alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 229 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 229

Commemorating the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the Chicago 
                            Board of Trade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 1998

Ms. Moseley-Braun (for herself and Mr. Durbin) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commemorating the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the Chicago 
                            Board of Trade.

Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade, which celebrates in April 1998 the 150th 
        anniversary of its establishment, has been an essential contributor to 
        financial growth in Chicago, Illinois, and our Nation;
Whereas futures markets were developed by finance pioneers in Chicago and today 
        Chicago remains the commercial crossroads of the world;
Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade, the oldest and largest futures and options 
        exchange, continues its tradition of innovation, functioning as a global 
        financial leader;
Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade's 150 years of accomplishments include such 
        major achievements as inventing grain futures, founding the world's 
        premier trade clearing system, launching the first stock options 
        exchange, developing the first interest rate futures, advancing the use 
        of technology with its electronic trading system, and constructing the 
        largest and most technologically advanced trading floor in the world;
Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade and its members have achieved success while 
        adhering to the highest standards of uncompromising integrity; and
Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade will continue as a world-leading financial 
        institution into the next millennium: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the Chicago Board of Trade and the city 
        of Chicago, Illinois, on the 150th anniversary of the 
        establishment of the exchange; and
            (2) expresses its wishes for continued years of innovation, 
        service, and leadership by the Chicago Board of Trade into the 
        next millennium.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**AULTRA
      GOLD INC.**


**FORM
      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Baljinder Bhullar, Chief Financial Officer of Aultra Gold Inc. (the "Company"),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2006, which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
            */s/
                Baljinder Bhullar*Dated:
                April 13, 2007
            
            Name:
                Baljinder Bhullar
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
HON. RONALD B. LEIGHTON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) No. CR06-5351RBL

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. ) RE: DISCLOSURE OF 

) EXCULPATORY SENTENCING

THOMAS MENDOZA-AGUILAR, ) INFORMATION

)

Defendant. )

DEFENDANT THOMAS MENDOZA-AGUILAR’s Motion For Disclosure

of Favorable Sentencing Information is GRANTED. The government

shall disclose a copy of DEA SA Erin Bruce’s ROI of the

defendant’s proffer on October 24, 2006 to the defendant’s

attorney at least two weeks prior to sentencing. 

Dated this 23rd day of July 2007.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-05351-RBL Document 299 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 1
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1048/2005 of 13 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market

(Official Journal of the European Union L 178 of 9 July 2005)

----
#### EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; Charles Coal Company, joint venturers on behalf of Colony Bay Company, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. DISTRICT 17, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA; Local Union No. 9177, United Mine Workers of America, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-2503.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 16, 2005.

Albert F. Sebok, Brian J. Moore, Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants. Deborah Stern, Associate General Counsel, Fairfax, Virginia; Charles F. Donnelly, Donnelly *&*Carbone, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*165Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Eastern Associated Coal Corporation and Charles Coal Company, on behalf of Colony Bay Company (hereinafter collectively “Company”), filed suit in the district court against District 17, United Mine Workers of America, and Local Union No. 9177, United Mine Workers of America (hereinafter collectively “Union”), seeking to vacate an arbitration award issued in favor of the Union. The district court granted summary judgment for the Union. We do not find that the district court erred by concluding that the arbitrator’s decision was based upon the collective bargaining agreement. *See United Paperworkers Int’l Union v. Misco, Inc.,*484 U.S. 29, 38, 108 S.Ct. 364, 98 L.Ed.2d 286 (1987) (stating review standard); *Island Creek Coal Co. v. Dist. 28, United Mine Workers of Am.,*29 F.3d 126, 129 (4th Cir.1994) (same). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See E. Assoc. Coal Corp. v. Dist. 17, United Mine Workers of Am.,*No. CA-03-2430 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Case No. 12,972.

#### In re SMITH et al.

[2 Ben. 122.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan., 1868.

Costs — Clerk’s and Marshal’s Pees.

[See Case No. 12.973.]

[In the matter of John P. Smith and James Smith, bankrupts.]

