alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Focus Media Holding Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kit Leong Low, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 13, 2012



By:

/s/ Kit Leong LowName:

Kit Leong LowTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 69335.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/21412, etc. (New York).

*442Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Hibachis similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 83

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas December 14, 1999, will be the 200th anniversary

of the death of George Washington, the father of our

Nation and the protector of our liberties;

Whereas the standards established by George Washington’s

steadfast character and devotion to duty continue to inspire all men and women in the service of their country

and in the conduct of their private lives;

Whereas the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association of the Union,

which maintains the Mount Vernon estate and directs research and education programs relating to George Washington’s contribution to our national life, has requested

all Americans to participate in the observance of this anniversary;

Whereas bells should be caused to toll at places of worship

and institutions of learning for the duration of 1 minute

commencing at 12 o’clock noon, central standard time,

throughout the Nation, on the 200th anniversary of the

death of George Washington;
2

SCON 83 RFH

Whereas the flag of the United States should be lowered to

half staff on the 200th anniversary of the death of

George Washington; and

Whereas the example set by George Washington is of the

utmost importance to the future of the Nation, and it is

the responsibility of private and government institutions

to prepare for the observation of the 200th anniversary

of the death of George Washington: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) calls upon the Nation to remember the life

4 of George Washington and his contributions to the

5 Nation; and

6 (2) requests and authorizes the President of the

7 United States—

8 (A) to issue a proclamation calling upon

9 the people of the United States—

10 (i) to commemorate the death of

11 George Washington with appropriate cere12 monies and activities; and

13 (ii) to cause and encourage patriotic

14 and civic associations, veterans and labor

15 organizations, schools, universities, and

16 communities of study and worship, to17 gether with citizens everywhere, to develop

18 programs and research projects that con-
3

SCON 83 RFH

1 centrate upon the life and character of

2 George Washington as it relates to the fu3 ture of the Nation and to the development

4 and welfare of the lives of free people ev5 erywhere; and

6 (B) to notify the governments of all Na7 tions with which the United States enjoys rela8 tions that our Nation continues to cherish the

9 memory of George Washington with affection

10 and gratitude by furnishing a copy of this reso11 lution to those governments.

Passed the Senate October 9 (legislative day, October 2), 1998.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 )

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-105M

 )

v. )

 )

MIGUEL PRUDENTE-MARTINEZ, ) DETENTION ORDER 

 )

Defendant. )

______________________________ )

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation.

Date of Detention Hearing: March 8, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. The defendant was represented by Jennifer Wellman.

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00076-MJP Document 9 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Washington are unknown/unverified; and BICE has filed a detainer.

(2) The defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 9th day of March, 2006. AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00076-MJP Document 9 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 56819.

#### Garod Radio Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 179968-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-57;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.    Date: March 24, 2006     By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale Name: Ellen Z. Lamale Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
(Reap. Dec. 10570)

#### Unitron Import Corp. (Wilet) *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-5059, etc.

(Decided July 25, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of this decision, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> *351IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by the following from Japan:

> Hamasaki Bamboo Industrial

> Kajishin Shoten

> Matsumoto Trading Co., Ltd.

> Nakagawa Seiren

> Nihon Mokuren Kogyo K.K.

> Shimamura Shoten

> Tachibana Seisakusho

> Tanaka Seiren

> Umekawa Seiren Shokai

> 2. That the said merchandise was entered or withdrawn from Customs warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and was therefore appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session; said merchandise not being identified in the Einal List published in T.D. 54521.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values, net packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on the invoices as not being included in the unit invoice values.

> 4. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A,” as heretofore limited, are submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe values of tbe merchandise, shipped by—

> Hamasaki Bamboo Industrial

> Kajishin Shoten

> Matsumoto Trading Co., Ltd.

> Nakagawa Seiren

> Nihon Mokuren Kogyo K.K.

> Shimamura Shoten

> Tachibana Seisakusho

> Tanaka Seiren

> Umekawa Seiren Shokai,

described in tbe invoices covered by tbe entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values for the respective items of merchandise as hereinabove indicated were the unit invoice values, net, packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on tbe invoices as not being included in the unit invoice values. As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

ANTHONY R. PINKNEY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 670 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22441]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0356]


Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV, L.P.; Notice Seeking 
Exemption Under the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of 
Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV, 
L.P., 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1472, Dallas, TX 75225, a Federal 
Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(``Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has 
sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations, Financings which Constitute Conflict 
of Interest, Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV, L.P. (``Licensee'') 
is proposing to provide financing to Central States Bus Sales, Inc. 
(``Company'') to support its growth.
    The proposed transaction is brought within the purview of 13 CFR 
107.730 because Diamond State Ventures II, L.P. (``DSV''), an Associate 
of Licensee as defined in 13 CFR 107.50, holds a 10% or greater equity 
interest in the Company. By virtue of DSV's equity ownership of the 
Company, the Company is also considered an Associate of the Licensee.
    Therefore, the proposed transaction requires a regulatory exemption 
pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730. Notice is hereby given that any interested 
person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen 
days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, 
Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. 
Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-22441 Filed 10-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 227

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the May 11, 1998, Indian

nuclear tests.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 12, 1998

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. BROWNBACK, and Mr. GLENN) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the May 11,

1998, Indian nuclear tests.

Whereas the Government of India conducted an underground

nuclear explosion on May 15, 1974;

Whereas, since the 1974 nuclear test by the Government of

India, the United States and its allies have worked extensively to prevent the further proliferation of nuclear

weapons in South Asia;

Whereas on May 11, 1998, the Government of India conducted underground tests of three separate nuclear explosive devices, including a fission device, a low-yield device,

and a thermo-nuclear device;
2

SRES 227 IS

Whereas this decision by the Government of India has needlessly raised tension in the South Asia region and threatens to exacerbate the nuclear arms race in that region;

Whereas the five declared nuclear weapons states and 144

other nations have signed the Comprehensive Test Ban

Treaty in hopes of putting a permanent end to nuclear

testing;

Whereas the Government of India has refused to sign the

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty;

Whereas the Government of India has refused to sign the

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty;

Whereas India has refused to enter into a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency covering any of its nuclear research facilities; and

Whereas the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Act of 1994 requires the President to impose a variety of aid and trade

sanctions against any nonnuclear weapons state that detonates a nuclear explosive device: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) condemns in the strongest possible terms

3 the decision of the Government of India to conduct

4 three nuclear tests on May 11, 1998;

5 (2) calls upon the President to carry out the

6 provisions of the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention

7 Act of 1994 with respect to India and invoke all

8 sanctions therein;
3

SRES 227 IS

1 (3) calls upon the Government of India to take

2 immediate steps to reduce tensions that this unilat3 eral and unnecessary step has caused;

4 (4) expresses its regret that this decision by the

5 Government of India will, of necessity, negatively af6 fect relations between the United States and India;

7 (5) urges the Government of Pakistan, the Gov8 ernment of the People’s Republic of China, and all

9 governments to exercise restraint in response to the

10 Indian nuclear tests, in order to avoid further exac11 erbating the nuclear arms race in South Asia;

12 (6) calls upon all governments in the region to

13 take steps to prevent further proliferation of nuclear

14 weapons and ballistic missiles; and

15 (7) urges the Government of India to enter into

16 a safeguards agreement with the International

17 Atomic Energy Agency which would cover all Indian

18 nuclear research facilities at the earliest possible

19 time.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000867

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

LORD HARRY S. UMAYAM, Claimant-Appellant, v.

SUTTER HEALTH PACIFIC, Employer-Appellee, and

FIRMS CLAIMS SERVICES, Insurance Carrier-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD

(CASE NO. AB 2018-082; DCD NO. 2-15-48583)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented ClaimantAppellant Lord Harry S. Umayam's (Umayam) March 11, 2020 letter

requesting to "stop the appeal," which the court construes as a

motion to dismiss the appeal, the papers in support, the record,

and there being no opposition, it appears that (1) the appeal has

not been docketed; (2) Umayam seeks to dismiss the appeal; and

(3) dismissal is authorized by Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 42(a).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is

granted and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 17, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000867

17-APR-2020

10:21 AM
III

Calendar No. 678

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 283

To refer H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble’’

to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for

a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Mr. WARNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To refer H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Lloyd

B. Gamble’’ to the chief judge of the United States

Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That (a) H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the

2 relief of Lloyd B. Gamble’’ now pending in the Senate,

3 together with all the accompanying papers, is referred to

4 the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

5 Claims.

6 (b) The chief judge shall—
2

•SRES 283 RS

1 (1) proceed according to the provisions of sec2 tions 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code;

3 and

4 (2) report back to the Senate, at the earliest

5 practicable date, providing—

6 (A) such findings of fact and conclusions

7 that are sufficient to inform the Congress of the

8 nature, extent, and character of the claim for

9 compensation referred to in such bill as a legal

10 or equitable claim against the United States or

11 a gratuity; and

12 (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably

13 due from the United States to Mr. Lloyd B.

14 Gamble.

15 (c) It is the sense of the Senate that if any judgment

16 is entered in favor of Lloyd B. Gamble against the United

17 States, any damages arising from injuries sustained by

18 Lloyd B. Gamble should not exceed $253,488.

Calendar No. 678

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 283

RESOLUTION

To refer H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of

O

port thereon.United States Court of Federal Claims for a reLloyd B. Gamble’’ to the chief judge of the

CTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Focus Media Holding Limited (the Company) on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason Nanchun Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 27, 2012



By:

/s/ Jason Nanchun JiangName:

Jason Nanchun JiangTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------