SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BRIDGETT R. FIELDS, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR06-246-RSL 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An evidentiary hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release in this case was 

scheduled before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on December 21, 2009. The United States 

was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Mark Parrent, and the defendant by 

Nancy Tenney. The proceedings were digitally recorded. 

The defendant had been charged and convicted of Embezzlement By a Bank Employee, 

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656. On or about July 25, 2008, defendant was sentenced by the 

Honorable Robert S. Lasnik to a term of one day, with credit for times serviced, to be followed 

by three years supervised release. 

The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in a mental health program, 

financial disclosure, $5,302.71 restitution, 60 days home confinement, search, no new credit, 
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

opening additional lines of credit, or obtaining loan without approval, not possess or obtain any 

driver’s license, Social Security number, birth certificate, passport, or any other form of 

identification in any other name other than true legal name. 

In a Petition for Warrant or Summons dated August 13, 2009, U.S. Probation Officer 

Tammy M. White asserted the following violations by defendant of the conditions of her 

supervised release: 

(1) Submitting a false monthly report for February and March 2009, in violation of 

standard condition 2. 

(2) Committing the crime of possession of another’s identity on or before March 

24, 2009, in violation of standard condition that she not commit another federal, state or local 

crime. 

(3) Committing the crime of criminal impersonation, on or before March 24, 2009, 

in violation of the standard condition that she not commit another federal, state or local crime. 

(4) Possessing another person’s Social Security number on or about March 24, 

2009, in violation of the special condition that she not obtain or possess any Social Security 

number in any other name other than her true legal name. 

(5) Opening a new line of credit on or before March 24, 2009, in violation of the 

special condition that she be prohibited from opening additional lines of credit without 

approval of the U.S. Probation office. 

(6) Incurring new credit card charges on or before July 22, 2009, in violation of the 

special condition that she be prohibited from incurring new credit charges without approval of 

the U.S. Probation Office. 

(7) Committing the crime of theft, on or before July 24, 2009, in violation of the 

standard condition that she not commit another federal, state or local crime. 

(8) Failing to work regularly at a lawful occupation since on or before October 8, 

2009, in violation of standard condition 5. 
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

On August 18, 2009, defendant made her initial appearance. The defendant was 

advised of the allegations and advised of her rights. On December 21, 2009, this matter came 

before the Court for an evidentiary hearing. Defendant admitted to violations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 

and 8. Alleged violation 1 was dismissed without prejudice by the government. 

I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of her supervised release as alleged in violations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, and that the 

Court conduct a hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on these violations has 

been set before the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik on March 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

 Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

 

DATED this 21st day of December, 2009. 

A

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

 AUSA: Mark Parrent 

 Defendant’s attorney: Nancy Tenney 

 Probation officer: Tammy M. White