P.1 

OAR Box 1672 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

^Tll-B-23 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 29 of 132 
P.2 

A-1S-I3 

£Pac=J JL-B-JZ3 a 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Air Docket A-98-13 

FROM: Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc 

DATE: October 3,2000 

SUBJECT: Spreadsheets for the Environmental and Cost Impacts ofthe Proposed OLD 

(Non-Gasoline) NESHAP 

Introduction 

This memorandum supplements Memo No. 6 (Environmental and Cost Impacts ofthe 

Proposed OLD NESHAP) in the technical support document (TSD). Memo No. 6 presents the 

estimated emission reductions and control costs for OLD operations facilities that would be 

affected by the proposed OLD NESHAP. The primary spreadsheets that were used in 

performing that impacts analysis are included in Attachment 1 to this memo. This memo also 

presents additional background and assumptions that are not included in Memo No. 6. 

Attachment 2 provides example calculations. 

The following spreadsheets are included and discussed in this memo: 

1. Storage Tank Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

2. Storage Tank Control Cost Impacts (3 sheets) 

3. Transfer Rack Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

4. Transfer Rack Control Cost Impacts 

5. Equipment Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions (2 pages) 

6. Small/Large Facility LDAR Costs for In-House and Subcontracted Programs (4 sheets) 

7. LDAR Nationwide Cost Summary 

8. Per-Facility and Nationwide Cost Impacts 

Discussion of Spreadsheets 

The following sections discuss each ofthe spreadsheets in Attachment 1. 

1. Storage Tank Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions (Sheet 1) 

The primary assumptions and methodology used to calculate baseline total organic 

compound (TOC) and hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from OLD storage tanks are 

discussed in Memo Nos. 3 and 6 in the TSD. Memo No. 6 also presents the methodology for 

estimating the emission reductions resulting from adding or modifying a floating roof in 

/ 
P.3 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 2 

affected tanks (i.e., those tanks located at an affected major source facility, meeting the size 

cutoff, and storing organic liquid above the vapor pressure cutoff). 

Table 1 summarizes the total population of OLD storage tanks, by tank type, and 

the number of tanks that are expected to require additional emission control to meet the OLD 

NESHAP. Tables 2,3, and 4 present the numbers of FXRT, IFRT, and EFRT, respectively, in 

the OLD data base by size and vapor pressure range. These three tables also show the origin of 

the percentages displayed in the third column of Table 1. 

TABLE 1. STORAGE TANK POPULATIONS USED TO ESTIMATE 

OLD EMISSION REDUCTIONS 

Tank Type 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

Totals 

Number of Each Tank 

Type in OLD Service8 

5,383 

1,814 

528 

7,725 

Number of Tanks in 

Regulatory Size, V.P. 

Cutoffsb 

33% =1,776 

75%= 1,361 

95% = 502 

3,638 

Number of Affected Tanks 

Requiring Control to MACT 

Levelc 

78% =1,386 

15% = 204 

30%= 150 

1,740 

"Calculated from the estimated number of each model plant times the number of each 

tank type per plant. 

bBased on tanks of 20,000-40,000 gal. with liquids having a vapor pressure _> 1.9 psia, 

AND tanks of ^40,000 gal. with v.p. ^0.75 psia, for tanks in the OLD survey responses. 

cBased on FXRT without a control device, and for IFRT/EFRT: 

Only VMI (vapor-mounted primary, no secondary seal) is below the floor for IFRT. 

For EFRT, the floor is a mechanical shoe or liquid-mounted primary seal with a 

rim-mounted secondary seal. All other seal types are below (less effective than) the floor. 

These percentages are based on the occurrence of various seals reported for tanks in the 

OLD survey responses. 

Based on the data in this table, only 1,386/5,383 = 26% of FXRT, 204/1,814 = 11% of IFRT, 

and 150/528 = 28% of EFRT will need new controls (first-time control or modifications to 

existing control) under the OLD NESHAP. 

X 
P.4 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 3 

TABLE 2. DISTRIBUTION OF FXRT IN THE O.L.D. DATA BASE 

Stored Organic 

Liquid Vapor 

Pressure (psia) 

0.1-0.5 

0.5-0.75 

0.75-1.5 

1.5-4.0 

>4.0 

Totals, No. & % 

Tank Size (gallons) 

5,000-

10,000 

33 

6 

13 

22 

5 

79(11) 

10,000-

20,000 

29 

9 

22 

20 

2 

82(12) 

20,000-

40,000 

76 

13 

20 

28 

5 

142 (20) 

>40,000 

180 

25 

44 

102 

$4 

405 (57) 

Totals, 

Number (percent) 

318(45) 

53(8) 

99 (14) 

172 (24) 

66(9) 

708 (100) 

Note: 

The shaded cells indicate the number of tanks that fall within the proposed regulatory coverage. 

The total is 233, or 33 percent of all FXRT in the data base that are over 5,000 gal. and 0.1 psia. 

TABLE 3. DISTRIBUTION OF IFRT IN THE O.L.D. DATA BASE 

Stored Organic 

Liquid Vapor 

Pressure (psia) 

0.1-0.5 

0.5-0.75 

0.75-1.5 

1.5-4.0 

>4.0 

Totals, No. & % 

Tank Size (gallons) 

5,000-

10,000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0(0) 

10,000-

20,000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0(0) 

20,000-

40,000 

1 

0 

0 

2 

3 

6(2) 

>40,000 

83 

17 

32 

188 

78 

398 (98) 

Totals, 

Number (percent) 

84(21) 

17(4) 

32(8) 

190 (47) 

81 (20) 

404 (100) 

Note: 

The shaded cells indicate the number of tanks that fall within the proposed regulatory coverage. 

The total is 303, or 75 percent of all IFRT in the data base that are over 5,000 gal. and 0.1 psia. 

3 
P.5 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 4 

TABLE 4. DISTRIBUTION OF EFRT IN THE O.L.D. DATA BASE 

Stored Organic 

Liquid Vapor 

Pressure (psia) 

0.1-0.5 

0.5-0.75 

0.75-1.5 

1.5-4.0 

>4.0 

Totals, No. & 

percent 

Tank Size (gallons) 

5,000-

10,000 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

10) 

10,000-

20,000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0(0) 

20,000-

40,000 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1(1) 

>40,000 

5 

0 

4 

65 

38 

112(98) 

Totals, 

Number (percent) 

5(4) 

1(1) 

4(4) 

66 (58) 

38 (33) 

114(100) 

Note: 

The shaded cells indicate the number of tanks that fall within the proposed regulatory coverage. 

The total is 108, or 95 percent of all EFRT in the data base that are over 5,000 gal. and 0.1 psia. 

2. Storage Tank Control Cost Impacts (Sheets 2-1,2-2, and 2-3) 

The percentage of each tank type requiring conversion (installation of emission 

controls) is the product ofthe two percentages shown for each type in Table 1 (for example, for 

FXRT the calculation is 0.33 x 0.78 = 0.2574). Control costs were consolidated at facilities, 

which reduced the number of facilities affected but concentrated the cost impacts. For 

example, at Model Plant 28-1,201 FXRT required conversion and we have assumed that these 

conversions would take place at 201/4 = 50 facilities. If two ofthe four FXRT at MP 28-1 were 

assumed to be already controlled at the MACT level, then only two would need conversion and 

100 facilities would be affected, reducing the cost impact at each plant site. The actual number 

is probably between 50 and 100 facilities. 

The detailed control costs are presented in Memo. No. 6 in the TSD. 

3. Transfer Rack Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions (Sheet 3) 

This spreadsheet calculates transfer rack baseline emissions as the sum of emissions 

from OLD racks with a vapor collection and control system and from uncontrolled racks (40 

percent of facilities are presumed from the OLD survey data to be currently controlling their 

transfer racks). Emission reduction is the difference between this baseline and the emissions 

4 
P.6 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 5 

occurring after the application of controls under the OLD NESHAP. The spreadsheet shows an 

estimate of 200 facilities applying this new transfer rack control. Note that not all ofthe 

facilities applying control are projected to incur the cost of new controls because they have 

existing control capacity. 

4. Transfer Rack Control Cost Impacts (Sheet 4) 

Due to the presence of existing control capacity for transfer racks at SIC 29 and 51 OLD 

facilities, many of these facilities will be able to apply these controls to additional organic 

liquid loading positions under this NESHAP. Our estimate is that, ofthe 200 new applications 

of control to OLD transfer racks, 115 of them will require the expenditures shown in the 

spreadsheet (i.e., 115 facilities would have to purchase a new control system). 

5. Equipment Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions (Sheet 5,2 pages) 

Similarly to Sheet 3, baseline emissions from equipment are calculated as the sum of 

emissions from controlled equipment (subject to an LDAR program) and uncontrolled 

equipment (no LDAR) at all OLD facilities. The two emission factors used in the calculations 

are from the EPA's Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates (Reference 7 in Memo 

No. 3 ofthe TSD). Table 5 presents the factors assigned to both controlled and uncontrolled 

equipment. 

6. Small/Large Facility LDAR Costs for In-House and Contracted Programs (Sheets 6-1, 

6-2,6-3, and 6-4) 

These four spreadsheets represent costing algorithms that were used in previous LDAR 

analyses performed to support the HON 1991 negotiated rule for equipment leaks (Reg Neg). 

Unit costs were updated to 1997 dollars. Note the relatively high initial cost for sampling 

connections, which represents the cost for retrofitting connections to closed-loop sampling. 

The average facility costs used to determine nationwide cost impacts were computed from the 

capital and annual costs (Cost Summary) appearing at the bottom left of these sheets. 

7. LDAR Program Cost Summary (Sheet 7) 

Model Plants 28-3 and 42-3 are designated as large LDAR facilities on this spreadsheet, 

while the remaining plants are considered small facilities in estimating equipment counts. 

Average costs are the arithmetic averages ofthe in-house and contracted scenarios. Recovery 

credits have not been accounted for in the calculations in order to be conservative and represent 

the maximum costs of implementing an LDAR program. 

5 
P.7 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3, 2000 

Page 6 

TABLE 5. TOC EMISSION FACTORS FOR EQUIPMENT 

Equipment Component 

Pumps (light liquid service) 

Valves (light liquid service) 

Connectors 

Sampling connections 

TOC Emission Factor (lb/hr) 

Uncontrolled 

Scenario3 

0.0438 

0.00887 

0.00403 

0.033 

Controlled 

Scenario 

0.00942b 

0.00232b 

0.002655b 

0.00c 

"From: Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates. EPA-453/R-93-026. 

June 1993. Page 2-10. (1993 Protocol Document.) 

b

Factor for HON-level program, maintaining less than 2% leakers, 10,000 ppm 

leak definition. Calculated using the following equation: 

("Uncontrolled Emission Rate - Emission Rate at 1%1. 

Uncontrolled Emission Rate 

Emission rates at 1% were calculated using the equations on page 5-19 ofthe 

1993 Protocol Document. 

cBased on 100 percent control efficiency attributable to a switch to closed-loop 

sampling (1993 Protocol Document, p. 5-2). 

8. Per-Facility and Nationwide Control Costs (Sheet 8) 

This spreadsheet shows a breakdown ofthe cost impacts by emission source for each 

model plant facility and each SIC code, as well as for the entire OLD industry. Unit costs are 

taken from the earlier spreadsheets. 

The costs of monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping (MRR) under the NESHAP have 

also been included on this spreadsheet. Individual cost items in Table 6-23 of Memo No. 6 

have been distributed among the appropriate model plants and added together to calculate the 

annual cost burden due to MRR. An MRR capital cost of $2,500 has also been added to each 

model plant's capital cost impact from controls implementation. The facilities presumed to be 

already controlled to the MACT level still show some capital and annual costs because these 

facilities will have some ofthe reporting and recordkeeping obligations ofthe regulation. 

(, 
Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 7 

Impacts 

Spreadsheets 

7 

P.8 

Attachment 1 
Sheet 1. OLD Storage Tank Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

00 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

Totals 

46-1 

46-2 

Totals 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Tank 

Type 

FXRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

FXRT 

EXRT 

FXRT 

IFRT 

EFRT 

Grand Totals 

I 

TOC 

Emissions 

per Tank 

(Ib/yr) 

31,263 

31,263 

2,215 

31,263 

2,215 

23,653 

7,052 

23,653 

7,052 

85,072 

23,653 

7,052 

85,072 

20,319 

4,967 

169,790 

20,319 

4,967 

169,790 

20,319 

4,967 

169,790 

90,593 

24,774 

522 

4,588 

60,082 

Number 

of Tanks 

at Each 

Model 

Plant 

4 

10 

2 

29 

3 

2 

1 

2 

1 

4 

4 

4 

4 

3 

3 

1 

6 

8 

1 

20 

20 

2 

5 

13 

4 

7 

3 

TOC 

Emissions 

from All 

Tanks 

(Ib/yr) 

125,052 

312,630 

4,430 

906,627 

6,645 

47,306 

7,052 

47,306 

7,052 

340,288 

94,612 

28.208 

340,288 

60,957 

14,901 

169,790 

121,914 

39,736 

169,790 

406,380 

99,340 

339,580 

452,965 

322,062 

2,088 

32,116 

180,246 

Total 

Number of 

Model 

Plants 

195 

105 

105 

70 

70 

370 

54 

54 

30 

30 

30 

27 

27 

27 

111 

25 

25 

25 

31 

31 

31 

38 

38 

38 

94 

26 

9 

35 

24 

17 

17 

41 

651 

Nationwide 

Baseline 

TOC 

Emissions 

(tons/yr) 

12,193 

16,413 

233 

31,732 

233 

60,803 

1.277 

190 

710 

106 

5,104 

1,277 

381 

4,594 

13,639 

762 

186 

2.122 

1,890 

616 

2,632 

7,721 

1.887 

6.452 

24,269 

5,889 

1,449 

7,338 

25 

273 

1,532 

1,830 

107,879 

Overall 

Liquid HAP 

Percentage 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

-

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.06 

0.06 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

Nationwide 

Baseline 

HAP 

Emissions 

(tons/yr) 

7,603 

10.504 

149 

20,308 

149 

38,914 

409 

61 

227 

34 

1,633 

409 

122 

1,470 

4,363 

564 

138 

1,571 

1,398 

456 

1,947 

5,714 

1.397 

4,774 

17,959 

353 

87 

440 

21 

232 

1,302 

1,856 

63,233 

TOC 

Emissions 

per Tank After 

Conversion 

(Ib/yr) 

1,992 

1,992 

1,499 

1,992 

1,499 

928 

5,353 

928 

5,353 

11,576 

928 

5,353 

11,576 

1,952 

3,342 

18,360 

1,952 

3,342 

18,360 

1,952 

3,342 

18,360 

1,614 

3,332 

16 

3,100 

8,109 

TOC 

Emission 

Reduction 

per 

Converted 

Tank (Ib/yr) 

29,271 

29,271 

716 

29,271 

716 

22,725 

1,699 

22,725 

1,699 

73,496 

22,725 

1,699 

73,496 

18,367 

1,625 

151,430 

18,367 

1,625 

151,430 

18,367 

1,625 

151,430 

88,979 

21,442 

506 

1,488 

51,973 

HAP Emission 

Reduction per 

Converted 

Tank 

(Ib/yr) 

18,733 

18,733 

458 

18,733 

458 

7,272 

544 

7,272 

544 

23,519 

7,272 

544 

23,519 

13,592 

1.203 

112,058 

13,592 

1,203 

112,058 

13,592 

1,203 

112,058 

. 5,339 

1,287 

430 

1,265 

44.177 

Total 

Number 

of Tanks 

780 

1,050 

210 

2,030 

210 

4,280 

108 

54 

60 

30 

120 

108 

108 

108 

696 

75 

75 

25 

186 

248 

31 

760 

760 

76 

2,236 

130 

117 

247 

96 

119 

51 

266 

7,725 

Number 

of Tanks 

Meeting 

Cutoffs 

257 

347 

158 

670 

158 

1,589 

36 

41 

20 

23 

114 

36 

81 

103 

452 

25 

56 

24 

61 

186 

29 

251 

570 

72 

1,275 

43 

111 

154 

32 

89 

48 

169 

3,638 

Number of 

These 

Tanks 

Controlled 

to Floor 

56 

77 

134 

147 

134 

548 

8 

34 

5 

19 

80 

8 

69 

72 

295 

6 

48 

17 

13 

158 

21 

55 

485 

51 

852 

10 

78 

88 

7 

76 

34 

117 

1,900 

Number of 

Tanks 

Requiring 

Conversion 

201 

270 

24 

523 

24 

1,041 

28 

6 

15 

3 

34 

28 

12 

31 

157 

19 

8 

7 

48 

28 

9 

196 

86 

22 

422 

33 

33 

66 

25 

13 

15 

53 

1,739 

Total TOC 

Emission 

Reduction 

' (tons/yr) 

2,948 

3.944 

8 

7,653 

8 

14,862 

314 

5 

168 

3 

1,257 

314 

10 

1,131 

3,203 

172 

7 

539 

444 

23 

669 

1,798 

69 

1,640 

5,362 

1,464 

357 

1,821 

6 

10 

378 

394 

25,341 

Total HAP 

Emission 

Reduction 

(tons/yr) 

1.886 

2,524 

5 

4.898 

5 

9,319 

100 

2 

54 

1 

402 

100 

3 

362 

1,025 

127 

5 

399 

329 

17 

495 

1,331 

51 

1,214 

3,968 

88 

21 

109 

5 

8 

321 

335 

14,756 

p:\n831\impacts 

9/28/00 

CO 
Sheet 2-1. Storage Tank Control Cost Impacts (Fixed-Roof Tanks) 

- ^ 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

Totals 

46-1 

46-2 

Totals 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Grand 

Totals 

Total 

Number 

of 

Facilities 

195 

105 

70 

370 

54 

30 

27 

111 

25 

31 

38 

94 

26 

9 

35 

24 

17 

41 

651 

Number of 

FXRT per 

Facility 

4 

10 

29 

2 

2 

4 

3 

6 

20 

5 

0 

4 

0 

Total 

Number of 

FXRT 

780 

1,050 

2,030 

3,860 

108 

60 

108 

276 

75 

186 

760 

1,021 

130 

0 

130 

96 

0 

96 

5,383 

Percentage 

of FXRT 

Requiring 

Conversion 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

0.2574 

Number of 

FXRT 

Needing 

Conversion 

201 

270 

523 

994 

28 

15 

28 

71 

19 

48 

196 

263 

33 

0 

33 

25 

0 

25 

1,386 

Number of 

Facilities 

Making 

FXRT 

Conversions 

50 

27 

18 

95 

14 

8 

7 

29 

6 

8 

10 

24 

7 

0 

7 

6 

0 

6 

161 

Capital 

Cost 

to Convert 

one FXRT 

(1997$) 

50,063 

50,063 

50,063 

46,480 

46,480 

46,480 

74,930 

74,930 

74,930 

120,065 

120,065 

28,564 

28,564 

FXRT 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

(1997$) 

200,252 

500,630 

1,451,827 

92,960 

92,960 

185,920 

224,790 

449,580 

1,498,600 

600,325 

0 

114,256 

0 

Total 

Capital 

Cost for 

FXRT 

(1997$) 

10,051,249 

13,530,527 

26,159,019 

49,740,795 

1,292,107 

717,837 

1,292,107 

3,302,051 

1,446,524 

3,587,379 

14,658,106 

19,692,009 

4,017,615 

0 

4,017,615 

705,828 

0 

705,828 

77,458,297 

Annual 

Cost per 

FXRT 

($/yr) 

-1,622 

-1,622 

-1,622 

7,702 

7,702 

7,702 

11,414 

11,414 

11,414 

25,523 

25,523 

6,667 

6,667 

FXRT 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

($/yr) 

-6,488 

-16,220 

-47,038 

15,404 

15,404 

30,808 

34,242 

68,484 

228,280 

127,615 

0 

26,668 

0 

Total Annual 

Cost for FXRT 

($/yr) 

-325.652 

-438,378 

-847,531 

-1,611,561 

214,109 

118,950 

214,109 

547,169 

220,347 

546,461 

2,232,852 

2,999,661 

854,051 

0 

854,051 

164,744 

0 

164,744 

2,954,063 

Note: No. of facilities making FXRT conversions (column 7) = Total no. of facilities (column 2) x % of FXRT in reg. cutoffs (33%) x 

percentage of FXRT below proposed control level (78%). For MP 28-1, no. of facilities = 195 x 0.33 x 0.78 = 50.193 (value used in 

spreadsheet calculations). For display purposes, the whole number (50) is shown on the sheet above. 

p:\n831\costs\FXRT 

9/29/00 
Sheet 2-2. Storage Tank Control Cost Impacts (Internal Floating Roof Tanks) 

O 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

Totals 

46-1 

46-2 

Totals 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Grand 

Totals 

Total Number 

of Facilities 

195 

105 

70 

370 

54 

30 

27 

111 

25 

31 

38 

94 

26 

9 

35 

24 

17 

41 

651 

Number 

of IFRT 

per 

Facility 

0 

2 

3 

1 

1 

4 

3 

8 

20 

0 

0 

0 

7 

Total 

Number of 

IFRT 

0 

210 

210 

420 

54 

30 

108 

192 

75 

248 

760 

1083 

0 

0 

0 

0 

119 

119 

1,814 

Percentage 

of IFRT 

Needing 

Conversion 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

0.1125 

Number of 

IFRT 

Needing 

Conversion 

0 

24 

24 

47 

6 

3 

12 

22 

8 

28 

86 

122 

0 

0 

0 

0 

13 

13 

204 

Number of 

Facilities Making 

IFRT 

Conversions 

0 

12 

8 

20 

6 

3 

3 

12 

3 

3 

4 

11 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

45 

Capital 

Cost 

to Convert 

one IFRT 

(1997$) 

4,314 

4,314 

4,314 

12,132 

12,132 

12,132 

9,071 

9,071 

9,071 

0 

0 

10,156 

10,156 

IFRT 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

(1997$) 

0 

8,628 

12,942 

12,132 

12,132 

48,528 

27,213 

72,568 

181,420 

0 

0 

0 

71,092 

Total 

Capital 

Cost for 

IFRT 

(1997$) 

0 

101,918 

101,918 

203,837 

73,702 

40,946 

147,404 

262,051 

76,537 

253,081 

775,571 

1,105,188 

0 

0 

0 

0 

135,963 

135,963 

1,707,039 

Annual 

Cost per 

IFRT 

($/yr) 

722 

722 

722 

2,620 

2,620 

2,620 

1,675 

1,675 

1,675 

0 

0 

2,110 

2,110 

IFRT 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

($/yr) 

0 

1,444 

2,166 

2,620 

2,620 

10,480 

5,025 

13,400 

33,500 

0 

0 

0 

14,770 

Total 

Annual 

Cost for 

IFRT 

($/yr) 

0 

17,057 

17,057 

34,115 

15,917 

8,843 

31,833 

56,592 

1413 3 

46,733 

143,213 

204,078 

0 

0 

0 

0 

28,248 

28,248 

323,032 

Note: No. of facilities making IFRT conversions (column 7) = Total no. of facilities (column 2) x % of IFRT in reg. cutoffs (75%) x 

percentage of IFRT below proposed control level (15%). For MP 28-2, no. of facilities = 105 x 0.75 x 0.15 = 11.8125 (value used in 

spreadsheet calculations). For display purposes, the whole number (12) is shown on the sheet above. 

p:\n831\costs\IFRT 

9/29/00 
Sheet 2-3. Storage Tank Control Cost Impacts (External Floating Roof Tanks) 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

Totals 

46-1 

46-2 

Totals 

51-1 

51-1 

Totals 

Grand 

Totals 

Total 

Number of 

Facilities 

195 

105 

70 

370 

54 

30 

27 

111 

25 

31 

38 

94 

26 

9 

35 

24 

17 

41 

651 

Number 

of EFRT 

per 

Facility 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

4 

1 

1 

2 

0 

13 

0 

3 

Total 

Number of 

EFRT 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

120 

108 

228 

25 

31 

76 

132 

0 

117 

117 

0 

51 

51 

528 

Percentage 

of EFRT 

Requiring 

Conversion 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

0.2850 

Number of 

EFRT Needing 

Conversion 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

34 

31 

65 

7 

9 

22 

38 

0 

33 

33 

0 

15 

15 

150 

Number of 

Facilities 

Making EFRT 

Conversions 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

9 

8 

16 

7 

9 

11 

27 

0 

3 

3 

0 

5 

5 

50 

Capital 

Cost 

to Convert 

one EFRT 

(1997$) 

0 

0 

0 

30,264 

30,264 

30,264 

41,232 

41,232 

41,232 

35,999 

35,999 

30,264 

30,264 

EFRT 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

0 

0 

0 

0 

121,056 

121,056 

41,232 

41,232 

82,464 

0 

467,987 

0 

90,792 

Total 

Capital 

Cost for 

EFRT 

(1997$) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1.035,029 

931,526 

1,966,555 

293,778 

364,285 

893,085 

1,551,148 

0 

1,200,387 

1,200,387 

0 

439,887 

439,887 

5,157,976 

Annual 

Cost per 

EFRT 

($/yr) 

0 

0 

0 

5,984 

5,984 

5,984 

4,719 

4,719 

4,719 

8,632 

8,632 

4,802 

4,802 

EFRT 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

($/yr) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

23,936 

23,936 

4,719 

4,719 

9,438 

0 

112,216 

0 

14,406 

Total 

Annual 

Cost for 

EFRT 

($/yr) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

204,653 

184,188 

388,840 

33,623 

41,692 

102,214 

177,529 

0 

287,834 

287,834 

0 

69,797 

69,797 

924,000 

Note: No. of facilities making EFRT conversions (column 7) = Total no. of facilities (column 2) x % of EFRT in reg. cutoffs (95%) x 

percentage of EFRT below proposed control level (30%). For MP 29-2, no. of facilities = 30 x 0.95 x 0.30 = 8.55 (yalue used in 

spreadsheet calculations). For display purposes, the whole number (9) is shown on the sheet above. 

p:\n831\costs\EFRT 

9/29/00 
Sheet 3. OLD Transfer Rack Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

Totals 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Liquid 

Throughput 

per Model 

Plant 

(gal/yr) 

1,255.580 

6.761,880 

28,073,280 

1.370,340 

22.126.250 

31.186,850 

9.297,060 

12,494,430 

27,422.160 

5,840 

8,635,770 

Grand Totals 

I 

Liquid 

Molecular 

Weight 

(Ib/lb-mole) 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

78.1 

Liquid 

True 

Vapor 

Pressure 

(psia) 

3.06 

3.06 

3.06 

3.18 

3.18 

3.18 

2.84 

2.84 

2.84 

2.36 

2.36 

Liquid 

Temperature 

(deg.F) 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

60 

Uncontrolled 

Rack 

Saturation 

Factor 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

1.45 

TOC 

Emissions 

per 

Uncontrolled 

Model 

Plant (lb/yr) 

10,426 

56,146 

233,103 

11,825 

190.928 

269,112 

71,647 

96,287 

211,326 

37 

55,303 

Nationwide 

TOC 

Number ol Emissions 

Plants trom 

Without a Uncontrolled 

Control Rants 

System (tons/yr) 

117 

63 

42 

222 

32 

18 

16 

66 

15 

19 

23 

57 

14 

10 

24 

369 

609.9 

1,768.6 

4,895.2 

7,273.7 

189.2 

1,718.3 

2.152.9 

4,060.4 

537.4 

914.7 

2,430.3 

3,882.3 

0.3 

276.5 

276.8 

15,493.2 

Controlled 

Rack 

Saturation 

Factor 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

0.60 

System 

Control 

Efficiency 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

0.95 

TOC 

Emissions 

per 

Controlled 

Model 

Plant (lb/yr) 

216 

1.162 

4,823 

245 

3,950 

5.568 

1.482 

1,992 

4,372 

1 

1.144 

Number of 

Plants with 

a Control 

System 

78 

42 

28 

148 

22 

12 

11 

45 

10 

12 

15 

37 

10 

7 

17 

247 

Nationwide 

TOC 

Emissions 

from 

Controlled 

Plants 

(tons/yr) 

8.4 

24.4 

67.5 

100.3 

2.7 

23.7 

30.6 

67.0 

7.4 

12.0 

32.8 

52.2 

0.0 

4.0 

4.0 

213.5 

Nationwide 

Baseline 

TOC 

Emissions 

(tons/yr) 

618.3 

1.793.0 

4,962.7 

7,374.0 

161 9 

1.742 0 

2.183.5 

4,117.6 

544.8 

928.7 

2,463.0 

3,934.$ 

0.3 

280.5 

280.8 

15,706.7 

Overall 

Liquid HAP 

Percentage 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.85 

0.85 

Nationwide 

Baseline 

HAP 

Emissions 

(tons/yr) 

395.7 

1.147.5 

3,176.1 

4,719.4 

61,4 

557 5 

698.7 

1,317.8 

403.1 

685 7 

1.822.7 

2,911.6 

0.2 

238 4 

238.7 

9,187.1 

TOC 

Emission 

Reduction 

per 

Uncontrolled 

Model 

Plant (Ib/yr) 

9,904 

53,339 

221,448 

11,233 

181,381 

255.656 

68,065 

91,473 

200,760 

36 

52,538 

Number of 

Plants 

Installing a 

Control 

System 

65 

35 

23 

123 

18 

10 

9 

37 

8 

10 

12 

30 

6 

4 

10 

200 

Nationwide 

TOC 

Emisslon 

Reduction 

(tons/yr) 

321.9 

933,4 

2,546 7 

3,802.0 

101.1 

906.9 

1,150.5 

2,168.6 

272.3 

457.4 

1,204.6 

1,934.2 

0.1 

105.1 

105.2 

7,999.8 

Nationwide 

HAP 

Emission 

Reduction 

(tons/yr) 

206.0 

597.4 

1,629.9 

2,433.3 

32.4 

2902 

368.1 

690.7 

2015 

338.4 

891.4 

1,431.3 

0.1 

89.3 

89.4 

4,644.7 

N) 

p:\n831\impacts\racks 

9/29/00 
Sheet 4. OLD Transfer Rack Control Cost Impacts- Facility Basis and Nationwide 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Total Number of 

OLD Facilities 

w/Transfer 

Racks 

Nationwide 

195 

105 

70 

54 

30 

27 

25 

31 

38 

24 

17 

616 

Number of 

Facilities 

Controlled by 

Other MACT 

130 

70 

47 

40 

22 

20 

12 

16 

19 

18 

13 

407 

Additional 

Facilities in 

Controlled 

States 

25 

14 

9 

40 

22 

20 

5 

5 

7 

n/a 

n/a 

147 

Number of 

Facilities 

Incurring 

Control Costs 

40 

21 

14 

0 

0 

0 

8 

10 

12 

6 

4 

115 

Size of Control 

Device 

Required 

Small 

Medium 

Large 

None 

None 

None 

Small 

Medium 

Large 

Small 

Small 

Capital 

Investment 

per Facility 

($/yr) 

40,800 

49,400 

58,800 

0 

0 

0 

40,800 

49,400 

58,800 

40,800 

40,800 

Direct Costs 

per Facility 

($/yr) 

42,570 

46,585 

50,100 

0 

0 

0 

42,570 

46,585 

50,100 

42,570 

42,570 

Indirect 

Costs per 

Facility ($/yr) 

27,345 

28,915 

30,630 

0 

0 

0 

27,345 

28,915 

30,630 

27,345 

27,345 

Annual Cost 

per Facility 

($/yr) 

69,915 

75,500 

80,730 

0 

0 

0 

69,915 

75,500 

80,730 

69,915 

69,915 

Total Capital 

Investment for 

Industry ($) 

1,632,000 

1,037,400 

823,200 

0 

0 

0 

326,400 

494,000 

705,600 

244,800 

163,200 

5,426,600 

Total Annual 

Costs 

for Industry 

($/yr) 

2,796,600 

1,585,500 

1,130,220 

0 

0 

0 

559,320 

755,000 

968,760 

419,490 

279,660 

8,494,550 

/ . i Note: Costs are for controls only and do not include testing, recordkeeping, and reporting costs. 

p:\n831\costs\racks 

9/29/00 

TJ 
Sheet 5. OLD Equipment Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

-fc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

A 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

Totals 

28-2 

Totals 

28-3 

Totals 

29-1 

Totals 

29-2 

Totals 

29-3 

Totals 

42-1 

Totals 

42-2 

Totals 

B 

Component 

Type 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

C 

Number 

of 

Components 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

50 

2,000 

500 

15 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

D 

Time in 

Which 

Emissions 

Occur 

(hr/yr) 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,280 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4.380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

E 

Total 

Number 

of Model 

Plants 

195 

195 

195 

195 

195 

105 

105 

105 

105 

105 

70 

70 

70 

70 

70 

54 

54 

54 

54 

54 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

25 

25 

25 

25 

25 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

F 

Number 

of Plants 

with No 

LDAR 

Program 

128 

128 

128 

128 

128 

69 

69 

69 

69 

69 

47 

47 

47 

47 

47 

35 

35 

35 

35 

35 

20 

20 

20 

20 

20 

18 

18 

18 

18 

18 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

21 

21 

21 

21 

21 

G 

Uncontrolled 

Emission 

Factor 

(Ib/hr/comp.) 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

H 

Nationwide 

Uncontrolled 

TOC 

Emissions 

(tpy) 

246 

565 

497 

46 

1,354 

132 

304 

268 

25 

730 

451 

830 

456 

51 

1,788 

67 

154 

136 

13 

370 

38 

88 

78 

7 

212 

35 

79 

70 

7 

190 

31 

71 

62 

6 

. 169 

40 

93 

82 

8 

222 

I 

Nationwide 

Uncontrolled HAP 

Emissions (tpy) 

157 

362 

318 

30 

867 

85 

195 

172 

16 

467 

289 

531 

292 

33 

1,144 

21 

49 

44 

4 

118 

12 

28 

25 

2 

68 

11 

25 

22 

2 

61 

23 

52 

46 

4 

125 

30 

69 

60 

6 

164 

J 

Number 

of Plants 

with an 

LDAR 

Program 

67 

67 

67 

67 

67 

36 

36 

36 

36 

36 

23 

23 

23 

23 

23 

19 

19 

19 

19 

19 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

K 

Controlled 

Emission 

Factor 

(Ib/hr/comp.) 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

O.0O9420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

L 

Nationwide 

Controlled TOC 

Emissions 

(tpy) 

28 

195 

68 

0 

291 

15 

105 

37 

0 

156 

47 

267 

58 

0 

373 

8 

55 

19 

0 

82 

4 

29 

10 

0 

43 

4 

26 

9 

0 

39 

4 

26 

9 

0 

39 

4 

29 

10 

0 

43 

M 

..[Nationwide..::: 

S:::SaselineS;H 

!.iiiei.i.i. 

7myffiw7m 

mmmmm 

mmmmiim 

mmimMGe& 

mmmmm«K 

:;....B..s..Bt_644 

147 

wmmmmm 

mmmmmsos 

.BBBSBBBBB-S 

mmm?**?* 

498 

Wmmwm\ 

mmrnim&ts 

?.................i5ifi 

2.161 

88:......:88*..:75: 

mmmxmim 

BBSBBBiBSiSS: 

BBBBBBBBSBIS 

4S3 

..;B:::B...::....B.42 

117 

88 

BBBBSBBBBBBT! 

255 

38 

K:;:BB;B:::.BB:B*06-

79 

BB.....;BBBBBB;7 

229 

34 

S.................37 

SSBBBBBSB-ft 

:BBBB;:BB:B.BB6 

208 

44 

122 

92 

.....................8 

265 

N 

Overall 

Uquid 

HAP 

Percentage 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.64 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.32 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

O 

BNationyiride: 

B:; BisenniiB:: 

Iiiiiiiiiii 

B.6iSss.on'i!..i. 

mmmm 

mmmmm 

BB;:B:BB:BS.48is 

BBBBBBBJBSK? 

BBBSBBBBHSO 

SSSH*SB*052 

.;:...::..::..::.....:$4 

88888888262 

wmrnmm 

88888888816 

8:8888888567 

88888888s3i? 

;................7fl-; 

88888888330 

mmmmm 

1,383 

24 

67 

mmmmsa 

S88BB88BBB... 

145 

..................3.3 

:BBBBBB:BB.::38 

mmmmm 

B88B:B88:B88:2 

82 

......8*:.S:TM:.I2 

34 

25 

88888888882 

73 

25 

72 

wmmrnsi 

:...S.......8....:._ 

154 

33 

90 

68 

.:88:BH88BB8:6 

196 

p 

Uncontrolled 

to Controlled 

TOC Emissions 

(tpy) 

53 

372 

130 

0 

555 

28 

201 

70 

0 

299 

97 

547 

119 

0 

763 

14 

102 

36 

0 

152 

8 

58 

20 

0 

87 

7 

52 

18 

0 

78 

7 

47 

16 

0 

69 

9 

61 

21 

0 

91 

Q 

iliiiisiiill 

liiiiiS^iSioS:;:;:::;: 

Reduction (tpy) 

wmmmm 

mmrnmmSS 

:.................:36J. 

..............:88at6 

799 

104 

mmmmam 

mmmmsmm 

mmmmm& 

SSSSSSSSSMI: 

354 

8888.BB.B8.283 

mmmmmasm 

..........;88888Rt: 

1.025 

S3 

mmmmms 

BBBBBBBBBlboi 

8888888888*3 

218 

30 

BBBBBBSBBKSO 

wmmmm 

:SBSSSS.SS:8*7 

125 

27 

27 

888888888852 

88888:888888:7' 

112 

........;:...........24 

BB:BBBB8S:BB24 

mmmmm 

BftB:BBSS:BBBB6 

100 

32 

£..................82 

:B.............:S..;8> 

:;:BB:;B:B;:;:B:;B:BB8 

131 

R 

Uncontrolled to 

Controlled HAP 

Emissions (tpy) 

34 

238 

83 

0 

355 

18 

128 

45 

0 

191 

62 

350 

76 

0 

488 

5 

33 

11 

0 

49 

3 

19 

7 

0 

28 

2 

17 

6 

0 

25 

5 

34 

12 

0 

51 

6 

45 

16 

0 

67 

S 

JIJWSiE^Mioniii 

Reduction (tpy) 

mmmmma 

mmmmmta 

:BBBB:B:BB:BS:23S 

mmmwmm 

511 

66 

BBBBHiBBBBBiSS 

BBBBBBBBBBIS? 

wmmzmms 

B:BBB:BB:BBB:;276 

BBBBB;BBB;;B22B 

B:B;B:BB:SB:BB1:81: 

wmmmmm 

BBB:;BBB:BB:B33 

656 

BBBfiBBBBBBBfl^ 

•S...................J5S 

mmmmiimz 

SBBBlBBSBSBBB:* 

70 

BBBB:;;B;;BBB;;B;IO 

wmmmmo 

BBBKBBSSBBJBIS 

H;B:.........B.BSS.2 

40 

:::BBB.B:::B::BB::B::9 

SBBwHSBBBWHSS 

:BBB:BB:BBB¥BBt_. 

:BB;;BB;BBB:BBBS2 

36 

18 

mmmmmm 

mmmmmm 

......................;4 

74 

23 

mmmm®m 

45 

^..................6 

97 

p:\n831\impacts\equip2, page 1 

9/29/00 
Sheet 5. OLD Equipment Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

«\ 

1 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

A 

Model 

Plant 

42-3 

Totals 

46-1 

Totals 

46-2 

Totals 

51-1 

Totals 

51-2 

Totals 

B 

Component 

Type 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Pumps 

Connectors 

Valves 

Samp. Conn. 

Grand Totals 

c 

Number 

of 

Components 

50 

2,000 

500 

15 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

10 

500 

200 

5 

D 

Time in 

Which 

Emissions 

Occur 

(hr/yr) 

4,380 

4.380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,330 

4,330 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

4,380 

E 

Total 

Number 

of Model 

Plants 

38 

38 

38 

38 

38 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

24 

24 

24 

24 

24 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

651 

F 

Number 

of Plants 

with No 

LDAR 

Program 

25 

25 

25 

25 

25 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

6 

6 

6 

6 

6 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

12 

12 

12 

12 

12 

431 

G 

Uncontrolled 

Emission 

Factor 

(Ib/hr/comp.) 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

0.04380 

0.00403 

0.00887 

0.03300 

H 

Nationwide 

Uncontrolled 

TOC 

Emissions 

(tpy) 

240 

441 

243 

27 

951 

33 

75 

66 

6 

180 

12 

26 

23 

2 

63 

33 

75 

66 

6 

180 

23 

53 

47 

4 

127 

6,536 

I 

Nationwide 

Uncontrolled HAP 

Emissions (tpy) 

177 

327 

180 

20 

704 

2 

5 

4 

0 

11 

1 

2 

1 

0 

4 

28 

64 

56 

5 

153 

20 

45 

40 

4 

108 

3,994 

J 

Number 

of Plants 

with an 

LDAR 

Program 

13 

13 

13 

13 

13 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

7 

7 

7 

7 

7 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

220 

K 

Controlled 

Emission 

Factor 

(Ib/hr/comp.) 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

0.009420 

0.002655 

0.002320 

0.000000 

L 

Nationwide 

Controlled TOC 

Emissions 

(tpy) 

27 

151 

33 

0 

211 

4 

26 

9 

0 

39 

1 

9 

3 

0 

13 

3 

20 

7 

0 

30 

2 

15 

5 

0 

22 

1,382 

M 

:8NaUpnw_de:8 

888Biaseiir»:8B: 

lllllsillll 

:8.Birt«Sw.isi:i8 

(tpy) 267 

safiaBBBSK 

BBBSHBBBBaTfi 

BB.88*8:8:t_i6_. 

36 

mmmmzm 

jpB8HBB;B.;;875: 

B;888::888:38:6 

;:5;;88:.....B;:.__I* 

S88888KBBB13: 

mmzmmss 

mmimmm 

888888888882: 

76 

36 

88888:8888835: 

8.....88.I&.#3 

...:8:......:88$SS 

210 

25 

67 

:888888888B2 

BS88888888::i4 

149 

Pi....g3_*is 

N 

Overall 

Uquid 

HAP 

Percentage 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.74 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

0.85 

O 

BNationwideg 

8;8Bas.Sne:..:. 

lilliwilil l 

...EnSSSBBi;.; 

(tpy) 

197 

:;:8:B|8:::s834M 

mmmmx* 

:B;:B;888::B8820 

860 

88?Ss..........2 

*Ss:gS£:888;.S 

:BS...............S 

;88:|888888:!::0 

SBBBBBBBBBIS 

;:........!:.........;3: 

88888888885. 

88888888885. 

8888888888Q 

BB...............-S 

30 

wmmmm 

MJmm&z 

.:888888888s 

179 

21 

;88888888:->57: 

m^smmm 

miii^MmiiA 

126 

B:8:BB8:8iti836 

p 

Uncontrolled 

to Controlled 

TOC Emissions 

(tpy) 

52 

291 

64 

0 

406 

7 

49 

17 

0 

74 

2 

17 

6 

0 

26 

7 

49 

17 

0 

74 

5 

35 

12 

0 

52 

Q 

|.i^§oill8 

ssSmiiSSsSilil 

Reduction (tpy) 

188 

5..._............3S* 

..»...........jes 

:BS88.8........i__ 

mmmmmu 

888888888826: 

£88838888826 

:88:;8888.....:«a 

::B::B;:::;:;:B::B::BS;::6 

BBBBBBBBBiOS 

BB::;:B;::::8:B::::BB:9 

88S.H8:....:888$ 

88888888881^ 

888888888882: 

8888888888.0. 

26 

:888:88888a826 

8S8S888888SS 

8888888TM.....$ 

;.;888883;;:...ipB 

18 

8888888388:..} 

888888888834 

:3B...:88888884 

8888888S..;8« 

JpIsiSSSiBIS 

R 

Uncontrolled to 

Controlled HAP 

Emissions (tpy) 

38 

215 

47 

0 

300 

0 

3 

1 

0 

4 

0 

1 

0 

0 

2 

6 

42 

15 

0 

63 

4 

30 

10 

0 

44 

S 

iiHAlliSssiqinii; 

Reriuctl_ri<tpyj 

H..........s?88i139 

:;:88;:888;8;:;:;:;i:iii: 

:8:;888a::a::::::8t:33 

................i:...i?0 

...............S84W 

:88888888:...:.2 

:

:

:888TM:8::8::8?::.2 

:^8:S®S:SSS88:.3 

saajaaaaasaHo 

^m:Mmimii 

:g:B8:..::;88g..;:..5l: 

88:..;?.......:888^ 

is...:?.:8:i:..;8i:88Sii: 

saawaaaaaaaQ 

888:;:......:88883t 

B8888a883...!a 

;888i:8883.:88S_ 

:;:88:;8888.8;..p; 

:i8888888888*.. 

90 

saaaBasaassasis 

:::;:a::a:::a:::::::::::8:8:i5 

8888:......3.B.29 

8888:.......;8s...4 

64 

:::aaa::a::aa:2:328 

p:\n831\impacts\equip2, page 2 

9/29/00 
Sheet 6-1. Small Facility Equipment Scenario-Costs for In-House LDAR Program 

(1997 Dollars) 

fl\ 

Small Facility 

Equipment Scenario 

tn-HouM 

U-tAR Program 

Cost Summary 

Type of Component 

>ump Seats 

• Light-Squid service 

Valves 

* light-Squid service 

Connectors 

* Ranges - tight Squid 

Pressure Relief Devices 

•Disks 

'Disk holders, valves, etc. 

Open-Ended Vatves 

Sampling Connections 

Compressor Vents 

Replacement Pump Saab 

Monitoring Device • Buy 

Monitoring Device - Rent 

Data Collection System 

Administrative and Reports 

Planning and Training 

Data Entry - Initial (hr) 

Data Entry - Subsequent (hr) 

TOTALS 

Capital Costs 

Annualized Capital Costs 

Annual Expenses 

Number of 

Components 

20 

200 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

30 

SS 

60 

60 

$5,641 

$1,275 

$1B,SS0 

Annual Fixed Costs (Vyr) 

Annual Variable Costs ($/yr) 

i 

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

ot Unit Cost 

(Vcomp) 

4.10 

0.85 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

444.60 

0.00 

195.75 

7.069.00 

1,305.00 

40.20 

4020 

2.05 

0.65 

S.645 

14,489 

These annual costs do not include recovery credits. 

Initial LDAR Costs 

(Vyr) (Capital) 

1,422.64 

638.67 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2,224.00 

0.00 

669.47 

0.00 

0.00 

123.00 

5.077.77 

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs 

3,417.00 

3,417.00 

Fretpiency of 

Monitoring 

(timesfyr) 

12.00 

4.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

(S/comp) or 

Charge (K) 

4.10 

0.65 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.45 

5.45 

5.45 

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs (J/yr) 

1.196.33 

660.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

962.44 

51.00 

2.689.78 

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs (Vyr) 

3.473.28 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

121.21 

0.00 

0.00 

3.594.49 

Initial Leak 

Frequency (5.) 

17.10 

8.50 

Initial 

Number of 

leaks 

3.42 

17.00 

Monitoring Instrument Rental: 

No. of Days 

In Rental 

Period 

1 

2 

3 

6 

15 

Convert to 1997$: 

No. of 

Rental 

Periods/yr 

4 00 

1.09 

Subsequent Leak 

Frequency (%) 

8.04 

2.00 

Cost per 

Rental 

Period 

$195.75 

$206.63 

$266.44 

$440.44 

$902.63 

Annual Number 

of Leaks 

19.30 

16.00 

Rental Costs 

$783.01 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$783.01 

Percent Repaired 

Online 

100.00 

75.00 

Daily 

Calibration 

Costs 

$44.86 

$179.44 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$179.44 

Repair Time 

(hours) 

16.00 

0.17 

.abor Charge 

(Vhr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

Online Leak 

Repair Cost 

(«yr) 

7,564.03 

49.10 

7,613.13 

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

Repair 

0.00 

25.00 

Repair 

Time 

(hours) 

60.00 

4.00 

Labor 

Charge 

<S/hr> 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual Offline 

Leak Repair 

Cost (Vyr) 

0.00 

392.00 

392.00 

Annual 

Admin. Cost 

(Vyr) 

1.206.00 

1,206.00 

Annual Misc. 

Charges (J/yr) 

2,778.62 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

88.96 

0.00 

0.00 

297.24 

0.00 

3,164.82 

P:\n831\ccsts\Ldar-KC 

9/29/00 

V 
Sheet 6-2. Small Facility Equipment Scenario-Costs for Contracted LDAR Program 

(1997 Dollars) 

\J 

Small Facility 

Equipment Scenario 

Contracted 

LDAR Program 

Cost Summary 

Type of Component 

Pump Seals 

* light-liquid service 

Valves 

" Light-liquid service 

Connectors 

* Flanges - light liquid 

Pressure Relief Devices 

"Disks 

* Disk holders, valves, etc 

Open-ended Valves 

Sampling Connections 

Compressor Vents 

Replacement Pump Seals 

Monitoring Device - Buy 

Monitoring Device - Rent 

Data Collection System 

Administrative and Reports 

Planning and Training 

TOTALS 

Capital Costs 

Annualized Capital Costs 

Annual Expenses 

Number of 

Components 

20 

200 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

150 

170 

$9,058 

$1,864 

$23,570 

Annual Fixed Costs ($/yr) 

Annual Variable Costs (S/yr) 

i 

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

(Vcomp) 

5.05 

5.05 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

444.80 

0.00 

195.75 

7,069.00 

126.40 

15.769.00 

40.20 

40.20 

10,762 

14.672 

These annual costs do not include recovery credits. 

Initial LDAR Costs 

(Vyr) (Capital) 

1.441.64 

1,478.67 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2,224.00 

0.00 

669.47 

0.00 

0.00 

5,813.77 

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs 

6,834.00 

6.834.00 

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yi) 

12.00 

4.00 

O.OO 

0.00 

0.00 

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or 

Charge (%) 

2.75 

2.75 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.45 

5.45 

5.45 

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs (Vyr) 

872.33 

2.200.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

3.072.33 

Annual -

Maintenance 

Costs (S W 

3.473.28 

O.OO 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

121.21 

0.00 

0.00 

3,594.49 

Initial Leak 

Frequency 

<*> 

17.10 

8.50 

Initial 

Number 

of Leaks 

3.42 

17.00 

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency 

<*> 

8.04 

2.00 

-

Annual 

Number of 

Leaks 

19.30 

16.00 

Percent 

Repaired 

Online 

100.00 

75.00 

Repair 

Tune 

(hours) 

16.00 

0.17 

Labor 

Charge ($/hr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

($M ) 

7.564.03 

49.10 

7,613.13 

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

Repair 

0.00 

25.00 

Repair 

Time 

(hours) 

80.00 

4.00 

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

Offline Leak 

Repair Cost 

<$*r> 

0.00 

392.00 

392.00 

Annual 

Admin. Cost 

<$/yr) 

6,030.00 

6.030.00 

Annual 

Misc. 

Charges 

<*yr) 

2,778.62 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

B8.96 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2,867.58 

P:\n831\eosts\Ldar-KC 

11/15/00 

Tl 

00 
Sheet 6-3. Large Facility Equipment Scenario-Costs for In-House LDAR Program 

(1997 Dollars) 

OQ 

Large Facility 

Equipment Scenario 

In-House 

LDAR Program 

Cost Summary 

Type of Component 

Pump Seals 

* UghMlquid service 

Valves 

* UghM-quid service 

Connectors 

* Flanges • Eight Gquid 

Pressure Relief Devices 

* Disks 

* Disk holders, valves, etc. 

Open-ended Valves 

Sampling Connections 

Compressor Vents 

Replacement Pump Seals 

Monitoring Device • Buy 

Monitoring Device - Rent 

Data Collection System 

Administrative and Reports 

Planning and Training 

Data Entry • Initial (hr) 

Data Entry • Subsequent (hr) 

TOTALS 

Capital Costs 

Annualized Capital Costs 

Annual Expenses 

Number of 

Components 

100 

500 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

15 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

30 

SS 

60 

60 

$10,089 

$3,504 

$81,011 

Annual Fixed Costs (S/yr) 

Annual Variable Costs (Vyr) 

i 

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

(Vcomp) 

4.10 

0.S5 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

444.80 

0.00 

195.75 

7,069.00 

1,305.00 

40-20 

40-20 

2.05 

0.85 

19,167 

65,348 

These annual costs do not induce recovery credits. 

Initial LDAR Costs 

(Vyr) (Capital) 

7.113.20 

1,596.67 

0,00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

6,672.00 

0.00 

3.347.33 

0.00 

0.00 

123.00 

18,852.19 

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs 

3,417.00 

3,417.00 

Frequency of 

Monitoftng 

(ttmes/yr) 

12.00 

4.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

(Vcomp) or 

Charge (S) 

4.10 

0.85 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.45 

5.45 

5.45 

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs (Vyr) 

5,981.67 

1.700.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

962.44 

51.00 

8,695.11 

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs (Vyi) 

17,366.40 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

363.62 

0.00 

0.00 

17.730.02 

Initial Leak 

Frequency (%) 

17.10 

8.50 

Initial 

Number of 

Leaks 

17.10 

42.50 

Monitoring Instrument Rental: 

No. of Days 

In Rental 

Period 

1 

2 

3 

6 

15 

Convert to 1997$: 

No. of 

Rental 

Periods/yr 

4.00 

1.09 

Subsequent tjeak 

Frequency (%) 

8.04 

2.00 

Cost per 

Rental 

Period 

$195.75 

$206.63 

$266.44 

$440.44 

$902.63 

Annual Number 

of Leaks 

96.48 

40.00 

Rental Costs 

$783.01 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$783.01 

Percent Repaired 

Online 

100.00 

75.00 

Daily 

Calibration 

Costs 

$44.86 

$179.44 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$0.00 

$179.44 

Repair Time 

(hours) 

16.00 

0.17 

.aber Charge 

(Vhr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

OnUneLeak 

Repair Cost 

<*/yr> 

37,820.16 

122.75 

37,942.91 

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

0.00 

25.00 

Repas 

Time 

(hours) 

80.00 

4.00 

Labor 

Charge 

(Vhr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual Offline 

Leak Repair 

Cost (Vyr) 

0.00 

980.00 

980.00 

Annual 

Admin. Cost 

(Vyr) 

1.206.00 

1,206.00 

Annual Misc. 

Charges (S/yr) 

13,693.12 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

266.88 

0.00 

0.00 

297.24 

0.00 

14,457.24 

P:\nS31 \costs\Ldar-KC 

9/29/00 

Tl 

-5 
Sheet 6-4. Large Facility Equipment Scenario-Costs for Contracted LDAR Program 

(1997 Dollars) 

-ft 

Large Facility 

Equipment Scenario 

Contracted 

LDAR Program 

Cost Summary 

Type of Component 

Pump Seals 

* Light-liquid service 

Valves 

" Light-liquid service 

Connectors 

* Flanges - light liquid 

Pressure Relief Devices 

-Disks 

* Disk holders, valves, etc 

Open-ended Valves 

Sampling Connections 

Compressor Vents 

Replacement Pump Seals 

Monitoring Device - Buy 

Monitoring Device - Rent 

Data Collection System 

Administrative and Reports 

Planning and Training 

TOTALS 

Capital Costs 

Annualized Capital Costs 

Annual Expenses 

Number of 

Components 

100 

500 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

15 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

150 

170 

$13,506 

$4,283 

$86,705 

Annual Fixed Costs (S/yr) 

Annual Variable Costs (S/yr) 

i 

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

(Vcomp) 

5.05 

5.05 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

444.80 

0.00 

195.75 

7,069.00 

126.40 

15,769.00 

40.20 

40.20 

24,473 

66,515 

These annual costs do not include recovery credits. 

Initial LDAR Costs 

(Vyr) (Capital) 

7,208.20 

3,696.67 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

6,672.00 

0.00 

3,347.33 

0.00 

0.00 

20,924.19 

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs 

6.834.00 

6.834.00 

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yO 

12.00 

4.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

(Vcomp) or 

Charge (%) 

2.75 

2.75 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.45 

5.45 

5.45 

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs (Vyr) 

4,361.67 

5.500.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

9,861.67 

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs (Vyr) 

17,366.40 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

363.62 

0.00 

0.00 

17,730.02 

Initial Leak 

Frequency 

(%) 

17.10 

8.50 

Initial 

Number 

of Leaks 

17.10 

42.50 

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency 

<*> 

8.04 

2.00 

Annual 

Number of 

Leaks 

96.48 

40.00 

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine 

100.00 

75.00 

Repair 

Time 

(hours) 

16.00 

0.17 

Labor 

Charge (Vhr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

(Vyr) 

37,820.16 

122.75 

37,942.91 

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

Repair 

0.00 

25.00 

Repair 

Time 

(hours) 

80.00 

4.00 

Labor 

Charge 

(Vhr) 

24.50 

24.50 

Annual 

OfTLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

<$/Vr) 

0.00 

980.00 

980.00 

Annual 

Admin. Cost 

<$*r) 

6,030.00 

6.030.00 

Annual 

Misc. 

Charges 

($/yr) 

13,893.12 

0.00 

0.00 

|_ 0.00 

266.88 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

14,160.00 

P:\n83 ItoosfsU.d'ar-KC 

11/15/00 
P.21 

Sheet 7 

LDAR Nationwide Cost Summary-Average of In-House and Contracted Programs 

Model Plant 

28-1 

28-2 

28-3 

29-1 

29-2 

29-3 

42-1 

42-2 

42-3 

46-1 

46-2 

51-1 

51-2 

Totals 

Average 

Capital Cost ($) 

7,350 

7,350 

11,798 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

11,798 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

Average 

Annual Fixed 

Cost ($/yr) 

8,204 

8,204 

21,820 

8,204 

8,204 

8,204 

8,204 

8,204 

21,820 

8,204 

8,204 

8,204 

8,204 

Average 

Annual 

Variable 

Cost ($/yr) 

14,581 

14,581 

65,932 

14,581 

14,581 

14,581 

14,581 

14,581 

65,932 

14,581 

14,581 

14,581 

14,581 

Total Annual 

Cost/Model 

Plant ($/yr)a 

22,785 

22,785 

87,752 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

87,752 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

Number of 

Affected 

Facilities6 

128 

69 

47 

35 

20 

18 

16 

21 

25 

17 

6 

17 

12 

431 

Nationwide 

LDAR Capital 

Cost ($) 

940,800 

507,150 

554,506 

257,250 

147,000 

132,300 

117,600 

154,350 

294,950 

124,950 

44,100 

124,950 

88,200 

3,488,106 

Nationwide 

LDAR 

Annual Cost 

($/yr)c 

2,916,480 

1,572,165 

4,124,344 

797,475 

455,700 

410,130 

364,560 

478,485 

2,193,800 

387,345 

136,710 

387,345 

273,420 

14,497,959 

"Annual costs do not include recovery credits. 

"Based on ICR data base, 65% of existing OLD facilities do not presently have a formal (Federal, State, or local) LDAR 

program and would thus incur these costs (there are an estimated 651 total OLD facilities nationwide). 

Nationwide costs were calculated by adding the Average Annual Fixed Cost to the Average Annual Variable Cost to 

get Total Annual Cost/Model Plant, and multiplying by the number of affected facilities. 

p:\n831\costs\total-kc 

9/29/00 

2.0 
P.2_L_ 

Sheet 8 

Per-Facility and Nationwide Control Costs-OLD MACT Proposal 

(includes MRR capital and annual costs) 

Model 

Plant 

28-1 

Totals 

28-2 

Totals 

28-3 

Totals 

Totals for 

SIC 28 

29-1 

Totals 

29-2 

Totals 

29-3 

Totals 

Totals for 

SIC 29 

42-1 

Totals 

42-2 

Totals 

42-3 

Totals 

Totals for 

SIC 42 

46-1 

Totals 

46-2 

Totals 

Totals for 

SIC 46 

51-1 

Totals 

51-2 

Totals 

Totata for 

SIC 81 

GRANf 

TOTALS 

Number of 

Facilities 

Affected 

67 

85 

40 

3 

195 

36 

46 

21 

2 

10S 

23 

32 

14 

1 

70 

370 

19 

23 

12 

54 

10 

12 

8 

30 

9 

10 

8 

27 

111 

9 

4 

4 

8 

25 

10 

7 

10 

4 

31 

13 

8 

12 

5 

38 

94 

9 

11 

6 

26 

3 

3 

3 

9 

35 

7 

6 

5 

6 

24 

5 

4 

4 

4 

17 

41 

> 651 

Tank 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

(1997 $) 

0 

0 

200,252 

200,252 

0 

0 

505,132 

505,132 

0 

0 

1,458,729 

1,458,729 

0 

0 

99,345 

0 

0 

197,230 

0 

0 

280,716 

0 

0 

213,459 

213,459 

0 

0 

423,158 

423,158 

0 

0 

1,238,326 

1,238,326 

0 

0 

600,325 

0 

0 

467,987 

0 

0 

114,256 

114,256 

0 

0 

119,229 

119,229 

Tank 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

(Vyr) 

0 

0 

-6,488 

-6,488 

0 

0 

-15,467 

-15,467 

0 

0 

-45.883 

-45,883 

0 

0 

16,783 

0 

0 

36,793 

0 

0 

51,409 

0 

0 

31,331 

31,331 

0 

0 

63,940 

63,940 

0 

0 

187,642 

187,642 

0 

0 

127,615 

0 

0 

112,216 

0 

0 

26,668 

26,668 

0 

0 

20,314 

20,314 

Rack 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

(1997$) 

0 

0 

40,800 

0 

0 

0 

49,400 

0 

0 

0 

58,800 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

40,800 

0 

0 

49,400 

0 

0 

0 

58,800 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

40,800 

0 

0 

0 

40,800 

Rack 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

(Vyr) 

0 

0 

69,915 

0 

0, 

0 

75,500 

0 

0 

0 

80,730 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

69,915 

0 

0 

75,500 

0 

0 

0 

80,730 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

q 

6 

69,915 

0 

0 

0 

69,915 

LBKR 

Capital 

Cost per 

Facility 

(1997$) 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

11,798 

11,798 

11,798 

0 

7,350 

7,350. 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

11,798 

11,798 

11,798 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

0 

7,350 

7,350 

7,350 

TEAR 

Annual 

Cost per 

Facility 

(Vyr) 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

87,752 

87,752 

87,752 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

87,752 

87,752 

87,752 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

0 

22,785 

22,785 

22,785 

Total Annual Total total 

Capital Control MRR Capital Annual 

Cost per Cost per Annual Total Ann. Cost for Cost for 

Facility Facility Cost/Facil. Cost/Facil. All Facilities All Facilities 

(1997$) ($/yr) ($/yr) ($/yr) (1997$) ($/yr) 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

250,902 86,212 

210,102 16,297 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

564,382 82,818 

514,982 7,318 

2,500 0 

14,298 87,752 

1,531.827 122,599 

1,473,027 41,869 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

109,195 39,568 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

207,080 S9;578 • 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

290,566 74,194 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

223,309 54,116 

264,109 124,031 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

482,408 162,225 

433,008 86,725 

2,500 0 

14,298 87,752 

1,311,424 356,124 

1,252,624 275,394 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

610,175 150,400 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

477,837 135,001 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

124.106 49,453 

164,906 119,368 

2,500 0 

9,850 22,785 

129,079 43,099 

169,879 113,014 

16,300 

18,500 

33,900 

18,500 

15,700 

18,500 

34,000 

18,500 

15,700 

18,500 

34,000 

18,500 

15,700 

18,700 

18,700 

15,700 

18,800 

18,800 

15,700 

18,900 

18,900 

16,400 

19,400 

19,400 

23,300 

16,400 

19,400 

23,200 

19,400 

16,400 

19,300 

23,100 

19,300 

13,300 

13,800 

13,800 

13,300 

14,700 

14.700 

16,400 

19,400 

19,400 

23,300 

16,400 

19,500 

19,500 

23,400 

16,300 

41,285 

120,112 

34,797 

15,700 

41,285 

116,818 

25,818 

15,700 

106,252 

156,599 

60,369 

15,700 

41,485 

58,268 

15,700 

41,585 

78,378 

15,700 

41,685 

93,094 

16,400 

42,185 

73,516 

147,331 

16,400 

42,185 

185,425 

106,125 

16,400 

107,052 

379,224 

294,694 

13,300 

36,585 

164,200 

13,300 

37,485 

149,701 

16,400 

42,185 

68,853 

142,668 

16,400 

42,285 

62,599 

136,414 

167,500 

837,250 

10,036,080 

630,306 

11,671,138 

90,000 

453,100 

11,852,022 

1,029,964 

13,425,086 

57,500 

457,536 

21,445,578 

1,473,027 

23,433,641 

48,529,863 

47,500 

226,550 

1,310,340 

1,584,390 

25,000 

118,200 

1,656,640 

1,799,840 

22,500 

98,500 

2,324,528 

2,445,528 

5,829,768 

22.500 

39,400 

893,236 

2,112,872 

3,068,008 

25,000 

68,950 

4,824,080 

1,732,032 

6,650,062 

32,500 

114,384 

15,737,088 

6,263,120 

22,147,092 

31,865,162 

22,500 

108,350 

3,661,050 

3,791,900 

7,500 

29,550 

1,433,511 

1,470,561 

5,262,461 

17,500 

59,100 

620,530 

989,436 

1,686,566 

12,500 

39,400 

516,316 

679,516 

1,247,732 

2,934,298 

94,421,542 

1,092,100 

3,509,225 

4,804,480 

104,391 

9,610,196 

565,200 

1,899,110 

2,453,178 

51,636 

4,969,124 

361,100 

3,400,064 

2,192,386 

60,369 

6,013,919 

20,493,239 

298,300 

954,155 

699,216 

1,951,671 

157,000 

499,020 

627,024 

1,283,044 

141,300 

416,850 

744,752 

1,302,902 

4,537,617 

147,600 

168,740 

294,064 

1,178,648 

1,789,052 

164,000 

295,295 

1,854,250 

424,500 

2,738,045 

213,200 

856,416 

4,550,688 

1,473,470 

7,093.774 

11,620,871 

119,700 

402,435 

985,200 

1,507,335 

39,900 

112,455 

449,103 

601,458 

2,108,793 

114,800 

253,110 

344,265 

856,008 

1,568,183 

82,000 

169,140 

250,396 

545,656 

1,047,192 

2,615,375 

41,375,895 

p:\n831\costs\Ad--rnrr1 

9/29/00 2 . / 
P.23 

. 1 ' . -

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 8 

Attachment 2 

Sample 

Calculations 

2Z 
P.24 

» . ' ». 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 9 

CALCULATIONS 

The section numbers and titles that follow (in bold type) correspond to the sections 

occurring earlier in the memo. The sample calculations below are provided in addition to those 

given in Memo No. 6 ofthe TSD. 

3. Transfer Rack Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

Baseline TOC is calculated from the expression: 

LL = (12.46)[(M)(P)(S)/(T)] W l ,000 gall 

where M = 78.1 g/g-mol 

T = 60 + 460 = 520 deg R 

S = 1.45 for uncontrolled, 0.60 for controlled loadings 

P = 3.06 for SIC 28, 3.18 for SIC 29,2.84 for SIC 42, 3.52 for SIC 46, 

2.36 for SIC 51 

For Mode! Plant 28-1: 

TOC baseline = 

1.255.580 aal/yr x (12.46X78.1M3.06_ [(1.45)(117)+(0.60)(78)(0.05)] 

(520)(1,000)(2,000) 

= 618.3 tons/yr. 

Emission reduction occurs at currently uncontrolled plants that install a control device. 

TOC reduction = 

1.255.580 gal/yr x (12.46)(78.1 V3.06V1.45) [1 - 0.05] x 65 plants 

(520)(1,000)(2,000) 

= 321.9 tons/yr. 

HAP reduction = 321.9 x0.64 = 206.0 tons/yr. 

5. Equipment Baseline Emissions and Emission Reductions 

These are similar to transfer racks, since there is an uncontrolled and controlled segment 

2.3 
P.25 

* r 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 10 

of baseline emissions (128 uncontrolled, 67 controlled plants). 

Again, for Model Plant 28-1: 

TOC baseline = 

4.380 x (128 [(0.0438)(20) + (0.00403)(500) + (0.00887)(200) + 

2,000 (0.033)(5)] + 67 [(0.00942)(20) + (0.002655)(500) + 

(0.00232)(200) + (0)(5)]J 

= 1,354 tpy (uncontrolled) + 291 tpy (controlled) 

= 1,644 tons/yr. 

HAP baseline = 1,644 tpy x 0.64 = 1,052 tons/yr. 

Emission reduction occurs at the 128 plants with no current LDAR program. Emissions at 

those plants after an LDAR program is implemented will be: 

E = 4,380 x 128 [(0.00942)(20) + (0.002655)(500) + (0.00232)(200)] 

= 555 tons/yr. 

Thus, TOC reduction = 1,354 tpy - 555 tpy = 799 tons/yr. 

HAP reduction = 799 tpy x 0.64 = 511 tons/yr. 

6. LDAR Costs for In-House and Contracted Programs 

The following equations are used in the LDAR cost algorithms to calculate the five 

capital and annual cost values at the bottom of Sheets 6-1,6-2, 6-3, and 6-4: 

A. Capital Costs = Initial LDAR Costs (samp, conn.) + Initial LDAR Admin. Costs 

B. Annualized Capital Costs = [Initial LDAR Costs (pump seals, valves, samp. conn, 

data entry-initial) x CRF1] + [Replacement Pum Seals x CRF2] 

where CRF1 = capital recovery factor = 0.142, in which interest rate (i) = 7%, 

economic life (n) = 10 years. 

For CRF2 (0.244), i = 7%, n = 5 years. The equation for CRF is: 
P.26 

_ * ' t 

Memo to Docket A-98-13 

October 3,2000 

Page 11 

CRF = i (1 + i.n 

(1 + i)n -1 

C. Annual Expenses = Annual Totals for Monitoring Costs, Maintenance Costs, 

Online/Offline Repair Costs, Admin. Costs, & Misc. Charges 

D. Annual Fixed Costs = Annualized Capital Costs + Annual Totals for Admin. Cost 

& Misc. Charges 

E. Annual Variable Costs = Annual Expenses - Annual Totals for Admin. Cost & 

Misc. Charges 

as-