alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 285/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 285 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5727 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 285

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5727 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 285/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 285/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 285/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7377 — Centerbridge/APCOA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2014/C 285/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7311 — MOL/ENI Česká/ENI Romania/ENI Slovensko) (1) | 3 |
| 2014/C 285/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7300 — COFCO/Noble Agri) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 285/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7377 — Centerbridge/APCOA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2014/C 285/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7311 — MOL/ENI Česká/ENI Romania/ENI Slovensko) (1)

3

2014/C 285/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7300 — COFCO/Noble Agri) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Wayne E. Jackson, Plaintiff,
v. United States ofAmerica, Defendant. 

# --

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

### ) ) ) ) ) Civil ActionNo. 

### ) ) ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JAN 

## f 62009 NANcyMAYER WHITT/NGTO U.S. DISTRICT

## cour#'ClERK 

# Og U1D1

This matter is before the Court onreview ofplaintiffs

### pro se complaint and application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant the application and will dismiss the complaint as it is required to do ifit determines that a prisoner action is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Plaintiff, a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary Lee in Jonesville, Virginia, sues the United States under the Trading with the EnemyAct, 50 App. U.S.C. 

### § 1 

### et seq., for "the return ofany and all negotiable instruments forwarded to agents ofthe United States ofAmerica and transferred to the AlienProperty Custodian and/or deposited in the Treasury ofthe United States ofAmerica." CompI. at 5. Plaintiffalso seeks to discharge alleged debts "onrecord with the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland (Northern Division)" that he claims
were satisfied by "Third Party Interpleader, Wayne Earl Jackson-EI[,] [who] has submitted several payments to 'discharge'" the debt. 

### Id. Plaintiffhas stated no cognizable claim underthe Trading withthe EnemyAct, which governs, 

### inter alia, claims to property seized "from [a foreign] enemyor ally of[said] enemy," 50 App. U.S.C. § 9(a), and the claim arising from proceedings in the District ofMaryland should be pursued in that court.

### Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios are subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). See Neitzke 

### v. Williams, 

### 490 U.S. 319,328 (1989); Best 

### v. Kelly, 39 

### F.3d 328,330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Moreover, a complaint may be dismissed as frivolous when it lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact," Brandon 

### v. District of Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734 

### F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir.1984), or is based on "fanciful factual allegation[s]." Neitzke, 

### 490 U.S. at 325. This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A separate Order of accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: December

### ~, 2008

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGEANT KAMMERZELL,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5263 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that

Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) be granted. The Court,

having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Karen L. Strombom, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) plaintiff’s Complaint [Dkt. #7] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to

Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants,

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 3rd day of November, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05263-FDB Document 20 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 1
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.201 Special Drawing Rights SDRs Certificates and Treasury Currency  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineMonetary authority; SDR certificates issued by federal government; asset
	FL713014003
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	1Monetary authority; SDR certificates issued by federal government; asset
	FL713014003
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	5.2
	2Federal government; Treasury currency; liability
	FL313112003
	25.9
	25.9
	25.9
	25.6
	25.3
	25.3
	25.3
	25.3
	25.3
	25.3
	25.3
	3Monetary authority; Treasury currency; asset
	FL713012003
	43.5
	44.2
	44.8
	45.5
	46.3
	47.6
	47.0
	47.3
	47.6
	47.7
	47.9
	4Instrument discrepancies; Treasury currency (seigniorage)
	FL903012005
	-17.6
	-18.3
	-18.8
	-19.9
	-21.0
	-22.2
	-21.7
	-22.0
	-22.2
	-22.4
	-22.6
	5 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 307

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Majority Leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was submitted

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Majority

Leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished Majority Leader, the Sen3 ator from Mississippi, the Honorable Trent Lott, for his

4 exemplary leadership and the cooperative and dedicated

5 manner in which he has performed his leadership respon6 sibilities in the conduct of Senate business during the sec7 ond session of the 105th Congress.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1919/2005

of 24 November 2005         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 25 NOVEMBER 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

Plaintiff had previously been advised by the Court that she had not effected proper service

of the summons and complaint on Defendant in an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for default,

issued on July 19, 2006. (Dkt. #18 at 2).

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SHARNELL HORNE, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C06-607-MJP-MJB

)

v. )

) REPORT AND

CITY OF SEATTLE, ) RECOMMENDATION

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________ )

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1981. On June 1, 2006, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in this court,

alleging discrimination and fraud by Defendant. On November 24, 2006, this Court

issued an Order directing Plaintiff to properly serve Defendant with the amended

complaint and appropriate summons as required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j)(2) and make

proof of service to the Court, or to show cause why this action should not be dismissed

without prejudice for failure to timely effect service.1

 (Dkt. #23). To date, Plaintiff has

neither made proof of proper service nor responded to the Court’s order to show cause,

and she has not requested an extension of time in which to do so.

Case 2:06-cv-00607-MJP Document 24 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 2

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends dismissal of this case pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to effect proper service and failure to comply with the

Court’s 

November 2006 show cause order. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and

Recommendation.

DATED this 29th day of January, 2007.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00607-MJP Document 24 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2
r 

U.S.I>tpott_, of TtOII&pOIIOIIon 

~' <e Of me )ec.,e'?'yOt tO~ O?i':J'·C" 

Chier. Documentary Services Dtv . 

Depanment of Transportation 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATlON OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 

Aerotransporte de Carga Union S.A. de C.V. 

(Name of Company. please print) 

. ha\'ing its princtpal 

Zona G de Hangares s/n, Colonia Zona Federal Aeropuerto tnternacional de Ia Ciudad de Mexico 

office at Delegaci6n Venustiano Carranza, Mexico OF, CP 15620 

(Address) 

hereby e~ig nate~ . pur~uantto ~ection 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code tfomterly ~ction IOU~tb) of the F~deral .'\1 iation Act 

of 19.5!!. a~ amended I the person named he low as it' Agent upon ,,·hom ser"ice of all notices ;~nd proce~~- und ~II ortJ.:r,. d.:ci~im, . 

and requiremems of the Depanment of·Tmnspot1ation may be made for and on behalf of ~aid carrier. h.:reby cunceling all pre1 iou~ 

1.1l!~ignation~ of ag.:nt~ made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent ______________________________ David M. Endersbee 

________ ~---------------------

. !Please Print) 

Zuckert Scoutt Rasenberger LLP, 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W. 

Suite 700, Washington, DC 20006 

--------------------------------- Address 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

( ·/) A.v;'/ / i 1

( ~~11...., ././! _1 / ~' (//,./.-( { Name Ji'/1,' • " · U 't <t:' · - C"-'X (Initials) __ 1.:.__ ,-~ "'-- ...::::::..._ ________ _ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Aerotransporte de Carga Union S.A. de C.V. 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by 

of said company . and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

on this _7_'"=1 __!.,._ day or--JAl-.I....!P_ Q._\ _L ___ , ~ 20 I 5 

/ 

/ 

I 

By: 

ATTEST: v' l (e ( 

OST f 1010.5 (1 - 95)
No. 68545.

protests 62/18957, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Victor England Agencies et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hanging paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England Agencies, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62825.

#### Rafidane Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 327665-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, they were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 1997

              Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution 
of the United States of America'', prepared under the direction of the 
Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a Senate document, 
with appropriate illustration.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 440,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 100,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the Joint 
        Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the pamphlet for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $120,000, such number of copies of the 
        pamphlet as does not exceed total printing and production costs 
        of $120,000, with distribution to be allocated in the same 
        proportion as in paragraph (1).

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 62 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 1997

              Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the brochure entitled ``How Our Laws Are 
Made'', under the direction of the Parliamentarian of the House of 
Representatives in consultation with the Parliamentarian of the Senate, 
shall be printed as a Senate document, with suitable paper cover in the 
style selected by the chairman of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 250,000 copies of the brochure for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 100,000 copies of the brochure for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the brochure for the use of the Joint 
        Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the brochure for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $180,000, such number of copies of the 
        brochure as does not exceed total printing and production costs 
        of $180,000, with distribution to be allocated in the same 
        proportion as in paragraph (1).

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business
      AdvisorsPhone
      (248) 203-0080
                Fax
      (248) 281-0940
                30600
      Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
                Bingham
      Farms, MI 48025-4586
                www.sucpas.com
 
 October
7, 2010
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To the
Board of Directors of
 Quality
Alliance Group, Inc.
 Chesterfield,
VA
 
 To Whom
It May Concern:
 
 Silberstein
Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by Quality
Alliance Group, Inc. of our report dated September 27, 2010, relating to the
financial statements of Quality Alliance Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as
of and for the years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from May
7, 2008 (inception) to June 30, 2010.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ Silberstein Ungar,
PLLC
 
 Silberstein
Ungar, PLLC
  1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KHALID O. RAHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5262 RBL/KLS

ORDER RE: AMENDED

COMPLAINT 

This civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. On May 24, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to

amend his complaint to correct certain pleading deficiencies. Plaintiff has done so and may now

effect service of his amended complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

Plaintiff may obtain service forms from the Clerk’s Office.

DATED this 3rd day of July, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05262-BHS Document 7 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. (ET).

PLACE: The meeting will be held in Auditorium LL-002 at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 and 
will be simultaneously webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. 
Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be 
webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. The Commission will consider whether to 
propose a new rule to prohibit national securities exchanges from 
offering volume-based transaction pricing in connection with the 
execution of agency-related orders in NMS stocks; and to require 
national securities exchanges to have certain anti-evasion rules and 
written policies and procedures and disclose certain information if 
they offer volume-based transaction pricing for member proprietary 
volume in those stocks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: October 11, 2023.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22835 Filed 10-12-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Answer by the Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association has been

served this 14th day of February, 2014, upon the following persons via email:

steve.morrissey@united.com

thomas.bolling@united.com

dan.weiss@coair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

russell.bailey@alpa.org

jonathan.cohen@alpa.org

edw@ttd.org

c1ytle@portoakland.com

kgeorge@broward.org

robert.wirick@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

jesse.elliot@faa.gov

nicholas.tsokris@faa.gov

john.chen@faa.gov

john.allen@faa.gov

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

nssparks@fedex.com

gbleopard@fedex.com

dberg@airlines.org

jcasey@airiines.org

kglatz@airlines.org

cc@eurocockpit.be

ejames@jamhoff.com

urskr@state.gov

sshur@traveltech.org

eugene.alford@trade.gov

Matthew.Baldwin@ec.europa.eu

Felix. LEINEMANN@eeas.europa.eu

David.Batchelor@sesarju.eu

Ottar.Ostnes@sd.dep.no

Iohn.Hanlon@ELFAA.com

paul.gretch@dot.gov

Robert.Finamore@dot.gov

romanow@pillsburylaw.com

peter.nelson@pillsburylaw.com

info@airlineinfo.com

vegard.einan@parat.com