alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

April 25, 1963

No. 67635.

#### Rex-Spanall, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/14307 (Galveston).

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of form supports- similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2319), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/322.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. and Victor England Agencies et al. *v.*United States, protests 62/3160, etc. (Seattle).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hanging paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England*Agencies, *Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: rta545@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:00:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

roger Arbogast

Plainfield, IN 46168
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Interest Rate Paid on Cash Deposited To Secure U.S. Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bonds

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning October 1, 2023, and ending on 
December 31, 2023, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
Immigration Bond interest rate is 3 per centum per annum.

DATES: Rates are applicable October 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Will Walcutt, 
Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal 
Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, Parkersburg, West Virginia 
26106-1328.
    You can download this notice at the following internet addresses: 
<http://www.treasury.gov> or <http://www.federalregister.gov>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Hanna, Manager, Funds Management 
Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the 
Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia 261006-1328 (304) 480-5120; 
Will Walcutt, Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management 
Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, 
Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-1328, (304) 480-5117.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal law requires that interest payments 
on cash deposited to secure immigration bonds shall be ``at a rate 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, except that in no case 
shall the interest rate exceed 3 per centum per annum.'' 8 U.S.C. 
1363(a). Related Federal regulations state that ``Interest on cash 
deposited to secure immigration bonds will be at the rate as determined 
by the Secretary of the Treasury, but in no case will exceed 3 per 
centum per annum or be less than zero.'' 8 CFR 293.2. Treasury has 
determined that interest on the bonds will vary quarterly and will 
accrue during each calendar quarter at a rate equal to the lesser of 
the average of the bond equivalent rates on 91-day Treasury bills 
auctioned during the preceding calendar quarter, or 3 per centum per 
annum, but in no case less than zero. [FR Doc. 2015-18545]. In addition 
to this Notice, Treasury posts the current quarterly rate in Table 2b--
Interest Rates for Specific Legislation on the TreasuryDirect website.
    The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Finance, Gary Grippo, 
having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the authority 
to electronically sign this document to Heidi Cohen, Federal Register 
Liaison for the Department, for purposes of publication in the Federal 
Register.

Heidi Cohen,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2023-22276 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME UNTIL FEBRUARY 12, 2007, TO FILE

ADDITIONAL DECLARATIONS

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

GARY ALAN NOBLE,

Petitioner, 

v.

SANDRA CARTER,

Respondent.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-579-JLR-JPD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL

FEBRUARY 12, 2007, TO FILE

ADDITIONAL DECLARATIONS

Petitioner Gary Alan Noble has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas

corpus arguing that his current sentence was unconstitutionally enhanced by the use of a 1969

conviction in which he was denied the assistance of counsel. Dkt. No. 1. Respondent has filed

a response opposing the petition (Dkt. No. 10), to which petitioner has timely replied. Dkt.

No. 13. Oral arguments in this matter were heard on January 18, 2007. During arguments,

petitioner moved for leave to expand the record with certain additional declarations. The

Court granted this request, affording petitioner until February 1, 2007, to supplement the

record. Dkt. No. 18. 

On February 2, 2007, petitioner brought the present motion, which seeks an additional

two weeks to file supplemental declarations. After careful consideration of the motion and

balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

Case 2:06-cv-00579-JLR Document 20 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME UNTIL FEBRUARY 12, 2007, TO FILE

ADDITIONAL DECLARATIONS

PAGE - 2

(1) Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 19) is GRANTED. 

However, petitioner shall file any additional declarations no later than Monday, February

12, 2007. No further extensions of time will be granted.

(2) The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to

counsel for both parties, and to the Honorable James L. Robart.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2007.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00579-JLR Document 20 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

				       NOS. 	2-08-156-CR

						2-08-157-CR

						2-08-158-CR

TRACI RENE CAHILL	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Traci Rene Cahill entered open pleas of guilty to three charges of possessing a forged check with the intent to pass.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.21(a), (d) (Vernon Supp. 2008).  She appeals her convictions and three twenty-month sentences, which the trial court ordered to be served concurrently.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeals are frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).  We gave appellant the opportunity to file a pro se brief, which she did, alleging ineffective assistance by her trial counsel.  The State did not file a brief.

	Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

	We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se brief.  We agree with counsel that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

							TERRIE LIVINGSTON

							JUSTICE

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 23, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 4F (2)


                           COMMITMENT REDUCTION NOTICE



To:  The First National Bank of Chicago,
As Agent (the "Agent") under the Credit
Agreement Described Below.

Re: 364 Day Credit Agreement, dated December 15, 1998 (the "Credit Agreement"),
among Dexter Corporation (the "Borrower"), the Agent, and the Lenders named
therein. Terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned thereto in the Credit Agreement.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The Borrower hereby gives notice under the Credit Agreement that the
Scheduled Asset Sale occurred today and the Borrower has received proceeds in
excess of $200,000,000.00. Pursuant to Section 2.7 of the Agreement, the
Aggregate Commitment under the 364 Day Credit Agreement is automatically and
permanently reduced from $300,000,000.00 to $100,000,000.00.



Very truly yours,

Dexter Corporation

By:       /s/ Dale Ribaudo

Name:     Dale Ribaudo

Title:    Treasurer

Date:     February 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF INCOME, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,832
<PP&E>                                           6,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,257
<SALES>                                          6,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,574
<CGS>                                            5,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (82)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.021)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: nano2nd@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:26:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Johnson

Littleton, CO 80130
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Smart & Final Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 23, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ross E. Roeder, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 
|-----------------
|Date: May 2, 2003
|                 



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Smart & Final Inc. and will be retained by Smart & Final Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 11 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 11

 A resolution making minority party appointments to Senate committees 
                        for the 105th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              January 9 (legislative day, January 7), 1997

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 A resolution making minority party appointments to Senate committees 
                        for the 105th Congress.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of rule XXV, the 
following shall constitute the minority party's membership on the 
standing committees for the 105th Congress, or until their successors 
are chosen:
    Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry: Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
Leahy, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Kerrey, Ms. Landrieu, 
and Mr. Johnson.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Byrd, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Hollings, 
Mr. Leahy, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
Reid, Mr. Kohl, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Dorgan, and Mrs. Boxer.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Levin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Bingaman, 
Mr. Glenn, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Robb, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Cleland.
    Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
Dodd, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Bryan, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Johnson, 
and Mr. Reed.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Hollings, 
Mr. Inouye, Mr. Ford, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Breaux, Mr. 
Bryan, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Wyden.
    Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Ford, 
Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Graham, Mr. Wyden, Mr. 
Johnson, and Ms. Landrieu.
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mr. Baucus, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Reid, Mr. Graham, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. 
Boxer, and Mr. Wyden.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Rockefeller, 
Mr. Breaux, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Graham, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Bryan, and 
Mr. Kerrey.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Biden, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Dodd, 
Mr. Kerry, Mr. Robb, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Wellstone.
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Mr. Glenn, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
Lieberman, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Torricelli, and Mr. Cleland.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Leahy, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
Kohl, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Torricelli.
    Committee on Labor and Human Resources: Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Wellstone, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. 
Reed.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ZACKARY DANIEL HILLEGASS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3197

[October 11, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 31-2016-CF000378-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. 

Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. P66/326.

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. *v.*United States, protest 65/7235 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc.,*and *J. J. Murphey & Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and *United States*v. *M. & D. Miller, Inc.*(41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62335.

#### H. A. Caesar & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 35524-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 9,566.

#### MILLER v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.

[2 N. J. Law J. 50.]

Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.

Sept. Term, 1878.

Bankruptcy — Action to Recover Debt Dub Bankrupt — Set-Ofp.

[It is no defense to an action by an assignee to recover a debt due the bankrupt that said debt has been claimed by the bankrupt as set-off in a pending suit.]

[This was an action by Miller, assignee in bankruptcy of Wyckoff and others, against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. Heard on demurrer to plea.]'

Edward Q. Keasbey, for demurrants.

Mr. Keen, for defendants.

To a declaration by an assignee in bankruptcy containing the common counts for money due to the bankrupts, a plea was filed alleging that the defendants, before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, had begun a suit against the bankrupts in the New Jersey supreme' court, and that the bankrupts did claim, by way of set-off in that action, the sum of money claimed in this suit, and for the same cause of action, and that that suit was still pending and undetermined.

A demurrer to this plea was sustained. The-plaintiff’s counsel cited Serra e’ Hijo v. Hoffman [30 La. Ann. 67].