alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE & PTM’s DUE DATE 1

U.S. v. Jeffcoat; CR06-5454RBL

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MAURICE JEFFCOAT,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5454 RBL

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DUE DATE

Based on the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the trial date, and the

affidavit of defense counsel in support of the motion, the Court makes the following

findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

2. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense to prepare would

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(i). 

3. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of some complexity,

including all relevant issues and defenses applicable to the case, which would make it

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself

within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act and currently set for this case. 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B(ii). 

4. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a continuance is necessary

to allow the defendant the reasonable time for effective preparation his defense. 18

Case 3:06-cr-05454-RBL Document 20 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE & PTM’s DUE DATE 2

U.S. v. Jeffcoat; CR06-5454RBL

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from September 11,

2006 to February 26, 2007, at 9:00 AM. The resulting period of delay from September

11, 2006 to February 26, 2007, is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

Motions to be filed not later than January 16, 2007.

Motion(s) Hearing, if needed, shall be conducted February 8, 2007 at 8:30 AM

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2006. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Digitally Signed upon oral authorization (JAB)

Presented By:

/s/ /s/ 

Russell V. Leonard Lisca Borichewski 

Attorney for Mr. Jeffcoat Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-05454-RBL Document 20 Filed 08/14/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

AL NERIO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5340RJB

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying

Apdopting [sic] R & R re: TRO Dkt. # 46.” Dkt. 54. The Court has considered the pleading filed in

support of the motion, and the remainder of the file herein.

On October 3, 2006, Plaintiff filed a pleading entitled “Mt for Emergency Immediate TRO” (Dkt.

16) and on October 2, 2006, Plaintiff filed a pleading entitled “Motion for TRO” (Dkt. 18). Both motions

dealt with the number of copies and envelopes Plaintiff is allotted each month at the Special Commitment

Center. Id. On November 9, 2006, U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold recommended that this Court

deny Plaintiff’s motions, finding that Plaintiff had failed to show irreparable injury. Dkt. 34-1. On

December 11, 2006, this Court adopted Judge Arnold’s recommendation and denied the two motions. 

Dkt. 46. Plaintiff now seeks a reconsideration of the December 11, 2006 Order Adopting Report and

Recommendation (Dkt. 46). Dkt. 54. 

Local Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(h) provides, in relevant part, as follows:

Motions for reconsideration are disfavored. The court will ordinarily deny such motions in the

absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal

authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence.

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 55 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration should be denied. Plaintiff has failed to show a manifest error

in the prior ruling or new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the Court’s

attention earlier with reasonable diligence. Plaintiff has failed to meet his burden under Local Fed. R. Civ.

P. 7(h). 

Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Apdopting [sic] R & R

re: TRO Dkt. # 46” (Dkt. 54) is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order

to all counsel of record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 

DATED this 21st day of December, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 55 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.1  TAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC. COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS TO CONSOLIDATED FIXED CHARGES  For the Years Ended December 31,2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Earnings Available for Fixed Charges:Income before income taxes

$
89,646

$
110,854

$
54,863

$
60,391

$
65,521Add:Interest and debt expense

79,104

68,807

64,983

52,129

47,578Write-off of deferred financing costs

675



250

204

2,367Appropriate portion of rents (a)

176

181

195

181

166Earnings available for fixed charges

$
169,601

$
179,842

$
120,291

$
112,905

$
115,632Fixed Charges:Interest and debt expense

$
79,104

$
68,807

$
64,983

$
52,129

$
47,578Write-off of deferred financing costs

675



250

204

2,367Appropriate portion of rents (a)

176

181

195

181

166Fixed Charges

$
79,955

$
68,988

$
65,428

$
52,514

$
50,111Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

2.12 X

2.61 X

1.84 X

2.15 X

2.31 X  
 (a) Portion of rental expenses that is deemed representative of an interest factor, which is 8% of total rental expense.
Exhibit 10.15
 HERCULES OFFSHORE 2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTION GRANT
  Optionee Name:
    
    (Executive Name)Number of Option Shares Granted:
    
    (No. Options)Type of Option (check one):
    
    Incentive Stock OptionX     Nonqualified Stock OptionEffective Date:
    
    (Date)Exercise Price per Share:
    
    (Price)Vesting Schedule:
    
    % of Grant
    
    Date Vested33-1/3 %33-1/3 %33-1/3 %
  OPTIONEE:
    
    HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.By(Executive Name)
    
    
    
    James W. Noe
     Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
     Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
  Page 1




---



##### 



HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.
 STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
     Effect of Plan and Authority of Board or Committee
 Grant of Option
 Exercisability
  Page 2




---



##### 



Term
 Term of Option.
 Early Termination.
    Manner of Exercise and Payment
  Page 3




---



##### 



Withholding Tax
 Delivery of Shares
  Nonassignability
  Page 4




---



##### 



Notices
 Relationship With Contract of Employment
     Governing Law
  Page 5




---



##### 



Cause
  Page 6
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AULTRA
GOLD INC.


FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Executive Officer of Aultra Gold Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Annual Report on Form 10- K/A of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




DATE:
      October 29, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Rauno PerttuName:
      Rauno PerttuTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10813)

#### Berben Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1082392, etc.

(Decided August 26, 1964)

*Barnes, Riohardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*397Lawence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain shotguns and parts thereof and fittings therefor, imported from Italy, forms the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision.

The cases have been submitted for determination by the court on a stipulation of fact by the parties hereto -wherein it has been agreed that the shotguns, with or without other words of description, and parts thereof and fittings therefor in issue were entered after February 28,1958, and that said merchandise does not appear on the official final list promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury (93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521), pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165). It was further stipulated and agreed by the parties that, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise in question, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the entered value.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra*(19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)), is the proper basis of value for the shotguns and parts thereof and fittings therefor in issue and that said value is the entered value.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
APR 2 9 2013 

Before the U.S. Department of Transportation H

Federal Aviation Administration ~~Rf N~ ~~(~K~~ 

) 

In the matter of ) 

) FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260 

TRANS TIME EXPRESS ) FAA Case No. 2011SW700220 

) The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

) 

JOINT MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIfE PROCEDURAI. SCHEDULE 

Pursuant to the Chief Judge's December 21, 2012, procedural order, the parties on 

January 22, 2013 proposed that Apri126, 2013 be the deadline for discovery completion 

and that May 31, 2013 be the deadline for the filing of stipulations, witness liats and the 

exchange of exhibits. At this time, discovery is ongoing and the parties are in settlement 

talks in an attempt to conclude this matter prior to hearing. Due to the fact that all 

requested discovery materials have not been received by Complainant, the parties request 

the deadlines be extended such that discovery concludes on May 31, 2013 and the 

exchange of hearing materials occurs by June 28, 2013. 
WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests that the Chief Administrative 

Law Judge grant Complainant's motion for an extension of the procedural schedule. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: ~ .

-C; 

Charles Raley, Attorney 

Enforcenent Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Eederal Aviatiion Administration 

800Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202)267-3357 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 

Email: charles.raley@faa.gov 

Dated: Apri123, 2013 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt, and by electronic transmission, a copy of Complainant's Joint 

Motion for and Extension of the Procedural Schedule In the Matter of Trans Time 

Express, FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260, FAA Case no. 2011 S W700220, addressed to: 

Cameron Niakan, Esq. 

10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 

Rockville, MD 20852 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document to: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Departrnent of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building — Suite 2 W 1000 

Dated: AprIl 23, 2013
THE TIREX CORPORATION
                          CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY

                  I, Michael  D.A.  Ash.,  Secretary  of The Tirex  Corporation,
hereby  certify  the  following  Resolution  was duly  adopted  by the  Board of
Directors of the Corporation:

         RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation authorizes the
issuance of shares of Common Stock of the  Corporation  to be registered on Form
S-8 to the  employees  and/or  consultants  as  appear  below,  in  lieu of cash
compensation for employment and/or consulting services rendered for which shares
the corporation has received full and adequate consideration:

            -------------------------------------------------------------
                                       NUMBER  OF S-8  REGISTERED  COMMON
            EMPLOYEE/CONSULTANT          STOCK AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED
            -------------------------------------------------------------
               Vijay Kachru                         1,265,221
            -------------------------------------------------------------
               Michel Massciotte                       52,950
            -------------------------------------------------------------
               Louis V. Muro                        1,391,588
            -------------------------------------------------------------
               Nisha Singh                            800,000
            -------------------------------------------------------------
               Total:                               3,509,759
            -------------------------------------------------------------


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, as Secretary of said Corporation,  have hereunto
set my hand and affixed the seal of the  Corporation  on this 14th Day of March,
2000.


                                             /s/ Michael D.A. Ash
                                             -------------------------------
                                                 Michael D.A. Ash, Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DeVONNE CHARLES HOUSTON,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5283RJB

 ORDER DIRECTING

SERVICE AND RETURN,

§ 2254 PETITION

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254. This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Magistrates’ Rules MJR 3 and MJR 4.

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

Case 3:06-cv-05283-RJB Document 8 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

or delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 31st , day of July, 2006. 

/S/ J/. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05283-RJB Document 8 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 112

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued in honor of the S.S. LANE VICTORY.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. KUYKENDALL (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr.

CHAMBLISS, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. HORN, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, and Mr.

TAYLOR of Mississippi) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued in honor of the S.S.

LANE VICTORY.

Whereas the United States merchant marine has provided

critical support to the Armed Forces of the United States

in periods of conflict throughout this century;

Whereas the S.S. LANE VICTORY was one of the vessels

used by the United States merchant marine to transport

equipment, troops, and supplies during World War II,

the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam era;

Whereas the S.S. LANE VICTORY was named for Isaac

Lane, an African American who rose from slavery to become a bishop in the Methodist Episcopal Church, and
2

•HCON 112 IH

who later founded Lane College in Jackson, Tennessee,

which stands today as a living museum; and

Whereas the profile of the S.S. LANE VICTORY on a commemorative postage stamp would heighten the Nation’s

awareness of the many acts of heroism rendered, and

other contributions made, by individuals in the United

States merchant marine: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service in honor

5 of the S.S. LANE VICTORY; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
YOLO-SOLA NO A IR QUA LITY MA NAGEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC WORKSHOP NOTICE 

### Prop os ed A do pt i on O f Ru le 2.41, Ex pand abl e P olysty ren e M anufa cturin g

Op erat i on s

The Y olo -S ola no Ai r Qual ity M anag ement D is tr ict ( Di str ict) st aff w il l hol d a p ubl icw or ks hop t o discuss th e prop osed ado ption of Distri ct Rule 2.4 1, EXPANDABL E POL YST YRENE MANUFACTURING OPERA T IONS. T he p ropo sed rule wi ll l imit the emission s of v olatile organic com po un dsfrom t he ma nu factu r i ng of ex pan dab le polysty rene produ cts. T he d raf t rule a n d d ra ft sta ff

repor t w il l be av ail abl e on the D is tr ict’ s websi te ( w w w
. y s a q md

. o rg ) u n d e r

t he Rul es and R eg ula ti ons li nk or may be o btai ned by

co ntacti ng C our

tney Graham at (5 30) 757- 3655. The publ icw or ks hop w il l be hel d at the fol low ing ti me and l ocat ion : Fr id ay , Ju ly

18, 2008 at1:00 p .m. Yolo-Solan o Air Quality Mana geme nt District 1947 G ali leo C our

t, Sui te 10 3 Dav is , C ali forni a 95618
The D is tr ict i nv it es w ri tten publ icco mments to be submitt ed to Susan K. McLau g hli n at 1947 Gal il eo Cou rt , Sui te 103, Dav is , C A 9 5618. C omments are to be recei v ed by the Di str ict by Jul y 24, 2008.
1

 
Participant or his Beneficiary hereunder shall become bankrupt or attempt to transfer,anticipate, alienate, assign, sell, pledge, encumber or charge any right or benefit hereunder,other than as contemplated by this Paragraph 3, or if any creditor shall attempt to subject thesame to a writ of garnishment, attachment, execution, sequestration, or any other form of processor involuntary lien or seizure, then such right or benefit shall cease and terminate.     4. *Effect of Termination of Employment*. Vesting in the Award is conditioned uponParticipant’s continuous employment by the Company from the Grant Date until the Vesting Date.Termination of the Participant’s employment with the Company by any means prior to the Vesting Dateshall result in forfeiture of the Award.     5. *Limitation of Rights*. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to: (a) give the Participant any right to be awarded any other Award in the future,even if other Awards are granted on a regular or repeated basis, as grants of Awardsare completely voluntary and made solely in the discretion of the Committee;  (b) give the Participant or any other person any interest in any property,including but not limited to, any fund, asset or assets or shares of Common Stock orany asset or assets or shares of any subsidiary of the Company (“Subsidiary”); or  (c) confer upon the Participant the right to continue in the employment or serviceof the Company or any Subsidiary, or affect the right of the Company or any Subsidiaryto terminate the employment or service of the Participant at any time or for anyreason.     6. *Successors and Assigns*. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of and beenforceable by the Participant, the Company and their respective permitted successors and assigns(including personal representatives, heirs and legatees), except that the Participant may notassign any rights or obligations under this Agreement except to the extent and in the mannerexpressly permitted herein.     7. *Governing Law*. This Award Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced inaccordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its officersthereunto duly authorized, and the Participant has hereunto set his hand as of the day and yearfirst above written.         HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.         By: /s/ James W. Noe          Name: James W. Noe    Title: Senior Vice President,General Counsel and Chief Compliance