alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,894
<SECURITIES>                                    54,479
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                       651
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,122
<PP&E>                                          12,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,494
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,114
<SALES>                                         18,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,645
<CGS>                                            6,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,028)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    650
<INCOME-TAX>                                       229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       421
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

 

March 26,2009

 

ReefGlobal Energy VI, L.P.

1901N Central Expy Suite 300

RichardsonTX 75080

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER

 

Gentlemen:

 

Asindependent petroleum engineers, Gleason Engineering hereby consents to theincorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ReefGlobal Energy VI, L.P. of information from our reserve report dated March 16,2009 and entitled “Estimate of Reserves and Future Revenues to Reef GlobalEnergy VI, L.P. in Certain Oil and Gas Properties located in the United Statesas of December 31, 2008, Based on Constant Prices and Costs in accordancewith Securities and Exchange Commission Guidelines” and all references to ourfirm included in or made a part of the Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
|   | Yours  very truly,       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Gleason  Engineering     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/  Dennis M. Gleason   |
|   | Dennis  M. Gleason, P.E. |
|   | President  and Owner     |

 

GLEASONENGINEERING

4621South Cooper; Suite 131-343

Arlington,Texas

(817)271-2148 * fax (817) 472-0522

www.gleason-engr.com

----
UNlTED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, California 958 12 Dear Mr. Fletcher: We received your May 20,2010, request on behalf of the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (District) for delegation ofthe authority to implement and enforce federal Clean Air Act section 112 maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for area sources not covered by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Part 70 program. By this letter, we are hereby granting the District formal delegation ofthe unchanged MACT standards for area sources. As ofthe date of this letter, the District will have authorityto implement and enforce existing MACT standards for area sources as promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the exception of the perchloroethylene dry cleaning standard and the chromium electroplating standardfor which statewide or district rules have already been approved and delegated by EPA. Additionally, the District will receive delegation of future area source MACT standards or revisions 90 days after promulgation ofthese standards or revisions, unless the District chooses to decline delegation of a particular future standardby notifying the EPA Region IX office in writing. If no such notification is received, the delegation will go into effect 90 days after promulgation ofthe standard or revision, without any additional action from the District or EPA. EPA will publish a future Federal Registernotice to codify these delegations into the CFR. We appreciate effortsby the California Air Resources Board and the District to implement the federal air toxics program and hope to continue working with you to reduce emissions of air toxics in California. If you have any questions about this delegation, please call me at (415) 947- 8715 or have your staff contact Mae Wang at (415) 947-4124. Sincerely, r 

# <~(pz(&mf>fi~k orahJordan Director,Air Division v

cc: Jorge 

### L. Fernandez, ARB Tom Murphy, Santa Barbara County APCD Douglas Grapple, Santa Barbara County APCD

Printed on Recycled Paper
No. P67/188.

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States,

protests 65/18492 and 66/1348 (New York).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of “original miniatures” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Abercrombie & Fitch Company*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 129, C.A.D. 808), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DEREK HUGH FLANARY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAREN SWENSON,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5380 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and proposed

Habeas Corpus Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, and to the Hon. Karen

L. Strombom.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05380-RBL Document 6 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                        EXHIBIT 23.2


                     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Seminole Finance Corporation

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 10, 1997 with respect
to the combined balance sheet of Seminole Finance Corporation and Related
Companies as of December 31, 1995 and the related combined statements of
operations, stockholder's equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1995, which report appears in the Form 8-K/A1 of Ugly Duckling
Corporation dated January 15, 1997.

                                        /s/ Barton & Company, P.A.
                                        Barton & Company, P.A.
                                        Certified Public Accountants


Tampa, Florida
March 31, 1997
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 19-11 

December 11, 2019

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

SUBJECT: Interagency Statement on the Use of Alternative Data in Credit Underwriting

Applicability: This statement applies to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, 

including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Consumer Financial 

Protection Bureau, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union 

Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have issued the attached 

interagency statement on the use of alternative data in underwriting by banks, credit unions, and 

non-bank financial firms. This statement is focused on consumer protection implications of the 

use of alternative data in underwriting, highlighting potential benefits and risks. 

The statement notes the benefits that using alternative data may provide to consumers, 

such as expanding access to credit and enabling consumers to obtain additional products and 

more favorable pricing and terms. The statement also explains that a well-designed compliance 

management program provides for a thorough analysis of relevant consumer protection laws and 

regulations to ensure firms understand the opportunities, risks, and compliance requirements 

before using alternative data. 

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Westra Miller, Counsel, 

Fair Lending Enforcement, at (202) 452-4251. In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s 

public website.1

 

1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx
 

Page 2 of 2 

Carol A. Evans 

Associate Director

Attachments:

• “Interagency Statement on the Use of Alternative Data in Credit Underwriting”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                               JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                                        13,884,000
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  5,397,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      35,000
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              21,563,000
<PP&E>                                                        10,133,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 5,242,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                36,735,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         15,571,000
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          51,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    16,695,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  36,735,000
<SALES>                                                       48,183,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              48,183,000
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 47,222,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               193,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,289,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     560,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              729,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     729,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.14


</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ROBERT DURALL,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-1012-MJP-MAT

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

This matter comes before the Court on petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel.

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, does hereby find

and ORDER as follows:

(l) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 5) is DENIED. There

is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unless an

evidentiary hearing is required. See Terravona v. Kincheloe, 852 F.2d 424, 429 (9th Cir. 1988);

Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F.2d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir. 1992); and, Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The Court may exercise its discretion

to appoint counsel for a financially eligible individual where the "interests of justice so require."

Case 2:06-cv-01012-MJP Document 7 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

PAGE -2

18 U.S.C. § 3006A. However, petitioner fails to satisfy the Court that the interests of justice are

best served by appointment of counsel at this time.

(2) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to petitioner and to the Hon. Marsha J.

Pechman.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01012-MJP Document 7 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000876528
<NAME> CROWN ENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          95,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,581
<PP&E>                                          66,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,516,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,974
<BONDS>                                        178,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       219,610
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,214,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,516,058
<SALES>                                         65,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,646
<CGS>                                         (34,887)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (148,309)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,267)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,109)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (57,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (57,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medwave, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate below (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and as of the date listed below,hereby certifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and shall not be deemedpart of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.        Date: May 29, 2007 By:  /s/ Frank A. Katarow    Frank A. Katarow    Chief Executive Officer (Interim)(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                                 [ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC. LOGO]

January 11, 2000

On March 25, 1999 representatives of Hovione, SA and Allos Therapeutics, Inc.
signed a term sheet indicating the intent of Hovione and Allos to establish a
supply agreement and its anticipated terms. According to this term sheet Hovione
would be the primary supplier of RSR13 sodium salt to Allos Therapeutics, during
clinical development and for a designated number of years after
commercialization. Since the signing of the term sheet Hovione and Allos
Therapeutics have worked together to develop RSR13 sodium salt.

This letter has two purposes: (1) To recognize that both parties still agree
that the terms in March 25, 1999 term sheet will form the basis of the
definitive contract and (2) that the terms contained in the term sheet will
function as a supply agreement until the definitive agreement is reached.


Acknowledged and Agreed


ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.                        HOVIONE INTER LIMITED


By: /s/ Stephen J. Hoffman, Ph.D., M.D.         By: /s/ Chry Villax
   ------------------------------------            -------------------------
   Stephen J. Hoffman, Ph.D., M.D.                 Chry Villax
   President & Chief Executive Officer             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  1/12/00                                  Date:  13th January 2000
     -----------                                     ---------------------


                      CONFIDENTIAL-[HOVIONE LOGO] HOVIONE


        7000 North Broadway, Suite 600 - Denver, CO 80231 - 303/426-6262
                                Fax 303/412-9160
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEVIN LAWRENCE HENDRICKSON,

Petitioner,

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5331 RBL/KLS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636

(b) (1) Local MJR 3 and 4.

Petitioner seeks to challenge a February 2006 conviction and sentence. (See proposed Habeas

Petition, Dkt. # 1). Petitioner states that he has filed an appeal with the Washington State Supreme Court

and is awaiting a final decision on that appeal. 

There is an exhaustion requirement in federal court for habeas actions. In order to satisfy the

exhaustion requirement, petitioner’s claims must have been fairly presented to the state's highest court. 

Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971); Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1985). A

federal habeas petitioner must provide the state courts with a fair opportunity to correct alleged violations

of prisoners' federal rights. Duncan v. Henry, --- U.S. ---, 115 S.Ct. 887, 888 (1995). It is not enough

that all the facts necessary to support the federal claim were before the state courts or that a somewhat

Case 3:06-cv-05331-RBL Document 6 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

similar state law claim was made. Id, citing Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270 (1971) and Anderson v.

Harless, 459 U.S. 4 (1982). Thus, petitioner’s claim before this court at this time appears unexhausted. 

2. Accordingly, petitioner shall show cause why this petition should not be dismissed. A response

is due by July 21, 2006. If petitioner fails to file a response or the response shows the petition cannot go

forward the court will enter a report and recommendation that the petition be dismissed.

3. The Court Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 3rd day of July, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05331-RBL Document 6 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2
----

|  | (1) | To                my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   /s/ Chene Gardner                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   Chene                Gardner                                   |
|   Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  |

----