alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 62313.

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 277227-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2019270EN.01005002.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/50

---

Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Vinci v Parliament

(Case T-391/19)

(2019/C 270/52)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Vinci (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament redetermined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament redetermined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the legal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the legal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-389/19 Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BERING STRAIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-658RSL

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On May 17, 2006, the Court granted defendant’s motion to compel. Because the only

relief requested in this action was an order to compel and the Court granted that relief, the Court

ordered the parties to show cause within ten days of the date of the order why this case should

not be closed. Neither party responded to the Order to Show Cause. Therefore, this matter is

DISMISSED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

DATED this 5th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00658-RSL Document 8 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 40/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 40 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 585 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 40

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 585 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 040/01 | Position (EU) No 1/2015 of the Council at first reading with view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international trafficAdopted by the Council on 16 October 2014 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 040/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 1/2015 of the Council at first reading with view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 040/01

Position (EU) No 1/2015 of the Council at first reading with view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international trafficAdopted by the Council on 16 October 2014 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 040/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 1/2015 of the Council at first reading with view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Communication pursuant to Article 23(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 (1) implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) on the control of concentrations between undertakings

(2004/C 139/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Address of the Commission's Directorate General for Competition

----

(1)OJ L 133, 30.04.2004, pages 1-39.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, OJ L 24, 29.01.2004, pages 1-22.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CHRISTOPHER S. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5328RBL

ORDER DENYING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Plaintiff's application for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is DENIED. This action shall therefore proceed only if

plaintiff pays the applicable filing fee ($350.00) within 30 days after entry of this order. If plaintiff fails to

pay the filing fee within this time period, the clerk shall dismiss plaintiff’s causes of action. 

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 4th day of October, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05328-RBL Document 22 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 47 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 47

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 4 (legislative day, June 2), 1998

 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (for himself and Mr. Helms) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That Congress does not approve the extension of the authority contained 
in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President 
to Congress on June 3, 1998, with respect to Vietnam.
                                 <all>
```
From: brobertson33@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Robertson

Bargersville, IN 46106
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**






To
      the
      Board of Directors


Equitable
      Financial Corps.


Grand
      Island, NE






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
      333-129969 and No. 333-139040 on Form S-8 of Equitable Financial Corp. of our
      report dated September 25, 2007 relating to our audit of the consolidated
      financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
      Equitable Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2007.






McGladrey
              & Pullen, LLP






Omaha,
      Nebraska


September
      25, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       749
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,011
<PP&E>                                         230,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           911
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Defendant.

________________________________________

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Counterclaim Plaintiff,

v.

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation, and VERITAS

SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

 Counterclaim Defendants.

 CASE NO. C06-0703-JCC

ORDER

 

 

 

This matter comes before the Court for review of the Special Master’s Report and

Recommendation (Dkt. No. 394) on Veritas Operating Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of

Non-infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,888,147. The Court has reviewed de novo the

Special Master’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), the parties’ respective objections and responses

Case 2:06-cv-00703-JCC Document 428 Filed 03/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

thereto (Dkt. Nos. 405, 410), the briefing and exhibits presented to the Special Master in the first

instance, and all other relevant documents in the case file. The Court has determined that oral argument

is not necessary. 

The Court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS the R&R with respect to non-infringement,

APPROVES and ADOPTS the R&R with respect to invalidity in view of Guy, APPROVES and

ADOPTS the R&R with respect to invalidity of asserted claims 9 and 10 in view of Purdin and Ruan, and

REJECTS the R&R respecting invalidity of asserted claims 1, 3–4, 6, 8, and 13–14 in view of Purdin.

Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Veritas’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,588,147 (Dkt. No. 218).

SO ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2008.AJohn C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00703-JCC Document 428 Filed 03/11/08 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

Q:/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TYRONE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5815RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and

the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE prior to service for failure to

state a claim. The plaintiff may not litigate issues which bear on the length of his

sentence and this action must proceed in habeas, not as a civil rights action.

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for any defendants

who have appeared, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 24th day of March, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05815-RBL Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 263 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 263

  To authorize the payment of the expenses of representatives of the 
               Senate attending the funeral of a Senator.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 1998

Mr. Warner submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize the payment of the expenses of representatives of the 
               Senate attending the funeral of a Senator.

    Resolved, That, upon approval by the Committee on Rules and 
Administration, the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to pay, from 
the contingent fund of the Senate, the actual and necessary expenses 
incurred by the representatives of the Senate who attend the funeral of 
a Senator, including the funeral of a retired Senator. Expenses of the 
Senate representatives attending the funeral of a Senator shall be 
processed on vouchers submitted by the Secretary of the Senate and 
approved by the Chairman of the Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 29, 2012

In The 

## Ji[t! i tri t a[ at aita

No. 05-12-01580-CV MICHAEL LODISPOTO, Appellant

V. ADI RUVOLO,Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-03660-2012



### ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s November 21, 2012 motion for temporary relief and appellee’s November 27, 2012 response to that motion. Neither party has requested enforcement of the temporary injunction from this Court. See TEX. R. App. P. 29.4. We therefore GRANT the motion and STAY the November 30, 2012 hearing In the trial court on appellee’s motion for contempt, motion for order to show cause, and motion for sanctions. This stay shall remain in effect until further order of this Court.



### DAVID L. JUSTICE
No. P66/352.

#### Kaplan & Gordon Corp. *v.*United States, protests 65/10457 and 65/11774 (New York).

*833Nichols, J.

In accordance -with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rush bags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
123 STAT. 1926 PUBLIC LAW 111–36—JUNE 30, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2344: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–139 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

June 9, considered and passed House. 

June 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–36 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for agreements 

for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by webcasters. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Webcaster Settlement Act of 

2009’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS. 

Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

‘‘2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009,’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ‘‘to make eligible 

nonsubscription transmissions and ephemeral recordings’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘February 15, 2009’’ 

and inserting ‘‘at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the 30th day 

after the date of the enactment of the Webcaster Settlement 

Act of 2009’’. 

Approved June 30, 2009. 

17 USC 101 note. 

Webcaster 

Settlement Act 

of 2009. 

June 30, 2009 

[H.R. 2344] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
No. 55703.

protests 141096-K and 146384-K (New York).

#### Bergdorf Goodman Co. and Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 71 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 71

   To ensure that the Senate is in compliance with the Congressional 
  Accountability Act with respect to permitting a disabled individual 
 access to the Senate floor when that access is required to allow the 
      disabled individual to discharge his or her official duties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 1997

Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Murkowski, and Mr. 
 Bryan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To ensure that the Senate is in compliance with the Congressional 
  Accountability Act with respect to permitting a disabled individual 
 access to the Senate floor when that access is required to allow the 
      disabled individual to discharge his or her official duties.

    Resolved, That (a) an individual with a disability (as defined in 
section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
12102)) who has or is granted the privilege of the Senate floor may 
bring those supporting services (including service dogs, wheelchairs, 
and interpreters) on the Senate floor the employing or supervising 
office determines are necessary to assist the disabled individual in 
discharging the official duties of his or her position.
    (b) The employing or supervising office of a disabled individual 
shall administer the provisions of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 99.17



Grant Bryan Bosworth.P.Eng.

Wardrop Engineering Inc.,

#800  555 West Hastings Street

Vancouver, B.C., Canada

V6B 1M1



e-mail address:

grant.bosworth@wardrop.com

Phone (business hrs):  (604) 408-3788







CONSENT OF AUTHOR



TO:

The British Columbia Securities Commission

The Alberta Securities Commission

The Ontario Securities Commission

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)



I, Grant Bryan Bosworth, P.Eng., do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project,of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Report) and filed in March 2007. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites.





Dated this 10th day of March, 2007











/s/ Grant B. Bosworth_______

Grant Bryan Bosworth, P.Eng.





---