Where, in a case of involuntary bankruptcy, the petitioner advanced the clerk’s fees, including $50 for the register, and also $40 for the marshal, as messenger, before he executed the warrant, and, after an assignee was appointed, applied for an order that the assignee repay them those sums out of the estate; the court

(BLATCHFOBI). District Judge,)

held, that the motion could not be granted in that shape; but, that the court could, under section 47 of the act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 540)] and general order No. 29, direct the assignee to pay the register’s and marshal’s fees out of the estate, but it must be regular bills of legal fees, properly taxed, and not those gross sums.
# Official Journal L 54/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.054.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 54 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5626 February 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.054.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 54

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5626 February 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | | 2013/93/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 14 April 2011 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin | 1 |
| | | 2013/94/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 26 March 2012 on the conclusion of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin | 3 |
| Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

2013/93/EU

*

Council Decision of 14 April 2011 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin

1

2013/94/EU

*

Council Decision of 26 March 2012 on the conclusion of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin

3

Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.12.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
           TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP. CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN
                       (AS AMENDED THROUGH JULY 23, 1997)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Section 10 (e) of the Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Capital
Accumulation Plan is hereby amended to add the following sentence at the end of
such Section:

                  "The value of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered
                  for tax withholding may not exceed the amount allowed
                  consistent with fixed plan accounting in accordance with
                  generally accepted accounting principles."
----

(2004/C 78 E/0106)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2349/03

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Galicia and CAP reform

What will be the situation of Galician agriculture when the CAP reform approved by the Council is implemented, bearing in mind that the Galician farming industry is characterised by the predominance of milk production, land-based family farms and a clear vocation and capacity for modernisation and, on the other hand, that the milk quota is totally inadequate to allow aspirations of non-Malthusian development? How will the measures taken as regards rural development affect Galician society? The Galician Government has stated that, in order to offset the fall in milk prices, Galicia will receive a sum of EUR 530 million in direct aid for the milk sector between now and 2014: what will be the significance of these funds, and where will they come from?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(11 September 2003)

The Commission considers that the latest CAP Reform offers to European farmers a clear, long-term planning framework for their business decisions, which allows them the flexibility to respond to future market demands, while at the same time contributing substantially to the stability of their incomes. The Commission believes that the reform will enhance quality, will make prices more a reflection of market demand and will allow the CAP to respond better to societal concerns regarding the environment and animal welfare. This will increase the support of consumers and taxpayers for the CAP, thus improving the image of farmers in European society.

Regarding the reform of the milk sector, the Honourable Member will recall that Commission's proposal to increase quotas by 1 % in each of the years 2007 and 2008 was turned down and that the Council decided to postpone, by one year to 2006, the 1,5 % increases already foreseen in the Agenda 2000 reform of 0,5 % in each of the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. However, the additional cuts agreed in the intervention price for butter have been compensated with higher levels of dairy premiums and additional payments to producers, now up to EUR 35,5 per tonne, which will be incorporated in the single payment scheme from 2007. These dairy premiums, which will be granted to dairy producers, are calculated from the payment rate multiplied by the individual reference quantity for milk available on the holding on 31 March of the calendar year concerned.

As for rural development, the CAP Reform package includes a number of new or reinforced measures that could be useful for Galician agriculture, during the transition to the new economic conditions expected. These measures include support for participation in food quality schemes and temporary support for compliance with new statutory standards and entry into the voluntary farm advisory system. In addition, support measures for young farmers will be reinforced and Community support for agri-environment measures strengthened. Extra funding for rural development will be made available as from 2006 by means of the compulsory modulation mechanism.

----
No. 57770.

protest 213993-K (New York).

#### Seacoast Export Corp. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2) provides, in part: “A party proceeding pro se shall keep the court

and opposing parties advised as to his current address. . . . [I]f such plaintiff fails to notify the court and

opposing parties within sixty days thereafter of his current address, the court may dismiss the action

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

STERLING BADGER, )

) No. C06-695RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ATHERTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

On November 6, 2007, the Court issued an order directing plaintiff to notify the Court

and defendant of plaintiff’s current address by January 11, 2008. See Dkt. #21 (Order

Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss). Plaintiff was notified that the failure to do so would

result in dismissal under Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2).1

 Id. at 2. Plaintiff has failed to provide the

Court and defendant with plaintiff’s current address as required by the Court’s November 6,

2007 Order and Local Rule 41(b)(2). Therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES plaintiff’s action

against defendant WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment

accordingly.

Case 2:06-cv-00695-RSL Document 23 Filed 01/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL -2-

DATED this 14th day of January, 2008.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-RSL Document 23 Filed 01/14/08 Page 2 of 2
... 

