alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-02034-JLR Document 74 Filed 11/10/06 Page 13 of 13
No. 53340.

protests 136180-K, etc. (New York).

#### Cuban American Products Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 17

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should develop,

promote, and implement voluntary policies to slow the population growth

of the Nation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. SAWYER (for himself and Mrs. MORELLA) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

should develop, promote, and implement voluntary policies to slow the population growth of the Nation.

Whereas rapid population growth creates serious problems

both in the United States and abroad;

Whereas the people of the United States envision a world

with a healthy environment, clean air and water,

uncluttered land, ample open space, natural beauty, wilderness, and abundant wildlife, in which the dignity of

human life is enhanced;

Whereas rapid population growth increasingly depletes irreplaceable natural resources, including energy resources;

Whereas rapid population growth significantly increases the

difficulty and cost of solving the social, economic, and po-
2

•HCON 17 IH

litical problems of the United States, and directly contributes to the pollution and degradation of the environment;

Whereas the right of families to choose both the number of

children they hope to have and the timing of the births

of those children is a fundamental human right;

Whereas the United States has the fastest growing population among developed countries;

Whereas the United States has the highest rates of teenage

pregnancy and childbirth among developed countries;

Whereas nearly 60 percent of pregnancies in the United

States are unintended, resulting in one of the highest

abortion rates among developed countries;

Whereas the Commission on Population Growth and the

American Future in 1972 and the President’s Council on

Sustainable Development in 1996 found that slowing

population growth is important to improving the quality

of life in the United States;

Whereas delaying efforts to slow population growth will increase the difficulty and cost of achieving that goal; and

Whereas failure to slow population growth voluntarily would

result in a significant deterioration of the quality of life

for all Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States should develop, promote, and implement, at

4 the earliest possible time and by voluntary means consist5 ent with human rights and individual conscience, the poli6 cies necessary to slow the population growth of the United
3

•HCON 17 IH

1 States, and thereby promote the future well-being of the

2 people of this Nation and of the world.

Æ
----

Call for proposals under the multiannual Community Programme on promoting safer use of the Internet and new online technologies

(Safer Internet plus)

(2006/C 167/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1.   Objectives and description

The European Commission has adopted a Work Programme and a call for proposals to implement the Safer Internet plus Programme (1).

The present call is open for proposals addressing the following actions:

1.   Fighting against Illegal Content

2.   Tackling unwanted and harmful content

3.   Promoting a Safer Environment

4.   Awareness-raising

2.   Eligible applicants

Participation in the Safer Internet plus programme is open to legal entities established in the 25 Member States.

It is further open to legal entities established in Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Turkey and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, if a bilateral agreement with the relevant country has been concluded to this effect. It is open to legal entities established in EFTA States that are contracting parties to the EEA Agreement (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway), in accordance with the provisions of that Agreement (2).

The participation of legal entities established in third countries and of international organisations is possible, though without financial support from the Community.

3.   Budget

The total budget earmarked for co-financing indirect actions (grant agreements concluded with third parties) is estimated at EUR 6,9 million.

4.   Deadline

The deadline for receipt of proposals by the Commission is 29 September 2006 at 17:00 (Luxembourg local time).

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available on the following web site:

http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet

All applications must comply with the specifications and conditions described in the full text of the call for proposals, the Work Programme and the Guide for proposers which are available in English on the Commission's above-mentioned internet site. These include information on how to prepare and submit proposals.

The evaluation of proposals will be based on the principles of transparency and equality of treatment. It will be carried out by the Commission with the assistance of outside experts. Each submission will be assessed on the basis of the evaluation criteria set out in the Safer Internet plus 2006 Work Programme.

All proposals received by the European Commission will be treated in strict confidence.

----

(1)  Decision No 854/2005/EC of 11 May 2005 of the European Parliament and the Council adopting a multiannual Community Programme on promoting safer use of the Internet and new online technologies OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 1.

(2)  Up-to-date information on which countries are part of the programme is published in the Official Journal of the European Union. An up-to-date list is also available on the programme website at

http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 [Name of Order] - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TAMARA LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREGORY FISHER, DDS, and KATHLEEN

ANN STOCKMAN, husband and wife,

GREGORY R. FISHER, DDS EMPLOYEE

BENEFIT AND WELFARE PLAN,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5352RJB

ORDER 

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. 42). The court is

familiar with the records and files herein and documents filed in support of and in opposition to said

motion.

First, it appears that the court’s order of May 9, 2007, (Dkt. 41) has caused some confusion,

for which the court apologizes. A cross claim (Dkt. 21) was pending between defendants Fisher,

Stockman and the Plan and defendant Regence BlueShield at he time the order was entered. That

cross claim was not addressed in the court’s order, nor was it discussed in the pleadings filed in

support of and in opposition to those motions (Dkts. 27, 28, and 38). The order was intended to

dismiss Regence BlueShield as a party defendant only, and the court did not then consider, nor does

Case 3:06-cv-05352-RJB Document 54 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 [Name of Order] - 2

the court now consider, the status of Regence BlueShield in the case as it relates to the cross claim. 

In other words, the order dismissing Regence BlueShield was intended to dismiss it as a party

defendant, not as a defendant to the cross claim or as a third party defendant. 

So far as the plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 42) is concerned, this additional

motion to amend should be granted in the form attached to plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion to

Amend (Dkt. 46), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a).

This ruling leaves the status of Regence BlueShield to be clarified by stipulation or further

motion practice. Regence BlueShield is no longer a defendant on plaintiff’s claim; the court makes

no ruling at this time on the status of the cross claim against Regence BlueShield.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 21st day of June, 2007.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05352-RJB Document 54 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JOSEPH M. PELTON,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, CASE NUMBER: C06-5389RBL/KLS

Commissioner of Social Security

 Administration,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Upon stipulation between the parties, this matter is REVERSED and REMANDED to the

Commissioner further administrative proceedings.

The parties also agree that reasonable attorney fees should be awarded upon proper

application, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.

 June 22, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05389-RBL Document 33 Filed 06/22/07 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

December 14, 1966

No. P66/365.

No. P66/366.

No. P66/367.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 60/7798(B) (New York). A. C. Gilbert Co. and Milton Snedeker Corp. *v.*United States, protest 65/20117 (New York). A. C. Gilbert Co. and Milton Snedeker Corp. *v.*United States, protest 66/2634 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal C 215/22 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5122 August 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 215

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5122 August 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2008/C 215/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 98/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery
  (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2008/C 215/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 98/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery
  (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered March 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00983-CR

No. 05-19-01002-CR

No. 05-19-01003-CR

EDUARDO ISAI REYES-BONILLA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F18-34785-P, F18-34298-P & F18-34784-P

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Crystal Jones-Brown’s March 11, 2020 

letter which we shall treat as a request for additional time to file the reporter’s 

record in the above appeals. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s 

record filed on or before March 25, 2020.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
Case 3:06-cr-05206-RBL Document 24 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-05206-RBL Document 24 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1** **Certification    of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** **Certification**     I, C. G. Kum certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of FCB Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2005;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation and;     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 30, 2006     /s/  C. G. Kum    C.G. Kum    President and Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

November 21, 1962

No. 67207.

protest 62/1197 (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware tableware plates, over 9% inches in diameter and valued under $1 per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 12, 2015

No. 04

- 14

- 00798

- CR

IN RE Flanzo LaFonte TOWNES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Retir ed Chief Justice (not participating)

Sandee Brya n Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus on November 17, 2014, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his post

- conviction motion for DNA testing. On November
26, 2014, this c ourt denied the petition because relator had appointed counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). On April 17, 2015 , relator filed a letter

, which we construe as a motion for rehe aring

, asking this court to rule on his pro se petition for mandamus

.

