# Official Journal C 253/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 563 September 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 563 September 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 253/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6828 — Delta Air Lines/Virgin Group/Virgin Atlantic Limited) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 253/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6828 — Delta Air Lines/Virgin Group/Virgin Atlantic Limited) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 253/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2013/C 253/03 | Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission's Communication on Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe | 3 |
| 2013/C 253/04 | Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on market surveillance of products and amending various legislative instruments of the European Parliament and of the Council | 8 |
| 2013/C 253/05 | Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission proposal for a regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC | 10 |
| 2013/C 253/06 | Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations | 12 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 253/07 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 15 |
| 2013/C 253/08 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 15 |
| 2013/C 253/09 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 16 |
| 2013/C 253/10 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 16 |
| 2013/C 253/11 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 17 |
| 2013/C 253/12 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 17 |
| 2013/C 253/13 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 18 |
| 2013/C 253/14 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 18 |
| 2013/C 253/15 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 19 |
| 2013/C 253/16 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 19 |
| 2013/C 253/17 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 20 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 253/02

Euro exchange rates

2

European Data Protection Supervisor

2013/C 253/03

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission's Communication on Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe

3

2013/C 253/04

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on market surveillance of products and amending various legislative instruments of the European Parliament and of the Council

8

2013/C 253/05

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission proposal for a regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC

10

2013/C 253/06

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations

12

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 253/07

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

15

2013/C 253/08

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

15

2013/C 253/09

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

16

2013/C 253/10

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

16

2013/C 253/11

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

17

2013/C 253/12

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

17

2013/C 253/13

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

18

2013/C 253/14

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

18

2013/C 253/15

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

19

2013/C 253/16

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

19

2013/C 253/17

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

20

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 253/18 | Call for proposals under the Capacities work programme of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities | 21 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 253/19 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7029 — ZTE Services Deutschland/Alcatel-Lucent Network Services) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 22 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2013/C 253/18

Call for proposals under the Capacities work programme of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

21

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 253/19

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7029 — ZTE Services Deutschland/Alcatel-Lucent Network Services) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

22

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6828 — Delta Air Lines/Virgin Group/Virgin Atlantic Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 253/01

On 20 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6828. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6828. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 September 2013

2013/C 253/02

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3207 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4593 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84775 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7222 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2317 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0095 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7026 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6641 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4680 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3907 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2418 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6900 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6819 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 449,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4816 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0822 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5773 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 038,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3220 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,572 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9745 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,309 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1257 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5521 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,5230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3207

JPY

Japanese yen

131,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4593

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84775

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7222

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2317

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0095

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7026

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2548

RON

Romanian leu

4,4238

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6641

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4680

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3907

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2418

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6900

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6819

KRW

South Korean won

1 449,66

ZAR

South African rand

13,4816

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0822

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5773

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 038,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3220

PHP

Philippine peso

58,572

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9745

THB

Thai baht

42,309

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1257

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5521

INR

Indian rupee

87,5230

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

European Data Protection Supervisor

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/3

---

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission's Communication on ‘Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe’

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website: http://www.edps.europa.eu)

2013/C 253/03

I.   Introduction

I.1.   Aim of the Opinion

| 1. | In view of the importance of cloud computing in the evolving information society and of the ongoing policy debate within the EU on cloud computing, the EDPS has decided to issue this Opinion on his own initiative. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In view of the importance of cloud computing in the evolving information society and of the ongoing policy debate within the EU on cloud computing, the EDPS has decided to issue this Opinion on his own initiative.

| 2. | This Opinion responds to the Communication of the Commission ‘Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe’ of 27 September 2012 (hereafter ‘the Communication’) (1), which sets forth key actions and policy steps to be taken to speed up the use of cloud computing services in Europe. The EDPS was consulted informally before the adoption of the Communication and provided informal comments. He welcomes that some of his comments have been taken into account in the Communication. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Opinion responds to the Communication of the Commission ‘Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe’ of 27 September 2012 (hereafter ‘the Communication’) (1), which sets forth key actions and policy steps to be taken to speed up the use of cloud computing services in Europe. The EDPS was consulted informally before the adoption of the Communication and provided informal comments. He welcomes that some of his comments have been taken into account in the Communication.

| 3. | However, given the scope and importance of the ongoing debate on the relationship between cloud computing and the data protection legal framework, this Opinion is not limited to the subjects addressed in the Communication. |
| --- | --- |

3.

However, given the scope and importance of the ongoing debate on the relationship between cloud computing and the data protection legal framework, this Opinion is not limited to the subjects addressed in the Communication.

| 4. | The Opinion focuses especially on the challenges that cloud computing poses for data protection and how the proposed data protection regulation (hereafter ‘the proposed regulation’) (2) would tackle them. It also comments on the areas for further action identified in the Communication. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Opinion focuses especially on the challenges that cloud computing poses for data protection and how the proposed data protection regulation (hereafter ‘the proposed regulation’) (2) would tackle them. It also comments on the areas for further action identified in the Communication.

I.2.   Background

| 5. | In the context of the general policy debate in the EU on cloud computing, the following activities and documents are of specific importance:






  — | following its 2010 Communication on the digital agenda for Europe (3) the Commission launched a public consultation on cloud computing in Europe from 16 May until 31 August 2011 and published the results on 5 December 2011 (4), |
| --- | --- | --- |

5.

In the context of the general policy debate in the EU on cloud computing, the following activities and documents are of specific importance:

—

following its 2010 Communication on the digital agenda for Europe (3) the Commission launched a public consultation on cloud computing in Europe from 16 May until 31 August 2011 and published the results on 5 December 2011 (4),

| — | on 1 July 2012, the Article 29 Working Party (5) adopted an opinion on cloud computing (hereafter ‘the WP29 Opinion’) (6) that analyses the application of the current data protection rules set forth in Directive 95/46/EC to cloud computing service providers operating in the European Economic Area (EEA) and their clients (7), |
| --- | --- |

—

on 1 July 2012, the Article 29 Working Party (5) adopted an opinion on cloud computing (hereafter ‘the WP29 Opinion’) (6) that analyses the application of the current data protection rules set forth in Directive 95/46/EC to cloud computing service providers operating in the European Economic Area (EEA) and their clients (7),

| — | on 26 October 2012, a resolution on cloud computing was adopted by the Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners during their 34th International Conference (8). |
| --- | --- |

—

on 26 October 2012, a resolution on cloud computing was adopted by the Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners during their 34th International Conference (8).

I.3.   Communication on cloud computing

| 6. | The EDPS welcomes the Communication. It identifies three specific key actions required at EU level to accompany and promote the use of cloud computing in Europe, as follows:






  — | key action 1: cutting through the jungle of standards, |
| --- | --- | --- |

6.

The EDPS welcomes the Communication. It identifies three specific key actions required at EU level to accompany and promote the use of cloud computing in Europe, as follows:

—

key action 1: cutting through the jungle of standards,

| — | key action 2: safe and fair contract terms and conditions, |
| --- | --- |

—

key action 2: safe and fair contract terms and conditions,

| — | key action 3: establishing a European Cloud Partnership to drive innovation and growth from the public sector. |
| --- | --- |

—

key action 3: establishing a European Cloud Partnership to drive innovation and growth from the public sector.

| 7. | Additional policy steps are also foreseen such as measures to stimulate the use of cloud computing by fostering research and development or awareness-raising, as well as the need to address key themes related to cloud services — including amongst others data protection, access by law enforcement, security, liability of intermediary service providers — through a reinforced international dialogue. |
| --- | --- |

7.

Additional policy steps are also foreseen such as measures to stimulate the use of cloud computing by fostering research and development or awareness-raising, as well as the need to address key themes related to cloud services — including amongst others data protection, access by law enforcement, security, liability of intermediary service providers — through a reinforced international dialogue.

| 8. | Data protection is mentioned in the Communication as an essential element for ensuring the success of cloud computing deployment in Europe. The Communication notes (9) that the proposed regulation addresses many of the concerns raised by cloud service providers and by cloud clients (10). |
| --- | --- |

8.

Data protection is mentioned in the Communication as an essential element for ensuring the success of cloud computing deployment in Europe. The Communication notes (9) that the proposed regulation addresses many of the concerns raised by cloud service providers and by cloud clients (10).

I.4.   Focus and structure of the Opinion

| 9. | This Opinion has three goals. |
| --- | --- |

9.

This Opinion has three goals.

| 10. | The first goal is to highlight the relevance of privacy and data protection in the current discussions on cloud computing. More particularly, it underlines that the level of data protection in a cloud computing environment must not be inferior to that required in any other data processing context. cloud computing practices can only be developed and applied legally if they guarantee that this level of data protection is respected (see Chapter III.3). The Opinion takes into account the guidance provided in the WP29 Opinion. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The first goal is to highlight the relevance of privacy and data protection in the current discussions on cloud computing. More particularly, it underlines that the level of data protection in a cloud computing environment must not be inferior to that required in any other data processing context. cloud computing practices can only be developed and applied legally if they guarantee that this level of data protection is respected (see Chapter III.3). The Opinion takes into account the guidance provided in the WP29 Opinion.

| 11. | The second goal is to further analyse the main challenges that cloud computing brings for data protection in the context of the proposed data protection regulation, in particular the difficulty to establish unambiguously the responsibilities of the different actors and the notions of controller and processor. The Opinion (mainly, Chapter IV) analyses how the proposed regulation would, as it is currently put forward (11), help ensure a high level of data protection in cloud computing services. It therefore builds upon the views developed by the EDPS in his Opinion on the data protection reform package (hereafter ‘the EDPS Opinion on the data protection reform package’) (12) and complements it by considering specifically the cloud computing environment. The EDPS underlines that his Opinion on the data protection reform package fully applies in relation to cloud computing services and must be considered as a basis for the present Opinion. Moreover, some of the issues mentioned there — such as his analysis of the new provisions on data subjects' rights (13) — are sufficiently clear and will therefore not be developed further in this Opinion. |
| --- | --- |

11.

The second goal is to further analyse the main challenges that cloud computing brings for data protection in the context of the proposed data protection regulation, in particular the difficulty to establish unambiguously the responsibilities of the different actors and the notions of controller and processor. The Opinion (mainly, Chapter IV) analyses how the proposed regulation would, as it is currently put forward (11), help ensure a high level of data protection in cloud computing services. It therefore builds upon the views developed by the EDPS in his Opinion on the data protection reform package (hereafter ‘the EDPS Opinion on the data protection reform package’) (12) and complements it by considering specifically the cloud computing environment. The EDPS underlines that his Opinion on the data protection reform package fully applies in relation to cloud computing services and must be considered as a basis for the present Opinion. Moreover, some of the issues mentioned there — such as his analysis of the new provisions on data subjects' rights (13) — are sufficiently clear and will therefore not be developed further in this Opinion.

| 12. | The third goal is to identify areas that require further action at EU level from a data protection and privacy perspective, in view of the cloud strategy put forward by the Commission in the Communication. They include, amongst others, providing further guidance, standardisation efforts, carrying out further risks assessments for specific sectors (such as public sector), developing standard contract terms and conditions, engaging into international dialogue on issues related to cloud computing and ensuring effective means of international cooperation (to be developed in Chapter V). |
| --- | --- |

12.

The third goal is to identify areas that require further action at EU level from a data protection and privacy perspective, in view of the cloud strategy put forward by the Commission in the Communication. They include, amongst others, providing further guidance, standardisation efforts, carrying out further risks assessments for specific sectors (such as public sector), developing standard contract terms and conditions, engaging into international dialogue on issues related to cloud computing and ensuring effective means of international cooperation (to be developed in Chapter V).

| 13. | The Opinion is structured as follows: Section II provides an overview of the main characteristics of cloud computing and the related data protection challenges. Section III reviews the most relevant elements of the existing EU legal framework and of the proposed regulation. Section IV analyses how the proposed regulation would help address the data protection challenges raised by the use of cloud computing services. Section V analyses the Commission's suggestions for further policy developments and identifies the areas where further work might be needed. Section VI contains the conclusions. |
| --- | --- |

13.

The Opinion is structured as follows: Section II provides an overview of the main characteristics of cloud computing and the related data protection challenges. Section III reviews the most relevant elements of the existing EU legal framework and of the proposed regulation. Section IV analyses how the proposed regulation would help address the data protection challenges raised by the use of cloud computing services. Section V analyses the Commission's suggestions for further policy developments and identifies the areas where further work might be needed. Section VI contains the conclusions.

| 14. | While many of the considerations of this Opinion apply to all environments in which cloud computing is used, this Opinion does not address the use of cloud computing services specifically by EU institutions and bodies subject to the supervision of the EDPS under Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. The EDPS will issue guidelines to these institutions and bodies on this subject separately. |
| --- | --- |

14.

While many of the considerations of this Opinion apply to all environments in which cloud computing is used, this Opinion does not address the use of cloud computing services specifically by EU institutions and bodies subject to the supervision of the EDPS under Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. The EDPS will issue guidelines to these institutions and bodies on this subject separately.

VI.   Conclusions

| 121. | As described in the Communication, cloud computing offers many new opportunities to businesses, consumers, and the public sector for the management of data through the use of remote external IT resources. At the same time, it presents many challenges in particular as to the appropriate level of data protection offered to data processed therein. |
| --- | --- |

121.

As described in the Communication, cloud computing offers many new opportunities to businesses, consumers, and the public sector for the management of data through the use of remote external IT resources. At the same time, it presents many challenges in particular as to the appropriate level of data protection offered to data processed therein.

| 122. | The use of cloud computing services raises a major risk of seeing responsibility evaporating in relation to processing operations carried out by cloud service providers, if the criteria for applicability of EU data protection law are not sufficiently clear and if the role and the responsibility of cloud service providers are defined or understood too narrowly, or are not implemented effectively. The EDPS emphasises that the use of cloud computing services cannot justify a lowering of data protection standards as compared to those applicable to conventional data processing operations. |
| --- | --- |

122.

The use of cloud computing services raises a major risk of seeing responsibility evaporating in relation to processing operations carried out by cloud service providers, if the criteria for applicability of EU data protection law are not sufficiently clear and if the role and the responsibility of cloud service providers are defined or understood too narrowly, or are not implemented effectively. The EDPS emphasises that the use of cloud computing services cannot justify a lowering of data protection standards as compared to those applicable to conventional data processing operations.

| 123. | In this respect, the proposed data protection regulation, as it has been put forward, would provide many clarifications and tools that would help ensure that a satisfactory level of data protection is complied with by cloud service providers offering their services to clients based in Europe, in particular:






  — | Article 3 would clarify the territorial scope of the EU data protection rules and broaden its scope so that cloud computing services would be covered, |
| --- | --- | --- |

123.

In this respect, the proposed data protection regulation, as it has been put forward, would provide many clarifications and tools that would help ensure that a satisfactory level of data protection is complied with by cloud service providers offering their services to clients based in Europe, in particular:

—

Article 3 would clarify the territorial scope of the EU data protection rules and broaden its scope so that cloud computing services would be covered,

| — | Article 4(5) would introduce a new element of controllership, that is ‘conditions’. This would be in line with the developing trend according to which, in view of the technical IT complexity underlying the provision of cloud computing services, it is necessary to expand the circumstances in which a cloud service provider may be qualified as the controller. This would better reflect the real level of influence on the processing operations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(5) would introduce a new element of controllership, that is ‘conditions’. This would be in line with the developing trend according to which, in view of the technical IT complexity underlying the provision of cloud computing services, it is necessary to expand the circumstances in which a cloud service provider may be qualified as the controller. This would better reflect the real level of influence on the processing operations;

| — | the proposed regulation would increase the responsibility and accountability of data controllers and processors, by introducing specific obligations such as data protection by design and by default (Article 23), data security breach notifications (Articles 31 and 32), and data protection impact assessments (Article 33). Furthermore, it would require controllers and processors to implement mechanisms to demonstrate the effectiveness of the data protection measures implemented (Article 22), |
| --- | --- |

—

the proposed regulation would increase the responsibility and accountability of data controllers and processors, by introducing specific obligations such as data protection by design and by default (Article 23), data security breach notifications (Articles 31 and 32), and data protection impact assessments (Article 33). Furthermore, it would require controllers and processors to implement mechanisms to demonstrate the effectiveness of the data protection measures implemented (Article 22),

| — | Articles 42 and 43 of the proposed regulation would allow a more flexible use of international data transfer mechanisms, to help cloud clients and cloud service providers adduce appropriate data protection safeguards for the transfers of personal data to data centres or servers located in third countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 42 and 43 of the proposed regulation would allow a more flexible use of international data transfer mechanisms, to help cloud clients and cloud service providers adduce appropriate data protection safeguards for the transfers of personal data to data centres or servers located in third countries,

| — | Articles 30, 31 and 32 of the proposed regulation would clarify the obligations of controllers and processors regarding the security of processing and information requirements in case of data breaches, laying the basis for a comprehensive and cooperative approach to the management of security between the different actors in a cloud environment, |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 30, 31 and 32 of the proposed regulation would clarify the obligations of controllers and processors regarding the security of processing and information requirements in case of data breaches, laying the basis for a comprehensive and cooperative approach to the management of security between the different actors in a cloud environment,

| — | Articles 55 to 63 of the proposed regulation would reinforce cooperation of supervisory authorities and their coordinated supervision over cross-border processing operations, which is particularly crucial in an environment such as cloud computing. |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 55 to 63 of the proposed regulation would reinforce cooperation of supervisory authorities and their coordinated supervision over cross-border processing operations, which is particularly crucial in an environment such as cloud computing.

| 124. | The EDPS nonetheless suggests that, after having taken into account the specificities of cloud computing services, further clarifications be made in the proposed regulation on the following aspects:






  — | as concerns the territorial scope of the proposed regulation, to amend Article 3(2)(a) to read ‘the offering of goods or services involving processing of personal data of such data subjects in the Union’, or alternatively to add a new recital specifying that the processing of personal data of data subjects in the Union by non-EU based controllers offering services to EU based legal persons also falls within the territorial scope of the proposed regulation, |
| --- | --- | --- |

124.

The EDPS nonetheless suggests that, after having taken into account the specificities of cloud computing services, further clarifications be made in the proposed regulation on the following aspects:

—

as concerns the territorial scope of the proposed regulation, to amend Article 3(2)(a) to read ‘the offering of goods or services involving processing of personal data of such data subjects in the Union’, or alternatively to add a new recital specifying that the processing of personal data of data subjects in the Union by non-EU based controllers offering services to EU based legal persons also falls within the territorial scope of the proposed regulation,

| — | to add a clear definition of the notion of ‘transfer’, as stated in his Opinion on the data protection reform package, |
| --- | --- |

—

to add a clear definition of the notion of ‘transfer’, as stated in his Opinion on the data protection reform package,

| — | to add a specific provision to clarify the conditions under which access to data stored in cloud computing services by non-EEA countries law enforcement bodies could be allowed. Such provision may also include the obligation for the recipient of the request to inform and consult the competent supervisory authority in the EU in specific cases. |
| --- | --- |

—

to add a specific provision to clarify the conditions under which access to data stored in cloud computing services by non-EEA countries law enforcement bodies could be allowed. Such provision may also include the obligation for the recipient of the request to inform and consult the competent supervisory authority in the EU in specific cases.

| 125. | The EDPS also underlines that further guidance will be necessary from the Commission and/or from supervisory authorities (in particular through the future European Data Protection Board) on the following aspects:






  — | to clarify which mechanisms should be put in place to ensure verification of the effectiveness of the data protection measures in practice, |
| --- | --- | --- |

125.

The EDPS also underlines that further guidance will be necessary from the Commission and/or from supervisory authorities (in particular through the future European Data Protection Board) on the following aspects:

—

to clarify which mechanisms should be put in place to ensure verification of the effectiveness of the data protection measures in practice,

| — | to assist processors with the use of BCRs and how they can comply with applicable requirements, |
| --- | --- |

—

to assist processors with the use of BCRs and how they can comply with applicable requirements,

| — | to provide best practices on issues such as controller/processor's responsibility, the appropriate retention of data in the cloud environment, data portability, and the exercise of data subjects' rights. |
| --- | --- |

—

to provide best practices on issues such as controller/processor's responsibility, the appropriate retention of data in the cloud environment, data portability, and the exercise of data subjects' rights.

| 126. | Furthermore, the EDPS acknowledges that codes of conduct drawn up by the industry and approved by the relevant supervisory authorities could be a useful tool to enhance compliance as well as trust among the various players. |
| --- | --- |

126.

Furthermore, the EDPS acknowledges that codes of conduct drawn up by the industry and approved by the relevant supervisory authorities could be a useful tool to enhance compliance as well as trust among the various players.

| 127. | The EDPS supports the development by the Commission, in consultation with supervisory authorities, of standard contractual terms for the provision of cloud computing services that respect data protection requirements, in particular:






  — | to develop model contractual terms and conditions to be included in the commercial terms of cloud computing service offerings, |
| --- | --- | --- |

127.

The EDPS supports the development by the Commission, in consultation with supervisory authorities, of standard contractual terms for the provision of cloud computing services that respect data protection requirements, in particular:

—

to develop model contractual terms and conditions to be included in the commercial terms of cloud computing service offerings,

| — | to develop common procurement terms and requirements for the public sector, taking into account the sensitivity of the data processed, |
| --- | --- |

—

to develop common procurement terms and requirements for the public sector, taking into account the sensitivity of the data processed,

| — | to further tailor international data transfer mechanisms to the cloud computing environment, in particular by updating the current standard contractual clauses and by putting forward standard contractual clauses for the transfer of data from processors based in the EU to processors located outside the EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

to further tailor international data transfer mechanisms to the cloud computing environment, in particular by updating the current standard contractual clauses and by putting forward standard contractual clauses for the transfer of data from processors based in the EU to processors located outside the EU.

| 128. | The EDPS underlines that appropriate consideration must be given to data protection requirements in the development of standards and certification schemes, in particular:






  — | to apply the principles of privacy by design and privacy by default in the development of the standards, |
| --- | --- | --- |

128.

The EDPS underlines that appropriate consideration must be given to data protection requirements in the development of standards and certification schemes, in particular:

—

to apply the principles of privacy by design and privacy by default in the development of the standards,

| — | to integrate data protection requirements such as purpose limitation and storage limitation in the standards' design, |
| --- | --- |

—

to integrate data protection requirements such as purpose limitation and storage limitation in the standards' design,

| — | the obligations of providers to provide their clients with the information necessary to perform a valid risk assessment and the security measures they implemented, as well as alerts about security incidents. |
| --- | --- |

—

the obligations of providers to provide their clients with the information necessary to perform a valid risk assessment and the security measures they implemented, as well as alerts about security incidents.

| 129. | Finally, the EDPS stresses the need to address the challenges raised by cloud computing at an international level. He encourages the Commission to engage in an international dialogue on the issues raised by cloud computing, including jurisdiction and access by law enforcement, and suggests that many of these issues could be addressed in different international or bilateral agreements, such as mutual assistance agreements and also trade agreements. Global standards should be developed at international level to set forth minimum conditions and principles regarding the access to data by law enforcement bodies. He also supports the development by the supervisory authorities of effective international cooperation mechanisms, in particular as relates to cloud computing issues. |
| --- | --- |

129.

Finally, the EDPS stresses the need to address the challenges raised by cloud computing at an international level. He encourages the Commission to engage in an international dialogue on the issues raised by cloud computing, including jurisdiction and access by law enforcement, and suggests that many of these issues could be addressed in different international or bilateral agreements, such as mutual assistance agreements and also trade agreements. Global standards should be developed at international level to set forth minimum conditions and principles regarding the access to data by law enforcement bodies. He also supports the development by the supervisory authorities of effective international cooperation mechanisms, in particular as relates to cloud computing issues.

Done at Brussels, 16 November 2012.

Peter HUSTINX

European Data Protection Supervisor

---

(1)  COM(2012) 529 final.

1

(2)  COM(2012) 11 final.

2

(3)  COM(2010) 245 final.

3

(4)  http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/cloudcomputing/docs/ccconsultationfinalreport.pdf

4

(5)  The Article 29 Working Party is an advisory body established pursuant to Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. It is composed of representatives of national supervisory authorities and the EDPS, and a representative of the Commission.

5

(6)  WP29 Opinion 05/2012 on cloud computing, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2012/wp196_en.pdf

6

(7)  In addition, at national level data protection authorities in several Member States have issued their own guidance on cloud computing, for example in Italy, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, France, and the UK.

7

(8)  Resolution on cloud computing adopted during the 34th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Uruguay, 26 October 2012.

8

(9)  See page 8 of the Communication, section on ‘Digital agenda actions on building digital confidence’.

9

(10)  The term ‘cloud clients’ is generally used in this Opinion to refer to customers, acting in their capacity as businesses, and to consumers, acting in their capacity of individual end users.

10

(11)  Account should be taken of the fact that the proposal for a regulation is currently being discussed by the Council and the European Parliament following the ordinary legislative procedure.

11

(12)  The Opinion is available at: http://www.edps.europa.eu

12

(13)  See EDPS Opinion, in particular paragraphs 140 to 158.

13

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/8

---

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on market surveillance of products and amending various legislative instruments of the European Parliament and of the Council

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website http://www.edps.europa.eu)

2013/C 253/04

1.   Introduction

| 1. | On 13 February 2013, the Commission adopted its Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package, including a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on market surveillance of products and amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC, and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 1999/5/EC, 2000/9/EC, 2000/14/EC, 2001/95/EC, 2004/108/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2006/95/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2008/57/EC, 2009/48/EC, 2009/105/EC, 2009/142/EC, 2011/65/EU, Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, Regulation (EC) No 764/2008 and Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter ‘the Proposal’) (1). On the same day, the Proposal was sent to the EDPS for consultation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 13 February 2013, the Commission adopted its Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package, including a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on market surveillance of products and amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC, and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 1999/5/EC, 2000/9/EC, 2000/14/EC, 2001/95/EC, 2004/108/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2006/95/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2008/57/EC, 2009/48/EC, 2009/105/EC, 2009/142/EC, 2011/65/EU, Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, Regulation (EC) No 764/2008 and Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter ‘the Proposal’) (1). On the same day, the Proposal was sent to the EDPS for consultation.

1.1.   Consultation of the EDPS

| 2. | Before the adoption of the Proposal, the EDPS was given the opportunity to provide informal comments. The EDPS welcomes the reference to the present consultation in the preamble of the Proposal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Before the adoption of the Proposal, the EDPS was given the opportunity to provide informal comments. The EDPS welcomes the reference to the present consultation in the preamble of the Proposal.

| 3. | In the present Opinion, the EDPS wishes to highlight those elements of the Proposal which have personal data processing implications and to reiterate some of his earlier comments which, if taken on board, would further improve the text from a data protection perspective. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the present Opinion, the EDPS wishes to highlight those elements of the Proposal which have personal data processing implications and to reiterate some of his earlier comments which, if taken on board, would further improve the text from a data protection perspective.

1.2.   General background

| 4. | The Proposal is part of the ‘Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package’ which also includes a proposal for a Regulation on consumer product safety (2) (replacing the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC, the ‘GPSD’) and a multi-annual action plan for market surveillance covering the period 2013-15. The overall objective is to clarify the regulatory framework for market surveillance in the field of non-food products (both for harmonised and non-harmonised products, whether intended for consumers or for professionals) and consolidate it in a single instrument. To this end, the Proposal merges the rules on market surveillance of the GPSD, Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 (3) and several sector-specific instruments of EU harmonisation legislation. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Proposal is part of the ‘Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package’ which also includes a proposal for a Regulation on consumer product safety (2) (replacing the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC, the ‘GPSD’) and a multi-annual action plan for market surveillance covering the period 2013-15. The overall objective is to clarify the regulatory framework for market surveillance in the field of non-food products (both for harmonised and non-harmonised products, whether intended for consumers or for professionals) and consolidate it in a single instrument. To this end, the Proposal merges the rules on market surveillance of the GPSD, Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 (3) and several sector-specific instruments of EU harmonisation legislation.

| 5. | In particular, the provisions regarding the functioning of the EU Rapid Information System (RAPEX) (4) that are currently contained in the GPSD have been transferred to the Proposal, according to which RAPEX would become the single alert system regarding products presenting a risk to EU consumers. |
| --- | --- |

5.

In particular, the provisions regarding the functioning of the EU Rapid Information System (RAPEX) (4) that are currently contained in the GPSD have been transferred to the Proposal, according to which RAPEX would become the single alert system regarding products presenting a risk to EU consumers.

| 6. | The Proposal will also formally establish the Information and Communication System for Market Surveillance (ICSMS) (5) which will serve as a database of market surveillance information as well as a communication channel for market surveillance authorities. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Proposal will also formally establish the Information and Communication System for Market Surveillance (ICSMS) (5) which will serve as a database of market surveillance information as well as a communication channel for market surveillance authorities.

3.   Conclusions

| 28. | The EDPS appreciates that data protection issues have been taken into account in the Proposal to a certain extent. However, in the present Opinion he gives some recommendations on how the Proposal could be further improved from a data protection perspective. |
| --- | --- |

28.

The EDPS appreciates that data protection issues have been taken into account in the Proposal to a certain extent. However, in the present Opinion he gives some recommendations on how the Proposal could be further improved from a data protection perspective.

| 29. | In particular, the EDPS recommends:






  — | including a substantive provision to clarify that the Proposal is not meant to provide for general derogations from data protection principles and that relevant personal data processing legislation (i.e. national rules implementing Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001) remain fully applicable in the market surveillance context. In addition, recital 30 would benefit from some redrafting, |
| --- | --- | --- |

29.

In particular, the EDPS recommends:

—

including a substantive provision to clarify that the Proposal is not meant to provide for general derogations from data protection principles and that relevant personal data processing legislation (i.e. national rules implementing Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001) remain fully applicable in the market surveillance context. In addition, recital 30 would benefit from some redrafting,

| — | amending Articles 19 and 21 of the Proposal so as to ensure that only personal information which is strictly necessary is processed for market surveillance purposes in RAPEX and ICSMS, respectively, in accordance with the principles of proportionality and data minimisation, |
| --- | --- |

—

amending Articles 19 and 21 of the Proposal so as to ensure that only personal information which is strictly necessary is processed for market surveillance purposes in RAPEX and ICSMS, respectively, in accordance with the principles of proportionality and data minimisation,

| — | providing in the proposed Regulation (e.g. in Articles 19 and 21) for fixed retention periods for the personal data processed in RAPEX and ICSMS, keeping in mind that an unlimited retention period for personal data would be difficult to justify under EU data protection law (even though it may be justifiable in case of information about products), |
| --- | --- |

—

providing in the proposed Regulation (e.g. in Articles 19 and 21) for fixed retention periods for the personal data processed in RAPEX and ICSMS, keeping in mind that an unlimited retention period for personal data would be difficult to justify under EU data protection law (even though it may be justifiable in case of information about products),

| — | maintaining the approach by which the public is informed about unsafe products (via the RAPEX website) without rendering personal information of economic operator(s) responsible for those products public, and applying a similar approach in all instances where information is published by market surveillance authorities in the context of the Proposal, |
| --- | --- |

—

maintaining the approach by which the public is informed about unsafe products (via the RAPEX website) without rendering personal information of economic operator(s) responsible for those products public, and applying a similar approach in all instances where information is published by market surveillance authorities in the context of the Proposal,

| — | should it be the intention of the legislator to provide for the publication of personal information of economic operators (for example as a sanction in cases of repeated breaches or an additional deterrent), including explicit substantive provisions that would at least specify what kind of personal data may be made public and for what purpose(s): in this context, attention is drawn to the need to consider modalities of publication which would cause less interference with an individual’s right to respect for their private life and to protection of their personal data, in line with the Schecke judgment (6) of the Court of Justice, |
| --- | --- |

—

should it be the intention of the legislator to provide for the publication of personal information of economic operators (for example as a sanction in cases of repeated breaches or an additional deterrent), including explicit substantive provisions that would at least specify what kind of personal data may be made public and for what purpose(s): in this context, attention is drawn to the need to consider modalities of publication which would cause less interference with an individual’s right to respect for their private life and to protection of their personal data, in line with the Schecke judgment (6) of the Court of Justice,

| — | supplementing the provisions on participation of applicant countries, third countries or international organisations in RAPEX (Article 19(4)), as well as on international exchange of confidential information (Article 22) with explicit references to specific provisions about personal data protection corresponding to those applicable in the Union, as required by Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. |
| --- | --- |

—

supplementing the provisions on participation of applicant countries, third countries or international organisations in RAPEX (Article 19(4)), as well as on international exchange of confidential information (Article 22) with explicit references to specific provisions about personal data protection corresponding to those applicable in the Union, as required by Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

Done at Brussels, 30 May 2013.

Giovanni BUTTARELLI

Assistant European Data Protection Supervisor

---

(1)  COM(2013) 75 final.

1

(2)  Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer product safety and repealing Council Directive 87/357/EEC and Directive 2001/95/EC (COM(2013) 78 final).

2

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).

3

(4)  http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/index_en.htm

4

(5)  https://www.icsms.org/icsms/App/index.jsp

5

(6)  CJEU, Schecke (C-92/09 and C-93/09), [2010] ECR I-11063.

6

Schecke

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/10

---

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission proposal for a regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website http://www.edps.europa.eu)

2013/C 253/05

1.   Introduction

1.1.   Consultation of the EDPS

| 1. | On 17 July 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (the proposed Regulation) (1), and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. This proposal was sent to the EDPS for consultation on 19 July 2012. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 17 July 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (the proposed Regulation) (1), and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. This proposal was sent to the EDPS for consultation on 19 July 2012.

| 2. | The EDPS welcomes the fact that he is consulted by the Commission and recommends that a reference to the consultation be included in the preambles of the proposed Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The EDPS welcomes the fact that he is consulted by the Commission and recommends that a reference to the consultation be included in the preambles of the proposed Regulation.

| 3. | Before the adoption of the proposed Regulation, the EDPS was given the possibility to provide informal comments to the Commission. Some of these comments have been taken into account. As a result, the data protections safeguards in the proposed Regulation have been strengthened. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Before the adoption of the proposed Regulation, the EDPS was given the possibility to provide informal comments to the Commission. Some of these comments have been taken into account. As a result, the data protections safeguards in the proposed Regulation have been strengthened.

1.2.   Objectives and scope of the proposed Regulation

| 4. | The proposed Regulation aims at facilitating the application process for clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, especially for multinational trials. It contains a legal framework for establishing an EU-wide central database (EU database), controlled by the Commission, as the single application platform for clinical trials in the EU. The proposed Regulation also introduces an electronic database (EMA database), controlled by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for reporting of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The proposed Regulation aims at facilitating the application process for clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, especially for multinational trials. It contains a legal framework for establishing an EU-wide central database (EU database), controlled by the Commission, as the single application platform for clinical trials in the EU. The proposed Regulation also introduces an electronic database (EMA database), controlled by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for reporting of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions.

1.3.   Aim of the EDPS Opinion

| 5. | The proposed Regulation may affect the rights of individuals related to the processing of their personal data. Amongst other issues, it deals with the processing of sensitive data (health data), databases and record keeping. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The proposed Regulation may affect the rights of individuals related to the processing of their personal data. Amongst other issues, it deals with the processing of sensitive data (health data), databases and record keeping.

| 6. | Although the EDPS welcomes that the Commission has made an effort to guarantee the correct application of EU rules concerning the protection of personal data in the proposed Regulation, the EDPS has identified certain unclarities and inconsistencies in the way the proposed Regulation deals with the issue of whether and what categories of personal data will be processed under the proposed Regulation, in particular where sensitive data regarding health might be processed and stored. The EDPS therefore sees a need for clarification in relation to this category of personal data, both regarding the authorisation procedure in the EU Portal and database and the reporting of adverse effects in the EMA database. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Although the EDPS welcomes that the Commission has made an effort to guarantee the correct application of EU rules concerning the protection of personal data in the proposed Regulation, the EDPS has identified certain unclarities and inconsistencies in the way the proposed Regulation deals with the issue of whether and what categories of personal data will be processed under the proposed Regulation, in particular where sensitive data regarding health might be processed and stored. The EDPS therefore sees a need for clarification in relation to this category of personal data, both regarding the authorisation procedure in the EU Portal and database and the reporting of adverse effects in the EMA database.

3.   Conclusions

| 32. | The EDPS welcomes the attention paid specifically to data protection in the proposed Regulation, but identified some scope for further improvement. |
| --- | --- |

32.

The EDPS welcomes the attention paid specifically to data protection in the proposed Regulation, but identified some scope for further improvement.

| 33. | The EDPS recommends that:






  — | Article 89 of the proposed Regulation clarifies the reference to Directive 95/46/EC by specifying that the provisions will apply in accordance with the national rules which implement Directive 95/46/EC, |
| --- | --- | --- |

33.

The EDPS recommends that:

—

Article 89 of the proposed Regulation clarifies the reference to Directive 95/46/EC by specifying that the provisions will apply in accordance with the national rules which implement Directive 95/46/EC,

| — | the proposed Regulation explicitly refers to Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 regarding the processing of personal data concerning health in Article 89, |
| --- | --- |

—

the proposed Regulation explicitly refers to Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 regarding the processing of personal data concerning health in Article 89,

| — | Article 78 clarifies whether personal data concerning health will be processed in the EU database, and if so, for what purpose, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 78 clarifies whether personal data concerning health will be processed in the EU database, and if so, for what purpose,

| — | Article 78 refers to the right of the data subjects to block their personal data, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 78 refers to the right of the data subjects to block their personal data,

| — | the proposed Regulation inserts, for the EMA database, a provision which more clearly defines in what situations and subject to what safeguards information containing patient data will be processed and stored, |
| --- | --- |

—

the proposed Regulation inserts, for the EMA database, a provision which more clearly defines in what situations and subject to what safeguards information containing patient data will be processed and stored,

| — | it should be explicitly mentioned in Article 39 of the proposed Regulation that the annual reports should only be using anonymous data, |
| --- | --- |

—

it should be explicitly mentioned in Article 39 of the proposed Regulation that the annual reports should only be using anonymous data,

| — | implementing measures to be adopted under the proposed Regulation specify in detail the data protection implications of the functional and technical characteristics of the EU database and the EMA database and that the EDPS be consulted on these measures, and |
| --- | --- |

—

implementing measures to be adopted under the proposed Regulation specify in detail the data protection implications of the functional and technical characteristics of the EU database and the EMA database and that the EDPS be consulted on these measures, and

| — | Article 55 of the proposed Regulation replaces or complements the minimum retention period of 5 years by a maximum retention period. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 55 of the proposed Regulation replaces or complements the minimum retention period of 5 years by a maximum retention period.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2012.

Giovanni BUTTARELLI

Assistant European Data Protection Supervisor

---

(1)  COM(2012) 369 final.

1

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/12

---

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website http://www.edps.europa.eu)

2013/C 253/06

I.   Introduction

I.1.   Consultation of the EDPS

| 1. | On 12 September 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (the Proposal) (1). On the same day, the Proposal was sent by the Commission to the EDPS for consultation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 12 September 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (the Proposal) (1). On the same day, the Proposal was sent by the Commission to the EDPS for consultation.

| 2. | The EDPS welcomes the fact that he is consulted by the Commission in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and that a reference to the EDPS consultation has been included in the preamble of the Proposal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The EDPS welcomes the fact that he is consulted by the Commission in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and that a reference to the EDPS consultation has been included in the preamble of the Proposal.

| 3. | The EDPS is pleased that also before the adoption of the Proposal, he was given the possibility to provide comments to the Commission. The EDPS believes that the level of data protection in the Proposal has increased as a result. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The EDPS is pleased that also before the adoption of the Proposal, he was given the possibility to provide comments to the Commission. The EDPS believes that the level of data protection in the Proposal has increased as a result.

I.2.   Context and objectives of the Proposal

| 4. | The aim of the Proposal is to strengthen and facilitate the role of the European political parties and foundations since they contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union, as foreseen in Article 10(4) TEU and Article 12(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Proposal envisages improving the funding and regulatory frameworks of the political parties at European level. It intends to replace the current Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding (which was revised in 2007) (2). The recognition as a European political party or foundation is a precondition under the Proposal for eligibility for funding from the EU budget (3). |
| --- | --- |

4.

The aim of the Proposal is to strengthen and facilitate the role of the European political parties and foundations since they contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union, as foreseen in Article 10(4) TEU and Article 12(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Proposal envisages improving the funding and regulatory frameworks of the political parties at European level. It intends to replace the current Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding (which was revised in 2007) (2). The recognition as a European political party or foundation is a precondition under the Proposal for eligibility for funding from the EU budget (3).

| 5. | The Commission considered that it was necessary to replace Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 after an assessment of the current financing and regulatory framework of European political parties and foundations, following the report by the Secretary-General of the European Parliament on party funding at European level and the European Parliament’s resolution of 6 April 2011 on the application of Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 (the Ginnakou report) (4). |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Commission considered that it was necessary to replace Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 after an assessment of the current financing and regulatory framework of European political parties and foundations, following the report by the Secretary-General of the European Parliament on party funding at European level and the European Parliament’s resolution of 6 April 2011 on the application of Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 (the Ginnakou report) (4).

| 6. | The central element of the Proposal is the introduction of a European legal statute, giving the European political parties and foundations legal personality based on EU law, which should help them to overcome current obstacles in recognition and functioning under different national legal systems. In order to benefit from the status of a legal person under EU law, the European political parties and foundations will have to meet high standards on internal democracy, governance, accountability, transparency, and respect for the values on which the Union is founded (5). Only those European political parties and foundations that have been recognised as such will be eligible for funding from the general budget of the EU (6). |
| --- | --- |

6.

The central element of the Proposal is the introduction of a European legal statute, giving the European political parties and foundations legal personality based on EU law, which should help them to overcome current obstacles in recognition and functioning under different national legal systems. In order to benefit from the status of a legal person under EU law, the European political parties and foundations will have to meet high standards on internal democracy, governance, accountability, transparency, and respect for the values on which the Union is founded (5). Only those European political parties and foundations that have been recognised as such will be eligible for funding from the general budget of the EU (6).

| 7. | The Proposal also foresees that the European political parties and foundations are subject to a comprehensive and transparent regulatory and control framework to reinforce public control and the principle of transparency (7). The transparency foreseen by the proposal includes the compulsory publication of certain personal data. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Proposal also foresees that the European political parties and foundations are subject to a comprehensive and transparent regulatory and control framework to reinforce public control and the principle of transparency (7). The transparency foreseen by the proposal includes the compulsory publication of certain personal data.

III.   Conclusion

| 57. | The EDPS welcomes the approach taken by the Commission in the present Proposal, which clearly envisages to achieve transparency with due respect to the privacy and data requirements. |
| --- | --- |

57.

The EDPS welcomes the approach taken by the Commission in the present Proposal, which clearly envisages to achieve transparency with due respect to the privacy and data requirements.

| 58. | However, he recommends the following improvements:






  — | to clarify in recitals 22 and 23 of the Proposal in which case Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and in which case Directive 95/45/EC is applicable, and to delete or specify subparagraphs (6) to (8) of Article 25 of the Proposal since the present text merely repeats obligations under Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, |
| --- | --- | --- |

58.

However, he recommends the following improvements:

—

to clarify in recitals 22 and 23 of the Proposal in which case Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and in which case Directive 95/45/EC is applicable, and to delete or specify subparagraphs (6) to (8) of Article 25 of the Proposal since the present text merely repeats obligations under Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001,

| — | to add the word ‘written’ to the text of recital 19 to align it with Article 24(2) and ensure consistency in the text of the Proposal, |
| --- | --- |

—

to add the word ‘written’ to the text of recital 19 to align it with Article 24(2) and ensure consistency in the text of the Proposal,

| — | to clarify the publication of names of contributors of more than EUR 1 000 per year under Article 24(1)(f) of the Proposal without their express written consent pursuant to Article 24(2) of the Proposal, |
| --- | --- |

—

to clarify the publication of names of contributors of more than EUR 1 000 per year under Article 24(1)(f) of the Proposal without their express written consent pursuant to Article 24(2) of the Proposal,

| — | to explain in the recitals, in light of the Schecke ruling, whether other means to achieve transparency have been considered and to better justify the chosen threshold of EUR 1 000 per year for publishing the names of donors and contributors, |
| --- | --- |

—

to explain in the recitals, in light of the Schecke ruling, whether other means to achieve transparency have been considered and to better justify the chosen threshold of EUR 1 000 per year for publishing the names of donors and contributors,

| — | to specify that the obligation to provide information about the publication and processing of personal data, as provided in Article 24(3) of the Proposal for potential members and donors, also applies to potential (legal) representatives of the parties and foundation, |
| --- | --- |

—

to specify that the obligation to provide information about the publication and processing of personal data, as provided in Article 24(3) of the Proposal for potential members and donors, also applies to potential (legal) representatives of the parties and foundation,

| — | to state explicitly in Article 24(1)(g) that personal data shall be excluded from publication on the website: or at least to clarify the details and the form of publishing the penalties and whether it, directly or indirectly, also foresees publishing personal data of natural persons, |
| --- | --- |

—

to state explicitly in Article 24(1)(g) that personal data shall be excluded from publication on the website: or at least to clarify the details and the form of publishing the penalties and whether it, directly or indirectly, also foresees publishing personal data of natural persons,

| — | to clarify in a recital which provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 are particularly relevant in the given context, |
| --- | --- |

—

to clarify in a recital which provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 are particularly relevant in the given context,

| — | as regards smaller parties, to state explicitly in Article 24(1)(g) that due account should be taken on the effect such publication may have on the members of the party or foundation concerned, |
| --- | --- |

—

as regards smaller parties, to state explicitly in Article 24(1)(g) that due account should be taken on the effect such publication may have on the members of the party or foundation concerned,

| — | to justify in a recital the reason why the respective maximum time limit for storing personal data collected in Articles 25(3) and (5) has been chosen, |
| --- | --- |

—

to justify in a recital the reason why the respective maximum time limit for storing personal data collected in Articles 25(3) and (5) has been chosen,

| — | to add in Article 24 of the Proposal an obligation for the European Parliament to ensure that the information published on the Registry’s website that includes personal data will only be accessible through Internet search engines if necessary for the purposes of the Proposal, |
| --- | --- |

—

to add in Article 24 of the Proposal an obligation for the European Parliament to ensure that the information published on the Registry’s website that includes personal data will only be accessible through Internet search engines if necessary for the purposes of the Proposal,

| — | to assess whether an annual update of the party’s and foundation’s members lists, as foreseen in Article 6(7) of the Proposal is sufficient to ensure the quality of the personal data, |
| --- | --- |

—

to assess whether an annual update of the party’s and foundation’s members lists, as foreseen in Article 6(7) of the Proposal is sufficient to ensure the quality of the personal data,

| — | to consider whether, at least in the case of members leaving the party or foundation, an immediate notification to the Registry would not benefit the aim of data quality better. |
| --- | --- |

—

to consider whether, at least in the case of members leaving the party or foundation, an immediate notification to the Registry would not benefit the aim of data quality better.

| 59. | The EDPS notes that processing of personal data relating to offences will be subject to prior checking by the EDPS under Article 27(1) and (2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. |
| --- | --- |

59.

The EDPS notes that processing of personal data relating to offences will be subject to prior checking by the EDPS under Article 27(1) and (2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2012.

Giovanni BUTTARELLI

Assistant European Data Protection Supervisor

---

(1)  COM(2012) 499 final.

1

(2)  See OJ L 297, 15.11.2003, p. 1 and OJ L 343, 27.12.2007, p. 5.

2

(3)  The funding from the EU budget will be regulated in a second proposal, to be adopted soon: see Commission Working Document prefiguring the proposal for an amendment to the Financial Regulation introducing a new title on the financing of European political parties, COM(2012) 500.

3

(4)  See the Report of the Secretary-General on party funding at European level pursuant to Article 15 of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 29 March 2004 laying down the procedures for implementing Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — 18 October 2010 and Resolution of 6 April 2011, A7-0062/2011.

4

(5)  See recitals 10 and 11 of the Proposal and p. 6 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Proposal.

5

(6)  See Article 12 and recital 12 of the Proposal and p. 6 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Proposal.

6

(7)  See p. 6 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Proposal.

7

---

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/15

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 30.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 30.7.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | POK/1N2AB. |
| Species | Saithe (Pollachius virens) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 24/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

30.7.2013

Duration

30.7.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

POK/1N2AB.

Species

Saithe (Pollachius virens)

Zone

Norwegian waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

24/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/15

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 30.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 30.7.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | HAD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 25/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

30.7.2013

Duration

30.7.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

HAD/1N2AB.

Species

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

Zone

Norwegian waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

25/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/09

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 29.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 29.7.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/51214D. |
| Species | Redfish (deep pelagic) (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 26/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

29.7.2013

Duration

29.7.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Latvia

Stock or group of stocks

RED/51214D.

Species

Redfish (deep pelagic) (Sebastes spp.)

Zone

EU and international waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

26/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | SAN/2A3A4. and management areas SAN/234_1, _2, _3, _4 |
| Species | Sandeel and associated by-catches (Ammodytes spp.) |
| Zone | EU waters of IIa, IIIa and IV and EU waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 28/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

SAN/2A3A4. and management areas SAN/234_1, _2, _3, _4

Species

Sandeel and associated by-catches (Ammodytes spp.)

Zone

EU waters of IIa, IIIa and IV and EU waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

28/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/17

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/11

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | MAC/8C3411 |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 29/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

MAC/8C3411

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

29/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/17

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/12

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 29.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 29.7.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N1G14P. |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 26/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

29.7.2013

Duration

29.7.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Latvia

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N1G14P.

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

26/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/13

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N1G14P. |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 30/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N1G14P.

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

30/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/14

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | MAC/*8ABD. |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 31/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

MAC/*8ABD.

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

31/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/15

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | HER/3D-R30 |
| Species | Herring (Clupea harengus) |
| Zone | Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 32/BAL |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

HER/3D-R30

Species

Herring (Clupea harengus)

Zone

Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

32/BAL

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/16

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 12.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 12.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | All Member States except Germany, Spain, France, Poland and United Kingdom |
| Stock or group of stocks | COD/1/2B. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | I and IIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 33/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

12.8.2013

Duration

12.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

All Member States except Germany, Spain, France, Poland and United Kingdom

Stock or group of stocks

COD/1/2B.

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Zone

I and IIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

33/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/20

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/17

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 15.7.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 15.7.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or group of stocks | SAN/234_24 |
| Species | Sandeel and associated by-catches (Ammodytes spp.) |
| Zone | Sandeel management area 2 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 34/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

15.7.2013

Duration

15.7.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Denmark

Stock or group of stocks

SAN/234_24

Species

Sandeel and associated by-catches (Ammodytes spp.)

Zone

Sandeel management area 2

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

34/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/21

---

Call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2013/C 253/18

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call:

‘Capacities’ specific programme:

| Call title | Research infrastructures |
| --- | --- |
| Call identifier | FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2013-2 |

Call title

Research infrastructures

Call identifier

FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2013-2

Information on the call budget, deadline and modalities, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the website:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

---

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/22

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.7029 — ZTE Services Deutschland/Alcatel-Lucent Network Services)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 253/19

| 1. | On 26 August 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking ZTE Services Deutschland GmbH (Germany), belonging to the ZTE Group (‘ZTE’), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Alcatel-Lucent Network Services GmbH (‘ALNS’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 26 August 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking ZTE Services Deutschland GmbH (Germany), belonging to the ZTE Group (‘ZTE’), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Alcatel-Lucent Network Services GmbH (‘ALNS’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for ZTE: design, development, production, distribution and installation of telecommunication systems and equipment worldwide, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for ZTE: design, development, production, distribution and installation of telecommunication systems and equipment worldwide,

| — | for ALNS: telecom infrastructure service company active mainly in Germany. |
| --- | --- |

—

for ALNS: telecom infrastructure service company active mainly in Germany.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.7029 — ZTE Services Deutschland/Alcatel-Lucent Network Services, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.7029 — ZTE Services Deutschland/Alcatel-Lucent Network Services, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).

---