alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF TRANSFER

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

FRED CHISOM, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C06-260-JLR-MJB

)

v. )

)

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ORDER OF TRANSFER

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

Petitioner is a state prisoner who is currently incarcerated at the Washington Corrections

Center in Shelton, Washington. He has submitted to this Court for review a petition for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner identifies a 2000 conviction in King County

Superior Court as the conviction under attack in the instant petition.

A review of this Court’s records reveals that petitioner has filed at least three previous

federal habeas petitions challenging the same 2000 King County Superior Court conviction. (See

C02-2048TSZ, C04-2261JCC, and C05-1133RSM.) The first of those petitions was denied on the

merits and dismissed by the Court in April 2003. (See C02-2048TSZ.) The two remaining

petitions were deemed successive and were transferred to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

(See C04-2261JCC, and C05-1133RSM.)

Case 2:06-cv-00260-JLR-MJB Document 6 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF TRANSFER

PAGE - 2

Because petitioner has filed at least three previous federal habeas petitions challenging the

same conviction which he seeks to challenge in the instant petition, including one which was

denied on the merits, the instant petition must be deemed successive. As petitioner has previously

been advised, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider a successive petition or motion until

the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has authorized its filing. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). 

Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the

interests of justice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

The Clerk is directed to close this case and to transfer all original documents to the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals. The Clerk shall, however, retain a copy of the motion and of this Order

in the file. The Clerk is further directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner and to the

Honorable Monica J. Benton.

DATED this 20th day of April, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Recommended for Entry this 

20th day of April, 2006.

 /s/Monica J. Benton 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00260-JLR-MJB Document 6 Filed 04/20/06 Page 2 of 2
July 20, 1954

No. 58292.

Suit 4774.

#### Joseph Ullmann Brokerage Corp. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1478 affirmed April 9, 1954. C. A. D. 560.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 106

Expressing the regret and apologies of the Congress for the accidental 
bombing by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) of the Chinese 
                          Embassy in Belgrade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

Mr. Hastings of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the regret and apologies of the Congress for the accidental 
bombing by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) of the Chinese 
                          Embassy in Belgrade.

Whereas on May 7, 1999, air strikes by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
        (NATO) in Belgrade resulted in two direct hits on the Chinese Embassy;
Whereas the air strikes badly damaged the embassy, and killed three Chinese 
        citizens and injured 26 others;
Whereas the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency issued a 
        statement that the bombs were meant for another building believed to be 
        located at that address, and this tragedy was solely due to a systems 
        failure to produce and verify accurate data; and
Whereas President Clinton, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and the United 
        States Ambassador to China James Sasser have issued apologies to the 
        Chinese premier, government, citizens, and victims for this tragedy: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress joins the President and Secretary of State in--
            (1) expressing its sincere regret and apologies for the 
        mistaken and tragic bombing by the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization (NATO) of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade that 
        killed three Chinese citizens and wounded 26 others; and
            (2) extending its deepest sympathies and condolences to the 
        Chinese Government, citizens, and families of the bombing's 
        victims.
                                 <all>
```
BOARD OF GOVERNORS 

or THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

WASHINGTON, D. C::. 20551 

October 30, 2013 

SANDRA F. BRAUNSTEIN 

DIRECTOR 

DIVISION OF CONSUMER 

AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 

CA 13-16 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS: 

SUBJECT: Interagency Examination Procedures for Garnishment of Accounts 

Containing Federal Benefit Payments Rule 

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state 

member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets. 

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance ofthe Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council has approved the attached interagency examination procedures for the 

Garnishment of Accounts Containing Federal Benefit Payments Rule (Garnishment Rule). 

Earlier this year, the Department of the Treasury, the Social Security Administration, the 

Department of Veteran Affairs, the Railroad Retirement Board, and the Office of Personnel 

Management issued the Garnishment Rule to implement statutory restrictions on garnishment of 

certain exempt federal benefit payments. The rule, 31 CFR Part 212, establishes procedures that 

a financial institution must follow when it receives a garnishment order against an account holder 

who receives certain Federal benefit payments by direct deposit. The attached examination 

procedures provide a narrative discussion of the Garnishment Rule and procedures for examiners 

to follow in evaluating an institution's compliance with the rule. 

If you have any questions, please contact Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer 

Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 452-2705. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ 

Attachment: Examination Procedures for Garnishment of Accounts Containing Federal Benefit 

Payments Rule
MASTER SERVICER CERTIFICATION


Re:	Irwin Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-1

	I, Dan Kuster, Vice President - Home Equity Lending of Irwin Union
Bank and Trust Company (the "Master Servicer"), in charge of servicing,
certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10 and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed
in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
for Irwin Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-1 (the "Trust");

	2.	Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by that annual report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the distribution information and
the servicing information required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee
by the Master Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement is included
in these reports;

	4.	I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the Master Servicer under the Sale & Servicing Agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the Sale and
Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Master
Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Sales and Servicing
Agreement; and

	5.	The reports discloses all significant deficiencies
relating to the Master Service's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as
set forth in the Servicing Agreement.

	Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated June 1, 2005
(the "Sale and Servicing Agreement"), among Bear Stearns Asset Backed
Securities I LLC., as depositor, Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company, as
seller and as the Master Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Indenture Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian.

	In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided by the following unaffiliated third parties: U.S.
Bank National Association.




Attest:					Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company,
					as Master Servicer


/s/ Suzanne Mercier			   By: /s/ Dan Kuster
Suzanne Mercier				   Dan Kuster
Assistant Secretary- Home Equity Lending   Vice-President - Home Equity Lending

					   Date:  3/23/06
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 85 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast 
     cancer should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 1997

 Mr. Gregg (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Hampshire) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Labor and 
                            Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast 
     cancer should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

Whereas individuals with breast cancer need a support system in their time of 
        need;
Whereas breast cancer is a disease of epidemic proportions, with 43,900 
        individuals in the United States expected to die from breast cancer in 
        1997, and 1 out of every 8 women in the United States expected to 
        develop breast cancer in her lifetime;
Whereas the millions of family members, including spouses, children, parents, 
        siblings, and other loved ones of persons with breast cancer can offer 
        strong emotional support to each other in addition to the support they 
        offer to patients and survivors dealing with their challenges;
Whereas it is important that the United States as a whole support the family 
        members and other loved ones of individuals with breast cancer in 
        addition to supporting the individual with breast cancer; and
Whereas 1997 brings the 25th anniversary of the National Cancer Program 
        providing research, training, health information dissemination, and 
        other programs with respect to the cause, diagnosis, prevention and 
        treatment of cancer, rehabilitation from cancer, and the continuing care 
        of cancer patients and their families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that an environment be 
encouraged where--
            (1) the family members and loved ones of individuals with 
        breast cancer can support each other in addition to the 
        individual with breast cancer; and
            (2) everything possible should be done to support both the 
        individuals with breast cancer as well as the family and loved 
        ones of individuals with breast cancer through public awareness 
        and education.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                           UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
