alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNISON
HEALTHCARE CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,758
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,621
<PP&E>                                          36,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,606
<BONDS>                                        128,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,103
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,333)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10578)

#### Descoware Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 949396.

(Decided August 20, 1963)

*Glad, & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed RM by Examiner Robert Muir on the invoice covered by the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement.

> 2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues here involved are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Descornare Oorp.*v. *United*
>       *362
>       *States,*R.D. 10158, and that the record in the cited case may he incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. That the merchandise was imported on or after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and is identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) ; and accordingly, appraisement was made under the provisions of section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by said Customs Simplification Act.

> 4. On or about the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantifies and in the ordinary course of trade were the appraised per se unit values in Belgian francs less 40 per centum plus 10 per centum sales tax plus packing as invoiced; and that on the said date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered to all purchasers for exportation to the United States.

> 5. The above-entitled appeal, may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

Upon tbe agreed facts and the cited authority, I find foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement and identified by the items marked “A” and initialed EM, by Examiner Eobert Muir, on the invoice to which said appeal relates, and that such values were the appraised *per se*unit values in Belgian francs, less 40 per centum, plus 10 per centum sales tax, plus packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K  for the year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Friedman, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: February 16, 2010 |                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | By:  /s/ Michael J. Friedman                                                                                                                                           
|                        | Name: Michael J. Friedman
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEVIN L. HENDRICKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THURSTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5374RBL

This matter having come before this Court upon Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his

Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 51) and Plaintiff’s motion for an for an extension of time under

Federal R. Civ. P. 4(m) and (6)(b) to serve Officer William Budinich (Doc. 52). 

The court has reviewed these two motion, the opposition and reply briefs, and the balance of the

record and hereby orders the following:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall file his Third

Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of entry of this Order. 

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve Officer Budinich is GRANTED. The

Plaintiff shall effect service upon Defendant William Budinich no later than sixty (60) days of entry of

this Order.

Dated this 17th day of October, 2007.

/s / J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05374-BHS Document 59 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00411

- CR IN RE Ali MAYBERRY Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 17, 2013 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On June 26, 2013, relator Ali Mayberry filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining of the trial court’s denial of his pro se motions for speedy trial and requesting that this court order the district court to reverse his convictions and dismiss the charges against him

. With regard to the petition for writ of mandamus, mandamus relief is not available with respect to rulings on speedy trial motions becaus e there is an adequate remedy by appeal. Smith v. Gohmert , 962 S.W.2d 590, 593 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); In re Denney , No. 04

- 12

- 00413

- CR, 2012 WL 2914961, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio July 18, 2012, orig. proceeding) (not

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No s . 2012CR2540;2012CR2541;2012CR2542, styled The State of Texas v. Ali Mayberry , pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas , the Honorable Angus McGinty presiding.04

- 13

- 00411

- CR designated for publication). Acco rdingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 52.8( a). With regard to the petition for writ of habeas corpus, this court, as an intermediate court of appeals, is not authorized to grant the relief requested. Pursuant to section 2 2.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint of liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of the violatio n of an order, judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court or judge in a civil case.” T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). In criminal matters, however, an intermediate court of appeals has no original habeas corpus ju risdiction. Chavez v. State , 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] 2004, no pet.);
Watson v. State , 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State , 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1999, no pet.). In crim inal matters, the courts authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, district courts,

an d county courts. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
----

(2004/C 88 E/0348)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1209/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Distribution of infant milk in African countries

While the World Health Organisation (WHO) advises against the advertising of milk powder for babies in order to promote breastfeeding, companies producing milk and manufacturing infant milk powder, for example Nestlé and Danone, have infringed WHO guidelines, arguing that they are seeking to reduce child mortality and are distributing milk powder and other items to pregnant women, for example stethoscopes, free of charge. In the accompanying advertising material they maintain that their milk is comparable to breast milk.

Given that such actions infringe WHO guidelines regarding the promotion of breastfeeding and given the European interests in these companies, what action will the Commission take in response to this situation?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(21 May 2003)

The Commission fully supports the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk substitutes, which was adopted by the World Health Assembly in 1981. The Commission is aware and concerned that there are still baby food companies that do not adhere to the Code and governments which have not implemented its provisions. The Commission will continue to encourage the compliance of the private sector, and particularly the companies, mentioned by the Honourable Member, with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk substitutes in the context of the European Union Corporate Social Responsibility Stakeholders Forum and associated dialogues and partnerships.

----
Order entered September 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00518-CR

RONNIE DECOURTLAND BASS, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-26843-N

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On September 12, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On September 23, 2013, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the September 12, 2013 order 

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
---

Exhibit 99.10



William J. A. Yeo

Hellman & Schofield

Level 4, 46 Edward Street

Brisbane

Queensland 4000



e-mail address:

bill@hellscho.com.au

Phone (business hrs):  (61) 7 3102 9393







CONSENT OF AUTHOR



TO:

The British Columbia Securities Commission

The Alberta Securities Commission

The Ontario Securities Commission

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)



I, William Yeo, PhD, MAusIMM, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project,of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Report) and filed in March 2007. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites.





Dated this 10th day of March, 2007











/s/ William J. A. Yeo_____________

William J. A. Yeo





---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 244

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part

of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the

Holocaust.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. NEY, Mr. EHLERS,

Mr. MICA, Mr. EWING, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. FROST, Mr. CANNON, and Mr. LATOURETTE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on May 4, 2000, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony

6 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

7 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 183 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 183   

Calling upon the Government of Indonesia to respect the results of the 
September 4, 1999, referendum on the status of East Timor and to bring 
     about an immediate end to the violence in East Timor with the 
           assistance of United Nations forces if necessary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1999

Mr. Hastings of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Calling upon the Government of Indonesia to respect the results of the 
September 4, 1999, referendum on the status of East Timor and to bring 
     about an immediate end to the violence in East Timor with the 
           assistance of United Nations forces if necessary.

Whereas on September 4, 1999, the people of East Timor overwhelmingly voted for 
        independence from Indonesia;
Whereas after the voting was concluded violence broke out in East Timor;
Whereas although the violence is being perpetrated in East Timor by army-backed 
        militias it is unclear who is directing these militias;
Whereas the Government of Indonesia declared martial law in East Timor to quell 
        the violence;
Whereas the establishment of martial law in East Timor has failed to stop the 
        violence;
Whereas it has been reported that hundreds of people have been killed and 
        injured since the violence began in East Timor;
Whereas it has been reported that many of East Timor's 800,000 residents have 
        been forced to flee East Timor;
Whereas the United Nations compound in Dili, East Timor, was besieged, and 
        access to food, water, and electricity was intentionally cut off; and
Whereas the international community has called upon the Government of Indonesia 
        to either take immediate and concrete steps to end the violence in East 
        Timor or allow a United Nations-sponsored international force to enter 
        East Timor and restore order: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress calls upon the Government of Indonesia to respect the 
results of the September 4, 1999, referendum on the status of East 
Timor and to bring about an immediate end to the violence in East Timor 
with the assistance of United Nations forces if necessary.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         207,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                       901
<INVENTORY>                                     19,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,285
<PP&E>                                         303,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (18,322)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 973,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,639
<BONDS>                                        446,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                           269
<OTHER-SE>                                     377,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   973,094
<SALES>                                          5,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,109
<CGS>                                           11,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 194/9 Au

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 489 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 489 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 194/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 194/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3883 — GDF/Centrica/NEW SPE) (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 194/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3855 — Webasto/Starck/Staxera) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 194/4 | Schedule of public holidays for 2006 (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 194/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3913 — 3i/Aviapartner) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 194/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 194/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3883 — GDF/Centrica/NEW SPE) (1)

2

2005/C 194/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3855 — Webasto/Starck/Staxera) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2005/C 194/4

Schedule of public holidays for 2006 (1)

4

2005/C 194/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3913 — 3i/Aviapartner) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

----

| RCC      Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Resource      Real Estate Funding 2007-1 CDO Investor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2007-1 Ltd. , a Cayman Island    company                        |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2007-1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company          |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding 2006-1 CDO Investor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2006-1 Ltd. , a Cayman Island    company                        |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2006-1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company          |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability  company                                  |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability    company                              |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE 3, LLC, a Delaware limited liability    company                              |
| RCC      Real Estate Trophy Properties XV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company             |
| Resource      TRS, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                       |
| RCC      Commercial, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                     |
| Apidos      Cinco CDO, Ltd (“TRS”), a Cayman Island company                               |
| Apidos      CDO I, Ltd. (“TRS”) a Cayman Island company                                   |
| Apidos      CDO III, Ltd., (“TRS”) a Cayman Island company                                |
| RCC      Real Estate Acquisitions SPE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company                 |
| Resource      Capital Trust I                                                                         |
| RCC      Trust II                                                                                     |

----

----