alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OMB No. 7100-0339 

Expiration Date: 02/28/2013

 Docket Number: ___________ 

OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION

NOTICE OR APPLICATION FOR CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT 

The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) will use this form to acquire information concerning the 

amount of capital that an institution intends to distribute, pursuant to 12 C.F.R. § 563 Subpart E 

of the OTS regulations. 

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16.5 minutes per 

response, including the time for reviewing instructions and completing and reviewing 

the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of 

the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of 

Thrift Supervision, Corporate & International Activities, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

20552; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (7100-0339), 

Washington, D.C. 20503. 

____________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 2 

OTS Form 1583 

Revised November 2008 
OMB No. 7100-0339 

Expiration Date: 02/28/2013

Docket Number: ___________ 

OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION

NOTICE OR APPLICATION FOR CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION 

TO: Office of Thrift Supervision Date of Filing: ______________ 

We, the undersigned executive officer and secretary, pursuant to the resolution of majority of the 

members of the board directors, of: 

Savings Institution Name 

Street Address of Savings Institution (include City, State and Zip Code) 

(hereinafter the Institution), hereby provide _____notice/____application (select one) to the Office of 

Thrift Supervision (OTS) that the Institution intends to issue a capital distribution in the amount to 

$ ___________, pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 563.140, and do hereby certify: 

1. That to the best of our belief, the institution ____qualifies/____does not qualify (select 

 one) for expedited treatment, pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Sections 563.143 and 516.25(a); 

2. That, if applicable, the Institution has attached any additional information required, pursuant 

 to 12 C.F.R. Section 563.146; and 

3. That we are aware that the OTS may request additional information or may impose conditions 

 for the distribution of capital and may determine that such distribution does not comply with the 

 requirements of 12 C.F.R. Section 563.143. 

__________________________________ ______________________________ 

Executive Officer Secretary 

 _______________________________ 

 Date of Receipt by OTS 

Page 2 of 2 

OTS Form 1583 

Revised November 2008
Case 2:06-cr-00241-RSL Document 12 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 62867.

#### Penson & Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/3717 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of 2

Texas department of Criminal justice- h*muhbj New Offender Search

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number:

TDCJ Number:

Name:

Race:

Gender:

DOB:

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

Projected Release Date:

Parole Eligibility Date:

Offender Visitation Eligible:

03420723

01795333

SHOCKLEY.JOHN DAVID

W

M

1967-06-17

2046-01-26

GOREE

2046-01-26

2028-07-27

YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense

Date

Offense

Sentence ~ . ~ Kl Sentence (YYDate County CaseNo" MM-DD)

T T

http://offender.tdcj .texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=03420723 6/24/2015
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 110 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 143
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                               S. Res. 110

  To permit an individual with a disability with access to the Senate 
         floor to bring necessary supporting aids and services.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 1997

Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Reid, Mr. Kerry, Mr. 
    Chafee, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
    Murkowski, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Harkin) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                      on Rules and Administration

                             July 31, 1997

               Reported by Mr. Warner, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  To permit an individual with a disability with access to the Senate 
         floor to bring necessary supporting aids and services.

    Resolved, That an individual with a disability who has or is 
granted the privilege of the Senate floor under rule XXIII of the 
Standing Rules of the Senate may bring necessary supporting aids and 
services (including service dogs, wheelchairs, and interpreters) on the 
Senate floor, unless the Senate Sergeant at Arms determines that the 
use of such supporting aids and services would place a significant 
difficulty or expense on the operations of the Senate in accordance 
with paragraph 2 of rule 4 of the Rules for Regulation of the Senate 
Wing of the United States Capitol.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 143

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  To permit an individual with a disability with access to the Senate 
         floor to bring necessary supporting aids and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 1997

                       Reported without amendment`
Before the Third Division,

December 14, 1966

No. P66/371.

#### Ardalt, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 59/30537, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 263

Expressing support for a National Teach Census Week.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself and Mrs. MALONEY of New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing support for a National Teach Census Week.

Whereas the decennial census is required by article I, section

2, clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas, in order to achieve the most accurate census possible, it is important that everyone participate in the census and that particular attention be given to ensuring

that children and all other hard to enumerate populations

are accurately counted;

Whereas the program commonly referred to as the ‘‘Census

in Schools Project’’, under the auspices of the Bureau of

the Census, represents an effective way to educate the

Nation’s youth as to the reasons why a full and complete

census is so important to a democratic society;
2

•HCON 263 IH

Whereas the Census in Schools Project seeks to increase participation in the 2000 decennial census by engaging parents through schools and through the active involvement

of children and teens; and

Whereas Members of Congress have participated in numerous

events relating to the Census in Schools Project in order

to help promote the importance of the 2000 decennial

census: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a National Teach Census Week should be

4 established to recognize the importance of partici5 pating in the 2000 decennial census; and

6 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

7 calling on elementary, secondary, and high school

8 teachers across the Nation, particularly those in9 volved in teaching American history and government,

10 to instruct their students on the importance of par11 ticipating in the 2000 decennial census.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 23.3


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                      Laidlaw Solid Waste Management Group

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Allied Waste Industries, Inc. on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 Registration No.
333-31231 dated November 7, 1997, of our report dated September 30, 1996, to the
Directors of Laidlaw Inc. on the balance sheets of the Laidlaw Solid Waste
Management Group as at August 31, 1995 and 1996 and the statements of operations
and cash flows for years ended August 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, which report is
incorporated in the Form 8K/A-4 dated of February 19, 1997.

This letter is provided to securities regulatory authorities pursuant to the
requirements of their securities legislation and is not for any other purpose.


                                                   /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND


November 7, 1997                                   Coopers & Lybrand
Hamilton, Canada                                   Chartered Accountants
1

MEMO to Docket

DATE: January 20th, 2015

SUBJECT: Telephone conversation on Portland Cement Subpart LLL

In attendance: Sharon Nizich, US EPA

 Chet Thompson, Crowell and Martin

Mr. Thompson asked some clarifying questions about completion of performance tests and whether 

the compliance date was actually 180 days after September 9, 2015. These questions were 

answered and then also duplicated in the response to comment document for the subject 

amendments, found in the docket, and copied here:

“Several commenters through telephone communications (as recorded in the final docket) have 

requested clarification on the Note for Paragraph (a) of Section 63.1348 relative to whether you must 

complete the performance test prior to or on the compliance date. Also the commenters seek 

clarification on the actual compliance date, since the general provisions under 63. 7 allows 180 days 

after the compliance date to show compliance. 

RESPONSE: The source must perform Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATA) for the CPMS or CEMS 

before the compliance date, since according to 63.1351(c), the compliance date for existing sources for 

all the requirements that become effective on February 12, 2013 (except for the open clinker pile 

requirements) will be September 9, 2015. The Note to paragraph (a) was to provide clarification that a 

source’s 30 day operating day performance test could start the day after the effective date, so that the 

rolling averages would begin to be developed following the first monitoring day after the compliance 

date. 40 CFR 63.7 does give the source 180 days to demonstrate compliance, however existing sources 

are expected to be operating in compliance on the effective date of the rule. It is expected that 

existing sources have procured their monitoring equipment and done their RATA for each emission 

source and is confident that they are in compliance on the compliance date.”
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-180/00: Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Association arrangements for the overseas countries and territories - Imports of sugar and mixtures of sugar and cocoa - Regulation (EC) No 465/2000 - Action for annulment - Safeguard measures - Proportionality)

(2005/C 217/02)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-180/00: Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agents: M. Fierstra and J. van Bakel) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. van Rijn and C. van der Hauwaert), supported by Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad), and by French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and D. Colas) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 12 May 2000 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 211 of 22.07.2000.

----
No. 62333.

#### Hershey Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3609 and 58/3101 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items in question are not in chief value of galalith but that they are in chief value of steel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE

                               CERTIFICATE SHARES


                         TECHNOLOGY VENTURES GROUP, INC.

         10,000,000 shares of common stock authorized- Par value $.0O1 par value

                                    SPECIMEN


         This certifies that______________________________________________ is
         hereby issued_______________________________________________ fully paid
         and non-assessable Shares of the Capital Stock of the above named
         Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the
         holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender
         of this Certificate properly endorsed.

                  In witness Whereof, this Corporation has caused this
         Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer(s) this
         _______________ day of______________ ___________


         ______________________                        _______________________
         Secretary                                     President
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian M. Sondey,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  /s/  Brian M.
  SondeyBrian M. SondeyPresident
  and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 1, 2010
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/26/06 Page 17 of 17
NO. 12-10-00292-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RONALD SMITH,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

AMERICA’S BEST VALUE 

INN & SUITES, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Ronald Smith, has failed to 

comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant 

to rule 32.1, Smith’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the 

appeal was perfected, i.e., August 31, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. On September 2, 

2010, this court notified Smith that he should file a docketing statement immediately if he 

had not already done so. By separate letter, also dated September 2, 2010, this court 

requested that Smith pay his filing fee on or before September 13, 2010. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5.

Because Smith did not pay his filing fee or file the docketing statement as 

requested in the September 2, 2010 letters, this court issued a second notice on 

September 17, 2010, advising Smith that the filing fee and the docketing statement were 

past due. The notice further provided that unless the filing fee was paid and the 

docketing statement filed on or before September 27, 2010, the appeal would be 

presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The 

September 27 deadline has passed, and Smith has not complied with the court’s request. 

Because Smith has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 30, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Trevor Herbert, Chief Financial Officer of Riverbank
Resources Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Riverbank Resources
      Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Riverbank Resources Inc.                                                              

Date: July 27, 2006.

| | /s/
      Trevor Herbert        
| | --------------------------------
| | Trevor Herbert                  
| | Chief Financial Officer         
| | (Principal Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)   
| | Riverbank Resources Inc         

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tao
Minerals Ltd. and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
AAM-13-273-E 

March 25, 2013 

 Exemption No. 10237A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0339 

Ms. Stacy Riggs 

Agent for Services 

Alamo Helicopter Tours San Antonio, LLC 

8535 Mission Road, Suite 104 

San Antonio, TX 78214 

Dear Ms. Riggs: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10237. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 6, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Alamo Helicopter Tours San Antonio, LLC (Alamo Helicopter Tours) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10237. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Alamo Helicopter Tours, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Alamo Helicopter 

Tours. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10237 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Alamo Helicopter Tours are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Alamo Helicopter Tours part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10237 to April 30, 2015, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon