alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: KIMBERLY KEEN E N,
ESQUIRE :

:

:

:

: No. 54 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of August , 2023, in consideration of the Motion for Leave

to Withdraw as Counsel, the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County for it to determine whether to permit Attorney Kimberly Keen e n to

withdraw. If the court permits Attorney Keen e n to withdraw, it is to resolve whether N.L.

is entitled to appointed counsel for allocatur review, and, if so, to appoint that attorney.

As this is a Children’s Fast Track matter, the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its order on remand within 14 days and to

promptly notify this Court of its determination.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 155 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 155

    Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day'' to 
   recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by 
                Scottish Americans to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 1997

Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day'' to 
   recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by 
                Scottish Americans to the United States.

Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially 
        those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of 
        Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 
        6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that 
        inspirational document;
Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish Americans played in 
        the founding of this Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the 
        signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the 
        Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry, 
        Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country in its 
        formative years and guide this Nation through its most troubled times;
Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable 
        contributions made by Scottish Americans that have led to America's 
        preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, 
        politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and 
        performing arts;
Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the 
        United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture, 
        representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, 
        residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan 
        Day on April 6 a success; and
Whereas these numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal 
        organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people 
        go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each year as 
``National Tartan Day''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 27th day of June , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

BOARD of TRUSTEES of the

GLASSWORKERS and INDUSTRY

HEALTH & SECURITY TRUST, et al.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) MS06-84 MJB

R & D GLASS and ALUMINUM

COMPANY,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge:

The Debtor Examination in the above entitled matter will be heard on July 18, 2006 at

10:00am in Courtroom 12 B.

Case 2:06-mc-00084-JPD Document 5 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES E. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-652RSM

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the entire record, including the administrative record, the

memoranda of the parties, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Monica J. Benton, finds and orders as follows. It is therefore ORDERED: 

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The Court REVERSES and REMANDS the decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security for further administrative proceedings.

DATED this 13th day of March, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00652-RSM Document 20 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 1
P.1 

UNION 

CARBIDE 

UNIO N CARBID E CORPORATIO N 39 OLD RIC&IEBURY ROAfl, DANBURY. CT 06817-0001 

COMMUNITY AND EMPLOYEE HEALTH. SAFETY 

AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT /oi(to)rfvX-s-2.i 

October 1. 1986 

Barbara Hostage 

Mail Code WH-548B 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M. St.. S.W. 

Washington. DC 20460 

Dear Ms. Hostage: 

As we discussed on the phone this past week. I am enclosing 

nine typical reports from Union Carbide facility managers to the NRC 

& Regional Administrators regarding continuous releases of hazardous 

substances under CERCLA. This data and information relate to 

emissions which are routine, anticipated releases to the air 

incidental to the normal manufacturing, treatment processes, and 

operation of facilities of Union Carbide. These releases, which may 

equal or exceed the applicable reportable quantity, are stable in 

quantity within the range indicated and are generally predictable 

during operations. Most of the enclosed data were previously 

submitted to the respective state agency in the form of air emission 

inventories or air pollution permits. 

As the reports state, it must be recognized and emphasized that 

the emission values (which are presented in the reports as ranges of 

emissions) are estimates of actual emissions. These estimates are 

based on one or more variable factors and sources, which may include 

process design calculations (both operational and treatment), 

sampling data, emission factors and often require individual 

engineering judgement. For example, the use of controversial 

emission factors in calculating fugitive emission losses can lead to 

widely varying results. 

We believe the data and information contained in these 

submissions establish for those locations the identified air 

emissions as continuous releases under CERCLA. I am in receipt of 

one response to these submissions from the Coast Guard (copy 

enclosed), which states that the Union Carbide report "does not 

constitute a report as required by 40 CFR 302.6." Nevertheless. I 

think you will recognize that these reports represent a significant 

effort by Union Carbide to come to terms with issues that have 

eluded resolution by either EPA or the regulated community. These 

issues, which include the definition and practical application of 

the terms "continuous releases" and "federally permitted releases", 

were the subject of meetings between Union Carbide, other CMA member 
P.2 

-2-

companies. and you this past summer and. as we understand it, are 

intended to be resolved as part of EPA's ongoing regulatory 

development process. We would welcome the opportunity to continue 

these discussions in order to assist EPA in developing technically 

sound and consistent regulations. As part of that process, we would 

be pleased to discuss with you the contents of the enclosed reports. 

R.F. Kelley 

Enclosure 

R.F.K./cv 

0453D
08555331.DOC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD - 1 

Case No. 06-5231 RBL

HON. RONALD B. LEIGHTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

MICHELLE BEARDSHEAR, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

RAKESH H. PATEL and ANITA R. PATEL, 

 Defendants. 

NO. 3:06-cv-5231 RBL 

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead, and the Court having noted the pertinent portions of the 

record and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 

Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead is 

GRANTED. Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise plead on or before October 4, 

2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2007. 

 

 ARONALD B. LEIGHTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-05231-RBL Document 42 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 2
08555331.DOC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD - 2 

Case No. 06-5231 RBL

Presented By: 

EISENHOWER & CARLSON, PLLC 

By: 

John R. Ruhl, WSBA # 8558 

Attorneys for Defendants 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1650 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Telephone: (206) 382-1830 

Facsimile: (253) 382-1920 

Email: jruhl@eisenhowerlaw.com

Richard H. Streeter 

DC Bar #946053 

Teresa L. Jakubowski 

Carolyn D. Gray 

Barnes & Thornburg, LLP 

750 17th Street, N.W., Suite 900 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 289-1313 

Facsimile: (202) 289-1330 

Case 3:06-cv-05231-RBL Document 42 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 192/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5810 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5810 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2015/C 192/01 | Opinion of the European Central Bank of 4 February 2015 on the review of the mission and organisation of the European Systemic Risk Board (CON/2015/4) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

European Central Bank

2015/C 192/01

Opinion of the European Central Bank of 4 February 2015 on the review of the mission and organisation of the European Systemic Risk Board (CON/2015/4)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 192/02 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| 2015/C 192/03 | Commission Implementing Decision of 9 June 2015 on financing the 2015 work programme on training in the field of food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health in the framework of the ‘Better Training for Safer Food’ programme | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 192/02

Euro exchange rates

7

2015/C 192/03

Commission Implementing Decision of 9 June 2015 on financing the 2015 work programme on training in the field of food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health in the framework of the ‘Better Training for Safer Food’ programme

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Catherine DAmico
 22
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-7 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-7 Filed 10/31/11 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DONALD W. COLLIER, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BOB BROWN and VAL WEST, of P.A.W.S.

Grays Harbor County,,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5271 RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon the filing of a Complaint, Amended

Complaint, and a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

Plaintiff has filed a Complaint and an Amended Complaint wherein he alleges that Defendant Bob

Brown and P.A.W.S. of Grays Harbor County wrongfully euthanized his pet dog, Soulfly. While the Court

is sympathetic, the Court is unaware of the nature of this Court’s jurisdiction to hear this matter. Therefore,

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days of entry of this Order why this matter should not

be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If Plaintiff intends to rely upon Pub. L. 89-544 (attached as an exhibit

to plaintiff’s complaint) codified as Title 7 U.S.C. § 2131 et. seq., he must allege some facts that Defendants

are covered by the act and that they violated the act as to Plaintiff and his dog, Soulfly. Plaintiff’s failure to

respond to this Court’s Order within fifteen (15) days will result in the dismissal of this Complaint and

Amended Complaint. 

Case 3:06-cv-05271-RBL Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 7th day of July, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05271-RBL Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS EVANS DUNIGAN,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5202M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 (X) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 (X) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 October 31, 2005.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-mj-05202-KLS Document 7 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judge Marsha J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY ROSENAU,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-157MJP

NOTICE OF WITNESS’

UNAVAILABILITY

The United States of America, by and through Jenny A. Durkan, United States

Attorney for the Western District of Washington, and Susan M. Roe and Marc Perez,

Assistant United States Attorneys for said District, hereby files this Notice of Witness’

Unavailability. This Notice is based on the accompanying affidavit and its attachments as

well as the law contained in the Second Supplemental Trial Brief filed July 5, 2012.

DATED this 10th day of July, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

JENNY A. DURKAN

United States Attorney

s/Susan M. Roe 

SUSAN M. ROE

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-1077

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: susan.roe@usdoj.gov

NOTICE OF WITNESS’

UNAVAILABILITY/ ROSENAU- 1

CR06-157MJP

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 170 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 10, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the attorneys of record for the defendant.

s/ Kathleen M. McElroy 

KATHLEEN M. McELROY

Paralegal Specialist

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: 206-553-7970

Fax: 206-553-0755

E-mail: Katie.McElroy@usdoj.gov

 

NOTICE OF WITNESS’

UNAVAILABILITY/ ROSENAU- 2

CR06-157MJP

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 170 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 2
AMENDMENT ONE
                                       TO
                         THE FLEET FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                   EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN NO. 2
                               (1997 RESTATEMENT)

         The Fleet Financial Group, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
No. 2 is amended effective February 1, 1999 by adding the following new Section
8.8:

         8.8 TRANSFER OF BENEFITS TO PLAN OF ACQUIRER. Notwithstanding anything
in this Plan to the contrary, if the Company sells a business or business unit
(whether in an asset or stock sale) and the acquirer maintains a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan that agrees to accept a transfer from this Plan of
the benefit liabilities of the Participants who become employees of the acquirer
as a result of the sale, such liabilities will be so transferred and the sale of
the business or business unit will not be treated as a termination of employment
of such Participants for purposes of the Plan.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment One has been adopted by the Human
Resources and Planning Committee on the 17th day of February, 1999 and is
executed by a duly authorized officer of Fleet Financial Group, Inc.

                                  FLEET FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


                                  By:  /s/ WILLIAM C. MUTTERPERL
                                      --------------------------
                                           William C. Mutterperl
                                           Executive Vice President, Secretary
                                                and General Counsel
No. 68515.

protests 62/17727 and 63/831 (New York).

#### M. Hohner, Inc., and R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the. merchandise consists of chord organs and parts thereof similar in all material; respects to those the subject of *Excelsior Accordions, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 148, C.D. 2328), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

|                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   |
| G.   Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal   executive officer)         |   |

Circle Pines, MinnesotaJuly 12, 2007