alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 143 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 143

Expressing the sense of Congress that Billerica, Massachusetts, should 
           be recognized as ``America's Yankee Doodle Town''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 1999

  Mr. Meehan submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that Billerica, Massachusetts, should 
           be recognized as ``America's Yankee Doodle Town''.

Whereas Thomas Ditson, Jr., a Billerica farmer, and a future member of the 
        Billerica Minuteman Company, was seized by British soldiers in March of 
        1775, subsequently tarred and feathered, and paraded through the streets 
        of Boston;
Whereas the soldiers accompanying him were said to have played the tune of 
        ``Yankee Doodle'', on their fifes and drums, and to have sung an 
        original verse of the song which ridiculed his plight;
Whereas the incident inspired outrage among the American Colonists and served to 
        fan the flames of dissidence;
Whereas during the Revolutionary War, ``Yankee Doodle'' was transformed into an 
        anthem of Yankee pride;
Whereas 1 month after the incident that inspired the original song lyrics, on 
        the fateful day of April 19, 1775, Thomas Ditson, Jr., did fight with 
        the Billerica Minutemen in Concord, Massachusetts, at the Battle of 
        Meriam's Corner;
Whereas the residents of Billerica celebrate their Revolutionary heritage every 
        year with a ``Yankee Doodle Homecoming'' festival, honoring Thomas 
        Ditson, Jr., and commemorating the role of Billerica in the fight for 
        American independence; and
Whereas the title ``America's Yankee Doodle Town'' was formally adopted by 
        Billerica's Board of Selectmen in 1988, and reflects the sense of town 
        pride residents feel in Billerica's connection to the song: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Billerica, Massachusetts, be 
recognized as ``America's Yankee Doodle Town''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered July 26, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00088-CV

BILLY D. BURLESON, III, ET AL., Appellants

V.

COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-04944-2014

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ July 25, 2021 unopposed third motion for an 

extension of time to file their brief on the merits. Appellants seek a further 

extension, in part, due to an inaccuracy discovered in the clerk’s record. We 

GRANT the motion as follows. We ORDER Collin County District Clerk Lynne 

Finley to file, by August 2, 2021, the corrected clerk’s record as requested by 

appellants. We extend the time for appellants’ brief on the merits to August 27, 

2021. 
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Finley and all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@ua solutionsgroup.com August 7, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for UAS Focus, LLC Exemption Request Under Section

333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act

of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, UAS Focus, LLC an operator of Small

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and

v ideography

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) to allow commercial operation of the 3D Robotics X8+ within the National Airspace

System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial surveying and engineering, remote sensing,

agriculture and ranching purposes, real estate photography, construction site inspect ions

and monitoring, power line, stack and pipeline inspections, tower inspections, surface

mining, wildlife and forestry monitoring, timber monitoring, law enforcement and first

responders, and educational and training operations over certain areas of the United

States, conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be

established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements.

UAS Focus, LLC in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements

of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45 .27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

UAS Focus, LLC has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA . 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition

, UAS Focus, LLC will be utilizing the s ame 3D Robotics X8+ pr oven

technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in numerous other a pproved

exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany UAS Focus, LLCUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@ua solutionsgroup.com Sec tion 333 Petition is included. Combined, th eir comp rehensive Section 333 Exemption

and the approvals the FAA has already give n to their chosen products and th e technology,

should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a S ummary G rant of UAS Focus,

LLC’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
Case No. 13,605.

#### SUMMERS v. WATSON.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 254.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1805.

Covenant — Injunction Bond.

Covenant will not lie on the condition of an injunction bond.

[See Case No. 17,289.]

Covenant, on the condition of an injunction bond against the defendant as surety.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

to appear without bail, on the ground that bail could not have been required if the plaintiff had brought an action of debt on the bond; and that covenant will not lie on the condition of a bond. The defendant does not covenant or promise to perform the condition, but may pay the penalty if he chooses. By the act of assembly, the plaintiff has a right to hold to bail in an action of covenant if he has a right of action of covenant. But here he has no right of action -of covenant.

THE COURT

were of opinion that covenant will not lie on the condition of this bond.
(Reap. Dec. 11083)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4441.

(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp, Bolter é Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND. AGREED • by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 T.D. 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 362 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported *626by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
0

∠

Alpha 40 ARF Trainer

Quantity 1 $189.99 

 $139.99 

Free Shipping on orders over 99*. Learn More

THIS PRODUCT IS IN STOCK

This Alpha 40 ARF Trainer is based on the same Alpha 40 RTF 

Trainer that has been used in flying clubs everywhere to 

introduce thousands to the fun of RC flight.

Add to Cart Add to Wish List +

ņ

You Might Also Consider

Share Your Photos with the Community

View Gallery (http://www.horizonh ∠ obby.com/HHStaticContentView?emsName=_resource-center_gallery&storeId=10151&catalogId=10051) Add a Photo ∠

Powered by Olapic (http://www.olapic.com/?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=powered-by-olapic&utm_campaign=horizonhobby)

#horizonhobby 

Tag your photos on 

Twitter and Instagram

I Add Your Photos Here!

$96.99 

Fuselage: Alpha 40 RTF 

 $129.99 

Phoenix R/C Pro Simulator 

V5.5 

â I LIKE: Airplanes Helicopters Cars & Trucks

 Boats Multirotor Enter Email Address ( ( (

( ( Subscribe

Alpha 40 ARF Trainer (HAN2460)

(14 reviews) Write a review  Share H Print

Ship To SPECIALS

Our Product Experts 

are online now.

Hangar 9 Alpha 40 ARF Trainer RC Airplane | Horizon Hobby Page 1 of 2

http://www.horizonhobby.com/HAN2460?KPID=HAN2460&CAWELAID=32001198000... 2/25/2016
Find a Retailer  ̈ Give us a Call: 800-338-4639 Site Map Email Signup Contact Us

Copyright © Horizon Hobby 

Our Product Experts 

are online now.

Hangar 9 Alpha 40 ARF Trainer RC Airplane | Horizon Hobby Page 2 of 2

http://www.horizonhobby.com/HAN2460?KPID=HAN2460&CAWELAID=32001198000... 2/25/2016
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Compilation of responses toclimate change questionnaire**
 
Parts: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:Y 4.AG 8/1:C 61/
Item Number:1010-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:000649418
 
December 30, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71028-71029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday, November 16, 2023. This meeting will be held 
virtually from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.
    The Committee presents advice and makes recommendations to the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on technical aspects of data 
collection and the formulation of economic measures and makes 
recommendations on areas of research. The BLS presents issues and then 
draws on the expertise of Committee members representing specialized 
fields within the academic disciplines of economics, statistics, data 
science, and survey design. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are 
as follows:

10:00 a.m. Acting Commissioner's Welcome and Review of Agency 
Developments
10:30 a.m. Using record linkage techniques to improve data import rates 
into the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
1:00 p.m. Development of Small Domain Estimation Models for 
Occupational Requirements Survey (ORS)
2:30 p.m. Productivity Dispersion Statistics for Retail Trade
4:00 p.m. Approximate Conclusion

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting

[[Page 71029]]

should be directed to Michael Giandrea, Bureau of Labor Statistics 
Technical Advisory Committee, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53111f0007121013313f207d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692b253a3d282a290b051a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals planning 
to attend the meeting should register at https://blstac.eventbrite.com. 
Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Mr. 
Giandrea at least two days prior to the meeting date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of October 2023.
Leslie Bennett,
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2023-22541 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

DESCRIPTION OF RELOCATION PROGRAM FOR DESIGNATED HIGH-COST AREAS

      The Company offers a relocation program (the "Relocation Program") for
employees who relocate at the Company's request to designated high cost
areas. The Company believes this program is an attractive incentive to retain
key employees. The Relocation Program provides a relocating employee who is
eligible for benefits under the Program with financial assistance, both in
purchasing a residence in a designated high cost area, and in selling his or
her existing home. Under the Relocation Program, an employee who relocates to
a designated high-cost area is eligible to receive a first mortgage loan
(subject to applicable lending guidelines) from Norwest Mortgage, Inc., and a
30-year, interest-free second mortgage down payment loan in an amount up to
100% of his or her annual base salary to purchase a new primary residence.
The Company may also provide a mortgage interest subsidy on the first
mortgage loan of up to 25% of the employee's annual base salary, payable over
a period not less than the first three years of the first mortgage loan. The
second mortgage loan must be repaid in full if the employee terminates
employment with the Company or retires, or if the employee sells the
residence or refinances the mortgage loans. In addition to first mortgage and
down payment loan assistance, the Company may provide a transfer bonus of up
to 30% of the eligible relocating employee's base salary and will generally
pay all related home purchase closing costs and moving expenses for the
relocating employee.

      With the exception of expenses paid to or on behalf of the employee to
move household goods, the benefits described above (other than the mortgage
loans) are treated as taxable income to the employee. The Relocation Program
also includes, as an additional benefit, reimbursement of the amount of taxes
paid on the taxable portion of amounts received by the employee under the
Relocation Program.

      The Relocation Program also assists employees relocating to a
designated high cost area in defraying costs associated with selling their
current residences. Available benefits may include payment of selling costs
customarily incurred by a seller of residential real estate (such as real
estate commissions, title and appraisal fees, and other routine closing
costs), purchase of the relocating employee's home at its appraised market
value by a third party relocation company using Company funds, and certain
cash incentives to employees who locate buyers for their homes directly.

The Company has designated the San Francisco Bay area and Los Angeles County,
California as high-cost areas, among others, under the Relocation Program.
# IMMC.EESC-2017-05890-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2017-05890-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

European Economic and Social Committee

European Economic and Social Committee

ECO/449

ECO/449

Location of the European Banking Authority (EBA)

Location of the European Banking Authority (EBA)

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

  [COM(2017) 734 final – 2017/0326 (COD)]

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

[COM(2017) 734 final – 2017/0326 (COD)]

Consultation

| Consultation | Council of the European Union, 14/12/2017


  European Parliament, 11/12/2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 114 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 17/01/2018 |
| Plenary session No | 531 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 167/0/1 |

Consultation

Council of the European Union, 14/12/2017

Council of the European Union, 14/12/2017

European Parliament, 11/12/2017

European Parliament, 11/12/2017

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 114 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 114 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

17/01/2018

17/01/2018

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

531

531

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

167/0/1

167/0/1

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rule 50(4) and 56(3)).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rule 50(4) and 56(3)).

Brussels, 17 January 2018

Brussels, 17 January 2018

Georges DASSIS

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
| date    | Assets | Liabilities |
|---------|--------|-------------|
| 2000:Q1 | 51.43  | 6.93        |
| 2000:Q2 | 51.37  | 7.08        |
| 2000:Q3 | 52.35  | 7.26        |
| 2000:Q4 | 52.04  | 7.41        |
| 2001:Q1 | 52.01  | 7.45        |
| 2001:Q2 | 53.41  | 7.65        |
| 2001:Q3 | 52.64  | 7.9         |
| 2001:Q4 | 54.3   | 8.03        |
| 2002:Q1 | 55.07  | 8.16        |
| 2002:Q2 | 54.69  | 8.35        |
| 2002:Q3 | 53.85  | 8.56        |
| 2002:Q4 | 55.05  | 8.81        |
| 2003:Q1 | 55.51  | 9           |
| 2003:Q2 | 57.82  | 9.39        |
| 2003:Q3 | 59     | 9.65        |
| 2003:Q4 | 61.24  | 9.9         |
| 2004:Q1 | 64     | 10.1        |
| 2004:Q2 | 65.12  | 10.42       |
| 2004:Q3 | 66.77  | 10.7        |
| 2004:Q4 | 69.5   | 11.07       |
| 2005:Q1 | 70.6   | 11.28       |
| 2005:Q2 | 72.54  | 11.61       |
| 2005:Q3 | 74.53  | 11.96       |
| 2005:Q4 | 76.45  | 12.26       |
| 2006:Q1 | 78.64  | 12.61       |
| 2006:Q2 | 79.04  | 12.96       |
| 2006:Q3 | 80.53  | 13.29       |
| 2006:Q4 | 82.25  | 13.56       |
| 2007:Q1 | 83.46  | 13.73       |
| 2007:Q2 | 84.19  | 14.04       |
| 2007:Q3 | 85.2   | 14.29       |
| 2007:Q4 | 84.69  | 14.5        |
| 2008:Q1 | 82.76  | 14.62       |
| 2008:Q2 | 81.17  | 14.56       |
| 2008:Q3 | 79.01  | 14.7        |
| 2008:Q4 | 75.53  | 14.4        |
| 2009:Q1 | 74.16  | 14.3        |
| 2009:Q2 | 74.72  | 14.28       |
| 2009:Q3 | 76.29  | 14.28       |
| 2009:Q4 | 76.58  | 14.28       |
| 2010:Q1 | 77.65  | 14.17       |
| 2010:Q2 | 77.14  | 14.11       |
| 2010:Q3 | 79.12  | 14.05       |
| 2010:Q4 | 80.71  | 14.06       |
| 2011:Q1 | 81.81  | 14.04       |
| 2011:Q2 | 82.23  | 14          |
| 2011:Q3 | 80.47  | 13.95       |
| 2011:Q4 | 81.81  | 13.95       |
| 2012:Q1 | 83.84  | 13.91       |
| 2012:Q2 | 83.87  | 13.86       |
| 2012:Q3 | 85.92  | 13.9        |
| 2012:Q4 | 86.97  | 13.89       |
| 2013:Q1 | 89.84  | 13.85       |
| 2013:Q2 | 91.02  | 13.86       |
| 2013:Q3 | 93.66  | 13.93       |
| 2013:Q4 | 95.91  | 14.11       |
| 2014:Q1 | 97.57  | 14.1        |
| 2014:Q2 | 99.57  | 14.2        |
| 2014:Q3 | 100.2  | 14.2        |
| 2014:Q4 | 102.16 | 14.27       |
| 2015:Q1 | 103.99 | 14.22       |
| 2015:Q2 | 104.66 | 14.35       |
| 2015:Q3 | 103.75 | 14.42       |
| 2015:Q4 | 105.34 | 14.44       |
| 2016:Q1 | 106.51 | 14.43       |
| 2016:Q2 | 108.08 | 14.57       |
| 2016:Q3 | 110.1  | 14.76       |
| 2016:Q4 | 110.92 | 14.86       |
| 2017:Q1 | 113.44 | 14.9        |
| 2017:Q2 | 115.33 | 15.06       |
| 2017:Q3 | 117.39 | 15.19       |
| 2017:Q4 | 120.27 | 15.4        |
| 2018:Q1 | 120.99 | 15.44       |
| 2018:Q2 | 122.74 | 15.58       |
| 2018:Q3 | 124.89 | 15.77       |
| 2018:Q4 | 121.41 | 15.89       |
| 2019:Q1 | 127.34 | 15.89       |
| 2019:Q2 | 129.88 | 16.07       |
| 2019:Q3 | 130.87 | 16.24       |
| 2019:Q4 | 134.62 | 16.4        |
| 2020:Q1 | 127.92 | 16.48       |
| 2020:Q2 | 136.08 | 16.49       |
| 2020:Q3 | 139.99 | 16.76       |
| 2020:Q4 | 147.42 | 17.06       |