                         OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                                SOFTLINK, INC.
                             A NEVADA CORPORATION

                       Effective as of December 8, 1999


     The undersigned, constituting the Board of Directors of Softlink.com a
Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), acting pursuant to the authority vested
in them by the Nevada Revised Statutes, hereby consent to and adopt the
following resolutions:

                            1999 HOLIDAY BONUS PLAN
                            -----------------------

     WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Corporation to reward employees
of the Corporation for their performance and to provide additional incentive to
employees by providing increased interest in the Corporation's welfare through
participation in the growth in value of the Corporation's common stock by
implementing a 1999 holiday bonus plan.

     RESOLVED, that the issuance of an aggregate amount of 20,250 shares of
common stock of the Corporation to employees of the Corporation is hereby
authorized and approved.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Corporation are hereby
authorized and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, to take
such actions and execute such documents they deem necessary or appropriate for
compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       1
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned directors of the Corporation have
executed this consent as of the date first written above.

                                      /s/ WILLIAM YUAN
                                     -------------------------------
                                     William Yuan, Director

                                      /s/ EDMUND T. LEUNG
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Edmund T. Leung, Director

                                      /s/ JOHNSON C. LEE
                                     -------------------------------
                                    Johnson C. Lee, Director

                                       2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5293RJB

ORDER DENYING ALL

PENDING MOTIONS

This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. §2000, has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Court has recommended this action be dismissed for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff has filed two motions asking for appointment of

counsel. (Dkt. # 5 and 6). In light of the pending Report and Recommendation the motions are DENIED.

DATED this 31st day of August, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE— 1

JARRAY ANTWON BROWN - 06-5035M

MAGISTRATE JUDGE STROMBOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 ) NO. 06-5035M

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

) MOTION TO EXTEND INDICTMENT

) DEADLINE

JARRAY ANTWON BROWN, )

)

Defendant. )

________________________________ )

Upon the stipulation of the parties to extend the indictment deadline and the

waiver of right to speedy indictment executed by the defendant, the Court finds that such

an extension would serve the ends of justice and outweighs the interests of the public and

the defendant in a speedy indictment; now, therefore,

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:06-cr-05423-FDB Document 23 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE— 2

JARRAY ANTWON BROWN - 06-5035M

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the indictment deadline be extended to July 11,

2006. The period of delay resulting from this extension is hereby excluded for speedy

trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

DATED this 8th day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ Mark W. Muenster 

MARK W. MUENSTER

Attorney for Defendant

Washington State Bar No. 11228

1010 Esther Street

Vancouver, WA 98660

Phone: 360-694-5085

Fax: 360-694-2741

E-mail: markmuen@ix.netcom.com

s/ J. Tate London 

J. TATE LONDON

Assistant United States Attorney

Washington Bar No. 18097

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: 206-553-4064

Fax: 206-553-0755

E-mail: Tate.London@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-05423-FDB Document 23 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE— 3

JARRAY ANTWON BROWN - 06-5035M

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 8, 2006 I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the attorney(s) of record for the defendant(s). I hereby certify that I have served the

attorney(s) of record for the defendant(s) that are non CM/ECF participants via telefax.

s/ Jacqueline Masonic 

JACQUELINE MASONIC

Supervisory Legal Assistant

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: (206) 553-4644

FAX: (206) 553-2502

E-mail: Jackie.Masonic@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-05423-FDB Document 23 Filed 05/09/06 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6635

JOHNNY WAYNE GAY,
Petitioner - Appellant,

v.
JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden, FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee,

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-03624-GRA)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Wayne Gay, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Johnny Wayne Gay, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gay v. LaManna , No. 2:08-cv-03624-GRA
(D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent
to the use of our report dated April 27, 2009 with respect to the financial statements of Xenith Bank [In Organization] included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Xenith Bankshares, Inc. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 27, 2009 with respect to the financial statements of Xenith Bank [In Organization] in the Registration Statement on S-8 (333-153118) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of
Xenith Bankshares, Inc.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|March 31, 2010       
|Richmond, Virginia
PUBLIC LAW 111–30—JUNE 19, 2009 123 STAT. 1775 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2675: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

June 9, considered and passed House. 

June 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–30 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title II of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform 

Act of 2004 to extend the operation of such title for a 1-year period ending 

June 22, 2010. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal Penalty 

Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DELAY OF SUNSET. 

Section 211(a) of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement 

and Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended by striking 

‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT. 

The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect immediately 

before June 22, 2009. 

Approved June 19, 2009. 

15 USC 1 note. 

Antitrust 

Criminal Penalty 

Enhancement 

and Reform Act 

of 2004 

Extension Act. 

15 USC 1 note. 

June 19, 2009 

[H.R. 2675] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                       617
<INVENTORY>                                      3,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,226
<PP&E>                                           5,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                     629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,696
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,537
<SALES>                                         19,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,130
<CGS>                                           13,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (361)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>