Having received from the trial court a copy of an order dated August 21, 2014, granting relator’s motion for post

- convicti on forensic DNA testing, this court has determined that relato r has obtained the relief requested in his mandamus petition. See Safety

– Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding) ( appropriate relief is to

direct trial court to consider and rule upon a motion within a reasonable time). No further action on relator’s mandamus petition is necessary or appropriate. Accordingly, t he panel has

considered relator’s motion for rehearing and it is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on May 12, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________

_________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009CR0764 , styled The State of Texas v. Flanzo LaFonte Townes

, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
| Name                                      | Jurisdiction     |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                      |             |
| Ann Tanker Corporation                    | Marshall Islands |
| Cathy Tanker Corporation                  | Marshall Islands |
| Chris Tanker Corporation                  | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Chartering, Inc.                      | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Condor Limited                        | Hong Kong        |
| DHT Eagle, Inc.                           | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Falcon Limited                        | Hong Kong        |
| DHT Hawk Limited                          | Hong Kong        |
| DHT Management AS                         | Norway           |
| DHT Maritime, Inc.                        | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Phoenix, Inc.                         | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Ship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Singapore        |
| London Tanker Corporation                 | Marshall Islands |
| Newcastle Tanker Corporation              | Marshall Islands |
| Samco Delta Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Epsilon Ltd                         | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Eta Ltd                             | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Gamma Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Iota Ltd                            | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Kappa Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Shipholding Pte. Ltd.               | Singapore        |
| Samco Theta Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Sophie Tanker Corporation                 | Marshall Islands |

----
PLATT & BUESCHER 

DEFENDANT’S WITNESS Attorneys at Law 

LIST/ROSENAU-1 P.O. Box 727 

No. CR06-157MJP Coupeville, WA 98239 

 Phone: (360) 678-6777 

1 Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HENRY ROSENAU, 

 Defendant. 

No. CR06-157MJP 

DEFENDANT’S WITNESS LIST 

 

COMES NOW, HENRY ROSENAU, by and through Counsel, Craig A. Platt, and 

respectfully submits this Witness List for the trial scheduled to begin on April 23, 2012 at 

9:00am. 

WITNESS LIST

 The defendant, Henry Rosenau may testify, but this has not been determined at this time. 

Judy Rosenau, the Defendant’s former wife, may testify. Veronica Schwartz may also testify. 

Finally, Glen Stewart may be called as a defense witness. 

The Defense reserves the right to call additional witnesses in its case-in-chief as those 

witnesses become known. The Defense also reserves the right to call as witnesses in its case-in-

 Fax: (360) 678-0323 

 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 108 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 3
 PLATT & BUESCHER 

DEFENDANT’S WITNESS Attorneys at Law 

LIST/ROSENAU-2 P.O. Box 727 

No. CR06-157MJP Coupeville, WA 98239 

 Phone: (360) 678-6777 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

chief any witness identified in the government’s proposed witness list. The defendant may call 

additional witnesses in rebuttal, but those witnesses have yet to be determined. 

 Respectfully submitted this 18th day of April, 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 PLATT & BUESCHER 

 s/Craig Platt_______________ 

 Craig Platt 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 WSBA #12396 

 P.O. Box 727 

 Coupeville, Washington 98239-0727 

 Telephone: (360) 678-6777 

 Fax: (360) 678-0323 

 Email: craig@plattbuescher.com

 Fax: (360) 678-0323 

 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 108 Filed 04/18/12 Page 2 of 3
 PLATT & BUESCHER 

DEFENDANT’S WITNESS Attorneys at Law 

LIST/ROSENAU-3 P.O. Box 727 

No. CR06-157MJP Coupeville, WA 98239 

 Phone: (360) 678-6777 

 Fax: (360) 678-0323 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on 4/18/2012, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the attorney(s) 

of record for the plaintiff. 

 s/Jill Ogren_______________ 

 Legal Assistant 

 Platt & Buescher 

 P.O. Box 727 

 Coupeville, Washington 98239-0727 

 Telephone: (360) 678-6777 

 Fax: (360) 678-0323 

 Email: reception@plattbuescher.com 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 108 Filed 04/18/12 Page 3 of 3