alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 11089)

#### D. C. Andrews & Co. of Maryland *v.*United States

Entry No. 6319.

(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp <& Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> *6325. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and the purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 7 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 7

   Commending Senator Robert Byrd for fifty years of public service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 1997

Mr. Daschle, Mr. Lott, Mr. Rockefeller, and Mr. Sarbanes submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commending Senator Robert Byrd for fifty years of public service.

Whereas the Honorable Robert C. Byrd has dutifully and faithfully served the 
        people of West Virginia since January 8, 1947;
Whereas, for 50 years, he had dedicated himself to improving the lives and 
        welfare of the people of West Virginia and the United States,
Whereas his 50-year commitment of public service has been one of total 
        dedication to serving the people of his beloved State and to the highest 
        ideals of public service,
Whereas he has held more legislative offices than anyone else in the history of 
        his State, and is the longest serving Senator in the history of his 
        State: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate congratulates the Honorable 
Robert C. Byrd, the senior Senator from West Virginia, for his 50 years 
of public service to the people of West Virginia and to the United 
States of America.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to Senator Robert C. Byrd.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 98 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.98
                                          Agreed to May 22, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 21, 1998, Friday, May 22, 1998, Saturday, May 23, 1998, 
or Sunday, May 24, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority 
Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent resolution, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 1, 1998, or 
until such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, May 22, 
1998, or Saturday, May 23, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent 
resolution, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, 
1998, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                       677
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,810
<PP&E>                                             650
<DEPRECIATION>                                     425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,542
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    188
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                188
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,397
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69770-69771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2016, Through December 
31, 2016

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2016, 
through December 31, 2016, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Office of Aerospace 
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch (AAM-820), 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 806,

[[Page 69771]]

Washington, DC 20591; Telephone (202) 267-8442.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's 
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing 
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the 
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive 
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum 
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2014, the random drug test positive 
rate was 0.534%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will 
remain at 25% for calendar year 2016.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum 
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol 
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the 
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at 
10%. In 2014, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.106%. 
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10% 
for calendar year 2016.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual 
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code 
of Federal Regulations Title 14, section 120.109(b) (for drug testing), 
and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 29, 2015.
James R. Fraser,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2015-28647 Filed 11-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 306

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic Leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 15 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was submitted

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic

Leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished Democratic Leader, the Sen3 ator from South Dakota, the Honorable Thomas A.

4 Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the cooperative

5 and dedicated manner in which he has performed his lead6 ership responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business

7 during the second session of the 105th Congress.

Æ
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 18

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to convicted spy Jonathan

Pollard.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. UPTON (for himself and Mr. GOSS) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to convicted

spy Jonathan Pollard.

Whereas in 1987 Jonathan Pollard was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for stealing and selling classified data to Israel; and

Whereas President Clinton is considering clemency for Mr.

Pollard: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that con3 victed spy Jonathan Pollard should not be released from

4 prison.

Æ
Ph竜耽1tom 2 Vision +聯is§fon Chec驚書ig隆

Ar商val Check髄st!

1 , lf day and opera指ng out of back of vehicle, POint ve輔cle輔o sun.!

2. Remove case翻d p胎ce on level §u向Ce!

3. Check dis治nce to nea聡st airpert andIo「 COn鵬鵬ed airspaee using smart phone or施blet app. 1

4. 1f聡qujred, use VH干a湧翻on t略nSCeiver to co融act tower of掴d韓cIose「 than 5N肌1

5. In掩m章ewe「/ C了AF of UAS ops, lo閑静on翻d m歌鵬i節t of飾g撤

l ,康e同ove t惰れSm聴e「

2. Ro細嘉e「一〇n

3.丁「蜜n$請純e「一〇n

4. Togg書e Switches - S2 is Up, Sl is Down in Fafl Safe

5, Vi寄ee M6niぬ「 - On

6、 Remove UAS fro請case

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. M掩ro-SD ca「d - 1nserted

9 UAS Ba能ery - 1nserted

lO. Pta鴎UAS in clear and safe l郷nch and re∞Very POS繭o両目t re紬「ns to home

「「 UAS唇翻eIV-On

12 WトFi Connec繭en to Mon轍er - Ve「ified

13, DJ案Appl施a剃on - Load

14 DJ喜applic離ien - Corlnect tO Camera

15. SD C合商-戸o手ma‡

16 C謝れe愉一F囲Up

1 7. GPS Ca書ib臨場on and Co陣n撃C基ions - Vefified

18" Ch甜ge Levels - Safe fo「郎ght

19. VIdeo Recording - S掻rt

20,丁ake 〇倍

1 Hove「 approximately ten fe鏡above the g「Ou軸to co繭rm UAS is unde「 contro1

2. Ail sticks oper翻e cor胎ctIy while in hoveトVe輔ed

l. Came「a- Fu" Up

2. V鱒合o Re○○巾e「一統op

3. Landing Zone - CIear/ S翻e

l.瞳誠造り- Rem8Ve & R馨p嘉ace

2. VVi-Fi Connec鱈on to Mor酒Or - Ver綱ed

3. DJ] app喜ica締on - Connect to Camera

4.丁ake謂

畠田d of Ops Ch悌糊謡1

1区制e吋一〇簡

2 丁「尋ns鵬i鵬「 ○ ○惰

3. R°uモer一〇楕

4 N綱fy Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
Before the Second Division,

May 14, 1964

No. 68550.

protest 310799-K/8824 (Chicago).

#### Standard Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*350Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Outdoor Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 14,
1997, except for Note 16 as to which the date is March 26, 1997, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Outdoor Systems, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Phoenix, Arizona
October 20, 1997
Case No. 6,569.

#### HODGSON et al. v. MOUNTZ et al.

[1 Cranch. C. C. 366.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1806.

Authority or Mayor or Georgetown — Coneession or Judgment — Stay—How Beckoned.

1. The mayor of Georgetown may, in that town, do any act which a justice of the peace of the county can do.

2. A judgment against two. may be superseded by one of the defendants, and the new confession will bind him and his sureties; and the other defendant need not be named in the super-sedeas.

[Cited in Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Bar-croft, Case No. 2,644.]

3. The six months’ stay is reckoned from the day of the confession of the new judgment.

4. The sum confessed need not be repeated and specially set forth in the blank at the end of the supersedeas.

5. Parol evidence may be given that the confession was made at a place within the jurisdiction of the magistrates before whom it was made.

[This was an action at law by Hodgson & Thompson against Mountz, Knowles, and another.]

Upon the return of a ca. sa. issued upon a supersedeas,—

Mr. Morsell and F. S. Key, for defendants,

moved the court to quash the execution. 1. Because the law of Maryland of 1791 (chapter 67, § 1) requires that the confession of judgment shall be made before two justices of the peace of the county, but this confession was made before the mayor of Georgetown, and one justice of the peace of the county only. 2. The original judgment was against Jacob Mountz and George Reintzel; and it is superseded by Mountz only. 3. The original judgment is misrecited in the super-sedeas, the original judgment being against both and the supersedeas stating that it was a judgment against one. 4. That the six months’ stay is to be reckoned from the day of the original judgment, but the supersedeas reckons it from the day of the date of the supersedeas, that is, the day of confession of the new judgment. 5. That the blank, at the end of the supersedeas, ought to be filled up with "the actual sum to be paid. 6. That it does not appear, upon the supersedeas, that the judgment wras confessed in Georgetown, so as to be within the jurisdiction of the mayor, and that parol evidence cannot be now given of that fact

Mr. Jones, for plaintiffs.

But THE COURT,

after argument, overruled all these objections, and refused to quash the execution.
EXHIBIT 2.1 
 Promissory Note
  $13,500.00
Date:March 28, 2011
 
 For value received, the undersigned Lux Digital Pictures, Inc (the “Promisor”) promises to pay to the order of Ingo Jucht. or its designee (the “Payee”), at 12021 Wilshire Blvd., #450, Los Angeles, CA. 90025, (or at such other place as Payee may designate in writing), the sum of Thirteen Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Dollars ($13,500.00) (“Principal Sum”).
 
 The Principal Sum shall be advanced to Promisor, via wire transfer, on or before March 31, 2011. The Principal Sum shall be due and payable, on demand, by Promisor to Payee, on December 31, 2011 (“Due Date”). If Promisor timely and fully pays the full Principal Sum to Payee, on or before the Due Date, the Note shall be retired and no interest shall accrue on the Note.
 
 If Promisor is unable to fully pay the Note, upon the Due Date, the Principal Sum shall accrue interest, on all unpaid portions of the Principal Sum, retroactive to the original date of the Note, at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, which shall continue to accrue until the Note is fully paid.
 
 No renewal or extension of this Note, delay in enforcing any right of the Payee under this Note, or assignment by Payee of this Note shall affect the liability of the Promisor. All rights of the Payee under this Note are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or consecutively at the Payee’s option.
 
 This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
 
 If any one or more provisions of this Note are determined to be unenforceable, in whole or in part, for any reason, the remaining provisions shall remain fully operative.
 
 In the event the Payee is required to utilize collection services, legal services or any other services to collect any amounts due hereunder, Payee shall be entitled to, in addition to the Principal sum plus accrued interest, less credits or payments, all of the costs of collection.
 
 All payments on this Note shall be paid in the legal currency of the United States.
 
 Promisor waives presentment for payment, protest, and notice of protest and nonpayment of this Note.
 
 Signed this 28th day of March 2011, at Beverly Hills, California.
   /s/ Ingo JuchtFor Lux Digital Pictures, Inc
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

April 2, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40885

Summary Calendar

CHARLIE J. LONG,

PetitionerAppellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

RespondentAppellee.

------------------------------------------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CV-354

------------------------------------------------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Charlie J. Long (“Long”), Texas prisoner # 902617, appeals the district court’s denial of his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Long’s petition stems from his

1999 conviction for aggravated assault, for which he is serving a 20-year sentence. The district court-2-

granted Long a certificate of appealability on the sole issue whether Long was deprived of his right

to compulsory process under the Sixth Amendment when a defe nse witness asserted his Fifth

Amendment right against self-incrimination upon the advice of an attorney appointed to represent the

witness. The state courts rejected this claim on the merits. Long also has filed a motion for leave to

file an out-of-time reply brief of excess length; that motion is GRANTED.

Contrary to Long’s assertion, the record does not support a determination that the witness’s

invocation of his Fifth Amendment right was a nyt hing but voluntary. Further, once the witness

appeared in court and refused to testify, Long’s Sixth Amendment compulsory process rights were

exhausted, regardless of the reason for invoking the Fifth Amendment. S ee United States v. Griffin

,

66 F.3d 68, 70 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Fo llin

, 979 F.2d 369, 374 (5 th Cir. 1992).

Acco rdingly, the state court’s rejection of Long’s Sixth Amendment claim was not based o n an

unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court, and

Long is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

AFFIRMED.