alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ALFONSO PALACIOS-TORRES,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-273M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: June 1, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a native and citizen of Mexico. No additional information is

available regarding the defendant’s ties to this community or to the Western District of

Washington.

(2) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

Case 2:06-cr-00194-TSZ Document 7 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 1st day of June, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00194-TSZ Document 7 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THOMAS S. KIRK and PAULINE R. KIRK,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-536C

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 

Coughenour, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. No. 7). 

Defendants have expressed their nonopposition to the proposed amendment (Dkt. No. 11). The Court

hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion. Plaintiffs are directed to file their Amended Complaint on the

Court’s Docket within 5 days of the date of this Minute Order.

DATED this 12th day of May, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ C. Ledesma 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00536-JCC Document 12 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 289 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 289

 Authorizing the printing of the ``Testimony from the Hearings of the 
                  Task Force on Economic Sanctions''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 7 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing of the ``Testimony from the Hearings of the 
                  Task Force on Economic Sanctions''.

    Resolved, that the ``Testimony from the Hearings of the Task Force 
on Economic Sanctions'', be printed as a Senate document, and that 
there be printed 300 additional copies of such document for the use of 
the Task Force on Economic Sanctions at a cost not to exceed $16,311.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7252

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES M. DEBARDELEBEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-83-50, CA-97-174-3-P) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James M. DeBardeleben, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James M. DeBardeleben seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. DeBardeleben , Nos. CR83-50; CA-97-174-3-P (Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69682-69683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) 
will hold a public meeting via telephone conference line on Wednesday, 
Nov. 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National 
Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adddd8cfc1c4cec1c4ccc4dec2c3edc4dfde83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e2e2b3c32373d32373f372d31301e372c2d70393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting 
via conference call of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, Nov. 15, 
2023, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide 
continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the 
IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is 
an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax 
administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund 
fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be 
the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information 
returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS 
electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive 
observations about current

[[Page 69683]]

or proposed policies, programs, and procedures, and suggest 
improvements. Please call or email Alec Johnston to confirm your 
attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 202-317-4299 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e6e4b5c52575d72575f574d51507e574c4d10595148">[email protected]</a>. Should you wish the ETAAC to consider a written 
statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7e7c2d5dbded4fbded6dec4d8d9f7dec5c499d0d8c1">[email protected]</a>.

    Dated: October. 3, 2023.
John A. Lipold,
Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, 
Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22281 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      25,176,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,500,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,430,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,261,311
<PP&E>                                       2,053,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 601,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,381,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,822,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,145
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,308,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,381,297
<SALES>                                      2,759,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,759,286
<CGS>                                        2,452,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,204,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (388,642)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (25,558,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (25,560,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (25,560,592)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7144
JACKIE EDWARD MESSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PHILLIP KELLY; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; JERRY W. MILLER; BILL HOGAN, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-126-1-MU) Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie Edward Messer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Messer v. Kelly , CA-97-126-1-MU (W.D.N.C. May 27, 1997). We note that Appellant's complaint should have been construed as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court's denial of relief was nevertheless proper because the rationale in Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), applies in Bivens actions. See Abella v. Rubino , 63 F.3d 1063, 1065 (11th Cir. 1995); Tavarez v. Reno , 54 F.3d 109, 110 (2d Cir. 1995). We modify the dismissal to be without prejudice to Appellant’s ability to refile his claims ifhis conviction is overturned or called into question by the appropriate court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-38-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 163; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Puerto Rico Steel Products Corporation; (Construction and 
Fencing Products); Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico

    On June 8, 2023, Puerto Rico Steel Products Corporation submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 163L, in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 38811, June 14, 2023). On 
October 6, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
section 400.14.

    Dated: October 6, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22572 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORD ON MTN

TO STRIKE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MEDZILLA, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SCISTAFF SERVICES, LLC, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-506P

ORDER ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES

The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:

1. Defendant Scott McKearney’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees

Contained in Its Response to Motion to Amend Answer

2. Plaintiff Medzilla, Inc.’s Response to Defendant Scott McKearney’s Motion to Exclude

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Contained in Its Response to Motion to Amend Answer

3. McKearney Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant McKearney’s Motion to

Strike.

and all exhibits and declarations attached thereto, makes the following ruling:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant McKearney’s Motion to Exclude is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Medzilla Inc.’s Motion for Attorney Fees is

DENIED.

The clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to all counsel of record.

Dated: December __15_, 2006

AMarsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00506-MJP Document 49 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended annual report on Form 20-F/A of Pixelplus
Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Hoang Taig Choi as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 29, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Hoang Taig Choi    
|Name:  |  | Hoang Taig Choi        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
| date    | Corporate Equity | Real Estate | Debt Securities | Other |
|---------|------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| 2015:Q1 | 0.61             | 0.47        | 0.07            | 0.74  |
| 2015:Q2 | 0.09             | 0.47        | -0.25           | 0.25  |
| 2015:Q3 | -1.97            | 0.47        | 0.2             | 0.35  |
| 2015:Q4 | 1.01             | 0.36        | -0.09           | 0.32  |
| 2016:Q1 | 0.28             | 0.23        | 0.24            | 0.44  |
| 2016:Q2 | 0.54             | 0.57        | 0.14            | 0.2   |
| 2016:Q3 | 0.76             | 0.63        | 0.11            | 0.37  |
| 2016:Q4 | 0.45             | 0.46        | -0.44           | 0.29  |
| 2017:Q1 | 1.45             | 0.42        | -0.05           | 0.69  |
| 2017:Q2 | 0.8              | 0.6         | 0.11            | 0.23  |
| 2017:Q3 | 0.97             | 0.57        | 0.19            | 0.23  |
| 2017:Q4 | 1.6              | 0.53        | 0.02            | 0.57  |
| 2018:Q1 | -0.19            | 0.25        | 0.32            | 0.32  |
| 2018:Q2 | 0.48             | 0.66        | 0.21            | 0.26  |
| 2018:Q3 | 1.32             | 0.37        | 0.32            | -0.06 |
| 2018:Q4 | -4.57            | 0.39        | 0.04            | 0.46  |
| 2019:Q1 | 4.22             | 0.7         | 0.07            | 1     |
| 2019:Q2 | 0.68             | 0.52        | 0.56            | 0.35  |
| 2019:Q3 | 0.03             | 0.36        | 0.38            | 0.28  |
| 2019:Q4 | 2.5              | 0.26        | 0.19            | 0.59  |
| 2020:Q1 | -7.8             | 0.42        | -0.67           | 1.16  |
| 2020:Q2 | 6.19             | 0.49        | 0.18            | 1.43  |
| 2020:Q3 | 2.76             | 0.43        | 0.03            | 0.59  |
No. 56201.

protests 150132-K/2102 and 157101-K/2771 (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. and International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                Employment Agreement executed September 16, 1999
                                     between
               Keith Steinbruck and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc.


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of
this 15th day of December, 1999, by and between Keith Steinbruck (the
"Employee") and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc. ("Eagle").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Employee and Eagle are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement executed September 16, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement effective
December 15, 1999 to take into account the resolutions adopted by Eagle's Board
of Directors at its special meeting on December 15, 1999.


         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements
hereinafter contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows:

         1. Section 3.b Annual Bonus of the Agreement shall be changed in its
entirety to read as follows:

         "The Employee and Eagle acknowledge that they are entering into this
         Agreement upon the consummation of Eagle's acquisition of Pacific
         Western Extruded Plastics Company ("PW Pipe"), and that the Employee is
         a former employee of PW Pipe. As such, for calendar year 1999 under the
         term of this Agreement, the Employee shall be entitled to a bonus equal
         to the bonus to which he would have been entitled under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan for the remainder of calendar year 1999, which shall be payable at
         such time and under such schedule as set forth under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan. For subsequent calendar years during the term of this Agreement,
         the Employee shall be entitled to participate in the Company's
         Performance Bonus Plan."

         2. Except as amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Employment Agreement effective as of the date first written above.

EAGLE PACIFICS INDUSTRIES, INC.



By:      /s/ William H. Spell                     /s/ Keith Steinbruck
Its:     Chief Executive Officer                  Keith Steinbruck
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 215 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 215

     Directing the Secretary of the Senate to request the House of 
Representatives to return the official papers on S. 414, and to make a 
        technical correction in the Act as passed by the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 1998

Mrs. Hutchison submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Secretary of the Senate to request the House of 
Representatives to return the official papers on S. 414, and to make a 
        technical correction in the Act as passed by the Senate.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate is directed to request 
the House of Representatives to return to the Senate the official 
papers on S. 414, entitled ``An Act to amend the Shipping Act of 1984 
to encourage competition in international shipping and growth of United 
States exports, and for other purposes''.
    Sec. 2. Upon the return of the official papers from the House of 
Representatives, the Secretary of the Senate is directed to make the 
following change in the text of the bill, viz:
    In the amendment of section 8(f) of the Shipping Act of 1984 by 
section 106(e) of the bill, insert a comma and ``including limitations 
of liability for cargo loss or damage,'' after ``practices''.
                                 <all>
```