01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

HAROLD PADDYAKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor, Monroe

Correctional Complex,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-0103-JCC-JPD

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is an inmate at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center in Aberdeen,

Washington, who is proceeding pro se in his attempt to bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights

claim against an employee of the Monroe Correctional Complex (the “Prison”). While

working in the Prison’s kitchen in 2003, plaintiff alleges that he requested work boots, but was

informed that the kitchen supervisor, Diane “Doe,” would not provide them. Dkt. No. 1,

Complaint at 3. According to the complaint, plaintiff subsequently slipped in the kitchen and

injured his back. Id. Plaintiff appears to allege Ms. Doe is liable for his injuries. For the

reasons discussed below, the Court recommends that the complaint be dismissed.

II. ANALYSIS

In order to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must assert that

he suffered a violation of rights protected by the Constitution or created by federal statute, and

Case 2:06-cv-00103-JCC Document 3 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 1 of 3

Paddyaker v. Doe Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -2

that the violation was proximately caused by a person acting under color of state or federal

law. See Crumpton v. Gates, 947 F.2d 1418, 1420 (9th Cir. 1991); see also WMX

Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 197 F.3d 367, 372 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc). Respondeat

superior liability will not support § 1983 liability unless plaintiff demonstrates that a supervisor

participated in the violations, directed the violations, or knew about the violations and did

nothing to prevent them. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (internal citation

omitted); see also Mabe v. San Bernardino County Dep’t of Pub. Soc. Serv., 237 F.3d 1101,

1109 (9th Cir. 2001).

Although the Court is sympathetic to the injuries plaintiff may have sustained, this

complaint fails to allege that Ms. Doe personally participated in violating any of plaintiff’s

constitutional rights. Rather, it appears to suggest that she is responsible for plaintiff’s injuries

by virtue of the fact that she was the kitchen supervisor at the time of the alleged injury. Even

if the complaint were construed to allege adequately respondeat superior liability, it has

articulated no constitutional violation. Allegations of mere negligence do not state a violation

of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Stevens v. Koskey, 877 F.2d 1435, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1989)

(“[a]llowing mere negligence to sustain a due process claim under section 1983 would

trivialize the fourteenth amendment”); see also Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1334

(9th Cir. 1990) (noting that in the context of medical care, allegations of “mere malpractice, or

even gross negligence, do[ ] not suffice”). Because the above-described deficiency cannot be

corrected by amendment, the Court recommends that the complaint be dismissed. See Cato v.

United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 1995).

III. CONCLUSION

The Court recommends that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to allege

adequately a violation of a constitutional right. The Court further recommends that plaintiff’s

application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. A proposed order accompanies

this Report and Recommendation. 

Case 2:06-cv-00103-JCC Document 3 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -3

DATED this 30th day of January, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00103-JCC Document 3 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 3 of 3