alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 401/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 401 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6324 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 401

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6324 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 401/01 | Commission Decision of 14 October 2020 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, France, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom into the European Union Transaction Log | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 401/01

Commission Decision of 14 October 2020 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, France, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom into the European Union Transaction Log

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 56833.

#### Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 175486-K, 175598-K, and 175166-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lead scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and that it is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ERIC M. BIRNEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5303RJB

ORDER 

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and the Honorable Karen L.

Strombom.

DATED this 21st day of August, 2006.

ARobert J Bryan

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05303-RJB Document 10 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Case 3:06-cv-05303-RJB Document 10 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALVIN LOUIS GLASS,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR06-192- JCC

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

An initial hearing on supervised release revocation in this case was scheduled before me

on September 17, 2008. The United States was represented by AUSA Patricia C. Lally and the

defendant by Lee A. Covell. The proceedings were digitally recorded.

Defendant had been sentenced on or about December 1, 2006 by the Honorable John C.

Coughenour on a charge of Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud, and sentenced to 24 months

custody, 3 years supervised release. (Dkt. 144.)

The conditions of supervised release included the standard conditions plus the requirements

that defendant participate in a drug program, abstain from alcohol, submit to search, participate

in a mental health program, pay restitution in the amount of $34,281.97, provide access to

financial information, disclose all assets and liabilities, and be prohibited from obtaining any
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -2

identification documents in any but his true legal name.

The conditions of supervision were modified on February 27, 2008 to require residence

and successful participation in a residential reentry program for up to 120 days.

In an application dated August 18, 2008 (Dkt. 188) U.S. Probation Officer Thomas J.

Fitzgerald alleged the following violation of the conditions of supervised release:

1. Consuming cocaine, a controlled substance, on or before May 28, June 26, July 7,

and August 13, 2008, all in violation of standard condition 7.

Defendant was advised in full as to the charge and as to his constitutional rights.

Defendant admitted the alleged violation and waived any evidentiary hearing as to whether

it occurred. (Dkt. 190.)

I therefore recommend the Court find defendant violated his supervised release as alleged,

and that the Court conduct a hearing limited to the issue of disposition. The next hearing will be

set before Judge Coughenour.

Pending a final determination by the Court, defendant has been released on the conditions

of supervision.

DATED this 17th day of September, 2008.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: District Judge: Honorable John C. Coughenour

AUSA: Patricia C. Lally

Defendant’s attorney: Lee A. Covell

Probation officer: Jennifer Tien, Lorraine Bolle for Thomas J. Fitzgerald
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1998

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. STEVENS, Mr.

FORD, Mr. LOTT, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. BOND, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KYL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire,

Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. THURMOND, Mr.

WARNER, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BREAUX, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HOLLINGS,

Mr. REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following article is proposed as an amendment

4 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be
2

•SJ 40 IS

1 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu2 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of

3 the several States within 7 years after the date of its sub4 mission for ratification:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE—

6 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys7 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 11
                             THERMOTREX CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                            Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                         ------------------------    ------------------------
                            June 28,      June 29,      June 28,     June 29,
                                1997          1996          1997         1996
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of Primary
     Earnings per Share:

   Net Income (a)       $   285,000    $ 1,071,000   $ 3,236,000  $17,346,000
                        -----------    -----------   -----------  -----------

   Shares:
     Weighted average
       shares outstanding 19,221,684    19,089,459    19,201,774   19,060,087

     Add: Shares issuable
          from assumed
          exercise of
          options (as
          determined by
          the application
          of the treasury
          stock method)           -        630,765             -      621,998
                        -----------    -----------   -----------  -----------
     Weighted average
       shares outstanding,
       as adjusted (b)   19,221,684     19,720,224    19,201,774   19,682,085
                        -----------    -----------   -----------  -----------
   Primary Earnings per
     Share (a) / (b)    $       .01    $       .05   $       .17  $       .88
                        ===========    ===========   ===========  ===========
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 18/2006

of 6 January 2006         

amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of countries and territories

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC (1), and in particular Articles 10 and 21 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 January 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 146, 13.6.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2005 (OJ L 194, 26.7.2005, p. 4).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX II

LIST OF COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES

PART A

PART B

Section 1

Section 2

PART C

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of J.A.M., a child, * From the 318th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. FM57813.

No. 11-15-00096-CV * June 18, 2015

 * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered the unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal as 

moot, which was filed by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas, and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with 

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALVIN STEVE PENN,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5082M

MINUTE ORDER 

 OF REFERENCE FOR 

 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold, United

States Chief Magistrate Judge: 

This matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom for the purpose of conducting

a settlement conference. Counsel are directed to contact Traci Whiteley, in-court deputy for Judge

Strombom, at 253-882-3827 to schedule the settlement conference. 

The foregoing Minute Order entered by /s/ Allyson P. Swan , Judicial Assistant,

this September 8, 2006. 

Case 3:06-mj-05082-JKA Document 12 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 1
Before The First Division,

October 16, 1959

No. 63443.

protests 58/8578, etc. (New York).

