alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 199

Designating the last week of April of each calendar year as ‘‘National Youth

Fitness Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1998

Mr. TORRICELLI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the last week of April of each calendar year

as ‘‘National Youth Fitness Week’’.

Whereas we are witnessing a historic decrease in the health

of our Nation’s adolescents with only 22 percent of our

children physically active for the recommended 30 minutes each day and nearly 15 percent of American youths

almost completely inactive;

Whereas even physical education classes are on the decline

with 75 percent of students in America not attending

daily physical education classes and 25 percent of students not participating in any form of physical education

in schools, which is a decrease in participation of almost

20 percent in just 4 years;

Whereas more than 60,000,000 people, 1⁄3 of the Nation’s

population, are overweight and even more disturbing, the
2

•SRES 199 IS

percentage of overweight adolescents has doubled in the

last 30 years;

Whereas these serious trends have resulted in a decrease in

the self-esteem of, and an increase in the risk of future

health problems for, our Nation’s adolescents;

Whereas adolescents represent the future of the Nation and

the decrease in physical fitness in the United States may

destroy our future potential unless we invest in our

youthful population today to increase our productivity

and stability tomorrow;

Whereas regular physical activity has proven effective in

fighting depression, anxiety, premature death, diabetes,

heart disease, high blood pressure, colon cancer, and a

variety of weight problems;

Whereas physical fitness campaigns help encourage consideration of the mental and physical health of our Nation’s

youth; and

Whereas Congress should take steps to reverse a trend which,

if not resolved, could destroy future opportunities for millions of today’s youth because a healthy child makes a

healthy, happy, and productive adult: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates the week beginning with the last

3 Sunday in April of each calendar year as ‘‘National

4 Youth Fitness Week’’;

5 (2) urges parents, families, caregivers, and

6 teachers to encourage and help adolescents to par-
3

•SRES 199 IS

1 ticipate in athletic activities and to teach adolescents

2 to engage in healthy lifestyles; and

3 (3) requests the President to issue a proclama4 tion each calendar year designating such week as

5 ‘‘National Youth Fitness Week’’ and encouraging

6 the people of the United States to observe this week

7 with appropriate activities and celebrations.

Æ
From: nkwells2400@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:39:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Wells

Cincinnati, OH 45236
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Robert Angrisano, President and Principal Financial Officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp. certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp.



Date:  April 12, 2006

/s/ Robert Angrisano



Robert Angrisano, President and Principal Financial Officer
From: cjaroch@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:54:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole Jaroch

, 46582-6708
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Robert Gelfand, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wallace Mountain
     Resources Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of June, 2006.


/s/  Robert Gelfand
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 259

   Designating the week beginning September 20, 1998, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 1998

Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 20, 1998, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas there are 104 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 20, 1998, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President of the United States issue 
        a proclamation calling on the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Willoughby, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 971]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered May 27, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defense counsel raised several *Batson*challenges during jury selection *(see, Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79), he failed to demonstrate "facts and other relevant circumstances sufficient to raise an inference that the prosecution used its peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors because of their race” *(People v Childress,*81 NY2d 263, 266), thereby failing to establish a prima facie "pattern of purposeful exclusion” *(People v Bolling,*79 NY2d 317, 325).

The imposed sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal L 289/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.289.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 289 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 535 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.289.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 289

English edition

Legislation

Volume 535 November 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2010/647/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2010/647/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, enteredin Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNARD LEROY MACCARLIE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

MARION SPEARMAN, Warden

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-16126

D.C. No. 2:00-cv-01830-LKKCHS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued & Submitted October 7, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior

District Judge.

** 

FILED

OCT 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior United States District Judge for the

Western Michigan, sitting by designation.
Petitioner Bernard Lee MacCarlie appeals the district court’s denial of his

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Reviewing the denial

of MacCarlie’s petition de novo, Jones v. Ryan, 691 F.3d 1093, 1100 (9th Cir. 2012),

we affirm.

1

The sole issue before this court is whether the inclusion of an implied malice

jury instruction on the charge of conspiracy to commit murder was prejudicial under

Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993). After reviewing the record as a whole,

we agree with the district court that the instructional error did not have a “substantial

and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.” Id. at 638; see

also Ayala v. Wong, No. 09-99005, 2013 WL 4865145, at *13 (9th Cir. Sept. 13,

2013). Read as a whole, the instructions—in particular the conspiracy

instruction—informed the jury that they were required to find premeditated intent, or

express malice, to convict on the conspiracy charge. Nothing in the record suggests

that the jury was confused or misled by the implied malice instruction. Moreover, the

evidence of a conspiracy to murder, including the manner in which the victim was

killed, was overwhelming. 

Finally, the arguments of both the prosecutor and MacCarlie’s counsel focused

exclusively on express malice murder, which clarified any ambiguity caused by the

1 We grant MacCarlie’s motion for judicial notice of his co-defendant’s

opening brief on appeal.

2
errant instruction. See Middleton v. McNeil, 541 U.S. 433, 438 (2004) (argument of

counsel, particularly that of the prosecutor, may resolve an ambiguous jury charge). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

3
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 ***CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***
 ***PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Berman Center, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
        in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  
 /s/ Samuel
        Chapman
 Name:  Samuel
        Chapman
 Title:  Executive
        Officer and Chairman of the Board
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 /s/ William
        McDunn
 Name:  William
        McDunn
 Title:  Chief
        Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 November
        14, 2005
 
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Berman Center, Inc. and will be retained by Berman Center, Inc. and furnished
        to
        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
# Official Journal C 251E/11 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 251E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4811 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 251E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4811 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 251E/1 | Common position (EC) No 29/2005 of 18 July 2005 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 251E/1

Common position (EC) No 29/2005 of 18 July 2005 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
May 2015

Jason Youn Photography LLC

2342 W. 8th Ave

Mesa AZ 85202

Help@JasonYoun.com

480-207-7209

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Jason Youn Photography LLC would like to submit the following as an 

amendment to Docket No FAA-2014-0233.

This is a petition to amend Exemption No. 11452:

Due to rapidly advancing UAS technology in both performance and safety 

mechanisms, Jason Youn Photography would like to amend Exemption No. 11452 to 

include more aircraft than are listed in the original exemption. 

These new unmanned aircraft (UAS) have several added safety mechanisms 

including but not limited to:

*Ground looking cameras for more stability in flight. 

*More accurate GPS systems for greater reliability. 

*More reliable lifting motors to run the thrust propulsion systems. 

*More reliable computer based Engine Control Units.

*Higher resolution video feeds to ground for greater situational awareness. 

*More flight data sent to the ground controls for grater situational awareness. 

*More reliable fail safe features for greater safety on the ground. 

! ! For these added safety reasons Jason Youn Photography would like to 

add the DJI Phantom 3 series and future Phantom iterations of the popular UAS to the 

list of approved aircraft.

The above paragraph is in keeping with the FAA’s publicly stated goal of maintaining 

flexibility to accommodate future technological innovation. 

Yours, 

Jason Youn

Jason Youn Photography LLC 

Petition to amend Exemption No. 11452