alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chester R.

Elk

River

EASTERN

 BAY

Choptank River

L. Choptank R.

St. Marys R.

H A R F O R D

K E N T

C E C I L

Q U E E N

A N N E S

T A L B O T

C A R O L I N E

D O R C H E S T E R

Kent 

Island

VIRGINIA

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

B A L T I M O R E

F R E D E R I C K

C A R R O L L

H O W A R D

M O N T G O M E R Y

 P R I N C E

G E O R G E S

C A L V E R T

A N N E A R U N D E L

C H A R L E S

S T. M A R Y S

BALTIMORE 

CITY

WASHINGTON,

 D.C.

Towson

Ellicott 

City

Savage

Unity

Rockville

Potomac

River

 Upper 

Marlboro

 Prince

La Plata Frederick

Leonardtown

Calvert 

 Cliffs

Chesapeake 

 Beach

Point Lookout

Patuxent R.

Patapsco River

Severn

River

Bush

River

Loch Raven 

Reservoir

Liberty 

Lake

Triadelphia

Reservoir

Western

Br.

Patuxent

River

Piscataway Cr.

Mattawoman

Cr.

Zekiah

Swamp Run

Nanjemoy

Cr.

Gunpowder R.

Middle R.

RIVER

POTOMAC

Cambridge

Centreville

Easton

Solomons

Lexington

Park

ANNAPOLIS

 Naval Air 

 Station

Patuxent 

River

Chestertown

C

H

E

S

A

P

E

A

K

E

B

A

Y

-140

-160

-120 -100

-80

-60

-40

-20

-20

0

20

0

-20

-40

-40

-60

-80

-80

-100

26 20

1

1

1

1

-2

-3

-2

3

9

-10

-21

-26

-37

-39

-47

-57

-53 -57 -58

-50

-65 -46

-62 -28

-29

-66

-68

-75

-75 -73 -71

-81

-69

-69

-68

-68

-111

-112

-124

-148 -141

-130

-144

-156 -160

-81 -91

-89

-137

-152

-154

-162

-130

-61

-24

-44 -67

-80

-80

-87 -71

-90

-69

-62

-53

-47

-43

-43

-22

-3

39

19

2

-7

-30

-47

-9

-4

1

15

13

-24

EXPLANATION

OUTCROP AREA OF THE AQUIA AQUIFER---Aquifer 

 is in the Aquia Formation of Paleocene age.

POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR---Shows altitude at 

 which water level would have stood in tightly 

 cased wells. Dashed where approximately

 located. Contour interval 20 feet. National 

 Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (sea level).

WELL---Number is altitude of water level, in feet 

 above or below (-) sea level, where water-level 

 measurements are available. Symbol indicates 

 average yield from well or well field, in gallons 

 per day, using 2004 and 2007 withdrawal data.

Less than 10,000 gallons per day -29

10,000 to 100,000

100,000 to 1,000,000

Greater than 1,000,000

-20

APPROXIMATE DOWNDIP BOUNDARY OF THE 

AQUIA AQUIFER 

Prepared by West Trenton 

Publishing Service Center.

Edited by Valerie M. Gaine.

Graphics by Timothy W. Auer.

For additional information, contact:

Director 

MD-DE-DC Water Science Center

U.S. Geological Survey

5522 Research Park Drive

Baltimore, MD 21228

or visit our Web site at:

http://md.water.usgs.gov

Stephen E. Curtin (USGS), David C. Andreasen (MGS), and Andrew W. Staley (MGS)

Potentiometric Surface of the Aquia Aquifer in Southern Maryland,

September 2007

77 00' O

76 00' O76 30' O

39

39

38

38

00'

30'

00'

30'

O

O

O

O

Prepared in cooperation with the

Maryland Geological Survey (MGS)

and the

Power Plant Assessment Program,

Maryland Department of Natural Resources

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Open-File Report 2009---1080

BASE FROM USGS DIGITAL LINE GRAPH, 1:250,000

0 10 MILES

0 10 KILOMETERS
No. 65277.

#### Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/19064 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
# Official Journal C 464A/17 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 464A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6417 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 464A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6417 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Corrigendum to Directorate-General Research and Innovation – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser – President of the Board of the European Innovation Council (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( OJ C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2021/C 464 A/01

Corrigendum to Directorate-General Research and Innovation – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser – President of the Board of the European Innovation Council (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( OJ C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( OJ C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 17.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 464/1

---

Corrigendum to Directorate-General Research and Innovation – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser – President of the Board of the European Innovation Council

(Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 432 A of 26 October 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

On page 5, under ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

| for: | ‘The closing date for registration is 26 November 2021, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 26 November 2021, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’,

| read: | ‘The closing date for registration is 17 December 2021, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 17 December 2021, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DARRYL WILLIAM YOUNG,

Plaintiff, 

v.

ROB MCKENNA, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C05-2053-MJP-MJB

ORDER OF TRANSFER 

Petitioner Darryl Young, appearing pro se, has filed a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. He has previously filed one other § 2254 petition in this Court, which was dismissed with

prejudice. See, Young v. State of Washington, C02-0010-BJR, Dkts. 17 & 18. Therefore this petition is

a second or successive one under 28 U.S.C. §2254. This Court is without jurisdiction to consider such a

petition until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has authorized its filing. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A);

Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3. Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Ninth Circuit Court of

Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a). 

Petitioner is advised that this transfer does not of itself constitute compliance with § 2244(b)(3)

and Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3; he must still file a motion for leave to proceed in the Court of Appeals and

make the showing required by § 2244(b)(2). Petitioner is directed to consult this statute and Ninth

Circuit Rule 22-3 for further information.

Should petitioner be granted leave by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to proceed on his

petition, his filing date for the purposes of the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) shall

be the date of initial filing in this Court. 

Case 2:05-cv-02053-MJP-MJB Document 3 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - 2

The Clerk is directed to terminate this case and transfer all original documents to the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals. The Clerk shall, however, retain a copy of the petition and of this Order in the file. 

The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel of record, if any, and to

Magistrate Judge Benton. 

DATED this 14th day of March 

A

, 2006.

Marsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Recommended for Entry 

this 10th day of March, 2006.

 /s/Monica J. Benton 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02053-MJP-MJB Document 3 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

October 4, 1960

No. 64629.

#### Ebrahimoff Djemmshidoff *v.*United States,

protests 59/32178 and 59/32179 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



|In connection with the annual report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|Dated:  October 8, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

68



|
|
No. 69350.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/25066 and 65/1160 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

YAGEO AMERICA, CORP., 

Plaintiff,

v.

FAN-CHU TSENG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0227RSL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On January 5, 2007, defendants

filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement that, taken as a whole, exceeds 50

pages in length. (Dkt. #31). As of this date, a courtesy copy of these documents has not

been provided for chambers. 

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause why they should not be

sanctioned for failure to comply with this Court’s Minute Order Setting Trial & Related

Dates requiring courtesy copies of lengthy filings for chambers. Defendants shall

immediately deliver a paper copy of the motion and all supporting documents, with tabs

or other organizing aids as necessary and clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy

of Electronic Filing for Chambers,” to the Clerk’s Office. 

Case 2:06-cv-00227-RSL Document 42 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

Defendants shall respond to this order to show cause no later than five days from the date

of this Order. 

DATED this 12th day of January, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00227-RSL Document 42 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio CAVAZOS-MEDRANO, also known as Juan Rodriguez-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41067.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sergio Cavazos-Medrano appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sentenced him to 46 months of imprisonment, two years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

For the first time on appeal, Cavazos-Medrano argues that, under *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this court must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because the mandatory guideline regime was in place at the time of his sentencing. An unpreserved challenge to the application of the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines is reviewed for plain error. *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556).

The district court’s application of the guidelines in their mandatory form constituted error that is “plain” for purposes of satisfying the first two prongs of the plain error analysis. *Id.*However, Cavazos-Medrano bears the burden of demonstrating “that the sentencing judge — sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one — would have reached a significantly different result.” *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Cavazos-Medrano has not made such a showing.

Cavazos-Medrano also argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 *336S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Cavazos-Medrano concedes, this argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and *Almendarez-Torres*was not overruled by *Apprendi. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores,*405 F.3d 270, 277 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 24 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 24 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 57802.

protest 210675-K (New York).

#### M. Pressner *&*Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 250 gross of item 4110 celluloid flower pins missing in case 74364, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such .portions of the merchandise contained in ease 74364, erroneously reported by the landing inspector as case 74362, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000876884
<NAME> WESTWOOD CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       6242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13277
<PP&E>                                            4706
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   17197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       10728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     17197
<SALES>                                          16077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16077
<CGS>                                            12458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1261
<INCOME-TAX>                                       477
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .140
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .140
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:06-cr-05383-KLS Document 12 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05383-KLS Document 12 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05383-KLS Document 12 Filed 08/28/06 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05383-KLS Document 12 Filed 08/28/06 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cr-05383-KLS Document 12 Filed 08/28/06 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          62,299
<SECURITIES>                                    34,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                       504
<INVENTORY>                                      3,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,599
<PP&E>                                          28,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,150
<BONDS>                                         80,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,550
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,781
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,756
<SALES>                                          6,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,329
<CGS>                                            4,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31,      2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                           |

| Dated:      June 29, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Zacharey Zenith                              |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Zacharey      Zenith                                  |   |
|                      |   | President,      Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive |   |
|                      |   | Officer      and Chief Financial Officer              |   |

----
Exhibit 16

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 29, 2007



Baja Mining Corp.



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Baja Mining Corp.



I, Grant Bosworth, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure of the technical report entitled  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of El Boleo Copper-Cobalt Project dated January 31, 2007, (the Technical Report), and any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Form 40-F Annual Report dated March 30, 2007 (the Form 40-F Annual Report) of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company), and to the filing of the Technical Report and this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report.



| |     |                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | (Signed) Grant Bosworth                               
| |     | Name: Grant Bosworth , P.Eng,
Wardrop Engineering Inc.
| |     | Location: Vancouver, British Columbia