alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 39

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the convening of the Second Session of the

One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the second regular session of the One Hundred Fifth

4 Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 27,

5 1998.

6 SEC. 2. Prior to the convening of the second regular

7 session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress on January

8 27, 1998, as provided in the first section of this joint reso9 lution, Congress shall reassemble at noon on the second

10 day after its Members are notified in accordance with sec11 tion 3 of this joint resolution.

12 SEC. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

13 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

14 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead15 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
2

SJ 39 ES

1 and Senate, respectively, to assemble whenever, in their

2 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate November 13, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 39

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the convening of the Second Session

of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 43 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 43

 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico 
  during fiscal year 1998, and to provide for the termination of the 
   withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the 
                              disapproval.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1998

    Mr. Coverdell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Helms, and Mr. 
 Hutchinson) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico 
  during fiscal year 1998, and to provide for the termination of the 
   withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the 
                              disapproval.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION.

    (a) Disapproval.--Pursuant to subsection (d) of section 490 of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j), Congress disapproves 
the determination of the President with respect to Mexico that is 
contained in the certification (transmittal No. 98-15) submitted to 
Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that section on 
February 26, 1998.
    (b) Termination.--Notwithstanding subsection (f) of that section, 
subsection (e) of that section (relating to the withholding of 
bilateral assistance and opposition to multilateral development 
assistance) shall cease to apply to Mexico during fiscal year 1998 if 
at any time after the enactment of this Act the President submits to 
Congress a certification pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(B) of that 
section that the vital national interests of the United States require 
that such subsection (e) cease to apply to Mexico during fiscal year 
1998.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

September 29, 1955

No. 59317.

protests 171180-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### William A. Hausman and Company et al. *v.*United States,

*258Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2510

KENDALL L. HOLLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-1804-A)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall L. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeri Kaylene Somers, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the

Army's motion to dismiss and for summary judgment in her Rehabilitation Act and Title VII claims. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v.

West, No. CA-95-1804-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011168EN.01S00301.xml

| 8.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/s3

---

NOTICE

On 8 June 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 168 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fifth supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for 1 year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
No. 63912.

protest 59/19167 (New York).

#### R. Moussaieff *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of the Llano-Burnet region, Texas: with an account of thepre-Cambrian geology**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:450
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959485
 
August 6, 2018
EXH
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyclone Power Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Frankie Fruge, president, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (a) | the
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (b) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.



|Date:
    September 11, 2017 | /s/ Frankie Fruge                      
|---------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                             | Frankie Fruge                          
|                             | President (Principal Executive Officer)
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00914-CV

IN RE Juan Edgar OCHOA, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 12, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 22, 2010, relator Juan Edgar Ochoa filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

complaining in part that the Justice of the Peace Precinct 3, Jim Hogg County, has prevented him 

from appealing the justice court’s ruling. However, by statute this court only has the authority to 

issue a writ against a “judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and 

other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). Therefore, we have no mandamus jurisdiction over a justice of the 

peace unless the issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. We conclude the 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. JP3-10-544, styled State of Texas v. Juan Edgar Ochoa, in the Justice of 

the Peace Precinct 3, Jim Hogg County, Texas, the Honorable Heriberto Martinez presiding. 
04-10-00914-CV

- 2 -

relief relator seeks is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly, relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LUCKY BREAK WISHBONE

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York

corporation; and YOUNG & RUBICAM, INC., a

Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-312TSZ

TAXATION OF COSTS

Having considered briefs in support of, and in opposition to, the cost bill herein, costs in the cause

indicated above are hereby taxed against DEFENDANTS SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and YOUNG

& RUBICAM , INC. , and on behalf of PLAINTIFF LUCKY BREAK WISHBONE CORPORATION

in the amount of $13,418.57 as follows:

Requested Disallowed Allowed

I. FILING FEE $250.00 0 $250.00

II. DEPOSITION COSTS $13,232.59 $6,178.97 $7,053.62

Clerk allowed as a taxable cost the expenses incurred for any deposition taken of a witness that

actually testified at trial. 

III. PRINTING COSTS $14,332.31 $8,599.36 $5,732.95

General copying costs are not taxable. Clerk estimated that 40% of requested costs represents the

portion of copying directly related to the trial proceedings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Requested Disallowed Allowed

TAXATION OF COSTS -- 2

IV. WITNESS FEES $382.00 0 $382.00

V. EXHIBIT COSTS $32,814.23 $32,814.23 0

Absent specific authorization from the court the costs for production of boards, diagrams, charts and

digitized materials for use at trial are not taxable. 

VI. OTHER TRIAL COSTS $305,588.46 $305,588.46 0

None of the items identified under this category are costs taxable by the clerk pursuant to 28 USC

1920.

Dated this 15th day of DECEMBER, 2008 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1917** 

ROBERT LOVE TAYLOR, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
STATE OF VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; ELAINE JACKSON KERNS , Defendants

– Appellees

.

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00803

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circ uit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Robert Love Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Love Taylor, Jr. appeals the district court ’s order dismissing h is petition for writ of mandamus show cause.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Taylor v. State of Va. Div. of Child Support
Enforcement , No. 1:10

- cv - 00803

- L MB

- TCB (E.D. Va. July 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 66098.

#### Eric Wedemeyer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/7949, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric vacuum brushes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit
        23.1**


**CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
        FIRM**





We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
        (No. 333-143483 and No. 333-147735) on Form S-3 and in the
        registration statement (No. 333-147734) on Form S-8 of Smart Balance,
        Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated March 12, 2008, with
        respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
        December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
        operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
        the periods in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which
        report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Smart
        Balance, Inc.




We
      also
      consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in these
      registration statements.








/s/
      Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC







March
      14,
      2008


Boulder,
      Colorado
No. 62868.

#### H. W. Ebert Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/5455 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: John Rego [mailto:jrego@JonesDay.com]

Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 4:34 PM To: French, Chuck Cc: Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com; John.Willoughby@erametgroup.com; Gregory.Timmons@erametgroup.com Subject: Estimated Cost of Additional EMI Fugitive Particulate Controls

Chuck:

Attached are EMI's current estimates for enhanced fugitive particulate controls, as described in the attachment. Please note that these estimates are necessarily general due to the fact that control strategies are conceptual and no detailed design work has been conducted. Although a 30% contingency has been incorporated in the estimates due to the preliminary status of the design, no contingency to account for anticipa ted start

- up and shakedown costs has been included and EMI
therefore believes the actual costs of implementing the described controls are likely to be higher.

Information related to estimated retrofit costs is being forwarded under separate cover beca use it is
based on confidential business information.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the attached information.

Thanks,

John

John A. Rego Partner, Environmental Health & Safety
JONES DAY®

- One Firm Worldwide?
90 1 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44114

- 1190 Office +1.216.586.7542

Fax +1.216.579.1212 jrego@jonesday.com

========== ========================================================================== This e

- mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney

- client or other privilege. If you received this e

- mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e

- mail, so that our records can be corrected.

========= ========================================================================== =
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 153 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 153

   To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by 
  Senate Legal Counsel in the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol 
                              Guide Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by 
  Senate Legal Counsel in the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol 
                              Guide Board.

Whereas, in the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol Guide Board, case No. 
        1:97CV00823, pending in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Columbia, a subpoena has been issued for the production of 
        documents of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its 
        counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the Senate with 
        respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or document 
        production relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate is 
authorized to produce documents relevant to the case of Sherry Yvonne 
Moore v. Capitol Guide Board, except where a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate in connection with 
the production of documents in this case.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANK A FOREMSKY,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5314

 CR06-5452

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, Ken Tyndal.

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Linda Sullivan. 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and ORDERS that the defendant

be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person 

 or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered 

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

June 28, 2007.

__s/Karen L. Strombom_________________

Karen L. Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05314-KLS Document 21 Filed 06/28/07 Page 1 of 1
LITERATURE CITED

Dixon, K.R. and J.A. Chapman. 1980. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity area. Ecology 61:1040-1044.

Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW8.

Harper, J.A. 1985. Ecology and management of Roosevelt elk in Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Portland,

OR. 70 pp.

Hill, T. 1976. The ecology and management of Roosevelt elk in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon. Unpubl. ms. on file at

Crater Lake National Park.

Hopkins, W.E. 1979. Plant associations of the south Chiloquin and Klamath Ranger Districts - Winema National Forest. USDA

For. Serv. PNW Region. R6-Ecol-79-005.

Jenkins, K.J. 1981. Status of elk populations and lowland habitats in western Olympic National Park. Cooperative Park Studies

Unit, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. Report 81-1.

Kuttell, M.P. 1975. Willapa Hills elk herd. Washington Department of Game, Olympia, WA. 63 pp.

Manning, R. 1974. [Elk, their ecology and management. Unpubl. ins. on file at Crater Lake National Park.

Merrill, E.H., K.L. Knutson, B. Biswell, R.D. Taber, and K.J. Raedeke. 1985. Mount Saint Helens Cooperative Elk study:

Progress Report 1981-84. Unpubl. ins.

Neu, C.W., C.R. Byers, and J.M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildl. Manage.

38:541-545.

Phillips, K.N. 1968. Hydrology of Crater, East and Davis Lakes, Oregon. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1859-E. 57

pp.

Smith, J.L. 1980. Reproductive rates, age structure, and management of Roosevelt elk in Washington's Olympic Mountains. Pp.

67-111 in W. MacGregor (ed.). Proceedings of the Western States Elk Workshop. Feb. 27-28, 1980, Cranbrook, B.C.

Stuwe, M. and C.E. Blohowiak. Undated. MCPAAL: microcomputer programs for the analysis of animal locations. Unpubl.

ins. available from Conservation and Research Center, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Walsh, S.J. 1977. An investigation into the comparative utility of color infrared aerial photography and LANDSAT data for

detailed surface cover type mapping within Crater Lake National Park, Oregon. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University,

Corvallis, OR. 356 pp.

Witmer, G.W. 1982. Roosevelt elk habitat use in the Oregon Coast Range. Ph.D. Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis,

OR. 104 pp.

_____, et al. 1985. Deer and elk. Pp. 231-267 in E.R. Brown (ed.). Management of Wildlife and Fish Habitats in Forests of

Western Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv. PNW Region.

http://www.nps.gov/crla/elk/elk5.htm

Date: 31-May-2001

CRATER LAKE

Report: Ecology Of Elk Inhabiting Crater Lake National Park And Vicinity

<<< PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT >>>

Crater Lake NP: Elk Ecology Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20081231044722/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/elk/elk5.htm 11/29/2011