alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 74368515185 NVXO121114394454086 K3XB32

X X Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X


## X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X
X X X X X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

Bromine, manuf. of, by-products from, distn. residues 

## X 321822 NV IES.pdf 

### XXX 

## X See Attachment 001 (NV Organics Structures Sanitized.docx)
NV Organics Structures Sanitized.docx Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

XXX
XXX 

## X X X Page 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX 

## X

XXX XXX XXX 

### X

Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

Feed for a bromine recovery uint 100 XXX 

### X 0 0 100 0

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X XXX XXX XXX 

## X X

XXX 

## X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X

Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONSee Attachment 003 (NV Manufacturing Process Sanitized.docx)

NV Manufacturing Process Sanitized.docx Page 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X X X

Page 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X XXX 

## X

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X

Page 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

See Attachment 002 (BRU Block Flow Sanitized.doc)

BRU Block Flow Sanitized.doc XXX 

## X Page 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

XXX

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX



### X X X X X XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X

Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSION{XXX}

Page 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 NV Organics Structures Sanitized NV Organics Structures Sanitized.docx Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 2 002 BRU Block Flow Sanitized BRU Block Flow Sanitized.doc Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. 1 003 NV Manufactuing Process Sanitized NV Manufacturing Process Sanitized.docx Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. 2 004 PMN Material Transfers Sanitized PMN Material Transfers Sanitized.docx 1 005 NV IES NV IES.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. 1

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name NV Organics Structures Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number NVXO121114394454086

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name BRU Block Flow Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number NVXO121114394454086

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name NV Manufactuing Process Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number NVXO121114394454086

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name PMN Material Transfers Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number NVXO121114394454086

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 005 Attachment Name NV IES 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number NVXO121114394454086
# L_2008042EN.01009901.xml

| 16.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/99

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EULEX/1/2008

of 7 February 2008

concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO

(2008/125/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP (1) of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO, and in particular Article 12(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 4 May 2007, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed in principle to the proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative to appoint Mr Yves de Kermabon as Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, and noted that the formal appointment would take place after the adoption of the Council Joint Action establishing the mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 4 May 2007, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed in principle to the proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative to appoint Mr Yves de Kermabon as Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, and noted that the formal appointment would take place after the adoption of the Council Joint Action establishing the mission.

| (2) | On 4 February 2008 the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 4 February 2008 the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP.

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP, the PSC is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of EULEX KOSOVO, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 12(2) of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP, the PSC is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of EULEX KOSOVO, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Yves de Kermabon is hereby appointed Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until the expiry of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2008.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

M. IPAVIC

---

(1)  See page 92 of this Official Journal.

1

---
Case No. 8,860.

#### McKIBBIN v. The C. VANDERBILT.

[2 Int. Rev. Rec. 62.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Aug., 1865.1

Collision — Hudson Riven — Navigation in Channel— Fog.

[The case was taken on appeal to the supreme court, where the decree of the circuit court was affirmed, with costs. 6 Wall (73 U. S.) 225.]

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.

[This was a libel by Robert H. McKibbin against the steamer C. Vanderbilt, to recover damages resulting from a collision. The district court rendered a decree for libelant (case not reported) in the sum of $7,020.53, from which claimant appeals.]

Mr. Morris, for libelant

Mr. Jones, for claimant and appellant

1

 [Affirmed in 6 Wall. (73 U. S.) 225.]

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The collision in this case occurred between the canal boat Canisteo, one of the tows in charge of the tug O. C. Hibbard, and the steamer C. Vanderbilt, on the morning of the 16th May, 1863, on the west shore of the Hudson river, about opposite the arsenal at Troy. The tug had left with her tow that morning, starting from the upper side-cut at Troy, on the west side of the river, descending along the same, one hundred and fifty or two hundred feet from the shore. The Vanderbilt was coming up the river on one of her usual trips, and making for the dock on the east side of the river. There had been a considerable freshet in the river, so that the water was some six or eight feet higher than its usual rate. There was no difficulty, therefore, as to sea room for the steamers to pass to the right and east of the descending tow. Indeed, upon the proofs, even in an ordinary stage of water, the Vanderbilt could easily have passed to the right in going to her dock. Both vessels, however, were in a dense fog at and before they discovered each other, and, as it respects the navigation of each, under the circumstances in which they found themselves, very little, if any, objection can be taken. The point pressing upon the steamer is, that she was too far to the east of the channel of the river, and, therefore, out of her proper course. This view was taken by the court below, and upon it a decree was rendered for the canal-boat. We are inclined to concur in this result. The west side is the natural and ordinary track for descending vessels; and the Vanderbilt, we think, was bound to take notice of this fact, and to have kept nearer to the middle of the river. She had no right to act upon the idea that the descending boat would take that course, and expect her to pass to the left or starboard, between her and the left shore. What makes the case more marked in this respect, is the fact that the steamer’s dock was on the east shore, some miles above the collision.

Decree affirmed.
No. 61608.

#### Porath & Magneheim, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 304947-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson,. J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

Honorable James L. Robart 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DONNELL CRENSHAW and LUCINDA M. 

WYNN, 

 Defendants. 

No. CR06-0242 JLR 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 

AND SETTING NEW PRETRIAL 

MOTIONS DEADLINE AND DATE 

OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

Based on the stipulated motion of the parties, the Court makes the following findings 

of fact and conclusions of law: 

1. This is a complicated case involving alleged fraud that took place over several 

years and in which there are thousands of pages of discovery. 

2. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of some complexity, 

including all relevant issues and defenses applicable to the case, which would make it 

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself within 

the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act and currently set for this case. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

Case 2:06-cr-00242-JLR Document 42 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 3
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

3. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best 

interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

4. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense to prepare would 

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(i). 

5. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a continuance is necessary 

to allow the defendants the reasonable time for effective preparation of their defense. 18 

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

NOW, THEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from December 5, 2006, to 

March 13, 2007, at 9:00 AM. The resulting period of delay from December 5, 2006, up to 

and including the new trial date of March 13, 2007 is hereby excluded for speedy trial 

purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B). 

The Pretrial Conference is rescheduled from November 14, 2006, to February 26, 

2007, at 11:00 AM. 

Pretrial motions are now due January 12, 2007. 

 DONE this 14th day of November, 2006. 

A

James L. Robart 

United States District Court Judge 

 

Presented by: 

s/ Kimberly N. Gordon 

KIMBERLY N. GORDON, WSBA #25401 

Counsel for Defendant Lucinda Wynn 

Case 2:06-cr-00242-JLR Document 42 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 3
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 s/ Christopher Black 

Christopher Black, WSBA #31744

Counsel for Defendant Donnell Crenshaw 

 s/ Andrew C. Friedman 

ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 2:06-cr-00242-JLR Document 42 Filed 11/15/06 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 127 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
       present a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on June 15, 
1999, for a ceremony to present a gold medal on behalf of Congress to 
Rosa Parks. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out 
in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.19

Rockford Corporation Warrant Ownership
                As of March 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           Maximum
                                                                                          Number of                    Exercise
Group                             Warrant Holder                                           Warrants                      Price
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>                                                     <C>                          <C>
Bartol Family                     GST Exempt Trust                                           34,738                      $0.85

                                  Boulder Investors Limited Partnership                      25,545                      $0.85

Current Employees                 Ron Trout                                                     202                      $0.85

Former Employees                  Darrell W. Chapman                                            818                      $0.85

Others                            Graham Humes                                                8,173                      $0.85

                                  Francis E. & Suzette E. Baird                               4,089                      $0.85

                                  Gordon A. Jr. & Blair B. MacInnes                          10,218                      $0.85

                                  Sharon Dedrick                                              1,020                      $0.85

Total

Others                            The Vrolyk Partnership 97-A                                23,500                      $3.16


                                  Total                                                     108,303
</TABLE>
III

Calendar No. 206

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 12), 1999

Received and placed on the calendar

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning United Nations General Assembly Resolution

ES–10/6.

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations General Assembly voted on February 9, 1999, to

pass Resolution ES–10/6, Illegal Israeli Actions In Occupied East Jerusalem And The Rest Of The Occupied Palestinian Territory, to convene for the first time in 50

years the parties of the Fourth Geneva Convention for

the Protection of Civilians in Time of War;
2

HCON 117 PCS

Whereas such resolution singles out Israel for unprecedented

enforcement proceedings, which have never been invoked,

even against governments with records of massive violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention;

Whereas such resolution unfairly places full blame for the deterioration of the Middle East Peace Process on Israel

and dangerously politicizes the Fourth Geneva Convention, which was established to address humanitarian crises; and

Whereas such vote, initiated by the Arab Group at the behest

of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), serves to

prejudge and undercut direct negotiations, puts added

and undue pressure on Israel to influence the results of

those negotiations, and contravenes the written commitment that Yasser Arafat gave to then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin that issues of permanent status

would only be dealt with directly by the parties: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the Department of State for the

4 vote of the United States against United Nations

5 General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6 affirming

6 that the text of such resolution politicizes the

7 Fourth Geneva Convention for the Protection of Ci8 vilians in Time of War which was primarily humani9 tarian in nature;

10 (2) urges the Department of State to continue

11 its efforts against convening and participating in the
3

HCON 117 PCS

1 conference, which is scheduled to be held in Geneva,

2 Switzerland, on July 15, 1999;

3 (3) urges the member states of the United Na4 tions to vigorously oppose any and all efforts to ma5 nipulate the Fourth Geneva Convention for the pur6 pose of attacking Israel; and

7 (4) urges United Nations Secretary General

8 Kofi Annan and Switzerland, which serves as the de9 pository of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to refrain

10 from assisting in the convening of the conference.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 206

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning United Nations General Assembly

Resolution ES–10/6.

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 12), 1999

Received and placed on the calendar
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C05-5792-RBL/KLS]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

CAROLE NICOLET,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5792-RBL/KLS

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Based upon the Stipulation between the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant

shall have an extension to and including December 20, 2006, to file Defendant’s answering brief. 

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including January 3, 2007, to file Plaintiff’s

Reply Brief.

DATED this 20th day of November, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-05792-RBL Document 23 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C05-5792-RBL/KLS]

AKaren L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ Joanne Dantonio 

JOANNE DANTONIO

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Phone: 206-615-2730

Fax: 206-615-2531

joanne.dantonio@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05792-RBL Document 23 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 2 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 3 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 4 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 5 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 6 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 7 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 8 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 9 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 10 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 11 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 12 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 13 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 14 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 15 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 16 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 17 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 18 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 19 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 20 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 21 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 22 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 23 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 24 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 25 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 26 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 27 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 28 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 29 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 30 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 31 of 32
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/05/06 Page 32 of 32
No. 59312.

protests 233351-K, etc. (New York).

#### P. Robertet, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.