alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| date    | Corporate Equity | Real Estate | Debt Securities | Other |
|---------|------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| 2015:Q1 | 0.6              | 0.47        | 0.04            | 0.74  |
| 2015:Q2 | 0.07             | 0.48        | -0.2            | 0.29  |
| 2015:Q3 | -1.98            | 0.45        | 0.2             | 0.32  |
| 2015:Q4 | 0.99             | 0.36        | -0.1            | 0.3   |
| 2016:Q1 | 0.25             | 0.24        | 0.2             | 0.46  |
| 2016:Q2 | 0.52             | 0.56        | 0.11            | 0.19  |
| 2016:Q3 | 0.73             | 0.64        | 0.1             | 0.37  |
| 2016:Q4 | 0.41             | 0.45        | -0.42           | 0.29  |
| 2017:Q1 | 1.43             | 0.41        | -0.07           | 0.65  |
| 2017:Q2 | 0.78             | 0.6         | 0.13            | 0.21  |
| 2017:Q3 | 0.94             | 0.57        | 0.18            | 0.21  |
| 2017:Q4 | 1.55             | 0.52        | 0.03            | 0.59  |
| 2018:Q1 | -0.18            | 0.61        | 0.34            | 0.35  |
| 2018:Q2 | 0.47             | 0.52        | 0.2             | 0.3   |
| 2018:Q3 | 1.32             | 0.3         | 0.34            | -0.06 |
| 2018:Q4 | -4.52            | 0.31        | 0.05            | 0.49  |
| 2019:Q1 | 4.2              | 0.58        | 0.01            | 1     |
| 2019:Q2 | 0.95             | 0.51        | 0.54            | 0.35  |
| 2019:Q3 | -0.2             | 0.38        | 0.2             | 0.33  |
| 2019:Q4 | 2.49             | 0.29        | 0.28            | 0.59  |
| 2020:Q1 | -7.61            | 0.66        | -0.43           | 1.14  |
| 2020:Q2 | 5.79             | 0.72        | 0.07            | 1.41  |
| 2020:Q3 | 2.89             | 0.74        | 0.11            | 0.59  |
| 2020:Q4 | 5.14             | 1.08        | 0.61            | 1.18  |
| 2021:Q1 | 3.1              | 1.23        | -0.59           | 1.55  |
| 2021:Q2 | 3.54             | 1.51        | -0.12           | 1.21  |
| 2021:Q3 | -0.32            | 1.44        | -0.01           | 1.25  |
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2821

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Scott Donald Wiele, * District of Minnesota. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: October 5, 2007 Filed: October 31, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Scott Donald Wiele appeals the 108-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Count 1); wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C . § 1343 (Count 2); and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957(a) (Count 3). In a brief filed under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his counsel argues that Wiele’s sentence is unreasonable because the court failed to cons ider the mitigating factors presented at sentencing, and improperly weighed the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.-2- We enforce the appeal waiver included in Wiele’s plea agreement: the plea colloquy reflects that Wiele understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the waiver; this appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; and no injustice would result. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enfor ceability of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). After reviewing the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant counsel’s withdrawal motion, and we deny Wiele’s pending motion to stay the appeal.

______________________________
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

EDWARD L. PRICE

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security

CASE NUMBER: C06-5378FDB

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

the ALJ erred in his decision as described in the report; and 

The matter is therefore REVERSED and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative

proceedings. 

 February 23, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Date Clerk

 s/Caroline M. Gonzalez 

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05378-FDB Document 19 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00063-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the Probate Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. PR-2014-00040-03

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

THE INDEPENDENT EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF PETER CARLSON 

KERN, DAN FLAGG, JOHN COCHRAN, AND BEN LIPMAN, Appellants

V.

423 COLONY, LTD., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss Their Appeal.” We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 4, 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HENRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5063 RBL/KLS

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST

TO STAY DISCOVERY

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. 

Plaintiff has filed a motion to stay this action pending his motion for reconsideration and motion for

temporary restraining order. (Dkt. # 26). Defendants have also requested a stay of discovery pending the

court’s consideration of their motion to dismiss. (Dkt. # 18).

Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order, originally noted for January 31, 2007, was stayed

pending the District Court’s consideration of the Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration of denials by this

court and the District Court of his motions for counsel. (Dkt. # 19, 21, 22, 23, 27). Plaintiff’s motion for

temporary restraining order is now ripe for consideration. The parties have now filed their response and

reply to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which was re-noted for February 23, 2007, and that motion is now

ripe for the Court’s review.

The court has broad discretionary powers to control discovery. Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 34 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon showing of good cause, the court may deny or limit discovery. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 26( c). The parties should not be burdened with the expense of discovery until the pending issues of the

restraining order and whether Plaintiff has appropriately stated a claim under Section 1983 have been

resolved. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to stay (Dkt. # 26) and Defendants’ motion to stay discovery (Dkt.

# 18) are GRANTED.

DATED this 14th day of March, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 34 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2017

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2017

155266(54)

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155266

v COA: 328885 

Oakland CC: 2014-139901-NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the 

time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be 

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before November 17, 2017.
# C_2022099EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2021-2022 SESSION

Sittings of 5 to 8 July 2021

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.206 Money Market Mutual Fund Shares  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineMoney market mutual funds; total financial assets
	FA634090005
	6.8
	30.1
	-26.6
	43.4
	118.0
	257.0
	-94.7
	-266.1
	-2.6
	1Money market mutual funds; total financial assets
	FA634090005
	6.8
	30.1
	-26.6
	43.4
	118.0
	257.0
	-94.7
	-266.1
	-2.6
	2Households and nonprofit organizations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA153034005
	-25.6
	-44.3
	-45.2
	-139.3
	19.0
	110.9
	-30.5
	-253.0
	-8.3
	3Nonfinancial corporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA103034003
	-0.9
	18.6
	6.3
	50.2
	72.2
	-8.8
	9.7
	-7.2
	31.3
	4Nonfinancial noncorporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA113034003
	2.9
	5.9
	5.9
	4.5
	7.6
	6.6
	5.5
	6.3
	5.3
	5State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA213034003
	5.9
	12.1
	5.9
	14.9
	14.8
	3.8
	4.3
	11.1
	4.4
	6Property-casualty insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA513034003
	-1.8
	3.2
	-2.5
	4.1
	3.3
	-4.2
	1.5
	-4.9
	-2.2
	7Life insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA543034005
	3.9
	2.6
	-0.3
	44.3
	-22.4
	9.0
	-14.4
	3.3
	0.9
	8Private pension funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA573034005
	0.9
	-4.6
	4.7
	10.1
	-0.6
	8.8
	2.2
	2.1
	5.6
	9State and local government employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA223034005
	2.9
	0.3
	0.2
	-6.4
	2.4
	-12.2
	7.2
	5.2
	0.7
	10Funding corporations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA503034003
	13.4
	35.1
	-0.5
	52.2
	7.2
	142.3
	-69.1
	-25.5
	-49.8
	11Rest of the world; U.S. money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA263034003
	5.1
	1.3
	-1.1
	8.7
	14.5
	0.7
	-11.1
	-3.4
	9.4
	12 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 65292.

#### John A. Conkey & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 59/29706, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Woodrow Crouch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |     |                        
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date: August 29, 2008 | By: | /s/ Woodrow Crouch     
|                      |     | Woodrow Crouch         
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JUN-30-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JUL-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                               1 
<CASH>                                                                   17,558 
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             2,083 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0 
<INVENTORY>                                                                 897 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         20,948 
<PP&E>                                                                    5,473 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           (4,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           23,570 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     3,951 
<BONDS>                                                                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0 
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0 
<COMMON>                                                                    279 
<OTHER-SE>                                                               19,340 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             23,570 
<SALES>                                                                   5,094 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          5,275 
<CGS>                                                                     1,356 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             1,356 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          4,251 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            (332)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0 
<CHANGES>                                                                     0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                               (332)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

s0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139265

HOWARD L. WARSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139265 COA: 283401 Genesee CC: 06-083704-CK HOWARD D. WARSON, DANIEL L. WARSON, MORTGAGEIT, INC., ARGENT MORTGAGE CO., L.L.C., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., REX FERGUSON, and PENNY FERGUSON, Defendants,

and

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. P68/43.

protests 66/11956, etc. (New York).

#### Service Cycle Supply Corp. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of padlocks of base metal over 1.5 inches but not over 2.5 inches in width similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Friedman, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |                                                                                                
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                                                                
|Date: May 25, 2011 |                                                                                                
|                   | By:  /s/ Michael J. Friedman                                                                   
|                   | Name: Michael J. Friedman
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.35.2
                                                                 ---------------




               AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE DATED JANUARY 3, 1998


                                                                    New York, NY
                                                                   April 1, 1998

The Promissory Note dated January 3, 1998 between Robert S. Ehrlich and Electric
Fuel Corporation (EFC) is hereby amended as follows:

Mr. Ehrlich will bear no personal liability on the principal and accrued
interest of this note, unless he is Terminated by EFC for Cause, as defined in
Section 6(c) of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement ("Employment
Agreement"), dated October 1, 1996.

The Company will have recourse only to Compensation due Mr. Ehrlich upon
Termination as per Section 7(b) of the Employment Agreement, and excludes the
release of Mr. Ehrlich's Manager's Insurance and Education Fund as per Sections
4(a) and 4(b) of the Employment Agreement.

All stock pledged to the Company under this Promissory Note is hereby released.

This Note shall be deemed to have been made under and shall in all respects be
governed by the internal laws of the State of Delaware without reference to
conflicts of laws.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note has been duly executed and delivered by


    /s/   Robert Ehrlich
 --------------------------

AGREED AND APPROVED



    /s/   Yehuda Harats
 -------------------------
Yehuda Harats
President and CEO
No. 55030.

#### Leonard Zwyns *v.*United States,

protest 146371-K.

C. D. 1279. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.