on a polar ice cap at this time of year: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and honors the
3

•HCON 205 EH

1 crew of the Air National Guard’s 109th Airlift Wing for

2 its heroic efforts in rescuing Dr. Jerri Nielsen from the

3 South Pole.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 151/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 151 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6628 April 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 151

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6628 April 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2023/C 151/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Research Executive Agency (REA) | 1 |
| 2023/C 151/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – amending budget No 1 | 6 |
| 2023/C 151/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Labour Authority (ELA) – amending budget No 1 | 13 |
| 2023/C 151/04 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – amending budget No 2 | 19 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2023/C 151/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Research Executive Agency (REA)

1

2023/C 151/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – amending budget No 1

6

2023/C 151/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Labour Authority (ELA) – amending budget No 1

13

2023/C 151/04

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – amending budget No 2

19

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) ( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 ) | 26 |
| | Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 ) | 27 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) ( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 )

( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 )

26

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 )

( OJ C 73, 28.2.2023 )

27

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD STEVEN MITUNIEWICZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARK,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5383RBL

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the file, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J.

Kelley Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the

courts order and failure to state a claim.

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold and to count this dismissal as a strike under the Prison Litigation Reform Act,

42 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).

DATED this 16th day of October, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05383-RBL Document 12 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 1
No. P66/386.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States, protests 61/15556, etc. (New Orleans).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Com*pany, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

RETURN, § 2255 MOTION

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHE KEUNG LING, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-2132JLR-MJB

) (CR98-220BJR)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ORDER FOR SERVICE AND 

 ) RETURN, § 2255 MOTION

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

Petitioner has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) The Clerk shall arrange for service by first class mail upon the United States Attorney

of copies of the motion, of all supporting documents, and of this Order, and shall direct a copy of this

Order to petitioner.

(2) Within thirty (30) days after such service, the United States shall file and serve an

answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, the United States should state its position as to whether an

evidentiary hearing is necessary. The United States shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court

and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

Case 2:05-cv-02132-JLR Document 8 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

RETURN, § 2255 MOTION

PAGE - 2

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, on the

face of the answer, the United States shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after it

is filed, and the Clerk shall note the answer accordingly. Petitioner may file and serve a response

not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter,

and the United States may file and serve a reply brief not later than the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter. 

(4) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Hon. James L. Robart.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02132-JLR Document 8 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Jifrt. iiii,i'rii'

10 &u$ -? PÞl

i.1ì LSTEVEN A. THOMPSON

Executive Dirclor Ol(LAl.|OMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QIJALIIY

?:?l

BRAD HENRY

Governor

July 29,2010

Mr. Tom Diggs

Associate Director, Air Programs

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. EPA, Region 6

1445 Ross Ave.

Dallas, TX 75202-2733

Dear Mr. Diggs:

'We 

are writing to clari$r our interpretation of EPA's interim guidance on use of PM16 as a

surrogate for PMz s. The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) commits

to implement PM2 5 standards consistent with Federal case law, and EPA Administrator petition

decisions, relevant to the use of the PMls Surrogate Policy (e.g., 75 FR 6827, 683 L-32; Feb. 1 l,

2010 and EPA's response to Petition IV- 2008-3, August 12,2009). Therefore, ODEQ will not

proceed on the general presumption that PMro is always a reasonable surrogate for PM2 5.

Any permit application in which the applicant is seeking to rely on the Surrogate Policy, ODEQ

will include in the permit record an adequate rationale or demonstration to support the use of

PM16 as a surrogate based on the facts and circumstances of the specific permit. In addition, the

record will include an explanation of how the impacts from the proposed source

construction/modification on the PM zs levels were determined. Further, ODEQ will be mindful of

the limits provided in the policy itself, such as the need to identifu the technical diffrculties that

justif,i the application of the policy in each specific case (75 FR 6834).

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (405) 702-4154.

Eddie Terrill

Division Director

Air Quality Division

cc: Dawson Lasseter, Engineering Manager

ET:aw

707 NORIH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX Ió7l, OKI-AHOMA CITY, OI(I.AHOMA 73101-1677

pr¡nted on recycled paper with soy ink

Èt

n^

OKLAHOMA

DEPAR'IMEN'I OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUATITY
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 23, 2016

t0316

Order 

Clerk

March 23, 2016

152266

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152266

COA: 327690 

Oakland CC: 2014-251021-FH

TERRENCE PATRICK HOBBS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2015 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Before the First Division,

December 19, 1949

No. 53826.

#### Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 7744-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pressed glassware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 52952, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 163

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the 100th anniversary of the birth

of Dorothy Day and designating the week of November 8, 1997, through

November 14, 1997, as ‘‘National Week of Recognition for Dorothy

Day and Those Whom She Served’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.

DODD, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. REED, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, and

Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the following resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the 100th anniversary

of the birth of Dorothy Day and designating the week

of November 8, 1997, through November 14, 1997, as

‘‘National Week of Recognition for Dorothy Day and

Those Whom She Served’’.

Whereas November 8, 1997, marks the 100th anniversary of

the birth of Dorothy Day on Pineapple Street in Brooklyn, New York;

Whereas Dorothy Day was a woman who lived a life of voluntary poverty, guided by the principles of social justice

and solidarity with the poor;
2

•SRES 163 ATS

Whereas in 1933 Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin founded the

Catholic Worker Movement and the Catholic Worker

newspaper ‘‘to realize in the individual and society the

express and implied teachings of Christ’’;

Whereas the Catholic Worker ‘‘Houses of Hospitality’’ founded by Dorothy Day have ministered to the physical and

spiritual needs of the poor for over 60 years;

Whereas there are now more than 125 Catholic Worker

‘‘Houses of Hospitality’’ in the United States and

throughout the world;

Whereas in 1972 Dorothy Day was awarded the Laetare

Medal by the University of Notre Dame for ‘‘comforting

the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable virtually all of

her life’’;

Whereas, upon the death of Dorothy Day in 1980, noted

Catholic historian David O’Brien called her ‘‘the most

significant, interesting, and influential person in the history of American Catholicism’’;

Whereas His Emminence John Cardinal O’Connor has stated

that he is considering recommending Dorothy Day to the

Pope for Cannonization; and

Whereas Dorothy Day serves as inspiration for those who

strive to live their faith: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) expresses deep admiration and respect for

3 the life and work of Dorothy Day;

4 (2) recognizes that the work of Dorothy Day

5 improved the lives of countless people and that her
3

•SRES 163 ATS

1 example has inspired others to follow her in a life of

2 solidarity with the poor;

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 297

To authorize testimony and representation of former and current Senate

employees and representation of Senator Craig in Student Loan Fund

of Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 9 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and representation of former and

current Senate employees and representation of Senator

Craig in Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc. v. Riley,

et al.

Whereas, in the case of Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc.

v. Riley, et al., Case No. CV 94–0413–S–LMB, pending

in the United States District Court for the District of

Idaho, testimony has been requested from Elizabeth

Criner, a former employee of Senator Larry Craig;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Senators and employees of the Senate with respect
2

SRES 297 ATS

to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating

to their official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, be the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Elizabeth Criner, and any other

2 former or current Senate employee from whom testimony

3 may be required, are authorized to testify in the case of

4 Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et al., except

5 concerning matters for which a privilege should be as6 serted.

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

8 represent Senator Larry Craig, Elizabeth Criner, and any

9 other Member or employee of the Senate in connection

10 with the testimony authorized in section one of this resolu11 tion.

