alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

ROUSE/ CR06-213JCC — 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) CASE NO.CR06-213JCC

 Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) ORDER OF CONTINUANCE

)

)

KIMBERLY ROUSE, )

)

)

 Defendant. ) )

The Court having reviewed the stipulated motion by the United States and

defendant KIMBERLY ROUSE to continue the trial date, and having reviewed the

records and files herein, makes the following findings and enters the following order:

The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and §3161(h)(8)(B)(i)

and (B)(ii), the ends of justice served by continuing the trial date from October 30, 2006

to November 13, 2006, outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial. This matter is complex due to the changing nature of the case and it is

therefore unreasonable to expect the parties to adequately prepare for trial before

November 13, 2006. Failure to grant a continuance to November 13, 2006 would deny

the defendant the time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that trial in this matter is continued from 

October 30, 2006 to November 13, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 2:06-cr-00213-JCC Document 60 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

ROUSE/ CR06-213JCC — 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of computing the time limitations 

imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3164, the period of delay from 

October 30, 2006, up to and including November 13, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.

AJohn C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Presented by:

 /s Jill Otake 

JILL OTAKE

Assistant United States Attorney

WA Bar # 28298

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-4254

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: jill.otake@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00213-JCC Document 60 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM).

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, October 18 from 4:00-4:30 p.m. EDT. A joint meeting of the EXIM Advisory Committee, Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee, and EXIM Advisory Councils will be held from 4:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

The Washington Hilton Hotel, 1919 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009 and Virtual. The meeting will be held in person for committee members, EXIM's Board of Directors and support staff, and virtually for all other participants.

# REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC COMMENT:

                        Virtual Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation virtually and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to                         *advisory@exim.gov.*

                        Interested parties may register for the meeting at:                         *https://events.teams.microsoft.com/​event/​5a102c27-d9ae-490d-a143-db0c4412029a@b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs to provide competitive financing to expand United States exports and comments for inclusion in EXIM's Report to the U.S. Congress on Global Export Credit Competition.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        For further information, contact India Walker, External Engagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062 or                         *india.walker@exim.gov.*

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22457 Filed 10-5-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00464-CV

In re Robert Samaniego

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Filed: July 20, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:15 p.m. on Thursday, October 19, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: October 12, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22904 Filed 10-12-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
---

Exhibit 99.8


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Baja Mining Corp. of our report dated March 30, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Annual Report. /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Vancouver, British Columbia March 30, 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered AccountantsPricewaterhouseCoopers Place, 250 Howe Street, Suite 700, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3S7T: +1 604 806 7000, F: +1 604 806 7806, www.pwc.com/ca“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each memberfirm of which is a separate legal entity.


---
April 22, 1963

No. 67636.

#### J. M. Altieri *v.*United States,

protest 61/17744.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Order entered October 12, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00909-CV

K&K ENTERPRISES, LLC, GARY KELLEY, CHERYL KELLEY AND 

HENRY KELLEY, Appellants

V.

PRESTON PARKER CROSSING, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-01239-2021

ORDER

Before the Court is Collin County Clerk Stacey Kemp’s October 10, 2022 

request for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record. Ms. Kemp explains the 

extension is necessary because appellants have failed to pay the fee for preparation 

of the record.

We GRANT the motion to the extent that we SUSPEND the deadline for 

filing the clerk’s record and ORDER appellants to file, no later than October 24, 
2022, written verification they have paid the fee. A new deadline for the filing of 

the record will be set upon appellants’ compliance.

We caution appellants that failure to comply may result in the appeal being 

dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES BACON

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIE THURMAN et al.,

Defendants

Case No. C06-5185RBL

ORDER DENYING AN EXTENSION

OF TIME TO CONDUCT

DISCOVERY

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR

3, and MJR 4. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion asking for an extension of time to conduct

discovery (Dkt. # 30). Defendants oppose the motion (Dkt. # 31). A scheduling order was issued

July 31, 2006. That order set the discovery deadline in this action for January 1, 2007 (Dkt. # 25).

Plaintiff alleges he currently does not have access to legal materials (Dkt. # 30). Defendants

provide much greater detail. Plaintiff is now housed at the Washington State Penitentiary and has

been in segregation since August of 2006, as a result of poor behavior (Dkt. # 31, page 2). 

Defendants allege plaintiff has access to his legal material and paper and pencil while in segregation

(Dkt. # 31, page 2). The filing of this motion shows he has access to pencil and paper.

Case 3:06-cv-05185-RBL Document 32 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

Plaintiff has not conducted any discovery in this action. Nor was he presented good reason

for his failure to do so. Plaintiff fails to tell the court what discovery he wishes to engage in and why

he did not engage in that discovery during the six-month discovery time frame. The motion for an

extension of time is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 31 day of January 2007.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05185-RBL Document 32 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 53333.

protest 58490-K (New York).

