alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 36-1 Filed 09/20/11 Page 45 of 45
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 24, 2013

t0521

Order 

May 24, 2013

146371 & (308)

DANIEL ADAIR, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 146371

COA: 230858

STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for expedited decision is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment denying all attorney fees for 

Phase II of the plaintiffs’ Headlee Amendment litigation. As explained by the special 

master, the plaintiffs established that their attorneys performed reasonable and necessary 

work relating to the record keeping claim for which they are entitled to attorney fees. 

Adair v Michigan, 486 Mich 468, 493-494 (2010). We REMAND this case to the Court 

of Appeals to articulate on the record specific factual findings regarding the amount of 

attorney fees that are properly compensable for Phase II and enter an award consistent 

with those findings, bearing in mind that the burden of proof to establish the attorney 

time devoted to the record keeping claim and the reasonableness of the requested fees 

rests on the plaintiffs. See Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519, 528-529 (2008) (opinion by 

TAYLOR, C.J.). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 127

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a

ceremony to present a gold medal on behalf of Congress

to Rosa Parks.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on June 15, 1999, for a ceremony to present

4 a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks. Phys5 ical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in
2

HCON 127 RDS

1 accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the

2 Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
ORDER DIRECTING SENTENCING 

MEMORANDUM TO BE FILED UNDER 

SEAL - 1

Gilbert H. Levy

Attorney at Law

2125 Western Avenue, Ste 330

Seattle, Washington 98121

(206) 443-0670 Fax: (866) 471-6818

Email: gilbert.levy.atty@gmail.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KEVIN KERFOOT,

Defendant.

Cause No. CR06-0252 TSZ

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK 

TO FILE DEFENDANT’S 

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM 

UNDER SEAL

This matter having come before the Court on Motion of the Defendant above named, 

docket no. 33, and it appearing that the Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandum includes protected 

material and that defense counsel is required by the Court’s protective order to file that material 

under seal, 

NOW THEREFORE it is ordered that the Clerk shall file the Defendant’s Sentencing 

Memorandum, docket no. 34, under seal. 

DATED this 25th day of July, 2017. A

Thomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00252-TSZ Document 37 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 2
ORDER DIRECTING SENTENCING 

MEMORANDUM TO BE FILED UNDER 

SEAL - 2

Gilbert H. Levy

Attorney at Law

2125 Western Avenue, Ste 330

Seattle, Washington 98121

(206) 443-0670 Fax: (866) 471-6818

Email: gilbert.levy.atty@gmail.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Presented by:

/s/Gilbert H. Levy

Gilbert H. Levy, WSBA 4805

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00252-TSZ Document 37 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 2
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 July 2004

(2004/C 174/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 11.01
                              CSK AUTO, INC.
             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                      --------------------------------
                                                      MAY 4, 1997       APRIL 28, 1996
                                                      -----------       --------------
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes                      $(1,125)                 $2,431

Fixed charges
       Interest expense                                  8,142                   3,595
       Interest portion of rentals                       5,256                   4,815
                                                      --------                  ------
               Total fixed charges                      13,398                   8,410
                                                      --------                  ------

Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges         $12,273                 $10,841

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)                    -                        1.3
</TABLE>



(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has not been computed for the
    thirteen weeks ended May 4, 1997 since earnings were not sufficient to
    cover fixed charges. The coverage deficiency was $1,125.
Exhibit 10.65


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     AMENDMENT TO  EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  (this  "Amendment")  dated this 9th of
December,  1999, by and between TREMONT ADVISERS,  INC., a Delaware  corporation
having its principal  executive offices at Corporate Center at Rye, 555 Theodore
Fremd Avenue, Rye, New York ("Tremont");  and ROBERT I. SCHULMAN,  an individual
residing at 18 Green Valley Road, Armonk, New York ("Executive").

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS,  Executive  is employed by Tremont  pursuant to and in  accordance
with the terms and conditions  contained in an employment  agreement dated April
22, 1994 (the "Employment Agreement"), by and between Tremont and Executive; and

     WHEREAS, Executive and Tremont are each desirous of amending the Employment
Agreement in accordance with this Amendment, effective January 1, 2000.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the promises and mutual  covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and in the Employment Agreement,  the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Section 3(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the
following  phrase:  "three hundred forty-two  thousand  dollars"  ($342,000) and
inserting in its place "three hundred fifty-two  thousand three hundred dollars"
($352,300).

2.  Section 5 shall be amended by deleting all  references  therein to "December
31, 1999" and inserting in its place "December 31, 2000."

3. Except to the extent amended by this  Amendment,  the terms and conditions of
the Employment  Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of
any conflict  between the terms of the  Employment  Agreement and the Amendment,
the Amendment shall control.

4. Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other that each has read the
foregoing  provisions and that each has had a sufficient  opportunity to discuss
this  Amendment  with  anyone each party might  desire  prior to signing  below.
Further, in signing this Amendment, each party has not relied on or been induced
to execute this  Amendment by any  statements,  representations,  agreements  or
promises,  oral or  written,  made  by the  other  except  for  those  expressly
contained in this Amendment.


                                       80
<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the
parties hereto as of the date first above written.

WITNESS


/s/ Suzanne S. Hammond                               By: /s/ Robert I. Schulman
------------------------------------                     ----------------------
Suzanne S. Hammond                                       Robert I. Schulman
Secretary and Treasurer

ATTEST                                               TREMONT ADVISERS, INC.


/s/ Stephen S. Clayton                               /s/ Sandra L. Manzke
------------------------------------                 --------------------
Stephen T. Clayton                                   Sandra L. Manzke
Chief Financial Officer                              Chief Operating Officer














                                       81
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 108 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 108

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued to raise public awareness of the serious problem of 
                       driving while intoxicated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 1999

  Mr. Forbes submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued to raise public awareness of the serious problem of 
                       driving while intoxicated.

Whereas 3 in every 5 Americans will be involved in an alcohol-related car crash 
        at some time in their lives, and 8 young people a day die in alcohol-
        related crashes;
Whereas, in the past decade, 4 times as many Americans died in drunk driving car 
        crashes as were killed in the Vietnam era;
Whereas the economic costs of alcohol-related crashes are estimated to be 
        $45,000,000,000 yearly, with an additional $70,500,000,000 lost in 
        quality of life due to these crashes; and
Whereas drunk driving is the Nation's most frequently committed violent crime, 
        and alcohol use represents the number 1 drug problem among young people: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service to raise public awareness of the serious problem 
        of driving while intoxicated; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
PROPOSED ORDER ON AGREED MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER 

DENYING TRIAL CONTINUANCE 1

Hon. Franklin D. Burgess

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO: CR 06-5220FDB

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) ORDER ON AGREED MOTION FOR

) RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

Sergio Cisneros-Alvarez, ) DENYING TRIAL CONTINUANCE

)

Defendant. )

This matter having come on regularly before the court on the Agreed Motion for

Reconsideration of Order Denying Trial Continuance (Ct. Rec 30) filed by the parties herein,

RICHARD A. SMITH of Smith Law Firm on behalf of Defendant, Sergio Cisneros-Alvarez, and

Michael Dion, AUSA, for Plaintiff United States of America, and the parties having agreed and

stipulated to the matter before the Court, THE COURT FINDS AS FACTS the facts set forth

in the Agreed Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Trial Continuance filed in this

case.

THEREFORE, THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THAT:

1. That the period of time between June 12, 2006, and August 28, 2006, shall be excluded

from computation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A), and 3161(h)(8)(B), because: (a)the failure

to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant and the Government

continuity of counsel; (b) deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation, taking into account he exercise of due diligence; and ©) the failure to grant

the continuance set forth in this Order would be likely to make a continuation of this proceeding

impossible, or result in a miscarriage of justice. 

2. That the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

Case 3:06-cr-05220-FDB Document 32 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
PROPOSED ORDER ON AGREED MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER 

DENYING TRIAL CONTINUANCE 2

and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Agreed Motion for Reconsideration of Order

Denying Trial Continuance is hereby GRANTED. The deadline for filing Defendant's PreTrial

motions is RESET to July 6, 2006. The TRIAL date of June 12, 2006, is STRICKEN and

RESET to August 28, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in Tacoma, WA. The PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

of June 2, 2006, is STRICKEN and RESET to August 17, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. in Tacoma, WA

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 24th day of May, 2006. 

 /s/ Franklin D Burgess 

FRANKLIN D BURGESS

United States District Court

Presented by: Smith Law Firm

 /s/ Richard A. Smith

RICHARD A. SMITH, WSBA 15127

SMITH LAW FIRM

314 No. Second Street

Yakima, WA 98901

Telephone : (509) 457-5108

Facsimile : (509) 452-4601

E-Mail : rasmith@house314.com

 /s/ Telephonic Authorization

Michael Dion, AUSA

U.S. Attorney's Office

1201 Pacific Avenue, Ste. 700

Tacoma, WA 98402

Telephone : 253-428-3824

E-mail : michael.dion@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-05220-FDB Document 32 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, Robert Mouat, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Registration Statement on Form 20-F of Baja Mining Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this Registration Statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this registration statement;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this registration statement, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this registration statement;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this registration statement is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this registration statement (the Evaluation Date); and



(c)

presented in this registration statement our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this registration statement whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: July 6, 2006



Robert Mouat               .

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



































































Baja mining/20-F/20-F Material Documents/Section 302 Certification - JWG
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 241

Relative to the death of the Honorable Barry Goldwater, formerly a Senator

from the State of Arizona.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 2, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of the Honorable Barry Goldwater,

formerly a Senator from the State of Arizona.

Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death of the

Honorable Barry Goldwater, formerly a Senator from the

State of Arizona.

Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate

these resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
2

SRES 241 ATS

Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it stand

recessed as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

deceased Senator.

Attest:

Secretary.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

NEIL GRENNING,

Plaintiff,

v.

EILEEN BISSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5298RJB

ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel (Dkt. # 31). After reviewing the

motion, and the remaining record, the court does find and order the following.

(1) Plaintiff’s motion to compel is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion asks the court to direct Defendant

to Answer the Complaint in a more complete fashion. Plaintiff argues that Defendant has failed to properly

Answer the Complaint and notes 81 examples of the Defendant’s allegedly inadequate Answer to the

Complaint. A review of the Complaint, its accompanying exhibits, along with the Answer to the

Complaint, shows no grounds for granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel.

(2) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and defendants’ counsel.

Dated this 13th day of February, 2007.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold__________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05298-RJB Document 35 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 1