70646 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 

1See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 76517 

(November 30, 2020) (Final Results), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

2 Id. 

3See NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 

569 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (CIT 2022). 

4See Final Results of Remand Redetermination 

Pursuant to Court Remand, NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. et 

al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 20–03898, 

Slip Op. 22–37 (CIT April 19, 2022), dated July 15, 

2022 (First Remand Results), available at https://

access.trade.gov/resources/remands/22-37.pdf. 

5 Id. at 2. 

6See NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 

601 F. Supp. 3d 1373 (CIT 2022). 

7 Id. 

8See Final Results of Remand Redetermination 

Pursuant to Court Remand, NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. et 

al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 20–03898, 

Slip Op. 22–135 (CIT December 6, 2022), dated 

March 3, 2023 (Second Remand Results), available 

at https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/22- 

135.pdf, at 2. 

Exporter Producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Cash deposit rate 

(adjusted for 

subsidy offsets) 

(percent) 

Luoyang Steelart Office Furniture Co., Ltd ............ Luoyang Flyer Office Furniture Co., Ltd ................ 21.38 10.84 

Pinghu Chenda Storage Office Co., Ltd ................. Pinghu Chenda Storage Office Co., Ltd ................ 21.38 10.84 

Tianjin Jia Mei Metal Furniture Ltd ......................... Tianjin Jia Mei Metal Furniture Ltd ........................ 21.38 10.84 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Commerce will issue revised cash 

deposit instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 4, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22453 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–876] 

Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of 

Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony With the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; Notice of Amended Final 

Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 14, 2023, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in NEXTEEL 

Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Slip. Op. 

23–103, Consol. Court No. 20–03898 

(CIT 2023), sustaining the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) 

second final results of redetermination 

pertaining to the administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

welded line pipe (WLP) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the 

period of review (POR) December 1, 

2017, through November 30, 2018. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s Final Results 

of the administrative review and that 

Commerce is amending the Final 

Results with respect to the dumping 

margins assigned to NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 

(NEXTEEL), SeAH Steel Corporation 

(SeAH), and non-selected respondents 

Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai 

Steel Company/Hyundai HYSCO 

(Hyundai Steel). 

DATES: Applicable July 24, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adam Simons, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6172. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 30, 2020, Commerce 

published its final results in the 2017– 

2018 antidumping duty administrative 

review of WLP from Korea.1 Commerce 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins of 15.07 percent for NEXTEEL, 

9.33 percent for SeAH, and 11.60 

percent for the non-selected 

respondents.2

Husteel, Hyundai Steel, NEXTEEL, 

and SeAH appealed Commerce’s Final 

Results. On April 19, 2022, the CIT 

remanded the Final Results to 

Commerce regarding its: (1) particular 

market situation (PMS) determination 

and resulting adjustment to the reported 

cost of production (COP) for WLP for 

SeAH and for purposes of calculating 

constructed value (CV) for NEXTEEL; 

(2) application of the PMS adjustment to 

SeAH for purposes of the sales-below 

COP test; (3) adjustment to NEXTEEL’s 

CV to account for sales of non-prime 

products; (4) reclassification of 

NEXTEEL’s reported losses relating to 

the suspended production of certain 

product lines; (5) denial of a constructed 

export price (CEP) offset for SeAH; and 

(6) calculation of the rate assigned to 

non-examined companies in light of any 

adjustments made to the calculations for 

either of the mandatory respondents 

stemming from the remand.3

In its First Remand Results, issued on 

July 18, 2022, Commerce recalculated 

NEXTEEL and SeAH’s weighted-average 

dumping margins without making a 

PMS adjustment.4 In addition, 

Commerce recalculated NEXTEEL’s 

weighted-average margin based on the 

actual costs of prime and non-prime 

merchandise reported by NEXTEEL. The 

revised weighted-average dumping 

margins for NEXTEEL and SeAH were 

1.12 percent and zero percent, 

respectively, and the resulting reviewspecific rate for the non-selected 

respondents was 1.12. percent.5

The CIT sustained Commerce’s First 

Remand Results on all issues except for 

the reclassification of NEXTEEL’s 

reported losses relating to the 

suspended production of certain 

product lines.6 The CIT again remanded 

the Final Results to Commerce for: (1) 

clarification on whether NEXTEEL 

suspended production on the lines in 

question for all or only part of the POR; 

and (2) explanation of why NEXTEEL’s 

costs as reported for those lines would 

not be ‘‘reasonably reflective of the cost 

associated with the production and sale 

of merchandise,’’ if NEXTEEL 

suspended production for only part of 

the POR, consistent with section 

773(f)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).7 In its Second 

Remand Results, issued on March 3, 

2023, Commerce provided clarification 

on the period of suspension for certain 

of NEXTEEL’s production lines and 

explanation of why it is appropriate to 

include the suspension losses as part of 

NEXTEEL’s general and administrative 

expenses. Because Commerce made no 

changes to the calculation of the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

NEXTEEL, the weighted-average 

dumping margin for NEXTEEL did not 

change from that presented in the First 

Remand Results (i.e., 1.12 percent).8


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 70647 

9See NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 

Slip. Op. 23–103, Consol. Court No. 20–03898 (CIT 

2023). 

10See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

11See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond 

Sawblades). 

12This rate is based on the rates for the 

respondents that were selected for individual 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts available. See section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Husteel and Hyundai Steel 

are the only two companies not selected for 

individual review in this administrative review that 

have unliquidated entries subject to this litigation. 

Commerce has already liquidated entries for the 

other non-selected respondents in this 

administrative review. 

13See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

1See Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 20478 

(April 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of the 2021–2022 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 19, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Uncoated Paper 

from Brazil: Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order; 2021–2022,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

The CIT sustained Commerce’s Second 

Remand Results on July 14, 2023.9

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,10 as 

clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit held that, pursuant to section 

516A(c) and (e) of the Act, Commerce 

must publish a notice of court decision 

that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a 

Commerce determination and must 

suspend liquidation of entries pending 

a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

July 14, 2023, judgment constitutes a 

final decision of the CIT that is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s Final 

Results. Thus, this notice is published 

in fulfillment of the publication 

requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

judgment, Commerce is amending its 

Final Results with respect to Husteel, 

Hyundai Steel, NEXTEEL, and SeAH for 

the period December 1, 2017, through 

November 30, 2018, as follows: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1.12 

SeAH Steel Corporation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 0.00 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 12

Husteel Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.12 

Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai HYSCO .......................................................................................................................................... 1.12 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because NEXTEEL, SeAH, and the 

non-selected companies Husteel and 

Hyundai Steel have a superseding cash 

deposit rate, i.e., there have been final 

results published in a subsequent 

administrative review, we will not issue 

revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 

This notice will not affect the current 

cash deposit rates for those exporters/ 

producers. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

Because the CIT’s ruling has not been 

appealed, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on 

unliquidated entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by NEXTEEL, SeAH, and the nonselected companies, Husteel and 

Hyundai Steel, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is not zero or 

de minimis. Where an import-specific 

ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,13 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 4, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22454 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–842] 

Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Suzano S.A. made sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2021, through February 28, 

2022. Commerce also determines that 

Sylvamo do Brasil Ltda. and Sylvamo 

Exports Ltda. (collectively, Sylvamo) 

did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable October 12, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Maciuba or Nathan James, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0413 or 

(202) 482–5305, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 6, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results, and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

On July 19, 2023, we extended the 

deadline for these final results to 

October 3, 2023.2 For a complete 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The product covered by this Order is 

certain uncoated paper from Brazil. For 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1