alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(D)

                              BANK ONE CORPORATION

                 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)
                 ---------------------------------------------


Effective Date
--------------

Effective January 1, 2000
(Amendment and restatement of BANK ONE CORPORATION Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 1998)

Coverage
--------
-  All Management Committee members as of January 1, 2000
-  Future participation approved by the OCN

Pay
---
-  Base + bonus + deferred  pay and bonus

Final Average Pay
-----------------
-  Highest 5 years out of the last 10 years

Service
-------
-  Same as qualified plan, but with prior service in some grandfathered cases

Formula
-------
-  2% x final average pay x Service to 30 years, less qualified plan benefits
   and other pension benefit sources

Normal Retirement
-----------------
-  Age 65 & 10 years service

Early Retirement
----------------
-  Reduced 6.67% per year from age 65
-  Unreduced after age 55 & 85 points

Non-Compete
-----------
-  No

Vesting
-------
-  Age 55 & 10 years service

Payment
-------
-  Annuities & lump sums
North American Snow Cover Extent

Downloaded from Rutger University Global Snow Lab

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/files/moncov.namgnld.txt
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Echo Healthcare Acquisition Corp., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:




The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form
      10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in
      the
      Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                April 2, 2007
            
            /s/
                Kevin W. PendergestKevin
                W. Pendergest*Chief
                Financial Officer*
**Exhibit 31.2**

Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

Pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Daniel C.Sibley, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2006;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: April 16, 2007 | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley               |
|----------------------|------------------------------------|
|                 | Daniel C. Sibley                   |
|                 | Chief Financial  Officer           |
|                 | Reef Oil &  Gas Partners, L.P. |

 

----
EPA File No

. 56228

- EUP

- 40
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50809-50810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eleventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 220: Automatic Flight 
Guidance and Control

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction of Notice of RTCA Special Committee 220 meeting: 
Automatic Flight Guidance and Control.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 220: Automatic Flight Guidance and 
Control

DATES: The meeting will be held September 13-15, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m., unless stated otherwise.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC, 20036. For hotel information please 
view the following website: http://www.rtca.org/directions/directions.asp#hotels.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC, 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax 
(202) 833-9434, website http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 220, Automatic Flight 
Guidance and Control

Agenda

Tuesday September 13--Thursday, September 15, 2011

Tuesday, September 13

     Introductions and Administrative Items
     Review of Meeting Agenda
     Review and approval of summary from the first plenary 
meeting RTCA paper no. 011-11/SC220-024
     Presentation of progress of Working Group-2
     Presentation of progress of Working Group-3
     Break-out sessions for Working Groups 2 and 3

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

     Continue Break-out sessions for Working Groups 2 and 3
     Continue development of Installation Guidance White Papers

Thursday, September 15, 2011

     Return to general plenary meeting
     Review of Working Group 2 Status--Progress, Issues and 
Plans
     Review of Working Group 3 Status--Progress, Issues and 
Plans

[[Page 50810]]

     Review of Action Items
     Administrative items (meeting schedule, location, and next 
meeting agenda)
     Any other business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-20744 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,075,406
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,445,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                      100,475
<INVENTORY>                                     8,652,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,230,770
<PP&E>                                          5,206,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                    252,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,930,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,135,542
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           4,797,170
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          265,711
<OTHER-SE>                                        178,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,930,981
<SALES>                                         4,819,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,819,084
<CGS>                                           4,729,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,315,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  499,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                382,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (676,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (676,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (676,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.06)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CARL EDWARD BELL,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, THE COURT OF 

COMMON PLEAS OF ERIE COUNTY, AND 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 WAP 2023

Appeal from the Order entered May 

17, 2023 of the Commonwealth 

Court at No. 34 MD 2022.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2024, the order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp., a Yukon Territory, Canada corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp.



Date:  April 13, 2004



/s/ Karen Liu

_____________________________________

Karen Liu, Principal Financial Officer
Portfolios of Hypothetical First-Lien Mortgages Data Definitions 

Variable Mnemonic Description 

Principal balance amount prin_bal_amt The principal balance as of 

2019:Q4 in dollars

Loan amount at origination loan_amt_orig The loan amount at origination 

in dollars

Loan-to-value ratio at 

origination 

ltv_ratio_orig The ratio of loan amount at 

origination to the property 

value at origination

Credit score at origination creditbureau_score_orig The FICO® scores of the 

borrower at origination 

Property state prop_state The state in which the property 

is located. This includes the 50 

U.S. states and the District of 

Columbia

Occupancy status of property occupancy_type The occupancy status of 

property:

1 is primary

2 is second home

3 is non-owner/investment 

U is unknown

Mortgage product product Mortgage products:

“frm” is fixed-rate mortgage

“arm” is adjustable-rate 

mortgage

Property type prop_type Property types: 

1 is single

2 is condo/co-op

3 is 2-4 units

4 is other

Mortgage purpose purpose_type Mortgage purpose:

1 is purchase

2 is rate/term refinance

3 is cash-out refinance

4 is other refinance

Loan term at origination loan_term_orig Loan term at origination in 

months

Year of loan origination year Year of loan origination

Loan age loan_age Loan age in months

Payment status status Payment status: 

1 is current (0-89 days past due)

2 is late (90-180 days past due)
December 21, 2020

Annie Loo, Esq.

Deputy General Counsel

SVB Financial Group

3003 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

Dear Ms. Loo: 

SVB Financial Group (together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, 

“SVBFG”), Santa Clara, California, a financial holding company as defined in the 

Bank Holding Company Act (“BHC Act”),1 has requested the Board’s approval 

under section 13 of the BHC Act (the “Volcker Rule”)2 and section 225.181 of the 

Board’s Regulation Y (the “Conformance Rule”)3 for a one-year extension of the 

period to conform investments in certain covered funds described herein.

The Volcker Rule generally prohibits any banking entity from 

engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an ownership 

interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or private 

equity fund (together, a “covered fund”), subject to certain exemptions.

4

 The 

Conformance Rule provides a transition period for new banking entities to bring 

their activities and investments into compliance with the Volcker Rule. Under the 

Conformance Rule, a company that was not a banking entity, or a subsidiary or 

affiliate of a banking entity, as of July 21, 2010, and becomes a banking entity, or 

 

1

 12 U.S.C. § 1841(p).

2

 12 U.S.C. § 1851.

3

 12 CFR 225.181. 

4

 See id. A banking entity is defined by statute as any insured depository

institution, any company affiliated with an insured depository institution, as well 

as any foreign bank that has a branch or agency in the United States, with certain 

exceptions.
RE: MATS Reconsideration Package RobertJ Wayland to: Higgins, Cortney 11/07/2012 11:31 AM Cc: Bill Maxwell

Cortney -

See the files below. I've added some additional materials that Bill/I thought might be useful for you in your review. Let us know when you'd like to set-up time to discuss the issues/concerns.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt
*********************************************************

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/07/2012 10:56 AM Subject: RE: MATS Reconsideration Package

Thanks Bob!

We got the package in ROCIS today – can you send over the supporting documentation (memos, spreadsheets) including these:

· Reconsideration of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, Proposed Rule

DRAFT_Reconsider_EGU_MACT_Floor_Memo_110612.pdf

· MATS Reconsideration: Beyond-the-Floor MemorandumDRAFT BTF Memo_110612.pdf

· Data and Procedure for Handling Below Detection Level Data in Analyzing Various Pollutant Emissions Databases for MACT and RTR Emissions Limits already in the docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234-20062)

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234- 20062[1].pdf

· Determination of Representative Detection Level (RDL) and 3 X RDL Values for Mercury Measured Using Sorbent Trap Technologies

Draft_hg3xrdl_110612.pdf

Ancillary Files/Materials:

Draft MATS EIA 110612.pdf

Draft_Controls_TSD_110612.pdf

Draft_SS TSD_110612.pdf

Spreadsheets:

I will send these under two separate emails to keep size management under control! :-)

Thanks, Cortney

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 07,
2012 10:46 AM To: Higgins, Cortney Subject: MATS Reconsideration Package

Cortney -

Let me know once OMB has accepted the MATS proposal package (I understand from OP that it was sent over this morning), and I'll send you all the TSDs and spreadsheets we discussed on Monday.thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt
*********************************************************
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast cancer

should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 7, 1997

Mr. GREGG (for himself and Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected

by breast cancer should not be alone in their fight

against the disease.

Whereas individuals with breast cancer need a support system in their time of need;

Whereas breast cancer is a disease of epidemic proportions,

with 43,900 individuals in the United States expected to

die from breast cancer in 1997, and 1 out of every 8

women in the United States expected to develop breast

cancer in her lifetime;

Whereas the millions of family members, including spouses,

children, parents, siblings, and other loved ones of persons with breast cancer can offer strong emotional sup-
2

•SRES 85 IS

port to each other in addition to the support they offer

to patients and survivors dealing with their challenges;

Whereas it is important that the United States as a whole

support the family members and other loved ones of individuals with breast cancer in addition to supporting the

individual with breast cancer; and

Whereas 1997 brings the 25th anniversary of the National

Cancer Program providing research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to the cause, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of

cancer, rehabilitation from cancer, and the continuing

care of cancer patients and their families: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that an

2 environment be encouraged where—

3 (1) the family members and loved ones of indi4 viduals with breast cancer can support each other in

5 addition to the individual with breast cancer; and

6 (2) everything possible should be done to sup7 port both the individuals with breast cancer as well

8 as the family and loved ones of individuals with

9 breast cancer through public awareness and edu10 cation.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JONAS DAVID SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C06-844-RSL-MJB

) (CR03-370-RSL)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ORDER DENYING MOTION

) UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s § 2255 motion, petitioner’s motion to compel,

petitioner’s request for rulings, petitioner’s motion for expedited release, the Report and

Recommendation of the Honorable Monica J. Benton, any objections thereto, and the remaining

record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED.

(3) Petitioner’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 16) and petitioner’s motion for expedited

release (Dkt. No. 21) are DENIED.

(4) Petitioner’s request for rulings (Dkt. No. 20) is STRICKEN as moot.

Case 2:06-cv-00844-RSL Document 31 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION

(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to Judge Benton.

DATED this 22nd day of January, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00844-RSL Document 31 Filed 01/22/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 60298.

protest 192569-K (Portland, Maine).

#### Stone & Downer Co. *v.*United States,

*400Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the duty assessed on the merchandise in question had not been paid and following Abstract 57870, the motion to dismiss was granted.