alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/31/201 1 12:4 G FAX 202493514 2 FA A * DM S g|001/00 2



### UNITE D STATE S DEFA RI'MEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N
I nth e Matte r

of : FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N TA A Docke t No
. CP10NM000 8 FAA Cas e No
. 2008NM70020 8 • DM S No
. FAA-2010-079 2 1 Judge : Richar dC
. Goodwi n

L.. J 

### Th e Honorabl e Richur dC
. Goodwin :

WITHDRAWA LO FREQUES T FO RHEARIN G Responden t

FKDF.RA L

### EXPRES S CORPORATION , b y an dthroug hcounsel , pursuant 1 0 Rul e 21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f

Praciie e i nFAA Civi l Penalt y Action s (1 4 CFR13.215) , request s a withdrawal o f

it s Reques t

fo r Hearing , a s the Administrato r an dth e Responden t

hav e settle dthi s matter . Date dthi s 26" ' day o f

May , 2011
.

I ti l 

# CEIVE D :A r

### 3 i 201 1 

# HEARIN G DOCKE T i nP^Wick s Loncever t D
. Almon d Th e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17" ^ Street , N W Sumner Annex , FourthFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 4.57-779 0 Fax:(202)457-779 9 Cynthi aChandler-Snel l Federal Expres s Corporatio n Regulator y Divisio n 362 0 Hack s Cros s Road Buildin g B , 3"^ Floo r Memphis , T K

3812 5 Tel : 901-434-836 1 Fax:901-434-828 3 Ctyunse l fo r Respondent s05/31/201 1 12:4 6 FA X 202493514 2 FA A DM S 2)002/00 2

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g documen t ha s bee n sen t

vi afacsimil e an dexpedite d courie r servic e to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Fax:(202)493-514 2 Th e Honorabl e Richiu dC
. Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Fas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , R mEl2-32 0 Washington , D. C 2059 0 Tel : (202 ) 366-213 9 Fax:(202)366-753 6 Mr
. Scoi l Morris , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio nAdmin i strat i o n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l (ANM-7 ) 160 1 Lin dAve. , S.W
. Rcnton , W A 9805 7 Tel : (425 ) 227-141 7 Fax:(425)227-100 7 Origina l an don e (1 ) cop y

On e (1 ) cop y

On e (1 ) cop y

Date dthi s 26'* ' da y o f

May , 2011
.

Almon c 'Wiclc s Group , PLL C 121 5 17''Street , N W Sumne r Annex , Fourt hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Counse l fo r

Responden t
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Timothy J. Barberich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/TIMOTHY J. BARBERICHTimothy J. Barberich Chief Executive
Officer

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000877357
<NAME>                        Sepracor, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                         107,733,000
<SECURITIES>                                    14,944,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,316,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,084,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,620,000
<PP&E>                                          24,531,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,638,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,954,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,530,000
<BONDS>                                         80,880,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,250,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,749,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,311,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,954,000
<SALES>                                          3,388,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,439,000
<CGS>                                            1,932,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,779,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,489,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,081,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,081,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,081,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .50
        


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 11085)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 17242.

(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Ses. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon tlie agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and *628made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### In the Matter of Togo Cab Corp., Respondent, v U.S. Capital Insurance Co., Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 972]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm three arbitration awards, U.S. Capital Insurance Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 2, 1993, as granted the petition, and (2) an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court, entered April 15, 1994, as denied its motion to dismiss the petition, granted the petition, and confirmed the arbitration awards.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition is granted, the petition is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of an appropriate amended order and judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment on the proceeding *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The appellant correctly contends that Arbitration Forums, *675Inc., violated its own No-Fault Arbitration Agreement Rules and Regulations (hereinafter Arbitration Rules) in scheduling and holding a hearing prior to the expiration of the one-year deferment which was duly requested and granted *(see,*Arbitration Rules, General Rule 11; *see also,*11 NYCRR 65.10 [d] [5] [ii] [b]). Pursuant to the Arbitration Rules, this violation constituted a jurisdictional error *(see,*Arbitration Rules, Decision Rule 2) and, therefore, the arbitrator exceeded her power in proceeding with the hearing and rendering the awards. Thereafter, Arbitration Forums, Inc., properly vacated the arbitrator’s determination and directed a rehearing in accordance with its own rules *(see,*Arbitration Rules, Decision Rule 2). Consequently, the Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to confirm the awards. Altman, J. P. Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, October 18, 2023—10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Decisional Matter:*                         Safety Standard Addressing Blade-Contact Injuries on Table Saws.                    

                        A live webcast of the meeting can be viewed at the following link:                         *https://cpsc.webex.com/​weblink/​register/​r88f341de3262d93f0deb0453a6e10f43*.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: October 11, 2023.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22824 Filed 10-12-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

Plaintiff has since withdrawn three of the motions and the Clerk of the Court should remove

these from the Court’s calendar - Dkt. # 49, 67, 68, and 78.

ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICK DRUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5360 RBL/KLS

ORDER TEMPORARILY STAYING

THE FILING OF MOTIONS

PENDING RESOLUTION OF

PENDING MOTIONS

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Presently before the

Court are numerous motions filed by Plaintiff. In a little over one month, Plaintiff has filed twentythree motions, including a motion for class certification:1

Dkt. # 48 Motion to Verify and Confirm Authenticity of Amended Complaint

Dkt. # 50 Motion for Distribution of Declaration Forms

Dkt. # 52 Motion for Order that Notary Publics Serve Subpoenas

Dkt. # 53 Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas

Dkt. # 54 Motion for Deposition Upon Written Questions

Dkt. # 55 Motion that Subpoenas and Depositions be Sent by Legal Mail

Dkt. # 56 Motion to Attach Affidavit to Form Distributed to Inmates

Dkt. # 57 Motion to File Supplemental Pleadings

Dkt. # 58 Motion for Order to Refute Kite

Dkt. # 59 Motion for Order that SCCC Serve Subpoena

Dkt. # 60 Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Answer and Objection

Dkt. # 61 Motion for Evidentiary Judicial Hearing and In Camera Review

Dkt. # 66 Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Defendants’ Answer and Objections

Dkt. # 69 Proposed Supplement re Motion to Supplement Amended Complaint

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 89 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Dkt. # 72 Motion to Withdraw/Strike Motion to Submit Pleadings Into Evidence

Dkt. # 77 Motion for Class Action Certification

Dkt. # 86 Motion to Certify Class and Joinder of Persons

Dkt. # 87 Non-Party Motion by James Davis

Dkt. # 88 Motion to Join Action as Plaintiff by Non-Party Jessiha Lancaster

In addition, Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, which is presently noted for February

23, 2007.

Plaintiff’s motion practice is overly burdensome and now borders on harassment. In order

for the Court to properly address each of these motions and to ensure efficient judicial oversight of

this case, Plaintiff is directed to refrain from filing any further motions in this matter pending the

Court’s resolution of all pending motions. 

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 89 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 311

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Interior 
 should support the establishment of a memorial to Thomas Paine on the 
National Park Service property in Constitution Gardens within the 1700 
 block of Constitution Avenue, N.W., in the District of Columbia, and 
 that the memorial should specifically include the structure known as 
                          the ``Canal House''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 20 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

 Mr. D'Amato submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Interior 
 should support the establishment of a memorial to Thomas Paine on the 
National Park Service property in Constitution Gardens within the 1700 
 block of Constitution Avenue, N.W., in the District of Columbia, and 
 that the memorial should specifically include the structure known as 
                          the ``Canal House''.

SECTION 1. THOMAS PAINE MEMORIAL.

    It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Interior 
should support the establishment of a memorial to Thomas Paine in the 
District of Columbia, as authorized by Public Law 102-407 (40 U.S.C. 
1003 note).

SEC. 2. LOCATION OF MEMORIAL.

    The memorial described in section 1 should--
            (1) be established on the National Park Service property in 
        Constitution Gardens within the 1700 block of Constitution 
        Avenue, N.W., in the District of Columbia; and
            (2) specifically include the structure known as the ``Canal 
        House'', to be used by the Thomas Paine National Historical 
        Association U.S.A. Memorial Foundation as an integral part of 
        the memorial, in a manner determined by the National Park 
        Service and the Thomas Paine National Historical Association 
        U.S.A. Memorial Foundation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, William Y. Tauscher,
certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Not applicable]

c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 14, 2007 |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                         |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer



43
# Official Journal L 178/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 178 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 655 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 178

English edition

Legislation

Volume 655 July 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1106 of 27 June 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Queso de Acehúche’ (PDO)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 of 4 July 2022 laying down common specifications for certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1108 of 1 July 2022 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption on importation granted for goods to be distributed or made available free of charge to persons fleeing the war in Ukraine and to persons in need in Ukraine
  (notified under document C(2022) 4469) | 57 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1106 of 27 June 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Queso de Acehúche’ (PDO))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 of 4 July 2022 laying down common specifications for certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

in vitro

1

3

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1108 of 1 July 2022 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption on importation granted for goods to be distributed or made available free of charge to persons fleeing the war in Ukraine and to persons in need in Ukraine
  (notified under document C(2022) 4469)

(notified under document C(2022) 4469)

57

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.