73392 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 237 / Monday, December 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

OAR–2012–0732, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air3), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the ‘‘Rules’’ section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

Beckham, Permits Office (AIR–3), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, (415) 972–3811, 

beckham.lisa@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document proposes to approve revisions 

to the California SIP to incorporate 

EKAPCD Rule 210.4—Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration, ICAPCD Rule 

904—Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) Permit Program, 

PCAPCD Rule 518—Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit 

Program, and YSAQMD Rule 3.24— 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration. 

The State of California is required under 

Part C of title I of the Act to adopt and 

implement a SIP-approved PSD permit 

program. The approval of these rules 

would establish a PSD permit program 

in each District for pre-construction 

review of certain new and modified 

major stationary sources in attainment 

or unclassifiable areas. Because the 

State of California does not currently 

have a SIP-approved PSD program 

within EKAPCD, ICAPCD, PCAPCD, and 

YSAQMD (referred to hereinafter as the 

‘‘Districts’’), EPA is currently the PSD 

permitting authority for each District. 

Inclusion of these rules into the SIP will 

transfer PSD permitting authority from 

EPA to the Districts. EPA will assume 

the role of overseeing the PSD 

permitting program within each District. 

We have published a direct final rule 

approving these revisions in the ‘‘Rules’’ 

section of this Federal Register because 

we view this as a noncontroversial 

action and anticipate no adverse 

comment. We have explained our 

reasons for this action and provided 

detailed information about the action in 

the preamble to the direct final rule. The 

regulatory text for this proposal is 

identical to that for the direct final rule. 

For additional information, including 

the regulatory text, see the direct final 

rule in the ‘‘Rules’’ section of this 

Federal Register. 

If no adverse comments are received, 

we will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse 

comment, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that this rule will 

not take effect, and all public comments 

received will be addressed in any 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on a distinct 

provision of this rule and that provision 

may be severed from the remainder of 

the rule, EPA may adopt as final those 

provisions of the rule that are not the 

subject of an adverse comment. In such 

case, EPA would publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

indicating which provisions we are 

withdrawing. The provisions that are 

not withdrawn would then become 

effective on the date set out in the direct 

final rule, notwithstanding adverse 

comment on any other provision. 

EPA does not intend to institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action must do so at this time. 

For further information about 

commenting on this action, please see 

the information provided in the 

ADDRESSES section of this document and 

refer to the direct final rule in the 

‘‘Rules’’ section of this Federal Register. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: September 25, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–29536 Filed 12–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0808; FRL–9750–3] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Monterey Bay 

Unified Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Monterey Bay Unified 

Air Pollution Control District 

(MBUAPCD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). This 

revision concerns opacity standards 

related to multiple pollutants, including 

particulate matter (PM) emissions from 

several different types of sources, 

ranging from fugitive dust to gas 

turbines. We are proposing to approve a 

local rule to regulate these emission 

sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA 

or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by January 9, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2012–0808, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 237 / Monday, December 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules 73393 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Idalia Pe ́rez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972– 

3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rule: Rule 400, Visible Emissions. In the 

Rules and Regulations section of this 

Federal Register, we are approving this 

local rule in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: October 26, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–29530 Filed 12–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1085] 

Proposed Flood Elevation 

Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: On February 5, 2010, FEMA 

published in the Federal Register a 

proposed rule that contained an 

erroneous table. This notice provides 

corrections to that table, to be used in 

lieu of the information published at 75 

FR 5909. The table provided here 

represents the flooding source, location 

of referenced elevations, effective and 

modified elevations, and community 

affected for Ballard County, Kentucky, 

and Incorporated Areas. Specifically, it 

addresses the following flooding 

sources: Cane Creek (backwater effects 

from Mississippi, Hazel Creek 

(backwater effects from Ohio River), 

Humphrey Creek (backwater effects 

from Ohio River), Humphrey Creek 

Tributary 9 (backwater effects from Ohio 

River), Lucy Creek (backwater effects 

from Ohio River), Mississippi River, 

Ohio River, and Stovall Creek 

(backwater effects from Mississippi 

River. 

DATES: Comments are to be submitted 

on or before March 11, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. FEMA–B– 

1085, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, 

Engineering Management Branch, 

Federal Insurance and Mitigation 

Administration, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064 

or (email) 

Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064 or (email) 

Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) publishes proposed 

determinations of Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and 

modified BFEs for communities 

participating in the National Flood 

Insurance Program (NFIP), in 

accordance with section 110 of the 

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 

42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a). 

These proposed BFEs and modified 

BFEs, together with the floodplain 

management criteria required by 44 CFR 

60.3, are minimum requirements. They 

should not be construed to mean that 

the community must change any 

existing ordinances that are more 

stringent in their floodplain 

management requirements. The 

community may at any time enact 

stricter requirements of its own or 

pursuant to policies established by other 

Federal, State, or regional entities. 

These proposed elevations are used to 

meet the floodplain management 

requirements of the NFIP and also are 

used to calculate the appropriate flood 

insurance premium rates for new 

buildings built after these elevations are 

made final, and for the contents in those 

buildings. 

Corrections 

In the proposed rule published at 75 

FR 5909, in the February 5, 2010, issue 

of the Federal Register, FEMA 

published a table under the authority of 

44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled ‘‘Ballard 

County, Kentucky, and Incorporated 

Areas’’ addressed the following flooding 

sources: Cane Creek (backwater effects 

from Mississippi, Hazel Creek 

(backwater effects from Ohio River), 

Humphrey Creek (backwater effects 

from Ohio River), Humphrey Creek 

Tributary 9 (backwater effects from Ohio 

River), Lucy Creek (backwater effects 

from Ohio River), Mississippi River, 

Ohio River, and Stovall Creek 

(backwater effects from Mississippi 

River. That table contained inaccurate 

information as to the communities 

affected for the flooding source the 

Mississippi River. In this notice, FEMA 

is publishing a table containing the 

accurate information, to address these 

prior errors. The information provided 

below should be used in lieu of that 

previously published. 

Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation ** 

* Elevation in feet 

(NGVD) 

+ Elevation in feet 

(NAVD) 

#Depth in feet above 

ground 

∧Elevation in meters 

(MSL) 

Communities affected 

Effective Modified 

Ballard County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas 

Cane Creek (backwater effects from Mississippi 

River).

From the confluence with Shawnee Creek Slough to 

approximately 2.3 miles upstream of confluence 

with Shawnee Creek Slough.

+331 +330 Unincorporated Areas of 

Ballard County. 

Hazel Creek (backwater effects from Ohio River).From the confluence with Brushy Pond Creek to approximately 3.2 miles upstream of the confluence 

with Brushy Pond Creek.

+332 +331 Unincorporated Areas of 

Ballard County. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with