alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CR06-157 MJP

)

v. )

) [PROPOSED]

HENRY C. ROSENAU, ) ORDER AUTHORIZING

) WITNESS DEPOSITION

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

This matter having come on before the undersigned Court on renewed Motion of the

Government for Authorization to permit the taking of a Witness Deposition.

Having considered the files and records herein, and pleadings of the parties, the Court

grants the government’s motion to authorize foreign deposition, and holds that, pursuant to

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 15 and in the interest of justice,

the government is authorized to take the deposition of witness Kip John Whelpley in

the above-entitled matter,

that the government will provide reasonable prior notice of the time and place of the

deposition to defense counsel and the Court,

the government and defense counsel shall be permitted to conduct examination of the

witness to preserve the testimony for trial,

that the defendant will pay the costs of the deposition,

//

//

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Order Authorizing Witness Deposition

United States v. Rosenau, CR06-157 - 1

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 55-1 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that the deposition shall be taken and filed in the manner provided in Rule 15, provided

that the scope and manner of examination and cross-examination is such as would be allowed

at trial.

So ordered this _____ day of _______________________, 2011.

MARSHA J. PECHMAN

Chief Judge, United States District Court

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Order Authorizing Witness Deposition

United States v. Rosenau, CR06-157 - 2

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 55-1 Filed 10/31/11 Page 2 of 2
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

RODOLFO VELAZQUEZ JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v. CASE NUMBER: C06-55284RJB

 CR02-5823RJB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury

has rendered its verdict.

 _X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or

heard and a decision has been rendered.

On February 23, 2007, an Evidentiary Hearing was held before the Court in this matter. For reasons stated

orally on the record, Petitioner has not shown that his claims meet the standard for relief under 28 U.S.C. sec. 2255.

The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is therefore DENIED. 

 February 26, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

/s/ Dara L. Kaleel_______________________ 

By Dara L. Kaleel, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05284-RJB Document 23 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1
AFS

- 13

- 582

- E

April 21, 2015

Exemption No. 10782B Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0279

Mr. Mario Cotumaccio Aviation High School
45

- 30 36 th Street Long Island

, NY 11101

Dea r Mr. Cotumaccio :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10782, as amended . It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the
revised conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 10

, 2015

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aviation High School for an amendment to Exemption No. 10782 . That

e xemption

, from §147.36 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

, currently allows Aviation High School to con duct instruction with a student/ instructor ratio greater than the designated 25 to 1 ratio

. Specifically, t he amendment you have request ed would allow Aviation High School to cond uct instruction with a student/ i nst ructor ratio of 2 8 to 1

.

We are amending the current grant of exe mption from § 147.36 to permit Aviation High
School to conduct FAA

- approved mechanic courses in the 2015

– 2016 school year with a
student/instructor ratio of 28 to 1, subject to the cond ition that Aviation High School ensures the facilities, instructional equipment, and instructor to student ratio continue to provide a level of safety equivalent to 14 CFR §147.36.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of E xemption No. 10782, as amended, remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113

, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me,2

AFS

- 13

- 582

- E I have amended Exemption No. 10782 to allow Avia tion High School to conduct instruction
with a student/ inst ructor ratio of up to 28 to 1, which is greater than the 2 5 to 1 requirement specified in 14 CFR §147.36

.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 1078 2, as amended

, to June 30,
201 6 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10782.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
From: maryhigg20@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:00:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Higgins

, 75041.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LILIA BELKOVA, individually and as successor trustee of the LAND TRUST AGREEMENT, NO:072003 DATED 2/9/04
, Appellant

,

v.

DEER RUN PROPERTY OWNERS ’ ASSOCIATION, INC.
, et al.

, Appellee s

.

No

. 4D2 2

- 1202

[ August 23, 2023 ]

A ppeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Sarah L. Shullman

, Judge ; L.T. Case No.
502017CC001472XXXXMB

.

Thomas L. Hunker and Sarah Hafeez of Hunker Appeals, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant

.

Steven R. Braten and Dina L. Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for Appellee Deer Run Property Owners’ Association.

Anthony A. Arsali of Arsali LLC, Delray Beach, for Third Party
Purchaser Nicholas Arsali.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Belkova v. Deer Run Prop. Owners’ Ass’n , 4D21

- 2924 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 23, 2023).

G ROSS
, D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
October 1, 1956

No. 60273.

Suit 4852.

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States.

-C. D. 1702. (Appeal dismissed July 1, 1955, to correct assignment of errors. See Abstract 60274 below, relating to suit 4855, which was substituted for suit 4852.)
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the General
Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 28, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 282 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 282

 To express the sense of the Senate regarding Social Security and the 
                            budget surplus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1998

  Mr. Johnson submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
 jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on 
  the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one 
committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be 
                               discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of the Senate regarding Social Security and the 
                            budget surplus.

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projections released July 15, 1998, 
        indicate that the ``on-budget'' deficit, which does not include Social 
        Security program surpluses, will be $41,000,000,000 for Fiscal Year 
        1998;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projections also show that the amount of 
        Federal debt held by the Social Security trust funds will grow from 
        $736,000,000,000 in 1998 to $2,250,000,000,000 in 2008;
Whereas the Social Security trust funds will be credited with interest payments 
        on Federal debt each year, rising from $46,000,000,000 in 1998 to 
        $117,000,000,000 in 2008, and these interest payments are an integral 
        part of Social Security's long-term financial viability; and
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office's current projections indicate that 
        there will not be a consistent surplus in the unified budget until 2005: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Congress and the 
President should--
            (1) continue to work to balance the budget without counting 
        Social Security trust fund surpluses;
            (2) continue to abide by ``pay as you go'' budget rules 
        requiring that legislation increasing mandatory spending or 
        reducing revenues must contain offsets to maintain budget 
        neutrality; and
            (3) save Social Security first by reserving all surpluses 
        attributable to the Social Security program, including interest 
        payments.
                                 <all>
```
March 23, 1962

No. 66605.

#### Borneo Sumatra Trading Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/9722(B).

Protest dismissed February 23,1962. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 271

Designating October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 3 (legislative day, AUGUST 31), 1998

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr.

BAUCUS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWNBACK,

Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BYRD, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

D’AMATO, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, Mr. FORD, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAMM, Mr.

GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INOUYE,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. MACK,

Mr. MCCAIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr.

MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

OCTOBER 9 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National Mammography

Day’’.

Whereas according to the American Cancer Society, in 1998,

178,700 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and

43,500 women will die from this disease;
2

SRES 271 ATS

Whereas in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that

about 2,000,000 women will be diagnosed with breast

cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a

woman at age 70 having twice as much of a chance of

developing the disease as a woman at age 50;

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast

cancer have no family history of the disease;

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a

certified facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is

the key to saving lives;

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers up to 2 years or more before a regular clinical breast

examination or breast self-examination (BSE), reducing

mortality by more than 30 percent; and

Whereas 47 States and the District of Columbia have passed

legislation requiring health insurance companies to cover

mammograms in accordance with recognized screening

guidelines: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National

3 Mammography Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 to observe such day with appropriate programs and

7 activities.

Æ
No. 54436.

#### S. H. Kress & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 983319-G (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Before the Second Division,

November 6, 1967

No. P67/381.

#### Davar Products, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 66/27525 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated *903mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O KORZILIUS et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5301FDB

REPORT AND

 RECOMMENDATION 

NOTED FOR:

October 13th, 2006

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and

MJR 4.

 On August 1st, 2006 the court entered an Order requiring plaintiff to submit service documents

including copies of the complaint. (Dkt. # 8). There are five named defendants in this action, they are C/O

Korzilius, Lieutenant Jacobs, Sergeant Gatchell, C/O Dowelly, and Superintendent Porter. (Dkt. # 10). 

Plaintiff has not complied. Instead of complying plaintiff has sent in two service forms, one for C/O Korzilius

and one for C/O Dowelly. The court has not received service forms for the other three defendants and no

service copies of the complaint have been received.

Plaintiff was specifically informed that failure to provide the documents would result in a Report and

Recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. 

(Dkt. # 8). As plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order the court now recommends this action be

Case 3:06-cv-05301-FDB Document 12 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 2

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A proposed order and proposed judgment accompanies this

Report and Recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to

set the matter for consideration on October 13th, 2006 as noted in the caption. 

DATED this 18th day of September, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05301-FDB Document 12 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

jjroso braw
A senins no2 *

ROAD DRAW
SPRING NO!

REE REV Ay MILES

ee
Y TD ~
y 7 WP el %
HO a
Vi,

BULLETIN 1009 PLATE 11

y
Zn,
L- a
eusi8 Line
mihi

suMMITK,
SPRING

EXPLANATION

N

4

B
T
7
N.

33

INGER BUTTE S
o ee.
1

X
~

ze pear
hi ais E Contact, dashed where —D—W iG
By E approximately locoted [. te X
= Landslide material 3 z fe RW ansen Reach)
a 3
een Mine 2) le
j . 2| & YS
® Ankaree formation "ig
Somple locality

2 °

o Brule formation Well

| Preserved only inpre~ |

2) arikaree landshde blocks \= ca
a|¢ & Spring

u nt of water
cchedron formetion igi ering 9 \\
i " Boundary of Custer
& Ludlow member of the Notional Forest
Fort Union formation
A fg 2 WN
if SV. | | . . ~~
S Hell Creek formation & | copy, SOUTH DAKOUA H S \
a . ) SESS
_ “ss
Ywewec, 65 mies RSE

Tapped on sonal pholowraphs dunn
arts of Jue, us and August 16
Base compiled from Ganerdl Land Otice plats

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE

°
it

SOUTHERN PART OF THE SLIM BUTTES AREA, HARDING COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA

2 Miles
J

343704 O—55 (In pocket) No. 2
No. 67187.

protests 323407-K and 60/2692 (New York).

#### The May Dept. Stores Co., Inc. (Kaufmann Div.) *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of knit outerwear of synthetic textile, valued over $5 per pound, similar in use to wool knit outerwear and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

October 24, 1966

No. P66/289. —

No. P66/290. —

No. P66/291. —

No. P66/292. —

No. P66/293. —

No. P66/294. —

#### The American Rolex Watch Corp. *v.*United States, protests 58/25127, etc. (New York). Paul Breguette Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 58/25128, etc. (New York). Movado Watch Agency, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 61/13101, etc. (New York). Eterna Watch Co. of America, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 61/13878, etc. (New York). Concord Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 61/19526, etc. (New York). American Rolex Watch Corp. *v.*United States, protests 65/19962, etc. (New York).

*822Rao, C. J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Benrus Watch Company et al.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), wherein said watch movements were held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55014.

#### R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 128843-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | (1)    | Registration Statement No. 333-201508 on Form S-8 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (2)    | Registration Statement No. 333-190729 on Form S-8 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (3)    | Registration Statement No. 333-183687 on Form S-8 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (4)    | Registration Statement No. 333-175351 on Form S-8 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (5)    | Registration Statement No. 333-167613 on Form S-8 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (6)    | Registration Statement No. 333-199697 on Form F-3 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (7)    | Registration Statement No. 333-194296 on Form F-3 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (8)    | Registration Statement No. 333-192959 on Form F-3 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (9)    | Registration Statement No. 333-176669 on Form F-3 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | (10)   | Registration Statement No. 333-166765 on Form F-3 |
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 553 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 553 Filed 06/21/12 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 553 Filed 06/21/12 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 553 Filed 06/21/12 Page 4 of 4
No. 66120.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/30507 (New *York).*

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.