alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Ronald Lacy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:12:37 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Ronald Lacy
Kearney, Nebraska
# Official Journal C 348/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 348 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6430 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 348

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6430 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 348/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10425 — BCP Dornoch Parent/DexKo) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 348/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10425 — BCP Dornoch Parent/DexKo) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 348/02 | Euro exchange rates — 27 August 2021 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 348/02

Euro exchange rates — 27 August 2021

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 348/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10244 — Vodafone Group/Safaricom/Sumitomo/Ethiopia JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2021/C 348/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10414 — Apollo Management/AS Graanul) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2021/C 348/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10405 — Alba/Swire/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2021/C 348/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10358 — Advent International/Eurazeo/Planet Group) (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 348/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10244 — Vodafone Group/Safaricom/Sumitomo/Ethiopia JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2021/C 348/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10414 — Apollo Management/AS Graanul) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2021/C 348/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10405 — Alba/Swire/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2021/C 348/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10358 — Advent International/Eurazeo/Planet Group) (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 219/3 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 219 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 583 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 219

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 583 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 219/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 219/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 219/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 219/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 219/03 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38132 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) — Additional PSO compensation for Arfea — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 219/03

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.38132 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) — Additional PSO compensation for Arfea — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
From: rebuilder777@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:30:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Tuinstra

Dorr, MI 49323
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 3 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE L. SCHWEITZER,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 97-4053

v. D. Utah DANIEL S. SCHWEITZER; HAZEL E. WUNDROW HANNEMAN SCHWEITZER,

Defendants - Appellees. (D.C. No. 96-CV-850-S)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , HENRY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Plaintiff and appellant George L. Schweitzer, appea ring pro se, appeals the dismissal of his First Amended Complaint for failur e to state a claim, for failure to show entitlement to relief, and for failure to p lead facts necessary to permit defendant and appellee Daniel S. Schweitzer to resp ond. We conclude that, for substantially the reasons set forth in the districtcourt’s order, entered on March 28, 1997, the district court correctly dismissed th is action. Daniel Schweitzer seeks an award of attorney’s fees and costs incurred on appeal, on the ground that the appeal is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38. An appeal is considered frivolous when “the result is obvious, or the appellant’s arguments are wholly without merit.” Braley v. Campbell , 832 F.2d 1504, 1510 (10th Cir. 1987) (en banc). This appeal is frivolo us. Accordingly, appellant George Schweitzer is ordered to show cause within 1 5 days why attorney’s fees and costs should not be assessed against him. See Doyle v. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n , 998 F.2d 1559, 1571 (10th Cir. 1993). The appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue f orthwith.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
No. P66/87.

protests 59/24912, etc. (New York).

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LAWRENCE HILDES, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,

Defendant.

No. C06-707

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

The parties have not complied with the order directing that a joint status report be filed by

July 31, 2006. The time for filing the report is hereby extended to ten days from the date of this

order. If the report is not filed by that time, sanctions may be ordered. Sanctions may include

dismissal of the action without prejudice.

Filed this 7th day of August, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By: /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00707-MJP Document 4 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 1
July 26, 1954

No. 58306.

Suit 4771.

#### United States *v.*Pacific Overseas Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co.

C. D. 1496 affirmed April 9, 1954. C. A. D. 559.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 141

Celebrating One America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. MCDERMOTT,

Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr. DOYLE, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr.

CUMMINGS, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. FROST, Mr. RAHALL,

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr.

CONYERS, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. WU, Mr. CARDIN, Mr.

WEXLER, and Mr. HALL of Ohio) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating One America.

Whereas the United States is a nation of immigrants, whose

270,000,000 inhabitants hail from every corner of the

globe;

Whereas from Ellis Island to the Pacific coast, the United

States has welcomed immigrants seeking freedom and opportunity;

Whereas the United States democratic system of government

mandates equal protection under the law and the right to

life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all its citizens;
2

•HCON 141 IH

Whereas the United States endured a civil war for emancipation, and in doing so, formed a permanent union and

a society of equals;

Whereas the United States has outlawed racial, ethnic, and

religious bigotry to create the world’s greatest multicultural society;

Whereas the United States respects the individual and welcomes each one’s participation in our democratic society;

Whereas the United States is the preeminent land of opportunity which rewards hard work, ingenuity, and perseverance;

Whereas the ethnic diversity of the United States has provided an abundance of energy, creativity, and prosperity;

Whereas people in the United States recognize and reward

the contributions of members from every group;

Whereas people in the United States are working to close opportunity gaps so that all may share in the great prosperity of our Nation;

Whereas people in the United States of all backgrounds have

sacrificed their lives in war to defend the cause of freedom for people around the world; and

Whereas people in the United States of African, Asian, European, Latin American, Middle Eastern, and Native American backgrounds cherish and celebrate their various national, ethnic, and religious heritages: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that all

3 people in the United States should reach out across our
3

•HCON 141 IH

1 differences in ethnicity, race, and religion to respect each

2 other and to celebrate, in friendship and unity, one Amer3 ica.

Æ
Case 3:05-cr-05868-MJB Document 8 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 302/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6522 November 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 302

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6522 November 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No. 10 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility [2022/2263] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No. 10 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility [2022/2263]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.129 Security Brokers and Dealers** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 1 – 

3:06-cv-05367-RBL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

THE HONORABLE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

PACTOOL INTERNATIONAL LTD., a 

Washington Corporation 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DEWALT INDUSTRIAL TOOL CO., a 

Maryland corporation, and KETT TOOL 

COMPANY INC., an Ohio corporation 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-05367-BHS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND THE DATE FOR 

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT 

TESTIMONY 

Plaintiff PacTool International, Inc. (“PacTool”) and Defendant Kett Tool Company Inc. 

(“Kett”) file this joint stipulation to request the Court to extend the date for Disclosure of Expert 

Testimony Under FRCP 26(a)(2) from January 4, 2008 to February 8, 2008. The parties 

conferred and concluded that additional time is necessary to prepare expert reports. The trial date 

and other pretrial dates do not have to be changed to accommodate this extension. 

Case 3:06-cv-05367-BHS Document 34 Filed 12/28/07 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) -2- 

3:06-cv-05367-RBL 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

U.S. BANK BUILDING CENTRE

1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3400

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

PHONE: (206) 903-8800 

FAX: (206) 903-8820

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 DATED this 28th day of December, 2007. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

 /s/ Brett J. Schlameus 

Paul T. Meiklejohn, WSBA No. 17477 

Edward W. Bulchis, WSBA No. 5558 

Brett J. Schlameus, WSBA No. 37012 

U.S. Bank Centre 

1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 

Seattle, WA 98101-4010 

Telephone: (206) 903-8800 

Facsimile: (206) 903-8820 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP 

 /s/ Gregory F. Ahrens 

Gregory F. Ahrens, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

John Paul Davis, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

2700 Carew Tower 

Cincinnati, OH 45202 

Telephone: (513) 241-2324 (ext. 202) 

Facsimile: (513) 421-7269 

BERESFORD BOOTH PLLC

 /s/ Paul Richard Brown 

Paul Richard Brown, WSBA No. 19357 

145 Third Avenue S., Suite 200 

Edmonds, WA 98020 

Telephone: (425) 776-4100 

Facsimile: (425) 776-1700 

Attorneys For Defendant 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, the Court hereby extends the date for the disclosure 

of expert testimony from January 4, 2008 to February 8, 2008. 

 DATED this 28th day of December, 2007. 

 A 

BENJAMIN H.SETTLE 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05367-BHS Document 34 Filed 12/28/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenville Federal Financial
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: September 25, 2008
    /s/ David M. KeplerDavid M. KeplerPresident and Chief Executive Officer