01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY COLIN SOLOMON, JR.

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR06-0134-RSL

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE

An evidentiary hearing on supervised release revocation in this case was scheduled 

before me on February 11, 2013. The United States was represented by AUSA Sarah Kate 

Vaughan and the defendant by Kevin Peck. The proceedings were digitally recorded.

Defendant had been sentenced on or about November 6, 2006 by the Honorable Robert 

S. Lasnik on a charge of Sexual Assault of a Minor, and sentenced to thirty-three months 

custody, three years supervised release. (Dkt. 32.)

The conditions of supervised release included the standard conditions plus the 

requirements that defendant abstain from alcohol and participate in alcohol treatment, be 

prohibited from entering any establishment where alcohol is the primary commodity for sale, 
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -2

participate in a drug testing program, submit to search, participate in a mental health 

program/sexual offender treatment program and make reasonable progress therein, have no 

unsupervised contact with minor children, submit to polygraph examination, follow all other 

lifestyle restriction or treatment requirements imposed by his therapist, and not possess or use 

any sexually explicit material.

On September 26, 2008, defendant’s supervised release was modified to require 

satisfactory participation in a residential reentry program for up to 180 days. (Dkt. 34.)

On August 24, 2009, defendant admitted violating the conditions of supervised release by 

failing to follow the instructions of his probation officer, failing to register with the state sex 

offender registration agency, and failing to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of 

release from the federal Bureau of Prisons. (Dkt. 45.) Defendant was sentenced to 10 months 

in custody, 26 months supervised release. (Dkt. 49.) Additional conditions required the 

defendant to not go to places within 100 feet of an area where minors are known to frequent, 

have his residence pre-approved by the probation office, have no direct or indirect contact of 

any kind with the victim, and reside in a residential reentry center for up to 120 days.

On January 4, 2011, defendant was sentenced to 4 months custody, 20 months 

supervised release for violating the conditions of supervised release by committing the crime of 

theft in the 3rd degree. (Dkt. 62.) On August 12, 2011, defendant was sentenced to 10 months 

custody, 10 months supervised release for failing to truthfully answer all inquiries of the 

probation officer, having unauthorized contact with a child under the age of 18, perusing 

material that contains sexually explicit conduct, and failing to comply with the location 

monitoring program. (Dkt. 76.) 
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -3

On January 11, 2012, the conditions of supervised release were modified to require 

defendant to reside in and satisfactorily complete a residential reentry program for up to 180 

days. (Dkt. 78.) On April 25, 2012, the conditions of supervise release were against modified to 

require residential reentry program participation for up to 180 days. (Dkt. 79.)

In an application dated October 20, 2012 (Dkt. 81, 82), U.S. Probation Officer Monique 

D. Neal alleged the following violation of the conditions of supervised release:

1. Failing to comply with the Location Monitoring Program on October 20, 2012, 

in violation of the special condition requiring him to participate in the Location Monitoring 

Program home detention component with active GPS technology for a period of 90 days.

In an application dated January 2, 2013 (Dkt. 86, 87), U.S. Probation Officer Steven R. 

Gregoryk alleged the following violation of the conditions of supervised release, which he 

recommended be incorporated with the previously reported violation:

2. Committing the crime of shoplifting (alcohol) on December 19, 2012, in 

violation of the general condition of supervision which states that the defendant shall not 

commit another federal, state, or local crime.

Defendant was advised in full as to those charges and as to his constitutional rights.

Defendant admitted alleged violations 1 and 2 and waived any evidentiary hearing as to 

whether they occurred.

I therefore recommend the Court consolidate the violations for hearing, find defendant 

violated his supervised release as alleged in violations 1 and 2, and conduct a hearing limited to 

the issue of disposition. The next hearing will be set before Judge Lasnik.

Pending a final determination by the Court, defendant has been detained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -4

DATED this 11th day of February, 2013.

A

Mary Alice Theiler 

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik

AUSA: Sarah Kate Vaughan

Defendant’s attorney: Kevin Peck

Probation officer: Monique D. Neal