#### M. Segerman *v.*United States,

*119Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-merchandise consists of mah jong sets similar in all material respects to those the-subject of Abstract 51959, the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was. sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 209 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 209

  A Resolution providing section 302 allocations to the Committee on 
                            Appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 1998

 Ms. Collins submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  A Resolution providing section 302 allocations to the Committee on 
                            Appropriations.

    Resolved, That for the purposes of section 302(a) of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the estimated allocation of the 
appropriate levels of budget totals for the Senate Committee on 
Appropriations shall be--
            For non-defense--
            (1) $289,547,000,000 in total budget outlays, and
            (2) $255,450,000,000 in total new budget authority;
            for defense--
            (1) $266,635,000,000 in total budget outlays, and
            (2) $271,570,000,000 in total new budget authority;
            for violent crime reduction--
            (1) $4,953,000,000 in total budget outlays, and
            (2) $5,800,000,000 in total new budget authority;
            for mandatory--
            (1) $291,731,000,000 in total budget outlays, and
            (2) $299,159,000,000 in total new budget authority;
until a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1999 is 
agreed to by the Senate and the House of Representatives pursuant to 
section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 45 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:06-cv-05173-RBL Document 3 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 2

Scott v. Bailey Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 45 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 3:06-cv-05173-RBL Document 3 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation in this Form 10-K of our report dated August 10,
2009, on our audit of the financial statements of Management Energy, Inc. as of
April 30, 2009 and for the year ended April 30, 2009. The period from inception
(May 19, 2005) to April 30, 2008 were audited by other auditors whose report
expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.





/s/M&K
      CPAS, PLLC





www.mkacpas.com


Houston,
TX


August
12, 2009





JOHN
KINROSS-KENNEDY




CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT




17848
Skypark Circle, Suite C




IRVINE,
CALIFORNIA, U.S.A.  92614-6401




(949)
955-2522. Fax (949)724-3817




jkinross@zamucen.com




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




I consent
to the incorporation by reference in the report of Management Energy, Inc.
(formerly Quantum Information Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30,
2009 of my Auditor’s report  dated July 7,  2008, relating
to the financial statements of Quantum Information Inc. for  the year
ended April 30, 2008.




/s/John
      Kinross-Kennedy, CPAAugust
      6, 2009
No. 58308.

protests 192908-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Thurmond & Cuneo, Inc., and H. P. Lambert Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
IV 

House Calendar No. 134 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 741 

[Report No. 110–382] 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 734) expressing the 

sense of the House of Representatives regarding the withholding of 

information relating to corruption in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2007 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 734) 

expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

regarding the withholding of information relating to corruption in Iraq. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 

4 734) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

5 regarding the withholding of information relating to corVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:56 Oct 16, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR741.RH HR741

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 741 RH 

1 ruption in Iraq. The resolution shall be considered as read. 

2 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

3 the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion 

4 or demand for division of the question except: (1) one hour 

5 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

6 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Over7 sight and Government Reform; and (2) one motion to re8 commit which may not contain instructions. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 134 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 741 

[Report No. 110

–382] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. 

formation relating to corruption in Iraq. Representatives regarding the withholding of inRes. 734) expressing the sense of the House of 

OCTOBER 15, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
II

Calendar No. 425

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1998

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. STEVENS, Mr.

FORD, Mr. LOTT, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. BOND, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KYL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire,

Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. THURMOND, Mr.

WARNER, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BREAUX, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HOLLINGS,

Mr. REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. GORTON, Mr. SPECTER, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 24, 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.
2

•SJ 40 RS

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following article is proposed as an amendment

4 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be

5 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu6 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of

7 the several States within 7 years after the date of its sub8 mission for ratification:

9 ‘‘ARTICLE—

10 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys11 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’.
Calendar No. 425

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

States.the physical desecration of the flag of the UnitedUnited States authorizing Congress to prohibit

JUNE 24, 1998

Reported without amendment
No. 63922.

protest 59/20673 (New York).

#### Compass Antiques Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,966,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               54,379,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,698,601
<INVENTORY>                                 66,845,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           123,709,251
<PP&E>                                      36,257,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             258,770,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       99,446,119
<BONDS>                                      8,433,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                        33,681
<OTHER-SE>                                 150,857,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               258,770,219
<SALES>                                    139,695,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           139,695,295
<CGS>                                      109,209,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,209,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,904,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,410,134
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,907,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,317,634
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,317,634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
No. 57810.

protest 218555-K (New York).

#### Geo. F. Bassett & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*388‘Opinion by

Oliver,' C] J.'

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hot plate mats of wood the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57261, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.