alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      741
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,572
<PP&E>                                             747
<DEPRECIATION>                                     477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,572
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,943<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<FN>
<F1>On October 30, 1996, the Company signed a letter of intent to sell
substantially all of the assets related to its waste management services
activities.  On November 1, 1996, the Company signed a letter of intent
to sell substantially all of the assets related to its oilfield services
business.  The Company's two business segments have been accounted for as
discontinued operations, and accordingly, their operations have been
segregated in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Search:   
-  Home 
-  Historical Documents     - Foreign Relations     of the United States 
  - About     the Foreign Relations Series 
  - Status     of the Series 
  - Foreign     Relations Volume Title Search 
-  Department History     - A     Short History of the Department 
  - Biographies     of the Secretaries of State 
  - Principal     Officers and Chiefs of Mission 
  - Principals     and Chiefs Alphabetical Listing 
  - Travels     of the Secretary of State 
  - Travels     of the President 
  - Visits by     Foreign Heads of State 
  - Buildings     of the Department of State 
-  Key Milestones     - The Founding     Era 
  - Diplomacy and     Revolution 
  - The Early     Republic 
  - Securing the     Republic 
  - The Antebellum     Period 
  - The Civil     War 
  - The Age of     Imperialism 
  - Into the     Twentieth Century 
  - The First World     War 
  - The Interwar     Period 
  - World War II 
  - The Cold War 
  - Bi-Polar Foreign     Policy 
  - Entangling     Alliances 
  - Détente 
  - Quest for     Peace 
  - Cold War     Denouement  
  - Toward the     Twenty-First Century 
-  Guide to Countries     - Guide to Country     Recognition and Relations 
  - World Wide     Diplomatic Archives Index 
-  More Resources     - About Us 
  - Conferences 
  - Educational Resources 
  - Open Government Initiative 
- Home  >   
- Historical   Documents 
- >  Advanced FRUS Title Search 
TitleKeywords:  Year PublishedStart - End  Years CoveredStart - End  Providers-  history.state.gov   
-  UW-Madison   
-  WorldCat 
Media-  Print   
-  Microfiche   
-  E-Pub 
Submit Clear  TitleHome | About Us | Contact Info | Privacy Notice | Copyright Information | Advanced Search
Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41529

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO EDUARDO AGUILAR-VASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-442-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Eduardo Aguilar-Vasquez (Aguilar) appeals his

guilty-plea conviction and sentence for attempted illegal reentry

of a deported alien. Aguilar argues that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and

(b)(2) are unconstitutional.

Aguilar’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Aguilar contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly
No. 05-41529

-2-

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Aguilar properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

BAXTER AIR, INC.,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

NOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.,

 Defendant.

 C05-2219 MJP

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C05-2219 MJP and

bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 3rd day of January, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-02119-MJP Document 5 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
C0NSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,513
<PP&E>                                         354,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,411
<BONDS>                                        121,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           930
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,208
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,449
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   471
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,554
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Defendant.

________________________________________

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Counterclaim Plaintiff,

v.

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation, and VERITAS

SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

 Counterclaim Defendants.

 CASE NO. C06-0703-JCC

ORDER

 

 

 

This matter comes before the Court for review of the Special Master’s Report and

Recommendation on Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent

No. 5,469,573 Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 (Dkt. No. 395). The Court has reviewed de novo the

Special Master’s Report and Recommendation (“‘573 Invalidity R&R”), the parties’ respective objections

Case 2:06-cv-00703-JCC Document 414 Filed 02/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

and responses thereto (Dkt. Nos. 402, 412), the briefing and exhibits presented to the Special Master in

the first instance, and all other relevant documents in the case file. The Court has determined that oral

argument is not necessary. 

The Court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS the Special Master’s ‘573 Invalidity R&R in its

entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Microsoft’s Motion for Summary Judgment of

Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,496,573 Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 (Dkt. No. 205).

SO ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2008.AJohn C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00703-JCC Document 414 Filed 02/20/08 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 232 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 232

 Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the safety and well-being 
     of United States citizens injured while travelling in Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 1999

Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Packard, and Mr. Cunningham) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the safety and well-being 
     of United States citizens injured while travelling in Mexico.

Whereas hundreds of United States citizens travel by automobile to Mexico every 
        day;
Whereas United States automobile insurance in not valid in Mexico and travellers 
        may purchase additional insurance to cover potential liability or injury 
        while in Mexico;
Whereas in cases where additional insurance is not purchased and a United States 
        citizen is involved in an automobile accident, the American will be 
        subject to a bond requirement before being permitted to return to the 
        United States; and
Whereas in a recent incident, a United States citizen injured in an automobile 
        accident in Mexico was not transferred to a United States hospital for 
        18 hours, even after medical personnel in Mexico recommended his 
        immediate transfer to the United States for emergency treatment, until 
        the family posted the bond set by Mexican authorities: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that, in order to protect the safety 
and well-being of United States citizens travelling in Mexico, the 
President should begin negotiations with the Government of Mexico to 
establish a humanitarian exemption to Mexican bond requirements, in 
order to ensure that United States citizens injured in Mexico can be 
immediately transferred to United States facilities for adequate 
medical treatment, if necessary.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CHIEF    FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**     I, Dennis K. Knapp, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on    Form 10-K    of Avanade Inc. for the period ended August 31, 2007, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date    hereof;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the period presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. November 20, 2007     /s/  Dennis    K. Knapp Dennis K. Knapp    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial and    Accounting Officer)
CA 21-14

October 25, 2021

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

SUBJECT: Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation Z

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve with total consolidated assets of $10

billion or less.

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently developed the attached interagency examination 

procedures for Regulation Z – Truth in Lending (TILA). These revised examination 

procedures supersede the examination procedures transmitted with CA Letter 21-3.

The attached procedures reflect amendments to Regulation Z published by the Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau in 2020 and 2021: (1) implementing permanent changes to 

Regulation Z’s qualified mortgage provisions, and (2) implementing an extension and 

phase-out for the GSE Patch, which had originally carried a January 10, 2021 sunset date 

under the Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage rule and which will now sunset on 

October 1, 2022.

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to the supervised institutions in their 

districts and to appropriate supervisory staff. Questions regarding this letter may be sent 

via the Board’s public website.

1

1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx. 
2

Sincerely, 

Eric S. Belsky

Director

Attachment:

• Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation Z

Supersedes:

• CA Letter 21-3, “Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation Z”

(March 4, 2021)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-38-2023]

On June 8, 2023, Puerto Rico Steel Products Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 163L, in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 38811, June 14, 2023). On October 6, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: October 6, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22572 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Claridge Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth Edmundson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Kenneth Edmundson By: Kenneth Edmundson Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: March 28, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CBRE REALTY FINANCE, INC.



|                                                   |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Holdings, LLC                  |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance TRS, Inc.                      |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance TRS, LLC                       |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Holdings II, LLC               |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Holdings III, LLC              |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Holdings IV, LLC               |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Holdings CDO Funding, LLC      |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance TRS Warehouse Funding, LLC     |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance TRS Warehouse Funding II, LLC  |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance TRS Warehouse Funding III, LLC |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance CDO 2006-1, Ltd.               |  | Cayman Islands                            
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance CDO 2006-1, LLC                |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance CDO 2006-1 Depositor, LLC      |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                   | 
|CBRE Realty Finance Trust I                        |  | Delaware