alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 105 Agreed to June 18, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

Special Olympics (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’)

shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the Law Enforcement

Torch Run for the 1999 Special Olympics World Games (in this

resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds on

June 18, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration

of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event shall be free of admission charge

to the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of

Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of

the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full

responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities

associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

(a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the approval of

the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may erect upon the Capitol

Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related

structures and equipment as may be required for the event.

(b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such

additional arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays,

advertisements, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well

as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect

to the event.

SEC. 5. LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—No person may represent, either directly

or indirectly, that this resolution or any activity carried out under

this resolution in any way constitutes approval or endorsement

by the Federal Government of any person or any product or service.
H. Con. Res. 105—2

(b) ENFORCEMENT.—The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall enter into an agreement with the sponsor,

and such other persons participating in the event authorized by

section 1 as the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

Board consider appropriate, under which such persons shall agree

to comply with the requirements of subsection (a). The agreement

shall specifically prohibit the use of any photograph taken at the

event for a commercial purpose and shall provide for the imposition

of financial penalties if any violations of the agreement occur.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000316206
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     52
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 42
<DISCONTINUED>                                     954
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       996
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.17


</TABLE>
NAIMA 


NORTH AMERICAN INSULATION 

MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 

VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT MAIL 

August 14, 2013 

Ms. Susan Fairchild 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02) 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 


4930 Old Page Road 


Durham, NC 27703 


RE: Work Practices For Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 

Dear Ms. Fairchild: 

The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") stated specifically: "We are proposing work 

practice standards for control of HF and HCI emissions from furnaces, instead of emission limits 

· .." (78 Fed. Reg. 22,369, 22,387 (April 15, 2013)) 

To facilitate the continued operation of wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities at the HF and 

HCI emission levels identified in the preparation of the proposed rules, manufacturers will follow 

these work practices for HCI and HF: 

WORK PRACTICES FOR HCl AND HF 

• 	 Maintain periodic quality assurance records for a five-year period for raw materials or glass 

formulations indicating the facility is maintaining low HCI and HF emissions. 

• 	 Specifically, for HCI emissions: 


- Monitor or conduct periodic testing ofraw materials or glass formulations. 


- Records will be made available for inspection. 


- Testing could be conducted by raw materials suppliers. 


• 	 Specifically, for HF emissions: 

- Monitor or conduct periodic testing ofraw materials or glass formulations. 

- Records will be made available for inspection. 

- Testing could be conducted by raw materials suppliers. 

- Limit use of high fluoride-containing batch materials so that the fluoride content of each 

glass formulation does not exceed its respective 2010-2011 levels. This could also 

include: 


- Limiting use of e-glass cullet that contains fluorine. 


- Limiting use of CRT cullet. 


NOTE: 	 High HCI can be problematic for furnaces, so there is a natural incentive to keep 

chlorides low. 

44 	CANAL CENTER PLAZA • SUITE 310 • ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 • TEL 703/684-0084 • FAX 703/684-0427 
Ms. Susan Fairchild 

August 14,2013 

Page 2 

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions. 

Angus E. Crane 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

cc: 	 Mr. Keith W. Barnett 

Group Leader, Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division, Mineral and Manufacturing Group 

u.S. Environmental Protection Agency 


4930 Old Page Road 


Durham, NC 27703
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM DIGITRAN
SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   13,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           367,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             759,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,139,000
<PP&E>                                                  807,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (383,000) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,563,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,365,000
<BONDS>                                                 921,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                               1,000
<COMMON>                                                156,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,880,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,563,000
<SALES>                                                 605,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,021,000   
<CGS>                                                   359,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,091,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (200,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (200,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (200,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION 

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE - 1 

The Honorable John C. Coughenour 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

A IGOR KHARITONOV, WILLIAM 

DAVIS, and EBONEY CHIPMAN, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: CR06-166 JCC 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 

Based on the stipulated motion of the parties to continue 

the date for trial (Dkt. No. 65), Defendant Davis’ Waiver of 

Speedy Trial (Dkt. No. 66), and Defendant Chipman’s Waiver of 

Speedy Trial (Dkt. No. 67), the Court makes the following 

findings of fact and conclusions of law: 

 1. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance 

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a 

speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

Case 2:06-cr-00166-JCC Document 68 Filed 01/05/07 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION 

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE - 2 

 2. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense 

to prepare would result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(8)(B)(i). 

 3. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of 

some complexity, including all relevant issues and defenses 

applicable to the case, which would make it unreasonable to 

expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial 

itself within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act 

and currently set for this case. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

 4. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a 

continuance is necessary to allow the defendant the reasonable 

time for the effective preparation his defense. 18 U.S.C. $ 

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

 NOW THEREFORE, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from 

January 16, 2007 to March 26, 2007. The resulting period of 

delay from January 16, 2007 to March 26, 2007, is hereby excluded 

for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and 

(B). Pretrial motions shall be due on March 2, 2007. 

 DONE this 5th day of January, 2007. 

 JUDGE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JU

 A

DGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00166-JCC Document 68 Filed 01/05/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30855]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 379]

Delegation to the Assistant Secretary for Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs of Authorities Under 
Certain Marine Convention Implementing Acts

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs the 
functions vested in the Secretary of State by the following:
    1. Sections 204, 208(a), and 209(b) of P.L. 104-43, Title II, the 
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Convention Act of 1995 (16 U.S.C. 5603, 
5607(a), 5608(b)).
    2. Sections 3(a), 4, and 5(a) of P.L. 98-445, the Eastern Pacific 
Tuna Licensing Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 972a(a), 972b, 972c(a)).
    3. Sections 503(b), (c)(3)(A), (d)(1)(D), 504, and 509 of P.L. 109-
479, Title V, the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention 
Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 6902(b), (c)(3)(A), (d)(1)(D), 6903, 
6908).
    The Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental 
and Scientific Affairs may, to the extent authorized by law, re-
delegate to officers and employees under his or her direction and 
supervision any of the functions delegated herein.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, 
and the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the 
Environment may at any time exercise any authority or function 
delegated by this delegation of authority.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: December 8, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-30855 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I , William Y. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Act), that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                    |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-23-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    82
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       18
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     61
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 61
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        61
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6695

JOSEPH A. BELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL A. ZENK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:07-hc-02068-BO)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 7, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Bell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Bell v. Zenk, No. 5:07-hc-02068-BO (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Petitioner,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5793RJB

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Petitioner in this

action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner has asked for an extension of time. (Dkt. # 10). At the time this motion was made

the petition had just been served, no notice of appearance had been entered, and there was no

answer. The motion is premature and seems to be based on misconceptions as to how the process

works.

The petition has been filed and ordered served. The petition consists of the documents filed

January 3rd, 2006. (Dkt. # 4). Neither the court nor respondent will consider “supplemental” filings

like the seven page document filed January 31st, 2006. (Dkt. # 12). That document will remain in

Case 3:05-cv-05793-RJB Document 22 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 2

the file. To supplement the petition, petitioner would need to bring a motion, show why the petition

needs to be supplemented and serve the documents on opposing counsel so he would have a chance

to respond to the motion. See, Local Rule 7.

The court is now waiting for an answer to the petition from respondent. After that answer is

filed the petitioner may file a traverse that addresses the arguments made by respondent. If petitioner

needs more time to file a traverse that would be the appropriate time to bring a motion for a

continuance. The current motion is DENIED.

The next motion before the court is respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file an

answer. (Dkt. # 15). Counsel indicates he is involved in a death penalty case set for an evidentiary

hearing in March and he request an extension of time to answer this petition. The respondent’s

counsel has shown good cause for an extension of time and the motion is GRANTED. An answer

will be due on or before April 14th, 2006. 

Petitioner’s traverse would be due four weeks after the filing of an answer The clerk is

directed to send copies of this order to petitioner and counsel for respondent and note the April 14th,

2006 date.

DATED this 13th day of March, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05793-RJB Document 22 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal L 324/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 324 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6414 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 324

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6414 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1472 of 13 September 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1472 of 13 September 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.