alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 189-3 Filed 01/18/10 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit 31
                                                                   ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2005-AB2;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


          Date: March 27, 2006


                                      /s/ Steve Bailey
                                      ----------------
                                      Steve Bailey
                                      Senior Managing Director
| (1)    | the annual report on Form 10-K of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.                                                                        |

|   | /s/ Robert Vivian                                                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Robert Vivian                                             |
|   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer |
|   |  (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)        |
|   |                                                                       |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
August 12, 2009
# Official Journal L 345/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.345.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5223 December 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.345.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 345

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5223 December 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/971/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 12 May 2009 on State aid which Germany proposes to grant towards the restructuring of WestLB AG (C 43/08 (ex N 390/08))
  (notified under document C(2009) 3900)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2009/972/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 17 June 2009 on aid scheme C 41/06 (ex N 318/A/04) which Denmark is planning to implement for refunding the CO2 tax on quota-regulated fuel consumption in industry
  (notified under document C(2009) 4517)

   (1) | 18 |
| | | 2009/973/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 13 July 2009 on the restructuring aid for Combus A/S
  (notified under document C(2009) 4538)

   (1) | 28 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/971/EC

*

Commission Decision of 12 May 2009 on State aid which Germany proposes to grant towards the restructuring of WestLB AG (C 43/08 (ex N 390/08))
  (notified under document C(2009) 3900)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 3900)

1

2009/972/EC

*

Commission Decision of 17 June 2009 on aid scheme C 41/06 (ex N 318/A/04) which Denmark is planning to implement for refunding the CO2 tax on quota-regulated fuel consumption in industry
  (notified under document C(2009) 4517)

   (1)

2

(notified under document C(2009) 4517)

18

2009/973/EC

*

Commission Decision of 13 July 2009 on the restructuring aid for Combus A/S
  (notified under document C(2009) 4538)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2009) 4538)

28

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

KHALID O. RAHMAN

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

PIERCE COUNTY, et al., 

CASE NUMBER: C06-5262BHS/KLS

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

That Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to

Local Rule CR 41(b)(2).

 May 30, 2008 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Date Clerk

 s/CM Gonzalez 

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05262-BHS Document 63 Filed 05/30/08 Page 1 of 1
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3199

___________ Douglas Thompson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. J. Booker, Warden, USP Leavenworth, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 2, 2002 Filed: December 11, 2002

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Douglas Thompson appeals the district court's 1 dismissal, as time-barred, of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging one of his state court2 For a discussion of Thompson's criminal history, see Thompson v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole , 39 F.3d 186, 187-89 (8th Cir. 1994).
3 The issues Thompson raised in his application for a certificate of appealability are not the same as the issues he raised in his original petition for writ of habeas corpus; therefore, the denial of his application was appropriate. Abdullah v. United States , 240 F.3d 683, 685 (8th Cir. 2001) ("Generally, a habeas claim cannot be raised by a petitioner for the first time on appeal."), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 923 (2001). -2- convictions for murder 2 and the court's refusal to grant a certificate of appealability. 3 For the reasons stated below, we affirm. "The one-year statute of limitations in § 2244(d)(1) took effect on April 24, 1996. [His] conviction was then final under state law. Therefore, he had one year–until April 24, 1997–to file a federal habeas petition, unless the one-year limitation in § 2244(d)(1) was tolled." Gray v. Gammon , 283 F.3d 917, 918 (8th Cir. 2002). Thompson's state conviction was final in 1983. SeeThompson v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. and Parole , 39 F.3d 186, 188 (8th Cir. 1994). Since he filed his current petition on June 7, 1999, and he has not met the requirements for tolling, his current application for writ of habeas corpus is time-barred by section 2244(d)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered October 28, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00025-CV

ERICA STENSON, APPELLANT

V.

HIGH POINTE VILLAGE, APPELLEE

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-07145-D

ORDER

As the court reporter has informed us appellant has failed to request a reporter’s record, 

we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c)(1). 

Appellant shall file her brief within thirty days of the date of this order. 

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Enrique RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51399.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark Glendon Parenti, Alpine, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Enrique Ramirez-Hernaiidez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL BURNHART, AKA (KELLY),

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARK, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5326RJB-KLS

ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION

TO CONSOLIDATE

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Magistrates’ Rules (MJR) 1, 3 and 4. This matter is on hold while plaintiff

cures certain defects in his application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

On June 21, 2006, plaintiff submitted a letter directed to the Clerk, in which he requested “all 1983

issues into one case.” (Dkt. #3). The Court shall treat that request as a motion to consolidate. While that

motion normally would be ripe for review at this time, the Court does not intend to allow this case to go

forward until the in forma pauperis issues noted in the order to show cause issued the same date herewith

have been resolved. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motions to consolidate (Dkt. #3) hereby is re-noted for

Case 3:06-cv-05326-RJB-KLS Document 10 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

September 14, 2006. 

DATED this 1st day of August, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05326-RJB-KLS Document 10 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID McCUISTION,

Petitioner,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5329RBL

 ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file an answer (Dkt. # 18). 

Counsel indicates files have been ordered from the state court to answer the petition. 

Respondent has shown good cause for an extension of time and will have until January 12,

2007 to file an answer.

The clerk is directed to send copies of this order to petitioner and counsel for respondent. And

to note the January 12, 2007 due date.

DATED this 6 day of December, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05329-RBL Document 20 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 67/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5111 March 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 67

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5111 March 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2008 of 10 March 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2008 of 10 March 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/214/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 18 July 2007 on State aid C 27/2004 which the Czech Republic has implemented for GE Capital Bank a.s. and GE Capital International Holdings Corporation, USA
  (notified under document number C(2007) 1965)

   (1) | 3 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/214/EC

*

Commission Decision of 18 July 2007 on State aid C 27/2004 which the Czech Republic has implemented for GE Capital Bank a.s. and GE Capital International Holdings Corporation, USA
  (notified under document number C(2007) 1965)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2007) 1965)

3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHELLE BEARDSHEAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAZELL DELL LANES, INC. and

SKIPPER’S, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5305RJB

ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

This matter comes before the court on review of the file.

On June 1, 2006, plaintiff Michelle Beardshear filed suit against Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. in federal

court alleging that she was denied access to a Skipper’s Restaurant owned, leased, or operated by Hazell

Dell Lanes, Inc. because the restaurant is not accessible to people with disabilities. Dkt. 1. The complaint

lists the following claims: (1) violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and (2) violation of the

Washington Law Against Discrimination. Id. On November 13, 2006, the court granted plaintiff’s motion

to file an amended complaint, adding Skippers, Inc., as a defendant. Dkt. 22 and 23.

On December 13, 2006, Skippers, Inc. filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Petition and Stay of

Proceedings, informing the court that, on December 12, 2006, Skippers, Inc. filed a Chapter 11

Bankruptcy Petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No.

06-14414. Dkt. 37. Accordingly, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1), the proceedings in this civil case

were automatically stayed against Skippers, Inc. pending the resolution of the bankruptcy.

Case 3:06-cv-05305-RJB Document 42 Filed 08/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

On January 19, 2007, pursuant to the stipulation of plaintiff and Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc., the court

stayed the litigation involving these two parties for thirty days. Dkt. 40.

No action has been taken by plaintiff or Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. to request that the stay be

continued or that the case proceed with regard to these two parties. Accordingly, the court should order

plaintiff and Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. to show cause why the stay should not be lifted with regard to

plaintiff’s claims against Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. 

Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that, not later than September 14, 2007, plaintiff and Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. are

ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any they may have, why the stay in this case should not be lifted with

regard to plaintiff’s claims against Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. If plaintiff and Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. fail to

timely respond to this order to show cause, or if they otherwise fail to show cause, the court will lift the

stay with regard to the claims involving plaintiff and Hazell Dell Lanes, Inc. and these claims will proceed.

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any

party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2007.

ARobert J Bryan

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05305-RJB Document 42 Filed 08/23/07 Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2014

- 0464

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) National

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)

– Second Round

FROM: Rhea Jones

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS

DATE: April 25, 2016

SUBJECT: Available Air Dispersion Modeling Files Received in Response to the EPA ’ s

Intended Designations Unde r the Court

- Ordered July 2, 2016 Deadline

The EPA has air quality modeling files, submitted by states and third parties, which were

received in response to our intended designations for areas subject to this action to promulgate

designations under the 2010 primary SO 2 NAAQS. These files are located within the EPA

Regional Offices for the respective states within each Region. The EPA Regional Offices will

respond to specific requests for subse ts of the data or for specific inputs and outputs of the

modeling process, as availabl e . Requests for these files should be sent to the following

individuals , for the states within their Regions :

EPA Region 1: Leiran Biton ( biton.leiran@epa.gov )

EPA Region 2: Henry Feingersh ( feingersh.henry@epa.gov )

EPA Region 3: Irene Shandruk ( shandruk.iren e@epa.gov )

EPA Region 4: Twunjala Bradley ( bradley.twunjala@epa.gov )

EPA Region 5: John Summerhays ( summerhays.john@epa.gov )

EPA Region 6: Dayana Medina ( medina.dayana@epa.gov )

EPA Region 7: David Peter ( peter.david@epa.gov )

EPA Region 8: Adam Clark ( clark.adam@epa.gov )

EPA Region 9: Gw en Yoshimura ( yoshimura.gwen@epa.gov )

EPA Region 10: John Chi ( chi.john@epa.gov )