alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SULAIMAN TUNKARA, )

) CASE NO. C05-2006MJP

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER GRANTING 

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS )

ENFORCEMENT, and ALBERTO GONZALES, ) TEMPORARY STAY

) OF REMOVAL

)

Respondents. )

_________________________________________)

Petitioner has filed, through counsel, a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241, and a motion for immediate stay of removal. (Dkt. #1). Within the petition for

writ of habeas corpus, Petitioner also requests an immediate stay of removal pending resolution

of the writ of habeas corpus. Having reviewed the motion, and the balance of the record, the

Court does hereby ORDER:

(1) Petitioner’s removal is temporarily STAYED pending briefing and a resolution of

petitioner’s request for immediate stay of removal and petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

The Court expresses no views at this time as to the merits of either Petitioner’s motion or

his underlying habeas petition.

 (2) Respondents shall file a response to petitioner’s motion for immediate stay of

Case 2:05-cv-02006-MJP-JPD Document 3 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL 

PAGE – 2

removal within 10 days of the entry of this Order.

(3) The Clerk shall direct a copy of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, and to the

United States Attorney for the Western District of Washington.

DATED this 2nd day of December, 2005.

__/s Ricardo S. Martinez__

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ for

MARSHA J. PECHMAN

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02006-MJP-JPD Document 3 Filed 12/02/05 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18240 and #18241; NEVADA Disaster Number NV-00076]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Nevada dated 10/10/2023. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Hilary. *Incident Period:*
                         08/18/2023 through 08/24/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 10/10/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/11/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/10/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the 
                    ( print page 71390)
                    Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Clark. *Contiguous Counties:* CALIFORNIA: Inyo, San Bernardino. NEVADA: Lincoln, Nye. ARIZONA: Mohave. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18240 8 and for economic injury is 18241 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Arizona, California, Nevada. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-22719 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 66117.

#### G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/1823 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of streamers for steel bicycle grips, not essential or necessary to the operation of a bicycle, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.222 Consumer Credit** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-02455-JCC Document 1 Filed 12/09/02 Page 10 of 10
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,966

LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF A MOTION TO RECUSE

FILED IN CAUSE NO. 99-11-06435-CR

IN THE 9 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a direct appeal of the denial of a motion to recuse filed in the 9 Judicial th

District Court of Montgomery County, Cause No. 99-11-06435-CR, styled The State of

Texas v. Larry Ray Swearingen. Appellant’s appeal is untimely and is, therefore,

dismissed. 

Do not publish

Delivered: November 26, 2008
Before the Third Division,

March 6, 1961

No. 65243.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19243-15818, etc. (New Orleans).

*364Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00438-CV

In the ESTATE of Joseph David MARKS Sr., Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PC0155

Honorable Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2016

MOTIONS TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

As of this date, a clerk’s record has not been filed. On August 26, 2016, however, appellees

Joseph D. Marks Jr. and Jeffery Marks filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, arguing there is no 

final, appealable order from which appellant can appeal. On September 6, 2016, appellant Jo Ann 

Marks Rivera filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, admitting there is no final, appealable order. 

Accordingly, we grant both the appellant’s and appellees’ motions to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of 

parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 11.1

         Statement re: Computation of per share earnings

                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                9/30/97          9/30/96
                                              ----------       ----------

Common Stock                                  14,768,498       10,293,035

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Options                           234,000              -

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Warrants                          773,000              -
                                              ----------       ----------
Weighted Average Shares and
Common Stock Equivalents                      15,775,498       10,293,035
                                              ==========       ==========
Earnings Per Common Share
Net Income                                   $       -         $     0.01
                                              ==========       ==========
| 1.     | the forgoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |

|   |   /s/ Jeremy L. Standrod            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeremy L. Standrod, Managing Partner          |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                          |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC |   |

----
No. 59320.

petition 7182-R (New York).

#### Georg Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

From the testimony, it appeared that the only difference between the entered value and the appraised value was a 5 percent discount, claimed to be a deductible item, but which the appraiser disallowed. The issue of law involved was decided in a test ease, *United States*v. *International Expediters, Inc., for Winsor & Newton, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 148, C. A. D. 511), the effect of which was to uphold the appraiser’s action concerning the merchandise covered by the shipment under consideration. Under said decision, the appeal in this case was abandoned. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

_____________

No. 16-3587

_____________

ROSE MARY KNICK,

 Appellant

v.

TOWNSHIP OF SCOTT; 

CARL S. FERRARO, Individually and in his Official 

Capacity as Scott Township Code Enforcement Officer 

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

District Court No. 3-14-cv-02223

District Judge: The Honorable A. Richard Caputo

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted on Remand July 23, 2019

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

Frank J. Bolock, Jr.

212 Front Street

Clarks Summit, PA 18411

J. David Breemer

Pacific Legal Foundation

930 G Street

Sacramento, CA 95814

Counsel for Appellant

Mark J. Kozlowski

William J. McPartland

Thomas A. Specht
Marshall Dennehey Warner

Coleman & Goggin

P.O. Box 3118

Scranton, PA 18505

Counsel for Appellees

________________

JUDGMENT ORDER ON REMAND

FROM THE SUPREME COURT 

OF THE UNITED STATES

________________

By opinion and judgment entered July 6, 2017, this Court affirmed the United 

States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania’s dismissal of appellant 

Rose Mary Knick’s Fourth Amendment challenge for lack of standing and her Fifth 

Amendment takings claim without prejudice pending exhaustion of state-law 

compensation remedies under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. 

Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985). 

By opinion filed June 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States overruled 

its prior holding in Williamson County that a property owner whose property has been 

taken by a local government has not suffered a violation of his Fifth Amendment rights 

and cannot bring a federal takings claim in federal court until a state court has denied his 

claim for just compensation under state law. Thus, the Supreme Court vacated this 

Court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

In light of the action taken by the Supreme Court overruling Williams County, it is 

hereby O R D E R E D that this Court’s prior opinion is vacated with respect to the Fifth 

Amendment takings claim. This Court’s determination that Knick lacked standing to 

advance a Fourth Amendment claim was not considered by the Supreme Court of the 

United States on certiorari review. As such, this Court’s opinion stands with respect to 

the Fourth Amendment claim.

Accordingly, it is now hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of 

the District Court entered September 8, 2016, be and the same is hereby AFFIRMED as 

to the dismissal of the Fourth Amendment claims, VACATED as to the dismissal of the 

Fifth Amendment claims, and REMANDED for further proceedings. The parties shall 

bear their own costs. 
By the Court, 

s/ D. Brooks Smith

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Date: August 9, 2019
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMMIE LEE KOHN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1990

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2008CF004784-B.

Sammie Lee Kohn, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Official Journal L 50/21 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 50 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4921 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 50

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4921 February 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 266/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 establishing accompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries affected by the reform of the EU sugar regime | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 266/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 establishing accompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries affected by the reform of the EU sugar regime

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.16.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                       CITICORP 1988 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Section 7(e) of the Citicorp 1988 Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended
to add the following sentence at the end of such Section:

                  "The value of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered
                  for tax withholding may not exceed the amount allowed
                  consistent with fixed plan accounting in accordance with
                  generally accepted accounting principles."
Before the First Division,

March 20, 1959

No. 62870.

#### Buck’s, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 303503-K (Galveston).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “Window — Niches” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as manufactures wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for. The protest claim is for free entry under the provision in paragraph 1774 of the said act, as amended by the Act of June 12, 1952, 66 Stat. 137, providing for free entry of—

> Altars, pulpits, communion tables, baptismal fonts, shrines, or parts of any of the foregoing * * * imported in good faith for the use of, either by order of or for presentation (without charge) to, any corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes.

At the trial of the issue, it was established that the niches were imported for donation to, and for the use of, St. John’s Episcopal Church in Wichita, Kans. It was also established that the niches were designed as an extension of the main altar table, so as to enlarge the same; that they, in fact, are a part of the reredos of the altar; and that the altar table and reredos, including the subject niches, form a single unit in harmonious design constituting the altar of the church.

We are of the opinion that the record evidence establishes that decision in this case must be in accordance with the principles expressed in our decision in *Bernardini Studios*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 281, C.D. 1942, cited by counsel for the plaintiff in the brief filed in its behalf.

The protest claim is, therefore, sustained and judgment will issue accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) gives notice of the following meeting:

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, October 19, 2023, 12 p.m.-1:30 p.m. (ET).

# PLACE:

AmeriCorps, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20525. For health and safety reasons, this will be a virtual meeting.
      - To register for the meeting, please use this link: https://americorps.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​GyvUyskiTySJh46ViJR5mg .                    
      - Webinar ID: 161 080 7298 Passcode: 129418.
      - To participate by phone, call toll free: (833) 568-8864.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

I. Opening Remarks by the Chair

II. CEO Report

III. Reflection of 9/11 Day of Service

IV. Oversight, Governance, and Audit Committee Report

V. Approval of Grant Plan

VI. Spotlight: AmeriCorps' 30th Anniversary

VII. Public Comment

VIII. Chair's Closing Remarks and Adjournment

                    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of the Board may do so in writing or virtually. Submit written comments to                     *board@cns.gov*                     with the subject line: “Comments for October 19, 2023, AmeriCorps Board Meeting” no later than 5:00 p.m. (ET) October 14, 2023. Individuals who would like to comment during the meeting will be given instructions for signing up when they join the meeting. Comments are requested to be limited to two minutes.                

AmeriCorps provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities, where needed.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Heather Leinenbach by telephone: (202) 489-5266 or by email:                         *board@cns.gov.*

Fernando Laguarda,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2023-21752 Filed 9-27-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
Case 3:06-cv-05161-RBL Document 30 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05161-RBL Document 30 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FREDDY L. FLONNORY

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 41, 2018

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 9707012190 (N)

§

§

Submitted: February 5, 2018

Decided: March 26 , 201 8

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

O R D E R

This 26 th day of March 2018

, after careful consideration of the opening brief

and the motion to affirm, it is clear that the judgment below should be affirmed on

the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its well

- reasoned

decision dated J anuary 2, 2018

. Flonn ory argued in his motion that, in 1996, a minor

witness against him had been interviewed by the FBI without a parent present. The

Superior Court did not err in concluding that this claim was procedurally barred and

did not satisfy the pleading requirement s of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 1 Filed 03/07/06 Page 12 of 12