alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000875579
<NAME>                          Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                             3487
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     1535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    37996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           (28750)
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6881
<OTHER-SE>                                                        59835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      37996
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     70498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (70498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (70498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (70498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.02)





</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00626-TSZ Document 16 Filed 12/27/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GARY F. ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v.

KEN QUINN,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5217 FDB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE OVERLENGTH

TRAVERSE

This habeas case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the court is the motion of

Petitioner Gary F. Robinson for leave to file an overlength traverse in support of his petition for writ

of habeas corpus. Mr. Robinson’s proposed memorandum is 35 pages long. Respondent has filed

no opposition to the motion.

The court finds that leave shall be granted and therefore, petitioner’s motion (Dkt. # 16) is

GRANTED.

DATED this 6th day of September.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05217-RBL Document 18 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD ROLLINGS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOVERNOR CHRISTINE GREGIORE

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5047 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND 

 DISMISSING CLAIM WITH 

 PREJUDICE

 The magistrate Judge recommends that this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action be

dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action under Section 1983. Plaintiff

challenges the ban on using or possessing tobacco products in prison by inmates. As detailed by the

Magistrate Judge, an inmate possesses no constitutional right to buy or use tobacco products while

incarcerated. Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation do not persuade this Court

otherwise. The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining

record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED prior to service for failure to state a claim. This dismissal

counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (g). 

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for any defendants

Case 3:06-cv-05047-FDB Document 9 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

who have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 8th day of June, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05047-FDB Document 9 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. F AA

- 20 13-0052 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-02-AD



## If

yo u m a k e c h a nges to th e va lu es in th e tab le be low, you m us t en s u re th e to tals upd a te acco rdin g l y. 

## If th ey do n o t , click (or Ta b ) into a nd th e n ou t of th e c h a nged ce ll

. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine , (e.g. , Inspection , propeller , appliance) Work-hours Labor Part s Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost re placement) (include cost (labor + 

### u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include onco nditi on costs here access , testing , ( @ $85 / h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Prorated lost life 0.0 8290 220

II t)

1 fit '



### ... ' I ()I 'I ( I)! )I
I ' ' I It I It '•I ( I,

I

I t'

I' The known number of product s in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1 , 823,800 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $
On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g. , Inspection , (include access , ( @ $85 /hour)

replac e ment) testing , and closeup) 

# " $

I '



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use thisfield to expla in anything in th e Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might n ot be obv ious. This fi e ld can also be us e d to exp la in warranty costs): 

### N/A

### Executive Order 12866: Co uld the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action"?

# ~ YES * D**NO~** *Ex planation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

# ~ YES * D**NO~** *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a s ig nificant economic impact on a s ub s tantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer.**~** YESD**NO~** Ex planation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation mi g ht be the only mode of transportation ?

# ~ YES* D**NO~** *Ex planation:
----

Berichtigung der Mitteilung der Kommission im Rahmen der Durchführung der Richtlinie 90/396/EWG

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 306 vom 10. Dezember 2004)

Seite 25:

Anstatt:

muss es heißen:

----
EXHIBIT23.3





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-143483 and No. 333-147735) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements
(No. 333-147734, No. 333-156341 and No. 333-156338) on Form S-8 of Smart
Balance, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated March 19, 2007,
relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of GFA Holding,
Inc and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended which
report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment
No.1, of Smart Balance, Inc.





/s/
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


July 24,
2009
No. P67/207. No. P67/208.

#### Alexanders Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 66/5916, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros. (a div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) et al *v.*United States,

protests 66/13144, etc. (New York).

LaNdis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal C 156A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 156A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 627 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 156A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 627 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2019/C 156 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/372/19 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2019/C 156 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/372/19 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clinton Louis NOBLE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50063.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Nancy B. Spiegel, Esq., Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Hanley Chew, Esq., USLA— Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

Wayne R. Young, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suit- ■ able for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*657MEMORANDUM **

Clinton Noble appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He contends that under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2005), the district court violated his constitutional rights and plainly erred in making an upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) for possession of a stolen firearm. Noble was sentenced before the United States Supreme Court held in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), that the Sentencing Guidelines were effectively advisory. The record does not show how the district court would have proceeded if it had known that the Guidelines were not mandatory. Accordingly, we remand for the district court to answer the question whether the sentence would have been materially different if it had known that the Guidelines were advisory, and for further proceedings under *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

DETENTION ORDER -1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

 AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MAHESH PATEL, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-199-RSM 

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

 Material witness. 

Date of Detention Hearing: August 22, 2008. 

 The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and 

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds 

that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant can meet will reasonably 

assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the 

community. 

 FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION 

 (1) Defendant was arrested on a material witness warrant. 

 (2) Defendant is a citizen of Canada. The Court received no information about his 

personal history, residence, family ties, employment history, or health. 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

DETENTION ORDER -2 

 (3) An immigration detainer has been lodged against the defendant. In view of these 

circumstances, defendant through his counsel stipulated to detention. 

 It is therefore ORDERED: 

 (1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the 

Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal; 

 (2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with 

counsel; 

 (3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which Defendant is confined shall 

deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection 

with a court proceeding; and 

 (4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel 

for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States Pretrial Services Officer. 

 DATED this 22nd day of August, 2008. 

A 

BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA 

United States Magistrate Judge
No. 63410.

protest 59/6508 (Boston).

#### H. P. Lambert Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Compound Natural Foods, Inc., a company duly
formed under the laws of Nevada (the "Company"), for the year ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Joey Canyon, President (Chief Executive Officer) and
Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except that the financial statements for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 filed herewith are unaudited. Although the
Company's auditors are working to complete their audit, it was not completed at
the time this filing was due. The Company will amend this filing with audited
information once the audit is completed; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 24, 2009                        /s/ Joey Canyon
                                         Joey Canyon
                                         President and
                                         Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Compound Natural Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Compound
Natural Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

April 18, 1963

No. 67612.

#### Lundsing & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/10665 and 59/32044 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III 

105TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 171 

Designating March 25, 1998, as ‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day 

of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 1998 

Mr. SPECTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 5, 1998 

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment 

MARCH 18, 1998 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 25, 1998, as ‘‘Greek Independence Day: 

A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American 

Democracy’’. 

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the supreme power to govern was invested 

in the people; 

Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States of America drew heavily upon the political experience and philosophy of ancient Greece in forming our representative democracy; 
2 

SRES 171 ATS

Whereas the founders of the modern Greek state modeled 

their government after that of the United States in an 

effort to best imitate their ancient democracy; 

Whereas Greece is one of the only 3 nations in the world, beyond the former British Empire, that has been allied with 

the United States in every major international conflict 

this century; 

Whereas the heroism displayed in the historic World War II 

Battle of Crete epitomized Greece’s sacrifice for freedom 

and democracy as it presented the Axis land war with its 

first major setback and set off a chain of events which 

significantly affected the outcome of World War II; 

Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond between our 2 nations and their peoples; 

Whereas March 25, 1998, marks the 177th anniversary of 

the beginning of the revolution which freed the Greek 

people from the Ottoman Empire; and 

Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate with the 

Greek people and to reaffirm the democratic principles 

from which our 2 great nations were born: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 25, 1998, as ‘‘Greek 

3 Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of 

4 Greek and American Democracy’’; and 

5 (2) requests the President to issue a proclama6 tion calling upon the people of the United States to 
3 

SRES 171 ATS

1 observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and ac2 tivities. 

Æ
No. 57794

protest 215240-K (New York).

#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CHRISTOPHER JAMES WITHAM,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-439-M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Possession of visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 13, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has failed to appear in a court of law on five separate occasions.

(2) Defendant has ignored several orders of the Court and failed to comply with the

terms and conditions therein.

(3) Defendant has previously had his probation revoked because of failure to comply.

(4) There are substantial issues outstanding relating to possible housing arrangements

for defendant.

(5) Defendant has a history of substance abuse.

Case 2:06-cr-00102-MJP Document 9 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(6) Defendant has a prior conviction for a similar offense for which he is now

charged.

(7) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings and ensure the safety of

the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 14th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00102-MJP Document 9 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 66099.

#### J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21518, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.