alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

DETERMINATION AS TO VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE -1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

 AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JACQUES M. SUTTON, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-160 JCC 

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

DETERMINATION AS TO ALLEGED 

VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED 

RELEASE

INTRODUCTION 

 I conducted a hearing on alleged violations of supervised release in this case on August 19, 

2008. The defendant appeared pursuant to a warrant. The United States was represented by 

Andrew Friedman, and defendant was represented by Carol Koller. Also present was U.S. 

Probation Officer Thomas J. Fitzgerald. The proceedings were digitally recorded. 

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE 

Defendant was sentenced on November 17, 2006 for being a felon in possession of a firearm. 

He received 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. 

PRESENTLY ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND 

DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION OF THE VIOLATIONS 

In a petition dated April 25, 2008, Supervising U.S. Probation Officer Thomas J. Fitzgerald 

alleged that defendant violated the following conditions of supervised release: 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

DETERMINATION AS TO VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE -2 

 1. Failing to report to the US probation office within 72 hours of release from custody of 

the bureau of prisons on or before April 7, 2008, in violation of the general terms of supervised 

release. 

2. Failing to report to the US probation officer, as directed on April 20 1, 2008, in violation 

of standard condition two. 

3. Failing to notify the US probation officer of change in employment, on or about April 7, 

2008, in violation of standard condition six. 

4. Failing to notify the US probation officer of change in residence on or about April 22, 

2008, in violation of standard condition six. 

Defendant admitted the above violations, waived any hearing as to whether they occurred, 

and was informed that the matter would be set for a disposition hearing before District Judge 

John C. Coughenour. 

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

Based upon the foregoing, I recommend the Court find that defendant has violated the 

conditions of his supervised release as alleged above, and conduct a disposition hearing. No 

request for release was made and defendant remains in custody pending disposition. 

 DATED this 19th day of August, 2008. 

s/ Brian A. Tsuchida 

United States Magistrate Judge
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**World Omni Financial Corp.** 

**Servicer Compliance Statement** 

**Pursuant to Item 1123** 

**of Regulation AB**

 

I, Joseph A. Venezia, do herebycertify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of WorldOmni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2022-A to Closed-EndServicing Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2022 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp., asClosed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)            Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K and coveredby the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made undermy supervision.

 

(ii)           Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand as of March 24, 2023.
Before the Second Divison,

March 3, 1960

No. 63909.

protests 311730-K, 323487-K, and 320186-K (New York).

#### Twin Textiles Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C.D. 1837), the •claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63430.

protest 309910-K/8884 (Chicago).

#### Lyons Transport *v.*United States,

*368Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of tennis or badminton racket strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61832, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.45

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Employment Agreement") is made effective as of
November 14, 2009 (the "Effective Date") by and among Cloud Peak Energy Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and Cary Martin (the "Executive").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Executive possesses skills, experience and knowledge that are of value to the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to enter into this Employment Agreement in connection with the proposed initial public offering of shares of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.
(the "IPO").

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valid consideration the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Section 1.Employment.



---





Section 2.Compensation.



2

---





Section 3.Employment Termination.



3

---





4

---





5

---



Section 4.Unauthorized Disclosure; Non-Solicitation; Non-Competition; Proprietary
Rights.



6

---





7

---





Section 5.Representations.The Executive represents and warrants that he (i) is not subject to
any contract, arrangement, policy or understanding, or to any statute, governmental rule or regulation, that in any way limits his or its ability to enter into and fully perform his or its obligations
under this Employment Agreement and (ii) is not otherwise unable to enter into and fully perform his or its obligations under
this Employment Agreement. The Company represents and warrants that this Employment Agreement will, by its effective date, have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Company.

Section 6.Withholding; Taxes.All amounts paid to the Executive under this Employment Agreement during
or following the Term shall be subject to any required withholding and other employment taxes imposed by applicable law.

Section 7.Miscellaneous.



8

---







9

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC./s/ Cary Martin

By:

/s/ Colin MarshallCary Martin



Name: Colin Marshall
Title: President, CEO


10

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67770-67771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Research and Development of 
Vaccines and Monoclonal Antibodies for Pandemic Preparedness 
(ReVAMPP) Centers for Bunyavirales, Paramyxoviridae and 
Picornoviridae (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: November 7-9, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Frank S. De Silva, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, 
Rockville, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5023, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2949697819b9e8493b29c9b939b96dc9c9b9adc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3c5c7c6d0cacfd5c2e3cdcac2cac78dcdcacb8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


[[Page 67771]]


    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21640 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 - ORDER FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTURY

CITY DOCTORS HOSPITAL LP

C:\Documents and Settings\jboring\Local Settings\Temp\notesF3A9D1\MM1891.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Christopher Velto, a Washington

citizen,

Plaintiff,

v.

Draeger Medical, Inc., a

Pennsylvania Corporation, and

Salus Surgical Group, LLC a

Delaware Limited Liability

Company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. C06-5190RBL

ORDER FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTURY

CITY DOCTORS HOSPITAL, LP

It appearing from the records in the above-entitled

action that Summons has been served upon the defendant named

below, and it further appearing from the Affidavit of counsel for

Plaintiff and other evidence required by F.R.C.P. 55(a) that the

defendant named below has failed to plead or otherwise defend in

Case 3:06-cv-05190-RBL Document 26 Filed 06/12/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 - ORDER FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTURY

CITY DOCTORS HOSPITAL LP

C:\Documents and Settings\jboring\Local Settings\Temp\notesF3A9D1\MM1891.wpd

this action as directed in said Summons and as provided in the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

Now, therefore, on request of counsel, the court hereby

orders the entry of DEFAULT of the following named defendant:

Century City Doctors Hospital, LP. 

Dated this 12th day of June, 

Bruce Rifkin

DISTRICT COURT EXECUTIVE

BY: S/Jean Boring

DEPUTY CLERK

Case 3:06-cv-05190-RBL Document 26 Filed 06/12/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 59823.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 171362-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                       875359
<NAME>                                             Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                        3881
<SECURITIES>                                                 22572
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 7681
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   288
<INVENTORY>                                                   7841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             47652
<PP&E>                                                       41941
<DEPRECIATION>                                               19763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               70539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         9561
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        13
<OTHER-SE>                                                   58106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 70539
<SALES>                                                      15036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             15036
<CGS>                                                         8405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               1137
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            728
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.06
        


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2091

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Rufus Merlin Sumlin, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 19, 2001 Filed: May 7, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rufus Merlin Sumlin, Jr., pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and

being a felon in possession of ammunition, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1994). At sentencing, he objected to receiving only a two-level, rather than three-level, reduction for acceptance of responsibility, and to the application of a four-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) for using or possessing firearms in connection with another felony offense.
The government linked Sumlin’s possession of firearms with his possession and sale of drugs on the basis of police reports, introduced through the testimony of the-2-

probati on officer who had reviewed them in preparing the presentence report. The reports related that firearms were present when Sumlin sold drugs to a confidential informant. The reports also showed that at the time of his arrest there, Sumlin had a loaded firearm in his pocket and that there was drug residue in the apartment. The District Court overruled Sumlin’s objections, finding an adequate evidentiary basis for the enhancement, and sentenced him to eighty-two months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Sumlin renews on appeal the arguments he presented below.
Sumlin’s challenge to the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction he received is foreclosed by his stipulation to a two-level reduction in his written plea agreement. See UnitedStates v. Barrett , 173 F.3d 682, 684 (8th Cir. 1999); UnitedStates v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995).
We conclude, however, that the District Court lacked an adequate factual basis for applying the challenged enhancement. By virtue of Sumlin’s objection, the government

had the burden to prove a connection between the firearms and another felony offense, but it did not show that its hearsay evidence bore sufficient indicia of reliability. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.3(a) (1998) (stating that a sentencing court may consider relevant evidence which might be inadmissible at trial, providedthe information has sufficient indicia of reliability); UnitedStates v. Wise , 976 F.2d 393, 402-04 (8th Cir. 1992) (en banc) (discussing when hearsay is sufficiently reliable under § 6A1.3(a)), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 989 (1993). We believe that a more probative evidentiary hearing on this issue is warranted.
Accor dingly, we vacate Sumlin’s sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion. Apart from the enhancement, Sumlin’s conviction and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

JEFFREY P. NEFF,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

OFFICER AARON PARKER, et al.,

 Defendant.

 C06-772 JCC

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-772 JCC and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 12th day of June, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00772-JCC Document 11 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 1 of 1

Neff v. Parker et al Doc. 11

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-58;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:/s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Case No. 14,877a.

#### UNITED STATES v. COURT.

[See Case No. 14.874.]
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.226 Pension Entitlements** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 3:05-cr-05853-JKA Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:05-cr-05853-JKA Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:05-cr-05853-JKA Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:05-cr-05853-JKA Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:05-cr-05853-JKA Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 5 of 5
Beltsville \ BARC

US Ntl. Arboretum (WA, D.C.)

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

Printable Version E-mail this page

Enter Keywords

Advanced Search

Programs and 

Projects

Subjects of 

Investigation

You are here: Research /

Research Project: Identification of Brown Patch 

Resistant Tall Fescue

Location: Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

2007 Annual Report

1a.Objectives (from AD-416)

The objective for this cooperative agreement is to 

identify sources of genetic resistance in tall fescue 

(Festuca arundinaceaea) to the complex of Rhizoctonia 

species causing brown patch disease in turfgrass. Brown 

patch is caused by multiple species of Rhizoctonia and 

present methods of germplasm development do not 

identify sources of resistance to individual species.

1b.Approach (from AD-416)

We will determine the frequency with which the species 

causing brown patch symptoms (R. solani, R. zeae, and 

R. oryzae) are isolated from symptomatic tall fescue 

and develop a method to screen sources of candidate 

germplasm for resistance to brown patch. We will also 

develop objective methods to digitally assess the 

severity of brown patch disease on turfgrass leaves and 

turfgrass swards.

3.Progress Report

Identification of disease resistance in tall fescue This 

report documents research conducted under a 

reimbursable agreement between ARS and Virginia Tech 

University. Additional results of the research can be 

found in the report for the parent project 1230-21000-

045-00D "Genetic Enhancement of Turfgrass 

Germplasm for Reduced Input Sustainability." Tall 

fescue germplasm is being inoculated and resistance 

levels determined using plant digital image analysis. 

Resistant material will be returned to the USDA for 

further germplasm enhancement work. This research is 

under National Program 205, Component 2, Problem 

area 2.1 (Lack of available germplasm). This project 

 

Project Team

Warnke, Scott

Project Annual 

Reports

FY 2008

FY 2007

Related National 

Programs

Rangeland, Pasture, 

and Forages (215)
was monitored by a site visit in 2006.

Last Modified: 05/09/2009

ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links

FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2009
    
    
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Chad C. Braun

Chad C. BraunTitle
    
    Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth III Corporation, the General
Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd.