alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43704

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MISTY LARAE MAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 477

Filed: April 12, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of three years, for trafficking in heroin, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Misty Larae May pled guilty to trafficking in heroin. Idaho Code § 37-2732B(a)(6). The 

district court sentenced May to a unified term of fifteen years with three years determinate. May

appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, May’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 110

     Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20, 1999, 30th 
 Anniversary of the first lunar landing should be a day of celebration 
      and reflection on the Apollo-11 mission to the Moon and the 
accomplishments of the Apollo program throughout the 1960's and 1970's.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 1999

  Mr. Cramer submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20, 1999, 30th 
 Anniversary of the first lunar landing should be a day of celebration 
      and reflection on the Apollo-11 mission to the Moon and the 
accomplishments of the Apollo program throughout the 1960's and 1970's.

Whereas the Apollo-11 mission successfully landed a manned spacecraft on the 
        Moon on July 20, 1969, marking the first time in history that humans 
        have walked on the surface of the Moon or any other planet;
Whereas the 6 Apollo missions successfully departed Earth aboard a Saturn V 
        Rocket, the largest and most powerful American rocket ever produced, en 
        route to the Moon;
Whereas 12 Americans successfully landed on the surface of the Moon where they 
        performed various experiments and collected samples for study, and 
        planted the flag of the United States of America in the lunar soil 
        achieving a milestone in American and human history;
Whereas the contributions of other Americans who made up the thousands of 
        contractors and Government employees who worked on the Apollo program is 
        recognized; and
Whereas the events of the Apollo missions are examples of the great achievements 
        of the American space program reflecting the explorer's spirit of the 
        American people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the 30th Anniversary of the first 
lunar landing should be a day of celebration and reflection on the 
Apollo-11 mission to the Moon and the accomplishments of the Apollo 
program throughout the 1960's and 1970's.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 9

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, David Mehner, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled Underground Resource Calculation and Review, (the Technical Report), dated November 27, 2003, and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) David Mehner                
| |     | Name: David Mehner, P.Geo.           
| |     | Location: Coldwater, British Columbia
# Official Journal L 287/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.287.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 287 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5231 October 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.287.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 287

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5231 October 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 948/2009 of 30 September 2009 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 948/2009 of 30 September 2009 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00782-JLR Document 117 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             527
<SECURITIES>                                     4,734
<RECEIVABLES>                                      142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   763
<PP&E>                                             391
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (205)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,018
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (175)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 3 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 12,975.

#### In re SMITH.

[6 Ben. 187.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct., 1872.

Bankruptcy — Striking out Proof of Claim— Unliquidated Damages.

A claim by a broker, who had made contracts as the agent of the bankrupt, but in. his own name, for the purchase of goods, which contracts the bankrupt refused to carry out, whereupon the broker settled them at a loss, to recover against the bankrupt the amount of such losses and of his brokerage, is a claim for unliquidated damages, and the proof of it. as a claim against the bankrupt’s estate, is to be disallowed.

[See in Re Bailey, Case No. 729.]

[In the matter of W. Fleming Smith, a bankrupt.]

The register, in this matter, certified to the court that the assignee had requested him to re-examine and to disallow a claim of one Jones, the proof of which had been filed with the register, on the ground that it was a claim for unliquidated damages, and that, in obedience to his order, the parties had appeared before him in the matter, and that the proof of claim stated a claim of $3,246 28, for and on account of moneys paid by Jones to various persons, and for interest and services, as set out in an account attached; that Jones, as broker, purchased the goods mentioned in the account, at Cincinnati, by the direction and for the account of the bankrupt, to be delivered to him, at Cincinnati, at the times therein mentioned; that the bankrupt failed to accept or receive the goods pursuant to the contracts of purchase made by Jones for him, by reason whereof the losses mentioned in the account occurred; that Jones thereupon settled and closed said several contracts of purchase, and disposed of the subject-matter thereof, and paid and suffered said several items of loss mentioned in the account, for and on account of the bankrupt, amounting to said sum of $3,246 28. The register certified that the only question was whether this was a claim for unliquidated damages, and that, if it was, it should be expunged.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The claim, as proved, must be disallowed and expunged.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 119

To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of Agriculture should

establish a temporary emergency minimum milk price that is equitable

to all producers nationwide and that provides price relief to economically

distressed milk producers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

BREAUX, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. D’AMATO, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of

Agriculture should establish a temporary emergency minimum milk price that is equitable to all producers nationwide and that provides price relief to economically distressed milk producers.

Whereas the basic formula price for milk established by the

Secretary of Agriculture under Federal milk marketing

orders fell to a 6-year low of $10.70 in May 1997 following months of substantial price volatility and remained at

similarly low levels throughout the summer of 1997;

Whereas the basic formula price for milk announced for each

month since April 1997 has been below the cost of pro-
2

•SRES 119 IS

ducing milk for milk producers in all regions of the United States, as calculated by the Department of Agriculture;

Whereas income losses to milk producers resulting from low

milk prices have imposed economic hardship on milk producers in all regions of the United States;

Whereas lost income to milk producers may create economic

losses to businesses and result in loss of jobs in rural

communities;

Whereas milk producers, rural residents, and agribusinesses

in rural areas have petitioned the Secretary of Agriculture to implement an emergency milk price floor to

provide price relief to milk producers;

Whereas the Secretary of Agriculture has authority under the

Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing

Agreement Act of 1937, to establish minimum prices paid

to milk producers covered by Federal milk marketing orders; and

Whereas the Secretary of Agriculture has authority under

section 143 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7

U.S.C. 7253) to use informal rulemaking to reform Federal milk marketing orders: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Secretary of Agriculture should immediately use the au3 thority of the Secretary under the Agricultural Adjust4 ment Act (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), reenacted with amend5 ments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
3

•SRES 119 IS

1 1937, to establish a temporary emergency minimum milk

2 price that—

3 (1) is equitable to all producers nationwide; and

4 (2) provides price relief to economically dis5 tressed milk producers.

Æ
No. 61104.

protests 584775-G, etc. (New York).

#### Draeger Shipping Co. and J. Citroen et al. *v.*United States,

*389Opinion by

Wilson, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18238 and #18239; Mississippi Disaster Number 
MS-00164]


Administrative Disaster Declaration of a Rural Area for the State 
of Mississippi

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of 
a rural area for the State of Mississippi dated 10/10/2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/14/2023 through 06/19/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/10/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/11/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Leake.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.000
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.500
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18238 C 
and for economic injury is 18239 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-22723 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6264

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEREK SHANNON WALLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-00-115, CA-02-731-BO)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Shannon Walls, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Derek Shannon Walls seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken from the final order denying a motion under

§ 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district

court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walls has not

made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S.

 , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 5/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 5 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 598 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 5

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 598 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2016/C 005/1 | Opinion No 7/2015 (pursuant to Articles 287(4), second subparagraph, and 322(2) of the TFEU) concerning a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 on the methods and procedure for making available the traditional, VAT and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements | 1 |
| 2016/C 005/2 | Opinion No 8/2015 (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2015/323 of 2 March 2015 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2016/C 005/1

Opinion No 7/2015 (pursuant to Articles 287(4), second subparagraph, and 322(2) of the TFEU) concerning a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 on the methods and procedure for making available the traditional, VAT and GNI-based own resources and on the measures to meet cash requirements

(pursuant to Articles 287(4), second subparagraph, and 322(2) of the TFEU)

1

2016/C 005/2

Opinion No 8/2015 (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2015/323 of 2 March 2015 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund

(pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN