alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN GIDIMIN KLIMAS, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR06-142-RSL 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An initial hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release was held before the 

undersigned Magistrate Judge on June 8, 2010. The United States was represented by 

Assistant United States Attorney Richard Cohen, and the defendant by Dennis Carroll. 

 The defendant had been charged and convicted of Aggravated Identity Theft, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1) On or about September 15, 2006, defendant was sentenced 

by the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, to a term of 48 months in custody, to be followed by 2 

years of supervised release. 

 The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in substance abuse and 

mental health programs, financial disclosure, $125,906 restitution, search, and no identification 

in any other name other than the defendants. 

Case 2:06-cr-00142-RSL Document 35 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 2
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 In a Petition for Warrant or Summons, dated June 7, 2010, U.S. Probation Officer 

Jennifer Van Flandern asserted the following violations by defendant of the conditions of his 

supervised release: 

1. Using heroin on or before May 28 and June 6, 2010, in violation of standard 

condition number seven. 

2. Using alcohol on or before May 29, 2010, in violation of the special 

condition that he abstain from the use of alcohol. 

 The defendant was advised of his rights, acknowledged those rights and admitted 

alleged violations 1 and 2. 

 I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of his supervised release as to violations 1 and 2, and that the Court conduct a 

hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on these violations has been set before the 

Honorable Robert S. Lasnik on June 22, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. 

 Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

 DATED this 8th day of June, 2010. 

A

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

 AUSA: Richard Cohen 

 Defendant’s attorney: Dennis Carroll 

 Probation officer: Jennifer Van Flandern 

Case 2:06-cr-00142-RSL Document 35 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31****Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended****Certification**I, Bryan R. Calder, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, of Merrill Auto Trust Securitization 2008-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and  5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by  the following unaffiliated parties:  CenterOne Financial Services LLC, as Receivables Servicer and Merrill Lynch Bank USA, as Administrator. By: /s/ Bryan R. Calder Name: Bryan R. Calder Title:  President U.S. Bank National Association,  as Master Servicer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) CR05-5886FDB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER TO CONTINUE

v. ) TRIAL AND EXTEND 

) MOTIONS CUTOFF DATE

)

ADBENASSER ENNASSIME, )

TONYA ENNASSIME, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

ORDER

In consideration of the parties’ joint motion for continuance of the Pretrial Motion

cutoff date and Trial date, the Court finds and rules as follows:

This Court finds as facts those facts set forth in the above motion to extend the

pretrial motion cut-off and trial date. For the reasons set forth, the motion is GRANTED. 

Further, the Court finds that given the need by defense counsel to fully review the

evidence and to conduct adequate investigation, the failure to grant the requested

continuance would unreasonably deny the defendants effective assistance of counsel and,

despite due diligence by all parties, result in a miscarriage of justice.

Further, the Court finds that given the large number of potential witnesses and the

relative complexity of the case, it is unreasonable to expect either the Government or

Case 3:05-cr-05886-RJB Document 27 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 2
defense counsel to be prepared to submit motions or prepare for trial within the time

allotted.

The Court further finds, for the reasons set forth above, that the ends of justice

served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendants in a speedy trial.

The new motion cut-off date shall be May 15, 2006 and the new trial date shall be

June 12, 2006. 

DATED this 9th day of May, 2006. 

A

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05886-RJB Document 27 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit: 10.16T

SECURITY INTEREST AGREEMENT (#19)                                 August 5, 1998

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp of 353 Main Avenue in Norwalk, Ct. (hereafter "Trudy)
is seeking to pay operational expenses and fund seasonal working capital
requirements, and

WHEREAS William W. Burnham (hereafter "Burnham") of White Oak Shade Road in New
Canaan, Ct. is willing to assist Trudy Corp by lending Trudy Corp $310,000.00
(three hundred ten thousand dollars and 00/100) to meet these requirements.

NOW THEREFORE, Trudy Corp agrees to provide a security interest to Burnham in
recognition of the value he is providing the Company and the risks therein.

Trudy agrees to give Burnham a collateral interest in all Cash or Securities,
all Accounts Receivable both of Trudy and its subsidiary, Soundprints, all
inventory of whatever kind, and all furniture and fixtures. This security
interest shall be limited to the amount referred to above, plus imputed
interest of 8% per annum.

Burnham shall be entitled to perfect his security interest, if and when, Trudy
is unable to repay this debt on its maturity; the entire $310,000.00 should be
repaid by October 5, 1998. In such circumstances, Burnham shall have a
collateral interest second only to that of First Union (if any) and Alice
Burnham, in any event senior to all trade creditors and to all other liabilities
of the Company unless otherwise stated or stipulated by legislation.

Both parties agree that there may be partial reductions under this agreement as
funds are repaid by Trudy to Burnham; the collateral interest shall be reduced
pro rata.

AGREED:  /s/ W. T. Carney                      ACCEPTED:  /s/ William W. Burnham
         ----------------------                           ----------------------
         William T. Carney                                William W. Burnham
         Vice President/ CFO for
         Trudy Corp.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

June 21, 2017

Dea

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after consultation with
the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your request pursuant to
section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan
holding company (“SLHC”), through employment with an independently owned agency that sells State
Farm insurance products and banking products from State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary federal
savings bank, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. This approval is
limited to your holding a position with an independently owned agency that sells State Farm and State
Farm Bank products. If you seek to work directly for State Farm or an independently owned agency
that sells products for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), you must obtain the Board’s
approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to the
Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a different
conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations constitute
conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decisions herein and, as such, may
be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or enter into a
pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or money laundering in
the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or independently owned agency
that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including agencies that sell State Farm and State Farm Bank
products.

Sincerely,

\ veel WB
Margaret McCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
CA 15-7

October 5, 2015

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to 

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve with total consolidated assets of $10 

billion or less.

SUBJECT: Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation P

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently developed the attached interagency examination 

procedures for Regulation P – Privacy of Consumer Financial Information. Regulation P 

prohibits a financial institution from disclosing nonpublic personal information about 

consumers to nonaffiliated third parties, unless it satisfies various notice and opt-out 

requirements. Regulation P also requires a financial institution to provide notice of its 

privacy policies and practices to its customers. These revised examination procedures 

supersede the Regulation P interagency examination procedures transmitted with CA 11-

4. 

The revised examination procedures reflect an October 2014 Consumer Financial 

Protection Bureau (CFPB) rulemaking1 that amended the requirements regarding 

financial institutions’ provision of annual disclosure of privacy practices to customers by 

creating an alternative delivery method that financial institutions can use under certain 

circumstances. Additionally, the examination procedures have been updated to reflect 

the CFPB’s December 2011 recodification in Regulation P of the privacy regulations 

that were previously issued (by the Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 

the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the National Credit Union Administration, the 

 1 See 79 FR 64057 (Oct. 28, 2014).
2

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the former Office of Thrift 

Supervision2), as well as to clarify requirements and improve readability.

If you have any questions, please contact Amal Patel, Senior Supervisory 

Consumer Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 912-7879, or Tim Robertson, Manager, at 

(202) 452-2565.

Sincerely, 

Attachment:

• Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation P

Supersedes: CA 11-4 “Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation P” 

(July 5, 2011)

 2 See 76 FR 79025 (Dec. 21, 2011). The FTC retains rulemaking authority over any financial institution 

that is a person described in 12 U.S.C. § 5519 (with certain statutory exceptions, the FTC generally retains 

rulemaking authority for motor vehicle dealers predominantly engaged in the sale and servicing of motor 

vehicles, the leasing and servicing of motor vehicles, or both).
# Official Journal L 138/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 614 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 138

English edition

Legislation

Volume 614 June 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 51 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles having at least four wheels with regard to their sound emissions [2018/798] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 51 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles having at least four wheels with regard to their sound emissions [2018/798]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 299

To authorize testimony and representation in BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg),

S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 14 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and representation in BCCI Holdings

(Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil,

et al.

Whereas, in the case of BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.,

et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, et al., C.A. No. 95–

1252 (JHG), pending in the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs have requested

testimony from Jack Blum, a former employee on the

staff of the Committee on Foreign Relations;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the Senate

with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official responsibilities;
2

SRES 299 ATS

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be

taken from such control or possession but by permission

of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Jack Blum is authorized to testify in

2 the case of BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v.

3 Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, et al., except concerning mat4 ters for which a privilege should be asserted.

5 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

6 to represent Jack Blum in connection with the testimony

7 authorized by section one of this resolution.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m(a) or 780(d)); and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                      |                                         |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                      |
|                             |                                                 |                                    |
| Date:                  August 9, 2005 | By:                                             | /s/    RODERICK DE GREEF |
|                                  | **Roderick                de Greef**                      |
|                                  | **Chief                Financial                Officer** |

----
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------






                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-32T1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 28, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,346
<INVENTORY>                                     21,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,896
<PP&E>                                          27,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,415
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,179
<SALES>                                         79,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,030
<CGS>                                           71,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,169)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 61137.

protests 294849-K and 294466-K (New York).

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc., and W. E. R. Ribbon Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk netting similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.