alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 87 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.87
                                         Agreed to April 1, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 419) to provide surveillance, 
research, and services aimed at prevention of birth defects, and for 
other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
        (1) In section 1 of the bill, strike ``1997'' and insert 
    ``1998''.
        (2) In section 2 of the bill:
            (A) In subsection (d) of section 317C of the Public Health 
        Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such section 2) 
        strike ``1998'' and insert ``1999''.
            (B) In subsection (f) of section 317C of the Public Health 
        Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such section 2) 
        strike ``1998'' and all that follows through ``2001'' and 
        insert ``1999, $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2000, and such sums 
        as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2001 and 
        2002''.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

HUSSEIN,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

TRIDENT SEAFOODS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-650P 

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

On August 3, 2006, the Court filed a minute order requiring the Plaintiff to either: (1) file a

motion to disqualify Defendant’s counsel or (2) file a second Amended Joint Status Report. The

deadline for the former was August 18, 2006; for the latter, August 31.

Plaintiff has neither filed a motion to disqualify counsel or a second Amended Joint Status

Report. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file a second Amended Joint Status Report by September 25,

2006; if he does not do so, the Court will dismiss the case on its own motion for failure to prosecute.

Filed this 18th day of September, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MJP Document 9 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 55701.

protests 169314—K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fan Company et al. v. United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5236FDB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By order of November 17, 2005, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was directed to pay the

filing fee within thirty days of the entry of the order, otherwise the cause of action would be

dismissed. Plaintiff responded by filing a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41. Such motion was unnecessary under the circumstances, as Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: This cause of action is DISMISSED.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05236-FDB Document 21 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 57792.

protests 188437-K, etc. (Boston).

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 5

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a President

pro tempore.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the President of the United States of the election

of a President pro tempore.

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be

2 notified of the election of Strom Thurmond, a Senator

3 from the State of South Carolina, as President pro tem4 pore.

Æ
Before the Third Division,

March 20, 1959

No. 62874.

#### Sam Forwand Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/4139 and 58/7213 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Percon Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of
September 30 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income and cash
flows for the nine months in the period ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                      4,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,257
<PP&E>                                           5,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,222)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,744
<BONDS>                                            730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,340
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,531
<SALES>                                         21,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,969
<CGS>                                           11,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,083
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer





I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 54422.

#### T. W. Holt & Company *v.*United States,

petitions 6766-R and 6767-R (Tampa).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Counsel for the petitioner advised the court that petition 6766-R was filed on August 31, 1949, at which time there was pending a motion for rehearing of a decision rendered July 11, 1949, upon petitioner’s appeal for reappraisement. The decision on said motion was not rendered until September 21, 1949, and consequently, until that last-mentioned date, there was no final appraisement. Petition 6766-R, filed prior thereto, was therefore dismissed as premature. With respect to petition 6767-R, it appeared that there was an honest difference of opinion between the importer and the appraiser as to the *218proper basis for determining value. Upon a full consideration of the entire record it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case. Petition 6767-R was therefore granted.
**Exhibit
        14.1**
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**
 **PUBLIC
        ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
        S-8 No. 333-129136) pertaining to the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan of
        Double
        Hull Tankers, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the
        consolidated financial statements of Double Hull Tankers, Inc. and our report
        dated March 31, 2006 with respect to the predecessor combined carve-out
        financial statements of OSG Crude both included in Double Hull Tankers, Inc.’s
        Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.
  
 /s/
        ERNST
& YOUNG LLP
 
 New
        York,
        New York
 April
        2,
        2007
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Jason Nanchun JiangName:
    Jason Nanchun JiangTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 24
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 56 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.56
                                      Agreed to October 23, 1997        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on October 29, 
1997, for a ceremony to honor Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope by conferring 
upon him the status of an honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of the 
United States. Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 
prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SIDNEY CHARLES RANDALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. LARSON, 

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0798-JCC-MAT

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE REPLY

 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se in this civil rights action, has filed a “motion for

reconsideration.” (Dkt. #61). It is apparent from reading this motion that plaintiff is seeking an

additional extension of time to file his reply, which he filed along with the motion for

reconsideration. The original deadline for filing the reply was June 15, 2007. (Dkt. #56).

Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration will be construed as a motion for an extension of time

to file a reply. Defendants have not filed a response to the motion. Having reviewed plaintiff’s

motion for an extension of time and the balance of the record, the Court does hereby find and

ORDER as follows:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Dkt. #61) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 62 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY

PAGE -2

reply, filed on June 25, 2007 (Dkt. #60), will be considered by the Court when it considers

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

(2) The Clerk shall RENOTE plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #52) for

consideration by the Court on July 6, 2007. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this

Order to plaintiff, to counsel for defendants, and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour.

DATED this 3rd day of July, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 62 Filed 07/03/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER EXTENDING SERVICE DEADLINE - 1

[MS06-90-RSM-MAT]

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

 Magistrate Judge Theiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. MS06-90-RSM-MAT

Petitioner, )

 )

v. ) [PROPOSED]

) ORDER EXTENDING

ELLEN M. RYAN, ) SERVICE DEADLINE

)

Respondent. ) )

The United States’ Motion to Extend Service Deadline is GRANTED. The

service deadline is hereby extended to the 17th day of July, 2006.

DATED this 16th day of June, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by:

s/Kristin B. Johnson 

KRISTIN B. JOHNSON, WSBA #28189

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-mc-00090-RSM-MAT Document 5 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER EXTENDING SERVICE DEADLINE - 2

[MS06-90-RSM-MAT]

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that she is an employee in the Office of the United

States Attorney for the Western District of Washington, and is a person of such age and

discretion as to be competent to serve papers.

That, on June 15, 2006, she electronically filed the foregoing document(s), Order

Extending Service Deadline, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of

such filing to the following CM/ECF participants:

-0-

That on June 15, 2006, she caused a copy of this Order Extending Service

Deadline, to be served upon the individual hereinafter named by first class mail, postage

prepaid as follows: 

Ellen M. Ryan

3208 NW 70th Street

Seattle, Washington 98117-6129

Dated this 15th day of June, 2006.

s/Lisa M. Lindquist 

 LISA M. LINDQUIST

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5200

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-7970

Facsimile: (206) 553-4073

E-mail: Lisa.Lindquist@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mc-00090-RSM-MAT Document 5 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.01



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               IN COMPLIANCE WITH
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, Jay A. Mealey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crown Energy
Corporation, hereby certify that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Crown Energy
Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the accompanying Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Crown Energy
Corporation.


                                            /s/    Jay Mealey
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:    Jay Mealey
                                            Title: President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer of Crown Energy Corporation
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                                   VANS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended August 31, 2002 of Vans, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
J. Greenebaum, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                        /s/ Andrew J. Greenebaum
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Andrew J. Greenebaum
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        October 10, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION 

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DUNCAN J. MCNEIL, III, ) CASE NO. C05-1975-JCC

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

) APPLICATION TO PROCEED

UNITED STATES, et al., ) IN FORMA PAUPERIS

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

Plaintiff Duncan J. McNeil, a prisoner incarcerated in Spokane County Jail, has filed an

application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in a civil suit. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff has been deemed

a “vexatious litigant” in the Eastern District of Washington, the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the Central District of California, and Spokane County Superior Court. See McNeil v.

Spokane County Jail, et al., No. C04-371-AAM (E.D. Wash.) (Dkt. 10). The Eastern District of

Washington also dismissed with prejudice more than three complaints filed by plaintiff upon

finding them frivolous and malicious, and entered a “pre-filing review order” imposing conditions

on any future complaints submitted by plaintiff to that court. Id. at Dkts. 10 & 25.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner who brings three or more civil actions which

are dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, will be precluded from

bringing any other civil action IFP unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. Accordingly, because plaintiff has litigated more than three prior actions that

Case 2:05-cv-01975-JCC Document 3 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION 

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Page - 2

were dismissed as frivolous and malicious, and because he does not allege, nor is there any

indication he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, he may not proceed in this

action without paying the full filing fee.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed IFP (Dkt. #1) is DENIED.

(2) This action shall proceed only if plaintiff pays the applicable filing fee within

thirty (30) days after entry of this Order.

(3) The Clerk shall furnish copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. Monica

J. Benton.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2006. AUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry

This 9th day of December, 2005.

 /s/Monica J. Benton 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01975-JCC Document 3 Filed 01/09/06 Page 2 of 2