alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71065-71066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-
00073]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Hawaii

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated 08/10/
2023.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2023 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 10/02/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster

[[Page 71066]]

Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Hawaii, dated 08/10/2023, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 11/09/2023.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-22686 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0398. JEROME MCINTOSH v. THE STATE.

Jerome McIntosh pled guilty to murder and other crimes and was sentenced to

life in prison. He subsequently filed a motion to vacate a void judgment and sentence,

which the trial court denied on October 3, 2018. McIntosh filed an application for

discretionary appeal from that denial in this Court on March 22, 2019. We lack

jurisdiction.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 16-5-1 (a), (e) (1); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (1) (322

SE2d 711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a

sentence of death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of

murder”). The Supreme Court’sjurisdiction over murder casesincludes appealsform

ordersresolving post-judgmentmotionsin such cases. See, e.g., Simpson v. State, 292

Ga. 764 (740 SE2d 124) (2013). Accordingly, this appeal is herebyTRANSFERRED

to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 09, 2019

04/09/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY  PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000876400
<NAME>                          STIMSONITE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                            222
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                      506
<INVENTORY>                                    13,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40,490
<PP&E>                                         27,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 68,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,196
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           90
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   68,809
<SALES>                                        63,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,710
<CGS>                                          41,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.45
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LEWIS JOHN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY MARK C. BERRY, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5694RJB

ORDER DENYING SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT BY UNITED

STATES MARSHALS

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s filing of an amended civil rights complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. #15). Plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status in this case. (Dkt. #7). 

Because plaintiff has not provided the court with any copies of his amended complaint for service, the court

will not order service of the complaint at this time. 

So that the Court can attempt service by mail, plaintiff must provide three (3) copies of the amended

complaint. The copies of the amended complaint for service must be submitted on or before May 10, 2006, or

the Court will recommend dismissal of this matter for failure to prosecute. 

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff. 

DATED this 10th day of April, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05694-RJB Document 16 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyof the Boston area, Massachusetts**
 
Report | Plates: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:839
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000961468
 
August 22, 2018
EXHIBIT 21

HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005



|                                            |  |               
|------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name                                        |  | Jurisdiction  
|Hercules Drilling Company, LLC              |  | Delaware      
|Hercules Liftboat Company, LLC              |  | Delaware      
|Hercules Offshore International, LLC        |  | Delaware      
|Hercules International Holdings, Ltd.       |  | Cayman Islands
|Hercules Liftboats Company Nigeria, Limited |  | Nigeria       
|Hercules International Asset Company, Ltd.  |  | Cayman Islands
|Hercules International Offshore, Ltd.       |  | Cayman Islands
|Hercules Marketing International, Ltd.      |  | Cayman Islands

All subsidiaries 100% owned
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group Separation 
Technology Research (STAR) Program: Phase 3 (``STAR Phase 3'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 15, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cooperative Research Group 
Separation Technology Research (STAR) Program: Phase 3 (``STAR Phase 
3'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities 
of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: AMISTCO Separation Products dba AMACS, Houston, TX; 
Saudi ARAMCO dba ARAMCO Services Company, Houston, TX; Chevron 
Technical Center, Houston, TX; ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering 
Company, Spring, TX; Koch-Glitsch, Wichita, KS; Linde, Pullach, 
GERMANY; and Sulzer Chemtech, Winterthur, SWITZERLAND.
    The general area of Separation Technology Research (STAR) Program: 
Phase 3's planned activities is to systematically research, test, and 
qualify separation equipment and increase fundamental knowledge in 
separation.

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22249 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
file:///X|/netsite-docs/lps115574/Read_Me.txt[7/30/2015 1:06:19 PM]

There are two options for viewing "AN UNBROKEN HISTORICAL RECORD: EBEY'S LANDING NATIONAL 

HISTORICAL RESERVE". Click on your preferred option to access.

html: 

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps115574/lps115574/www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/ebla/adhi/index.htm 

pdf: http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps115574/ebey's_landing_admin.pdf
No. 62315.

#### Marian Mills *v.*United States,

protests 252122-K, 258105-K, and 258281-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 3-2 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
Case Ho. 8,200.

#### LEONARD v. The VOLUNTEER.

[4 Chi. Leg. News, 156.]

Circuit Court, W. D. Ohio.

Jan., 1872.

Admiralty — Jurisdiction—Collision.

[See Case No. 16,900.]

Willey, Cary & Terrell, for libellants.

Canfield *&*Caskey, for respondents.

Notes to opinion delivered by Hon. H. H. Emmons, Circuit Judge, in January, 1872, as taken by Benjamin Weaver, stenographer:

That in a case of collision in the Cuyahoga river where the steamer tug, defendant, was engaged in the business of towing within and out of the river, the admiralty had jurisdiction. That it was no objection -that the contract of towing was to be performed within the body of a state, or within a harbor, inasmuch as the foundation for this objection, as derived from [The Propeller Commerce] 1 Black [66 U. S. 574] and [Allen v. Newberry] 21 How. [62 U. S. 244] had been removed by the later cases; instancing The Belfast [7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 624], and subsequent cases, which put the admiralty juris-dictión-upon broad and rational grounds, viz: that the grant of admiralty jurisdiction to the federal courts includes all cases of maritime contract or tort upon waters navigable between state and state.
S. Con. Res. 83 Agreed to October 15, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas December 14, 1999, will be the 200th anniversary of

the death of George Washington, the father of our Nation and

the protector of our liberties;

Whereas the standards established by George Washington’s steadfast character and devotion to duty continue to inspire all men

and women in the service of their country and in the conduct

of their private lives;

Whereas the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association of the Union, which

maintains the Mount Vernon estate and directs research and

education programs relating to George Washington’s contribution

to our national life, has requested all Americans to participate

in the observance of this anniversary;

Whereas bells should be caused to toll at places of worship and

institutions of learning for the duration of 1 minute commencing

at 12 o’clock noon, central standard time, throughout the Nation,

on the 200th anniversary of the death of George Washington;

Whereas the flag of the United States should be lowered to half

staff on the 200th anniversary of the death of George Washington;

and

Whereas the example set by George Washington is of the utmost

importance to the future of the Nation, and it is the responsibility

of private and government institutions to prepare for the observation of the 200th anniversary of the death of George Washington:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That Congress—

(1) calls upon the Nation to remember the life of George

Washington and his contributions to the Nation; and

(2) requests and authorizes the President of the United

States—

(A) to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

of the United States—

(i) to commemorate the death of George Washington with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and

(ii) to cause and encourage patriotic and civic

associations, veterans and labor organizations, schools,

universities, and communities of study and worship,

together with citizens everywhere, to develop programs

and research projects that concentrate upon the life

and character of George Washington as it relates to

the future of the Nation and to the development and

welfare of the lives of free people everywhere; and
S. Con. Res. 83—2

(B) to notify the governments of all Nations with which

the United States enjoys relations that our Nation continues to cherish the memory of George Washington with

affection and gratitude by furnishing a copy of this resolution to those governments.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Before the Second Division,

February *7,*1968

No. P68/49.

protests 66/22441, etc. (New York).

No. P68/50.

protests 66/80699, etc. (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States, William Shaland Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000875278
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US CURRENCY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             488,755
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   488,755
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,941,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,992,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,941,789
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     6,153
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      187,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   695,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (876,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (876,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (876,791)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2009, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended February 28, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Top Flight Game Birds,      Inc. |

| Date:      June 9, 2009                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |
| Top      Flight Game Birds, Inc.                                             |
|                                                                         |
| By: /s/      Rhonda      Heskett                                             |
| Rhonda      HeskettChief      Executive Officer, Chief      FinancialOfficer |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

AL NERIO et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5340RJB

ORDER ON PENDING

MOTIONS 

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and

MJR 4.

Now before the court are five motions filed by the plaintiff. The motions include:

1. Motion to extend discovery and set a new scheduling order (Dkt. # 132).

2. Motion to conduct discovery (Dkt. # 136).

3. A renewed motion to extend the discovery deadline (Dkt. # 137).

4. Motion for leave to amend the complaint (Dkt. # 138).

5. Motion to conduct discovery (Dkt. # 143).

The motions relating to discovery, (Dkt. # 132, 136, 137, and 143), are DENIED, except as noted

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 165 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

below.

Plaintiff’s second motion to conduct discovery is accompanied by requests for admissions sent to Al

Nerio and John Rockwell (Dkt. # 143). Plaintiff asks each of these defendants to admit the hearing committee

was told what to find as to facts and sanctions (Dkt. # 143, attachments). This action challenges a hearing held

April 6, 2006. Defendants object and argue the question is duplicative of one already asked defendant

Rockwell and answered in plaintiff’s written deposition questions. Defendant Nerio is directed to answer this

question.

Plaintiff also propounds a request for production of all documents related to his April 6, 2000, hearing

(Dkt. # 143). Defendants have objected and note that plaintiff has access to the documents simply by making a

request to “SCC staff.” The court expects Mr. Scott to first access the records in the manner recommended by

defendants. 

Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint (Dkt. # 138). Judge Lasnik set the parameters of this case in the

order allowing plaintiff to proceed (Dkt. # 2). The motion is DENIED. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 29 day of May, 2007.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05340-RJB Document 165 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2