alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHARLES HEWETT,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C06-918 TSZ

JO ANNE B BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

) REASSIGNING and REFERRING CASE

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C06-918 TSZ and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the

document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:06-cv-00918-TSZ Document 7 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 20th day of September, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:06-cv-00918-TSZ Document 7 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Ch8s. A. Touch 

Reoords Bulldiag 

Dallas, 2, Teua 

Dear Sir: 

tiona whlc@, lrnture 

the cuqrent year? 

rqad district highway ftind untl.1 

the requiremeats of the Sate Board with respect 

to refunding absll be oomplled with. 

“But it ia aleo provided by Subsection (g) of 

srid Article: 

“‘In this ooanection it ia declrred to be the 

intent of the Leglsleture ~that all contractual 
Honorable Chfbs. A. Tosch, psge 2 

duties arid obll 

ad7 

tloas which lpsy exlst between 

_ Any county a or defined road dlstriat and the 

owner or holder of the prese t 

ml7 

outstanding indebtedness of any county a or deiln ed road 

district, shsll not be in any smsner disturbed 

or impsired and &ill remsin lnvlolate.~ 

"ti! do not question,the powerand ruthorltp 

of thi State Bomd to require ths refund 

eligible 'obli#tious rturlng, 

we do,qqeatioro the authority of the Btite Board 

to de- tbit the county attempt to redeem by 

refuadlgg bonds PIILturing In future. years. 

"As you know, the redemption statute (Article 720) provides thSt such bonds,msy bs redeqst- 

&ble )rt the pleasure of the county' 8nd that 

such r,edemjMon %sy be fixed by the Cosm~W~ionersl Coq+.t* 

Ye thl& it is o,&& d8t the Beard OS 6ouMy and 

plstriat Rord,Indebtedness &s the ruthotiitip to require councomplied tiith. 

$h lgwth Court ia ‘both the Goabrra. Co&y case 

and the B&r COpaty *se laba eorstru~d &tia3n 7?9in such 

a msnaer &a to &b cl&r th*t beads Wy be op!lorUl under 

the &s regkrdlesk of the iact that the CWUUi.SSi~ik~l’S’ COUrt 

IgaoFed the slbtute iud attempted to i88uO then to *ture 

seri*lly lrad without optioq of prier redemption. Zhe Attorney &ge&l's D@srtmtmt has held otherwise for the last 
Honorable Oh%. A. Bosch, page 3 

taenty-five yetbra, but alme the 8. eple 

'Y 

Court has spoken in 

such-usmlstakrble UngrBrge, we ah&L *ccept its Opinion and 

follow it. 

Pou are therefore advised that in our opinion the 

State Bdrd of Oounty and ~lst+iat aoad I&debtedsess0m3 the 

authority to requlTe,+oo~t~es~ to re?m$ Uy bondswhlchrre 

optionU either ay re%gon of.,h0+?g reserved suoh .option In 

thtrprOceeding8 rutboriciag t,hqlr iss1P~ce, or by reMion of the 

pr0~i81~8 of Article 720, &a sonh Article has been coimtrued 

by the Supreme Cotirt. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORXtY (kRRRjU OF TEXAS
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the annual report of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the
undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to her knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 18, 2009




By:
            /s/ 
      Shannon YanName:
            Shannon
      YanTitle:
            Interim
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
  Officer)
III

★(Star Print)

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 76

Proclaiming a nationwide moment of remembrance, to be observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, in order to appropriately honor American

patriots lost in the pursuit of peace and liberty around the world.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1997

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KERRY, Ms.

MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

KEMPTHORNE, Mr. GLENN, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. DODD, Mr. BINGAMAN,

Mr. COLLINS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. BURNS,

Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. KERREY, Mr. ROTH, Mr. LOTT, Mr. SPECTER, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER,

Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. ROBB, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. MACK,

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 23, 1997

Committee Discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Proclaiming a nationwide moment of remembrance, to be

observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, in order to

appropriately honor American patriots lost in the pursuit

of peace and liberty around the world.

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace

has always been a valued objective of this great country;
2

SRES 76 ATS1S

Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in service as peacemakers and

peacekeepers;

Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate the

appreciation and gratitude these loyal Americans deserve

and to commemorate the ultimate sacrifice they made;

Whereas Memorial Day is the day of the year for the Nation

to appropriately remember American heroes by inviting

the citizens of this Nation to respectfully honor them at

a designated time; and

Whereas the playing of ‘‘Taps’’ symbolizes the solemn and

patriotic recognition of those Americans who died in service to our Country: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate requests that—

(1) a nationwide moment of remembrance be observed on Memorial Day, May 26, 1997, by the simultaneous pausing of all citizens to acknowledge the playing

of ‘‘Taps’’ at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) in

honor of the Americans that gave their lives in the pursuit of freedom and peace; and

(2) the President issue a proclamation calling upon

the departments and agencies of the United States and

interested organizations, groups, and individuals to participate in and promote this nationwide tribute to the

dedicated American men and women who died in the

pursuit of freedom and peace.

Æ
U

.S

. Department of T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration


## JUN 2 9 2015

Mr. Tim Hendrix Manager, Certification & Airworthiness The Boeing Company 2401 E. Wardlow Road Long Beach, CA 90807-5309
Dear Mr. Hendrix: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S

.W

. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received your letter no. CP-L4L-15-00 191 , dated May 21, 2015 , petitioning for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations ( 14 CFR) 25

.901 (c) at Amendment 25-126 , and 25

.981 (a)(3) at Amendment 25-125. The exemption, if granted , would allow planned changes for the 757-200 (freighters only) and 757-200PF center-wing-tank Fuel Quantity Indication System (FQIS) fuselage wiring installation. Your petition , which you submitted to the Department ofTransportation ' s Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at regulations.gov , is in docket no. FAA-2015-2021. We are in the process ofreviewing your request, and will contact you ifwe need additional information. If you have questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process , please contact Mike Dostert at 425-227-2132 , or e-mail mike

.dostert @ faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.229 Proprietors Equity in Noncorporate Business  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineHouseholds and nonprofit organizations; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FL152090205
	10103.0
	10834.2
	11249.3
	10671.7
	10834.2
	10884.4
	11009.6
	11156.5
	11249.3
	1Nonfinancial noncorporate business; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business (net worth)
	FL112090205
	10085.1
	10819.6
	11234.5
	10654.3
	10819.6
	10873.2
	10999.2
	11142.8
	11234.5
	2Security brokers and dealers; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FL662090205
	17.9
	14.7
	14.8
	17.5
	14.7
	11.2
	10.3
	13.8
	14.8
	3 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
Before the Second Division,

December 22, 1948

No. 52767.

#### Rolex Watch Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 137866-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEIDI G LATIMER,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-233RSL

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

RELEASE 

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of release.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, DAVID JENNINGS.

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, JUANITA HOLMES.

The U.S. Pretrial Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of 

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge JAMES P DONOHUE.

Date of hearing: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2006

Time of hearing: 9:00 A.M.

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X ) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person

 or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered by

 the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

September 1, 2006.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold ______________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00233-RSM Document 27 Filed 09/01/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECNOL
MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. 10Q FILING FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 1996 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THIS DOCUMENT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,107,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,664,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,270,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,163,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,881,752
<PP&E>                                      72,092,053
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,116,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,327,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,371,593
<BONDS>                                     10,032,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,117
<OTHER-SE>                                 121,935,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,327,053
<SALES>                                    107,552,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           107,552,956
<CGS>                                       62,269,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               62,269,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,413,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             753,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,860,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,629,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,230,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,230,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE ARE NOT MATERIALLY DIFFERENT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
• 1
. . . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD 

### UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptivePractices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

### Unfair andDeceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled onthe outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed bythe Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: April30, 2015
Respectfully submitted,

# /~~/}fr/~ Blane Workie Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this Thirtieth day ofApril, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served inthe following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle Boca Raton, Florida 33433

I
Before the Third Division,

December 27, 1946

No. 51488.

#### Protests 114442-K, etc., of W. F. Mackay (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
| date    | Assets | Liabilities |
|---------|--------|-------------|
| 2000:Q1 | 51.48  | 6.98        |
| 2000:Q2 | 51.41  | 7.13        |
| 2000:Q3 | 52.35  | 7.31        |
| 2000:Q4 | 52.02  | 7.46        |
| 2001:Q1 | 51.98  | 7.5         |
| 2001:Q2 | 53.39  | 7.7         |
| 2001:Q3 | 52.6   | 7.96        |
| 2001:Q4 | 54.28  | 8.08        |
| 2002:Q1 | 55.04  | 8.22        |
| 2002:Q2 | 54.62  | 8.41        |
| 2002:Q3 | 53.74  | 8.63        |
| 2002:Q4 | 54.96  | 8.88        |
| 2003:Q1 | 55.44  | 9.07        |
| 2003:Q2 | 57.73  | 9.46        |
| 2003:Q3 | 58.9   | 9.72        |
| 2003:Q4 | 61.11  | 9.98        |
| 2004:Q1 | 63.81  | 10.18       |
| 2004:Q2 | 64.91  | 10.5        |
| 2004:Q3 | 66.49  | 10.78       |
| 2004:Q4 | 69.18  | 11.15       |
| 2005:Q1 | 70.21  | 11.37       |
| 2005:Q2 | 72.09  | 11.7        |
| 2005:Q3 | 74.08  | 12.05       |
| 2005:Q4 | 75.95  | 12.34       |
| 2006:Q1 | 78.16  | 12.7        |
| 2006:Q2 | 78.7   | 13.05       |
| 2006:Q3 | 80.24  | 13.39       |
| 2006:Q4 | 82     | 13.66       |
| 2007:Q1 | 83.25  | 13.84       |
| 2007:Q2 | 84.1   | 14.15       |
| 2007:Q3 | 85.18  | 14.4        |
| 2007:Q4 | 84.76  | 14.61       |
| 2008:Q1 | 82.92  | 14.74       |
| 2008:Q2 | 81.38  | 14.67       |
| 2008:Q3 | 79.28  | 14.81       |
| 2008:Q4 | 75.79  | 14.51       |
| 2009:Q1 | 74     | 14.41       |
| 2009:Q2 | 74.41  | 14.38       |
| 2009:Q3 | 75.88  | 14.39       |
| 2009:Q4 | 76.17  | 14.38       |
| 2010:Q1 | 77.2   | 14.28       |
| 2010:Q2 | 76.68  | 14.21       |
| 2010:Q3 | 78.65  | 14.15       |
| 2010:Q4 | 80.25  | 14.16       |
| 2011:Q1 | 81.3   | 14.14       |
| 2011:Q2 | 81.65  | 14.1        |
| 2011:Q3 | 79.85  | 14.05       |
| 2011:Q4 | 81.11  | 14.05       |
| 2012:Q1 | 83.08  | 14.01       |
| 2012:Q2 | 83.02  | 13.96       |
| 2012:Q3 | 84.94  | 14          |
| 2012:Q4 | 85.97  | 13.99       |
| 2013:Q1 | 88.76  | 13.95       |
| 2013:Q2 | 89.96  | 13.96       |
| 2013:Q3 | 92.55  | 14.04       |
| 2013:Q4 | 94.79  | 14.22       |
| 2014:Q1 | 96.53  | 14.2        |
| 2014:Q2 | 98.51  | 14.3        |
| 2014:Q3 | 99.16  | 14.3        |
| 2014:Q4 | 100.92 | 14.37       |
| 2015:Q1 | 102.76 | 14.33       |
| 2015:Q2 | 103.54 | 14.47       |
| 2015:Q3 | 102.66 | 14.54       |
| 2015:Q4 | 104.21 | 14.56       |
| 2016:Q1 | 105.38 | 14.56       |
| 2016:Q2 | 106.88 | 14.69       |
| 2016:Q3 | 108.84 | 14.88       |
| 2016:Q4 | 109.61 | 14.98       |
| 2017:Q1 | 112.04 | 15.03       |
| 2017:Q2 | 113.94 | 15.18       |
| 2017:Q3 | 115.98 | 15.33       |
| 2017:Q4 | 118.89 | 15.53       |
| 2018:Q1 | 120.02 | 15.58       |
| 2018:Q2 | 121.61 | 15.71       |
| 2018:Q3 | 123.65 | 15.88       |
| 2018:Q4 | 120.03 | 16          |
| 2019:Q1 | 125.92 | 15.99       |
| 2019:Q2 | 128.38 | 16.17       |
| 2019:Q3 | 129.32 | 16.34       |
| 2019:Q4 | 133.2  | 16.5        |
| 2020:Q1 | 127.27 | 16.56       |
| 2020:Q2 | 135.3  | 16.57       |
| 2020:Q3 | 139.91 | 16.83       |
| 2020:Q4 | 148.83 | 17.12       |
| 2021:Q1 | 153.89 | 17.32       |
| 2021:Q2 | 159.75 | 17.66       |
| 2021:Q3 | 162.93 | 17.97       |
| 2021:Q4 | 168.18 | 18.35       |
| 2022:Q1 | 167.92 | 18.64       |
Cite as 2015 Ark. 53

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-14-615

EUGENE WESLEY

APPELLANT

V.

MARY ANN WILKINSON AND DIANE

HART, LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT

CLERK’S OFFICE

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered February 19, 2015

PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LEE

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 39CV-13-20]

HONORABLE L.T. SIMES, JUDGE

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM

On February 11, 2013, appellant Eugene Wesley filed a civil rights complaint against the

Lee County Circuit Court clerk and a deputy clerk, seeking declaratory judgment and money

damages. He subsequently filed a motion for the defendants to produce certain documents and

a motion for default judgment.

On March 25, 2014, the circuit court dismissed the complaint without prejudice on the

ground that no summons had been issued or served in the matter as required by Arkansas Rule

of Civil Procedure 4(i) (2014). The motions were declared moot. Appellant brings this appeal

from the order.

Rule 4(i) provides that, if service of the summons and a copy of the complaint is not

made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint or within the period of

time allowed by an extension, the action shall be dismissed without prejudice. This court has

held that statutory service requirements, being in derogation of common-law rights, must be

strictly construed and that compliance with them must be exact. Trusclair v. McGowan Working
Cite as 2015 Ark. 53

Partners, 2009 Ark. 203, at 3, 306 S.W.3d 428, 430 (citing Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick,

GMC Co., 353 Ark. 701, 120 S.W.3d 525 (2003)). 

Appellant argues that he served a copy of the complaint on the defendants, but the

record in this appeal does not reflect that summonses were ever issued or served in this matter. 

Accordingly, based on the record before us, we cannot say that the circuit court erred in

dismissing the complaint without prejudice.

Affirmed.

Eugene Wesley, pro se appellant.

No response.

2
Before the Second Division,

October 3, 1961

No. 66113.

#### Raleigh Industries of America, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/16363-S, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.