alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Adrian Adams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 7, 2008

| | /s/ADRIAN ADAMSAdrian Adams President and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will be retained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 10.22


 


 


 


 


 








TO:


Unico American Corporation


26050 Mureau Road


Calabasas, CA 91302


Attention: Michael Budnitsky, Chief Financial Officer


 


FROM:


Cary L. Cheldin


26050 Mureau Road


Calabasas, CA 91302


 


RE: Amendment to Employment Agreement


  


Pursuant to Section 14 of the “Employment Agreement”
entered into on the 17th day of March, 2015, between myself and Unico American Corporation, I, Cary L. Cheldin,
hereby agree to waive certain rights as described below.


 


These waivers are retroactive to January 1, 2017, and shall remain
effective from January 1, 2017, until January 1, 2018. Nothing contained in the following waivers shall be construed to require
me to reimburse the Company for any compensation, however defined, which has already been paid to me.


 


Waivers:


 


	 	1.	I, Cary L. Cheldin, hereby waive my right to the Mandatory Bonus provided under Section 3.2 of the Employment Agreement.


 


	 	2.	I, Cary L. Cheldin, hereby waive my right to protection against the Company’s decision, if any, to decrease my annual bonus.


 


By Executive:


 


/s/ Cary L. Cheldin


Cary L. Cheldin


March 23, 2018


 


 


By Company:


 


/s/ Michael Budnitsky


Michael Budnitsky


March 23, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

______________________________) 

)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY ) NO. C06-355 JLR

)

)

vs. ) MINUTE ORDER

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

______________________________)

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the

Court, the Honorable James L. Robart, U.S. District

Judge:

The court hereby dismisses this action without

prejudice for failure to retain counsel. 

The clerk is directed to mail a copy of the minute

order to plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company.

Filed and entered this 25th day of January, 2007.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

\s\ C. Condon

By ____________________

 Casey Condon

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00355-JLR Document 18 Filed 01/25/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION TO JURY- 1

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY C. ROSENAU,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR06-157MJP

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION 

TO JURY 

Dated: May 4, 2012.

A

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 147 Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION TO JURY- 2

Members of the jury, you have advised that you have been unable to agree upon a verdict 

in this case. I have decided to suggest a few thoughts to you.

As jurors, you have a duty to discuss the case with one another and to deliberate in an 

effort to reach a unanimous verdict if each of you can do so without violating your individual 

judgment and conscience. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but only after you 

consider the evidence impartially with your fellow jurors. During your deliberations, you should 

not hesitate to reexamine your own views and change your opinion if you become persuaded that 

it is wrong. However, you should not change an honest belief as to the weight or effect of the 

evidence solely because of the opinions of your fellow jurors or for the mere purpose of 

returning a verdict.

All of you are equally honest and conscientious jurors who have heard the same 

evidence. All of you share an equal desire to arrive at a verdict. Each of you should ask yourself 

whether you should question the correctness of your present position.

I remind you that in your deliberations you are to consider the instructions I have given 

you as a whole. You should not single out any part of any instruction, including this one, and 

ignore others. They are all equally important.

You may now retire and continue your deliberations.

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 147 Filed 05/04/12 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

 

DIANA ZOE ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5312RBL

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. [Dkt. #1]

The district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed in forma pauperis upon completion of a

proper affidavit of indigency. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, the court has broad discretion in

denying an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963), cert.

denied 375 U.S. 845 (1963). Additionally, notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, the court

may dismiss a case at any time if it determines that (A) the allegation of poverty is untrue, or (B) the action

is (i) frivolous or malicious, or (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(A) and (B). 

Here, the Plaintiff seeks to assert three claims against Governor Gregoire, including “falsification of

state records, fraud and theft.” Plaintiff apparently disagrees with what appear to be official transcripts

from Washington’s Community College System from the 1980s. Plaintiff has made no showing of this

court’s jurisdiction over her claims, and none is apparent from the face of her various filings.

Case 3:06-cv-05312-RBL Document 4 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

 Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

 DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05312-RBL Document 4 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Ameren Corporation

Revised 316(b)Phase II Rulemak

 Site-specific

 Large, fresh-water river consideration Large, fresh-water lake consideration Compliance options “TIOP” and “adaptive” compliance State BPJ alternative

 Utilize recently conducted IM studies

 Fish to be protected Estimated annual IM of protected fish

 Cost consideration

 Remanded rulemaking $$$ spent >>Shad/Drum/Carp “Finality” to installing technology
Ameren Corporation

Revised 316(b)Phase II Rulemak

 Entrainment

 Retain 5% freshwater river threshold

 “...EPA believes the 5% threshold to be sufficiently 

protective...”

 “...provides a consistent metric...” “...flow is related to is related to entrainment. EPA b

the intake capacity standard established under todayrule minimizes the entrainment impacts of CWIS ...”

 “...[NJDEP] finds it reasonable...”

 Retain freshwater lake threshold Entrainment survivability consideration

 Calculation Baseline

 CWIS siting credit allowance CWIS equipment “upgrade” allowance
# C_2016305EN.01003001.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2016 — Mozzett v EUIPO — di Lelio (Alfredo alla Scrofa)

(Case T-96/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - Figurative EU trade mark Alfredo alla Scrofa - Earlier national word mark L’ORIGINALE ALFREDO - Request for proof of genuine use - Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 305/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mario Mozzetti (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ines di Lelio (Rome) (represented by: D. De Simone, G. Orsoni and R. Fecchio, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2014 (Case R 655/2014-1), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Ms di Lelio and Mr Mozzetti.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mario Mozzetti to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mario Mozzetti to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

December 27, 1948

No. 52769.

#### J. J. Gavin & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 547454-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C06-5147FDB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

LATREVIA DAVENPORT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-5147FDB

ORDER FOR EXTENSION

Based upon Stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant

shall have an extension to and including September 13, 2006, to file a response to Plaintiff’s

opening brief. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including September 27,

2006, to file Plaintiff’s Reply Brief.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05147-FDB Document 15 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C06-5147FDB]

Presented by:

s/ JEFFREY BAIRD

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98104-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-2205

FAX: (206) 615-2531

jeffrey.h.baird@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05147-FDB Document 15 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 2
# Bayer CropScience

December 12, 2014 Document Processing Desk Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency One Potomac Yard 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington , VA 22202 Attention: Richard Gebken, Product Manager (10) Bayer CropScience 2 T.W. Alexander Drive P. 0. Box 12014 RTP, NC 27709 Phone: (9 19) 549-2000

Subject: Voluntary Cancellation of the Registration of Synapse WG Insecticide, EPA Reg . No . 264- 1026 Dear Mr. Gebken: Bayer CropScience is requesting to voluntarily cancel without prejudice the registrations of Synapse WG Insecticide, EPA Reg . No . 264- 1026. HHRA 17 dated October 2012 instructed as a condition of the waiver of the subchronic inhalation toxicity study registration requirement, dry flowable formulations of flubendiamide (Synapse WG, EPA Reg. No. 264-1026) must be canceled . BCS no longer has stocks of Synapse WG Insecticide to sell. We would request that for 18 months from the date of this letter (June 12, 2016) persons other than the registrants will be allowed to sell or distribute existing stocks of Synapse until supplies are exhausted , provided that such sale and distribution is consistent with the terms of the previously approved labeling on or that accompanied the canceled products . We would also like to request to have the 30 day comment period for this action waived. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone a: (919) 600-4794 or by e-mail at amy.mccaskill@bayer.com . Sincerely, Amy McCaskill Regi s tration Manager cc: Deborah McCall , EPA, OPP, RD
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 64

To designate the week of May 4, 1997, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers

and Employees Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 18, 1997

Mr. ROBB submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 4, 1997, as ‘‘National

Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of our criminal justice system;

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care,

custody and dignity of the human beings charged to their

care; and

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives:

Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 64 IS

1 Resolved, That the Senate designate the week of May

2 4, 1997, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employ3 ees Week.’’ The President is authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

5 States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies

6 and activities.

Æ
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

DAVID MCCUISTON,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

WASHINGTON STATE OF ATTORNEY CASE NUMBER: C06-5329RBL

GENERAL'S OFFICE AND

DR. HENRY RICHARDS,,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation.

The Petition is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

 April 10, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05329-RBL Document 27 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 1
| Name                                      | Jurisdiction     |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                      |             |
| Ann Tanker Corporation                    | Marshall Islands |
| Cathy Tanker Corporation                  | Marshall Islands |
| Chris Tanker Corporation                  | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Chartering, Inc.                      | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Condor, Inc.                          | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Eagle, Inc.                           | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Falcon, Inc.                          | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Hawk, Inc.                            | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Jaguar Limited                        | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Leopard Limited                       | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Lion Limited                          | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Management AS                         | Norway           |
| DHT Maritime, Inc.                        | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Panther Limited                       | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Phoenix, Inc.                         | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Puma Limited                          | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Ship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Singapore        |
| DHT Tiger Limited                         | Marshall Islands |
| Newcastle Tanker Corporation              | Marshall Islands |
| Samco Delta Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Epsilon Ltd                         | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Eta Ltd                             | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Gamma Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Iota Ltd                            | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Kappa Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Samco Shipholding Pte. Ltd.               | Singapore        |
| Samco Theta Ltd                           | Cayman Islands   |
| Sophie Tanker Corporation                 | Marshall Islands |

----
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Clay Ceramics

FROM: Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: July 2, 2009

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

Stonepeak Ceramics, Inc.

238 Porcelain Tile Drive

Crossville, TN 38555

PERSON CONTACTED:

William Smith

931-459-2509 office

931-510-2083 cell

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

For information on the kilns tested during the 10/12/05 stack test report.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

Mr. Smith stated that he was not working at the facility when the 10/12/2005 

testing took place, and that everyone who did work there at the time does not now. He 

indicated that there is physical evidence on Kiln 1 and Kiln 2 that show that they have 

been tested in the past, but he isn’t sure which one or if both were tested on 10/12/2005. 

After looking at the production rate for the test he determined that most likely only one 

kiln was being tested at the time. When asked to denote a kiln for the test he choose

Kiln 1. 

Mr. Smith also clarified that each kiln (Kiln 1, Kiln 2, and Kiln 3) have their own 

baghouse and bypass system. He stated that the three baghouses all duct to two emission 

stacks, but because of the bypass system, emissions from the kilns can be routed to either 

stacks. He said that they normally only operate two kilns at a time.

Mr. Smith also asked that all production data be treated as Confidential Business 

Information (CBI).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT WARD GARRISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5837 FDB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH

BRIEF

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to file overlength brief in support of their motion for

summary judgment. (Dkt. # 96). Defendants request 10 pages in addition to the 24 pages required

by the Local Rules. Defendants state that they have attempted to address all of the claims as

succinctly as possible; however, Plaintiff has brought a number of federal law claims against ten

defendants and several unnamed John/Jane Does, requiring additional pages to include all necessary

facts and legal arguments.

Having reviewed the motion and record, the Court ORDERS that Defendants’ motion to file

an overlength brief (Dkt. # 96) is GRANTED.

Case 3:05-cv-05837-FDB Document 98 Filed 08/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER 2

DATED this 10th day of August, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05837-FDB Document 98 Filed 08/10/07 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

| I, Raymond W. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Cardiac Science, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                         | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
| (2)                                                                                                                                                                                                         | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Dated:  May 14, 2003

|   | /s/ RAYMOND W. COHEN                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                              |
|   | **Raymond W. Cohen Chief Executive Officer** |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 818 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 14, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4156) making emergency supplemental 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 4156 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

t0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144445

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144445 COA: 306123 Wayne CC: 10-006460-FC JAMAR MARVIN McHENRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.