alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Re:    Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. Home Equity Asset Trust 2005-4 Home Equity Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-4 I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Home Equity Asset Trust 2005-4 (the "Trust"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be prepared by the Trustee based upon the servicing information required to be provided by the Servicers under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is included in these reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statements included in the report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and based upon the review required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the report, the Servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and 5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicers' compliance with the minimum servicing standards based, in each case, upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Servicers (other than Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) and the Trustee. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of  June 1, 2005 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor (the "Depositor"), DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., as seller (in such capacity, the "Seller"), Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ("SPS"), as a servicer (in such capacity, a "Servicer"), Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFBNA"), as master servicer (in such capacity, the "Master Servicer"),  and as a servicer (in such capacity, a "Servicer" and together with SPS, the "Servicers"), The Murrayhill Company, as credit risk manager (in such capacity, the "Credit Risk Manager") and U.S. Bank National Association as trustee (in such capacity, the "Trustee") /s/ Bruce Kaiserman     Bruce Kaiserman Vice President March 30, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00315-CR

John A. PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR9852

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, John A. Perez pled nolo contendere to repeated 

violations of court ordered bond conditions and was sentenced to two years in the institutional 

division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in accordance with the terms of his pleabargain agreement. On May 3, 2022, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to 

appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After John A. Perez filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent 

copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, 

which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal; or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id.

25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment 

assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and 

agreed to by John A. Perez. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and 

ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See 

id. Thus, the trial court’s certification appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case 

and that John A. Perez does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record.” Id. 25.2(d).
This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) 

unless an amended trial court certification showing that John A. Perez has the right to appeal is 

made part of the appellate record by August 12, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels 

v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 140

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of the President’s action

to eliminate discriminatory trade practices by Japan relating to international shipping.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24, 1997

Mr. HELMS (for himself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BROWNBACK, and Mr. INOUYE) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of the President’s action to eliminate discriminatory trade practices

by Japan relating to international shipping.

Whereas restrictive and discriminatory Japanese port practices have been a significant source of international concern for many years, have increased the cost of transporting goods to and from Japan for American consumers, and all ocean carriers and their customers, and have

restricted United States carriers’ operations in Japan

while Japanese carriers have not faced similar restrictions in the United States;

Whereas for many years the Federal Maritime Commission,

and the United States Departments of State and Trans-
2

•SRES 140 IS

portation, have investigated and monitored these practices and urged the Japanese Government to remedy the

problems caused by these restrictions; and

Whereas recent actions by the Federal Maritime Commission

and negotiations conducted by the Departments of State

and Transportation with the Government of Japan have

reportedly produced agreements which would, when implemented, reform the Japanese port practices and remedy these problems: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses strong support

2 for—

3 (1) the efforts of the President and executive

4 branch to achieve removal of Japanese port restric5 tions, and

6 (2) vigilant, continued monitoring and enforce7 ment by the Federal Maritime Commission of

8 changes in port practices promised by the Japanese

9 Government that will benefit international trade.

Æ
#### Michael Hebert *vs.*Bishop & Babbin Co. et al, Trustees.

Aroostook.

Decided January 27, 1940.

*Arthur J. Nadeau,*for plaintiff.

*Pendleton & Rogers,*for defendant.

In assumpsit for the purchase price of a carload of potatoes; plea the general issue, defense being that the purchaser was not the agent of defendant; verdict for the plaintiff.

The case comes up on a general motion for new trial.

The jury heard the testimony. There is evidence to substantiate their finding. Motion overruled.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 16,
1998 included in Allied Waste Industries, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997, and to all references to our firm included in this
registration statement.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona,
  July 16, 1998.
10
11
12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

24
25
26

Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE
ALEXANDER SERRA, M.D.,
Plaintiff, No. C 05-0827 JCC
Vv.

CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
INC., a Minnesota corporation; CDI PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R.
MANAGEMENT CORP., a Minnesota CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), AND [PROPOSED]
corporation; ONEX, INC., a Canadian ORDER THEREON
corporation; DON JACOBSEN, an individual;
TOM TOMLINSON, an individual; and
ROBERT BAUMGARTNER, an individual,

Defendants.

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS
HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record,
based upon the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release effective July 5, 2005,
that the claims of plaintiff Alexander Serra, M.D., asserted against defendants Center for
Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., CDI Management Corp., Onex, Inc., Don Jacobsen, Tom Tomlinson
and Robert Baumgartner in the above-captioned action, shall be and are hereby DISMISSED

with prejudice, AND THAT all parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND -1- 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER i he
Case No. C05-0827 JCC HAGENS BERMAN
SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1201 Frm Ave, SUTE 2900 ©

1845.10 0037 MTN.DOC TELEPHONE (208) 62:



10
11
12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

24
25
26

Date: August 3, 2005

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C05-0827 JCC

1845.10 0037 MTN.DOC

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

By__/s Jeffrey T. Sprung
Jeffrey T. Sprung, WSBA #23607

1301 Fifth Ave., Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: 206-623-7292
Facsimile: 206-623-0594

Timothy T. Scott

SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP
555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415-772-1296

Facsimile: 415-772-7400

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GARVEY SCHUBERT BARER

By__/s David Lieberworth

David Lieberworth, WSBA #9329
1191 Second Ave., 18" Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: 206-464-3939
Facsimile: 206-464-0125

Attorneys for Defendants

By:
Hon. John C. Coughenour
United States District Judge

-2- Ee
si
HAGENS BERMAI

N
SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

1201 Fart Avenue, SUITE 2900

TELEPHONE (208) 62:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL AND PTM - 1

(Brian R. Foy, Jr.; CR06-229 RSM)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

 JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BRIAN R. FOY, JR.,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-229 RSM

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DEADLINE

THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion, the records and files

herein, hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise

of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering 

a continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more

speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:06-cr-00229-RSM Document 18 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL AND PTM - 2

(Brian R. Foy, Jr.; CR06-229 RSM)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued to

January 8, 2007, and the deadline in which to file pretrial motions is continued to

December 6, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of

November 6, 2006, up to and including the new trial date of January 8, 2007, shall be

excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

DONE this 31 day of October 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Paula Semmes Deutsch

Attorney for Brian Foy

s/ Jill Otake

Assistant United States Attorney

Per telephonic authorization

Case 2:06-cr-00229-RSM Document 18 Filed 10/31/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-J8
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-J8


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

14 , 2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00709

- CV

A PLUS TRANSMISSION , JESSE HESTER , AND DAVID DOIG , Appellant s

V.

CALVIN BONIABY , Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No

. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- CCV

- 065108

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 8, 2019. On December 18, 2019, appellant s filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

The moti o n i s granted.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

# ACTION:

Notice of performance review board appointments.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of those individuals who have been selected to serve as members of the Performance Review Board (PRB). The PRB is comprised of a Chairperson and career senior executives that meet annually to review and evaluate performance appraisal documents. The PRB provides a written recommendation to the appointing authority for final approval of each SES and SL performance rating, performance-based pay adjustment, and performance award. The PRB is advised by the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of Legal Counsel, and Office for Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. Designated members will serve a 12-month term.

# DATES:

The board membership is applicable beginning on November 1, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia G. Pierre, Chief Operating Officer, EEOC, 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20507, (202) 291-3260.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the names and position of the EEOC PRB members are set forth below:

Mr. Carlton Hadden, Chair, Director, Office of Federal Operations, EEOC

Mr. Bradley Anderson, Director, Birmingham District, EEOC

Ms. Kimberly Essary, Deputy Chief Data Officer, EEOC

Ms. Gwendolyn Reams, Acting General Counsel, EEOC

Mr. Kevin Richardson, Chief Human Capital Officer, EEOC

Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Staff, U.S. Department of Justice

Ms. Jamie Williamson, Director, Philadelphia District, EEOC

Mr. Raymond Peeler, Associate Legal Counsel, EEOC (Alternate)

Ms. Pierrette McIntire, Chief Information Officer, EEOC (Alternate)

By the direction of the Commission.

Cynthia G. Pierre,

Chief Operating Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-23088 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71539-71540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[Docket ID ED-2023-IES-0182]

Request for Information on Potential New Program, From Seedlings 
to Scale (S2S); Correction

AGENCY: Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 12, 2023, the Department of Education (Department) 
published in the Federal Register a request for information (RFI) on a 
potential new program, From Seedlings to Scale (S2S). We are correcting 
the docket identification number. All other information in the RFI 
remains the same.

DATES: This correction is applicable October 17, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Higgins, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: 
(202) 987-1531. Email: [email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 12, 2023, the Department 
published a RFI on S2S, a potential new program. (88 FR 70652). We are 
correcting the docket identification number.
    Accessible Format: On request to the contact person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can 
obtain this document in

[[Page 71540]]

an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an 
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text 
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Correction

    In FR Doc. No. 2023-22482, appearing on pages 70652-70654 of the 
Federal Register of October 12, 2023, we make the following correction:
    On page 70652, in the heading, remove ``[Docket ID ED-2023-IES-
0011]'' and add, in its place, ``[Docket ID ED-2023-IES-0182]''.

Mark Schneider,
Director, Institute of Education Sciences.
[FR Doc. 2023-22898 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DENISE BREWER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5327JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is plaintiff’s responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05327-RJB Document 3 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1