alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-36
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-36


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                             Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                             Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 25, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1610

Lower Tribunal No. 18-2612

________________

Pierre Michel Smith,

Appellant,

vs.

Lydie Ladouceur Smith,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ivonne 

Cuesta, Judge.

Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Annabel C. Majewski, for 

appellant.

Kaplan Loebl, LLC, and Liliana Loebl and Amanda B. Haberman, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So. 2d 490, 497-98 

(Fla. 1999) (holding: “When reviewing the order granting a new trial, an 

appellate court must recognize the broad discretionary authority of the trial 

judge and apply the reasonableness test to determine whether the trial judge 

committed an abuse of discretion. If an appellate court determines that 

reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the 

trial court, there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion”); Umana v. 

Citizens Prop. Insur. Corp., 282 So. 3d 933, 934-35 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) 

(holding: “The absence of a hearing transcript at which the trial court made 

this decision prevents any meaningful review of whether the trial court 

abused its discretion in this regard”) (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of 

Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Barsan v. Trinity Fin. Servs., LLC, 

258 So. 3d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Rodriguez v. Lorenzo, 215 So. 3d 631 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2017)).
In the Senate of the United States,

June 23, 2000.

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 251) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution commending the Republic of Croatia for the conduct of

its parliamentary and presidential elections.’’, do pass with

the following

AMENDMENTS:

Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert:

1 That it is the sense of Congress that—

2 (1) the people of the Republic of Croatia are to

3 be congratulated on the successful elections and the

4 outgoing Government of Croatia is to be commended

5 for the democratic standards with which it managed

6 the elections;

7 (2) the United States should support the efforts

8 of the new Government of Croatia to increase its work

9 on refugee return, privatization reform, media reform,

10 and further cooperation with the International Crimi-
2

HCON 251 EAS

1 nal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to set an

2 example to other countries in the region;

3 (3) Congress strongly supports Croatia’s commit4 ment to western democratic standards and will give

5 its full support to the new Government of Croatia to

6 fully implement democratic reforms; and

7 (4) the United States continues to promote Cro8 atian-American economic, political, and military re9 lations and recognizes Croatia as a loyal partner in

10 south central Europe.

Amend the preamble as follows:

Page 2, first unnumbered line, strike out ølandslide¿

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 251

AMENDMENTS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 19, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
75 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-10, CP2024-10.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-23025 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 63921.

protest 59/20210 (New York).

#### C. A. Haynes & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
---

|EXHIBIT 15




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mediware Information Systems, Inc.


We have reviewed, in accordance
with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Mediware
Information Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and for the three
month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated November 10, 2000; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.


We are aware that our review report, which
is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2000, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-07591).


We are also aware that our review report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not
considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or
a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of
that Act.


Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP


New York, New YorkNovember 13, 2000
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Zila, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated _____ __, 1996, appearing in
the Current Report on Form 8-K of Zila, Inc., dated July 18, 1997 and to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus, which is part of
this Registration Statement.


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
---------------------
Grant Thornton LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

June 18, 1997


                                  EXHIBIT 23-C
No. 55710.

protest 478477-G (Pittsburgh).

#### Gimbel Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 17

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, Eric Norton, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled An Updated Preliminary Assessment of El Boleo Copper-Cobalt Project dated January 31, 2007, (the Technical Report), and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                                                                                 
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) Eric Norton                                                                            
| |     | Name: Eric Norton, P.Eng.
Vice President  Project Development and Operations, Baja Mining Corp.
| |     | Location: Sydney, Australia
IV

House Calendar No. 107

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 171

[Report No. 106–314]

Congratulating the American Public Transit Association for 25 years of

commendable service to the transit industry and the Nation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 3, 1999

Mr. SHUSTER (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PETRI, and Mr. RAHALL)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

SEPTEMBER 13, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the American Public Transit Association for

25 years of commendable service to the transit industry

and the Nation.

Whereas public transportation is a fundamental public service

and an integral component of the Nation’s surface transportation infrastructure;

Whereas public transportation service results in productive

jobs for the Nation’s workers and provides broad support

for business and economic growth;
2

•HCON 171 RH

Whereas public transportation provides safe and efficient mobility for millions of people in the United States each

day;

Whereas the American Public Transit Association was established in 1974 to promote and advance knowledge in all

matters relating to public transportation; and

Whereas, during a period of remarkable resurgence in public

transportation, the American Public Transit Association

has provided a quarter of a century of service to the Nation as the professional association representing the transit industry: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress congratulates the American

3 Public Transit Association for 25 years of commendable

4 service to the transit industry and the Nation.

House Calendar No. 107

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 171

[Report No. 106–314]

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the American Public Transit Association for 25 years of commendable service to

the transit industry and the Nation.

SEPTEMBER 13, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-73M

)

v. )

)

JOHN GIDIMIN KLIMAS, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Offense charged: 

Aggravated Identity Theft

Date of Detention Hearing: March 31, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Lawrence Lincoln. The defendant was represented by Mike Filipovic.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant’s has an extensive criminal history including a number of

charges involving alcohol/substance abuse.

(2) Defendant is homeless with a history of nonappearance and failing to

comply; his ties to the Western District of Washington are

unknown/unverified.

(3) The defendant’s association with nine aliases and two social security

numbers causes concern given the nature of the instant offense.

Case 2:06-cr-00142-RSL Document 8 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

(4) The defendant stipulated to detention.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate,

to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or

being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of April, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00142-RSL Document 8 Filed 04/03/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy BACON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6592.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Jimmy Bacon, pro se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy Bacon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss Bacon’s appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *See United States v. Bacon,*Nos. CR-95-123-BO; CA-01-61-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Ramirez's *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 147 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 147

Commending the decision to grant women in Kuwait the right to vote and 
                        run for elected office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1999

Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Gejdenson, Mrs. Kelly, and 
     Mrs. Maloney of New York) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the decision to grant women in Kuwait the right to vote and 
                        run for elected office.

Whereas His Royal Highness Emir Jabir al-Ahmad al-Jabir al-Sabah and the Kuwaiti 
        Cabinet have recognized the right of Kuwaiti women citizens to 
        participate in their country's electoral politics beginning in 2003;
Whereas on May 16, 1999, the Emir decreed with the Cabinet's blessing that women 
        should be given the right to vote and run for the elected national 
        assembly; and
Whereas many men and women in Kuwait have been advocating for human and 
        political rights and full participation of all citizens in the political 
        process: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States--
            (1) commends His Royal Highness Emir Jabir al-Ahmad al-
        Jabir al-Sabah of Kuwait for his commitment to Kuwaiti womens' 
        right to vote and run for public office, as reflected in his 
        decision on May 16, 1999;
            (2) congratulates the women of Kuwait for this achievement;
            (3) urges the Kuwaiti Parliament to strongly support this 
        landmark decision giving women in Kuwait the right to vote and 
        run for elected office, and which brings honor and respect to 
        the Emir and the people of Kuwait; and
            (4) urges President Clinton to support further democratic 
        development in the Persian Gulf region.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JOHN WISE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5810FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial

partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent

of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is

satisfied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis,

the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee

equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average

monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this

Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 14 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of

this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager at the Department of

Corrections).

DATED this 10th day of April, 2006. 

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 14 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2