alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report
of Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard J. Tajak, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 23, 2010 |  | /S/ RICHARD J. TAJAK   
|                        |  | Richard J. Tajak       
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Before the First Division,

June 7, 1965

No. 69347.

#### Louis Marx & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/6925, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.120.b State and Local Government Employee Retirement Funds Defined Benefit Plans** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 171

Congratulating the American Public Transit Association for 25 years of 
      commendable service to the transit industry and the Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1999

  Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Petri, and Mr. Rahall) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the American Public Transit Association for 25 years of 
      commendable service to the transit industry and the Nation.

Whereas public transportation is a fundamental public service and an integral 
        component of the Nation's surface transportation infrastructure;
Whereas public transportation service results in productive jobs for the 
        Nation's workers and provides broad support for business and economic 
        growth;
Whereas public transportation provides safe and efficient mobility for millions 
        of people in the United States each day;
Whereas the American Public Transit Association was established in 1974 to 
        promote and advance knowledge in all matters relating to public 
        transportation; and
Whereas, during a period of remarkable resurgence in pubic transportation, the 
        American Public Transit Association has provided a quarter of a century 
        of service to the Nation as the professional association representing 
        the transit industry: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress congratulates the American Public Transit Association for 
25 years of commendable service to the transit industry and the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                      1,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,307
<PP&E>                                          18,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,055
<OTHER-SE>                                          97
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        54
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
No. 56191.

protest 170328-K (Baltimore) .

#### Philipp Brothers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Equitable Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Richard L. HarbaughRichard L. HarbaughPresident and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 26, 2006By:

/s/ Kim E. MarcoKim E. MarcoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 26, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND PTM DEADLINE

(Juan Rojas-Rodriguez; CR05-441JCC)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

1 (206) 553-1100

 JUDGE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JUAN ROJAS-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-0441C

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE

THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion of the parties for a continuance

of the trial date and the pretrial motions date, finds that the ends of justice will be served by

ordering a continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to ensure adequate time

for effective case preparation, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

The Court further finds that the period of time from the current trial date of March 6,

2006 until the new trial date of April 10, 2006, shall be excludable time pursuant to the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

Case 2:05-cr-00441-JCC Document 15 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND PTM DEADLINE

(Juan Rojas-Rodriguez; CR05-441JCC)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

2 (206) 553-1100

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued until

April 10, 2006 and that pretrial motions shall be filed no later than March 9, 2006.

DONE this 10th day of February, 2006.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Peter J. Avenia

WSBA # 20794

Attorney for Juan Rojas-Rodriguez

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-1100

Fax No.: (206) 553-0120

Peter_Avenia@fd.org

s/ Lisca Borichewski

Assistant United States Attorney

Per telephonic authorization

Case 2:05-cr-00441-JCC Document 15 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2
No. P68/59.

protests 66/11924 and 66/24080 (New York).

#### Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal C 275E/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.275.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 275E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5312 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.275.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 275E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5312 October 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 275E/01 | Position (EU) No 14/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcareAdopted by the Council on 13 September 2010 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

Council

2010/C 275E/01

Position (EU) No 14/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcareAdopted by the Council on 13 September 2010

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative: Centers for Engineering Molecular Technologies for Functional Dissection of Neural Circuits (UM1).                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jasenka Borzan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Neuroscience Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1260,                         *jasenka.borzan@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 11, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-22804 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 187

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the European

Council noise rule affecting hushkitted and reengined

aircraft.

Whereas for more than 50 years, the International Civil Aviation Organization (in this resolution referred to as the

‘‘ICAO’’) has been the single entity vested with authority

to establish international noise and emissions standards

and, through the ICAO’s efforts, aircraft noise has decreased by an average of 40 percent since 1970;
2

HCON 187 RFS

Whereas the ICAO is currently working on an expedited basis

on even more stringent international noise standards,

taking into account economic reasonableness, technical

feasibility, and environmental benefits;

Whereas international noise and emissions standards are critical to maintaining the economic viability of United

States aeronautical industries and to obtaining their ongoing commitment to progressively more stringent noise

reduction efforts;

Whereas European Council Regulation No. 925/1999, banning certain aircraft meeting the highest internationally

recognized noise standards from flying in Europe, undermines the integrity of the ICAO process and undercuts

the likelihood that new Stage 4 aircraft noise standards

will be developed;

Whereas while no regional standard is acceptable, European

Council Regulation No. 925/1999 is particularly offensive

because there is no scientific basis for the regulation and

because the regulation has been carefully crafted to protect European aviation interests while imposing arbitrary,

substantial, and unfounded cost burdens on United

States aeronautical industries;

Whereas the vast majority of aircraft that will be affected by

European Council Regulation No. 925/1999 are operated

by United States flag carriers; and

Whereas implementation of European Council Regulation No.

925/1999 will result in a loss of jobs in the United States

and may cost United States aeronautical industries in excess of $2,000,000,000: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—
3

HCON 187 RFS

1 (1) if European Council Regulation No. 925/

2 1999 is not rescinded by the European Council at

3 the earliest possible date, the Secretaries of Trans4 portation and State should take all appropriate ac5 tions to ensure that a petition regarding the regula6 tion is filed with the International Civil Aviation Or7 ganization pursuant to Article 84 of the Chicago

8 Convention; and

9 (2) the Secretaries of Commerce, State, and

10 Transportation and other appropriate parties should

11 use all reasonable means available to them to ensure

12 that the goal of having the regulation rescinded is

13 achieved.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
# Official Journal L 229/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6316 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 229

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6316 July 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1026 of 24 April 2020 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Japan | 1 |
| | * | Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European union and Japan | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1026 of 24 April 2020 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Japan

1

*

Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European union and Japan

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENSES - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SHARONDA BELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

ADDUS HEALTHCARE, 

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5188RJB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENSES

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defenses (Dkt. 14). The

court is familiar with the records and files herein and documents filed in support of and in opposition

to the motion. 

Plaintiff filed a Complaint (Dkt. 1) as a class action, alleging various violations of wage and

hour laws for over “one hundred persons in the class.” The persons in the class, except for the

named plaintiff, were not named. Defendant responded with a Supplemental Answer to the

Complaint (Dkt. 11) that made appropriate denials and, in accord with the requirements of notice

pleading in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleged fifteen “affirmative defenses.” The

defendant’s pleading was an appropriate response to the Complaint, and raises possible defenses that

will, in time, be dismissed or stricken, or will proceed to trial as the facts in the case are developed by

Case 3:06-cv-05188-RJB Document 23 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENSES - 2

both parties. It is likely that some of the allegations denominated as “affirmative defenses” are not,

technically, affirmative defenses. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(f) directs the court to construe pleadings as to do

substantial justice. Plaintiff here desires that the court strike portions of the Supplemental Answer as

insufficient, redundant or immaterial in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). 

Plaintiff’s motion is premature and appears to be an attempt to resolve issues before the facts

are developed. In accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(f), the motion should be DENIED

without prejudice to raising the issue of which defenses are adequate by appropriate motion at

appropriate times as the case develops in the future. 

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defenses (Dkt. 14) is DENIED. 

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of

record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05188-RJB Document 23 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 14,290.

#### TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO BALES OF COTTON.

[Afiirming Case No. 14,291. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]