alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in the
capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the company, that, to my
knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                 |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|----- | --------------- | ----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | March 31,
 2011 | By:   | /s/ Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|      |                 | Name: | Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|      |                 | Title | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer
 and Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, the
 General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Interfaces for PersonalIdentity Verification**
 
Overview and Summary ofChanges | Parts: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:C 13.10:800-73-2
Item Number:0247 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000810328
 
December 30, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Rust Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 19, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Rust Foundation has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Spruce Systems, 
Inc., New York, NY; and Turbofish, Inc., Austin, TX, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 12, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 38535).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22228 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
III

Calendar No. 9

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 31

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee

on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 28, 1997

Mr. WARNER, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

JANUARY 30, 1997

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the

Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint Committee

of Congress on the Library.

1 Resolved, That the following-named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected members of the following joint

3 committees of Congress:

4 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: John Warner;

5 Thad Cochran; Mitch McConnell; Wendell H. Ford; and

6 Daniel K. Inouye.
2

SRES 31 ATS

1 JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS:

2 Ted Stevens; John Warner; Thad Cochran; Daniel Patrick

3 Moynihan; and Dianne Feinstein.

Calendar No. 9

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 31

RESOLUTION

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of

Committee of Congress on the Library.the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint

JANUARY 30, 1997

Considered and agreed to
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**363 KA 14-00544** 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VINCENT OWENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), entered February 10, 2014. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by determining that defendant is a level one risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq .), defendant contends that the People failed to notify him within 10 days prior to the SORA hearing that they intended to seek a determination different from that recommended by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board), as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3), and that County Court did not otherwise provide him with a meaningful opportunity to respond to the People’s requested departure. We agree ( see People v Scott , 96 AD3d 1430, 1430-1431). The risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board did not assess points against defendant under risk factor 11, for having a history of drug or alcohol abuse. At the SORA hearing, however, the People for the first time requested that 15 points be assessed against defendant under risk factor 11, and the court granted that request. We need not remit the matter to County Court to comply with Correction Law § 168-n (3) ( see id. at 1431), however, inasmuch as we also agree with defendant that the People “failed to prove by the requisite clear and convincing evidence that he had a history of alcohol and drug abuse” ( People v Coger , 108 AD3d 1234, 1234-1235; see generally People v Mingo , 12 NY3d 563, 571). Without the 15 points assessed by the court under risk factor 11, the points assessed against defendant under the remaining risk factors make him a presumptive level one**-2- 363 KA 14-00544** 

risk, and there is no basis in the record for granting an upward departure based on an aggravating factor not taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines ( see generally People v Grady , 81 AD3d 1464, 1464). We therefore modify the order by determining that defendant is a level one risk pursuant to SORA.

Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BILLY NEWBERRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAPT. F. FINSEN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-1018-MJP

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff is a Washington state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 1, 2006, I issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) which

is currently pending before the Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. (Dkt. #3). Plaintiff has moved for

appointment of counsel, and Judge Pechman has referred that motion to me for consideration in

light of the pending R&R. (Dkt. #5). Having reviewed plaintiff’s motion for appointment of

counsel and the balance of the record, the court does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel does not raise any new issues or

provide any additional information beyond what was contained in his previous submissions.

Accordingly, the motion does not affect the analysis of plaintiff’s complaint reflected in the R&R.

Turning to the merits of the motion for appointment of counsel, the court notes that there

is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although the

Case 2:06-cv-01018-MJP Document 7 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

PAGE -2

court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), can request counsel to represent a party proceeding in forma

pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789

F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984);

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires

an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to

articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wilborn, 789

F.2d at 1331.

Plaintiff has neither demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor shown that, in

light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, he is unable to articulate his claims himself.

Accordingly, plaintiff has not demonstrated that this case involves exceptional circumstances that

warrant appointment of counsel and the motion (Dkt. #6) is hereby DENIED.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable

Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 31st day of August, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-01018-MJP Document 7 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       81
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    166
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 85 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast 
     cancer should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 1997

 Mr. Gregg (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
  Torricelli, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Lott, Mr. 
  Robb, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
Reid, and Mr. Hutchinson) submitted the following resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

                           September 25, 1997

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast 
     cancer should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

Whereas individuals with breast cancer need a support system in their time of 
        need;
Whereas breast cancer is a disease of epidemic proportions, with 43,900 
        individuals in the United States expected to die from breast cancer in 
        1997, and 1 out of every 8 women in the United States expected to 
        develop breast cancer in her lifetime;
Whereas the millions of family members, including spouses, children, parents, 
        siblings, and other loved ones of persons with breast cancer can offer 
        strong emotional support to each other in addition to the support they 
        offer to patients and survivors dealing with their challenges;
Whereas it is important that the United States as a whole support the family 
        members and other loved ones of individuals with breast cancer in 
        addition to supporting the individual with breast cancer; and
Whereas 1997 brings the 25th anniversary of the National Cancer Program 
        providing research, training, health information dissemination, and 
        other programs with respect to the cause, diagnosis, prevention and 
        treatment of cancer, rehabilitation from cancer, and the continuing care 
        of cancer patients and their families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that an environment be 
encouraged where--
            (1) the family members and loved ones of individuals with 
        breast cancer can support each other in addition to the 
        individual with breast cancer; and
            (2) everything possible should be done to support both the 
        individuals with breast cancer as well as the family and loved 
        ones of individuals with breast cancer through public awareness 
        and education.
                                 <all>
```
From: melvin024@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:01:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Kinikin

Big Piney, WY 83113
<PAGE>

                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

          This Amendment No. 1 to Salary Continuation Agreement ("Amendment No.
1") is made as of December 4, 1998 by and between Chart Industries, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Don A. Baines (the "Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

          WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has
determined that modification of the Salary Continuation Agreement dated as of
May 22, 1996 by and between the Company and the Employee (the "Agreement") is
appropriate to ensure the continued dedication of the Employee to the Company,
notwithstanding the possibility, threat or occurrence of a Change of Control (as
defined in the Agreement), and to update certain information contained in the
Agreement; and

          WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has caused the Company to prepare
this Amendment No. 1 to reflect such modifications and updated information;

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

          1.    SALARY CONTINUATION PERIOD. Section 3.1(i) is restated in its
entirety to read as follows:

          "(i) the date that is 24 months subsequent to the Effective Date,".

          2.    COMPANY ADDRESS. The address of the Company in Section 7(b)is
amended to read as follows:

                Chart Industries, Inc.
                5885 Landerbrook Drive
                Suite 150
                Mayfield Heights, Ohio  44124.

          3.    NO OTHER PROVISION MODIFIED. Except as modified by Sections
1 and 2 hereof, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and
effect.

<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands
as of the day and year first above written.

                                       /s/ Don A. Baines
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Don A. Baines

                                       CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                       By:/s/ Arthur S. Holmes
                                       ----------------------------------
                                              Arthur S. Holmes
                                              Chairman and Chief Executive
                                              Officer

Attest: /s/Thomas F. McKee
       -----------------------------
         Thomas F. McKee
         Secretary


                                       2
Motions Dismissed; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and 

Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00890-CR

IN RE DAKOTA SEMMLER, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

155th District Court

Austin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019R-0162

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 27, 2023, relator Dakota Semmler filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Jeff R. 

Steinhauser, presiding judge of the 155th District Court of Austin County, to 
2

vacate the trial court’s September 5, 2023 “order for withdrawal of defense 

counsel” and the trial court’s October 25, 2023 “order on defense motion to 

reconsider.”

The mandamus record reflects that on November 7, 2023, relator signed a 

“waiver of attorney-client conflict.” The waiver was not before the trial court 

when the trial court signed the complained-of orders. “We do not consider 

arguments in a petition for writ of mandamus which were not presented to the trial 

court.” In re Chu, 134 S.W.3d 459, 463 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, orig. proceeding)

(citing In re American Optical Corp., 988 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex. 1998) (orig.

proceeding)).

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to 

refiling the same. Additionally, we dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).