alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-318M

)

v. )

)

ERIC D. MOYER, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Count I: Possession of Child Pornography

Date of Detention Hearing: June 20, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a contested detention hearing pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention

hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant

can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety

of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Jill Otake. 

The defendant was represented by Robert Gombiner.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of danger due to his criminal history

which includes a conviction for this same offense six years ago; he was

released from prison three years ago.

 (2) The defendant does not contest detention.

Case 2:06-mj-00318-MJB Document 7 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of June, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00318-MJB Document 7 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2
d+,3€osr4, 2. 

## fi"& UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY 

# a=" ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER REGION 4 % oe 61 FORSYTHSTREET



### '%( ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

Ms. Trudy Fisher Executive Director Mississippi Department of

Environmental Quality 

### P. 

### 0.Box 2261 Jackson, Mississippi 39225-226

### 1 Dear Ms. Fisher: Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's 

### FY 2009 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by 

## 5 105of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues, your report is now finalized and the grant has been closed out. This letter documents the coilclusion ofthejoint evaluation process required by 

### 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.1 

### 15 and identified as a commitment in your 

### FY 2009 Air Planning Agreement under Cross CuttingIssues. We appreciate the progress you made in 

### FY 2009 and look forward to working with you in 

### FY 2010 and future years to continue ourjoint efforts to protect and improve air quality. 

### If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 562-9097 or Angela Isom at (404) 562-9092. Sincerely,
Douglas Neeley Chief Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch Enclosure

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable .Printed wnh Vegetable Od Based Inks on RecycledPaper (Mlnimum30%Postconsumer)
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 168

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Leg1999. gress adjourn sine die not later than July 31, islative Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Con-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 168

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, notwithstanding the provisions of sec3 tion 132(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946

4 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of Representatives and the

5 Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess of three
2

•HCON 168 EH

1 days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress

2 have adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for

3 an adjournment (in excess of three days) to a day certain

4 or for adjournment sine die.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 24, 1997, except for Note 8, as to which
the date is February 28, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of E-Z
Plan, Inc. included in the Registration Statement (Form S-1) and related
Prospectus of Ugly Duckling Corporation for the registration of 5,325,000 shares
of common stock and 325,000 common stock purchase warrants.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young L.L.P.
 
San Antonio, Texas
December 17, 1997
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Health Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Andrew Adams, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Roger R. Hopkins, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                            
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
|    | Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                  
|    |                                                                                            
|(b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,         
|    | the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                          

November 5, 2009/s/W. Andrew AdamsW. Andrew AdamsChairman, Board of Directors andChief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2009/s/Roger R. HopkinsRoger. R. HopkinsChief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 12, 2007 | By:                */s/*                Yan Liang Fan |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Yan                Liang Fan                          |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer                |

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 29, 2007



/s/    CHARLES J. SCHREIBER,
JR.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

___________

No. 24-10248

___________

Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America, Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce; Longview Chamber of Commerce; American Bankers Association; Consumer Bankers Associatio n; Texas Association of Business,

Plaintiffs—Appellants ,

versus

Consumer Financial Protecti on Bureau; Rohit Chopra, in his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau , Defendants—Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CV-213

______________________________

ORDER:

IT IS ORDERED that the administra tive stay of the District Court’s
transfer order is extended until 5: 00PM on Friday, April 5, 2024. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 2, 2024
Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 24-10248

2 LYLE W. CAYCE, CLERK United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit /s/ Lyle W. Cayce

ENTERED AT THE DIRE CTION OF THE COURT
No. P68/29.

protest 67/21562 (New York).

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of key driven calculating machines and metal parts dedicated for use therewith similar in all material respects, except for having in addition an electric motor as an essential feature, to those the subject of *Plus Computing*
      *992
      *Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 CCPA 160, C.A.D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00577-CR

ROBERT ALLEN BRUNSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 6 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered Appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 19, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,082
<SECURITIES>                                     8,791
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,953
<PP&E>                                           1,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,962
<SALES>                                         10,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,447
<CGS>                                            3,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 2 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 3 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 4 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 5 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 6 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 7 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 8 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 9 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 10 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 11 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 12 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 13 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 14 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 15 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 16 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 17 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 18 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 19 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 20 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 21 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 22 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 23 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 24 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 25 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 26 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-02010-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/05 Page 27 of 27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE E. COLON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 709 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. 

### FAA- 

# :J<t I 

### 3 - 0 1'3D Directorate Identifier : 

# c:lt) 1"3:; -J £_ - 

### 0 

## 7**~** 

# 4.b -AD (/"you 

### make changes to 

### the values in th e fab le below. 

### yo u must ensure the lo !als upda te occordingl y 

### (l they do not, click (or Tab) into and th en out ofthe changed ce ll. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e
.g., aircraft , engine , (e.g., In spection , propeller, appliance) Work-h ours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost ( labor+ 

# u.s. for U .S
. Fleet Do n ot includ e on condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Produ cts 

### Replace Diaphragm 4.0 ,. \_i I 

### 53
. 00 

## ' { !, 

### 400 ' i '7.2,)1).()11 ) l .; ) j fhl \ () .00 ' ').' ' (•I• ) !I O(J l I) ('( ') 0.00 1 1 ( (' 

### On 1:, 0.00 

### ' (li , I (":f, 

# " () ()() 'I I' ' '•\) ') U.OO 

# ' ) 

## n• ' f;.()() \ (J \ { I \' ,, 00 () (llJ 

# . ' ) 0.0\• (l 

### .r '· 

### ' (J.[)(J ' '1,"•0 .1,1 11.00 ' (l ( t I \l( ) [' {)(' 

### n (, I ()t, .... () ,()(} \ O.IJfl 1 1.1 ) I i}(l ' t' (l( 'I.!' )**~** 0.00 {!('\I ' ;it $ () .()0 

### " f\ c \I tl ,) !).(,()

I \1 I ! ill' ) 0.00

I• '·) \ () .00 The known number of products in comp lian ce: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $157,200 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if 

### known) $157200 On-Condition Costs:
. , Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e
.g., Inspection, (inc lud e access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testin g , and closeup) \ () 

# .. '; (1,()0

... \I 'J(J \ I (I () ( li) .,.. lj. ){' <:., () II l (' ().()(1 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use thisfield to exp lain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obv ious. Thisfield can also be used to expla in warranty costs):


### 7

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory

# action**;** YES* 

# 0 NO 

### [gj *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

- YES* 

# 0 NO 

### [gj * Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer. YES 

# 0 NO 

### [gj Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 

# 0 NO 

### [gj * Explanation:



### 8
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 193 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 193

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 1999

                                Received

                           November 19, 1999

           Referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the support of Congress for activities to increase public 
                 participation in the decennial census.

Whereas the decennial census is required by article I, section 2, clause 3 of 
        the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas, in order to achieve a successful decennial census, the joint efforts of 
        Federal, State, and local government, and of other institutions, groups, 
        organizations, and individuals will be needed;
Whereas the Bureau of the Census has implemented a partnership program through 
        which a comprehensive outreach, education, and motivation campaign is 
        being carried out to encourage all segments of the population to 
        participate in the upcoming census; and
Whereas it is fitting and proper that Congress seek to promote the efforts of 
        the Bureau of the Census, and of the other aforementioned institutions, 
        organizations, groups, and individuals to achieve a successful decennial 
        census: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of achieving a successful 
        decennial census;
            (2) encourages State and local governments, community 
        leaders, and all other parties involved in this joint 
        undertaking to continue to work to ensure a successful census;
            (3) reaffirms the spirit of cooperation that exists between 
        Congress and the Bureau of the Census with respect to achieving 
        a successful census; and
            (4) asserts this public partnership between Congress and 
        the Bureau of the Census to promote the decennial census.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amendment No.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TAL International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian M. Sondey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2016/s/ BRIAN M. SONDEY Brian M. SondeyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20645 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RONNIE WAYNE JACKSON Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-260-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T he attorney appointed to represent RonnieWayneJackson has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 05-20645

2 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
No. 69357.

#### Etta Hat Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/11912 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of headdresses similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Novik & Co., Inc.*v. *Unites States*(45 Cust. Ct. 183, C.D. 2221), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.