alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| date    | Corporate Equity | Real Estate | Debt Securities | Other |
|---------|------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| 2015:Q1 | 0.6              | 0.47        | 0.07            | 0.74  |
| 2015:Q2 | 0.07             | 0.47        | -0.26           | 0.25  |
| 2015:Q3 | -1.98            | 0.47        | 0.2             | 0.35  |
| 2015:Q4 | 1                | 0.36        | -0.1            | 0.31  |
| 2016:Q1 | 0.25             | 0.24        | 0.25            | 0.44  |
| 2016:Q2 | 0.52             | 0.57        | 0.15            | 0.2   |
| 2016:Q3 | 0.73             | 0.63        | 0.11            | 0.37  |
| 2016:Q4 | 0.41             | 0.46        | -0.45           | 0.29  |
| 2017:Q1 | 1.43             | 0.42        | -0.05           | 0.69  |
| 2017:Q2 | 0.78             | 0.6         | 0.12            | 0.22  |
| 2017:Q3 | 0.94             | 0.57        | 0.18            | 0.23  |
| 2017:Q4 | 1.55             | 0.53        | 0.03            | 0.57  |
| 2018:Q1 | -0.18            | 0.24        | 0.31            | 0.32  |
| 2018:Q2 | 0.48             | 0.65        | 0.21            | 0.27  |
| 2018:Q3 | 1.32             | 0.37        | 0.33            | -0.07 |
| 2018:Q4 | -4.53            | 0.38        | 0.04            | 0.5   |
| 2019:Q1 | 4.18             | 0.7         | 0.05            | 1.01  |
| 2019:Q2 | 0.85             | 0.52        | 0.65            | 0.35  |
| 2019:Q3 | -0.16            | 0.35        | 0.35            | 0.27  |
| 2019:Q4 | 2.46             | 0.26        | 0.28            | 0.6   |
| 2020:Q1 | -7.7             | 0.41        | -0.64           | 1.16  |
| 2020:Q2 | 5.95             | 0.5         | 0.2             | 1.49  |
| 2020:Q3 | 2.59             | 0.44        | 0.01            | 0.6   |
| 2020:Q4 | 4.88             | 0.93        | 0.27            | 1.06  |
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

SHEREE BOYD,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, CASE NUMBER: C06-5348KLS

Commissioner of Social Security

 Administration,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Based on the Stipulation of the parties, the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and

REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.

 March 29, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05348-KLS Document 21 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, October 20, 2023.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​*.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: October 11, 2023.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-22837 Filed 10-12-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00746-JLR Document 16 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>

                                                                                                                  Exhibit 11.1
                                                   Micro Linear Corporation
                                        Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                                         (Unaudited)
                                            (In thousands, except per share data)

                                                                Three Months                      Nine Months
                                                                    Ended                            Ended
                                                                September 30,                    September 30,
                                                        ------------------------------    -----------------------------
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C> 
                                                           1997             1996             1997             1996
                                                        ------------    --------------    ------------    -------------

    Net income......................................         $  728              $549         $ 5,418           $5,368
                                                        ============    ==============    ============    =============

    PRIMARY:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding......         11,811            12,430          11,878           12,401

    Common equivalents attributable to:
         Convertible preferred shares...............              -                 -               -                -
         Options and warrants.......................            868               695           1,307              983
                                                        ------------    --------------    ------------    -------------
    Total weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding..............         12,679            13,125          13,185           13,384
                                                        ============    ==============    ============    =============

    Net income per share............................          $0.06             $0.04           $0.41            $0.40
                                                        ============    ==============    ============    =============
</TABLE>
7

Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection of frame 

to stringer 

connections

240.0 $20,400.

00 $0 $20,400.00 2 $40,800.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $40,800

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
8

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: This is an aging A/C with a small flying fleet

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
March 27, 1957

No. 60591.

Suit 4885.

#### United States *v.*Shell Oil Co., Inc., and A. W. Salter & Co., Inc.

C. A. D. 637.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     Form 10-Q for six months ended Oct. 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               986,829
<SECURITIES>                         702,613
<RECEIVABLES>                        116,715
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          548,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,386,687
<PP&E>                               673,211
<DEPRECIATION>                       487,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,576,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                491,033
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                          16,436,870
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       2,576,993
<SALES>                              179,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     179,730
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        232,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,450,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,419,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,419,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,419,554)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.26)



</TABLE>
Case No. 13,677.

#### STURGIS et al. v. The OREGON.

[9 Betts, D. C. MS. 140.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 12, 1847.

Maritime Lien — Salvage—Local Lien.

Before BETTS, District Judge.

A reargument of this cause having been ordered, on motion of the advocates for the libellants [Russell Sturgis and William Board-man], on tne question whether this court has-not jurisdiction in rem of the subject-matter of the action, although the services sued for were not salvage services, and although no lien attached for them or the materials supplied the boat by virtue of the local law, and the same having been fully argued by Mr. Cutting for the libellants, and by Mr. S. Sherwood for the claimants, and due deliberation being had of the premises, it is considered by the court that the matters of claim pur forth in the libel,' according to the facts and circumstances in proof in this case, are not a lien on said steamboat, and are not entitled to a maritime privilege as against her which can be enforced in a court of admiralty. It is therefore considered by the court, that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter in an action in rem. Wherefore it is ordered and decreed by the court that the motion that the libellants have their remedy in this behalf, notwithstanding the decree rendered herein on the third day of March last [Case No. 13,576a], be overruled and denied, but without costs.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AULTRA
GOLD INC.


FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Executive Officer of Aultra Gold Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008,
which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      March 30, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Rauno PerttuName:
      Rauno PerttuTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6058
STEPHEN SHIELDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; CAROLYN ROBINSON, Fairfax County Public Schools; SHERMAN HARRISTON, Fairfax County Public Schools; EMANUEL CALLOWAY, Fairfax County Public Schools, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-631-2) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Shields, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stephen Shields appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shields v. Fairfax County Pub. Sch. , No. CA-04-631-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.38
                             [Form of Certificate]

                                  WAM!NET INC.

                             A Minnesota Corporation


No. __                                               ______ Shares of Class E
                                                     Convertible Preferred Stock


     This certifies that ____________________ is the registered holder of Shares
of Class E Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (see reverse
side), transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers this ___ day of March, 2000.


                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gary L. Hokkanen, President



                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Edward J. Driscoll, Jr., Secretary
<PAGE>

                          [REVERSE SIDE OF CERTIFICATE]

     The Class E Convertible Preferred Stock has the rights and preferences as
set forth in the Certificate of Designation of Class E Preferred Stock as filed
of record with the Minnesota Secretary of State on February 16, 2000, as
amended, a copy of which may be obtained from the Company with no charge.

     The securities evidenced hereby are subject to the terms of that certain
Stockholder's Agreement, dated as of March 4, 1999 as amended on March 14, 2000,
by and among the Company, Silicon Graphics, Inc., MCI WorldCom, Inc., Winstar
Communications, Inc., Winstar Credit Corp. and Cerberus Partners, L.P. A copy of
the Stockholders' Agreement has been filed with the Secretary of the Corporation
and is available upon request. The securities evidenced hereby have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") and may not
be resold, transferred or otherwise disposed of other than in a transaction
exempt from, or not subject to, the registration requirements of the Act or
pursuant to an effective registration statement thereunder.




     For value received, _____________________________________ does hereby sell,
assign and transfer unto _______________________________________________ Shares
represented by the within Certificate and does hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint _________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said Shares
on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in
the premises.

Dated: ______________________


                                       -----------------------------------------

Note: The signature on this assignment must correspond with the name as written
upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement or any change whatever.


                                      -2-
Before the Second Division,

November 30, 1966

No. P66/353.

#### William L. Bane & Co. and N. Bloom & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 174133-K (New York).

Fokd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of candlesticks and candelabra, silver plated on nickel silver or copper, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *L. Tobert Co., Inc., and American Shipping Co.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 586, Abstract 62036), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") by Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|

| | By: | /s/Stephen Katz                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| |     | Stephen Katz                         
| |     | Chief Executive Officer              
| |     | August 1, 2007                       
|
|
|
| | By: | /s/Kenneth Block                     
| |     | Kenneth Block                        
| |     | Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
| |     | August 1, 2007                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been provided to Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and will be retained by Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
### 2'-

## g****J- -fS** **!■--.**

### .^2^**r.**

### '*fs-~**?s As** **i' ,£.** **,Jf**

### /7-

# /WZ^e£r/&k**'/y 7)** **/*+*,****c- <■** **3*~****S--J**

# 336o**/73 /•** 

## J.**//i t** *

# 7>**f.****f*i«,r**

# /J.**&>,„,-*****/ J** *

## 24**St*****3s r** ***&■*****./ jr** **/- f~** **-J ,/** **,M IS** ***t, ••** ***■> rw** **fir 

### //r** ■.****:■ j-** **"3 r>.** **■*,****.■**

### .■•?**/• '-»** **-Y**

## ,-/**r: «.** **a.**

### fy**r, //** 

## ?.**■- -.** 

## ,1,4*,**,~>**

### *~&**s' r.r** **/•< -.** **t i*****-/ /-•** **^"//.**

# /-"**,->• f.** **J>j*****tr <■** **'j- i>i** **s- '-** **■' '-.** **//-- x/** **'. . ,** 

## <~

### AS

### Z~r'**<:<■/ 7-0** 

## 2>**'-~ ^&** 

## -X

## (O

## /■/*>*,£„**r*cr'****fttjcr,Pe. y-o** 

## 6/

## (3)

### .€**■'C. r<.-** 

## lT***"f s***

## (I

# /x**(VJ**

## •■".;**-*■****..."**

## 3000
AFS-13-582-E

April 21, 2015

 Exemption No. 10782B

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0279

Mr. Mario Cotumaccio

Aviation High School

45-30 36th Street

Long Island, NY 11101

Dear Mr. Cotumaccio:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10782, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the 

revised conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 10, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Aviation High School for an amendment to Exemption No. 10782. That 

exemption, from §147.36 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), currently allows 

Aviation High School to conduct instruction with a student/instructor ratio greater than the

designated 25 to 1 ratio. Specifically, the amendment you have requested would allow

Aviation High School to conduct instruction with a student/ instructor ratio of 28 to 1.

We are amending the current grant of exemption from §147.36 to permit Aviation High 

School to conduct FAA-approved mechanic courses in the 2015 – 2016 school year with a 

student/instructor ratio of 28 to 1, subject to the condition that Aviation High School ensures 

the facilities, instructional equipment, and instructor to student ratio continue to provide a 

level of safety equivalent to 14 CFR §147.36.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10782, as 

amended, remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided 

by 49 U.S.C. §§106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, 
2

AFS-13-582-E

I have amended Exemption No. 10782 to allow Aviation High School to conduct instruction 

with a student/ instructor ratio of up to 28 to 1, which is greater than the 25 to 1 requirement 

specified in 14 CFR §147.36.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10782, as amended, to June 30, 

2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10782.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service