March 5, 2015 

Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

Post Office Box 12308 

Austin, Texas 78711-2308 

Dear ~1r. Acosta; 

Re: ?ending Habeas Corpus A~plication 

Trial No. Wll-52654-Y(A) 

Enclosed for timely and proper fileind is AP?LICANT'S 

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIAL 

COURT'S JANUARY 22, 2015 FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

BASED ON NEW CASE L~W DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED 

s·rATES. 

\ 

Thank you for presenting this to the Court. 

MOTIO~.M~SSE[D) 

DATE: -/;5 

laY: J? ·u· 

Yours Sincerely, 

£..t2fll?rA b a fl E rfl Ah(iY IJ E-=z~· ;-;:::-;-"""" Gonzalo Hernandez, #1801383 

Polunsky Unit 

3872 Fm 350 South 

Livingston, Texas 77351 
EX PARTE 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

TRIAL NO. Wll-52654-Y(A) 

GONZALO HERNANDEZ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIAL COURT'S JANUARY 22, 2015 

FINDING OF FACT AND-CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BASED ON NEW 

CASE LAW DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED 

STATES. 

COMES NOW, Gonzalo Hernandez, the Ap.p-licant·herein, and timely 

requests an Extension of Time in which to prepare and file objections to the trial court's finding of fact and conclusions of law. 

In support thereof, Applicant would show: 

I 

Upon a plea of not guilty, a Dallas Countyj Texas jury found 

Applicant guilty to the offense of Continuous Sexual Abuse of a 

Child. The offense was. alleged to have occurred on or about Aug~ 

ust 7, 2010. The same jury sentenced Applicant to 40 years imprisonment. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the judgement of 

the trial court on March 21, 2014 in an unpublished opinion. No 

.Petition for Discretionary Review was prosecuted. 

II 

Applicant has never been previously convicted of a felony 
and is proceeding pro se in the above styled habeas corpus application. 

III 

At the time of Applicant's appeal he·w~s unaware of the 

Supreme Court decision announced in Martinez v Ryan, u.s. 

132 s.ct. 1309, 162 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), providing for the assistance of counsel in collateral ineffective assistance of counsel 

claims that are no longer available on direct appeal. 

IV 

The follow-up case, announced one year later in Trevino v 

Thaler, u.s. 133 s.ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), 

determined that Martinez applied to Texas cases. 

v 

Accordingly, Applicant would like the opport~1ity to reguest the appointment of counsel in the trial cou~t so that counsel 

can review the entire trial proceedings (Applicant had to file his 

habeas corpus without benefit of reviewing the record) in su~port 

of Applicant's ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims. 

Wherefor, for these reasons Applicant prays the Honorable 

Court of Criminal•Appeals will grant Applicant 30 days in which to 

submit his objections. 

Respectfully Submitted. 

~N?.I}tc /IE/l!V/[JYIJEZ 

Gonzalo Hernandez, #1801383 

Polunsky Unit 

3872 Fm 350 South 

Livingston, Texas 77351 

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 247 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 247

  To authorize testimony, document production, and representation of 
    Member and employees of the Senate in United States v. Jack L. 
                            Williams, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize testimony, document production, and representation of 
    Member and employees of the Senate in United States v. Jack L. 
                            Williams, et al.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Jack L. Williams, et al., Criminal Case 
        No. 96-0314, pending in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Columbia, a trial subpoena has been served upon Galen 
        Fountain, an employee of the Senate on the staff of the Committee on 
        Appropriations, and testimony may be requested from Senator Dale 
        Bumpers;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2)), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent Members and employees of the Senate with 
        respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to 
        their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, by rule VI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no Senator shall absent 
        himself from the service of the Senate without leave;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Senator Dale Bumpers, Galen Fountain, and any other 
employee from whom testimony or document production may be required, 
are authorized to testify and to produce documents in the case of 
United States v. Jack L. Williams, et al., except when Senator Bumpers' 
attendance at the Senate is necessary for the performance of his 
legislative duties, and except concerning matters for which a privilege 
should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Bumpers, Galen Fountain, and any other employee of the Senate, 
in connection with testimony and document production in United States 
v. Jack L. Williams, et al.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB filed by Cancer Therapeutics,  Inc. (the
"Company")as  filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Chene Gardner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Date as of January 15, 2007
                                      By       /s/ Chene Gardner
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Chene Gardner
                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. P66/369.

No. P66/370.

#### Dumont Handkerchiefs, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 66/4900 (New York). Handcraft, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 66/5753 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of handkerchiefs, not blocked-printed by hand, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ashear Bros., Ino.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.