Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 21181 

NOX), equipment list, equipment 

arrangement, and a summary of kiln 

characteristics that were relied upon as 

the design basis for the SNCR system. 

(ii) By October 3, 2017, the owner/

operator shall submit to EPA a summary 

of any process improvement or 

debugging activities that were 

performed on the SNCR system. 

Elements of this summary report shall 

include: a description of each process 

adjustment performed on the SNCR 

system, a discussion of whether the 

adjustment affected NOX emission rate 

(including CEMS data that may have 

been recorded while the adjustment was 

in progress), a description of the range 

(if applicable) over which the 

adjustment was examined, and a 

discussion of how the adjustment will 

be reflected or accounted for in kiln 

operating practices. In addition, to the 

extent that the owner/operator evaluates 

the impact of varying reagent injection 

rate on NOX emissions, the owner/

operator shall include the following 

information: the range of reagent 

injection rates evaluated (expressed as a 

molar ratio of reagent to average NOX

concentration), reagent injection rate, 

average NOX concentration, lime 

production rate, kiln flue gas 

temperature, and the presence of any 

detached plumes from the kiln exhaust. 

(iii) The owner/operator shall submit 

a report that lists the daily rolling 30- 

kiln operating day emission rates for 

NOX and SO2, calculated in accordance 

with paragraphs (i)(6)(iii) and (iv) of this 

section. 

(iv) The owner/operator shall submit 

a report that lists the monthly rolling 

12-month emission rates for NOX and 

SO2, calculated in accordance with 

paragraphs (i)(6)(v) and (vi) of this 

section. 

(v) The owner/operator shall submit 

excess emissions reports for NOX and 

SO2 limits. Excess emissions means 

emissions that exceed any of the 

emissions limits specified in paragraph 

(i)(3) of this section. The reports shall 

include the magnitude, date(s), and 

duration of each period of excess 

emissions; specific identification of 

each period of excess emissions that 

occurs during startups, shutdowns, and 

malfunctions of the kiln; the nature and 

cause of any malfunction (if known); 

and the corrective action taken or 

preventative measures adopted. 

(vi) The owner/operator shall submit 

a summary of CEMS operation, to 

include dates and duration of each 

period during which the CEMS was 

inoperative (except for zero and span 

adjustments and calibration checks), 

reason(s) why the CEMS was 

inoperative and steps taken to prevent 

recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or 

adjustments. 

(vii) The owner/operator shall submit 

results of all CEMS performance tests 

required by 40 CFR part 60, Appendix 

F, Procedure 1 (Relative Accuracy Test 

Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and 

Cylinder Gas Audits). 

(viiii) When no excess emissions have 

occurred or the CEMS has not been 

inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during 

the reporting period, the owner/operator 

shall state such information in the 

semiannual report. 

(9) Notifications. All notifications 

required under this section shall be 

submitted by the owner/operator to the 

Director, Enforcement Division (Mail 

Code ENF–2–1), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. 

(i) The owner/operator shall submit 

notification of commencement of 

construction of any equipment which is 

being constructed to comply with the 

NOX emission limits in paragraph (i)(3) 

of this section. 

(ii) The owner/operator shall submit 

semiannual progress reports on 

construction of any such equipment. 

(iii) The owner/operator shall submit 

notification of initial startup of any such 

equipment. 

(10) Equipment operations. (i) At all 

times, including periods of startup, 

shutdown, and malfunction, the owner/ 

operator shall, to the extent practicable, 

maintain and operate the kilns, 

including associated air pollution 

control equipment, in a manner 

consistent with good air pollution 

control practices for minimizing 

emissions. Pollution control equipment 

shall be designed and capable of 

operating properly to minimize 

emissions during all expected operating 

conditions. Determination of whether 

acceptable operating and maintenance 

procedures are being used will be based 

on information available to the Regional 

Administrator, which may include, but 

is not limited to, monitoring results, 

review of operating and maintenance 

procedures, and inspection of the kilns. 

(ii) After completion of installation of 

ammonia injection on a kiln, the owner/ 

operator shall inject sufficient ammonia 

to achieve compliance with the NOX

emission limits from paragraph (i)(3) of 

this section for that kiln while 

preventing excessive ammonia 

emissions. 

(11) Enforcement. Notwithstanding 

any other provision in this 

implementation plan, any credible 

evidence or information relevant as to 

whether the kiln would have been in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements if the appropriate 

performance or compliance test had 

been performed can be used to establish 

whether or not the owner/operator has 

violated or is in violation of any 

standard or applicable emission limit in 

the plan. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08883 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2013–0581; FRL–9926–52– 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Idaho: 

Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate 

Matter 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On June 28, 2010, the State of 

Idaho submitted a State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) revision to the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) to address 

certain interstate transport requirements 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA 

finds that the Idaho SIP meets the CAA 

interstate transport requirements that 

the SIP contain adequate provisions 

prohibiting air emissions that will 

contribute significantly to 

nonattainment or interfere with 

maintenance of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS in any other state. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

May 18, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR– 

2013–0581. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the http://

www.regulations.gov Web site. Although 

listed in the index, some information 

may not be publicly available, i.e., 

Confidential Business Information or 

other information the disclosure of 

which is restricted by statute. Certain 

other material, such as copyrighted 

material, is not placed on the Internet 

and will be publicly available only in 

hard copy form. Publicly available 

docket materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste, 

and Toxics, AWT–150, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The 

EPA requests that you contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
21182 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357, 

hall.kristin@epa.gov, or by using the 

above EPA, Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is 

intended to refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

In a notice of proposed rulemaking 

published on February 23, 2015 (80 FR 

9423), the EPA proposed to find that the 

Idaho SIP adequately addressed the 

interstate transport requirements of 

CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Please see 

our February 23, 2015, proposed 

rulemaking for further explanation and 

the basis for our finding. The public 

comment period for the proposed rule 

ended on March 25, 2015. No comments 

were received on the proposal. 

II. Final Action 

The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP 

meets the interstate transport 

requirements of CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS. This action is being 

taken under section 110 of the CAA. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the 

EPA’s role is to approve State choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves State law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by State law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

this action does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved to 

apply on any Indian reservation land or 

in any other area where the EPA or an 

Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a 

Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 16, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 6, 2015. 

Michelle L. Pirzadeh, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart N—Idaho 

■ 2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph 

(e) is amended by adding an entry at the 

end of the table for ‘‘Interstate Transport 

Requirements for the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.670 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 21183 

EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES

Name of SIP provision 

Applicable geographic 

or 

non-attainment area 

State 

submittal date EPA Approval date Comments 

*******

Interstate Transport Requirements for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

State-wide ................. 6/28/2010 4/17/2015 ..........................

[Insert Federal Register 

citation].

This action addresses the 

following CAA elements: 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). 

[FR Doc. 2015–08893 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0188; FRL–9926–31– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Michigan; SO2 Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a request by 

the Michigan Department of 

Environmental Quality (MDEQ) 

submitted on February 14, 2014, and 

supplemented on October 27, 2014, to 

revise the Michigan state 

implementation plan (SIP) to 

incorporate sulfur dioxide (SO2) limits 

found in Michigan’s Air Pollution 

Control Rules at Chapter 336, Part 4, 

‘‘Emissions Limitations and 

Prohibitions—Sulfur Bearing 

Compounds.’’ EPA will take no action 

on the provisions pertaining to the 

Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) 

SO2 trading program because CAIR is no 

longer in effect. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective June 16, 2015, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by May 18, 

2015. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2014–0188, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014– 

0188. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g. CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Charles 

Hatten, Environmental Engineer, (312) 

886–6031 before visiting the Region 5 

office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Hatten, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, 

hatten.charles@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this action? 

II. What did Michigan submit? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews 

I. What is the background for this 

action? 

On February 14, 2014, and October 

27, 2014, MDEQ submitted a request to 

incorporate revisions to the Part 4 rule 

in Michigan’s SO2 SIP. Specifically, the 

revisions to the Part 4 rule includes the 

removal of obsolete rule language, 

added definitions, and the consolidation 

of certain provisions for sources located 

in Wayne County. 

MDEQ published a Notice of Public 

Information in several newspapers and 

provided a 30-day public comment 

period on September 30, 2012, October 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES