alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 167 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 167

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to permit temporary 
    construction and other work on the Capitol Grounds that may be 
    necessary for construction of a building on Constitution Avenue 
Northwest, between 2nd Street Northwest and Louisiana Avenue Northwest.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 167

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may permit temporary construction and 
other work on the Capitol Grounds that may be necessary for 
construction of a building on Constitution Avenue Northwest, between 
2nd Street Northwest and Louisiana Avenue Northwest. Such work may 
include activities resulting in temporary obstruction of a curbside 
parking lane on Louisiana Avenue Northwest and on Constitution Avenue 
Northwest, between 2nd Street Northwest and Louisiana Avenue Northwest.

SEC. 2. PERIOD OF USE.

    Work on the Capitol Grounds under section 1 is authorized during 
the period beginning August 6, 1999, and ending October 31, 2001, or 
such longer period as the Architect of the Capitol determines 
necessary.

SEC. 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Work on the Capitol Grounds under section 1 may 
not begin until the Architect of the Capitol receives such assurances 
as the Architect may require to ensure that--
            (1) all areas of the Capitol Grounds that are disturbed by 
        reason of such work will be restored to their original 
        condition without expense to the United States; and
            (2) such work will be carried out so as not to interfere 
        with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed 
        by the Architect of the Capitol.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The United States shall not incur 
any expense or liability incident to any activity associated with work 
on the Capitol Grounds under section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 3, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 16134 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 7201

Mr. John L. Thomas, II

Counsel for Drone Services Orlando, LLC

611 N. Wymore Road, Suite 105

W inter Park, F L 32789

Dear Mr. Thomas :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated December 22, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) on behalf of Drone Services Orlando, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You

requested an amendment to change the company name from John J. Jones Investments, Inc. to

Drone Services Orlando, LLC

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety th at were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any d elay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 16134

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained2

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is

granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Drone Services Orlando, LLC is hereafter referred to as the

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 16134 remain in

effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on April 30, 2018 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO COMPEL - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

EDDIE HERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

57 DEGREES NORTH, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-1098L

ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO COMPEL

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to

attend an independent medical examination (“IME”) with vascular specialist Frank

Fiaschetti, M.D., in Ketchum, Idaho (Dkt. #47). Defendant originally scheduled the IME

for June 7, 2007, during the week that plaintiff was in Seattle for his deposition, but

plaintiff refused to attend the IME.

Although an IME usually should be conducted in the forum plaintiff has selected

for litigation, in this case, traveling to Idaho is not significantly more burdensome for

plaintiff, who lives in Virginia, than traveling to Seattle. Furthermore, plaintiff could

have made the short airplane trip to Idaho while he was already in Seattle for his

Case 2:06-cv-01098-RSL Document 64 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff argues that he has traveled to Seattle twice, once in early April and once

in early June. Defendant denies that plaintiff traveled to Seattle for this case in early

April, and argues that the early June trip was the only one defendant has required him to

make to litigate this case.

2

 Given that plaintiff is unemployed, the Court expects that defendant will

purchase the airplane ticket and pay for the other travel expenses in advance to the extent

possible.

ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO COMPEL - 2

deposition.1 Plaintiff is currently unemployed, so he will not have to take time off from

work. Defendant will pay for plaintiff’s travel expenses.2

 Defendant’s counsel attempted

to find a suitable and willing physician in Seattle to conduct the IME, but was unable to

do so. Conducting the IME in Virginia could result in increased expenses and a

significantly decreased likelihood that the IME physician could appear at trial. Dr.

Fiaschetti has explained that merely conducting a review of the records, without

examining plaintiff, would be insufficient. Finally, plaintiff argues that the motion is

untimely because there is no evidence that the examination can be completed and an

expert report disclosed by the July 7, 2007 deadline. The delay, however, was caused by

plaintiff’s refusal to attend the deposition while he was already on the West Coast in

early June. 

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to compel

(Dkt. #47). Plaintiff must submit to an IME with Dr. Fiaschetti at his office in Ketchum,

Idaho on a mutually convenient date.

DATED this 27th day of June, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01098-RSL Document 64 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2
DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 20-6

March 31, 2020

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability: This letter is relevant to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve.

SUBJECT: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Quarterly Reporting during the 

COVID-19 Pandemic

On March 26, 2020, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a 

statement to inform its supervised financial institutions that it does not intend to cite in an 

examination or initiate an enforcement action for failure to report the quarterly HMDA data.1

This letter serves as notice that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (Board) will take 

the same approach in order to provide its supervised financial institutions with flexibility, reduce 

administrative burden, and allow the institution to focus its time and attention on serving its 

customers. At a later date, the Board will provide information as to how and when it expects its 

supervised institutions to resume quarterly HMDA data submissions. In the meantime, 

institutions should continue collecting and recording HMDA data in anticipation of making 

annual data submissions. 

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to the Federal Reserve-supervised 

institutions in their districts that may be impacted by the HMDA quarterly reporting 

requirements, as well as to their supervisory and examination staff. If supervised financial 

institutions have questions about the guidance set forth in this letter, they are encouraged to 

 1 The CFPB statement is available at: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_hmda-statement_covid19_2020-03.pdf. Under Regulation C (12 CFR 1003.5(a)(1)(ii)), which implements HMDA, financial institutions 

that report for the preceding calendar year at least 60,000 covered loans and applications (excluding purchased 

loans) must report their HMDA data quarterly (except for the fourth quarter) in addition to annually. The first 

quarterly submissions in 2020 was originally due by May 30, 2020.
2

contact the responsible Federal Reserve Bank. In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s 

public website.2

Sincerely,

Suzanne Killian

Senior Associate Director

 2 https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 199 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 199

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 1999

                                Received

                           November 19, 1999

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that prayers and invocations at 
public school sporting events contribute to the moral foundation of our 
 Nation and urging the Supreme Court to uphold their constitutionality.

Whereas prayers at public school sporting events are entirely consistent with 
        our American heritage of seeking Divine guidance and protection in all 
        of our undertakings;
Whereas sporting events provide a significant and long-lasting impact in 
        character and values development among young people;
Whereas prayers and invocations have been demonstrated to positively affect the 
        fair play and sportsmanlike behavior of both players and spectators at 
        sporting events;
Whereas lower court rulings about prayer at sporting events have placed school 
        and community leaders in the difficult position of choosing between 
        conflicting values, rights, and laws;
Whereas congressional leaders have found value in beginning each legislative day 
        with prayers; and
Whereas statements of belief in a Supreme Power and the virtue of seeking 
        strength and protection from that Power are prevalent throughout our 
        national history, currency, and rituals: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) prayers and invocations at public school sporting 
        events are constitutional under the First Amendment to the 
        Constitution; and
            (2) the Supreme Court, accordingly, should uphold the 
        constitutionality of such practices.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 120

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the occasion of the death of Mother

Teresa of Calcutta

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. NICKLES (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MACK, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. ROBB, Mr. KOHL, Mr. BIDEN, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. REID, Mr. DODD, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. KERREY, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. DOMENICI,

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms.

MOSELEY-BRAUN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KYL, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ASHCROFT, and Mr. INHOFE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the occasion of the

death of Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Whereas the American people are greatly saddened by the

death of Mother Teresa of Calcutta;

Whereas Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity,

which now operates numerous orphanages, hospices, and

other centers of charitable activity in the United States

and around the world, offering compassionate care to

those who are too often shunned by other institutions;
2

SRES 120 ATS

Whereas Mother Teresa has been recognized as an outstanding humanitarian and has received: the first Pope John

XXIII Peace Prize (1971); the Jawaharlal Nehru Award

for International Understanding (1972); the Nobel Peace

Prize (1979); the Presidential Medal of Freedom (1985);

and the Congressional Gold Medal (1997);

Whereas Mother Teresa became only the fifth person ever

awarded honorary United States Citizenship (1996);

Whereas Mother Teresa inspired people worldwide through

her selfless actions and altruistic life; and

Whereas Mother Teresa embodied benevolence, compassion,

and mercy and brought the face of God to humanity:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) expresses our deep admiration and respect

3 for the life and work of Mother Teresa, and extends

4 to her Missionaries of Charity our sympathy for the

5 loss they share with the world;

6 (2) recognizes that Mother Teresa’s work im7 proved the lives of millions of people in the United

8 States and around the world, and her example in9 spired countless others;

10 (3) encourages all Americans to reflect on how

11 they might keep the spirit of Mother Teresa alive

12 through their own efforts; and

13 (4) designates September 13, 1997 as a Na14 tional Day of Recognition for the humanitarian ef15 forts of Mother Teresa and of those who have la-
3

SRES 120 ATS

1 bored with her in service to the poor and afflicted

2 of the world.

3 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

4 an enrolled copy of this resolution to the Calcutta, India,

5 Mother House of the Missionaries of Charity.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGEANT KAMMERZELL,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5263 FDB/KLS

ORDER TO PROVIDE SERVICE

COPIES

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 1, 3 and 4. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and has filed an acceptable Complaint. Plaintiff has not provided service copies of his

Complaint.

Plaintiff will provide one copy of the Complaint for each named Defendant he wishes the United

States Marshals Service to attempt to serve. The service copies must be returned to the Court on or

before October 31, 2006 or the Court will recommend dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and note this matter for October 31,

2006.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05263-FDB Document 15 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12.2**CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**          I, Daniel Mingdong Wu, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Focus Media Holding Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by thisannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.Date:June 28, 2006         By: /s/ Daniel Mingdong Wu    Name:  Daniel Mingdong Wu    Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005

a)

AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	SASCO 2005-S3
	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the
Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms
of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by
the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts
to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:


/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                      5,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,117
<PP&E>                                           5,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,851
<BONDS>                                          3,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,126
<SALES>                                          7,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,499
<CGS>                                            6,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (160)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (164)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     73
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 48
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        48
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .007
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .007
        

</TABLE>