alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-19-00650-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL IRISH, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on a motion to appoint new counsel. On February 

12, 2020, Appellant’s counsel, Honorable Irma Sanjines, filed a motion to withdraw in 

conjunction with filing an Anders brief. On March 2, 2020, appellant filed a motion for 

appointment of new counsel.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel 
2

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 

(Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the 

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with 

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of 

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed 

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to 

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge 

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall 

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be 

appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number 

of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial 

court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be

filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of 

this order. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

9th day of March, 2020.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51447 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIRO DARLENY MINERO-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-562-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jairo Darleny Minero-Mendez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CELERINO CARRASCO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORRECTIONAL SERVICE CORP, et al.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5084RJB

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 22)is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses, after submitted by plaintiff, to enable plaintiff to properly

serve copies of the complaint on each of the named defendants. Plaintiff, who is no longer incarcerated or

in custody, shall note that it is his responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint along with

appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05084-RJB Document 23 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018142EN.01000201.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas

(Case C-64/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 19(1) TEU - Legal remedies - Effective judicial protection - Judicial independence - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Reduction of remuneration in the national public administration - Budgetary austerity measures))

(2018/C 142/02)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses

Applicant:

Defendant: Tribunal de Contas

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU must be interpreted as meaning that the principle of judicial independence does not preclude general salary-reduction measures, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, linked to requirements to eliminate an excessive budget deficit and to an EU financial assistance programme, from being applied to the members of the Tribunal de Contas (Court of Auditors, Portugal).

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

1

---
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/13/2015 9:15:23 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
No. 55713.

protests 156374-K, etc. (Tampa).

#### Florida Fishermens Supply Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
**Exhibit99.2**

** **

 

**KPMG LLP**

2500Ruan Center

666Grand Avenue

DesMoines, IA 50309

 

**Independent Accountants’ Report**

 

TheBoard of Directors

WellsFargo Financial, Inc.

 

Membersof the Board:

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion that Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. (theCompany) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Saleand Servicing Agreement for the Wells Fargo Financial Auto Owner Trust 2005- Aportfolio as of December 31, 2005 and for the period from June 16,2005 through December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the Company’scompliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Wells Fargo Financial, Inc.complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31,2005 and for the period from June 16, 2005 through December 31, 2005,is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

Thisreport is intended solely for the information and use of Ace Securities Corp.,Wilmington Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s,and Fitch, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone otherthan these specified parties.

 

 

March 3,2006

 

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limitedliability partnership, is the U.S.

member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 313 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 313

 Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the brutal killing 
                        of Mr. Matthew Shepard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

     Mr. Thomas (for himself and Mr. Enzi) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the brutal killing 
                        of Mr. Matthew Shepard.

Whereas Mr. Matthew Shepard, a 21-year-old student at the University of Wyoming 
        in Laramie, Wyoming, was physically beaten and tortured, tied to a 
        wooden fence and left for dead; and
Whereas Mr. Matthew Shepard died as a result of his injuries on October 12, 
        1998, in a Colorado hospital, surrounded by his loving family and 
        friends: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate, That it is the sense of the Senate that 
it--
            (1) condemns the actions which occurred in Laramie, 
        Wyoming, as unacceptable and outrageous;
            (2) urges each member of Congress and every citizen of the 
        United States, in his or her own way, through his or her 
        church, synagogue, mosque, workplace, or social organization, 
        to join in denouncing and encouraging others to denounce this 
        outrageous murder of another human being;
            (3) pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to such 
        crimes, and to encourage all Americans to dedicate themselves 
        to ending violence in the United States; and
            (4) pledges to do everything in its power to fight 
        prejudice and intolerance that leads to the murder of innocent 
        people.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

August 12, 1954

No. 58324.

protests 152424-K and 158114-K (New York).

#### A. Tanzi Engineering Co. and Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*340Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved machines consist of noodle-making machines similar in all material respects, except that said machines are power driven and chiefly used in factories rather than in households, to the noodle-making machines the subject of *A. Tanzi Engineering Co.*and *Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 4, C. D. 1490), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 21-2 Filed 03/02/07 Page 7 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

A LOVING HEART, Corp., et al.,

 Defendant.

 C06-790 TSZ

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-790 TSZ and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 12th day of June, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00790-TSZ Document 4 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 1 of 1

Chao v. A Loving Heart Corp et al Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND

TIME TO FILE INDICTMENT

(Alfonso Palacios-Torres; #06-194TSZ)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

1 (206) 553-1100

 JUDGE THOMAS S. ZILLY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALFONSO PALACIOS-TORRES,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-194 TSZ

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

INDICTMENT

The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and the defendant’s

agreement to extend the time for an indictment, finds as to the facts stipulated to by counsel

in that document, and hereby makes the following findings of fact:

1. A failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within

the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

2. The parties believe that an extension of time in which to indict may result in

the possible resolution of the case without an indictment and without trial. Thus, the Court

further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance in this case,

that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial preparation and that these factors

outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18

Case 2:06-cr-00194-TSZ Document 12 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND

TIME TO FILE INDICTMENT

(Alfonso Palacios-Torres; #06-194TSZ)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

2 (206) 553-1100

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which an

indictment in this case must be filed against the defendant shall be extended from June 30,

2006, to July 31, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of delay from June 30, 2006, to July

31, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18, U.S.C. §§ 3161 et seq.

DONE this 29th day of June, 2006. 

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/ Timothy R. Lohraff

WSBA # 32145

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Alfonso Palacios-Torres

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

Phone: (206) 553-1100

Fax: (206) 553-0120

tim_lohraff@fd.org

s/ Donald M. Reno, Jr.

Assistant United States Attorney

Telephonic Approval

Case 2:06-cr-00194-TSZ Document 12 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2
# Exhibit 10.1

# SECOND AMENDMENT TO FINANCING AGREEMENT

# May 8, 2006

This
Second Amendment to Financing Agreement is entered into by and between Marquette Business Credit, Inc. (Lender) and Insignia
Systems, Inc. (Borrower).

The following changes amend
the Financing Agreement dated September 16, 2004, as amended on November 22, 2004. In conjunction with this amendment, the
Borrower will be signing a Second Restated Revolving Note (the Revolving Note) of even date in the principal amount of
$1,500,000 subject to the original Financing Agreement and Amendment to Financing Agreement, as amended herein.

SECTION I.    LOAN AGREEMENT

At Borrowers request,
Lender in its sole discretion may lend to Borrower up to eighty percent (80.0%) of the net amount of accounts (as that term is
defined in the Uniform Commercial Code) that are listed in current schedules provided by Borrower and that are deemed eligible for
advances by Lender, or any greater or lesser percentage at Lenders absolute discretion. Loans for additional sums requested
by Borrower may be made at Lenders sole discretion based upon Lenders valuation of other collateral or other factors.
All loans made pursuant hereto shall be due on demand and shall be evidenced by a Second Restated Revolving Note dated May 8, 2006
(the Revolving Note) herewith payable to Lenders order. All loans made pursuant hereto are secured by a security
interest in the accounts and other collateral, as granted to Lender by the Security Agreement between Borrower and Lender dated
September 16, 2004.

At Lenders discretion,
Lender may from time to time make additional loans to Borrower on a demand basis, evidenced by Term Note(s). All of the collateral
pledged to Lender shall secure all of Borrowers obligations under the Revolving Note and any Term Note(s).

Lender may from time to time
furnish to Borrower a statement of Borrowers account. Any such statement shall be conclusive unless and except as written
objections thereto calling Lenders attention to errors are received by Lender within thirty (30) days after it is mailed or
delivered to Borrower.

SECTION II.    Paragraph C of the Financing
Agreement, as Amended on November 22, 2004, is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

C.    There
will be a net minimum interest charge payable to Lender of $2,500.00 per month. Borrower further agrees that if this agreement is
terminated under Section VIII hereof, regardless of the date of such termination, the total charges which shall have been paid or
which shall be payable net to Lender, shall not be less than $2,500.00 for each month from the termination date through the Final
Due Date as defined in the Revolving Note.

|MARQUETTE BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.Lender |                  | INSIGNIA SYSTEMS, INC.Borrower
|------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------
|By:                                   | /s/   Ed Janssen |                               
|Name:                                 | Ed Janssen       |                               
|Title:                                | Vice President   |                               

---
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**Assets Flow of Funds Matrix for 2013** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
PRESERVATION PRINCIPLES

East Woodlands

Location and Access

The East Woodlands are located along a ridge line on the eastern portion of the reserve. Smith Prairie and Keystone

Road form the eastern boundary, Crockett Prairie, the southern edge; Ebey's Prairie and Coupeville, the western edge;

and Penn Cove, the northern boundary

This area, like the West Woodlands, is largely remote and undeveloped with some residential development and

Rhododendron Park located within.

Primary access is along Highway 20, which slices through the center of the woodlands, and Parker Road which follows

the northern edge.

Significance and Integrity

Densely-wooded, this area remains a natural resource area. The inaccessible nature of the forest channeled early

settlement around the large ridge into the prairies and along its edges.

More recent development, including scattered residential structures and recreational activities associated with park areas,

have maintained the forest edge as a visual screen, and, as a whole, the area maintains its natural resources.

A complex in the interior portion of the woodlands

Preservation Principles

Preservation principles for the East Woodlands focus on maintaining the natural resources of the area.

1. In order to protect the remaining natural quality of the area, maintain forest land use designation for entire area.

2. Large residential developments within the woodlands are discouraged. However, where new development occurs,

appropriate vegetative screening and the clustering of structures is strongly encouraged in order to minimize

potential impacts on natural resources.

3. To maintain the visual quality of the woodlands, preserve wooded edges of the area as a visual buffer, especially

as viewed from Highway 20 and Parker Road.

NEXT>>> Smith Prairie

http://www.nps.gov/ebla/rcl/rcl6d.htm

Last Updated: 07-Jun-2000

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve

Reading the Cultural Landscape

Views from the east woodlands looking north across Penn

Cove.

Cleared area within woodlands is not visible from the road

because

of vegetation left along edges as physical screen.

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve: Reading the Cultural Landscape Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20080512043338/http://www.nps.gov/archive/ebla/rcl/rcl6d.htm 11/29/2011
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 77 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish the 

Committee on Indian Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Mr. REHBERG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

establish the Committee on Indian Affairs. 

1 Resolved, That (a) clause 1 of rule X of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by redesig3 nating paragraphs (k) through (t) as paragraphs (l) 

4 through (u) and by inserting after paragraph (j) the fol5 lowing new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(k) Committee on Indian Affairs. 

7 ‘‘Relations of the United States with Native 

8 Americans and Native American tribes.’’. 

9 (b) Clause 1(l) of rule X of the Rules of the House 

10 of Representatives is amended by striking subparagraph 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 77 IH 

1 (20) and redesignating subparagraph (21) as subpara2 graph (20). 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS