### BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Notice of IATA Traffic Conference

Actions Tentatively Exempted

From Filing for Approval Docket OST

- 2012

- 0058

NOTICE OF TIER 1 AGREEMENTS FILING

BY THE

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOC IATION

28 October 2014

Communications with respect to this

Document should be sent to

Douglas Lavin

Regional Vice President

– North America

International Air Transport Association

1201 F Street, NW, Suite 650

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 62 8

- 9292

### Summary DOCKET: DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0058 DOT ORDER: None Requested

Date: 28 October 201 4

Filing fee/IATA Acct: Waived by Order 2012

- 4

- 18, Appendix A, Section D

US/UST involved Yes

Intended effective date: 1 Ap ril 2015

Implementation date: 1 April 2015

Memo / Resolution s PTC COMP Memo 1767 24 October 20 1 4

- Resolution s 011b, 012, 017c, 024d, 024f, 038, 100, 101, 302

### NOTICE OF TIER 1 AGREEMENTS FILING

Pursuant to statements submitted by Member airli nes of the International Air Transport

Association (IATA), the undersigned has been constituted to be their attorney

- in

- fact for filing

with the Department of Transportation copies of agreements adopted by the IATA Traffic

Conferences.

On their behalf, and pursuant to the procedures specified in Order 2012

- 4

- 18 (13 April

2012), I am filing with the Department, in Docket OST

- 2012

- 0058, this Notice, the subject

agreements and supporting documentation. These agreements are Tier 1 agreements

tentatively exempt ed by Order 2012

- 4

- 18 from Condition #2 to the Department’s approval of

the Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences, which condition requires pre

implementation Department review. The intended effective date of the agreements is

1 April 20 15

.

The subject agreements amend or establish Resolutions and/or Recommended Practices

that do not address subject areas which the Department has indicated it still chooses to review

under Condition #2. The text of the agreements and other conferen ce documentation sent to

airline Members of IATA accompany this Notice. The cover pages of the documentation clearly

identify each affected Resolution and /or Recommended Practice and show whether the subject

agreements are amendments or new agreements. Other pages provide the text of each subject

agreement. Where an affected Resolution or Recommended Practice has previously been

exempted from Condition #2 by Department action, the cover pages include the appropriate

### docket and order number. The cover pa ges include a summary to explain the nature and

purpose of the subject amendments and/or agreements.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Douglas Lavin

Douglas Lavin

Regional Vice President

– North America

International Air Transport Association

Attorne y

- In

- Fact

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of this notice has been served this day by first class or priority mail on the

following person:

Chief, Transportation, Energy & Agriculture Section

Antitrust Division

Department of Justice

Washington, D.C. 2 0530

A copy of this notice has been sent this day by email to Esta Rosenberg

( Esta.Rosenberg@dot.gov ) and to Della Davis (Della.Davis@dot.gov) of the Department of

Transportation.

/s/ Douglas Lavin

Douglas Lavin

28 October 2014

Date Serv ed

### OUTLINE OF CONTENTS

RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT:

COMPOSITE PASSENGER TARIFF COORDINATING CONFERENCE MEETING

(COMP )

INTENDED EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 APRIL 201 5

Reso lution 

### Title

011b 

### Global Indicators

0 12 

### Glossary of Terms

017c 

### Construction Rules for Fare Components

024d 

### Currency Names, Codes, Rounding Units and

Acceptability of Currencies

024f 

### Administrative Provisions for the R eview and

Monitoring of Currency Values

038 

### Taxes, Fees and Charges

100 

### Standard Condition Resolution for Special Fares

101 

### Standard Condition Resolution for Normal Fares

302 

### Baggage Provisions Selection Crit eria24 Octo ber 201 4

MEMORANDUM

PTC COMP 1767

TO: Members Participating in Tariff Coordinating Conferences

FROM: Manager, Tariffs & Reservation Standards

SUBJECT: Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference

San Diego, USA

, 14 October 2014

Composite Resolution s 011b, 012, 017c, 024d , 024 f

, 038, 100 , 101 , 302

Intend ed Effective Date: 1 April 2015

R ESOLUTIONS

- A DOPTED

Attac h ed are Composite Resolution s 011b, 012, 017c, 024d, 024f, 038, 100, 101 and

302

, which w ere adopted at the above meeting for an intende d effective date of

1 April 201 5

.

The filing period for the attached Resolutions ends 28 Nove mbe r 201 4

. Members are reminded of their obligations under Resolutions 001 and 006 to advise this

office by the end of the filing period whether approval b y their Government authorities is

required and, if so, to accomplish the necessary filing formalities. The effective date will be

declared in accordance with Resolutions 001 and 006, when all the known necessary

Government approvals have been received.

Alban Sato

Manager, Tariffs & Reservation Standards

Airline Distribution Standards

International Air Transport Association

Route de l’Aéroport 33

PO Box 416

CH

- 1215 Geneva 15 Airport

Switzerland

Tel: +41 22 770 2842

Fax +41 22 770 2896

AS www.iata.org E

- Mail: tariffs @ i ata .orgRESOLUTION S AMENDED AT

COMPOSITE MEETING OF

PASSENGER TARIFF COO RDINATING CONFERENCE

SAN DIEGO, USA

, 14 OCTOBER 2014

EFFECTIVE DATE: 01 APRIL 201 5

RESO TITLE COMMENTS RD

011b Global Indicators Amending 1

0 12 Glossary of Terms Amend ing 2

017c Construction Rules for Fare Components Amending 3

024d Currency Names, Codes, Rounding Units and

Acceptability of Currencies Amending 4

024f Administrative Provisions for the R eview and

Monitoring of Currency Values Amending 5

038 Taxes, Fees and Charges Amending 6

100 Standard Condition Resolution for Special Fares Amending 7

101 Standard Condition Resolution for Normal Fares Amending 8

302 Baggage Provisions Selection Crit eria Amending 9P TC COMP 1 767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 1

Resolution : 011b

GLOBAL INDICATORS

PTC1(91 ) 011b Amending

PTC2(169 ) 011b

PTC3(96 ) 011b

PTC12(200 ) 011b

PTC23(165 ) 011b

PTC31(130 ) 011b

PTC123(17 9 ) 011b

Filing Period Begin s 2 8 October 2014 Intended Effe ctivenes s: 1 April 201 5

Ends 2 8 November 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 011b is amended as follows

.....

c) fares may only be used for the Global Indicator for which they are established.

The itinerary within a fare component will attract a Global Indicator as follows

Fare Component GI Routing Restriction

Wholly Within TC1 WH

Wholly Within TC2 EH

Wholly Within TC3 EH

Between TC1 and TC2 via the Atlantic AT

.....

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 2

Reso lution : 012

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

PTC1( 9 1 ) 012 Amending

PTC2( 16 9 ) 0 12

PTC3( 96 ) 012

PTC12( 200 ) 0 12

PTC23( 165 ) 0 12

PTC31( 130 ) 0 12

PTC123( 17 9 ) 0 12

Filing Period Begins 2 8 Octo ber 201 4 Intended Effectiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 2 8 November 2014 Expiry: Indefi nite

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 012 is amended as follows

TERM DEFINITION

Ticketed Point p oints shown in the fare calculation ‘good for passage’ section of the

passenger ticket

Russia Russia in TC3 (XU) and Russia in TC2 (RU)

Date of

Transaction the date of issuance of the ticket, EMD, MCO or PTA

Traffic

Document ticket, EMD, MCO or any other accountable passenger traffic document

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 3

Resolution : 017c

Page: 1 of 2

CONSTRUCTION RULES FOR FARE COMPO NENTS

PTC1(91 ) 01 7c Amending

PTC2(169 ) 0 17c

PTC3(96 ) 017c

PTC12(200 ) 01 7c

PTC23(165 ) 01 7c

PTC31(130 ) 0 17c

PTC123(17 9 ) 0 17c

Filing Period Begins 28 October 2014 Intended Effe ctiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 28 November 2014 Expiry: Indef inite

Type A

RESOLVED that Resolution 017c is amended as follows

------ 5) HIGHER INTERMEDIATE POINT (HIP) CHECK

a) Normal Fares

xii) Stopovers and transfers application: When a stopover or transfer rule of the

fare to be used for the HIP check is expressed as applying to the pricing unit, the

stopover or transfer restriction shall be applied solely to the sector(s) for which the

check is being made.

Example

Routing: BKK

- FRA

- GVA

- PAR

- NYC

- BOS

- AMS

- FRA

- BKK

Fare component 1: BKK

- NYC

HIP check is required BKK

- FRA, BKK

- GVA, BKK

- PAR, FRA

- GVA, FRA

PAR, FRA

- NYC, GVA

- PAR, GVA

- NYC, PAR

- NYC.

This example illustrates the FRA

- NYC HIP check.

Fares (1/2 RT in NUCs)

BKK

- NYC Y 2000.00

FRA

- NYC Y 2400.00

FRA

- NYC Y2 2100.00

Stopover rest rictions on the Y2 fare:

A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted on the pricing unit

A minimum of 2 stopovers are required on the pricing unit

1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound

1 stopover is required in LON on the inbound

2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 3

Resolution : 017c

Page: 2 of 2

The stopover restrictions for the Y2 fare are applied solely to the FRA

- GVA

- PAR

NYC outbound sectors.

• A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted: Only 2 stopover s occur

(GVA, PAR)

• A minimum of 2 stopovers are required: 2 stopovers occur (GVA,

PAR)

• 1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound: 1 occurs in PAR

• 2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit: 1 occurs in

GVA

The Y2 fare can be used for th e HIP.

Fare component 2: NYC

- BKK (fare is selected BKK

- NYC)

HIP check is required BKK

- FRA, BKK

- AMS, BKK

- BOS, FRA

- AMS, FRA

- BOS,

FRA

- NYC, AMS

- BOS, AMS

- NYC, BOS

- NYC.

This example illustrates the FRA

- NYC HIP check.

Fares (1/2 RT in NUCs)

BKK

- NYC Y 2000.00

FRA

- NYC Y 2400.00

FRA

- NYC Y2 2100.00

Stopover restrictions on the Y2 fare:

A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted on the pricing unit

A minimum of 2 stopovers are required on the pricing unit

1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound

1 stop over is required in LON on the inbound

2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit

The stopover restrictions for the Y2 fare are applied solely to the

FRA

- AMS

- BOS

- NYC inbound sectors.

• A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted: Only 2 stopovers

occur (AMS,BOS)

• A minimum of 2 stopovers are required: 2 stopovers occur

(AMS, BOS)

• 1 stopover is required in LON on the inbound: No stopover

occurs in LON

The Y2 fare cannot be used and the Y fare is used for the HIP.

.....

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 4

Re solution : 024d

CURRENCY NAMES, CODE S, ROUNDING UNITS AN D ACCEPTABILITY OF

CURRENCIES

PTC1(91) 024d Amending

PTC2(169) 024d

PTC3(96) 024d

PTC12(200) 024d

PTC23(165) 024d

PTC31(130) 024d

PTC123(179) 024d

Filing Period Begins 28 October 2014 I ntended Effectiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 28 November 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 024 d, Attachment ‘A’ is amended as follows

Rounding Units

Country Name Currency Code

Alpha Num C urrency Name Accept

ability Local

Currency

Fares and

Related

Charges Other

Charges Decimal

Units Notes

Malaysia MYR 458 Malaysian Ringgit 1 1 0 2 15

Notes

15 The Malaysian GST shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of MYR 0.0 5

P TC COMP 1 767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 5

Resolution : 024 f

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVI SIONS FOR THE REVIEW AND MONITORING OF CU RRENCY

PTC1(91 ) 024 f Amending

PTC2(169 ) 024 f

PTC3(96 ) 024 f

PTC12(200 ) 024 f

PTC23(165 ) 024 f

PTC31(130 ) 024 f

PTC123(17 9 ) 024 f

Filing Period Begins 2 8 October 2014 Intended Effectiv eness: 1 April 2015

Ends 28 November 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type A

RESOLVED that Resolution 024 f Paragraph 2)b)i) is amended as follows

...... b) as a result of this notification, lo cal currency fares and charges may be revised by

i) Local Panels in accordance with the provisions of Section E Paragraphs 2) or 3) of

Resolution 024e

i i ) means of an exchange of cables between the TC Members’ head offices

ii i ) requesting the Secreta ry to convene a Conference for the area(s) concerned

......

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1 767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 6

Resolution : 038

TAXES, FEES AND CHARGES

PTC1(9 1 ) 0 38 Amending

PTC2(16 9 ) 038

PTC3(96 ) 038

PTC12(200 ) 0 38

PTC23(165 ) 0 38

PTC31(130 ) 038

PTC123(17 9 ) 038

Filing Period Begin s 28 October 2014 Intended Effe ctiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 2 8 November 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 038

, Paragraphs 1 ) is am ended as follows

1) fare levels contained in Resolutions are considered res ponsive to market

requirements and exclusive of government and/or regulatory and/or airport authority

imposed taxes, fees or charges based on passenger count



### .....

P TC COMP 1 767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 7

Resolution : 100

Page: 1 of 2

STANDARD CONDITIO N RESOLUTION FOR SPE CIAL FARES

PTC1(9 1 ) 100 Amending

PTC2(16 9 ) 100

PTC3(96 ) 100

PTC12(200 ) 100

PTC23(165 ) 100

PTC31(130 ) 100

PTC123(17 9 ) 100

Filing Period Begins 2 8 October 2014 Intended Effectiveness: 1 April 201 5

Ends 2 8 December 2014 Expiry: Indefini te

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 100 is amended follows:

5) RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING

......

B) Inclusive Tour Fares

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours)

...... 15) SALES RESTRICTIONS

A ) 1) Advertising and Sales

no restrictions

2) Extension of Validity

as provided in governing Resolution

B) 1) a) ‘sales’ shall include the issuance of tickets, miscellaneous charges orders

(MCOs), multiple purpose documents (MPDs), electronic miscel laneous

documents (EMDs) and prepaid ticket advices (PTAs)

......

16) PENALTIES

.... B) 1) Cancellation, No

- Show, Upgrading

a) governing Resolutions

Passenger Services Conference Resolutions 735c (Rerouting and Refund in Case

of Death) and 737 (Refunds)

b) Inclusive Tour Fares

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours)

.....

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 7

Resolution : 100

Page: 2 of 2

18) TICKET ENDORSEMENTS

A) APEX/Super APEX/PEX/Super PEX

1) t ickets may must show by insert or sticker in accordance with the Important

Notice in accordance with Passenger Services Conference Resolution 728 that

travel is at a special fare and subject to special conditions

... ..

26) GROUPS

..... B) 1) Minimum Group S ize

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 026 (Counting of Group Fare Passengers)

2) Accompanied Travel

for groups of 20 or more passengers, if lack of space prevents the group from

travelling together, some members of the group may travel on the next preceding

and/or succeeding flight with available space

3) Affinity, Incentive Fares

governing Resolutions

Composite Resolutions 076xx (Affinity and Incentive Provisions) and 076z (Form of

Application for Affinity Group Fares)

........

27) TOURS

... ....

B) governing Resolutions

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours) and Passenger Agency

Conference Resolution 870 (Inclusive Tours (except USA))

......

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 8

Resolution : 101

STANDARD CONDITION R ESOLUTION FOR NORMAL FARE S

PTC1(91) 101 Amending

PTC2(169) 101

PTC3(96) 101

PTC12(200) 101

PTC23(165) 101

PTC31(130) 101

PTC123(179) 101

Filing Period Begins 28 October 2014 Intended Effectiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 28 December 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type B

RESOLVED that Resolution 101, Paragraph 15) i s amend ed as follows

------

15) SALES RESTRICTIONS

A) 1) Advertising and Sales

no restrictions

2) Extension of Validity

as provided in governing Resolution

B) 1) a) ‘sales’ shall include the iss uance of tickets, miscellaneous charges orders

(MCOs), multiple purpose documents (MPDs), electronic miscellaneous documents

(EMDs) and prepaid ticket advices (PTAs)

------

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 17 67

SAN, Oct14ADOPTED Res Doc : 9

Resolution : 302

STANDARD CONDITION R ESOLUTION FOR N ORMAL FARES

PTC1(91) 302 Amending

PTC2(169) 302

PTC3(96) 302

PTC12(200) 302

PTC23(165) 302

PTC31(130) 302

PTC123(179) 302

Filing Period Begins 28 October 2014 Intended Effectiveness: 1 April 2015

Ends 28 December 2014 Expiry: Indefinite

Type B

RESO LVED that Resolution 302, Paragraph 4) Caribbean is amended and new paragraph 5)

introduced as follows:

4) for the purposes of Paragraph 3) b) above, the following are considered TC1 subareas:

..... Caribbean

Anguilla Guadeloup e

Antigua and Barbuda (including St.Barthelemy

Aruba and Northern St.Martin)

Bahamas Haiti

Barbados Jamaica

Bermuda Martinique

Bonaire, Saba, Sint Eustatius Montserrat

British Virgin Islands St.Barthelemy

Cayman Islands St.Kitts and Nevis

Cuba St. Maarten

Curacao Saint Lucia

Dominica St. Martin

Dominican Republic St.Vincent and the Grenadines

Grenada Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Guyana Trinidad and Tobago

French Guiana Turks and Caicos Islands

Suriname

.....

5) Volun tary Changes to Itineraries

Baggage provisions effective on the date that is used for the recalculation of the fare

will be applied

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct14Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference

San Diego, USA

, 14 October 2014

Summary of Agreements

For inten de d effective date of 1 April 2015 , Composite meeting adopted the following

changes.

• added a provision in Resolution 302 for clarity in cases of reissue

• Resolution 011b Global Indicators amended for clarity

• Resolution 017c amended to outline HIP fare proc essing when the fare rule applies

for pricing unit

• Resolution 012 Glossary of Terms amended as follows;

o ‘Ticketed Point’ updated to align with e

- ticket

o ‘Russia’ defined to clarify that travel between Russia in TC2 and TC3 is

deemed domestic

• Numerous editor ial amendments and updates made, removing references to

resolutions that no longer exist

• Decimal unit for Malaysia Ringgit amended in Resolution 024d Attachment ‘A’ to

accommodate GST

P TC COMP 1767

SAN, Oct1423 October 2014

MEMORANDUM

PTC COMP 1766

TO: Members Participating in Tariff Coordinating Conferences

FROM: Manager, Tariffs & Reservation Standards

SUBJECT: Composite Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conferences

San Diego, USA

, 14 October 2014

M INUTES

Attached are the Minutes of the Composite Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordinating

Conferences, which was held in San Diego, USA

, 14 October 2014 under the Chairmanship

of Mrs

. Patricia George.

Alban Sato

Manager, Tariffs & Reservation Sta ndards

International Air Transport Association

Route de l’Aéroport 33

PO Box 416

CH

- 1215 Geneva 15 Airport

Switzerland

Tel: +41 22 770 2842

Fax +41 22 770 2896

www.iata.org E

- Mail: tariffs @ i ata .orgOUTLINE OF CONTENTS

Subject Attachmen t Opening of Meeting

Attendance Record A

Determination of Voting Membership

Examination of Credentials of Accredited Representatives and Alternates

Approval of Minutes

Report

– Tariff Coordination Passenger Steering Group (TCPSG ) B

Report

– Resolution Advisory Working Group (RADWG)

Implementation

- Premium Economy Fares

Resolution 302 and Interline Baggage Rules for Canada

Baggage Provisions for Auto

- Reissue Process C

Fare Selection Criteria

– Inclusion of Carrier Fees D

Implementation

– Fare Selection Criteria E

Fare Selection Criteria Within Europe

Carrier Selection for Fare Construction Checks

– Editorial Correction F

Application of ‘Wholly’ within in an Area for Fare Component G

HIP Fare Processing When the Fare Rule Applies for Pricing Unit H

Resolution 012

- Ticketed Points I

Russia in TC2 (RU) and Russia in TC3 (XU) J

Normal Fare Open Jaw K

Editorial Amendments L

Implementation

- Single Source for Exchange rates M

Aligning Resolutions for the Introduction of Single Source for Exchange Rates

Decimal Units

- Malaysia N

Backhaul Check in Area Fares Resolutions

Close of MeetingCOMPOSITE MEETING OF PASSENGER TARIFF COO RDINATING CONFERENCE S

S an Diego, USA

, 14 October 2014

M I N U T E S

OPENING OF MEETING

The Chairman, Mrs. Patricia George, opened the Composite Meeting of Tarif f

Coordinating Conference s at 1400 hours on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 . The Meeting

had been conv ened by Memorandum P TC COMP 1741

, dated 19 Nov ember 2013 . It

comprised the following:

9 1 st Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordination Conference 1

16 9 th Meeting of Passenger Tar iff Coor dination Conference 2

96 th Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordination Conference 3

200 th M eeting of Passenger Tariff Coordination Conference 12

165 th Meeting of Passenger Tarif f Coordination Conference 23

130 th Meeting of Passenger Tarif f Coordination Co nference 31

179 th Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordination Conference 123

As with all tr affic confe rence meetings, this meeting has immunity from US anti

- trust

laws, on the co ndition that all agreements are submitted for specific approval by the US

authorities. IATA would submit the agreements to the DoT in accordance with this

condition. C onsistent with thi s, IATA's Board of Governors has determined that any

agreement reached at this meeting must not be put into effect prior to its declaration o f

effectiveness. This ruling is contained in the Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA

Traffic C onferences and must be complied with.

The meeting was also advised that the foregoing applies equally to email discussions,

instant messaging and social media discussions whether directed to announced

participants or other parties not present in the meet ing. Participants are reminded that

live streaming of this meeting to parties not present in person is not permitted except

as indicated by and with the express permission and knowledge of the Chairperson

and IATA and only in the event that specific parti cipation on a given item from a party

not present in person is required. Unauthorized recording of the meeting is prohibited

ATTENDANCE RECORD

The Attendance Record is at **Attachment 'A'.**

DETERMINATION OF VOT ING MEMBERSHIP

The Voting Membership for th e meeting was determined in accordance with the

Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences.

EXAMINATION OF CREDE NTIALS OF ACCREDITED REPRESENTATIVES AND

ALTERNATES

The accreditation received by IATA was examined and found to be in accor dance with

the Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING

The following minutes were approved:

Composite Meeting of Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conferences

Dublin, Ireland, 30

- 31 October 2013

Memorandum PTC COMP 1 740 dat ed 1 9 November 2013TARIFF COORDINATION PASSENGER STEERING G ROUP (TCPSG) REPORT

Mr. Jerry Foran is Chairman and Mr. Nobu Yamanouchi the Vice

- Chairman of the COMP

Steering Group. It is composed of members as follows :

TC1: Anita Leuenberger (UA), Julio Ordonez (AV)

TC2: Jerry Foran (BA), Nobu Yamanouchi (LH), Linda Grinfeld (LY)

, Agnes Kwanya (KQ)

TC3: Nobuhiro Mikuriya (JL), Jimmy Cheng (CX)

The group met briefly in the morning of 14 October 2014 to provide guidance to IATA.

Following items were discussed:

• TCPSG terms of reference : as shown in **Attachment ‘B’**

, were reviewed and

validated

.

• The Steering Group instructed IATA to check with members absent to see if they wish

to continue to stand as a member

.

• The Group e ndorsed IATA proposal to hold the Composite meeting in July in Geneva,

separately from the Passenger Week to ensure appropriate amount of ti me can be

dedicated for meeting, including presentations and information sessions for the

benefit of the airline mem bers and systems

• The Group endorsed IATA proposal to hold the Steering Group meeting for one day

prior to the Composite meeting

• The Group endorsed IATA proposal to invite System providers as observers to the

Composite meeting to ensure that airlines and systems together work to finalize

industry standards at the Composite meeting

• The Group endorsed amendments to Resolution 017ha Fare Selection Criteria that

includes carrier fees in the process, as developed by the Resolution Advisory

Working Group (RADWG)

Final Result:

• The report was noted by the meeting.

• The Composite meeting agreed on the IATA proposal to hold the next meeting in July

in Geneva with system providers attending the meeting as observers. VA expressed

concern that for delegates attending the change means that delegates attending

other conferences in the same week will require additional travel to Geneva. IATA

advised that their concerns will be reviewed for more efficient meeting process.

RESOLUTION ADVISORY WORKING GROUP (RADWG ) REPORT

Meeting was advised that the Resolution Advisory Working Gro up (RADWG) met twice in

2014 and developed several major recommendations for the Compo site meeting for final

approval, for example:

• Amendments to Resolution 017ha Fare Selection Criteria to inc lude carrier fees in the

process, and agreed to incorporate market ‘within Europe’ in Resolution 017ha for

global application and rescind Resolution 017hh

• Developed technical details for the Single Source for Exchange Rates project

• Developed Implementation Guide for Resolution 017ha to support airlines implement

the amended fare selection criteria

• Amended and simplified open jaw processing for both normal and special fares

• Developed implementation plan for Premium Economy fares, amendments to

Resolution 30 2 and the Interline Baggage Rules for Canada and the Single Source

Project.

• Numerous amendments to fare construction resolutions for clarity and simplificationIATA advised that the meetings have been very well attended: September 2014 meeting was

attende d by 26 airlines and 8 system providers.

To ensure that airlines are well represented at the head table , IATA advised that Ms. Anita

Leuenberger (UA) had been invited to be the vice chairman of the working group, and that

the invitation had been accepted.

Two RADWG meetings are scheduled for 2015 as follows. Airlines were encouraged to

participate.

Date Meeting Venue

9

- 13 Mar 2015 RADWG YMQ

Sep 2015 RADWG GVA

http://www.iata.or g/whatwedo/workgroups/Pages/calendar.aspx

Final Result:

The report was noted by the meeting. The meeting acknowledged the work accomplished by

RADWG and express ed gratitude to the Chairman of the group , Ms. Cynthia Towne.

IMPLEMENTATION

- PREMIUM E CONOMY FARES

The Composite meeting in October 2013 adopted changes to Resolutions 006j, 006p, 006r,

012, 017c and 017e, while the Passenger Services Conference ( PSC ) meeting agreed to

amend Resolution 728 to support the introduction of interlineable Premi um Economy Fares.

To ensure that all impacted processes have solutions in place, and so that airlines have at

least a one year lead time before implementation, RADWG agreed to the new

implementation date of 1 October 2015 . This date has been advised to a ll Members via

memorandum PTC COMP 1755 dated 5 M ay 2014, and was also confirmed to the PSC

meeting held on 13

- 14 October 2014 in San Diego.

Final Result:

• The meeting note d the new date of implementation as advised by Memorandum PTC

COMP 1755

• Airlines agreed to discuss internally and ensure that all processes are reviewed and

are prepared for implementation

RESOLUTION 302 AND INTERLINE BAGGAGE RU LES FOR CANADA

The Spring 2014 RADWG meeting was advised by the systems and ATPCO that there will

not b e a solution in place for the proposed implementation date of 1 October 2014 for the

amendment made to Resolution 302 , to use the provisions of the marketing carrier if the

MSC sector is a code share service

.

If the airlines want to implement the change o n the intended effective date, airlines can use

the current facility in the ATPCO filing to 'default to marketing' in their filing. However this

means that all airlines will have to review and amend their filings in ATPCO, which is seen as

a tremendous lab orious process and risk confusing the market.

Additionally, airlines would need to review and refile all their filings again when ATPCO and

systems develop a reversed logic, so that the general rule would be ‘marketing’ with ability to

default to operati ng.

Considering the burden placed on the airlines and risks involved in manipulating the filings,

airlines at the meeting believed it would be better that ATPCO and systems develop

solutions then implement the change to 302. Initial discussion with ATPCO showed that theywould have a solution in place by 1st quarter 2015 and latest mid

- 2015. The meeting

endorsed IATA proposal for IATA and ATPCO work together to come up with an appropriate

implementation date.

Interline Baggage Rules for Canada

- CTA

On 1 6 April 2014, Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) issued a decision that mirrors US

DoT requirements for effective 1 October 2014. Several systems have advised that they

would not be able to comply on that date. IATA and A4A subsequently submitted a petit ion,

on 11 July requesting that either the effective date be postponed until 1 April 2015, or that a

period of non

- enforcement be established also until 1 April 2015.

On 22 August 2014, CTA issued an Order No.144

- A

- 158, amending the implementation date

to 1 April 2015 as requested.

The Fall 2014 RADWG reviewed the implementation status for the amendment to Resolution

302 and new CTA rule and agreed to implement both on 1 April 2015

.

Final Result:

• Meeting note d the new implementation date

• Airlines agree d to review their baggage provisions filings to ensure that they are in

compliant with the CTA regulation

BAGGAGE PROVISIONS I N AUTO

- REISSUE PROCESS



### A carrier pointed out at the Spring 2014 RADWG meeting that there are no provision in

Resolution 017f regarding to the baggage allowance to be applied as historical or current

based on the date of original issue (Reissue) or at the time of reassessment (Exchange).

The carrier was concerned that when there is a change in baggage allowance after ticket

is sue and passenger unable to have the original baggage allowance when they would

like to change the schedule of the 2 nd 

### coupon.

e.g. ticket issued between May and Jun would get 30kg allowance for HKG

to TPE RT, otherwise would be 20kg. Passenger issu ed a ticket on 10May

and entitled to have 30kg for roundtrip. On 10Sep, passenger request to

rebooking the TPE

- HKG flight. 30kg allowance would still provide to

passenger as long as the revised fares are applicable to the 30kg fares.

Based on Resolution 0 17f, the above is a reissue case, fares and charge would be based on

the date of original issue and applicable at the time of commencement of transportation.

System handling of baggage varied, that while treated baggage completely differently from

fares , while others used data in category 31 where available. The meeting understood that

there is no standard whether to use current or historical rule when recalculating baggage.

Airlines in the meeting endorsed that the baggage should follow the fares and u se historical

rules when recalculating. One differentiated that the current charges should apply while for

allowance use historical.

To reflect the carrier intent IATA suggested that a new paragraph be added in Resolution

302 for clarity

.

Final Result:

The m eeting adopt ed the proposed change as shown in **Attachment ‘C’**  for effect 1 April

2015.FARE SELECTION CRITE RIA

– INCLUSION OF CARRIER FEES



### In reviewing the implementation process for Resolution 017ha Fare Selection

Criteria, RADWG members express ed concern that as presented, the resolution

does not provide a transparent solution for passengers as the process does not

include carrier fees that are often a significant part of what passengers pay at the

time of ticketing . RADWG was also concerned th at the resolution would not be able

to comply with increased regulations for customer protection unless more

transparency and complete solution are provided.

RADWG developed an amendment to the resolution to include carrier fees in the

process

. Majority o f the RADWG airline members supported the inclusion of carrier

fees in the process.

The selection process as outlined in Paragraphs 2) (describes the step in identifying

the eligible carriers) and 3) (describes the steps for determining the lowest eligibl e

fares of each carrier) essentially remain the same.

Paragraph 4) has been added to describe the steps for determining the lowest

eligible fares of each carrier

, includ ing carrier fees in the process

.

IATA advised the Conference that the issue of proc essing validating carriers had been

discussed in detail at the RADWG meeting, however the issue cannot be built into the

process from resolution perspective due to regulatory and legal reasons. Airlines will need to

work with ATPCO and other solution provi ders in this regards.

A carrier questioned whether ticketing fees should be included in the process. The carrier

was advised that this had also been addressed and the agreement at RADWG was to

exclude ticketing fee but could be reviewed in the future.



### The Conference also noted that as of today, there is no solution in place to show the

selected carrier on the ticket, making it difficult for ticketing and check

- in staff to

service the tickets , or for revenue accounting staff to process them . Relevant PSC

ticketing resolutions already reflect structured fare calculation package that includ es

selected carrier element; however this has not been implemented as costly EDIFACT

upgrades are required.

Final Result:

The Conference adopted changes to Resolution 01 7ha as shown in **Attachment ‘D’** . Being

advised that systems require 12 months to develop the solution, the Conference agreed on

the effective/implementation date of 15 January 2016.



### Spring 2015 RADWG meeting will finalize the new version of implementation guide

that includes carrier fees in the process.

The Conference agreed that the amendments to Resolution 017ha as adopted at the

2013 Composite meeting and scheduled to be implemented 26 February 2015 not be

implemented as an intermediary step, and implem ent the new agreement only for 15

January 2016.

FARE SELECTION CRITE RIA

– EDITORIAL CHANGES



### Composite meeting was requested to approve editorial changes and additional

examples for clarity in Resolution 017ha.Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **At tachment**  **‘E’** for effect 1 April 2016

.

FARE SELECTION CRITE RIA WITHIN EUROPE

European airlines in RADWG Fall 2014 meeting agreed to apply the same resolution for fare

selection criteria with the rest of the world for consistency.

Contingent on agreemen ts made , RADWG proposes to rescind Resolution 017hh and

incorporate ‘Within Europe’ in Resolution 017ha. RADWG will develop additional examples

for clarity at the March 2015 RADWG meeting.

Final Result:

With abstentions from SK and FI, t he Meeting agr eed to rescind Resolution 017hh effective

15 January 2016 in line with implementation of amended Resolution 017ha

.

CARRIER SELECTION FO R FARE CONSTRUCTION CHECKS

– EDITORIAL

CORRECTION

RADWG Fall 2014 meeting identified errors in Resolution 017i C arrier Selecti on for Fare

Construction Checks and requested the Composite meeting to adopted the corrections.

Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘**  **F ’**  for effect 1 5 January 2016

APPLICATION OF ‘WHOL LY’ WITHIN IN AN ARE A FOR FARE COMPONENT

A t the Spring 2014 RADWG meeting s system expressed concern on the introduction of the

term ‘wholly’ in defining the routing ‘within an area’ in Resolution 011b, which carriers saw as

restrictions in filing their fares and the routings. Other systems agreed and expressed the

need for clarification. It was also understood that carriers have the means to control the

routings of the fares they file either via mileage or by designating the via point(s) allowed or

restricted.

So that the definition is simple ye t flexible , RADWG proposed to delete the term ‘Wholly’ in

Resolution 011b, paragraph 1)c).

Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘**  **G ’**  for effect 1 April 2015

HIP FARE PROCESSING WHEN THE FARE RULE A PPLIES FOR PRICING U NIT

Consequent to discus sions at the Fall 2013 RADWG meeting, system providers requested

guidance from the Composite meeting on how the fare selected for HIP should be processed

when the rule for such fare applies on pricing unit basis.

Straw vote at the 2013 Composite meeting r evealed that 12 carriers preferred that fare rule

filed on a pricing unit should be validated and applied on the fare component, while 10 others

preferred that Fare rule filed on a pricing unit basis to be ignored and use only the ‘amount’.

To further und erstand the requirement of the airlines, another straw vote was taken at the

RADWG meeting, and carriers were given the choice of:

1. Ignore PU restrictions

– use fare,

2. Apply PU restriction on Fare Component, or

3. Ignore fares with PU restrictions

- don’t use10 carriers advised that option 1 is the preferred choice being the clearest, while 4 preferred

option 2 and 2 for option 3.

RADWG developed a proposal that utilizes option 2 specifically addressing the stopover and

transfer issues on how to ap ply the stopover and transfer rules when a stopover or transfer

rule is expressed as applying to the pricing unit

. It was understood that the day/time and

seasonality issues are already addressed.

Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘H**  **’** for effe ct 1 April 2015

RESOLUTION 012

- TICKETED POINTS

It had been pointed out by Vietnam Airlines that while on ‘paper’ tickets it is clear that

‘ ticketed points ’ are those appear in “Good for passage” box, e

- ticket is not clear.

Fall RADWG 2014 suggest ed that the definition in Resolution 012 be amended as follows for

clarification.

Ticketed Point: Points shown in the fare calculation ‘good for passage’ section of the

passenger ticket

It was explained that whilst certain markets in North America may have airport code

depending on how the fares are filed, the points referred to is a city code in the fare

calculation column

.

Final Result :

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘ I**  **’** for effect 1 April 2015

TRAVEL BETWEEN RUSSI A IN TC3 AND RUSSIA IN TC2

To e nsure that travel between Russia in TC2 and Russia in TC3 points is deemed domestic,

RADWG proposed to add the following definition to Composite Resolution 012:

Russia: Russia in TC3 (XU) and Russia in TC2 (RU)

Final Result:

A dopted as shown in **Attac hment ‘**  **J ’**  for effect 1 April 2015

NORMAL FARE OPEN JAW

Today it is stipulated in IATA resolution 012 for Normal Fare Open Jaw, as well in IATA

resolution 017b, D1) d) that the OOJ of a DOJ must be Domestic. For Special Fares this is

less restrictive.

Within ATPCO’s CAT 10 product, carriers have the ability to restrict their fares to SOJ, DOJ,

OOJ or TOJ to combine two different fares from different rules. Even when there are IATA

principles, airlines should be able to file their data per their intent.

Most but not all GDS are processing what carriers have coded in ATPCO CAT 10 to allow

that a Normal Fare Open Jaw can include an international surface sector at the origin and

the two fare components do not have to be international.

Of the system not applying carrier coding, no two are pricing the same based on hard coded

interpretations of the IATA requirements.It was discussed that neither the airlines who want their coding applied, nor the airlines who

want systems to apply hard coded logic are g etting what they want or need, and, as such,

neither methodology can be relied upon.

To bring consistency amongst all GDS the IATA Resolutions 012 and 017b for Normal Fare

Open Jaw should be amended to be less restrictive as it is today for Special Fares.

The Fall 2013 RADWG generally agreed that the normal fare open jaw should be less

restrictive, as all the controls are available for carriers. Some concerns had been expressed

as to how the mileage control would be applied for the open jaw, and how the new open jaw

would still mirror round trip travels.

The Fall 2014 RADWG developed language to make the Normal Fare Open Jaw less

rest rictive to allow Origin Open Jaw in different countries. As the change to the normal fare

open jaw processing results in making the process the same for both normal fares and

special fares, definitions were combined for simplicity and Resolution 017b adjusted

accordingly.

RADWG noted that the proposed changes will have impact on pricing process; however,

there are controls in place if the fares are appropriately coded, for example the combination

category (cat. 10). Airlines need to review their coding to ensure that their fares are auto

priced as intended. To support this process, a taskforce is developing a template that airlines

can reference when coding their fares



### .

Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘ K**  **’** for effect 1 October 2015

EDITORIAL AMENDMENTS

RADWG noted that the proposed changes will have impact on pricing process; however,

there are controls in place if the fares are appropriately coded, for example the combination

category (cat. 10). Airlines need to review their coding to ensure that their fares are auto

priced as intended. To support this process, a taskforce is developing a template that a irlines

can reference when coding their fares.

Final Result:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘ L**  **’** for effect 1 April 2015

IMPLEMENTATION

– SINGLE SOURCE

Members were reminded that t he 2013 Tariff Composite meeting adopted changes to

Resolutions 0 24e to establish a single BSR source and simplify the conversion process.

IATA has since :

• finalized the agreement with the exchange rate provider

• developed an in

- house application to manage the file has been developed and can

provide csv, txt, xml formats

• m ade available the single source data to airlines for comparison purposes

• sent a survey to airlines and systems to help determine the following outstanding

issues:

o Exception countries

o File frequency

o The timing of the loading and effectiveness of the exchang e rates

o Distribution methods

o System limitations on decimalsFollowing outstanding issues were discussed by 2014 RADWG meetings with a plan of

action for each.

Exception currencies calculation

Unless otherwise instructed, exception country currencies wi ll be calculated through USD.

Clarification is required on whether or not the calculation of the exception should apply only

when converting to the specific currency or if the reciprocal should also apply when

converting from the specific currency.

Examp le:

USD to VEF = 11.80 and VEF to USD = 0.84745762 (1 / 11.80), or

USD to VEF = 11.80 and VEF to USD = 0.15880 (the OANDA rate which is the inverse of

VEF 6.30).

SITA believed that in accordance with Resolution 024e as is currently written, there would

n ot be a reciprocal relationship and may require an amendment apply the inversed rates.

Sirena Travel mentioned that they have encountered similar questions when dealing with

Belarus, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan currencies.

UA stated that it would be import ant to see the reciprocal for currencies such as Venezuela

(VEF), as a special exchange rate is used for airline transactions (see above example).

The general feedback from the group was that they did not have a definite opinion but would

want the final d ecision mapped and maintained.

Time of day

Additional support was given for a daily file and the discussion focused on the time of day the

rates would become effective. The group agreed that it would be the system responsibility to

release the rates bas ed on the time zone of the user. There might be some issues for

systems who do not currently have this F unctionality, especially for multiple time zones within

the same country (Russia, Guam for the US). In general, it was agreed that systems wo uld

requ ire the daily file by 05 :00 ATL time to be effective the following day starting at 00:00 for

each time zone.

Distribution method

ATPCO, IATA iiNET, and the Online Library extranet site were discussed as possible

distribution methods. ATPCO and iiNET ge nerated the most interest and ATPCO advised

that they could include the file as part of their international subscription however they would

like to have an estimate of the number of customers so that they can plan for development.

IATA will work with ATPCO and iiNET on a timeline to test file distribution.

Digits to the right of the decimal

The largest amount of digits to the right of the decimal appearing in the OANDA data is 8.

The group advised that with minor development, they should be able to handl e this amount,

provided that any changes to the standard are advised well in advance. IATA will research

and advise the largest amount of digits to the left of the decimal appearing on the file.

Historical archiving

The systems agreed that they would be responsible for archiving historical files. Feedback

from one system is that the standard is about 2 years while another stated that depending on

the country, it could be 3 to 5 years. IATA has no specific requirement to store files but will

check with I ATA Legal for clarification.

File format

The group agreed that the .csv format of the comparison test file is sufficient for their needs

and that the effective date of the rates should appear in the file. IATA will provide a

specification document once the file development is complete.Timeline

The systems advised that they would need sufficient time for testing and development before

file implementation. IATA also advised that they do not foresee any major changes to the

initial cost estimates for the final file. IATA will continue its file development and determine

the timing of a testing phase.

Action items identified at the Spring 2014 RADWG meeting were:

• Document clarifications

• Airlines and systems to respond to the survey if not already done so

• IATA to prepare another survey for additional clarifications

• Systems to advise IATA for any requirements on the data and distribution method

US DOT

Memorandum PTC COMP 1758 issued on 6 June 2014 outlined changes to Resolution 024e

at the Composite meet ing held 30

- 31 October 2013 in Dublin. US DoT had been conferred

prior to filing, and they advised that they see no issue in IATA filing the amendments.

Accordingly, IATA filed the agreement under Docket OST

- 2012

- 0058

- 0040 Tier 1

– for

information only

– o n 14 August 2014. Provided that there are no comments from US DoT,

the filing will be considered approved on 14 September 2014.

IATA Communication

Subsequent to the issuance of memo PTC COMP 1758, IATA issued a memorandum PTC

COMP 1759 on 20 June 2014 to update the industry on the status of the Project Single

Source for Exchange Rates and encouraged airlines to review currency processing and to

advise, if needed, any country

- specific requirements and update frequency.

Final Result:

• The meeting noted an updated as shown in **A ttachment ‘M**  **’**

• The meeting confirmed the implementation date of no later than 1 April 2015

• Airlines agreed to review the data provided and consult IATA if country

- specific

exceptions are required

• Airlines to work with their systems for testing

ALIGNING RESOLUTIONS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF SINGLE SOURCE FOR

EXCHANGE RATES



### In line with the introduction of the single sour ce for the rates of exchange, JL

propose d to amend resolutions in order to reflect new sources and remove reference

to ‘Bankers Selling’ Rates and simply refer to ‘rates’

.

The meeting was concerned that the verbiage as proposed may be confused with

IATA Rate of Exchange (IROE), and expressed their preference to continue to use

the generic term ‘bankers selling rate’.

F inal Result:

IATA to develop a proposal in conjunction with the development of the proposed

implementation guide for the single source for consistent message.

DECIMAL UNITS

- MALAYSIA



### The national carrier of Malaysia advises that the Royal Malaysia n Custom will

introduce Good Service Tax (GST) effective Travel 01 April 2015. This GST applied

for Malaysian Domestic point and Malaysian Airport Taxes.

In order to accommodate the tax, decimal units for Malaysian Ringgit need to be

amended.Final Res ult:

Adopted as shown in **Attachment ‘ N**  **’** for effec tive 1 April 2015. IATA will provide

government document for processing clarity (also shown in **Attachment ‘ N**  **’** )

BACKHAUL CHECK IN AR EA FARES RESOLUTIONS

The e

- Tariff session held 2

- 22 June 2014 for sub areas ‘Within Africa’, ‘Within Middle East’

and ‘Between Middle East and Africa’ adopted amendments to normal fares resolutions

applicable for the subarea to apply following exceptions:

17) HIGHER INTERMEDIATE POINT AND MILEAGE EXCEPTIONS

A) Not applica ble for backhaul check

While the intent of the amendment may have been to align with the exception in Resolution

017c, paragraph 6)a)v), where the BHC is not to be applied for pricing units ‘within Africa’, it

is the understanding of the secretary that ad ding the provision in the YY fare condition as

shown above would not have the same result as the provision in Resolution 017c.

RADWG reviewed the rule adopted and agreed with IATA assessment that the rule only

means that the BHC would not be performed usi ng YY fares. Systems also advised that this

would unlikely be processed and automated.

Final Result:

The Meeting agreed that the provision, not programmable and little impact even if developed,

should be removed from relevant resolutions.

CLOSE OF MEE TING

The Chairman thanked the delegates and IATA staff for their support, cooperation and active

p articipation in the discussion.

The Conference expressed gratitude to the Chairman for the very successful meeting.

The Composite Meetin g was closed at 163 0 hours on 14 October 2014

.ATTACHMENT **‘A’**



### 2014 Tariff Composite Meeting 14

- 15 October 2014 San Diego

Company Attendee

Air China Hailong Yue

Air China Mi Zhou

Air France Christophe Picot

All Nippon Airways Sawako Oda

American Airlines Joe Malone y

American Airlines Heather Samp

British Airways Deirdre O'Callaghan

Cathay Pacific Airways Benson Sing Ming Law

Cathay Pacific Airways Shirley Yan

China Southern Airlines Li Sun

China Southern Airlines Boyu Xu

Croatia Airlines Andrina Takac

EgyptA ir Elmoatazbella Kohiel

El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. Linda Grinfeld

Google Cynthia Towne

Hahn Air Lines Jörg Troester

Hahn Air Lines Becker Katharina

IATA David McEwen

IATA Alban Sato

IATA Daniel Kanter

IATA Cristina Rotor

Icelandair Helga Bjornsdot tir

Japan Airlines Rie Hayashi

Chairman Patricia George

Kenya Airways Agnes Kwanya

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Marianne Klinkenberg

Korean air Kyungim Kim

Lufthansa German Airlines Detlef Nadenau

Malaysia Airlines Mokhtar Mohammad

Philippine Airlines Florida Vinas

Philippine Airlines Dina May Flores

Qantas Airways Leonie Privett

Scandinavian Airlines Kurt Saetre

Swiss International Air Lines Sebastien Nicolas

TAROM

– Romanian Air Transport Ramona TUTUNEA

Thai Airways International Kanthiphop Ch antarapattamanon

Thai Airways International Nantavan Suvongse

Turkish Airlines Nesrin Cendere

Turkish Airlines Muhammed Cihad A lkiş

United Airlines Anita Leuenberger

Vietnam Airlines Uyen Vu Thi

Virgin Australia Simon Pitt

Xiamen Airlines Shengmin Chu

Xiamen Airlines Ying ZhangATTACHMENT ‘ B ’

Page 1 of 1



### Tariff Coordination Passenger Steering Group (TCPSG)

The Passenger Steering Group (TCPSG) is a group of Representatives elected to assist and

advise IATA concerning matters related to Tariff Coordination. It is comprised of individual

rather than carriers who have been nominated by any TC Member airline and elected by

Me mber airlines based in the Traffic Conference they will represent.

TCPSG meeting frequency

PSG meets at least once every year, including conference calls.

Membership

• The Steering Group, in addition to the IATA Secretariat, shall be comprised of up to 12

members who shall be individuals elected to represent the conferences with the

following geographical distribution:

• TC1 based

- 2 members (1 from the USA and 1 from the rest of TC1)

• TC2 based

- 4 members (2 from Europe and 1 each from the Middle East and Africa)

• TC3 based

- 2 members

• Chairmen from other TC committees and working groups

• The TCPSG shall elect its own Chairman and Vice

- Chairman from the above

- mentioned

members. The term of office shall be 2 years.

Terms of Reference

• to assist the Secreta riat in the development of future plans and activities

• to represent the Conference needs of all Member carriers

• to liaise with other IATA Conferences either directly with the appropriate IATA

Secretariat, or through their own Steering Groups

• to review p olicy matters arising from Conferences and suggest approaches for handling

such policy matters

• to review the activities of Conference working groups and the recommendations made

by such working groups prior to submission to the Conferences

• to involve par ticipation of industry experts in the areas of automation, tariff publication,

data processing, etc., as required

The Secretary shall be the Manager Tariffs & Reservation Standards ( satoa@iata.org ).ATTACHMENT ‘ C ’

P age 1 of 1



### Resolution 302 BAGGAGE PROVISIONS SELECTION CRITERIA

.....

5) Voluntary Changes to Itineraries

Baggage provisions effective on the date that is used for the recalculation of the fare

will be appliedATTACHMENT ‘D ’

Page 1 of 1

Resolution 017ha Fare Selection Criteria

1) for the purposes of fare selection, the fares to be used will be those applicable to the

carrier(s) selected. These may be

a) carrier specific fares, or

b) if all fares of the selected carrier(s) cannot be used, the YY fare (subject to the selected

carrier’s acceptance of the use of YY fares), or

c) if a partial structure has been filed as carrier specific fares then the remainder of the

structure will be established using YY fares unless the carrier has advised th at such YY

fares will not apply

Examples

1. The carrier only has fare records for carrier specific Normal Fares

- the special fares

structure for that carrier will be the YY fares

2. The carrier has only a single fare record for a carrier specific PEX fare

– the Normal fares

and the rest of the special fares for that carrier will be the YY structure

3. The carrier has no fare records for carrier specific fares

– the YY structure will apply for

that carrier

2) the fares to be selected for compa rison, in the direction of the fare selection in accordance

with Resolution 017a, will be

a) the fares of the carrier which provides

i. the carriage on the first sector which crosses from one area to another, if none

ii. the carriage on the first s ector which crosses from one sub

- area to another, if none

iii. the carriage on the first international sector,

and

b) the fares of the carrier which provides carriage on the longest of the following, as

measured by TPM(s)

i. international sector , or

ii. consecutive international sectors, or

iii. combination of consecutive international and domestic sectors

3) The resultant fares shall be as per Resolution 017a 1) a) when calculated and subsequently

compared

4) The pricing solution to be offered shall be the lowest of the resultant fares and

additional fees towards end result

........ATTACHMENT ‘E’

Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION 017HA FAR E SELECTION CRITERIA

EXAMPLES OF FARE COMPONENTS CROSSING AREAS:

..... 4. Journey: BKK

- XX

- AMS

- Z Z

- LAX

- ZZ

- HNL

- ZZ

- NYC

- BB

- PAR

- BB

- BKK

---------------------------------- > <

---------------------------------

.....

GENERAL

..... 4) S urface S ectors

a) If the surface sector matches 2) a) criteria, YY fares will be selected

i) Area Crossing:

Example Journey : TYO ZZ CMB surface DXB UU AMS

--------------------------------------------- > Fare Component: TYO

- AMS

CMB

- DXB surface sector is the sector crossing areas. Consequently, the fares to

be selected for comparison will be YY fares (as result of 2)a)i) above) and those of

carrier ZZ TYO

- CMB (as result of 2)b)i) above)

ii) Sub Area Crossing:

Example Journey : MBJ UU AUA surface CCS LL SCL

------------------------ -------------------- > Fare Component: MBJ

- SCL

AUA

- CCS surface sector is the sector crossing sub

- areas. Consequently, the fares

to be selected for comparison will be YY fares (as result of 2)a)ii) above) and those

of carrier LL CCS

- SCL(as result of 2)b)i) above)

iii) First International:

Example Journey: DUR ZZ JNB surface DAR DD NBO

------------------------------------------ > Fare Component: DUR

- NBO

JNB

- DAR sector is the first international sector. Consequently, the f ares to be

selected for comparison will be YY fares (as result of 2)a)iii) above) and those of

carrier DD DAR

- NBO(as result of 2)b)i) above). Carrier ZZ’s fares are not

considered as the sector DUR

- JNB is domestic.

b) surface sector mileage according to 2)b) criteria

i) Calculation of consecutive TPMs

for the purpose of determining the carrier performing the greatest portion of carriage,

surface sectors will not be considered for the calculation of consecutive TPMs

Example Journey : SEL

- ZZ

- TYO surface OSA

- ZZ

- HKG

- BB

- SIN

--------------------------------------------------------- >

Fare Component: SEL

- SIN

TYO

- OSA surface sector is not considered for the calculation of TPM, therefore the comparison would be:

SEL

- TYO (carrier ZZ) 758

OSA

- HKG (carrier ZZ) 1548

HKG

- SIN (carrier BB) 1594ATTACHMENT ‘E’

Page 2 of 2

The fares to be selected for comparison will be those of ZZ OSA

- HKG (as result of 2)a)ii) and BB HKG

- SIN (as result of 2)b)i)

ii. Longes t Single International Sector

for the purpose of determining the carrier performing the greatest portion of carriage, if the longest single international sector is a surface sector, such sector is not

considered

Example Journey : BUE

- DD

- RIO sur face BOG

– CC

- CCS

----------------------------------------------- >

Fare Component : BUE

- CCS

BUE

- RIO (carrier DD) 1232

RIO

- BOG 2827

BOG

- CCS (carrier CC) 638

Even though RIO

- BOG is the longest sector in TPM, it is not cons idered.

The fares to be selected will be DD BUE

- RIO (as result of both (2)a)iii) and 2)b)i))

5) Side

- Trip

Example Journey : URC XX BJS ( XX TYO YY BJS ) YY SYD ZZ NAN

---------------- (Side trip excluded)

-------------- ------ > Fare component: URC

- NAN

t he fares to be selected for comparison will be those of:

carrier XX YY BJS

- SYD (as result of both 2)a) i i ) and 2)b)i) above)

For the purpose of determining fare selection for through URC

- NAN fare:

- Carrier XX BJS

- TYO shall not be considered as first sub

- area crossing carrier

- TYO

- BJS TPM may not be combined for consecutive TPM calculatio n

6) for the purpose of this Resolution

a) travel between Canada and USA is not considered as international travel

Example Journey : Y UL ZZ NYC UU MEX

----------------------------- >

Fare Component : YUL

- MEX

The fares to be selected for comparison will be those of carrier UU NYC

- MEX (as a

result of both (2) a) iii and 2) b) i))

first international sector is NYC

- MEX

b) travel between Denmark, Norway and Sweden is considered as international

travel

Example Journey : SVG BB STO BB CPH surface ATH CC BEY

---------------------------------------------- ----------- >

Fare component SVG

- BEY

first international sector is SVG

- STO

The fares to be selected for comparison will be those of carrier CC ATH

- BEY ((as a

result of (2) a)ii) and carrier BB SVG

- STO

- CPH (as a result of (2) b)ii)).ATTACHMENT ‘F’

Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION 017I CARR IER SELECTION FOR FA RE CONSTRUCTION CHEC KS

2) Circle Trip Minimum Check (CTM)

........ Journey 2

– Three component Circle Trip STO

- KK

- ATH

- LL

- CAI

- MM

- NBO

- MM

- DEL

- OO

- X/ZRH

- OO

- MAD

- PP

X/HAM

- KK

- STO

The fares are half RT STO

- NBO ( lowest o f LL /MM ) plus half RT NBO

- DEL (MM) plus half RT DEL

- STO (OO); all

carriers selected in accordance with Resolutions 017ha

For the CTM check the following will be the selected carriers:

From To Carrier(s) Basis

STO ATH (outbound) KK Single Carrier

STO ATH (inbound) OO /MM Carrier crossing between

areas/longest TPM

STO CAI (outbound) LL/KK Carrier crossing between

subareas/longest TPM

STO CAI (inbound) OO /MM Carrier crossing between

areas/longest TPM

STO NBO (outbound) LL/MM First subarea crossing/longest TPM

STO NBO (inbound) OO Carrier crossing between

areas/longest TPM

STO DEL (outbound) MM Carrier crossing between

areas/longest TPM

STO DEL (inbound) OO Carrier crossing between

areas/longest TPM

STO MAD (outbou nd) MM First area crossing/longest TPM

STO MAD (inbound) KK/PP First international/longest TPMATTACHMENT ‘G ’

Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION 011b GLOBAL INDICATORS

.....



### c) fares may only be used for the Global Indicator for which they are

establish ed. The itinerary within a fare component will attract a Global

Indicator as follows

Fare Component GI Routing Restriction

Wholly Within TC1 WH

Wholly Within TC2 EH

Wholly Within TC3 EH

Between TC1 and TC2 via the Atlantic AT

.....ATTA CHMENT ‘ H ’

Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION 017C

- C ONSTRUCTION RULES FOR FARE COMPONENTS

------ 

### 5) HIGHER INTERMEDIATE POINT (HIP) CHECK

a) Normal Fares

xii) Stopovers and transfers application: When a stopover or transfer rule of the

fare to be used for th e HIP check is expressed as applying to the pricing unit, the

stopover or transfer restriction shall be applied solely to the sector(s) for which the

check is being made.

Example

Routing: BKK

- FRA

- GVA

- PAR

- NYC

- BOS

- AMS

- FRA

- BKK

Fare component 1: BKK

- NYC

H IP check is required BKK

- FRA, BKK

- GVA, BKK

- PAR, FRA

- GVA, FRA

PAR, FRA

- NYC, GVA

- PAR, GVA

- NYC, PAR

- NYC.

This example illustrates the FRA

- NYC HIP check.

Fares (1/2 RT in NUCs)

BKK

- NYC Y 2000.00

FRA

- NYC Y 2400.00

FRA

- NYC Y2 2100.00

Stopover restrictions on the Y2 fare:

A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted on the pricing unit

A minimum of 2 stopovers are required on the pricing unit

1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound

1 stopover is required in LON on the inbound

2 stopovers are permitted an ywhere on the pricing unit

The stopover restrictions for the Y2 fare are applied solely to the FRA

- GVA

PAR

- NYC outbound sectors.

• A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted: Only 2 stopovers occur (GVA, PAR)

• A minimum of 2 stopovers are required: 2 stopovers occur (GVA,

PAR)

• 1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound: 1 occurs in PAR

• 2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit: 1 occurs in

GVA

The Y2 fare can be used for the HIP.ATTACHMENT ‘H ’

Page 2 of 2

RESOLUTION 017C

- C ONSTRUCTION RULES FOR FARE COMPONENTS

------ 5) HIGHER INTERMEDIATE POINT (HIP) CHECK

a) Normal Fares

xii) Stopovers and transfers application: When a stopover or transfer rule of the

fare to be used for the HIP check is expressed as applying to the pricing uni t, the

stopover or transfer restriction shall be applied solely to the sector(s) for which the

check is being made.

Example

Routing: BKK

- FRA

- GVA

- PAR

- NYC

- BOS

- AMS

- FRA

- BKK

Fare component 1: BKK

- NYC

HIP check is required BKK

- FRA, BKK

- GVA, BKK

- PAR, FRA

- GVA

, FRA

PAR, FRA

- NYC, GVA

- PAR, GVA

- NYC, PAR

- NYC.

This example illustrates the FRA

- NYC HIP check.

Fares (1/2 RT in NUCs)

BKK

- NYC Y 2000.00

FRA

- NYC Y 2400.00

FRA

- NYC Y2 2100.00

Stopover restrictions on the Y2 fare:

A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted on the pricing unit

A minimum of 2 stopovers are required on the pricing unit

1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound

1 stopover is required in LON on the inbound

2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit

The stopover restrictions f or the Y2 fare are applied solely to the FRA

- GVA

PAR

- NYC outbound sectors.

• A maximum of 4 stopovers are permitted: Only 2 stopovers occur (GVA, PAR)

• A minimum of 2 stopovers are required: 2 stopovers occur (GVA,

PAR)

• 1 stopover is required in PAR on the outbound: 1 occurs in PAR

• 2 stopovers are permitted anywhere on the pricing unit: 1 occurs in

GVA

The Y2 fare can be used for the HIP.ATTACHMENT ‘I’

Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION 012

– GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Ticketed Point: Points shown in the fare calculat ion ‘good for pas sage’ section of the

passenger ticketATTACHMENT ‘J ’

Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION 012

– GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Russia : Russia in TC3 (XU) and Russia in TC2 (RU)ATTACHMENT ‘K ’

Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION 012

– GLOSSARY OF TERMS

No rmal Fare Open Jaw travel from one country and return thereto, comprising two international

fare components. only and where

a) origin open jaw : the outward point of departure in the country of unit

origin and the inward point of arrival in the country of u nit origin are

different

OR

b) turnaround open jaw : the outward point of arrival and the inward

point of departure are different

OR

c) double open jaw : the outward point of departure in the country of

unit origin and the inward point of arrival in the coun try of unit origin

are different (origin jaw)

AND

the outward point of arrival and the inward point of departure are

different (turnaround open jaw)

Open Jaw

- (Special Fares) travel comprising only two international fare components with a surface

break (s) which, unless otherwise specified in a special fares resolution,

may be between any two points/countries in the area(s) of unit origin

and/or turnaround for which the special fare resolution applies and for

which the fare is assessed as a single pricin g unit using half round trip

fares. In this context

a) for 'turnaround open jaw' the outward point of arrival and the inward

point of departure are different, or

b) for 'origin open jaw' the outward point of departure and the inward

point of arrival are di fferent, or

c) for 'single open jaw' either a) or b) applies, or

d) for 'open jaw' any combination of the above may apply

Open Jaw T ravel comprising two international fare components and assessed as a

single pricing unit consisting of half round trip far es. Such fares may be

subject to more restrictive open jaw provisions if so published within the

applicable fares resolution. In this context

a) o rigin open jaw : the outward point of departure and the inward point

of arrival are different

OR

b) turnaround ope n jaw : the outward point of arrival and the inward

point of departure are different

OR

c) d ouble open jaw : the outward point of departure and the inward

point of arrival are different (origin open jaw)

AND

the outward point of arrival and the inward point of departure are

different (turnaround open jaw)ATTACHMENT ‘K ’

Page 2 of 2

Resolution 017b

------

SECTION D

- OPEN JAW FARES

1) Normal Fare Open Jaw

a) General

The following conditions apply to the assessment of a normal fare open jaw:

i) t he fare for a normal fare open jaw pricing unit shall be the sum of half the applicable round trip fares for

both international legs of the open jaw ; assessed from the country of unit origin provided that when a fare

component terminates in the country of unit origin, the fare applicable from the country of unit origin shall

be used

ii) Canada, USA shall be considered as one country

iii) except for pricing units wholly within Scandinavia, Scandinavia shall be considered as one country

iv) Aruba, Bonair e, Sint Eustatius, Saba, Curacao, St. Maarten shall be considered as one country

v) except for pricing units wholly within Europe, Europe shall be considered as one country

b) Origin Open Jaw

i) only domestic surface sectors are permitted

i) both domes tic and international surface breaks are permitted

ii) when the surface sector is an international sector the distance of such surface sector must not be greater

than the flown distance of the shorter of the two fare components (measurement of the surface sector shall

be in accordance with Resolution 017c, Paragraph 4) c)

c) Turnaround Open Jaw

i) both domestic and international surface breaks are permitted

ii) when the surface sector is an international sector the distance of such surface sector must not be greater

than the flown distance of the shorter of the two fare components (measurement of the surface sector shall

be in accordance with Resolution 017c, Paragraph 4) c)

b) Origin or Turnaround Open Jaw

i) either domestic or international surface bre ak is permitted

ii) when the surface sector is an international sector the distance of such surface sector must not be greater

than the flown distance of the shorter of the two fare components (measurement of the surface sector shall

be in accordance with Resolution 017c, Paragraph 4) c)

d c ) Double Open Jaw

i) Combination of an Origin Open Jaw and a Turnaround Open Jaw with a Domestic Surface Sector See

paragraph b) and c) above for application of each portion of the open jaw

ii)Combination of an Origin Open Jaw and a Turnaround Open Jaw with an International Surface Sector

i) both domestic and/or international surface breaks are permitted

ii) when the surface sector is an international sector the distance of such surface sector must not be greater

than the flown distance of the shorter of the two fare components (measurement of the surface sector shall

be in accordance with Resolution 017c, Paragraph 4) c)

2) Special Fare Open Jaw

Except as otherwise specified in a fare Resolution, the fare for an open jaw shall be the sum of half the

applicable round trip fares for both international legs of the open jaw; provided that when a fare component

terminates in the country of unit origin, the fare applicable from the country of unit origin shall be used

Excep tion: for travel originating and terminating in Europe (except for travel wholly within Europe):

where an open jaw applies between countries in Europe, the fare component which terminates in Europe shall

be assessed in the direction from EuropeATTACHMENT ‘L ’

Page 1 of 3

1. Resolution 017ha Fare Selection Criteria

- Paragraph 4)c)

Resolution 302 Baggage Provisions Selection Criteria

– Paragraph 4

Caribbean

Anguilla Guadeloupe

Antigua and Barbuda (including St.Barthelemy

Aruba and Northern St.M artin)

Bahamas Haiti

Barbados Jamaica

Bermuda Martinique

Bonaire, Saba, Sint Eustatius Montserrat

British Virgin Islands St.Barthelemy

Cayman Islands St.Kitts and Nevis

Cuba St. Maarten

Curacao Saint Lucia

Dominica St. Martin

Domi nican Republic St.Vincent and the Grenadines

Grenada Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Guyana Trinidad and Tobago

French Guiana Turks and Caicos Islands

Suriname

2. Resolution 024f Administrative Provisions for the Review and Monitoring of Currency

Values

– Paragraph 2)b)i)

b) as a result of this notification, local currency fares and charges may be revised by

i) Local Panels in accordance with the provisions of Section E Paragraphs 2) or 3) of

Resolution 024e

i i ) means of an exchange of cables between the TC Members’ head offices

ii i ) requesting the Secretary to convene a Conference for the area(s) concerned

3. Resolution 038 Taxes, Fees and Charges

– Paragraph 1)

1) fare levels contained in Resolutions are considered responsive to market r equirements

and exclusive of government and/or regulatory and/or airport authority imposed taxes,

fees or charges based on passenger countATTACHMENT ‘L ’

Page 2 of 3

4. Resolution 100 Standard Condition Resolution for Special Fares

5) RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING

Paragraph B)

B) Inclusive Tour Fares

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours)

15) SALES RESTRICTIONS

A) 1) Advertising and Sales

no restrictions

2) Extension of Validity

as provided in governin g Resolution

B) 1) a) ‘sales’ shall include the issuance of tickets, miscellaneous charges orders

(MCOs), multiple purpose documents (MPDs), electronic miscellaneous documents

(EMDs) and prepaid ticket advices (PTAs)

16) PENALTIES

.... B) 1) Cancellati on, No

- Show, Upgrading

a) governing Resolutions

Passenger Services Conference Resolutions 735c (Rerouting and Refund in Case of

Death) and 737 (Refunds)

b) Inclusive Tour Fares

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours)

18) TICKET ENDORSEMENTS

A) APEX/Super APEX/PEX/Super PEX

1) tickets may must show by insert or sticker in accordance with the Important

Notice in accordance with Passenger Services Conference Resolution 728 that

travel is at a special fare a nd subject to special conditions

26) GROUPS

B) 1) Minimum Group Size

governing Resolution

Composite Resolution 026 (Counting of Group Fare Passengers)

2) Accompanied Travel

for groups of 20 or more passengers, if lack of space prevents the group fro m

travelling together, some members of the group may travel on the next preceding

and/or succeeding flight with available space

3) Affinity, Incentive Fares

governing Resolutions

Composite Resolutions 076xx (Affinity and Incentive Provisions) and 076z (Form of

Application for Affinity Group Fares)ATTACHMENT ‘L ’

Page 3 of 3

27) TOURS

B) governing Resolutions

Composite Resolution 047a (Provisions for Inclusive Tours) and Passenger Agency

Conference Resolution 870 (Inclusive Tours (except USA))

5. Re solution 101 Standard Condition Resolution for Normal Fares

–

15) SALES RESTRICTIONS

A) 1) Advertising and Sales

no restrictions

2) Extension of Validity

as provided in governing Resolution

B) 1) a) ‘sales’ shall include the issuance of tickets, miscellaneous charges orders

(MCOs), multiple purpose documents (MPDs), electronic miscellaneous documents

(EMDs) and prepaid ticket advices (PTAs)

6. Resolution 012 Glossary of Terms

Date of Transaction the date of issuance of the ticket, EMD, MCO or

PTA

Traffic Document ticket, EMD, MCO or any other accountable

passenger traffic documentATTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 1 of 6ATTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 2 of 6ATTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 3 of 6ATTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 4 of 6ATTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 5 of 6A TTACHMENT ‘M ’

Page 5 of 6Attachment ‘N ’

Page 1 of 2

Rounding Units

Country Name Currency Code

Alpha Num Currency Name Accept

ability Local

Currency

Fares and

Related

Charges Other

Charges Decimal

Units Notes

Malaysia MYR 45 8 Malaysian Ringgit 1 1 0 2 15



### Notes

15 The Malaysian GST shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of MYR 0.05Attachment ‘N ’

Page 2 of 2SUMMARY OF AGREEMENT

The Composite meeting met in San Diego

, USA, 14 October 201 4 . The ch anges are briefly

described below.

For Intended Effect 1 April 2015 :

• added a provision in Resolution 302 for clarity in cases of reissue

• made editorial correction to 017 i Carrier Selection for Fare Construction Checks

• Resolution 011b Global Indicators ame nded for clarity

• Resolution 017c amended to outline HIP fare processing when the fare rule applies

for pricing unit

• Resolution 012 Glossary of Terms amended as follows;

o ‘Ticketed Point’ updated to align with e

- ticket

o ‘Russia’ defined to clarify that travel between Russia in TC2 and TC3 is

deemed domestic

• Numerous editorial amendments made, removing references to resolutions that no

longer exist

• Decimal unit for Malaysia Ringgit amended to accommodate GST

For Intended Effect 1 October 2015 :

• Normal Fare Open Jaw liberalized and simplified

For Intended Effect 15 January 2016 :

• Amended Resolution 017ha Fare Selection Criteria to include carrier fee s in the

process for transparency , including editorial changes.

• Rescinded Resolution 017hh Fare Sel ection Criteria for Europe and incorporated the

area into Resolution017ha for global application