alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 103

Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to cultural education and

awareness of the history of slavery in America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. PAYNE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to cultural

education and awareness of the history of slavery in America.

Whereas during the period beginning in the late 15th century

and continuing through the 19th century, millions of persons of African origin were enslaved and brought to the

Western Hemisphere;

Whereas the enslavement of Africans and their descendants

deprived them of the opportunity to preserve many of

their social, religious, political, and other customs;

Whereas the discrimination and oppression of African Americans continued after the abolishment of slavery because

of the legalization of second-class citizenship status for

African Americans through Jim Crow laws, segregation,

and other practices; and
2

•HCON 103 IH

Whereas despite these events and continued discrimination

today, African Americans have made significant contributions to the development of this country: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of Congress that the history

4 of the African slave trade, slavery in America, and

5 the depth of the impact of slavery on our society has

6 been immense; and

7 (2) Congress calls on States to explore the es8 tablishment of a commission or committee to encour9 age and promote the implementation of education

10 and awareness programs concerned with slavery in

11 America, and the contributions of African Americans

12 in building our country.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM GARY FUGITT,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5896RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 (X) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( X ) Nature and extent of Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 May 15, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05896-RBL Document 9 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                       429
<INVENTORY>                                      2,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,482
<PP&E>                                          11,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,129
<BONDS>                                          2,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,521
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,209
<OTHER-SE>                                    (112,099)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,067
<SALES>                                         11,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,719
<CGS>                                            6,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (227)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.38)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

AL NERIO et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5340RJB

ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS

FILED WHILE THIS ACTION

WAS STAYED

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR

3, and MJR 4. On March 13, 2007, this action was stayed (Dkt # 112). On March 15, 2007, plaintiff

filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. # 114).

The motion was filed at a time when the action was stayed and the motion violates the case

management order in this case (Dkt. # 6, ¶ 10). The motion will not be considered by the court. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants and

remove Docket 114 from the court’s calendar.

DATED this 20, day of April, 2007.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 127 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: November 28, 2017

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

LINDA BAKER, as the court-appointed *

guardian and conservator for *

JAMES BAKER, *

*

Petitioner, * No. 17-1085V

*

v. * Special Master Gowen

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Dismissal; Order Concluding Proceedings

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Under Vaccine Rule 21(a); Influenza (“Flu”)

* Vaccination; Prurigo Nodularis.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mark Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner.

Daniel Principato, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On August 9, 2017, Linda Baker (“petitioner”), as the court-appointed guardian and 

conservator for James Baker, filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury 

Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination 

received on October 16, 2014, James Baker developed prurigo nodularis. Petition (ECF No. 1).

On November 22, 2017, petitioner filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Vaccine Rule 

21(a). Notice (ECF No. 10). 

 

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this order concluding 

proceedings contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the

United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at 

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the order is posted on the court’s website, each party has 

14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret

or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or

similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule

18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither 

party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the order will be posted on the court’s website without any 

changes. Id.

2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq.

(hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the 

Act.
2

I. DISCUSSION

Under Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(A), petitioner may voluntarily dismiss the petition without 

order of the special master or the court by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service 

of respondent’s report.

Under Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the result of this voluntary dismissal is an Order 

Concluding Proceedings. No judgment will enter pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11, for purposes of 

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a).

II. CONCLUSION

This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed 

that judgment shall not enter, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a). The Clerk of the Court is 

directed to remove this case from my docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas L. Gowen 

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master
No. 69355.

#### Louis Marx & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/5696 and 59/16031 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 23.1



LOGO

April 27, 2012

Focus Media Holding Limited

Unit No. 1, 20thFloor

The Centrium

60 Wyndham Street

Central, Hong Kong

Dear Sirs,

Re: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2011 of Focus Media Holding Limited (Annual Report)

We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the headings Information on the CompanyBusiness
OverviewRegulatory Matters and Organizational Structure in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of Focus Media Holding Limited to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about April 27th, 2012.

Yours faithfully,



LOGO

Global Law Office
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, William Y. Tauscher, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2007 |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                         |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 10

David Dreisinger 
5233 Bentley Crescent 
Delta, B.C., Canada V4K4K2 e-mail address:
     ddreisinger@bajamining.comPhone (business hrs):
     (604) 613-4434
   CONSENT OF AUTHOR **** TO:
     United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)
  I, David Dreisinger, Ph.D., P.Eng., Member and Fellow CIM, Member TMS-AIME, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Technical Report Update,of the Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated March 2, 2010 (the Technical Report) and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Annual Report on Form 40-F for Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) and to the use of my name therein. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites. Dated this 29thday of March, 2010  /s/David DreisingerDavid Dreisinger, Ph.D., P.Eng.


---
No. 67218.

protest 59/20316 (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the corrected invoice, designated as exhibit 1, reflects that the proper value for the merchandise upon which duties should be assessed is $490.48, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I , William Y. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Act), that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                    |  |  |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 190

 To express the sense of the Senate regarding reductions in class size.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1998

 Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of the Senate regarding reductions in class size.

Whereas long-range projections by the Bureau of the Census indicate a rising 
        number of births, rising to 4,200,000 in 2010 and 4,600,000 in 2020;
Whereas in the coming years the population of school-aged children is expected 
        to increase to a record 52,200,000;
Whereas academic achievement for all students is one of our Nation's highest 
        priorities;
Whereas increased enrollments have resulted in a further increase of the average 
        class size;
Whereas research has shown that children in small classes in the earliest grades 
        achieve better academically than the peers of such children in larger 
        classes;
Whereas research has shown substantial lasting benefits for children who were in 
        small classes during the earliest grades;
Whereas smaller classes allow students to receive more individual attention from 
        their teachers, and reduce teachers' burden of managing large numbers of 
        students and the other work of the teachers; and
Whereas several States have been forward thinking in trying to address this 
        classroom size problem: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) experiments in reducing class size have had an effect 
        on academic achievement in the earliest grades; and
            (2) the Senate should seek to assist States in the efforts 
        of States to reduce class size and access the benefits of such 
        a reduction.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,644,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,947,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,123,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,649,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     298,902,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              41,557,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             451,896,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       80,579,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 167,741,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               451,896,000
<SALES>                                     35,536,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            99,863,000
<CGS>                                       26,302,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,015,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,125,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,627,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,096,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,058,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,038,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                534,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,504,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>