alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 172

Expressing the sense of Congress in opposition to a ‘‘bit tax’’ on Internet

data proposed in the Human Development Report 1999 published by

the United Nations Development Programme.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1999

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BARTON of

Texas, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BURR of

North Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs.

CHENOWETH, Ms. DUNN, Mr. GOODE, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HANSEN,

Mr. HASTINGS of Washigton, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr.

ISTOOK, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. LINDER, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. MICA,

Mr. GARY MILLER of California, Mr. NEY, Mr. OSE, Mr. PAUL, Mr.

PEASE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. POMBO, Mr. ROGAN, Mr.

SCHAFFER, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr.

TANCREDO, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr.

WICKER, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. COOK, and Mrs. MYRICK) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress in opposition to a ‘‘bit

tax’’ on Internet data proposed in the Human Development Report 1999 published by the United Nations Development Programme.

Whereas the Internet has rapidly become a highly valued tool

for millions of people in the United States and across the
2

• HCON 172 IH

world and promises to become an ever-greater benefit to

mankind;

Whereas the Internet has spurred entirely new industries

dominated by the United States and has become critical

to the continued growth of our economy;

Whereas emerging telecommunications technologies promise

to extend the benefits of the Internet to ever-growing and

far-flung populations;

Whereas the Internet should remain tax-free;

Whereas any global tax collected by the United Nations

would present a threat to the sovereignty of the United

States and would violate the United States Constitution;

Whereas Americans are by far the greatest users of the Internet and would thus be disproportionately affected by any

global Internet tax;

Whereas the most effective and just way to spread technology

and wealth is through the operation of a free market;

Whereas the rapidly increasing sophistication and decreasing

cost of telecommunications and computing products and

services should not be disturbed; and

Whereas the United Nations Development Programme’s

Human Development Report 1999 proposed that a socalled ‘‘bit tax’’ be levied on all data sent through the

Internet: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress urges the Administration to

3 protect United States sovereignty by aggressively opposing

4 the global ‘‘bit tax’’ proposed in the Human Development
3

• HCON 172 IH

1 Report 1999 published by the United Nations Develop2 ment Programme.

Æ
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.228 Taxes Payable by Businesses  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineAll sectors; taxes payable; liability
	FA893178005
	19.4
	20.1
	16.8
	11.8
	18.9
	-6.4
	-31.6
	-27.9
	-39.8
	20.4
	-2.6
	1Nonfinancial corporate business; taxes payable; liability
	FA103178000
	7.2
	8.8
	2.3
	-9.1
	-1.4
	-1.8
	16.0
	-10.5
	-36.0
	-39.8
	-1.6
	2Nonfinancial noncorporate business; taxes payable; liability
	FA113178003
	-0.7
	0.6
	7.6
	3.2
	3.7
	9.0
	6.1
	6.6
	8.1
	6.1
	6.2
	3U.S.-chartered depository institutions; taxes payable (net); liability
	FA763178003
	6.6
	10.6
	7.0
	0.1
	15.2
	-4.4
	-27.6
	8.6
	-17.7
	41.4
	17.7
	4Property-casualty insurance companies; taxes payable (net); liability
	FA513178003
	5.6
	-4.4
	3.8
	19.1
	1.9
	-8.2
	-18.9
	-23.4
	8.1
	5.3
	-16.5
	5Life insurance companies, general accounts; taxes payable (net); liability
	FA543178073
	2.6
	5.2
	-4.6
	-2.3
	-1.9
	-0.7
	-5.6
	-8.9
	1.8
	5.6
	-4.3
	6Finance companies; taxes payable; liability
	FA613178003
	0.3
	0.5
	0.2
	0.1
	1.0
	0.6
	1.0
	0.3
	-0.6
	-1.6
	-1.8
	7Security brokers and dealers; taxes payable; liability
	FA663178003
	-2.1
	-1.1
	0.5
	0.6
	0.3
	-0.8
	-2.5
	-0.7
	-3.4
	3.4
	-2.3
	8All sectors; taxes receivable; asset
	FA893078005
	28.1
	28.1
	31.5
	29.0
	-0.8
	25.2
	10.9
	-19.6
	-29.4
	74.1
	95.8
	9Federal government; taxes receivable; asset
	FA313078005
	27.1
	25.6
	22.0
	24.9
	-4.5
	16.2
	4.8
	-26.6
	-37.0
	68.3
	89.1
	10State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; taxes receivable; asset
	FA213078005
	1.0
	2.4
	9.5
	4.1
	3.7
	9.0
	6.1
	6.9
	7.6
	5.9
	6.7
	11Instrument discrepancies; taxes receivable
	FA903078005
	-8.6
	-8.0
	-14.7
	-17.2
	19.7
	-31.6
	-42.5
	-8.3
	-10.4
	-53.7
	-98.4
	12 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
Before the Second Division,

December 18, 1963

No. 68177.

#### Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co., Inc., and Yokogawa Electric Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/15477 and 61/17023 (New York).

*287Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of instruments, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 2004 Management Stock Plan and 2005 Management Omnibus Incentive Plan of TAL International Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of TAL International Group, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of TAL International Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP
New York, New York
March 7, 2008


---
Exhibit
13.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of DHT Holdings, Inc. (the
“registrant”), for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each of
the undersigned officers of the registrant hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:




(a)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(b)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.




Date:
March 25, 2010




By:
            /s/ 
      Ole
      Jacob DiesenOle
      Jacob DiesenChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)





By:
            /s/ 
      Eirik
      UbøeEirik
      UbøeChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 140

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Haiti should conduct free, fair, transparent, and peaceful elections, and

for other purposes.

Whereas Rene ́ Preval was elected president of Haiti on December 17, 1995, and inaugurated on February 7, 1996;

Whereas a political impasse between President Preval and the

Haitian Parliament over the past 2 years has stalled

democratic development and contributed to the Haitian

people’s political disillusionment;
2

HCON 140 RFS

Whereas Haiti’s economic development is stagnant, living

conditions are deplorable, and democratic institutions

have yet to become effective;

Whereas Haiti’s political leaders propose free, fair, and transparent elections for local and national legislative bodies;

and

Whereas Haiti’s new independent Provisional Electoral Council has scheduled those elections for November and December 1999: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the provisional Electoral Council

4 of Haiti for its decision to hold elections for 19 sen5 ate seats, providing for a transparent resolution of

6 the disputed 1997 elections;

7 (2) urges the Government of Haiti to actively

8 engage in dialogue with all elements of Haitian soci9 ety to further a self-sustainable democracy;

10 (3) encourages the Government and all political

11 parties in Haiti to proceed toward conducting free,

12 fair, transparent, and peaceful elections as sched13 uled, in the presence of domestic and international

14 observers, without pressure or interference;

15 (4) urges the Clinton Administration and the

16 international community to continue to play a posi17 tive role in Haiti’s economic and political develop18 ment;
3

HCON 140 RFS

1 (5) urges the United Nations to provide appro2 priate technical support for the elections and to

3 maximize the use of United Nations civilian police

4 monitors of the CIVPOL mission during the election

5 period;

6 (6) encourages the Clinton Administration and

7 the international community to provide all appro8 priate assistance for the coming elections;

9 (7) encourages the Government of Haiti to

10 adopt adequate security measures in preparation for

11 the proposed elections;

12 (8) urges all elements of Haitian civil society,

13 including the political leaders of Haiti, to publicly

14 renounce violence and promote a climate of security;

15 and

16 (9) urges the United States and other members

17 of the international community to continue support

18 toward a lasting and committed transition to democ19 racy in Haiti.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 35.1

World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB

I, Victor A. De Jesus, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida
corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the Servicer) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2008 (the Agreement), among World Omni Auto
Receivables Trust 2008-B, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

(i)        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entitys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

(ii)       To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 27, 2009.





WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.By:

/s/  Victor A. De JesusName:  Victor A. De JesusTitle:  Vice President, Finance and Administration/          Chief Financial Officer
No. P66/362.

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/15455, etc. (Cleveland).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of articles in chief value of metal, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The A. W. Fenton Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 242, Abstract 67085), or *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of articles in chief value of metal, suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67085, *supra,*the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 221

To designate April 30, 1998, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate and Eliminate

Racism Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 30, 1998

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

CAMPBELL, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ENZI, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HATCH, Mrs.

HUTCHISON, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. MACK, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr.

DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KERREY, Mr.

