alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.16



Timothy A. Ross

1726 Cole Blvd.

Building 22 Ste. 130

Golden, CO 80401



e-mail address:

tross@agapito.com

Phone (business hrs):  (303) 271-3750







CONSENT OF AUTHOR



TO:

The British Columbia Securities Commission

The Alberta Securities Commission

The Ontario Securities Commission

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)



I, Timothy A. Ross, PE, SME Registered Member, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project,of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Report) and filed in March 2007. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites.





Dated this 10th day of March, 2007











/s/ Timothy A. Ross______________

Timothy A. Ross



---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Miles, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 74]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), rendered April 5, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of l1/2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The hearsay nature of the lab report presented to the Grand Jury as proof that the substance defendant was charged with selling and possessing contained cocaine did not render the indictment jurisdictionally defective *(see, People v Iannone,*45 NY2d 589, 600-601). Accordingly, defendant waived his right to *255challenge the sufficiency of the evidence by pleading guilty to a lesser included offense *(People v Pelchat,*62 NY2d 97, 108; *People v Phillips,*201 AD2d 255, *Iv denied*83 NY2d 914). Nor does defendant show how he was prejudiced by the People’s failure to file timely copies of the report in accordance with CPL 190.30 (2-a) *(see, People v Patterson,*161 Misc 2d 493), or how this technical defect otherwise impaired the integrity of the Grand Jury process *(see, People v Pelchat, supra).*Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
February 16, 1953

No. 57084.

protest 153397-K.

#### Joseph Ullmann Brokerage Corp. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1478. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 31.3

I, Pamela G. Marrone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 24, 2017                                   
|                                                       
|/s/ Pamela G. Marrone                                  
|Pamela G. Marrone President and Chief Executive
Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

Concerning United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. ROTHMAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning United Nations General Assembly Resolution

ES–10/6.

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations General Assembly voted on February 9, 1999, to

pass Resolution ES–10/6, Illegal Israeli Actions In Occupied East Jerusalem And The Rest Of The Occupied Palestinian Territory, to convene for the first time in 50

years the parties of the Fourth Geneva Convention for

the Protection of Civilians in Time of War;

Whereas such resolution singles out Israel for unprecedented

enforcement proceedings, which have never been invoked,

even against governments with records of massive violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention;

Whereas such resolution unfairly places full blame for the deterioration of the Middle East Peace Process on Israel
2

•HCON 117 IH

and dangerously politicizes the Fourth Geneva Convention, which was established to address humanitarian crises; and

Whereas such vote, initiated by the Arab Group at the behest

of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), serves to

prejudge and undercut direct negotiations, puts added

and undue pressure on Israel to influence the results of

those negotiations, and contravenes the written commitment that Yasser Arafat gave to then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin that issues of permanent status

would only be dealt with directly by the parties: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the Department of State for the

4 vote of the United States against United Nations

5 General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6 affirming

6 that the text of such resolution politicizes the

7 Fourth Geneva Convention for the Protection of Ci8 vilians in Time of War which was primarily humani9 tarian in nature;

10 (2) urges the Department of State to continue

11 its efforts against convening and participating in the

12 conference, which is scheduled to be held in Geneva,

13 Switzerland, on July 15, 1999;

14 (3) urges the member states of the United Na15 tions to vigorously oppose any and all efforts to ma-
3

•HCON 117 IH

1 nipulate the Fourth Geneva Convention for the pur2 pose of attacking Israel; and

3 (4) urges United Nations Secretary General

4 Kofi Annan and Switzerland, which serves as the de5 pository of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to refrain

6 from assisting in the convening of the conference.

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 214

Commending the Grand Forks Herald for its public service to the Grand

Forks area and receipt of a Pulitzer Prize.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1998

Mr. CONRAD (for himself, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr.

HAGEL, and Mr. MOYNIHAN) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending the Grand Forks Herald for its public service

to the Grand Forks area and receipt of a Pulitzer Prize.

Whereas the residents of the Grand Forks area in North Dakota and Minnesota experienced the most devastating

floods in 500 years during April 1997;

Whereas more than 50,000 residents of the Red River Valley

area were severely displaced for months by the flooding;

Whereas the offices of the Grand Forks Herald, whose newspaper has a daily circulation of 37,000, were displaced by

the floods and moved to various locations to publish the

newspaper, including the University of North Dakota and

Manvel Elementary School, and the paper was printed by

the St. Paul Pioneer Press of St. Paul, Minnesota, to enable the paper to maintain continuous publication;
2

•SRES 214 ATS

Whereas the Grand Forks Herald publisher Mike

Maidenberg, editor Mike Jacobs, and more than 70 staff

members, whose lives were turned upside down by the

floods, never failed to publish an edition of the newspaper

during the floods, sometimes hitting a circulation of

117,000 and keeping the community together even

though the paper’s facilities were totally destroyed;

Whereas the Grand Forks Herald was honored with journalism’s most prestigious award, the Pulitzer Prize for public service, for its extraordinary efforts to continue publishing during the severe flooding; and

Whereas the dedication and devotion of the Grand Forks

Herald to the community made an extraordinary difference in the lives of many people during the flooding

by helping to maintain a sense of stability during this

terrible natural disaster: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends the Grand Forks Herald and its

3 staff for their dedication to community and excel4 lence in public service; and

5 (2) congratulates the newspaper on being se6 lected to receive one of our Nation’s most coveted

7 awards for public service, the Pulitzer Prize.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 19, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 11, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Parcel Return Service Contract 20 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-5, CP2024-5.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-23016 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Table 9. Cost Effectiveness of MACT Floors: Overall and by Subcategory Appendix A

Table 8. Cost Effectiveness of MACT Floors: Overall and by Subcategory

A. Compliance by Additional Control Only

Subcategory Total Annual Cost 

($/yr)

Total Emission 

Reductions (tpy)

Cost Effectiveness ($/tpy 

pollutant reduced)

Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas $7,640,173 2,937 $2,601

Energy recovery unit - Solids $110,919,410 10,673 $10,393

Incinerator $17,391,611 277 $62,695

Small, remote $6,129,053 11.3 $540,334

Waste-burning kiln $132,434,143 20,872 $6,345

Overall $274,514,391 34,771 $7,895

B. Compliance or Most Inexpensive Disposal Alternative

Subcategory Total Annual Cost 

($/yr)

Total Emission 

Reductions (tpy)

Cost Effectiveness ($/tpy 

pollutant reduced)

Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas $7,640,173 2,937 $2,601

Energy recovery unit - Solids $110,919,410 10,673 $10,393

Incinerator $3,627,919 465 $7,810

Small, remote $3,536,989 11.3 $311,819

Waste-burning kiln $132,434,143 20,872 $6,345

Overalla

$258,158,634 34,909 $7,395

a - emissions adjusted to account for landfill flare emissions from gas generated from diverted waste

Note:

Total Annual Cost is derived from calculations described previously in this memo.

Total Emission Reductions are derived in the CISWI Emission Reductions Memo.
Case No. 8,873.

#### McLAUGHLIN v. STELLE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 483.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1808.

Courts — Jurisdictional Amount — Non Pros.

Assumpsit. Verdict for $11. Non pros.: it being below the jurisdiction of this court.

[Cited in Hellrigle v. Dulaney, Id. 6,343.]

¡See Currey v. Fletcher [Case No. 3,490], Dec. term, 1802.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM HEALTHTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONSOLDIATED BALANCE SHEET
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>       0000876889                 
<NAME>      HEALTHTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.                 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                   USD 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         37,631
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,850,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,327,261
<PP&E>                                         13,836,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 892,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,272,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,050,308
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    19
<COMMON>                                       6845
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,447,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,272,490
<SALES>                                        1,603,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,603,953
<CGS>                                          351,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,281,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               48,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             64,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                274,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                   93,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            180,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   180,942
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
No. 68543.

protests 59/1631, etc. (New York).

#### Schick X-Ray Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of injectors and parts, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Schick X-Ray Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 38, C.D. 2358), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Real Fyre Gas Logs**

 **Outdoor Campfyre**

 **Fire Magic Grills**

 **American Outdoor Grill** 

 **Find a Dealer RH Peterson sets the standard in quality for grills an**  **d gas logs. Find the perfect match for your magic hou r.** 
Home / Real Fyre / Vented Series / 

# Vented Series
**Enjoy the splendor and warmth of a cozy fire with R eal-Fyre Gas Logs.** 



### Charred Series
**View Styles** 



### Designer Series
**View Styles**  

# Page **1 of**  **6 Vented Series** 

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/** 

### Classic Series

**View Styles**  

# Page **2 of**  **6 Vented Series** 

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/** 

# Page **3 of**  **6**

**Vented Series**

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/** 

### Contemporary Series

**View Styles** 



### Burner Systems
**View Styles** 



### Control Systems
**View Styles** 


### Brands

 **Fire Magic**

 **American Outdoor Grill**

 **Real Fyre**

 **Campfyre**


### RHP

 **Register**

 **Find a Dealer** 

 **News**

 **About RH Peterson** 

 **Contact RHP** 


### Resources

 **Dealer Login**

 **Catalogs**

 **Find a Dealer** 


### News

 **KTLA**

**– Grill Masters and Exotic Grilling** 

 **Saving the Planet**

**- One**  **Propane Flame**

**- Grilled Burger at a Time** 

 **Whats the Best Grill on the Market?** 

 **Natural Gas Abundance** 

 **Natural Gas Prices Decline** 

**- Near 8 year lows!!!** 


### Search

**RH Peterson Co.**

 **Fire Magic**

 **Real Fyre**

 **American Outdoor Grill**

 **Camp Fyre Expand**  **next previous**  Search.. Submit Query 

# Page **4 of**  **6 Vented Series** 

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/** **Close**

**Previous**
**0/0**
**Next** 

# Page **5 of**  **6 Vented Series** 

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/** 

# Page **6 of**  **6**

**Vented Series**

**11/11/2011 http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented** 

**- series/**
No. 65291.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/5874 and 59/5878 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of piano benches the same as those the subject of *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 144, C.D. 2169), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | (a) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Svein Moxnes Harfjeld                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Svein Moxnes Harfjeld                                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

| By:    | /s/ Eirik Ubøe                                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Eirik Ubøe                                                     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 176

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the right of all Americans to keep and bear arms in defense of life or liberty and in the

pursuit of all other legitimate endeavors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. CRANE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the

right of all Americans to keep and bear arms in defense

of life or liberty and in the pursuit of all other legitimate

endeavors.

Whereas the second amendment to the Constitution of the

United States conveys an inalienable right to all American citizens, such right occupying the same preferred position as all other constitutional rights;

Whereas unconscionable abridgements of the second amendment have been undertaken over the years by State and

local governmental bodies, and have been allowed by the

courts to stand uncorrected; and

Whereas the Framers of the second amendment to the Constitution and those who ratified the second amendment
2

•HCON 176 IH

intended that the individual retain the right to keep and

bear arms in order to protect life, liberty, and property

and to protect our Nation from those who would attempt

to destroy our freedom: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Constitution provides that all individual citizens have the

4 right to keep and bear arms, which right supersedes the

5 power and authority of any government.

Æ
### Table 9. Cost Effectiveness of MACT Floors: Overall and by **Subcategory** Appendix A



# Table 8. Cost Effectiveness of MACT Floors: Overall and by Subcategory
**A. Compliance by Additional Control Only Subcategory**  **Total Annual Cost ($/y** **r) Total Emission** 

**Reductions (tpy) Cost Effectiveness ($/tpy**  **pollutant reduced)** Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas $7,640,173 2,937 $2,601 Energy recovery unit - Solids $110,919,410 10,673 $10,393 Incinerator $17,391,611 277 $62,695 Small, remote $6,129,053 11.3 $540,334 Waste-burning kiln $132,434,143 20,872 $6,345 **Overall $274,514,391**  **34,771 $7,895** 


### B. Compliance or Most Inexpensive Disposal Alternative **Subcategory Total Annual Cost**  **($/y r)**  **Total Emission**

**Reductions (tpy) Cost Effectiveness ($/tpy**  **pollutant reduced)** Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas $7,640,173 2,937 $2,601 Energy recovery unit - Solids $110,919,410 10,673 $10,393 Incinerator $3,627,919 465 $7,810 Small, remote $3,536,989 11.3 $311,819 Waste-burning kiln $132,434,143 20,872 $6,345 **Overall a**  **$258,158,634 34,909**  **$7,395** a - emissions adjusted to account for landfill flare emissions from gas generated from diverted waste

Note: Total Annual Cost is derived from calculations described previously in this memo. Total Emission Reductions are derived in the CISWI Emission Reductions Memo.