alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.221 Farm Mortgages (1)  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineAll sectors; farm mortgages; asset
	FA893065603
	11.6
	12.0
	15.6
	12.1
	12.1
	15.5
	15.5
	15.7
	15.7
	1Corporate farm business; farm mortgages; liability
	FA183165605
	4.3
	4.2
	3.8
	3.6
	2.7
	4.1
	3.6
	4.0
	3.6
	2Noncorporate farm business; farm mortgages; liability
	FA233165605
	7.3
	7.8
	11.8
	8.5
	9.4
	11.5
	11.9
	11.6
	12.1
	3All sectors; farm mortgages; asset
	FA893065603
	11.6
	12.0
	15.6
	12.1
	12.1
	15.5
	15.5
	15.7
	15.7
	4Households and nonprofit organizations; farm mortgages; asset
	FA153065605
	1.3
	-4.2
	2.5
	-4.6
	-12.4
	5.4
	0.3
	0.3
	4.1
	5Nonfinancial noncorporate business; farm mortgages; asset
	FA113065603
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.1
	0.1
	0.0
	0.1
	0.0
	6Federal government; farm mortgages; asset
	FA313065605
	0.9
	0.7
	0.6
	0.7
	0.6
	0.5
	-1.2
	2.5
	0.5
	7State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; farm mortgages; asset
	FA213065603
	0.0
	0.1
	0.0
	0.1
	0.1
	0.0
	0.0
	0.1
	0.0
	8U.S.-chartered depository institutions; farm mortgages; asset (USDA)
	FA763065633
	4.6
	6.0
	4.8
	4.7
	7.0
	4.0
	6.8
	4.7
	3.7
	9Foreign banking offices in the U.S.; farm mortgages; asset
	FA753065603
	0.2
	0.0
	-0.0
	-0.0
	0.2
	-0.1
	-0.1
	-0.0
	0.1
	10Life insurance companies; farm mortgages on farm land; asset
	FA543065633
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.9
	0.2
	1.0
	0.6
	1.0
	0.9
	1.1
	11State and local government employee defined benefit retirement funds; farm mortgages; asset
	FA223065643
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	12Government-sponsored enterprises; farm mortgages; asset
	FA403065605
	4.8
	8.7
	6.5
	7.8
	15.7
	3.5
	8.5
	7.4
	6.7
	13Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; farm mortgages; asset
	FA413065605
	-0.1
	0.7
	0.2
	3.2
	-0.1
	1.4
	0.1
	-0.2
	-0.5
	14 Back to top
  **NOTES** Excludes mortgages on farm houses.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
# Official Journal L 416/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 416 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6423 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 416

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6423 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2035 of 16 November 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Alho da Graciosa’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2036 of 19 November 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard 17 (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2037 of 22 November 2021 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions from the obligations for the registration of aquaculture establishments and record-keeping of operators (
  1
  ) | 80 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2035 of 16 November 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Alho da Graciosa’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2036 of 19 November 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard 17 (
  1
  )

1

3

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2037 of 22 November 2021 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions from the obligations for the registration of aquaculture establishments and record-keeping of operators (
  1
  )

1

80

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 16

- 00438

- CV

In the ESTATE of Joseph David MARKS Sr., Deceased

From the Probate Court No

. 1, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015PC0155 Honorable Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2016

MOTION S TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED
As of this date, a clerk’s record has not been filed. On August 26, 2016, however, appell ee s
Joseph D. Marks Jr. and Jeffery Marks filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, arguing there is no
final, appealable order from which appellant can appeal

. On September 6, 2016, a ppellant Jo Ann

Marks Rivera filed a motion to dismiss this appeal
, admitting there is no final, appealable order

. Accordingly, we grant both the appellant’s and appellees’ motion s to dismiss

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of
parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

{1002985.DOC} 

ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION 

FOR DISMISSAL - 1 

C06-0378 

AUL v. Gay - order for leave (1002985).DOC 

LEE • SMART • COOK • MARTIN & PATTERSON 

P.S., Inc. • Pacific Northwest Law Offices 

1800 One Convention Place • 701 Pike Street • Seattle • WA • 98101-3929 

Tel. 206.624.7990 • Toll Free 877.624.7990 • Fax 206.624.5944 

 

Hon. Mary Alice Theiler 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MARCILLE GAY AND GORDON 

JOHNSON PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

GERALDINE JOHNSON, 

 Defendant. 

No. C06-0378-MAT 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO MOVE FOR DISMISSAL 

(PROPOSED) 

The court having fully reviewed the plaintiff’s motion for leave to move for discharge 

from further liability and participation in this action after August 9, 2006, and having fully 

reviewed the papers submitted in favor of and opposition to the motion, including the 

Declarations submitted and the Exhibits attached to them, the court finds there is good cause to 

grant American United Life permission to move for dismissal after August 9, 2006. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 

plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion for dismissal after August 9, 2006 is GRANTED. 

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 6th day of September, 2006. 

 s/ Mary Alice Theiler 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00378-MAT Document 20 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 2

American United Life Insurance Company v. Gay et al Doc. 20

Dockets.Justia.com
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

{1002985.DOC} 

ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION 

FOR DISMISSAL - 2 

C06-0378 

AUL v. Gay - order for leave (1002985).DOC 

LEE • SMART • COOK • MARTIN & PATTERSON 

P.S., Inc. • Pacific Northwest Law Offices 

1800 One Convention Place • 701 Pike Street • Seattle • WA • 98101-3929 

Tel. 206.624.7990 • Toll Free 877.624.7990 • Fax 206.624.5944 

 

Presented by: 

LEE, SMART, COOK, MARTIN & 

 PATTERSON, P.S., INC. 

