alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 142

   To express the sense of the Senate regarding the treatment of any 
                    future unified budget surpluses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 1997

Mr. Moynihan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                        the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To express the sense of the Senate regarding the treatment of any 
                    future unified budget surpluses.

Whereas the current economic expansion is now in its seventh year and shows no 
        signs of ending;
Whereas the unemployment rate is below 5 percent for the first time in 24 years;
Whereas the current official inflation rate, which may be overstated, is about 2 
        percent;
Whereas the deficit has been reduced from $290,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1992 
        to $23,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, or just three-tenths of 1 
        percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP);
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projects that, under present law, the 
        unified budget will have a surplus of $86,000,000,000 in 2007;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office also projects that, under present law, 
        the debt held by the public will fall from about 50 percent of GDP this 
        year to about 30 percent by 2007;
Whereas this extraordinary combination of good budget and economic news is 
        largely the result of budget policies included in the Omnibus Budget and 
        Reconciliation Act of 1993;
Whereas the budget is not yet in surplus;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office also projects that the deficit is likely 
        to reappear after 2007, and that the debt held by the public as a 
        percentage of GDP is also likely to increase as the baby boom generation 
        begins to retire;
Whereas, without the on-budget surpluses of the social security trust funds, the 
        Congressional Budget Office still projects annual deficits of about 
        $100,000,000,000 even after the budget is ``balanced'' in 2002; and
Whereas projected unified budget surpluses in the short-run would rapidly 
        disappear if the current expansion ends, and the economy would enter a 
        recession: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) any unified budget surpluses that might arise in the 
        current expansion should be used to reduce the Federal debt 
        held by the public; and
            (2) to achieve this goal during this economic expansion 
        that there be no net tax cut or new spending that is not offset 
        by reductions in spending on other programs or tax increases.
                                 <all>
```
(R.D. 11537)

#### Star Textile and Research, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 505; 12427; 7301.

(Decided June 3, 1968)

*Busby d RivMn*for the plaintiff.

*EcfooinL. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

The foregoing three appeals to reappraisement on the calendar of the Boston Term were called in New York on April 29, 1968, at a regularly scheduled calendar call. Defendant moved that these appeals be dismissed on the ground that they had not been timely filed as required by statute. Plaintiff conceded untimeliness.

On consideration of the official papers on file in the court, it appears that in appeal R65/18112 notice of appraisement was mailed July 2, 1965, and that written appeal for reappraisement was filed 33 days thereafter, on August 4, 1965. In the appeals, R65/18113 and R65/18114, notices of appraisement were mailed June 25, 1965, and written appeals were filed 40 days thereafter, on August 4,1965.

These appeals are found to be untimely and should be dismissed. (Section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.) The motion is granted.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 67226.

protests 59/22479(B), etc. (Mobile).

#### Transamerican Match Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
J -A06029- 18 2018 PA Super 335

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. IN RE: J.C. APPEAL OF: J.C. : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1 391 WDA 2017 Appeal from the Order July 5, 2017 I n the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Juvenile Division at No(s): CP- 02-JV - 0001886- 2011 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E, SHOGAN , J., and STRASSBURGER, J . * DISSENTING OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED DECEMBER 10, 2018 In this appeal, Appellant asks this Court to determine whether Act 21 constitutes punishment under Commonwealth v. Muniz , 164 A.3d 1189 (Pa. 2017) and Commonwealth v. Butler , 173 A.3d 1212 (Pa. Super. 2017). Appellant’s Supplemental Brief at 5 . As noted by the Majority, another panel of this Court recently examined this exact issue in In re H.R. , ___ A.3d ___, 2018 WL 4519816 (Pa. Super. filed Sept. 21, 2018). 1 In H.R. , this Court held that Act 21 did not constitute pun ishment, even after Muniz and Butler . Id. at *5. In doing so, we found Muniz and Butler distinguishable because SORNA was found to be a punitive statute, whereas 1 Cf. Appellant’s Supplemental Brief at 5 (“Does 42 Pa.C.S. § 6403 (“Act 21 ”) constitute p unishment as determined by a Muniz - Butler analysis.”) with H.R. , 2018 WL 4519816, at *2 (citation omitted) (“Is Act 21 punitive, such that its retroactive application to [Appellant] and its mechanism for determining whether an individual is a sexually violent delinquent child are unconstitutional under [ Muniz ] and [ Butler ]?”).J -A06029- 18

- 2 - under In re S. A. , 925 A.2d 838 (Pa. Super. 2007), our Court previously determined that Act 21 was non - punitive. H.R. , 2018 WL 4519816, at *3- 4. “I t is beyond the power of a Superior Court panel to overrule a prior decision of the Superior Court, except in circumstan ces where intervening authority by our Supreme Court calls into question a p revious decision of this Court.” Commonwealth v. Pepe , 897 A.2d 463, 465 ( Pa. Super. 2006) (citations omitted). Because there has been so such intervening authority, we are bound by H.R. ’s holding that Act 21 is non - punitive. See Pepe , 897 A.2d at 465. Therefore, I would find that Appellant’s claim regarding Act 21 fails and would proceed to address his first claim. See Appellant’s Brief at 6. Additionally , given the dispari ty in analysis and ultimate conclusions between the H.R. Cou rt and the Majority here as to whether Act 21 is punitive, and because this issue is of substantial public importance, I believe this issue should be reviewed by this Court en banc or our Supreme Court.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KA JNEES H J ARET , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70447 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 664- 706 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K a j ne e s h J a r e t , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orw i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e the



# FI LED SEP 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70447 2 a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s , R ah i m zadeh v. H older , 61 3 F . 3d 91 6, 92 0 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni al of w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al be c aus e J a r e tf

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha tthe I ndi a n gove rnm e nti s unw i l l i ng or u n ab le to c o n tr o l th e M u s lim e x tr e m is ts h e f e a r s . See N

ah rv an iv. G on zales , 399 F . 3d 11 48 , 11 54 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( al tho ug h p ol i ce w er e unabl e t o sol ve cr i m es a ga i ns tpe t i t i one r , e vi de nc e di d notc om pe l f i ndi ng tha tc r i m e s w e r e c om m i tt e d by f or c e s the gove rnm e ntw a s unabl e orunw i l l i ng t o c ontr ol be c aus e pol i c e t ook r e p o rts a n din v e s tig a te dp e titio n e r ’s c o m p la in ts ) ; R ah i m zadeh , 613 F . 3d a t923 ( c ountryr e portdi d nots upportc onc l us i on tha tgove rnm e ntw a s unw i l l i ng or un abl e t o con trol pet i t i on er ’ s a tt ac kers ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
No. 57503.

#### Decorative Crafts, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 200460-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.202 U.S. Deposits in Foreign Countries  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineRest of the world; U.S. private deposits, including negotiable certificates of deposit; liability
	FA263191005
	71.6
	-215.0
	-147.4
	31.1
	-117.9
	-240.9
	-331.3
	-265.8
	-326.7
	153.1
	-180.7
	1Households and nonprofit organizations; private foreign deposits; asset
	FA153091003
	4.5
	-9.9
	-7.9
	2.6
	-6.4
	-14.1
	-20.6
	-15.0
	-17.9
	3.3
	-8.2
	2Nonfinancial corporate business; private foreign deposits; asset
	FA103091003
	9.1
	-5.8
	0.6
	42.1
	-8.9
	-20.6
	23.3
	-32.4
	-4.0
	-41.6
	42.2
	3Money market mutual funds; private foreign deposits; asset
	FA633091003
	8.9
	-64.2
	0.3
	-9.8
	-9.8
	-13.4
	8.0
	-39.7
	-6.0
	26.0
	-18.6
	4Instrument discrepancies; private foreign deposits
	FA903091005
	49.0
	-135.1
	-140.3
	-3.8
	-92.9
	-192.7
	-342.0
	-178.8
	-298.8
	165.5
	-196.2
	5 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
Before the Third Division,

December 27, 1950

No. 55037.

#### D. Aboudi *v.*United States,

protests 119169-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of carpets exported from Iran between the dates of December 21, 1939, and September 26, 1941, and that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 54056. In accordance with stipulation and pursuant to the instructions contained in T. D. 51892, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, converting the currency of the invoices, Iranian rials, to United States dollars at the rate of $.053475, except as to any carpets which may have been exported with benefit of drawback.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
A STRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP AND ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, P laintiff s- Appellant s,

v.
ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant

AND
OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellant,

AND

TORRENT PHARMACEUTICAL S LIMITED
AND TORRENT PHARMA INC., Defendants

- Appellants,

AND

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICAL S INC.
AND MYLAN INC., Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________
201 2- 1359, -1 360,

- 1361,

- 1362,

- 1363,

- 1364

______________________Appeal s from the United States District Court of New Jersey in N os. 10

- CV

- 1835, 10

- CV

- 4203, 10

- CV

- 4205, 10

- CV

- 4971, 10

- CV

- 5519, 11

- CV

- 2483, and 11

- CV

- 2484, Judge Joel A . Pisano

.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
H ENRY J. R ENK , Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffsappellees. With him on the brief were B RUCE C. H AAS , S TEVEN C. K LINE , M ICHAEL P. M C G RAW , D ENNIS G REGORY and R OBERT J. C ZA RNECKI , J R

.
C HRISTOPHER T. G RIFFITH , Leydig, Voit & Mayer, LTD., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant

- appellant, Osmotica Pharmaceutical Corporation and W ILLIAM A. R AKOCZY , Rakoczy Molino M a zzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for Defenda nts

- appellants, Myland Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. With them on the brief w ere R OBERT F. G REEN , L EYDIG , Voit & Mayer, LTD. of Chicago, Illinois , J AMACIA P. S ZELIGA , of Washington, DC, and A MY D. B RODY , Rakoczy Molino M a zzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illi nois
,
H. K EETO S ABHARWAL , Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants

appellants, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited, et al. With him on the brief were B YRON L. P ICKARD , J ONATHAN M. S TRANG and D ENNIES V ARUGHESE

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (M OORE , M AYER , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 14, 2013 /s/ J an Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly C lerk
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

SEP 3 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE L. SCHWEITZER,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 97-4053

v. D. Utah

DANIEL S. SCHWEITZER; HAZEL

E. WUNDROW HANNEMAN

SCHWEITZER,

Defendants - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 96-CV-850-S) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff and appellant George L. Schweitzer, appearing pro se, appeals the

dismissal of his First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, for failure

to show entitlement to relief, and for failure to plead facts necessary to permit

defendant and appellee Daniel S. Schweitzer to respond. We conclude that, for

substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, entered on March

28, 1997, the district court correctly dismissed this action. 

Daniel Schweitzer seeks an award of attorney’s fees and costs incurred on

appeal, on the ground that the appeal is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38. An

appeal is considered frivolous when “the result is obvious, or the appellant’s

arguments are wholly without merit.” Braley v. Campbell, 832 F.2d 1504, 1510

(10th Cir. 1987) (en banc). This appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, appellant

George Schweitzer is ordered to show cause within 15 days why attorney’s fees

and costs should not be assessed against him. See Doyle v. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n,

998 F.2d 1559, 1571 (10th Cir. 1993).

The appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
1 

CASE NO. CV06_0900 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

BRIAN JOHNSON, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a 

Washington corporation, 

 Defendant. 

No. CV06-0900RAJ 

ORDER 

Scott A. Kamber seeks to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs Brian Johnson, Brian 

Weatherill, Nathan Verrilli, James Grennan, and Charles Ellis in the above-captioned litigation. 

As this Court finds that Mr. Kamber has submitted satisfactory reasoning for withdrawal, that the 

granting of his Motion will not cause substantial prejudice or delay to any party, and that all 

parties have joined in this request by stipulation, 

Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 235 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

CASE NO. CV06_0900 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Scott A. Kamber’s Stipulated Request to Withdraw as 

Counsel for Plaintiffs is GRANTED, and Scott A. Kamber is hereby terminated as counsel in 

this proceeding. 

 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2010. 

A

The Honorable Richard A. Jones 

United States District Judge

Presented by: 

Scott A. Kamber, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

KAMBERLAW, LLC

11 Broadway, 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

Tel: (212) 920-3072 

Email: skamber@kamberlaw.com 

Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 235 Filed 02/05/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                        CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS CORPORATION
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three months ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                   February 2,    January 31,       February 2,     January 31,
                                                  -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                      1997           1996              1997              1996
                                                      ----           ----              ----              ----

<S>                                                <C>            <C>               <C>              <C>  
Weighted average shares outstanding (1)              7,432          7,431              7,428            7,432

Net Income                                         $ 1,817        $ 2,305           $  3,250         $  4,553

Net income per share                               $  0.24        $  0.31           $   0.44         $   0.61
</TABLE>


------------------
(1)Common stock equivalents, which were dilutive, were included in the
   computation of weighted average number of shares outstanding.
<PAGE>   1







                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,  QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

                                          1997          1996            1997          1996
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------   -----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>             <C>           <C>
Net income (loss) attributable to
   common shares                       $1,574,000    ($3,617,000)    $  577,000    $1,262,000
                                       ==========    ===========     ==========    ==========





Weighted average shares outstanding     3,484,000      3,128,000      3,519,000     3,282,000

Common stock equivalents                  133,000           --          202,000       235,000
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    ----------

Total weighted average common and
   common equivalent shares             3,617,000      3,128,000      3,721,000     3,517,000
                                       ==========    ===========     ==========    ==========

Net income (loss) per common and
   common and equivalent share         $      .44    ($     1.16)    $     0.16    $     0.36
                                       ==========    ===========     ==========    ==========


</TABLE>
# FAA UAS Civil COA Request Any information that is provided is bound by the Freedom of Information Act (FOlA) and may be releasable. This requires compiiance to FOIA and consent to the release of your information. If you do not consent to the refease of your information, you must contact us for further guidance. For more information, please visit http://v,rww.foia.gov/. 333 Exemption # or 1 ~ Date 08/24/2015 Federal Register pocket # IrA-2007-0001 

### Proponent Information Contact Name Company Name Street Address 1 Street Address 2 City State Phone Number 

### E-maik Address 

## Aircraft System Aircraft Type Aircraft Registration Chesley Crain Crain & Associates, Inc. 151 Business Center Drive

Birmingham AL Zip CoriF 135244 205-995-8231 contact@fireonc.com

DJI Phantom 2 N551 QA Performance Characteristics Climb Rate 6m\s Descent Rate 2m\s (Feet/Minute) (Feet/Minute)Turn Rate (DegreeslSecond) Cru=se Max Speed Gross Takeoff Weight 90 degrees\s

15m\s 1000grams Approach Speed

Min LaunchlRecovery Il000grams 

## Operational Information Location 

## to
Altitude 

# u Description of Operation U Less than 200' Distance from nearest Town/City We are a private fire investigation company. We want to use the aircraft to investigate and survey a fire scene from the air. This allows us to determine the safety of a scene before we enter. Also, it allows us to photograph the scene from an angle that we previously didn't have the ability to, with out the use of a bucket lift. This will help in determining the cause and spread of the fire.

Operations Area (Attach VFR Chart with Coordinates) Ciass of Airspace ❑ A ❑ (Requires FAA HQ approva() ❑ Dnder Mode G Veif ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E 

### ©; ❑ G(With an operational ATG Tower) Flight Gonditions, V 

# m VFR ❑ IFR 

## Air Traffic Communication to

Transmitter Receiver Guard (Emergency Frequency) ❑ VHF Q Yes 

## 0 Yes Q Yes

@No QNo Q No

### Transmitter Fieceiver Guard (Emergency Frequency) ❑ UHi= Q Yes 

# 0 Yes 

# 0 Yes

Q''va @ No Q No 

## Procedures Lost Link Procedures qp 1. How long to activate LL procedurE 2. LL Altitude Immediately upon loss of signal from remote 60'



### 3. !_ost l_ink Route 4. Lost Lnk Point Directly back to take off point
5. Fiight Termination Point Point of take off

Lost Communication Procedures ?. Behveen Piiflt and Air Traffic Control 

### U N\A

2. Between Pi[ot and Observer %# M

# Observer Line of Sight of Observer ~ 

### © Yes ❑ Other 

# I

~ Observer Location V 

### Time of Day Q Day Q Night Q Both Transponder Q Yes Mode C ❑



## Q No 

## @ N/A
Please return completed form to 9-AJV-115-UASOrganizationMaa-ctov 

### -