alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  OCTOBER 4, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000876400
<NAME>                          STIMSONITE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-04-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                            748
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                      550 
<INVENTORY>                                    11,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40,390
<PP&E>                                         32,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 67,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,457
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           90
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,031 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   67,497
<SALES>                                        67,332 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               67,332
<CGS>                                          43,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,077 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.52
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 256 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 256

To refer S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard M. Barlow 
of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' to the chief judge of the United States Court 
                of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 1998

Mr. Bingaman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 17, 1998

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

              October 5 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To refer S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard M. Barlow 
of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' to the chief judge of the United States Court 
                of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That (a) S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
Richard M. Barlow of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' now pending in the Senate, 
together with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief 
judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.
    (b) The chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed according to the provisions of sections 1492 
        and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the Senate, at the earliest practicable 
        date, providing--
                    (A) such findings of fact and conclusions that are 
                sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in such bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States or a gratuity; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Mr. Richard M. Barlow of 
                Santa Fe, New Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40190

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC DIONEL LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-103-1

- - - - - - - - - - 

November 6, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Dionel Lewis appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Lewis argues that the

district court erroneously believed that it lacked the authority

to grant a downward departure based on sentencing entrapment and

that the district court did not consider the appropriate factors

in determining whether his case was atypical. The district court

considered Lewis’ argument that he was predisposed to sell only

small amounts of cocaine and that he would not have sold a large 
No. 98-40190

-2-

amount of cocaine if the Government’s confidential informant had

not repeatedly requested it and offered him money and other

assistance. The district court determined that Lewis had not

demonstrated facts which warranted a downward departure based on

sentencing entrapment. Because the district court did not deny

the downward departure based on an erroneous assumption that it

lacked the authority to depart downward based on sentencing

entrapment, the district court’s denial of Lewis’ motion for a

downward departure is unreviewable. See United States v.

Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, Lewis’

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Official Journal L 269/12 O

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5012 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 269

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5012 October 2007

---

| Contents | | III   Acts adopted under the EU Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY |
| | * | Council Decision 2007/643/CFSP of 18 September 2007 on the financial rules of the European Defence Agency and on the procurement rules and rules on financial contributions from the operational budget of the European Defence Agency | 1 |

Contents

III   Acts adopted under the EU Treaty

page

ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY

*

Council Decision 2007/643/CFSP of 18 September 2007 on the financial rules of the European Defence Agency and on the procurement rules and rules on financial contributions from the operational budget of the European Defence Agency

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1


VITAL PRODUCTS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Products, Inc. (the Registrant)
on Form 10-K/A for the period  ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James McKinney, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aaron Shrira and will be retained by Vital Products, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: August 20 2013


By: /s/ James McKinney

James McKinney

(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72207-72208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-
00073]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Hawaii

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated 08/10/
2023.
    Incident: Wildfires, including High Winds.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2023 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 10/11/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Hawaii, dated 08/10/2023, is hereby 
amended to expand the incident for this disaster to include high winds.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.


[[Page 72208]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-23061 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40629

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEO ABLE VELASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-175-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Leo Able Velasquez has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Velasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 11, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40629 Document: 00514866987 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2019
No. 18-40629

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40629 Document: 00514866987 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2019
United States Steel Corporation – Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 8

The BART report discusses the technical feasibly of low NOX burners and a variety of

selective catalytic reduction (SCRs) systems. Provide all documentation, including

reports and studies, to determine the technical feasibility of low NOx burners and

SCRs at the facility's indurating furnaces.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response: Chrissy Bartovich, Teresa Simetkosky, 

Stephani Campbell

Answer:

A file review was conducted to locate reports and studies that were completed in relation to the 

U. S. Steel Minntac permit that required NOx reduction technology evaluation. The responsive 

documents found during the file review are provided in the Item 8 subfolder.
|   | (a)    | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (b)    | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

|   |        |                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Svein Moxnes Harfjeld                                                                         |   |
|   |   | Name:  Svein Moxnes Harfjeld                                                                      |   |
|   |   | Title:    Co-Chief Executive Officer                                                    |   |
|   |   |              (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

|   |        |                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Trygve P. Munthe                                                                              |   |
|   |   | Name:  Trygve P. Munthe                                                                           |   |
|   |   | Title:    Co-Chief Executive Officer                                                    |   |
|   |   |              (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

|   |        |                                                                                                                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                  |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Eirik Ubøe                                                                                              |   |
|   |   | Name:  Eirik Ubøe                                                                                           |   |
|   |   | Title:    Chief Financial Officer                                                                      |   |
|   |   |              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 64

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of H.R. 1119, an Act

3 to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1998 for mili4 tary activities of the Department of Defense, for military

5 construction, and for defense activities of the Department

6 of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal

7 year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, the

8 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the fol9 lowing corrections:

10 In section 3165—

11 (1) in subsection (b)(1), strike out ‘‘under the

12 jurisdiction’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Los Ala13 mos National Laboratory’’ and insert in lieu thereof

14 ‘‘under the administrative jurisdiction of the Sec15 retary at or in the vicinity of Los Alamos National

16 Laboratory’’; and

17 (2) in subsection (e), strike out ‘‘, the Secretary

18 of the Interior’’ and all that follows through the end

19 and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘but not later than 90
2

SCON 64 ES

1 days after the submittal of the report under sub2 section (d)(1)(C), the County and the Pueblo shall

3 submit to the Secretary an agreement between the

4 County and the Pueblo which allocates between the

5 County and the Pueblo the parcels identified for

6 conveyance or transfer under subsection (b).’’.

Passed the Senate November 6, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 64

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for corrections to be made in the

enrollment of H.R. 1119.
10/15/2020 The Rustic Landscape of Rim Village, 1927-1941

https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/E45aph 1/2

The Rustic Landscape of Rim Village, 1927-1941

craterlakeinstitute.com/index-of-general-cultural-history-books/park-structures/1-04/

The Rustic Landscape of Rim Village, 1927-1941

Table of Contents

1. 01 Cover

2. 02 Acknowledgments

3. 03 Historical Overview

4. 04 Purpose of the Report

5. 05 Methodology and Scope

6. 06 Context and Site Boundaries

7. 07 Design Context Introduction

8. 08 The Rustic Style at the Rim Introduction

9. 09 The Rustic Style at the Rim – Implementation

10. 10 Landscape History – Summary

11. 11 Typology Introduction

12. 12 Circulation – Definition

13. 13 Circulation – Roads

14. 14 Circulation – Parking

15. 15 Circulation – Walkways
10/15/2020 The Rustic Landscape of Rim Village, 1927-1941

https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/E45aph 2/2

16. 16 Circulation – Trails

17. 17 Vegetation – Definition

18. 18 Vegetation – Planting Concepts

19. 19 Vegetation – Plant Materials

20. 20 Structures – Definition

21. 21 Structures – Buildings

22. 22 Structures – Rock Walls

23. 23 Small-scale Features – Definition

24. 24 Small-scale Features – Signs

25. 25 Small-scale Features – Drinking Fountains

26. 26 Small-scale Features – Curbing

27. 27 Small-scale Features – Benches

28. 28 Small-scale Features – Picnic Tables

29. 29 Small-scale Features – Fireplaces

30. 30 Construction Technologies

31. 31 Construction Technologies – Stonework

32. 32 Construction Technologies – Planting

33. 33 Construction Technologies – Paving

34. 34 Recommendations – Significance and Integrity

35. 35 Introduction – New Design in the Context of the Designed Historic Landscape

36. 36 Introduction – Recommendations

37. 37 Circulation – Roads

38. 38 Vegetation – Planting Concepts

39. 39 Structures – Design Principles

40. 40 Small-Scale Features

41. 41 Construction Technologies

42. 42 Endnotes

43. 43 Bibliography

44. 44 Appendix A Apologia

45. 45 Appendix B Memorandum

46. 46 Appendix C Memorandum

47. 47 Appendix D – Report on Naturalization in the Rim Area

48. 48 Appendix E – List of Classified Structures

49. 49 Appendix F – Subject: Historic sign types and their application

<< previous — next >>
From: jatherholt@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:03:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Jeffrey Atherholt

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Atherholt

Catonsville, MD 21228