71376 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2023 / Notices 

Housing Agencies (PHAs) use this 

information in budget submissions 

which are reviewed and approved by 

HUD field offices as the basis for 

obligating the operating fund grant. This 

information is necessary to calculate the 

eligibility for the operating fund grant 

under the Operating Funding Program 

regulations, as amended. The Operating 

Fund is designed to provide the amount 

of operating funds needed for wellmanaged PHAs. PHAs submit the 

information electronically with these 

forms. 

HUD collects information for the 

HUD–52723 and HUD–52722 through 

web-based forms in the Operating Fund 

Web Portal. HUD discontinued using 

VBA enhanced Excel tools to collect this 

data after CY 2022. Web-based forms 

improve the availability of the forms to 

PHAs, improve data integrity, and 

secure transfer of the data from the PHA 

to HUD. Web-based forms should not 

increase the burden to complete. 

HUD executed the collection of the 

HUD–52719: Small Rural Frozen Rolling 

Base (SRFRB) Election and Revision 

form to implement Section 209(b) of the 

Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 

and Consumer Protection Act, Public 

Law 115–174. SRFRB allows eligible 

small and rural PHAs to freeze a utility’s 

three-year rolling base consumption that 

is used to calculate Operating Fund 

grants from one to twenty years. With 

this form PHAs elect to participate, 

select the utility, calculate rolling base 

consumption, and select the term. 

TOTAL ESTIMATED BURDENS

Information collection Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Responses 

per annum 

Burden hour 

per response 

Annual burden 

hours 

Hourly cost 

per response Annual cost 

HUD–52723 ................. 6,200 1 0.33 2,046 2,046 $37.66 $98,067 

HUD–52722 ................. 6,200 1 0.42 2,604 2,604 37.66 77,052 

HUD–52719 ................. 30 1 1 1 30 37.66 1,130 

Total ...................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 4,650 ........................ ........................ 176,249 

B. Solicitation of Public Comment 

This notice is soliciting comments 

from members of the public and affected 

parties concerning the collection of 

information described in Section A on 

the following: 

(1) Whether the proposed collection 

of information is necessary for the 

proper performance of the functions of 

the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; 

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond; including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

(5) ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

HUD encourages interested parties to 

submit comments in response to these 

questions. 

C. Authority 

Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35. 

Colette Pollard, 

Department Reports Management Officer, 

Office of Policy Development and Research, 

Chief Data Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22756 Filed 10–13–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–36767; 

PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is 

soliciting electronic comments on the 

significance of properties nominated 

before October 7, 2023, for listing or 

related actions in the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

electronically by October 31, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: Comments are encouraged 

to be submitted electronically to 

National_Register_Submissions@

nps.gov with the subject line ‘‘Public 

Comment on <property or proposed 

district name, (County) State>.’’ If you 

have no access to email, you may send 

them via U.S. Postal Service and all 

other carriers to the National Register of 

Historic Places, National Park Service, 

1849 C Street NW, MS 7228, 

Washington, DC 20240. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register 

of Historic Places/National Historic 

Landmarks Program, 1849 C Street NW, 

MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240, 

sherry_frear@nps.gov, 202–913–3763. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

properties listed in this notice are being 

considered for listing or related actions 

in the National Register of Historic 

Places. Nominations for their 

consideration were received by the 

National Park Service before October 7, 

2023. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 

CFR part 60, comments are being 

accepted concerning the significance of 

the nominated properties under the 

National Register criteria for evaluation. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Nominations submitted by State or 

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: 

Key: State, County, Property Name, 

Multiple Name (if applicable), Address/ 

Boundary, City, Vicinity, Reference 

Number. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2023 / Notices 71377 

ALABAMA 

Baldwin County 

Jenkins Farm and House (Boundary Increase), 

29040 Jenkins Farm Rd., Loxley, 

BC100009548 

Lowndes County 

Campsite 2: Rosie Steele Property, 5892–5876 

Highway 80 W, White Hall vicinity, 

SG100009549 

Morgan County 

Simpson’s Florist, 902 6th Avenue SE, 

Decatur, SG100009550 

KANSAS 

Douglas County 

Lone Star Lake Civilian Conservation Corps 

(CCC) Camp, (New Deal-Era Resources of 

Kansas MPS), 660 E 665 Road, Lawrence 

vicinity, MP100009545 

WEST VIRGINIA 

Morgan County 

Paw Paw Old Mayor’s Office and Jail, 93 Lee 

Street, Paw Paw, SG100009542 

Randolph County 

Davis & Elkins College Historic District 

Portions of Campus Drive, Harpertown Road, 

Graceland Drive, Allen Street & Residential 

Drive, and College Drive, Elkins, 

SG100009540 

Wayne County 

Stark, Henry and Julia Hoard, House, 359 B 

Street, Ceredo, SG100009543 

Wood County 

Downtown Parkersburg Historic District, 

Portions of Juliana, Market, Avery, and 

Second through Eighth Streets and 

Williams Court Alley and Phillips Court 

Alley, Parkersburg, SG100009541 

WISCONSIN 

Dane County 

Willard and Fern Tompkins House, 110 

Henuah Circle, Monona, SG100009539 

A request for removal has been made 

for the following resource(s): 

NORTH DAKOTA 

Golden Valley County 

Sentinel Butte Public School, Byron St., 

Sentinel Butte, OT82001313 

Additional documentation has been 

received for the following resource(s): 

ILLINOIS 

Kane County 

Aurora Broadway Historic District 

(Additional Documentation), Roughly 

bounded by the Fox R., East New York St., 

the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe 

Railroad tracks, and East Benton St., 

Aurora, AD100008483 

MISSISSIPPI 

Panola County 

Como Commercial Historic District, (Johnson, 

Andrew, Architecture in North Mississippi 

TR), Roughly bounded by Elder Frank 

Ward St. on the W and N Main St. on the 

E. On the N bounded by Church Ave., 

Como, AD08000675 

Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR 

part 60. 

Sherry A. Frear, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22771 Filed 10–13–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1363] 

Certain Lidar (Light Detection and 

Ranging) Systems and Components 

Thereof; Notice of Commission 

Determination To Review and, on 

Review, To Affirm With Modification an 

Initial Determination Terminating the 

Investigation in Its Entirety Based on 

an Arbitration Agreement; Termination 

of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

and, on review, to affirm with 

modification an initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting a motion to terminate the 

investigation in its entirety based upon 

an arbitration agreement. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Namo Kim, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3459. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 

17, 2023, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by Ouster, Inc. of San 

Francisco, CA (‘‘Ouster’’). See 88 FR 

31519–20 (May 17, 2023). The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain LiDAR 

(Light Detection and Ranging) systems 

and components thereof by reason of the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 11,175,405; 11,178,381; 

11,190,750; 11,287,515; and 11,422,236. 

Id. The notice of investigation names as 

respondents Hesai Group of Shanghai, 

China; Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. of 

Shanghai, China; and Hesai Inc. of Palo 

Alto, CA (collectively, ‘‘Hesai’’). Id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations 

(‘‘OUII’’) is also participating in this 

investigation. Id. 

On June 22, 2023, Hesai filed a 

motion to terminate or alternatively stay 

the investigation in its entirety based 

upon an arbitration provision in a 2020 

Litigation Settlement and Patent CrossLicense Agreement (‘‘Settlement 

Agreement’’) between Hesai Photonics 

Technology Co. Ltd. (‘‘Hesai Photonics,’’ 

a subsidiary of respondent Hesai Group) 

and Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (‘‘Velodyne,’’ 

now merged with Ouster). On July 7, 

2023, Ouster filed an opposition to the 

motion and OUII filed a response in 

support of the motion. On July 12, 2023, 

a case management conference was held 

to give each of the parties an 

opportunity to discuss the motion to 

terminate or stay. 

On July 17, 2023, Ouster filed a 

supplemental brief. On July 18, 2023, 

OUII filed a sur-reply to Ouster’s 

opposition. On July 20, 2023, Hesai filed 

a sur-reply to Ouster’s opposition. 

On August 24, 2023, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 10) pursuant 

to Commission Rule 210.21(d), 19 CFR 

210.21(d), granting the motion to 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety under 19 U.S.C. 1337(c) because 

of an arbitration agreement. In 

particular, the ID finds that (1) ‘‘a valid 

arbitration agreement at ¶ 9.5 exists as 

part of the Settlement Agreement that 

binds Ouster and Hesai,’’ (2) ‘‘the 

arbitrability of the dispute between 

Ouster and Hesai . . . rests with 

[Judicial Arbitration and Mediation 

Services, Inc.], London,’’ and (3) ‘‘Hesai 

did not waive its right to arbitrate as 

Ouster argues.’’ See ID at 4. 

On August 31, 2023, Ouster filed a 

petition for review of the ID with the 

Commission. On September 8, 2023, 

Hesai and OUII filed their responses to 

Ouster’s petition. 

On September 12, 2023, Ouster filed 

a notice of recent developments 

explaining that, on September 5, 2023, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1