alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regu lator-y Evaluation 

Docket No. F AA-206-23 706 Directorate Identifier: 2006-NE-03-/\D 

1/.1"1111 muke c/J(IIJ.!!.<'S In 1/te l'11f11es ill II!!' tuh/e he/u11'. I'OIIIIJIISI t'IWII'C the totllls llf)(/1111' u1 ·conling~r. ll 

1/w.1· dn !WI. click (or /'u/1) inlo uml 1/Jen o111 t~/1/tc ('//llllged r<'ll. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircrafl, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@£85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Initia l inspection 8.0 $498 2,250 

Repetitive 

16.0 $498 1, 125 inspection # 1 

Repetitive 

16.0 £498 562 inspection #2 

Repetiti ve 16.0 $498 28 1 inspectio n # 3 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,307,044 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: @ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Special consider·ations for· Economic Analysis (Use this .field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

!lwt was assumed or might not he obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): Total fleet costs 
are annotated above. The repetitive inspections listed are estimated to take twelve years to 

complete. The FAA amortized costs over twelve years resulting in an annual cost of $525,587 . 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 

YES D NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
# Official Journal C 21/26 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 21 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4826 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 21

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4826 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 021/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 021/2 | Commission interpretative communication on the temporary nature of road cabotage in the movement of freight (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 021/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3702 — CVC/CSM) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 021/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3699 — EQT III Limited/Smurfit Munksjö) (1) | 9 |
| 2005/C 021/5 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 10 |
| 2005/C 021/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3705 — Kohlberg Kravis Roberts/Masonite International) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 15 |
| 2005/C 021/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3625 — BLACKSTONE/ACETEX) (1) | 16 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 021/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 021/2

Commission interpretative communication on the temporary nature of road cabotage in the movement of freight (1)

2

2005/C 021/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3702 — CVC/CSM) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

2005/C 021/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3699 — EQT III Limited/Smurfit Munksjö) (1)

9

2005/C 021/5

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

10

2005/C 021/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3705 — Kohlberg Kravis Roberts/Masonite International) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

15

2005/C 021/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3625 — BLACKSTONE/ACETEX) (1)

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 3:06-cv-05385-RBL Document 38 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05385-RBL Document 38 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

14, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00709-CV

A PLUS TRANSMISSION, JESSE HESTER, AND DAVID DOIG, 

Appellants

V.

CALVIN BONIABY, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-CCV-065108

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 8, 2019. On December 18, 

2019, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 
2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
Case 2:05-cv-02064-JLR Document 31 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of One XL Corp., (the “Company”), on Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the requirement set
forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), C. Lynn White, the President,
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.




Date:
      September 28, 2009
              By:
              /s/ C. Lynn WhiteC.
      Lynn WhitePresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Financial Officer)




* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 19, 2019

s0416 

# Order

Clerk April 19, 2019

158394

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158394

COA: 342316

Oakland CC: 2016

- 259655

- FH

VANESSA AIDEE MANSOUR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND STEPHEN FRANKLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-93-74, CA-98-155-1)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Stephen Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Stephen Franklin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Franklin, Nos. CR-93-74;

CA-98-155-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
III

Calendar No. 390

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 141

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amdendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating One America.

Whereas the United States is a nation of immigrants, whose

270,000,000 inhabitants hail from every corner of the

globe;

Whereas from Ellis Island to the Pacific coast, the United

States has welcomed immigrants seeking freedom and opportunity;

Whereas the United States democratic system of Government

mandates equal protection under the law and the right to

life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all its citizens;

Whereas the United States endured a civil war for emancipation, and in doing so, formed a permanent union and

a society of equals;
2

HCON 141 RS

Whereas the United States has outlawed racial, ethnic, and

religious bigotry to create the world’s greatest multicultural society;

Whereas the United States respects the individual and welcomes each one’s participation in our democratic society;

Whereas the United States is the preeminent land of opportunity which rewards hard work, ingenuity, and perseverance;

Whereas the ethnic diversity of the United States has provided an abundance of energy, creativity, and prosperity;

Whereas people in the United States recognize and reward

the contributions of members from every group;

Whereas people in the United States are working to close opportunity gaps so that all may share in the great prosperity of our Nation;

Whereas people in the United States of all backgrounds have

sacrificed their lives in war to defend the cause of freedom for people around the world; and

Whereas people in the United States of African, Asian, European, Latin American, Middle Eastern, and Native American backgrounds cherish and celebrate their various national, ethnic, and religious heritages: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that all

3 people in the United States should reach out across our

4 differences in ethnicity, race, and religion to respect each

5 other and to celebrate, in friendship and unity, one Amer6 ica.
3

HCON 141 RS

1 Passed the House of Representatives October 13,

2 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 390

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 141

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating One America.

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                            CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, President of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR7;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 30, 2006

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     President
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Continental Illinois National Bank : Report of an Inquiry Into Its Federal Supervision and Assistance

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, 1977-1995. 						*Continental Illinois National Bank : Report of an Inquiry Into Its Federal Supervision and Assistance : Staff Report to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Insurance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session*,										1985,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/347,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
March 22, 1962

No. 66604.

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/10323.

Protest abandoned February 13, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 60/9080.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.

Mollison, J., dissented.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

DESIGNERS EDGE, INC.,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

NATIONAL - JLR GEAR, et al.,

 Defendant.

 C06-612 RSM

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-612 RSM and

bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 19th day of June, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00612-RSM Document 18 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 1
Attachment 3 

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby certify that GE has notified all refrigerator manufacturers listed below know to 

GE to sell products in the United States and forwarded them a copy of this waiver: 

AGA Marvel 

Arcelik A.S. 

BSH Home Appliances Corporation 

Danby Products, Ltd. 

Electrolux Home Products NA 

Fagor America, Inc. 

Fisher & Paykel Appliances 

GE Appliances 

Haier America 

LG Electronics USA 

Liebherr-Canada Ltd. 

MC COMMERCIAL INC. (Mabe Canada) 

Miele, Inc. 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

Panasonic Consumer Electronics Co. 

Scotsman Ice Systems 

Sub-Zero, Inc. 

U-Line Corporation 

Viking Range Corporation 

Whirlpool Corporation 

In addition, GE has provided courtesy copies to: The Association of Home Appliance 

Manufacturers (AHAM), which generally is interested in DOE proceedings affecting the 

industry. ACEEE, NRDC and Alliance to Save Energy are not manufacturers but have 

an interest i iciency requirements for appliances.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71004-71005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and

[[Page 71005]]

the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Roybal Centers.
    Date: November 14-15, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 
National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue RM: 2C212, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f39362d2b3734321f323e36337131363771383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3858a91978b888ea38e828a8fcd8d8a8bcd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22520 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

BRENT WILKS,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C06-948 RSM

JO ANNE B BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

) REASSIGNING and REFERRING CASE

)

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C06-948 RSM and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the

document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:06-cv-00948-RSM Document 10 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 3rd day of October, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:06-cv-00948-RSM Document 10 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10576)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 998714.

(Decided August 7, 1963)

*Sharretts, Paley é Garter*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*360LawkeNCe, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain steel wire.

The parties hereto have submitted the appeal for decision on a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed that the steel wire in issue is not on the final list of articles (93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521) from which the operation of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165) is withheld.

It was further stipulated and agreed that the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise in question, at which such or similar merqhandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, was offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit price, less the amount shown on the invoices for ocean freight.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra*(19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the steel wire in question and that said value is represented by the invoice unit price, less the amount shown on the invoices for ocean freight.

As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.