alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
123 STAT. 1932 PUBLIC LAW 111–38—JUNE 30, 2009 

Public Law 111–38 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide additional personnel authorities for the Special Inspector General for 

Afghanistan Reconstruction. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AUTHORITIES FOR THE SPECIAL 

INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR AFGHANISTAN 

RECONSTRUCTION. 

Section 1229(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 381) is amended 

by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) PERSONNEL.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Inspector General may select, 

appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may 

be necessary for carrying out the duties of the Inspector 

General, subject to the provisions of title 5, United States 

Code, governing appointments in the competitive service, 

and the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of 

chapter 53 of such title, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates. 

‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (ii), the 

Inspector General may exercise the authorities of subsections (b) through (i) of section 3161 of title 5, United 

States Code (without regard to subsection (a) of that 

section). 

‘‘(ii) PERIODS OF APPOINTMENTS.—In exercising the 

employment authorities under subsection (b) of section 

3161 of title 5, United States Code, as provided under 

clause (i) of this subparagraph— 

‘‘(I) paragraph (2) of that subsection (relating 

to periods of appointments) shall not apply; and 

‘‘(II) no period of appointment may exceed the 

date on which the Office of the Special Inspector 

5 USC app. 8G 

note. 

June 30, 2009 

[S. 615] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
PUBLIC LAW 111–38—JUNE 30, 2009 123 STAT. 1933 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 615: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111–15 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Apr. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

June 15, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

General for Afghanistan Reconstruction terminates 

under subsection (o).’’. 

Approved June 30, 2009. 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
No. 57803.

protests 175563-K and 179942-K (New York).

#### Shasha Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed, not found, or not manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not landed, not found, or not manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.219 Multifamily Residential Mortgages** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

April 23, 2010

Dorothy Beard Docket Branch Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: U.S.-Japan Alliance Case, DOT-OST-2010-0059

Dear Ms. Beard:

American Airlines, Inc. hereby submits additional letters in support of its application for antitrust immunity with Japan Airlines.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl B. Nelson, Jr. Associate General Counsel American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17 th 

### Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647 carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com mrosia@crowell.com mcmillin@woa.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil gbleopard@fedex.com jim.ballough@faa.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.com byerlyjr@state.gov kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

_______________________________ CARL B. NELSON, JR.

April 23, 2010
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2965

_____________________________
CDC C APITAL I NVESTMENTS , LLC, as Trustee,

Appellant,

v.

F REEDOM M ORTGAGE C ORPORATION , et al.
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

. July 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. Tramontana v. Bank of New York Mellon , 230 So. 3d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank , 172 So. 3d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App . P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ian P. Hudson of King Hudson PLLC, St. Petersburg
, for Appellant.

Cynthia L. Comras, David Rosenberg, and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton
, for Appellee.
No. 68539.

protest 69/22668 (New York).

#### Daiichi Bussan Kaisha, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sample books and that the principles are the same as those involved in *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 118, C.D. 2243), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal L 102I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 102I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6617 April 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 102I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6617 April 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/822 of 17 April 2023 on amending Regulation (EU) No 461/2010 as regards its period of application (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/822 of 17 April 2023 on amending Regulation (EU) No 461/2010 as regards its period of application (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 64625.

#### Overseas Leather Importing Co. and H. A. Gogarty, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/7299 (New York).

*296Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo*& *Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C.D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
!3 

RECEIVED 

SERVED: July 27,2012 ,AUG -7 2012 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HEARING DOCKET 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

COLGAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EAOO 18 

(Civil Penalty Actions) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2009-0582 

Response to Order of Chief Administrative Law Judge to Show Cause 

Why Default Should Not Be Entered For Failure to Comply With Order 

In response to the Show Cause Order, entered on or about July 1, 2012, Respondent 

Colgan Air, Inc. ("Respondent") responds as follows: 

1. For several months following the Prehearing Conference in this matter, 

Respondent and the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") were 

engaged in active settlement negotiations. 

2. In the interim, Respondent filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. While said filing 

does not apply to enforcement proceedings by a regulatory agency in cases 

involving safety and regulatory laws, said filing did have the practical effect 

of slowing down the pace of all such discussions. 

3. Discussions with the Complainant have now resumed and Respondent is 

hopeful ofhaving a resolution of this matter shortly. 
4. Respondent respectfully requests an additional thirty (30) days to either reach 

a settlement agreement or produce the documents listed in the Show Cause 

Order. 

ark A. Dombroff, Esq. 

DombroffGilmore Jaques & French, P.C. 

1676 International Drive- Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

Phone: (703) 336-8800 

Fax: (703) 336-8750 

Counsel for Colgan Air, Inc. 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2W100022 

Sent via U.S. First Class Mail 

ONE COPY 

W. Chris Harrison, Pinnacle Airlines, Corp. Counsel 

In-House Counsel 

Pinnacle Airlines, Corp. 

40 S. Main Street, 14th Floor 

Memphis, TN 38103 

TEL: (901) 348-2483 

Sent via Email & U.S. First Class Mail 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: (718) 553-3273 

(718) 995-5699 

Sent via Email & U.S. First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Sent via Facsimile & U.S. First Class Mail 

FAA Docket No. CP09EA0018 

(Civil Penalty Action)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Dataon solar-geophysical activity, October 24-November 6, 1968**
 
Parts: OneTwo
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.220:8
Item Number:0273-D-17 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959783
 
July 31, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Albert Horcher, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Albert Horcher
                                                   ----------------------------
cf                                                 Albert Horcher
                                                   Secretary, Treasurer and
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
                                                   November 14, 2003
From: adamval@hughes.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:12:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Valerie Skiles

Huntington, IN 46750
No. 58758.

petition 7142-R (Detroit).

#### Ford Motor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

From the record, it appeared that the difference between the entered and appraised values represented the cost of certain pattern equipment manufactured in the United States and used in connection with the production in Canada of the rough iron eastings in question. Prior to entry, the matter was taken up by representatives of the importer and a full disclosure of all pertinent facts was made at that time. There being a difference of opinion between the parties, the merchandise was entered at values which did not include the said cost of the patterns, and appraisement was made at values including it. The matter was made the subject of litigation, and final decision was adverse to the contention of the importer. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 32 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]






                                                        Calendar No. 10
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 32

     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1997

 Mr. Warner, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported 
  the following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

                            January 30, 1997

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

    Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the committees of the 
Senate, together with related materials, be printed as a Senate 
document, and that there be printed 600 additional copies of such 
document for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.




                                                        Calendar No. 10

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                        committees of the Senate

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 30, 1997

                        Considered and agreed to`
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 187 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 325
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 187

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation 
                   in the People's Republic of China.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 1998

   Mr. Mack (for himself, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Helms, Mr. Thomas, Mr. 
  Feingold, Mr. Abraham, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. 
   Hutchinson, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Brownback) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             March 11, 1998

                Reported by Mr. Helms, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation 
                   in the People's Republic of China.

Whereas the annual meeting of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in 
        Geneva, Switzerland, provides a forum for discussing human rights and 
        expressing international support for improved human rights performance;
Whereas according to the United States Department of State and international 
        human rights organizations, the Government of the People's Republic of 
        China engages in widespread human rights violations; and
Whereas President Clinton pledged that the United States would step up its 
        efforts in cooperation with other states to insist that the United 
        Nations Commission on Human Rights pass a resolution dealing with the 
        serious human rights abuses in the People's Republic of China: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the United States 
should introduce and make all efforts necessary to pass a resolution 
criticizing the People's Republic of China for its human rights abuses 
in China and Tibet at the annual meeting of the United Nations 
Commission on Human Rights.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 325

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              S. RES. 187

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation 
                   in the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 11, 1998

                       Reported without amendment`
No. 58764.

protest 237563-K (New York).

#### Carl Pellitteri Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 10.21.2

              Amendment to the Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan
            of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates, as amended and restated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first sentence of the Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A.
and Affiliates (the "Plan") is amended and restated as follows:

                        "The Purpose of this Plan is solely to provide benefits
                        to an individual whose participation in the Citigroup
                        Pension Plan (a/k/a Citibuilder Retirement Plan)
                        ("Plan") is attributable to employment with an entity
                        which was a participating employer in the Retirement
                        Plan of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates and a member of a
                        select group of management or highly compensated
                        employees for purposes of Sections 201, 301, and 401 of
                        the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
                        amended ("ERISA")."

Section 2 of the Plan is amended by adding the following language:

                        "Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of
                        computing the benefits under this Plan for individuals
                        whose benefit in the Retirement Plan is determined by
                        reference to the cash balance formula, compensation in
                        excess of $500,000 shall be disregarded."