alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| date    | Corporate Equity | Real Estate | Debt Securities | Other |
|---------|------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| 2015:Q1 | 0.6              | 0.45        | 0.02            | 0.75  |
| 2015:Q2 | 0.07             | 0.49        | -0.16           | 0.31  |
| 2015:Q3 | -2               | 0.44        | 0.2             | 0.34  |
| 2015:Q4 | 1                | 0.33        | -0.1            | 0.24  |
| 2016:Q1 | 0.25             | 0.27        | 0.15            | 0.51  |
| 2016:Q2 | 0.52             | 0.62        | 0.15            | 0.21  |
| 2016:Q3 | 0.73             | 0.6         | 0               | 0.34  |
| 2016:Q4 | 0.42             | 0.44        | -0.39           | 0.19  |
| 2017:Q1 | 1.43             | 0.39        | -0.04           | 0.61  |
| 2017:Q2 | 0.78             | 0.65        | 0.14            | 0.3   |
| 2017:Q3 | 0.95             | 0.55        | 0.19            | 0.15  |
| 2017:Q4 | 1.56             | 0.48        | -0              | 0.56  |
| 2018:Q1 | -0.19            | 0.68        | 0.31            | 0.41  |
| 2018:Q2 | 0.47             | 0.4         | 0.19            | 0.13  |
| 2018:Q3 | 1.34             | 0.38        | 0.34            | -0.02 |
| 2018:Q4 | -4.55            | 0.27        | -0.01           | 0.44  |
| 2019:Q1 | 4.22             | 0.64        | 0.06            | 1.29  |
| 2019:Q2 | 0.96             | 0.51        | 0.45            | 0.26  |
| 2019:Q3 | -0.23            | 0.27        | 0.15            | 0.23  |
| 2019:Q4 | 2.48             | 0.33        | 0.2             | 0.68  |
| 2020:Q1 | -7.71            | 0.7         | -0.54           | 1.46  |
| 2020:Q2 | 5.8              | 0.68        | -0.08           | 1.39  |
| 2020:Q3 | 2.91             | 0.8         | 0.08            | 0.58  |
| 2020:Q4 | 5.72             | 1.09        | 0.6             | 1.33  |
| 2021:Q1 | 2.72             | 1.23        | -0.58           | 1.5   |
| 2021:Q2 | 3.31             | 1.5         | 0.01            | 1.12  |
| 2021:Q3 | 0.03             | 1.54        | 0               | 1.57  |
| 2021:Q4 | 2.36             | 1.45        | -0.13           | 1.13  |
| 2022:Q1 | -2.78            | 1.58        | 0.09            | 0.95  |
| 2022:Q2 | -7.94            | 1.48        | -0.18           | 0.35  |
| 2022:Q3 | -1.94            | 0.82        | 0.43            | 0.3   |
Molly Joseph Ward Secretary of Natural Resourc

e s 

# COMMONWEALTH

of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Street address

: 629 East Main Street

, Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mailing address

: P.O

. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 www

. deq. virginia

. gov 

## FEB 0 1 2016 David Arnold, Acting Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) U.S. EPA, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

David K . Pa y l or Director (804) 698-4020 1-800-592-5482 Reference: VOC Emission Standards, Printing (Rev. C09) Dear Mr. Arnold: Pursuant to the requirements of§ 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting approval of a revision to the Commonwealth

of Virginia State Implementation Plan approved and submitted under the authority of§ 10.1-1185 of the Code of Virginia and in accordance with the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements
for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans). This revision consists of an amendment

to the existing Article 53 (Emission Standards for Lithographic Printing Processes) and two new regulations: Article 56 (Emission Standards for Letterpress Printing Operations

in the Northern Virginia Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Control Area, 8-hour Ozone Standard) and Article 56.1 (Emission Standards for Offset Lithographic Printing Operations
in the Northern Virginia Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Control Area, 8-hour Ozone Standard). These regulations were adopted in order to meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) for these source types. The regulation amendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on June 19, 2015 under the authority of§ 10.1-1308 of the Code ofVirginia. Enclosed are the following: 1. A true copy of the official regulation (Revision C09) which was published
in the Virginia Register of Regulations
on November 30, 2015 after being duly adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on June 19, 2015, certified by the Office of the Attorney General as

# within the Board's statutory authority on June 22, 2015 and thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted
to the Virginia Registrar on behalf of the Board by the Department
of Environmental Quality as a true and accurate copy of the duly adopted regulation on October 29, 2015. 2. Certification
of public participation activities and compliance with both state administrative procedures and the public hearing requirements
of 40 CFR 51.102. 3. Record of hearing and summary of comment. For purposes of this submittal, certain provisions are being included for information purposes only and are not to be construed
as part of the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan; these provisions are specifically identified
in Enclosure

2 of this submittal. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

# S{:erely, 

# vJf?mr£ David K, 

# Paylor 

# "J DKP\geg TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOO SIP\NONA TTN PLANS\20 16\C09-SIP.DOC Enclosures
#### Merlin C. Joy *vs.*Ralph A. Jewell et al.

Somerset.

Decided September 13, 1939.

*Paul L. Woodworth,*for plaintiff.

*Pattangall, Goodspeed & Williamson,*for defendants.

Appeal dismissed with additional costs.

Decree below affirmed. So ordered.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Karen L. Unger, P.S.

 Attorney at Law

332 E. 5th, Suite 100

Port Angeles, WA 98362

(360) 452-7688

ORDER MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE

PAGE 1

C:\Documents and Settings\rmiller\Local Settings\Temp\notesE1EF34\ordercontiningsentence.wpd

HONORABLE JUDGE BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT 

OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) NO. CR06-5455FDB

)

vs. ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

) TO CONTINUE

EARL MORRISHOW, Jr., ) SENTENCING DATE

Defendant. )

___________________________ _________)

 Upon stipulation of the parties to continue the date for sentencing in the above-captioned case, the

Court finds that such a continuance would serve the ends of justice; therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter be continued to September 14, 2007. 

Done this 31st day of May, 2007. 

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Presented by:

 /s/ Karen L. Unger 

KAREN L. UNGER

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:06-cr-05455-BHS Document 45 Filed 05/31/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 99 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.99
                                          Agreed to May 22, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, for the purpose of section 1082(b)(1)(B) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, the display of the POW/MIA flag 
at the Capitol shall begin at 6:30 p.m. on Sunday, May 24, 1998. As 
used in this section, the term ``POW/MIA flag'' has the same meaning as 
in section 1082 of such Act.
    Sec. 2. The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe regulations with 
respect to the first section of this resolution.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2009-1231

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM212AD

170-57-0036 --- 3/13/09

190-57-0027 --- 3/18/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. Sw.,

Renton, WA 98057

4252271221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 pm., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-38 RSM

)

v. )

)

NIZAR SABAZ-ALI, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

______________________________)

Offenses charged: 

Conspiracy to Smuggle and Transport Illegal Aliens, in violation of Title 8 U.S.C.,

Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(I) and 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii);

Bringing Illegal Aliens for Financial Gain, in violation of Title 8 U.S.C., Section

1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2; and

Transporting Illegal Aliens, in violation of Title 8 U.S.C. Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii),

1324(1)(A)(v)(II) and 1324 (a)(1)(B)(i).

Date of Detention Hearing: January 24, 2007

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by John

Lulejian for Lisca Borichewski. The defendant was represented by Bruce Erickson.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant is viewed as a risk of non-appearance as he is not a citizen

of the United States and has no known ties to this district; he is associated

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 308 Filed 01/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

with several aliases and dates of birth; and a BICE detainer has been filed

against him.

(2) The defendant does not contest detention at this time.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the

United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 25th day of January, 2007.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 308 Filed 01/25/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Vital Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007
(the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2008


By: /s/ Michael Levine
------------------------------------
        Michael Levine
        President and
        Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 13, 2008


By: /s/ Henry Goldberg
------------------------------------
        Henry Goldberg
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
#### James E. MCKISSICK, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. David CLARY; Doug Whitaker; Gaffney Police Department, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-6562.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2005.

James E. McKissick, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Dean Jolly, Jr., Stacey Todd Coffee, Logan, Jolly *&*Smith, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James E. McKissick, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended granting summary judgment to Defendants. The district court adopted the report and recommendation, finding that McKissick failed to file specific objections.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). On appeal, McKissick does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that his objections were merely general. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b) (failure to raise claim in informal brief waives consideration of that claim). Accordingly, we conclude that McKissick has waived appel*229late review of both the substance of the magistrate judge’s report and the district court’s construction of his objections.

Thus, we affirm the order of the distinct court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
----

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-61/05) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/100/EEC - Copyright - Exclusive right to authorise or prohibit rental and lending - Incorrect transposition)

(2006/C 224/18)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and W. Wils, Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes and N. Gonçalves, Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 2 and 4 of Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

----

(1)OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

----
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.226 Life Insurance Reserves  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineAll domestic sectors; life insurance reserves; liability
	FA883140005
	44.4
	47.0
	57.9
	35.5
	66.1
	28.4
	21.9
	81.4
	39.2
	1Federal government; life insurance reserves; liability
	FA313140003
	0.8
	-0.1
	-2.1
	0.9
	-0.6
	1.3
	-0.4
	0.8
	0.1
	2Life insurance companies; life insurance reserves; liability
	FA543140005
	43.7
	47.1
	60.0
	34.6
	66.7
	27.1
	22.3
	80.6
	39.1
	3All domestic sectors; life insurance reserves; liability
	FA883140005
	44.4
	47.0
	57.9
	35.5
	66.1
	28.4
	21.9
	81.4
	39.2
	4Households and nonprofit organizations; life insurance reserves; asset
	FA153040005
	33.5
	36.4
	48.5
	22.9
	56.5
	17.8
	12.3
	71.7
	29.2
	5U.S.-chartered depository institutions; life insurance reserves; asset
	FA763040005
	5.9
	6.5
	5.2
	8.6
	5.6
	6.6
	5.5
	5.7
	6.0
	6Holding companies; life insurance reserves; asset
	FA733040005
	5.0
	4.1
	4.2
	4.0
	4.0
	4.0
	4.0
	4.0
	4.0
	7 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER 1–

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT

OF CHARLES HARGITT AND CHRISTINE

HARGITT, husband and wife, as owners and

operators of the BALAO III, Official No.

293669, for exoneration from or limitation of

liability,

 Plaintiffs.

_____________________________________

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, THE

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,

PEMCO MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, NORTHWERN INSURANCE

COMPANY OF NEW YORK, STATE

FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY

COMPANY, FRED ROSENBERRY, and the

PORT OF EVERETT,

 Third-Party Plaintiffs,

v.

EVERETT YACHT SALES, INC., a

Washington Corporation,

 Third-Party Defendant.

C06-930Z

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas

S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

Case 2:06-cv-00930-TSZ Document 26 Filed 08/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER 2–

(1) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties’ Stipulated

Motion to Continue Trial and Amend Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Minute Order,

docket no. 24, as follows. The Court continues the trial to Tuesday, May 27, 2008. The

Clerk is directed to enter a new scheduling order setting pretrial deadlines in accordance with

the new trial date.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of

record.

Filed and entered this 15th day of August, 2007.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/ Claudia Hawney

By Claudia Hawney

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00930-TSZ Document 26 Filed 08/15/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOTREX
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          38,267
<SECURITIES>                                     6,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,767
<INVENTORY>                                     47,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,847
<PP&E>                                          64,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,535
<SALES>                                        205,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,835
<CGS>                                          133,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        



</TABLE>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 211

Expressing the strong support of the Congress for the recently concluded

elections in the Republic of India and urging the President to travel

to India.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1999

Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. GEJDENSON, and Mr. LANTOS) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the strong support of the Congress for the recently concluded elections in the Republic of India and

urging the President to travel to India.

Whereas the Republic of India is a longstanding parliamentary democracy where citizens may freely change their

government;

Whereas India has a thriving multiparty system where a

broad spectrum of political views are represented;

Whereas India recently conducted a successful round of elections, involving over 650,000,000 registered voters and

resulting in a 60 percent voter turnout and re-election of

Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee;
2

•HCON 211 IH

Whereas India and the United States share a special relationship as the world’s most populous democracy and the

world’s oldest democracy, respectively, and have a shared

commitment to upholding the will of the people and the

rule of law;

Whereas the President has expressed his continued desire to

travel to South Asia; and

Whereas India continues to be a shining example of democracy for all of Asia to follow: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of

4 India on the successful conclusion of their recent na5 tional elections;

6 (2) congratulates Prime Minister Atal Bihari

7 Vajpayee on his re-election;

8 (3) calls on the President to travel to India as

9 part of any trip to South Asia; and

10 (4) urges the President to broaden our special

11 relationship with India into a strategic partnership.

Æ