alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

Notice of Open Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM).

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, October 18th from 4:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

Hybrid meeting—Washington Hilton Hotel, 1919 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009 and Virtual. The meeting will be held in person for committee members, EXIM's Board of Directors and support staff, and virtually for all other participants.

# REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC COMMENT:

                        Virtual Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation virtually and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to                         *advisory@exim.gov.*

                        Interested parties may register for the meeting at:                         *https://events.teams.microsoft.com/​event/​48ebe66f-b21f-441a-a0eb-e172d5c5f4c8@b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        For further information, contact India Walker, External Engagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062 or                         *india.walker@exim.gov.*

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22456 Filed 10-5-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41309 Summary Calendar

ARMANDO G. HERNANDEZ, ET AL, Plaintiffs ROBERT J. BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, ET AL, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:98-CV-46

- - - - - - - - - - January 29, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The district court has not certified for interlocutory appeal its denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for certification of the complaint as a class action. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292. APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 61621.

#### The Best Foods, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 303940-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection and following *The Best Foods, Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1791), the motion was granted.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer





I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11

Commemorating ‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day,’’ June 19, 1865, the day

on which slavery finally came to an end in the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 23, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. LEVIN, and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Commemorating ‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day,’’ June 19,

1865, the day on which slavery finally came to an end

in the United States.

Whereas news of the end of slavery came late to frontier

areas of the country, especially in the American Southwest;

Whereas the African-Americans who had been slaves in the

Southwest thereafter celebrated June 19 as the anniversary of their emancipation;

Whereas their descendants handed down that tradition from

generation to generation as an inspiration and encouragement for future generations;

Whereas Juneteenth celebrations have thus been held for 130

years to honor the memory of all those who endured slav-
2

SJ 11 IS

ery and especially those who moved from slavery to freedom; and

Whereas their example of faith and strength of character remains a lesson for all Americans today, regardless of

background or region or race: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the annual observance of June 19 as Juneteenth

4 Independence Day is an important and enriching part of

5 our country’s history and heritage.

6 That the celebration of Juneteenth provides an op7 portunity for all Americans to learn more about our com8 mon past and to better understand the experiences that

9 have shaped our Nation.

10 That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the

11 National Association of Juneteenth Lineage as an expres12 sion of appreciation for its role in promoting the observ13 ance of Juneteenth Independence Day.

Æ
Case 3:06-cv-05262-BHS Document 9 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05262-BHS Document 9 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2
Ameren CorporationRevised 316(b)Phase II RulemakingSite-specificLarge, fresh-water river considerationLarge, fresh-water lake considerationCompliance options“TIOP” and “adaptive” complianceState BPJ alternativeUtilize recently conducted IM studiesFish to be protectedEstimated annual IM of protected fishCost considerationRemanded rulemaking $$$ spent>>Shad/Drum/Carp“Finality” to installing technologyAmeren CorporationRevised 316(b)Phase II RulemakingEntrainmentRetain 5% freshwater river threshold“...EPA believes the 5% threshold to be sufficientlyprotective...”“...provides a consistent metric...”“...flow is related to is related to entrainment. EPA believesthe intake capacity standard established under today’s finalrule minimizes the entrainment impacts of CWIS ...”“...[NJDEP] finds it reasonable...”Retain freshwater lake thresholdEntrainment survivability considerationCalculation BaselineCWIS siting credit allowanceCWIS equipment “upgrade” allowance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,159
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             559
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               127,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,410
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          88,409
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            88,157
<LOANS>                                        306,853
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 658,976
<DEPOSITS>                                     433,617
<SHORT-TERM>                                   175,980
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,864
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           680
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 658,976
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,856
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,715
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,251
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,822
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,603
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,219
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      340
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,763
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,723
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        704
<LOANS-PAST>                                       342
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,523
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,192
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      285
<RECOVERIES>                                        77
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,324
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,247
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             77
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL/KESLING - 1

CR05-173M UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-173RSM 

 Plaintiff, )

) 

)

 v. ) ORDER OF CONTINUANCE

)

)

ROBERT KESLING, )

)

 Defendant. ) )

In consideration of the parties’ joint motion for continuance, and observing that no prior

trial continuances in this matter have been sought, the Court finds and rules as follows: This Court

finds as facts those facts set forth in the above motion to extend the pre-trial motion cut-off date

and the trial date submitted on behalf of all parties. For the reasons set forth, the motion is

GRANTED. The pre-trial motion cut-off date shall be September 15, 2005. Further, the Court

finds that given the nature and seriousness of the charges in this case, the abundant discovery to

be had, and the need by defense counsel and the defendant herein to fully review the evidence, and

conduct adequate investigation, the failure to grant the requested trial continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant effective assistance of counsel and, despite due diligence by all

parties, result in a miscarriage of justice. Further, the Court finds that given the complexity of the

evidence, the duration and extent of the alleged conspiracy, the number of the alleged participants,

and the volume of recordings and documentary evidence in this case, it is unreasonable to expect

either the government or defense counsel to be prepared to go to trial within the time allotted.

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 19 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL/KESLING - 2

CR05-173M UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

The Court further finds, for the reasons set forth above, that the ends of justice served by

granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

The new motion cut-off date shall be September 15, 2005. The new trial date shall be

November 7, 2005. The time from the filing of this motion for continuance, through the new trial

date shall be, and is, excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections

3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(i)(ii) and (iv).

DATED this 5 day of July, 2005.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

/s Ronald J. Friedman 

RONALD J. FRIEDMAN 

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-1779

Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: ronald.friedman@usdoj.gov

/s Robert S. Huff per written consent on Joint Motion

ROBERT S. HUFF 

Attorney for Defendant ROBERT KESLING 

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 19 Filed 07/05/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 10.4**

AMENDMENT NO. 2 

TO THE 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 2 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2009 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital AdvisorsLLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of January 15, 2010 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement.

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the AdvisoryAgreement and advance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoingand of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 ofthis Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through theperiod ending March 31, 2010 exceeds the amount of the Company’s Funds from Operations from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2010. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for theAdvance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative Funds from Operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributionsdeclared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for theperiod from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and yearfirst above written. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.BY: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
 
KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCBY: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
 
BY: Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner
 
BY: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
February 10, 1958

No. 61560.

#### T. H. Gonzalez *v.*United States,

protest 287178-K.

C. D. 1949. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Samuel              Chapman                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
| Name:                 Samuel ChapmanTitle:                  Executive                Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal                Executive Officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Carlos              Bernal                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Name: Carlos              BernalTitle: Chief                Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |   |        |
| November              14, 2006                                                                                        |   |   |   |

----
Order entered March 1 8 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01235 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 01237

– CR JOHN CLOUD, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. F93 - 61603 - N and F93 - 60604 - N



### O RDER Appellant’s February 27, 2014 “Motion for Entry of Filed PJN” is DENIED. The Court has the record in the above case before it and will review the trial court’s ruling based on the record. We DIRE CT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first

- class mail, to John Cloud, TDCJ No. 749521, Powledge Unit, 1400 F.M. 3452, Palestine, Texas 75803. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Dallas County Distri ct Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report
of Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Ducker, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2010 |  | /s/ JOHN DUCKER        
|                     |  | John Ducker            
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

AKLILUTA GIRMU, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-1798-MJB

)

v. ) ORDER

)

NORTHWEST BASEBALL UMPIRES, )

ASSOCIATION

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee. Plaintiff may proceed without

prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, and to issue summonses to

plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note

that it is his and/or his attorney’s responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint

along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2005.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01798-MJP Document 5 Filed 11/03/2005 Page 1 of 1

Girmu v. Northwest Baseball Umpires Association Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
No. 61031.

protests 286688-K and 286130-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc., and E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).