alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, DavidP. Southwell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: August 8, 2007 |                                                    |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ DAVID P. SOUTHWELL                                  |
|                      | David P. Southwell                                      |
|                      | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

VINICIA BRIGGS,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, CASE NUMBER: C06-5368RBL

Commissioner of Social Security

 Administration,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation;

The Administrative Decision is AFFIRMED.

 February 27, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05368-RBL Document 21 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 26, 2013

NO. 03-11-00786-CV

Charles J. Williamson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

summary judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the summary 

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing that the appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF



THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bill Ferrari, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of Kamp-Rite Holdings Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Registrant"), for the twelve month period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |  |                                | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: April 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Bill Ferrari               | 
|                     |  | Name:  Bill Ferrari           
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020124EN.01002501.xml

| 17.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/25

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9784 – Triton/Renk)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 124/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Triton Managers V Limited (‘Triton Fund V’, Jersey), |
| --- | --- |

—

Triton Managers V Limited (‘Triton Fund V’, Jersey),

| — | RENK AG (‘Renk’, Germany), controlled by Volkswagen AG. |
| --- | --- |

—

RENK AG (‘Renk’, Germany), controlled by Volkswagen AG.

Triton Fund V acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Renk.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Triton Fund V: investing in medium-sized companies headquartered in Central and Northern Europe operating in different markets, with particular focus on three core sectors: business services, industrials and consumer/health, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Triton Fund V: investing in medium-sized companies headquartered in Central and Northern Europe operating in different markets, with particular focus on three core sectors: business services, industrials and consumer/health,

| — | for Renk: manufacturing transmissions for tracked vehicles, suspension systems, test systems, wind gear units and slide bearings, mill gear units, high-speed gear units, extruder gear units, marine propulsion units and couplings. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Renk: manufacturing transmissions for tracked vehicles, suspension systems, test systems, wind gear units and slide bearings, mill gear units, high-speed gear units, extruder gear units, marine propulsion units and couplings.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9784 – Triton/Renk

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Before the Third Division,

March 18, 1959

No. 62861.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 241754-K, etc. (New York).

*310Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61245, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



VOCUS, INC.
2005 STOCK AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
  I. NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT
 Name:
    
    (Recipient)Address:
  Date of Grant:Vesting Commencement Date:Total Number of Shares Granted:Type of Grant:
    
    Restricted Stock AwardVesting Schedule:This Grant shall be vested according to the following vesting schedule:
 % of the shares subject to the Grant shall vest
[on each of the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries] of the Vesting Commencement Date,
subject to Recipients Continuous Service on such
dates
 II. AGREEMENT
 Award of Restricted Stock
 Vesting of Restricted Stock
   - 1 -




---



##### 



Delivery of Restricted Stock
   - 2 -




---



##### 



Termination of Continuous Service
 Rights with Respect to Restricted Stock
   - 3 -




---



##### 



Transferability
 Tax Matters; Section 83(b) Election
    Amendment or Modification
 Complete Agreement
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Entire Agreement; Governing Law
 No Guarantee of Continued Service Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the
vesting of shares pursuant to the vesting schedule hereof is earned only by continuing as an
Employee, Consultant or Director (not through the act of being hired, being granted this Restricted
Stock or acquiring shares hereunder). Recipient further acknowledges and agrees that this
Agreement, the transactions contemplated hereunder and the vesting schedule set forth herein do not
constitute an express or implied promise of continued engagement as an Employee, Consultant or
Director for the vesting period, for any period, or at all, and shall not interfere in any way with
Recipients right or the companys right to terminate Recipients relationship as an Employee,
Consultant or Director, as applicable, at any time, with or without cause.
 No Trust or Fund Created
 Interpretation
 Notices
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Recipient
    
    Vocus, Inc.Signature
    
    SignaturePrinted Name
    
    Stephen A. Vintz, CFOResidence Address
 - 6 -
No. 60283.

protests 276200-K, etc.

#### James Barclay & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

*395Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 *C. C.*P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,****PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**  I, Frank A. Katarow, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for Medwave, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 14, 2007         By:                                         /s/ Frank A. Katarow    Frank A. Katarow    Chief Executive Officer (Interim)
No. 56188.

protest 174055-K (New York).

#### Miles Metal Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap, of which metal is the component material of chief value, and which is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
June 2, 1965

No. 69346.

#### American Bitumuls Company *v.*United States,

protest 187198-K.

C.D. 2524. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Case No. 14,866.

#### UNITED STATES v. COPPER STILL.

[See Case No. 15.928.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID GREENING,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5255RJB/JKA

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner

does not appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05255-RJB Document 4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 1 of 1

Greening v. Miller-Stout Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
#### Ned L. PARKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1709.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2001.

Decided July 19, 2001.

Ned L. Parker, Jr., pro se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ned L. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Parker v. City of Charleston Police Dep’t,*No. CA-00-965-2-12 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International    Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year    ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date    hereof (the "Report"), Sau Shan Ku, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,    certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted    pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    Oakridge International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    /s/ Sau Shan Ku
--------------------------
Sau Shan Ku
    Chief Financial Officer
October 14, 2011 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        3,943
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       10,082
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              7,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  12,204
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       18,336
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         18,131
<LOANS>                                     113,887
<ALLOWANCE>                                     984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              173,385
<DEPOSITS>                                  153,465
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             381
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         31
<OTHER-SE>                                   19,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              173,385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               2,574
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               458
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                178
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              3,210
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,518
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,692
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    29
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 606
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      606
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    385
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  8.2
<LOANS-NON>                                     328
<LOANS-PAST>                                  2,395
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1,038
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    94
<RECOVERIES>                                     11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               984
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         984


</TABLE>
#### Edgar M. PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Montgomery County Housing Opportunity Commission; Montgomery County Public School; The Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-1424.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 28, 2005.

Edgar M. Porter, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Edgar M. Porter appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed the amended supplemental complaint because Porter only made general, non-fact-specific allegations of racial bias. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. *See Porter v. Montgomery County,*No. CA-05-75DKC (D. Md. filed Mar. 15, 2005; entered Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*