alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

October 2, 1961

No. 66111.

#### Border Brokerage Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 262058-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of nylon gill nets similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 63947, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1006, as modified by the General *329Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 61802), for gill nets, wholly or in chief value of flax or ramie, by similitude, or at 22*4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53866), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 63877). The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of nylon fish netting the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 63947, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, for cotton fishing nets, by similitude. The items marked “0,” stipulated to consist of nylon mending twine similar in use to flax rope or twine used in tying together gill nets, were held dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 1004(b), as modified by T.D. 51802, for twines and cords, composed of two or more yarns wholly or in chief value of flax, by similitude. The items marked “D,” stipulated to consist of nylon twine or rope used with nets similar in use to cotton rope, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 912 of the act as cotton cords, by similitude, or at 33 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108). *(United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.) Protest 59/4287, having been abandoned only insofar as it covers the item marked “D” on entry 05-2431, described as “1 lb. TN-8 Light Green Nylon Twine,” was dismissed as to said item.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Registration  Rights Agreement (the "Amendment") is made
and entered  into as of the 14th day of March,  2000,  by and between Ferrellgas
Partners,  L.P., a Delaware  limited  partnership  (the "Issuer"),  and Williams
Natural Gas Liquids, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Williams").

WHEREAS,  Issuer and Williams have entered into that certain Registration Rights
Agreement dated as of December 17, 1999 (the "Registration Rights Agreement");

WHEREAS, Issuer and Williams desire to amend the Registration Rights Agreement
as set forth in this Amendment; and

WHEREAS,  pursuant to Section 9(d) of the  Registration  Rights  Agreement,  the
Registration  Rights  Agreement  may be amended in writing by the Issuer and the
Holders (as defined in the  Registration  Rights  Agreement)  of not less than a
majority  in  aggregate  number of the then  outstanding  Registrable  Units (as
defined in the Registration Rights Agreement);

NOW,   THEREFORE,   in   consideration   of  the  premises  and  the  respective
representations,  warranties,  covenants,  agreements and  conditions  contained
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I
                 AMENDMENTS TO THE REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
A. Amendment to Definition of "Effectiveness Target Date" in the Registration
Rights Agreement.

The reference in clause (iii) of the definition of  "Effectiveness  Target Date"
in the Registration  Rights Agreement to "180 days" is hereby amended to be "240
days."

B. Amendment to Section 2(a)(iii) of the Registration Rights Agreement.

The  reference in the first  sentence of Section  2(a)(iii) of the  Registration
Rights Agreement to "120 days" is hereby amended to be "180 days." The reference
in the first sentence of Section 2(a)(iii) of the Registration  Rights Agreement
to "180 days" is hereby amended to be "240 days."

                                   ARTICLE II
                               GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Full Force and Effect.

Except as expressly  amended hereby,  the  Registration  Rights  Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect in accordance  with the provisions  thereof on
the date hereof.


<PAGE>
RONNDL\075483\009007
HOUSTON\1090135.1
-2-
B. Other Provisions.
     Section  9 of  the  Registration  Rights  Agreement  shall  apply  to  this
Amendment  and be  incorporated  herein with the same force and effect as if its
provisions were reprinted as part of this  Amendment.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective
as of the first date stated above.

FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
By: FERRELLGAS, INC.,
its general partner

By:________________________
James M. Hake
Sr. Vice President

WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS, INC.

By:________________________
Don R. Wellendorf
Vice President/Attorney-in-Fact
# Official Journal C 369A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.369.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 369A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5529 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.369.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 369A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5529 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2012/C 369A/01 | Vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Auditors

2012/C 369A/01

Vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |
| 281 | (MT) |
| 283 | (SV) |
| 285 | (ES) |
| 288 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | (HU) |
| 294 | (BG) |
| 296 | (BG) |
| 300 | |
| 302 | |
| 304 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 305 | |
| 307 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 314 | |
| 316 | |
| 324 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 339 | |
| 340 | (LT) |
| 349 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 352 | |
| 368 | |
| 369 | (EN/FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

281

(MT)

283

(SV)

285

(ES)

288

(DE/EN/FR)

290

291

292

(HU)

294

(BG)

296

(BG)

300

302

304

(DE/EN/FR)

305

307

(DE/EN/FR)

314

316

324

(DE/EN/FR)

339

340

(LT)

349

(DE/EN/FR)

352

368

369

(EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 99-20822

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20822

Conference Calendar

 

JAVIER ORTIZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; 

RICHARD V. CRAVENER, District Director

of the Houston District of the Immigration

& Naturalization Service,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CV-1229

--------------------

April 11, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Ortiz, a permanent resident alien, appeals the

dismissal of his habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction. 

Ortiz sought habeas relief from a removal order issued pursuant

to a proceeding instituted by the Immigration and Naturalization

Service (“INS”). The INS instituted removal proceedings because

Ortiz had been convicted of the aggravated felony of driving 

while intoxicated.

Without filing an administrative appeal with the Board of
No. 99-20822

-2-

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), Ortiz filed a petition for habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Parties are required to

exhaust administrative remedies before challenging administrative

actions in the courts. Haitian Refugee Ctr. v. Smith, 676 F.2d

1023, 1034 (5th Cir. 1982). Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d), Ortiz

argues that exhaustion is not required when the administrative

remedy would be inadequate or ineffective. He contends that

appealing to the BIA would have been futile because a prior

decision by the BIA had foreclosed his only argument on appeal. 

However, Ortiz’s reliance on this provision is misplaced. The

statute expressly requires the exhaustion of administrative

remedies before a district court would have jurisdiction to

review Ortiz’s habeas petition. Accordingly, this argument is

without merit.

Ortiz also argues that he is not required to exhaust his 

administrative remedies because he is raising a constitutional

objection. This is legally and factually frivolous because his

brief raises no constitutional issue at all. 

This appeal raises issues that are without arguable merit

and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th

Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

5

th Cir. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                             CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC.
                         (A development stage company)


                     COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INFORMATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                            Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                               September 30,                   September 30,
                                           1996            1995           1996            1995
                                      --------------   ------------   ------------   -------------
<S>                                   <C>              <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
 Net income (loss).................   $     (164,552)  $   (250,955)   $  (582,618)  $    (677,085)
                                      ==============   ============    ===========   =============
Computation of primary per share
  information:
   Shares:
    Number of shares outstanding...       38,987,844     38,080,344     38,727,843      38,004,788
                                      ==============   ============    ===========   =============
Primary earnings per share:
 
Net income (loss)..................   $         (.00)  $       (.01)   $      (.02)  $        (.02)
                                      ==============   ============    ===========   =============
 
</TABLE>


(a)  Weighted average number of shares outstanding.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 
| ****                     |
|--------------------------|
|  Sallie  Mae, Inc.  |
|  12061 Bluemont Way |
|  Reston,VA 20190    |

 

 

**Annual Officer Certificate**

** **

**SLM Student Loan Trust 2005-6**

 

Pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Administration Agreement (the“Agreement”) and Section 3.9 of the Trust Indenture (“the Indenture”), we, theundersigned, hereby certify that (I) a review has been made of the activitiesand performance of the Servicer and Administrator from January 1, 2005 throughDecember 31, 2005, and (II) to the best of our knowledge, the Servicer and Administratorhave fulfilled their obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.Additionally, pursuant to Section 11.1(b) (v) of the Indenture, alldispositions of collateral that occurred during the above period were in theordinary course of the issuer’s business and the proceeds thereof were appliedin accordance with the basic documents.

 

 

March 27, 2006

 

 
| /S/ TED A. MORRIS  |   | /S/ J. LANCE FRANKE |   |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| Authorized Officer |   | Authorized Officer  |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-05-160-CV

CAROLYN DANIELS	APPELLANT

		V.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK AS TRUSTEE 					APPELLEE			S

AND HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK	

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On July 21, 2005, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment dismissing this appeal for want of prosecution because the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the appellate record had informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and because appellant did not timely respond to our June 27, 2005 letter informing her that she needed to make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provide this court with proof of payment.  Appellant subsequently filed a motion to reinstate, which we construed as a motion for rehearing, explaining that she had made numerous attempts to pay for the clerk’s record and that she was finally able to do so on July 27.  We granted her motion, withdrew our prior opinion and judgment, and reinstated the appeal.  The reporter’s record was filed August 19, and the clerk’s record was filed August 26.  On August 29, we informed appellant by letter that her brief was due September 28.

	On October 6, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).  TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated that “this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution” unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining appellant’s failure to file a brief and the need for an extension.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant has not filed a brief, nor has she reasonably explained her failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

									PER CURIAM  			

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 23, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CHARLES G. FELTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al.,

Defendants

Case No. C05-5818RBL

ORDER GRANTING

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

(3) Plaintiff’s causes of action are DISMISSED; and plaintiff’s pending motions, if any, are

denied as being moot;

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold

DATED this 21st day of November, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05818-RBL Document 73 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.51

                                    AMENDMENT

Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 1, 1994 as amended on December
15, 1996 between TTR Technologies Ltd. and Baruch Sollish (the "Agreement") made
this 22nd day of July, 1998.

1. Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended so that after the expiry of
the current term (other than for reasons set forth in clauses 3.1 (i) and (ii))
the Agreement shall automatically be renewed the for additional three (3) year
periods on the same terms and conditions set forth therein (unless mutually
agreed otherwise), unless either party elects not to renew the term of the
Agreement by giving written notice to the other at least 60 days before the
expiration date.

In Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the date stated
above.


TTR Technologies Ltd.


/s/ Marc D. Tokayer                     /s/ Baruch Sollish
-----------------------------------     ----------------------------------------
 Marc D. Tokayer                           Baruch Sollish
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-157129 on Form S-8 of our reports dated January 31, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Distance Education Holdings Limited, its subsidiaries, its variable
interest entity and the subsidiaries of its variable interest entity (collectively, the Group) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to retrospective application of the
authoritative guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income) and the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Distance Education Holdings Limited
for the year ended September 30, 2012.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP,
|Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China                       
|                                                              
|January 31, 2013
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14440-14441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5716]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Council on the Arts 175th Meeting

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice--Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on March 30, 2012, in 
Room M-09 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Friday, March 30th in 
Room M-09 (ending time is approximate), will be open to the public on a 
space available basis. The meeting will begin with opening remarks and 
voting on recommendations for funding and rejection and guidelines, 
followed by updates by the Chairman. From 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. there 
will be presentations on Operation Homecoming and the healing arts 
programs at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Arts and 
Achievement in At-Risk Youth: Findings From Four Longitudinal Studies, 
and an overview of NEA Arts and podcasts. The meeting will adjourn 
following concluding remarks and announcement of voting results.

[[Page 14441]]

    This meeting will be webcast. The webcast can be accessed by going 
to Art Works blog at www.arts.gov/artworks.
    If, in the course of the open session discussion, it becomes 
necessary for the Council to discuss non-public commercial or financial 
information of intrinsic value, the Council will go into closed session 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552b, and in accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of November 10, 2009. Additionally, discussion concerning purely 
personal information about individuals, submitted with grant 
applications, such as personal biographical and salary data or medical 
information, may be conducted by the Council in closed session in 
accordance with subsection (c)(6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend, as observers, Council 
discussions and reviews that are open to the public. If you need 
special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office 
of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TTY-TDD 202/682-5429, 
at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from the Office of Communications, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506, at 202/682-5570.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-5716 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
# Official Journal L 162/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.162.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 162 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5521 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.162.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 162

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5521 June 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 508/2012 of 20 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 508/2012 of 20 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.