alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 14-3

May 30, 2014

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS AND TO EACH DOMESTIC BANKING ORGANIZATION SUPERVISED 

BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE:

SUBJECT: Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage 

for Other Residential Buildings

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state 

member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 

2012 (the Biggert-Waters Act), which amended the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. 

Section 100204 of the Biggert-Waters Act increased the maximum limits of building coverage 

available for non-condominium residential buildings designed for use for five or more families 

(classified as “Other Residential” buildings by the National Flood Insurance Program). The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has announced the availability of insurance

under the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) reflecting these increased maximum limits 

effective June 1, 2014.

In response to the availability of SFIPs with the increased limits, the Board of Governors 

of the Federal Reserve System, the Farm Credit Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency (the Agencies) are issuing the attached “Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum 

Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings.” This statement conveys the 

Agencies’ expectations of supervised institutions with regard to any loans secured by Other 

Residential buildings located in a Special Flood Hazard Area that may be affected by the 

availability of increased maximum insurance for these types of properties.
Page 2 of 2

Federal Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter and the accompanying guidance

to state member banks and bank holding companies, as well as to supervisory and examination 

staff. If you have any questions concerning this guidance, please contact Lanette Meister, Senior 

Supervisory Consumer Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 452-2705. In addition, questions 

may be sent via the Board’s public website.1

Sincerely,

Tonda Price

Acting Director

Attachment: Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage 

for Other Residential Buildings

Cross Reference: CA13 – 2, “Interagency Statement on the Impact of the Biggert-Waters Act”

 1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00581

- CR

Justin LUNA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9367 Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California

, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). The State has filed a letter waiving its rig ht to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro

se brief.

If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting the record within ten days from the date of this order. If the appellant desires to fi le a pro se brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro s e brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further

order of the court.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
(Reap. Dec. 10828)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2075.

(Decided September 23, 1964)

*BrooJcs & Broolcs*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain tires and tubes and rimbands, exported from Holland and entered at the port of New Orleans, La.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the present merchandise is statutory export value and that such value therefor is the invoiced unit prices, as entered, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22547]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2023 / 
Notices

[[Page 70920]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Proposed New Recreation Fee Sites; Correction

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a document in the Federal 
Register of September 21, 2023, concerning new recreation fee sites on 
the Shoshone National Forest. The document contained incorrect contact 
information and supplementary information.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 21, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
20415, on page 65151, in the second column, correct the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT caption to read:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Rau, Outdoor Recreation Planner, 
307-578-5140, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b6b7a6e7735697a6e5b6e687f7a357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15657460793b67746055606671743b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 21, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
20415, on page 65151, in the third column, correct the second paragraph 
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION caption to read:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  An expanded amenity recreation fee of $5 
per site per night would be charged at the Aspen Glade, Frye Lake, Hugh 
Otte, Little Popo Agie, and Warm Springs Campground. An expanded 
amenity recreation fee of $10 per night would be charged at Brown 
Mountain, Deer Creek, Jack Creek, Lily Lake, Little Sunlight, Wild 
Iris, and Wood River Campgrounds. The recreation fee revenues would 
enhance recreation opportunities, improve customer service, and address 
maintenance needs. Reservations for the campgrounds could be made 
online at www.recreation.gov or by calling 877-444-6777. Reservations 
would cost $8.00 per reservation.

    Dated: October 5, 2023.
Jacqueline Emanuel,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2023-22547 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX 23.1





Silberstein Unga, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors





Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com








June 15, 2011








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


Sillenger Exploration Corp.


Burnaby, BC, Canada





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by Sillenger Exploration Corp. of our report dated May 25, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Sillenger Exploration Corp., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the years ending February 28, 2010 and 2009 and the period from February 14, 2007 (Inception) through February 28, 2010.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC


Silberstein Ungar, PLLC




































































1
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 219

To authorize printing of the minutes of the Senate Republican and

Democratic Party Conferences.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 29, 1998

Mr. MACK (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize printing of the minutes of the Senate

Republican and Democratic Party Conferences.

Whereas the Senate Republican and Democratic Conferences

have maintained minutes of their meetings since the earliest years of this century;

Whereas the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress

recommends that the portions of those minutes at least

30 years old be published; and

Whereas the minutes of the Senate Party Conferences offer

rich documentation of the Senate’s institutional development during the first two-thirds of the 20th century:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,
2

•SRES 219 ATS

1 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE

2 REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE, 1911–1964.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be printed as a Senate

4 document the book entitled ‘‘Minutes of the Senate Re5 publican Conference, 1911–1964’’, prepared by the Senate

6 Historical Office under the supervision of the Secretary

7 of the Senate, with the concurrence of the United States

8 Senate Republican Conference.

9 (b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Senate document de10 scribed in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and

11 shall be in the style, form, manner, and binding as di12 rected by the Joint Committee on Printing after consulta13 tion with the Secretary of the Senate.

14 (c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

15 number of copies, there shall be printed with suitable bind16 ing the lesser of—

17 (1) 1,000 copies for use of the Senate, to be al18 located as determined by the Secretary of the Sen19 ate; or

20 (2) a number of copies that does not have a

21 total production and printing cost of more than

22 $1,200.

23 SEC. 2. PRINTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE DEMOCRATIC

24 CONFERENCE, 1903–1964.

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be printed as a Senate

26 document the book entitled ‘‘Minutes of the Senate Demo-
3

•SRES 219 ATS

1 cratic Conference, 1903–1964’’, prepared by the Senate

2 Historical Office under the supervision of the Secretary

3 of the Senate, with the concurrence of the United States

4 Senate Democratic Conference.

5 (b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Senate document de6 scribed in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and

7 shall be in the style, form, manner, and binding as di8 rected by the Joint Committee on Printing after consulta9 tion with the Secretary of the Senate.

10 (c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

11 number of copies, there shall be printed with suitable bind12 ing the lesser of—

13 (1) 1,000 copies for the use of the Senate, to

14 be allocated as determined by the Secretary of the

15 Senate; or

16 (2) a number of copies that does not have a

17 total production and printing cost of more than

18 $1,200.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M Clinebell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Act), that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell
|                    |  |  |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
March 6, 2007
NO. 07 -02- 0369- CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEV ENTH D ISTR ICT OF T EXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

_____________________________ ____ EX PARTE DARRI CK MAR CIAN O KIZZEE

_____________________________ ____ Before Q UINN an d REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. DISMISSAL Proceeding pro se, Dar rick Marcian o Kizzee filed a no tice of a ppea l fro m the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’s dismissal of his application for w rit of habeas corpus. By let ter dated September 13, 2002, this Court

requested t hat Kizz ee show why this Cour t has jurisdict ion to enter tain his purpo rted appeal. Kizzee r

esponded by filing a docu ment e ntitled “Co urt’s Ju risdic tion.” Although he cites several legal authorit ies, Kizzeedoes n ot referen ce any a uthority establ ishin g that this Court has jurisdi ction to hear an a ppeal o f the d ismi ssal by the high er court. Accordingly, w

e dismiss this purported appeal for w ant of jurisdicti on. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish.
----

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS

Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

(2005/C 189/05)

Article 107(1), (2), (3) and (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Reference period: July 2005

Application period: October, November and December 2005

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147197

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147197

COA: 308945

Kent CC: 11-005642-FH

GREGORY MICHAEL MANN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 244

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a

ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days

of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on May 4, 2000, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony
2

HCON 244 RFS

1 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

2 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives January 31,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Case No. 6,570.

#### HODGSON v. TURNER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 74.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1802.

Foreign Bill or Exchange — Action against In-dorser — Protest—Judgment against Drawer — Whether a Bar.

1. In an action against the indorser of a foreign bill of exchange, for non-payment, it is not necessary to produce a protest for non-acceptance.

2. A judgment and execution by the plaintiff, against the drawer of a bill, is no bar to a *287judgment against the indorser, although that execution be levied on the drawer's goods, which are not sold for want of buyers.

The defendant was indorser of a foreign bill of exchange, protested for non-payment as well as for non-acceptance.

Mr. Gantt, for defendant,

prayed the court to instruct the jury that it was necessary for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant had reasonable notice of the protest for non-acceptance; and cited Kyd, Bills, 109, 117-119, 137; Milford v. Mayor, 1 Doug. 55; Bull. N. P. 271; Rogers v. Stephens, 2 Term R. 713; Goodall v. Dolley, 1 Term R. 712; Burrows, 2,070; and the case of Oates & Co. v. Mc-Curdy. in the general court of Maryland.

Mr. Mason, for plaintiff,

cited Brown v. Barry, 3 Dali. [3 U. S.] 305, and Clerk v. Russel,- Id. 420, 424.

THE COURT,

on the authority of Brown v. Barry and Clarke v. Russel [supra], refused to give the instruction as prayed.

Mr. Gantt, for defendant, then produced a fieri- facias, issued last term and returnable to this, on a judgment obtained by the plaintiff against Bowie, the drawer of this bill; on which execution he stated the marshal had seized the goods of Bowie, but that they were not sold for want of buyers; and prayed the court to instruct the jury that this execution so levied, was a discharge of the in-dorser. Seld. Prac. 564.

THE COURT refused to give the instruction.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350  ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil &Gas Partners, L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy VI,L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  April 15, 2008 | Reef  Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Managing  General Partner                      |
|                       |                                           |
|                       | By:  Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                       | /s/  Michael J. Mauceli                        |
|                       | Michael  J. Mauceli                            |
|                       | Manager  and Member                            |
|                       | *(principal  executive officer)*               |

 

Thiscertification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that thePartnership specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18 - 0083

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT JAMES LECOU,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Matthew J. W a ld , Distr ict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 22 2020

04/22/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0083