alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22639]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-090]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed October 2, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through October 6, 2023 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230134, Final, NRCS, CA, ADOPTION--Upper Llagas Creek Flood 
Protection Project, Review Period Ends: 11/13/2023, Contact: Ernesto De 
La Riva 530-792-5680. The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 
has adopted the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Final EIS No. 20180300 
filed 11/28/2018 with the Environmental Protection Agency. The NRCS was 
not a cooperating agency on this project. Therefore, republication of 
the document is necessary under Section 1506.3(b)(1) of the CEQ 
regulations.
EIS No. 20230135, Final, TxDOT, TX, US 380 McKinney, Contact: Doug 
Booher 512-416-2663. Under 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), TxDOT has issued a 
single document that consists of a final environmental impact statement 
and record of decision. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under 
NEPA does not apply to this action.
EIS No. 20230136, Final, TxDOT, TX, Loop 9 Segment A, Contact: Doug 
Booher 512-416-2663. Under 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), TxDOT has issued a 
single document that consists of a final environmental impact statement 
and record of decision. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under 
NEPA does not apply to this action.
EIS No. 20230137, Final Supplement, FERC, AL, Coosa River Hydroelectric 
Project, Review Period Ends: 11/13/2023, Contact: Office of External 
Affairs 866-208-3372.

    Dated: October 10, 2023.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-22639 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the Comptroller General of the United States (the Sponsors) have agreed to continue an advisory committee to consider and recommend accounting standards and principles for the federal government. The advisory committee is called the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB). Copies of the charter can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.

Notice is also hereby given that the Sponsors intend to charter FASAB's subcommittee, called the Appointments Panel. The Appointments Panel's mission is to assist in the selection, appointment, and monitoring of special government employee members of FASAB. The Panel assists the Sponsors by recruiting and recommending individuals for appointment or reappointment of special government employee members. The panel also assists the Sponsors and FASAB in evaluating and monitoring adherence to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) criteria for an entity designated as a source for generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Sponsors affirm that the Appointments Panel is essential to the conduct of the agencies' business, is in the public interest, and the functions cannot be performed by other means.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

*Authority:*31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014).                    

Dated: October 5, 2023.

Monica R. Valentine,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-22515 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.229 Proprietors Equity in Noncorporate Business  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineHouseholds and nonprofit organizations; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FA152090205
	167.3
	231.5
	89.9
	181.6
	28.0
	51.5
	39.2
	82.3
	40.5
	89.5
	116.4
	1Nonfinancial noncorporate business; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business (net worth)
	FA112090205
	166.4
	234.4
	83.2
	186.8
	25.9
	49.2
	41.2
	58.1
	52.2
	97.4
	119.6
	2Security brokers and dealers; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FA662090205
	0.9
	-2.9
	6.7
	-5.2
	2.0
	2.3
	-2.0
	24.2
	-11.7
	-7.9
	-3.2
	3 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix CORONA-MANSANO, also known as Rogelio Corona-Mansano, also known as Rojillio Monsano-Diego, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51400.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Felix Corona-Mansano raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen VintzStephen VintzChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Southern Plains Lane, OK

Printable Version E-mail this page

Enter Keywords

This site only

Advanced Search

Programs and Projects

You are here: Research /

Research Project: Suitable Watermelon Varieties, Weed

Management, and Soil Condition Improvement in Organic

Production Systems

Location: Lane, OK

2005 Annual Report

4d.Progress report.

A Non-funded Cooperative Agreement was established

under the supervision of ARS scientists Dr. Charles

Webber and Dr. Angela Davis, in cooperation with organic

producers Joe and Vickie Townsend. Additional details of

research can be found in the report for the parent CRIS

6222-21220-001-00D, Production Systems Affecting Yield

and Quality of Vegetable Crops. The objective of this

project was to investigate the two foremost concerns of

organic producers, i.e., suitable organic varieties and

weed management. Research was initiated to investigate

the suitability of watermelon varieties within a weed

management system using rye and legume cover crops,

and appropriate organically certified inputs. Transplants

of six varieties, including diploids, triploids, and heirloom,

of watermelons were produced using organic procedures

and materials. The cereal and legume cover crops were

flail mowed prior to transplanting watermelon seedlings

into the mulch. No-till methods for production were used.

Data on weeds, disease, and insect occurrence and

populations were collected for analysis.

Project Team

Russo, Vincent

Webber, Charles - Chuck

Zibilske, Larry

Davis, Angela

Project Annual Reports

FY 2005

Related National Programs

Crop Production (305)

Last Modified: 09/29/2006

ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links

FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | FirstGov | White House

ARS Project: Suitable Watermelon Varieties, Weed Management, and Soil Condition ... Page 1 of 1

file://Z:\upload\tuesday\lps116066\projects=2005.htm 3/17/2011
Exhibit 18

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, Timothy Ross, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of El Boleo Copper-Cobalt Project dated January 31, 2007, (the Technical Report), and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) Timothy Ross                                                
| |     | Name: Timothy Ross, PE, SME Registered Member Agapito Associates Inc.
| |     | Location: Grand Junction, Colorado
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, DavidP. Southwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  September 12, 2006 |                      |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | /s/ DAVID P. SOUTHWELL    |   |
|                      | David P. Southwell        |
|                      | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 78

To designate April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate and Eliminate

Racism Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 24, 1997

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. WARNER, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. GORTON, Mr. ABRAHAM, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. REID, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. DODD, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. GRAMM,

Mr. KERRY, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr. MOYNIHAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate

and Eliminate Racism Day’’.

Whereas the term ‘‘hate crime’’ means an offense in which

one or more individuals, commits an offense (such as an

assault or battery (simple or aggravated), theft, criminal

trespass, damage to property, mob action, disorderly conduct, or telephone harassment) by reason of the race,

color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation,

physical or mental disability, or national origin of another

individual or group of individuals;
2

•SRES 78 IS

Whereas there are almost 8,000 hate crimes reported to the

Department of Justice each year, and the number of hate

crimes reported increases each year;

Whereas hate crimes have no place in a civilized society that

is dedicated to freedom and independence, as is the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States must lead and set

the example for the world in protecting the rights of all

people;

Whereas the people of the United States should take personal

responsibility for and action against hatred and hate

crimes;

Whereas the Members of Congress, as representatives of the

people of the United States, must take personal responsibility for and action against hatred and hate crimes;

Whereas the laws against hate crimes, which have been

passed by Congress and signed by the President, must be

supported and implemented by the people of the United

States and by Federal, State, and local law enforcement

officials and other public servants: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National

3 Erase the Hate and Eliminate Racism Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 and throughout the world to recognize the impor7 tance of using each day as an opportunity to take
3

•SRES 78 IS

1 a stand against hate crimes and violence in their na2 tions, states, neighborhoods, and communities.

Æ
# C_2014455EN.01000801.xml

| 18.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/8

---

Special Report No 21/2014 ‘EU-funded airport infrastructures: poor value for money’

(2014/C 455/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 21/2014 ‘EU-funded airport infrastructures: poor value for money’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TONY D. PENWELL, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-2106-TSZ-MJB

)

v. )

) ORDER

REED HOLTGEERTS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________)

(1) The Court ADOPTS the R&R, docket no. 97, with the following

modifications to clarify the Court’s ruling:

(a) Plaintiff has failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding the facts

as outlined in the Declaration of Brian O’Farrell, the Department of Adult and Juvenile

Detention Programs and Classifications Supervisor for the Regional Justice Center in Kent,

Washington. Mr. O’Farrell’s Declaration supports the Defendants’ need to place Mr.

Penwell in Administrative Segregation to enforce Court Orders restricting Mr. Penwell’s

telephone use, and the Defendants’ need to provide each inmate held in Administrative

Segregation with the same programs and time out of their cells as all other inmates held in

Administrative Segregation. O’Farrell Decl., docket no. 82, ¶¶ 5-9, 11, 15. Mr. O’Farrell

states, in particular, that “[f]or staff and security reasons, inmates placed in Administrative

Segregation cannot be given the same programs and privileges provided to those in the

general population.” Id. ¶ 15.

(b) Plaintiff has failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact that he has

suffered an “atypical and significant hardship . . . in relation to the ordinary incidents of

prison life” as a result of his post-conviction confinement in Administrative Segregation. 

Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995).

Case 2:05-cv-02106-TSZ Document 101 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

PAGE - 2

(2) The Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, docket 

no. 81.

(3) The Court DISMISSES with prejudice the complaint and this action.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel of

record, and to Judge Benton.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25th day of July, 2007.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02106-TSZ Document 101 Filed 07/25/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 51487.

#### Protests 127661-K, etc., of F. Schumacher & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 51799.

#### Merrill, Clark & Meinig, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 622312-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as-the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Below please find additional interagency comments under EOs 12866 and 13563 regarding the 

2013 Methyl Bromide CUE proposed rule. Please let me know if these proposed edits are 

acceptable or if you have any questions. 

If a discussion is necessary and EPA is available today, we are also available today. Otherwise, 

Monday is likely the next opportunity to have a discussion given the Holiday. 

The commenter suggests the following insertion into page 38 of the draft rule:

Finally, EPA also requests comment on and relevant data to support other potential mechanisms within 

the Montreal Protocol, the Clean Air Act, or other statutory authorities that the EPA could use to 

respond to unforeseen events such as an emergency pest outbreak when there are no remaining US 

stocks of MeBr or available alternatives, such as iodomethane or sulfuryl fluoride. For example, the 

Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer envision cases 

EO 12866/13563 review -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2013 Critical Use 

Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Frey, Nathan J. 

to:

Drusilla Hufford, David Donaldson, Jeremy Arling

11/21/2012 10:46 AM

Cc:

"Lee, Amanda I.", JohnB Chamberlin

Hide Details 

From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

To: Drusilla Hufford/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, David Donaldson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Jeremy Arling/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>, JohnB 

Chamberlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded.

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1144.htm 12/5/2012
when emergency uses of MeBr may be necessary, while still achieving the environmental objectives of 

the program (see for example RIN: 2060-AL94 at 

http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=200910&RIN=2060-AL94). 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1144.htm 12/5/2012