alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                        44
<INVENTORY>                                      5,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,399
<PP&E>                                           5,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,865
<SALES>                                         23,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,795
<CGS>                                           20,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (345)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (445)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (428)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)
        

</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO § 2255 MOTION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ELDERT VEJAR-NUNEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-2075-MJP-JPD

ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO

§ 2255 MOTION

On December 27, 2005, the Court directed that respondent be served with a copy of

petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Dkt. No. 5. It appears, however, that respondent never

received the service documents. Dkt. No. 6. Although respondent acknowledges knowing

the motion was pending, it now seeks a continuance of the time in which it must file an

answer. Id. Counsel for respondent argues that a continuance is proper because he has

several other matters pending and because he will be out of the country until February 7,

2006. Id. Having carefully considered respondent’s motion and the record, the Court orders

as follows:

(1) Respondent’s motion for a continuance, Dkt. No. 6, is GRANTED.

Respondent shall have until February 27, 2006, to file its response. The Court construes

respondent’s motion to indicate additional service is unnecessary. If respondent believes it

must be re-served, it is directed to advise the Court no later than January 18, 2006.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the parties and to the

Case 2:05-cv-02075-MJP Document 7 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO § 2255 MOTION

PAGE -2

Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 13th day of January, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-02075-MJP Document 7 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 57492.

#### Arista Oil Products Company *v.*United States,

protest 183749-K (New York).

Mollison, Judge:

The plaintiff in this case imported certain sperm oil into the United States which the collector of customs classified as refined sperm oil, assessing duty thereon at the rate of *Sj4*cents per gallon under the provision therefor in paragraph 52 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. It is claimed that the oil in question is properly classifiable as crude sperm oil, dutiable at only *1}{*cents per gallon under the provisions of the same paragraph and act, as modified.

When the case was called for trial, motion was made by counsel for the defendant to dismiss the same on the ground that it was untimely, having been filed more than 60 days after the date of liquidation, citing section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Counsel for the plaintiff concedes that the liquidation occurred on September 14, 1951, and that a document, dated November 20, 1951, addressed to the Collector of Customs, District No. 10, New York 4, N. Y., and purporting on its face to be a protest against the collector’s action on liquidation in this case, was received in the customhouse at New York on November 21, 1951, or some 68 days after liquidation.

It is contended on behalf of the plaintiff, however, that certain documents consisting of copies of four letters and one affidavit should be considered as the protest in this case. The letters, which were received in evidence as collective exhibits 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, and 1-D, bear dates from October 3 to October 29, 1951, and on their face and by the testimony of the general manager and partner of the plaintiff company who signed the same are addressed to the examiner of merchandise in the appraiser’s office who passed upon the merchandise in question. It is apparent from the testimony referred to that the letters and the affidavit (which was executed by the witness and was received in evidence as collective exhibit 1-E) were either mailed to or personally delivered to the examiner of merchandise.

A careful examination of all of the documents referred to shows that none purports to protest the action of the collector — certainly, none meets the requirement of the statute that protests shall set forth “distinctly and specifically, and in respect to each entry, payment, claim, decision, or refusal, the reasons for the objection thereto” to say nothing of the fact that they were not filed “with the collector,” as required by the statute.

While it is true that this case presents a hardship dn view of the fact that it is conceded by the defendant that the imported article was actually crude sperm oil, as claimed by the plaintiff, nevertheless, because it clearly appears that no timely protest was filed, we are unable to ignore the plain provisions of section 514, *supra,*which constitute a statute of limitations, to afford any relief to the plaintiff.

The motion made by counsel for the defendant is therefore granted, and judgment will issue dismissing the protest accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DARREL WAYNE VANDERGRIFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

TONY GAMBONE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5381RBL

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

ADMIT EVIDENCE

This Civil Rights action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, has been referred to the

undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The plaintiff has been

granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Before the court is a motion filed by plaintiff asking the

court to “admit relevant evidence.” (Dkt # 78). This is the fourth such motion filed by plaintiff over

a 35 day period. (Dkt. # 67, 68, 73, an 78).

Defendants oppose the motions and note there is no rule under the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure that allows for filings of this nature (Dkt # 79). Defendant opposes the court entering the

documents at this point in the proceedings.

The Defendant is correct. When discovery or documents are submitted to the court, they

must be attached to a motion or in support of a motion. See Generally, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (c); See

also, Local Rule 7 (b).

When a motion is before the court the court can properly consider if a certain exhibit is

Case 3:06-cv-05381-RBL Document 80 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

admissible. The court is not in a position to determine what, if any, of the documents submitted by

plaintiff may ultimately be admissible. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

The documents will remain in the file. The court does not consider them as evidence at this

point in time. Either party may cite to these documents at the proper time and the other side will then

have an opportunity to object to the court’s consideration of the document. 

The clerk’s office is directed to send plaintiff and counsel for defendants a copy of this Order

and to remove docket number 78 from the court’s calendar.

DATED this 21 day of August, 2007.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05381-RBL Document 80 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21

 

Subsidiaries of AgFeed Industries, Inc.

 

Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of AgFeed: 

 

Nanchang Best Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Shanghai Best Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Guangxi Huijie Sci. & Tech. Feed Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

 

Majority-Owned Subsidiaries of Nanchang Best:

 

Lushan Breeder Pig Farm Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Wannian Xiandai Animal Husbandry Limited Liability Co., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Jiangxi Huyun Livestock Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Ganzhou Green Animal Husbandry Develop. Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Gang Feng Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC 

Yichun Tianpeng Domestic Livestock Farm, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the PRC
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 241 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]







105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 241

  Relative to the death of the Honorable Barry Goldwater, formerly a 
                   Senator from the State of Arizona.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Relative to the death of the Honorable Barry Goldwater, formerly a 
                   Senator from the State of Arizona.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret the 
announcement of the death of the Honorable Barry Goldwater, formerly a Senator 
from the State of Arizona.
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate these resolutions to 
the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family 
of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it stand recessed as a 
further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
            Attest:

                                                                      Secretary.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWERTEL, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         403,534
<SECURITIES>                                    32,882
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               503,762
<PP&E>                                         700,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                (140,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,484,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,438
<BONDS>                                        900,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,484,229
<SALES>                                         20,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,298
<CGS>                                           48,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (46,481)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (54,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (54,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (62,050)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.24)


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 139-1 Filed 04/30/12 Page 17 of 17
**1996-  peanut_stocks_and_processing_12.27.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_11.27.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_10.29.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_09.27.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_08.26.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_07.26.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_06.26.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_05.28.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_04.30.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_03.28.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_02.28.96peanut_stocks_and_processing_01.26.96

**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5236FDB-KLS

ORDER

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Magistrates’ Rules (MJR) 1, 3 and 4. This matter is on hold while plaintiff

cures certain defects in his application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Plaintiff previously filed several motions in this matter, including three motions for subpoenas (Dkt.

#3-#5) and a motion for protective order (Dkt. #8). On June 15, 2006, the Court issued an order re-noting

those motions due to the fact that the issue of plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status had not yet been

resolved. (Dkt. #11). Because that issue continues to remain unresolved, the above noted motions (Dkt.

Case 3:06-cv-05236-FDB Document 14 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

#3-5, #8) again hereby are re-noted for September 24, 2006. 

DATED this 10th day of September, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05236-FDB Document 14 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAN BUTLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5373 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION TO

REVERSE DECISION OF THE

COMMISSIONER AND

REMAND FOR FURTHER

CONSIDERATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

that the decision of the Commissioner determining Ms Butler to not be disabled be reversed and the matter

be remanded to the administration for further consideration before a new administrative law judge. The

Commissioner has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The ALJ erred as described in the report;

(3) The matter is therefore REMANDED to the administration for further consideration as

directed in the report; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff's counsel, Defendant's counsel

Case 3:06-cv-05373-FDB Document 23 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

and Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2007.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05373-FDB Document 23 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 109

Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, in its elections, its 
        dedication to democratic ideals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1999

 Mrs. Capps (for herself, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Houghton, Mr. Berman, Mr. 
 Saxton, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Ose, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
 Porter, Mr. Bonior, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Matsui, 
   Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Dixon, Ms. Schakowsky, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. 
 Crowley, Mr. Berry, Mr. Holt, Mr. Farr of California, Ms. Kilpatrick, 
Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Filner, Mr. Payne, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kennedy 
    of Rhode Island, Mr. Blagojevich, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Ms. 
Velazquez, Mr. Minge, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Horn, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
 Etheridge, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Allen, Mr. 
 Engel, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Bentsen, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Phelps, 
Mr. Oberstar, Mr. King, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. 
 Forbes, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, 
Mr. Condit, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, and Mr. 
   Rothman) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, in its elections, its 
        dedication to democratic ideals, and for other purposes.

Whereas since its creation in 1948, Israel has fulfilled the dreams of its 
        founders who envisioned a vigorous, open, and stable democracy;
Whereas the centerpiece of Israeli democracy is its system of competitive and 
        free elections;
Whereas on May 17, 1999, the Israeli people--Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs--
        went to the polls in large numbers in a remarkably peaceful election; 
        and
Whereas this election is only the latest example of Israel's commitment to the 
        democratic ideals of freedom and pluralism, values that it shares with 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States--
            (1) commends the people of Israel for reaffirming, in the 
        May 17 election, its dedication to democratic ideals;
            (2) congratulates Ehud Barak on his election as Prime 
        Minister of Israel; and
            (3) pledges to work with the President of the United States 
        and the new Government of Israel to strengthen the bonds 
        between the United States and Israel and to advance the cause 
        of peace in the Middle East.
                                 <all>
```
f..ft.Q. Dl»-\S-D0Q3g-Cft

XlO Tu£ COOftf Of C£CHOl&L (VPPCALS

RECEBWE_ ...

FILED IN ft d5£Rf &RJCJL DmJL&U£ftfV C0URY 0F CR!^Al mm*

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS nrT .. nn,_ ^x|- OCT 01 2015

OCT 0122^5 *

Abel Acosta, Clerk

£XKS< MoTIDv) £oR gXf&OSXksO Of 1irt£

To ftol toRwyi Codr< d£ cerMTiOAL frWemS*:

Tars, MofiiMO To fi£Qoe>f TUAf TA£ tcm£. foe siix^

&M 3o o^iTo ftLLou) urn te&otdp&uc txhet To

30 DM 0£&DUtt£ £o# ftxr»JGr A PerXfXi*} foe A QiscsectaM^

af TLm Txm£ ft&u&ue&r-t £xL£k-mrs> RC&osir pro-s£

n

Turk £xf£iasi6i0 %$, f^or <ofi Pui?pos£ of oioaitu£

&Klfu£> TO a Cov)Rf frPfeGOTtPO AtTDtatetf TO fiOX HIS

(PM)PoQ Hrn,

-I-
^o D&vMWftwN Q&?&x£\kLV< (?daoeT aootodm^l

-TxtAl SO WC Y\M fta)I£vd TH£ QZCDQAk Hoe£ Eyr&Osroexy

CM& flBfiPfttfL AislO £nu£ Tw\£ (PORj Pto-S£,

irt€2£ U&S &fc&0 >» PR£\)ldO^ SEQUENT fog Ak)

£iT£i^Mixa.

<Uii uuoc«sr^ioto was* aita&jt to co^gol uirnl TU£

SfGrtl AUO OoCtoaf Rito*) ££ TU£ SffeTE. XS> OPft&CD To fHri

AWtaii To gwrtoto <±\C TxwC £b£ fiELrsofi- «n Poxixoo

<bt QDiLcetro^ftW c^jxfiua To ocroMiLrac s,:2o^,

&fch0 foft SAJOA OftttiZ. &*JO &)RtU£& tfttXttP tt> IA4XCM "^

££S£&tt& 13* ^ustfltf £^rXT\j£ft.

Tac T^(^ 0CP&er>*0Jr dp (jLiwxjj&Ltfifira^ at YU£

Wtool UlimK T^ u)ftu*en £oa^ Tcvki oecuvfcC aitott

(tojoiiM op' Pc&xom Twwvf £ Wmi£ ££&& Tun norxao &k)&

Tvte£#«irf£ Horxao to sospqjo q>3 KoujJk a^ Tn&r

e*>0 cods/. jQ^^hamLd^Uo^

-2-
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Vital Products, Inc for the year ended July 31, 2008 and 2007
of our report dated November 12, 2008 included in its Registration Statement
on Form S-1/A (No. 333-127915) dated February 27, 2008 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedules  for the year ended
July 31, 2008 listed in the accompanying index.

/s/MSCM LLP
------------------------
MSCM LLP

November 13, 2008
<PAGE>