alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04865

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04865\04865_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04865\04865_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04865\04865_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04865\04865_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04865\Certification Statement Plant ID 04865.pdf Plant certification statement

04865\Supplemental Documents\04865_Chouteau.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04865\Supplemental Documents\04865_ICR_CHOUTEAU 1-2 WATER BALANCE.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04865\Supplemental Documents\EA\04865_CHT-NOV1998.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04865\Supplemental Documents\EA\04865_CHT-SEPT1999.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04865\Supplemental Documents\EA\04865_Final AECI EA_011309_redline version.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04865\Supplemental Documents\EA\04865_Final EA_011309_clean.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04865\04865_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04865\04865_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      Financial Data Schedule
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,343,080
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,166,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,123,009
<INVENTORY>                                    220,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,112,004
<PP&E>                                         30,054,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,321,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,123,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,304,344
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       732
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,815,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,123,977
<SALES>                                        7,941,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,965,085
<CGS>                                          4,722,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,416,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,057,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               78,737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,190,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                   34,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,155,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,155,335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .15
        


</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10671

Summary Calendar

ANTONIO FUERTE, JR

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RISSI OWENS; HOWARD A THRASHER, SR; ELVIS HIGHTOWER; JUANITA

GONZALEZ

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CV-695

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Fuerte, Jr., Texas inmate # 01341702, appeals the dismissal of his

pro se, in forma pauperis, civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 against individual members of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

(the Board). The district court dismissed Fuerte’s complaint for failure to state

a claim for which relief can be granted.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 24, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10671

2

Fuerte’s argument that he is entitled to injunctive and declaratory relief

on claims surrounding the Board’s ruling that he was not entitled to mandatory

supervision release fails to state a due process violation. See Greenholtz v.

Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 15-16 (1979); Boss v.

Quarterman, 552 F.3d 425, 428-29 (5th Cir. 2008); Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d

216, 224 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the district court did not err when it

dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim. See Cornish v. Corr. Servs.

Corp., 402 F.3d 545, 549 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
MULTI-ENGINE TURBO PROPELLER GROUND TRAINING

KING AIR 90 ORIGINAL 05-05-11 90DIFF-1

DIFFERENCES 90 DIFFERENCES

09000064818bda0c Last printed: 10/27/2014 7:51:00 AM

Last Saved: 5/7/2011 1:17:00 PM

CURRICULUM SEGMENT

AIRCRAFT REVISION NO. DATE PAGE NO.

SECTION MODULE SEQUENCE AND NAME

ELEMENTS REMARKS OR EXCEPTIONS

1. Aircraft Description

a. Overview

b. Dimensions

c. Emergency Exits

2. Annunciator System

a. Overview 

b. Flasher 

3. Powerplant

a. Turbine section

b. Horsepower rating

c. Boost pump

4. Propeller

a. Overview

b. RPM limits

c. Four bladed propeller

5. Auto Ignition

a. Torque values

b. Controls and indications

6. Fire Detection/Protection

a. Overview 

b. Extinguisher switches

c. Avionics smoke detector
MULTI-ENGINE TURBO PROPELLER GROUND TRAINING

KING AIR 90 ORIGINAL 05-05-11 90DIFF-2

DIFFERENCES 90 DIFFERENCES

09000064818bda0c Last printed: 10/27/2014 7:51:00 AM

Last Saved: 5/7/2011 1:17:00 PM

CURRICULUM SEGMENT

AIRCRAFT REVISION NO. DATE PAGE NO.

SECTION MODULE SEQUENCE AND NAME

ELEMENTS REMARKS OR EXCEPTIONS

7. Fuel System

a. Overview

b. Main tank

c. Transfer pump

d. Fuel gauge

e. Fuel purge systems

f. Abnormal procedures

i. Transfer pump failure

g. E90 fuel differences

8. Electrical System

a. Overview

b. Busses

c. Current limiter check

d. Triple-fed bus

e. External power

9. Pressurization System

a. Differential pressures

10. Heating and Cooling

a. Electric heat

b. Air conditioning compressor

11. Oxygen system

a. Crew masks

b. Passenger masks
MULTI-ENGINE TURBO PROPELLER GROUND TRAINING

KING AIR 90 ORIGINAL 05-05-11 90DIFF-3

DIFFERENCES 90 DIFFERENCES

09000064818bda0c Last printed: 10/27/2014 7:51:00 AM

Last Saved: 5/7/2011 1:17:00 PM

CURRICULUM SEGMENT

AIRCRAFT REVISION NO. DATE PAGE NO.

SECTION MODULE SEQUENCE AND NAME

ELEMENTS REMARKS OR EXCEPTIONS

12. Ice Protection

a. Windshield anti-ice

b. Propeller heat

c. Surface de-ice

d. Engine inlet lip heat

e. Engine inlet vanes

f. C90B differences

13. Landing gear

a. Mechanical gear

b. Brakes 

14. Flight Controls

a. Electric trim

b. Intermediate flaps

15. Pneumatic System

a. No pneumatic shutoff

b. E90 differences

16. Doors and Emergency Exits

a. Emergency exit operation

17. Pitot Static System

a. Overview 
MULTI-ENGINE TURBO PROPELLER GROUND TRAINING

KING AIR 90 ORIGINAL 05-05-11 90DIFF-4

DIFFERENCES 90 DIFFERENCES

09000064818bda0c Last printed: 10/27/2014 7:51:00 AM

Last Saved: 5/7/2011 1:17:00 PM

CURRICULUM SEGMENT

AIRCRAFT REVISION NO. DATE PAGE NO.

SECTION MODULE SEQUENCE AND NAME

ELEMENTS REMARKS OR EXCEPTIONS

18. Weight and Balance

19. Performance

a. Accelerate/Stop

b. Accelerate/Go
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     The Board of Directors    FCB Bancorp and Subsidiaries     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual    Report on    Form 10-K    of FCB Bancorp and Subsidiaries (FCB Bancorp) of our report    dated March 30, 2006, with respect to the consolidated    balances sheets of FCB Bancorp as of December 31, 2005, and    the related consolidated statements of operations,    shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three years    ended December 31, 2005, which report is included in this    annual report on    Form 10-K    of FCB Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2005.
No. 61122.

protests 291342-K and 293793-K (New York).

#### Advance Shipping Company and Vandegrift Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# Official Journal C 48/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6411 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 48

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6411 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 48/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10095 — Crédit Agricole Italia/Credito Valtellinese) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 48/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10100 — Stirling Square Capital Partners/TA Associates/NBS Group) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2021/C 48/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9234 — Harris Corporation/L3 Technologies) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 48/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10095 — Crédit Agricole Italia/Credito Valtellinese) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 48/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10100 — Stirling Square Capital Partners/TA Associates/NBS Group) (
  1
  )

1

2

2021/C 48/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9234 — Harris Corporation/L3 Technologies) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 48/04 | Euro exchange rates — 10 February 2021 | 4 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 48/05 | Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2) – Establishment of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) ( OJ C 210, 5.7.2006 ) | 5 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2021/C 48/06 | State aid – Decision to raise no objections | 8 |
| 2021/C 48/07 | State aid – Decision to raise no objections | 10 |
| 2021/C 48/08 | State aid – Decision to raise no objections | 11 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 48/04

Euro exchange rates — 10 February 2021

4

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 48/05

Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2) – Establishment of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) ( OJ C 210, 5.7.2006 )

( OJ C 210, 5.7.2006 )

5

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2021/C 48/06

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

8

2021/C 48/07

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

10

2021/C 48/08

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Greenville Federal
Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: September 26, 2006
    /s/ David M. KeplerDavid M. KeplerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Auto Search Cars, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Martin, President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








April 15, 2010
/s/ Jonathan MartinJonathan MartinPresident, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 61 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 61

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 1997

              Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the publication entitled ``Our Flag'', 
revised under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall 
be reprinted as a Senate document.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 250,000 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 51,500 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        Joint Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the publication for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $150,000, such number of copies of the 
        publication as does not exceed total printing and production 
        costs of $150,000, with distribution to be allocated in the 
        same proportion as in paragraph (1).

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TRACY D. McWILLIAMS, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR05-452-RSM 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An initial hearing on a Supplemental Violation and Request for Warrant was held 

before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on April 6, 2010. The United States was represented 

by Assistant United States Attorneys Andrew Friedman and the defendant by Stewart Riley. 

 The defendant had been charged and convicted of Conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 371 and Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. On or about September 15, 2006, 

defendant was sentenced by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, to a term of twenty-one 

months in custody, to be followed by five years of supervised release. 

 The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in substance abuse and 

Case 2:05-cr-00452-RSM Document 142 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

mental health programs, financial disclosure, $55,006.21 restitution, search, business 

disclosure, no new credit, and no other identification. 

 In a Supplemental Violation and Request for Warrant, dated March 29, 2010, U.S. 

Probation Officer Donald E. Moon asserted the following violations by defendant of the 

conditions of her supervised release: 

(6) Using cocaine and marijuana on or about March 4, 2010, in violation of 

standard condition number 7. 

(7) Using marijuana on or about March 11, and March 18, 2010, in violation of 

standard condition number 7. 

(8) Failing to submit to mandatory drug testing on March 22, 2010, in violation of 

a general condition. 

The defendant was advised of her rights, acknowledged those rights, and admitted to 

alleged violations 6, 7 and 8. 

I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of her supervised release as to violations 6, 7 and 8 and that the Court conduct a 

hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on these violations has been set before the 

Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez on May 7, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. 

Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

cc: District Judge: Honor

DATED this 6th day of April, 2010. 

able Ricardo S. Martinez 

A

 AUSA: Andrew Friedman 

 Defendant’s attorney: Stewart Riley 

 Probation officer: Donald E. Moon 

Case 2:05-cr-00452-RSM Document 142 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2
'"" ,., ..**~** b"" I,, J''"'''**l<,cL~~~vtU**0"·**~~,** r<"·1·"f''r'I·c··.**r-r~** M,j · 2014 ttM1 II M''l 6: 08 CBIC Control Number358892 February 28, 2014

RECENED[}.PR 15 20\4**~~-~~** Document Control Office (7 407M) USEP A Headqt1carters, Ariel Rios Bldg.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460-0001

EPA DOCKET CENTER Att: 40 CFR 799-5089Docket# EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 Re: Exemption Req1,1est In Compliance With 40 CFR 790.80 40 CFR 790.87 To Whom It May Concern, This correspondence confirms recent telephone and e-mails with Mr. John Schaeffer, who kindly extended assistance relative to compliance concerning testing and or exemption from testing of the chemical product sodium m-nitrobenzene sulfonate. Rather than hiring a third party chemical testing laboratory, Rit-Chem Co., Inc. has chosen to negotiate via CFR 790.87 with Tiarco Chemical Co. Our monetary offer has been accepted by Mr. Kevin J. Nolan- V.P. & General ManagerofTiarco Chemical Co. We are awaiting their vvTitten acceptance and requested Tiarco submit a letter confirming the granting the rights to utilize their testing data results based on· paying a fair and equitable reimbursement to Tiarco. Rit-Chem Co., inc. will submit a copy of the agreement, which, presumably will be done, as stated above to the USEP A. We again thank you for the guidance provided by the members of the USEP A Department. Sincerely,**b~** President \l CEO Cc: via e-mail to Schaeffer,John<schaeffer.john@epa.gov> 1 Zeiss Drive- Suite 200 • Thornwood, New York 10594-1941 • Tel: (914) 769-9110 • Fax: (914) 769-1408

.s%**-g~** $<( "':I: ew**~>­** -g..c cw :i-**~(.)**•
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
             2005-C;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.


             Date: March 29, 2006


                                                 /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                 ----------------
                                                 Steve Bailey
                                                 Senior Managing Director