alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2694034
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8019578
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6374275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17971316
<PP&E>                                         4447530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32070765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15824679
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2500
<COMMON>                                       253370
<OTHER-SE>                                     10719376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32070765
<SALES>                                        15921645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15921645
<CGS>                                          11424955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13604601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               889742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                471272
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            471272
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   471272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 204

To commend and congratulate the University of Kentucky on its men’s

basketball team winning its seventh National Collegiate Athletic Association championship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. FORD (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend and congratulate the University of Kentucky

on its men’s basketball team winning its seventh National Collegiate Athletic Association championship.

Whereas the University of Kentucky Wildcats men’s basketball team defeated the University of Utah’s team on

March 30, 1998, in San Antonio, Texas, to win its seventh National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)

championship;

Whereas, the Wildcats overcame the largest halftime deficit

in a championship game, earning for themselves the nickname ‘‘The Comeback Cats’’;

Whereas, Coach Tubby Smith, his staff, and his players displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, unselfishness,
2

SRES 204 ATS

and sportsmanship throughout the course of the season

in achieving collegiate basketball’s highest honor; and

Whereas Coach Smith and the Wildcats have brought pride

and honor to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, which is

rightly known as the basketball capital of the world: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate commends and congratu2 lates the University of Kentucky on its outstanding accom3 plishment.

4 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

5 a copy of this resolution to the president of the University

6 of Kentucky.

Æ
# Official Journal L 321/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 321 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 635 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 321

English edition

Legislation

Volume 635 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1389 of 28 September 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Olio lucano’ (PGI) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1390 of 28 September 2020 correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/914 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Brie de Meaux’ (PDO)) | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1391 of 2 October 2020 concerning certain protective measures relating to African swine fever in Germany
  (notified under document C(2020) 6889)

   (
  1
  ) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1389 of 28 September 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Olio lucano’ (PGI)

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1390 of 28 September 2020 correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/914 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Brie de Meaux’ (PDO))

3

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1391 of 2 October 2020 concerning certain protective measures relating to African swine fever in Germany
  (notified under document C(2020) 6889)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 6889)

1

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[House Document 114-57]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

114th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - House Document 114-57
_____________________________________________________________________

 
  AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR PAY INCREASES FOR CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                     THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

 AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR PAY INCREASES FOR CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 
   COVERED BY THE GENERAL SCHEDULE AND CERTAIN OTHER PAY SYSTEMS IN 
          JANUARY 2016, PURSUANT TO 5 U.S.C. 5303(b) AND 5304a

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    September 9, 2015.--Referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
              Government Reform and ordered to be printed
              
                                      ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

49-011                         WASHINGTON : 2015            
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 28, 2015.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 
pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the 
General Schedule and certain other pay systems in January 2016.
    Title 5, United States Code, authorizes me to implement 
alternative pay plans for pay increases for civilian Federal 
employees covered by the General Schedule and certain other pay 
systems if, because of ``national emergency or serious economic 
conditions affecting the general welfare,'' I view the 
adjustments that would otherwise take effect as inappropriate.
    Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to 
exercise my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 U.S.C. 
5303(b) and 5304a to set alternative January 2016 across-the-
board and locality pay adjustments. Specifically, I have 
determined that for 2016, across-the-board pay increases will 
be 1.0 percent. Also, I will make a decision by November 30, 
2015, regarding an alternative plan for locality payments under 
5 U.S.C. 5304a. The alternative plan for locality payments will 
be limited so that the total combined cost of the 1.0 percent 
across-the-board base pay increase and the varying locality pay 
increases will be 1.3 percent of basic payroll, consistent with 
the assumption in my 2016 Budget. These decisions will not 
materially affect our ability to attract and retain a well-
qualified Federal workforce.
    The adjustments described above shall take effect on the 
first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 1, 
2016.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  [all]
```
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JOSHUA BINDER,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-0041-RSL-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1962(c).

Count 2: Conspiracy to Commit RICO in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).

Count 3: Violent Crime in Aid of Racketeering — Conspiracy to Murder Michael

Walsh in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(5).

Count 4: Violent Crime in Aid of Racketeering — Murder of Michael Walsh in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(1).

Count 11: Interference with Commerce by Threats or Violence in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 1951(a) and (b).

Date of Detention Hearing: February 17, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 27 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is facing the possibility of a penalty of death or life in prison on the

instant charges which involve crimes of extreme violence.

(2) Defendant is alleged to have made serious threats against witnesses to previous

crimes charged against defendant. The fear experienced by the witnesses has allegedly caused

the witnesses to withdraw cooperation and the charges to be dismissed.

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably address the danger to other persons or the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 21st day of February, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 27 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 61612.

#### Eastern Air Lines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 32081A-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Following *Pan American Airways, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 1851), the protest was overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALTER WEINBERG et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5172FDB

ORDER ON MOTIONS FILED

AFTER SEPTEMBER 14, 2006

This civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). A dispositive Report and Recommendation

is pending (Dkt. # 75).

On September 14, 2006, this action was stayed (Dkt. # 62). At that time a number of motions filed

by plaintiff were pending (Dkt. # 62). In the order staying the action the parties were directed to file no

further pleadings unless directed to do so by the court (Dkt. # 62). The court ordered defendants to

submit briefing regarding several of plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief. That briefing was filed, plaintiff

replied, and on October 13, 2006, the court entered a Report and Recommendation to deny injunctive

relief, dismiss the action, and declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant (Dkt. # 75).

Within one week plaintiff filed a motion to stay the action (Dkt. # 79). That motion was filed

despite the fact that the case had already been stayed. Thereafter, plaintiff has filed a motion for summary

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 94 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

judgment (Dkt # 91) and a second motion to stay the action (Dkt. # 93). 

This action remains stayed. If the matter survives the currently pending Report and

Recommendation, the court will order briefing on outstanding motions in an orderly sequence. The parties

are again directed to file no further motions or briefing. Motions filed while an action is stayed will not be

considered.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants and to

remove (Dkt # 79, 91, and 93 from the courts calendar).

DATED this 23 day of February, 2007.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 94 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 2
March 7, 1962

No. 66551.

#### Dessy Atco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/12675 and 61/12827.

Protests abandoned February 14, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 61/9472.) Plaintiff’s application for rebearing granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmChem, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David A. Lattanzio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002


                                                   /s/ David A. Lattanzio
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David A. Lattanzio
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 REPORT FILED
ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,240,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,219,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                   751,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,391,590
<PP&E>                                      20,114,899
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,314,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,498,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,988,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       47,161,062
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,052
<OTHER-SE>                                (27,038,860)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,498,367
<SALES>                                     47,966,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,222,429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               62,559,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,156,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,493,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

NOE GARCIA-LIMA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50242 

D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00383-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018**

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Noe Garcia-Lima appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 48-month sentence and 3-year term of supervised release imposed following 

his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 

8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50242

Garcia-Lima contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to 

respond to his non-frivolous mitigation arguments and sufficiently explain its 

substantial upward variance. The record reflects that the court considered and 

responded to Garcia-Lima’s mitigation arguments at the sentencing hearing. The 

court made clear that, notwithstanding those arguments, it believed that an aboveGuidelines sentence was warranted in light of Garcia-Lima’s criminal and 

immigration history. In particular, the court noted that a sentence higher than 

Garcia-Lima’s previous 41-month sentence for an immigration offense was 

warranted. The court also discussed the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, 

noting in particular its concern for deterrence, respect for the law, and protection of 

the public. The court satisfied its procedural obligations. See Rita v. United 

States, 551 U.S. 338, 356-59 (2007); United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576 F.3d 

929, 937-38 (9th Cir. 2009).

Garcia-Lima also contends that the district court procedurally erred by 

failing to consider the Guidelines’ recommendation that no term of supervised 

release be imposed for a deportable alien. See U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c). The court did 

not plainly err. See United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir. 2008).

The record makes clear that, even if the court had explicitly acknowledged the 

Guidelines provision at issue, it would have imposed the same three-year term of 

supervised release given its concerns about Garcia-Lima’s failure to be deterred 
3 17-50242

and the danger he poses to the public. See U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1 cmt. n.5; Dallman, 

533 F.3d at 762 (no plain error where a defendant cannot a show “a reasonable 

probability that he would have received a different sentence” absent the alleged 

error). 

AFFIRMED.