alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                               December 22, 1997


Mr. Marc Ferrie
1245 Vallejo Street
San Francisco, CA  94109

Dear Marc:

     It is my pleasure to offer you the position of Vice President of
Engineering. Your expected start date is as early as possible the week of
January 5, 1998.

     You will be compensated semi-monthly in arrears based on an annual salary
of $150,000. You will also be eligible to receive additional bonus compensation
of up to $25,000 per annum to be based on performance criteria to be established
within 90 days after your commencement of employment. If you meet or exceed your
performance criteria, your total cash compensation will be $175,000 per annum.

     You will also receive options to purchase 250,000 shares of Evolve Common
Stock, vesting at a rate of 1/5th on your first anniversary of employment with
the Company and 1/60th per month over a four-year period thereafter.

     Evolve also offers comprehensive health care benefits and a 401(k) plan.
Enclosed please find a packet of information relating to benefits and other
employment matters, including the Evolve Tahoe Trip, which I hope and your
family can attend.  Please contact Rosemary Tong, our Human Resources Manager,
at (415) 439-4017 with any questions about these materials.

     As set forth in our Employment, Confidential Information and Inventions
Assignment Agreement, you will be asked to sign as a condition of employment,
Evolve's policy is that all employment and compensation with company is "at
will" in that they can be terminated with or without cause, and with or without
notice, at any time at the option of either Evolve or yourself, except as
otherwise provided by law.

     We are very excited about having you on board. Please indicate your
acceptance of this offer by faxing back a signed copy of this letter to me at
(415) 439-4093.

                                Sincerely,


                                John P. Bantleman
                                President and Chief Operating Officer

Accepted and agreed to:


By:
   ------------------------
        Marc Ferrie

Date:
     -------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,427
<PP&E>                                           8,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,952)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,436
<BONDS>                                          6,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                           668
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,629
<SALES>                                          5,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,999
<CGS>                                            3,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    367
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 158 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 158

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the Document Door of the United States Capitol as the 
                           ``Memorial Door''.

Whereas on July 24, 1998, a lone gunman entered the United States Capitol 
        through the door known as the Document Door, located on the first floor 
        of the East Front;
Whereas Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut was the first United States Capitol Police 
        officer to confront the gunman just inside the Document Door and lost 
        his life as a result;
Whereas Detective John Michael Gibson also confronted the gunman and lost his 
        life in the ensuing shootout;
Whereas the last shot fired by Detective John Gibson--his final act as an 
        officer of the law--finally brought down the gunman and ended his deadly 
        rampage;
Whereas while the gunman's intentions are not fully known, nor may ever be 
        known, it is clear that he would have killed more innocent people if 
        United States Capitol Police Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective John 
        Gibson had not ended the violent rampage;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police represent true dedication and 
        professionalism in their duties to keep the United States Capitol and 
        the Senate and House of Representatives office buildings safe for all 
        who enter them;
Whereas the United States Capitol shines as a beacon of freedom and democracy 
        all around the world;
Whereas keeping the sacred halls of the United States Capitol, known as the 
        People's House, accessible for all the people of the United States and 
        the world is a true testament of Congress and of our Nation's dedication 
        to upholding the virtues of freedom;
Whereas the door near where this tragic incident took place has been known as 
        the Document Door; and
Whereas it is fitting and appropriate that the Document Door henceforth be known 
        as the Memorial Door in honor of Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective 
        John Gibson: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the door known as the Document Door and located on the first floor 
of the East Front of the United States Capitol is designated as the 
``Memorial Door'' in honor of Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut and 
Detective John Michael Gibson of the United States Capitol Police, who 
gave their lives in the line of duty on July 24, 1998, near that door.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 50

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the correction of cost-ofliving adjustments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. ROTH (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the correction

of cost-of-living adjustments.

Whereas the final report of the Senate Finance Committee’s

Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price

Index, chaired by Professor Michael Boskin, has concluded that the Consumer Price Index overstates the cost

of living in the United States by 1.1 percentage points;

Whereas Dr. Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System, has testified

before the Senate Finance Committee that ‘‘the best

available evidence suggests that there is virtually no

chance that the CPI as currently published understates’’

the cost of living and that there is ‘‘a very high probability that the upward bias ranges between 1⁄2 percentage point per year and 11⁄2 percentage points per year’’;
2

•SRES 50 IS

Whereas the overstatement of the cost of living by the

Consumer Price Index has been recognized by economists

since at least 1961, when a report noting the existence

of the overstatement was issued by a National Bureau of

Economic Research Committee, chaired by Professor

George J. Stigler;

Whereas Congress and the President, through the indexing of

Federal tax brackets, Social Security benefits, and other

Federal program benefits, have undertaken to protect

taxpayers and beneficiaries of such programs from the

erosion of purchasing power due to inflation;

Whereas Congress and the President intended the indexing of

Federal tax brackets, Social Security benefits, and other

Federal program benefits to accurately reflect changes in

the cost of living; and

Whereas the overstatement of the cost of living increases the

deficit and undermines the equitable administration of

Federal benefits and tax policies: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that all

2 cost-of-living adjustments required by statute should accu3 rately reflect the best available estimate of changes in the

4 cost of living.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MUNOZ-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50062.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio Munoz-Munoz raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez*
      *371
      *Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                         380,366
<SECURITIES>                                   393,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,058
<INVENTORY>                                    148,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,417,311
<PP&E>                                         563,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                 339,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,991,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,809
<BONDS>                                         98,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,144
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,460,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,991,513
<SALES>                                      1,246,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,246,194
<CGS>                                          607,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  607,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (75)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                156,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       12,018
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
No. 62883.

#### Joseph H. Brown & Son *v.*United States,

protests 325898-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1 C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52766.

#### American Cyanamid Co. *v.*United States,

protest 142870-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
No. 59850.

#### Armour and Company *v.*United States,

protest 179507-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of ADFlex Solutions, Inc. of our report dated January 19, 1998, included in the
1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of ADFlex Solutions, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-85560, 33-85562, 33-88866, 33-902160, 33-92162, 33-95864,
33-98394, 333-31261, and 333-39125) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive
Plan, the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Outside Director Stock
Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and the 1996 Outside Director Stock Option Plan, of our report
dated January 19, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated by reference, and of our report dated January 19, 1998, with
respect to the schedule included, in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 20, 1998
B I L L O F C O S T S

THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

No. 13-12-00199-CV

GRADY DOWELL

v.

GRACIE QUIROZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARIO GONZALEZ LIRA, 

NOE LIRA; MARIA ANGELES LIRA; MARLINY GUTIERREZ, ANNETTE GUTIERREZ, 

NANCY GUTIERREZ, AND DAVID GUTIERREZ

(No. 2006-CPC-92-B IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF CAMERON COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING

FILING

FILING

FILING

FILING

FILING

FILING

CLERK'S RECORD

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

INDIGENT

FILING

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$576.00

$50.00

$25.00

$100.00

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

PAID

AMI

APE

ANT

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

CLK

ANT

ANT

ANT

Balance of costs owing to the Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Corpus Christi, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK OF THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the 

same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand 

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Thirteenth District of Texas, this April 30, 

2015day of May, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk
No. 57777.

protests 203057-K, etc. (Boston).

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content fof wool, as’used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages. of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 167 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 167

    Recognizing the outstanding achievement of the Denver Bronco's 
quarterback, John Elway, in the victory of the Denver Broncos in Super 
                              Bowl XXXII.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 1998

   Mr. Campbell (for himself and Mr. Allard) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the outstanding achievement of the Denver Bronco's 
quarterback, John Elway, in the victory of the Denver Broncos in Super 
                              Bowl XXXII.

Whereas, since becoming quarterback for the Denver Broncos in 1983, John Elway 
        has been involved in some of the most striking comeback victories in the 
        history of the National Football League (referred to in this resolution 
        as the ``NFL'');
Whereas John Elway has been a Pro Bowl quarterback, was named NFL Most Valuable 
        Player in 1987 and the American Football Conference's Most Valuable 
        Player in 1993, holds numerous NFL passing records, and is the all-time 
        winningest quarterback in the history of the NFL;
Whereas John Elway's leadership, dedication, and perseverance symbolizes 
        excellence in these qualities for the entire Nation and represents these 
        qualities for America to the world; and
Whereas John Elway, an exceptional athlete, has sustained a high level of 
        personal competitiveness and has finally led his team to the honor of a 
        Super Bowl championship: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the outstanding achievement of the Denver 
        Broncos' quarterback, John Elway; and
            (2) congratulates John Elway as the winning quarterback of 
        Super Bowl XXXII.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Timothy Armes, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Reportof MedCareers Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of MedCareers Group, Inc.

 

*By:/s/ Timothy Armes*

Timothy Armes

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial/Accounting Officer)

 

May 19, 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BEATRIZ RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

GEOVERA SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1588

[April 2, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; William W. Haury, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-025147 

(18).

Erik D. Diener of The Diener Firm, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Maureen G. Pearcy of Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., Miami, and Joseph V. Manzo 

of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

EDDIE HERNANDEZ, )

) No. C06-1098RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

57 DEGREES NORTH, LLC, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On August 9, 2007, plaintiff Eddie

Hernandez filed a motion with related documents that, taken as a whole, exceeds 50 pages in

length (Dkt. ##74-76). As of this date, a courtesy copy of these documents has not been

provided for chambers. 

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause within five days of this Order why he

should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with this Court’s “Order Regarding Initial

Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement” (Dkt. # 7) and the “Minute Order Setting

Trial & Related Dates” (Dkt. # 12). Plaintiff shall immediately deliver a paper copy of the

documents filed on August 9, 2007, with tabs or other organizing aids as necessary and clearly

marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers,” to the Clerk’s

Office.

The Clerk of Court is directed to place this Order to Show Cause on the Court’s calendar

for August 23, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01098-RSL Document 77 Filed 08/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE -2-

DATED this 15th day of August, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-01098-RSL Document 77 Filed 08/15/07 Page 2 of 2