alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO LEON

- ANDRES,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70511

Agency No. A089

- 818

- 033

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an

Order of the Immigration Judge

Submitted May 6, 2020 * *

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Leon

- Andres , a native and citizen of Guatemala , petitions for

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.31(a) that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in

Guatemala

, and is thus not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an IJ’s negative reasonable

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 14 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70511

fear determination for substantial evidence. Andrade

- Garcia v. Lynch , 828 F.3d

829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016)

, and w e deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Leon

- Andres failed

to establish a reasonable possibility of persecution in Guatemala on account of a

protected ground

. See INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (an

applicant “must provide some evidence of [motive], direct or circumstantial”) ; see

also Zetino v. Hold

er , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) ( petitioner’s “ desire to

be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by

gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination th at Leon

- Andres

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or

acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala

. See Garcia

- Milian v.

Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1033

- 35 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that petitioner did not

establish the necessary state action for CAT relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2053** 

LINDA L. WAGNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. LINDAWAGNER.COM, an Internet domain name , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00053

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : February 28, 2017 Decided: March 15, 2017

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Linda L. Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Attison Leonard Barnes, III, Ari Scott Meltzer, David Edison Weslow, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, D
. C
. , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Linda L. Wagner appeals the district court ’ s order s granting summary judgment in favor of the Internet domain name
L indawagner
. com and denying reconsideration in Wagner’s in rem action under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15
U.S.C. § 1125(d) (2012) . We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wagner v. Lindawagner.com , No. 1:16

- cv - 00053

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2016; Aug. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisiona l process.
AFFIRMED
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00302

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF E.P.

- M., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV

- 17

- 0143)

February 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., October 19, 2023.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7B, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors 
must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing, Cybersecurity Update.
    2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Part 745, Simplification of 
Insurance Rules.
    3. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Parts 701, 741, 746, 748, and 752, 
Fair Hiring in Banking.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-22943 Filed 10-13-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Year Ended June 30,
                                                                          -------------------
                                                  1998             1997             1996             1995             1994
                                                  ----             ----             ----             ----             ----

<S>                                            <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>      
Earnings:

   Earnings (loss) from continuing
     operations before income taxes            $  66,458        $  62,009        ($ 11,924)       $  43,832        $  26,186

Add:

   Fixed charges                                  65,026           54,388           54,292           48,226           34,891

   Amortization of capitalized interest
     in costs and expenses                        46,212           49,457           42,354           31,205           18,003

Deduct:

   Interest incurred                             (61,546)         (51,917)         (52,022)         (46,641)         (33,677)
                                               ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------    

Earnings, as adjusted                          $ 116,150        $ 113,937        $  32,700        $  76,622        $  45,403
                                               =========        =========        =========        =========        =========    

Fixed charges:

   Interest incurred and amortization of
     deferred financing costs                  $  61,546        $  51,917        $  52,022        $  46,641        $  33,677

   Interest expense component of rent
     expense                                       3,480            2,471            2,270            1,585            1,214
                                               ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------

Total fixed charges                            $  65,026        $  54,388        $  54,292        $  48,226        $  34,891
                                               =========        =========        =========        =========        =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 1.79x            2.09x               (1)           1.59x            1.30x
                                               =========        =========        =========        =========        =========


</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $21.6 million.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT L. LONGO, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 371 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of January, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 7 Filed 05/24/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 3:06-cr-05351-RBL Document 93 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

December 29, 1966

No. P66/387.

#### U. S. Asiatic Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 60/5615 and 60/21843 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar iu all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Below please find additional interagency comments under EOs 12866 and 13563 regarding the 2013 Methyl Bromide CUE proposed rule. Please let me know if these proposed edits are acceptable or if you have any questions. If a discussion is necessary and EPA is available today, we are also available today. Otherwise, Monday is likely the next opportunity to have a discussion given the Holiday. The commenter suggests the following insertion into page 38 of the draft rule:

Finally, EPA also requests comment on and relevant data to support other potential mechanisms within the Montreal Protocol, the Clean Air Act, or other statutory authorities that the EPA could use to respond to unforeseen events such as an emergency pest outbreak when there are no remaining US stocks of MeBr or available alternatives, such as iodomethane or sulfuryl fluoride. For example, the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer envision cases EO 12866/13563 review -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2013 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide Frey, Nathan J. to: Drusilla Hufford, David Donaldson, Jeremy Arling 11/21/2012 10:46 AM Cc: "Lee, Amanda I.", JohnB Chamberlin Hide Details From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>
To: Drusilla Hufford/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, David Donaldson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeremy Arling/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>, JohnB Chamberlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded. Page 1 of 2

12/5/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1144.htmwhen emergency uses of MeBr may be necessary, while still achieving the environmental objectives of the program (see for example RIN: 2060-AL94 at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=200910&RIN=2060

- AL94 ). Page 2 of 2

12/5/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1144.htm
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 9, 2009
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Chad C. Braun

Chad C. BraunTitle
    
    Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth III Corporation, the General
Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN GREEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 478 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

ORDER SEALING – page 1 (253) 593-6710

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDDY RODRIGUEZ SANTIAGO,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5265RBL 

ORDER SEALING DEFENDANT’S

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

The Court having considered the Motion for Order Sealing Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, are to be sealed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2007. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

/s______________________

Colin A. Fieman

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:06-cr-05265-RBL Document 67 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 1
About this capture
Internet Archive
Wayback Machine
End Of Term 2016 UNT Crawls
CA 16-5

July 15, 2016

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

SUBJECT: Final Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Community 

Reinvestment

The Federal Reserve, along with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and 

the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, published final revisions to “Interagency 

Questions and Answers Regarding Community Reinvestment” (Interagency Qs and As) 

today. The Interagency Qs and As provide guidance on the Community Reinvestment 

Act regulations for use by agency supervisory staff, examiners, financial institutions, and 

the public. The 2016 Interagency Qs and As supersedes the 2010 Interagency Qs and As

and the 2013 Interagency Qs and As distributed under CA 13-18 and CA 10-2. 

The revisions to the Interagency Qs and As address several community 

development related issues, including economic development, community development 

loans and activities that are considered to revitalize or stabilize underserved 

nonmetropolitan middle-income geographies, the availability and effectiveness of retail 

banking services, community development services, innovative or flexible lending 

practices, and general guidance on responsiveness and innovativeness. In addition,

technical corrections reflecting changes in the financial regulatory landscape over the last 

several years have been made. The document can be found at http://www.ffiec.gov/cra.

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including institutions with total consolidated 

assets of $10 billion or less.
2

Questions on this letter and the Interagency Qs and As should be directed to 

Cathy Gates, Senior Project Manager, at 202-452-2099; or Theresa Stark, Senior Project 

Manager, at (202) 452-2302 in the Division of Consumer and Community Affairs. In 

addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.1

Sincerely,

Suzanne Killian

Senior Associate Director

Attachments: Press Release and Federal Register Notice for Interagency Questions and 

Answers Regarding Community Reinvestment

Supersedes: CA 13-18 “Final Revisions to Interagency Questions and Answers 

Regarding Community Reinvestment” (November 15, 2013) and CA 10-2 “Revised 

Interagency Questions and Answers on Community Reinvestment” (March 11, 2010)

 1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
September 18, 1956

No. 60251.

protest 194412-K.

#### Davies Turner & Company *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWERTEL, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         286,399
<SECURITIES>                                    63,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               373,949
<PP&E>                                         666,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (90,678)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,410,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,469
<BONDS>                                        833,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,410,285
<SALES>                                         15,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,140
<CGS>                                           49,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (179,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (179,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (179,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.76)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1  SUBSIDIARIES OF TAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010  Name

JurisdictionTAL   International Container Corporation

DelawareTrans   Ocean Ltd.

DelawareTrans   Ocean Container Corporation

DelawareSpacewiseInc.

DelawareTAL   Advantage I LLC

DelawareTAL   Advantage II LLC

DelawareTAL   Advantage III LLC

DelawareTAL   Advantage IV LLC

DelawareTAL   International Container Pty. Limited

AustraliaTAL   do Brasil  Investimento de   Capital Propio  Ltda.

BrazilTAL   Sales & Marketing Planning (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

ChinaTAL   International Container (HK) Limited

Hong   KongBox   Rent, Inc.

DelawareIntermodalEquipment Inc.

DelawareTAL   International Container NV

BelgiumTAL   International Container SRL

ItalyGreyboxServices I Ltd.

United   KingdomICS   Terminals (UK) Limited

United   KingdomTAL   International Structured Inc.

Delaware
No. 67214.

protests 328424-K, etc. (New York).

#### Carlyle Fabrics *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

STEVEN PRUITT,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5323JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is his responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 22nd day of June, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05323-RJB Document 2 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

April 4, 1957

No. 60606.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 275343-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of nine fishing reels missing from case No. 105, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the said nine fishing reels missing from case No. 105. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# Official Journal L 245/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.245.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 245 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5511 September 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.245.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 245

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5511 September 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2012 of 10 September 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | 2012/502/EU |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 20 July 2012 on the Data Exchange for Cash Services (ECB/2012/16) | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2012 of 10 September 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

GUIDELINES

2012/502/EU

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 20 July 2012 on the Data Exchange for Cash Services (ECB/2012/16)

(ECB/2012/16)

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.