alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

SERVICE DEADLINE – Page 1 of 2 

ISAK BRESSLER 

Attorney at Law 

6750 15th Avenue NW 

Seattle, WA 98117 

(206) 957-9010; Fax (206) 957-9013 

 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

 

 The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

LAWRENCE HILDES, et. al., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 vs. 

 

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

CASE No: CV6-707 

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF SERVICE DEADLINE 

Note on Motion Calendar: 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2006 

(CLERK’S ACTION REQUIRED) 

 

This Matter having come on for consideration on Plaintiffs’ motion and the Court having 

reviewed the records and files herein, it is hereby 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 4(m) and 

6(b), be granted a 60 day extension of the service deadline in the above matter. 

 

DATED this _22nd day of September, 2006. 

 

__/s Marsha J. Pechman_________

 JUDGE MARSHA J. PECHMAN 

Case 2:06-cv-00707-MJP Document 11 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

SERVICE DEADLINE – Page 2 of 2 

ISAK BRESSLER 

Attorney at Law 

6750 15th Avenue NW 

Seattle, WA 98117 

(206) 957-9010; Fax (206) 957-9013 

 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

 

 

Presented by: 

/S/__________________________

Isak Bressler (WSBA #31747) 

Attorney at Law 

6750 15th Avenue NW 

Seattle, WA 98117 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00707-MJP Document 11 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 61633.

#### Balex Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160866-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MOTION 

CALENDAR DATE OF RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 1

C06-0700-JLR-MAT

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

District Judge James L. Robart

Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHARANJIT SINGH

(Agency # 71-786-358),

Petitioner,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

of the United States; MICHAEL CHERTOFF,

Secretary of the Department of Homeland

Security; and A. NEIL CLARK, Field Office

Director for Immigration and Customs

Enforcement, WARDEN, Immigration and

Detention Facility,

Respondents. 

 No. C06-0700-JLR-MAT

 STIPULATION AND ORDER 

 CONTINUING MOTION CALENDAR 

 DATE OF RESPONDENTS’ MOTION 

 TO DISMISS

The Petitioner and Respondents, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and

jointly move that the motion calendar date for the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss,

//

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-00700-JLR Document 21 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MOTION 

CALENDAR DATE OF RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

C06-0700-JLR-MAT

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

currently noted for July 21, 2006, be continued one (1) week to July 28, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Jay W. Stansell DATED: July 24, 2006 

JAY W. STANSELL, WSBA #18752

Federal Public Defender’s Office

Attorney for Petitioner

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

s/Robert P. Brouillard DATED: July 24, 2006 ROBERT P. BROUILLARD, WSBA #19786

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Respondents

ORDER

The above is SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 24th day of July, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00700-JLR Document 21 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

[PHARMCHEM INC. LETTERHEAD]

June 30, 2003

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Richard D. Irwin
23 Wild Duck Road
Wilton, CT 06897

Re: Repayment of Subordinated Promissory Note

Dear Mr. Irwin:

         PharmChem, Inc. (the "Company") borrowed $375,000.00 (the "Loan") from
you pursuant to an Unsecured Subordinated Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
dated September 19, 2001 and as evidenced by that certain Unsecured Subordinated
Promissory Note for $375,000.00 dated September 21, 2001 (the "Note"). In
connection with the Loan, the Company issued to you a warrant for 37,500 shares
of the Company's common stock (the "Original Warrant") at an exercise price of
$3.00 per share. The Company has agreed to repay the Loan prior to the original
maturity date and you have agreed to accept $187,500.00 (the "Repayment Amount")
as payment in full for the original principal amount of the Note, and unpaid
interest thereon of $25,312.50.

         Upon receipt of the Repayment Amount, you will mark the Note "paid in
full" and promptly return the Note to the Company.

         It is understood that the repayment of the Loan as described above is
contingent upon the Company successfully completing the new financing with
Silicon Valley Bank.

         In connection with the Company's repayment of the Loan, the Company has
further agreed to reissue the Original Warrant with a new per share exercise
price of $____, i.e., the average closing price of a share of the Company's
common stock for the thirty day period ending June 26, 2003 (the "New Warrant").
As a condition to our issuance of the New Warrant, you will need to return to
the Company the Original Warrant in the postage-paid, preaddressed envelope
provided herewith for that purpose and, upon our receipt of the Original
Warrant, we will issue to you the New Warrant.

<PAGE>

Repayment of Subordinated Promissory Note
Richard D. Irwin
June 30, 2003
Page 2

         BY YOUR SIGNING BELOW AND RETURNING THIS LETTER TO ME, FIRST, BY FAX AT
(817) 605-6402 AND, SECOND, BY OVERNIGHT MAIL USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE,
INDICATING YOUR AGREEMENT TO AND APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE, PHARMCHEM WILL THEN
OVERNIGHT A CHECK TO YOU IN THE AMOUNT OF $212,812.50.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   PharmChem, Inc.

                                   /s/ David A. Lattanzio
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   David A. Lattanzio
                                   Vice President,
                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                   Secretary

AGREED AND APPROVED:

/s/ Richard D. Irwin

Richard D. Irwin

By: Richard D. Irwin
Name: Richard D. Irwin
Title: __________________________

Dated: June 26, 2003
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 11

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 20, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Tuesday, January 19, 1999, it stand adjourned

4 until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 2, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives January 19,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
# Official Journal L 170/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 170 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 581 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 170

English edition

Legislation

Volume 581 July 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the short-stay visa waiver | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1050 of 30 June 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran | 2 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the short-stay visa waiver

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1050 of 30 June 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ERIK BOBADILLA RODRIGUEZ, )

 )

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-2082RSM

)

v. )

)

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al., ) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Respondents ) UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA)

 )

__________________________________ )

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees, respondents’ reply, the

Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate

Judge, and the remaining record, finds and Orders as follows:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) The Court finds that petitioner is the prevailing party, that respondents’ position

was not substantially justified as defined by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28

U.S. § 2412, and that there are no special circumstances that would make an

award in this case unjust.

(3) Petitioner’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees in the amount of $32,876.70 (Dkt. #31) is

GRANTED.

Case 2:05-cv-02082-RSM Document 37 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE – 2

(4) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record,

and to the Honorable Monica J. Benton.

DATED this _6_ day of February, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02082-RSM Document 37 Filed 02/06/07 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

April 29, 1963

No. 67644.

#### National Carloading Corp. and O. B. Distributors *v.*United States,

protests 69/14980 and 59/12678 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

August 6, 1957

No. 61128.

protests 937886-G, etc. (New York).

#### H. Baron & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bitter orange pulp the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 60, C. A. D. 638), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ANDREAS SIEGFRIED GORATH,

 Petitioner,

v.

CYNTHIA ANNE GORATH,

Respondent..

Case No. C06-5276 RBL

ORDER ON EVIDENTIARY HEARING

This Hague Convention Return case is before the court on its own Motion, following its request and

receipt of the transcript of the German Court proceedings in the action commenced there by Mrs. Gorath. The

Court has reviewed that transcript.

The German Court declined to grant the request of either Mr. or Mrs. Gorath for “provisional” rulings

on the their respective claims for sole custody of the children at issue. The Court specifically did not make

factual findings about the merits of the parties’ claims, including particularly Mrs. Gorath’s claim that, more

than a year prior to removal, Mr. Gorath had threatened to “shoot her dead” if she left him. The German Court

did not address the potential applicability of Article 13 of the Hague Convention, and it specifically

acknowledged and referenced the ongoing repatriation proceedings in this Court. 

Case 3:06-cv-05276-RBL Document 23 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

It remains clear to this court that the best and most convenient evidence on the subject mater of this

dispute is in Germany. If the German Court does not resolve the factual issues present in both the custody and

Hague Return cases, then this court will hold an evidentiary hearing and resolve the Hague return case under

the Hague Convention, including particularly Articles 3 and 13, on November 6, 2006. The Court will do so

based on the law and on the evidence adduced at that hearing, including presumably the testimony of the

parties.

If the German Court does resolve these factual issues, or schedules a hearing to do so in the not too

distant future, this court will factor that determination into its resolution of the matter before it. 

DATED this 31st day of October, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05276-RBL Document 23 Filed 10/31/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 174

In the Interest of W.C.M.

Clark Herniman, DO, Petitioner and Appellee

 

 v.

W.C.M., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20240213

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, 

the Honorable Nicholas D. Thornton, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mary E. DePuydt, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and 

appellee; submitted on brief. 

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. 
1

Interest of W.C.M.

No. 20240213

Per Curiam.

[¶1] W.C.M. appeals from the district court’s order requiring continued 

hospitalization, arguing the evidence was not sufficient for the court to find he is mentally 

ill and in need of treatment. Applying our more probing clearly erroneous standard of 

review, Interest of C.W., 552 N.W.2d 382, 383 (N.D. 1996), the court’s findings are not 

clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers 

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
# Official Journal C 120/20 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 120 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4920 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 120

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4920 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 120/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 120/2 | Draft Commission regulation on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid | 2 |
| 2006/C 120/3 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1) | 11 |
| 2006/C 120/4 | List of grants awarded under the 2005 financial year on budget line 05 08 06 | 21 |
| 2006/C 120/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4205 — Aleris International/Corus Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 25 |
| 2006/C 120/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4236 — Wendel-Carlyle/Stahl) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 26 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 120/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 120/2

Draft Commission regulation on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

2

2006/C 120/3

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (1)

11

2006/C 120/4

List of grants awarded under the 2005 financial year on budget line 05 08 06

21

2006/C 120/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4205 — Aleris International/Corus Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

25

2006/C 120/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4236 — Wendel-Carlyle/Stahl) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

26

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARILYN MEYERS, o/b/o K.M.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5399RBL-KLS

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. #8), the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the report and

recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) the Commissioner erred as described in the report;

(3) defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied;

(4) this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings as

described in the report; and

(5) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant’s counsel

and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 15th day of December, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05399-RBL Document 15 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAMON PEREZ-CAMACHO,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 06-411M

DETENTION ORDER

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: August 3, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds the

following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Pretrial Services Report of August 3, 2006 reveals that there is an immigration

detainer lodged against the defendant. 

Case 2:06-cr-00266-JCC Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of Mexico.

(3) There is no information available to show that defendant has any ties to this

community or to the Western District of Washington.

(4) Defendant has a criminal background history revealing prior charges and

convictions.

(5) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance because of the nature of the instant

charge and as a risk of danger based on his criminal history.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than detention

that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community..

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

/ / /

Case 2:06-cr-00266-JCC Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 3

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00266-JCC Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, TimothyJ. Barberich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  September 12, 2006 |                      |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | /s/ TIMOTHY J. BARBERICH  |   |
|                      | Timothy J. Barberich      |
|                      | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----