KOHL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. AKAKA, Mrs. BOXER, and Mrs. FEINSTEN) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate April 30, 1998, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate

and Eliminate Racism Day’’.

Whereas the term ‘‘hate crime’’ means an offense in which

one or more individuals, commits an offense (such as an

assault or battery (simple or aggravated), theft, criminal

trespass, damage to property, mob action, disorderly conduct, or telephone harassment) by reason of the race,

color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation,
2

SRES 221 ATS

physical or mental disability, or national origin of another

individual or group of individuals;

Whereas there are almost 8,000 hate crimes reported to the

Department of Justice each year, and the number of hate

crimes reported increases each year;

Whereas hate crimes have no place in a civilized society that

is dedicated to freedom and independence, as is the

United States;

Whereas the people of the United States must lead and set

the example for the world in protecting the rights of all

people;

Whereas the people of the United States should take personal

responsibility for and action against hatred and hate

crimes;

Whereas the Members of Congress, as representatives of the

people of the United States, must take personal responsibility for and action against hatred and hate crimes;

and

Whereas the laws against the crimes, which have been passed

by Congress and signed by the President, must be supported and implemented by the people of the United

States and by Federal, State, and local law enforcement

officials and other public servants: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates April 30, 1998, as ‘‘National

3 Erase the Hate and Eliminate Racism Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 and throughout the world to recognize the impor-
3

SRES 221 ATS

1 tance of using each day as an opportunity to take

2 a stand against hate crimes and violence in their na3 tions, states, neighborhoods and communities.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1 (I)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  AmeriResource  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB /A for the quarter ended March  31,  2006
(the "Report"),  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the
date hereof (the "Report), the  undersigned,  Delmar  Janovec,  Chief Executive
Officer  and  the  person  performing functions similar to that of a  Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Delmar Janovec
Dated: September 18, 2007           ------------------
                                    Delmar Janovec
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                    Financial Officer
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 65

To express the sense of the Senate on consideration of comprehensive

campaign finance reform.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 18, 1997

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. DORGAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate on consideration of

comprehensive campaign finance reform.

Whereas spending on Federal election campaigns has increased to an estimated $2.65 billion in the most recent

election cycle, a threefold increase over campaign spending just twenty years ago, even after adjusting for inflation;

Whereas, in the 1995–1996 election cycle, the Democratic

Party committees raised $332 million, a 73-percent increase over the $192 million raised four years earlier,

and the Republican party committees raised $549 million, a 74-percent increase over the $316 million they

raised four years earlier;
2

SRES 65 IS

Whereas overall campaign spending for congressional races

has risen from $99 million in 1976 to $626 million in

1996, a more than sixfold increase;

Whereas, since 1992, when political parties were first required to report soft money contributions to the Federal

Election Commission, these contributions, which are

raised outside Federal election law, have tripled, from

$86 million in 1992 to over $263 million in the last election cycle;

Whereas there has been a proliferation of negative ‘‘issue’’

ads paid for by political parties and interest groups to influence Federal elections, further increasing the cost of

campaigns;

Whereas as political campaigns have become longer, costlier

and more negative, voter apathy has increased and voter

participation in Presidential elections has declined from

60 percent in 1948–1968, to 53 percent from 1972–

1992, to an all-time low of 49 percent in 1996;

Whereas these trends will continue if Congress fails to enact

comprehensive campaign finance reform;

Whereas the more than 6,700 pages of hearing records, 49

days of testimony before 8 different congressional committees, 15 committee reports from 6 different committees and 113 Senate floor votes, constitute a sufficient

Senate record on campaign finance reform; and

Whereas campaign finance reform has been filibustered in the

Senate 17 times in the last ten years: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Senate should proceed to the consideration of comprehen-
3

SRES 65 IS

1 sive campaign finance reform that reduces spending on po2 litical campaigns and curtails the influence of special in3 terest money in Federal elections by no later than May

4 31, 1997, and adopt as a goal the final enactment of such

5 legislation by no later than July 4, 1997.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-379-CV

IN RE JOHN DOE(S)	RELATORS

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J., and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: October 27, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 14, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988)                           ( print page 71398)                        that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, November 14, 2023, at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143, or write TAP Office, 4041 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include a committee discussion involving Form 8888 Allocation of Refund and instructions; and Decedent and Trust forms and publications.                

Dated: October 10, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-22725 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P