alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p110280en1.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0280

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 6/15/2011

ENGINEER: Prothero \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: Cytec Industries, Inc.

USE:

 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Wear impermeable gloves and suitable protective

clothing. Since this product is absorbed through the skin,

 care must be taken to prevent skin contact and

contamination of clothing / chemical splash proof goggles

or face shield / Where this material is not used in a

closed system, good enclosure and local exhaust

ventilation should be provided to control exposure.

Respirator: Where exposures are below the established

exposure limit, no respiratory protection is required.

Where exposures exceed the established exposure limit,

use respiratory protection recommended for the material

and level of exposure.

Health Effects: causes eye and skin irritation /

overexposure to vapor may cause respiratory tract

irritation and central nervous system depression /

combustible liquid and vapor.

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
p110280en1.txt

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (04/08/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1 .

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 83 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0280

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
p110280en1.txt

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. 

High End:

to: 

from:

basis:

Conservative: 

to: 

from:

basis: 

High End of Range:

Low End of Range: 

to:

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Low End of Range: 

High End of Range: 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
p110280en1.txt

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis: 

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, reg

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater?

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

Dermal:

MEMORANDUM of TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Casey MacQueen

Organization: ERG for CEB

CALL TO: 

Organization: Cytec

Date: 04/11/2011

Time: 1pm

Phone: 

 what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 11-0280

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
March 15, 1939

Honorable ci. Lee O’Daniel Governor of Texas Austin, Texas Dear Governor: opinion No. o-447 Re: Reward offerred by Governor be are in receipt of your letter of March 9, 1939, in which you request an opinion onthe question of whether rewards oiferred by aformer Governor, whioh have not been revoked, terminate when the newGovernor takes office.

Article 1007, Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, provices that the Governor mayoffer areward for the apprehension of one aocused of a felony in this State whoIs evading arrest.

In Karling v. Morris, 91 Tax. 584, 9 5. W. 739, and in Lauve v. Balfour, 1st White &Wilson Civ. Cases, para. 726, our oourts held that an offer of areward continued valid and binding until samewasrevoked. Areward mayexpire by its own terms, or the Governor mayrevoke sameat anytime he desires, prior to the time the party ror whose arrest the reward is oiferred has been apprehended, or at least located.

Sinae the Governor’s office is a constitutional one, and is never vacant, the reward offerred by the Governor is made by him in his official capacity; and a reward offerred by one Qovernor would, and does, oontinue in full force and effect until the sating Governor revokes same, unless there is a tims limit, or some other oondition oontained in the original rewrrd as offerred. Thefaot that the person holding the office of Gov-. ernor ohanges does not in any wayarfect the offer of the reward as madeby the Governor. Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS (Signed)

GWB:PBP BY George W.Barcue Assistant

RPPROTED

: ATTORIWYGENERAL OF!&i&U (Signed Gerald C. Mann)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         211,404
<SECURITIES>                                   253,257
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,757
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               904,761
<PP&E>                                         317,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,184,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          644,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,446
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,184,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,381
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  480,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (168,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (171,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (171,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Aspen Diversified Fund LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Deborah Terry,Chief  Financial Officer of
Aspen Partners, Ltd, Managing Member of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | the
forgoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the
information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | Date: March 31, 2011                         
| | ---------------------------------------------
| |                                              
| |                                              
| | /s/ Deborah Terry                            
| | Deborah Terry, Chief Financial Officer       
| | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                         
| | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC
No. 64594.

#### B. Shackman & Co. and F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16529 and 58/20548 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

The protests were dismissed.
# Official Journal C 128/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 128 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6111 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 128

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6111 April 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 128/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8839 — GIP/NTV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 128/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8839 — GIP/NTV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 128/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2018/C 128/03 | Commission notice on Community guides to good practice | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 128/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2018/C 128/03

Commission notice on Community guides to good practice

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 128/04 | Call for proposals under the 2018 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership | 4 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2018/C 128/04

Call for proposals under the 2018 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al.,,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5315 FDB

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

By Order, dated September 15, 2006, this Court denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and directed Plaintiff to pay the required filing fee within thirty (30) days, otherwise

this action would be dismissed. The Plaintiff having failed to comply with the directive of the Court,

it is hereby ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’S action is dismissed; and 

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and any other party that

has appeared in this action.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05315-FDB Document 8 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32

|   | (1) | To      my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        | Cancer      Therapeutics, Inc. |                         |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                        |                           |                         |   |
| Date:      January 14, 2010 | By:                            | /s/ Chene      Gardner  |   |
|                        |                           | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                        |                           | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                        |                           |                         |   |
No. 54999.

#### M. Kopit Co. *v.*United States,

protests 124612-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Slates*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for frée entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                      4,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,547
<PP&E>                                           6,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                     234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,105
<SALES>                                         13,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,913
<CGS>                                            9,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    827
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medwave, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onFebruary 14, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates listed below, herebycertifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and shall not be deemedpart of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.     Date: February 14, 2006           By:      /s/ Timothy J. O’Malley         Timothy J. O’Malley    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DANIEL BLANCHARD, by his Parents Cheryl

and Jerry Blanchard; and CHERYL

BLANCHARD; and JERRY BLANCHARD,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOHN

FLAHERTY, Superintendent; JOSH

BROOKS, Principal; DAVE CRAYK, Special

Education Teacher,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5166FDB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF

CHERYL BLANCHARD’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff Cheryl Blanchard moves for appointment of counsel in this case concerning the

education of a minor child with a disability. Plaintiff is capable of articulating her arguments and has

not otherwise demonstrated entitlement to appointment of counsel. ACCORDINGLY, 

IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff Cheryl Blanchard’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. #

2] is DENIED. 

