72068 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 201 / Thursday, October 19, 2023 / Notices 

1Center for Biological Diversity v. EPA, et al., 

Case No. 21–1279 (3d. Cir.). 

2008 Ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS),’’ and 

published at 85 FR 80616 (December 14, 

2020) (‘‘Final Rule’’). 

On February 12, 2021, Plaintiff 

petitioned the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Third Circuit to review 

the Final Rule.1 On August 2, 2021, EPA 

filed a motion for voluntary remand 

without vacatur in Third Circuit Case 

No. 21–1279 so that the Agency could 

reconsider the Final Rule. On 

September 3, 2021, the Third Circuit 

granted EPA’s motion for voluntary 

remand without vacatur. To date, EPA 

has not completed its reconsideration of 

the Final Rule. The proposed consent 

decree would establish a deadline for 

EPA to complete its reconsideration of 

the Final Rule. Further, if that 

reconsideration process results in 

rulemaking, EPA shall, within 15 

business days of signature of a notice of 

a final rule, send the rulemaking 

package to the Office of the Federal 

Register for review and publication in 

the Federal Register. 

In accordance with section 113(g) of 

the CAA, for a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

document, the Agency will accept 

written comments relating to the 

proposed consent decree. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. 

III. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC–2023– 

0500, via https://www.regulations.gov. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from this docket. 

EPA may publish any comment received 

to its public docket. Do not submit to 

EPA’s docket at https://

www.regulations.gov any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e., 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, the full EPA public comment 

policy, information about CBI or 

multimedia submissions, and general 

guidance on making effective 

comments, please visit https://

www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. For additional information 

about submitting information identified 

as CBI, please contact the person listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document. Note 

that written comments containing CBI 

and submitted by mail may be delayed 

and deliveries or couriers will be 

received by scheduled appointment 

only. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment. This ensures 

that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the https://

www.regulations.gov website to submit 

comments to EPA electronically is 

EPA’s preferred method for receiving 

comments. The electronic public docket 

system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system, which means EPA will not 

know your identity, email address, or 

other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

Gautam Srinivasan, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23083 Filed 10–18–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

Performance Review Board— 

Appointment of Members 

AGENCY: U.S. Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 

ACTION: Notice of performance review 

board appointments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

appointment of those individuals who 

have been selected to serve as members 

of the Performance Review Board (PRB). 

The PRB is comprised of a Chairperson 

and career senior executives that meet 

annually to review and evaluate 

performance appraisal documents. The 

PRB provides a written recommendation 

to the appointing authority for final 

approval of each SES and SL 

performance rating, performance-based 

pay adjustment, and performance 

award. The PRB is advised by the Office 

of the Chief Human Capital Officer, 

Office of Legal Counsel, and Office for 

Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion to 

ensure compliance with laws and 

regulations. Designated members will 

serve a 12-month term. 

DATES: The board membership is 

applicable beginning on November 1, 

2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cynthia G. Pierre, Chief Operating 

Officer, EEOC, 131 M Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20507, (202) 291–3260. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 

names and position of the EEOC PRB 

members are set forth below: 

Mr. Carlton Hadden, Chair, Director, Office of 

Federal Operations, EEOC 

Mr. Bradley Anderson, Director, Birmingham 

District, EEOC 

Ms. Kimberly Essary, Deputy Chief Data 

Officer, EEOC 

Ms. Gwendolyn Reams, Acting General 

Counsel, EEOC 

Mr. Kevin Richardson, Chief Human Capital 

Officer, EEOC 

Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal 

Employment Opportunity Staff, U.S. 

Department of Justice 

Ms. Jamie Williamson, Director, Philadelphia 

District, EEOC 

Mr. Raymond Peeler, Associate Legal 

Counsel, EEOC (Alternate) 

Ms. Pierrette McIntire, Chief Information 

Officer, EEOC (Alternate) 

By the direction of the Commission. 

Cynthia G. Pierre, 

Chief Operating Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23088 Filed 10–18–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6570–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[FR ID: 179690] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1