alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

Thematic sub-priority area: ‘Global Change and Ecosystems’

Call identifier: FP6-2005-Global-4

(2005/C 177/15)

----

(1)OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 1.

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002)4789, as modified by C(2003)577, C(2003)955, C(2003)1952, C(2003)3543, C(2003)3555, C(2003)4609, C(2003)5183, C(2004)433, C(2004)2002, C(2004)2727, C(2004)3324, C(2004)4178, C(2004)5286, C(2005)27, C(2005)961, C(2005)2076 and C(2005)2747, all decisions unpublished.

(4)OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23.

(5)OJ L 248, of 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 357, of 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003)883 of 27.3.2003, as last modified by C(2004)1855 of 18.5.2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.

----

ANNEX

FP6-2005-Global-4

Call information

1.   Specific Programme: Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area

2.   Activity: Priority thematic area ‘Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystems’; Sub-Priority ‘Global Change and Ecosystems’

3.   Call title: Thematic call in the area of ‘Global Change and Ecosystems’

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2005-Global-4

5.   Date of publication (1): 

6.   Closure date(s): For IP and NOE: 3 November 2005 (first stage) at 17:00 (Brussels local time). For STREP and CA: 3 November 2005, at 17:00 (Brussels local time). For SSA: 3 November 2005, at 17:00 (Brussels local time) (please see also No 12 Proposal submission and evaluation procedure).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 205 million

8.   Areas called and Instruments: 

9.   Minimum number of participants (3): 

10.   Restrictions to participation: None.

11.   Consortia agreements: 

12.   Proposal submission and evaluation procedure: 

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) for each instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable: 

----

(1)  The Director-General responsible for the call may publish it up to one month prior to or after the envisaged date of publication.

(2)  IP = Integrated project; NOE = Network of excellence; STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action

(3)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = Associated States; ACC = Associated candidate countries.

Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participants may be the sole participant in an indirect action.

(4)  For part A of IP and NOE outline proposals, only the co-ordinator shall fill in the requested forms with the details of its organisation and the overall project budget.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 23 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 23

      Designating Alan Scott Frumin as a Parliamentarian Emeritus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. Byrd) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Designating Alan Scott Frumin as a Parliamentarian Emeritus.

    Resolved, That Alan Scott Frumin be, and he is hereby designated as 
a Parliamentarian Emeritus of the United States Senate.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 742 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 16, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2102) to maintain the free flow of information to the public 

by providing conditions for the federally compelled disclosure 

of information by certain persons connected with the news 

media. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended 

by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill 

shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions of 

the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 

(2) the amendment printed in the report of the Committee 

on Rules, if offered by Representative Boucher of Virginia or 
2 

•HRES 742 EH 

his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of 

any point of order (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

of rule XXI) or demand for division of the question, shall be 

considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for ten 

minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 

an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 

instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 2102 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 60288.

protest 134461-K/1327 (Chicago).

#### W. C. Sullivan & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rates applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content (T. D. 53159)” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
# Official Journal C 465/27 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 465 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6127 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 465

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6127 December 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 465/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 November 2018 to 30 November 2018(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 465/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 November 2018 to 30 November 2018(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JULIO PEREZ-CASTRO, )

) CASE NO. C05-2052L

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER GRANTING STAY

A. NEIL CLARK, et al., ) OF REMOVAL

)

Respondent. )

_________________________________________)

On December 9, 2005, petitioner filed, through counsel, a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus and Motion for Stay pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking an emergency stay of his

removal pendente lite. The Court does hereby ORDER:

(1) Petitioner’s removal is temporarily STAYED pending briefing and a resolution of

petitioner’s motion for stay. The Court expresses no view at this time as to the merits of

petitioner’s habeas petition and motion for stay.

(2) Respondents shall file a response to petitioner’s request for stay within 10 days of the

entry of this Order.

//

//

//

Case 2:05-cv-02052-RSL Document 2 Filed 12/09/2005 Page 1 of 2

Perez-Castro v. Clark et al Doc. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 2

(3) The Clerk shall direct a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 9th day of December, 2005. 

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02052-RSL Document 2 Filed 12/09/2005 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

          I, Roderick de Greef, Chief Financial Officer of Cardiac Science, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                            |

Dated:     August 14, 2003

|   | /s/  RODERICK DE GREEF                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   | **Roderick de Greef Chief Financial Officer** |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CHAMPERY RENTAL REO, LLC, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 85094 

FILED 

AUG 08 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK QE fl PREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CL;RK 

This is a pro se appeal from a postjudgment order denying a 

motion to nullify a sale of property. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark 

County; Monica Trujillo, Judge. 

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to 

NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal 

was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the 

judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The order was filed on 

May 19, 2022, with written notice of entry filed and served on appellant by 

mail on May 25, 2022. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal until July 

26, 2022, well after expiration of the 30-day appeal period. NRAP 4(a)(1). 

An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. Healy v. 

Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 741 P.2d 432 (1987). 

This court lacks jurisdiction and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

, J. 

Silver 

• 

Cadish 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) IV4TA (421103 
cc: Hon. Monica Trujillo, District Judge 

Wesley Rusch 

Wedgewood, LLC 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 2
From: jean_parker@aar.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vona Parker

Pueblo, CO 81007
Exhibit 32

# SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify that:

(1)    The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the accompanying
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   November 14, 2005 | /s/   Scott F. Drill                                                            
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Scott F. DrillPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)

|Date:   November 14, 2005 | /s/   Justin W. Shireman                                                                         
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Justin W. ShiremanVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

Page 20 of 20

---
# Official Journal C 2/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 485 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 485 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 002/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,09 % on 1 January 2005 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 002/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,09 % on 1 January 2005 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 002/2 | Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ Programme (Decision 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26.6.2003, OJ L 176 of 15.7.2003). | 2 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 002/2

Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ Programme (Decision 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26.6.2003, OJ L 176 of 15.7.2003).

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 1 

(Case No. CV06-0900 RAJ) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Honorable Richard A. Jones 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

BRIAN JOHNSON, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a 

Washington corporation, 

 Defendant. 

No. CV06-0900 RAJ

ORDER 

 Based on the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. # 234), this matter is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2010. 

A

The Honorable Richard A. Jones 

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 236 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 2 

(Case No. CV06-0900 RAJ) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Presented by: 

s/Karl J. Quackenbush

Karl J. Quackenbush, WSBA #9602 

Gavin W. Skok, WSBA # 29766 

RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S. 

1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 4500 

Seattle, WA 98154 

Tel: (206) 624-3600 

Email: kquackenbush@riddellwilliams.com 

Email: gskok@riddellwilliams.com 

Charles B. Casper, Admitted pro hac vice 

Gregory Hauck, Admitted pro hac vice

MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER 

 & RHOADS, LLP

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109-1029 

Tel: (215) 772-1500 

Fax: (215) 772-7620 

Email: ccasper@mmwr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Microsoft Corporation 

Case 2:06-cv-00900-RAJ Document 236 Filed 02/05/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 11.2

CONSENT OF EXPERT



To:

Baja Mining Corp., (the Company)



I, David Mehner, P.Geo, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report titled, Underground Resource Calculation and Review, Boleo District, of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated November 27, 2003 (the Technical Report) and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Registration Statement on Form 20-F dated, July 6, 2006 (the Registration) of the Company, and to the filing of the Technical Report with United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Registration Statement.



Dated this 6th day of July, 2006.



By: [consentofexpertdavidmehne002.gif]
Exhibit 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the 2nd Quarter 2003 ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan Parker
----------------------------
Alan Parker
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22544]



[[Page 70932]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of completion of panel review in the matter of Certain 
Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada Final Affirmative Antidumping 
Duty Determination (Secretariat File Number: USA-CDA-2020-1904-02).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USA-CDA-2020-1904-02 Panel has granted a consent motion 
filed on behalf of the Full Member Subgroup of the American Institute 
of Steel Construction, LLC, requesting the termination of panel review 
in the Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada Final 
Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination (Fabricated Structural Steel 
from Canada AD) dispute. Given the Panel's ruling on this consent 
motion, and pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the NAFTA Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (Rules), the Fabricated 
Structural Steel from Canada AD dispute has been terminated. As a 
result, and in accordance with Rule 78(a), notice is hereby given that 
panel review of the Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada AD dispute 
has been completed effective September 28, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, 
NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides 
a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations 
issued by the government of the United States, the government of 
Canada, and the government of Mexico. There are established Rules, 
which were adopted by the three governments and require Notices of 
Completion of Panel Review to be published in accordance with Rule 78. 
For the complete Rules, please see https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Texts-of-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/Article-1904.

    Dated: October 6, 2023.
Vidya Desai,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2023-22544 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P