alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64615.

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 66353-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
PRESERVATION PRINCIPLES

Smith Prairie

Location and Access

Divided by the reserve boundary, most of Smith Prairie is located outside the reserve. The small portion that is within the

reserve is bounded on the west by the forest of the East Woodlands.

A 600-acre open area enclosed by forest, Smith Prairie is the primary south entry to the reserve. Access is along

Highway 20, which cuts across the prairie.

Significance and Integrity

The early donation claims of Joseph Smith and John Kineth filled the small portion of the prairie land inside the reserve.

One of the first roads on the reserve (1854) linked Ebey's claim and Smith's claim. The Kineth farm complex, located

along the old wagon road from Coupeville to Langley, is in its original location with a number of original outbuildings

remaining on the complex. The land itself, while used for agriculture, was never as productive as the other prairies, and

as a result, less intensive pasture and grazing replaced market crop production. That pattern continues today and a variety

agricultural land uses remain, including a tree farm, state game farm, feed crops, some pasture and natural open areas.

The presence of these land uses and the remaining farm complex reflects a continuity of land use that contributes to the

historic integrity of the landscape.

Preservation Principles

Preservation principles for Smith Prairie focus on maintaining its naturally open and historically rural character.

1. In order to maintain the open nature and overall visual qualities of the prairie, maintain existing agricultural land

use designation and existing historic structures.

2. In order to minimize other potential visual impacts on the prairie, any new structures not associated with existing

complexes should be located along the edges of the prairie.

3. To support the historic and natural "low profile" of the prairie landscape, development of hedgerows along

existing fence lines or in lieu of new fence materials is encouraged.

View of Smith Prairie looking northwest from Highway 20. Tree farm is in the foreground.

NEXT>>> Penn Cove

http://www.nps.gov/ebla/rcl/rcl6e.htm

Last Updated: 07-Jun-2000

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve

Reading the Cultural Landscape

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve: Reading the Cultural Landscape Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20080513141307/http://www.nps.gov/archive/ebla/rcl/rcl6e.htm 11/29/2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED LEASING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOBBY G. PADGETT, II, et al.,

Defendants.

 NO. 05-2126JLR

 ORDER

 

The court has received Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 11). As

Plaintiff admits, the parties have not yet commenced discovery. Defendants show that they

have had no opportunity to test the evidence underlying Plaintiff’s claims, or to develop

evidence to support their defenses. The court therefore DENIES Plaintiff’s motion without

prejudice to raising these issues again after the parties have had an opportunity to conduct

meaningful discovery.

Dated this 27th day of April, 2006.

A 

James L. Robart

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02126-JLR Document 23 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES G. KINNEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PHILIP GUTIERREZ,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 56750

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 07440

- DMG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN , and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Charles G. Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his action seeking a declaratory judgment . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal on the basis of judicial

immunity

. Romano v. Bible , 169 F.3d 1182, 118 6 (9th Cir. 1999)

. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

e xcept as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kinney’s request for oral

argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. 

# FILED

DEC 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 56750

The district court properly dismissed Kinney’s claims against Judge

Gutierrez on the basis of judicial immunity. See Duvall v. County of Kitsap , 260

F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to whether an act is

judicial in n ature and subject to judicial immunity). Contrary to Kinney’s

contention

, Judge Gutierrez was not acting in a ministerial or administrative

capacity when he issued the remand orders.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint

without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. Cervantes v.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth

standard of review and expl aining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper

when amendment would be futile).

We reject as unsupported by the record Kinney’s contention that the district

judge was biased.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
No. 67185.

protests 58/9831, etc. (New York).

#### The Glemby Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon hair nets similar in use to manufactures of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### Tribal NSR Rule **Tribal NSR Rule**

**- Summary of Comments Presentation**  **Summary of Comments Presentation Jessica Montanez**  **Jessica Montanez to:**  **King, Heidi R. 11/10/2010 04:44 PM**  **Cc: Raj Rao**  **Heidi, Per your conversation with Raj earlier today, I am attaching a summary of the comments we received on**  **the main issues in the Tribal NSR Rule. Please let us know if you have any questions.**
**Jessica**

**TribalNSRRulesCommentsSummary111010.ppt Jessica Montañez**  **Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Policy Division**  **New Source Review Group 109 TW Alexander Drive MD: C504-03 RTP, NC 27711**  **Phone: 919-541-3407, Fax: 919-541-5509 Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy .**  **Looking for a speaker for your school or community event? http://www.epa.gov/rtpspeakers/**
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARK W. KILBOURNE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2020-1429

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:18-cv-04619-JSW, 

Judge Jeffrey S. White.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

ROBERT JAMES MCAUGHAN, JR., McAughan Deaver 

PLLC, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also 

represented by ALBERT BERTON DEAVER, JR. 

 JOSEPH A. HYNDS, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, 

PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by JENNIFER NOCK. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 20-1429 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 11/04/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

November 4, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1429 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 11/04/2020
Before the Second Division,

October 11, 1956

No. 60281.

protest 284796-K (Boston).

#### Pistorino & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 166

Recognizing the outstanding achievements of the Denver Broncos in winning

Super Bowl XXXII.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself and Mr. ALLARD) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the outstanding achievements of the Denver

Broncos in winning Super Bowl XXXII.

Whereas on August 14, 1959, a passion was born in the

heart of the Rocky Mountain Region that brought such

memories as ‘‘Orange Crush,’’ ‘‘The Drive,’’ ‘‘The Fumble,’’ ‘‘The Three Amigos,’’ and 4 previous Super Bowl

appearances;

Whereas the fans of the Denver Broncos are recognized

throughout the National Football League (referred to in

this resolution as the ‘‘NFL’’) for their unconditional allegiance to the team, contributing to 229 consecutive

sold-out stadium home games;

Whereas the Denver Broncos’ organization assembled a

championship caliber coaching staff who created a championship caliber team;
2

•SRES 166 ATS

Whereas the Denver Broncos played in 4 previous Super

Bowls without winning, represented the American Football Conference in Super Bowl XXXII which had not won

a Super Bowl in 13 years, and was considered the underdog in the game; and

Whereas after almost 40 years, the Denver Broncos became

champions of the NFL with a victory in Super Bowl

XXXII over the defending national champions and perennial contenders, the Packers from Green Bay, Wisconsin:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the outstanding achievement of

3 the Denver Broncos in winning Super Bowl XXXII

4 on January 25, 1998; and

5 (2) congratulates the players, staff, and fans of

6 the Denver Broncos for a terrific football season and

7 a thrilling victory in Super Bowl XXXII.

Æ
Exhibit  32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarter Report of Startech Environmental Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Joseph F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By:   /s/    Joseph
F. Longo          Joseph F. Longo          Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President         March 26, 2007

The  foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate  disclosure document.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAUL GUERRERO-VERDEJO,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 06-412M

DETENTION ORDER

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: August 3, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds the

following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Pretrial Services Report of August 3, 2006 reveals that there is an immigration

detainer lodged against the defendant. 

Case 2:06-cr-00264-RSM Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of Mexico.

(3) There is no information available to show that defendant has any ties to this

community or to the Western District of Washington.

(4) Defendant has a criminal background history revealing prior charges and

convictions.

(5) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance because of the nature of the instant

charge and as a risk of danger based on his criminal history.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than detention

that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

/ / /

Case 2:06-cr-00264-RSM Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 3

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00264-RSM Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------






                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-33CB;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 28, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
(Reap. Dec. 10565)

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 27955.

(Decided July 18, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward N. O-lad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(James J?. O’Sara,*trial attorney) , for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been sub-*336mittp.fl for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> Mb. Glad : If it please the Court, I oiler to stipulate — or, first, if it please the Court, this appeal is limited to just that item described on the commercial invoice as 51/52 article 9178 Carnation, of 200 dozen.

> I offer to stipulate that this merchandise was exported from Hong Kong on or before October of 1959;

> That it is not on the final list promulgated under the new law for value, being part of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956;

> And that the proper basis of appraisement is export value;

> And that the export value at this time, during this period, for such or similar merchandise was 55 cents per dozen unit, net, packed.

> Mb. O’Haea : This matter has been discussed with Mr. Farrar, the Assistant Appraiser of this port, and with his concurrence the defendant so stipulates. [R.2.]

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was 55 cents per dozen unit, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-K of Sync2
Networks Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 20011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Moore Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: November 15, 2012


/s/ John Moore
-----------------------------------
John Moore
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 200

Designating March 26, 1998, as ‘‘National Maritime Arbitration Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 26, 1998

Mr. INOUYE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating March 26, 1998, as ‘‘National Maritime

Arbitration Day’’.

Whereas Congress recognizes the integral role arbitration

plays in expeditiously settling maritime disputes;

Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators is a nonprofit,

United States based organization providing arbitration

and other Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) services

to the international maritime industry;

Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators has successfully

facilitated the resolution of over 3,400 international commercial and maritime disputes since its inception in

1963; and

Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators celebrates its

35th anniversary on March 26, 1998: Now, therefore, be

it
2

•SRES 200 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates March 26, 1998, as ‘‘National

3 Maritime Arbitration Day’’; and

4 (2) requests the President to issue a proclama5 tion designating March 26, 1998, as ‘‘National Mar6 itime Arbitration Day’’ and calling upon the people

7 of the United States to observe the day with appro8 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****EDA update**
 
2005:Jun | Jul
2007:Aug | Sep | Nov | Dec
2008:Jul | Oct | Nov | Dec
2009:Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
 
SuDoc Number:C 46.32:
Item Number:0130-D-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000654304
 
December 23, 2019
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

DEBRA L. LARRABEE,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C06-848 MJP

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

) REASSIGNING and REFERRING CASE

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C06-848 MJP and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the

document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:06-cv-00848-MJP-JPD Document 11 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 20th day of September, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:06-cv-00848-MJP-JPD Document 11 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 2