alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 450I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 450I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6328 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 450I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6328 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 450 I/01 | Statement: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards exceptional additional resources and implementing arrangements under the Investment for growth and jobs goal to provide assistance for fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy (REACT-EU) — Adoption of the legislative act | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 450 I/01

Statement: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards exceptional additional resources and implementing arrangements under the Investment for growth and jobs goal to provide assistance for fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy (REACT-EU) — Adoption of the legislative act

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF



THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of Nugent Engine Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Registrant"), for the twelve month period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: April 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Robert Smith               | 
|                     |  | Name:  Robert Smith           
|                     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TREADCO,
INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000876948
<NAME> TREADCO, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,809,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,682,604
<INVENTORY>                                 28,195,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,688,361
<PP&E>                                      48,184,059
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,166,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,847,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,445,040
<BONDS>                                      9,870,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,723
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,156,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,847,153
<SALES>                                     37,504,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,504,948
<CGS>                                       38,081,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,081,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               394,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               385,844
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (971,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (343,862)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (627,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (627,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-152555) and related Prospectus pertaining to the registration of anaggregate of 1,000,000 shares of its common stock of Argyle Security, Inc. andin the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-126569) and related Prospectuspertaining to the registration of 4,075,046 shares of its common stock and187,500 common stock purchase warrants of Argyle Security, Inc. of our reportdated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedules of Argyle Security, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

 

San Antonio, Texas

 

March 31, 2009

 

----
Before the Third Division

May 26, 1965

No. 69329.

#### Alfred H. Marzolf *v.*United States,

protest 64/1670 (Seattle).

The following order was entered:

Donlon, Judge:

Defendant having moved in open court at Seattle to dismiss the above-captioned protest on the ground that it failed to comply with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, and the presiding judge having reserved decision on the motion, with leave granted the parties to file briefs; and

Plaintiff having duly filed a brief in opposition to the motion and defendant having requested and been granted an extension of time to file its brief; and

Defendant having now filed with the court its withdrawal of its oral motion to dismiss the protest after “closer examination of the Court file pertaining to this protest and further consideration of the issues involved,”

Now, therefore, on all the papers and proceedings herein, defendant’s motion to dismiss the protest is withdrawn.

The clerk is directed to set this case on the calendar *of the*next Seattle term.

So ordered.
----

----

|                        (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      16, 2009 | /s/      David J. Bryant                                  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                | David      J. Bryant                                      |
|                | Chief      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
|                |                                                      |

----

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 790 

Commending the people of the State of Washington for showing their support 

for the needs of the State of Washington’s veterans and encouraging 

residents of other States to pursue creative ways to show their own 

support for veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

Mr. BAIRD (for himself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. REICHERT, 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the people of the State of Washington for showing their support for the needs of the State of Washington’s veterans and encouraging residents of other States 

to pursue creative ways to show their own support for 

veterans. 

Whereas every day, American men and women risk their lives 

serving the country in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas it is important to many Americans to be able to donate money directly to causes about which they care; 

Whereas it is important for residents to have a tangible way 

to demonstrate their support for veterans; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 790 IH 

Whereas despite Government funding for the Nation’s veterans, many important needs of veterans remain unmet; 

Whereas citizens in the State of Washington have banded together in a grassroots effort to create a Veterans Family 

Fund Certificate of Deposit; 

Whereas any financial institution in the State of Washington 

can choose to offer a Veterans Family Fund Certificate 

of Deposit; 

Whereas the Bank of Clark County has become the first institution to offer these Certificates of Deposit; 

Whereas the Governor of the State of Washington and the 

Washington State Veterans Affairs Department have expressed the State’s support for this program; 

Whereas when a person buys a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit from a participating financial institution, half of the interest is automatically donated to the 

State of Washington’s Veterans Innovation Program to 

address the unmet needs of the State of Washington’s 

veterans and their families; 

Whereas the Veterans Innovation Program provides emergency assistance to help current or former Washington 

National Guard or Reserve service members cope with financial hardships, unemployment, educational needs, and 

many basic family necessities; and 

Whereas the Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit 

will be officially launched on November 8, 2007: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 790 IH 

1 (1) commends the people of the State of Wash2 ington for showing their support for the needs of the 

3 State of Washington’s veterans; and 

4 (2) encourages residents of other States to pur5 sue creative ways to show their own support for vet6 erans. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
# C_2008254EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP

AND ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v.

ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Defendant

AND

OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED

AND TORRENT PHARMA INC., 

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

AND MYLAN INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

____________________ 

2012-1359, -1360, -1361, -1362, -1363, -1364

______________________ 
Appeals from the United States District Court of New 

Jersey in Nos. 10-CV-1835, 10-CV-4203, 10-CV-4205, 10-

CV-4971, 10-CV-5519, 11-CV-2483, and 11-CV-2484, 

Judge Joel A. Pisano. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

HENRY J. RENK, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & 

Scinto, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffsappellees. With him on the brief were BRUCE C. HAAS, 

STEVEN C. KLINE, MICHAEL P. MCGRAW, DENNIS GREGORY

and ROBERT J. CZARNECKI, JR. 

CHRISTOPHER T. GRIFFITH, Leydig, Voit & Mayer,

LTD., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant, 

Osmotica Pharmaceutical Corporation and WILLIAM A.

RAKOCZY, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, of 

Chicago, Illinois, argued for Defendants-appellants, 

Myland Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. With them on the 

brief were ROBERT F. GREEN, LEYDIG, Voit & Mayer, LTD.

of Chicago, Illinois, JAMACIA P. SZELIGA, of Washington, 

DC, and AMY D. BRODY, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik 

LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, 

H. KEETO SABHARWAL, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & 

Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantsappellants, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited, et al. With 

him on the brief were BYRON L. PICKARD, JONATHAN M.

STRANG and DENNIES VARUGHESE. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 PER CURIAM (MOORE, MAYER, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 14, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly

 Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       Exhibit 5


                        SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
                               Counsellors at Law
                             Two Renaissance Square
                       40 North Central Avenue, Suite 2700
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85004

                                                       Telephone: (602) 528-4000
                                                      Telecopier: (602) 253-8129

July 26, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         RE:      MESA AIR GROUP, INC. - OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN
                  FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Mesa Air Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
relating to the registration of 150,000 shares of its Common Stock, no par value
(the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's Outside Directors' Stock
Option Plan (the "Plan").

         In that connection, we have examined such documents, corporate records
and other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of
this opinion, including the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the
Company.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

         1. The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as a
corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada.

         2. The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the
Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.

                                            /s/ Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.120.c State and Local Government Employee Retirement Funds Defined Contribution Plans  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineState and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; total financial assets
	FL224090055
	481.6
	471.6
	488.1
	486.2
	457.3
	471.6
	473.4
	478.0
	492.9
	1State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares, including variable annuity money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL223034055
	6.3
	6.3
	6.2
	6.3
	5.3
	6.3
	5.3
	5.2
	5.1
	2State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; mutual fund shares, including variable annuity mutual fund shares; asset
	LM223064255
	277.9
	263.9
	281.9
	278.7
	255.1
	263.9
	269.2
	270.7
	279.0
	3State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; miscellaneous assets
	FL223090055
	197.3
	201.5
	199.9
	201.2
	196.9
	201.5
	198.9
	202.0
	208.8
	4State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; unallocated insurance contracts; asset
	FL223095505
	144.9
	146.4
	146.8
	147.3
	143.0
	146.4
	146.4
	148.5
	153.3
	5State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; unidentified miscellaneous assets
	FL223093053
	52.5
	55.0
	53.2
	53.9
	53.9
	55.0
	52.5
	53.6
	55.5
	6State and local government employee defined contribution retirement funds; total financial assets
	FL224090055
	481.6
	471.6
	488.1
	486.2
	457.3
	471.6
	473.4
	478.0
	492.9
	7 Back to top
  **NOTES** Includes 403(b) and 457 type plans.
Assets held at life insurance companies.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION

AND REGULATION

SR 21-11

June 30, 2021

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

SUBJECT: FFIEC Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations Examination Handbook

Applicability: This letter applies to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including 

those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) has published the 

“Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations” (AIO) booklet. The AIO booklet is one in a series 

of 11 booklets that comprise the FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook (IT 

Handbook). The AIO booklet replaces the current Operations Booklet, which was published in 

July 2004. 

This booklet focuses on enterprise-wide, process-oriented approaches that consider the 

design of technology within the overall business structure (Architecture), implementation of IT 

infrastructure components (Infrastructure), and delivery of services and value for customers

(Operations). It discusses the following: 

• Principles and practices for IT and operations for safety and soundness, consumer financial 

protection, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 

• Processes for addressing risk related to the design and implementation of IT systems. 

• Principles to help examiners evaluate the delivery of financial products and services. 

• Management oversight of AIO and its related components, including governance; common 

risk management topics; specific activities of architecture, infrastructure, and operations; and 

evolving technologies that examiners may encounter during their reviews of AIO.

The AIO booklet and the other booklets in the IT Handbook are available on the FFIEC 

website at: https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/it-booklets.aspx.

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to the supervised organizations in their 

districts and to appropriate supervisory staff.
 

Page 2 of 2

In addition, institutions may send questions via the Board’s public website.1

Michael S. Gibson

Director

Division of Supervision and Regulation

1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx
Before the Third Division

June 1, 1965

No. 69345.

#### Shell Oil Co. *v.*United States,

protest 195630-K.

C.D. 2509, rehearing denied, Abstract 69233. Plaintiff’s second rehearing denied as untimely filed, Abstract 69295. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate order, Abstract 69295, dismissed.