alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 20355 Su m m ar yC al endar

GERAL D AL LE N PER RY , Pet i t i o ne r - Appe l l ant

v. RI CK T HALER, DI RE CT O R, TEXAS D EP AR TM EN T O F CR I M I N AL J U STI CE, CO RR EC T I ONA L I NS T I T UT I ONS DIVI S I ON , R espon den t

- A pp el l ee
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 97- C V

- 894

B ef ore JO L LY , W IE N E R , an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Pet i t i oner - A ppel l antG era l d A l l en Per r y, Texas pr i so ner# 64 4896, w as c o nvi c t e d b y a j ur y o f a gg r av at e d r obber y ands e nt e nc e d t o 4 5 ye ar s i n pr i s o n. Per r y s e e ks ac e r t i f i c at e o f a ppe al ab i l i t y ( CO A) so t hathe m aya ppe alt he d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n u n d e rR u le 1 1 o f th e F e d e r a l R u le s o f C iv il Pro c e d ur e . A CO A i s no t ne c e s s a r y f o r t hi s a p p e a l ; t he r e f o r e we deny i tas United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 20355

unn ec es sa r y. Per r y’ s m ot i on t o c onsoli d a te t hi s appealw i t h A ppealN o. 09- 2 0 0 4 7 i s DE NI ED

. I n hi s Rul e 1 1 m o t i o n, Pe r r y asked the d i s t r i c tc o ur tt o s anc t i o n t he A t t orney G en eral o f th e S t ate of T exas, argu i n g t h at th e m ot i on f or s u m m ary ju d g m e n t t h e S ta te file din re s p o n s e to h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 p e tit io n h a dn o b a s is i n l a w or fact. P erryf i l ed h i s R u l e 1 1 m oti on m ore tha n 11 ye a rs a ft er th e Sta te fil edi ts
m o t i o n f

o rs um m ar y j udg m e nt
. Thi s c o ur tm aya f f i r m t he de ni alo f

r e l i e f o n a ny g r o u n da p p a r e n t o n th e fa c e o f th e re c o r d

. Se e Sojo ur ne r T v

. Edw ar ds , 97 4 F. 2d 27, 30 ( 5th C i r. 199 2)

. A ccor di n gl y, t h e di st ri ct court di d n otabu se it s di scr et i on
w h e n it d e n ie dP e r r y ’ s u n tim e lym o tio n . S eeTh o m a s v . Ca p ita l Sec u rity S ervi ces , I

n c. , 836 F. 2d 866, 879 (5t h C ir. 1 9 8 8 ) ( e n b a n c). Perr y has f

i l ed num er ous m ot i ons i n t he di st r i c tcour treg ar di ng i t s deni al
o f h is § 2 2 5 4 p e tit io n . T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t h a s d e n ie da ll o f P e r r y ’ s m o tio n s . T h is court h as den i ed allof P erry’ s r el ated requests. P e rry i s w arn ed that f u t u re fr iv o lo u s ch a lle n g e s re g a r d in gh is co n v ic tio n o rth e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d e n ia l o f h is § 225 4 peti t i on , regardl ess of h ow theya re st yl ed, cou l d resul ti n t h e i m posi t i on of sancti on s, i n cl u di n g m on et ary san ct i on s. AF F I RMED. C OADE NI ED A S UNNE CE S S ARY

. S ANC T I ON WARNI NG I S S UED

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DISMISSING CASE - C06-784-RSL-MJB 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN WASHINGTON OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TYREE BELLINGER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendant(s).

CASE NO. C06-784-RSL-MJB

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING 

CASE

The application by plaintiff for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete or

defective as set forth in the memorandum from the clerk to plaintiff on 6/6/2006. The clerk advised

plaintiff that failure to correct the deficiency or pay the filing fee on or before 7/6/2006 could result

in dismissal of the case. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor adequately supplemented the

application to proceed in forma pauperis.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) The application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED;

////

////

Case 2:06-cv-00784-RSL-MJB Document 9 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DISMISSING CASE - C06-784-RSL-MJB 2

(2) The case is DISMISSED;

(3) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to Magistrate Judge

Monica J. Benton.

Dated this 25th day of July, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Recommended for entry this

24th day of July, 2006.

 /s/Monica J. Benton 

Monica J. Benton

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00784-RSL-MJB Document 9 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2
#### In re John T. COPLEY, Debtor. John T. Copley, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Automobile Mutual Property And Casualty Insurance Company; Wanda Copley; United States Of America; H. Lynden Graham, Jr.; Janet Smith Holbrook, former Chapter 7 Trustee; David Konrad, former counsel to Chapter 7 Trustee; James M. Pierson, former Chapter 13 bankruptcy attorney, Parties in Interest-Appellees, and Debra A. Wertman; Alfred Sines, Jr., former divorce attorney; James W. Lane, Jr., former counsel for the debtor; R. Scott Clarke; Shawn D. Bayliss; Stephen L. Thompson, Parties in Interest.

No. 00-1966.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2001.

Decided June 18, 2001.

*76John T. Copley, pro se. Arden John Curry, II, Pauley, Curry, Sturgeon & Vanderford, Gary L. Call, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, WV; Lynn B. Pollard, Hamilton, Burgess, Young *&*Pollard, P.L.L.C., Fayetteville, WV; Janet Smith-Holbrook, David Konrad, Huddleston, Bolen, Beatty, Porter & Copen, Huntington, WV, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John T. Copley appeals from the district court’s orders affirming numerous orders of the bankruptcy court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the lower courts’ opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Copley’s motion to file a supplemental brief and have considered the issues therein, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Copley v. State Auto. Mut. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*Nos. CA-99-1054-3; BK-97-30131 (S.D.W.Va. June 12 & July 6, 2000). In light of the resolution of this appeal, the stay pending appeal entered on October 16, 2000, is terminated. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
No. 61626.

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protest 307508-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

On motion of defendant, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,631,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,069,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,475
<INVENTORY>                                  5,804,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,002,201
<PP&E>                                       9,262,375
<DEPRECIATION>                               (427,580)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,178,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,876,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,825,472
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       265,711
<OTHER-SE>                                   (533,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,178,332
<SALES>                                     30,725,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,725,129
<CGS>                                       23,156,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,206,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,721,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,554,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,159,949)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,159,949)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,159,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
No. 53298.

protests 143960-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kasenit Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
March 7, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID FURRY, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00754-CV V.

SMS FINANCIAL XV, L.L.C., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CHASE BANK 

OF TEXAS, N.A., Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, SMS 

FINANCIAL XV, L.L.C., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CHASE BANK OF 

TEXAS, N.A., signed July 31, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, DAVID FURRY, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/02-0643]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, (“Act”), under section 309 of the Act, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations, to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 02/02-0643 issued to Hudson Ferry Capital II, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2023-22387 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westwood Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Shepherd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David L. Shepherd


David L. Shepherd
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit (10)(ix)(1)


                            AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO
                      RESTATED NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
                      SUPPLEMENTAL THRIFT-INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, the Northern Trust Corporation (the "Corporation") maintains the
Restated Northern Trust Corporation Supplemental Thrift-Incentive Plan for
employees of The Northern Trust Company, effective as of July 20, 1999 (the
"Plan); and

WHEREAS, by virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to the
Corporation under Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Board authorized amendments to
the Plan by resolution dated November 16, 1999;

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority delegated by the Board to the
undersigned officer by such resolution, the Plan is hereby amended in the
following particulars, effective beginning with the 2000 Plan Year:

1.  The last clause of the first sentence of section 3.1 is amended to read "but
    not to exceed eighteen percent (18%)."

2.  The last clause of the first sentence in section 3.2 is amended to read "but
    not to exceed eighteen (18%)."


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed on
its behalf by the undersigned officer this 31st day of December, 1999.
                                           ----


/s/ Perry R. Pero
----------------------------------------------
Perry R. Pero
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00641-JCC Document 267 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 80I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 080I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6317 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 080I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6317 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/408 of 17 March 2020 amending Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/408 of 17 March 2020 amending Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 12.2**CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**  I, Daniel Mingdong Wu, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Focus Media Holding Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: May6, 2008         By:                        /s/ Daniel Mingdong Wu    Name:  Daniel Mingdong Wu    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF EXPERT



To:

Baja Mining Corp., (the Company)



I, Michael Holmes, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  A Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project, of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated August 12, 2005 (the Technical Report) and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Registration Statement on Form 20-F dated, July 6, 2006 (the Registration) of the Company, and to the filing of the Technical Report with United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Registration Statement.



Dated this 6th day of July, 2006.



By: [consentofexpertmikeholmes001.jpg]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian E. COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6530.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Brian E. Collins, pro se. Fenita Morris Shepard, J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Brian E. Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.*
      *See United States v. Collins,*Nos. CR-99-92-H; CA-00-676-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 23, 2001; entered Fed. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

Collins’ claim that his sentence is not proper in light of the rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is without merit. We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi*is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.
# Official Journal C 278A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.278.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5315 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.278.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5315 October 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European CommissionCommunity Plant Variety Office |
| 2010/C 278A/01 | Call for expression of interest in the appointment as alternate of the Chairperson of its Board of Appeal (COM/2010/10283) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European CommissionCommunity Plant Variety Office

2010/C 278A/01

Call for expression of interest in the appointment as alternate of the Chairperson of its Board of Appeal (COM/2010/10283)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 147 | (FI) |
| 149 | (IT) |
| 150 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | (PL) |
| 157 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 171 | (IT) |
| 178 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 184 | |
| 188 | (DA/DE/EN/FR/SL) |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 196 | (BG/EN/NL/RO/SL) |
| 201 | |
| 204 | (EN/FR) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | (EN/FR) |
| 236 | |
| 238 | |
| 242 | (BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL) |
| 248 | (DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO) |
| 249 | |
| 253 | |
| 254 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 256 | (RO) |
| 257 | (CS/PL) |
| 261 | |
| 262 | |
| 265 | |
| 266 | (RO) |
| 269 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 278 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(DA/FI/MT)

147

(FI)

149

(IT)

150

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

151

155

156

(PL)

157

163

164

171

(IT)

178

(DE/EN/FR)

184

188

(DA/DE/EN/FR/SL)

190

191

192

(DE/EN/FR)

196

(BG/EN/NL/RO/SL)

201

204

(EN/FR)

219

227

(EN/FR)

236

238

242

(BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL)

248

(DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO)

249

253

254

(DE/EN/FR)

256

(RO)

257

(CS/PL)

261

262

265

266

(RO)

269

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

278

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN