alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18213 and #18214; PENNSYLVANIA Disaster Number PA-00138]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 10/02/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flash Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/15/2023 through 07/16/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 10/02/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/01/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/02/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Northampton. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Bucks, Carbon, Lehigh, Monroe. New Jersey: Warren. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18213 6 and for economic injury is 18214 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are New Jersey, Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-22214 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-531
In Re: LEVERN HENRY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-3971-O-OBD) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Levern Henry, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to have his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) action transferred to this courtor have default judgment entered in his favor due to the Respondents' delay in filing a response. Petitioner failed to show that he has a clear right to the relief sought and that no other remedy is available. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988); see Stines v. Martin , 849 F.2d 1323, 1324 (10th Cir. 1988). While we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 2
R.
McNall
quarry
c | EXPLANATION
60
oo
S Muck areas drained
ONS,
“O88
0, SHS
580 oN Se > CV
or Jey, Bog areas undrained
a
Areas of muck containing
more than 4000 ppm of zine
2.
U
Fault
Dashed where upprowimately
located U, upthrown side;
By downthrown side
“3, Oy
oA, 70
Zn —Y) x/0
70 ppm of zinc in soll or muck
at depth of 1 foot
/0 ppin of lead in soil or muck
at depth of 1 foot
8. oe ZG
oo Probable bedroék outcrop
a) under till of mineralized
R220 x /0 LOCATION OF SECTION Y zones in dolomite
S70 SHOWN ON FIG 23 le oe _o
oa Profile section showing relation
iS needed 90 x et of till sampling to cored
NV Y " sections of Lockport dolomite
\ iz Yy Yj
\ y Yo Y Zn
KN Sphalerite seen in outcrops
NN Yj
SS Y/ 180 i . Pb
we. 104 Li Galena seen in outcrops
ene ns Y 650 Bai
oT (0° oa B10x 78 x x05 (A DH.
SSA 9 x/0 460 500 Drill hole
ees SG yg, 10 .H.
cS yy |
eN 1H. |
$3330 WY 340 ¢
KS y 1
° 3 CLARENDON fi q
Z “430 itt
150
x20 Yj ZOU
Clarendon
quarry Rg
270 430 230
x30 x30 x40
2
DEIR
fs
NEW,
Yjypoe ;
270¥ 2
30
D
1600 80
30 € x/0
2700 780:
70% % 4000: 410:
40:
i
5
3
2
ri
z
Big Muck: 3
130 & z\ |x
px © @\ |E
5 m\ |o
3 al |Z
4 |
aie
eB)
EA
40
10
Soll analyses by F. S. Grimaldi, H. W. Larkin,
Hy Almond, and Harold Bloom
AG Upper part Lockport dolomite EXPLANATION
700 5 1
340 150 DH. 25 oe =
Lower part Lockport dolomite 20 lo 140 aap =
| we 450 Glacial till Shale
680 120 120 :

H 3 60

ees:

LEZ ae

Reel COMA oe
it ee

LILI RL OZ ON,

he ‘pf ~ “s

ia gegen
LBs

Kay

OH. 7.
1 Drill holes projected into section
Reef dolomite

along strike

ZONE 4
Mineralized zones in dolomite
60
10

60 ppm of zinc in soil
10 ppm of lead in soil

Shaly dolomite

Dense dolomite

Reef limestone

aly limestone

eI

Dense limestone

g

MAP AND SECTION SHOWING RELATION OF GEOCHEMICAL SOIL DATA TO LOCKPORT DOLOMITE BEDS,
MANNING AREA, ORLEANS COUNTY, NEW YORK

1 0) 1 Miles
Ll 1 L L 1 j
No. 56814.

#### Packing Products Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 179934-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The court finding that the protest was not filed within the statutory period of 60 days after liquidation, as required by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the motion to dismiss was granted.
No. 61132.

protests 272841-K, etc. (New York).

#### Accurate Millinery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 5, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 25, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 9 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-283, CP2023-286.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-22141 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 60284.

protests 189505-K, 189506-K, and 206140-K (Philadelphia).

#### Ebeling *&*Reuss Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of figures the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ALEXANDER WARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-431JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court is in receipt of the parties’ agreed motion to extend certain pretrial

deadlines in this matter (Dkt. # 23). The court DENIES the stipulation. If the parties

wish to enter a new stipulation, they must do so in compliance with this order.

The court issues scheduling orders setting trial dates and related dates to provide a

reasonable schedule for the resolution of disputes. First, the court generally sets the

discovery cut-off 30 days prior to the deadline for filing dispositive motions in order to

ensure that the court has before it a complete record when it considers a motion that could

potentially dispose of the case. Second, the schedule generally provides 90 days between

the deadline for filing dispositive motions and the trial date. This 90-day period takes

Case 2:06-cv-00431-JLR Document 25 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

into account: (a) an approximate 30-day lag between the date a party files a motion and

the date that motion becomes ripe for the court’s consideration, see Local Rules W.D.

Wash. CR 7(d)(3); and (b) an additional 30 days during which the court endeavors to rule

on the motion, id. at CR 7(b)(5). Anything short of a 90-day period leaves inadequate

time for the parties to consider the court’s ruling and plan for trial or an alternate

resolution. 

Here, the parties request a continuance in order to take expert depositions long

after discovery ends and propose to shorten the deadline between dispositive motions and

trial. Without a compelling reason to do so, the court declines to abandon its case

management principles outlined above. 

Filed and entered this 18th day of September, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00431-JLR Document 25 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

         <ARTICLE>                 5
                
         <S>                       <C>
         <PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS
         <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   FEB-28-1998
         <PERIOD-END>                        AUG-31-1997
         <CASH>                                  290,696
         <SECURITIES>                                  0
         <RECEIVABLES>                       178,903,257
         <ALLOWANCES>                          6,416,000
         <INVENTORY>                           1,065,228
         <CURRENT-ASSETS>                    163,829,559
         <PP&E>                                2,239,070
         <DEPRECIATION>                          888,681
         <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      178,201,271
         <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               135,659,696
         <BONDS>                                       0
         <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
         <PREFERRED>                                   0
         <COMMON>                             22,136,891
         <OTHER-SE>                           20,124,354
         <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        178,201,271
         <SALES>                             132,966,601
         <TOTAL-REVENUES>                    139,717,482
         <CGS>                               125,287,810
         <TOTAL-COSTS>                       127,973,340
         <OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,585,248
         <LOSS-PROVISION>                      2,170,739
         <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,685,530
         <INCOME-PRETAX>                       5,988,155
         <INCOME-TAX>                          2,131,420
         <INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,856,735
         <DISCONTINUED>                                0
         <EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
         <CHANGES>                                     0
         <NET-INCOME>                          3,856,735
         <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.71
         <EPS-DILUTED>                              0.71
                           

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED   APRIL 5,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000876400
<NAME>                          STIMSONITE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-05-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                            341
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                      537 
<INVENTORY>                                    12,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,741
<PP&E>                                         27,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,410
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           90
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,823 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,867
<SALES>                                        13,857 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,857
<CGS>                                          10,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,974 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (742)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,049)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEDRO RICARDO ANIYEA,

Defendant.

CR06-170MJP

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, MATTHEW THOMAS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, LINDA SULLIVAN;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable MONICA J PECHMAN

Date: SEPTEMBER 22, 2008

Time: 10:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

May 15, 2008

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40190 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERIC DIONEL LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-103-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 6, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eric Dionel Lewis appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Lewis argues that the district court erroneously believed that it lacked the authority to grant a downward departure based on sentencing entrapment and that the district court did not consider the appropriate factors in determining whether his case was atypical. The district court considered Lewis’ argument that he was predisposed to sell only small amounts of cocaine and that he would not have sold a largeNo. 98-40190 -2- amount of cocaine if the Government’s confidential informant had not repeatedly requested it and offered him money and other assistance. The district court determined that Lewis had not demonstrated facts which warranted a downward departure based on sentencing entrapment. Because the district court did not deny the downward departure based on an erroneous assumption that it lacked the authority to depart downward based on sentencing entrapment, the district court’s denial of Lewis’ motion for a downward departure is unreviewable. See United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, Lewis’ appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Official Journal C 260/9 Au

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 260 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 609 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 260

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 609 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 260/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fifth supplement to the 35th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 260/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fifth supplement to the 35th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
iu MAY 16 '94 13:24 PSTP ORNL I r,a

## I AGENDA QUAIL ERLY REVIEW MEETING DISTRIBUTION T NSFGRMER DETERMINATION STUDY

{ Buildin 3147 , Conference Room 130

In-Service Transformer Model
................ S. Cohn 7:00 reakfast Mee ng ...................... Carden Plaza 8:15 DOE Visitors $heck In .................. Visitor Control 8:30 Welcome and Energy Division Overview
.... M. A. Kuliasha f 8:45 Power System Technology Program
..... J. VanCoevering 9:00 Project Overview ......................... P. Barnes 9:20 Tra,4 sformer T echnology .... ........... B. McConnell 9:50 10:20 10:50 11:00 11:30 12:15. 1:30 3:30 Utility Analyst

Break . .... ...•.•..........•••••..•........•.•.

Ju n e 13, 1994

.........................J.VanDyke

Industrial Tran sformers
........................ S. Das Conservation. 'rojects

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . G. Courville Lunch
..... ► . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . OR M Cafeteria Motor Resear^h ............... . ........... J. Kueck Leavefor Airort MAY 16 '94 13:24 PSTP ORNL

AGENDA QUA:tERLY REVIEW MEETING DISTRIBUTION 

### T NSFORMER DETERMINATION STUDY



### 7:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00

9:50 10:20 10:50 

### 11:00 11:30 

### 12:15,

,1:30 3:30**~** BuDdin 3147, CoafereDce Room 130 June 13, 1994 

## 1!realffast Me1ng_. • •• •••.••••.•••••••• Garden Piou

### Jys~,of7~**~,~:1~~** DOE Visitors

## ~heCk In •••••••••••••••• ,. Jlisltor Conll'ol Welcome and

# ~nergy Division Overview •••• M. A. Kuliasha I Power 

### System+ Technology 

### Program ••••• J. VanCoevering I Project 

### overvfew ••••••••••••.•••••••••••• P. 

### Barnes Tl'a!)Stormer .techllOIOgy , ••••••••••••••• B. McConneU
, In
.. Service

## Tr~nSformer Model •••••••••• "..... 

### S. Cohn Utility Ana4 ., ••••••••••••••••••••••• 

### J. VanDyke j 

### Break •••• ," 

# i
.. · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ... · · · · · Indudrial 

### Ttformers
....................... S. Dljs Conservation 

### rrojeds
.................... G. Courville

, / ' 

### Lunch • • • • •**~** 

### • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • " • • • • •• ,ORNL Cafeteria Motor

# Rese.r~h**tr!"!f.~~** 

# .................. J.

# ~'::'ct

, - 

### Letnelor 

# Airtrt
I 

# I 

# I Icu ci

TO : K-25

(FORMERLY OAK RIDGE GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT) 

## City of O ak Ridge

RIDGE INN a// DAYS INN GARDEN PLAZA HOTEL AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND ENERGY AND VISITORS BUREAU HOLIDAY INA

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORA TORY (ORNL) TO OLIVER SPRINGS 

## · fl..



### 5 

### ,**TO;J(~5** (FORMEA..Y OAKAIOGE GASEOUS DIFFUSION TO .1-40 I(INGSTON (EXIT 356) TO Ol.IVER SPRINGS 

## City of 

## Oak Ridge

DAYS INN--: GARDEN PlAZA HOTEL /"'" AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND EM£RGV AND VISITPR'S BUREAU HOLIDAY IN,.

Y-12 PLAt