alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3694]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products previously 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must Be Received On or Before: 3/21/2011.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.
    For Further Information or To Submit Comments Contact: Patricia 
Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or e-mail 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C 47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

Deletions

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. If approved, the action will not result in additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities.
    2. If approved, the action may result in authorizing small entities 
to furnish the products to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the products proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    The following products are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Products

NSN: 5350-00-229-3081--Cloth, Abrasive.
NPA: Louisiana Association for the Blind, Shreveport, LA.
NSN: 7930-01-512-7758--Food Service Cleaner.
NPA: The Lighthouse for the Blind, St. Louis, MO.
Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, Fort Worth, 
TX.
NSN: 7510-01-502-2918--Portfolio (16'' x 12'' x 4'').
NPA: South Texas Lighthouse for the Blind, Corpus Christi, TX.
Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, New York, NY.

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-3694 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
**1997-  peanut_stocks_and_processing_12.29.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_11.26.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_10.29.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_09.26.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_08.27.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_07.29.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_06.26.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_05.28.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_04.30.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_03.31.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_02.28.97peanut_stocks_and_processing_01.27.97

**
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of OSL Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eli Feder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: December 12, 2011




/s/ Eli Feder


Eli Feder


Chief Executive Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OSL Holdings Inc.  and will be returned by OSL Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 15 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 15

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary author and 
                the official home of ``Yankee Doodle''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. McNulty submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary author and 
                the official home of ``Yankee Doodle''.

Whereas the song ``Yankee Doodle'' is a humorous and patriotic ditty that dates 
        back to America's colonial period;
Whereas ``Yankee Doodle'' was popular from its inception, spreading throughout 
        New England and the Middle Atlantic States, where it was sung at 
        parades, in taverns, and beside campfires;
Whereas the British soldiers, known as Redcoats, picked up the tune at the 
        beginning of the American Revolution as a means of deriding the rag-tag 
        Continental Army;
Whereas, after the Battle of Lexington, ``Yankee Doodle'' became an anthem and a 
        source of pride among the rough-hewn Americans who were taking on the 
        polished British Redcoats;
Whereas, while the tune of ``Yankee Doodle'' originated in Europe as a common 
        air, many claims as to the authorship of the lyrics have been made;
Whereas, despite the other claims, Dr. Richard Shuckburgh, a British Army 
        surgeon who served on America's frontier for most of his adult life, is 
        today generally considered to be the primary author of the lyrics to 
        ``Yankee Doodle''; and
Whereas Dr. Shuckburgh is believed to have written almost all, if not all, of 
        the lyrics for ``Yankee Doodle'' at Fort Crailo in the city of 
        Rensselaer, New York, after viewing the provincial forces gathered there 
        in the 1750s for an attack on Fort Ticonderoga: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Richard Shuckburgh should be recognized and honored 
        as the primary author of ``Yankee Doodle''; and
            (2) Fort Crailo in the present-day city of Rensselaer, New 
        York, should be recognized as the ``Home of Yankee Doodle''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 57079.

petitions 6868-R and 6916-R (New York).

#### J. L. Hammett Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It appeared from the record that the merchandise involved had been imported by petitioner from 1903 to the present time; that it was always entered at the invoice prices, less nondutiable charges; that the customs officials had never raised any question as to such value until the importations here involved; and that numerous conferences were had by the customhouse brokers and the petitioner’s attorney with the customs officials prior to making the entries in an effort to ascertain the correct value at which the merchandise should be entered. A representative' from each of the customhouse brokerage firms making the entries testified that a so-called submission sheet was submitted to the customs officials in the case of both entries and that they made available to said officials all papers as well as other information in their possession. Based upon all the facts disclosed by the record, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted. *(United, States*v. *Fish,*268 U. S. 607, and *Linen Thread Co.*v. *United States,*13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 395, T. D. 41322.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-14-1998
<CASH>                                      43,471,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,011,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,153,227
<PP&E>                                      64,597,264
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,722,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,315,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,702,527
<BONDS>                                     95,983,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 50,900,524
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,679,009)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,221,793
<SALES>                                     11,475,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,475,235
<CGS>                                        9,209,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,731,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,050,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,061,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,061,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (333,596)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,394,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (349.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (349.95)
        

</TABLE>
Mr. Pietro Bordolatti
Via facsimile 305-467-6462

                                                                  April 23, 1999

Dear Pietro:

      I received back your signed copy by fax of the Stock Purchase Agreement
today. Please note that Contessa will probably need to file a document with the
SEC which describes this transaction as Contessa is a public company. As a
result, the timetable for closing set out in the document is probably too
ambitious as a closing will be delayed pending the SEC's processing of our
filing. I would therefore like to amend Section 2 of the document you signed so
that the first sentence reads as follows:

      "The closing of the purchase and sale of the GBR Shares and the Contessa
Shares shall be deferred until compliance with all SEC rules and regulations has
occurred."

      Please sign below and fax back to me that you understand that closing will
be delayed.

                                          Very truly yours,


                                          Peter F. Wojnar

I understand that the closing of the stock sales shall be delayed as described
above and agree to such extension of the closing date.

----------
Pietro Bortolatti
No. 61138.

protest 288262-K (New York).

#### Glensder Textile Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

CAROLE NICOLET,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, CASE NUMBER: C05-5792RBL-KLS

Commissioner of Social Security

 Administration,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

The ALJ erred as described in the report;

The matter is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner

 for further administrative proceedings.

 March 12, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-05792-RBL Document 29 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR EXPENSES - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

SILVER BAY LOGGING, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C06-881RSM

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR 

EXPENSES 

SILVER BAY LOGGING, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Counterdefendant. 

This matter is now before the Court for consideration of defendant/counterclaimant’s request for 

attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to F.R.Civ.Proc. 37(a)(4)(A). The Court has reviewed

defendants’ declaration (Dkt. # 32), plaintiff’s opposition (Dkt. # 34), and the documents relating to the

underlying motion to compel (Dkt ## 16, 22, 23, 25, 26, and 30). For the reasons below, the Court

declines to order the payment of fees and expenses. 

Case 2:06-cv-00881-RSM Document 39 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR EXPENSES - 2

When a motion to compel is granted, or if the disclosure is provided after the motion was filed,

the Court shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the opposing party or attorney, or

both, to pay the reasonable expenses incurred in bringing the motion, unless the Court finds that the

opposition to the motion was substantially justified, or other circumstances make an award of expenses

unjust. F.R.Civ.Proc. 37(a)(4)(A). The Court finds that plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to compel

was substantially justified, in that reasonable minds could disagree on plaintiff’s obligation to produce Mr.

Kingston as a witness. Further, the fact that plaintiff was required to pay defendant’s expenses in

attending Mr. Kingston’s deposition in Texas makes a further award of sanctions unjust. 

Dated this 13th day of December, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00881-RSM Document 39 Filed 12/13/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                                                 [ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC. LOGO]

                                 March 17, 2000

On December 30, 1998, Allos Therapeutics, Inc. ("Allos") accepted Taylor
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Development Proposal number allos1098c, dated 28 December
1998, for RSR13 (New Formulation) in vials (the "Proposal").

The purpose of this letter is to confirm that the Proposal, with the exception
of the "Estimate for Commercial Manufacturing" contained on Page 5, serves as
the final approved agreement between the parties pursuant to which the parties
will operate until such time as it is terminated, in writing, by Allos, or the
development phase of the program is completed and the product is approved for
commercial sale by the FDA or other similar international agency.

Acknowledged and Agreed.

TAYLOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.                ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

By:    /s/ Thoman Handel                    By:      /s/ Douglas G. Johnson
       ------------------------                      ---------------------------

Name:  Thomas Handel                        Name:    Douglas G. Johnson
       ------------------------                      ---------------------------

Title: Executive Director                   Title:   Director, Manufacturing
       ------------------------                      ---------------------------

Date:  3/17/00                              Date:    17-March-2000
       ------------------------                      ---------------------------

       7000 North Broadway, Suite 400 - Denver, CO 80221 - 303 / 426-6262
                                Fax 303 /426-9160
No. R66/17.

#### Kurt Orban Company v. United States, reappraisement R59/3 (Cleveland).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company, Inc.*v. *United*States, 52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851, the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f.o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
| 1.     | the forgoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |

|   |   /s/ Adam Langley                  |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Adam Langley, Chief Compliance Officer        |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                          |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC |   |

----
**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**


**ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
      “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned officer of China Clean Energy Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      March 11, 2008





/s/
                Gary
                ZhaoGary
                ZhaoChief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,902,458
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         858,955
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            37,600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,922,539
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     68,079,909
<ALLOWANCE>                                    696,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             135,578,037
<DEPOSITS>                                  98,781,804
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            757,879
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,795,416
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             135,578,037
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,296,379
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              762,717
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,285,303
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,344,399
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,280,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,280,799
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,063,600
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  379,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,329,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (311,047)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.15
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               317,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              696,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           696,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        334,000
        

</TABLE>