United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3344

___________

Luis Orlando Gomez-Garcia, *

*

Petitioner, *

* On Petition for Review of an

v. * Order of the Immigration

* and Naturalization Service.

District Director, U.S. Department of *

Justice Immigration & Naturalization * [Not To Be Published]

Service, *

*

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: June 2, 1999

 Filed: June 11, 1999

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and BEAM, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Luis Gomez-Garcia, a citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States in 1994

without inspection. In 1995, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ordered him

to show cause why he should not be deported. Following a hearing, an Immigration

Judge found deportability had been established, denied Gomez-Garcia’s application for

asylum and withholding of deportation, and gave him the option to depart voluntarily.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed his appeal, and Gomez-Garcia
-2-

now petitions for review. He does not contest that he is deportable, but maintains he

was subject to past persecution and has a well-founded fear of future persecution based

upon imputed political opinions. Reviewing the BIA’s denial of asylum for an abuse

of discretion, and the factual findings underlying its refusal to grant asylum under the

substantial-evidence standard, see Feleke v. INS, 118 F.3d 594, 597-98 (8th Cir. 1997),

we deny Gomez-Garcia’s petition.

The Attorney General has discretion to grant asylum to a “refugee.” See 8

U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1). A refugee is an alien who is unwilling to return to his or her home

country because of “persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of

race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”

See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A).

Gomez-Garcia testified that he was threatened by guerrillas because they

wanted him to join them, and that he was beaten when his father was kidnapped by

guerrillas in 1992. Gomez-Garcia does not claim to have expressed any political

opinions for or against the government or guerrilla groups. He asserts, however, that

his father’s and cousins’ anti-guerrilla political opinions had been imputed to him.

There does not appear to be any evidence that anyone persecuted Gomez-Garcia for

such an opinion. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-84 (1992); Miranda v.

INS, 139 F.3d 624, 625-28 (8th Cir. 1998). Even assuming Gomez-Garcia established

he had been the victim of persecution, we conclude that the evidence of Guatemala’s

changed conditions rebuts his claim of a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Specifically, the State Department’s Report on Guatemala and the parties’ stipulations

reflected the following: (1) there was a negotiated end to the civil war, and a peace

accord was signed in 1996; (2) the Guatemalan government and guerrillas ceased

offensive and counterinsurgency activities in 1996; (3) the government ordered

demobilization of rural civil defense patrols, which was completed in 1996; (4) the

Guatemalan Congress passed a national conciliation law, exempting specific warrelated acts from prosecution, and the U.N. Human Rights Verification Mission stated
-3-

that the law was consistent with international standards; and (5) the President of

Guatemala reduced the institutional and legal autonomy of the army and police, and

restructured the military command.

Because substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum, we also affirm the

BIA’s denial of withholding of deportation. See Behzadpour v. United States, 946 F.2d

1351, 1354 (8th Cir. 1991).

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.