alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2196

In Re: OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:05-cr-00112-WO-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Okang Kareem Rochelle, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Okang Kareem Rochelle petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing release pending sentencing or a status conference in the district court, and for the appointment of a special judge to “preside over litigation who would ensure that [his] rights governed by a fair and public hearing or trial [are] respected and protected.” Pet. for Writ of Mandamus at 2.

We conclude that Rochelle is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav.

& Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is not a substitute for a direct appeal; it is a drastic remedy that should only be used in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Rochelle fails to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances or that his rights cannot be fully protected through the established appellate process. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed informa pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Contract ID: 487171 

EXTENSION AMENDMENT TO GOOGLE SERVICES AGREEMENT 

This Extension Amendment to the Google Services Agreement (“Amendment”), effective as of the first day following the current
expiration date of the Agreement (as defined below) (“Amendment Effective Date”), is between Synacor, Inc. (“Company”) and Google Inc. (“Google”) and amends the existing Google Services Agreement
between Company and Google (the “Agreement”).    Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to those terms in the Agreement. The parties agree as follows: 

1.     Extension. The term of the Agreement is extended for an additional one month from the current expiration date. 

2.     General. The parties may execute this Amendment in counterparts, including facsimile, PDF, or other electronic
copies, which taken together will constitute one instrument. Except as expressly modified herein, the terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date by persons duly authorized. 

 

			
	Company: Synacor, Inc. 
		
	By:	 	/s/ William J. Stuart
	Name:	 	William J. Stuart
	Title:	 	CFO
	Date:	 	03-23-18

  

			
	Google LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Philipp Schindler
	Name:	 	Philipp Schindler
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	Date:	 	2018.03.27
Case 3:06-cr-05220-FDB Document 7 Filed 03/23/06 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 99.9


CONSENT OF MICHAEL F. SHAW Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 30th day of March, 2012. /s/Michael ShawName: Michael F. Shaw


---
Order entered September 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01504-CV

KATRINA MCPHERSON, Appellant

V.

MELISSA LOPEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05725-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 16, 2019 third motion for an extension of time 

to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 15, 2019. 

We caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
     ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1999         
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1   
<CASH>                             1,051,323  
<SECURITIES>                       3,075,667  
<RECEIVABLES>                        176,379 
<ALLOWANCES>                               0  
<INVENTORY>                          243,850  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   4,579,431  
<PP&E>                               502,104  
<DEPRECIATION>                       406,692  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     7,325,220  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,720,259  
<BONDS>                                    0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                0  
<COMMON>                          16,252,420  
<OTHER-SE>                                 0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       7,325,220  
<SALES>                              362,456  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     362,456     
<CGS>                                      0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        304,267  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,256,566  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,010,121)  
<INCOME-TAX>                               0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0  
<CHANGES>                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,010,121)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.19)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.19) 
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Recognizing the severity of the disease of colon cancer, the 
 preventable nature of the disease, and the need for education in the 
    areas of prevention and early detection, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the 
        United States for men and women combined;
Whereas it is estimated that in 1999, 129,400 new cases of colorectal cancer 
        will be diagnosed in men and women in the United States;
Whereas the disease is expected to kill 56,600 individuals in this country in 
        1999;
Whereas adopting a healthy diet at a young age can significantly reduce the risk 
        of developing colorectal cancer;
Whereas research has shown that a high fiber, low fat diet, with minimal amounts 
        of red meat and maximum amounts of fruits and vegetables, can 
        significantly reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer;
Whereas colorectal cancer is increasingly diagnosed in individuals below age 50;
Whereas regular screenings can save large numbers of lives;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health Care 
        Financing Administration, and the National Cancer Institute have 
        initiated the Screen for Life Campaign, targeted at individuals age 50 
        and older, to spread the message of the importance of colorectal cancer 
        screening tests; and
Whereas education can help inform the public of methods of prevention and 
        symptoms of early detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes--
                    (A) the severity of the issue of colorectal cancer;
                    (B) the preventable nature of the disease;
                    (C) the importance of the Screen for Life Campaign; 
                and
            (2) calls on health educators, elected officials, and the 
        people of the United States--
                    (A) to broaden the message of the Screen for Life 
                Campaign to reach all individuals; and
                    (B) to learn about colorectal cancer and its 
                preventive nature, and learn to recognize the risk 
                factors and symptoms which enable early detection and 
                treatment.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Before the Second Division,

June 20, 1947

No. 51797.

#### Allan Jensen *v.*United States,

protests 29432-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent *100ad valorem under paragraph. 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 4.2


 



























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We have issued our report dated April 11, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust Series 4-4, comprising the Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio, contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-223962) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.












/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP







Chicago, Illinois


April 11, 2018
No. 57800.

protest 176619-K (New York).

#### J. J. Boll and Sylvan Ginsbury *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of }^-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

FOY/ CR06-0229RSM — 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) CASE NO.CR06-0229RSM

 Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) ORDER OF CONTINUANCE

)

)

BRIAN RUSSELL FOY, )

)

)

 Defendant. ) )

The Court having reviewed the stipulated motion by the United States and

defendant BRIAN RUSSELL FOY to continue the trial date, and having reviewed the

records and files herein, makes the following findings and enters the following order:

The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and §3161(h)(8)(B)(i),

(ii) and (iv), the ends of justice served by continuing the trial date from September 11,

2006, to November 6, 2006, outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a

speedy trial. This matter is complex due to the nature of the offense involved as well as

potential mental health defenses and it is therefore unreasonable to expect defense

counsel to adequately prepare for trial before September 11, 2006. Additionally, failure

to grant the requested continuance would deny Defendant the time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a

miscarriage of justice.

Case 2:06-cr-00229-RSM Document 14 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

FOY/ CR06-0229RSM — 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that trial in this matter is continued from 

September 11, 2006, to November 6, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. Defendant shall file a waiver of

speedy trial no later than September 11, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of computing the time limitations

imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3164, the period of delay from

September 11, 2006, up to and including November 6, 2006, is excludable time pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

DATED this 6 day of September, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

 /s Jill Otake 

JILL OTAKE

Assistant United States Attorney

WA Bar # 28298

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-4254

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: jill.otake@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00229-RSM Document 14 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 2
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

August 30, 2024

CR-2023-0681

Walker Coleman Barkley v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Lee Circuit Court: CC22-381) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on August 30, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
1 Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51169 Summary Calendar

GEOFFREY E. ROHDE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

RIPPY SURVEYING CO.; CP RIPPY SURVEYING; CL RIPPY SURVEYING CO.
INC.; RIPPY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; RIPPY ENGINEERING CO.

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

A-98-CV-179-JN)

August 20, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appella nt complains to this court of the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants dismissing

Appellant’s constructive discharge claim brought under Title VII.

He lists five issues for appeal but in the body of his somewhat

rambling brief he discusse s others as well. We have given his

br ief the widest possible reading and considered all arguments

advanced in light of the record and find no reversible error by the

district court.

First, the district court dismissed the action for failure to2

abide by the time requirements of Title VII. The record clearly

demonstrates that this decision was corr ect. Additionally, the

district court found, as an alternative basis for its ruling, that

Defendants did not constitute an “employer” as that term is defined

in Title VII. That decision is also correct. Finally the district

court treated Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion as a Rule 59 motion

which it was completely free to do.

Nor do we find any error in the method of calculating or the

justification for awarding costs and attorney’s fees to Defendant.

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

CELSO P ROSALES,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5215FDB

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination of

conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime

of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of the

person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would impose

to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 (X) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision in this district.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (X) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice and for reasons contained in the Government’s Motion for Detention.

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate,

to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 October 8, 2008.

___s/Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Jordan Friedman



_________________________________________

Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer





Date: signed on February 25, 2009







1
# Official Journal C 304/15 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 304 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5815 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 304

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5815 September 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2015/C 304/01 | Note to readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2015/C 304/01

Note to readers

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2015/C 304/02 | Annual accounts of the European Court of Auditors for the financial year 2014 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2015/C 304/02

Annual accounts of the European Court of Auditors for the financial year 2014

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 338/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 628 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 338

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 628 October 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 338/01 | Euro exchange rates — 7 October 2019 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 338/01

Euro exchange rates — 7 October 2019

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 338/02 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 2 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 338/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9544 — Brookfield/Johnson Controls Autobatterie) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2019/C 338/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9552 — BP/China National Aviation Fuel Group/CNAF Air BP General Aviation Fuel Company) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 338/02

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

2

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 338/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9544 — Brookfield/Johnson Controls Autobatterie) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2019/C 338/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9552 — BP/China National Aviation Fuel Group/CNAF Air BP General Aviation Fuel Company) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN