alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LUCIANO TONELLI, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C06-698-TSZ-JPD

)

v. )

)

SARGENT AUTRY, et al., ) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

 Plaintiff is a Washington state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Two of the three named defendants have filed their answer and the third –

former corrections officer Brandon Siivone – has recently been served with a copy of the complaint. 

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to locate defendant Siivone. (Dkt. #29). Having

reviewed the motion and the balance of the record, the court does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Clerk has mailed to defendant Siivone a copy of the complaint, at an address

provided by counsel for defendants. Accordingly, it is not necessary for plaintiff to locate defendant

Siivone and the Clerk shall STRIKE plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Dkt. #29) as

unnecessary. In addition, the court notes that plaintiff did not mail a copy of the motion to

defendants. Although plaintiff attaches a certificate of service to the motion, the certificate states

only that plaintiff mailed a copy of the motion to the court; it does not state that he mailed a copy to

counsel for defendants. Plaintiff is reminded again that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 5(a) and Local Rule CR 5(f), he must send a copy of every motion he files to counsel

for defendants, or the court will strike the motion and will not consider it. 

Case 2:06-cv-00698-TSZ Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE - 2

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for

defendants, and to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly.

DATED this 22nd day of September, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00698-TSZ Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal L 59/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 59 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6528 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 59

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6528 February 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2005-7;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


          Date: March 27, 2006


                                      /s/ Steve Bailey
                                      ----------------
                                      Steve Bailey
                                      Senior Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Platinum Research Organization, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):



|(1) | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ John T. Jaeger, Jr.                     
|John T. Jaeger, Jr.                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer       
|(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                                            
|April 14, 2008                              
|                                            
|/s/ David A. Hart                           
|David A. Hart                               
|Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|                                            
|April 14, 2008
# Official Journal C 178A/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 178A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6622 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 178A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6622 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Economic and Social Committee |
| 2023/C 178 A/01 | Vacancy notice No 16/T/23 concerning the post of Secretary-General (M/F) in the Secretariat of the European Economic and Social Committee (Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Economic and Social Committee

2023/C 178 A/01

Vacancy notice No 16/T/23 concerning the post of Secretary-General (M/F) in the Secretariat of the European Economic and Social Committee (Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union)

(Publication under Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### GARDERE attorneys and counselors • www.gardere.com

AnacarolinaEstaba Dire(...'t Dial: 713-276-5398 Direct Fax: 713-276-6398 Email: aestaba@gardere.com

VIA REGULARMAIL andEMAIL james.archier@faa.gov James Archier, Agency Attorney Federal AviationAdministration Southwest Region Office ofRegional Counsel Fort Worth, Texas 76137 April29, 2013 

# RECE\\IED**""~** '{

## ~ \ ltl\3 HEARING

# DOCK'SI

Re: FAA Case No. 2011-EA-700202; Radio Holland USA, Inc. Dear Mr. Archier: This letter is in response to FAA correspondence dated April 15, 20 13. Accordingly, Radio Holland requests a hearing in this matter pursuant to 14 CFR 

### § 13.16h ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations. In addition, Radio Holland requests to take the deposition of Special Agent Louis Fernandez.

AnacarolinaEstaba AE/pprn cc: Federal Aviation Administration VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur WrightBuilding, Suite 2W1000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430
GardereOl- 6313261v.l

GARDERE WYNNE SEWEll UP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002·5011 • 713.276.5500 Phone • 713.276.5555 Fax Austin • Dallas • Houston • Mexico City
No. 57068.

#### Peerless Roll Leaf Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 193596-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Coughlin Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and *Gillette Safety Razor Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: nanahaus@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:18:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Uphaus

Rochester, MI 48306
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

A pril 6 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk April 6 , 2016

15 3182 (5 3 )

KALI PUNG

, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 15 3182

v COA: 327793

Gratiot CC: 1 4

- 0 11947

- CK

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD

, Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of Michael W. Pung to participate as

amicus curiae and file an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on

April 1 , 2016 , is accepted for filing

.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 3, 2014

No. 04-14-00437-CV

ESTATE OF DELFINA E. ALEXANDER, Deceased

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-PB7-000016-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION. Costs are assessed against the party that incurred them.

It is so ORDERED on September 3, 2014.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of September, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 257

  Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 15, 1998, should be 
        designated as ``National Inhalant Abuse Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 1998

  Mr. Murkowski (for himself, Mr. Lott, Mr. Daschle, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Helms, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Biden, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
  Torricelli, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Inouye) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 15, 1998, should be 
        designated as ``National Inhalant Abuse Awareness Day''.

Whereas inhalant abuse is nearing epidemic proportions with over 20 percent of 
        all students admitting to experimenting with inhalants by the time they 
        graduate from high school and only 4 percent of parents suspecting their 
        children of inhalant use;
Whereas according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, inhalant use ranks 
        third behind use of alcohol and tobacco for all youths through the 
        eighth grade;
Whereas the over 1,000 products that are being inhaled to get high are legal, 
        inexpensive, and found in nearly every home and every corner market;
Whereas using inhalants even once can lead to kidney failure, brain damage, and 
        even death;
Whereas inhalants are considered a gateway drug, one that leads to the use of 
        harder, more deadly drugs; and
Whereas because inhalant use is difficult to detect, the products used are 
        accessible and affordable, and abuse is so common, increased education 
        of young people and their parents regarding the dangers of inhalants is 
        an important step in our battle against drug abuse: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) it is the sense of the Senate that October 15, 1998, 
        should be designated as ``National Inhalant Abuse Awareness 
        Day'', to be observed with appropriate activities; and
            (2) the Senate requests that the President issue a 
        proclamation designating October 15, 1998, as ``National 
        Inhalant Abuse Awareness Day''.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 29, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00563

- CR

Kelvin Pedro Bester, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appeal be

dismissed in accordance with the opinion of this Court; and it appearing that the appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs be made; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 29, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00564

- CR

Kelvin Pedro Bester, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES , JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should b e dismissed for want of

jurisdiction: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appeal be

dismissed in accordance with the opinion of this Court; and it appearing that the appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs be made; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRANCE R. JOHNSON,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-302JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received a motion to proceed in forma pauperis from Defendant

Terrance R. Johnson (Dkt. # 1). The court’s review of Mr. Johnson’s proposed complaint

reveals that he is attempting to remove a felony prosecution under Washington law from

King County District Court. Except under narrow circumstances not present here, federal

law provides no removal jurisdiction over criminal actions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441

(establishing removal jurisdiction over civil actions). The court therefore lacks subject

matter jurisdiction over this action, and need not address Mr. Johnson’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. 

Case 2:06-cv-00302-JLR Document 2 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER - 2

The clerk shall remand this action to King County District Court.

Filed and entered this 4th day of April, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00302-JLR Document 2 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2
Opinion issued March 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00508-CV

———————————

NATHANIEL JONES, III, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE M. KAHN, AND 

OFFICER G. POLK, Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-07137

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Nathaniel Jones, III, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. No 

opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

TEDDY ORIBELLO,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-489 M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Count 1: Computer Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (a)(4);

Count 2: Aggravated Identity Theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A..

Date of Detention Hearing: October 18, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following: 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant poses as substantial risk of flight. Defendant has two warrants

outstanding for failures to appear on forgery charges. 

(2) At the time of his arrest, the defendant had two drivers’ licenses which bore his

photograph but which also had different names from his real name. 

(3) Defendant has no stable employment history and is a native and citizen of the 

Philippines with recent travel to the country.

Case 2:05-cr-00437-JLR Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(4) Defendant also poses a risk of danger to the community. Serious issues of abuse

of controlled substances are present. In addition, on the day after he was arrested and released

on bond for state charges similar to those that are the subject of the pending federal charges,

there was access to an alleged victim’s account which could be traced to the defendant. 

(5) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will 

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 18th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00437-JLR Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2