alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

NOTICE OF OCCURRENCE

OF ADR PROCEDURE

Cutler Nylander & Hayton

 Professional Service Corporation

505 Madison Street, Suite 220

Seattle, Washington 98104

Telephone 206 340-4600

Hon. John C. Coughenour 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. Gordon, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a

‘GORDONWORKS.COM’,

 Plaintiff,

NO. CV06-0204JCC

v. NOTICE OF OCCURRENCE

OF ADR PROCEDURE

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.CO,; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES IX,

 

 Defendant.

Pursuant to CR 39.1(c)(6) notice is hereby given that on March 5, 2007 the

parties to this action participated in a mediation. The case remains unresolved at this

time. Pursuant to CR 39.1(c)(6), I DID NOT submit a letter to the Court

recommending the occurrence of continued or other ADR proceedings.

Dated this 13 day of March, 2007. th

 s/ Philip E. Cutler 

Philip E. Cutler (WSBA #5084)

CR 39.1 Mediator

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 113 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 113

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

NOTICE OF OCCURRENCE

OF ADR PROCEDURE

Cutler Nylander & Hayton

 Professional Service Corporation

505 Madison Street, Suite 220

Seattle, Washington 98104

Telephone 206 340-4600

Philip E. Cutler

505 Madison Street, Suite 220

Seattle, WA 98104

Telephone: 206-340-4600

E-mail: philcutler@cnhlaw.com

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this 13 day of March , 2007 I served the foregoing th

Notice of Occurrence of ADR Procedure on all parties to this action by depositing a true

and correct copy hereof in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, properly

addressed to counsel of record for the parties.

Dated: March 13, 2007 s/ Philip E. Cutler 

Philip E. Cutler (WSBA #5084)

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 113 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 189

Honoring the 150th anniversary of the United States Women’s Rights Movement that was initiated by the 1848 Women’s Rights Convention held

in Seneca Falls, New York, and calling for a national celebration of

women’s rights in 1998.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1998

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs.

MURRAY, and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Honoring the 150th anniversary of the United States Women’s Rights Movement that was initiated by the 1848

Women’s Rights Convention held in Seneca Falls, New

York, and calling for a national celebration of women’s

rights in 1998.

Whereas 1998 will mark the 150th anniversary of the Women’s Rights Movement in the United States, a valiant

civil rights movement that began in 1848 when the Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls, New

York;

Whereas the Declaration of Sentiments, the document issued

by the Women’s Rights Convention, is a strong reflection
2

•SRES 189 IS

of this country’s commitment to liberty and personal

freedom;

Whereas the Women’s Rights Movement has had an irreversible effect on the opportunities open to women in all

areas of life, including business, education, religion, the

arts, science, and athletics;

Whereas the history surrounding the fight for women’s equality over the past century and a half is still greatly unknown and unrecognized by many of our Nation’s citizens

and demands more acknowledgment in our children’s curriculum;

Whereas there is an ever-increasing need for both women and

men to share in the fundamental responsibilities of our

national life with a full and equal participation in society;

and

Whereas March 1998, is National Women’s History Month,

celebrated with the theme of ‘‘Living the Legacy of Women’s Rights’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes and celebrates 1998 as the 150th

3 anniversary of the Women’s Rights Movement and

4 March 1998 as National Women’s History Month

5 under the theme ‘‘Living the Legacy of Women’s

6 Rights’’; and

7 (2) calls on educators, government officials, and

8 businesses to celebrate the legacy of the Women’s
3

•SRES 189 IS

1 Rights Movement and remember the struggle that

2 began 150 years ago.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 1

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARNOLD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

 DANIELLE FAHOUM,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5903

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE 

Upon the stipulation of the parties to continue the trial date in the abovecaptioned case, the Court finds that such a continuance would serve the ends of justice

and outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant; therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued to May 15, 2006. The

resulting period of delay from April 17, 2006, to May 15, 2006, is hereby excluded for

speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

DONE this 14th day of April, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. KELLEY ARNOLD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented By:

/s/________________________________ /s/_____________________________

Colin A. Fieman Barbara Sievers 

Case 3:05-cr-05903-KLS Document 10 Filed 04/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:05-cr-05903-KLS Document 10 Filed 04/14/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6145

EARL LOCKLEAR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE W. KENWORTHY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:05-hc-00744-D) Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 7, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Earl Locklear seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Locklear has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 11.1
                             STIMSONITE CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Quarter Ended                       Year Ended
                                        ----------------------------      -----------------------------
Description                              3/30/97        3/31/96            3/30/97         3/31/96
-----------                              -------        -------            -------         -------

<S>                                        <C>            <C>                <C>             <C>
Average shares outstanding                 8,648,501      8,856,400          8,767,592       8,899,129

Net additional  shares  
  assuming  dilutive stock 
  options  exercised and proceeds
  used to purchase treasury 
  shares at fair market  value               128,871        160,542            138,743         176,259

Options  issued  within  one  
  year  prior  to the  initial 
  filing  date  of the  registration 
  statement for an initial public 
  offering in accordance with Staff
  Accounting Bulletin No. 83                     --          16,259              4,531          22,313
                                        -------------  -------------      -------------   -------------

Average number of common
  shares and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                       8,777,372      9,033,201          8,910,866       9,097,701
                                        =============  =============      =============   =============

Net income (loss)                         ($776,000)     ($992,000)         ($632,000)      $2,599,000
                                        =============  =============      =============   =============

Per share data:
Net income (loss)                            ($0.09)        ($0.11)            ($0.07)           $0.29
                                        =============  =============      =============   =============
</TABLE>
Case No. 13,602.

#### The SULTANA.

[1 Brown, Adm. 13.] 1

District Court, D. Michigan.

Feb., 1857.

Seamen — Wages—Clerk op a Steamboat.

The clerk of a steamboat is a mariner, and entitled to a lien for wages.

Libel for wages. Libellant was hired and served during the autumn of 1850 as clerk of the Sultana, and claimed a lieu for his wages.

WILKINS, District Judge.

The clerk of a steamboat is a mariner, within the meaning of the law conferring a lien for wages. Curt. Merch. Seam. p. 5, and notes; The Prince George, 3 Hagg. Adm. 376; 2 Bouv. Law Dict. p. 405; Mills v. Long [Sayer, 136], referred to in 2 Dod. 105; Wilson v. The Ohio [Case No. 17,825]; Fland. Mar. Law, 354; Ross v. Walker, 2 Wils. 264; Trainer v. Superior [Case No. 14,136]. Decree for libellant
FOURTHCAI INC
                          4300 N. MILLER RD. SUITE 120
                         SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85251-3620


February 1, 2000


Kenneth R. Lew
4300 North Miller Rd. Suite 120
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

    Re: Lock-Up Agreement with Fourthcai, Inc.

Gentlemen,

     In consideration of the sale to the holder by Fourthcai, Inc., (Company) of
its Common Stock ($.0001 par value), the undersigned holder warrants,  covenants
and agrees for the benefit of the Company not to sell, offer to sell, solicit an
offer to buy, contract to sell, make any short sale,  pledge,  grant,  grant any
option to purchase,  or  otherwise  transfer or dispose of, any shares of Common
stock, or any securities  convertible  into or exercisable or  exchangeable  for
Common Stock,  owned directly or beneficially by the undersigned or with respect
to which the undersigned has the power of disposition, except in connection with
or following a completed merger or acquisition by the Company and the Company is
no longer  classified as a blank check company  pursuant to Section 7 (b) (3) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     An attempt to sell, transfer or any type of disposition of the shares shall
be a violation of this letter  agreement and shall be  ineffective  and null and
void.

     In  furtherance  of the  foregoing,  the holder agrees to; (1) delivery his
shares to the  Company  for safe  keeping;  (2) allow the  Company to advise its
Transfer Agent not to transfer said  securities and (3) authorize the company to
deliver a copy of this  Agreement to the  transfer  agent with  instructions  to
decline to make any transfer of securities if such transfer  would  constitute a
violation or breach of this Agreement.

     This  Agreement  shall be  binding  upon the  holder,  its  agents,  heirs,
successors, assignees and beneficiaries.

     A waiver of the terms and  conditions of this  agreement must be in writing
and executed by the proper officer of the Company and the holder.

     If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this  Agreement,  the holder
agrees  that  there is no  adequate  remedy at law and said  breach  will  cause
irreparable damage. Accordingly,  the holder agrees that the Company is entitled
to the issuance of an immediate injunction without notice to restrain the breach
or  threatened  breach.  This remedy is not exclusive and the holder agrees that
the  Company  and third  party  beneficiaries  shall be  entitled  to seek other
remedies including a claim for other remedies, including money damages.

THE HOLDER

/s/ Kenneth R. Lew
----------------------
Kenneth R. Lew              Constituting 30,000 shares certificate(s)


                                                             #__________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DAVID W. BURTON, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C06-654-MJP-JPD

)

v. )

)

E.J. HALE, et al., ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, defendants’ motion for summary judgment,

the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate

Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 28) is GRANTED.

(3) Plaintiff’s complaint, and this action, are DISMISSED with prejudice.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for defendants,

and to the Honorable James P. Donohue.

DATED this _4th_ day of March 

A

, 2007.

Marsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MJP Document 40 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HEE CHAN RYOU,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-231M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Conspiracy to Commit False Use of Passport and Bank Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 1344 and 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: May 16, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has no ties to this community or to the Western District of

Washington.

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of South Korea. 

Case 2:06-cr-00174-RSM Document 20 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Because defendant has many friends, both parents, and five brothers residing in

Korea, defendant is viewed as a risk of flight.

(4) Defendant has little reason to avoid fleeing jurisdiction.

(5) There are no conditions or combination of conditions other than detention that

will ensure the appearance of the defendant in court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00174-RSM Document 20 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2
From: willpatm@frontiernet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:16:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Myers

Camden, MI 49232
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 11

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 11

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Tuesday, January 19, 1999, it stand adjourned

4 until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 2, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives January 19,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/26/06 Page 6 of 6
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-073 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
# C_2006132EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 7 June 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 132 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Second supplement to the 24th complete edition’ and ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

Image

---