alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Ugly Duckling Corporation:
 
     We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 18, 1997 with respect
to the combined balance sheet of Seminole Finance Corporation and Related
Companies as of December 31, 1996 and the related combined statements of
operations, stockholder's equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1996, included in the Form S-1 Registration Statement of Ugly
Duckling Corporation and the related Prospectus, and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" therein.
 
     Our report dated March 18, 1997, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states: "the accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
7 to the combined financial statements, the Company is involved in a lawsuit
that involves a material amount of damages that, if there were an adverse
outcome, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note
7. The combined financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty."
 
                                          /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Tampa, Florida
December 19, 1997
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SAMUEL CAWYER, individually and on

behalf of DIMITRI “PETE” CAWYER, a

minor,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.;

HUSQVARNA OUTDOOR PRODUCTS,

INC., FORMERLY ELECTROLUX HOME

PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-5391RJB

ORDER STRIKING

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION

TO COMPEL RE: DEFENDANT

HUSQVARNA AND STRIKING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A

PROTECTIVE ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s First Motion to Compel RE: 

Defendant Husqvarna (Dkt. 13) and Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. 22). The

Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motions and the

remainder of the file herein.

I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION

Having determined that a protective order is warranted to protect trade secrets in the

Project 405 file, the subject of the pending discovery motions, the Court re-noted Plaintiff’s First

Motion to Compel RE: Defendant Husqvarna (Dkt. 13) and Defendants’ Motion for a Protective

Order (Dkt. 22). Dkt. 29. The purpose of re-noting the motions was to allow the parties to

provide “supplemental briefing as to which documents in the Project 405 file should be

Case 3:06-cv-05391-RJB Document 36 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 1
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRXAS 

AUSTIN 

.A~. 

GUud c. MANN YebmmryU*lms a-FI OutmmAL 

. 

\.. 

. 
moa~~or thoonoulag IIyL8bp oh, ta b l ppu8atwa b7 ruh 

offloor, 88atlll& the kia4, poba4 uouu8 

a OEpmaldituro an4 tho wouri~ for the 

oxpomo8 of hs8 ‘cPnio0 ror mob amla(l I-’ 

WJlth, r h iol p ph liua 8l0 h a l.l. b o fuo 

geuoat8tloa to l 8ld 8ourt tlrmt k 

u4erooa bf 8ho mlatr An&Jr, Li my;’ 

l th o r ul8oo h o o o tulw Tmuuror 

k rhOthOr tuad8 UI .V&bbdiF; 

Yet Of 8UOkQiP1IUOI.. . . 

\ . 

P[ tbbb
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’ MOT.

FOR RECONSIDERATION - 1

(CV06-0204JCC)

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a

‘GORDONWORKS.COM’; OMNI

INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington

limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

No. CV06-0204JCC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF DATE

BY WHICH PLAINTIFFS MUST

FILE THEIR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:

November 9, 2006

The Court issued an order (Dkt. No. 46) on November 9, 2006 granting Plaintiffs’

motion for relief from deadline. Specifically, the Court directed Plaintiffs “to file their

summary judgment motion by Monday December 18, 2006, as requested.” However,

Plaintiffs’ request was that the Court order “the Plaintiff to file a motion for summary

judgment within 30 days”. See Plaintiffs’ Mot. for Relief, Dkt. No. 42, at 3:18-19. 

Thirty (30) days from the date of Plaintiffs’ motion is not December 18, but rather

December 4, 2006. Accordingly, the Court hereby reconsiders the date by which

Plaintiffs must file their summary judgment motion.

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 47-2 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 47 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’ MOT.

FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2

(CV06-0204JCC)

Defendants’ motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 47) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs

are directed to file their summary judgment motion by December 4, 2006, as requested. 

The noting date for such motion shall be December 29, 2006. Defendants’ Motion for an

Undertaking (Dkt. No. 38) is hereby RENOTED for consideration on December 29, 2006

as well.

 DATED this _____ day of November, 2006.

HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 47-2 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
# C_2020327EN.01000101.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9902 — HPS/Temasek/Cypress Creek Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 327/01)

On 23 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9902. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9902. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

June 14, 2012

Mr. James F. Donnellan
Vice President
Government and Industry Relations
MetLife, Inc.
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036

Dear Mr. Donnellan:

This letter is in response to the request by MetLife, Inc., New York,
New York (“MetLife”), for an extension of time from June 12, 2012, until
September 30, in which to resubmit a capital plan.' In connection with this
request, the due dates for the Y-14M regulatory reports for June and
July 2012 also would be extended until September 30.

These extensions would allow additional time for the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation to act on the request by GE Capital Financial Inc.,
Holladay, Utah, to acquire the insured deposits of MetLife’s depository
institution subsidiary, MetLife Bank, National Association, Bridgewater,
New Jersey. When that transaction is consummated, MetLife will cease to be
a bank holding company and no longer be required to submit a capital plan or
regulatory reports to the Federal Reserve.

Based on all the facts of record, including the information provided in
your request and in other supervisory information, the Secretary of the Board,
acting under delegated authority, has granted MetLife’s request for an
extension of time until September 30, 2012, to resubmit its capital plan and to
file the Y-14M regulatory reports for June and July 2012.? This action should
not be construed as granting relief from any other conditions or commitments
to which MetLife may be subject.

" See 12 CFR 225.8.
2 12 CFR 265.5(a)(2)(i).


-2-

Please contact Alexander Psomas, Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
at (212) 720-6017 if you have any questions.

Sincerely yours,

Nath Forer—

Robert deV. Frierson
Deputy Secretary of the Board

cc: Alexander Psomas, Supervising Examiner
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JONAS DAVID SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

 No. CV06-844RSL

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Smith’s (1) “Motion for

Reconsideration; For New Trial; For Entry of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and

Request for Dismissal of Indictment” (Dkt. #33), (2) “Supplement to Motion for

Reconsideration; Motion for Judicial Notice of Certified Documents From National Archives”

(Dkt #34), and (3) “Request To Correct the Record” (Dkt. #35). Judgment was issued by the

Court on January 22, 2007 (Dkt. #31). 

The Court reads Smith’s motions as motions for reconsideration of the Court’s January

22, 2007 order adopting Judge’s Benton’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #31). “Motions

for reconsideration are disfavored. The court will ordinarily deny such motions in the absence

of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority

which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” Local

Rule CrR 12(c)(11)(A). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any manifest error in the Court’s

Case 2:06-cv-00844-RSL Document 36 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION-2

prior ruling or to produce any new facts or legal authority that would change the Court’s original

analysis. As such, his motions for reconsideration (Dkt. #33) (Dkt. #34) (Dkt. #35) are denied.

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00844-RSL Document 36 Filed 04/23/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Continue 

Trial and Pretrial Motions Deadline - 1

(John Young; #05-431TSZ)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

 JUDGE THOMAS S. ZILLY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOHN LEONARD YOUNG,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 05-431 TSZ

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DEADLINE

THE COURT having considered the defense motion, the records and files herein,

the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of

due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial preparation

and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial, within

the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:05-cr-00431-TSZ Document 17 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Continue 

Trial and Pretrial Motions Deadline - 2

(John Young; #05-431TSZ)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued to

October 30, 2006 and that the deadline in which to file pretrial motions is continued to

October 9, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the period of time from the current trial date of July

31, 2006, up to and including the new trial date of October 30, 2006, shall be excludable

time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

DONE this 24th day of July, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/ Paula Semmes Deutsch

WSBA # 23940

Attorney for John Leonard Young

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1111 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-1100

Fax No.: (206) 553-0120

paula_deutsch@fd.org

Case 2:05-cr-00431-TSZ Document 17 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period ended  September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc., general partner
[of the general partner] of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 13, 2002



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period ended  September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner [of the general
partner] of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

ADFlex Mexico, S.A. de C.V., organized under the laws of Mexico 
ADFlex Solutions Limited, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom 
ADFlex Solutions FSC Inc., organized under the laws of Barbados 
ADFlex Cayman Limited, organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands
ADFlex (Thailand) Limited, organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand
Case 3:06-cr-05447-MAT Document 16 Filed 02/11/08 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05447-MAT Document 16 Filed 02/11/08 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05447-MAT Document 16 Filed 02/11/08 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05447-MAT Document 16 Filed 02/11/08 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05447-MAT Document 16 Filed 02/11/08 Page 5 of 5
B

esmartaboutusing

householdproducts!

Be smart when you use, 

 store, and dispose 

 of household 

 products.

Here’s what you can do to 

safeguard your family, 

your home and your community...

 Did you know that the

 products you use for 

 cleaning, carpentry, auto repair and 

 gardening 

 can contain 

 ingredients that can

 harm you, your family 

 and your 

 environment?

These products may

harm your children 

and pets, cause 

physical injury to 

sanitation workers if put out for 

regular trash pick-up, and 

contaminate septic tanks or pollute 

the ground water if poured down 

drains and toilets.

United States

Environmental Protection Agency (5305P)

Washington, DC 20460

Official Business

Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA530-F-06-013

October 2006

www.epa.gov/osw

Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

Sure,

yourhome

isclean...

safe?

butisit

 family

foryour
Always... Never...

Pour harmful household products

down a sink, toilet or bathtub drain

unless the products are made for

that purpose

Pour products like used oil or bug killer

on the ground or into storm drains

Store leftover products in food

or beverage containers

x

x

x

For everyday tasks, try household products that are

less harmful. Remember to follow the same rules 

about storing these products and never mix these

products together.

Many communities hold special collection days or 

have special drop-off sites for harmful household 

products. Contact your local trash service for help, 

call EARTH 911 (1-877-EARTH-911), or visit

www.earth911.org.

 READ

 the Label

 Before you buy, always 

 check the product labels.

 Look for labeling that reads

 "DANGER," "WARNING,”

 "CAUTION," "TOXIC," "CORROSIVE,"

"FLAMMABLE," or "POISON." These warnings tell

you if the product is harmful to you, your family and

the environment, and how to use, store and dispose

of it safely.

Pay close attention to the labels on:

 KEEP products in their original 

containers and store them safely away

from children and pets

 TRY alternative products 

when available

Glass Cleaner: Mix 1 tablespoon of vinegar or 

lemon juice in 1 quart of water. 

Toilet Bowl Cleaner: Use a toilet brush and

baking soda or vinegar. 

Furniture Polish: Mix 1 teaspoon of lemon juice

in 1 pint of vegetable oil.

Rug Deodorizer: Sprinkle liberally with baking

soda and vacuum after 15 minutes.

Plant Spray: Wipe leaves with mild soap and

water and rinse.

Mothballs: Use cedar chips, lavender flowers,

rosemary, mint, or white peppercorns.

DISPOSE of household products safely

Drain Openers

Oven Cleaners

Automotive Oil and 

Fuel Additives 

Paint Thinners,

Strippers and Removers

Grease and Rust

Removers

Glues

Bug and Weed Killers 

Mold and Mildew

Removers
No. 57066.

protest 193977-K (New York).

#### Charmeur Products, Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ichthyolsulfonate d’ammonium the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
William Y. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 16, 2005 |  | /s/ WILLIAM Y. TAUSCHER                    
|                        |  | William Y. Tauscher Chief Executive
Officer
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.12


                              CADE INDUSTRIES, INC.

                               1996 INCENTIVE PLAN

                                 RICHARD A. LUND
                               EDWARD B. STEPHENS




     The 1996 bonus award will be based on performance against
     two (2) factors: Cade Industries' results of operations
     and Cade Industries' cash flow generation. Each of the two
     (2) factors is weighted and the maximum bonus award
     possible is fifty percent (50%) of your 1996 total base
     compensation. The bonus award earned for 1996 will be paid
     both in cash (75%) and Cade Industries stock (25%). The
     following table summarizes the factors and their
     respective weightings on the 1996 bonus award:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Weighting                        Bonus
          Factor                     Factor                        Percent
     ------------------            ---------                       -------

<S>                                <C>                             <C>  
     Cade Ind. earnings               60.0%                           30.0%
     Cade Ind. cash flow              40.0%                           20.0%
                                   -------                         -------
                                     100.0%                           50.0%
                                   =======                         =======
</TABLE>


      The number of Cade Industries' shares to be issued will be
      based on the closing price of the stock at 12/31/95.

      Bonus payments will be made upon the public announcement
      of Cade Industries' 1996 earnings.






   ------------------              ---------------           ------------------
   Terrell L. Ruhlman              Richard A. Lund           Edward B. Stephens