alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 18

To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of the national

debt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. FAIRCLOTH submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly

pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the

Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of

the national debt.

Whereas the United States national debt is approximately

$4.9 trillion;

Whereas the Congress has authorized the national debt by

law to reach $5.5 trillion;

Whereas the 104th Congress and the President have both

presented plans to balance the budget by the year 2002,

by which time our national debt will be approximately

$6.5 trillion; and

Whereas this accumulated debt represents a significant financial burden that will require excessive taxation and lost
2

SRES 18 IS

economic opportunity for future generations of the

United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any

2 comprehensive legislation that balances the budget by a

3 certain date and that is agreed to by the Congress and

4 the President shall also contain a strategy for reducing

5 the national debt of the United States.

Æ
No. 61641.

#### Bunge Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 303945-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection and following *The Best Foods, Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1791), the motion was granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,107,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          32,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,297,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        736,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     327,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,297,587
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  628,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        

</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0861 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-092-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109A and A109AII Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 63 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive for the specified Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) helicopters 

with a certain tail rotor special hub plug installed. This action requires a one-time inspection and depending on the 

inspection results, replacing certain parts or disassembling the tail rotor hub and blades assembly and inspecting for 

damage. 

Costs:

Action Number of 

Work Hours X 

Labor Rate

Labor 

Cost

Parts Cost Cost per 

Aircraft

Affected 

fleet size

Fleet Cost 

Determine the 

tightening torque value 

of the hub plug (onetime inspection)

0.25 hrs X 

labor rate of 

$85

$21 0 $21 63 $1,323

Replace lock washer 

and O-ring 

2.0 hrs X labor 

rate of $85

$170 $287 $457 56

(assume 

89% of 

fleet)

$25,592

Replace hub plug 2.0 hrs X labor 

rate of $85

$170 $850 $1020 1 (assume 

1% of the 

fleet

$1020

Replace Trunnion, 

Hub Plug, Spacers, 

Static Stop

5.0 hrs. X 

labor rate of 

$85

$425 $8,884 $9,309 7 (assume 

10% of 

fleet)

$65,163

Total cost impact for 

this AD

$93,098

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1

                          ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT LETTER

The Board of Directors
Prologic Management Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 to register 500,000 shares under the 1994 stock option plan of Prologic
Management Systems, Inc. of our report dated June 3, 1996, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Prologic Management Systems, Inc. and subsidiary
as of March 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended March 31, 1996, which report appears in the March 31,
1996, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prologic Management Systems, Inc.

                                              /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 13, 1997
- https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/f-backgroundbulletin/  https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/f_backgroundbulletin.pdf
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 279 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 279

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2000

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 200th birthday 
                celebration of the Library of Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF EVENT TO CELEBRATE THE 200TH BIRTHDAY OF 
              THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS.

    The Library of Congress (in this resolution referred to as the 
``sponsor'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 200th 
birthday celebration of the Library of Congress (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds on April 24, 
2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event shall be free of admission charge to the 
public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under 
conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may erect upon the Capitol 
Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related 
structures and equipment as may be required for the event.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event, except that no 
arrangements may be made to limit access to any public road on the 
Capitol Grounds.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00226

- CR

C AMILLE M ASON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 1555502 )

December 10 , 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Dauphin ot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in t h e trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





In
connection with the Annual Report of Quality Alliance Group, Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),
Adam Wimmer, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial
officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my
knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.





Date:
      October 19, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Adam WimmerAdam
      WimmerPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Financial Officer)





*  This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
# Official Journal L 16/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.016.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 16 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5420 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.016.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 16

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5420 January 2011

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008) | 1 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008)

(OJ L 353, 31.12.2008)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NEXT >>>

http://www.nps.gov/crla/lodgepole/lodgepole.htmDate: 29-May-2001

CRATER LAKEReport: Lodgepole Pine—History and Management

Lodgepole Pine at Crater Lake: Historyand Management of the Forest

Structure*by Donald B. Zobel and Robert S. Zeigler**

Department of Botany and Plant PathologyOregon State UniversityCorvallis, Oregon 97331

*Final Report, Contract CX-9000-6-0064, Pacific Northwest Region, NationalPark Service.

**Present Address: Dept. of Plant Pathlogy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853.

CONTENTS

 Introduction Important Characteristics Of Lodgepole Pine Characteristics Of Lodgepole Pine Forests Parasitic Plants Affecting Forest Structure Primary Causes Of Death Of Lodgepole Pine Types Of Forest History And Dynamics Plant Communities In Lodgepole Pine Forest Suggestions For Management Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E(1) Appendix E(2) Appendix F Appendix G

Page 1 of 1Crater Lake NP: Lodgepole Pine: History and Management

11/29/2011http://web.archive.org/web/20100301180705/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/lodgepole/lodgepole.htm
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID L. LAIL (DECEASED),

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5317 FDB

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES

PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B)

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for authorization of attorney fees

under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Counsel for Plaintiff seeks a gross fee award of $8,157.45. The

Commissioner has filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion indicating Defendant has no objection to

the fee request.

Attorney's fees may be awarded to a successful social security claimant's lawyer for his or

her representation before a court pursuant 42 U.S.C. §§ 406(b); Straw v. Bowen, 866 F.2d 1167 (9th

Cir. 1989). Plaintiff must apply to the Social Security Administration for an award of fees for

representation at the administrative level. 42 U.S.C. § 406(a); Stenswick v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 519

(9th Cir. 1987). Previously, this Court awarded Plaintiff’s counsel $3,814.20 pursuant to the Equal
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Plaintiff's counsel now petitions for a gross fee of $8,157.45.

Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) the court can only award fees up to the 25 percent withheld

from the past-due benefits. This 25 percent limit applies to the total of EAJA and § 406(b) fees

combined. See, Morris v. Social Sec. Admin., 689 F.2d 495, 497-98 (4th Cir. 1982); Webb v.

Richardson, 472 F.2d 529, 536 (6th Cir. 1972); Dawson v. Finch, 425 F.2d 1192, 1195 (5th Cir.

1970).

Plaintiff was awarded $38,573.00 in past due benefits. Twenty-five percent of past due

benefits is $9,643.25. The Court concludes that the attorney's fees sought by counsel are reasonable

within the meaning of § 406(b). Plaintiff’s counsel is entitled to a gross attorney fee of $8,157.45. 

Subtracting the $3,814.20 previously awarded EAJA fees, counsel is entitled to a net award of

$4,343.25. 

ACCORDINGLY;

IT IS ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees [Dkt #33] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s

counsel is awarded 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) gross attorney fees in the sum of $8,157.45. The

Commissioner is directed to subtract the $3,814.20 previously awarded EAJA fees and send to

Plaintiff’s counsel an award of $4,343.25., minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by

statute.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2009.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Financial Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 15, 2011

By:  /s/ Louis J. Brothers

Louis J. Brothers

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and 

        Chairman of the Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The information contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE:  June 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive Officer By:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Denying Motion to Suppress

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

GERALD A. BRENNER,

Defendant.

Case No. 06-5412 KLS

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

SUPPRESS

This matter having come before the court on the “Defendant’s Memorandum, In Support of Motion

for Order Suppressing Evidence.” Dkt. #5. The plaintiff filed its response (Dkt. #6) and the defendant has

now filed his reply (Dkt. #7). The court notes that no request for oral argument or for an evidentiary

hearing has been made by either party. 

The court further notes that no evidence has been presented to the court either in support of the

motion or in opposition to the motion. While the plaintiff references an attachment, there was no

attachment to his memorandum. The parties have chosen, instead, to rely on counsels’ summary of the

facts. It appears to this Court that the knowledge, training and understanding of the investigating officer is

crucial to the court’s determination of this motion and that such determination cannot be made on the

limited record now before the court. Therefore, this court is denying the motion to suppress, without

Case 3:06-cr-05412-JPD Document 7 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Denying Motion to Suppress

Page - 2

 prejudice, so as to allow the defendant to raise the matter at the time of trial, now scheduled for

September 5, 2006. 

DATED this 18th day of August, 2005.

 /s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L. Strombom

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cr-05412-JPD Document 7 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 2
- 1 

Cause No. CV06-5356 RJB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

KEATING, BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK, INC., P.S. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

800 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4141 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-3175 

PHONE: (206) 623-8861 

FAX: (206) 223-9423 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

HENRY NARTE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, and 

JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5, 

 Defendants. 

No. CV 06-5356 RJB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto 

that the above-entitled matter has been fully settled and compromised and may be 

dismissed with prejudice and without assessment of costs or attorney’s fees to any party. 

Dated: 8/15/06______________________ s/ 

Kevin Keefe, WSBA # 11437 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: 8/16/06_____________________ s/ 

Shannon M. Ragonesi, WSBA # 31951 

Of Attorneys for Defendant 

 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that 

the Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with prejudice and without assessment of costs or 

attorney’s fees to any party. 

Case 3:06-cv-05356-RJB Document 6 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
 - 2 

Cause No. CV06-5356 RJB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

KEATING, BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK, INC., P.S. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

800 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4141 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-3175 

PHONE: (206) 623-8861 

FAX: (206) 223-9423 

 DONE IN OPEN COURT this 17th day of August, 2006. 

 A

ROBERT J. BRYAN 

United States District Judge 

Presented by: 

KEATING, BUCKLIN & McCORMACK, INC., P.S. 

s/ 

Shannon M. Ragonesi, WSBA # 31951 

Of Attorneys for Defendant 

Approved as to form; 

Notice of presentation waived 

s/ 

Kevin Keefe, WSBA # 11437 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 DATED August 16, 2006. 

 KEATING, BUCKLIN & McCORMACK, 

 INC., P.S. 

 s/ Shannon M. Ragonesi

 Shannon M. Ragonesi, WSBA # 31951 

 Defendants City of Bainbridge Island 

 Keating Bucklin & McCormack, Inc., P.S. 

 800 Fifth Avenue, #4141 

 Seattle, WA 98104 

 (206) 623-8861 

 (206) 223-9423 Facsimile 

sragonesi@kbmlawyers.com 

Case 3:06-cv-05356-RJB Document 6 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2