alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K  for the year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Friedman, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |                                                                                                                                                                          
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 15, 2011 |                                                                                                                                                                          
|                        | By:  /s/ Michael J. Friedman                                                                                                                                             
|                        | Name: Michael J. Friedman
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
#### Aminata Florence KAMARA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-2079.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 2005.

Decided Aug. 10, 2005.

Joseph Peter Drennan, Alexandria, Virginia; James T. Reynolds, Paul Shearman Allen *&*Associates, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Eric W. Marsteller, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Aminata Florence Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen. We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005); *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); *Yanez-Popp v. U.S. INS,*998 F.2d 231, 234 (4th *144Cir.1993). A denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor motions to reopen. *M.A. v. U.S. INS,*899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc).

Kamara raises several issues in her brief, none of which have merit. We note the Board did not abuse its discretion denying the motion to reopen as untimely. Moreover, there was no evidence of changed circumstances within Sierra Leone. Thus, there was no reason to ignore the ninety-day period in which to file motions to reopen. We are without authority to review the Board’s decision not to sua sponte reopen the case. *Belay-Gebru v. INS,*327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir.2003). We further find no authority to exercise our mandamus authority and to compel the Board to review the merits of the petition to reopen. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988).

Insofar as Kamara challenges the March 12, 2004 order summarily affirming the immigration judge’s order, we are without jurisdiction because Kamara did not file a timely petition for review. *Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (this time period is “jurisdictional in nature and must be construed with strict fidelity to [its] terms.”).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also deny the motion for stay of removal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
#### State of Maine *vs.*Raymond F. Cushing.

Piscataquis.

Decided October 4, 1939.

*Judson C. Gerrish,*County Attorney, for State.

*James M. Gillin,*for respondent.

The indictment in this case is not within the statute as it read at the time of the commission of the alleged offense.

For such reason, the exception must be sustained, the demurrer adjudged good and the indictment quashed. Exception sustained. Demurrer adjudged good. Indictment quashed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE GOVERNMENT’S RETURN MEMORANDUM 

AND STATUS REPORT - 1

(CV06-0967 TSZ-MAT) UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

District Judge Thomas S. Zilly

Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KHURRAM PARVEEN RANA,

A# 98-764-072,

 Petitioner,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security,

ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General;

NEIL CLARK, Field Office Director,

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement,

 Respondents.

No. CV06-0967 TSZ-MAT

STIPULATION AND ORDER

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE GOVERNMENT’S RETURN

MEMORANDUM AND STATUS

REPORT

Noted on motion calender for:

August 31, 2006. 

STIPULATION

This case is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Government’s Return

Memorandum and Motion to Dismiss is due on September 5, 2006. The Petitioner is

currently assessing his options regarding the retention of counsel in Texas (where he is

now detained on a criminal matter) and requires additional time to consider the status of

his representation before this matter is heard. 

Therefore, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the Government

be given an additional two-week extension of time in which to file its return

memorandum and motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the parties further STIPULATE,

AGREE AND JOINTLY REQUEST, that the Court extend to September 19, 2006 the

due date for the Government’s response, or for filing of appropriate dismissal documents. 

Case 2:06-cv-00967-TSZ Document 13 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE GOVERNMENT’S RETURN MEMORANDUM 

AND STATUS REPORT - 2

(CV06-0967 TSZ-MAT) UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

DATED this 31st day of August, 2006.

 /s/Robert Pauw 

ROBERT PAUW, WSBA #13613

1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1600

Seattle, Washington 98104-1094

Phone: 206-682-1080

Email: rpauw@ghp-law.net

DATED this 31st day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Priscilla T. Chan 

PRISCILLA T. CHAN, WSBA #28533

Assistant United States Attorney

Western District of Washington

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: 206-553-7970

Fax: 206-553-4073

Email: Priscilla.Chan@usdoj.gov

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated, the above is SO ORDERED. The Clerk is

directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 5th day of September, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by:

 /s/ Robert Pauw 

ROBERT PAUW, WSBA #13613

Attorney for Petitioner Rana

 /s/ Priscilla T. Chan 

PRISCILLA T. CHAN, WSBA #28533

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for the United States of America

Case 2:06-cv-00967-TSZ Document 13 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2
December 23, 1946

No. 51493.

#### Protest 71854-K of Charles C. Perry.

C. D. 1032. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWERTEL, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         241,433
<SECURITIES>                                    33,375
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,608
<INVENTORY>                                     23,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,420
<PP&E>                                         576,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (62,634)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,319,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,384
<BONDS>                                        802,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                     260,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,319,236
<SALES>                                          6,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,723
<CGS>                                           17,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5,282)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (57,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (57,690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (57,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.14)
        

</TABLE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 196

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for the

presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to President and Mrs. Gerald R. Ford.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on October 27, 1999, for the presentation of

4 the Congressional Gold Medal to President and Mrs. Ger5 ald R. Ford. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall
2

HCON 196 RFS

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the

2 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives October 18,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MAURICE DALTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5820RJB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Case 3:05-cv-05820-RJB Document 4 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager) at the Washington State

Department of Corrections.

DATED this 27th day of January, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05820-RJB Document 4 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.126 Agency- and GSE-Backed Mortgage Pools  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineAgency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FL413065005
	1648.5
	1775.5
	1646.2
	1677.2
	1729.5
	1775.5
	1803.9
	1844.0
	1875.8
	1Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; home mortgages; asset
	FL413065105
	1474.8
	1568.8
	1468.9
	1491.1
	1536.5
	1568.8
	1587.7
	1614.8
	1648.4
	2Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; multifamily residential mortgages; asset
	FL413065405
	172.1
	204.3
	175.7
	184.6
	190.6
	204.3
	213.4
	226.5
	224.8
	3Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; commercial mortgages; asset
	FL413065505
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	4Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; farm mortgages; asset
	FL413065605
	1.6
	2.3
	1.6
	1.6
	2.4
	2.3
	2.7
	2.7
	2.7
	5Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FL413065005
	1648.5
	1775.5
	1646.2
	1677.2
	1729.5
	1775.5
	1803.9
	1844.0
	1875.8
	6 Back to top
  **NOTES** GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Farmer Mac, and Farmers Home Administration pools. Beginning 2010:Q1, almost all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage pools (L.126) are consolidated on Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's balance sheets (L.125). Also includes agency- and GSE-backed mortgage pool securities which are used as collateral for agency- and GSE-backed CMOs and privately issued CMOs. Excludes Federal Financing Bank holdings of pool securities, which are included with federal government mortgages and other loans and advances.
Such issues are classified as agency- and GSE-backed securities.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WAYNE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA CARTER, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5324FDB-KLS

ORDER

This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), Local Magistrates Rules MJR 3 and 4, and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

This order is before the Court on plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Court’s order to show cause (Dkt.

#35) regarding defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. #30). 

On May 14, 2007, the Court issued its order to show cause informing plaintiff that due to certain

deficiencies in his complaint, he had failed to state a proper claim against any of the named defendants. 

The Court, however, granted plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint, curing, if possible, the

deficiencies noted in the order to show cause, before recommending defendants’ motion to dismiss be

granted. On May 21, 2007, the copy of the order to show cause sent to plaintiff was returned for lack of

proper postage. It was sent out again on the same day. 

To date, plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order to show cause. Nevertheless, erring on

the side of caution, the Court shall send plaintiff a copy of the order to show cause one more time, and

Case 3:06-cv-05324-FDB Document 36 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

grant him additional time to respond. Accordingly, plaintiff shall have file by no later than August 6,

2007, an amended complaint curing, if possible, the deficiencies noted in the order to show cause as

directed to do so therein. Plaintiff is warned, however, that this is his last chance to filed an amended

complaint, and that failure to timely do so will result in a recommendation that defendants’ motion

to dismiss be granted. 

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 6th day of July, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05324-FDB Document 36 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

MONTGOMERY SCARP MACDOUGALL, PLLC

1218 Third Avenue, Suite 2700

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone (206) 625-1801 STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL- 1 Facsimile (206) 625-1807

Honorable J. Kelley Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT TACOMA

ROBERT AINSWORTH,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware

Corporation,

 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5349 JKA

STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF

DISMISSAL

 )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective

undersigned attorneys, that the above-captioned cause of action has been settled and should be

dismissed with prejudice and without cost to either party.

DATED this 8th day of January, 2009 DATED this 8th day of January, 2009

Montgomery Scarp MacDougall, PLLC Bremseth Law Firm, P.C.

 s/Bradley P. Scarp s/Frederic A. Bremseth 

Bradley P. Scarp, WA. Bar No. 21453 Frederic A. Bremseth, Minn. No. 11149

Tobias Kammer, WSBA No. 34578 Keith E. Ekstrom, Minn. No. ________

Of Attorneys for defendant Of Attorneys for plaintiff, pro hac vice

1218 Third Avenue, Suite 2700 601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 995 

(206) 625-1801 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

brad@montgomeryscarp.com (952) 475-2800

fbremseth@bremseth.com

kekstrom@bremseth.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

MONTGOMERY SCARP MACDOUGALL, PLLC

1218 Third Avenue, Suite 2700

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone (206) 625-1801 STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL- 2 Facsimile (206) 625-1807

Eagle Law Offices

 s/Paul Eagle 

Paul Eagle, WA Bar No. 22477

Of attorneys for plaintiff

1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3200

Seattle Washington, 98154

paul@eaglelawoffices.com

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled cause is

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost to either party.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2009.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold Honorable J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented and approved by:

Montgomery Scarp MacDougall, PLLC Bremseth Law Firm, P.C.

s/Bradley P. Scarp s/Frederic A. Bremseth 

Bradley P. Scarp, WA. Bar No. 21453 Frederic A. Bremseth, Minn. No. 11149

Tobias Kammer, WSBA No. 34578 Keith E. Ekstrom, Minn. No. ________ 

Of Attorneys for defendant Of Attorneys for plaintiff, pro hac vice

1218 Third Avenue, Suite 2700 601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 995 

(206) 625-1801 Minnetonka, Minnesota

brad@montgomeryscarp.com 55305(952) 475-2800

fbremseth@bremseth.com

kekstrom@bremseth.c