alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 116/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 116 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 646 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 116

English edition

Legislation

Volume 646 April 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 crisis (
  1
  ) | 25 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 crisis (
  1
  )

1

25

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Raymond R. Quirk, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Fidelity National Financial, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 26, 2018

 

 
|   By: | /s/ Raymond R. Quirk    |   |
|-----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|            | Raymond R. Quirk        |   |
|            | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, DavidP. Southwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10,2007

|        | /s/ DAVID P.  SOUTHWELL   |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | David P. Southwell        |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
No. 68542.

protests 62/2651, etc. (New York).

#### Raleigh Industries of America, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 8,871.

#### McLAUGHLIN v. JOHNS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 372.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1806.

Bail — lx Civil Action — Affidavit.

Affidavit of administratrix to hold to bail.

[This was a suit by McLaughlin’s adminis-tratrix against Richard Johns.]

*234[See Case No. 10,828.]

Affidavit of administratrix, “that the above account is truly extracted from the books of the deceased, and that she believes the same to be a just and true account, and that since the death of the intestate she has received no part thereof,” held sufficient to hold to bail — (nem. con.).
No. 54431.

#### Siegfried Loewenthal Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 119746-K, etc. (Cleveland).

*220Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Oust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 4.4.1

                                 AMENDMENT 1 TO
                           CAROLINA FIRST CORPORATION
                 AMENDED COMMON STOCK DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN


         This Amendment 1 (this "Amendment") to Carolina First Corporation's
Amended Common Stock Dividend Reinvestment Plan, amended as of June 27, 1996
(the "Plan") is made by Carolina First Corporation, to be effective as of June
30, 2000.

         The Plan is hereby amended to increase the shares of common stock of
Carolina First Corporation issuable thereunder from 300,000 to 450,000.

         Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan is ratified and affirmed
in its entirety.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is entered into as of March 2, 2000.

                                            CAROLINA FIRST CORPORATION


                                            By:      /s/ William S. Hummers III
                                                     --------------------------
                                            Name:    William S. Hummers, III
                                            Title:   Executive Vice President
Exhibit 10.64


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     AMENDMENT TO  EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  (this  "Amendment")  dated this 9th of
December,  1999, by and between TREMONT ADVISERS,  INC., a Delaware  corporation
having its principal  executive offices at Corporate Center at Rye, 555 Theodore
Fremd Avenue,  Rye, New York  ("Tremont");  and SANDRA L. MANZKE,  an individual
residing in Pound Ridge, New York ("Executive").

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS,  Executive  is employed by Tremont  pursuant to and in  accordance
with the  terms  and  conditions  contained  in an  employment  agreement  dated
September  25, 1995 (the  "Employment  Agreement"),  by and between  Tremont and
Executive; and

     WHEREAS, Executive and Tremont are each desirous of amending the Employment
Agreement in accordance with this Amendment, effective January 1, 2000.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the promises and mutual  covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and in the Employment Agreement,  the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Section 3(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the
following  phrase:  "three  hundred  eighty  thousand  dollars"  ($380,000)  and
inserting in its place "three hundred ninety-one  thousand four hundred dollars"
($391,400)."

2.  Section 5 shall be amended by deleting all  references  therein to "December
31, 1999" and inserting in its place "December 31, 2000."

3. Except to the extent amended by this  Amendment,  the terms and conditions of
the Employment  Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of
any conflict  between the terms of the  Employment  Agreement and the Amendment,
the Amendment shall control.

4. Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other that each has read the
foregoing  provisions and that each has had a sufficient  opportunity to discuss
this  Amendment  with  anyone each party might  desire  prior to signing  below.
Further, in signing this Amendment, each party has not relied on or been induced
to execute this  Amendment by any  statements,  representations,  agreements  or
promises,  oral or  written,  made  by the  other  except  for  those  expressly
contained in this Amendment.


                                       78
<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the
parties hereto as of the date first above written.

WITNESS


/s/ Suzanne S. Hammond                                 By: /s/ Sandra L. Manzke
-------------------------------------                     ---------------------
Suzanne S. Hammond                                        Sandra L. Manzke
Secretary and Treasurer

ATTEST                                                 TREMONT ADVISERS, INC.


/s/ Stephen S. Clayton                                 /s/ Robert I. Schulman
-------------------------------------                  ----------------------
Stephen T. Clayton                                     Robert I. Schulman
Chief Financial Officer                                Chief Operating Officer














                                       79
No. 61146.

protest 295309-K/8498 (Chicago).

#### National Carloading Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bamboo poles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59620, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 202 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 202

 Expressing the sense of Congress that the Capitol Police Board should 
exercise the authority granted to it under law to exempt members of the 
 United States Capitol Police with good service records from mandatory 
             separation from employment at 57 years of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1999

  Mr. Traficant (for himself and Mr. Burton of Indiana) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that the Capitol Police Board should 
exercise the authority granted to it under law to exempt members of the 
 United States Capitol Police with good service records from mandatory 
             separation from employment at 57 years of age.

Whereas the United States Capitol Police is facing a severe manpower shortage;
Whereas taxpayers are forced to pay millions of dollars each year in overtime 
        for members of the United States Capitol Police;
Whereas having the United States Capitol Police retain experienced officers with 
        good service records is a viable option to enhance the security of the 
        Capitol complex and reduce the costs associated with recruiting, hiring, 
        and training new officers; and
Whereas Congress should do everything in its power to ensure that the United 
        States Capitol Police retains as many experienced officers with good 
        service records as possible: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that in the case of members of the 
United States Capitol Police with good service records, the Capitol 
Police Board should exercise the authority granted to it under sections 
8335(d) and 8425(c) of title 5, United States Code, to exempt those 
members from mandatory separation from employment at 57 years of age.
                                 <all>
```
No. 64649.

#### Karl B. Rosen Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/28217 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *B. L. Lemke & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 1937), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

February 17, 1955

No. 58775.

protests 239048-K, etc. (New York).

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                Employment Agreement executed September 16, 1999
                                     between
                  Jack Cobb and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc.


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of
this 15th day of December, 1999, by and between Jack Cobb (the "Employee") and
Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc. ("Eagle").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Employee and Eagle are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement executed September 16, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement effective
December 15, 1999 to take into account the resolutions adopted by Eagle's Board
of Directors at its special meeting on December 15, 1999.


         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements
hereinafter contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows:

         1. Section 3.b Annual Bonus of the Agreement shall be changed in its
entirety to read as follows:

         "The Employee and Eagle acknowledge that they are entering into this
         Agreement upon the consummation of Eagle's acquisition of Pacific
         Western Extruded Plastics Company ("PW Pipe"), and that the Employee is
         a former employee of PW Pipe. As such, for calendar year 1999 under the
         term of this Agreement, the Employee shall be entitled to a bonus equal
         to the bonus to which he would have been entitled under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan for the remainder of calendar year 1999, which shall be payable at
         such time and under such schedule as set forth under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan. For subsequent calendar years during the term of this Agreement,
         the Employee shall be entitled to participate in the Company's
         Performance Bonus Plan. PW Pipe's Performance Unit Payment incentive
         program ("PUP") has been terminated and nothing contained herein shall
         adversely impact the Employee's rights under the PUP that accrued prior
         to September 16, 1999."

         2. Except as amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Employment Agreement effective as of the date first written above.

EAGLE PACIFICS INDUSTRIES, INC.



By: /s/ William H. Spell                     /s/ Jack Cobb
Its: Chief Executive Officer                 Jack Cobb
Case 2:06-mc-00114-RSM Document 1 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1
From: Matthew J. Bruff

To: Brent Ruminski

Subject: RE: DOE Report CBI Clarification - SGE00110

Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:08:30 PM

Brent,

As discussed this morning, the info is not considered CBI.

Thanks for the call.

Matt

From: Brent Ruminski [mailto:Brent.Ruminski@erg.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:08 AM

To: Matthew J. Bruff

Subject: DOE Report CBI Clarification - SGE00110

Hi Matthew,

My name is Brent Ruminski and I work for Eastern Research Group, Inc., a contractor for the United

States Environmental Protection Agency. We are supporting EPA with a proposed effluent guideline

(ELG) rulemaking for the unconventional oil and gas extraction industry

(http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/oilandgas/unconv.cfm).

In the technical development document that supports the proposed rulemaking, we have cited a

DOE report (DE-FE0000833) for which you authored. As you’re probably aware, this report is

available to the public for download on DOE’s website (http://www.netl.doe.gov/research/oil-andgas/project-summaries/completed-env/de-fe0000833). However, we recently noticed that the

word “confidential” appears in the footer on some pages. Can you please confirm that this report is

not considered confidential business information (CBI). If this report is not considered CBI, then it

will be included in the public record at www.regulations.gov under the document control number

(DCN): SGE00110.

Thank you,

Brent Ruminski

Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG)

14555 Avion Parkway Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

703-633-1701 (office)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSH KAHN,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5381

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, CPT KEN TYNDAL;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, MIRIAM SCHWARTZ;.

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge J KELLEY ARNOLD:

Date of hearing: MARCH 26, 2007

Time of hearing: 2:00 P.M.

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person

 or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

March 20, 2007.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05381-KLS Document 17 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 1
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 113

Expressing the commitment of Congress to address the emergency that

currently exists in American agriculture.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. BERRY (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. FORD, and Mr. MINGE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the commitment of Congress to address the

emergency that currently exists in American agriculture.

Whereas the prosperity and security of the United States is

dependent on our ability to domestically produce safe, affordable, and abundant agricultural commodities;

Whereas American farmers are the most productive ever,

anywhere in the world;

Whereas a combination of factors has contributed to historically low commodity prices received by American farmers;

Whereas Congress has recently been forced to make emergency appropriations to address the crisis facing our

farmers;
2

•HCON 113 IH

Whereas current price projections indicate that the crisis will

continue through the 1999 crop year;

Whereas Congress has an obligation to protect the food and

fiber security of America; and

Whereas the current budget restrictions and resulting appropriations for agriculture do not allow for adequate devotion of financial resources to properly address the crisis

facing American agriculture: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) expresses its continuing commitment to

4 American farmers;

5 (2) recognizes the need to protect the food and

6 fiber security that the United States has historically

7 enjoyed;

8 (3) recognizes the need to provide adequate fi9 nancial resources to address the crisis devastating

10 rural America and American farmers; and

11 (4) recognizes that legislation providing for fu12 ture appropriations will likely be needed in the

13 106th Congress to address the emergency that cur14 rently exists in American agriculture.

Æ
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DEVONNE MICHAEL LEE,

Defendant. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-67M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Possession of Cocaine Base with Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A).

Date of Detention Hearing: February 17, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has a lengthy criminal background history.

(2) Defendant has a prior history of failures to comply with the conditions of his

probation.

(3) When charged with the instant offense, defendant was on supervised release from

a prior conviction involving possession of cocaine.

(4) There is no information that is verifiable regarding defendant’s residence.

Case 2:06-mj-00067-JPD Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(5) Defendant has a past and present history of substance-abuse problems.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings and that will address the

danger to other persons or the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 21st day of February, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00067-JPD Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2