ORDER OF THE COURT - 1 Jesse Cantor,# 26736 

RIOS CANTOR, P.S. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

811 FIRST AVE, SUITE 200 

SEATTLE, WA 98104 

(206) 749-5600 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DAVID MATUSICKY 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

NO. CR 06-0199 RSM 

ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 

AND PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE.

ORDER OF THE COURT

 This matter having come before the court on the Defendant’s Motion to Continue the PreTrial Motions Deadline from July 6, 2006 to September 21, 2006, and a Motion to Continue the 

Trial date from August 21, 2006 to October 30, 2006, and the court having considered the 

arguments made by all parties, together with the balance of the records and files herein, This 

Court now finds as follows: 

Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez

Case 2:06-cr-00199-RSM Document 46 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 3
ORDER OF THE COURT - 2 Jesse Cantor,# 26736 

RIOS CANTOR, P.S. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

811 FIRST AVE, SUITE 200 

SEATTLE, WA 98104 

(206) 749-5600 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 That this Motion is the first motion to continue the pre-trial motions deadline and trial 

date filed by any party; 

 That the Government will be distributing voluminous discovery to the defense during the 

week of July 10, 2006, that includes discovery from a separate but related case, thereby requiring 

additional time for effective defense preparation; 

 That the defendant understands his rights to a Speedy Trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 

3161 and has executed a speedy trial waiver through November 15th 2006; 

 That no party, including the United States, opposes a Motion to Continue the pre-trial 

motions deadline and the trial date. 

 That this period of delay is reasonable; that the defendants are joined for trial; that the 

time for trial has not run; and that no motion for severance has yet been granted. 18 U.S.C. 

Section 3161(h)(7); 

 The Court finds that taking into account the complexity of the case and the exercise of 

due diligence, that the failure to grant the continuance would deny the defense the reasonable 

time for effective trial preparation; 

 Accordingly, This Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested 

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial; 18 

U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(8)(A) and Section 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

 The new proposed dates of [September 21 , 2006], for the motions cut-off deadline, and 

[October 30, 2006], for the trial date, do not appear to prejudice any party, including the 

Government. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

Case 2:06-cr-00199-RSM Document 46 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 3
ORDER OF THE COURT - 3 Jesse Cantor,# 26736 

RIOS CANTOR, P.S. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

811 FIRST AVE, SUITE 200 

SEATTLE, WA 98104 

(206) 749-5600 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The Pre-Trial Motions Cut-Off date shall be extended to September 21, 2006, with the 

trial date of October 30, 2006. 

It is further ordered that the period of delay resulting from this continuance is excludable 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) as to each co-defendant. 

SO ORDERED ON THIS _17__ DAY OF July 2006. 

 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Presented by: 

s/ Jesse Cantor______ Jesse Cantor 

Attorney for the Defendant.

Case 2:06-cr-00199-RSM Document 46 Filed 07/17/06 Page 3 of 3