alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
96-153

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

 

 No. 96-153

 _______________

MISCHELLE SCHELSKE and RICK SCHELSKE, )

 )

 Plaintiffs and Appellants, )

 )

 v. )

 )

CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC., a foreign )

corporation; OPI PRODUCTS, INC., )

a foreign corporation; CLAIROL, INC., )

a foreign corporation, HELENE CURTIS, )

INC., a foreign corporation; NEXXUS )

PRODUCTS COMPANY, a foreign corporation; )

THE ADU COMPANY, a foreign corporation; )

REVLON PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS, INC., )

a foreign corporation; COSMETIC ARTS, )

a foreign corporation; AMERICAN ) O R D E R

INTERNATIONAL, a foreign corporation; )

SEBASTIAN INTERNATIONAL, a foreign )

corporation; UNIT CHEMICAL CORPORATION, )

a foreign corporation; PAUL MITCHELL )

(BOCCHI LABORATORIES); MATRIX ESSENTIALS, )

INC., a foreign corporation; MALIBU 2000, )

a foreign corporation; HIGHLAND CORPORATION, )

a foreign corporation; CAPITAL HILL MALL )

PARTNERSHIP, a Utah limited partnership; )

JC PENNEY COMPANY, INC., a foreign )

corporation; PALMER DUNCAN CONSTRUCTION )

COMPANY, a Montana corporation; and DOES )

and ROES ONE THROUGH TEN, )

 )

 Defendants and Respondents. )

 _______________

 On January 2, 1997, this Court issued its opinion in the above

case. The opinion is presently reported at 54 St.Rep. 21. On

January 10, 1997, Appellants petitioned for rehearing and

Respondents filed their brief in opposition thereto. Appellants

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-153%20(04-01-97)%20Order.htm (1 of 2)4/11/2007 2:39:50 PM
96-153

objected to Respondents' brief. Because Justice Charles E.

Erdmann, the author of the opinion, was no longer a sitting justice

on this Court and because there were, otherwise, insufficient votes

from the original 5-member panel to either grant or deny the

petition for rehearing, this case was placed back on the

classification agenda and was reconsidered by the Court en banc

with District Judge John Warner sitting for Justice W. William 

Leaphart, who had originally recused himself.

 Upon careful reconsideration of the record, briefs on appeal,

petition for rehearing and the briefs filed in support of and in

opposition to the petition for rehearing, 

 IT IS ORDERED that this Court's opinion as filed January 2,

1997, is reaffirmed and shall continue as the decision of this

Court in this case and cause. Appellants' petition for rehearing

is DENIED.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice

of this order by mail to counsel of record and that this order be

published with the Court's January 2, 1997 opinion.

 Dated this 1st day of April, 1997.

/S/ J. A. TURNAGE

/S/ JAMES C. NELSON

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY

/S/ JOHN WARNER, District Court Judge 

 

 Justice Terry N. Trieweiler continues to dissent to the

Court's January 2, 1997 opinion in this case and cause and Justices

William E. Hunt and James M. Regnier join that dissent.

/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER

/S/ JIM REGNIER 

/S/ WILLIAM E. HUNT, SR.

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-153%20(04-01-97)%20Order.htm (2 of 2)4/11/2007 2:39:50 PM
H. Con. Res. 277 Agreed to May 15, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this

resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) shall be permitted to

sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds

on June 24, 2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except

that the Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized

to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the

Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

and other related structures and equipment as may be required

for the event to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements,

displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other
H. Con. Res. 277—2

restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the

event to be carried out under this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25



           FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN

                           COR THERAPEUTICS AND SOLVAY



           This Amendment is entered into effective as of 13 March 1995 between
COR THERAPEUTICS, INC. ("COR"), a Delaware Corporation, with its principal
offices at 256 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080, U.S.A.
and SOLVAY, SOCIETE ANONYME ("SOLVAY"), a Belgian corporation, with its
principal offices at 33, rue du Prince Albert, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.

                                   WITNESSETH

           WHEREAS, COR and Solvay have entered into a License and Supply
Agreement effective as of 27 July 1994 (the "Agreement") on their behalf and on
behalf of their Affiliates (as defined in the Agreement);

           WHEREAS, COR and Solvay are willing to modify a provision of the
Agreement;

           NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree
to amend the Agreement as follows:

           In Section 2.2, on page 5, replace line 13 by "(...) as the breach or
default remains uncured. If by 15 June 1995, SOLVAY and COR have not (...)".

           All the other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and
in full force and effect.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COR and Solvay have executed this Amendment to be
effective on the date first set forth hereabove.

COR THERAPEUTICS, Inc.                     SOLVAY S.A.



By:                                        By:
   ----------------------------------         ----------------------------------

Title:                                     Title:
      -------------------------------            -------------------------------



                                       1.
No. 58745.

protests 229106-K, etc. (New York).

#### The London Gramophone Corp. *v.*United States,

*277Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                 BMC WEST CORPORATION
                          Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                           
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                     --------------------------
                                                      March 31,       March 31,
                                                         1997           1996
                                                      ---------       ---------
Net income                                            $456,000        $750,000
Class B preferred stock accretion                       (6,500)         (8,500)
                                                    ----------      ----------
Adjusted net income                                   $449,500        $741,500
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------
Weighted average shares
  outstanding                                       11,827,254       9,502,827

Net effect of dilutive stock
 options based on the treasury
 stock method using average
 market price                                          220,339         252,272
                                                    ----------      ----------
Total common shares and equivalents                 12,047,593       9,755,099
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------

PRIMARY INCOME PER SHARE                            $      .04      $      .08
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------

COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Adjusted net income                                   $449,500        $741,500
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding
                                                    11,827,254       9,502,827

Net effect of dilutive stock
 options based on the treasury
 stock method using the higher of
 quarter-end market price or
 average market price                                  220,339         265,292
                                                    ----------      ----------
Total shares and equivalents                        12,047,593       9,768,119
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                    $      .04      $      .08
                                                    ----------      ----------
                                                    ----------      ----------



                         This is Page 14 of 16 Pages
Presidential Documents

71271 

Federal Register 

Vol. 88, No. 197 

Friday, October 13, 2023 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of October 12, 2023 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Situation in and in Relation to Syria 

On October 14, 2019, by Executive Order 13894, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United 

States constituted by the situation in and in relation to Syria. 

The situation in and in relation to Syria, and in particular the actions 

by the Government of Turkey to conduct a military offensive into northeast 

Syria, undermines the campaign to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and 

Syria, or ISIS, endangers civilians, and further threatens to undermine the 

peace, security, and stability in the region, and continues to pose an unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the 

United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 13894 of October 14, 2019, must continue in effect beyond October 

14, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 with respect to the situation 

in and in relation to Syria. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 12, 2023. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22862 

Filed 10–12–23; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


AULTRA
GOLD INC.


FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Financial Officer of Aultra Gold Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008,
which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      March 31, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Rauno PerttuName:
      Rauno PerttuTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DEANNE M. KROULIK,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA acting

through the State Director, USDA Rural

Development, Rural Housing Service of

Washington; and T.D. Escrow Services, Inc.

d.b.a. T.D. Service Company, a Washington

Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5388FDB

ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL

BRIEFING

Plaintiff Kroulik has moved for an order restraining Trustee’s sale, and the matter has been

briefed. Kroulik interprets the loan documents in this matter as requiring her to make monthly

payments of $301.24 per month, that she has overpaid and is only in arrears $566.55. 

The Government submits declarations with attachments to support its contention that Kroulik

over $10,000.00 in arrears. There is a difference of opinion in how the documents are interpreted by

the parties. Exhibit C to the Cronquist Declaration is an example. 

It would be helpful to the Court to have the terms explained (e.g. installment note rate,

monthly payment, monthly payment assistance) and how they are factored together – considering 

Case 3:06-cv-05388-FDB Document 15 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 2

Kroulik v. United States of America et al Doc. 15

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

taxes and insurance – to get to the amount to be paid per month in order to determine any arrearage. 

Therefore, the Court requests further briefing clarifying materials already submitted. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Defendants shall submit an additional brief responding to Plaintiff’s Reply brief

and clarifying as indicated above no later than Monday, July 31, 2006; 

2. Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants’ brief no later than 4:30 p.m. Tuesday,

August 1, 2006. or 24 hours after the Government files its brief, whichever is earlier. 

DATED this 26th day of July, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05388-FDB Document 15 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABIODUN M. SODIPO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

RON ROSENBERG, Chief, Administrative Appeals Office; UNITED STATES

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 15464

D.C. No. 3:13

- cv

- 04856

- JD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2017 **
San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN, *** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAR 10 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Abiodun Sodipo applied for an employment

- based visa, but did not satisfy the

statutory requirement s of a job offer

, see 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A), or a Department

of L abor certification of a labor shortage, see 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5)(A) (i)

. The

U nited S tates Citizenship and Immigration Services declined Sodipo’s request to

waive these requirements “in the national interest

, ” 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(B)(i); 8

C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(ii) , and denied his visa application

. S odipo then filed this

action under the Administrative Procedure Act challenging the denial of the national

interest waiver . T he district court granted summary judgment to the government

defendants , and Sodipo timely appealed.

The Immigration and Nationality Act provides that “no court shall have

jurisdiction to review . . . any . . . decision

. . . of the Attorney General .

. . the

authority for which is specified under this subchapter to be in the discr etion of the

Attorney General.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). The decision to deny a national

interest waiver is one such decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(B)(i) (“[T]he

Attorney General may, when the Attorney General deems it to be in the national

in terest, waive the requirements . . . .”); Schneider v. Chertoff , 450 F.3d 944, 948

(9th Cir. 2006) ( describing national interest waiver a s “purely discretionary”). Thus,

the district court lacked jurisdiction to review the denial of the waiver.3

W e therefo re vacate the judgment below and remand for entry of an order

dismissing Sodipo’s action for lack of jurisdiction. Each party is to bear its own

costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS

.
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION

AND REGULATION

DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

SR 20-18

CA 20-13

August 3, 2020

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE 

BANK AND INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE

SUBJECT: Joint Statement on Additional Loan Accommodations Related to COVID-19

Applicability: This letter is relevant for all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, 

including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

This letter announces that the Federal Reserve and the other Federal Financial Institutions

Examination Council (FFIEC) members1 have issued the attached Joint Statement on Additional 

Loan Accommodations Related to COVID-19. This statement discusses risk management 

principles relevant to institutions that work with their borrowers as loans near the end of initial 

loan accommodation periods related to COVID-19. The statement includes principles for 

considering accommodation options and for restructuring safe and sound credit extensions going 

forward. The agencies encourage financial institutions to consider prudent accommodation 

options that can ease cash flow pressures on affected borrowers, improve their capacity to 

service debt, and facilitate a financial institution’s ability to collect on its loans. 

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to the supervised organizations in their 

districts and to appropriate supervisory staff. Questions may be sent via the Board’s public 

website.2

Jennifer Burns Eric S. Belsky

Deputy Director Director

Division of Supervision Division of Consumer and

and Regulation Community Affairs

 1

 Members of the FFIEC include the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,

the National Credit Union Association, and the State Liaison Committee. 2 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
Page 2 of 2

Attachment:

• Joint Statement on Additional Loan Accommodations Related to COVID-19

Cross References to:

• SR letter 13-17, “Interagency Supervisory Guidance Addressing Certain Issues Related to 

Troubled Debt Restructurings”

• Federal Reserve Board, April 7, 2020, press release, "Agencies issue revised interagency 

statement on loan modifications by financial institutions working with customers affected 

by the coronavirus" 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20200407a.htm

• SR 13-19/CA 13-21 “Guidance on Managing Outsourcing Risk”

• CA Letter 20-4, “CRA Consideration for Activities in Response to the Coronavirus”

• CA Letter 20-10, “Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Consideration for Activities in 

Response to the Coronavirus”
-i~~2=:'~~1ll>

ERICKSON AIR-CRANE

INCORPORATED

January 28,2014

Nichole Tennyson

Legal Counsel

Phone: 503-505-5883

E-mail: ntennyson@ericksonaircrane.com

=

Department of Transportation

Essential Air Service Program

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Room W86-308

Washington, DC 20590

Attention: Kevin Adams, Greg Frazier

Re: !lJlcoming Name Change, Contract Order 2013-6-11

Dear Mr. Adams, Mr. Frazier,

lJ

As part of our continued integration effOJ1srelated to our acquisition of Evergreen Helicopters, Inc., we would

like to share with you exciting news that you mayor may not already be aware of. We will be legally changing

the name of Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. to Erickson Helicopters, Inc. in the coming weeks. The company will

remain a separate legal entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of Erickson Air-Crane Incorporated. You will

receive formal notification once the name change becomes effective but we wanted to give you a heads up that

this change is coming in the near future. Once the change is effective we will work through any required

notification and! or modification processes that are required in our agreement.

Feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns.

/jiJl)

Nichole Tennyson

5550 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 200 • Portland, OR 97239' Phone (503) 505-5800 • Fax (503) 473-8540

www.ericksonaircrane.com