alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JOHN WISE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5810 FDB/KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

This civil rights case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to

stay Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and in opposition to Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment. (Dkt. # 52). 

DISCUSSION

Rule 56(f) permits continuance of a motion for summary judgment only where the moving

party shows by affidavit that the party cannot present facts essential to justify the party’s opposition

and states the reasons therefor. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f). The moving party has the burden to set forth

sufficient facts to show that the evidence sought exists. Conkle v. Jeong, 73 F.3d 909, 914 (9th Cir.

1995). The moving party must demonstrate that “additional discovery would uncover specific facts

which would preclude summary judgment.” See Maljack Prods., Inc. v. Good Times Home Video

Corp., 81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir. 1996). Denial of a Rule 56(f) application is proper where it is clear

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 59 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

that the evidence sought is almost certain nonexistent or is the object of pure speculation. Terrell v.

Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1018 (9th Cir. 1991). Plaintiff merely states that Defendants’ motion should

be stayed until “all discovery may be completed.” He has identified no additional facts or particular

discovery he believes is necessary to adequately prepare his opposition to the pending summary

judgment motion.

Plaintiff has made no showing under Rule 56(f) and therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to stay (Dkt.

# 52) shall be DENIED.

DATED this 6th day of April, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 59 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust
             2005-4;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


             Date: March 27, 2006


                                                /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                ----------------
                                                Steve Bailey
                                                Senior Managing Director
Fr om: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

To: David Putney/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Bilskis, Patricia A." <Patricia.Bilskis@alcoa.com>, "Mitchell, Kathryn M"

<Kathryn.Mitchell@alcoa.com>

Date: 05/18/2012 02:21 PM

Subject: FW: POM test data for Intalco

- Part 2 of 2

________________________________________

Second half of Intalco POM test report.

Mike

Michael Palazzolo

Alcoa Inc.

201 Isabella Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15212

- 5858

Ph: 412

- 553

- 4832
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            1998               1997
                                                            ----               ----
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>      
Net Loss applicable to Common Stock                       (274,608)          (302,870)

Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding
Common equivalent shares representing shares issuable
upon exercise of stock options and warrants              3,676,054          3,676,054
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 issuances and grants           --                 --
Shares used in per share computations                    3,676,054          3,676,054

Net loss per common share applicable to Common Stock         (0.08)             (0.08)
</TABLE>


Primary and fully diluted calculations are identical.
# C_2008269EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Washington, DC 20551

August 9, 2018

Ms. Danielle Getkin

Accounting Specialist - Regulatory Reporting

Old Point Financial Corporation

101 East Queen Street

Hampton, Virginia 23669

Dear Ms. Getkin:

This letter responds to the request from Old Point Financial Corporation (“Old

Point”), Hampton, Virginia, for an extension oftime to file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP financial

reports until December 31, 2018. Old Point recently crossed the threshold of $1 billion in total

consolidated assets and, without an extension, would be required to file the FR Y-9C and

FR Y-9LP financial reports on August 9 and August 14, respectively.

Old Point requested additional time to file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP reports

due to the burden associated with filing these reports. Old Point has represented that, if an

extension is granted, it will continue to file the FR Y-9SP financial report during the extension

period.

Acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Board and having considered all

relevant facts, I have approved Old Point’s request for an extension oftime. Accordingly, Old

Point is granted an extension oftime, until December 31, 2018, to file the FR Y-9C and

FR Y-9LP financial reports. This action is based on all the facts ofrecord, including the

information discussed above, and the representations in your submissions. Any material change

in those facts or representations could affect this approval and should be communicated promptly

to Board staff.
Please contact Kevin Tran, Division of Supervision and Regulation, at (202) 452-

2309, if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,

Ann Misback

Secretary ofthe Board

cc: Kristin Barnes, Manager

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
U NlTED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Robert D. Fletcher 

Deputy Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95 8 12 

Dear Mr. Fletcher: 

We received your May 20,2010, request on behalf of the Santa Barbara County Air 

Pollution Control District (District) for delegation of the authority to implement and enforce 

federal Clean Air Act section 1 12 maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for 

area sources not covered by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Part 70 program. 

By this letter, we are hereby granting the District formal delegation of the unchanged MACT 

standards for area sources. 

As of the date of this letter, the District will have authority to implement and enforce 

existing MACT standards for area sources as promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), with the exception of the perchloroethylene dry cleaning standard and the 

chromium electroplating standard for which statewide or district rules have already been approved 

and delegated by EPA. Additionally, the District will receive delegation of future area source 

MACT standards or revisions 90 days after promulgation of these standards or revisions, unless 

the District chooses to decline delegation of a particular future standard by notifying the EPA 

Region IX office in writing. If no such notification is received, the delegation will go into effect 

90 days after promulgation of the standard or revision, without any additional action from the 

District or EPA. EPA will publish a future Federal Register notice to codify these delegations into 

the CFR. 

We appreciate efforts by the California Air Resources Board and the District to implement 

the federal air toxics program and hope to continue working with you to reduce emissions of air 

toxics in California. If you have any questions about this delegation, please call me at (41 5) 947- 

8715 or have your staff contact Mae Wang at (415) 947-4124. 

Sincerely, 

r <~(pz(&mf>fi~k orah Jordan 

Director, Air Division v 

cc: Jorge L. Fernandez, ARB 

Tom Murphy, Santa Barbara County APCD 

Douglas Grapple, Santa Barbara County APCD 

Printed on Recycled Paper
----

(2004/C 65 E/033)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0556/03

by María Izquierdo Rojo (PSE) to the Commission

(20 February 2003)

Subject:   European funding and the banning of women from Mount Athos

The European Parliament has recently adopted two motions for resolutions (Swiebel and Izquierdo Rojo reports) in which it opposed the banning of women from Mount Athos. It should also be borne in mind that the monastery region of Mount Athos has been granted aid to restore and renovate monasteries and preserve cultural treasures, which belong to both men and women.

Can the Commission answer the following:

Supplementary answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2003)

----

(1)OJ C 318 E, 13.11.2001.

----
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

160)VI-E-9 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:22 PM Sheet 160 of 198 
TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

Qlpioalnc Call 

Q&itgolnj Call 

Person Calling 

C^£^\> ^ ^*»»c^S 

Person Called \ 

i X 

V^ 

iubjV 

V.Y-. *-*-* 

P.2 

A-83-27 

Project No. 

VI-E-9 

Project Naaa 

V2_ l^w^ 

Tlaa ^ -

Activity 

Q~r^-S<X.'r\ 

Activity 

V

8

*"^ "S^gsSTt-. ^SVc>\ - ^ ^=.^Q.V^>^ ~ ^X-va.y^ ^>o^Zv. S t sv >tA> 

General SubHet 

^^Or—^^^y. ^ \ \ C.V^-^.1 Q . 

v3 

\^V<- > . C V ~^S 

TOPICS DISCUSSED ANO ACTION TAKEN 

w ov^joo ^ vc^Sa, =£* -<-vllvJ>.^^ ^c-^s : N^sT ^ 

^Vo—m Ow-^S^- -\\^\g^ K Q > \ ^ 

y^^ ^ ^ s^^^,. -\»<^vx< V^Xa^a-S,' . 

^>**-r^S > C CVocO^^^ c \^<NS^ > s^^XVg^ . 

^ T 

^ ^ 

-^V>\ \ . 

V ^'•AV^A . 

,^b ^ N-c* 

\>v:>.> ^>-> Vs>^ •a>Ov ~^T«a> S> c N> > g - <^r^> ~ V > 

^ S " 

• 'K'-^ - c-^^^yg" ^ 

ZS^Ow. < ^N 

-*->. m> mS 

^bm. 1

 Q»a w K^-Cg * • ^-.-^sgasa^N ^ -S> v, V 

v, 

NT 

V^^ ' V vV.cc <^^^ ^ . N^=> ^ V ^ ruPo^ V 

A-" d ^ X N<* > ^ ^ V >C^-^ s <~^^>-^V>.0>^CJL 

^ V . 

J^c ^.v v<^^ 

\c,VW - \S\cs^k»-S> L.W ws^- S 

^-•- ^ 
P.3 

R AD I A H 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

Olneoalng Call 

Ooucgolng Call 

Person Calling 

Peison Callad 

General Subjacc 

Project No. 

Project Natat 

Data Tlat 

Activit y 

Activity 

Ri.Ulbutlon 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

"rt/frs-fcrfVaA^ >«>^5> ^O^*?-

\ ^ N C3\\, 21 : 

3 

.%\<s^c^ ^ ^ W ^^ \ 

3 

^ L^ ^- ^ W^ N 

\ — > ^ 

«—<a •AS^ ^ 

v>-r^fl- ^ -^g=> ^W^ *A -

^ _ «s ^^S"* - ^-^S^ _X « ^> 

s

i v cy^-gy 

*5».C-a-,-^cs^G^ *od 

, Ci ^—~'--cJs~ <^S> ^^ ~ 

•cve ^ ^_ v. "S 

"3 

^?- r -~& -

***» 

Jk ,V^&- CcSSUs, 

^ 

O r %^>j<<a -
# Official Journal C 201/18 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 201 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4818 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 201

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4818 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 201/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 201/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3938 — CRH/Quester) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 201/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3917 — Goldman Sachs et al./CMP Fonds) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 201/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3881 — Phoenix/A&C Adivar-Comifar) (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 201/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 201/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3938 — CRH/Quester) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2005/C 201/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3917 — Goldman Sachs et al./CMP Fonds) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2005/C 201/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3881 — Phoenix/A&C Adivar-Comifar) (1)

4

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 201/5 | Call for proposals — DG EAC No 38/05 — Permanent activities of bodies pursuing an aim of general European interest in the field of culture or an objective forming part of the European Union's policy in this area | 5 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 201/5

Call for proposals — DG EAC No 38/05 — Permanent activities of bodies pursuing an aim of general European interest in the field of culture or an objective forming part of the European Union's policy in this area

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BOARD OF GOVERNORS 

or THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20551 

November 18,2013 

S A NDRA F. BRA UNST EIN 

DIRECTOR 

DIVISION OF CONSUMER 

A ND C O MMUNITY AFFAIRS 

CA 13-20 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS: 

SUBJECT: Consumer Compliance and Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Examination 

Frequency Policy 

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all 

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including institutions with total consolidated 

assets of $10 billion or less. 

This letter transmits a revised policy for the mandated frequency of ( 1) consumer 

compliance and Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) examinations of state member banks and 

(2) assessments of non-state member bank entities regulated by the Federal Reserve 1 to 

determine whether these entities are subject to consumer protection laws and regulations and 

must be examined. This policy will be effective on January 1, 2014. 

The Federal Reserve's examination frequency policy is being updated to ensure that 

examination resources are appropriately directed to institutions commensurate with the 

institution's asset size and the effectiveness of its consumer compliance risk management 

program in today's financial landscape. \ 

We understand that during the transition to the new examination frequency schedule, 

Reserve Banks may need to make adjustments to the mandated examination dates for some 

institutions. Reserve Banks should review the schedule and submit examination mandate 

waivers to their Board Division of Consumer & Community Affairs Oversight Analyst for 

approval as a group. 

1 U.S. Offices (Branch and Agency) of Foreign Banks, Edge Act Corporations, Article XII New York Investment 

Companies, Agreement Corporations, and Non-Deposit Trust Companies regulated by the Federal Reserve. 
Please distribute this letter and the attachment to Federal Reserve-supervised institutions, 

supervisory staff, and examiners. Questions on this letter and the new program should be 

directed to Carol Evans, Assistant Director, at (202) 452-2051; Cathy Gates, Senior Project 

Manager, at 202-452-2099; or Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer Financial Services 

Analyst, at (202) 452-2705 in the Division of Consumer and Community Affairs. In addition, 

questions may be sent via the Board's public website. 

Sincerely, 

~~ 

Attachment: Consumer Compliance and Community Reinvestment Act Examination Mandates 

Supersedes: CA 03-12 Examination and Interim Monitoring Event Frequency 

Page 2 of2
# CA2007024EN.01000101.xml

| 2.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 24/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

         CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of The
Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
respective knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton
   Stores, Inc.

      DATE: June 8, 2005                   By: /s/ Byron L. Bergren
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Byron L. Bergren
                                               President and Chief
                                               Executive Officer and Director

                                           By: /s/ Keith E. Plowman
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Keith E. Plowman
                                               Senior Vice President,
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to The Bon-Ton
Stores, Inc. and will be retained by The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                        |  |             
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) by FCB Bancorp (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/ C. G. KumC. G. Kum President and Chief Executive
Officer




/s/ Romolo SantarosaRomolo Santarosa Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
- Federal Open Market Committee
- Credit and Liquidity Programs and the Balance Sheet
- Policy Implementation   - Policy Normalization
  - Policy Tools
- Reports   - Monetary Policy Report to the Congress
  - Beige Book
  - Quarterly Report on Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Developments
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C06-630-JLR]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

BARBARA L. MCKENZIE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-630-JLR

ORDER FOR REMAND

Based on the stipulation between the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the

above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings pursuant

to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will

re-evaluate the medical evidence as a whole. The ALJ will reassess Plaintiff's residual functional

capacity (RFC), considering all physical and mental limitations. The ALJ will reconsider, with

vocational expert testimony if necessary, whether there are other jobs Plaintiff could perform at

step five of the sequential evaluation. Upon proper presentation, the Court will consider Plaintiff's

Case 2:06-cv-00630-JLR Document 19 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C06-630-JLR]

application for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 

DATED this 16th day of October, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Recommended for Entry:

this 2nd day of October, 2006.

s/ Mary Alice Theiler 

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ L. JAMALA EDWARDS 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900

Seattle, WA 98104

Phone: (206) 615-3749

Fax: (206)615-2531

jamala.edwards@ssa.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00630-JLR Document 19 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 2