71826 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2023 / Notices 

1See HA Food’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Expedited 

Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated July 6, 

2023. 

2 Id. 

3See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

India: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 

Review, 88 FR 59868 (August 30, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

4 Id. 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Preliminary Results PDM at 2. 

6See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 60431 

(September 1, 2023). 

1See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 

2022, 88 FR 32729 (May 22, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022: Large 

Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

Background 

On July 6, 2023, HA Food requested 

that Commerce conduct an expedited 

CCR, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3), to confirm that HA Food 

is the successor-in-interest to Highland 

Agro for purposes of determining AD 

cash deposits and liabilities.1 In its 

submission, HA Food stated that, in 

2022, Highland Agro undertook a name 

change to HA Food and changed its 

corporate structure to become a limited 

liability company.2

On August 30, 2023, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), Commerce 

initiated this CCR and published the 

Preliminary Results, preliminarily 

determining that HA Food is the 

successor-in-interest to Highland Agro.3

In the Preliminary Results, we provided 

all interested parties with an 

opportunity to comment.4 However, we 

received no comments. 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. 

The product is currently classified 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings: 0306.17.00.03, 

0306.17.00.04, 0306.17.00.05, 

0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.07, 

0306.17.00.08, 0306.17.00.09, 

0306.17.00.10, 0306.17.00.11, 

0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.13, 

0306.17.00.14, 0306.17.00.15, 

0306.17.00.16, 0306.17.00.17, 

0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.19, 

0306.17.00.20, 0306.17.00.21, 

0306.17.00.22, 0306.17.00.23, 

0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.25, 

0306.17.00.26, 0306.17.00.27, 

0306.17.00.28, 0306.17.00.29, 

0306.17.00.40, 0306.17.00.41, 

0306.17.00.42, 1605.21.10.30, and 

1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

Final Results of CCR 

For the reasons stated in the 

Preliminary Results, Commerce 

continues to find that HA Food is the 

successor-in-interest to Highland Agro. 

As a result of this determination, and 

consistent with our established practice, 

we find that HA Food should receive 

the AD cash deposit rate previously 

assigned to Highland Agro. Because 

there are no changes from the 

Preliminary Results, there is no decision 

memorandum accompanying this notice 

and the Preliminary Results are hereby 

adopted as the final results of this CCR. 

Consequently, Commerce will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

suspend liquidation of all shipments of 

subject merchandise produced and/or 

exported by HA Food and entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of this notice in the Federal 

Register at 3.88 percent, which is the 

current AD cash deposit rate for 

Highland Agro.6 This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.216(e), 351.221(b), and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: October 11, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22945 Filed 10–17–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–897] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

HiSteel Co., Ltd. (HiSteel) and the 21 

non-examined companies, for which a 

review was requested, made sales of 

large diameter welded pipe (welded 

pipe) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) 

at prices below normal value (NV), 

while Hyundai Steel Company 

(Hyundai Steel) did not make sales of 

the subject merchandise at prices below 

NV, during the period of review (POR) 

May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable October 18, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Cherry or Samantha Kinney, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0607 or 

(202) 482–5305, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 22, 2023, Commerce 

published its preliminary results in the 

2021–2022 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on welded pipe 

from Korea and invited interested 

parties to comment.1 A summary of the 

events that occurred since publication 

of the Preliminary Results, as well as a 

full discussion of the issues raised by 

parties for these final results, are 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2023 / Notices 71827 

3See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determination and Antidumping 

Duty Order, 84 FR 18767 (May 2, 2019) (Order). 

4See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021, 88 FR 7406 (February 3, 2023). 5See Appendix II. 

6See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012). 

7See Order, 84 FR at 18769. 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is welded carbon and alloy steel 

pipe (other than stainless steel pipe), 

more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in 

nominal outside diameter (large 

diameter welded pipe), regardless of 

wall thickness, length, surface finish, 

grade, end finish, or stenciling. Imports 

of the product are currently classifiable 

in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) under 

subheadings 7305.11.1030, 

7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 

7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 

7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 

7305.19.1060, 7305.19.5000, 

7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6090, 

7305.39.1000 and 7305.39.5000. While 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the scope of 

this Order is dispositive. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in parties’ case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

are listed in Appendix I to this notice. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, Commerce made certain 

changes to the margin calculations for 

HiSteel. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum contains descriptions of 

these changes. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted- average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. For these final results of 

review, we calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin for Hyundai 

Steel of zero and a weighted-average 

dumping margin for HiSteel that is not 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. Consistent with 

Commerce’s practice, we assigned 

HiSteel’s weighted-average dumping 

margin to the non-examined 

companies.4

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period May 1, 2021, 

through April 30, 2022: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

HiSteel Co., Ltd .......................... 6.17 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

Non-Examined Companies 5 ...... 6.17 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for HiSteel within five days 

of the date of publication of this notice 

to parties in this proceeding, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Because we made no changes to our 

preliminary weighted-average dumping 

margin calculations for Hyundai Steel 

there are no calculations to disclose for 

this company. 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in this review, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of 

these final results in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because HiSteel reported entered value 

for all of their U.S. sales, we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of those sales. Where an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), the entries by that importer 

will be liquidated without regard to 

antidumping duties. Because the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hyundai Steel is zero percent, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.6

Consistent with Commerce’s 

clarification of its assessment practice, 

for entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by any of the 

above-referenced respondents for which 

they did not know the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at 

the all-others rate established in the 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation 

of 7.08 percent ad valorem 7 if there is 

no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.8

For the non-examined companies 

subject to review, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate all applicable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR at 

the rate listed in the table above, which 

is equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin calculated for HiSteel. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
71828 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2023 / Notices 

9See Order, 84 FR at 18768. 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for subject merchandise 

exported by a company not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published in 

the completed segment for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review or the 

original LTFV investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 7.08 percent ad valorem, 

the all-others rate established in the 

LTFV investigation.9

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: October 12, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Differential Pricing 

HiSteel-Specific Issues 

Comment 2: Constructed Export Price 

Offset 

Comment 3: Annual or Quarterly Cost 

Methodology 

Comment 4: Selling, General, and 

Administrative Expenses 

Comment 5: General and Administrative 

Expenses Offset 

Hyundai Steel-Specific Issues 

Comment 6: Correction of Draft Customs 

Instructions 

SeAH-Specific Issues 

Comment 7: Voluntary Respondent 

Treatment 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 

2. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. 

3. Daiduck Piping Co., Ltd. 

4. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 

5. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

6. EEW KHPC Co., Ltd. 

7. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 

8. Geumok Tech. Co. Ltd. 

9. Hansol Metal Co. Ltd. 

10. Husteel Co., Ltd. 

11. Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. 

12. Il Jin Nts Co. Ltd. 

13. Kiduck Industries Co., Ltd. 

14. Kum Kang Kind. Co., Ltd. 

15. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. 

16. Nexteel Co., Ltd. 

17. SeAH Steel Corporation 

18. Seonghwa Industrial Co., Ltd. 

19. SIN–E B&P Co., Ltd. 

20. Steel Flower Co., Ltd. 

21. WELTECH Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23005 Filed 10–17–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 03–6A008] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of issuance of an 

amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review to California Pistachio Export 

Council, LLC (CPEC), Application No. 

03–6A008. 

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, 

through the Office of Trade and 

Economic Analysis (OTEA), issued an 

Export Trade Certificate of Review to 

CPEC on September 29, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA, 

International Trade Administration, 

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or email at etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4011–21) (the Act) 

authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to 

issue Export Trade Certificates of 

Review. An Export Trade Certificate of 

Review protects the holder and the 

members identified in the Certificate 

from State and Federal government 

antitrust actions and from private treble 

damage antitrust actions for the export 

conduct specified in the Certificate and 

carried out in compliance with its terms 

and conditions. The regulations 

implementing Title III are found at 15 

CFR part 325. OTEA is issuing this 

notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), 

which requires the Secretary of 

Commerce to publish a summary of the 

certification in the Federal Register. 

Under section 305(a) of the Act and 15 

CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by 

the Secretary’s determination may, 

within 30 days of the date of this notice, 

bring an action in any appropriate 

district court of the United States to set 

aside the determination on the ground 

that the determination is erroneous. 

Description of Certified Conduct 

CPEC amended its Certificate as 

follows: 

1. Added the following entity as a 

Member of the Certificate within the 

meaning of section 325.2(l) of the 

Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): 

a. Nichols Pistachio 

List of Members, as amended: 

1. Horizon Nut, LLC 

2. Keenan Farms, Inc. 

3. Meridian Nut Growers, LLC 

4. Monarch Nut Company 

5. Nichols Pistachio 

6. Primex Farms, LLC 

7. Setton Pistachio of Terra Bella, Inc. 

8. Zymex Industries, Inc. 

The effective date of the amended 

certificate is July 10, 2023, the date on 

which CPEC’s application to amend was 

deemed submitted. 

Dated: October 12, 2023. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22938 Filed 10–17–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1