alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# r - ATt, 7 7.7 ,, viie L ,..., 44i i ,i,1 ' 

# 01

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 07-0011

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE 

# FILED MAY 1 4 2021

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court ORDERState of Montana

The judges ofthe Eighth Judicial District ofthe State of Montana have requested the assistance of retired District Judge Wm. Nels Swandal to assume jurisdiction of Cascade County Cause Nos. ADV-20-121, Jodie Young v. ERA Advantage Realty, and ADV-19-773,Bridger Holdings v. Bridger Steel. Judge Swandal has retired under the provisions ofthe Montana Judges'Retirement System and,being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103, MCA,has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Eighth Judicial District Court with the above-listed matters. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active service in the District Court ofthe Eighth Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, to assume jurisdiction ofCascade County Cause Nos. ADV-20-121,Jodie Young v. ERA Advantage Realty, and ADV-19-773, Bridger Holdings v. Bridger Steel, and is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings,opinions,and orders, including final resolution ofsaid matters. 2. For all active service, Judge Swandal shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be reimbursed. A copy ofthis Order shall be filed with the District Court Clerk ofCascade County, with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel ofrecord in the above-listed matters. 05/14/2021

Case Number: PR 07-0011

### A copy ofthis Order shall also be provided to the District Court Judges ofthe Eighth

Judicial District, the Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, Beth McLaughlin, Supreme Court Administrator,and Cathy Pennie,Office ofthe Supreme Court Administrator. This Order is entered by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of the 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof. i ,. \., DATED this 11 day ofMay,2021.

ChiefJustice

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

WARD K. CAPSTICK,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant.

 C06-300 MJP

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-300 MJP and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 21st day of April, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00300-MJP Document 7 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Bloomsburg Town Center, LLC :

:

v. : No. 905 C.D. 2019

:

Town of Bloomsburg, :

Appellant :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, December 23, 2020

, having considered Appellee’s application

for reargument and Appellant’s answer in response thereto , the application is

denied.
No. 68537.

protest 59/29956 (Milwaukee).

#### M. E. Dey & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PEDRO RANDELL SHIRD, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1784 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed July 6, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; J. Frank Porter, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PHILLIP IRA SCHEFFLIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5696FDB

ORDER REFUSING TO SERVE

PETITION AND DIRECTION

TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court, having reviewed the § 2254 petition filed in this case, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court will not order a response to the petition because petitioner has failed to name a

proper respondent.

Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Court states:

(a) Applicants in present custody. If the applicant is presently in custody pursuant to

the state judgment in question, the application shall be in the form of a petition for a writ of

habeas corpus in which the state officer having custody of the applicant shall be named as

respondent.

Accordingly, a petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him

or her as the respondent to the petition. This person typically is the warden of the facility in which the

petitioner is incarcerated. Failure to name the petitioner's custodian deprives federal courts of personal

jurisdiction. Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994)(citations omitted). In

this case, petitioner has named the State of Washington as respondent. The State is not a proper

respondent in a habeas corpus petition.

(2) Petitioner must show cause why his petition should not be dismissed and he is granted

Case 3:05-cv-05696-FDB Document 6 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

leave to amend the petition to name a proper respondent to be filed with the clerk not later then

December 15, 2005.

(3) If petitioner fails to timely file an amended petition naming a proper respondent, the petition

will be subject to dismissal.

(6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold_______ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05696-FDB Document 6 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 65250.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/12072, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAKOREAN D. BRADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

Case No. 5D23-901

LT Case No. 2019-CF-12790

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed April 25, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County,

Steve Henderson, Judge.

Jakorean D. Bradley, Perry, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY and SOUD, JJ., concur.
From: mccurryg@mac.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:34:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Georgia McCurry

American Fork, UT 84003
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RENEWED/SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TONY D. PENWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

REED HOLTGEERTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-2106-TSZ-MAT

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ 

RENEWED/SUPPLEMENTAL 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

The parties have filed a joint status report. (Dkt. 143.) The Court ORDERS the 

following briefing schedule: defendants shall file their renewed/supplemental motion for 

summary judgment by May 15, 2012, to be noted for the fourth Friday after the filing and 

service of the motion; plaintiff’s response and defendants’ optional reply are due in accordance 

with Local Rule CR 7(d)(3). If necessary, the Court shall request the parties’ input on a 

discovery plan and a trial date after resolution of the summary-judgment motion. The Clerk of 

Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel for the parties.

///
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RENEWED/SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

PAGE -2

DATED this 21st day of February, 2012.

A

Mary Alice Theiler 

United States Magistrate Judge
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 30 of 30
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICKEY A. BEAVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICK PALMERTON,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5215RJB

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is 

currently in custody at the Western State Hospital, and plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to

afford the $250.00 filing fee. Plaintiff shall note that leave to proceed as a pauper does not necessarily

entitle plaintiff to a waiver of any other cost(s) of litigation. . 

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 21st day of April, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05215-RJB Document 3 Filed 04/21/2006 Page 1 of 1

Beaver v. Western State Hospital et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
No. 61610.

#### Paolo Alonge, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 169648-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of condimento similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Paolo Alonge, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 351, C. D. 1886), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00066

- CV

SITRAM GERS EQUIPMENT

v. ZULEIMI BENITEZ

On Appeal from the 423rd District Court of Bastrop County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 423

- 8283

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 15, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 256

To refer S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard M. Barlow 
of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' to the chief judge of the United States Court 
                of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 1998

Mr. Bingaman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To refer S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard M. Barlow 
of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' to the chief judge of the United States Court 
                of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That (a) S. 2274 entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
Richard M. Barlow of Santa Fe, New Mexico'' now pending in the Senate, 
together with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief 
judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.
    (b) The chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed according to the provisions of sections 1492 
        and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the Senate, at the earliest practicable 
        date, providing--
                    (A) such findings of fact and conclusions that are 
                sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in such bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States or a gratuity; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Mr. Richard M. Barlow of 
                Santa Fe, New Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67855-67856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 5, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

[[Page 67856]]

    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21848 Filed 9-28-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
No. 54425.

#### M. J. Golombeck *v.*United States,

protest 136039-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 183

Congratulating Northeastern University on providing quality higher education

in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for 100 years, from 1898–1998.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1998

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. KERRY) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Northeastern University on providing quality

higher education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

for 100 years, from 1898–1998.

Whereas on October 16, 1997, Northeastern University

marked the beginning of its centennial celebration;

Whereas Northeastern University began providing higher

education in conjunction with the Boston Young Men’s

Christian Association (YMCA) in 1898;

Whereas Northeastern University currently enrolls over

27,000 full time students and boasts an alumni in excess

of 137,000 individuals;

Whereas Northeastern University has attained a national reputation for cooperative education that prepares students

to transition successfully into the workplace;
2

•SRES 183 ATS

Whereas Northeastern University provides access to higher

education for students from all backgrounds;

Whereas Northeastern University has achieved growing recognition as a major research institution; and

Whereas the Senate supports Northeastern University’s efforts to offer exceptional educational opportunities to individuals from throughout the world: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes and congratulates Northeastern

3 University as an outstanding educational institution

4 that has produced exceptional alumni during the

5 past 100 years and gives every indication of doing

6 so for the next 100 years; and

7 (2) wishes Northeastern University a successful

8 and memorable centennial celebration.

Æ
Hon. Franklin D. Burgess

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO: CR 06-5220FDB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER 

v. ) ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

) EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

Sergio Cisneros-Alvarez, ) DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MOTIONS

)

Defendant. ) 

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File PreTrial

Motions. The motion was heard without oral argument. The Government does not object to

an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File PreTrial Motions is GRANTED. All pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 18, 2006.

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 9th day of May, 2006. 

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by: Smith Law Firm

 /s/ Richard A. Smith

RICHARD A. SMITH, WSBA 15127

SMITH LAW FIRM

314 No. Second Street

Yakima, WA 98901

Telephone : (509) 457-5108

Facsimile : (509) 452-4601

E-Mail : rasmith@house314.com

Case 3:06-cr-05220-FDB Document 21 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Realty Finance Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth J. Witkin, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 16, 2009