alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 249

To congratulate the Chicago Bulls on winning the 1998 National Basketball

Association Championship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16, 1998

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN (for herself and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To congratulate the Chicago Bulls on winning the 1998

National Basketball Association Championship.

Whereas the Chicago Bulls, despite injuries to Scottie Pippen

and Luc Longley, went 62–20 and tied for the best regular season record in the National Basketball Association;

Whereas the Bulls battled through the playoffs, sweeping the

New Jersey Nets and defeating the Charlotte Hornets in

5 games, before beating the Indiana Pacers in 7 games

to return to the NBA Finals for the third straight year;

Whereas the Bulls displayed stifling defense throughout the

playoffs before beating the Utah Jazz to repeat the 3-

peat and win their third consecutive NBA championship,

their sixth in the last 8 years;
2

•SRES 249 ATS

Whereas head coach Phil Jackson and the entire coaching

staff skillfully led the Bulls through an injury riddled 62-

win season and a 15–6 playoff run;

Whereas Michael Jordan won his fifth most valuable player

award, and he, along with Scottie Pippen, were again

named to the NBA’s ‘‘All-Defensive First Team’’;

Whereas Michael Jordan won his record tenth scoring title

and was named the NBA Finals most valuable player for

the sixth time in 6 appearances in the finals;

Whereas Scottie Pippen again exhibited his outstanding offensive and defensive versatility, proving himself to be

one of the best all-around players in the NBA;

Whereas the quickness, tireless defensive effort, and

athleticism of the colorful Dennis Rodman, who won his

seventh straight rebounding title, keyed a strong Bulls

front line;

Whereas Toni Kukoc displayed his awesome variety of offensive skills in both assisting on, and hitting, several big

shots when the Bulls needed them most;

Whereas veteran guard Ron Harper, in shutting down many

of the league’s top point guards throughout the playoffs,

demonstrated the defensive skills that have made him a

cornerstone of the league’s best defense;

Whereas center Luc Longley frustrated many of the all-star

caliber centers that he faced while at times providing a

much needed scoring lift;

Whereas Steve Kerr buried several 3-pointers when the Bulls

needed them most;

Whereas the outstanding play of Jud Buechler, Scott Burrell,

and Bill Wennington and the tenacious defense of Randy
3

•SRES 249 ATS

Brown, each of whom came off the bench to provide valuable contributions, were an important part of each Bulls

victory; and

Whereas the contributions of Dickey Simpkins and rookies

Rusty LaRue and Keith Booth, both on the court and in

practice, again demonstrated the total devotion of Bulls

personnel to the team concept that has made the Bulls

one of the great sports dynasties of modern times: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Chicago

2 Bulls on winning the 1998 National Basketball Associa3 tion championship.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40796 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BOBBY JAMES REECE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1-95-CR-95-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1997 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Bobby James Reece has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record, as well as Reece’s response to counsel’s motion, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kolen Kalani KAIMANA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10451.

D.C. No. CR-00-00127-SOM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 2001.*

Decided July 19, 2001.

Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kolen Kalani Kaimana appeals his forty-six month sentence imposed after his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We review de novo the interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines, *United States v. France,*57 F.3d 865, 866 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

Kaimana contends that the district court erred by enhancing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) (2000) for making a threat of death during the bank robbery. Kaimana argues that the note he handed the teller, which stated, “I got a gun give me all the money,” was by itself insufficient to constitute a threat of death. His contention is without merit. Given the context, a bank teller could have reasonably interpreted the note as a death threat for failing to comply with Kaimana’s demand. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, cmt. n. 6; *France,*57 F.3d at 866-67. Accordingly, the district court properly applied the two-*734level enhancement. *See France,*57 F.3d at 868.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 63913.

protest 59/19561 (New York).

#### New York Quinine *&*Chemical Works, division of S. B. Penick & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 9, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or (504) 202-9679.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 9, 2023, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Kelvin Johnson. For more information, please contact Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or (504) 202-9679, or write TAP Office, 1555 Poydras Street, 2nd floor, MS 12, New Orleans, LA 70112 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include a committee discussion about the CP 2000 (Proposed Changes to Your Tax Return). There will be a discussion of the Difficult/Challenging Letters/Notices, and a Review of Letter 5071C.                

Dated: October 10, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-22726 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 64

To designate the week of May 4, 1997, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers

and Employees Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 18, 1997

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FEINGOLD,

Mr. HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

KOHL, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

BIDEN, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

GLENN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. WYDEN, Mr.

BAUCUS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BYRD, Mr.

BREAUX, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CLELAND, Mr.

FORD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KERREY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG,

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

REED, Mr. REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. TORRICELLI,

Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BOND, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COATS, Mr. COLLINS, Mr.

ENZI, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL,

Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr.

NICKLES, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr.

GORTON, and Ms. MIKULSKI) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 1, 1997

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 4, 1997, as ‘‘National

Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’.
2

SRES 64 ATS

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of our criminal justice system;

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care,

custody and dignity of the human beings charged to their

care; and

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designate the week of May

2 4, 1997, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employ3 ees Week.’’ The President is authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

5 States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies

6 and activities.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RYAN BLEVINS,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5370

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, Barb Sievers. 

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Russell Leonard. 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge J. Kelley Arnold:

Date of hearing: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 

Time of hearing: 2:30pm

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person

 or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

September 4, 2007.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom _ Karen L. Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05370-MAT Document 23 Filed 09/04/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Lawrence B. COPLEY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor; Arch of West Virginia/Apogee Coal Company, Respondents.

No. 01-1078.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 29, 2001.

Decided July 19, 2001.

Lawrence B. Copley, Petitioner pro se. Christian P. Barber, Barry H. Joyner, United States Department of Labor, *208Washington, DC; Douglas Allan Smoot, Ann Brannon Rembrandt, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, WV, for respondents.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence B. Copley appeals the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 *&*Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.**See Copley v. Director, OWCP,*Nos. 97-1389-BLA; 00-0267-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 We have considered the recent revisions to the regulations implementing the Black Lung Benefits Act, *see*Regulations Implementing the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended; 65 Fed. Reg. 79,919 (Dec. 20, 2000), and have determined that the revisions do not affect the outcome of this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<CIK>                   0000877357
<NAME>                  SEPRACOR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>            1
<CURRENCY>              U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     113,335,000
<SECURITIES>                               137,997,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,030,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,296,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           260,430,000
<PP&E>                                      25,495,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,996,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,603,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,989,000
<BONDS>                                    270,355,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,823,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,156,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               295,603,000
<SALES>                                      3,505,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,117,000
<CGS>                                        2,411,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,133,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,369,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,630,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (29,452,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (29,452,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (29,452,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TONY WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA CARTER, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5151RJB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:06-cv-05151-RJB Document 2 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager) at the Washington State

Department of Corrections.

DATED this 28th day of March, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05151-RJB Document 2 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 34/7 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 517 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 34

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 517 February 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 034/01 | Commission communication on the results of the risk evaluation and the risk reduction strategies for the substances: Piperazine; Cyclohexane; Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate; But-2yne-1,4-diol; Methyloxirane; Aniline; 2-Ethylhexylacrylate; 1,4-Dichlorobenzene; 3,5-dinitro-2,6-dimethyl-4-tert-butylacetophenone; Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate; Phenol; 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 034/01

Commission communication on the results of the risk evaluation and the risk reduction strategies for the substances: Piperazine; Cyclohexane; Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate; But-2yne-1,4-diol; Methyloxirane; Aniline; 2-Ethylhexylacrylate; 1,4-Dichlorobenzene; 3,5-dinitro-2,6-dimethyl-4-tert-butylacetophenone; Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate; Phenol; 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene
   (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THE CHRISTENSEN FIRM,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHAMELEON DATA CORPORATION,

and DEREK S. DOHN,

Defendants.

C06-337Z

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas

S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

(1) Defendants’ motion for voluntary dismissal of malpractice counterclaim,

docket no. 134, is GRANTED. Defendants’ malpractice counterclaim is DISMISSED

without prejudice.

(2) Defendants’ related motion for protective order, docket no. 134, is STRICKEN

as moot.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of

record.

Filed and entered this 25th day of February, 2008.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/ Claudia Hawney

By Claudia Hawney

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00337-TSZ Document 144 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

November 13, 1962

No. 67183.

protests 59/21232, etc. (New York).

#### Advance Shipping Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-9007

IN RE WILLIAM C. SHERIDAN,

 

WILLIAM C. SHERIDAN,

Defendant, Appellant,

v.

NANCY MICHELS,

Appellee.

 

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued March 29, 2004, should be

amended as follows:

On page 33: line 6: delete first two sentences in this

paragraph which read: "Accordingly, pending

the entry of a final judgment by the district

court, based upon the recommended findings of

fact and conclusions of law entered by the

bankruptcy court, Sheridan is reinstated to the

bankruptcy court bar immediately. See supra

note 9."

line 10: delete "shall be" and replace with

"is";

line 11: delete "that" and replace with

"which";

lines 15-16: Delete "Sheridan is hereby

reinstated to the bankruptcy court bar, and

the..." and insert "The" before "case."
No. 59273.

protest 242925-K (Philadelphia).

#### Shasha Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers not disclosing anything that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
No. 65264.

#### Eli E. Albert, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/18950 (New York).

*370Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.