alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS

AND ALLIED TRADES, AFL-CIO, DISTRICT

COUNCIL NO. 5, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

R.H. EASTMOND, INC., et al, 

Defendants.

 No. C06-394MJP

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for an entry of judgment by default

against Defendants Ron Eastmond and R.H. Eastmond, Inc. (Dkt. No. 31.) Having considered the

motion, the documents submitted in support of the motion, and the record herein, the Court

concludes that it cannot enter the judgment requested without more supporting information.

Plaintiffs request the following judgment amount: $66,154.31, which is comprised of

$21,273.06 in unpaid wages, $2942.63 interest, $21,273.06 exemplary damages, $1362.56 in delay

wages, $18,723 in attorneys’ fees, and $580 in costs. The declarations and exhibits submitted

support the $21,273.06 in unpaid wages. (See Flavin Decl., Exs. 2-3.) They also support an award

of $580 in costs and $18,723 in attorneys’ fees. (See Flavin Decl., Ex. 4; Mark Decl.) But Plaintiffs

have not documented how they calculated the interest, delay wages, or exemplary damages. 

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-00394-MJP Document 34 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER – 2

Because the Court cannot enter default judgment on the evidence presented, the motion for

entry of default judgment is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiffs resubmitting their motion with

proper documentation.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2007.

AMarsha J. Pechman

 United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00394-MJP Document 34 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID McCUISTION,

Petitioner,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE ATTORNEY

GENERAL’S OFFICE AND Dr. HENRY

RICHARDS,

Respondents.

Case No. C06-5329RBL

 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The petition is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

(3) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, and to the Hon. J.

Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 6th day of April, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05329-RBL Document 26 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

10-K Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iShares Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Lee Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2007         
|                             
|/s/    LEE T. KRANEFUSS      
|Lee Kranefuss *              
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32



                      AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 12, 2000
                       TO THE EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN OF
                         UNITED STATES TRUST CORPORATION

     The Executive Incentive Plan is amended effective January 12, 2000 as
follows:

     1.   Section 9 is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 9(g)
          at the end of the Section:

     "(g) Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the effective time of the merger of
     Patriot Merger Corporation ("Merger Sub") with and into the Corporation
     pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 12, 2000,
     by and among The Charles Schwab Corporation ("Schwab"), Merger Sub and the
     Corporation (the "Merger Agreement"), payment with respect to each
     Participant's Account shall be made to the Participant, or if the
     Participant has died, to his or her Beneficiary, in the form of a single
     lump sum cash payment that would otherwise be required to be made hereunder
     upon a Change in Control, as determined in accordance with the procedures
     set forth in Section 1.7 of the Merger Agreement."
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 62

Authorizing printing of the brochure entitled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. FORD) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the brochure entitled ‘‘How Our

Laws Are Made’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the brochure en3 titled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’, under the direction of

4 the Parliamentarian of the House of Representatives in

5 consultation with the Parliamentarian of the Senate, shall

6 be printed as a Senate document, with suitable paper

7 cover in the style selected by the chairman of the Joint

8 Committee on Printing.

9 (b) There shall be printed—
2

SCON 62 ATS

1 (1)(A) 250,000 copies of the brochure for the

2 use of the House of Representatives, distributed in

3 equal numbers to each Member;

4 (B) 100,000 copies of the brochure for the use

5 of the Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each

6 Member;

7 (C) 2,000 copies of the brochure for the use of

8 the Joint Committee on Printing; and

9 (D) 1,400 copies of the brochure for distribu10 tion to the depository libraries; or

11 (2) if the total printing and production costs of

12 copies in paragraph (1) exceed $180,000, such num13 ber of copies of the brochure as does not exceed total

14 printing and production costs of $180,000, with dis15 tribution to be allocated in the same proportion as

16 in paragraph (1).

Æ
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER OF REMAND

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ROBIN JERMYN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0542-RSL

ORDER OF REMAND

The Court has reviewed the entire record, including the Administrative Record, the

memoranda of the parties, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Mary Alice Theiler. It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The Court remands this matter for further administrative proceedings; and

(3) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to all counsel and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 17th day of November, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00542-RSL Document 18 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cr-05373-KLS Document 12 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 1
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.107 State and Local Governments 1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.226 Life Insurance Reserves  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineAll domestic sectors; life insurance reserves; liability
	FL883140005
	1278.6
	1352.3
	1359.3
	1416.8
	1477.4
	1515.8
	1503.9
	1500.8
	1515.8
	1531.8
	1547.7
	1Federal government; life insurance reserves; liability
	FL313140003
	48.7
	50.0
	50.3
	50.5
	51.3
	51.1
	51.0
	50.8
	51.1
	51.1
	51.2
	2Life insurance companies; life insurance reserves; liability
	FL543140005
	1229.9
	1302.3
	1309.0
	1366.3
	1426.1
	1464.6
	1452.9
	1450.0
	1464.6
	1480.8
	1496.5
	3All domestic sectors; life insurance reserves; liability
	FL883140005
	1278.6
	1352.3
	1359.3
	1416.8
	1477.4
	1515.8
	1503.9
	1500.8
	1515.8
	1531.8
	1547.7
	4Households and nonprofit organizations; life insurance reserves; asset
	FL153040005
	1137.5
	1199.3
	1186.4
	1233.0
	1282.8
	1310.6
	1303.8
	1298.3
	1310.6
	1324.3
	1337.7
	5U.S.-chartered depository institutions; life insurance reserves; asset
	FL763040005
	116.0
	125.5
	138.0
	143.8
	149.6
	156.2
	153.1
	154.5
	156.2
	157.6
	159.0
	6Holding companies; life insurance reserves; asset
	FL733040005
	25.1
	27.6
	34.9
	39.9
	45.0
	49.0
	47.0
	48.0
	49.0
	50.0
	51.0
	7 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

I, J. Jay Jaski, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pure Nickel Inc. certify that:

 
| 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pure Nickel Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pure Nickel Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  April 16, 2007

 
|   | /s/ J. Jay Jaski                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

J. Jay Jaski, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2015

a0921

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2015

150085

RANDY PATTERSON,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 150085

AGC: 0031-13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of June 3, 2015, the Attorney Grievance Commission was directed to 

provide a supplemental response to the complaint for superintending control. On order of 

the Court, the supplemental response having been received, the complaint for 

superintending control is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Exhibit 31

                                  Certification

I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest Mortgage
Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R5;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.
<PAGE>

Date: 3/14/06

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.

/s/ John P. Grazer
------------------
John P. Grazer
CFO
APPENDIX C

Distribution of plant communities in Pinus contorta forest in Crater LakeNational Park. Heavy black lines correspond to

the boundaries of the principal P. contorta stands. "X" signifies non-P. contorta surrounded by P. contorta. Each grid unit

in the eastern part of the Park is one mile square. All maps are to the same scale (from Zeigler, 1978).

Communities:

1 = Calocedrus decurrens/Arctostophylos

2 = Pinus contorta/Purshia/Carex

3 = Pinus contorta/Carex-Stipa

4 = Pinus contorta/Carex-Lupinus

5 = Abies concolor/Bromus carinatus - Lupinus

6 = Abies lasiocarpa/Collomia-Lathyrus

7 = Abies lasiocarpa/Haplopappus/Aster-Elymus

8 = Abies magnifica var. shastensis - Tsuga mertensiana/Carex-Lupinus

9 = Mixed Conifer/Arctostaphylos-Purshia/Carex

10 = Tsuga mertensiana/Vaccinium

11 = Mixed Conifer/Arctostaphylos

CRATER LAKE

Report: Lodgepole Pine—History and Management

Crater Lake NP: Lodgepole Pine: History and Management Page 1 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20081009013238/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/lodgepole/lodgepoleac.htm 11/29/2011
(click on image for a larger size in a new window)

http://www.nps.gov/crla/lodgepole/lodgepoleac.htm

Date: 29-May-2001

<<< PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT >>>

Crater Lake NP: Lodgepole Pine: History and Management Page 2 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20081009013238/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/lodgepole/lodgepoleac.htm 11/29/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 98 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 98

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 21, 1998, Friday, May 22, 1998, Saturday, May 23, 1998, 
or Sunday, May 24, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority 
Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent resolution, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 1, 1998, or 
until such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, May 22, 
1998, or Saturday, May 23, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrrent 
resolution, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, 
1998, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate May 21, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 98

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the 
                       House of Representatives.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Smith, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 695]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary Davis, J., at hearing; Bonnie Wittner, J., at plea and sentence), rendered October 7, 1993, *220convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of l1/2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

As the hearing court correctly held, the police had a common-law right to inquire based on defendant’s close resemblance to one of the suspects described in the radio transmission and their observation of him counting money in the lobby of the building where a drug sale had reportedly occurred only two or three minutes earlier. The predicate for police intrusion escalated into reasonable suspicion to pursue and detain when defendant fled up the stairs upon making eye contact with the officers, and into probable cause to arrest upon recovery of the bag containing cocaine that defendant discarded during his flight *(see, People v Bora,*191 AD2d 384, *affd*83 NY2d 531; *see also, People v Holmes,*81 NY2d 1056, 1057-1058). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 149

Expressing the sense of Congress that access to affordable prescription drugs

is critical to the quality of life of older Americans and that coverage

for prescription drugs should be included in the Medicare Program as

soon as possible, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 1, 1999

Ms. STABENOW submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the

Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that access to affordable

prescription drugs is critical to the quality of life of

older Americans and that coverage for prescription drugs

should be included in the Medicare Program as soon

as possible, and for other purposes.

Whereas the Medicare program does not currently provide a

prescription drug benefit, leaving too many seniors in the

United States unable to afford the prescription drugs

they need, often forcing them to choose between medicine

and important daily needs, such as buying food;

Whereas at least one-third of all Americans age 65 and older

pay the entire cost of their medicine at the highest pos-
2

•HCON 149 IH

sible prices, while many bulk purchasers of drugs, including HMO’s and the Federal Government, receive generous discounts;

Whereas senior citizens in the United States spend roughly

three times as much of their income on health care as do

those under the age of 65;

Whereas the average older American depends on 18 prescriptions a year;

Whereas pharmaceuticals represent the fastest growing sector

of health care costs in the United States;

Whereas medical care has changed dramatically since the inception of Medicare in 1965—conditions that once required surgery can now be treated with medication—the

program needs to be modernized to better meet these new

realities; and

Whereas the long-term solution to this problem is creating a

prescription drug benefit for the Medicare program: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) senior citizens should not be forced to pay

4 a large part of their monthly income for prescription

5 drugs;

6 (2) a top priority for the available budget sur7 plus should be to strengthen and modernize the

8 Medicare program for the future, including adding

9 prescription drug coverage;
3

•HCON 149 IH

1 (3) President Clinton should be commended for

2 introducing a Medicare reform proposal with a pre3 scription drug benefit; and

4 (4) Congress should consider legislation to ac5 complish this as soon as possible.

Æ
No. 63927.

protest 59/10691 (New York).

#### Intercontinental Metal Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.