alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 154

 Congratulating Ehud Barak on his election as Prime Minister of Israel 
    and encouraging Israel and her neighbors, Syria and Lebanon, to 
                  establish a lasting peace agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1999

  Mr. Crowley (for himself, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Holden, Mr. 
  Abercrombie, Mr. Shows, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Waxman, Mr. 
    Etheridge, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Stupak, Ms. 
Schakowsky, and Mr. Wu) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Ehud Barak on his election as Prime Minister of Israel 
    and encouraging Israel and her neighbors, Syria and Lebanon, to 
                  establish a lasting peace agreement.

Whereas Israel is the only democratic country in the Middle East;
Whereas Israel is a strong political and military ally of the United States;
Whereas Ehud Barak has been elected Prime Minister of Israel and is committed to 
        moving the Middle East peace process forward;
Whereas in order for the Middle East peace process to be moved forward, the 
        security of Israel and the Israeli people must be guaranteed;
Whereas a unilateral declaration of statehood by the Palestinian Authority will 
        irrevocably damage the Middle East peace process and the security of the 
        State of Israel;
Whereas Syria and Lebanon are the only two neighbors sharing borders with Israel 
        that have not negotiated a peace agreement with Israel; and
Whereas the involvement of the United States has led to peace agreements between 
        Israel and both Egypt and Jordan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates Ehud Barak on his election as Prime 
        Minister of Israel;
            (2) recognizes that the only way peace can be established 
        between Israel and her neighbors is if the security of the 
        citizens of Israel is guaranteed;
            (3) encourages Israel, along with Syria and Lebanon, to 
        establish negotiations to ensure a long-term peace in the 
        region which respects the security of both the State of Israel 
        and the Israeli people; and
            (4) encourages the Secretary of State to work with Israel, 
        Lebanon, and Syria to develop a long-term and lasting peace for 
        the Middle East.
                                 <all>
```
|    |                                                                                        |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| Date:  April 28, 2017 |   | /s/ Lucinda M. Baier |
|                  |   | Lucinda M. Baier |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 60717 Summary Calendar

**Normandina Yolanda Menocal**

**- Bardales; Ely Lizbeth**  **Bardales**

**- Menocal,** 

Petitioners **,**

versus **Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A208 150 592 Agency No. A208 150 593

Before **King, Higginson,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Normandina Yolanda Menocal

- Bardales , a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from an order of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying her application for asylum and denying protection under the

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-60717 Document: 00516803474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2023No. 21

- 60717

2 Convention Against Torture (CAT)

. 1 “ We have authority to review only the decision of the BIA, not the IJ, unless the IJ’s decision influenced the BIA’s decision. ” Singh v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018)

. We review the BIA’s decision for substantial evidence , reversing only if “the evidence is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could reach a contrary conclusion.” Gjetani v. Barr , 968 F.3d 393, 396 (5th Cir. 2020) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

. Menocal

- Bardales argues that neither the IJ nor the BIA gave an adequate explanation for their respective decisions denying asylum

. We disagree. Both decision s sufficiently “ref lect meaningful consideration of the relevant substantial evidence.” Abdel

- Masieh v. U.S. I.N.S. , 73 F.3d 579, 585 (5th Cir. 1996). On the merits, Menocal

- Bardales does not challenge the BIA’s determination s that she failed to establish past persecution and failed to establish a nexus between the harm alleged and her asserted particular social group s. She has therefore abandoned any such claims, and we need not address them. Sharma v. Holder , 729 F.3d 407, 411 n.1 (5th Cir. 2013)

. R egardi ng her CAT claim, Menocal

- Bardales fails to show that the evidence compels the conclusion that she more likely than not would be tortured if repatriated. See Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1140

- 41 (5th Cir. 2006) ; Ramirez

- Mejia v. Lynch , 794 F.3d 485, 49 3 (5th Cir. 2015)

. And while Menocal

- Bardales again argues that the IJ and the BIA did not sufficiently analyze the evidence relating to the possibility of future torture , we again disagree

. B oth decisions “reflect meaningful consideration” of the evidence related to Menocal

- Bardales’s CAT claim

. Abdel

- Masieh , 73 F.3d at 585. The petition for review is **DENIED**

.

1 Menocal

- Bardales’s minor daughter is a derivative applicant on the application. Case: 21-60717 Document: 00516803474 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2023
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-      ) and the related Prospectus of our report, which includes
an explanatory paragraph concerning KARS-YES Holdings Inc.'s ability to continue
as a going concern, dated November 6, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of KARS-YES Holdings Inc. as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and
for the years ended June 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995. We also consent to the
reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts."
 
                                          /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
December 17, 1997
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.212 Corporate and Foreign Bonds** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 59331.

protest 249485-K (New York).

#### J. Manheimer *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 5th day of September , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) CR06-213 JCC

RICHARD GOW,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Counsel for the defendant has filed a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (dkt #45). The

Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, has referred the matter to this court

(dkt #46).

The Court hereby schedules a hearing on the motion for Thursday, September 14, 2006, at

11:30am, in Courtroom 12A, United States Courthouse, Seattle, Washington. The defendant,

Richard Gow, is hereby directed to appear with his counsel of record. The Assistant U.S.

Attorney may appear, but will be excused from the courtroom while the court questions Mr.Gow

and his counsel regarding the motion to withdraw.

Case 2:06-cr-00213-JCC Document 48 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 5th day of September , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

Case 2:06-cr-00213-JCC Document 48 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3089

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Matthew Aaron Sawyer, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 14, 2009 Filed: July 9, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Matthew Sawyer appeals from the twen ty-four month sentence imposed by the district court 1 following Sawyer’s violation of the conditions of his supervised release. Sawyer argues that resentencing is requi red because the district court did not adequately consider the relevant factor s set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we concludethat the sentence imposed is reasonable and that the district court ade quately explained its reasons for imposing it. See, e.g. , United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v.-2- Bear Robe , 521 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v. Merrival , 521 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2008). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Before the Second Division,

May 27, 1965

No. 69326.

#### Gosho Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/8538(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRISTIAN LEON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1576

[November 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Barry M. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16CF003167AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 207

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding support for the inclusion of

salaries of Members of Congress in any proposed across-the-board reduction in fiscal year 2000 funding for Federal agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 1999

Mr. STRICKLAND submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the

Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding support for the

inclusion of salaries of Members of Congress in any

proposed across-the-board reduction in fiscal year 2000

funding for Federal agencies.

Whereas Congress may pass an across-the-board funding reduction for Federal agencies to bring closure to the debate on fiscal year 2000 funding levels;

Whereas lawmakers voted themselves a 3.4 percent cost-ofliving adjustment this year;

Whereas salaries of Members of Congress would not be affected by this across-the-board reduction;
2

•HCON 207 IH

Whereas the rest of the Government’s payroll would be affected by the proposed reduction which would likely result

in layoffs or temporary furloughs;

Whereas it is estimated that the reductions could force layoffs of 39,000 military personnel; and

Whereas programs at the Department of Education, Department of Labor, and the Department of Health and

Human Services such as ‘‘Meals on Wheels’’, the National Institutes of Health, Head Start, and the Safe and

Drug Free Schools program would be reduced: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That any across-the-board funding reduction

3 for agencies in fiscal year 2000 should also include the

4 same reduction for salaries of Members of Congress.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-206 JLR

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

OSCAR VASQUEZ-CRUZ, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Distribute Heroin and Cocaine in violation of USC §§ 21:841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(A), and 846.

Date of Detention Hearing: June 21, 2006

 The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Sarah Vogel. The defendant was represented by Michele Shaw.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

Case 2:06-cr-00206-RSM Document 44 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Defendant stipulated to detention at this time, reserving the right to

address the matter in the future.

(3) There appears that there is no condition or combination of conditions

other than detention that would reasonably assure future Court

appearances and/or the safety of other persons or the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00206-RSM Document 44 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 53338.

protest 146918-K (Galveston).

#### Dixie Berry *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the official papers it appeared that the declaration required by Public Law 790, 56 Stat. 1041, as amended by Public Law 384, 61 Stat. 917, was not found upon examination of the merchandise. Therefore, duty was assessed under appropriate paragraphs of the Tariff Act of 1930. Upon the record the court was constrained to overrule the protest claim of free entry.
# Official Journal C 55A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.055.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 55A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5726 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.055.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 55A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5726 February 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2014/C 055A/01 | Call for expressions of interest — Research Administrators contract staff members (function group IV) for parliamentary research | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2014/C 055A/01

Call for expressions of interest — Research Administrators contract staff members (function group IV) for parliamentary research

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
- Testimony and Speeches   - Monetary Policy Report
  - Testimony
  - Speeches
- Press Releases   - Monetary Policy
  - Orders on Banking Applications
  - Banking and Consumer Regulatory Policy
  - Enforcement Actions
  - Other Announcements
  - All Press Releases 
- Regulatory Reform
- Conferences
- Other Public Communication
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 1 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 1 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 1 Filed 05/11/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 1 Filed 05/11/06 Page 4 of 4
Exhibi
32.1




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the annual report of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the
undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to her knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 18, 2009




By:
            /s/ 
      Tai-ming OuName:
            Tai-ming
      OuTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
  Officer)
No. 57508.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 180708-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair-on leather the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Carey & Skinner, Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1436), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.