alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archiveassures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. 
**Title: U.S.Army War College key strategic issues list [electronic resource]**
 
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011-12| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2016-17 | 2017-18
2018-20 | 2021-22
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146/18:
Item Number:0307-A-63 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000649307
 
June 6, 2018
Case 2:02-cv-02438-RSL Document 28 Filed 12/01/03 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02438-RSL Document 28 Filed 12/01/03 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02438-RSL Document 28 Filed 12/01/03 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

                        Wednesday, October 11, 2023—10:00 a.m. (See                         **MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED**                         for each meeting).                    

# PLACE: 

Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meetings—Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Decisional Matter (postponed from October 4, 2023):*                         Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—Safety Standard for Infant Rockers and Infant/Toddler Rockers.                    

*Decisional Matter:*                         Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—Safety Standard for Residential Gas Furnaces and Boilers.                    

*Briefing Matter:*                         FY 2024 Operating Plan.                    

                        A live webcast of the meetings can be viewed at the following link:                         *https://cpsc.webex.com/​weblink/​register/​rcba2daff690fcdbc61d969fd800c6446.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: October 4, 2023.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22449 Filed 10-5-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 14th day of December , 2005

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHIHULY, INC., and PORTLAND PRESS,

INC.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1801 JPD

ROBERT KAINDL; BRYAN RUBINO;

ART GLASS PRODUCTION, et al,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Defendants Robert Kaindl, Bryan Rubino, and Art Glas Production have filed a Motion to

Dismiss (dkt #17) and requested oral argument. The request for argument is GRANTED.

The Court will hear argument on Thursday, January 5, 2006 at 10:00am, in courtroom

12A, U.S. Courthouse, Seattle, Washington. Each side will be permitted thirty (30) minutes to

present their respective arguments.

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 37 Filed 12/14/05 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 14,283.

#### TWENTY-SIX BARRELS AND SEVENTEEN TIERCES OF DISTILLED SPIRITS.

[11 Int. Rev. Rec. 78.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1870.

Forfeiture — Internal Revenue — Payment of Tax — Burden of Proof.

In the ease of 26 barrels and 17 tierces of distilled spirits, shipped by Jacob B. Good, from Lancaster. Pa., and seized in the city of .New York, in May. 1868, the defence admitted the seizure, and the prosecution claimed that, under the 45th section of the old act [14 Stat. 163], it devolved on the claimant to .prove that the tax had been paid, while the defence argued that this rule had been repealed by the act of Jiily 1868 [15 Stat. 125].

BLATCHFORD, District Judge,

however, ■held that the old act was in force, and consequently the sprits were condemned.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

LAUGHING RABBIT, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PETERSON INDUSTRIES, LLC,

 Defendant(s).

 Case No. C06-754P

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

At the request of counsel, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The

report will be due on September 29, 2006. All other FRCP 26-related dates are adjusted

accordingly. Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including

dismissal of this action.

Filed this 31st day of July, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00754-MJP Document 6 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,200,000                                                  Bellevue, Washington
                                                                          [Date]


          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Mercata, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Maker"),
hereby promises to pay to the order of Paul G. Allen or his successors or
assigns, as the case may be ("Payee"), at 110 - 110th Avenue NE; Bellevue,
Washington, or such other place as may be specified in writing by Payee, the
principal sum of One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,200,000), plus
simple interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum on the unpaid
principal balance.  The principal amount of this promissory note and all accrued
interest shall be payable immediately on the demand of Payee at any time on or
after December 31, 1999.

          Maker shall have the right to prepay all or any part of this
promissory note at any time without penalty or premium, and any such prepayment
shall be applied first to the payment of accrued interest and then to the
payment of principal.

          Maker hereby waives presentment for payment, notice of dishonor,
protest and notice of protest, and in the event of default hereunder, Maker
agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

          This promissory note shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.

          ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT OR TO
FOREBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON
LAW.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this promissory note as of the
date first above written.

                                             Mercata, Inc.


                                             By:   /s/ Jon Engman
                                                   ---------------
                                             Its   V.P. & Treasurer
                                                   ----------------

                                       1.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 36 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 36

Relative to the retirements of Arthur Curran, Donn Larson, and Richard 
                                Gibbons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relative to the retirements of Arthur Curran, Donn Larson, and Richard 
                                Gibbons.

Whereas Arthur Curran, Donn Larson, and Richard Gibbons will retire from the 
        Senate on January 31, 1997;
Whereas Arthur Curran was appointed as a Senate Doorkeeper in 1975 by Vice 
        President Rockefeller;
Whereas Arthur Curran rose to the post of Superintendent of Doorkeepers and has 
        dutifully served in that post for the last 15 years;
Whereas Donn Larson first began his Senate career under an appointment from 
        Senator Milton Young in 1959;
Whereas Donn Larson served in the Republican Cloakroom from 1961 to 1968, 
        leaving to work in the Federal Government until his return to the Senate 
        in 1977, where he has served as Deputy Supervisor of the Doorkeepers 
        since 1981;
Whereas Richard Gibbons has served as a Senate Doorkeeper since 1977, acting as 
        press liaison outside the President's Room just off the Senate Floor;
Whereas since the 103rd Congress Richard Gibbons has served in the Senate 
        Chamber and has diligently assisted both Senators and staff alike in a 
        myriad of tasks in addition to his role of helping to maintain order in 
        the Chamber; and
Whereas each of these three gentlemen has faithfully served the Senate and they 
        have carried out their duties with efficiency and good nature: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate extends its thanks to Arthur Curran, Donn 
Larson, and Richard Gibbons for their many years of dedicated service 
and wishes them well in their future aspirations.
    The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to Arthur Curran, Donn Larson, and Richard Gibbons.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JOHN WISE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5810 FDB/KLS

ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO

AMEND AND GRANTING MOTION

FOR ADDITIONAL COPY OF

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the

Court are Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. # 31) and motion for an

additional copy of Defendant’s Answer to the Complaint (Dkt. # 32). Plaintiff filed his motion to

amend, along with a certificate of service on September 27, 2006. The certificate of service reflects

that Plaintiff served only the Clerk of the Court with a copy of the motion to amend. 

Plaintiff must serve the Defendants with copies of all pleadings or motions filed in this matter. 

Whenever a pleading or other paper is filed in paper form for the Clerk’s Office to scan and upload

to CM/ECF, the filer must serve conventional copies on all parties to the case according to the

Federal Rules. Although Plaintiff filed his motion to amend on September 27, 2006, the certificate of

service reflects that he did not serve Defendants with a copy of the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff is

advised that the motion shall be re-noted to provide Defendants with sufficient time to respond to his

motion and that in the future, any pleading, motion or other paper that Plaintiff files with the Court

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 38 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

should also be served in paper form on the Defendants.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint (Dkt. # 31) shall be re-noted for

November 17, 2006. Plaintiff’s motion for an additional copy of Defendant’s Answer (Dkt. # 32) is 

GRANTED; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of Defendant’s Answer to

Plaintiff.

The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for

Defendants.

DATED this 24th day of October, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 38 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 9,695.

#### MILLER v. WHEATON et al.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 41.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1812.

Bail — Civil Case — Affidavit.

Affidavit to hold to bail.

P. S. Hey, for Briscoe, moved to enter his appearance for this defendant without bail. The plaintiff had filed, as his cause of action, a promissory note of Wheaton, and an affidavit by an indifferent witness that Briscoe acknowledged to him that he was a partner with Wheaton in the transaction and equally liable for the debt.

THE COURT

(PITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent) held it to be sufficient to hold Briscoe to bail.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ROBERT BENNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

EVERGREEN WASHINGTON HEALTHCARE

SEATTLE, LLC dba SEATTLE MEDICAL &

REHABILITATION CENTER,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-2048C

ORDER

This matter has come before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed February 14, 2006. (Dkt.

No. 8.) Plaintiff’s complaint is presented on pleading paper addressed to the “Seattle Office for Civil

Rights,” bears a “SOCR” case number, and is titled “Employment Charge.” The complaint alleges that

Defendant violated Title VII by terminating his employment because of his race. 

The complaint does not allege facts establishing this Court’s jurisdiction over the matters asserted

in the complaint. See, e.g., E.E.O.C. v. Farmer Bros. Co., 31 F.3d 891, 899 (9th Cir. 1994) (explaining

that “[t]o establish federal subject matter jurisdiction, [a plaintiff is] required to exhaust [his] EEOC

administrative remedies before seeking federal adjudication of her claims”). Rule 8(a) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure requires that “[a] pleading which sets forth a claim for relief . . . shall contain . .

Case 2:05-cv-02048-JCC Document 9 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

. a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends.” Accordingly,

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by Friday, March 10, 2006, at 4:30 p.m. why the Court

should not dismiss this action for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to comply with this

Order by Friday, March 10, 2006, at 4:30 p.m. will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. 

 Plaintiff is also directed to ensure that all future papers filed with the Court comply with Local

Rule CR 10.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2006.

AUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02048-JCC Document 9 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2
10s

WV
fH

‘CAUUY
SOWWIMZELD->O0.

xX
ao
Ivy
ey
UW

Nit  /

GEOLOGIC MAP, PLANS, AND SECTION OF THE ACCESSIBLE UNDERGROUND WORKINGS,

FLORIDA PROPERTY, JUAB COUNTY, UTAH
No. 67192.

protests 62/6550-16559, etc. (New Orleans).

#### E. W. Bruno Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
| Name                         |   | Jurisdiction           |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                         |   |                   |
| Ania Aframax Corporation     |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Ann Tanker Corporation       |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Cathy Tanker Corporation     |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Chris Tanker Corporation     |   | Marshall Islands       |
| DHT Maritime, Inc.           |   | Marshall Islands       |
| DHT Phoenix, Inc.            |   | Marshall Islands  |
| London Tanker Corporation    |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Newcastle Tanker Corporation |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Rebecca Tanker Corporation   |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Regal Unity Corporation      |   | Marshall Islands       |
| Sophie Tanker Corporation    |   | Marshall Islands       |

----
No. 67211.

protests 323288-K and 58/9519 (New York).

#### Kaiser-Reismann Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc.,*and Wood *Niebuhr & Co.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

KATHY ANN GUIDRY,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5264RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( X ) Defendant appears on a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum from the Washington Corrections for Women.

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 May 1, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05264-BHS Document 19 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by AB&T Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ Daniel C. AyscueDaniel C. AyscuePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Roger A. MobleyRoger A. MobleyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Parris, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 103]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J., at plea; Franklin Weissberg, J., at sentence), rendered March 2, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of l1/2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress the credit cards recovered from his possession by a department store’s security guard was properly denied without a hearing for failure to allege facts (CPL 710.60 [1], [3] [b]) showing a connection between security guards and police indicative of "active governmental involvement” in the surveillance, apprehension or questioning of defendant *(People v Ray, 65*NY2d 282, 286-287; *see also, People v Jones,*47 NY2d 528, 533). We reject defendant’s argument that such a connection is to be inferred from his allegations that the security guards resemble the police in the uniforms they wear and tactics they use, run the store’s "own private jail”, and "operate for the sole purpose of aiding the police” in gathering and turning over the information and suspects needed to prosecute. "[A]ny store policy reflecting a practice of turning defendant over to authorities *after*investigation and the decision to prosecute have privately been made is constitutionally immaterial and, in reality, simply consistent with the customary procedures involved in *all*citizens’ arrests” *(People v Ray, supra,*at 287-288 [emphasis in original]). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
# Official Journal C 83/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.083.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.083.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2012/C 083/01 | List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2012/C 083/01

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN