alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF TNE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bon. Charln~ R. Vmtln 

Caunt7 Auaitat 

RaBarrimn count7 

Uantmll, Tom 
ROIL charlo. 11. E.rtln, P.g. 8 

officers 8hal.l reonivo l .Id r.larf In lieu 

of .ll other fee., ooani~ion8 01 oompc~atIon rhloh they would oth.rwI.o be l th o r lr ed 

ta ntdn; provided. hover. that the l 8a e88or 

.nU .ol;lr:ator a? t8xes ehall oontinue to aolIeat and retain for the banerlt of the core’ 

Ealary l%nd or f unde bereina~re&ed 

1 fro8 end oo~r~llfislonn whi h h 

dsr law to oollbatt l ml 1 

oivI1 ease8 by tha 6trte but all suoh so8tr 80 

pald 8h.11 ba .ooounted ior by tha ot?iosre 

oolleatln& the .~ae, .s the7 .r8 xwqulmd under 

the 

ecmel 

rovI8lo~ of thI8 Aot to 8ooount tar toss, 

8eIon8 

partiM." 

and oorto .f3l&.tsb fraz prirats 

(uaaor.eorin(l our.) 

Tin uQderl7ing purp0.e o$ the offIosr.' &lAr7 

bw, Artiole 39160, .qme, I. that the foe. and eosmd..Ion., 

othenI.a m.alv.blo by the oeuat 

into and nab up the OS?Io.r.' 8. Ia 

offioen, rhould b8 p.id 

zy FuaQ. Fhl. f.wh.wn 

by S.otIon S, above quated, and by Ssotion S thortot, whloh 

prwiU1~8 In pert 88 foll0~~8: 

*Sea. S. Xt ahall be the dut7 oi all 

offlaors to ohnrge and aollwt In the maaner 

l uth o r laby o d lea+ all i.e. .nd .omaI..Ion. 

rNoh .r8 petitted by law fo bo assassed md 

oolleoted tar all 0rfioiiii ranice pm0n8ea 

by them. As aaU when euoh fee8 alo eoll.etad they .hell br Qspo.Itod In the Offleer.’ 

Wary Fund, or fund. proviaetl In thla A.&..* 

Aooord1ngly, you are ~sptruuy advleed that the 

oounty ahaul pay to the aoe~eor-oolleotor the fore otherWl8e r@osIvahlrI by hh frm the OOUnty, whsreupon the ..8e88oroolleetor should ileposlt 88~0 in the Offloors* 6alkry Fun4 

In the 8.m. manner a. f.s. naeived h7 him frtnu the Stete. 
Hon. Clmrloe R, Xartln, Page S 

W8 trust this l mrere your Inquiry eatlafaotorily and we ronala, 

Verytruly 7oura 

ATTmmY f3mlaAs OF TEXAS 

m 

ATTORNEY GEhXRAL OB TEXAS 

APPROYED 

0WNt0~ 0 COMM~TTEL 

..$$gg
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stacie K. Yamane, the Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

Date: March 29, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 122 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.122
                                     Agreed to November 19, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Mounted Guard was assigned to the Immigration Service under 
  the Department of Commerce and Labor from 1904 to 1924;

Whereas the founding members of this Mounted Guard included Texas 
  Rangers, sheriffs, and deputized cowboys who patrolled the Texas 
  frontier looking for smugglers, rustlers, and people illegally 
  entering the United States;

Whereas following the Department of Labor Appropriation Act of May 28, 
  1924, the Border Patrol was established within the Bureau of 
  Immigration, with an initial force of 450 Patrol Inspectors, a yearly 
  budget of $1 million, and $1,300 yearly pay for each Patrol 
  Inspector, with each patrolman furnishing his own horse;

Whereas changes regarding illegal immigration and increases of 
  contraband alcohol traffic brought about the need for this young 
  patrol force to have formal training in border enforcement;

Whereas during the Border Patrol's 75-year history, Border Patrol 
  Agents have been deputized as United States Marshals on numerous 
  occasions;

Whereas the Border Patrol's highly trained and motivated personnel have 
  also assisted in controlling civil disturbances, performing National 
  security details, aided in foreign training and assessments, and 
  responded with security and humanitarian assistance in the aftermath 
  of numerous natural disasters;

Whereas the present force of over 8,000 agents, located in 146 stations 
  under 21 sectors, is responsible for protecting more than 8,000 miles 
  of international land and water boundaries;

Whereas, with the increase in drug-smuggling operations, the Border 
  Patrol has also been assigned additional interdiction duties, and is 
  the primary agency responsible for drug interdiction between ports-
  of-entry;

Whereas Border Patrol agents have a dual role of protecting the borders 
  and enforcing immigration laws in a fair and humane manner; and

Whereas the Border Patrol has a historic mission of firm commitment to 
  the enforcement of immigration laws, but also one fraught with 
  danger, as illustrated by the fact that 86 agents and pilots have 
  lost their lives in the line of duty--6 in 1998 alone: Now, 
  therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes the historical significance of the United 
States Border Patrol's founding and its 75 years of service to our 
great Nation.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

        CONSENT OF RICHARD A. EISNER & COMPANY, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   
         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-59187 on Form S-3 of Integrated Process Equipment
Corp. (the "Company") of our report dated August 18, 1995, on our audit of the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows of the Company for the year ended June 30, 1995, which report is included
in the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.
    


                                       /s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP


   
New York, New York
July 17, 1998
H. Con. Res. 158 Agreed to July 21, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas on July 24, 1998, a lone gunman entered the United

States Capitol through the door known as the Document Door,

located on the first floor of the East Front;

Whereas Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut was the first United States

Capitol Police officer to confront the gunman just inside the

Document Door and lost his life as a result;

Whereas Detective John Michael Gibson also confronted the gunman and lost his life in the ensuing shootout;

Whereas the last shot fired by Detective John Gibson—his final

act as an officer of the law—finally brought down the gunman

and ended his deadly rampage;

Whereas while the gunman’s intentions are not fully known, nor

may ever be known, it is clear that he would have killed more

innocent people if United States Capitol Police Officer Jacob

Chestnut and Detective John Gibson had not ended the violent

rampage;

Whereas the United States Capitol Police represent true dedication

and professionalism in their duties to keep the United States

Capitol and the Senate and House of Representatives office

buildings safe for all who enter them;

Whereas the United States Capitol shines as a beacon of freedom

and democracy all around the world;

Whereas keeping the sacred halls of the United States Capitol,

known as the People’s House, accessible for all the people of

the United States and the world is a true testament of Congress

and of our Nation’s dedication to upholding the virtues of freedom;

Whereas the door near where this tragic incident took place has

been known as the Document Door; and

Whereas it is fitting and appropriate that the Document Door

henceforth be known as the Memorial Door in honor of Officer

Jacob Chestnut and Detective John Gibson: Now, therefore, be

it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the door known as the Document Door and located

on the first floor of the East Front of the United States Capitol

is designated as the ‘‘Memorial Door’’ in honor of Officer Jacob

Joseph Chestnut and Detective John Michael Gibson of the United
H. Con. Res. 158—2

States Capitol Police, who gave their lives in the line of duty

on July 24, 1998, near that door.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-15
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-15


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.





/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                     Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 196

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

for the presentation of the Congressional GoldMedal to President and Mrs. Gerald R. Ford.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 196

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on October 27, 1999, for the presentation of

4 the Congressional Gold Medal to President and Mrs. Ger5 ald R. Ford. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall
2

•HCON 196 EH

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the

2 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives October 18,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-32805 and No. 33-32970 of Zila, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statements
No. 33-46239 and No. 333-00645 of Zila, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated
April 11, 1997 appearing in this Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 1997
of Zila, Inc.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
----------------------------
Grant Thornton LLP


Sacramento, California
July 17, 1997
Customer Procedure - TS

- MF0 6Y4

CONFIDENTIAL {

The notified substance will form a polymer capsule. This activity will take place at facility in

. The polymer will not be sold as a discrete substance; it is part of the capsule formulation and is built in situ when producing the capsules. It will be prepared only in combination with water, perfume oil and other excipients. The described production process in this paper is more a description of polymer formation and not actual manufacturing proce ss. The polymer could be produced this way, but since it serves as a capsule shell material, it must be synthesized in situ during the encapsulation process, at the interface between water and perfume oil droplets.

The polymer capsules containing perfume oil and/or other components will be incorporated in slurry

.

The concentration of the notified substance in the slurry will be 5-7 %. The slurry containing the notified substance will be shipped to a customer in 200 kg drums. The

notified substance will be incorporated in the final product at 0.07%.

The slurry will be transferred from a shipping container into a storage container (Exposure A). Empty drums will be landfilled (Release 1). The slurry will be added to the product base (detergent, cleaning formulation, etc. ). The finished product will then be piped in the conveyor lines for filling, dispensed in the end- use containers, and distributed to the point of sales. The equipment will be washed in the end of the manufacturing campaign (Release 2). Several samples may be taken for quality control.

A. The PMN substance will be transferred from a shipping container into a storage

container (Exposure 1) ; t he emptied drums will be sent to a landfill (Release 1).

B. The slurry will be pumped in the production batch.

C. The ingredients will be mixed until blend is uniform and passes QA.

D. A sample will be taken after all ingredients are charged into the mixing vessel to ensure all ingredients were added, and the % of each ingredient is correct. The QC samples will b e discarded into a holding container, and landfilled (Release 2).

E. Finished product is dispensed in the containers, and shipped to the point-of- sale.

F. The mixing vessel will not be rinsed between the batches of the same formula. Rinsing will typically take p lace at the end of each manufacturing campaign. The rinsate containing trace amounts of the PMN substance will be released into

POTW (Release 3).} B

Mixing

Vessel PMN Substance is added to the mixing vessel

- Stabilizer

- Carrier

- A uxiliary components

Conveyor line Mixing vessel is

rinsed between campaigns Release 3 E mpty drums are sent

to a landfill

D QC

o To ensure all ingredients were added, and

o % ingredients are correct

o Samples will be discarded into

a drum and land filled Release 1

Exposure 1

C Exposure 2

Release 2

E F A

The finished product is dispensed, packaged, and sent to the point of sales
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 174

In the Interest of W.C.M. Clark Herniman, DO, Petitioner and Appellee

v. W.C.M., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20240213 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Nicholas D. Thornton, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Mary E. DePuydt, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.1 Interest of W.C.M. No. 20240213 Per Curiam. [¶1] W.C.M. appeals from the district court’s order requiring continued hospitalization, arguing the evidence was not sufficient for the court to find he is mentally ill and in need of treatment. Applying our more probing clearly erroneous standard of review, Interest of C.W. , 552 N.W.2d 382, 383 (N.D. 1996), the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Before Judge Ford,

August 24, 1966

No. R66/24.

#### Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/476 and R61/1651 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Lollytogs, Ltd.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073), the court found and held that export value, as that value *845is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Custom Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (children’s clothing) and that said value is represented by the invoice unit f.o.b. value, net packed, exclusive of any additional charges or commissions.
# Official Journal L 278/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5022 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 278

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5022 October 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2007 of 18 September 2007 amending and updating Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2007 of 18 September 2007 amending and updating Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Anna P. CASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N.Y.C. DEPT. OF SANITATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 01-7045.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 11, 2001.

Anna P. Castro, New York, NY, pro se.

Ellen Raviteh, Esq., Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of New York, New York, NY, for appellee.

Present MINER, LEVAL, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

*64Anna P. Castro, *pro se*and *in forma pauperis,*appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant dismissing the complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et seq.,*alleging racial and sexual discrimination. The district court properly dismissed the claims where plaintiffs submissions included only conclusory and vague allegations, and where the court had provided *pro se*plaintiff with an explanation of the nature and consequences of a summary judgment motion.

We affirm the judgment of the district court.
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust
             2005-5;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


             Date: March 27, 2006


                                                     /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Steve Bailey
                                                     Senior Managing Director
Before the Third Division,

May 13, 1964

No. 68547.

protest 63/13673 (New York).

#### Edward P. Paul & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 CCPA 112, C.A.D. 351), and that the merchandise, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
CoStar Group, Inc. v. Commercial Investment MLS Doc. 2

Dockets.Justia.com