alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4234

_____________________________

ANTHONY RAY PEEK,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

May 7, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Anthony Ray Peek, pro se, Appellant.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender 

Review, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
(Reap. Dec. 10801)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6516, etc.

(Decided August 20, 1964)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court :

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, T.D. 53567, made pursuant to the antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.O., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the .aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> *3866. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value- under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1980 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and. said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921, for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act, to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Jonathan Kalman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Jonathan Kalman
            
            Dated:
                June 27, 2007Jonathan
                Kalman
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 16, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice 
President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#05474a562b5657462b447575696c6664716c6a6b762b466a6868606b717645676a762b6377672b6a7762"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c6e637f027f7e6f026d5c5c40454f4d584543425f026f4341414942585f6c4e435f024a5e4e02435e4b">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Eastern Bankshares, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts; to acquire 
Cambridge Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire Cambridge Trust 
Company, both of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-22889 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JOSE ALFREDO VERDUZCO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-472M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged: 

Count 1: Possession of Methamphetamine with the Intent to Distribute in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841 (b)(1)(A)(viii).

Count 2: Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(ii)(ll).

Count 3: Use of a Firearm During and in Relation to a Drug Trafficking Crime in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(l).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 6, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement. 

Case 2:06-cr-00168-JCC Document 9 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 7th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00168-JCC Document 9 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICHAEL ORRIN GRIFFIN,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR05-439-RSL-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged: 

Bank Robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a).

Date of Detention Hearing: December 15, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant previously served time for the crime of committing bank robbery,

for which he was sentenced on February 4, 2000.

(2) At the hearing on December 15, 2005, the defendant pleaded guilty to committing

the crime of bank robbery on or about November 14, 2005.

(3) When he committed the bank robbery on November 14, 2005, the defendant was

on supervised release.

Case 2:05-cr-00439-JCC Document 2 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

(5) Defendant has stipulated to detention.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 15th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00439-JCC Document 2 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RICHARD A. KIRKHAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELLA DOE, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-2131-MJP-JPD

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

On June 21, 2006, the Court issued an order granting plaintiff’s motion for extension

of time to conduct discovery in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Dkt. No. 21. The

Court granted a 90-day extension because plaintiff’s 120-day request appeared excessive in

light of the specific discovery sought and plaintiff’s relative sophistication. Id. This matter

comes before the Court upon plaintiff’s “reply to defendant’s response” to his original

motion. Dkt. No. 22. Because the “reply” follows the Court’s order and renews plaintiff’s 

request for the 120-day extension of time, the Court construes it as a motion for

reconsideration. Having carefully considered plaintiff’s motion and balance of the record, the

Court ORDERS as follows:

Case 2:05-cv-02131-MJP Document 23 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -2

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED. Motions for

reconsideration are disfavored and will ordinarily be denied in the “absence of a showing of

manifest error . . . or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been

brought to [the Court’s] attention earlier without reasonable diligence.” Local Rule CR 7(h). 

Plaintiff has failed to make such a showing in this case. The Court is aware that plaintiff’s

incarceration has complicated his ability to litigate his case. Nevertheless, because discovery

is progressing and plaintiff is attempting to retain counsel, the 90-day extension is appropriate

at this time. If plaintiff later finds that the allotted 90-day discovery period is inadequate, he

may renew his request for an additional extension of time.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the parties and to the

Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 30th day of June, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-02131-MJP Document 23 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order 

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

EFFIE LIGON, individually, and as managing

partner of IBIS GROUP, LLC, and as trustee

of IBIS COMPANY TRUST,

Defendant.

Case No. MS06-5017 FDB 

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT 

TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE

SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE UNITED

STATES INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitle court upon the Petition of the Internal Revenue

Service for an order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service administrative summons served on respondent

July 7, 2005. 

Having considered all materials submitted in support of and in response to said petition, as well as

the files and records herein, including but not limited to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, and having considered Respondent’s objections, it is hereby 

ORDERED as follows:

1. The court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding.

2. Respondent be, and she is hereby ordered to fully obey the administrative summons served on

respondent July 7, 2005, by attending, testifying, and producing all documentation required by the terms of

the summons before Internal Revenue Service Agent Paul Shipley, or any other proper officer or employee

Case 3:06-mc-05017-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order 

Page - 2

of the Internal Revenue Service, at such time and place as may be set by Revenue Agent Shipley or any

other proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service.

3. Failure to comply with the terms of this order may result in a finding of civil contempt

punishable by fine or imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §401.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party

appearing pro se.

Dated this 2nd day of October, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-mc-05017-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

I, Robert C. Salipante, Principal Executive Officer of Keyport Life Insurance Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert C. Salipante                        

Robert C. Salipante

May 15, 2003

 

 

 

 

I, Davey S. Scoon, Principal Financial Officer of Keyport Life Insurance Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Davey S. Scoon                             

Davey S. Scoon

May 15, 2003
Case No. 14,896.

#### UNITED STATES v. CROZIER.

District Court, D. Tennessee.

Feb. 1, 1869.

Criminal Law—Pardon.

[Cited in 2 Brightley, Dig. 140, to the point as given above. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible.]

The president had power, by the amnesty proclamation of 1868. to pardon ail of a particular class of political offenders.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Helmerich & Payne International Drilling

Co. and Albert Denzell Barnes

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Laura Sanchez, Individually and as

Representative of the Estate of Oscar

Sanchez, Jr., Deceased, Cristian Sanchez,

Haley Sanchez, Marlee Sanchez and Jaden

Sanchez

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 1 05

- C V

Appeal from the

112 th District C ourt

of Reagan County , Texas

(TC# CV02251 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Elizabeth Lusk’s r equest for an extension of time within which to file

the Reporter ’ s Record until December 22 , 2022

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Elizabeth Lusk

, Official Court Reporter for the 112 th District

Court f or Reagan County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record and forward the sam e to this Cou rt

on or before December 22 , 2022

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 7th d ay of December , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.30






November 5, 1999


David A. Lattanzio
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PharmChem Laboratories, Inc.
1505A O'Brien Drive
Menlo Park, CA  94025

Dear Dave:

With regard to the Loan & Security Agreement ("Agreement") between Comerica
Bank-California ("Bank") and PharmChem Laboratories, Inc. ("Borrower") dated
November 18, 1997, and the First Modification to the Agreement dated August 10,
1998, Borrower has requested, and Bank has agreed, to modify the Agreement as
set forth below.

1.)     Up to $2,000,000 of the Borrower's $6,000,000 Revolving Line of Credit
        can be used to repurchase outstanding stock of the Borrower.

2.)     Borrower shall be permitted to declare and distribute any dividends in
        the form of rights which allow shareholders to purchase shares of a new
        series of preferred stock. This shall include a shareholders rights
        offering or other actions that are now currently contemplated by the
        company.

All other Terms and Conditions of the Agreement shall be in full force and
effect.

Sincerely,

/s/  James L. Weber
----------------------------------


James L. Weber
Vice President
Before the First Division,

June 24, 1953

No. 57408.

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 188238-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.