# Official Journal C 355/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.355.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 355 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 543 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.355.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 355

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 543 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 355/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 347, 26.11.2011 | 1 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2011/C 355/02 | Appointment of the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 355/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 347, 26.11.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 355/02

Appointment of the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 355/03 | Joined Cases C-431/09 and C-432/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — Airfield NV, Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) (C-431/09), Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA (C-432/09) (Copyright — Satellite broadcasting — Directive 93/83/EEC — Articles 1(2)(a) and 2 — Communication to the public by satellite — Satellite package provider — Single communication to the public by satellite — Persons to whom that communication may be attributed — Authorisation from copyright holders for the communication) | 3 |
| 2011/C 355/04 | Case C-439/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France)) — Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la Concurrence, Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi (Article 101(1) and (3) TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 — Articles 2 to 4 — Competition — Restrictive practice — Selective distribution network — Cosmetics and personal care products — General and absolute ban on internet sales — Ban imposed by the supplier on authorised distributors) | 3 |
| 2011/C 355/05 | Case C-454/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid for New Interline SpA — Recovery) | 4 |
| 2011/C 355/06 | Case C-83/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Pontevedra (Spain)) — Aurora Sousa Rodríguez, Yago López Sousa, Rodrigo Manuel Puga Lueiro, Luis Ángel Rodríguez González, María del Mar Pato Barreiro, Manuel López Alonso, Yaiza Pato Rodríguez v Air France SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 2(1) — Compensation for passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight — Meaning of ‘cancellation’ — Article 12 — Meaning of ‘further compensation’ — Compensation under national law) | 4 |
| 2011/C 355/07 | Case C-139/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Prism Investments BV v J.A. van der Meer, in his capacity as receiver in the liquidation of Arilco Holland BV (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Enforcement — Grounds for refusing enforcement — Compliance, in the State in which it was delivered, with the judgment in respect of which the declaration of enforceability is sought) | 5 |
| 2011/C 355/08 | Case C-148/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — DHL International NV, formerly Express Line NV v Belgisch Instituut voor Postdiensten en Telecommunicatie (Postal services — External procedures for dealing with users’ complaints — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 19 — Scope — Additional to means of redress available under national law and under European Union law — Freedom of action of Member States — Restrictions — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment) | 6 |
| 2011/C 355/09 | Case C-224/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Baden-Baden (Germany)) — Criminal proceedings against Leo Apelt (Directive 91/439/EEC — Mutual recognition of driving licences — Withdrawal of the national driving licence issued by the Member State of residence and issue of a driving licence for vehicles in categories B and D by another Member State — Refusal of recognition by the Member State of residence — Obligation to hold a valid licence for vehicles in category B at the time of issue of the licence for vehicles in category D) | 6 |
| 2011/C 355/10 | Joined Cases C-463/10 P and C-475/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 — Deutsche Post AG, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 10(3) — Decision requiring the production of information — Act open to challenge for the purposes of Article 263 TFEU) | 7 |
| 2011/C 355/11 | Case C-9/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Waypoint Aviation SA v État belge — SPF Finances (Freedom to provide services — Tax legislation — Tax credit on income from loans granted for the acquisition of assets used on national territory — Exclusion of assets for which the right to use is transferred to a third party established in another Member State) | 7 |
| 2011/C 355/12 | Case C-443/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands), lodged on 29 August 2011 — F.P. Jeltes, M.A. Peeters, J.G.J. Arnold v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv) | 8 |
| 2011/C 355/13 | Case C-463/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 6 September 2011 — L v M | 8 |
| 2011/C 355/14 | Case C-475/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Berufsgericht für Heilberufe bei dem Verwaltungsgericht Gießen (Germany) lodged on 19 September 2011 — Disciplinary proceedings against Kostas Konstantinides | 9 |
| 2011/C 355/15 | Case C-485/11: Action brought on 22 September 2011 — European Commission v French Republic | 9 |
| 2011/C 355/16 | Case C-486/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Jonathan Rodrigues Esteves v Seguros Allianz Portugal SA | 10 |
| 2011/C 355/17 | Case C-495/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 14 July 2011 in Case T-190/06 Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission | 10 |
| 2011/C 355/18 | Case C-499/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Dow Europe GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-42/07: The Dow Chemical Company and others v European Commission | 11 |
| 2011/C 355/19 | Case C-516/11 P: Appeal brought on 7 October 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs NV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission | 12 |
| 2011/C 355/20 | Case C-519/11 P: Appeal brought on 11 October 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Liften BV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission | 12 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 355/21 | Case T-190/08: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 October 2011 — CHEMK and KF v Council (Dumping — Imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia — Calculation of the export price — Profit margin — Price undertaking — Injury — Causal link — Complaint — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons) | 14 |
| 2011/C 355/22 | Case T-192/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council (Dumping — Imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia — Causal link — Community interest — Lack of cooperation — Facts available — Market economy treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons) | 14 |
| 2011/C 355/23 | Case T-348/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Aragonesas Industrias y Energía v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Sodium chlorate market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Action for annulment — Market-sharing — Price-fixing — Body of evidence — Date of the evidence — Statements of competitors — Acknowledgment — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances) | 15 |
| 2011/C 355/24 | Case T-349/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Uralita v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Sodium chlorate market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Action for annulment — Imputability of unlawful conduct) | 15 |
| 2011/C 355/25 | Case T-579/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Eridania Sadam v Commission (State aid — Measures by the Italian authorities aimed at compensating for the losses suffered by the sugar refinery Villasor (Italy) following a drought — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Obligation to state reasons — Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural sector) | 15 |
| 2011/C 355/26 | Case T-57/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Alfastar Benelux v Council (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of technical maintenance and help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council — Rejection of a tender — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based) | 16 |
| 2011/C 355/27 | Case T-189/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Poloplast v OHIM — Polypipe (P) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community trade mark P — Earlier figurative Community marks P and P POLYPIPE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 16 |
| 2011/C 355/28 | Case T-214/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — COR Sitzmöbel Helmut Lübke v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (COR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for territorial extension of the protection of an international registration — Word mark COR — Earlier Community word mark CADENACOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods) | 17 |
| 2011/C 355/29 | Case T-426/09: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM — Koninklijke BAM Groep (bam) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark BAM — Earlier national figurative mark BAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 17 |
| 2011/C 355/30 | Case T-436/09: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Dufour v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — ECB’s databases used for the preparation of reports on staff recruitment and mobility — Refusal of access — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Meaning of ‘document’ — Action for damages — Premature) | 17 |
| 2011/C 355/31 | Case T-72/10: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Intermark v OHIM — Natex International (NATY’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATY’S — Earlier Community figurative mark Naty — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial rejection of opposition) | 18 |
| 2011/C 355/32 | Case T-238/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (Horse Couture) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark Horse Couture — Earlier national figurative mark HORSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 18 |
| 2011/C 355/33 | Case T-262/10: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Microban International and Microban (Europe) v Commission (Public health — List of additives which may be used in the manufacture of plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs — Withdrawal by the original applicant of the application for inclusion of an additive on the list — Commission decision not to include 2,4,4’-trichloro-2’-hydroxydiphenyl ether in the list — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Regulatory act — Whether directly concerned — No implementing measures — Legal basis) | 19 |
| 2011/C 355/34 | Case T-353/10: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission (Action for annulment — Debit note — Objection of inadmissibility — Contractual nature of the dispute — Nature of the action — Act open to challenge) | 19 |
| 2011/C 355/35 | Case T-489/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 October 2011 — Rousse Industry v European Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation — Failure to have regard to formal requirements — Inadmissibility) | 19 |
| 2011/C 355/36 | Case T-492/11: Action brought on 21 September 2011 — ‘Rauscher’ Consumer Products v OHIM (Representation of a tampon) | 20 |
| 2011/C 355/37 | Case T-500/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — Germany v Commission | 20 |
| 2011/C 355/38 | Case T-505/11: Action brought on 26 September 2011 — Aldi v OHIM — Dialcos (dialdi) | 21 |
| 2011/C 355/39 | Case T-514/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — i-content v OHIM — Decathlon (BETWIN) | 21 |
| 2011/C 355/40 | Case T-515/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Delphi Technologies v OHIM (INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD) | 22 |
| 2011/C 355/41 | Case T-517/11: Action brought on 29 September 2011 — United States Polo Association v OHIM — Polo/Lauren (Representation of a device of two polo players) | 22 |
| 2011/C 355/42 | Case T-518/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — BTL Diffusion v OHIM — dm-drogerie markt (babyTOlove) | 23 |
| 2011/C 355/43 | Case T-521/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — Deutsche Bahn and Others v Commission | 23 |
| 2011/C 355/44 | Case T-523/11: Action brought on 4 October 2011 — Maxima Grupė v OHIM — Bodegas Maximo (MAXIMA PREMIUM) | 24 |
| 2011/C 355/45 | Case T-524/11: Action brought on 30 September 2011 — Volvo Trademark v OHIM — Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries (LOVOL) | 25 |
| 2011/C 355/46 | Case T-525/11: Action brought on 29 September 2011 — Volvo Trademark v OHMI — Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries (LOVOL) | 25 |
| 2011/C 355/47 | Case T-534/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — Schenker v Commission | 26 |
| 2011/C 355/48 | Case T-536/11: Action brought on 2 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Commission | 27 |
| 2011/C 355/49 | Case T-543/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — Ghreiwati v Council | 27 |
| 2011/C 355/50 | Case T-545/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission | 28 |
| 2011/C 355/51 | Case T-546/11: Action brought on 11 October 2011 — Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development v Commission | 28 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2011/C 355/52 | Case F-71/11: Action brought on 22 July 2011 — ZZ v Court of Justice of the European Union | 30 |
| 2011/C 355/53 | Case F-94/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 30 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 355/03

Joined Cases C-431/09 and C-432/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — Airfield NV, Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) (C-431/09), Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA (C-432/09) (Copyright — Satellite broadcasting — Directive 93/83/EEC — Articles 1(2)(a) and 2 — Communication to the public by satellite — Satellite package provider — Single communication to the public by satellite — Persons to whom that communication may be attributed — Authorisation from copyright holders for the communication)

3

2011/C 355/04

Case C-439/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France)) — Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la Concurrence, Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi (Article 101(1) and (3) TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 — Articles 2 to 4 — Competition — Restrictive practice — Selective distribution network — Cosmetics and personal care products — General and absolute ban on internet sales — Ban imposed by the supplier on authorised distributors)

3

2011/C 355/05

Case C-454/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid for New Interline SpA — Recovery)

4

2011/C 355/06

Case C-83/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Pontevedra (Spain)) — Aurora Sousa Rodríguez, Yago López Sousa, Rodrigo Manuel Puga Lueiro, Luis Ángel Rodríguez González, María del Mar Pato Barreiro, Manuel López Alonso, Yaiza Pato Rodríguez v Air France SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 2(1) — Compensation for passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight — Meaning of ‘cancellation’ — Article 12 — Meaning of ‘further compensation’ — Compensation under national law)

o

4

2011/C 355/07

Case C-139/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Prism Investments BV v J.A. van der Meer, in his capacity as receiver in the liquidation of Arilco Holland BV (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Enforcement — Grounds for refusing enforcement — Compliance, in the State in which it was delivered, with the judgment in respect of which the declaration of enforceability is sought)

5

2011/C 355/08

Case C-148/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — DHL International NV, formerly Express Line NV v Belgisch Instituut voor Postdiensten en Telecommunicatie (Postal services — External procedures for dealing with users’ complaints — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 19 — Scope — Additional to means of redress available under national law and under European Union law — Freedom of action of Member States — Restrictions — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment)

6

2011/C 355/09

Case C-224/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Baden-Baden (Germany)) — Criminal proceedings against Leo Apelt (Directive 91/439/EEC — Mutual recognition of driving licences — Withdrawal of the national driving licence issued by the Member State of residence and issue of a driving licence for vehicles in categories B and D by another Member State — Refusal of recognition by the Member State of residence — Obligation to hold a valid licence for vehicles in category B at the time of issue of the licence for vehicles in category D)

6

2011/C 355/10

Joined Cases C-463/10 P and C-475/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 — Deutsche Post AG, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 10(3) — Decision requiring the production of information — Act open to challenge for the purposes of Article 263 TFEU)

7

2011/C 355/11

Case C-9/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Waypoint Aviation SA v État belge — SPF Finances (Freedom to provide services — Tax legislation — Tax credit on income from loans granted for the acquisition of assets used on national territory — Exclusion of assets for which the right to use is transferred to a third party established in another Member State)

7

2011/C 355/12

Case C-443/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands), lodged on 29 August 2011 — F.P. Jeltes, M.A. Peeters, J.G.J. Arnold v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)

8

2011/C 355/13

Case C-463/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 6 September 2011 — L v M

8

2011/C 355/14

Case C-475/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Berufsgericht für Heilberufe bei dem Verwaltungsgericht Gießen (Germany) lodged on 19 September 2011 — Disciplinary proceedings against Kostas Konstantinides

9

2011/C 355/15

Case C-485/11: Action brought on 22 September 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

9

2011/C 355/16

Case C-486/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Jonathan Rodrigues Esteves v Seguros Allianz Portugal SA

10

2011/C 355/17

Case C-495/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 14 July 2011 in Case T-190/06 Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission

10

2011/C 355/18

Case C-499/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Dow Europe GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-42/07: The Dow Chemical Company and others v European Commission

11

2011/C 355/19

Case C-516/11 P: Appeal brought on 7 October 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs NV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission

12

2011/C 355/20

Case C-519/11 P: Appeal brought on 11 October 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Liften BV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission

12

General Court

2011/C 355/21

Case T-190/08: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 October 2011 — CHEMK and KF v Council (Dumping — Imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia — Calculation of the export price — Profit margin — Price undertaking — Injury — Causal link — Complaint — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

14

2011/C 355/22

Case T-192/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Transnational Company ‘Kazchrome’ and ENRC Marketing v Council (Dumping — Imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia — Causal link — Community interest — Lack of cooperation — Facts available — Market economy treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

14

2011/C 355/23

Case T-348/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Aragonesas Industrias y Energía v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Sodium chlorate market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Action for annulment — Market-sharing — Price-fixing — Body of evidence — Date of the evidence — Statements of competitors — Acknowledgment — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances)

15

2011/C 355/24

Case T-349/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Uralita v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Sodium chlorate market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Action for annulment — Imputability of unlawful conduct)

15

2011/C 355/25

Case T-579/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Eridania Sadam v Commission (State aid — Measures by the Italian authorities aimed at compensating for the losses suffered by the sugar refinery Villasor (Italy) following a drought — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Obligation to state reasons — Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural sector)

15

2011/C 355/26

Case T-57/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Alfastar Benelux v Council (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of technical maintenance and help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council — Rejection of a tender — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based)

16

2011/C 355/27

Case T-189/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Poloplast v OHIM — Polypipe (P) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community trade mark P — Earlier figurative Community marks P and P POLYPIPE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

16

2011/C 355/28

Case T-214/09: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — COR Sitzmöbel Helmut Lübke v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (COR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for territorial extension of the protection of an international registration — Word mark COR — Earlier Community word mark CADENACOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods)

17

2011/C 355/29

Case T-426/09: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM — Koninklijke BAM Groep (bam) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark BAM — Earlier national figurative mark BAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2011/C 355/30

Case T-436/09: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Dufour v ECB (Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — ECB’s databases used for the preparation of reports on staff recruitment and mobility — Refusal of access — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Meaning of ‘document’ — Action for damages — Premature)

17

2011/C 355/31

Case T-72/10: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Intermark v OHIM — Natex International (NATY’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATY’S — Earlier Community figurative mark Naty — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial rejection of opposition)

18

2011/C 355/32

Case T-238/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (Horse Couture) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark Horse Couture — Earlier national figurative mark HORSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

18

2011/C 355/33

Case T-262/10: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Microban International and Microban (Europe) v Commission (Public health — List of additives which may be used in the manufacture of plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs — Withdrawal by the original applicant of the application for inclusion of an additive on the list — Commission decision not to include 2,4,4’-trichloro-2’-hydroxydiphenyl ether in the list — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Regulatory act — Whether directly concerned — No implementing measures — Legal basis)

19

2011/C 355/34

Case T-353/10: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission (Action for annulment — Debit note — Objection of inadmissibility — Contractual nature of the dispute — Nature of the action — Act open to challenge)

19

2011/C 355/35

Case T-489/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 October 2011 — Rousse Industry v European Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation — Failure to have regard to formal requirements — Inadmissibility)

19

2011/C 355/36

Case T-492/11: Action brought on 21 September 2011 — ‘Rauscher’ Consumer Products v OHIM (Representation of a tampon)

20

2011/C 355/37

Case T-500/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — Germany v Commission

20

2011/C 355/38

Case T-505/11: Action brought on 26 September 2011 — Aldi v OHIM — Dialcos (dialdi)

21

2011/C 355/39

Case T-514/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — i-content v OHIM — Decathlon (BETWIN)

21

2011/C 355/40

Case T-515/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Delphi Technologies v OHIM (INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD)

22

2011/C 355/41

Case T-517/11: Action brought on 29 September 2011 — United States Polo Association v OHIM — Polo/Lauren (Representation of a device of two polo players)

22

2011/C 355/42

Case T-518/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — BTL Diffusion v OHIM — dm-drogerie markt (babyTOlove)

23

2011/C 355/43

Case T-521/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — Deutsche Bahn and Others v Commission

23

2011/C 355/44

Case T-523/11: Action brought on 4 October 2011 — Maxima Grupė v OHIM — Bodegas Maximo (MAXIMA PREMIUM)

24

2011/C 355/45

Case T-524/11: Action brought on 30 September 2011 — Volvo Trademark v OHIM — Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries (LOVOL)

25

2011/C 355/46

Case T-525/11: Action brought on 29 September 2011 — Volvo Trademark v OHMI — Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries (LOVOL)

25

2011/C 355/47

Case T-534/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — Schenker v Commission

26

2011/C 355/48

Case T-536/11: Action brought on 2 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Commission

27

2011/C 355/49

Case T-543/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — Ghreiwati v Council

27

2011/C 355/50

Case T-545/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

28

2011/C 355/51

Case T-546/11: Action brought on 11 October 2011 — Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development v Commission

28

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 355/52

Case F-71/11: Action brought on 22 July 2011 — ZZ v Court of Justice of the European Union

30

2011/C 355/53

Case F-94/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission

30

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN