alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RONALD R CHRISTEL,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5375

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, CPT ROBSON. 

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, LINDA SULLIVAN. 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge J. RICHARD CREATURA:

Date of hearing: FEBRUARY 3, 2010

Time of hearing: 2:30 P.M.

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered 

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

January 27, 2010.

A J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge
Chester R.

Elk

River

EASTERN

 BAY

Choptank River

L. Choptank R.

St. Marys R.

H A R F O R D

K E N T

C E C I L

Q U E E N

A N N E S

T A L B O T

C A R O L I N E

D O R C H E S T E R

Chestertown

Kent 

Island

VIRGINIA

MARYLAND

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

B A L T I M O R E

F R E D E R I C K

C A R R O L L

H O W A R D

M O N T G O M E R Y

 P R I N C E

G E O R G E S

C A L V E R T

A N N E A R U N D E L

C H A R L E S

S T. M A R Y S

BALTIMORE 

CITY

Towson

Ellicott 

City

Savage

Unity

Rockville

Potomac

River

 Upper 

Marlboro

Prince

 Frederick La Plata

Waldorf

Chalk Point

 Power Plant

Leonardtown

Calvert 

Cliffs

Point Lookout

Patuxent

River

Patapsco River

Severn R.

Bush

River

Loch Raven 

Reservoir

Liberty 

Lake

Triadelphia

Reservoir

Western Br.

Patuxent

River

Piscataway

Mattawoman

Cr.

Cr.

Zekiah

Swamp

Run

Nanjemoy

Cr.

Gunpowder R.

Middle R.

Cambridge

Centreville

Easton

Solomons

ANNAPOLIS

Naval Air Station

Patuxent River

Bowie

RIVER

POTOMAC

C

H

E

S

A

P

E A

K E

B A

Y

WASHINGTON,

 D.C.

-60

-50

-40

-30

-30

-20

-10

-70

-80

-4 -10

-11

0

-14

-14

-20

-20

-22 -18

-6

-19

-20

-34 -26

-25 -26

-23

-30

-19

-31

-13

-39

-37

-53

-90 -51

-66

-76

-84

-48

-41

-46

-47

-1

-59

-74

-75

-80

-29

-37 -39

-42 -45

-22

-15 -19

-18 -17

-23

-14

EXPLANATION

OUTCROP AREA OF THE MAGOTHY AQUIFER---Aquifer is in the Magothy Formation of Late Cretaceous age.

LINE OF EQUAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACES, SEPTEMBER 1975 AND 

SEPTEMBER 2007--- Contour interval 10 feet. Negative value indicates decline of potentiometric surface.

WATER-LEVEL DIFFERENCE AND WELL YIELD---Number indicates the difference, in feet, between the 

 potentiometric surfaces, September 1975 and September 2007, where a difference value is available. 

 Symbol indicates average yield from well or well field, in gallons per day, using 2004 withdrawal data.

Less than 10,000 gallons per day -29

10,000 to 100,000

-20

100,000 to 1,000,000

Greater than 1,000,000

APPROXIMATE SUBSURFACE BOUNDARY OF THE MAGOTHY AQUIFER

Prepared by West Trenton 

Publishing Service Center.

Edited by Valerie M. Gaine.

Graphics by Timothy W. Auer.

For additional information, contact:

Director 

MD-DE-DC Water Science Center

U.S. Geological Survey

5522 Research Park Drive

Baltimore, MD 21228

or visit our Web site at:

http://md.water.usgs.gov

0 10 MILES

0 10 KILOMETERS

77 00' O

76 00' O76 30' O

39

39

38

38

00'

30'

00'

30'

O

O

O

O

The Difference Between the Potentiometric Surfaces of the Magothy Aquifer 

in Southern Maryland, September 1975 and September 2007

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Stephen E. Curtin (USGS), David C. Andreasen (MGS), and Andrew W. Staley (MGS)

Prepared in cooperation with the

Maryland Geological Survey (MGS)

and the

Power Plant Assessment Program,

Maryland Department of Natural Resources

Open-File Report 2009---1083

BASE FROM USGS DIGITAL LINE GRAPH, 1:250,000
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying
report of Legal Life Plans, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2012 (the “Report”),
I, Scott Weissman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 18, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Scott Weissman     
|Scott Weissman         
|Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Notably, in his objection to the Report and Recommendation, plaintiff does not allege that he

was not served with copies of defendants’ motions for summary judgment. And, in any event, the Court

is directing the Clerk of Court in this order to send copies of the summary judgment motions to plaintiff.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER

RESETTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

JAMES DEAN WILKS, ) No. C06-615RSL 

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. ) REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

) TIME AND ORDER RESETTING

KING COUNTY, et al., ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s objection to the Report and

Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt.

#40). In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Donohue recommends that defendants’

motions for summary judgment (Dkt. ##29, 33) should be granted because plaintiff failed to

respond to the motions. See Dkt. #40 at 4. In his objection to the Report and Recommendation,

plaintiff requests more time to respond to defendants’ motions for summary judgment because

of his incarceration and also requests copies of docket numbers 10, 29, 30, 33-39. See Dkt. #42

at 7-8.1

 

The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s request for additional time. Plaintiff shall file his

Case 2:06-cv-00615-RSL Document 48 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER

RESETTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -2-

Objection to the Report and Recommendation, including his response to defendants’ summary

judgment motions, with the Clerk (not mailed directly to Judge’s chambers) and serve

defendants by Friday, November 30, 2007. Failure to file an objection within this time waives

the right to appeal any order by this Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. In

accordance with the Local Rules, any objections should be noted for consideration on the

motion calendar for the third Friday after they are filed. If no timely objections are filed, the

matter will be ready for consideration by this Court on Friday, December 7, 2007.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order, along with copies of docket

numbers 10, 29, 30, 33-40 to the address provided by plaintiff: 

James Dean Wilks

BKG# 207037062

King County Jail

500 Fifth Avenue

Seattle, WA 98104-2332

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00615-RSL Document 48 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1266 CAF 12-00006** 
, 

## CAF 12-00077 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ANDIE M., FREDERICK M. AND VONYEE M.

--------------------------------------- ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
KIMBERLY M. AND ANDREW M., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

KELLY M. CORBETT, FAYETTEVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT ANDREW M.
FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (KRISTEN MCDERMOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT KIMBERLY M.
GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SARA J. LANGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
JAMES E. CORL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, CICERO, FOR ANDIE M. AND VONYEE M.

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Bryan R. Hedges, J.), entered December 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, inter alia, transferred guardianship and custody of Andie M. and Vonyee M. to petitioner. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent parents appeal from an order that, inter alia, terminated their parental rights with respect to two of their children pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b on the ground of permanent neglect, committed the custody and guardianship of those children to petitioner, and freed them for adoption. Contrary to respondents’ contention, Family Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to enter a suspended judgment ( see Matter of Arella D.P.-D. , 35 AD3d 1222, lv denied 8 NY3d 809; Matter of Kyle S ., 11 AD3d 935, 936). Although the record establishes that respondents had made progress in improving, inter alia, the deplorable conditions and other problems existing in the family home, the progress “was not sufficient to warrant any further prolongation of the child[ren]’s unsettled familial status” ( Matter of Maryline A. , 22 AD3d 227, 228). Under the circumstances, freeing the children for adoption by the foster parents with whom they had been residing was plainly in their best interests ( see Matter of Star Leslie W ., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148; Matter of Arron**-2- 1266 CAF 12-00006**  , **CAF 12-00077**

Brandend C. , 267 AD2d 107, 108; Matter of Amanda R ., 215 AD2d 220, 220-221, lv denied 86 NY2d 705). Finally, the court properly denied posttermination visitation to respondents. It is now well settled that a court lacks the authority to direct continuing contact between parents and their children once parental rights have been terminated pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b ( see Matter of Hailey ZZ. [Ricky ZZ.] , 19 NY3d 422, 426, 437-438).

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0019

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SACRAMENTO JUAN DOMINGUEZ, J.R.,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 27 2024

03/27/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,694
<SECURITIES>                                     5,084
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,839
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,771
<PP&E>                                          33,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,695
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,431)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                                 APACHE TRUST I


     This Certificate of Trust of Apache Trust I (the "Trust"), dated March 13,
2000, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form
a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section
3801, et seq.)(the "Act").

     1.   Name. The name of the business trust formed by this Certificate of
Trust is Apache Trust I.

     2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware are Chase
Manhattan Bank Delaware, 1201 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801,
Attention: Corporate Trust Adminstration.

     3.   Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     4.   Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or
more counterparts.



                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<PAGE>   2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the
Act.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE, not
                                    in its individual capacity but solely
                                    as trustee



                                    By: /s/ DENIS KELLY
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Denis Kelly
                                        Title: Assistant Vice President


                                    THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, not in its
                                    individual capacity but solely as trustee

                                    By: /s/ WALTER I. JOHNSON, III
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Walter I. Johnson, III
                                        Title: Assistant Treasurer


                                    THOMAS L. MITCHELL, not in his individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust

                                     /s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELL
                                    --------------------------------------------


                                    MATTHEW W. DUNDREA, not in his individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust


                                     /s/ MATTHEW W. DUNDREA
                                    --------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OCEAN OPTIQUE DISTRIBUTORS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
     ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
     SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         247
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                   158
<INVENTORY>                                    4,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,319
<PP&E>                                         870
<DEPRECIATION>                                 671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,852
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,599
<COMMON>                                       7,468
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,664
<SALES>                                        6,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,264
<CGS>                                          4,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (653)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.19)
        


</TABLE>
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 

42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [C02-2434C] - 1 

Halpern & Oliver, PLLC 

1800 Cooper Pt. Road SW, Bldg. 19 

Olympia, WA 98502 

(360) 753-8055 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 United States District Judge JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

HARIOETT R. GRAVELY, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL NO. C02-2434C 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 

PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the undersigned upon Plaintiff’s 

Motion For Attorneys Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 406(b), the Court having considered 

the contentions of Plaintiff and Defendant, good cause having been shown for entry of 

the Order, now therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorneys Elie Halpern and Amy Gilbrough are 

awarded a gross attorney’s fee of $19,456.75 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), reduced 

by the EAJA fees of $5,887.00 that previously were awarded, leaving a net fee of 

$13,569.75. When issuing the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s 

attorney herein, Social Security is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney the net 

balance of $13,569.75, minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. 

Case 2:02-cv-02434-JCC Document 31 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 

42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [C02-2434C] - 2 

Halpern & Oliver, PLLC 

1800 Cooper Pt. Road SW, Bldg. 19 

Olympia, WA 98502 

(360) 753-8055 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 DATED this 7th day of December, 2006. 

 

 JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 

 

A

United States District Judge 

Presented by: 

S/ELIE HALPERN____________ 

ELIE HALPERN 

Attorney for Plaintiff

S/AMY GILBROUGH_________

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:02-cv-02434-JCC Document 31 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (a) and (b)  I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.   By:
 /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert Name:
S. Emerson Lybbert Title:
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)  Date: October 31, 2008   PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (a) and (b)  I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.    By:
/s/ S. Emerson Lybbert Name:
S. Emerson Lybbert Title:
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)  Date: October 31, 2008
lion. d. SC. uooa,Yareb 14, lDsB#Page 2

thattimeconferredany generalporerof eondmm~tionon the C2&ualsaian,

and In that Instame they wstrlated the graut of power to anith County, Terse. The tegislrtura not havlng **made** an eXprf3ss grant of thepower 0T 00~1 denmatioant.0

the Conunieslon,

re oanuotby fmplie8tion oonfer thatporor upon the Cfnmiesio~ for the oourtm bate held that the 8tatutesconferring the **power**of lm**min0nt domain**  **be Otriotlj**  **cdonStrue& and**  **ii the**  **p0rw iu**  doubtful, it will **be** reeolted infavorof'thepmpartp olmer.

It is the opiarlono? th&* apwiaent th8t the -doa wee ut hw@ UItheaatp forthdrplqodstmdorenrpl-owpt
No. 55707.

protests 169930-K, etc. (New York).

#### L. Bamberger & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.