alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 56

Designating March 25, 1997 as ‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day

of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. SANTORUM, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

GRASSLEY, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. ROTH, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

COCHRAN, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. GREGG, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. JEFFORDS,

Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. KOHL, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

BIDEN, Mr. ROBB, Mr. REID, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. KERRY, Ms.

MIKULSKI, Mr. REED, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr.

WYDEN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BYRD, Mr. SARBANES,

Mr. DODD, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. HELMS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. INHOFE, Mr.

MURKOWSKI, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. MACK, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mr.

COATS) submitted the following resolution, which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

MARCH 6, 1997

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

MARCH 14, 1997

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating March 25, 1997 as ‘‘Greek Independence Day:

A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American

Democracy’’.
2

SRES 56 ATS

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the supreme power to govern was invested

in the people;

Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States of America drew heavily upon the political experience and philosophy of ancient Greece in forming our representative democracy;

Whereas the founders of the modern Greek state modeled

their government after that of the United States in an

effort to best imitate their ancient democracy;

Whereas Greece is one of the only three nations in the world,

beyond the former British Empire, that has been allied

with the United States in every major international conflict this century;

Whereas the heroism displayed in the historic World War II

Battle of Crete epitomized Greece’s sacrifice for freedom

and democracy as it presented the Axis land war with its

first major setback and set off a chain of events which

significantly affected the outcome of World War II.

Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond between our two nations and their peoples;

Whereas March 25, 1997 marks the 176th anniversary of the

beginning of the revolution which freed the Greek people

from the Ottoman Empire; and

Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate with the

Greek people, and to reaffirm the democratic principles

from which our two great nations were born: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That March 25, 1997 is designated as

2 ‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration
3

SRES 56 ATS

1 of Greek and American Democracy.’’ The President is re2 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

3 of the United States to observe the day with appropriate

4 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

LEON POWELL, a.k.a. 

RASHID ALI, 

 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ No. 48, 2020 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 82007195DI (N) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 

 Submitted: March 17, 2020 

 Decided: March 19, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, 

Justices. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the parties’ responses, it 

appears to the Court that: 

(1) On February 7, 2020, the appellant, Leon Powell, a.k.a. Rashid Ali, 

filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order, dated January 13, 2020, denying 

his motion for transcripts. The Clerk issued a notice directing Powell to show cause 

why this appeal should not be dismissed based upon this Court’s lack of jurisdiction 

to hear an interlocutory appeal in a criminal matter. In his response to the notice to 

show cause, Powell asserts that he has a right to review the penalty phase of his trial. 
2

(2) In this case, the Court asked the State to clarify the nature of the 

proceedings currently pending before the Superior Court in Powell’s case. The State 

has responded and notes that Powell’s request for transcripts appears to have been 

made because Powell was contemplating filing a Rule 35(a) motion for correction 

of an illegal sentence. Although a Rule 35(a) motion is not currently pending before 

the Superior Court, the docket reflects that Powell has filed a motion to dismiss and 

a motion for postconviction relief in the Superior Court, both of which remain 

pending. 

(3) Under the Delaware Constitution only a final judgment may be 

reviewed by the Court in a criminal case.1 “An order constitutes a final judgment 

where it leaves nothing for future determination or consideration.”2 The Superior 

Court’s January 13, 2020 order denying Powell’s motion for transcripts is an 

interlocutory order.3 To the extent that Powell seeks transcripts in connection with 

his pending motion for postconviction relief, his pending motion to dismiss, or a 

future filing of a Rule 35(a) motion, if Powell is unsuccessful on the merits of any 

such motion, he may then appeal to this Court for a review of that final judgment as 

well as any interlocutory ruling relating to the denial of a request for transcript at 

 

1

 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). 

2 Robinson v. State, 704 A.2d 269, 271 (Del. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

3 Hall v. State, 2018 WL 3993440, at *1 (Del. Aug. 17, 2018). 
3

State expense.4 At this point in time, however, the Court lacks jurisdiction to 

consider Powell’s interlocutory appeal. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice

 

4 Christopher v. State, 2009 WL 2841191, at *1 (Del. Sept. 4, 2009).
No. 59844.

#### W. C. Sullivan & Company *v.*United States,

protest 224937-K/5455 (Chicago).

*403Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items, described as porcelain wine sets are not tableware, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Zhozef KARAPETIAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74138.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Zhozef Karapetian, Glendale, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA OIL, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Zhozef Karapetian, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

“Where, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions.” *See Kataria v.*INS; 232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000). We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination. *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based upon the omissions in Karapetian’s testimony of incidents that he described in his asylum application. *See id.*at 1043. Karapetian failed to mention both that the police beat his wife and that she subse*656quently suffered a miscarriage, and that the police arrested him in 1997 and broke his arm by throwing him out of a moving car. Because these omissions go to the heart of his asylum claim, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s credibility finding. *See id.*

Because Karapetian did not establish that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Karapetian’s CAT claim because he failed to exhaust the issue with the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 127

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to present

a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to present a gold medal on behalf of Congress

to Rosa Parks.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on June 15, 1999, for a ceremony to present

4 a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks. Phys5 ical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in

6 accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the

7 Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
# Official Journal L 52/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6415 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 52

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6415 February 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/175 of 12 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1052)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/175 of 12 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1052)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 1052)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
District Judge Robert J. Bryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LORI A. SIVERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

and DAVID HERRING,

Defendants.

NO. CV06-5351-RJB

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST

ALL PARTIES

[ x ] Clerk’s Action Required

Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), the parties to this action, by and through their

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be

dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs to either party.

SO STIPULATED this 26th day of April, 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 16 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 3
JOHN MCKAY

United States Attorney

__________/s/_______________________

Rebecca S. Cohen, WSBA #31767

Assistant United States Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Western District of Washington

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-7970

rebecca.cohen@usoj.gov

Attorney for the United States

ENGLISH LANE MARSHALL

STAHNKE & VANDERWOOD

____________/s/____________________

Derek J. Vanderwood, WSBA #24257

12204 S.E. Mill Plane Blvd., Suite 200

Vancouver, WA 98684

(360) 449-6100

vanderwood@elmbsv.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICE OF B. JEFFREY CARL

__________/s/_______________________

B. Jeffrey Carl, WSBA #15730

705 Second Avenue, Suite 910

Seattle, WA 98104

(206) 682-5120

jcarl@wolfenet.com

Attorney for the United States

Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 16 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED that the

above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. The

Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 30th day of April, 2007.

A

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge

Presented By:

JOHN MCKAY

United States Attorney

____________/s/_____________________

Rebecca S. Cohen, WSBA #31767

Assistant United States Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Western District of Washington

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-7970

rebecca.cohen@usoj.gov

Attorney for the United States

ENGLISH LANE MARSHALL

STAHNKE & VANDERWOOD

____________/s/____________________

Derek J. Vanderwood, WSBA #24257

12204 S.E. Mill Plane Blvd., Suite 200

Vancouver, WA 98684

(360) 449-6100

vanderwood@elmbsv.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICE OF B. JEFFREY CARL

____________/s/_____________________

B. Jeffrey Carl, WSBA #15730

705 Second Avenue, Suite 910

Seattle, WA 98104

(206) 682-5120

jcarl@wolfenet.com

Attorney for the United States

Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 16 Filed 05/01/07 Page 3 of 3
# Official Journal C 4/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 4 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 598 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 4

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 598 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 004/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2016/C 004/2 | Notification of Romania pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Compania Națională de Transport al Energiei Electrice ‘Transelectrica’ — S.A. as transmission system operator in Romania | 2 |
| 2016/C 004/3 | Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Notice regarding applications for exclusive licences to prospect for liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons (‘the Saint-Quintien Licence’) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 004/1

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2016/C 004/2

Notification of Romania pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Compania Națională de Transport al Energiei Electrice ‘Transelectrica’ — S.A. as transmission system operator in Romania

2

2016/C 004/3

Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Notice regarding applications for exclusive licences to prospect for liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons (‘the Saint-Quintien Licence’) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BEFORE the Thirb DIVISION,

June 15, 1967

No. P67/199.

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear and Freedman & Slater, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/1254 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RONALD R. CHRISTEL,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5375

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial Services Office

alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of the Appearance Bond supervision as set forth

in the Petition filed by U.S. Pretrial Services

The plaintiff appears through Special Assistant United States Attorney, BARBARA SIEVERS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD ;

The defendant has been advised of the allegation(s)and that he/she could be detained pending

resolution of the underlying charges in the Complaint/Indictment/ or Information if found to be in

violation; maximum potential sanction if substantiated; and 

The court finding probable cause with regard to the allegation(s); the matter is scheduled for hearing

on the following time and date before the Honorable 

Date: DECEMBER 10, 2008

Time: 9:15 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

(X) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

December 1, 2008.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold _________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT32.1






CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.






Date:  February
      27, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Stephen
      B. HughesStephen
      B. HughesChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      executive officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41309

Summary Calendar

 

ARMANDO G. HERNANDEZ, ET AL,

Plaintiffs

ROBERT J. BATEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, ET AL,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:98-CV-46

- - - - - - - - - -

January 29, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court has not certified for interlocutory

appeal its denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for certification of

the complaint as a class action. Accordingly, we DISMISS the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT

I hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-SB Registration  Statement, of Corsea
Management,  Inc.  my report for the period  from March 3, 2000  (inception)  to
March 6, 2000,  dated March 8, 2000,  relating to the  financial  statements  of
Corsea Management, Inc. which appear in such Form 10-SB.


                                                   STEPHEN S. BUSH, C.A.
                                                   Chartered Accountant

Port Moody,B.C.
Canada
March 8, 2000

                                        By:/s/ Stephen S. Bush
                                        Chartered Accountant
EXHIBIT32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      10, 2010
              
              By:
              /s/Stephen B.
      HughesStephen
      B. HughesChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      executive officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 87/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.087.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 87 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5623 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.087.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 87

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5623 March 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2013/C 087/01 | Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2013/C 087/01

Extension of the period of validity of the lists of suitable candidates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN