alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C06-0511-RSL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

LORA E. LAVINE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Civil No. C06-0511-RSL

ORDER

Based upon review of the file, and noting the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of

Social Security for further administrative proceedings as set out in the stipulation of the parties. 

On remand the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will be directed to offer Plaintiff a new

hearing. At the hearing, Plaintiff will be given the opportunity to present additional evidence

and/or arguments. The ALJ will be directed to further consider and re-evaluate the medical

source evidence, in particular from Gary McCallum, M.D., Robert A. Morris, PA-C, Kerry

Case 2:06-cv-00511-RSL Document 18 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C06-0511-RSL]

Bartlett, Ph.D., and Donald E. Piro, Ph.D., including the diagnosis of fibromyalgia and the

functional limitations arising from any mental impairments Plaintiff may have. The ALJ will be

directed to further evaluate Plaintiff's credibility. The ALJ will be directed to further develop the

record and to take any further action necessary to render a new decision in this matter. 

Reasonable attorney fees will be awarded, upon proper application, pursuant to the Equal Access

to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

DATED this 11th day of September, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge Recommended for Entry this

31st day of August, 2006.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Presentd by:

s/ TERRYE E. SHEA, WSB # 27609

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Phone: 206-615-2143

Fax: 206-615-2531

terrye.shea@ssa.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00511-RSL Document 18 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

March 20, 1962

No. 66588.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 320394-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United Stales*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows:

(1) The items marked “A” at 15 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for other metal articles suitable for controlling electrical energy:

(2) the items marked “B” at 13% percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for other metal articles having as an essentia! feature an electrical element or device; and (3) the items marked “C” at 17% percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 51802, for metal electrical switches and switchgear, as claimed.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 43

To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) of

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico

during fiscal year 1998, and to provide for the termination of the

withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the disapproval.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1998

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HELMS, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove the certification of the President under section

490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding

assistance for Mexico during fiscal year 1998, and to

provide for the termination of the withholding of and

opposition to assistance that results from the disapproval.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION.

4 (a) DISAPPROVAL.—Pursuant to subsection (d) of

5 section 490 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
2

•SJ 43 IS

1 U.S.C. 2291j), Congress disapproves the determination of

2 the President with respect to Mexico that is contained in

3 the certification (transmittal No. 98–15) submitted to

4 Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that

5 section on February 26, 1998.

6 (b) TERMINATION.—Notwithstanding subsection (f)

7 of that section, subsection (e) of that section (relating to

8 the withholding of bilateral assistance and opposition to

9 multilateral development assistance) shall cease to apply

10 to Mexico during fiscal year 1998 if at any time after the

11 enactment of this Act the President submits to Congress

12 a certification pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(B) of that

13 section that the vital national interests of the United

14 States require that such subsection (e) cease to apply to

15 Mexico during fiscal year 1998.

Æ
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3612 — Henkel/Sovereign)

(2005/C 92/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 95

Designating August 16, 1997, as ‘‘National Airborne Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 2, 1997

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating August 16, 1997, as ‘‘National Airborne Day’’.

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was authorized by the

War Department on June 25, 1940, to experiment with

the potential use of airborne troops;

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was composed of 48 volunteers who began training in July 1940;

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon performed the first official Army parachute jump on August 16, 1940;

Whereas the success of the Parachute Test Platoon led to the

formation of a large and successful airborne contingent

serving from World War II until the present;

Whereas the 82d Airborne Division was the first Airborne Division that was organized following the successes of the

Parachute Test Platoon and the early airborne training
2

•SRES 95 IS

program and has continued in active service since its creation;

Whereas the 82d Airborne Division Association exists to continue and foster that special esprit de corps among fellow

paratroopers, to perpetuate the memory of the 82d Airborne Division troopers who fought and died for our Nation, and to further the common bond among all members of the airborne community; and

Whereas the 82d Airborne Division Association, during the

52d year of existence and at the 50th Annual Convention, adopted a resolution to perpetuate the memory of

the Parachute Test Platoon’s ‘‘Jump Into History’’ on

August 16, 1940: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates August 16, 1997, as ‘‘National

3 Airborne Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the Federal, State, and local ad6 ministrators and the people of the United States to

7 observe the day with appropriate programs, cere8 monies, and activities.

Æ
#### L.A. GRIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST MARINER BANK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2548.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided June 27, 2001.

Lorenzo Grier, pro se. Thomas Omar Lawson, Lawson & Kipp, Fairfax, VA; John Sears Simcox, Karen Montgomery Crabtree, Simcox & Barclay, Annapolis, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Grier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his discrimination suit. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because Grier’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, *see*Fed. R.App .P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 2, 2000. Grier’s notice of appeal was filed on December 7, 2000. Because Grier failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 99(b)



The Board of Directors
HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by HSBC Automotive Trust 2005-1

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2006



Management Assertion





As of December 31, 2005 and for the period June 22, 2005 to December 31, 2005, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by HSBC Automotive Trust 2005-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, as successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 22, 2005, as supplemented.



|/s/ Joyce Bevacqua
Joyce Bevacqua
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2006
Date                  |                                                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lee Whatcott
Lee Whatcott
Chief Financial Officer
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2006
Date | /s/ Craig Peters
Craig Peters
Group Director - Asset Management -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2006
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 180 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 180

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the tax exclusion for employer-
   provided educational assistance programs should be made permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1998

 Mrs. Boxer submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                        the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the tax exclusion for employer-
   provided educational assistance programs should be made permanent.

Whereas since its inception in 1978, section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 has enabled millions of workers to advance their education and 
        improve their job skills without incurring additional taxes or a 
        reduction in take-home pay;
Whereas a well trained and educated workforce is essential to our Nation's 
        economy, competitiveness, and national security;
Whereas education and retraining will be necessary to maintain and strengthen 
        the competitive position of American industries through the next 
        century;
Whereas much of our Nation's workforce and many of our Nation's industries are 
        experiencing the pressures of rapid technological change and facing the 
        pressures of global competition;
Whereas many cutting edge American industries are facing a dearth of qualified 
        United States citizens to fill key positions in important disciplines 
        such as engineering, mathematics, and computer science;
Whereas the United States Senate is on record supporting a permanent extension 
        of section 127 of such Code for both graduate and undergraduate study; 
        and
Whereas there is bipartisan support for a permanent extension of section 127 of 
        such Code, as evidenced by the introduction of bills by Senators of both 
        parties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that legislation to 
permanently extend section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
should be brought to the Senate floor as expeditiously as possible in 
order to help ensure that United States workers will not be discouraged 
from advancing their education and job skills.
                                 <all>
```
No. 65267.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 316216-K/14991, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10,1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified, by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by' the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 7 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 7 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yasser RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50972.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

*347Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael J. Bagley, Law Office of Michael J. Bagley, Eagle Pass, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Yasser Rivera appeals from his conviction of importing five kilograms or more of cocaine and possessing with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. Rivera contends for the first time on appeal that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because it was based on over 50 kilograms of cocaine, more than the five kilograms of cocaine alleged in the indictment and found by the jury.

The district court plainly erred by basing Rivera’s sentence on the extra verdict factual finding that more than 50 kilograms of cocaine were involved in Rivera’s offense. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). However, Rivera has not demonstrated that the result likely would have been different but for the district court’s error, had the district court sentenced him under an advisory guideline sentencing scheme. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 522 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE REPORT**

The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Federal HomeLoan Bank of Seattle (Seattle Bank) consists of six directors, two representing the public interest and four representing industry members. The members of the Audit and Compliance Committee are Craig E. Dahl (chair), William V. Humphreys (vicechair), Harold B. Gilkey, Cynthia A. Parker, Jack T. Riggs, and Gordon Zimmerman. The Audit and Compliance Committee members are independent, as defined by the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

The Audit and Compliance Committee oversees the Seattle Bank’s financial reporting process; reviews compliance with laws, regulations, policies, andprocedures; and evaluates the adequacy of administrative, operating, and internal controls. The Audit and Compliance Committee has adopted and is governed by a written charter. 

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Seattle Bank’s management and itsindependent auditors the audited financial statements and the independent auditors report thereon. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee has discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by Statement onAuditing Standards (SAS) No. 61, as modified and supplemented. The Audit and Compliance Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditor required by Independence Standards Board (ISB) Standard No. 1,“Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” as modified and supplemented, and has discussed with the independent auditor its independence. 

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the current Audit and Compliance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the 2008 audited financial statements be included in the Seattle Bank’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K. 

**Audit and Compliance Committee**

Craig E. Dahl, Chair 

William V. Humphreys, Vice Chair 

Harold B. Gilkey 

Cynthia A. Parker 

Jack T. Riggs, M.D. 

Gordon Zimmerman
## Ph竜耽1tom 2 Vision +聯is§fon Chec驚書ig隆

Ar商val Check髄st! 1 , lf day and opera指ng out of back of vehicle, POint ve輔cle輔o sun.! 2. Remove case翻d p胎ce on level §u向Ce! 3. Check dis治nce to nea聡st airpert andIo「 COn鵬鵬ed airspaee using smart phone or施blet app. 1 

### 4. 1f聡qujred, use VH干a湧翻on t略nSCeiver to co融act tower of掴d韓cIose「 than 5N肌1 

### 5. In掩m章ewe「/ C了AF of UAS ops, lo閑静on翻d m歌鵬i節t of飾g撤

l ,康e同ove t惰れSm聴e「 2. Ro細嘉e「一〇n 

### 3.丁「蜜n$請純e「一〇n 4. Togg書e Switches - S2 is Up, Sl is Down in Fafl Safe 5, Vi寄ee M6niぬ「 - On 

### 6、 Remove UAS fro請case 

## 7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed 8. M掩ro-SD ca「d - 1nserted 9 UAS Ba能ery - 1nserted lO. Pta鴎UAS in clear and safe l郷nch and re∞Very POS繭o両目t re紬「ns to home 

## 「「 UAS唇翻eIV-On 12 WトFi Connec繭en to Mon轍er - Ve「ified 

### 13, DJ案Appl施a剃on - Load 14 DJ喜applic離ien - Corlnect tO Camera 

### 15. SD C合商-戸o手ma‡ 

### 16 C謝れe愉一F囲Up 1 7. GPS Ca書ib臨場on and Co陣n撃C基ions - Vefified 18" Ch甜ge Levels - Safe fo「郎ght 19. VIdeo Recording - S掻rt 

### 20,丁ake 〇倍

1 Hove「 approximately ten fe鏡above the g「Ou軸to co繭rm UAS is unde「 contro1 2. Ail sticks oper翻e cor胎ctIy while in hoveトVe輔ed



### l. Came「a- Fu" Up 

### 2. V鱒合o Re○○巾e「一統op 3. Landing Zone - CIear/ S翻e


### l.瞳誠造り- Rem8Ve & R馨p嘉ace 2. VVi-Fi Connec鱈on to Mor酒Or - Ver綱ed 3. DJ] app喜ica締on - Connect to Camera 

### 4.丁ake謂
畠田d of Ops Ch悌糊謡1 

## 1区制e吋一〇簡 2 丁「尋ns鵬i鵬「 ○ ○惰 3. R°uモer一〇楕 

### 4 N綱fy Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                         LASER-PACIFIC MEDIA CORPORATION
              INCENTIVE AND NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN (1997)



This  Amendment No. 1 (this  "Amendment")  to Laser  Pacific  Media  Corporation
Incentive and Non-Qualified  Stock Option Plan (1997) (the "Plan") is made as of
July 19, 1999.

WHEREAS,  the Board of Directors of Laser-Pacific Media Corporation,  a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") approved amending the Plan in April 1999, subject to
the  approval of the  stockholders  of the Company,  to increase  the  aggregate
number of shares that may be sold pursuant to options  granted under the Plan by
500,000;

WHEREAS,  the stockholders of the Company approved amending the Plan to increase
the  aggregate  number of shares that may be sold  pursuant  to options  granted
under  the  Plan by  500,000  on July  16,  1999 at the  annual  meeting  of the
Company's stockholders ;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

     1. Amendment of Section 3.

Section 3 of the Plan is hereby  amended by deleting  Section 3 in its
entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:

Subject to the provisions of Section 6 relating to  adjustments  upon changes in
stock,  the  aggregate  number of shares  that may be sold  pursuant  to options
granted  under  the  Plan  shall  not  exceed,  in the  aggregate,  One  Million
(1,000,000)  Company Shares.  If any option granted under the Plan shall for any
reason expire, be canceled, or otherwise terminate without having been exercised
in full, the stock not purchased under such option shall again become  available
for issuance pursuant to the Plan.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has executed this  Amendment on this 19 day of
July, 1999.


                                         LASER-PACIFIC MEDIA CORPORATION


                                        By:_________________________________
                                            Name:  James R. Parks
                                            Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
No. 53325.

protests 146869-K, etc. (New York).

#### The American Museum of Natural History et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.