alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 95 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 95

       Designating August 16, 1997, as ``National Airborne Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 1997

Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating August 16, 1997, as ``National Airborne Day''.

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was authorized by the War Department on June 
        25, 1940, to experiment with the potential use of airborne troops;
Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was composed of 48 volunteers who began 
        training in July 1940;
Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon performed the first official Army parachute 
        jump on August 16, 1940;
Whereas the success of the Parachute Test Platoon led to the formation of a 
        large and successful airborne contingent serving from World War II until 
        the present;
Whereas the 82d Airborne Division was the first Airborne Division that was 
        organized following the successes of the Parachute Test Platoon and the 
        early airborne training program and has continued in active service 
        since its creation;
Whereas the 82d Airborne Division Association exists to continue and foster that 
        special esprit de corps among fellow paratroopers, to perpetuate the 
        memory of the 82d Airborne Division troopers who fought and died for our 
        Nation, and to further the common bond among all members of the airborne 
        community; and
Whereas the 82d Airborne Division Association, during the 52d year of existence 
        and at the 50th Annual Convention, adopted a resolution to perpetuate 
        the memory of the Parachute Test Platoon's ``Jump Into History'' on 
        August 16, 1940: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 16, 1997, as ``National Airborne 
        Day''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the Federal, State, and local administrators and 
        the people of the United States to observe the day with 
        appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

s1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

138236

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138236 COA: 288852 Wayne CC: 06-009095-01-FH MICHAEL JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
# Official Journal C 95A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.095.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 95A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5315 April 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.095.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 95A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5315 April 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 095A/01 | Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the Galileo Supervisory Authority — COM/2010/10209 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 095A/01

Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the Galileo Supervisory Authority — COM/2010/10209

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00776

- CR Christopher BUSTOS , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR13086 Honorable Christine Del Prado , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Lori Massey Brissette , Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 11, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED ; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED Following an abandonment hearing in the trial court due to a ppellant’s court

- appointed
attorney ’s failure to file a brief, on July 15, 2024, counsel filed a brief and motion to withdraw
pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies she has served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, has informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, and has explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83,04

- 23

- 00776

- CR

- 2

- 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). On July 19, 2024, appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. However, because appellant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means appellant’s pro se motion was treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id

. Accordingly, on August 8, 2024, we denied appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss

. On August 1 2 , 2024 , appellant ’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a)

.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 10.88


                             MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

This  Memorandum  of  Agreement  ("MOA")  by  and  between  B.H. Centrum a.s. (a
subsidiary  of  Ilbau and Bau Holding) ("BHC") and Century Casinos, Inc. ("CCI")
is  dated  January  7,  2000.

     PREAMBLE:

1.     HC  has developed a hotel/retail/office complex in Prague, Czech Republic
("Marriott  Hotel"  and  "MiIlennium Plaza"). The company Casino Millennium a.s.
("CM")  has  rented space in the complex from BHC for the operation of a casino.
CCI  (or its subsidiary) has entered into a casino services agreement with CM to
assist  CM  in  the management of the casino. The casino opened to the public in
July  1999.

2.     BHC  receives  10% of the casinos gross revenues as rent and CCI receives
10% of the casino's gross revenues as casino services fee. Further, BHC receives
45%  of  CM's  distributable  profit  in  exchange for certain investments (e.g.
inside  architecture  arid  design,  etc.)  and  CCI  receives  45%  of  CM's
distributable  profit  in  exchange  for  the  provision  of  gaming  equipment.

3.     Initially,  before  the  opening of the casino, it has bean the intent of
both  BHC  and  CCI  to undertake this casino project as a joint venture. Sudden
changes in local laws, however, made that impossible at that time. These changes
have been reversed in late 1999, opening the way for BHC and CCI to follow their
original  joint  venture  intent.

AGREEMENT:

1.     BHC  and  CCI  agree  to  continue  this project on a 50/50 joint venture
basis.  This shall be achieved by either forming a new joint venture company, to
be owned 50% by BHC and 50% by CCI, or by jointly acquiring the existing company
CM.  in early 2000.  The consent to sell the CM shares has already been obtained
from the current CM shareholders.  BHC and CCI represent that the attorneys have
already  been  briefed  in  this  regard  and  a  first draft of a joint venture
agreement  should  be  forthcoming  shortly.

2.     BHC  and CCI shall have equal representation on the Supervisory Board and
the Management Board of that new joint company. The joint company shall rent the
casino  space under the same terms and conditions from BHC as does CM currently;
the  joint  company  shall enter into a casino services agreement with CCI under
the  same  terms  and  conditions  as  outlined  in the existing casino services
agreement  between  CM  and  CCI.


Agreed  to  and  accepted:

     /s/  G.  Leuthmetzer__________
     ------------------------------
DipI.  Ing.  G.  Leuthmetzer
     B.  H.  Centrum


/s/  Peter  Hoetzinger__________
--------------------------------
     Peter  Hoetzinger
Century  Casinos.  Inc.

                                        1
<PAGE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT

 Plaintiff,

vs.

SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5359RBL

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

“APPEAL”

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s appeal [Dkt. #10] of Magistrate J. Kelley Arnold’s

Order directing him to amend his complaint [Dkt. #7]. Plaintiff apparently argues that the order “ignores 50

years of case law” and “is not proper.” It is not clear to what the plaintiff refers, but it is clear that his initial

complaint did not name a person as a defendant in his §1983 claim. For this and other reasons articulated in

the Order, the complaint was defective and the appeal of that order is DENIED. 

Since his appeal, Plaintiff has sought to add a named person as a defendant in an amended complaint.

[Dkt. #12]. He did so only after the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation that his

Complaint be dismissed as a sanction for failing to comply with the court’s prior Order directing him to file

an amended compliant. He instead said that he “stands by his complaint.” 

This is a familiar pattern for Mr. Scott, who repeatedly and wastefully does what he is directed to do

only after the given deadline has passed.

For that reason, the Court will delay ruling on the Report and Recommendation and Order Mr. Scott

Case 3:06-cv-05359-RBL Document 14 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

to SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING why he could not and did not timely comply with the Court’s Order [Dkt.

#7] and why the Magistrate Judge’s R&R should not be adopted and the complaint dismissed. He will do so

by December 11, 2006, or this matter will be dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated this 1st day of December, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 3:06-cv-05359-RBL Document 14 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER- [C06-5336RJB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

FREDERICK RAINER, III,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-5336RJB

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Based upon the Stipulation between the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant

shall have an extension to and including December 11, 2006, to file Defendant’s answering brief. 

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including December 26, 2006, to file

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief.

DATED this 13th day of November, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05336-RJB Document 22 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER- [C06-5336RJB]

Presented by:

s/ JOHANNA VANDERLEE WSB # 19178

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98104-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-3858

FAX: (206) 615-2531

johanna.vanderlee@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05336-RJB Document 22 Filed 11/13/06 Page 2 of 2
**Bank
                  of America N.A.**
                900
                  West Trade Street
                Suite
                  650
                NC1-026-06-01Charlotte,
                  NC 28255www.bankamerica.com


**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**


**OFFICER’S
      CERTIFICATE** ****








Re: B anc
      of
      America Commercial Mortgage Inc.


Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates


Series 2005-3








In
      connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
      behalf of Bank of America, N.A., hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
      activities for the period ending December 31, 2005 and of its performance under
      the Sub-Servicing Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
      of
      July 1, 2005 have been made under my supervision; (ii) to the best of my
      knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America has fulfilled all of its
      obligations under the agreements in all material respects throughout the
      aforementioned period; and (iii) Bank of America has received no notice
      regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any portion of the Trust
      fund as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental
      agency or body.








Bank
      of
      America, N.A.








/s/
      Sean D. Reilly


Sean
      D.
      Reilly


Principal








/s/
      H.
      Michael Lumadue


H.
      Michael Lumadue


Vice
      President
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 38

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Armed Services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 30, 1997

Mr. THURMOND from the Committee on Armed Services, reported the following original resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and

Administration

RESOLUTION

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Armed

Services.

1 Resolved, That, in carrying out its powers, duties, and

2 functions under the Standing Rules of the Senate, in ac3 cordance with its jurisdiction under rule XXV of such

4 rules, including holding hearings, and reporting such hear5 ings, and making investigations as authorized by para6 graphs 1 and 8 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of

7 the Senate, the Committee on Armed Services is author8 ized from March 1, 1997, through February 28, 1998, and

9 March 1, 1998, through February 28, 1999, in its discre10 tion: (1) To make expenditures from the contingent fund
2

SRES 38 RS

1 of the Senate, (2) to employ personnel, and (3) with the

2 prior consent of the Government department or agency

3 concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administra4 tion, to use on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis

5 the services of personnel of any such department or

6 agency.

7 SEC. 2. (a) The expenses of the committee for the

8 period March 1, 1997, through February 28, 1998, under

9 this resolution shall not exceed $2,704,397.

10 (b) For the period March 1, 1998, through February

11 28, 1999, expenses of the committee under this resolution

12 shall not exceed $2,776,389.

13 SEC. 3. The committee shall report its findings, to14 gether with such recommendations for legislation as it

15 deems advisable, to the Senate at the earliest practicable

16 date, but not later than February 28, 1997, and February

17 28, 1998, respectively.

18 SEC. 4. Expenses of the committee under this resolu19 tion shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate

20 upon vouchers approved by the chairman of the commit21 tee, except that vouchers shall not be required: (1) For
3

SRES 38 RS

1 the disbursement of salaries of employees paid at an an2 nual rate, (2) for the payment of telecommunications pro3 vided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Door4 keeper, United States Senate, (3) for the payment of sta5 tionery supplies purchased through the Keeper of the Sta6 tionery, United States Senate, (4) for payments to the

7 Postmaster, United States Senate, (5) for the payment of

8 metered charges on copying equipment provided by the Of9 fice of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper, United

10 States Senate, or (6) for the payment of Senate Recording

11 and Photographic Services.

12 SEC. 5. There are authorized such sums as may be

13 necessary for agency contributions related to the com14 pensation of employees of the committee from March 1,

15 1997, through February 28, 1998, and March 1, 1998,

16 through February 28, 1999, to be paid from the Appro17 priations account for ‘‘Expenses of Inquiries and Inves18 tigations’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------




                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2005-6;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


          Date: March 27, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<CIK>                                      0000876716
<NAME>      Smith Barney International Advisors Currency Fund L.P.

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,102,931
<SECURITIES>                                      (109,459)
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,003,596
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,003,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               51,736
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,951,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,003,596
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   (46,737)
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    60,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (106,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (106,881)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>