alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. Res. 76

In the Senate of the United States,

May 23, 1997.

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace

has always been a valued objective of this great country;

Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in service as peacemakers and

peacekeepers;

Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate the

appreciation and gratitude these loyal Americans deserve

and to commemorate the ultimate sacrifice they made;

Whereas Memorial Day is the day of the year for the Nation

to appropriately remember American heroes by inviting

the citizens of this Nation to respectfully honor them at

a designated time; and

Whereas the playing of ‘‘Taps’’ symbolizes the solemn and

patriotic recognition of those Americans who died in service to our Country: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate requests that—

(1) a nationwide moment of remembrance be observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, by the simultaneous pausing of all citizens to acknowledge the playing

of ‘‘Taps’’ at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) in
2

SRES 76 ES

honor of the Americans that gave their lives in the pursuit of freedom and peace; and

(2) the President issue a proclamation calling upon

the departments and agencies of the United States and

interested organizations, groups, and individuals to participate in and promote this nationwide tribute to the

dedicated American men and women who died in the

pursuit of freedom and peace.

Attest:

Secretary.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 168 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 168

       Waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn sine die not later 
                          than July 31, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 1999

  Mr. Dreier submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn sine die not later 
                          than July 31, 1999.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, notwithstanding the provisions of section 132(a) of the 
Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of 
Representatives and the Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess 
of three days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress have 
adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for an adjournment (in 
excess of three days) to a day certain or for adjournment sine die.
                                 <all>
```
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 12.1**

**Contax Participações S.A.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.**

**Certification of Michel Neves Sarkis, Chief Executive Officer**

I, Michel Neves Sarkis, certify that:

1.                  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Contax Participações S.A.; 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.                  The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

a)                  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)                  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c)                  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d)                 disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.                  The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

1

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00353

- CR

Tung Thanh Nguyen

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1367269D )

October 23, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed . It is order ed that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Nov ember 6 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk November 6 , 2017

155266 (54)

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 155266

v COA: 328885

Oakland CC: 2014

- 139901

- NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On the order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the

time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before November 17, 2017.
Before the Third Division,

June 8, 1965

No. 69360.

#### Irving M. Sobin Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/2028, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

Since the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, they were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 95-60301

________________________

EL CHARRO TV RENTAL, INC.;

DIANA L. PETERS, Tax Matters Person, Petitioners-Appellants,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the decision of the United States Tax Court

(24840-91)

____________________________________________________

February 14, 1996 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

El Charro appeals from the tax court’s decision holding that the rental units were not properly

depreciated under the inco me forecast method. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and

considered the arguments raised by the parties. Finding no erro r in t he t ax court’s ruling, we

AFFIRM for the reasons presented by the tax court in the opinion published at T.C. Memo. 1994-601

(U.S. Tax Ct. Dec. 7, 1994).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       Exhibit 5


                        SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
                               Counsellors at Law
                             Two Renaissance Square
                       40 North Central Avenue, Suite 2700
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85004

                                                       Telephone: (602) 528-4000
                                                      Telecopier: (602) 253-8129

July 26, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         RE:      MESA AIR GROUP, INC. - NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
                  FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Mesa Air Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
relating to the registration of 189,527 shares of its Common Stock, no par value
(the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's 1999 Non-Qualified Stock
Option Plan (the "Plan").

         In that connection, we have examined such documents, corporate records
and other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of
this opinion, including the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the
Company.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

         1. The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as a
corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada.

         2. The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the
Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.

                                            /s/ Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
Exhibit 31.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN Holdings,
Inc.;
        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and
               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert       Chief Executive Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert        October 27, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WINDY PAYNE, individually and as 

guardian on behalf of D.P., a minor child,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

 Defendant,

And

JODI COY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-35921

D.C. No. 3:05-cv-05780-RBL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2015

Seattle, Washington

Before: NGUYEN and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges and ZOUHARY,** District 

Judge.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, District Judge for the U.S. District Court 

for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

FILED

AUG 3 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 Case: 13-35921, 08/03/2015, ID: 9631729, DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-05780-RBL Document 157 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Jodi Coy appeals the district court’s denial of summary judgment and 

qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de 

novo, Preschooler II v. Clark Cty. Sch. Bd. Of Trs., 479 F.3d 1175, 1179 (9th Cir. 

2007), we reverse. The case is remanded for further proceedings on Plaintiff’s

remaining Monell and state law claims. 

Coy is entitled to qualified immunity with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourth 

Amendment claim because, at the time she acted, it would not have been clear to a 

reasonable official that placing D.P. in the safe room, as part of his aversive and 

behavioral intervention plan, was an unconstitutional seizure. See Ashcroft v. alKidd, 131 S. Ct. 2074, 2083–85 (2011); Couture v. Bd. of Educ. of Albuquerque Pub.

Sch., 535 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 2008); Wash. Admin. Code § 392-172-394 (2005).

Likewise, Coy is entitled to qualified immunity with respect to Plaintiff’s

Fourteenth Amendment claim because, at the time Coy acted, it would not have been 

clear to a reasonable official that having D.P. assist in cleaning up after he defecated

in the safe room violated D.P.’s substantive due process rights. See Harris v. 

Robinson, 273 F.3d 927, 931–32 (10th Cir. 2001).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

 Case: 13-35921, 08/03/2015, ID: 9631729, DktEntry: 46-1, Page 2 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-05780-RBL Document 157 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2
STIP & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

C05-5797 KLS

Page 1 of 3

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. STROMBOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DENNIS E. JORDAN and JEANETTE

A. JORDAN, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal

corporation; TACOMA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, a subdivision of the

City of Tacoma; MICHAEL GOETZ,

individually and in his official capacity

as a Tacoma Police Officer; GARY

ROBERTS, individually and in his

official capacity as a Tacoma Police

Officer; and JOHN OTIS, individually

and in his official capacity as a

Tacoma Police Officer,

Defendants.

NO. C05-5797 KLS

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and between the

parties that the above-captioned matter has been fully settled and 

compromised, inclusive of attorneys’ fees, and the lawsuit can be dismissed 

Case 3:05-cv-05797-KLS Document 26 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 3
STIP & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

C05-5797 KLS

Page 2 of 3

with prejudice with all parties to bear their own costs.

DATED this day of April, 2007

LAW OFFICES OF ELIZABETH A. PAULI, City Attorney

MONTE E. HESTER, INC. P.S.

By: By: 

BRETT A. PURTZER JEAN P. HOMAN

WSB# 17283 WSB# 27084

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the above-entitled Court based upon

the stipulation of the parties, and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

now, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the claims of the plaintiffs,

be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice with all parties to bear their

own costs and attorney’s fees.

DONE IN OPEN COURT 7th day of May, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

ELIZABETH A. PAULI, City Attorney

By:

JEAN P. HOMAN

WSB #27084

Attorney for Defendants

Case 3:05-cv-05797-KLS Document 26 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 3
STIP & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

C05-5797 KLS

Page 3 of 3

Approved as to Form and

Notice of Presentment Waived:

LAW OFFICES OF MONTE E. HESTER, P.S.

By:

BRETT A. PURTZER

WSB #17283

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:05-cv-05797-KLS Document 26 Filed 05/07/07 Page 3 of 3
---

Exhibit 99.11


CONSENT OF THOMAS GLUCK Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 30th day of March, 2012. /s/Thomas GluckName: Thomas Gluck


---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 187 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 187

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation 
                   in the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 1998

   Mr. Mack (for himself, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Helms, Mr. Thomas, Mr. 
  Feingold, Mr. Abraham, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Ashcroft) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation 
                   in the People's Republic of China.

Whereas the annual meeting of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in 
        Geneva, Switzerland, provides a forum for discussing human rights and 
        expressing international support for improved human rights performance;
Whereas according to the United States Department of State and international 
        human rights organizations, the Government of the People's Republic of 
        China engages in widespread human rights violations; and
Whereas President Clinton pledged that the United States would step up its 
        efforts in cooperation with other states to insist that the United 
        Nations Commission on Human Rights pass a resolution dealing with the 
        serious human rights abuses in the People's Republic of China: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the United States 
should introduce and make all efforts necessary to pass a resolution 
criticizing the People's Republic of China for its human rights abuses 
in China and Tibet at the annual meeting of the United Nations 
Commission on Human Rights.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                       558
<INVENTORY>                                      1,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,144
<PP&E>                                          20,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,096
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,761
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,051
<INCOME-TAX>                                       333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,718
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>