alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: benbriwetzel@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:43:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Briana Wetzel

Fullerton, CA 92831
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; notice of cancellation of open hearing.

# SUMMARY:

                        The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing on October 18, 2023. The announcement for this hearing was previously published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 9, 2023.                    

# DATES:

October 18, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2023-21829 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer





I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Board of Visitors, United States Military Academy (USMA)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Meeting cancellation notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972, the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 the Department of 
Defense announces that the following Federal advisory committee meeting 
will not take place.

DATES: Monday, October 16, 2023. Time: 9-11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 
    Location: Haig Room, Jefferson Hall, 758 Cullum Road, West Point, 
NY.
    Reason for Cancellation: Due to the uncertainty of the schedule of 
the House of Representatives in Washington, DC, the USMA Board of 
Visitors meeting originally scheduled for Monday, October 16, 2023, is 
cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Committee's Designated Federal 
Officer or Point of Contact is Ms. Deadra Ghostlaw, (845) 938-6534, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7733121613051659301f1804031b1600370012040307181e190359121302"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="793d1c181d0b18573e11160a0d15180e390e1c0a0d091610170d571c1d0c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to circumstances beyond the control of 
the Department of Defense and the Designated Federal Officer, the 
United States Military Academy Board of Visitors is unable to provide 
public notification required by 41 CFR 102-3.150(a) concerning the 
cancellation of its October 16, 2023, meeting. Accordingly, the 
Advisory Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 
pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day 
notification requirement.

James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-22615 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 62323.

#### The American Import Company *v.*United States,

protest 279905-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects, except as to the component material of chief value, to the hats the subject of Abstract 58730, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

FRANKLIN BANCORPORATION, INC.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE AND EARNINGS PER SHARE, ASSUMING DILUTION

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS - EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,

                                               1998                                         1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           INCOME             SHARES      PER SHARE        INCOME          SHARES        PER SHARE
                         (NUMERATOR)      (DENOMINATOR)     AMOUNT       (NUMERATOR)    (DENOMINATOR)     AMOUNT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                        <C>              <C>           <C>          <C>            <C>                <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income available
  to stockholders          $1,723           6,692,244      $0.26           $1,383        6,487,577           $0.21

EFFECT OF DILUTIVE
  SECURITIES:
Options                                       474,952                                      399,992
                                            ---------                                    ---------
EARNINGS PER SHARE
  ASSUMING DILUTION:
Income available to
  stockholders plus
  assumed conversions      $1,723           7,167,176      $0.24           $1,383        6,887,569           $0.20
                           ------           ---------      -----           ------        ---------           -----
</TABLE>





                                Page 15 of 15
No. 57499.

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60676-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

This case was formerly reported in Abstract 49532. Subsequent to that decision, defendant’s motion for rehearing was granted, but the resulting record was so meager that the court, on its own motion, restored the case to the docket for all purposes. When the ease was called for trial, it was suspended pending decision in protest 132624-K, which ease was ultimately decided in favor of the plaintiff in *A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476). In the present case, it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of C. A. D. 476, *supra.*It was further stipulated that the protest was abandoned as to entry 3513. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items in question covered by entry number 4400.
## Swanson

. Bria n (OST) Dt^P^S P iJOO O -^^^ 5 From : Robin_Connors@nps.go v'' -.-,.^..
. Sent : Thursday , Decembe r29 , 201 1 2:44 P M \;'!!'' TM I OF To : EAS(OST ) -^
. ^yM'}^^^^^ Subject : Answe rt o Pacifi cWings'Petitio n fo rReconsideratio n -- ' *J rER AI iON S 

## P 1 ^ 3 0 I strongl yoppos e Pacifi c idlings ' petitio n fo r reconsider^ation . The y performe d ver ypoorl yi n providin g th e Kalaupap a Communit ywit h ai r servic e i n th e past , and Mal<an i Ka i ha s opene d u p mor e opportunitie s t o affordabl ytrave l betwee n Kalaupap a an d Topsid e Molokai , a s wel l a s Honolulu . Robi n Connor s Archeologist , Cultura l Resourc e Managemen t Kalaupap a Nationa l Historica l Par k P.O . Bo x 222 2 Kalaupapa , H I 9674 2 Office : 808-567-638 4 Fax : 808-567-640 8
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 269

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate

Legal Counsel in the case of Rose Larker, et al. v. Kevin A. CariasHerrera, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 1 (legislative day, AUGUST 31), 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate Legal Counsel in the case of Rose

Larker, et al. v. Kevin A. Carias-Herrera, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Rose Larker, et al. v. Kevin A.

Carias-Herrera, et al., Civil No. 97CA06257, pending in

the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, a subpoena has been issued for the production of documents

of the Sergeant-at-Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the Senate

with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testi-
2

SRES 269 ATS

mony or document production relating to their official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be

taken from such control or possession by permission of

the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms and Doorkeeper

2 of the Senate is authorized to produce documents relevant

3 to the case of Rose Larker, et al. v. Kevin A. Carias-Her4 rera, et al.

5 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

6 to represent the Sergeant-at-Arms and Doorkeeper of the

7 Senate in connection with the production of documents in

8 this case.

Æ
#### Tony COLIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N.E.C. USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1347.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
Before the Third Division,

June 20, 1949

No. 53311.

protests 97953-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### S. Alioto & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KRISTINE WILMER,

Petitioner

v.

ALEXANDRA S. BETHMAN AND ANDREW

BETHMAN AND ARTHUR W. WATKINS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 59 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 9, 2009
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ H. Kerr Taylor

H. Kerr TaylorTitle
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III
Corporation, the General Partner of
AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund
III, Ltd.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 171 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 171

Designating March 25, 1998, as ``Greek Independence Day: A National Day 
           of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 1998

 Mr. Specter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 5, 1998

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

                             March 18, 1998

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating March 25, 1998, as ``Greek Independence Day: A National Day 
           of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy''.

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the 
        supreme power to govern was invested in the people;
Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States of America drew heavily upon 
        the political experience and philosophy of ancient Greece in forming our 
        representative democracy;
Whereas the founders of the modern Greek state modeled their government after 
        that of the United States in an effort to best imitate their ancient 
        democracy;
Whereas Greece is one of the only 3 nations in the world, beyond the former 
        British Empire, that has been allied with the United States in every 
        major international conflict this century;
Whereas the heroism displayed in the historic World War II Battle of Crete 
        epitomized Greece's sacrifice for freedom and democracy as it presented 
        the Axis land war with its first major setback and set off a chain of 
        events which significantly affected the outcome of World War II;
Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond between our 2 nations 
        and their peoples;
Whereas March 25, 1998, marks the 177th anniversary of the beginning of the 
        revolution which freed the Greek people from the Ottoman Empire; and
Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate with the Greek people and to 
        reaffirm the democratic principles from which our 2 great nations were 
        born: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 25, 1998, as ``Greek Independence Day: 
        A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American 
        Democracy''; and
            (2) requests the President to issue a proclamation calling 
        upon the people of the United States to observe the day with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT F

EMAIL COMMUNICATION

DATED 3/14/2007

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-7 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 117 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
(3/15/2007) Roger Townsend - RE: Gordon v. Virtumundo Page 1

From: Roger Townsend

To: Bob Siegel; Derek Newman

Date: 3/14/2007 4:21 PM

Subject: RE: Gordon v. Virtumundo

CC: Jr. Douglas E. McKinley; Roger M. Townsend

Bob:

Per our discussion today, we will move to compel depositions of the individual customers. If you believe further discussion would be 

fruitful, then we are available to discuss arrangements to facilitate their depositions.

We will follow up shortly regarding the deposition of Mr. Resnick. Where do you intend for that deposition to take place? Is it 

Chicago? That information would be helpful in scheduling the deposition. Also, can you advise as to any dates that Mr. Resnick and 

plaintiffs' counsel are unavailable.

Thanks

Roger

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800 phone * (206) 274-2801 fax

(206) 274-2825 Direct Dial

(206) 898-2616 Mobile

>>> On 3/13/2007 at 3:57 PM, in message <F5B4BAA1E0433F41B34EE5AD016231FD3851FA@EXVBE014-

12.exch014.msoutlookonline.net>, "Bob Siegel" <Bob@iJusticelaw.com> wrote:

Derek and Roger,

Below is my agreement and understanding as to the issue of third-party

witness depositions. Frankly,we do not consider depositions

at this late date to be a“reasonable”extension of the discovery deadline.

You have had over 2 months since the witnesses were disclosed and since

we reached this understanding. We even provided you with tentative dates

of these witnesses availability, however, you chose not to note, or arrange

their depositions. Accordingly, we will oppose your attempt to depose these

witnesses now.

Regarding our expert, we agree that you are entitled to depose Mr. Resinick

pursuant to the civil rules applying to such depositions related to payment

to the expert, etc.Please provide dates and times for that deposition and

we will seek to make Mr.Resinick available. 

Sincerely,

Bob Siegel

_____________________________________________

From:Bob Siegel

Sent:Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:07 PM

To:'Derek Newman'; 'Roger Townsend'

Cc:Bob Siegel

Subject:Gordon v. Virtumundo

Gentlemen:

In response to your letter of this date, since these individuals are not parties, we cannot simply "make them 

available". However, we will not object if you should choose to note their depositions after the discovery cut-off, 

and will agree to a reasonable extension of the cut-off for that limited purpose, and will otherwise seek to 

cooperate in that regard. 

Sincerely,

Bob Siegel

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-7 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 2