alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Small Electric Motors Energy

Conservation Standards Notice of

Public Meeting and Data Availability

This page

presents

meeting

materials

and

information

on how to

submit

comments

for the

public

meeting on

energy

conservation standards for small electric motors.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is considering

potential standards for certain single-phase and polyphase

small electric motors, which would achieve the maximum

improvement in energy efficiency that is technologically

feasible and economically justified, and would result in

significant energy savings. The purpose of this meeting is

to discuss and receive comments about the classes of

small electric motors under consideration, the analyses

performed to evaluate efficiency standards, potential

efficiency standard levels, and other issues affecting this

rulemaking.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat

PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

Meeting Materials

Notice of Public Meeting and Data Availability,

Federal Register, 73 FR 79723, December 30, 2008

(PDF 64 KB)

Preliminary Technical Support Document

Agenda (PDF 88 KB)

Presentations (PDF 1.1 MB)

Supplemental Slides on Scaling Relationships (PDF

119 KB)

Modified LCC and NIA Graphs (Coming soon)

How to Submit Comments

You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or by

courier. Wherever possible, comments in the electronic

format should carry the electronic signature of the author.

Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted

electronically must be authenticated by submitting a

signed original paper document.

E-mail:

small_electric_motors_std.rulemaking@hq.doe.gov.

Include Docket Number EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007

in the subject line of the message.

Postal Mail:

Ms. Brenda Edwards

DATE: January 30, 2009

TIME: 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. EST

LOCATION:

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 1E-245

Washington, DC 20585

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 2 2/20/2009 9:13 AM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.6
U.S. Department of Energy

Building Technologies Program

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Mailstop EE-2J

Washington, DC 20585

Please include a signed original.

Hand Delivery or Courier:

Ms. Brenda Edwards

U.S. Department of Energy

Building Technologies Program

950 L'Enfant Plaza, 6th Floor

Washington, DC 20024

Telephone: (202) 586-2945

Please include a signed original.

Comments should clearly identify docket number

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007. The deadline for submitting

comments is March 2, 2009.

Contact Information

James Raba

Project Manager

(202) 586-8654

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 02/05/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

2 of 2 2/20/2009 9:13 AM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DEBT SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 NO. C06-298JLR

 ORDER

 

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion for an expedited hearing on

their motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) (Dkt. # 11). 

The court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion, subject to the following instructions.

The court notes that Plaintiffs have served all Defendants except Jennifer Whalen and

Greg Moses. The court directs Plaintiffs to update the court if they effect service. The court

notes that no Defendant has formally entered an appearance, and thus directs counsel for

Plaintiffs to ensure that Defendants are properly served with pleadings and orders in this

action, including this order, until Defendants enter an appearance.

Defendants are ordered to respond in writing to Plaintiffs’ motion for a TRO no later

than 12:00 p.m. on Friday, March 24, 2006. Plaintiffs shall not file a reply. The court will

hold a hearing on the motion for TRO on Monday, March 27, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. The parties

Case 2:06-cv-00298-JLR Document 14 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER- 2

shall advise the court no later than 3:00 p.m on Thursday, March 23, 2006 if they wish to

present live witnesses at the hearing.

The court notes that Plaintiffs no longer wish to maintain this action under seal. The

court therefore directs the clerk to unseal the record in this action, and to lift the seal from all

documents filed to date.

Dated this 13th day of March, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00298-JLR Document 14 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 30, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Lora Strine, EPA

SUBJECT: May 26, 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants

SUMMARY

A phone call was held between EPA and Patrick Cummins, CNEE on May 26, 2015 to discuss the 

proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Center for New Energy Economy

Patrick Cummins

Jeff Lyng

US EPA

Implementation Workgroup

Godfrey, Janice; Strine, Lora; Boswell, Colin; Burns, Ward; Cain, Alexis; Culligan, Kevin; Dalcher, Debra; 

Donaldson, Guy; Drake, Robert; Dressler, Jason; Farris, Laura; Fellner, Christian; Fulton, Abby; Gonzalez, 

