alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 159/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 159 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 593 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 159

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 593 May 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 159/1 | Position (EU) No 6/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)Adopted by the Council on 8 April 2016 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 159/2 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 6/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) | 83 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 159/1

Position (EU) No 6/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)Adopted by the Council on 8 April 2016 (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 159/2

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 6/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)

83

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 2, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-981

Lower Tribunal No. F10-24648

________________

Roque Torres,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Roque Torres, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 37 02

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Brad le y R. Hartke ; Do ug la s P. Hartk e; Jo anL. Hartk e, in di vi du al ly andas Trus te es of t he Jo an L. Hartk e QTIP Ma rit al Trus t d at ed7/ 12 /1 99 6 a ndas Trus te es of t he Ro be rt Eu ge ne Hart ke Fam il y Trus t d at ed7/ 12 /1 99 6; The J oa n L. Hart ke QTIP Mari ta l Tru stda te d 7 /1 2/ 19 96 ; Th e Ro be rt Eu ge ne Hart ke Fam il y Trus t d at ed7/ 12 /1 99 6 ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff s - Ap pe ll ees

v. W IPT, In c. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t Ro ge r Dean W al dn er ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t The One S to p, In c.; R DW -KILT, Inc

. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el la nt

s Co m m un it y Ban k
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __Subm it te d: Octo be r 17 , 20 18 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

17 , 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SHEPHERD, KELLY, an d S TRAS, Ci rcu itJu dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Brad le y R. Hartke , Dou gl as P. Hart ke , an d Jo an L. Hart ke , in di vi du al ly an d as tru st ees of Ha rtk e-re la te d t ru st s (c ol le ct iv el y , Hart ke s) fil edanact io n i n t he Uni te d St at es D i s t ric t Co urt se ek in g a de cl arat io n th at pr om is so ry no te s th ey ex ecu te d to en ti ti es own ed by Ro ge r Dean W al dn er were un en fo rcea b l e
. The W om en ’s In ve st m en t Pro pe rty Trus t, In c. (WI P T) , The One St op , In c., an d RDW-KILT , In c. (co ll ect iv el y , App el la nt s) —co un te rcl ai m ed , se ek in g r e c o ve ry on th e no te s. All pa rti es m ov ed fo r jud gm en t on th e pl ead in gs
. The di st ric t co urt de ni ed App el la nt s’ 1
m ot io n fo r jud gm en t on th e pl ead in gs an d gr an te d th e Hartke s’ m ot io n fo r jud gm en t on th e pl ead in gs
. Thi s ap pe al fo ll owe d. W e ha ve ju r i sd ic ti on , 28 U.S.C. § 12 91 , 2
an d rev ie w de no vo th e di st ric t co urt’s en try of jud gm en t on th e pl ead in gs , Sch nu ck Marke ts , In c
. v . Fi rs t Data Mer ch an t Serv ic es Co rp ., 85 2 F.3 d 73 2, 73 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 17 ), an d it s in te rp ret at io n an d ap pl ic at io n of st at e la w, Nol le s v. St at e Co m m it te e f o r R e or ga ni zat io n of Sch oo l Dis tri ct s, 52 4 F.3 d 89 2, 90 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ). Ha v i n g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e pa rti es ’ br ie fs , th e reco rd , an d th e ap pl ic ab le le ga l pr in ci pl es , we fin d no rev ers ib le erro r in th e di stri c t co urt’s di sp os it io n of th is m at te r. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

th e jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
The Hon or ab le Pau l A. Mag nu so n, Unit ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a. W al dn er fi le d asep arat e, pr o s e ap pe al in No. 1 7- 36 85

. 2 -2

-
Case No. 8,874.

#### McLAUGHLIN v. STEPHENS.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 148.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1818.

Municipal Corporation — Ordinance—Gaming— State Law.

The common council of Alexandria, have power to prohibit by their by-laws, the keeping of gaming-tables in the town, under a penalty to be recovered by warrant before the mayor, in the name of the common council, and to be levied upon the goods and chattels of the offender, although lie may be also liable to prosecution under the laws of Virginia, adopted by the act of congress of the 27th of February, 1801 [2 Stat. 103],

[Cited in Town of Van Burén v. Wells (Ark.) 14 S. W. 40; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 453,13 N. W. 915.]

Trespass against the defendant (who was a constable,) for levying a penalty of $20, under the by-law of the 15th of June, 1816, for keeping.' a faro-table. By the amended charter of 1804 (section 5) the common council of Alexandria has power to make “all laws which they shall conceive requisite,” “for the regulation of the morals and police of the town,” and “for the prevention and removal of nuisances,” “and to enforce the observance of their said laws by reasonable penalties and forfeitures to be levied upon the goods and chattels of the offender,” provided that such laws shall not be inconsistent with the laws and constitution of the United States.

Mr. Mason, for plaintiff,

contended that the power to make by-laws, was not intended to give the corporation power to make laws concerning matters which were already regulated by the general law of the land; but only concerning such subjects as affected the morals or police of the town exclusively. That the offence was already provided for and prohibited by the act of assembly of Virginia of the 19th of January, 1798, p. 373. That gaming did not affect the town exclusively. That the plaintiff might be twice punished for the same offence, if he was liable to this penalty.

Mr. Taylor, contra.

This by-law applies exclusively to the police of the town,. The penalty is for keeping the gaming-table in the town, which is a circumstance of aggravation of the offence, and is necessary to the conviction.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) was of opinion, that the corporation had power to pass the by-law, and to enforce it in this manner.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52


            FORM OF AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY REGISTRATION AGREEMENT
            -------------------------------------------------------

     The undersigned, [insert the name of each entity and individual who is
become a party to the Registration Agreement], hereby certify to, and agree with
ZC Acquisition Corp, a Delaware corporation ("ZC Corp"), as follows:

     1.  The undersigned have each read a copy of that certain Registration
Agreement, dated March 23, 1999 (the "Registration Agreement"), by and among ZC
Corp, CTCR Fund VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, CTCR VI Executive
Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, GTCR Associates VI, a Delaware
general partnership, William Seibel and any other executive employees of ZC Corp
or other entities and individuals who, at any time, acquire securities of ZC
Corp in accordance with Section 8 of the Registration Agreement

     2.  The undersigned agree that their signatures below shall constitute an
executed counterpart signature page to the Registration Agreement and that they
shall succeed to all of the rights and obligations of an "Other Stockholder"
under the Registration Agreement as contemplated by Section 8 of the
Registration agreement.

     Executed this ____ day of _______________, _____.


[Insert a signature line for each entity and individual who is becoming a party
to the Registration Agreement]


     As required by Section 8 of the Registration Agreement referred to above,
the undersigned hereby consents to [insert the name of each entity and
individual who is becoming a party to the Registration Agreement] succeeding to
all of the rights and obligations of an "Other Stockholder" under such
Registration Agreement.


                                                GTCR FUND VI, L.P.
                                                By:   GTCR Partners VI, L.P.
                                                Its:  General Partner

                                                By:   GTCR Golder Rauner, LLC
                                                Its:  General Partner

                                                By:   _________________________
                                                Its:  Principal
<PAGE>

     The foregoing agreement was entered into between ZEFER Corp. and the
following stockholders as of the date set forth opposite each stockholders'
name:

     1261417 Ontario Limited, April 30, 1999
     Matthew P. Burkley, April 30, 1999
     Ian R. Colliety, April 30, 1999
     Stephen R. DiMarco, April 30, 1999
     Deborah E. Frieze, April 30, 1999
     Edmond C. Jay, April 30, 1999
     Alexandre Scherer, April 30, 1999
     Kaming Ng, April 30, 1999
     Anthony K. Tjan, April 30, 1999
     Gregory S. Hipwell, May 14, 1999
     Jason J. Zada, May 14, 1999
     Renaissance Worldwide, Inc., May 28, 1999
     Allan L. Cohen, September 13, 1999
     Fred Luconi, September 13, 1999
     Thomas J. Waite, September 13, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Boulder Specialty Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lewis                          
|                     |  |     |  | James E. Lewis                              
|                     |  |     |  | Vice Chairman of the Board                  
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal financial and accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARNOLD P. NELSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 573 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2965

_____________________________

CDC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS,

LLC, as Trustee,

Appellant,

v.

FREEDOM MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

July 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Tramontana v. Bank of New York Mellon, 230 So. 

3d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank, 172 So. 

3d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Ian P. Hudson of King Hudson PLLC, St. Petersburg, for 

Appellant.

Cynthia L. Comras, David Rosenberg, and Jarrett Cooper of 

Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Melvin Wayne Richardson, Appellant

No. 06-14-00234-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 195th District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F06-

62371-N). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Melvin Wayne Richardson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 9, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (Thousands except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months
                                             Ended September 30,
                                               1997       1996
                                             -------    -------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>   
PRIMARY

  Average shares outstanding                  14,313     10,582

  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
  based on the treasury stock method
  using average market price                     876      1,053
                                             -------    -------

                            TOTAL             15,189     11,635
                                             -------    -------

  Net income                                 $ 3,751    $ 3,604
                                             -------    -------

  Per share amount                           $  0.25    $  0.31
                                             -------    -------

FULLY DILUTED

  Average shares outstanding                  14,313     10,582

  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
  based on the treasury stock method
  using the quarter-end market price,
  if higher than the average market price        915      1,161
                                             -------    -------

                            TOTAL             15,228     11,743
                                             -------    -------

  Net income                                 $ 3,751    $ 3,604
                                             -------    -------

  Per share amount                           $  0.25    $  0.31
                                             -------    -------
</TABLE>
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.119.b Federal Government Employee Retirement Funds Defined Benefit Plans (1)  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineFederal government defined benefit retirement funds; total financial assets(2)
	FA344090045
	89.5
	93.0
	96.4
	94.3
	96.3
	96.7
	96.5
	96.0
	96.5
	1Federal government defined benefit retirement funds; debt securities; asset
	FA344022045
	69.1
	75.9
	83.2
	-87.6
	659.8
	81.2
	48.2
	71.2
	132.2
	2Federal government defined benefit retirement funds; Treasury securities; asset(3)
	FA343061165
	68.9
	75.4
	83.7
	-90.9
	660.3
	81.6
	48.7
	71.8
	132.6
	3Federal government retirement funds; agency- and GSE-backed securities held by National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust; asset
	FA343061733
	-0.1
	0.0
	-0.0
	0.1
	-0.0
	-0.0
	-0.0
	-0.0
	-0.0
	4Federal government retirement funds; corporate and foreign bonds held by National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust; asset
	FA343063033
	0.3
	0.5
	-0.4
	3.2
	-0.5
	-0.3
	-0.4
	-0.6
	-0.4
	5Federal government retirement funds; corporate equities held by National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust; asset
	FA343064133
	-1.7
	-1.6
	-0.8
	-4.0
	-0.9
	-0.6
	-0.8
	-1.0
	-0.8
	6Federal government defined benefit retirement funds; claims of pension funds on sponsor; asset(4)
	FA343073045
	22.1
	18.7
	14.0
	185.9
	-562.6
	16.1
	49.0
	25.9
	-34.9
	7Federal government defined benefit retirement funds; pension entitlements (total liabilities)(5)
	FA344190045
	89.5
	93.0
	96.4
	94.3
	96.3
	96.7
	96.5
	96.0
	96.5
	8 Back to top
  **NOTES** Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, Railroad Retirement Board, judicial retirement fund, Military Retirement Fund, Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and the National Railroad Investment Trust.
Includes claims on sponsor (i.e., unfunded pension entitlements).
Includes both marketable and nonmarketable government securities.
Unfunded defined benefit pension entitlements.
Actuarial value of accrued pension entitlements in defined benefit plans. These liabilities are assets of the household sector.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             370
<SECURITIES>                                     4,442
<RECEIVABLES>                                      419
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   797
<PP&E>                                             393
<DEPRECIATION>                                     188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,136
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (77)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (77)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (77)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 655/2005

of 28 April 2005         

fixing the representative prices and the additional import duties for molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 29 April 2005         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the market in sugar (1), and in particular Article 24(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and the additional duties applying to imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1422/95 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 79/2003 (OJ L 13, 18.1.2003, p. 4).

(3)OJ 145, 27.6.1968, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1422/95.

----

ANNEX

Representative prices and additional duties for imports of molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 29 April 2005

----

(1)  This amount replaces, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1422/95, the rate of the Common Customs Tariff duty fixed for these products.

(2)  For the standard quality as defined in Article 1 of amended Regulation (EEC) No 785/68.

----