alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8547

WILLIAM RAY DELOACH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN BASS; REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR SMITH;

L. A. BROWN, C/O; LIEUTENANT HARRISON, C/O,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-972-2)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ray DeLoach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIUM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district

court entered its order on November 8, 1995; Appellant's notice of

appeal was filed on December 14, 1995. Appellant's failure to note

a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Recon Technology, Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2009 (the Report), I, Shenping Yin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|September 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Yin Shenping    
|                   |  |  |  | Yin Shenping           
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 111 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 111

   Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas there are 116 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 14, 1997, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President of the United States issue 
        a proclamation calling on the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) by Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.                                                  |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | By:   | /s/Stephen Katz                                                 |   |   |
|--------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |            | Stephen Katz      Chief Executive Officer      October 25, 2006 |   |

|   | By:   | /s/Kenneth Block                                                                    |   |   |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |            | Kenneth Block        Secretary and Chief Financial Officer         October 25, 2006 |   |

A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been  provided to Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and will be retained by  Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

14

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

BOBBY LAYTHEN BINFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRY BENDA, et al,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-5364RBL-KLS

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #23), plaintiff’s

motion for judgment as a matter of law (Dkt. #24), the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants’ motion is GRANTED;

(3) Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED;

(4) Plaintiff’s complaint hereby is DISMISSED; and

(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, defendants’ counsel and

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 27th day of July, 2007.ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05364-RBL Document 32 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b))  I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the Company) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   By:  /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert Name: S. Emerson Lybbert Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  Date:

December 21

, 2010   PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b)  I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the Company) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    By: /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert Name: S. Emerson Lybbert Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  Date:

December 21

, 2010   1
```

[House Document 111-53]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-53

 
  MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE RELATING TO THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OF 
                             SAMUEL B. KENT

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                         THEUNITEDSTATESSENATE

                              transmitting

   A MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE PERTAINING TO THE CERTIFICATION OF THE 
  RESIGNATION OF SAMUEL B. KENT, JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 
 COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. REFERRED TO THE MANAGERS ON 
        THE PART OF THE HOUSE APPOINTED BY HOUSE RESOLUTION 565.

               June 26, 2009.--And ordered to be printed
                             Certification

    I, Nancy Erickson, having custody of the seal of the United 
States Senate, hereby certify that the attached record is a 
true and correct copy of a record of the United States Senate, 
received by the United States Senate Sergeant at Arms from 
Samuel B. Kent on June 24, 2009, and presented to the Senate in 
open session on June 25, 2009.
    In Witness Whereof, I have set my hand and caused to be 
affixed the Seal of the United States Senate at Washington, 
D.C., this 25th day of June, 2009.

                                            Nancy Erickson,
                                           Secretary of the Senate.
                                                     June 24, 2009.

    I, Samuel B. Kent, Judge of the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of Texas, hereby tender my 
resignation as a Federal District Judge effective 30th June 
2009.

                                                    Samuel B. Kent.

Witnessed:
    Terrance W. Gainer.
    Andrew B. Willison.

                                    

```
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 154

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Magee, et al. v. Hatch, et al., No.

97–CV02203, pending in the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs have

named Senator Orrin Hatch as a defendant; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the Senate may direct its counsel

to defend its Members in civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Hatch in the case of Magee, et

3 al. v. Hatch, et al.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

May 16, 1967

No. 67/164.

#### Latama, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/18834 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *National Carloading Corp.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          68,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    127,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,652
<PP&E>                                       3,758,587
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,421,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,821,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          833,128
<BONDS>                                        868,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     899,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,821,347
<SALES>                                        972,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               978,057
<CGS>                                          357,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,132,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (382,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (382,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (382,055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 - NOTE 3. - LOSS PER COMMON SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 63428.

protests 315722-K, etc. (New York).

#### Lacy Falk et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Answer by the Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association has been served this 14th day of February, 2014, upon the following persons via email: steve.morrissey@united.com thomas.bolling@united.com dan . weiss@coair.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com howard.kass@usairways . com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com rpommer@atlasair . com russell . bailey@alpa.org j onathan . cohen@alpa.org edw@ttd.org c1ytle@portoakland.com kgeorge@broward.org robert.wirick@aa.com francis . heil@aa . com jesse . elliot@faa.gov nicholas.tsokris@faa . gov john . chen@faa.gov john . allen@faa.gov anita.mosner @hklaw.com jenni fer.nowak@hklaw.com nssparks@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex . com dberg@airlines . org jcasey@airi ines.org kglatz@airlines.org cc@eurocockpit . be ejames@jamhoff.com urskr@state.gov sshur@traveltech . org eugene . alfo rd@trade . gov Matthe w .Bal dwin@ec . europa.eu Felix . LEINEMANN@eeas.europa.eu David . Batchelor@sesarju.eu Ottar.Ostnes@sd.dep.no Iohn.Hanlon@ELFAA . com paul . gretch@dot . gov Robert . Finamore@dot . gov romanow@pillsburylaw.com peter . nelson@pillsburylaw . com info@airlineinfo.com vegard . einan@parat . com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF M.B.B.

PETITION OF: C.B., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 374 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Before the First Division,

July 2, 1952

No. 56779.

#### Star Jewelry Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 180436-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pear-shaped glass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Brier Manufacturing Co.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 68, C. A. D. 465), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Gary H. Schoenfeld, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vans, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.

Date: October 8, 2003

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gary H. Schoenfeld               
| |                                      
| | Gary H. Schoenfeld                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        

25
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO MALDONADO-SANCHEZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5085M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( X ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 May 11, 2006.

__s/ Karen L. Strombom________________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05331-RBL Document 7 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1