# Official Journal C 80/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.080.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 80 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5517 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.080.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 80

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5517 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2012/C 080/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 73, 10.3.2012 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 080/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 73, 10.3.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2012/C 080/02 | Case C-545/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Convention defining the Statute of the European Schools — Interpretation and application of Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1) — Right of seconded teachers to access to the same progression in status and pay as those enjoyed by their national counterparts — Exclusion of certain teachers seconded by the United Kingdom to the European Schools from access to improved pay scales and other additional payments available to their national counterparts — Incompatibility with Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1)) | 2 |
| 2012/C 080/03 | Case C-210/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Márton Urbán v Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága (Road transport — Breach of the rules on the use of the tachograph — Obligation on Member States to establish proportionate penalties — Flat-rate fine — Proportionality of the penalty) | 2 |
| 2012/C 080/04 | Case C-249/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC) (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Articles 2(7), 9(5) and 17(3) — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling) | 3 |
| 2012/C 080/05 | Case C-277/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directives 93/83/EEC, 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC and 2006/116/EC — Sharing of the rights to exploit a cinematographic work, by contract, between the principal director and the producer of the work — National legislation allotting those rights, exclusively and by operation of law, to the film producer — Possibility of departing from that rule by an agreement between the parties — Subsequent rights to remuneration) | 4 |
| 2012/C 080/06 | Case C-553/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 2 November 2011 — Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder | 5 |
| 2012/C 080/07 | Case C-601/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2011 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 9 September 2011 in Case T-257/07 France v Commission | 5 |
| 2012/C 080/08 | Case C-609/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-427/09 centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 6 |
| 2012/C 080/09 | Case C-610/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-434/09 Centrotherm Systemtechnik v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 7 |
| 2012/C 080/10 | Case C-614/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 30 November 2011 — Niederösterreichische Landes-Landwirtschaftskammer v Anneliese Kuso | 8 |
| 2012/C 080/11 | Case C-628/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2011 — Proceedings for a financial penalty against International Jet Management GmbH | 9 |
| 2012/C 080/12 | Case C-642/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — EOOD Stroy Trans v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — gr. Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia po Prihodite | 9 |
| 2012/C 080/13 | Case C-643/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varneski administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — LVK-56 ЕООD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — grad Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihodite | 10 |
| 2012/C 080/14 | Case C-645/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2011 — Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir and Others | 11 |
| 2012/C 080/15 | Case C-664/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Serveis en Impressió i Retolació Vargas, S.L. v Banco Mare Nostrum, S.A. | 11 |
| 2012/C 080/16 | Case C-665/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Alfonso Carlos Amselem Almor v NCG Banco, S.A. | 12 |
| 2012/C 080/17 | Case C-4/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna (Italy) lodged on 2 January 2012 — Danilo Tola v Ministero della Difesa | 12 |
| 2012/C 080/18 | Case C-23/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Latvia) lodged on 17 January 2012 — Mohamad Zakaria | 12 |
| 2012/C 080/19 | Case C-48/12: Action brought on 31 January 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 13 |
| 2012/C 080/20 | Case C-50/12 P: Appeal brought on 1 February 2012 by Kendrion NV against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 November 2011 in Case T-54/06 Kendrion v Commission | 14 |
| | General Court |
| 2012/C 080/21 | Case T-76/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation) | 15 |
| 2012/C 080/22 | Case T-77/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Dow Chemical v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation) | 15 |
| 2012/C 080/23 | Case T-83/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Proof of participation in the cartel — Proof of having distanced oneself from the cartel — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Guidelines on the method of setting — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expectation — Principle of proportionality — Mitigating circumstances) | 16 |
| 2012/C 080/24 | Case T-321/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — skytron energy v OHIM (arraybox) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark arraybox — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 16 |
| 2012/C 080/25 | Case T-469/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenses excluded from Community financing — Tomato processing and rice storage sectors — Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes — Principle of proportionality) | 16 |
| 2012/C 080/26 | Case T-305/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Hartmann-Lamboy v OHIM — Diptyque (DYNIQUE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DYNIQUE — Earlier Community word mark DIPTYQUE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 17 |
| 2012/C 080/27 | Case T-387/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Goutier v OHIM — Euro Data (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARANTAX — Earlier national word mark ANTAX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 17 |
| 2012/C 080/28 | Case T-424/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Dosenbach-Ochsner v OHIM — Sisma (Representation of elephants in a rectangle) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark representing elephants in a rectangle — Earlier international and national figurative marks representing an elephant and earlier national word mark elefanten — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distinctive character of the earlier marks) | 17 |
| 2012/C 080/29 | Case T-596/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA-Europe (EuroBasket) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark EuroBasket — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 18 |
| 2012/C 080/30 | Case T-64/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Run2 — Earlier Community word and figurative marks RUN2DAY — Earlier BENELUX figurative mark RUN2DATE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 18 |
| 2012/C 080/31 | Case T-315/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2012 — Groupe Partouche v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility) | 18 |
| 2012/C 080/32 | Case T-607/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2012 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision refusing to transmit documents to a national competition authority — Application for interim measures — No interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Measures requested not provisional in character — Inadmissibility) | 19 |
| 2012/C 080/33 | Case T-637/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — Euris Consult v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Public services contract — Tendering procedure — Services of translation into Maltese — Rejection of a tender — Arrangements for communication — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable damage — Lack of urgency) | 19 |
| 2012/C 080/34 | Case T-674/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — TV2/Danmark v Commission | 19 |
| 2012/C 080/35 | Case T-1/12: Action brought on 2 January 2012 — France v Commission | 20 |
| 2012/C 080/36 | Case T-18/12: Action brought on 9 January 2012 — Interbev v European Commission | 21 |
| 2012/C 080/37 | Case T-22/12: Action brought on 16 January 2012 — Fomanu v OHIM (Qualität hat Zukunft) | 22 |
| 2012/C 080/38 | Case T-26/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — PT Musim Mas v Council | 22 |
| 2012/C 080/39 | Case T-29/12: Action brought on 17 January 2012 — Bauer v OHIM — BenQ Materials (Daxon) | 23 |
| 2012/C 080/40 | Case T-33/12: Action brought on 23 January 2012 — Piotrowski v OHIM (MEDIGYM) | 24 |
| 2012/C 080/41 | Case T-34/12: Action brought on 25 January 2012 — Herbacin cosmetic v OHIM — Laboratoire Garnier (HERBA SHINE) | 24 |
| 2012/C 080/42 | Case T-36/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — Athens Resort Casino v Commission | 25 |
| 2012/C 080/43 | Case T-43/12: Action brought on 30 January 2012 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council | 25 |
| 2012/C 080/44 | Case T-337/09: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2012 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission | 26 |
| 2012/C 080/45 | Case T-298/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Ghost Brand v OHIM — Procter & Gamble International Operations (GHOST) | 26 |
| 2012/C 080/46 | Case T-300/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Otto v OHIM — Nalsani (TOTTO) | 26 |
| 2012/C 080/47 | Case T-362/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission | 26 |
| 2012/C 080/48 | Case T-397/11: Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Symfiliosi v FRA | 26 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2012/C 080/02

Case C-545/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Convention defining the Statute of the European Schools — Interpretation and application of Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1) — Right of seconded teachers to access to the same progression in status and pay as those enjoyed by their national counterparts — Exclusion of certain teachers seconded by the United Kingdom to the European Schools from access to improved pay scales and other additional payments available to their national counterparts — Incompatibility with Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1))

2

2012/C 080/03

Case C-210/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Márton Urbán v Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága (Road transport — Breach of the rules on the use of the tachograph — Obligation on Member States to establish proportionate penalties — Flat-rate fine — Proportionality of the penalty)

2

2012/C 080/04

Case C-249/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC) (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Articles 2(7), 9(5) and 17(3) — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling)

3

2012/C 080/05

Case C-277/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directives 93/83/EEC, 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC and 2006/116/EC — Sharing of the rights to exploit a cinematographic work, by contract, between the principal director and the producer of the work — National legislation allotting those rights, exclusively and by operation of law, to the film producer — Possibility of departing from that rule by an agreement between the parties — Subsequent rights to remuneration)

4

2012/C 080/06

Case C-553/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 2 November 2011 — Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder

5

2012/C 080/07

Case C-601/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2011 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 9 September 2011 in Case T-257/07 France v Commission

5

2012/C 080/08

Case C-609/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-427/09 centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

6

2012/C 080/09

Case C-610/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-434/09 Centrotherm Systemtechnik v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

7

2012/C 080/10

Case C-614/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 30 November 2011 — Niederösterreichische Landes-Landwirtschaftskammer v Anneliese Kuso

8

2012/C 080/11

Case C-628/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2011 — Proceedings for a financial penalty against International Jet Management GmbH

9

2012/C 080/12

Case C-642/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — EOOD Stroy Trans v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — gr. Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia po Prihodite

9

2012/C 080/13

Case C-643/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varneski administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — LVK-56 ЕООD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — grad Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihodite

10

2012/C 080/14

Case C-645/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2011 — Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir and Others

11

2012/C 080/15

Case C-664/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Serveis en Impressió i Retolació Vargas, S.L. v Banco Mare Nostrum, S.A.

11

2012/C 080/16

Case C-665/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Alfonso Carlos Amselem Almor v NCG Banco, S.A.

12

2012/C 080/17

Case C-4/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna (Italy) lodged on 2 January 2012 — Danilo Tola v Ministero della Difesa

12

2012/C 080/18

Case C-23/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Latvia) lodged on 17 January 2012 — Mohamad Zakaria

12

2012/C 080/19

Case C-48/12: Action brought on 31 January 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

13

2012/C 080/20

Case C-50/12 P: Appeal brought on 1 February 2012 by Kendrion NV against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 November 2011 in Case T-54/06 Kendrion v Commission

Kendrion v Commission

14

General Court

2012/C 080/21

Case T-76/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

15

2012/C 080/22

Case T-77/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Dow Chemical v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

15

2012/C 080/23

Case T-83/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Proof of participation in the cartel — Proof of having distanced oneself from the cartel — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Guidelines on the method of setting — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expectation — Principle of proportionality — Mitigating circumstances)

16

2012/C 080/24

Case T-321/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — skytron energy v OHIM (arraybox) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark arraybox — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

16

2012/C 080/25

Case T-469/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenses excluded from Community financing — Tomato processing and rice storage sectors — Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes — Principle of proportionality)

16

2012/C 080/26

Case T-305/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Hartmann-Lamboy v OHIM — Diptyque (DYNIQUE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DYNIQUE — Earlier Community word mark DIPTYQUE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2012/C 080/27

Case T-387/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Goutier v OHIM — Euro Data (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARANTAX — Earlier national word mark ANTAX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

17

2012/C 080/28

Case T-424/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Dosenbach-Ochsner v OHIM — Sisma (Representation of elephants in a rectangle) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark representing elephants in a rectangle — Earlier international and national figurative marks representing an elephant and earlier national word mark elefanten — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distinctive character of the earlier marks)

17

2012/C 080/29

Case T-596/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA-Europe (EuroBasket) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark EuroBasket — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 080/30

Case T-64/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Run2 — Earlier Community word and figurative marks RUN2DAY — Earlier BENELUX figurative mark RUN2DATE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 080/31

Case T-315/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2012 — Groupe Partouche v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility)

18

2012/C 080/32

Case T-607/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2012 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision refusing to transmit documents to a national competition authority — Application for interim measures — No interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Measures requested not provisional in character — Inadmissibility)

19

2012/C 080/33

Case T-637/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — Euris Consult v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Public services contract — Tendering procedure — Services of translation into Maltese — Rejection of a tender — Arrangements for communication — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable damage — Lack of urgency)

19

2012/C 080/34

Case T-674/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — TV2/Danmark v Commission

19

2012/C 080/35

Case T-1/12: Action brought on 2 January 2012 — France v Commission

20

2012/C 080/36

Case T-18/12: Action brought on 9 January 2012 — Interbev v European Commission

21

2012/C 080/37

Case T-22/12: Action brought on 16 January 2012 — Fomanu v OHIM (Qualität hat Zukunft)

22

2012/C 080/38

Case T-26/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — PT Musim Mas v Council

22

2012/C 080/39

Case T-29/12: Action brought on 17 January 2012 — Bauer v OHIM — BenQ Materials (Daxon)

23

2012/C 080/40

Case T-33/12: Action brought on 23 January 2012 — Piotrowski v OHIM (MEDIGYM)

24

2012/C 080/41

Case T-34/12: Action brought on 25 January 2012 — Herbacin cosmetic v OHIM — Laboratoire Garnier (HERBA SHINE)

24

2012/C 080/42

Case T-36/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — Athens Resort Casino v Commission

25

2012/C 080/43

Case T-43/12: Action brought on 30 January 2012 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

25

2012/C 080/44

Case T-337/09: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2012 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission

26

2012/C 080/45

Case T-298/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Ghost Brand v OHIM — Procter & Gamble International Operations (GHOST)

26

2012/C 080/46

Case T-300/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Otto v OHIM — Nalsani (TOTTO)

26

2012/C 080/47

Case T-362/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

26

2012/C 080/48

Case T-397/11: Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Symfiliosi v FRA

26

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN