alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with this Annual Report of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K for the year ending August
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Reno R. Rollé, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
      Such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ending August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
      The information contained in such amended Yearly
Report on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc.








Dated: 
      December 14, 2009





RED
ROCK PICTURES HOLDINGS INC.





By:
      /s/ Reno
      RolléReno
      RolléPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,
              and
      Director
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 70919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 172

[Docket No. FDA-2003-F-0321]


Kerry Inc.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing 
that we have filed a petition, submitted by Kerry, Inc., proposing that 
the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 
sodium alginate as a stabilizer and thickener in plant protein products 
at a level not to exceed 3 percent.

DATES: The food additive petition was filed on August 9, 2023.

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the 
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document into 
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts, and/or go to the Dockets 
Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Kampmeyer, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus 
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 409(b)(5) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), we are giving notice that 
we have filed a food additive petition (FAP 3A4836), submitted on 
behalf of Kerry Inc., by ToxStrategies, LLC, 739 Thornapple Dr., 
Naperville, IL 60540. The petition proposes to amend the food additive 
regulations in part 172 (21 CFR part 172) ``Food Additives Permitted 
for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption'' to provide for the 
safe use of sodium alginate as a stabilizer and thickener in plant 
protein products (as defined in 21 CFR 170.3(n)(33)) at a level not to 
exceed 3 percent.
    The petitioner has claimed that this action is categorically 
excluded under 21 CFR 25.32(k) because the substance is intended to 
remain in food through ingestion by consumers and that is not intended 
to replace macronutrients in food. In addition, the petitioner has 
stated that, to their knowledge, no extraordinary circumstances exist. 
If FDA determines a categorical exclusion applies, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required. If FDA determines a categorical exclusion does not apply, we 
will request an environmental assessment and make it available for 
public inspection.

    Dated: October 6, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22637 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

Evelyn Morash [evmor62@aol.com] 

Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:34 PM 

Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

Blue/red Connector line 

As a lifelong East Boston resident I heartily endorse the Blue/Red line connector tunnel. The Blue line is probably one of 

the heaviest user of our new populations who are working two jobs and coming home late at night. The connector would 

be a blessing for many of these East Boston residents. 

Evelyn Morash 

62 Putnam Street 

East Boston, MA 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject:
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.100 Domestic Nonfinancial Sectors 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.107 Financial Business 1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 157 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 157

   Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President for the 
  courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided 
                 over the deliberations of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President for the 
  courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided 
                 over the deliberations of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
Honorable Al Gore, Vice President of the United States and President of 
the Senate, for the courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in which 
he has presided over its deliberations during the first session of the 
One Hundred Fifth Congress.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 38A/17 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 38A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5217 February 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 38A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5217 February 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2009/C 038A/01 | Call for expression of interest for Contract Agents for temporary assignments (EMEA, London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2009/C 038A/01

Call for expression of interest for Contract Agents for temporary assignments (EMEA, London)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[English Translation]
 Confirmation Letter
  1.
    
    Yu WeiID number: 3101061973101508122.
    
    Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co., Ltd. (Focus Media Advertisement)Registered address: Rm. 1003F, No. 1027 Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai3.
    
    Focus Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Focus Media Technology)Registered address: Block E, Rm. 1003, No. 1027 Changning Road, Changning District,
Shanghai4.
    
    Focus Media Digital Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.(Focus Media Digital)Registered address: Rm. A72, 28/F, No. 369 Jiangsu Road, Changning District, Shanghai5.
    
    Shanghai Perfect Media Advertising Agency Co., Ltd.(Shanghai Perfect Media)Registered address: Rm. A68, 28/F, No. 369 Jiangsu Road, Changning District, Shanghai
  1.
    
    Jiang Nanchun, Yu Wei, Focus Media Technology, Focus Media Digital, Focus Media Advertisement
and other relevant parties have executed the agreements listed under Annex I of this
Confirmation Letter (collectively referred to as Control Agreements).2.
    
    Shanghai Perfect Media, Yu Wei, Focus Media Advertisement have participated in the Control Agreements by
execution of the Acknowledgement Letters for Participation on May 22, 2006, therefore becoming
a party of the Control Agreements in connection with Shanghai Perfect Media.3.
    
    As part of the Acknowledgement Letters for Participation mentioned above, Focus Media
Advertisement, Yu Wei, Focus Media Technology and Shanghai Perfect Media executed the
Acknowledgement Letter for Participation of the Call Option Agreement on May 22, 2006 (known
as Acknowledgement Letter for Participation)




---



##### 



Annex I
 Control Agreements
 1.
    
    Jiang Nanchun, Yu Wei, Focus Media Advertisement, Focus Media Technology, Focus Media Digital
and other relevant parties executed the Equity Pledge Agreement on March 28, 2005.2.
    
    Jiang Nanchun, Yu Wei, Focus Media Advertisement, Focus Media Technology and other relevant
parties executed the Call Option Agreement on March 28, 2005.3.
    
    Jiang Nanchun, Yu Wei, Focus Media Advertisement, Focus Media Technology and other relevant
parties executed the Shareholders Voting Rights Proxy Agreement on March 28, 2005.




---



##### 



[Signature Page]
  Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co., Ltd.
 /s/Alex Deyi Yang
 Yu Wei
 /s/Yu Wei
 Focus Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
 /s/ Alex Deyi Yang
 Focus Media Digital Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
 /s/ Alex Deyi Yang
 Shanghai Perfect Media Advertising Agency Co., Ltd.
 /s/ Alex Deyi Yang
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenville Federal Financial
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: September 25, 2008
    /s/ Susan J. AllreadSusan J. AllreadChief Financial Officer and Secretary
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR Submission of Waiver and Authorization Measures into the California SIP

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V

– Criteria for Determining the Completeness of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

2.1(a) Submi ttal Letter from Governor's Designee YES See letter from Richard Corey

, ARB Executive Officer

.
2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption YES See enclosed ARB Resolution 1 5

- 40

. 2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation YES See ARB Resolution 1 5

- 40

. 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan for ozone

c. C ontingency measures, d. T ransportation control conformity budgets

c. V ehicle Miles T raveled offset demonstration d. Reason ably Available Control Measure analysis NO Not applicable.

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with S tate's Procedural Requirements YES See ARB Resolution 1 5

- 40

.

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 YES See public noti ce and proof of publication in the ARB public notice published to web on June 19 , 2015 at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/wsh /waivernotice.pdf
2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in Accordance with Notice YES See A R B Resolution 1 5

- 40

.

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses YES T he re were no public comments for the ARB B oard adoption

. See Board Meeting Comment Log.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant NO Not applicable.

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status NO Not applicable.

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissio ns NO Not applicable.

2.2(d) Demonstra tion that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS NO Not applicable.

2.2(e) Modeling Support NO Not applicable.

2.2(f)

- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification NO Not applicable.

W: \ Federal Liaison

-- General \ Lawsuits and Court Cases \ Waiver Excercise \ Submittal to EPA \ SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist.doc
Appendix B. SCR Cost Survey Results

Discussion of OAQPS Cost Manual Method for AQCS Estimationsubmitted to the NM Environment Department by Public Service of NM regarding BART for the San Juahttp://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/reghaz/documents/03292008DiscussionofOAQPSCostManualMethod

SCR Capital Cost Survey Results 

from Table 7-1. of CURRENT CAPITAL COST AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POWER PLANT 

Prepared by J. Edward Cichanowicz for Utility Air Regulatory Group, June, 200

Referen

Average and Low-High Cost Observations 

Capital, MW (

2006 Basi

ce $/kW, 

s) Observed ($/kW)

Cost Basis

Hoskin

2003

s, 128 (400 MW) 80-160 2002. 15 of 20 reported unit costs exce

relationship of unit cost a

Cichanow

, 2004

icz 84 (600-899 MW

(100-399 M

) to 128 

W) 56-185 2003. For four categories of generating 

units were among the firs

Marano

2006

, 118 (>900) to 16

MW)

7 (<300 Most co

to be wit

sts reported 

hin 100-200

2005. “Units with a capacity of 600 to 90

difficult to retrofit than those in o

Estimation of Costs and Impacts of NOx Control Technologies Applied to the PGE Boardman Planhttp://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/haze/docs/ergMemo.pdf

Referen

Average and Low-High Cost Observations 

Capital, MW (

2006 Basi

ce $/kW, 

s) Observed ($/kW)

Cost Basis

ERG 2008 227 207 - 267 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the accompanyingreport of Legal Life Plans, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2013 (the “Report”),I, David Luther, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

Dated: October 22, 2013
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 274

To express the sense of the Senate that the Louisville Festival of Faiths

should be commended and should serve as a model for similar festivals

in other communities throughout the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1998

Mr. FORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that the Louisville Festival of Faiths should be commended and should serve

as a model for similar festivals in other communities

throughout the United States.

Whereas a Festival of Faiths celebrating the diversity of religion has been held in Louisville, Kentucky, in the month

of November of each of the last 3 years;

Whereas the Louisville Festival of Faiths has provided an opportunity for representatives of different faiths to communicate with each other and learn about each other’s

heritage, experiences, and beliefs;

Whereas more than 60 faiths have participated in the Louisville Festival of Faiths over the past 3 years;
2

•SRES 274 IS

Whereas the freedom to practice religion in diverse ways is

a principle that the United States was founded on and

one that the United States has embraced throughout its

history;

Whereas religious diversity, in addition to its other benefits,

expands the perspectives and experiences available to this

Nation as a whole;

Whereas the communication of diverse perspectives and experiences between representatives of different religions can

enrich the lives of such individuals and can assist such

individuals in developing an appreciation of the commonality between different religions;

Whereas such communication can also diminish the potential

for conflict between religious groups at a time when the

dangers of religious conflict pose increasingly serious

problems throughout the world; and

Whereas the Louisville Festival of Faiths experience can be

replicated without great difficulty in other communities:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Louisville Festival of Faiths—

3 (1) should be commended for its concept and its

4 achievements to date; and

5 (2) should serve as a model for similar festivals

6 in other communities throughout the United States.

Æ
No. 59282.

protest 217439-K (San Francisco).

#### S & D Ades Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of so-called silk squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the 2nd Quarter 2004 ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan Parker
---------------------------
Alan Parker
Chief Financial Officer
August 23, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Edward S. DESMORE, Sr., Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-7042.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 7, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Edward S. Desmore, Sr. appeals from the October 31, 2000 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Appeal No. 00-1290, dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction because he filed his Notice of Appeal (NOA) from the Board of Veterans Appeals out of time. We *dismiss.*

The government asserts that Desmore’s appeal challenges only factual determinations or the application of law to the facts of the case, and is thus beyond our jurisdiction. As the government notes, we are a court of limited jurisdiction marked out by Congress. *See Livingston v. Derwinski,*959 F.2d 224, 225 (Fed.Cir.1992). We have jurisdiction to review the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decisions regarding “the validity of any statute or regulation ... or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied on by the [Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims] in making the decision,” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); and except for appeals presenting constitutional issues, we may not “review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular ease.... ” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). If Desmore does not meet these requirements, we must dismiss his appeal.

Desmore argues that the Board of Veterans Appeals issued two decisions in his case on January 3, 2000, and that he did not receive the decision that is the subject of this appeal until March 10, 2000, when that decision was faxed to his personal representative. As a result, he contends that March 10, 2000, should be used to determine his compliance with the requirement that an NOA must be filed within 120 days after the Board of Veterans Appeals decision is mailed to an appellant. 38 U.S.C. § 7266; Ct.App. Vet. Cl. R. Pract. & Proc. 4. The Veterans Court found that the Board of Veterans Appeals mailed both versions of the January 3, 2000, Board of Veterans Appeals decision to Desmore’s last known address. It then applied Rule 4 of the Veterans Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, and determined that Desmore had not filed his NOA in time. 38 U.S.C. § 7266. The factual finding that the two decisions were mailed on January 3, 2000, and the application of the filing statute and rule to that factual finding are beyond our jurisdiction.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JOHN HENRY DAVIS,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1741-RSM-JPD

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

On February 3, 2006, petitioner filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel. Dkt. No. 16. This

motion shall be noted for February 24, 2005, which is the date the petition is noted for

consideration. The Court will consider the motion and the petition together at such time. See

Local Rule CR 7.

DATED this 10th day of February, 2006.

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of the Court

/s/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01741-RSM Document 17 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1