alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 103/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.103.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 103 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 569 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.103.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 103

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 569 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 103/01 | List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the second generation Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 31(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Article 46(8) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System | 1 |
| 2013/C 103/02 | List of N.SIS II Offices and the national SIRENE Bureaux | 117 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 103/01

List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the second generation Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 31(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Article 46(8) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System

1

2013/C 103/02

List of N.SIS II Offices and the national SIRENE Bureaux

117

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FOURTHCAI INC
                          4300 N. MILLER RD. SUITE 120
                         SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85251-3620


February 1, 2000

Corporate Architects, Inc
4300 N. Miller Rd. Suite 120
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251-3620

     Re: Lock-Up Agreement with Fourthcai, Inc.

Gentlemen,

     In consideration of the sale to the holder by Fourthcai, Inc., (Company) of
its Common Stock ($.0001 par value), the undersigned holder warrants,  covenants
and agrees for the benefit of the Company not to sell, offer to sell, solicit an
offer to buy, contract to sell, make any short sale,  pledge,  grant,  grant any
option to purchase,  or  otherwise  transfer or dispose of, any shares of Common
stock, or any securities  convertible  into or exercisable or  exchangeable  for
Common Stock,  owned directly or beneficially by the undersigned or with respect
to which the undersigned has the power of disposition, except in connection with
or following a completed merger or acquisition by the Company and the Company is
no longer  classified as a blank check company  pursuant to Section 7 (b) (3) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     An attempt to sell, transfer or any type of disposition of the shares shall
be a violation of this letter  agreement and shall be  ineffective  and null and
void.

     In  furtherance  of the  foregoing,  the holder agrees to; (1) delivery its
shares to the  Company  for safe  keeping;  (2) allow the  Company to advise its
Transfer Agent not to transfer said  securities and (3) authorize the company to
deliver a copy of this  Agreement to the  transfer  agent with  instructions  to
decline to make any transfer of securities if such transfer  would  constitute a
violation or breach of this Agreement.

     This  Agreement  shall be  binding  upon the  holder,  its  agents,  heirs,
successors, assignees and beneficiaries.

     A waiver of the terms and  conditions of this  agreement must be in writing
and executed by the proper officer of the Company and the holder.

     If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this  Agreement,  the holder
agrees  that  there is no  adequate  remedy at law and said  breach  will  cause
irreparable damage. Accordingly,  the holder agrees that the Company is entitled
to the issuance of an immediate injunction without notice to restrain the breach
or  threatened  breach.  This remedy is not exclusive and the holder agrees that
the  Company  and third  party  beneficiaries  shall be  entitled  to seek other
remedies including a claim for other remedies, including money damages.


THE HOLDER


By /s/ Edmond Lonergan
   --------------------------
   Corporate Architects, Inc.       Constituting 5,000,000 shares certificate(s)

                                                             #__________________
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 154 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 154

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Magee, et al. v. Hatch, et al., No. 97-CV02203, pending 
        in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        plaintiffs have named Senator Orrin Hatch as a defendant; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend its Members in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Hatch in the case of Magee, et al. v. Hatch, et al.
                                 <all>
```
No. 61628.

#### Trans World International Service Co. *v.*United States,

protest 307393-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

VANS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended
August 30, 2003 of Vans, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Blechman,
the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Scott J. Blechman* 
| |                        
| | Scott J. Blechman      
| | Vice President and     
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | October 8, 2003        

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Vans, Inc. and will be retained by Vans, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

26
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 250

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the third Saturday in June of 
       each year should be designated as ``National Rivers Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 1998

 Mr. Chafee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the third Saturday in June of 
       each year should be designated as ``National Rivers Day''.

Whereas the United States has a total of 3,000,000 linear miles of rivers, which 
        have played a fundamental role in the Nation's culture, heritage, 
        ecological health, economic development, and overall quality of life;
Whereas rivers are used throughout the Nation as efficient transportation routes 
        for commerce and industry, are used in urban areas as public 
        transportation corridors, and have facilitated economic growth by 
        providing transportation, generating hydroelectric power, and supplying 
        water for farms and rural towns;
Whereas rivers support fish, waterfowl, and other wildlife that need greenways 
        and clean water to survive in their habitats, and people throughout 
        America live in close proximity to rivers and streams and use them for 
        swimming, fishing, boating, and other forms of recreation and leisure;
Whereas the Nation's rivers are important tourist destinations, which, each 
        year, attract more than 46,000,000 international travelers and generate 
        more than $430,000,000 in tourism revenue;
Whereas the activities carried out along the Nation's rivers affect water 
        resources, environment, and geography on regional, national, and global 
        scales;
Whereas the President and Congress have declared their support for rivers 
        through the American Heritage Rivers program; and
Whereas it is appropriate for the people of the United States from time to time 
        to reflect upon the manner in which their activities and lifestyles 
        affect the rivers of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the third 
Saturday in June of each year should be designated as ``National Rivers 
Day''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 305 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 305

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the President pro tempore for the 
  courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided 
                 over the deliberations of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 15 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the President pro tempore for the 
  courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided 
                 over the deliberations of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
Honorable Strom Thurmond, President pro tempore of the Senate, for the 
courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided 
over its deliberations during the second session of the One Hundred 
Fifth Congress.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 10573)

#### Standard Oil Company of California *v.*United States

Entry No. 24733, etc.

(Decided August 1, 1963)

*Stiarretts, Paley & Garter lor the*plaintiff.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made a part of this decision, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain seamless steel casing, exported from Italy.

The parties hereto have submitted the appeals for decision on a stipulation of fact, which reads as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise is limited to seamless steel casing, exported from Italy, and that the facts and the law are similar in all material *359respects to tlie merchandise the subject of *United States*v. *Dalmmter, Ine., R. W. Smith,*47 Oust. Ot. page 577, A.R.D. 135.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in A.R.D. 135 be incorporated with the record in this case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar imported merchandise were freely offered for sale for consumption in the United States, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the prices shown on Schedule A hereto attached less 2 per cent cash discount less 5.211 per cent for general expenses and 2.744 per cent for profit less ocean freight and inland freight as stated in the appraisement less duty of 7% per cent on casing Grade J-55 or 7% per cent plus 4 per cent on casing Grade N-80.

Upon the record before tlie court, I find and bold that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(e)), is the proper basis of value for the seamless steel casing in issue and that said value is as shown on schedule A, attached to and made part of this decision, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 5.211 per centum for general expenses and 2.744 per centum for profit, less ocean freight and inland freight, as stated in the appraisement, less duty of *7y2*per centum on casing grade J-55 or 7% per centum, plus 4 per centum on casing grade N-80.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BADEN SPORTS, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

KABUSHIKI KAISHA MOLTEN (DBA

MOLTEN CORPORATION) and MOLTEN

U.S.A., INC., 

Defendants.

No. C06-210MJP

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MR. HAMPTON’S

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Baden’s motion for leave to file expert

witness Hampton’s supplemental report. (Dkt. No. 263.) Defendants oppose the motion. (Dkt. No.

286.) Having considered the motion and response, and the record herein, the Court DENIES the

motion.

On August 1, 2007, the Court issued an order limiting Mr. Hampton’s testimony to the

information and opinions expressed in his original expert report and during his deposition. (See Dkt.

No. 273, Order at 3.) The Court based this order on Baden’s failure to timely supplement Mr.

Hampton’s report. (Id.) That order foreclosed the possibility of Mr. Hampton filing a supplemental

report. For the reasons stated in the August 1 Order, Plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental report

is DENIED.

Dated: August 13th, 2007. AMarsha J. Pechman

 United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00210-MJP Document 307 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the amended Yearly Report of Hurley Exploration, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Chet Kurzawski, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hurley Exploration, Inc.. |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By:    | */s/*   *Chet Kurzawski*

Chet KurzawskiChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Dated: September 12, 2006

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DIEGO SANJUAN , Appellant,

v.

GUARDIANSHIP OF MARIA ANGELICA MENA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2857

[ September 7, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Maxine Cheesman , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 502020GA00623XXXMB and 502021MH000512XXXXMB

.
Ricardo Corona, Ricardo M. Corona

, Yung Truong , and Laura Hernandez of Corona Law Firm , P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Barry W. Taylor of Taylor & Taylor Law, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Diego Sanjuan timely appeals the circuit court’s order appointing co

guardians o ver the person and property of a w ard. Sanjuan argues the circuit court erroneously appointed the b rothers as co

- guardians over the

w ard. He also argues the court erred when it revoked the w ard’s appointment of a health care surrogate. We affirm the court’s appointment of the brothers as co

- g uardians without further discussion. But we reverse the court’s revocation of the w ard’s appointment of a health care surrogate for failure to “express[] which grounds supported revocation and absent evidence of any of the grounds set forth in section 765 .105 [

, Florida Statutes (20 07 )].” Graham v. Florida Dep ’ t of Child

. & Families , 970 So. 2d 438, 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; see also Martinez v. Guardianship of Smith

, 159 So. 3d 394, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). On remand

, the court must determine what grounds under section 765.105 require revocation of the health care surrogate if it determines any such grounds exist

.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

.2 W ARNER , G ROSS and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Utah Department of Workforce ) ASBCA No. 62563

)

Under Contract No. FA8201

- 13

- C

- 0115 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Vanessa R. Walsh, Esq.

Assistant Utah Attorney General

Salt Lake City, UT

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Capt Seiji Ohashi, USAF

Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board ’ s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) , and the

parties ’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $214,981

. Inte rest shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from March 20, 2020

until date of payment.

Dated: July 1 5 , 2020

JOHN J. THRASHER

Chairman

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)2 I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62563

, Appeal of Utah

Department of Workforce , rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s Charter.

Dated: July 20, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70660-70661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22582]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the

[[Page 70661]]

standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 27, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90d3fffdfdf5fee4e3bef1e0e0fcf9f3f1e4f9fffee3d0f3f8f9bef6e2f2beffe2f7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5714383a3a32392324793627273b3e3436233e38392417343f3e7931253579382530">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. George B. Bley II, Palm Harbor, Florida, individually, and 
acting in concert with the Bley Family Control Group; to retain voting 
shares of Petefish, Skiles Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
retain voting shares of Petefish, Skiles & Company, both of Virginia, 
Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-22582 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# mnlteb**~tate~** 

# (!Courtof**§ppeaI~** 

# for tbejf 

# eberaI (!Circuit

MICHAEL S. POWELL, Plaintiff-CrossAppellant, 

### v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant-Appellant. 2010-1409, -1416 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 07-CV-B0435, Judge Daniel T.K. Hurley. 

### ONMOTION



### ORDER Michael S. Powell moves without opposition to withdraw Alexander D. Brown as principal counsel and to substitute Donald R. Dunner. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time, until October 30, 2010, to file its principalbrief. Upon considerationthereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:POWELL v. HOME DEPOT The motions are granted. 

## SEP 21 2010 Date

cc: Alexander D. Brown, Esq.
s21 Donald R. Dunner, Esq. George M. Sirilla, Esq. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### u.s.

## eouJ~~~PEALS FOR THE FEDERALCIRCUIT 

## SEP 21 2010

JAN HORBALY 

### ClERK