Larry; Gordon, Michael; Haber, Matt; Hackel, Angela; Hoffman, Howard; Hutson, Nick; Johnson, Mary; 

Johnson, Terry; Kakade, Seema; Ketcham-Colwill, Jim; Lau, Gavin; Lawrence, Rob; Lee, Anita; Linn, Emily; 

Lloyd, David; McConnell, Robert; Miller, Julia; Mitchell, Ken; Mulholland, Denise; Murray, Beth; Narvaez, 

Madonna; Newman, Erin; Orlando, Danny; Ortega, Kellie; Patel, Ketan; Rosenberg, Julie; Santiago, Juan; 

Saracino, Ray; Sherry, Christopher; Solomon, David; Srivastava, Ravi; Steib, Clovis; Stevens, Gabrielle; 

Torres, Elineth; Wieber, Kirk; Williamson, Timothy; Wong, Shutsu; Zenick, Elliott; Moskal, John; Elman, 

Barry; Conroy, David; Greene, Cynthia; Shatas, Angie; Raymond Forde; Gardella, Anthony; Mangels, Karl; 

Mark, Jeremy; Victor, Meg; Daly, Carl; Aisling, Kathleen; Swanson, Nicholas; Wortman, Eric; Hansen, 

Mark; Olszewski, Joshua; Thomas, Carrie; Vijayan, Abi; Argentieri, Sabrina; Evans, DavidA; Marten, Alex; 

Sheriff, Glenn
M otions Dismissed; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4 , 202 4
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00890

- CR

IN RE DAKOTA SEMMLER , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 155th District Court Austin C ounty, Texas T ria l Court Cause N o. 2019R

- 0162



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 27, 2023 , relator Dakota Semmler filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator a sks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Jeff R. Steinhauser, presiding judge of the 155th District Court of Austin County , to2 vacate the trial court ’s September 5, 2023 “ order for withdrawal of defense counsel ” and the trial court’s October 25, 2023 “ order on defense moti o n to reconsider

. ”
The mandamus record reflects that o n November 7, 2023, relator signed a

“ waiver of attorney

- c lient conflict

. ” The waiver was not before the trial court when the trial court signed the complained

- of orders

. “We do not co nsider arguments in a petition for writ of mandamus which were not presented to the trial

c ourt.” In re Chu , 134 S.W.3d 459, 463 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2005, orig. proceeding) (citing In re American Optical Corp. , 988 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding )).
R elator has n ot established that he is entitle d to mandamus relief. Accordingly , w e deny re lator ’ s peti tion for writ of m andamus without prejudice to refiling the same

. Additionally, we dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Bourl io t, Zimmerer, and Spain. Do Not Publis h

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

191) IV-E-65 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:57 PM Sheet 191 of 242 
P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

AIJ6 2 A 1988 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: EPA/Mitsubishi Meeting Regarding Activated Carbon 

FROM: Karen Lostoski, Mechanical Engineer ~<CX^-A-^ ^jo"Hr>U> 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

TO: Public Docket A-87-11 

THRU: John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

On April 6, 1988 Mr. Kenneth P. Von Hertsenberg, Sales 

Consultant for Mitsubishi International Corporation, met with 

representatives of the Office of Mobile Sources at the Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory in Ann Arbor, MI. A list of 

attendees is attached. 

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the results of 

EPA's testing on the activated carbon manufactured by Kuraray 

Chemical Co. The EPA obtained a value of 56 g/L working 

capacity for this carbon whereas Kuraray gave a value of 115 

g/L capacity. Due to the great discrepancy in values, it was 

decided that the test procedures used to obtain these values 

would be compared. Further discussion on the use of this 

carbon will take place after the two procedures are compared. 

Attachment 
P.3 

Attendees List 

EPA/Mitsubishi International Meeting 

April 6, 1988 

Mitsubishi International 

Kenneth Von Hertsenberg 

EPA 

John Anderson 

Jean Schwendeman 

Karen Lostoski
No. 57487.

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 164676-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and various other trays, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of the decisions cited, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 40 percent under paragraph 339, as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 35 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753), as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (3) the items marked with the letter “C” at 35 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by T. D. 49753, as household utensils, plated with silver on copper; (4) the items marked with the letter “D” at 25 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by T. D. 49753, as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (5) the items marked with the letter “E” at 35 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by T. D. 49753, for articles, plated with silver on copper; and (6) the items marked with the letter “F” at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as articles, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer.
No. 59837.

#### Trans World International Service Co. *v.*United States,

protest 251639-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opaque white glass stones, faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 10.3**

AMENDMENT NO. 1 

TO THE 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2009 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital AdvisorsLLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of November 13, 2009 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement.

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the AdvisoryAgreement and advance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoingand of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 ofthis Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through theperiod ending January 31, 2010 exceeds the amount of the Company’s Funds from Operations from January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2010. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor forthe Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative Funds from Operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of anydistributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’sStockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and yearfirst above written. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.BY: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
 
KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCBY: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
 
BY: Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner
 
BY: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID

LD Mc Cauley

9-1460-00032

Address 3875 California Road, Orchard Park, NY 14127

Type of business Captive Job Shop

# of Employees 

Hours of Operation 24 hours per day, 5 days per week

Annual Revenue $60,000,000

Process Type Decorative electroplating

Tank Design and Operation

Dimensions 44'L x 34'W x 64'H, 400 gals.

Rectifier Capacity 1500 amps

Annual Hours of Operation 4000 hours/year

Emisison Control Technology

Type of control/control device packed bed scrubber

control device operating parameters 0.5 inches of water

Emission test data Has test been performed? No. 

1996 Emission statement

Exhaust design

Emission point EP 09104

Stack height (m) 10

Stack diameter (m) 0.77

Exit velocity (m/sec) 13.76

cubic meters per minute 375.3

Exit temperature (K) 297

Other Available Supporting Documents

Emission Inventory Report 2009

Chromium release lbs/yr 9.6 x 10-3 From 1996 Emission statement

Permit Application/Operating permit

State Facility Permit - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html

Process flow diagrams/plant layout See attached files
Notes
Quad/Graphics Buffalo

9-1430-00213

West Falls Machine Co.

9-1466-00047

2475 George Urban Blvd. 

Depew, NY 14043

11692 East Main Street, 

East Aurora, NY 14052

Printing and Publishing Job Shop

420 15

24 hrs/day, 7 day/wk 6:00 am - 5:30 pm

$40MM -

Hard chromium electroplating

Small hard chrome 

electropating

One active tank

20' X 5.25'

Tank 1 - 4'W x 5'L x 7'D 

(1256 gallons)

Tank 2 - 3'W x 4'L x 4'D 

(359 gallons)

limited to 60 E06 amp/hr per 

year < 60 E06 amp/hr per year

250 8760

composite mesh pad mist eliminator - Creco

0-2.5 inches of H2O max 1.6 inches of H2O

Complete test report Complete test report

EP 00101

10.97 7.0104

0.405 0.77

7.29 6.7

61.4 117.4

294 300

2009 2009

7.36 1.87

Title V - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical

/32249.html

State Facility Permit - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chem

ical/32249.html

See attached files See attached files
The chromium plating portion 

of this facility is closed but 

printing operations still open.
Quad/Graphics Buffalo

9-1430-00213

2475 George Urban Blvd. Depew, NY 14043 To Atmosphere

 Liquid Return to Tank

Vapor to

 Scrubber

Fume Suppressant 

(monitored by Surface Tension)

Cylinders

* Tank also normally operates with a partial foam blanket to further suppress chomic acid fumes.

Chrome 

Tank 

(Tank 4 

Plate & 

Baffle 

Mesh Pad Filter
o Atmosphere

Equipped with Magnahelic

Gauge for Pressure Differential Monitoring
LD McCauley
April 1st , 2013

Sirs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

REF. Comments in Support of Resolution 787

To Whom It May Concern,

By means of the following communication, we want to confirm th at Taca International Airline, S.A., Avianca

and TACA Airlines, support IATA  ́s Resolution 787

– termed as New Distribution Capability

– NDC

- taking into

account that it constitutes an updated data transmission standard based on XML, and thus it will make it

easier, faster and more economic to provide the customer with more information about fare alternatives,

ancillary services, on board amenities and graphics such as pictures and seat maps

.

Given the fact that NDC will further include new technology usi ng messaging through XML based protocols and

web services that will enable transparency and consistency in airline pricing, products and services across all

channels and greater customer personalization and o ffering in the shopping process, we consider tha t we

should support the initiative.

In addition to the above

, it is important to bear in mind that carriers and travel agents need real time dynamics

that allow interactive contact with their customers; and through the use of NDC, it seems that we will b e able

to avoid current constraints with existing EDIFACT messages.

NDC will also enable a dynamic distribution model that will provide a better access to distribution channels for

providers and customers that is currently possible only through the airlin es’ own websites.

Yours sincerely,

Jorge Andrés Serrano

Aeronautic al Affairs manager

Jorgeandres.serrano @aviancataca.com

Transamerican Airlines , S.A.
!"#



 $%

&'%!"#()


*+ !", "#)
- 
!", "#)


.
 "

+
, 
)
"

/
0,




 12
22 
3  
'
4,, 
2
 

.
 



.
, 
 

5,
,





	
 4,, 
.,"2
6 ' 
"+.)
77897
:"')
77897


*"'


+ 


5
%
2
'
 2 


#9'
 2
 

,

 
, 

1

#







2,
2,, ; 


 2	



","
*4
 
 


# 






"

'

4




,2'2 
2


2

*4




 2
'
,, 


4
1
, 

 
, 	


 

2

'
","
*4
 
#
'2



 2" 
 


,%"

2
 	
/	











""< ,
=
,  
2


2
, 2 





,
%
 '
1

"# 

'2

 ', 

1
 

 
2

 

2













"
>
?

00


. 2
4#2	
/



 	
+.
@9A





7A@


$<







@@@


!",
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 10 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 10 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02035-TSZ Document 10 Filed 03/13/06 Page 3 of 3
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Posting EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0187 to Regulations
.gov for Public Access FROM: Dan Kenny Branch Chief Signature :

THRU: Susan Lewis Registration Division US EPA/OSCPP/OPP



# ~- _;)~ 3/3J)2P!f:'


# car fiu 7 f11 1 lew15 

# 3/?J I /~ Thi s memorandum authori zes the posting of EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0187 to Regulations
.gov for public access . Monsanto Company has submitted an application to amend their M1691 Dicamba Herbicide for use on dicamba tolerant cotton and soybeans
. This is an issue of high public interest and concern so the Agency feels it is important to get feedback from stakeholders before a final decision is reached. This document will be open for public comment from 03 /3 1/ 2016 to 04/ 30/2016
. Submit your comments , identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0187 , by one of the following methods :
• Electronically: www.regulations.gov : Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Dicamba: New U se on Herbicide-Tolerant Cotton and Soybeans Environmental Protection Agency , Mailcode 28221 T , 1200 Penns ylv ania Ave , NW , Washington , DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: Hand Delivery : Environmental Protection Agency , Mail code 28221 T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue , NW , Washington , DC 20460
. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation , and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information
.Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted , comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations
.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute . Multimedia submissions (audio , video , etc .) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make
. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e
. on the web , cloud , or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods , the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions , and general guidance on making effective comments , please visit : http: //www.epa .gov

### Idockets/commenting-epa-dockets
.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis , Registration Division , U S EPA/OSCPP/OPP 7505P , Environmental Protection Agency , 1200 Pennsylvania Ave , NW , Washington , DC 20460 ; telephone number : (703 ) 305-7090 email address: RDFRnotices @ epa.gov
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Uni

- Tec Trade, Inc. v. Schneider Electric Services and ECP Electrical

Supply, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00745

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 80650

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Uni

- Tec Trade, Inc., has filed a motion for rehearing. Construing this motion

in part to be a motion for rehearing, the panel has voted to overrule the motion.

It is so ORDERED.

J udge’s signature:

____ Justice Richard Hightower

___________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower

Date: __ December 8, 2020

__________