Æ
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the accompanying report of Cancer Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Chene Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
To my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: October 20, 2010





/s/ Chene GardnerChene GardnerChief Financial OfficerChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Jennifer Elizabeth Timar

Appellate case number: 01-18-00722-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-47229

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 12, 2019

Party filing motion: Relator

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Landau, and Countiss

Date: August 29, 2019
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.221 Farm Mortgages  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineAll sectors; farm mortgages; asset
	FA893065603
	8.1
	13.1
	6.0
	12.0
	11.8
	12.5
	12.5
	12.6
	12.6
	4.1
	4.1
	1Corporate farm business; farm mortgages; liability
	FA183165605
	3.1
	4.5
	3.0
	4.3
	4.4
	4.4
	4.9
	3.8
	2.9
	1.0
	0.5
	2Noncorporate farm business; farm mortgages; liability
	FA233165605
	5.0
	8.6
	3.0
	7.7
	7.4
	8.1
	7.5
	8.8
	9.7
	3.1
	3.5
	3All sectors; farm mortgages; asset
	FA893065603
	8.1
	13.1
	6.0
	12.0
	11.8
	12.5
	12.5
	12.6
	12.6
	4.1
	4.1
	4Households and nonprofit organizations; farm mortgages; asset
	FA153065605
	-1.7
	9.5
	-9.8
	2.2
	12.3
	6.1
	7.6
	4.4
	6.0
	-3.0
	-2.4
	5Nonfinancial noncorporate business; farm mortgages; asset
	FA113065603
	0.1
	-0.1
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.1
	0.1
	0.1
	0.1
	0.1
	0.1
	6Federal government; farm mortgages; asset
	FA313065605
	0.4
	0.3
	0.1
	-0.3
	0.9
	0.7
	0.7
	0.7
	0.6
	0.5
	0.6
	7State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; farm mortgages; asset
	FA213065603
	0.1
	-0.0
	0.0
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.1
	0.0
	0.1
	0.1
	0.0
	0.0
	8U.S.-chartered depository institutions; farm mortgages; asset (USDA)
	FA763065633
	7.0
	1.7
	11.6
	4.4
	-6.9
	1.8
	1.7
	1.8
	1.9
	2.0
	2.0
	9Foreign banking offices in the U.S.; farm mortgages; asset
	FA753065603
	0.0
	-0.0
	0.0
	-0.0
	0.2
	0.0
	-0.1
	-0.0
	0.2
	-0.1
	-0.1
	10Life insurance companies; farm mortgages on farm land; asset
	FA543065633
	-0.9
	0.6
	-1.5
	0.5
	1.4
	0.4
	0.4
	0.4
	0.4
	0.4
	0.4
	11State and local government employee defined benefit retirement funds; farm mortgages; asset
	FA223065643
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	12Government-sponsored enterprises; farm mortgages; asset
	FA403065605
	3.4
	3.3
	5.4
	5.4
	3.9
	2.7
	2.3
	2.0
	3.4
	2.8
	3.3
	13Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; farm mortgages; asset
	FA413065605
	-0.2
	-2.1
	0.3
	-0.2
	-0.1
	0.7
	-0.1
	3.2
	-0.1
	1.4
	0.1
	14 Back to top
  **NOTES** Excludes mortgages on farm houses.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
| date    | Assets | Liabilities |
|---------|--------|-------------|
| 2000:Q1 | 51.42  | 6.93        |
| 2000:Q2 | 51.36  | 7.08        |
| 2000:Q3 | 52.34  | 7.26        |
| 2000:Q4 | 52.04  | 7.41        |
| 2001:Q1 | 52     | 7.45        |
| 2001:Q2 | 53.38  | 7.65        |
| 2001:Q3 | 52.6   | 7.9         |
| 2001:Q4 | 54.27  | 8.03        |
| 2002:Q1 | 55.05  | 8.16        |
| 2002:Q2 | 54.66  | 8.35        |
| 2002:Q3 | 53.82  | 8.56        |
| 2002:Q4 | 55.27  | 8.81        |
| 2003:Q1 | 55.74  | 9           |
| 2003:Q2 | 58.06  | 9.39        |
| 2003:Q3 | 59.24  | 9.65        |
| 2003:Q4 | 61.48  | 9.9         |
| 2004:Q1 | 64.27  | 10.1        |
| 2004:Q2 | 65.4   | 10.42       |
| 2004:Q3 | 67.05  | 10.7        |
| 2004:Q4 | 69.8   | 11.07       |
| 2005:Q1 | 70.92  | 11.28       |
| 2005:Q2 | 72.87  | 11.61       |
| 2005:Q3 | 74.87  | 11.96       |
| 2005:Q4 | 76.8   | 12.26       |
| 2006:Q1 | 79     | 12.62       |
| 2006:Q2 | 79.41  | 12.96       |
| 2006:Q3 | 80.91  | 13.29       |
| 2006:Q4 | 82.66  | 13.56       |
| 2007:Q1 | 83.89  | 13.73       |
| 2007:Q2 | 84.63  | 14.04       |
| 2007:Q3 | 85.63  | 14.29       |
| 2007:Q4 | 85.15  | 14.5        |
| 2008:Q1 | 83.23  | 14.62       |
| 2008:Q2 | 81.64  | 14.56       |
| 2008:Q3 | 79.51  | 14.7        |
| 2008:Q4 | 76.02  | 14.4        |
| 2009:Q1 | 74.59  | 14.3        |
| 2009:Q2 | 75.18  | 14.28       |
| 2009:Q3 | 76.76  | 14.28       |
| 2009:Q4 | 77.06  | 14.28       |
| 2010:Q1 | 78.12  | 14.14       |
| 2010:Q2 | 77.58  | 14.08       |
| 2010:Q3 | 79.58  | 14.02       |
| 2010:Q4 | 80.5   | 14.03       |
| 2011:Q1 | 81.63  | 14          |
| 2011:Q2 | 82.06  | 13.95       |
| 2011:Q3 | 80.31  | 13.89       |
| 2011:Q4 | 81.65  | 13.9        |
| 2012:Q1 | 83.68  | 13.86       |
| 2012:Q2 | 83.68  | 13.82       |
| 2012:Q3 | 85.75  | 13.87       |
| 2012:Q4 | 86.76  | 13.91       |
| 2013:Q1 | 89.65  | 13.87       |
| 2013:Q2 | 90.84  | 13.89       |
| 2013:Q3 | 93.46  | 13.97       |
| 2013:Q4 | 95.76  | 14.05       |
| 2014:Q1 | 97.42  | 14.01       |
| 2014:Q2 | 99.36  | 14.14       |
| 2014:Q3 | 99.93  | 14.25       |
| 2014:Q4 | 101.87 | 14.32       |
| 2015:Q1 | 103.74 | 14.28       |
| 2015:Q2 | 104.43 | 14.42       |
| 2015:Q3 | 103.54 | 14.49       |
| 2015:Q4 | 105.15 | 14.52       |
| 2016:Q1 | 106.32 | 14.52       |
| 2016:Q2 | 107.92 | 14.66       |
| 2016:Q3 | 109.99 | 14.85       |
| 2016:Q4 | 110.87 | 14.95       |
| 2017:Q1 | 113.41 | 15.01       |
| 2017:Q2 | 115.29 | 15.18       |
| 2017:Q3 | 117.41 | 15.32       |
| 2017:Q4 | 120.33 | 15.53       |
| 2018:Q1 | 121.12 | 15.57       |
| 2018:Q2 | 122.9  | 15.71       |
| 2018:Q3 | 125.09 | 15.89       |
| 2018:Q4 | 121.75 | 16.03       |
| 2019:Q1 | 127.2  | 16.03       |
| 2019:Q2 | 129.36 | 16.2        |
| 2019:Q3 | 130.63 | 16.39       |
| 2019:Q4 | 133.88 | 16.55       |
| 2020:Q1 | 127.42 | 16.63       |