alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                       860
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,246
<PP&E>                                          11,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,659
<SALES>                                          7,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,059
<CGS>                                            2,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
| 1.     | the forgoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |

|   |   /s/ Kenneth E. Banwart            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kenneth E. Banwart, Managing Director         |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                          |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC |   |

----
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0124**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Oversight hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, October 18, 2023, from 10:30-11:30 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be via videoconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda is: Committee Chair's opening remarks regarding the agenda; Presentation and discussion of the Results of NSF Pilots to Improve Reviewer Training.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703-292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Christopher Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2023-22911 Filed 10-12-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 4.21**
No. P68/32.

protest 60/25330 (New York).

#### Starlite Jewelry Mfg. Co. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles covered by the foregoing protest consist of merchandise classified as flashlights similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 555, C.D. 2703), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P67/215.

#### Wal Rich Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 66/1339 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-02111-TSZ Document 14 Filed 03/20/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-02111-TSZ Document 14 Filed 03/20/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 290 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 290

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 7 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas Senator John F. Kerry has received a subpoena for documents in the case 
        of Tyree v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al., Case No. 98-CV-11829, 
        now pending in the United States District Court for the District of 
        Massachusetts;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent Members of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for documents relating to their official 
        responsibilities; and
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Kerry in connection with the subpoena served upon him in the 
case of Tyree v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 14,262.

#### TURNER v. NEWMAN.

[3 Biss. 307;1 4 Chi. Leg. News, 361.]

Circuit Court, N. D. Illinois.

July Term, 1872.

.Practice — Proceedings to Restore Records.

The proceedings to restore records in the United States courts must conform to the act of congress, and not to the state statute. ; ■

Petition to restore the record of a judgment heretofore rendered in this court in favor of the petitioner against the defendant, praying a summons, and that the case pro-; ceed in the manner provided by the statute of the state of Illinois, approved April 9,1872' (2 Gross, 317), commonly called the “Burnt Records Act”

Paddock & Ide, for plaintiff.

D.- S. Pride,.for defendant

BLODGETT, District Judge.

The plaintiff .claims that by the 5th section of the-act of .congress, approved June 1, 1872 [17 Stat 196),' entitled “An act te.'further the administration of justice,” he is entitled to proceed in con- ■ formity with the state statute. That section' provides “That the practice, pleadings, forms . and modes of proceeding in other than equity and admiralty causes, in the circuit and district courts of the United States, shall conform as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, forms and modes of proceeding existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the state' in which such courts , are held, any rule of court to the contrary notwithstanding: provided, that nothing herein contained shall alter the rules of evidence ' under the laws of the United States as practiced in the courts thereof.”

We do not think the restoration of the records of this court is by the act just quoted brought within the provisions of the state law on that subject. By act of congress, approved March 3, 1871 (16 Stat. 474), provision is made for the restoration of the records of the federal courts in all cases when the same shall be lost or destroyed. And by the act of congress, approved March 18, 1872 (17 Stat. 41), the method of proceeding under that statute is further regulated and defined.

It seems dear to us that it was not the intention of congress, by the fifth section of the act of June 1st, to repeal or abrogate the act of March 3, 1871, and its amendment The proceeding to restore records does not come within the general term of practice or pleadings in the courts, ■ which obviously has reference to the mode of commencing and trying causes, but it is a special proceeding sui generis, and to be governed by the statute authorizing it. The act of March 3d applies to all cases in law, equity, and admiralty, while the conformity act of June 1st only applies to proceedings at law, so that if the- construction contended for in-.this case was to prevail,, we should have one mode of procedure in cases at law governed by the state statute, and another, in equity and admiralty cases, governed by act of congress.

For these reasons we consider that proceedings to restore records in this court, must conform to the act of congress, and that the state statute does not control, although we admit that- the state statute is in many respects much more simple and easy of application than the act of congress.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(c)

                                                            [ZURICH KEMPER LOGO]


KEMPER INVESTORS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (KILICO)
1 Kemper Drive, Long Grove, Illinois 60049-0001  telephone 800-621-5001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROUP MASTER APPLICATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Application
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application for
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name of Product
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name of Group
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Principal Office Street Address
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

City                                  State        Zip
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benefits and payments provided by this contract, when based on Guarantee Period
Values, may increase or decrease in accordance with the Market Value Adjustment
formula stated in the contract schedule.

Benefits, payments and values provided by this contract, when based upon the
investment experience of the subaccounts, are variable and are not guaranteed
as to dollar amount. Refer to the variable account and annuity period provisions
for a determination of any variable benefits.


Signatures
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature of Authorized Representative
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Typed Name
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Title
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signed at (City, State and Zip)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Witnessed by
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Licensed Agent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-300M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

JOSE MANUEL NAMBO-SILVA, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Heroin, Methamphetamine and Cocaine

Date of Detention Hearing: June 9, 2006

 The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Todd Greenberg. The defendant was represented by Michele Shaw.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

Case 2:06-cr-00198-RSL Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Defendant stipulates to detention due in part to the placement of an ICE

detainer.

(3) Based upon the foregoing information, it appears that there is no

condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future Court appearances and/or the safety of other persons or the

community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006. AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00198-RSL Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 55718.

protest 146543-K (Cleveland).

#### Paramount Distillers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the entry in this case involves alcoholic beverages. The issue as to the dutiable quantity was before this court under protest 116196-K and was decided favorably to the importer on May 15, 1947, published in 18 Cust. Ct. 197, Abstract 51719. The entry was reliquidated on January 24, 1949, and duty was assessed upon the quantities indicated in the decision of the court.

This action, filed with the collector on February 23, 1949, within 60 days of the reliquidation of the entry by the collector in conformity with the mandate of the court, claims that duty has been assessed upon an excess quantity of proof gallons, and that duty should have been assessed upon a quantity of proof gallons as shown by the United States inspector’s return of proof gallons, upon which internal revenue tax was assessed; and it is more specifically contended that under the provisions of Public Law 612, approved June 8, 1948, duty was assessed upon an estimated excess of 624.88 proof gallons.

At the trial of this case counsel for the plaintiff submitted the case on the official papers, and asked permission to file a brief. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest for the reasons that the reliquidation was made strictly in conformity with the mandate of the court; that no petition for a rehearing was ever taken; and that no appeal was filed, and, therefore, the decision as to the quantity became final and conclusive upon all parties before Public Law 612 became effective.

In the case of *Maui Dry Goods & Grocery Co., Ltd.*v. *United States,*24 Cust. Ct. 297, C. D. 1251, this court held that the question of quantity could not properly be raised in a protest against the collector’s reliquidation of an entry, in which the collector had merely acted by reason of a mandate of this court.

In the case of *Alfred Hart Distilleries, Inc.*v. *United States,*27 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1338 (protest 138949-K, decided June 20, 1951) this court held, as shown in the head note, as follows:

> A protest filed against the collector's reliquidation of an entry, nearly a year after a decision by this court, as to the quantity upon which duty should be *271assessed, where the collector refused to adopt the quantity found by the court, is *held*insufficient to again raise the question of a change in quantity on account of a change in the law by Public Law 612, and the retroactive features thereof, when such act became effective several months after the court’s mandate had become final and conclusive as to quantity upon all parties.

In view of the foregoing decisions, Government’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff has no cause of action is granted. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000693

28-FEB-2018

12:31 PM
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 157

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President for the courteous,

dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President

for the courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in

which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the Honorable Al Gore, Vice President of the

3 United States and President of the Senate, for the cour4 teous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has

5 presided over its deliberations during the first session of

6 the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

STORY WORLDWIDE, LLC,,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

ASSOCIA LIVING, INC.,

 Defendant.

 C06-720 MJP

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-720 MJP and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 6th day of September, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00720-MJP Document 12 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4
                                    AMENDMENT

                                      OF A

                                      LEASE


Dated:   April 1, 1995

BETWEEN:    THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SUCCESSOR BY AMALGAMATION
            OF NORTH AMERICAN LIFE ASSURANCE CO. AND THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE
            INSURANCE COMPANY EFFECT JANUARY 1, 1996

            and

            MEDIA SYNERGY INC. (LESSEE)

FOR:     Approximately 5,584 sq.ft. on the second floor of Building C
         the Ontario Design Centre
         260 King Street East,

Amended November 6, 1996, save and except for the below changes, the existing
lease shall remain in full force and effect.

1. The Landlord agrees that upon expiration of the term of the Subtenant's Lease
Agreement with Alliance for Converging Technologies, 31st July, 2001, the
Subtenant shall have an extension of a lease for the premises, it will observe,
comply with and perform all terms, conditions and covenants in the Lease and
perform all obligations of any kind whatsoever in the Lease as and when the same
are due to be performed by the Tenant pursuant to the terms of the Lease, except
for the basic net rental rate will be $11.00 net per square foot until November
30, 2001.

DATED at Toronto, this 10th day of August, 1999.

Signed, Sealed and                            MEDIA SYNERGY INC.
Delivered in the presence of:
                                              per:

 /s/ Judy Lucas                                /s/ Martha Miller
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------

Signed, Sealed and                            The Manufacturers Life Insurance
Delivered in the presence of:                 Company
                                              per:

 /s/ Judy Lucas                                /s/ Ron Meanchoff
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
# Official Journal C 14A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.014.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 14A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5718 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.014.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 14A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5718 January 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 014A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 32nd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 014A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 32nd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN