alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 61 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 61

 Authorizing printing of a revised edition of the publication entitled 
                             ``Our Flag''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 1997

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Ford) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing printing of a revised edition of the publication entitled 
                             ``Our Flag''.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the publication entitled ``Our Flag'', 
revised under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall 
be reprinted as a Senate document.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 250,000 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 51,500 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the publication for the use of the 
        Joint Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the publication for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $150,000, such number of copies of the 
        publication as does not exceed total printing and production 
        costs of $150,000, with distribution to be allocated in the 
        same proportion as in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Management and performancehighlights**
 
2001 | 2002
 
SuDoc Number:NS 1.1/7:
Item Number:0834-B-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000649355
 
December 30, 2019
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00789-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/16/07 Page 7 of 7
July 6 , 2015

Mr. Lawrence L. Rolfs

Flying Tiger Aviation, LLC

P.O. Box 238

Oak Ridge, LA 71264

Dear Mr. Rolfs :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 9 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0921 ),

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 5 Filed 03/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 161 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 161

                     To amend Senate Resolution 48.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

 Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                     To amend Senate Resolution 48.

    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 48, 105th Congress, agreed to 
February 4, 1997, is amended--
            (1) in section 1(e), by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$10,000''; and
            (2) in sections 1(e) and 1(g), by striking ``September 30, 
        1997'' and inserting ``September 30, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NETFLIX, INC.,

Appellant

v.

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES 

PTE. LIMITED,

Appellee

______________________

2022-1800, 2022-2208

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-

01582, IPR2021-00542.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

HARPER BATTS, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton 

LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY LIANG, CHRISTOPHER SCOTT PONDER. 

 DAN YOUNG, Quarles & Brady LLP, Littleton, CO, argued for appellee. Also represented by KENT DALLOW; 

CHAD KING, King IAM LLC, Lone Tree, CO. 

 ______________________

Case: 22-1800 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2024
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, HUGHES, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 11, 2024

Date

Case: 22-1800 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 03/11/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   VANS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended November 29, 2003 of Vans, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
J. Blechman, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                    /s/ Scott J. Blechman*
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Scott J. Blechman
                                                    Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    January 8, 2004

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vans, Inc. and will be retained by Vans, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 64642.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3100 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of Panel Decision.

# SUMMARY:

On October 5, 2023, the Binational Panel issued its Decision in the matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances (Secretariat File Number: USA-CDA-2017-1904-03). The Binational Panel affirmed in part and remanded in part the Department of Commerce's Final Determination.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-2311.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to provide judicial review of the trade remedy determination being challenged and then issue a binding Panel Decision. There are established                     *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews,*                     which were adopted by the three governments for panels requested pursuant to Article 1904(2) of NAFTA. The notice of this Binational Panel's Decision is being published pursuant to Rule 70. For the complete Rules, please see                     *https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/​secretariat/​agreement-accord-acuerdo/​nafta-alena-tlcan/​rules-regles-reglas/​article-article-articulo_​1904.aspx?​lang=​eng.*

Dated: October 6, 2023.

Vidya Desai,

U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2023-22599 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHARLES and LAURA GORMAN et al.,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

NATIONAL CITY HOME LOAN

SERVICES, INC.,

 Defendant.

 C06-618 RSL

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-618 RSL and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 27th day of June, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00618-RSL Document 6 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 105/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 105 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5823 April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 105

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5823 April 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Rules of procedure of the General Court | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Rules of procedure of the General Court

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 138

Authorizing expenditures for consultants by the Committee on Rules and

Administration.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 23, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself, and Mr. FORD) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing expenditures for consultants by the Committee

on Rules and Administration.

1 Resolved, That section 16(b) of Senate Resolution 54,

2 105th Congress, agreed to February 13, 1997, is amended

3 by striking ‘‘$300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$400,000’’.

Æ
No. 66584.

#### R. C. Allen Business Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 313354-K, 316278-K, and 329493-K (Los Angeles).

*379Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of adding machines in chief value of metal having an electric motor as an essential feature, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 126 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 181
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 126

                          [Report No. 105-87]

  Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 1997

  Mr. Specter, from the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, reported the 
    following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs.

    Resolved, That section 18(b) of Senate Resolution 54, 105th 
Congress, agreed to February 13, 1997, is amended by striking out 
``$1,123,430'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``$1,698,430''.




                                                       Calendar No. 181

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 126

                          [Report No. 105-87]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 1997

                         Placed on the calendar`
Order entered September 1 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01504 - CV KATRINA MCPHERSON, Appellant

V. MELISSA LOPEZ, Appellee On Appeal from the County Co urt at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 05725 - E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 16, 2019 third motion for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 15, 2019

. We caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
From: eashirley@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:33:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Shirley

Minneapolis, MN 55416
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 246

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States

Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber

of the United States Senate.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole

5 and specific purpose of permitting an official photograph

6 to be taken of the United States Senate in actual session

7 on a date and time to be announced by the Majority Lead8 er after consultation with the Democratic Leader.

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements
2

SRES 246 ATS

1 therefor, which arrangements shall provide for a minimum

2 of disruption to Senate proceedings.

Æ
**Exhibit        32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT**

**TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  SafeStitch                  Medical, Inc. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |                                                                                                                                           |                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                                                  | /s/ Adam                S.                Jackson |
|   | Adam                    S. JacksonChief                    Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)November                    12, 2008 |

----