#### George Borgfeldt Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of miniature metal figures, such as dogs, horses, and other animals, carts, wheelbarrows, and men, women, and boys, shown as handling different tools and *372objects and engaged in different enterprises, tbe same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of *United States*v. *F. W. Woolworth Co.*(28 C.C.P.A. 196, C.A.D. 145) and that the items in question are composed in chief value of lead or zinc, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer. On the agreed facts and following the cited decision, certain of the articles in question were held properly classified under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified, for articles, not specially provided for, composed in chief value of lead, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, dutiable as follows: (1) Those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, between January 1, 1948, and June 6, 1951, at 2 cents per pound, but not less than 15 percent nor more than 45 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802) ; (2) those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, subsequent to June 6,1951, at 2 cents per pound, but not less than 15 percent nor more than 30 percent ad valorem, under said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52820) ; and (3) those entered, or withdrawn for consumption, on and after September 10, 1955, at 1% cents per pound, but not less than 11% nor more than 22% percent ad valorem, under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877). The items stipulated to be in chief value of zinc were held dutiable as follows: (1) Those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, prior to July 1, 1956, at 22% percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802; (2) those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on and after June 80,1956, and prior to June 30, 1957, at 21 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108) ; and (3) those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on and after June 30, 1957, at 20 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00247- CV

In t he M at te r of M . A . L.

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. J-21 ,897 , HO NORAB LE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
The district cour

t found beyond a re asonable doubt that M.A.L . committed criminal trespass a nd adjudicate d him delinquent. The cour t committed him t o the Texas Youth Commi ssion for a n indeterminate period.

M.A.L . stipulated at trial that he intentionally and knowing ly

entered the pre mises of L anier Hig h School with notice that such entry was forb i d d en an d without the permission of a
sc ho ol empl oy ee, who is the ow ne r o f t he sc ho ol f

or thi s p ur po se . B y his so le iss ue on

a pp e a l, M
. A.L . contends that the district c ourt lacke d jurisdiction over him beca use he should have been tried under a more specific statute with a less sever e punishment rang e. Com pa reTex. Educ. Code Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996) (tre spass on school g rounds, C lass C misdemeanor), with Tex. P en. Code Ann. § 30.05 (West 2004-05) ( trespass, Class B misdemeanor)
. He argues t hat bec ause the lesser offe nse is a Class C misdemeanor and is not within the definition of delinquent conduct, the district court lac ked jurisdiction. See Te x. F am. Cod e Ann. § 51. 03 (a ) (We st Supp . 2 00 4- 05 ); se e als o T e x. Const. art. V, § 19 (justice c ourt has orig inal jurisdiction over off enses punishable by

fine only ).2 This Court has rec ently conclude d in a similar juvenile ca se that these statutes are not in p ar i m ate ria , that the State could cha rg e the juvenile under either st atute, and that the district court had jurisdiction over the alleg ation of cr iminal trespass ag ainst the juvenile. See In re J .M.R. , 149 S.W. 3d 28 9, 29 4- 95 (T e x. Ap p. —Aus tin 20 04 , n o p e t.) ; see also In re K.M. , No. 03-04-00315- CV, 2005 Tex. App. L EXI S 4661, at *2 (Austin J une 17, 2005, no pet. h.). This appeal is controlled by that de c isi on . We a ff

ir m th e jud g me nt o f t

he dis tr ic t c ourt .

David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Jul y

13, 2005
# C_2020061EN.01004901.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/49

---

Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)

(Case T-851/19)

(2020/C 61/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Labesius, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Sakkari (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SAKKATTACK in the colours black, red, yellow, white and grey – Application for registration No 16 603 557

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 in Case R 2560/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the joinder of the present case with case T-788/19; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the joinder of the present case with case T-788/19;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51245

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ANTONIO VELASQUEZ-SUAREZ, also known as Jose Suarez, also

known as Juan Gabriel, also known as Juan Gabriel Martinez, also known as

Jose Cruz Velasquez, also known as Gabriel Martinez, also known as Joe

Antonio Velasquez-Suarez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-301-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Antonio Velasquez-Suarez

(Velasquez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Velasquez has filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-51245 Document: 00512347677 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-51245

as Velasquez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-51245 Document: 00512347677 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 56

Designating March 25, 1997 as ‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day

of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. SANTORUM, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

GRASSLEY, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. ROTH, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

COCHRAN, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. GREGG, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. JEFFORDS,

Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. KOHL, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

BIDEN, Mr. ROBB, Mr. REID, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. KERRY, Ms.

MIKULSKI, Mr. REED, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr.

WYDEN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BYRD, Mr. SARBANES,

Mr. DODD, and Mr. TORRICELLI) submitted the following resolution,

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating March 25, 1997 as ‘‘Greek Independence Day:

A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American

Democracy’’.

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the supreme power to govern was invested

in the people;
2

SRES 56 IS

Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States of America drew heavily upon the political experience and philosophy of ancient Greece in forming our representative democracy;

Whereas the founders of the modern Greek state modeled

their government after that of the United States in an

effort to best imitate their ancient democracy;

Whereas Greece is one of the only three nations in the world,

beyond the former British Empire, that has been allied

with the United States in every major international conflict this century;

Whereas the heroism displayed in the historic World War II

Battle of Crete epitomized Greece’s sacrifice for freedom

and democracy as it presented the Axis land war with its

first major setback and set off a chain of events which

significantly affected the outcome of World War II.

Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond between our two nations and their peoples;

Whereas March 25, 1997 marks the 176th anniversary of the

beginning of the revolution which freed the Greek people

from the Ottoman Empire; and

Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate with the

Greek people, and to reaffirm the democratic principles

from which our two great nations were born: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That March 25, 1997 is designated as ‘‘Greek

2 Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of

3 Greek and American Democracy.’’ The President is re4 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people
3

SRES 56 IS

1 of the United States to observe the day with appropriate

2 ceremonies and activities.

Æ