alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71740-71741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28440]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2014-0090]

Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health; Notice of 
Solicitation for Membership

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation for membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice that the Secretary is soliciting 
nominations for membership for this Committee to serve for 2 year 
terms.

DATES: Consideration will be given to nominations received on or before 
January 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Completed nomination forms should be sent to the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. R.J. Cabrera, Designated Federal 
Officer, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 34, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; 
(301) 851-3478, email: rj.cabrera@aphis.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal 
Health (SACAH or the Committee) advises the Secretary of Agriculture on 
strategies, policies, and programs to prevent, control, or eradicate 
animal diseases. The Committee considers agricultural initiatives of 
national scope and significance and advises on matters of public 
health, conservation of national resources, stability of livestock 
economies, livestock disease management and traceability strategies, 
prioritizing animal health imperatives, and other related aspects of 
agriculture.

[[Page 71741]]

    The Committee Chairperson and Vice Chairperson are elected by the 
Committee from among its members.
    Terms will expire for the current members of the Committee in May 
2015. We are soliciting nominations from interested organizations and 
individuals. An organization may nominate individuals from within or 
outside its membership. Nomination forms are available on the Internet 
at http://www.ocio.usda.gov/forms/doc/AD-755.pdf or may be obtained 
from the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The 
Secretary will select members to obtain the broadest possible 
representation on the Committee, in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) Regulation 1041-1. Equal opportunity practices, in 
line with the USDA policies, will be followed in all appointments to 
the Committee. To ensure that the recommendations of the Committee have 
taken into account the needs of the diverse groups served by the 
Department, membership should include, to the extent practicable, 
individuals with demonstrated ability to represent minorities, women, 
and persons with disabilities.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of November 2014.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-28440 Filed 12-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
No. 64641.

#### S. Rosenberg Christmas Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/5554 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber or hemp articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 50 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 50

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the correction of cost-of-
                          living adjustments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 1997

    Mr. Roth (for himself and Mr. Moynihan) submitted the following 
       resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate regarding the correction of cost-of-
                          living adjustments.

Whereas the final report of the Senate Finance Committee's Advisory Commission 
        to Study the Consumer Price Index, chaired by Professor Michael Boskin, 
        has concluded that the Consumer Price Index overstates the cost of 
        living in the United States by 1.1 percentage points;
Whereas Dr. Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal 
        Reserve System, has testified before the Senate Finance Committee that 
        ``the best available evidence suggests that there is virtually no chance 
        that the CPI as currently published understates'' the cost of living and 
        that there is ``a very high probability that the upward bias ranges 
        between \1/2\ percentage point per year and 1\1/2\ percentage points per 
        year'';
Whereas the overstatement of the cost of living by the Consumer Price Index has 
        been recognized by economists since at least 1961, when a report noting 
        the existence of the overstatement was issued by a National Bureau of 
        Economic Research Committee, chaired by Professor George J. Stigler;
Whereas Congress and the President, through the indexing of Federal tax 
        brackets, Social Security benefits, and other Federal program benefits, 
        have undertaken to protect taxpayers and beneficiaries of such programs 
        from the erosion of purchasing power due to inflation;
Whereas Congress and the President intended the indexing of Federal tax 
        brackets, Social Security benefits, and other Federal program benefits 
        to accurately reflect changes in the cost of living; and
Whereas the overstatement of the cost of living increases the deficit and 
        undermines the equitable administration of Federal benefits and tax 
        policies: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that all cost-of-
living adjustments required by statute should accurately reflect the 
best available estimate of changes in the cost of living.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES M. DAVIS

4767 WHARF ROAD

BOW WA 98232

360-766-3223

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND

FILING MOTIONS IN LIMINE, 05-5808RBL -1

THE HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THOMAS K. STARK,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOTEM OCEAN TRAILER EXPRESS,

INC.; INTEROCEAN AMERICAN

SHIPPING CORPORATION; SEA STAR

STEVEDORE CO. in personam, and SS

NORTHERN LIGHTS et al. in rem,

Defendants.

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE NO. C05-5808RBL

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING DATE TO FILE MOTIONS

IN LIMINE

Plaintiff Thomas K. Stark and defendants Totem Ocean Trailer Express, Inc. (TOTE),

Interocean American Shipping Corporation (IAS), and Sea Star Stevedore Co., by and through their

attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The parties stipulate and agree that, because of continuing settlement negotiations,

the court should extend the date for the filing of motions in limine by one week to February 5, 2007;

2. The extension of this date will not affect the discovery cutoff date or the scheduled

trial date of February 26, 2007.

STIPULATED TO AND AGREED this 29th Day of January, 2007.

Case 3:05-cv-05808-RBL Document 44 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES M. DAVIS

4767 WHARF ROAD

BOW WA 98232

360-766-3223

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND

FILING MOTIONS IN LIMINE, 05-5808RBL -2

CHARLES M. DAVIS

s/

Charles M. Davis, WSBA # 5088

Counsel for Plaintiff Thomas Stark

4767 Wharf Road

Bow, WA 98232

Tel: (360) 766-3223

Fax: (360) 766-4014

E-mail: cdavis@davismarine.com

MARC E. WARNER

s/ 

Marc E. Warner, WSBA # 5937

Attorney for Defendants TOTE and IASC

LeGros, Buchanan & Paul

701 Fifth Ave., Suite 2500

Seattle WA 98104

Tel: (206) 623-4990

Fax: (206) 467-4828

E-mail: mwarner@legros.com

THOMAS G. JOHNSON

s/ 

Thomas G. Johnson, WSBA # 8929

Attorney for Defendant Sea Star Stevedore Co.

2101 Fourth Ave., Suite 2400

Seattle WA 98212

Tel: (206) 443-3400

Fax: (206) 443-9076

E-Mail: tgjohnson@bmjlaw.com

ORDER

Based upon the above stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the Court’s scheduling order is

modified as follows:

1. Motions in Limine: February 5, 2007;

The trial date of February 26, 2007, is not affected by these changes.

Dated this 30th day of January, 2007.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05808-RBL Document 44 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 58747.

protest 237532-K (New York).

#### Joseph Fleischer & Co., Inc., and Dorf International, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the involved merchandise, consisting of a ladies’ court theatrical wig, is composed of human hair and is in chief value of human hair. In accordance with stipulation of counsel, it was held that the merchandise described on the invoice as “D.l Theatrical wig, Ladies Court” was dutiable as claimed.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 185

To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should save Social Security

first and should finance any tax cuts or new investments with other

funds until legislation is enacted to make Social Security actuarially

sound and capable of paying future retirees the benefits to which they

are entitled.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DASCHLE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

JOHNSON, Mr. FORD, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. REID)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Finance

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should

save Social Security first and should finance any tax

cuts or new investments with other funds until legislation

is enacted to make Social Security actuarially sound

and capable of paying future retirees the benefits to

which they are entitled.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE BUDGET AND

3 SOCIAL SECURITY.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that—
2

•SRES 185 IS

1 (1) the Social Security system provides benefits

2 to 44,000,000 Americans, including 27,300,000 re3 tirees, over 4,500,000 people with disabilities,

4 3,800,000 surviving children, and 8,400,000 surviv5 ing adults, and is essential to the dignity and secu6 rity of the Nation’s elderly and disabled;

7 (2) the Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and

8 Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust

9 Funds have reported to Congress that the ‘‘total in10 come’’ of the Social Security system ‘‘is estimated to

11 fall short of expenditures beginning in 2019 and in

12 each year thereafter . . . until [trust fund] assets

13 are exhausted in 2029’’;

14 (3) intergenerational fairness, honest account15 ing principles, prudent budgeting, and sound eco16 nomic policy all require saving Social Security first,

17 in order that the Nation may better afford the re18 tirement of the baby boom generation beginning in

19 2010;

20 (4) in reforming Social Security in 1983, Con21 gress intended that near-term Social Security trust

22 fund surpluses be used to prefund the retirement of

23 the baby boom generation;

24 (5) in his State of the Union message to the

25 joint session of Congress on January 27, 1998,
3

•SRES 185 IS

1 President Clinton called on Congress to ‘‘save Social

2 Security first’’ and to ‘‘reserve one hundred percent

3 of the surplus, that is any penny of any surplus,

4 until we have taken all the necessary measures to

5 strengthen the Social Security system for the twen6 ty-first century’’; and

7 (6) saving Social Security first would work to

8 expand national savings, reduce interest rates, en9 hance private investment, increase labor productiv10 ity, and boost economic growth.

11 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

12 Senate that Congress should save Social Security first by

13 reserving any unified budget surplus until legislation is en14 acted to make Social Security actuarially sound and capa15 ble of paying future retirees the benefits to which they

16 are entitled.

Æ
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed June 4, 

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00344-CV

KANICWA THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF J.T., 

A MINOR, Appellant

V.

