alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.24b

                       ADDENDUM TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
                                    BETWEEN
         FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC MAD INTELLIGENT INFORMATION INCORPORATED

                               DATED JUNE 16,1997

This Addendum is to the Distribution Agreement between News America Digital
Publishing, a Division of News Corporation (Provider) and Intelligent
Information Incorporated (Distributor) dated June 16, 1997.

The parties, Provider and Distributor agree to the following changes in the
Distribution Agreement:

1.     Elimination of the first sentence under 6.b of the Term and Termination
       Clause "Provider may terminate this Agreement for any and no reason at
       any time upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to Distributor";

2.     Redefinition of Content under Section a in Exhibit A of the Agreement
       from "Content shall be determined by Provider in consultation with
       Distributor" to "All Content News America Digital Publishing (NADP)
       provides, including, but not limited to Fox News Online, Fox Sports
       Online and TV Guide Entertainment Network (TVGEN)";

3.     Redefinition of Exclusive under Section 2 d of the Agreement from
       "Provider grants Distributor a three year period of exclusivity solely
       with respect to the content and the Trademark license to use in the
       Wireless market, to start concurrent with signing of this agreement.
       Distributor grants Provider a three year period of exclusivity as it
       pertains to a cable News Channels CNN, and MSNBC" to "Provider grants
       Distributor a one and one half year period of exclusivity solely with
       respect to the content and the Trademark license to use in the Wireless
       market, to start concurrent with signing of this agreement or June
       16, 1997. Distributor grants Provider a one and one half year period of
       exclusivity as it pertains to a cable News Channels CNN, and MSNBC."; and

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto hereby execute this Addendum.

News America Digital Publishing         Intelligent Information Incorporated

/s/ John Linguin                        /s/ Stephen G. Maloney
-----------------------------------     ------------------------------------
Authorized Signature                    Authorized III Signature

John Linguin Vice President-Finance     Stephen G. Maloney, President
-----------------------------------     ------------------------------------
Name, Title                             Name, Title

August l0, 1998                         August 20, 1998
-----------------------------------     ------------------------------------
Date                                    Date
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

 

I, Matthew Hoole, do herebycertify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of WorldOmni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2022-A to Closed-EndServicing Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2022 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp., asClosed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)             Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K and coveredby the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made undermy supervision.

 

(ii)            Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand as of March 22, 2024.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2009
    
    
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ H. Kerr Taylor

H. Kerr TaylorTitle
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III
Corporation, the General Partner of
AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund
III, Ltd.
Case 3:06-cv-05237-RBL Document 18 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of the eastern part of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, Custerand Blaine Counties, Idaho**
 
Report | Plates: 0102030405
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1545
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962079
 
August 22, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES E. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-652-RSM

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Costs

Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, defendant’s response, plaintiff’s reply, and the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Monica J. Benton, finds and ORDERS as

follows: 

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Costs Under the Equal Access

to Justice Act (Dkt. #22) is GRANTED in the amount of $6,702.89 in attorney

fees, $41.54 in expenses, and $54.25 in costs, for a total of $6,798.68.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel and to the

Honorable Monica J. Benton.

DATED this 1 day of October , 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00652-RSM Document 31 Filed 10/01/07 Page 1 of 1
From: abegerton@bobcatwireless.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:17:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Egerton

Childress, TX 79201
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL – 1

(C06-00678 RSL)

United States Attorney

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

 District Judge Robert S. Lasnik 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TALAL SADAK

(Agency # 79-195-669),

Petitioner,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al. 

Respondents.

No. C06-0678 RSL 

 JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

JOINT STIPULATION

COMES NOW, the parties by and through John McKay, United States Attorney for the

Western District of Washington and Priscilla T. Chan, Assistant United States Attorney for said

District, and Talal Sadak, pro se, and respectively stipulate to allow petitioner/plaintiff to

voluntary dismiss his case, without claim of either party to attorney fees or costs.

 // 

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-00678-RSL Document 9 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL – 2

(C06-00678 RSL)

United States Attorney

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

DATED this 11th day of August, 2006.

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

/s/Priscilla T. Chan PRISCILLA T. CHAN, WSBA #28533

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: 206-553-7970

Fax: 206-553-4073

E-mail: priscilla.chan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants

/s/ Talal Sadak 

TALAL SADAK, pro se

9929 - 184th Street East

Puyallup, Washington 98375

Phone: 253-606-8939

Email: stkabi@gmail.com

Petitioner/Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The case is dismissed without prejudice.

 DATED this 18th day of August, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00678-RSL Document 9 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ABDOULAYE DIALLO, )

) Case No. C06-756-RSL-JPD

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER GRANTING

ALBERTO GONZALES, ) TEMPORARY STAY OF

) REMOVAL

Respondent. )

_________________________________________)

On May 30, 2006, petitioner’s Petition for Review and Motion for Stay of Removal was

transferred from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to this Court. (Dkt.

#1, Attach. 2). Petitioner challenges the legality of his custody by the U.S. Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and seeks a stay of his removal proceedings. The Court does

hereby ORDER:

(1) Petitioner’s removal is temporarily STAYED pending briefing and a resolution of

petitioner’s motion for stay. The Court expresses no views at this time as to the merits of

petitioner’s petition and motion for stay.

 (2) Respondent shall file a response to petitioner’s motion for stay within 15 days of

the entry of this Order.

(3) The Clerk shall direct a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, and shall

forward a copy of this Order to Judge Donohue.

Case 2:06-cv-00756-RSL Document 5 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 2

DATED this 8th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Recommended for Entry

this 1st day of June, 2006.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00756-RSL Document 5 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (3 MB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (500 KB PDF)
Summary tables (205 KB PDF)
Flows tables (700 KB PDF)
Level tables (700 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (70 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (35 KB PDF)
Integrated macroeconomic accounts table (450 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical data | About| Technical Q&AsCurrent release | 
Screen reader |  
PDF (3 MB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)  | Preliminary Z.1 Code Updates

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 10, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22490]



[[Page 70422]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 13, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Karen Smith, Director, Mergers & 
Acquisitions) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99daf6f4f4fcf7edeab7f8e9e9f5f0faf8edf0f6f7ead9fdf8f5b7ffebfbb7f6ebfe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2764484a4a42495354094657574b4e4446534e4849546743464b0941554509485540">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Unifi Financial, Inc., San Antonio, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Stockmens National Bank in Cotulla, 
Cotulla, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-22490 Filed 10-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEPT-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7816
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35469
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2139
<INVENTORY>                                      2860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57458
<PP&E>                                         213574
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44162
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        51543
<OTHER-SE>                                      31499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256062
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54535
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2695
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 30, 2012 

y0123 

Order 

 

January 30, 2012 

143983 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143983 

 COA: 298528 

Oakland CC: 2009-227631-FH 

RAYMOND DAVID HASLETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Opinion issued March 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 12

- 00508

- CV

——————————— NATHANIEL JONES, III , Appellant V. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , DETECTIVE M. KAHN, AND OFFICER G. POLK , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 07137

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appella nt , Nathaniel Jones, III, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. No
opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, B land, and Massengale

.
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 9 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 9 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 9 Filed 03/06/06 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE & PTM’s DUE DATE 1

CR06-5350RBL

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOSE LUIS CAMPOS,

CARLOS ROMALLIS DANIELS, and

MIGUEL ANGEL PERALTA

ALONZO,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5350RBL

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DUE DATE

Based on the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the trial date, and the

affidavit of defense counsel in support of the motion, the Court makes the following

findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

2. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense to prepare would

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(i). 

3. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of some complexity,

including all relevant issues and defenses applicable to the case, which would make it

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself

within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act and currently set for this case. 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B(ii). 

Case 3:06-cr-05350-RBL Document 55 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE & PTM’s DUE DATE 2

CR06-5350RBL

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

4. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a continuance is necessary

to allow the defendant the reasonable time for effective preparation his defense. 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from November 27,

2006 to April 9, 2007, at 9:00 am. The resulting period of delay from November 27,

2006, to April 9, 2007, is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

Pre-trial motions are due no later than November 20, 2006.

Pre-trial motions hearing shall be on January 17, 2007, at 9:00 am.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2006. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented By:

/s/ /s/ 

Russell V. Leonard Matthew H. Thomas 

Attorney for Mr. Campos Assistant United States Attorney

/s/_____________________________ /s/______________________________

Phil I. Brennan, Jr. John J. Kannin, IV

Attorney for Mr. Peralta Alonzo Attorney for Mr. Daniels

Case 3:06-cr-05350-RBL Document 55 Filed 11/01/06 Page 2 of 2