alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JOSE LUIS CAMPOS,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5091M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( X ) Allegations that defendant was found in possession of approximately $300,000 in cash as well as a significant amount of

drugs.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 May 22, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05350-RBL Document 14 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

December 21, 1950

No. 55024.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 91039-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of Sync2 Networks Corp, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Warren Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Warren GilbertName:
Warren GilbertTitle:
Chief Financial Officer/Principal Financial OfficerDate:
March 7, 2014





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sync2 Networks Corp and will be retained by Sync2 Networks Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
|  | LOGIN  |  Home  |  Site Map   |   Contact Us    |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |
|  |
|                                                                                    |  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| - 
- 
- 
- 
- 
-  - Newsletters
- Videos
- Press Release: Volunteers Honored

- 
- |  |
Disclaimer
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DANIEL J. SIMMS, aka TERRY WEEKS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-0942-RSM

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Daniel Simms has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §

2254. Petitioner is currently incarcerated in the King County Department of Adult and Juvenile

Detention where he is awaiting sentencing on charges of first degree robbery, second degree

assault, and first degree unlawful possession of a firearm. (See Dkt. No. 1.) Petitioner indicates

in his petition that he was convicted on June 29, 2006, and that he is to be sentenced on July 25,

2006. (See id.)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the district court may entertain an application for a writ of habeas

corpus only from an individual in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court. This Court

has no jurisdiction to intervene in ongoing state court proceedings. See Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court

for E. Dist. of Wash., 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991), see also, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Because

Case 2:06-cv-00942-RSM Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

1

 Petitioner is advised that once he is sentenced, and a judgment is entered by the King

County Superior, his federal habeas claims will become eligible for review by this Court only after

he has properly exhausted his state court remedies with respect those claims. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254(b)(1).

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -2

petitioner has not yet been sentenced for his crimes, no judgment has yet been entered against.

This Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to consider the instant petition.1

Accordingly, this Court recommends that petitioner’s federal habeas petition be dismissed

without prejudice. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

DATED this 6th day of July, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00942-RSM Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 275

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 11, 1998, should be

designated as ‘‘National Children’s Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 10, 1998

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CAMPBELL, and Mr. BURNS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 11, 1998,

should be designated as ‘‘National Children’s Day’’.

Whereas the people of the United States should celebrate

children as the most valuable asset of the Nation;

Whereas children represent the future, hope, and inspiration

of the United States;

Whereas the children of the United States should be allowed

to feel that their ideas and dreams will be respected because adults in the United States take time to listen;

Whereas many children of the United States face crises of

grave proportions, especially as they enter adolescent

years;
2

•SRES 275 IS

Whereas it is important for parents to spend time listening

to their children on a daily basis;

Whereas modern societal and economic demands often pull

the family apart;

Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set

aside a special time for all family members to engage together in family activities;

Whereas adults in the United States should have an opportunity to reminisce on their youth and to recapture some

of the fresh insight, innocence, and dreams that they may

have lost through the years;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the United States will provide an opportunity to

emphasize to children the importance of developing an

ability to make the choices necessary to distance themselves from impropriety and to contribute to their communities;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the Nation will emphasize to the people of the

United States the importance of the role of the child

within the family and society;

Whereas the people of the United States should emphasize to

children the importance of family life, education, and

spiritual qualities; and

Whereas children are the responsibility of all Americans and

everyone should celebrate the children of the United

States, whose questions, laughter, and tears are important to the existence of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—
3

•SRES 275 IS

1 (1) it is the sense of the Senate that October

2 11, 1998, should be designated as ‘‘National Chil3 dren’s Day’’; and

4 (2) the President is requested to issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 to observe ‘‘National Children’s Day’’ with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1517

GABRIEL ISMAEL GUTIERREZ MEJIA,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: November 10, 2020

Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gabriel Ismael Gutierrez Mejia, Petitioner Pro Se. Allison Frayer, Lori B. Warlick, Office 

of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gabriel Ismael Gutierrez Mejia, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal 

under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s 

factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the 

denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We therefore deny 

the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Gutierrez Mejia (B.I.A. 

Apr. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THOMAS E. NANCE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1963 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 24, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County, Jalal A. Harb, Judge. Jonathan Hackworth of Hackworth Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


### KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI , JJ., Concur.
No. 55011.

#### Rose Cummings *v.*United States,

protests 163865-K and 163869-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR 

AUTHORIZATION TO DEPOSE FOREIGN 

WITNESSES- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY C. ROSENAU,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR06-157MJP

ORDER ON GOVERNMENT’S 

MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION 

TO DEPOSE FOREIGN WITNESSES

This matter comes before the Court on the government’s renoted motion for authorization 

to depose foreign witnesses. (Dkt. No. 79.) Having reviewed the government’s renoted motion, 

its emergency request for ruling regarding deposition procedure (Dkt. No. 80), the Defendant’s 

opposition to the motion (Dkt. No. 81), the government’s reply in support of the motion (Dkt. 

No. 85), all related filings, and having considered the oral argument of the parties, the Court 

hereby ORDERS: 

1. The government’s request to conduct the deposition of a foreign witness is DENIED.

This order incorporates the reasoning explained orally by the Court in the March 23 

hearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR 

AUTHORIZATION TO DEPOSE FOREIGN 

WITNESSES- 2

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

2. Instead, because exceptional circumstances exist, the government is AUTHORIZED

to secure the live broadcast testimony in Canada of Kip Whelpley. The government 

shall facilitate the testimony so that the Defendant can see Mr. Whelpley, Mr. 

Whelpley can see the Defendant, and the Jury can see Mr. Whelpley testifying live. 

3. The Defendant’s attorney, Mr. Platt, shall travel to Canada to conduct cross 

examination of Mr. Whelpley. A direct communication link between Mr. Platt and the 

Defendant shall be provided, and opportunities for the Defendant to communicate 

with Mr. Platt will be set up. 

4. The Court hereby APPOINTS a second attorney to represent Mr. Rosenau in this 

matter. This attorney will be available to Mr. Rosenau while he is in the courtroom 

during the live video testimony of Mr. Whelpley from Canada. 

5. The government’s request to depose Zachary Miraback is DENIED without 

prejudice, because the government has failed to demonstrate exceptional 

circumstances for his unavailability, beyond simply stating that he is not willing to 

cooperate. 

6. The government shall bear the expense of securing and facilitating the live video 

testimony of Mr. Whelpley, including the reasonable costs of Mr. Platt to attend the 

deposition in Canada. 

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Dated this 23rd day of March, 2012.

A
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DeVONNE CHARLES HOUSTON,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, 

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5283RJB

 ORDER CHANGING

CASE CAPTION

This habeas corpus petition has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR

4. Petitioner seeks federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner originally

named the State of Washington as respondent. (Dkt. # 4). On June 20th, 2006 the court entered an

order to amend the petition or file a motion to change the case caption. (Dkt. # 5). Petitioner has

complied. (Dkt. # 6). 

The clerk of court is directed to change the case caption in this case to reflect Maggie MillerStout as respondent.

The clerk is ordered to send a copy of this order to the petitioner.

DATED this 31st , day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05283-RJB Document 7 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22837]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, October 20, 2023.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: October 11, 2023.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-22837 Filed 10-12-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Before the Pirst Division,

October 18, 1956

No. 60286.

protests 288470-K, etc. (New York).

#### Burt Cassell and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with -stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked *396with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) CR06-183 JPD

PERIKLIS PETRIDIS,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

1. The Court hereby establishes the following schedule for the Jury Trial set to commence

on Tuesday, August 8, 2006.

2. Counsel are to be present and ready to proceed beginning at 9:00am, on Tuesday,

August 8, 2006. Jury selection will begin at 9:30am; upon selection of a panel, the Court will

hear opening statements followed by the calling of the first witness. The Court will recess at

noon, and resume at 1:30pm, continuing until 4:30pm. There will be a fifteen (15) minute recess

both during the morning and afternoon session.

3. On Wednesday, August 9, and Thursday, August 10, trial will commence at 8:30am

and run until 1:30pm. There will be two fifteen (15) minute recesses during the session. Counsel

and witnesses are advised that it is possible that the Wednesday and Thursday schedules may

Case 2:06-cr-00183-JPD Document 35 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

change to that described in paragraph 2

4. The schedule for Friday, August 11, will mirror the first day of trial; i.e., the session

will begin at 9:00am and continue to noon and resume at 1:30pm.

5. The Court will conduct voir dire. Each party will be entitled to up to twenty (20)

minutes of follow-up non-objectionable questioning. Jurors will be allowed to take notes after

selection. 

Dated this 24st day of July, 2006

/S/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cr-00183-JPD Document 35 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00564-CV

Kay Stein 

v.

Gerarda Elizabeth Duenas

NO. 375064 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 10 OF BEXAR COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

CLK RECORD

$0.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$1,491.17

$20.00

$50.00

$100.00

$25.00

$393.00

08/10/2015

01/12/2015

12/09/2014

10/14/2014

09/08/2014

07/21/2014

06/24/2014

06/24/2014

06/24/2014

06/24/2014

06/08/2014

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

TRANSFER

PAID

UNK

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$2,119.17.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 
hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this October 23, 2015.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
KALMAN SAMUEL CAGAN

- TEUBER, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Intervenor

______________________
2023

- 1824

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH

- 315H

- 17

- 0410

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it is o rdered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 23-1824 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2024C AGAN

- T EUBER V

. MSPB 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

April 30, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 30, 2024 Case: 23-1824 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2024
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS115861 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.