V. PRIMARY CAUSES OF DEATH OF LODGEPOLE PINE

Very few lodgepole pines reach the age and size of which they are capable; most probably die at a relatively young age

following either fire or infestation by mountain pine beetle (Dendroctanus ponderosae).

A. Mountain Pine Beetle

Mountain pine beetles often attack lodgepole pines. The female bores through the outer bark and lays her eggs in the

inner bark; after hatching, the larvae feed on the phloem tissue. A heavy attack quickly results in death.

After an initial attack the females may abandon a tree if conditions are unsuitable. Suitability is apparently associated

with phloem thickness; phloem thickness increases with tree diameter; thus beetles preferentially attack larger trees,

which suffer the greatest mortality. Trees with thin phloem, due to their small size (or, in cases, perhaps due to heavy

mistletoe infection), are relatively immune. The usual diameter of susceptibility is 25-35 cm in the Rocky Mountains and

seems similar here.

At the elevations encountered in the Park mountain pine beetle populations are food-limited. Under endemic conditions

beetle populations are low, selectively removing only a few large individuals from a susceptible stand each year. The

populations may be kept at endemic levels for several reasons: there may not be enough large trees to support increasing

numbers of beetles; the trees may be vigorous enough to successfully resist attack; environmental conditions may be too

severe (e.g. low temperature) to permit large scale brood survival. At Crater Lake conditions restricting beetle population

buildup may be encountered in a multi-aged lodgepole stand where there are only a few trees of susceptible size at any

given time. There are apparently no stands at Crater Lake that are either vigorous enough to perpetually resist attack or at

high enough elevations so that environmental extremes always restrict beetle activity.

Epidemic conditions arise when the available food supply is large and environmental conditions (both physical and

biotic) permit large-scale brood survival. Populations increase as the beetles successfully attack most of the large trees,

each of which produces large numbers of adults. Thus, epidemics are more likely to occur, and impact is most severe, in

single-aged stands where most individuals reach a susceptible size at about the same time. As most of the large trees are

killed the beetles are forced to attack trees as small as 10 cm dbh. These trees with thin phloem are incapable of

supporting large numbers of brood. As the brood starve to death in the smaller trees, and disease and predators increase,

the beetle population declines.

Following an epidemic, activity may remain low for years until surviving trees reach the most susceptible size class. In a

lodgepole climax stand, openings from beetle-caused mortality permit increased lodgepole reproduction. As this age

class reaches susceptible size and conditions permit, another bark beetle epidemic is likely. In seral stands the shade

tolerant species are released and replace the pine unless fire recycles the stand to lodgepole. In both cases epidemics

greatly increase the amount of fuel on the forest floor.

No known control method for mountain pine beetle is effective over large areas. The last attempts at control at Crater

Lake were abandoned several years ago. Beetle activity, since it is affected by the number of susceptible trees, will

probably continue to be high as the lodgepole stands which originated in 1850-1900 reach susceptible size. Then the

level will probably wane somewhat as some seral stands are replaced by fir and hemlock.

B. Fire

Lodgepole pine is easily killed by fire, as it has thin bark even when old. Trees affected by fire but not killed directly

succumbed in 10-12 months to bark beetles (Ips pini and Dendroctanus ponderosae) in the 1976 Panhandle control burn.

Fire decreases the seed availability on the site, because cones are not serotinous. However, removal of overstory shade

and litter enhances seedling survival. Major tree competitors, western white pine, the firs and mountain hemlock, are all

very susceptible to fire when young, but develop thicker bark with age, and become more resistant than lodgepole. Many

understory plants such as grasses and sedges may recover rapidly after fire and some may increase with repeated fires

(see Appendix D). Others may be reduced in importance or eliminated at least temporarily. Thus, response of tree

regeneration to fire may vary with the ground cover present, as a result of its interference with seedling establishment.

CRATER LAKE

Report: Lodgepole Pine—History and Management

Crater Lake NP: Lodgepole Pine: History and Management Page 1 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20081009014001/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/lodgepole/lodgepole5.htm 11/29/2011
Although fire will reduce the litter on the forest floor, the dead lodgepole needles and twigs will rapidly replenish the

fine litter and, as the snags fall, heavy fuels may become very dense. (In the Rocky Mountains, half the snags fall in

about 15 years). The usual increase in fuels following fire in lodgepole is in sharp contrast to the fuel reduction which

occurred after fire in the primeval ponderosa pine forests, where most of the overstory survived. Fire scar and age class

data indicate that some areas which burned in the primeval forest were reburned within twenty to thirty years.

Evidence for the fire history of lodgepole forests comes from several sources: (1) Fire scars are rare. The few are mostly

in one community. Those on other species in lodgepole forests are also rare, with the most common, on western white

pine, having a record of only two fires. (2) Charcoal is present in variable amounts in the forests. Surface charcoal

collected in many stands was identified as lodgepole pine, or white pine, or non-pine species. This can separate stands

where fir and hemlock were previously present from those which were only lodgepole pine. (3) Presence of very

common age classes may indicate an origin after fire; they may also indicate disturbance by bark beetles or wind effects,

or simply the coincidence of heavy seed years with very favorable conditions for seedling establishment, in some

communities. (4) Reports by the early qualified observers (e.g. Leiberg 1900), histories of Indian activity, and park

records of lightning fires provide much pertinent information.

Lightning fires are common (7 per year recently) in the Crater Lake area and were almost certainly the major ignition

source in primeval lodgepole pine forests. Although some low elevation stands were probably burned by Indian-caused

fires moving up slope, there was little Indian activity at high elevations where most lodgepole forests are. This situation

changed drastically with the arrival of white man in the area about 1855. Fires were used in roadbuilding and caused by

visitors and hunters. Grazing on the west slope was accompanied by extensive burning. Considerable fir and hemlock

forest was converted to lodgepole pine by this burning, which certainly also burned some of the lodge pole already

present. Our age data confirm the historical reports, with many lodgepole stands originating between 1855 and 1900, and

many older ones having large age classes established then. These are particularly evident in the areas of greatest activity

by white man, the west slope, Pinnacles Valley, and the general route of the Union Creek - Fort Klamath road. With fire

suppression, man-caused fires and the size of lightning fires were greatly reduced. These activities of white man have

thus resulted in differences from the amounts of lodgepole forest one would have expected with primeval conditions;

there is more area of 75 to 120 year old stands and less of younger stands than there would have been.

C. Fire - Bark Beetle Interactions

The effects of fire and bark beetles are not independent of each other. Lodgepole trees which survive fire seem very

susceptible to bark beetles, perhaps capable of triggering an epidemic. Trees killed by bark beetles quickly become fuel

to support more intense fires Fire allows another generation of lodgepole pine, which can eventually support more

beetles. In contrast, beetle kill of lodgepole in seral forests opens the canopy and thus accelerates growth of the fir and

hemlock and the transition to the more fire-proof fir-hemlock forest. The long term effect of beetles thus may be to

decrease chance of fire earlier than otherwise, if the stage of high fuel loads passes without fire.

In many northern Rocky Mountain forests, fire suppression led to abnormally large areas of old lodgepole pine with

resulting massive beetle kills, much larger than would have occurred in the primeval condition. At Crater Lake, some

seral forests have recently reached the size of susceptibility to beetles; recycling them to new, beetle-proof stands with

controlled fire might seem a logical thing to do. However, this appears NOT to be appropriate. Many of these stands

were converted from fir-hemlock to lodgepole by fires caused by white man and a return to primeval conditions requires

some area of lodgepole forest be allowed to revert to fir-hemlock. Furthermore, controlled burning in lodgepole reduces

fuel loads only temporarily, since the overstory is usually killed, producing extremely high ground fuels as the debris

falls, and probably requiring a reburn for safety. In the resulting lodgepole stand, fire danger and beetle susceptibility

eventually will be high again. Thus, a general program of controlled burning in seral stands is ruled out by (1) the policy

to return to primeval forest, which requires conversion of some lodgepole forest to fir-hemlock, and (2) long-range safety

considerations, i.e., allowing stands to develop naturally to fir-hemlock and thus reducing the fire danger permanently at

no management cost. A present period of widespread beetle kills and the resultant high fire danger appear to be the price

of a return toward primeval conditions in several of the seral communities.

http://www.nps.gov/crla/lodgepole/lodgepole5.htm

Date: 29-May-2001

<<< PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT >>>

Crater Lake NP: Lodgepole Pine: History and Management Page 2 of 2

http://web.archive.org/web/20081009014001/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/lodgepole/lodgepole5.htm 11/29/2011