alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.    Very truly yours,   /s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Executive Officer/s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Financial OfficerDated: April 13, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.Y

                       10% TWO YEAR CONVERTIBLE TERM NOTE

$100,000                                                        January 25, 2000

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Electropure, Inc., a California Corporation, hereby
promises to pay ANTHONY M. FRANK, or assigns (the "Lender"), the principal sum
of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) on or before January 25, 2002, plus
interest accrued thereon at the rate of Ten Percent (10%) per annum.

         Lender shall have the right, in his sole discretion, to convert the
principal and interest accrued on such loan into securities of Electropure, Inc.
and/or securities of the proposed subsidiary of Electropure, Inc. to be known as
Micro Imaging Technologies.

         Any conversion of the loan, or any portion thereof, shall be at
mutually agreed upon terms.

         In witness whereof, the parties have executed this 10% Two-Year
Convertible Term Note on the day and date set forth above.


ELECTROPURE, INC.


By: /s/ FLOYD H. PANNING                       /s/  ANTHONY M. FRANK
        -------------------------------        ---------------------------------
        Floyd H. Panning, President                Anthony M. Frank
        23456 South Pointe Drive                   320 Meadowood Court
        Laguna Hills, CA  92653                    Pleasant Hill, CA  94523-3176
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-05267-RBL Document 19 Filed 12/21/06 Page 7 of 7
No. 59326.

protest 240344-K (New York).

#### Lansen-Naeve Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles described as “Dreigang-Kettenschaltungen,” which were imported in the same shipment with bicycles, were necessary to the completion of the bicycles and should have been classified as bicycles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 11081)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 754092-1/3.

*623(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp, Stolter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisemexit has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price ('See. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, axe correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 11079)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15950.

*621(Decided October 13, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed, facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-05-270-CV

 TIFFANY L. LEWIS AND ALL					       APPELLANTS

OCCUPANTS	

	V.

SAMER RASOUL				                  			 APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On July 27, 2005 and August 24, 2005, we notified appellants, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellants have not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellants have failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 15, 2005
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.119.c Federal Government Employee Retirement Funds Defined Contribution Plans  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineFederal government retirement funds; total financial assets held by Thrift Savings Plan
	FL344090025
	411.9
	430.2
	421.4
	425.0
	410.5
	430.2
	434.3
	440.7
	455.9
	1Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; debt securities; asset
	FL344022025
	203.8
	220.0
	144.6
	81.8
	12.8
	220.0
	226.3
	230.0
	235.7
	2Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; Treasury securities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FL343061155
	195.0
	210.9
	135.6
	72.6
	3.9
	210.9
	217.0
	220.4
	225.5
	3Federal government retirement funds; agency- and GSE-backed securities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FL343061723
	5.5
	5.7
	5.6
	5.7
	5.6
	5.7
	5.7
	6.0
	6.2
	4Federal government retirement funds; corporate and foreign bonds held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FL343063023
	3.2
	3.4
	3.4
	3.5
	3.3
	3.4
	3.5
	3.7
	4.0
	5Federal government retirement funds; corporate equities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	LM343064123
	208.2
	210.2
	216.0
	215.6
	197.8
	210.2
	208.0
	210.7
	220.3
	6Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; claims of pension funds on sponsor; asset
	FL343073053
	0.0
	0.0
	60.9
	127.6
	199.9
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	7Federal government retirement funds; total financial assets held by Thrift Savings Plan
	FL344090025
	411.9
	430.2
	421.4
	425.0
	410.5
	430.2
	434.3
	440.7
	455.9
	8 Back to top
  **NOTES** Thrift Savings Plan.
Includes nonmarketable and marketable Treasury securities held by the Thrift Savings Plan G and F funds.
Suspended investments in the Thrift Savings Plan G Fund by the Treasury.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 66612.

#### James Betesh Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/10741, etc. (New York).

*387Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware eggcups similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 8, C.D. 2226), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 202 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 202

        To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Council.

Whereas, in the cases of William L. Singer v. Office of Senate Fair Employment 
        Practices, No. 98-6002, and Office of the Senate Sergeant at Arms v. 
        Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 98-6003, pending in the 
        United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, petitioners 
        William L. Singer and the Office of the Senate Sergeant at Arms have 
        sought review of a final decision of the Select Committee on Ethics, 
        which had been entered, pursuant to section 308 of the Government 
        Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.S.C. Sec. 1208 (1994), in the records 
        of the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend committees of the Senate in 
        civil actions relating to their official responsibilities; and
Whereas, pursuant to section 303(f) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 
        1991, 2 U.S.C. Sec. 1203(f) (1994), for purposes of representation by 
        the Senate Legal Counsel, the Office of Senate Fair Employment 
        Practices, the respondent in this proceeding, is deemed a committee 
        within the meaning of sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a), 288c(a)(1) (1994): 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices in the cases of William 
L. Singer v. Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices and Office of 
the Senate Sergeant at Arms v. Office of Senate Fair Employment 
Practices.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation rates.**
 
2000-07 | 2001-08: ReportSummary | 2002-09 Report / Summary | 
2010:ReportSummary| 2010-11 | 2010-12 Report / Summary |
2010-13ReportSummary | 2010-14: ReportSummary | 2010-15: ReportSummary
2010-16:ReportSummary | 2010-17: ReportSummary | 2016-18: ReportSummary
2016-19:ReportSummary
 
SuDoc Number:A 98.22:
Item Number:0074-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000649315
 
July 25, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12219]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Botticelli Drawings” at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Legion of Honor, San Francisco, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22499 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 61135.

protest 294796-K (New York).

#### Shuen On Co. *v.*United States,

*396Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 60311, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64587.

#### Anglo-American Commodities et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160801-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. [CASE NO.]2-02-505-CR

[APPELLANT NAME]KNYVETT REYES	APPELLANT

	V.

[APPELLEE NAME]THE STATE OF TEXAS	[APPELLEE OR STATE]STATE

	------------

	FROM THE [COURT]CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 DISTRICT COURT OF [COUNTY]TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MERMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Knyvett Reyes attempts to appeal hiser conviction for criminally negligent homicide.  [CR221] The trial court imposed a sentence of confinement for two years in the state jail and appellantAppellant was placed on community supervision for four years. [CR221]  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Pursuant to rule 26.2 of the rules of appellate procedure, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed, or within 90 days after the date sentence is imposed if the defendant files a timely motion for new trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2 ( a)(1).  Appellant’s sentence was imposed on August 30, 2002.  HShe filed a timely motion for new trial on September 30, 2002. [CR227]  Therefore, appellantAppellant’s notice of appeal was due December 2, 2002.  Id.  On December 23, 2002, appellantAppellant filed hiser notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. [CR235]  This court denied appellantAppellant’s motion because it was not filed within the fifteen-day period in which to request an extension, as permitted by rule 26.3.  Id.Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.           

	On January 27, 2003, we notified appellantAppellant of the apparent untimeliness of the notice of appeal and stated we would dismiss the appeal unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  Appellant has not filed a response.

	Because appellantAppellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.  See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. cCrim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

perP	PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and 	wal	WALKJER, JJ.

			DO NOT PUBLISH

		Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

         [DELIVERED: MARCH 6, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, John T. Rynd, Chief Executive Officer and President of Hercules Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Troy L. Carson, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to his knowledge:


(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:April 29, 2016/s/ John T. RyndJohn T. Rynd Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ Troy L. CarsonTroy L. Carson Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Before the Third Division,

April 5, 1956

No. 59818.

#### Otto Sales Company *v.*United States,

protest 689715-G (Portland, (Oreg.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (a) of the rules of this court, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.