By:______/s/ Michael A. Patterson_______________ 

 Michael A. Patterson, WSBA 7976 

 Rosemary J. Moore, WSBA 28650 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Lee Smart Cook Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc. 

 701 Pike Street, Suite 1800 

 Seattle, WA 98101 

 Phone: (206) 624-7990 

 Fax: (206) 624-5944 

map@leesmart.com

 rjm@leesmart.com

 

Case 2:06-cv-00378-MAT Document 20 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Westwood
Corporation Consolidated Balance Sheet (unaudited) for June 30, 1999, and the
related Consolidated Statement of Operations (unaudited) for the six months
ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      2,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,678
<PP&E>                                           4,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,256
<SALES>                                          8,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,940
<CGS>                                            7,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (47)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (533)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.077)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.077)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RAINIER INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC,

Defendant.

 NO. C06-428JLR

 AMENDED ORDER

 

This order supersedes the court’s order of April 17, 2006 (Dkt. # 4) which erroneously

stated that Defendant had removed this action from a state court. Plaintiff filed its complaint

in this court. 

The court has reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and finds that it does not establish subject

matter jurisdiction over this matter. Plaintiff must, within seven (7) days of the date of this

order, serve and file a submission providing the following information:

1. For purposes of assessing diversity jurisdiction, the court must consider the

domicile of all members of a limited liability company. Johnson v. Columbia

Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). As Defendant is a

limited liability company, Plaintiff must submit allegations that permit the court

to determine Defendant’s domicile.

2. For purposes of assessing diversity jurisdiction, a corporation’s domicile is both

the state in which it is incorporated and the location of its principal place of

business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). Plaintiffs’ complaint provides no allegation

regarding its principal place of business. It must provide that information.

Case 2:06-cv-00428-JLR Document 5 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order, the court will dismiss this action. If

Defendant has a response to Plaintiff’s submission, such response shall be filed and served

within seven (7) days of the date of the submission.

Dated this 18th day of April, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00428-JLR Document 5 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
Sun Community Bancorp Limited
Phoenix, Arizona
 
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting a part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Sun Community Bancorp Limited of our
report dated March 18, 1997 relating to the financial statements of Bank of
Tucson for the period ended December 31, 1996 which is contained in that
Prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts"
in the Prospectus.
 
                                          COTTON, PARKER, JOHNSON & CO., P.C.
 
Tucson, Arizona
April 20, 1999
December 20, 1950

No. 55029.

#### General Aniline & Film Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 160650-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby consent to incorporate by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-156493) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-148386, 333-148390, 333-149689, 333-159390 and 333-160249) of our report dated March 16, 2011 relating to the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of AgFeed Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) which appear in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December, 31 2010.
 
 Our report dated March 16, 2011, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, expressed an opinion that AgFeed Industries, Inc. had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
 /s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
 Des Moines, Iowa
 March 16, 2011
From: rcrouch44@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:33:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ray Crouch

Seattle, WA 98198
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER a/k/a

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER MARKS a/k/a

ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS a/k/a WAYNE

RUDDER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

NEIL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5282 RBL/KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY MOTION TO

DISMISS

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the

Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. # 34). 

After careful review of Plaintiff’s motion, Defendants’ response (Dkt. # 35), and Plaintiff’s reply

(Dkt. # 40), the Court finds that the motion should be denied. 

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff is an immigration detainee at the Northwest Detention Center ("NWDC"). 

Defendants are employees of the NWDC, which, under contract with the Federal Bureau of

Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("BICE"), is owned and operated by The Geo Group Inc.

Case 3:06-cv-05282-RBL Document 41 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

("GEO"). On July 5, 2006, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting claims against three BICE 

Defendants and against the seven GEO Defendants, all of whom are or were detention officers at

NWDC.

On April 6, 2007, Defendants filed their motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule

56 and noted same for May 4, 2007. Plaintiff filed this motion on April 12, 2007 (Dkt. # 34), stating

that because Defendants clearly rely on matters outside of the Complaint, the motion must be treated

as one for summary judgment and he must be allowed time for discovery. The discovery deadline in

this case was on March 30, 2007 and the dispositive motions deadline was on April 27, 2007. 

Plaintiff specifically states that he needs the ICE custody file and the GEO custody file, which

contain copies of all the grievances and kites filed by Plaintiff, as well as documents and the checks

relating to his claim of payment of monies to him for his work. (Id. at 4). 

The documents sought by Plaintiff were the subject of a motion to compel. (Dkt. # 29). By

separate Order, the Court denied that portion of Plaintiff’s motion. As to the custody files

specifically referred to above, Defendants state that all documents responsive to Plaintiff’s requests

relating to his reclassification and nonpayment claims are contained in Plaintiff’s detainee file and that

file has been provided to him. (Dkt. # 38, # 37, ¶ 2). 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to stay (Dkt. # 34) is DENIED.

DATED this 11th day of May, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05282-RBL Document 41 Filed 05/16/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the  "Partnership")  for the quarter ended  September 30,
2008 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Melanie  R.  Wenk,  Vice
President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of
the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.



/s/MELANIE R. WENK
------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

Date:    April 15, 2010