alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                      11,557,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,210,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,692,351
<INVENTORY>                                 49,384,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           107,657,406
<PP&E>                                      22,785,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,864,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,318,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,650
<OTHER-SE>                                 105,017,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,864,928
<SALES>                                     57,822,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,822,788
<CGS>                                       32,600,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,600,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,081,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               346,279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             755,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,700,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,598,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,666,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,666,076
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT23.1







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-143483 and No. 333-147735) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements
(No. 333-147734, No. 333-156341 and No. 333-156338) on Form S-8 of Smart
Balance, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated February 27,
2009, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the periods in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008 which report appears in the December 31, 2008
annual report on Form 10-K of Smart Balance, Inc. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in these registration
statements.








/s/
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC








February
27, 2009


Denver,
Colorado
Exhibit 31

                         CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY
                     NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                                 WITH FORM 10-K


      I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of New Century Home
Equity Loan Trust 2005-A, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-A;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing LP and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.126 Agency- and GSE-Backed Mortgage Pools  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineAgency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FL413065005
	1146.8
	1311.9
	1442.7
	1573.5
	1648.5
	1775.5
	1677.2
	1729.5
	1775.5
	1803.9
	1844.0
	1Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; home mortgages; asset
	FL413065105
	1075.0
	1222.9
	1326.6
	1423.9
	1474.8
	1568.8
	1491.1
	1536.5
	1568.8
	1587.7
	1614.8
	2Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; multifamily residential mortgages; asset
	FL413065405
	68.1
	87.3
	114.2
	147.8
	172.1
	204.3
	184.6
	190.6
	204.3
	213.4
	226.5
	3Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; commercial mortgages; asset
	FL413065505
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	4Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; farm mortgages; asset
	FL413065605
	3.8
	1.7
	1.9
	1.8
	1.6
	2.3
	1.6
	2.4
	2.3
	2.7
	2.7
	5Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FL413065005
	1146.8
	1311.9
	1442.7
	1573.5
	1648.5
	1775.5
	1677.2
	1729.5
	1775.5
	1803.9
	1844.0
	6 Back to top
  **NOTES** GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Farmer Mac, and Farmers Home Administration pools. Beginning 2010:Q1, almost all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage pools (L.126) are consolidated on Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's balance sheets (L.125). Also includes agency- and GSE-backed mortgage pool securities which are used as collateral for agency- and GSE-backed CMOs and privately issued CMOs. Excludes Federal Financing Bank holdings of pool securities, which are included with federal government mortgages and other loans and advances.
Such issues are classified as agency- and GSE-backed securities.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JAMES ROBERT JACKSON,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-218M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Possession of Methamphetamine with Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: May 8, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), there is a rebuttable presumption that

defendant is a flight risk and a danger to the community based on the nature of the pending

charges.

(2) Defendant has multiple failures to appear in court and one escape charge.

(3) Defendant’s criminal background history reveals serious and substantial

charges.

Case 2:06-cr-00156-RSM Document 8 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(4) Defendant has no stable residence.

(5) Defendant has prior substance-abuse problems which appear to be ongoing.

(6) There is evidence that defendant may been involved with witness intimidation.

(7) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will address the risk of flight and the the danger to other persons of the

community posed by defendant.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 8th day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00156-RSM Document 8 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139305

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139305 COA: 291668 Berrien CC: 2008-402766-FC HARRY LONZO-BOLTON ERVIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 29, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY 

### , C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2023 / Presidential Documents 68445 

Proclamation 10643 of September 29, 2023 

Death of Dianne Feinstein 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Senator Dianne Feinstein was a pioneering American and a true trailblazer. 

In San Francisco, she showed enormous poise and courage in the wake 

of tragedy, and became a powerful voice for American values. In the United 

States Senate, she turned passion into purpose, and led the fight to ban 

assault weapons, also making her mark on everything from national security 

to the environment to protecting civil liberties. Senator Feinstein was a 

role model for so many Americans and she had an immense impact on 

younger female leaders for whom she generously opened doors. She was 

a historic figure, and our country will benefit from her legacy for generations. 

As a mark of respect for the memory of Senator Dianne Feinstein, by the 

authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the 

flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House 

and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval 

stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District 

of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, on the day of interment. I also direct that the flag 

shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States 

embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including 

all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-three, 

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred 

and forty-eighth. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22244 

Filed 10–3–23; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC10BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALORICA AND ALORICA, INC.,

Appellants,

v.

ELVIA JASSO,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00158-CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018-DCV-1535)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed because the trial court has vacated the interlocutory order that is the subject of this 

appeal. On August 30, 2018, the trial court denied Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration, and 

Appellants filed notice of appeal. On November 2, 2018, the trial court signed an order vacating 

the August 30, 2018 order. See TEX.R.APP.P. 29.5 (while an appeal from an interlocutory order is 

pending, the trial court retains jurisdiction of the case and unless prohibited by statute may make 

further orders, including one dissolving the order complained of on appeal). 

It is well established that a court is prohibited from deciding moot controversies. National 

Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999). A case is moot if a 

justiciable controversy ceases to exist at any stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal.

In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005). This appeal became moot 
- 2 -

when the trial court vacated the order denying Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. All pending motions are denied as moot.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

November 28, 2018

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
Order entered January 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01325-CV

JOHN H. CARNEY & ASSOCIATES, Appellant

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02253

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for leave to file a corrected brief. We GRANT

the motion. Appellant’s corrected brief received January 7, 2015 is deemed filed as of the date 

of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LUCINDA M WYNN,

Defendants.

Case No. CR06-242JLR

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF BOND

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial

Services Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of release.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, Barb Sievers. 

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Russell Leonard. 

The U.S. Pretrial Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of 

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge J Kelley Arnold:

Date of hearing: July 21, 2006

Time of hearing: 3:00 p.m.

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person

 or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

July 20, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00242-JLR Document 25 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 63I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 063I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 657 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 063I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 657 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 63 I/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/157, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/156 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali | 1 |
| 2022/C 63 I/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2017/1775/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) 1770/2017 concerning restrictive measures against Mali apply | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 63 I/01

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/157, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/156 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali

1

2022/C 63 I/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2017/1775/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) 1770/2017 concerning restrictive measures against Mali apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 197

Designating May 6, 1998, as ‘‘National Eating Disorders Awareness Day’’

to heighten awareness and stress prevention of eating disorders.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1998

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating May 6, 1998, as ‘‘National Eating Disorders

Awareness Day’’ to heighten awareness and stress prevention of eating disorders.

Whereas over 8,000,000 Americans suffer from eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and

compulsive eating;

Whereas 1 in 10 individuals with anorexia nervosa will die;

Whereas 1 in 4 college-age women struggle with an eating

disorder;

Whereas 80 percent of young women believe they are overweight;

Whereas 52 percent of girls report dieting before the age of

13;
2

•SRES 197 IS

Whereas 30 percent of 9-year-old girls fear becoming overweight;

Whereas the incidence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia has

doubled over the last decade, and anorexia nervosa and

bulimia is striking younger populations;

Whereas the epidemiologic profile of individuals with eating

disorders includes all racial and socio-economic backgrounds;

Whereas eating disorders cause immeasurable suffering for

both victims and families of the victim;

Whereas individuals suffering from eating disorders lose the

ability to function effectively, representing a great personal loss, as well as a loss to society;

Whereas the treatment of eating disorders is often extremely

expensive;

Whereas there is a widespread educational deficit of information about eating disorders;

Whereas the majority of cases of eating disorders last from

1 to 15 years; and

Whereas the immense suffering surrounding eating disorders,

the high cost of treatment for eating disorders, and the

longevity of these illnesses make it imperative that we acknowledge the importance of education, early detection,

and prevention programs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates May 6, 1998,

2 as ‘‘National Eating Disorders Awareness Day’’ to height3 en awareness and stress prevention of eating disorders.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 PROPOSED ORDER - [C06-889-MAT]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PATRICIA A. COUTEE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-889-MAT

PROPOSED ORDER FOR REMAND

Based upon Stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the case is

REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four). On remand, the ALJ shall: 1) update the record; 2) fully

address the treating opinion of Dr. Tirschwell (Tr. 1029-32); 3) re-assess claimant's residual

Case 2:06-cv-00889-MAT Document 16 Filed 11/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 PROPOSED ORDER - [C06-889-MAT]

functional capacity with specific references to evidence supporting the assessed limitations; 

4) compare this RFC with the demands of claimant's past relevant work; 5) as, necessary, obtain

vocational expert testimony; and 6) complete any other actions necessary to develop the record

and issue a new decision

DATED this 6th day of November, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by:

s/ JEFFREY BAIRD

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98104-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-2205

FAX: (206) 615-2531

jeffrey.h.baird@ssa.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00889-MAT Document 16 Filed 11/07/06 Page 2 of 2