alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM DUE DATE 

(Pham, et al; CR06-243TSZ)

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

1 (206) 553-7970

THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PHUONG THI KIM PHAM and

MINH BINH PHAM,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-243TSZ

ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE

TRIAL DATE AND EXTEND TIME FOR

PRETRIAL MOTIONS

THE COURT having considered the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the

trial date and extend the due date of the pretrial motions, and the records and files herein, the

Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuances would deny counsel the

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering the

continuances in this case and that the continuances are necessary to ensure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy

trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date be continued from September 18,

2006, to November 6, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00243-TSZ Document 28 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM DUE DATE 

(Pham, et al; CR06-243TSZ)

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

2 (206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pretrial motions are due October 5, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of

September 18, 2006, up to and including the new proposed trial date of November 6, 2006,

shall be excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the government’s and Phuong Pham’s request for

a Settlement Conference is GRANTED.

DONE this 15th day of August, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Presented by:

 s/ Patricia C. Lally 

PATRICIA C. LALLY

Assistant United States Attorney

WSBA #28910

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Telephone: 206-553-2619

Fax: 206-553-0755

Email: Patricia.Lally@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00243-TSZ Document 28 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Randall BakerRandall BakerChief Executive Officer/s/ Randall BakerRandall BakerChief Financial OfficerDated: April 2, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

                  Re:    Soundview Home Loan Trust, Series 2005-A
                         Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-A
                         ----------------------------------------

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Soundview Home
Loan Trust, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-A;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicers under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicers have fulfilled each of its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers' compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing LP, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

                                         FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                         By: /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Robert McGinnis
                                         Title: President
                                         Date:  March 30, 2006
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Government Ownership of the Twelve Federal Reserve Banks

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					,	Steagall, Henry Bascom					 and 	Seventy-Fifth Congress, 1937-1939. 						*Government Ownership of the Twelve Federal Reserve Banks : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Seventy-Fifth Congress, Third Session, on H.R. 7230, March 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 31, April 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 19, 1938*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 2, 1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/736,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc., as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 26, 1998.
 
                                          /s/ PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
June 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     179,999,000
<SECURITIES>                               282,488,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,410,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,208,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           478,126,000
<PP&E>                                      29,568,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,135,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             522,269,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,661,000
<BONDS>                                    489,475,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,279,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (27,088,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               522,269,000
<SALES>                                      2,576,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,082,000
<CGS>                                        1,162,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,183,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,619,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,290,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (30,324,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (30,324,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (30,324,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.93)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 203/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.203.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 203 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5617 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.203.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 203

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5617 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 203/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6933 — Vitol/Phillips 66 Power Operations) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 203/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6933 — Vitol/Phillips 66 Power Operations) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 203/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2013/C 203/03 | Special Report No 3/2013 ‘Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road?’ | 3 |
| 2013/C 203/04 | Special Report No 5/2013 ‘Are EU Cohesion Policy funds well spent on roads?’ | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 203/02

Euro exchange rates

2

Court of Auditors

2013/C 203/03

Special Report No 3/2013 ‘Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road?’

3

2013/C 203/04

Special Report No 5/2013 ‘Are EU Cohesion Policy funds well spent on roads?’

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         153,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               487,139
<PP&E>                                         211,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,167,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,985,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   (841,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,167,223
<SALES>                                        318,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,940
<CGS>                                          211,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,116,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (802,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (802,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (802,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICK DRUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5360 RBL/KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PLEADING

TRANSFER

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Presently before the

Court is Plaintiff’s “motion for pleading transfer,” in which Plaintiff requests the Clerk of the Court

to attach questionnaires and declarations submitted in support of a previously filed motion for the

appointment of counsel (Dkt. # 1) to his Amended Complaint (Dkt. # 11). The Amended Complaint

was served on Defendant on September 12, 2006. (Dkt. # 14). 

Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. Previously filed motions and exhibits may not be

transferred or substituted for another. This is particularly true as to the Amended Complaint as it has

already been served upon the Defendant. However, Plaintiff is referred to Rule 10(c) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure which states, in pertinent part, that, “[s]tatements in a pleading may be

adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in an other pleading or in any

motion.” And, that a “copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part

thereof for all purposes.” Plaintiff may refer to the previously filed questionnaires and declarations in

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 19 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

later filings, but does not need to re-file them with each new motion and pleading.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for pleading transfer (Dkt. # 13) is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 19 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

J.L and M.L., AND THEIR MINOR DAGHTER,

K.L.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERCER ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT, a

municipal Washington corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-494MJP

TAXATION OF COSTS

Costs in the above-entitled action are hereby taxed against DEFENDANT MERCER ISLAND

SCHOOL DISTRICT and on behalf of PLAINTIFFS in the amount of $295.00.

Dated this 28th day of AUGUST, 2007 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:06-cv-00494-MJP Document 60 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-648]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 6702]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Parts 103, 112, and 114

[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0008]
RIN 0579-AD19

Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Packaging and 
Labeling

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2011-648 beginning on page 2268 in the 
issue of Thursday, January 13, 2011, make the following correction:
    On page 2269, in the third column, in first full paragraph, 20 
lines from the bottom, ``8 EC'' should read ``8 [deg]C''.
[FR Doc. C1-2011-648 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001029863
<NAME> AMERICA WEST HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         152,603
<SECURITIES>                                     2,956
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,277
<INVENTORY>                                     25,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               330,981
<PP&E>                                         920,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 245,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,535,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          490,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     665,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,535,102
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,402,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,281,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

April 10, 1957

No. 60609.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 122797-K, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The uncontradicted testimony establishing that the items of merchandise in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.