alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

Calendar No. 325

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 187

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human rights situation

in the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1998

Mr. MACK (for himself, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. HELMS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr.

FEINGOLD, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. ASHCROFT,

Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

MARCH 11, 1998

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the human

rights situation in the People’s Republic of China.

Whereas the annual meeting of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, provides

a forum for discussing human rights and expressing

international support for improved human rights performance;

Whereas according to the United States Department of State

and international human rights organizations, the Gov-
2

•SRES 187 RS

ernment of the People’s Republic of China engages in

widespread human rights violations; and

Whereas President Clinton pledged that the United States

would step up its efforts in cooperation with other states

to insist that the United Nations Commission on Human

Rights pass a resolution dealing with the serious human

rights abuses in the People’s Republic of China: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 United States should introduce and make all efforts nec3 essary to pass a resolution criticizing the People’s Repub4 lic of China for its human rights abuses in China and

5 Tibet at the annual meeting of the United Nations Com6 mission on Human Rights.

Calendar No. 325

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 187

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the

of China.human rights situation in the People’s Republic

MARCH 11, 1998

Reported without amendment
Before the First Division,

October 25, 1956

No. 60297.

protest 261078-K (New York).

#### Artamount, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The uncontradicted testimony established that the articles in question are folding combs, designed to be carried in women’s handbags, and that they are exclusively used for combing hair and never as hair ornaments. The parties conceded that the combs are composed in chief value of metal and are valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68118.

#### Quon Quon Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/16497, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “IT” consist of rattaneore flower cages the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039) and that the items marked “R” consist of trays in part of rattan or bamboo similar in all material respects to the trays in part of rattan the subject of Abstract 66729, the claim at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 409 as articles, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan, or at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), was sustained. The items marked “W,” stipulated to consist of trays, etc., not in part of rattan, similar in all material respects to those the subject of said Abstract 66729, were held dutiable at 16% percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476), for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for, as claimed.
PUBLIC LAW 106–564—DEC. 23, 2000 114 STAT. 2811

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3756:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 10, considered and passed House.

Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–564

106th Congress

An Act

To establish a standard time zone for Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Islands, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME ZONE ESTABLISHED.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act of March 19,

1918 (15 U.S.C. 261; commonly known as the Calder Act) is

amended—

(1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘eight zones’’ and

inserting ‘‘nine zones’’; and

(2) in the second sentence—

(A) by striking ‘‘; and that of the eighth’’ and inserting

‘‘; that of the eighth’’; and

(B) by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘;

and that of the ninth zone on the one hundred and fiftieth

meridian of longitude east from Greenwich.’’.

(b) NAME OF ZONE.—Section 4 of the Act of March 19, 1918

(15 U.S.C. 263; commonly known as the Calder Act) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘and that of the eighth’’ and inserting ‘‘that

of the eighth’’; and

(2) by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘; and

that of the ninth zone shall be known as Chamorro standard

time’’.

(c) DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME.—Section 7 of the Uniform Time

Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 267) is amended by inserting ‘‘Guam, the

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after ‘‘Puerto

Rico,’’.

Approved December 23, 2000.

Dec. 23, 2000

[H.R. 3756]
Before the First Division,

February 7, 1968

No. P68/46.

protests 61/5675 and 61/9295 (New York).

No. P68/47.

protests 64/1938, etc. (New York).

No. P68/48.

protests 64/6293, etc. (New York).

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States, Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States, Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*996Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA *7,*C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                                    AMENDMENT

                                      OF A

                                      LEASE

Dated: December 5, 1996

BETWEEN:       THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
               (LANDLORD)

               AND

               MEDIA SYNERGY INC. (TENANT)

FOR:     Approximately 5,584 sq. ft. on the second floor of Building C
         the Ontario Design Centre
         260 King Street East,

Save and except for the below changes, the existing lease shall remain in full
force and effect.

1.       LEASED PREMISES

The Tenant shall lease an additional gross area of 4,150 square feet on the
ground floor of B Building as outlined on Schedule "B".

2.       BASE RENT

The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord yearly by monthly installment base Rent as
per following schedule:

Year 1 - $8.00/sq. ft. = $2,766.67/month or $33,200 per annum

Year 2 - $9.00/sq. ft. = $3,112.50/month or $37,350 per annum

3.       TERM

The term on the additional space shall be from November 1, 1999 to November 30,
2001. The tenant shall have access to the space upon execution of this amendment
to complete their leasehold improvements.

4.       COMMENCEMENT OF RENT

Rent shall commence on November 1, 1999.
<PAGE>   2
DATED at Toronto, this 15th day of September 1999.

Signed, Sealed and                            MEDIA SYNERGY INC.
Delivered in the presence of

                                              per:
 /s/ Shanna Finman                             /s/ Martha Ainsley
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------

Signed, Sealed and                            The Manufacturers Life Insurance
Delivered in the presence of:                 Company

                                              per:
 /s/ Judy Lucas                                         /s/ Ron Meanchoff
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
October 6, 1964

Reap. Dec. 10831.

#### Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R62/14016 and R62/14017.

Reappraisements dismissed September 2, 1964. Entered at Cbieago, Ill. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
No. P68/40.

protests 64/9923, etc. (New York).

No. P68/41.

protests 65/18753, etc. (New York).

#### F. J. Neil Co., Inc. *v.*United States, F. J. Neil Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Beokworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wood slats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 563, C.D. 2704), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, M.K. JAMISON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DASHAYNE G. PACE-BATES

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS 

NMCCA 201300482

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 4 October 2013.

Military Judge: Col Daniel J. Daugherty, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, The Basic School, 

Training Command, Quantico, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol M.E. Sayegh, 

USMC.

For Appellant: LCDR Shannon A. Llenza, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

13 March 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Treboria Lymyous-Dew Wallace, Appellant

No. 06-13-00224-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 42271-

B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Treboria Lymyous-Dew Wallace, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 1, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0024 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW ANDREW SOTTO,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 13 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0024
No. 58305.

protest 224697-K (New York).

#### W. R. Grace & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Order filed November 10, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00601-CV

____________

In the Interest of N.S., a Child

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-03294J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. Appellant's brief was due 

November 9, 2015. No brief has been filed. 

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel William M. Thursland, to 

file appellant’s brief no later than November 20, 2015. If the brief is not filed by 

that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in 
contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel 

due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM
No. 66123.

#### Swartz Waldbaum *v.*United States,

protest 61/4199 (New York).

*333Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pull reels in chief value of steel, used in the lining of handbags, and not suitable for use in the manufacture of articles provided for in paragraph 1527 (a), (b), or (c), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

January 29, 1968

No. P68/25.

protest 65/13962 (Boston).

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

FoRD, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg.*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12220]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Imagined Fronts: The Great War and Global Media” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22772 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Before the Second Division,

May 13, 1964

No. 68541.

protest 61/11131-12116 (Chicago).

#### Lyons Transport *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchwrd & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C. A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Boulder Specialty Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen B. Hughes                                                          
|                     |  |     |  | Stephen B. Hughes                                                              
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59826.

#### International Packers Commercial Division of International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 251192-K, 256308-K, and 260938-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                   VANS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended November 30, 2002 of Vans, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary H.
Schoenfeld, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                               /s/ Gary H. Schoenfeld*
                                               ------------------------
                                               Gary H. Schoenfeld
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               April 10, 2003

         * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Vans, Inc. and will be retained by Vans, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

March 14, 1961

No. 65278.

#### General Wine & Spirits Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/18292 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyand ore deposits of the Wood river region, Idaho**
 
Report | Plates: 0109102025
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:814
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960669
 
August 14, 2018
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 180 Filed 11/08/12 Page 6 of 6
No. P66/227. —

No. P66/228. —

No. P66/229. —

#### United China & Glass Company *v.*United States, protests 316217-K/14989, etc. (New Orleans). United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States, protests 59/8913 and 62/19863 (Seattle). National Silver Co. *v.*United States, protest 64/16779 (Los Angeles).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company,*In*c.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.1

                                  AMENDMENT TO

                             INTEK INFORMATION, INC.
                            1997 AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN



Section 6.1 of the Intek Information, Inc. 1997 Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:

     6.1. Maximum Number. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock
          --------------
     that may be made subject to Stock Options shall be 2,455,552 authorized
     shares. To the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the
     time the ISO is granted) of the stock with respect to which ISOs are
     exercisable for the first time by an individual in a particular calendar
     year exceeds $100,000, such excess Stock Options shall be treated as NSOs.
     If any shares of Common Stock subject to Stock Options are not purchased or
     otherwise paid for before such Stock Options expire, such shares may again
     be made subject to Stock Options.



This Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors and by the requisite
percentage of stockholders of Intek Information, Inc. on February 24, 2000. The
effective date of this Amendment is February 24, 2000.