MIGUEL PELAYO, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1202973

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed February 6, 2024. On May 22, 2024, 

appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal “without prejudice.” The 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak only of dismissal of an appeal; neither 

“with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is appended to the word “dismissal.” See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We construe the motion as one for voluntary dismissal under 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). So construed, the motion is granted, 

and the appeal is dismissed. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0632 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 044 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model SA - 365N, SA - 365N1, AS - 365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, EC155B1, SA - 365C, SA - 365C1, SA - 365C2, and SA - 366G 1 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 31 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect corrosion on the main gearbox (MGB) casing, which could lead to a crack, failure of the MGB, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for the inspection) (8 x $85/work-hour for the corrosion repair) $ 43 $680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 43 for the inspection $ 680 for the corrosion repair Total US Fleet Cost $1,318 for the inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) 

### Project Engineer : Rao Edupuganti
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JANET G. WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., and JASEN

McDANIEL,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-800MJP

TAXATION OF COSTS

Costs in the above-entitled cause are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFF JANET G. WILSON and

on behalf of DEFENDANTS in the unopposed amount of $6,019.85.

Entered this 24th day of JULY , 2007 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:06-cv-00800-MJP Document 35 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 1
Year,Household net worth1,Total,Growth of dom Households,estic nonfinanc Businesses,ial debt2 State and local gov’ts,Federal government
2005,61890,8.6,10.6,8.1,5.8,6.6
2006,66382,8.4,10.5,9.8,3.9,3.9
2007,66838,8.1,7.2,12.4,5.5,4.7
2008,56590,5.7,-0.1,5.8,0.6,21.4
2009,58391,3.4,0.3,-4.3,4.0,20.4
2010,62575,4.3,-0.6,-0.9,2.3,18.5
2011,63840,3.5,-0.5,3.0,-1.7,10.8
2012,69922,5.0,2.0,4.8,-0.2,10.1
2013,79371,4.0,1.8,5.1,-1.3,6.7
2014,83426,4.4,3.1,6.3,-0.5,5.4
2013Q2,74331,2.2,1.4,5.1,-1.1,1.6
2013Q3,76807,3.2,3.3,7.3,-3.0,0.9
2013Q4,79371,6.1,1.5,4.2,-2.8,14.4
2014Q1,80482,4.0,1.8,6.1,-1.7,5.7
2014Q2,81882,4.2,5.1,5.0,0.1,3.5
2014Q3,81861,4.5,3.1,6.1,-1.7,6.0
2014Q4,83426,4.8,2.2,7.2,1.5,5.9
2015Q1,85017,2.5,1.7,7.2,4.3,-1.1
2015Q2,85712,4.4,3.9,8.3,1.0,2.4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 72116)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 19, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Ground Advantage® Contract 4 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-2, CP2024-2.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-23017 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

                       STARTECH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert L. DeRochie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Robert L. DeRochie
                                       ----------------------
                                       Robert L. DeRochie
                                       Chief Financial Officer & Vice President,
                                       Investor Relations
                                       June 20, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial Date, etc.

U.S. v. Brandom Estrada, et al.,/CR06-5205FDB - 1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-5205FDB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER 

v. ) GRANTING STIPULATED

) MOTION TO CONTINUE

BRANDOM LEMARK ESTRADA, and ) TRIAL DATE

RICARDO VASQUEZ MANZANO, )

)

Defendants. ) )

Upon the stipulation and motion of the parties to continue the trial date in the

above-captioned case, and based upon the stipulated and agreed facts set forth in the

parties’ motion, which are hereby incorporated by reference, the Court finds that such a

continuance would serve the ends of justice and outweigh the best interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial; therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued to June 26, 2006. The

period of delay resulting from this continuance from the current trial date of May 30,

2006, up to and including the new trial date of June 26, 2006, is hereby excluded for

speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) for the purpose of

computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174.

Case 3:06-cr-05205-FDB Document 20 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial Date, etc.

U.S. v. Brandom Estrada, et al.,/CR06-5205FDB - 2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial conference date will be rescheduled

under separate order of the Court. 

DATED this 19th day of May, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s*/ Colin Fieman 

COLIN FIEMAN

Attorney for Defendant

Brandom Lemark Estrada

s*/ Roger Hunko 

ROGER HUNKO

Attorney for Defendant

Ricardo Vasquez Manzano

*Telephonic approval

s/ Douglas J. Hill 

DOUGLAS J. HILL

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-05205-FDB Document 20 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

August 6, 1954

No. 58315.

protest 191572-K (New York).

#### Fromson Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the brass-clad steel tubing in question consists of articles containing 4 percent or more of copper by weight and not in chief value thereof. Upon the uncontroverted facts of record, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.