alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014024EN.01002601.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/26

---

Action brought on 30 October 2013 — Zehnder v OHIM — UAB ‘Amalva’ (komfovent)

(Case T-577/13)

2014/C 24/46

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zehnder Verkaufs- und Verwaltungs-AG (Gränichen, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: UAB ‘Amalva’ (Vilnius, Lithuania)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 August 2013 given in Case R 255/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 August 2013 given in Case R 255/2012-4;

| — | Order the other parties to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other parties to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark in black and white containing the word element ‘komfovent’ for goods in Class 11 — Community trade mark registration No 4 635 272

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds were those laid down in Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) CTMR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested CTM invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 75 CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (a)   | the report fully complies with the requirements              of              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;              and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By                  /s/ Ole Jacob Diesen  |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Ole                Jacob Diesen                     |
| Chief                Executive Officer              |
|                                                |
| By                    /s/ Eirik Ubøe |
| Eirik                Ubøe                      |
| Chief                Financial Officer              |
|                                                |
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 280

Directing the printing as a Senate document of a compilation of materials

entitled ‘‘History of the United States Senate Committee on Agriculture,

Nutrition, and Forestry’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1998

Mr. LUGAR (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Directing the printing as a Senate document of a compilation

of materials entitled ‘‘History of the United States Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry’’.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

3 SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NU4 TRITION, AND FORESTRY.

5 The Public Printer shall print—

6 (1) as a Senate document a compilation of ma7 terials, with illustrations, entitled ‘‘History of the

8 United States Senate Committee on Agriculture,

9 Nutrition, and Forestry’’; and
2

•SRES 280 ATS

1 (2) 100 copies of the document in addition to

2 the usual number.

Æ
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 490-1 Filed 01/26/11 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 490-1 Filed 01/26/11 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 490-1 Filed 01/26/11 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 490-1 Filed 01/26/11 Page 4 of 4
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 4 -00 177 -CR K e nne th Tuc k , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 9020 859 , HO NORAB LE WI LLIAM E. BENDER , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant’s moti on to withdraw his notice of appea l is gr anted. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 42.2(a) . The a

ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: De cembe r 12, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Retrophin, Inc. 

San Diego, California 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (333-202861) and Form S-8 (No. 333-206510) ofRetrophin, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Retrophin, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in the Form 10-K filed onFebruary 26, 2016. 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP 

New York, NewYork 

February 26, 2016
No. 61584.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 308288-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Oust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 39

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 30, 1997

Mr. THOMPSON, from the Committee on Governmental Affairs, reported the

following original resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Rules and Administration

MARCH 6, 1997

Reported by Mr. WARNER, with an amendment

[Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert the part printed in italic]

MARCH 11, 1997

Considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Governmental

Affairs.

1 Resolved, That (a) Senate Resolution 54, agreed to

2 February 13, 1997, is amended by adding at the end the

3 following:

4 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS

5 ‘‘SEC. 24. (a) IN GENERAL.—A sum equal to not

6 more than $4,350,000, for the period beginning on the

7 date of adoption of this section and ending on December
2

•SRES 39 ATS

1 31, 1997, shall be made available from the contingent

2 fund of the Senate out of the Account for Expenses for

3 Inquiries and Investigations for payment of salaries and

4 other expenses of the Committee on Governmental Affairs

5 under this resolution, of which amount not to exceed

6 $375,000 may be expended for the procurement of the

7 services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof

8 (as authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorga9 nization Act of 1946, as amended). The expenditures by

10 the Committee on Governmental Affairs authorized by this

11 section supplement those authorized in section 13 and may

12 be expended solely for the purpose stated in this section.

13 ‘‘(b) PURPOSE OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS.—The addi14 tional funds authorized by this section are for the sole pur15 pose of conducting an investigation of illegal or improper

16 activities in connection with 1996 Federal election cam17 paigns.

18 ‘‘(c) REFERRAL TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETH19 ICS.—The Committee on Governmental Affairs shall refer

20 any evidence of illegal or improper activities involving any

21 Member of the Senate revealed pursuant to the investiga22 tion authorized by subsection (b) to the Select Committee

23 on Ethics.

24 ‘‘(d) FINAL REPORT.—The Committee on Govern25 mental Affairs shall submit a final public report to the
3

•SRES 39 ATS

1 Senate no later than January 31, 1998, of the results of

2 the investigation, study, and hearings conducted by the

3 Committee pursuant to this section.’’.

4 (b) Section 16(b) of Senate Resolution 54, agreed to

5 February 13, 1997, is amended by—

6 (1) striking ‘‘$1,339,109’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘$1,789,109’’; and

8 (2) striking ‘‘$200,000’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘$300,000’’.

10 (c) The Committee on Rules and Administration shall

11 continue to conduct hearings on campaign reform.

Æ
BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE

®

PNM SJGS PNM SJGS

NMED Question #1 (Sept 2
BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE®

- 2

Question #1

Please provide a schematic of the S

including all major components such induced draft fan, SCR, SCR-bypassfan, boiler, baghouse, and the locatiofans are to be located
BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE®

- 3

SCR System Arrangement and Com

Steam

Generator

Bottom

Ash

Ammonia

Fabric

Filter

New ID Fans

Fly Ash

Silo

Air

Heater

Air

Heater

Ash

Ball

Mill

Reage

Slurr

Tank

Lime- stone

Silo

(Disposal)

Hot Side ESP

SCR

Notes:1. Equipment added for SCR in red.2. Hot Side ESP de-energized.

