alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAUL DAVID ALVARADO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

 

Case No. CR05-5747RBL

 CR06-5333RBL

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office

alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, DAVID JENNINGS:

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, JOHN CARPENTER: 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

supervision; the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s) and maximum potential sanction if

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable RONALD B. LEIGHTON: 

Date: APRIL 12, 2011 

Time: 8:30 AM 

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office. This Order is entered

without prejudice to review.

March 18, 2011.

A

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05333-RBL Document 30 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 10809)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Company, a/c Volkswagon Washington, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2886.

*393(Decided August 25 1964)

*Stein & Shostak for*the plaintiff.

*JoJm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The question of the proper value for duty purposes of certain Porsche automobiles is presented by the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

By stipulation of the parties, the following facts have been agreed to:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the above entitled appeal for reappraisement consists of automobiles, which commodity is included on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and, accordingly, is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 2. That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the country of exportation for home consumption or for exportation to the United States.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the United States.

> 4. That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 of the Porsche automobiles involved herein is as follows:

> U.S. Dollars

> Coupe Serial No. 106695 $2, 616. 00

> Coupe Serial No. 107603 2, 585. 00

> Coupe Serial No. 107160 2,585. 00

> Convt. Coupe Serial No. 86224 2, 826. 50

> Convt. Super Coupe Serial No. 86424 2, 961. 00

> Convt. Super Coupe Serial No. 85985 2, 995. 00

> 5.That the above entitled appeal may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described herein and abandoned in .all other respects.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis of value for the automobiles in issue and that said value is as indicated in paragraph 4 of the above-quoted stipulation.

As to all other merchandise, the appeal having been abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM HEALTHTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         109,608                 109,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  659,629                 659,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,930                 100,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,430,915               1,430,915
<PP&E>                                      13,015,253              13,015,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,045                 428,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,056,653              24,056,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,801,652               3,801,652
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         19                      19
<COMMON>                                         4,488                   4,488
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,056,653              24,056,653
<SALES>                                        936,543               3,266,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               936,543               3,266,585
<CGS>                                           74,737                 692,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,064,809               4,150,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,705                 260,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (128,266)               (884,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0               (202,706)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (128,266)               (681,664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                150,000                 450,000
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,734               (231,664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                  (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Angerthal, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: February 14, 2011
Before the Second Division,

October 13, 1959

No. 63427.

protests 307257-K and 273895-K (New York).

#### F. H. Cone & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 225A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 225A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 625 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 225A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 625 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 225 A/01 | Directorate-General Eurostat — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director ‘Macroeconomic statistics’ ESTAT.C, in Luxembourg (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10389 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2019/C 225 A/01

Directorate-General Eurostat — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director ‘Macroeconomic statistics’ ESTAT.C, in Luxembourg (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10389

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18110 and #18111; COLORADO Disaster Number CO-00143]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4731-DR), dated 08/25/2023.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/08/2023 through 06/23/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/02/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/24/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/28/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Colorado, dated 08/25/2023, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
      ( print page 69980)    
*Primary Counties:*                     Baca, Kiowa, Prowers, Teller.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-22399 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

December 7, 2009

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2009-1087

ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA v. ALPINE ELECTRONICS

Decided: December 4, 2009 Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change:

Page 8 line 21 after “known algorithms even though it did” insert “not”.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 76

Proclaiming a nationwide moment of remembrance, to be observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, in order to appropriately honor American

patriots lost in the pursuit of peace and liberty around the world.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1997

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Proclaiming a nationwide moment of remembrance, to be

observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, in order to

appropriately honor American patriots lost in the pursuit

of peace and liberty around the world.

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace

has always been a valued objective of this great country;

Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in service as peacemakers and

peacekeepers;

Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate the

appreciation and gratitude these loyal Americans deserve

and to commemorate the ultimate sacrifice they made;

Whereas Memorial Day is the day of the year for the Nation

to appropriately remember American heroes by inviting
2

•SRES 76 IS

the citizens of this Nation to respectfully honor them at

a designated time; and

Whereas the playing of ‘‘Taps’’ symbolizes the solemn and

patriotic recognition of those Americans who died in service to our Country: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate requests that—

2 (1) a nationwide moment of remembrance be

3 observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, by the si4 multaneous pausing of all citizens to acknowledge

5 the playing of ‘‘Taps’’ at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Stand6 ard Time) in honor of the Americans that gave their

7 lives in the pursuit of freedom and peace; and

8 (2) the President issue a proclamation calling

9 upon the departments and agencies of the United

10 States and interested organizations, groups, and in11 dividuals to participate in and promote this nation12 wide tribute to the dedicated American men and

13 women who died in the pursuit of freedom and

14 peace.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Angerthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

March 26, 2007
No. 67658.

#### S. Jack Senter *v.*United States,

protest 62/10738 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass aerators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

PHILIP GRINER,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-0232 JLR-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged: 

Count 1: Structuring Currency Transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324(a)(3) and

5324(d)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: August 24, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a risk of flight because his ties to this district are unknown. He has

provided no background information.

Case 2:06-cr-00232-JLR Document 10 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) It appears that the defendant previously absconded from supervised release from

the District of Idaho during November 2003, and his whereabouts were unknown until May

2006, when he was arrested in Mexico.

(3) It appears that the defendant may have family that resides in Columbia, South

America. 

(4) There are no conditions or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00232-JLR Document 10 Filed 08/25/06 Page 2 of 2
# L_2008293EN.01S00301.xml

| 31.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
No. 66608.

#### Stephen Leeman Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/26492 (New York).

*386Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Secretary Moniz 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Jerry Woitas Uwoitas@swbell.net] 

Friday, July 12, 2013 11 :46 AM 

Secretary Moniz 

Ceiling Fan Regulations 

EX.EC -e1.0l3-001Pe2JO 

I am opposed to any ceiling fan regulation that would require motion sensors on these fans. I live in Kingsville, 

Texas and our summertime heat here in South Texas is extremely hot. I have a vaulted ceiling in my den and 

the air conditioning ducts are located in the ceiling. Heat rises so, when my air conditioner is running (which is 

almost constant with summertime temperatures running around 100 degrees and above) the cold air at the duct 

mixes with the hot air in the vaulted ceiling causing moisture to accumulate at the duct and drips water onto my 

furniture unless the ceiling fan is running at the same time as the air conditioner. If the ceiling fans could only 

run when someone is in the room, my furniture and carpet would be ruined and mold would form. 

1