DATED this 24th day of May 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05166-JKA Document 10 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Order entered September 7, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01115-CV

PATRICK DAUGHERTY, Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04005

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 6, 2018 unopposed motion for leave to reply. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER the reply brief be filed no later than October 1, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.147**Supplemental Agreement For Loan Agreement****This Supplement Agreement For Loan Agreement**(this “**Supplemental Agreement**”) is entered intoas of March 20, 2006 by and among the following Parties:(1)  **New Allyes Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.**(“**Lender**”)Address: Room E-G, Floor 28 Zhaofeng Shimao Tower, 369Jiangsu Road, Shanghai; (2)  **Suyang Zhang**(“**Borrower**”) IDcard No.: 310107581124243Address: Room 64, No.9 of No.74 Lane, Wujing Road, Shanghai;**Whereas:**The Lender and the Borrower signed a Loan Agreement (“**Original Loan Agreement**”) in amount of RMB500,000 as of April 20, 2005, this loan was used as the registered capital of Shanghai QuanshiAdvertisement Co., Ltd. (“**SH Quansh**i”) in Shanghai for the Borrower.Now because of the requirement of Shanghai Quanshi’s business operation, the registered capital ofShanghai Quanshi shall be increased by the consent of the Lender. The Lender and the Borrowerthrough mutual negotiations hereby for the increased registered capital enter into thisSupplemental Agreement as below:1. According to the provisions and terms of the Original Loan Agreement, the Lender agrees toprovide another loan without interest in amount of RMB 2,000,000 to the Borrower forincreasing the registered capital of SH Quanshi. The term of this loan is from March 20, 2006to March 19, 2016 with the validity time of 10 years and shall be renewed by the consent ofboth parties. 2. Other terms of the Original Loan Agreement keep effective. 3. This Supplemental Agreement takes effect as of the date of execution. This SupplementalAgreement shall be prepared in 2 original copies, with each involved party holding 1 copyhereof. Any amendments or supplements to this Supplemental Agreement shall be made in writingand shall take effect only when properly signed by the Parties to this Supplemental Agreement.**[the remainder of this page is left blank]**
1

 
**Execution Page****Lender:** **New Allyes Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.**(Corporate Seal)/s/ Jiangang Wang
No. 63362.

protests 59/10015, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Chong Kee Jan Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists o-f plastic mahjong sets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62151, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62326.

#### Gerli & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 161335-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *C. M. Gourdon, Inc.*(43 C. C. P. A. 4, C. A. D. 601), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Pos t O f fic e Bo x 12548

, Austin

, T exa s 7 8 7 1 1

- 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3

- 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattorneygeneral.gov 

# March 18, 2015

F IRST 

# C OURT OF 

# A PPEALS 

# VIA ELECTRONIC FILING 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066 ATTN: Christopher A. Prine

Re: Case No. 01-14-00899-CV; The State of Texas v. Titan Land Development, Inc. and Bauer-Hockley 550, L.P. ; In the First Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas.

Dear Mr. Prine:

I will be presenting oral argument on behalf of The State of Texas at the oral argument scheduled for April 8, 2015, in the above-referenced case.

Sincerely,

/S/ Susan Desmarais Bonnen Susan Desmarais Bonnen Assistant Attorney General susan.bonnen@texasattorneygeneral.gov

SDB/lfm

cc: Charles McFarland via email: cmcfarland@mcfarlandpllc.com ACCEPTED 01-14-00899-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/18/2015 3:03:13 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 283

To refer H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble’’

to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for

a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Mr. WARNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

OCTOBER 15 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To refer H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Lloyd

B. Gamble’’ to the chief judge of the United States

Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That (a) H.R. 998 entitled ‘‘A bill for the

2 relief of Lloyd B. Gamble’’ now pending in the Senate,

3 together with all the accompanying papers, is referred to

4 the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

5 Claims.

6 (b) The chief judge shall—
2

SRES 283 ATS

1 (1) proceed according to the provisions of sec2 tions 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code;

3 and

4 (2) report back to the Senate, at the earliest

5 practicable date, providing—

6 (A) such findings of fact and conclusions

7 that are sufficient to inform the Congress of the

8 nature, extent, and character of the claim for

9 compensation referred to in such bill as a legal

10 or equitable claim against the United States or

11 a gratuity; and

12 (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably

13 due from the United States to Mr. Lloyd B.

14 Gamble.

15 (c) It is the sense of the Senate that if any judgment

16 is entered in favor of Lloyd B. Gamble against the United

17 States, any damages arising from injuries sustained by

18 Lloyd B. Gamble should not exceed $253,488.

Æ
July 20, 1965

Reap. Dec. 11045.

#### H & H Customs Clearance Co. *v.*United States,

Reappraisements dismissed June 11, 1965.

Entered at New York, N.Y. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
No. 64636.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 986113-G, etc. (New York).

*301Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 608), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1165), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.