alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.7


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rowland Wallenius, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 30, 2012
     /s/ Rowland WalleniusRowland WalleniusChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Baja Mining Corp. and will be retained by Baja Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: D & R USA Enterprise, Inc., Saherish Business, Inc. d/b/a Texas Food 

Mart, and Samoda, Inc. d/b/a Amigo Food Mart v. SCF RC Funding 

IV, LLC, Essential Properties Realty Trust, LLC a/k/a SCF Realty 

Group. LLC, Mountain Express Oil Company, and Trujo Wadud, 

Individually

Appellate case number: 01-22-00018-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-47779

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

On January 19, 2022, Appellants D & R USA Enterprise, Inc., Saherish Business, Inc.

d/b/a Texas Food Mart, and Samoda, Inc. d/b/a Amigo Food Mart filed an “Emergency Motion 

Requesting Stay of Proceedings in Trial Court Pending Appeal” seeking a stay of all trial court 

proceedings in Cause No. 2021-47779, D & R USA Enterprise, Inc, Saherish Business, Inc. d/b/a 

Texas Food Store, and Samoda, Inc. d/b/a Amigo Food Mart v. SCF RC Funding IV, LLC, 

Essential Properties Realty Trust, LLC a/k/a SCF Realty Capital LLC, Mountain Express Oil 

Company, and Turjo Wadud, Individually, in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas. 

We grant Appellants’ motion for emergency relief and stay all trial court proceedings in Cause 

No. 2021-47779 pending final adjudication of the present appeal or until further order from this 

Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: January 19, 2022
PRESERVATION PRINCIPLES

Coupeville

Location and Access

The town of Coupeville is the commercial center of the reserve, occupying 740 acres of land stretching across Highway 20 to

Prairie Center in Ebey's Prairie. Coupeville is bounded by Penn Cove on the north, Woodlands to the east and west, and Ebey's

Prairie on the south.

Primary access into the town is along Main Street off of Highway 20, along Parker Road from the east , and Madrona Way from

the west.

Significance and Integrity

Platted in 1881, the town of Coupeville grew quickly into the market and service center of the island. Front Street, along the

waterfront, was the original center of town and still contains the oldest commercial buildings in Coupeville, including a number

of false-front structures from the nineteenth century.

Neighborhoods surrounding the old commercial core also contain several older residences, many of which retain qualities from

their original site designs. These designs include large, undivided lots, remnant orchards, gates, walls, walks and grounds that

denote early patterns and development trends, as well as social values.

Prairie Center, in the southernmost portion of the city (south of Highway 20), developed as the military base at Fort Casey grew

and centered around Pat's Place (now the Tyee Motel and Cafe) built in 1910.

Contemporary activities associated with tourism and recreation, including boating on Penn Cove and the dock at Coupeville's

wharf, echo historic trends that lend regional importance to the town.

The Wharf in Coupeville, historically a major access point for the movement of goods, now provides moorage for small

boats.

Preservation Principles

Preservation principles for Coupeville encourage the continued maintenance of all historic structures and significant landscape

patterns and features.

1. In order to preserve historic landscape patterns, maintain distinct and separate commercial districts and residential

neighborhoods.

2. In order to maintain visual continuity and quality any new buildings in the area should be sympathetic in design, scale

and material to surrounding structures, land forms, and views especially to the water (see Design Considerations for

Historic Properties, 1984).

3. Maintain the cohesive visual and material quality of the town by encouraging attention to entry experiences, signage,

building setback and scale, orientation of structures to each other and surroundings, and a general regard for the

townscape as a whole.

NEXT>>> East Woodlands

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve

Reading the Cultural Landscape

The Olympic building and the Tyee Motel and Cafe in Prairie Center.

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve: Reading the Cultural Landscape Page 1 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20080508213725/http://www.nps.gov/archive/ebla/rcl/rcl6c.htm 11/29/2011
http://www.nps.gov/ebla/rcl/rcl6c.htm

Last Updated: 07-Jun-2000

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve: Reading the Cultural Landscape Page 2 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20080508213725/http://www.nps.gov/archive/ebla/rcl/rcl6c.htm 11/29/2011
No. 56835.

#### Wesley & Winter, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 152878-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paper napkins the same in all material respects (except that they are of crepe paper) as those the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise entered prior to January 1, 1948, is dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1413, and that which was entered subsequent to said date is dutiable at 15 percent under said paragraph, as modified, *supra.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 224 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 224

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning an international project 
   to evaluate and facilitate the international exchange of advanced 
                             technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 1998

 Mr. Stevens (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Hollings, Mr. 
 Inouye, and Mr. Murkowski) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning an international project 
   to evaluate and facilitate the international exchange of advanced 
                             technologies.

Whereas currently in the post Cold-War world, there are new opportunities to 
        facilitate international political and scientific cooperation on cost-
        effective and advanced innovative nuclear waste technologies;
Whereas there is increasing public interest in monitoring and remediation of 
        nuclear wastes; and
Whereas it is in the best interest of the United States to explore and develop 
        options with the international community to facilitate the exchange of 
        evolving advanced nuclear waste technologies: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the President should instruct the Secretary of Energy, 
        in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of 
        Defense, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency, and other officials as appropriate, to consider the 
        Advanced Technology Research Project (known as ``ATRP'') and 
        report to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 
        Senate on--
                    (A) whether the United States should encourage the 
                establishment of an international project to facilitate 
                the evaluation and international exchange of data 
                (including cost data) relating to advanced nuclear 
                waste technologies, including technologies for solid 
                and liquid radioactive wastes and contaminated soils 
                and sediments;
                    (B) whether such a project could be funded 
                privately through industry, public interest, and 
                scientific organizations and administered by an 
                international non-governmental, nonprofit organization, 
                with operations in the United States, Russia, Japan, 
                and other countries that have an interest in developing 
                such technologies; and
                    (C) any legislation that the Secretary believes 
                would be required to enable such a project to be 
                undertaken.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) (Mod. 10/93) Judgment in a Civil Case "

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

THOMAS K. STARK, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

(Bench Trial Findings and Award of Fees and Costs)

v.

CASE NUMBER C05-5808RBL

TOTEM OCEAN TRAILER EXPRESS, INC.; 

SEA STAR STEVEDORE CORP.,

[ % ] Decision by Court. This action came to trial before the Court. The issues have been presented and a decision has been

rendered.

BASED ON WRITTEN/ORAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IT IS ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED

Under Washington law, indemnification agreements such as that contained in the Stevedoring and Mechanic Services

Agreement are valid and enforceable. 

Injuries to Stark arose primarily through his own negligence. 

Stark qualifies as an agent and as an employee under the indemnity agreement. TOTE must indemnify Sea Star against “any

and all loss, damage, cost and expense, including attorney’s fees, that may be suffered by Sea Star resulting from breach of such

responsibility. Sea Star is entitled to recover all of the costs and expenses, including legal fees that it incurred in investigating and

defending Stark’s claims.

Sea Star has submitted a summary of its costs and expenses including legal fees incurred prior to the trial. Sea Star in entitled

to indemnity from TOTE for all of its legal fees and costs including those legal fees incurred at trial. 

TOTE’s claims for indemnity are DENIED.

Sea Star’s claim for indemnity of its legal fees and costs based on the Stevedoring and Mechanic Services Agreement is

GRANTED.

The Amount of $277,891.03 is AWARDED to Sea Star Stevedore Co. as Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses incurred.

Sea Star’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is hereby GRANTED.

 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Dated: April 23, 2007 Clerk

s/Jean Boring 

(By) Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-05808-RBL Document 70 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 11

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, Phillip Hellman, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled Resource Estimate Study, the El Boleo Copper-Cobalt-Zinc Deposit, dated March 2005, and the technical report entitled An Updated Preliminary Assessment of El Boleo Copper-Cobalt Project, dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Reports), and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) Phillip Hellman                             
| |     | Name: Phillip Hellman, FAIG, PhD.
Hellman & Schofield
| |     | Location: Sydney, Australia
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-156816) pertaining to the registration of shares for the Facet Biotech Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and the Facet Biotech Corporation 2008 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of our report dated February 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Facet Biotech Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Facet Biotech Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Palo
Alto, California
February 23, 2010

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM’s DUE DATE 

(Eric Moyer; #06-221JLR)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

1 (206) 553-1100

 JUDGE JAMES L. ROBART

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ERIC DAVID MOYER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-221 JLR

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE

TRIAL DATE AND EXTEND TIME FOR

PRETRIAL MOTIONS

THE COURT having considered the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the trial

date and extend the due date of the pretrial motions, the affidavit of defense counsel, and the

records and files herein, the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuances would deny counsel the

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering the

continuances in this case and that the continuances are necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial,

within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date be continued from September 5, 2006,

to November 13, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00221-RSL Document 16 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM’s DUE DATE 

(Eric Moyer; #06-221JLR)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

2 (206) 553-1100

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pretrial motions be due September 5, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of

September 5, 2006, up to and including the new proposed trial date of November 13, 2006,

shall be excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. 

DONE this 16th day of August, 2006.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge 

Presented by:

s/ Robert H. Gombiner

WSBA # 16059

Attorney for Eric David Moyer

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

Phone: (206) 553-1100

Fax: (206) 553-0120

robert_gombiner@fd.org

Case 2:06-cr-00221-RSL Document 16 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2
'"" ,., .. ~ b"" I,, J''"''' 

l<,cL~~~vtU 

0

" · ~~, r<" ·1· " f'' r' I ·c·· . r-r~ M,j · 

2014 ttM1 II M''l 6: 08 

CBIC Control Number 

358892 

February 28, 2014 

RECENED 

[}.PR 15 20\4 ~~-~~ 

Document Control Office (7 407M) 

USEP A Headqt1carters, Ariel Rios Bldg. 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

EPA DOCKET CENTER 

Att: 40 CFR 799-5089 

Docket# EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

Re: Exemption Req1,1est In Compliance With 

40 CFR 790.80 

40 CFR 790.87 

To Whom It May Concern, 

This correspondence confirms recent telephone and e-mails with Mr. John Schaeffer, who kindly 

extended assistance relative to compliance concerning testing and or exemption from testing of 

the chemical product sodium m-nitrobenzene sulfonate. 

Rather than hiring a third party chemical testing laboratory, Rit-Chem Co., Inc. has chosen to 

negotiate via CFR 790.87 with Tiarco Chemical Co. Our monetary offer has been accepted by 

Mr. Kevin J. Nolan- V.P. & General ManagerofTiarco Chemical Co. We are awaiting their 

vvTitten acceptance and requested Tiarco submit a letter confirming the granting the rights to 

utilize their testing data results based on· paying a fair and equitable reimbursement to Tiarco. 

Rit-Chem Co., inc. will submit a copy of the agreement, which, presumably will be done, as 

stated above to the USEP A. 

We again thank you for the guidance provided by the members of the USEP A Department. 

Sincerely, 

b~ President \l CEO 

Cc: via e-mail to Schaeffer,John<schaeffer.john@epa.gov> 

1 Zeiss Drive- Suite 200 • Thornwood, New York 10594-1941 • Tel: (914) 769-9110 • Fax: (914) 769-1408 

.s% 

-g~ 

$<( 

"':I: 

ew 

~>­ -g..c 

cw 

:i-

~(.) 

•
Reap. Dec. 10575.

#### Joseph O. Gray *v.*United States,

Reappraisement abandoned July 10, 1963.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif. (Notpublished.) (Initial No. R62/4998.) Motion by plaintiff.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 158

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Designating the Document Door of the United States Capitol

as the ‘‘Memorial Door’’.

Whereas on July 24, 1998, a lone gunman entered the

United States Capitol through the door known as the

Document Door, located on the first floor of the East

Front;

Whereas Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut was the first United

States Capitol Police officer to confront the gunman just

inside the Document Door and lost his life as a result;
2

HCON 158 RDS

Whereas Detective John Michael Gibson also confronted the

gunman and lost his life in the ensuing shootout;

Whereas the last shot fired by Detective John Gibson—his

final act as an officer of the law—finally brought down

the gunman and ended his deadly rampage;

Whereas while the gunman’s intentions are not fully known,

nor may ever be known, it is clear that he would have

killed more innocent people if United States Capitol Police Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective John Gibson

had not ended the violent rampage;

Whereas the United States Capitol Police represent true dedication and professionalism in their duties to keep the

United States Capitol and the Senate and House of Representatives office buildings safe for all who enter them;

Whereas the United States Capitol shines as a beacon of freedom and democracy all around the world;

Whereas keeping the sacred halls of the United States Capitol, known as the People’s House, accessible for all the

people of the United States and the world is a true testament of Congress and of our Nation’s dedication to upholding the virtues of freedom;

Whereas the door near where this tragic incident took place

has been known as the Document Door; and

Whereas it is fitting and appropriate that the Document

Door henceforth be known as the Memorial Door in

honor of Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective John Gibson: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the door known as the Document Door

3 and located on the first floor of the East Front of the
3

HCON 158 RDS

1 United States Capitol is designated as the ‘‘Memorial

2 Door’’ in honor of Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut and De3 tective John Michael Gibson of the United States Capitol

4 Police, who gave their lives in the line of duty on July

5 24, 1998, near that door.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                             Stimsonite Corporation
                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                            For the Periods Indicated

                                           Quarter Ended                    Nine Months Ended                 Twelve Months Ended
                                      -----------------------           -----------------------           ------------------------

Description                           9/28/97         9/29/96           9/28/97         9/29/96           9/28/97          9/29/96
-----------                           -------         -------           -------         -------           -------          -------

<S>                                  <C>             <C>               <C>             <C>               <C>              <C>      
Average Shares Outstanding           8,536,044       8,823,983         8,584,524       8,844,428         8,624,639        8,858,525

Net additional  shares  
  assuming  dilutive stock 
  options  exercised and 
  proceeds used to purchase 
  treasury shares at fair 
  market value                         126,379         143,033           126,627         151,163           128,258          157,906

Options issued within one 
  year prior to the initial 
  filing date of  registration
  statement for an initial 
  public offering in accordance 
  with Staff Accounting
  Bulletin No. 83                            0           4,446                 0          11,461                 0           13,086
                                   -----------      ----------        ----------       ---------         ----------      ----------

Average number of common
  shares and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                 8,662,423       8,971,462         8,711,151       9,007,052         8,752,897        9,029,517
                                   ===========      ==========        ==========      ==========        ==========        =========

Net Income (loss)                   $2,741,000      $2,458,000        $3,943,000      $3,530,000         ($435,000)      $3,293,000

Per share data:
Net Income (loss)                        $0.32           $0.27             $0.45           $0.39            ($0.05)           $0.36
</TABLE>

See Accompanying Notes
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6109

JAMES L. JACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER FLOURNOY, Guard; OFFICER BROWN, Guard;

OFFICER LEVESQUE, Guard; LIEUTENANT WERLIN,

Shift Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-98-624)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint

for his failure to either pay the filing fee or consent to collections being made from his prison trust fund. Appellant’s informal brief discusses only the substance of his complaint. We

therefore dismiss his appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED