alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1615

GEORGE NAGIB ARMANIOUS, Petitioner,

v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: December 31, 2008 Decided: January 27, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samy Beshay, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Franci s W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: George Nagib Armanious, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Armanious first challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Armanious fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that

he seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Armanious’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”

Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because

23 Armanious failed to show that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. Accordingly, we deny t he petition for review. ∗ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

∗ Armanious failed to raise any challenges to the denial of his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. He has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (finding that failure to raise a challenge in an opening brief results in abandonment of that challenge); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (same).
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22

Relative to the death of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, formerly a Senator

from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, and Mr. KERRY) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, formerly a Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death

3 of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, formerly a Senator from

4 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; be it further

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the

8 deceased; and be it further
2

SRES 22 ATS

1 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it

2 stands adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem3 ory of the deceased Senator.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C06-5337JKA]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JEROME W. MOODY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-5337JKA

ORDER FOR PERMISSION TO EXCEED

PAGE LIMIT

Based upon Defendant’s Motion for Permission to Exceed the Page Limit, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant shall have leave to submit briefing four (4) pages in excess of

the page limitations.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05337-JKA Document 17 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C06-5337JKA]

Presented by:

s/ Thomas M. Elsberry 

Thomas M. Elsberry WSB # 26456

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Phone: 206-615-2112

Fax: 206-615-2531

thomas.elsberry@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05337-JKA Document 17 Filed 11/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILL BAILEY,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5173RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff has failed to properly amend his complaint despite being given over 90 days

from the time of the Report and Recommendation to amend (Dkt # 39), and nearly 90

days from the Order adopting that Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 44). This

action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to

comply with court orders. Any pending motion is DENIED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendant,

and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05173-RBL Document 69 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 58297.

protests 169222-K, etc. (New York).

#### B. M. Heede, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Certain items of the merchandise, marked “A” and “B,” stipulated to consist of paper napkins (except that those marked “B” are of crepe paper) the same as those the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474), were held dutiable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 1413, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for papers, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes. Other items of the merchandise, marked "C,” stipulated to consist of manufactures of paper wadding, were held dutiable at 6 cents per pound and *7}i*percent ad valorem under the provision therefor in paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 51802.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

U.S. v. Booker, NO. CR06-5421(RBL) – page 1

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CEDRIC BOOKER,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5421RBL

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

The Court having considered the Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of

Counsel, and the accompanying Affidavit of Linda R. Sullivan and Memorandum in

Support of the Motion;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Federal Public

Defender, and Assistant Federal Public Defender Linda R. Sullivan, are permitted to

withdraw as defense counsel in this matter, and that new defense counsel shall be

appointed to represent the defendant from the CJA panel. 

Withdrawing counsel shall notify the CJA panel coordinator immediately of this

order. 

DONE this 7th day of August, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

 /s/ Linda R. Sullivan LINDA R. SULLIVAN

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:06-cr-05421-RBL Document 18 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 280/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 280 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 619 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 280

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 619 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 280/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9009 — KKR/Casual Dining Bidco) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 280/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9009 — KKR/Casual Dining Bidco) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 280/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2018/C 280/03 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  ) | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 280/02

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2018/C 280/03

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2018/C 280/04 | Judgment of the Court of 24 April 2018 in Case E-7/17 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/29/EU) | 4 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2018/C 280/04

Judgment of the Court of 24 April 2018 in Case E-7/17 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/29/EU)

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Directive 2014/29/EU)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 25 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 25

      Disapproving the rule of the Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration relating to occupational exposure to methylene chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 1997

Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Nickles, and Mr. Shelby) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Disapproving the rule of the Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration relating to occupational exposure to methylene chloride.

Whereas when the Occupational Safety and Health Administration published on 
        January 10, 1997, its final rule on occupational exposure to methylene 
        chloride it redefined the size of small business without appropriate 
        consultation;
Whereas the Small Business Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 1994 (Public 
        Law 103-403) requires the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 
        to apply to the Small Business Administration to use an alternative 
        definition of small entities that may be affected by the 
        Administration's rule;
Whereas the Occupational Safety and Health Administration did not consult with 
        the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration while 
        performing the economic analysis for the rule when proposed;
Whereas section 601 of title 5, United States Code (relating to regulatory 
        flexibility) requires consultation with the Office of Advocacy before 
        using an alternative definition of small business; and
Whereas more than 90 percent of the businesses that would be affected by the 
        Administration's rule are classified as small businesses in the 
        regulations of the Small Business Administration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
the rule submitted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 
relating to the occupational exposure to methylene chloride, and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

            Re:   Meritage Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-2
                  Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2
                  -------------------------------------------

            CERTIFICATION

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Meritage Mortgage
Loan Trust 2005-2 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Saxon Mortgage
Services, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2006

                                    FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                    By:   /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Name: Robert McGinnis
                                          Title: President
(Reap. Dec. 11077)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 824937-1/2

(Decided October 13, 1965)

*619
      *Sharp, Solter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardiboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (See. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# Official Journal L 124/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6118 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 124

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6118 May 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/688 of 23 March 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 as regards benchmarking portfolios, reporting templates and reporting instructions (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/688 of 23 March 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 as regards benchmarking portfolios, reporting templates and reporting instructions (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: M.C., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 138 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 68530.

protests 63/17633 and 63/22858 (Philadelphia).

#### Amco Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, they were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 209

A Resolution providing section 302 allocations to the Committee on

Appropriations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2, 1998

Ms. COLLINS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

A Resolution providing section 302 allocations to the

Committee on Appropriations.

1 Resolved, That for the purposes of section 302(a) of

2 the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the estimated allo3 cation of the appropriate levels of budget totals for the

4 Senate Committee on Appropriations shall be—

5 For non-defense—

6 (1) $289,547,000,000 in total budget outlays,

7 and

8 (2) $255,450,000,000 in total new budget au9 thority;

10 for defense—
2

SRES 209 ATS

1 (1) $266,635,000,000 in total budget outlays,

2 and

3 (2) $271,570,000,000 in total new budget au4 thority;

5 for violent crime reduction—

6 (1) $4,953,000,000 in total budget outlays, and

7 (2) $5,800,000,000 in total new budget author8 ity;

9 for mandatory—

10 (1) $291,731,000,000 in total budget outlays,

11 and

12 (2) $299,159,000,000 in total new budget au13 thority;

14 until a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year

15 1999 is agreed to by the Senate and the House of Rep16 resentatives pursuant to section 301 of the Congressional

17 Budget Act of 1974.

Æ
THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SONIA LIM, surviving spouse of

EDUARDO LIM, and for the marital

community comprised thereof,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEMS, a

corporation doing business in Washington

and CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES,

a corporation doing business in Washington,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:06-cv-05191-FDB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Motion of Defendants Franciscan Health

Services and Catholic Health Initiatives (collectively, “Franciscan” or “FHS”) for an Order to File

Certain Documents Under Seal. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, Plaintiff’s opposition (if

any), and Franciscan’s reply (if any), hereby rules as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order to File Certain Documents Under Seal is

GRANTED.

2. The Court directs the clerk to file under seal, Exhibits B and C to the Declaration

of Ronald J. Breeden in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

Case 3:06-cv-05191-FDB Document 35 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION

TO SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS - 2

Seattle-3355256.1 0027797-00132

DATED this 9th day of February, 2007.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Order Presented by:

STOEL RIVES LLP

By ________________________________

Keelin A. Curran, WSBA #16258

Theresa A. Briscoe, WSBA #34384

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:06-cv-05191-FDB Document 35 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 51801.

#### Van Raalte Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 848086-G, etc. (New York).

*101Opinion by

Kincheloe,. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.