alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 113 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 113

  Expressing the commitment of Congress to address the emergency that 
               currently exists in American agriculture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1999

Mr. Berry (for himself, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Ford, and Mr. Minge) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the commitment of Congress to address the emergency that 
               currently exists in American agriculture.

Whereas the prosperity and security of the United States is dependent on our 
        ability to domestically produce safe, affordable, and abundant 
        agricultural commodities;
Whereas American farmers are the most productive ever, anywhere in the world;
Whereas a combination of factors has contributed to historically low commodity 
        prices received by American farmers;
Whereas Congress has recently been forced to make emergency appropriations to 
        address the crisis facing our farmers;
Whereas current price projections indicate that the crisis will continue through 
        the 1999 crop year;
Whereas Congress has an obligation to protect the food and fiber security of 
        America; and
Whereas the current budget restrictions and resulting appropriations for 
        agriculture do not allow for adequate devotion of financial resources to 
        properly address the crisis facing American agriculture: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) expresses its continuing commitment to American 
        farmers;
            (2) recognizes the need to protect the food and fiber 
        security that the United States has historically enjoyed;
            (3) recognizes the need to provide adequate financial 
        resources to address the crisis devastating rural America and 
        American farmers; and
            (4) recognizes that legislation providing for future 
        appropriations will likely be needed in the 106th Congress to 
        address the emergency that currently exists in American 
        agriculture.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICK DRUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5360 RBL/KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On July 6, 2006, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (Dkt. # 3). 

The court’s order was based on plaintiff’s ability to articulate his claims and the lack of exceptional

circumstances warranting appointment of counsel. While plaintiff may not have vast resources or

legal training, he meets the threshold for a pro se litigant. Plaintiff argues that the appointment of

counsel is warranted so that this matter may be litigated on behalf of other inmates “being assaulted

in some cases and security tapes being disposed of in said cases.” By separate order to show cause

(Dkt. # 9), plaintiff has been advised that he cannot act on behalf of others, but must bring his action

on his own behalf and must plead specific conduct that has been committed by a person or persons

acting under color of state law that deprived him of a right, privilege or immunity secured by the

Constitution in order to properly plead a Section 1983 claim in this court. Plaintiff must do so by

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 10 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

August 31, 2006 or face dismissal of this action.

After carefully reviewing the motion for reconsideration and the record, the court ORDERS

as follows:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 8) is DENIED. Motions for

 reconsideration are disfavored and will ordinarily be denied in the absence of a showing of manifest

error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been

brought to the court’s attention earlier with reasonable diligence. Local Rule CR 7(h)(1). Here,

plaintiff has identified no error in the court’s order, nor presented any new facts or legal authority not

already considered by the court that suggest reconsideration is appropriate. Plaintiff’s motion is

therefore denied.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable 

Ronald B. Leighton.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 10 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23046]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Thursday, October 19, 2023.

PLACE: 1255 Union Street NE, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Regular Board of Directors meeting.
    The Interim General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that 
in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4) permit 
closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

 Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session
III. Executive Session: Report from CEO
IV. Executive Session: Report from CFO
V. Executive Session: GAO Workplan Update
VI. Executive Session: Report from Interim General Counsel
VII. Executive Session: Report from CIO
VIII. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass Update
IX. Action Item: Approval of Meeting Minutes--August 3 Special Audit 
Committee Meeting and August 17 Annual Board of Directors Meeting
X. Action Item: Professional Learning and Event Management System 
(PLEMS)
XI. Action Item: Atlanta Office Lease
XII. Discussion Item: October 2 Audit Committee Meeting
XIII. Discussion Item: National NeighborWorks Association Presentation
XIV. Discussion Item: Capital Corporations Leadership
    a. Community Housing Capital
    b. NeighborWorks Capital
XV. Inflation Reduction Act Update
XVI. FY2024 Corporate Scorecard
XVII. Management Program Background and Updates Other Reports
    a. 2023 Board Calendar
    b. 2023 Board Agenda Planner
    c. CFO Report
    i. Financials (through 7/31/23)
    ii. Single Invoice Approvals $100K and over
    iii. Vendor Payments $350K and over
    iv. Exceptions
    d. Programs Dashboard
    e. Housing Stability Counseling Program (HSCP)
    f. Strategic Plan Scorecard--FY23 Q3 (Q3 Production)

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:  Everything except the Executive (Closed) 
Session.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:  Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; [email protected].

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2023-23046 Filed 10-16-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
No. 53829.

#### T. D. Downing & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 566442-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

By virtue of the decision in *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 391), the protests were dismissed.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 314

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the authority of the Secretary

of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payments made

to skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. HATCH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the authority

of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make

adjustments to payments made to skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare Program.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING AUTHOR3 ITY OF SECRETARY, COLLECTION OF DATA,

4 AND REPORT TO CONGRESS.

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—It is the sense of the Senate that

6 the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in making

7 payments under the prospective payment system for

8 skilled nursing facilities pursuant to section 1888(e) of the
2

•SRES 314 IS

1 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)), has the au2 thority under section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of such Act to pro3 vide for an appropriate adjustment to account for case mix

4 which reflects a patient’s medical needs requiring the pro5 vision of non-therapy ancillary services (such as res6 piratory therapy, pharmacy, laboratory, X-ray, and paren7 teral and enteral services, and covered durable medical

8 supplies).

9 (b) DATA.—It is the sense of the Senate that the Sec10 retary of Health and Human Services should gather suffi11 cient data on the provision of non-therapy ancillary serv12 ices by skilled nursing facilities that are paid under the

13 prospective payment system pursuant to section 1888(e)

14 of the Social Security Act in order to develop the appro15 priate adjustment for case mix under section

16 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of such Act.

17 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the

18 Senate that the Secretary of Health and Human Services

19 should periodically report to Congress on the development

20 of the appropriate adjustment for case mix under section

21 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Social Security Act which reflects

22 a patient’s medical needs requiring the provision of non23 therapy ancillary services.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10G (1)



                               DEXTER CORPORATION

                       AMENDMENT TO THE DEXTER CORPORATION
             TRANSFERRED EXECUTIVES' SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM


                                    Article I

1.1 This Amendment to The Dexter Corporation Transferred Executives'
Supplemental Retirement Program as amended and restated retroactive to February
26, 1987 (the "Plan") of Dexter Corporation (the "Company") is made pursuant to
Article 6 of the Plan and shall be effective as of January 1, 2000.


                                   Article II

2.1      Section 7.04 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

                  7.04 Program Unfunded. It is expressly intended that no funds
shall be set aside by trust, insurance contract, or otherwise, to fulfill any
responsibilities which Dexter may have under the Plan; provided, however, that
nothing in this Section 7.04 shall prohibit Dexter from establishing and
transferring assets to one or more trusts, the assets of which shall be subject
to the claims of the creditors of Dexter in the event of its bankruptcy or
insolvency, in order to secure the payment of benefits under the Plan.

2.2 In all other respects, the Plan as hereby amended is ratified and confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment as of the
date set forth in Article 1.1, such execution having been duly authorized by the
Company's Board of Directors.


                                                     DEXTER CORPORATION


                                                     /s/  Bruce H. Beatt
                                                     By: Bruce H. Beatt
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LENIER AYERS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HENRI RICHARDS,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5264RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff’s “Appeal” [Dkt. #41] of

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom’s Order Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. #38].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Strombom under 28 U.S.C. § 636. Under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72(a), the non-dispositive order of a magistrate judge to whom the matter has been referred for

practical matters may be reviewed by the District Court upon the objection of a party. The Court construes

Mr. Ayers’ “appeal” in this instance to be such an objection.

Magistrate Judge Strombom correctly determined that plaintiff is not entitled to the appointment of

counsel; therefore, plaintiff’s “appeal”/objection is DENIED.

Case 3:06-cv-05264-RBL-KLS Document 42 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 3rd day of April, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05264-RBL-KLS Document 42 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 110A/2 Ap

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 110A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 632 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 110A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 632 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2020/C 110 A/01 | Corrigendum to notice of open competitions — EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2020/C 110 A/01

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions — EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Robert Angrisano, President and Principal Financial Officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp. certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp.



Date:  April 15, 2005

/s/ Robert Angrisano





Robert Angrisano, President and Principal Financial Officer
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79

To commemorate the 1997 National Peace Officers Memorial Day.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 28, 1997

Mr. KEMPTHORNE (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFFEE, Mr. COCHRAN,

Mr. COLLINS, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. D’AMATO,

Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG,

Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HELMS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. NICKLES, Mr.

SESSIONS, Mr. BOB SMITH, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS,

Mr. WARNER, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr.

BRYAN, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. FORD, Mr. GLENN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KOHL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROBB, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. REID, Mr. BREAUX, and Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 1, 1997

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

MAY 5, 1997

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commemorate the 1997 National Peace Officers Memorial

Day.
2

SRES 79 ATS

Whereas, the well-being of all citizens of this country is preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas, more than 500,000 men and women, at great risk

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of the peace;

Whereas, peace officers are the front line in preserving our

children’s right to receive an education in a crime-free

environment that is all too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;

Whereas, 117 peace officers lost their lives in the performance of their duty in 1996, and a total of 13,692 men

and women have now made that supreme sacrifice;

Whereas, every year 1 in 9 officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 is

injured, and 1 in 4,000 is killed in the line of duty;

Whereas, on May 15, 1997, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in our Nation’s Capital to join

with the families of their recently fallen comrades to

honor them and all others before them: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That May 15, 1997, is hereby designated

2 as ‘‘National Peace Officers Memorial Day’’ for the pur3 pose of recognizing all peace officers slain in the line of

4 duty. The President is authorized and requested to issue

5 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

6 States to observe this day with the appropriate ceremonies

7 and respect.

Æ
No. 67642.

#### Pan American Import Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/13869 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-298M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

VINCENTE PEREYRA- )

GONZALES, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to distribute Cocaine, Heroin and Methamphetamine

Date of Detention Hearing: June 9, 2006

 The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Todd Greenberg. The defendant was represented by Jennifer Horwitz.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

Case 2:06-mj-00298-MJB Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Defendant stipulates to detention due in part to the placement of an ICE

detainer.

(3) Based upon the foregoing information, it appears that there is no

condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future Court appearances and/or the safety of other persons or the

community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006. AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00298-MJB Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2