alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 786 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 786

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
general appropriations for military construction and veterans' affairs 
                 be considered as stand-alone measures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2007

     Mr. Gingrey (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Lewis of 
California, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Burton 
     of Indiana, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. McKeon, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. David Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Franks of 
 Arizona, Mrs. Drake, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Poe, Mr. Jones of 
   North Carolina, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Bonner, Mr. Walberg, Mr. 
    Bilbray, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Pearce, Mr. English of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Boozman, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Kuhl of New York, Mr. 
  Hulshof, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Akin) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
general appropriations for military construction and veterans' affairs 
                 be considered as stand-alone measures.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
``Stand-alone requirement for military construction and veterans' 
              affairs appropriations
    ``11. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or joint 
resolution, or conference report thereon, containing appropriations 
within the jurisdiction of the Subcommittee on Military Quality of Life 
and Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies of the Committee on 
Appropriations if such measure also contains appropriations within the 
jurisdiction of any other subcommittee of that committee. The preceding 
sentence shall not apply to any measure making supplemental 
appropriations or to any measure continuing appropriations for a period 
of not to exceed 60 days.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
     I, Timothy A. Richardson, the chief executive officer of Micro LinearCorporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 ofchapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of myknowledge,
     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 26, 2004 (the “Report”), complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
November 10, 2004    /s/ Timothy Richardson  Timothy A. Richardson Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

KATHRYN NURRE, )

) No. C06-901RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DR. CAROL WHITEHEAD, in her individual )

and official capacity as the Superintendent of )

Everett School District No. 2, )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 26, 2007, plaintiff filed a

motion with related documents that, taken as a whole, exceeds 50 pages in length (Dkt. ##16 -

20). As of this date, a courtesy copy of these documents has not been provided for chambers. 

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause within five days of this Order why she

should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with this Court’s “Order Regarding Initial

Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement” (Dkt. # 4) and the “Minute Order Setting

Trial & Related Dates” (Dkt. # 7). Plaintiff shall immediately deliver a paper copy of the

documents filed on April 26, 2007, with tabs or other organizing aids as necessary and clearly

marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers,” to the Clerk’s

Office.

The Clerk of Court is directed to place this Order to Show Cause on the Court’s calendar

for May 14, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00901-RSL Document 22 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE -2-

DATED this 7th day of May, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00901-RSL Document 22 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LAMBERTO PASTRANA-GODINEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-616M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: December 20, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00459-RSM Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will 

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00459-RSM Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10583)

#### Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 1273.

(Decided September 10, 1963)

*John J. Atkinson*for tbe plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation of submission, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between tbe attorneys for tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:

> 1. That tbe merchandise is identified on tbe Einal List published by tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury pursuant to tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521) and accordingly was appraised under tbe provisions of Section 402a of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by tbe said Customs Simplification Act.

> *3722. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Japan or for export to the United States.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the principal markets of the United States.

> 4. That the cost of production of the involved merchandise as defined in Section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended was $44,972 per camera and $2.50 per case for each case as invoiced as “soft” case or $3.00 per case for each case invoiced as “hard” case.

> 5. That the appeal for reappraisement may he submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described here-inabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is cost of production, as defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and hold that such statutory value therefor is $44,972 per camera, and $2.50 per case for each case invoiced as “soft” case, and $3 per case for each case invoiced as “hard” case.

As to all other merchandise covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.224 Mutual Fund Shares  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineMutual funds; mutual fund shares; liability
	FA653164205
	309.7
	95.8
	253.1
	225.1
	-35.4
	-59.6
	-22.5
	79.8
	204.0
	1Mutual funds; mutual fund shares; liability
	FA653164205
	309.7
	95.8
	253.1
	225.1
	-35.4
	-59.6
	-22.5
	79.8
	204.0
	2Households and nonprofit organizations; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA153064205
	241.5
	58.3
	48.9
	63.4
	102.1
	18.8
	-197.4
	144.5
	83.5
	3Nonfinancial corporate business; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA103064203
	15.2
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	4State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA213064203
	1.2
	2.7
	3.6
	0.5
	3.5
	3.4
	1.1
	1.2
	2.6
	5U.S.-chartered depository institutions; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA763064203
	-0.7
	-0.9
	-2.5
	3.8
	-3.3
	-1.6
	4.1
	-0.5
	-8.2
	6Credit unions; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA473064205
	-0.2
	-0.1
	-0.6
	0.6
	0.5
	-1.0
	0.1
	0.1
	-0.4
	7Property-casualty insurance companies; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA513064203
	1.2
	0.8
	0.8
	0.8
	0.8
	0.8
	-3.0
	-0.8
	-0.8
	8Life insurance companies; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA543064205
	-33.0
	-29.4
	-27.3
	-32.8
	-38.0
	-19.5
	-57.1
	-60.6
	-36.2
	9Private pension funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA573064205
	40.6
	34.2
	70.7
	75.9
	-49.7
	39.9
	149.8
	14.1
	26.1
	10State and local government employee retirement funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA223064205
	11.3
	15.7
	49.6
	29.9
	-20.6
	3.7
	10.5
	-13.6
	17.9
	11Rest of the world; U.S. mutual fund shares; asset
	FA263064203
	32.7
	7.1
	102.4
	75.6
	-38.0
	-111.4
	62.1
	-12.2
	112.0
	12 Back to top
  **NOTES** Shares of open-end investment companies; excludes shares of money market mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 64652.

#### Organon, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/1123(A), 59/1124(A), and 59/1124(B) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 57498.

#### Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 179987-K and 180479-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 54349, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 82 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 9
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TIMOTHY E. SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

NORMAN MALENG, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-0839-JCC-JPD

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

On July 21, 2006, the Court declined to serve plaintiff’s complaint because it failed to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Dkt. No. 14. The Court, however, gave

plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint that corrected the deficiencies therein. This

matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file an amended

complaint. Dkt. No. 16. Having carefully reviewed plaintiff’s motion and the record, the

Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No.

16) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until September 1, 2006, to file an amended

complaint. Plaintiff is reminded that the amended complaint must comply with the standards

described in the Court’s July 21, 2006, order declining to serve. Dkt. No. 14.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-00839-JCC-JPD Document 17 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE -2

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and to the

Honorable John C. Coughenour.

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00839-JCC-JPD Document 17 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of PHH Mortgage Trust, Series 2008-CIM2 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: PHH
    Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 20, 2009


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHAEL HAMILTON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 211 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 2a

Correspondence of Les Rose

Counsel, Royal Canadian Mounted

Police

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 56-1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 56-1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND PTM DEADLINE

(Juan Rojas-Rodriguez; CR05-441JCC)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

1 (206) 553-1100

 JUDGE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JUAN ROJAS-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-0441JCC

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE

THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion of the parties for a continuance

of the trial date and the pretrial motions date, finds that the ends of justice will be served by

ordering a continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to ensure adequate time

for effective case preparation, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

The Court further finds that the period of time from the current trial date of February

21, 2006 until the new trial date of March 6, 2006, shall be excludable time pursuant to the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

Case 2:05-cr-00441-JCC Document 13 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND PTM DEADLINE

(Juan Rojas-Rodriguez; CR05-441JCC)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

2 (206) 553-1100

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued until

March 6, 2006 and that pretrial motions shall be filed no later than February 10, 2006.

DONE this 17th day of January, 2006.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Peter J. Avenia

WSBA # 20794

Attorney for Hector Felix

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-1100

Fax No.: (206) 553-0120

Peter_Avenia@fd.org

s/ Lisca Borichewski

Assistant United States Attorney

Per telephonic authorization

Case 2:05-cr-00441-JCC Document 13 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000665

23-MAY-2018

01:34 PM
```

[111th Congress Public Law 38]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 1932]]

Public Law 111-38
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide additional personnel authorities for the Special Inspector 
  General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. <<NOTE: June 30, 2009 -  [S. 
                                 615]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 5 USC app. 8G note.>> ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL 
                              AUTHORITIES FOR THE SPECIAL 
                              INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR AFGHANISTAN 
                              RECONSTRUCTION.

    Section 1229(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 381) is amended by striking 
paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Personnel.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Inspector General may select, 
                appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may 
                be necessary for carrying out the duties of the 
                Inspector General, subject to the provisions of title 5, 
                United States Code, governing appointments in the 
                competitive service, and the provisions of chapter 51 
                and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, relating 
                to classification and General Schedule pay rates.
                    ``(B) Additional authorities.--
                          ``(i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii), the 
                      Inspector General may exercise the authorities of 
                      subsections (b) through (i) of section 3161 of 
                      title 5, United States Code (without regard to 
                      subsection (a) of that section).
                          ``(ii) Periods of appointments.--In exercising 
                      the employment authorities under subsection (b) of 
                      section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, as 
                      provided under clause (i) of this subparagraph--
                                    ``(I) paragraph (2) of that 
                                subsection (relating to periods of 
                                appointments) shall not apply; and
                                    ``(II) no period of appointment may 
                                exceed the date on which the Office of 
                                the Special Inspector

[[Page 123 STAT. 1933]]

                                General for Afghanistan Reconstruction 
                                terminates under subsection (o).''.

    Approved June 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 615:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111-15 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Apr. 30, considered and passed Senate.
            June 15, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```