alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICK DRUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5360 RBL/KLS

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PERMIT REFERENCE

TO EARLIER MOTION

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Presently before the

Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Permit Reference to Earlier Motion in Amended Complaint. (Dkt.

#39). Plaintiff seeks to incorporate by reference, the declaration and questionnaires attached to his

motion for appointment of counsel. (See Dkt. # 1, Attach. 3). Plaintiff states that he sent all of his

copies of these documents to the Court (in accordance with Local Rule CR 103), but never received

the additional copy back from the Clerk for his records. Defendants, who were not parties to the

action at the time Plaintiff filed his initial in forma pauperis application and motion for appointment

of counsel, object to the incorporation of these documents as they were never served with copies. 

Ordinarily, whenever a pleading or other document is filed in paper form for the Clerk’s

office to scan and upload to CM/ECF, the filer must serve conventional copies on all parties to the

case. This means that the Plaintiff is responsible for serving Defendants with copies of all pleadings

and motions and that to properly make the documents at issue a part of his Amended Complaint,

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 46 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

copies should have been attached and served on the Defendants. However, the Court recognizes

that Plaintiff’s exhibits were not returned to him through an inadvertent oversight. In addition,

Plaintiff has clearly identified the documents at issue so that there can be no confusion and

Defendants have access to the documents through CM/ECF. In this instance, therefore, the Court

finds that the Plaintiff may be permitted to reference the earlier documents without first having

served them on Defendants. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. # 39) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for

reconsideration (Dkt. # 43) is DENIED as moot.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 4th day of January, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 46 Filed 01/08/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 183 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 183

  Congratulating Northeastern University on providing quality higher 
  education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for 100 years, from 
                               1898-1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1998

    Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Kerry) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Northeastern University on providing quality higher 
  education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for 100 years, from 
                               1898-1998.

Whereas on October 16, 1997, Northeastern University marked the beginning of its 
        centennial celebration;
Whereas Northeastern University began providing higher education in conjunction 
        with the Boston Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) in 1898;
Whereas Northeastern University currently enrolls over 27,000 full time students 
        and boasts an alumni in excess of 137,000 individuals;
Whereas Northeastern University has attained a national reputation for 
        cooperative education that prepares students to transition successfully 
        into the workplace;
Whereas Northeastern University provides access to higher education for students 
        from all backgrounds;
Whereas Northeastern University has achieved growing recognition as a major 
        research institution; and
Whereas the Senate supports Northeastern University's efforts to offer 
        exceptional educational opportunities to individuals from throughout the 
        world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes and congratulates Northeastern University as 
        an outstanding educational institution that has produced 
        exceptional alumni during the past 100 years and gives every 
        indication of doing so for the next 100 years; and
            (2) wishes Northeastern University a successful and 
        memorable centennial celebration.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

October 3, 1967

No. P67/333.

#### Castelazo & Associates and Famous Jobbing Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/5 (Los Angeles).

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of gunracks with drawers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hurricane Import Co.*and *Wheeler & Miller v. United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 210, C.D. 2577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 8,870.

#### McLARNS’ CASE.

[Cited m U. S. v. Holly, Case No. 15,381. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB filed by Cancer Therapeutics,  Inc. (the
"Company")as  filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Chene Gardner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Date as of August 29, 2006
                                      By       /s/ Chene Gardner
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Chene Gardner
                                        Chief Financial Officer
(PROPOSED) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 1 LAW OFFFICES OF JOHN HENRY BROWNE PS

821 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2100 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 

(206) 388-0777 • FAX: (206) 388-0780 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 V. 

VAN BENNUM, 

 Defendants. 

No. CR06-189TSZ 

 ORDER 

 CONTINUING TRIAL 

 THIS MATTER HAVING COME on/or before the undersigned Judge, upon the 

application of the defendant VAN BENNUM for an order continuing trial, and the Court 

having considered the records and files herein. 

 THE COURT HAVING FOUND that counsel for Mr. Bennum and the 

Government agree that a continuance of the trial date is necessary, that defense counsel 

requires additional time to investigate the confidential informant in this case, that 

additional time is required by counsel for Mr. Bennum and the Government to meet and 

discuss a resolution of this case, that respective counsel are already entertaining plea 

negotiations, and that continuing the trial date on the ground that the "ends of justice 

served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in 

a speedy trial," as permitted by 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A) (B)(ii) and (B)(iv); 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial in this matter is continued from 

February 12, 2007 to April 23, 2007 and that the pretrial motions deadline is extended 

until March 16, 2007. 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00189-TSZ Document 56 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
 

(PROPOSED) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 2 LAW OFFFICES OF JOHN HENRY BROWNE PS

821 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2100 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 

(206) 388-0777 • FAX: (206) 388-0780 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of 

February 12, 2007 to April 23, 2007 is excluded in calculating the time within which trial 

must begin under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). 

 

DATED this 19th day of January, 2007. 

 s/ Thomas S. Zilly 

 _______________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 Presented by: 

Van Bennum, represented by: 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN HENRY BROWNE 

s/ Jessica Riley 

WSBA # 32705 

2100 Exchange Building 

Seattle, Washington 98104 

Phone: 206-388-0777 

Fax: 206- 88-0780 

email: jriley@jhblawyer.com

JILL OTAKE 

s/Jill Otake (telephonic approval)

Assistant United States Attorney 

United States Attorney’s Office 

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 

Seattle, WA 98101-1271 

jill.otake@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00189-TSZ Document 56 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05344-RBL Document 23 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05344-RBL Document 23 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-02399-JCC Document 12 Filed 12/17/03 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02399-JCC Document 12 Filed 12/17/03 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-02399-JCC Document 12 Filed 12/17/03 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1997
<CASH>                                       7,915,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,394,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,451,889
<INVENTORY>                                 32,776,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,086,173
<PP&E>                                      14,445,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,111,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,214,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,355
<OTHER-SE>                                  96,537,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,111,060
<SALES>                                     44,202,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,202,974
<CGS>                                       26,793,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,793,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,719,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               148,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,797,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,622,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,883,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,883,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2015* |
|-----------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Notice of Fiscal Year 2023 Health Center Program COVID-19 HHS 
Bridge Access Program Funding Awards

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department 
of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of funding awards.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In support of the HHS Bridge Access Program for COVID-19 
Vaccines and Treatments, HRSA provided more than $81 million in one-
time funding to all current Health Center Program operational (H80) 
award recipients and to health center look-alikes that previously 
received American Rescue Plan funding (L2C awards).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olivia Shockey, Expansion Division 
Director, HRSA, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6579626569616f734a6278796b246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="157a667d7a767e706c557d6766743b727a63">[email protected]</span></a> and (301) 594-4300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Intended Recipient of the Award: The total amount of funding, 
number of awards, and award recipients can be found here: https://bphc.hrsa.gov/funding/coronavirus-related-funding/covid-19-bridge-funding/fy-2023-awards.
    Project Period: September 1, 2023--December 31, 2024.
    CFDA Number: 93.527.
    Authority: Section 2401 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, 
Public Law 117-2.
    Justification: The end of the declared COVID-19 Public Health 
Emergency and associated transition to commercial access to vaccines 
and therapeutics impacts the capacity of health centers to maintain 
essential COVID-19 related services for their patients, including but 
not limited to health center patients who lack health insurance. Health 
centers will use one-time Bridge funding to support uninsured and 
underinsured patients and residents of their communities with needs 
such as COVID-19 vaccination and therapeutics, enabling/patient support 
services (such as outreach, education, enrollment assistance, 
transportation, translation, and care coordination) to support COVID-19 
related services; community COVID-19 vaccination events; and, supplies 
and personnel who support COVID-19 related services and care delivery, 
including personnel costs necessary to develop, support, or expand 
collaborations, including collaborations with state/jurisdiction 
immunization programs. Recipients will submit data on program 
activities through the HRSA Health Center COVID-19 survey as required, 
as well as periodic progress reports.

Carole Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-22751 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Indo Global Exchange(s) Pte, Ltd.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John O'Shea, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By: /s/ John O'Shea


Name: John O'Shea


Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)





Dated: February 12, 2015
#### THIET VAN PHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel BRAXTON, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

Nos. 04-7665, 05-6187.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 15, 2005.

Decided Aug. 8, 2005.

Thiet Van Phan, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Thiet Van Phan seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) and denying Phan’s motion for reconsideration. These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Phan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
From: toleary19@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:13:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine O'Leary

Stevensville, MI 49127
No. 51793.

#### Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 731654-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Catherine DAmicoCatherine DAmicoExecutive Vice President  Finance and
Chief Financial Officer 23
Exhibit 99.02



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               IN COMPLIANCE WITH
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Alan L. Parker, Controller of Crown Energy Corporation, hereby
certify that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Crown Energy Corporation fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
accompanying Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Crown Energy Corporation.


                                            /s/    Alan Parker
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:    Alan Parker
                                            Title: Controller of
                                            Crown Energy Corporation
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

AL NERIO et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5340RJB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO CONDUCT NON

STENOGRAPHIC DEPOSITIONS

AND GRANTING LEAVE TO

CONDUCT DEPOSITIONS ON

WRITTEN QUESTION

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and

MJR 4. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion asking for leave to conduct non-stenographic depositions. 

The motion is DENIED. 

Plaintiff has leave of court to serve written deposition questions on defendants counsel. Answers

or objections will be due thirty days after service is accomplished. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this document to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 16th day of November, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 35 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 1