SCR By-pass
BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE

®

- 4

Typical SCR System Reactor and Ducting

Vaporized

Ammonia

Flue Gas to

Air Heater

Flue Gas

From Hot 

Side ESP

Bypass

Damper

Isolation

Dampers
BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE®

- 5

Attachmentsz Design Concept Definition Sheet – Sz Units 1 and 2 Proposed SCR Layoutz Units 3 and 4 Proposed SCR Layout
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 02

- 1714 V

(Filed: May 21 , 2014)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****

*

RICHARD KERNS and KELLY KERNS, *

P arent s of , KK , a minor, *

*

Petitioner s

, *

* Vaccine Act Interim Fees and Costs

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***

DECISION (ATTORN E YS’ FEES)

HASTINGS, Special Master.

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (hereinafter “the

Program”), petitioner s seek , pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and (e) (1), an award for attorneys’ fees

and other costs inc urred in attempting to obtain Program compensation in this case

.

I

ENTITLEMENT TO FEES AND COSTS GENERALLY

Pursuant to § 300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1), the special master may make an award of attorneys’ fees

and costs even when, as in this case, the petitioners are not found to qualify for a substantive Program

award, if the petition was filed in “good faith” and upon a “reasonable basis.”

II

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner s filed the instant request for fees and costs on July 5, 2013. Respondent has not filed

any documents opposing the request. On January 16, 2014, I filed a Decision granting the request.

However, later that same day, petitioner s ’ counsel left a telephone message at my office noting that my

Decision did not address petitioner s ’ request that I d irect the payment of fees solely to counsel . Iinterpreted this message as an oral Motion for Reconsideration of my Decision on fees , and I filed an

Order withdrawing my Decision on January 17, 2014.

O n M a y 20 , 2014, I filed a decision determining that at torneys’ fees and costs may be paid

directly to counsel in appropriate circumstances

. Goodridge v. HHS , No. 02

- 320V (2014)

. For the reasons

stated in Goodridge , I find it appropriate in this case to award a check for attorneys’ fees and other costs

solely to petitioners ’ counsel . Further, respondent has not argued in this case against petitioner s ’

request that I do so.

III

AMOUNT OF THE AWARD

The requested amount of $7,598 appears reasonable.

Accordingly, my decision is that fees and costs are to be aw arded in the total amount of $7,598.

/s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANGELO COICOU

, Appellant,

v.

STSTE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2322

[ January 13, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John Joseph Murphy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 16549CF10A

.

Angelo Coicou, Live Oak, pro se, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, L EVI NE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 30 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00707

- CR

STEVEN BERNELL PENTON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 65544

- A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from the order of the Court of Criminal Appeals denying his application for post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. An article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus is returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals, and that court’s decision cannot be appealed to this court

. See Tex. Code Crim . Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. O nly the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review post

-2

conviction habeas corpus proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of App eals for Eighth Dist ., 910 S. W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction).
This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the order on appellant ’ s post

- con viction application for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
PUBLIC LAW 111–26—JUNE 19, 2009 123 STAT. 1771 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 663: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Feb. 12, 13, considered and passed House. 

May 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–26 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 12877 

Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. YVONNE INGRAM-EPHRAIM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 19, 2009. 

June 19, 2009 

[H.R. 663] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 89

   To constitute the majority party's membership on the Governmental 
Affairs committee for the 105th Congress, or until their successors are 
                                 chosen

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 1997

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To constitute the majority party's membership on the Governmental 
Affairs committee for the 105th Congress, or until their successors are 
                                 chosen

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the restrictions contained in rule 
25, the following shall be the majority party's membership on the 
Governmental Affairs committee for the 105th Congress, or until their 
successors are chosen:
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Mr. Thompson, (Chair) Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Nickles, Mr. 
Specter, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, and Mr. Bennett.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 25/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 25 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6330 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 25

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6330 January 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 of 27 January 2020 fixing for 2020 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 of 27 January 2020 fixing for 2020 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 524]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ524.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2493]]

Public Law 106-524
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To revise the boundary of Fort Matanzas National Monument, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2000 -  [S. 1670]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Florida. 16 USC 431 
note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Map.--The term ``Map'' means the map entitled ``Fort 
        Matanzas National Monument'', numbered 347/80,004 and dated 
        February, 1991.
            (2) Monument.--The term ``Monument'' means the Fort Matanzas 
        National Monument in Florida.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Monument is revised to include 
an area totaling approximately 70 acres, as generally depicted on the 
Map.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The Map shall be on file and available for 
public inspection in the office of the Director of the National Park 
Service.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.

    The Secretary may acquire any land, water, or interests in land that 
are located within the revised boundary of the Monument by--
            (1) donation;
            (2) purchase with donated or appropriated funds;
            (3) transfer from any other Federal agency; or
            (4) exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION.

    Subject to applicable laws, all land and interests in land held by 
the United States that are included in the revised boundary under 
section 2 shall be administered by the Secretary as part of the 
Monument.

[[Page 114 STAT. 2494]]

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.

    Approved November 22, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1670:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-331 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 31, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 47 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 47 Filed 10/26/11 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 47 Filed 10/26/11 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 47 Filed 10/26/11 Page 4 of 4