alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN emuw=w”~ b G? ~rromnasea=ab I

I+ ! i

lk d :

,‘\ Mr. Nell J. Gilllgan i t ! CountyAuditor Uvalde, Texas (-... :'\"\l,, -----. Desr Sir; ---1 "..~.\\,, ;iy::s; :;%$iq*‘t,

kunds given t6'tha.m te?ala or xouas Bill onatrwtion end 6 OS lateral roads.

way for cc;un+y

lateral roads and for the payment or legal obli&.:tlons lxmurred therefor prior to ~'muaq 2, 1939, (b) for the oonstruation or Improvementof oounty l&era1 rwds, (o) for p&ng the yriuofpal, interest and sinki~~$

fund requirements of my bonds or

## 374

Mr. Neil 3. Gilllgan, page 2

warrants which were lecjaliy issued by suoh county or road distrlotprior to January 2, 1939, the proceeds orwhich were sotually expended In the oonstruotlonor improvement of lateral county roads, (d) for the plurpose OS supplezuenting

runds appropriatedby the United States Government Sor Sorka Progress Administrationhighway construotton,irubllo %orks Administrationhighway oonstruction, and such other grants OS Federal Sunde aa may be niade

avaiLable to the aLunties or this state 

### for oouuty lateral road oonstruotlon, a& (e) Sor the purpose of cooperatingwith the StateHighway Department and the Federal Government Fn the construction of rarm-tomarket roads." IIIour opinion this olearly authorizes the oommissionarti'

oourt to expend the tunds given them uuder louse Bill #68t3for the oonstructlonand hialhtauanoa or oounty lateral roads.

Xhen onae the aounty la advised of the balsnae availableto thalr oredlt In the lateral road amount set up under this law by the Board of County and District Road Indebtedness it then becomes a uatter for Betermination by the commlasioners* court US that county as to the dispositionof~suoh Sunds available, subject only to the restriatlonsabove stated.

This department is not in a position to any when suah Suudsmay beaome available to the various counties, Sor the reason thst the administmtion of thie law has been conS8rredupon the Board of County and District Road Indebtednessand we think tl:atthey alone oan advise you as to the time such fuudswill beoome available.

You have already been malled a oopy OS our opinion Number O-908,whioh we thluk answers your third inquiry asNr. Nell J. GilJ.lgau, page 3

to the constitutionalityOS this bill. %ie might state further that in our opinion tie objeotionsraised in OpinionNumber O-908were oorreoted in the present bill.. House Bille688, we think, complieswith opinionNumber O-908. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEU2

Clarenoe h.’ 

### Crowr

Assl@ant

APPROEED SEP 23, 19

APPROVED OPBUSi COliKCTTEE By /s/ B.W.B.

Chairman
EXHIBIT 11.1

                Statement re: Computation of per share earnings

                                                         Nine Months Ended

                                                   03/31/97           03/31/96
                                                   --------           --------

Common Stock ..............................        2,778,500          2,126,818

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Options ....................        -0-                      -0-

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Warrants ...................        -0-                      -0-

Weighted Average Shares and
Common Stock Equivalents ..................        2,778,500          2,126,818
                                                   =========         ==========
Earnings Per Common Share
Net Income ................................            (0.17)             (0.95)
                                                   =========         ==========

                                                        Three Months Ended

                                                     03/31/97          03/31/96
                                                     --------          --------
Common Stock ..............................         3,066,563         2,149,175

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Options ....................         -0-               -0-

Common Stock Equivalents
Dilutive Stock Warrants ...................         -0-               -0-

Weighted Average Shares and
Common Stock Equivalents ..................         3,066,563         2,149,175
                                                    =========        ==========
Earnings Per Common Share
Net Income ................................              0.07             (0.56)
                                                    =========        ==========

                                       14
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-138475) of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and in therelated Prospectus, and  (2) Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-129344, 333-134135, 333-149289) of HerculesOffshore, Inc.;of our report dated February 25, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofHercules Offshore, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofHercules Offshore, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2007.              /s/  Ernst & Young LLP         Houston, Texas
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OCEAN OPTIQUE DISTRIBUTORS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         242
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                   183
<INVENTORY>                                    4,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,253
<PP&E>                                         870
<DEPRECIATION>                                 684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,243
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,559
<COMMON>                                       7,920
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,576
<SALES>                                        9,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,473
<CGS>                                          6,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.17)
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 2 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 3 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 4 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 5 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 6 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 7 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 8 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 9 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 10 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 11 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 12 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 13 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 14 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 15 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 16 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 17 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 18 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 19 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 20 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 21 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 22 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 23 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 24 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 25 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 26 of 27
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 27 of 27
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PARAMJIT SINGH DHALIWAL,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-211-RSL-JPD

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH

BRIEF, NUNC PRO TUNC

Petitioner Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal, an inmate at the Monroe Correctional Complex in

Monroe, Washington, has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt.

No. 1. The present matter comes before the Court on respondent’s motion to file and

overlength summary judgment brief. Dkt. No. 28. After careful consideration of the motion,

governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Good cause having been established, petitioner’s motion (Dkt. No. 30) is

GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, pursuant to Local Rule CR 7(f).

(2) The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to

counsel for both parties, and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, Chief Judge.

DATED this 20th day of March, 2007. AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00211-RSL-JPD Document 36 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 1
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.229 Proprietors Equity in Noncorporate Business  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineHouseholds and nonprofit organizations; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FL152090205
	6759.1
	7412.8
	8172.5
	9326.3
	9980.7
	10747.6
	10396.1
	10564.9
	10747.6
	10813.7
	10978.7
	1Nonfinancial noncorporate business; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business (net worth)
	FL112090205
	6743.2
	7401.0
	8155.2
	9310.0
	9962.8
	10732.9
	10379.3
	10547.5
	10732.9
	10801.4
	10967.8
	2Security brokers and dealers; proprietors' equity in noncorporate business
	FL662090205
	15.9
	11.9
	17.2
	16.3
	17.9
	14.7
	16.8
	17.5
	14.7
	12.3
	10.9
	3 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
NO. 12-20-00228-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: HARRIS CENTER FOR 

MENTAL HEALTH AND IDD, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The Harris Center for Mental Health and IDD filed this original proceeding to challenge 

Respondent’s conclusion that Harris Center lacked standing to file a motion to revoke and to 

participate in a hearing on outpatient treatment regarding patient W.R.1 On November 18, 2020, 

this Court conditionally granted the petition and directed Respondent to notify W.R. and set a 

hearing on Harris Center’s motion to revoke outpatient treatment. By an order signed on 

November 25, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this 

proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 

Opinion delivered December 16, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Respondent is the Honorable Campbell Cox, II, Judge of the 145th District Court in Nacogdoches County, 

Texas. The Real Parties in Interest are the State of Texas and W.R. 
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 16, 2020

NO. 12-20-00228-CV

HARRIS CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND IDD,

Relator

V.

HON. CAMPBELL COX, II,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

Harris Center for Mental Health and IDD; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-20-

00228-CV and an interested person in trial cause number F1924026, pending on the docket of 

the 145th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas. Said petition for writ of 

mandamus having been filed herein on September 29, 2020, and the same having been duly 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DANNI STEINER,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5143 FDB

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY

The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation in this case, agreeing with the

Magistrate Judge that Steiner’s habeas corpus petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice as the

issues raised were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal. 

In order to proceed this Court must first issue, if appropriate, a certificate of appealability. Petitioner

has failed to demonstrate that the Court’s decision to dismiss his petition would be debatable or

wrong. See, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

Certificate of Appealability is denied to Petitioner.

DATED this 17th day of October, 2006 AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05143-FDB Document 24 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                       431
<INVENTORY>                                        907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,573
<PP&E>                                          15,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,973
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,305
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
```

[106th Congress Public Law 500]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ500.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2224]]

Public Law 106-500
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To assist in the establishment of an interpretive center and museum in 
the vicinity of the Diamond Valley Lake in southern California to ensure 
 the protection and interpretation of the paleontology discoveries made 
   at the lake and to develop a trail system for the lake for use by 
   pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2000 -  [S. 
                                2977]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INTERPRETIVE CENTER AND MUSEUM, DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE, 
                            HEMET, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Assistance for Establishment of Center and Museum.--
The <<NOTE: Contracts.>>  Secretary of the Interior shall enter into an 
agreement with an appropriate entity for the purpose of sharing costs 
incurred to design, construct, furnish, and operate an interpretive 
center and museum, to be located on lands under the jurisdiction of the 
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, intended to 
preserve, display, and interpret the paleontology discoveries made at 
and in the vicinity of the Diamond Valley Lake, near Hemet, California, 
and to promote other historical and cultural resources of the area.

    (b) Assistance for Nonmotorized Trails.--The Secretary shall enter 
into an agreement with the State of California, a political subdivision 
of the State, or a combination of State and local public agencies for 
the purpose of sharing costs incurred to design, construct, and maintain 
a system of trails around the perimeter of the Diamond Valley Lake for 
use by pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles.
    (c) Matching Requirement.--The Secretary shall require the other 
parties to an agreement under this section to secure an amount of funds 
from non-Federal sources that is at least equal to the amount provided 
by the Secretary.
    (d) <<NOTE: Deadline.>>  Time for Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
enter into the agreements required by this section not later than 180 
days after the date on which funds are first made available to carry out 
this section.

[[Page 114 STAT. 2225]]

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated not more than $14,000,000 to carry out this section.

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2977 (H.R. 4187):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-923 accompanying H.R. 4187 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-455 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.5 Total Liabilities and Its Relation to Total Financial Assets** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ORDER

C06-5165-JCC

PAGE - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JULIUS E. MCNEIL et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROSE ART, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-5165-JCC

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Marcell S. Johnson’s motion for release of 

settlement funds (Dkt. No. 43). This case involved a suit to recover damages that Mr. Johnson 

suffered while he was a minor. (See generally Dkt. No. 1.) At the time the case settled, Mr. 

Johnson was still a minor. (Dkt. No. 43 at 2.) Consequently, the settlement funds were deposited 

with KeyBank in a blocked account. (Id.) Mr. Johnson now seeks release of the funds from that 

account because he has reached the age of eighteen. (Id.) The Court hereby GRANTS Mr. 

Johnson’s motion and ORDERS that KeyBank is authorized and directed to disburse directly to 

Mr. Johnson any and all funds, plus any interest accrued, held in account number 9954 in the 

name of “Osborn Machler, PPLC Simeon J. Osborn” for and on behalf of Mr. Johnson.

//

//

//
ORDER

C06-5165-JCC

PAGE - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DATED this 17th day of December 2019.

A

John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
No. P67/183.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 66/5196 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of pumps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Victoria*Distributors, *Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 284, C. D. 2639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
PUBLIC LAW 106–573—DEC. 28, 2000 114 STAT. 3061

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3594:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Dec. 15, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–573

106th Congress

An Act

To repeal the modification of the installment method.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Installment Tax Correction

Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF INSTALLMENT METHOD.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 536 of the Ticket

to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 (relating

to modification of installment method and repeal of installment

method for accrual method taxpayers) is repealed effective with

respect to sales and other dispositions occurring on or after the

date of the enactment of such Act.

(b) APPLICABILITY.—The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall

be applied and administered as if that subsection (and the amendments made by that subsection) had not been enacted.

Approved December 28, 2000.

26 USC 453.

26 USC 453 note.

26 USC 1 note.

Installment Tax

Correction Act of

2000.

Dec. 28, 2000

[H.R. 3594]
Case 2:06-cr-00198-RSL Document 196 Filed 07/12/06 Page 1 of 1