alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 174

To state the sense of the Senate that Thailand is a key partner and friend

of the United States, has committed itself to executing its responsibilities

under its arrangements with the International Monetary Fund, and that

the United States should be prepared to take appropriate steps to ensure

continued close bilateral relations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 9, 1998

Mr. ROTH (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr.

MACK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

MARCH 3, 1998

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

MARCH 11, 1998

Considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To state the sense of the Senate that Thailand is a key

partner and friend of the United States, has committed

itself to executing its responsibilities under its arrangements with the International Monetary Fund, and that

the United States should be prepared to take appropriate

steps to ensure continued close bilateral relations.

Whereas the United States maintains a close bilateral partnership with Thailand and has a profound interest in furthering that relationship;
2

•SRES 174 ATS

Whereas the friendship between our two countries goes back

farther than that with any other Asian nation dating

back to the Treaty of Amity and Commerce and Navigation of 1833;

Whereas the bilateral trade relationship is robust and promises to grow even more so in time;

Whereas the United States security relationship with Thailand is one of our most critical, and it is in both countries’ interest to maintain and strengthen that relationship;

Whereas the new Government in Thailand has committed

itself to making significant structural reforms to its economy in line with the conditions placed upon it by the

International Monetary Fund, including improving financial and economic transparency and cutting its budget;

Whereas the conditions imposed on Thailand by the International Monetary Fund were developed in August of

1997, when the economic environment in Asia was vastly

different from that existing today;

Whereas an example of those changed circumstances is the

fact that both Korea and Indonesia provided second line

of defense contingency loans to Thailand in August 1997,

amounting to US$500 million each; and

Whereas Thailand’s democratic reforms have advanced with

that country’s economic growth and development: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the United States should enhance the close

3 political and security relationship between Thailand

4 and the United States and strengthen economic ties
3

•SRES 174 ATS

1 and cooperation with Thailand to ensure that Thai2 land’s economic recovery continues uninterrupted;

3 and

4 (2) Thailand deserves praise and commendation

5 from the United States for the measures it has im6 plemented to resolve its financial problems.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, David P. Southwell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Date: May 7, 2008 |                                                                                             
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | /s/DAVID P. SOUTHWELLDavid P. Southwell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will be retained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 PROPOSED ORDER - [C06-5281-RBL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

DESIREE A. MATTISON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LINDA S. McMAHON,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Civil No. C06-5281-RBL

PROPOSED ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. #8), Plaintiff's motion to

strike (Dkt. #13), the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States

Magistrate Judge, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation:

(2) the Commissioner erred as described in the report;

(3) plaintiff's motion to strike is denied;

(4) defendant's motion to dismiss is denied;

Case 3:06-cv-05281-RBL Document 25 Filed 01/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 PROPOSED ORDER - [C06-5281-RBL]

(5) this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative 

Proceedings as described in the report; and

(6) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel,

defendant's counsel, and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the matter is REMANDED for additional

proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC § 405(g).

DATED this 24th day of January, 2007.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ RICHARD M. RODRIGUEZ

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98105-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-3748

FAX: (206) 615-2531

Richard.Rodriguez@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05281-RBL Document 25 Filed 01/24/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69681-69682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22291]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this person are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley Smith, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Compliance, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://ofac.treasury.gov).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On September 28, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
individuals and entities are blocked under the relevant sanctions 
authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 69682]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC23.000


    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-22291 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.










July
                __, 2006
            By:/s/
                Jonathan KalmanJonathan
                KalmanChairman
                and Chief Executive OfficerJuly
                __, 2006
            2006By:/s/
                James S. CassanoJames
                S. CassanoExecutive
                Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer
                and Secretary
### r U.S . I>tpot t _, of TtOII&pOIIOIIon

**~' <e**  Of me )ec.,e'?'yOt

**tO~ O?i':J'·C"**  C hier. Documentary Services 

### Dtv . Depanment of Transportation Washington. 

### D .C . 20590 DESIGNATlON OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. 

### C-55 

## Aerotran s porte de Ca rg a U ni o n S.A. de C.V. (Name of Company. please print) . ha\'ing its princtpal 

### Zo na G de Hangare s s /n, Colonia Zona Federal Aeropuerto tnternacional de Ia Ciudad de Mexico office at 

### Delegaci6n Venustiano Carranza, Mexico OF, CP 15620 (Address) hereby

**e~ig nate~**  **. pur~uantto**  **~ection** 

### 46103 of Title 

### 49 of t he 

### U. S . Code tfomterly

**~ction IOU~tb)**  of the

**F~deral** .'\1 iation Act of 19.5!!.

**a~** amended I the person nam ed he low as it' Agent upon ,, · hom ser"ice of all notices

**;~nd proce~~-**  und

**~II** ortJ.:r,.

**d.:ci~im,**

**.** and requiremems of the Depanment of·Tmnspot1ation may be made for and on behalf of

**~aid** carrier. h.:reby cunceling all

**pre1 iou~** 

**1.1l!~ignation~** of

**ag.:nt~** 

### made by it to 

### th e DOT. 

## David M. 

## End ersbee Name of Agent ______________________________ ______ __ **~---------------------** . !Please Print) 

## Zuckert Sco utt Rasenberger 

## LLP , 888 Seventeenth S tree t, N.W. S uit e 700 , Washington , DC 20006 

# --------------------------------- Address The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

### ( ·/) A . v;'/ / 

# i 1 (



# ~~ **11....,** ././ ! _1 /



# ~' (//,./.- ( { 

### Name 

# Ji'/1, ' •

" · U 't 

### <t:' · - C"-'X (Initial s ) __ 

### 1 .:.__



### ,-~ **"'-- ...::::::..._** ________ _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF . 

## Aerotran s porte de Carga Union S.A. de C.V. (Name of Company) presents to be s ign ed in its nam e by of s aid compa ny . and to be a tte s ted under its corpora te seal 

### by
on 

### this 

# _7_ '"=1 __!.,._ day 

## or --JAl-.I....!P
_ Q.
_ \


## _ L

__ _ ,
**~** 20 I 5 / 

# / I 

### By: ATTEST : 

## v' l (e ( OST f 1010 .5 (1 - 95)
February 1, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161

SUBJECT: Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Impacts Calculations

This memorandum accompanies spreadsheets placed on the docket that calculate GHG 

emissions per british thermal unit of renewable fuel. These spreadsheets integrate the 

results from modeling of each stage of the renewable fuel lifecycle (e.g., feedstock 

production, domestic and international agricultural emissions, fuel transport and 

distribution). The only piece of the lifecycle analysis not calculated in these spreadsheets 

are the emissions from international land use change. The results from these impact 

calculation spreadsheets were used in spreadsheets that compare the lifecycle GHG 

emissions of renewable fuels with the 2005 petroleum baseline, which are docketed 

separately.

For more information about the calculation of lifecycle GHG emissions and the data 

contained in these spreadsheets refer to the RIA Chapter 2.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected by breast cancer

should not be alone in their fight against the disease.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 7, 1997

Mr. GREGG (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LOTT,

Mr. ROBB, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. REID, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

SEPTEMBER 25, 1997

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that individuals affected

by breast cancer should not be alone in their fight

against the disease.

Whereas individuals with breast cancer need a support system in their time of need;

Whereas breast cancer is a disease of epidemic proportions,

with 43,900 individuals in the United States expected to

die from breast cancer in 1997, and 1 out of every 8

women in the United States expected to develop breast

cancer in her lifetime;
2

SRES 85 ATS

Whereas the millions of family members, including spouses,

children, parents, siblings, and other loved ones of persons with breast cancer can offer strong emotional support to each other in addition to the support they offer

to patients and survivors dealing with their challenges;

Whereas it is important that the United States as a whole

support the family members and other loved ones of individuals with breast cancer in addition to supporting the

individual with breast cancer; and

Whereas 1997 brings the 25th anniversary of the National

Cancer Program providing research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to the cause, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of

cancer, rehabilitation from cancer, and the continuing

care of cancer patients and their families: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that an

2 environment be encouraged where—

3 (1) the family members and loved ones of indi4 viduals with breast cancer can support each other in

5 addition to the individual with breast cancer; and

6 (2) everything possible should be done to sup7 port both the individuals with breast cancer as well

8 as the family and loved ones of individuals with

9 breast cancer through public awareness and edu10 cation.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 8 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 8

                       Granting floor privileges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 1997

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                       Granting floor privileges.

    Resolved, That an employee in the office of Senator Max Cleland, to 
be designated from time to time by Senator Cleland, shall have the 
privilege of the Senate floor during any period when Senator Cleland is 
in the Senate chamber during the 105th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2014310EN.01008701.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/87

---

NOTE TO THE READER

| Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2014 has been withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank. |
| --- |

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 87/2014 has been withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DEANNE M. KROULIK,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA acting

through the State Director, USDA Rural

Development, Rural Housing Service of

Washington; and T.D. Escrow Services, Inc.

d.b.a. T.D. Service Company, a Washington

Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5388FDB

ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL

BRIEFING

Plaintiff Kroulik has moved for an order restraining Trustee’s sale, and the matter has been

briefed. Kroulik interprets the loan documents in this matter as requiring her to make monthly

payments of $301.24 per month, that she has overpaid and is only in arrears $566.55. 

The Government submits declarations with attachments to support its contention that Kroulik

over $10,000.00 in arrears. There is a difference of opinion in how the documents are interpreted by

the parties. Exhibit C to the Cronquist Declaration is an example. 

It would be helpful to the Court to have the terms explained (e.g. installment note rate,

monthly payment, monthly payment assistance) and how they are factored together – considering 

Case 3:06-cv-05388-FDB Document 15 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

taxes and insurance – to get to the amount to be paid per month in order to determine any arrearage. 

Therefore, the Court requests further briefing clarifying materials already submitted. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Defendants shall submit an additional brief responding to Plaintiff’s Reply brief

and clarifying as indicated above no later than Monday, July 31, 2006; 

2. Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants’ brief no later than 4:30 p.m. Tuesday,

August 1, 2006. or 24 hours after the Government files its brief, whichever is earlier. 

DATED this 26th day of July, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05388-FDB Document 15 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6339

RASHAD DWAYNE VICK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Wallens Ridge Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1441-AM) Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rashad Dwayne Vick, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rashad Dwayne Vick, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JASON CHRISTIAN BERGER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 10252

D.C. No. 3:13

- cr

- 08075

- DLR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023 * *

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Jason Christian Berger appeals from the district court’s order revoking

supervised release and imposing a 24

- month sentenc e

. Pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Berger ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 23 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 10252

record. Berger has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Berger’s

pro se arguments that his underlying conviction is invalid because he is innocent

,

and that his former attorneys were ineffective

, cannot be raised in these

proceedings. See United States v. Cate

, 971 F.3d 1054, 105 8

- 59 (9th Cir. 2020)

(defendant cannot attack his underlying conviction in a supervised release

revocation proceeding); United States v. Rahman , 642 F.3d 1257, 1259

- 60 (9th

Cir. 2011) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims are generally not considered on

direct appeal)

. Moreover, the record shows that Berger’s supervised release was

not revoked for his alleged use of cocaine or for failing to atte nd drug treatment.

Rather, his supervised release was properly revoked upon his admission that he had

failed to appear for mandatory drug tests.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Berger’s pro se requests for

relief are DENIED.

AFFIRMED.