alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 24, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), POINT OF CARE MARKETING ASSOCIATION (“POCMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Point of Care Marketing Association, Verona, NJ. The nature and scope of POCMA's standards development activities are: to develop, promulgate and publish voluntary consensus standards for the Point of Care Media Advertising Industry using procedures that incorporate the attributes of openness, balance of interests, due process, and appeals process, and consensus. The POCMA intends to standardize the terms and conditions for point of care media advertising to make it easier for advertising agencies and marketers to buy and capture value from advertising in healthcare settings.

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22234 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

M EMORANDUM SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of Public Meeting on March 14, 2011,

regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Stuart C. Miles - McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management TO: Public Docket #EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0156: Im proving Regulations: General As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering "how best to promote retrospective analy sis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of its retrospective review of regulatio ns, EPA convened public meetings around the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodicall y review our regulations. T his Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the input received from stakeholders participating in a public meeting held on March 14, 2011, in Arlington, Virginia.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 228 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 228

    To authorize the printing of a document entitled ``Washington's 
                          Farewell Address''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1998

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Ford) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To authorize the printing of a document entitled ``Washington's 
                          Farewell Address''.

    Resolved, That the booklet entitled ``Washington's Farewell 
Address'', prepared by the Senate Historical Office under the direction 
of the Secretary of the Senate, be printed as a Senate document.
    Sec. 2. The Senate document described in section 1 shall include 
illustrations and shall be in the style, form, manner, and printing as 
directed by the Joint Committee on Printing after consultation with the 
Secretary of the Senate.
    Sec. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies, there shall be 
printed 600 additional copies of the document specified in section 1 
for the use of the Secretary of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In
connection with this Annual Report of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ending August
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Reno R. Rolle, Chief Executive Officer and Presidentof
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1.
      Such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ending August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
      The information contained in such amended Yearly
Report on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc.
   Dated: 
      December 17, 2008
  RED
ROCK PICTURES HOLDINGS INC.
  By:
      /s/ Reno
      RolleReno
      RollePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,
                  and
      Director
# Official Journal C 157/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5724 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 157

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5724 May 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 157/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 157/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 157/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7202 — Lenovo/Motorola Mobility) (1) | 2 |
| 2014/C 157/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7137 — EDF/Dalkia in France) (1) | 3 |
| 2014/C 157/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7260 — CPPIB/G&M/Enagás/Tecgas) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 157/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7202 — Lenovo/Motorola Mobility) (1)

2

2014/C 157/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7137 — EDF/Dalkia in France) (1)

3

2014/C 157/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7260 — CPPIB/G&M/Enagás/Tecgas) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 15

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, John W. Greenslade, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled Bateman Engineering Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper-Cobalt Project, (the Technical Report), dated August 12, 2005, and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp.(the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) John W. Greenslade                    
| |     | Name: John W. Greenslade
CEO, Baja Mining Corp.
| |     | Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Exhibit 32

Form 10

|   | (1) | To my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/ Chene Gardner  |
| Chene Gardner           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Chief Executive Officer |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The case was removed here on June 12, 2006. (Dkt. #1).

ORDER 

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KAZUKO ISHIGUMA WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-0814RSM

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule

12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Dkt. #2). On April 26, 2006, plaintiff filed

the instant lawsuit in King County Superior Court, alleging negligence and claiming damages

arising from an incident in which hot tea was spilled on her lap during an international United

Airlines flight between the United States and Japan.1 (Dkt. #1, Ex. A). Defendant has filed a

motion to dismiss, asserting that plaintiff’s common law negligence claim is preempted by the

Montreal Convention of 1999 and is barred by the two-year limitation period. (Dkt. #2). 

Plaintiff has failed to respond.

Accordingly, having reviewed defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and the remainder of the

Case 2:06-cv-00814-RSM Document 8 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER 

PAGE – 2

record, the Court does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #2) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED

with prejudice. This Court’s Local Rules state that “[i]f a party fails to file papers in opposition

to a motion, such failure may be considered by the court as an admission that the motion has

merit.” Local Rule CR 7(b)(2). Having reviewed the record in this case, the Court finds no

reason not to apply this rule.

(2) The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 15 day of August, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00814-RSM Document 8 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 55727.

protests 159667-K, etc. (New York).

#### Biological Raw Products Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 11064)

#### Panation Trade Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2879, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Judge:

The following appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court as follows:

> 1. That the involved merchandise consists of cigarette lighters exported from Japan after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165) ; that the involved merchandise is not identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) and that appraisement was accordingly made under Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act.

> 2. That the merchandise, the facts, and the issues herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Panation Trade Co.*v. *United States,*A.R.D. 181, and that the record in the said cited case may be incorporated herein.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets in the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses, incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit ex-factory prices, plus packing as invoiced.

> 4. That the appeals enumerated in Schedule “A” annexed may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation and upon the incorporated record, the same *being*limited *to the*merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and following tlie cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in sec*599tion 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and hold that such statutory values for the involved merchandise are the invoice -unit ex-factory prices, plus packing, as invoiced.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CHADRICK JOHN DERBYSHIRE,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-507M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession of Cocaine With Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

and 841(b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: November 7, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), there is a rebuttable presumption that defendant

is a flight risk and a danger to the community based on the nature of the pending charges.

Defendant has not overcome these presumptions.

(2) Defendant’s instant offense is a serious charge and involves a large amount of

drugs.

Case 2:05-mj-00507-MJB Document 10 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Defendant is a Canadian citizen and has no known ties to the Western District of

Washington or to this community.

(4) Defendant has no employment or legitimate means of support.

(5) Defendant’s current living arrangements appear to be unstable.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00507-MJB Document 10 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2023

NO. 03-22-00297-CR

Adam Ahmad Noureddine, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order modifying the conditions of community supervision entered by 

the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this 

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 57784.

protests 116500-K, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of internal-combustion engines similar in all material respects to the articles involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was held that the value of the items involved is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink on the invoices by the examiner.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WILLIAM L.E. DUSSAULT, Guardian ad

litem for J.B., a minor; TIMOTHY and

ESTHER BUCKMAN, wife and husband and

parents of J.B.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

PENINSULA WOMEN’S CLINIC, P.L.L.C., a

Washington Corporation; ROBERT H.

PALMER, JR., M.D.; DEBORAH G. BOPP,

R.N., C.N.M., A.R.N.P.; CLALLAM

COUNTY PHD #2 d/b/a OLYMPIC

MEDICAL CENTER; CATHY L. REGISTER,

R.N.; and Unknown John and Jane Does,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5297RJB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR CLARIFICATION

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification (Dkt. 58). The court

has considered the motion and documents filed in support of and in opposition thereto and the file. 

For the reasons stated herein, the motion should be denied. 

This motion appears to be more a motion for reconsideration than a motion for clarification. 

The court’s Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Temporarily Seal File and Deem Confidential

Certain Pleadings Until Conclusion of Litigation (Dkt. 54) does not require clarification. 

Case 3:06-cv-05297-RJB Document 63 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER - 2

While the court is aware that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), the court may

“make such other order as it deems proper for the protection of the infant or incompetent person,”

the court is not satisfied, on the showing made, that there is justification to withhold a guardian ad

litem settlement report from other parties that remain in the case. 

The court is also mindful that under Western District of Washington Local Civil Rules, and

under Washington law, a “compelling interest test” is used. No sufficiently compelling interest

justifying sealing of the file from other parties to the case has been shown here. See Western District

of Washington Local Civil Rule 5(g)(1) and Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa, 97 Wn.2d 30 (1982);

Dreiling v. Jain, 151 Wn.2d 900 (2004); Rufer v. Abbot Labs, 154 Wn.2d 530 (2005); & Woo v.

Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., 2007 WL 641827 (Wash. App., Div. I, Mar. 5 2007). 

Therefore it is now

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification is DENIED. 

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of

record via the CM/ECF system and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address

via the U.S. Mail.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2007.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05297-RJB Document 63 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 51/17 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 51 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6017 February 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 51

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6017 February 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 51/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 51/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 51/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 51/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6
38.4 38.6 38.8 39.0 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL