alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.34**

AMENDMENT NO. 2 

TO THE 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 2 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2008 (the“Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as ofJanuary 27, 2009 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement and Amendment no. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated January 7, 2009. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and advance fundsto the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants andagreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisorhereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending March 31, 2009 exceeds theamount of the Company’s Funds from Operations from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2009. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that theCompany’s cumulative Funds from Operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to theCompany’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first abovewritten. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.    By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive OfficerKBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC    By: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
 
 By: 
Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general

partner
   By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.    Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amendment No.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TAL International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Burns, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2016/s/ JOHN BURNS John BurnsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 99.12


CONSENT OF SCOTT BRITTON Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 31st day of March, 2011. /s/Scott BrittonName: Scott Britton


---
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Scott F. Drill, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Systems, Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Registrant, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.






Dated:   November 13, 2006
        
        /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. DrillPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 196

 Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the presentation 
 of the Congressional Gold Medal to President and Mrs. Gerald R. Ford.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1999

  Mr. Ehlers submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administraiton

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the presentation 
 of the Congressional Gold Medal to President and Mrs. Gerald R. Ford.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on October 27, 
1999, for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to President 
and Mrs. Gerald R. Ford. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v.

JESUS CERVANTES-CAMACHO,

EDDY RODRIQUEZ-SANTIAGO

Defendant. 

CASE NO.CR06-5265RBL

 

 ORDER GRANTING 

 CONTINUANCE OF

 TRIAL DATE

Defendant Cervantes-Camacho moves to continue the trial date. Pursuant to the affidavit of

Counsel, AUSA Jennings and Mr. Fieman do not object to the requested continuance. For the

reasons stated in the Affidavit of Thomas Campbell , the motion is GRANTED and the Trial

Date is CONTINUED to October 30, 2006.

In view of the foregoing, the court finds and rules as follows:

1. Failure to grant a continuance in this matter would deny the defense the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Title 18

U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

2. The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Title 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). The period of delay

resulting from this continuance from JULY 3, 2006 to OCTOBER 30, 2006 is excluded for

speedy trial computation purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) as this is a

reasonable period of delay.

Case 3:06-cr-05265-RBL Document 42 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -2

ACCORDINGLY:

The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to Monday, OCTOBER 30, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

The Pretrial Motion hearing, if needed, is rescheduled for OCTOBER 19, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

The Motions Cutoff date is extended to SEPTEMBER 4, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2006. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER -2

Case 3:06-cr-05265-RBL Document 42 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 141

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating One America.

Whereas the United States is a nation of immigrants, whose

270,000,000 inhabitants hail from every corner of the

globe;

Whereas from Ellis Island to the Pacific coast, the United

States has welcomed immigrants seeking freedom and opportunity;
2

HCON 141 RFS

Whereas the United States democratic system of Government

mandates equal protection under the law and the right to

life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all its citizens;

Whereas the United States endured a civil war for emancipation, and in doing so, formed a permanent union and

a society of equals;

Whereas the United States has outlawed racial, ethnic, and

religious bigotry to create the world’s greatest multicultural society;

Whereas the United States respects the individual and welcomes each one’s participation in our democratic society;

Whereas the United States is the preeminent land of opportunity which rewards hard work, ingenuity, and perseverance;

Whereas the ethnic diversity of the United States has provided an abundance of energy, creativity, and prosperity;

Whereas people in the United States recognize and reward

the contributions of members from every group;

Whereas people in the United States are working to close opportunity gaps so that all may share in the great prosperity of our Nation;

Whereas people in the United States of all backgrounds have

sacrificed their lives in war to defend the cause of freedom for people around the world; and

Whereas people in the United States of African, Asian, European, Latin American, Middle Eastern, and Native American backgrounds cherish and celebrate their various national, ethnic, and religious heritages: Now, therefore, be

it
3

HCON 141 RFS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that all

3 people in the United States should reach out across our

4 differences in ethnicity, race, and religion to respect each

5 other and to celebrate, in friendship and unity, one Amer6 ica.

7 Passed the House of Representatives October 13,

8 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DESIREE A. MATTISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5281RBL-KLS

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. #8), plaintiff’s motion to strike

(Dkt. #13), the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate

Judge, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find

and ORDER:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) the Commissioner erred as described in the report;

(3) plaintiff’s motion to strike is denied;

(4) defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied;

(5) this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings as

described in the report; and

(6) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant’s counsel

Case 3:06-cv-05281-RBL Document 22 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05281-RBL Document 22 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 2
August 8, 2016

Mr. Mark Denney
Advanced Research and Engineering Integrated Solutions, LLC 111 Bailey Drive
Suite 3
Niceville

, FL 32578

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 1141

Dear Mr. Denney :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
ORDER GRANTING SECOND 

EXTENSION OF TIME (PROPOSED) 

NO. C06-0820-RSM-MAT 

1 ERROR! AUTOTEXT ENTRY NOT DEFINED.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARY ALICE THEILER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

SUN HEAN LEY, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

DOUG WADDINGTON, 

 Respondent. 

NO. C06-0820-RSM-MAT 

ORDER GRANTING SECOND 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

 

(PROPOSED) 

 Respondent, having filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer in 

this matter, and the Court being fully advised and having examined the records and files 

herein; 

 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer in 

this matter be and the same is hereby granted. 

 Respondent's answer to Mr. Ley’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus shall be due on or 

before October 30, 2006. 

 DATED this 25th day of October, 2006. 

 s/ Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 

Submitted by: 

ROB MCKENNA 

Attorney General 

/s/Gregory J. Rosen 

GREGORY J. ROSEN, WSBA #15870 

Assistant Attorney General 

Case 2:06-cv-00820-RSM Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING SECOND 

EXTENSION OF TIME (PROPOSED) 

NO. C06-0820-RSM-MAT 

2 ERROR! AUTOTEXT ENTRY NOT DEFINED.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on October 30, 2006, I caused to be electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. I certify that I 

mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the following non CM/ECF 

participants: 

SUN HEAN LEAY, DOC #993738 

STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER 

191 CONSTANTINE WAY 

ABERDEEN WA 98520 

/s/Kirsten Rasset________

 KIRSTEN RASSET 

Case 2:06-cv-00820-RSM Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, 0. C, 20851

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 28, 2017

Mr. Denis Velasquez,
14932 Hyatt Place
Woodbridge, Virginia 22191

Dear Mr. Velasquez:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your
request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-
affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”),
Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company (“SLHC”), through employment with
an independently owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and banking products
from State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary federal savings bank, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State
Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. This approval is limited to your holding a position with an
independently owned agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank products. If you seek to
work directly for State Farm or an independently owned agency that sells products for another
SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), you must obtain the Board’s approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to
the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a
different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations
constitute conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decisions herein
and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. Additionally, if you are
convicted of, or enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach
of trust, or money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC,
BHC, or independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including
agencies that sell State Farm and State Farm Bank products.

Sincerely,
NM in wit Mn Sw

Margaret McCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

"12 U.S.C. § 1829,
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-31
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-31


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                  Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER OF REMAND - [C05-5803-FDB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ANGELINA J. STWALLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5803-FDB

ORDER OF REMAND

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision

in regard to Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security

Income disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED

and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ)

shall:

Case 3:05-cv-05803-FDB Document 16 Filed 05/10/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER OF REMAND - [C05-5803-FDB]

• Reevaluate the effect of drug addiction to determine Plaintiff's period of sobriety

sufficient to address the effects of her mental impairments absent substance abuse. 

• Obtain additional evidence from treating sources to clarify the severity of Plaintiff's

mental impairments with and without substance abuse, and reevaluate the mental

impairments pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520a;

• reassess the claimant's RFC and provide appropriate limitations for all severe

impairments;

• Discuss all lay witness testimony, specifically from counselor Klinzman, and either

accept it or provide germane reasons for rejecting it; and

• Obtain medical and vocational expert testimony at the hearing.

• The case will be assigned to a new ALJ.

///

///

///

///

Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff’s application for costs and

Case 3:05-cv-05803-FDB Document 16 Filed 05/10/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 3 ORDER OF REMAND - [C05-5803-FDB]

attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

DATED this 9th day of May 2006.

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for entry by 

Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by:

s/ Leisa A. Wolf 

LEISA A. WOLF

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Phone: 206-615-3621

Fax: 206-615-2531

leisa.wolf@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05803-FDB Document 16 Filed 05/10/06 Page 3 of 3