alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

February 13, 1968

No. P68/54.

protests 63/13081 and 63/13082 (New York).

No. P68/55.

protests 65/3784, etc. (New York).

#### Marset, Inc. *v.*United States, Marset, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain varnish or ink pastes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Marset, Inc.,*and *W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 2400), wherein the merchandise was held to be an entirety, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I)ISMISS: Opinion issued October 5, 2012

in The

(!nttrt tif Apiiah

FiftIi Jiitrirt uf jixwi at Ja11ai

No. 05-1 2-00402-CV

JO [IN BUNTEN, JR, Appellant

V.

GRAHAM MORT(;A(;E CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10 1st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-1l-00580-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Morris, Francis, and Murphy

Opinion By Justice Murphy

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant no longer

desires to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(l).

) P

I J if 4

MARY M1JRPKY

JUST1CE

120402 F.P05
(!niart vf .\pi’rak

Fif11! Oitrirt nf ixa at Ju1tai

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the 1 () I St Judicial District Court

of Dallas County, Texas. (TrCt.No. DC- 11-

00580-E).

Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy. Justices

Morris and Francis, participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee. Graham Mortgage Corporation. recoverits costs ofthe appeal

from appellant. John Bunten, .J r.

Judgment entered October 5. 2012.

JftU//i

MARY MdPHY 4! f

JUSTICE

JOI-IN BUNEN. JR., Appellant

No, 05-1 2-00402-CV V.

GRAI-IAM MOREGAGE CORPORATION.

Appellee
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL D. SIMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SETH HUBER, et. al.,,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5171 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Magistrate Judge recommends that this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action be dismissed

with prejudice for failure to state a claim. As detailed by The Magistrate Judge, the Plaintiff seeks to

invoke this Court’s jurisdiction to dismiss state criminal charges against him. The Magistrate Judge

ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

Plaintiffs’ response fails to address the Younger abstention doctrine. See, Younger v. Harris, 401

U.S. 37 (1971). Dismissal will allow Plaintiff to litigate his claim in the state court and only after

doing so, he may determine whether to seek redress in Federal Court any remaining cognizable

federal claims.

The Court, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s complaint, Report and Recommendation of

Case 3:06-cv-05171-FDB Document 12 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, Plaintiff’s response to show cause, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel for

Defendants, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 1st day of August, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05171-FDB Document 12 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 63861.

protest 59/16850 (New York).

#### Sphinx Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 65268.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. et al. *v.*United States

protests 60/17251, etc. (New York).

*371Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00617

- CV

Toni COMBEST and Mountain Laurel Minerals, LLC, Appellants

v.

MUSTANG MINERALS, LLC

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00144

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal of Appellant Mountain Laurel Minerals, LLC is DISMISSED, and th e trial court’s judgment against Appellant Toni Combest is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant Toni Combest.

SIGNED August 3, 2016.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         560,374
<SECURITIES>                                   266,262
<RECEIVABLES>                                  257,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,693
<INVENTORY>                                    144,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,391,024
<PP&E>                                         547,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                 310,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,900,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          425,314
<BONDS>                                        110,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,112
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,362,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,900,405
<SALES>                                        601,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,280
<CGS>                                          294,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  294,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (286)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 77

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of William L. Singer v. Office of Senate

Fair Employment Practices, No. 97–6000, pending in the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,

petitioner William L. Singer has sought review of a final

decision of the Select Committee on Ethics which had

been entered, pursuant to section 308 of the Government

Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.S.C. 1208 (1994), in

the records of the Office of Senate Fair Employment

Practices;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(1) (1994), the Senate may direct its counsel to

defend committees of the Senate in civil actions relating

to their official responsibilities; and
2

SRES 77 ATS

Whereas, pursuant to section 303(f) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.S.C. 1203(f) (1994), for

purposes of representation by the Senate Legal Counsel,

the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, the respondent in this proceeding, is deemed a committee within the meaning of sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a),

288c(a)(1) (1994): Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent the Office of Senate Fair Employment Prac3 tices in the case of William L. Singer v. Office of Senate

4 Fair Employment Practices.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Beamon, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 473]

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered September 2, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which *444could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-111 RSM

)

v. )

)

MAX WENCL, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Offense charged: 

Possession of a Stolen Postal Arrow Key.

Date of Detention Hearing: September 11, 2006

The Court, having conducted a contested detention hearing pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention

hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant

can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety

of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by John Lulejian.

The defendant was represented by Ralph Hurvitz.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant’s criminal history includes three prior identity theft convictions

beginning from the year 2002. The defendant therefore poses an economic

risk to the community. 

(2) Prior court history involves five failures to appear, two as recent as 2006. 

There is an active bench warrant pending. 

Case 2:06-cr-00111-RSM Document 10 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

(3) The defendant’s substance abuse problems, to which he admitted involves 

methamphetamine, causes the Court concern as posing a risk to the

community.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the

United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 11th day of September, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00111-RSM Document 10 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40629 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

LEO ABLE VELASQUEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 175

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Leo Able Velasquez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Velasquez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel ’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40629 Document: 00514866987 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2019No. 18

- 40629

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excuse d from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40629 Document: 00514866987 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          38,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     92,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               253,694
<PP&E>                                       3,774,683
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,565,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,514,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,242,552
<BONDS>                                        868,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,514,630
<SALES>                                        620,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               622,364
<CGS>                                          249,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  780,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               115,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (304,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (304,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (304,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1997 - NOTE 3. - LOSS PER COMMON SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                      66,631,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,881,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,868,968
<INVENTORY>                                  3,573,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,293,024
<PP&E>                                      16,499,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 653,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,882,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,350,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       219,225
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,882,399
<SALES>                                        148,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,005
<CGS>                                          148,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,947,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,317,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,317,677)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                 [HENDERSON, DAILY, WITHROW & DEVOE LETTERHEAD]

                               November 16, 1998

Central Newspapers, Inc.
200 East Van Buren Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In connection with the sale by a certain selling shareholder of up to
1,336,850 shares of Class A common stock, no par value ("Common Stock") of
Central Newspapers, Inc. (the "Company"), including 174,372 shares to be sold by
the Selling Shareholder in the event of exercise of an over-allotment option by
the underwriters, we have examined the Company's Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation, its Amended and Restated Code of By-laws, applicable
resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company and such other
documents and records as we have deemed necessary for the giving of this
opinion. We have also examined the Registration Statement on Form S-3, No.
333-67077 (the "Registration Statement"), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), for the purpose of registering the shares of
Common Stock for sale. Based on our examination, we are of the opinion that:

     (1)  The Company has been duly formed and is validly existing as a
          corporation under the laws of the State of Indiana with full power and
          authority to conduct the business in which it is engaged as described
          in the Registration Statement.

     (2)  All necessary action has been taken by the Company's Board of
          Directors to authorize the registration of the Common stock and no
          action by the Company's shareholders is required.

     (3)  The Common Stock will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
          when (i) the Registration Statement has become effective; and (ii) the
          shares of
<PAGE>   2
HENDERSON, DAILY, WITHROW & DEVOE


     Central Newspapers, Inc.
     200 East Van Buren Street
     Phoenix, Arizona  85004
     November 16, 1998
     Page 2 of 2 pages


               Common Stock have been sold and paid for as provided in the 
               Registration Statement.

          We hereby consent to the use of our name under the caption "Legal 
Matters" in the prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement 
and further consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the 
Registration Statement.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                           [HENDERSON, DAILY, WITHROW & DEVOE]


OWD:kac
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MARIO DEYAN ATKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TODD PACIFIC SHIPYARDS

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 CASE NO. C06-0883-JCC 

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 

Coughenour, United States District Judge:

Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 39.1(e) and MJR 9(a), the Court hereby refers this case

for settlement purposes only to the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge. 

DATED this 19th day of March, 2009.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ V. Perez 

Deputy Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 18-1669, 19-1042, 19-1043, 19-1107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

MARTIN GOTTESFELD,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 5, 2021 is 

amended as follows:

On page 32, line 10, replace "convicted and sentenced" with 

"indicted"
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01180.A01

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B

.