alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

February 5, 1968

No. P68/39.

protest 66/1351 (New York).

#### Seaway Importing Co. and R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Beokworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of gunracks with drawers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hurricane Import Co.*and *Wheeler & Miller*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 210, C.D. 2577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 3 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 3

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1997

Mr. Thurmond introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is hereby proposed as 
an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the 
Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
individual or group prayer in public schools or other public 
institutions. No person shall be required by the United States or by 
any State to participate in prayer. Neither the United States nor any 
State shall compose the words of any prayer to be said in public 
schools.''.
                                 <all>
```
Year,Household net worthx1,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt total,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt Households,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt Businesses, Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt State and local govt's,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt Federal government
2005,61853,9.0,11.2,8.1,5.8,7.0
2006,66300,8.4,10.2,9.8,3.9,3.9
2007,66722,8.2,7.1,12.4,5.5,4.9
2008,56492,6.2,1.1,5.8,0.6,24.2
2009,58270,3.3,0.0,-4.3,4.0,22.7
2010,62458,4.1,-1.1,-0.9,2.3,20.2
2011,63879,3.6,-0.2,3.0,-1.7,11.4
2012,69864,5.0,1.5,4.8,-0.2,10.9
2013,79262,3.8,1.6,5.1,-1.3,6.5
2014,83296,4.3,2.9,6.0,-0.5,5.4
2013Q1,72619,4.1,0.7,3.5,1.9,9.1
2013Q2,74211,3.0,1.6,4.9,-0.2,3.5
2013Q3,76628,3.6,3.2,7.2,-3.7,2.6
2013Q4,79262,4.4,0.7,4.4,-3.3,10.5
2014Q1,80327,4.2,2.3,6.0,-1.3,6.0
2014Q2,81724,3.5,3.7,4.9,1.2,2.5
2014Q3,81650,4.4,2.9,5.0,-2.8,7.2
2014Q4,83296,4.9,2.8,7.7,1.1,5.4
2015Q1,84925,2.8,2.2,6.6,4.8,-0.4
<PAGE>
                                   TCSI CORPORATION

                                     EXHIBIT 11.1
                                           
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                                           
                 COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN PER SHARE CALCULATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,           September 30,
                                                      --------------------    -------------------
                                                         1997      1996          1997      1996
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------
(In thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>
Weighted average shares of common stock                 21,730    21,027        21,510    20,285

Common stock equivalents                                    --        --            --        --
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------

Shares used in calculation of earnings (loss) 
  per share                                             21,730    21,027        21,510    20,285
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------

Net loss                                               $  (493)  $(6,506)      $(1,973)  $(1,147)
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------

Loss per share                                         $ (0.02)  $ (0.31)      $ (0.09)  $ (0.06)
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------
                                                      ---------  ---------    ---------  --------
</TABLE>


                                     -33-
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.201 Special Drawing Rights SDRs Certificates and Treasury Currency  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
LineMonetary authority; SDR certificates issued by federal government; asset
	FA713014003
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	1Monetary authority; SDR certificates issued by federal government; asset
	FA713014003
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	2Federal government; Treasury currency; liability
	FA313112003
	-0.3
	0.0
	0.0
	-0.4
	-0.3
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	-0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	3Monetary authority; Treasury currency; asset
	FA713012003
	0.9
	0.7
	0.6
	0.7
	0.8
	1.3
	1.3
	1.3
	1.0
	0.6
	0.9
	4Instrument discrepancies; Treasury currency (seigniorage)
	FA903012005
	-1.1
	-0.7
	-0.6
	-1.1
	-1.1
	-1.3
	-1.3
	-1.3
	-1.0
	-0.6
	-0.9
	5 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 52774.

#### A. S. Leather Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 70950-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
From: mccfarm@monmouthnet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:15:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Grace McCrery

Monmouth, IL 61462
Exhibit 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the 1st Quarter 2004 ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan Parker
-------------------------
Alan Parker
Chief Financial Officer
July 2, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Andrew Hayden - Member 

AirOcean Aviation, LLC 

120 Church St 

Yalesville 

CT 06492 

June 1st, 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Part 135 / Part 91 Drug and Alcohol Prevention Programs 

To Whom it May Concern: 

Please accept this letter as request for an exemption from the requirement to maintain two drug 

and alcohol misuse prevention programs under 14 CFR Parts 135 and 91. We are a small Part 

135 Air Carrier Certificate holder (Certificate Number 6AOA132M) and also offer helicopter 

tours under FAR 91.147. We operate four aircraft, one under Part 135 and three under Part 91. 

We have a total of five pilots and three maintenance personnel of which several serve under 

both operations. 

The current requirement results in the possibility of individuals being randomly selected for 

testing for both operations at the same time. Maintaining two separate programs increases the 

expense to the company resulting in financial hardship. Granting our request will not adversely 

affect the safety of our operation as all personnel in safety sensitive positions will remain part 

of a testing program as required by both FAR Part 135 and FAR Part 91. 

One of our company Members, Pavel Bortnovskiy, acts as our DER and we utilize a third party 

consortium to directly oversee the drug and alcohol prevention programs ensuring compliance 

with regulations. This provides, in our opinion, the ability to manage all personnel under one 

testing program. We believe we will still meet the intended goals of the drug and alcohol 

prevention and monitoring for the Federal Aviation Administration. 

In addition we are aware that such exemptions have been granted to other similar operations. 

Reference: Solid Edge Aviation, LLC / Exemption number 9703 / Document ID FAA-2007-

0181-0001. 
If you need any further information or have any questions please feel free to contact me at any 

of the following: 

• Office: 203-294-8800 

• Fax: 203-294-8804 

• e-mail: andrew.hayden@airocean.com

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew Hayden 

Member
(Reap. Dec. 10554)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 2752, *etc.*

(Decided July 3, 1963)

*Richard Van Steenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been limited to the birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1954 and 1955, and entered at the port of New Orleans.

Counsel for the respective parties have stipulated that the merchandise and the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those which were before the court in *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers*Corporation, 46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent.

Consistent with the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the birch plywood in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the values set forth in column “4” of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each of said reappraisement cases set forth in the said schedule.

As to all other merchandise, except birch plywood exported from Finland in the years 1954 and 1955, included in the shipments covered by the entries involved herein, the appraised values are affirmed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 156

Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of the Senate pro

tempore, and the majority and minority leaders to make certain appointments after the sine die adjournment of the present session.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of

the Senate pro tempore, and the majority and minority

leaders to make certain appointments after the sine die

adjournment of the present session.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the sine die adjourn2 ment of the present session of the Congress, the President

3 of the Senate, the President of the Senate pro tempore,

4 the majority leader of the Senate, and the minority leader

5 of the Senate be, and they are hereby, authorized to make

6 appointments to commissions, committees, boards, con7 ferences, or interparliamentary conferences authorized by
2

SRES 156 ATS

1 law, by concurrent action of the two Houses, or by order

2 of the Senate.

Æ
No. 59845.

#### Thornley & Pitt *v.*United States,

protest 265291-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

phone: (206) 274-2800

fax: (206) 274-2801

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRIAN R. CARTMELL, in his capacity as

attorney-in-fact and agent acting on behalf of

the shareholder REPRESENTATIVE for the

former eNIC Corporation shareholders,

Plaintiff,

vs.

VERISIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

NO. CV02-2411C

STIPULATION AND ORDER

GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, the former shareholders of eNIC Corporation, by and through their

shareholder Representative, wish to file the proposed First Amended Complaint which is

attached to this stipulation as Exhibit A;

WHEREAS, the claims Brian Cartmell brought in the original complaint,

personally as an individual (but not as the shareholder Representative), are moot, and

accordingly those claims should be dismissed, but not any claims he may have by virtue

of being a former shareholder of eNIC Corporation; and

///

///

Case 2:02-cv-02411-JCC Document 105 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

phone: (206) 274-2800

fax: (206) 274-2801

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, defendant Verisign, Inc. consents to the foregoing subject to the

condition that VeriSign may respond without limitation to the proposed Amended

Complaint including, inter alia, by answer, counterclaim, or affirmative defense.

DATED this ____ day of July, 2005.

NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

By: Derek A. Newman

Derek A. Newman, 26967

Roger M. Townsend, 25525

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LANE POWELL PC

 

By: / s / with permission

John R. Neeleman, 19752

Gwendolyn C. Payton, 26752

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby ORDERS:

1. The former shareholders of eNIC Corporation, by and through their

shareholder Representative, may file a First Amended Complaint.

2. Brian Cartmell’s claims against Defendant brought on his own behalf, but

not any claims brought as the Shareholder Representative, are hereby dismissed without

prejudice, and without costs or fees to any party. Nothing contained in this stipulation or

order is intended to affect Mr. Cartmell’s rights or claims as shareholder Representative,

nor any rights or claims he may have by virtue of being a former shareholder of eNIC

Corporation.

3. VeriSign may respond without limitation to the proposed Amended

Complaint including, inter alia, by answer, counterclaim, or affirmative defense.

Dated this __9th_ day of August, 2005.

AUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02411-JCC Document 105 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.117 Private Pension Funds 1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, David P. Southwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

Date:
November 13, 2003

| |  | /s/DAVID P. SOUTHWELLDavid P. Southwell Chief Financial
Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
No. 58333.

protest 203016-K (San Francisco).

#### A. Giurlani & Bro. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the examiner testified that the merchandise consisted of cheese, made from sheep’s milk, in original loaves, and suitable for grating. In view of this testimony and on the authority of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503) and Abstract 57390, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**ANNUAL
      PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**LNR
      PARTNERS, INC.**





**Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement**


**dated
      as of July 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”), by and among**


**Banc
      of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., as Depositor, Bank of America,
      N.A.,**


**as
      Master Servicer, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee and
      REMIC**


**Administrator,
      ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as Fiscal Agent**


**and
      LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer**


**(BACM
      2005-3)**








The
      undersigned, Susan K. Chapman, as Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc., a
      Florida Corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the
      Agreement, does hereby certify on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of
      the
      activities of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and of the
      Company’s performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;
      (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      from the Closing Date and through such period ended December 31, 2005; and
      (iii)
      the Company has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging
      the
      status, of any Component Mortgage Loan REMIC, REMIC I, REMIC II, as a REMIC
      from
      the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate
      as
      of the 1st day of March, 2006.














/s/
      Susan K.
      Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President


LNR
      Partners,
      Inc.
|   | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-183687) pertaining to the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan of DHT Holdings, Inc., |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-175351) pertaining to the 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan of DHT Holdings, Inc., |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-167613) pertaining to the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan of DHT Holdings, Inc., |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-176669) of DHT Holdings, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (5) | Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-166765) of DHT Holdings, Inc. and in the related Prospectus; |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|