alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: grandmaveggie@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Evelyn Laci

Hardin, MT 59034
Before the First Division,

January 3, 1952

No. 56210.-

protest 174136-K (A) (New York).

#### Air Clearance Ass’n, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 63903.

protests 58/23248, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Alpha Lux Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cases for moisture testers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 22, C.D. 2097), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 179

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the United Nations and global

taxation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. ROYCE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the United

Nations and global taxation.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the following:

5 (1) The United Nations is an organization of

6 sovereign states, funded with voluntary contribu7 tions. It lacks any authority to impose taxes on its

8 member states.

9 (2) The United Nations Development Program

10 (UNDP) released a report recommending global tax-
2

•HCON 179 IH

1 ation as a source of revenue, including a proposal

2 for a global tax on e-mail.

3 (3) This is not the first time that proposals for

4 global taxation have come from the United Nations.

5 In 1996, former Secretary-General Boutros Boutros6 Ghali suggested a global tax, saying that it would

7 give the United Nations some financial independence

8 so that it was not ‘‘under the daily financial will of

9 the Member States’’.

10 SEC. 2. POLICY TOWARD THE UNITED NATIONS AND GLOB11 AL TAXATION.

12 It is the policy of the United States to oppose global

13 taxation.

14 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

15 It is the sense of Congress that—

16 (1) the United Nations should not in any way

17 advocate global taxation;

18 (2) no United States funds should be used by

19 the United Nations to support, advocate, print, or

20 analyze global taxation proposals; and

21 (3) if it is the position of the United Nations

22 to oppose global taxation, then it should not use any

23 funds of the member states to advocate, print, or

24 analyze global taxation.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

March 28, 1962

No. 66615.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/25802, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5302 FDB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS 

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial

partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent

of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is

satisfied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis,

the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee

equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average

monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this

Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Case 3:06-cv-05302-FDB Document 9 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($350.00) for this matter has been paid. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of

this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager of the Airway Heights Correction Center,

Airway Heights, Washington. 

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05302-FDB Document 9 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 2
I, Peter J. Scanlon, certify that:                                  Exhibit 31.2

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Startech
     Environmental Corporation.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our report about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          control over financial report which are reasonably likely to adversely
          affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
          report financial information; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

By: /s/ Peter J. Scanlon
------------------------
Peter J. Scanlon
Chief Financial Officer Vice President, and Principal Financial Officer
DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 18-8

 

October 2, 2018 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all institutions 

supervised by the Federal Reserve, including those with total consolidated assets of $10 billion 

or less.

SUBJECT: Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation CC

 The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently developed the attached interagency examination procedures for 

Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA)). These revised examination 

procedures supersede the examination procedures transmitted with CA Letter 04-9. 

The attached document reflects amendments to Regulation CC effective on July 1, 2018. 

The document also incorporates amendments to the EFAA in the Economic Growth, Regulatory 

Relief, and Consumer Protection Act,1 which include extending coverage to American Samoa, 

the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam. Finally, the document has been 

updated to remove outdated examples and examination procedures. 

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Dana Miller, Senior 

Counsel, Supervisory Policy and Outreach at (202) 452-2751. In addition, questions may be sent 

via the Board’s public website.2

Sincerely, 

Carol Evans 

Associate Director

 

1 Public Law 115-174, section 208 (2018). 2 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx. 
Page 2 of 2

Attachments: 

• Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation CC

Supersedes: 

• CA 04-9, “Revised Regulation CC Examination Procedures - Check Clearing for the 21st 

Century” (Oct. 28, 2004)
Case 2:02-cv-02460-TSZ Document 32 Filed 07/12/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-02460-TSZ Document 32 Filed 07/12/04 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Almaymoon Mawji Principal Executive Officer of Easy CD Yearbook, Inc. (the
"Company"), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 28, 2008           By: /s/ Almaymoon Mawji
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                              Name:  Almaymoon Mawji
                              Title: President, Treasurer and Director
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:02-cv-02380-MJP Document 27-3 Filed 11/12/03 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02380-MJP Document 27-3 Filed 11/12/03 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02380-MJP Document 27-3 Filed 11/12/03 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2514-029]

      ( print page 71347)    
                    On September 29, 2023, Appalachian Power Company submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its request for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Virginia DEQ), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify Virginia DEQ of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     August 1, 2023.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     One year, August 1, 2024.                

If Virginia DEQ fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: October 3, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 5.23(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-22699 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
---

Exhibit 99.11


CONSENT OF THOMAS GLUCK Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 31st day of March, 2011. /s/Thomas GluckName: Thomas Gluck


---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MAURICE DALTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SARGEANT PAUL ESTES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5820RJB

ORDER 

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has asked for appointment of counsel in the complaint and

in his response to the court’s order to show cause. (Dkt. # 5 and 8).

There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Although the court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), can request counsel to represent a party proceeding

in forma pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon,

789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984);

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires

an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to

articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d

Case 3:05-cv-05820-RJB Document 8 Filed 03/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

at 1331.

Plaintiff has demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate his claims pro se. Moreover, it

appears that this case does not involve exceptional circumstances which warrant appointment of

counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. # 5 and 8) is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 22nd day of March, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05820-RJB Document 8 Filed 03/23/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, David M. Tierney, principal financial officer of Reef Global EnergyVI, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  April 15, 2009 |   | /s/  David M. Tierney                              |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | David  M. Tierney                                  |
|                       |   | Chief  Accounting Officer–Public Partnerships |
|                       |   | Reef  Exploration, L.P.                            |
|                       |   | (principal  financial and accounting officer)      |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided tothe Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----