alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ELDERT VEJAR-NUNEZ, )

)

Petitioner, ) Case No. C05-2075-MJP-JPD

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s § 2255 motion, the government’s response, the

Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate

Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining record, does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner’s § 2255 petition (Dkt. #1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED

with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to Judge Donohue.

DATED this 18th day of July, 2006.

A

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02075-MJP Document 15 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22680]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Release of the Federal Maritime Commission's FY 2020 Service 
Contract Inventory Analysis

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) is publishing 
this notice to advise the public of the availability of its FY 2020 
Service Contract Inventory Analysis. The FY 2021 Service Contract 
Inventory Analysis includes Scope, Methodology, Findings, Actions Taken 
or Planned, and Accountable Officials.

DATES: The inventory is available on the Commission's website as of 
October 10, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katona Bryan-Wade, Director, Office of 
Management Services, 202-523-5900, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f897958b95998a918c91959db89e959bd69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="56393b253b37243f223f3b3316303b3578313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Acting in compliance with Sec. 743 of 
Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2010, the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of its FY 2020 Service Contract 
Inventory Analysis. The FY 2020 Service Contract Inventory Analysis 
includes Scope, Methodology, Findings, Actions Taken or Planned, 
Accountable Officials.

Objectives, and Agency Findings

    This analysis was developed in accordance with guidance issued by 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Procurement Policy 
(OFPP), and in accordance with FAR subpart 4.17--Service Contracts 
Inventory. The Federal Maritime Commission has posted its FY 2021 
Service Contract Inventory Analysis at the following link: https://www.fmc.gov/about-the-fmc/governmentwide-laws-regulations/service-contract-analysis/.

Carl Savoy,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-22680 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal L 11/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 11 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6214 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 11

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6214 January 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/2 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/2 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market (
  1
  )

1

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/26 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union ( OJ L 8 I, 10.1.2019 ) | 34 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/26 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union ( OJ L 8 I, 10.1.2019 )

( OJ L 8 I, 10.1.2019 )

34

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER STRIKING

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MIKE KREIDLER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DANNY L. PIXLER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0697RSL

ORDER STRIKING NOTICE 

OF WITHDRAWAL

On November 27, 2007, defendants’ counsel filed a Notice of Withdrawal and

Substitution of Counsel. (Dkt. #116). However, according to General Rule 2(g)(4)(A),

“No attorney shall withdraw an appearance in any case, civil or criminal, except by leave

of court.” An order of substitution is not required if there is simply a change or addition

of attorneys within the same law firm. In this case, however, counsel is seeking to

withdraw and substitute attorneys from a different firm. 

Accordingly, the notice of withdrawal is STRICKEN. Counsel will not be 

permitted to withdraw until he complies with General Rule 2(g)(4)(A), including filing a 

Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 117 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER STRIKING

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL - 2

certification that the motion was served on the clients.

DATED this 28th day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 117 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 255 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES 255

To commend the Library of Congress for 200 years of outstanding service 
to Congress and the Nation, and to encourage activities to commemorate 
        the bicentennial anniversary of the Library of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 1998

   Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Ford, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Moynihan) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To commend the Library of Congress for 200 years of outstanding service 
to Congress and the Nation, and to encourage activities to commemorate 
        the bicentennial anniversary of the Library of Congress.

Whereas the Library of Congress was established in 1800 and will celebrate the 
        200th anniversary of the Library of Congress in 2000;
Whereas the goal of the bicentennial commemoration is to inspire creativity in 
        the century ahead and ensure a free society through greater use of the 
        Library of Congress and libraries everywhere;
Whereas the bicentennial goal will be achieved through a variety of national, 
        State, and local projects, developed in collaboration with the offices 
        of the Members of Congress, the staff of the Library of Congress, and 
        special advisory committees; and
Whereas the bicentennial commemorative activities include significant 
        acquisitions, symposia, exhibits, issuance of a commemorative coin, and 
        enhanced public access to the collections of the Library of Congress 
        through the National Digital Library: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the Library of Congress on 200 
years of service to Congress and the Nation, and encourages the 
American public to participate in activities to commemorate the 
bicentennial anniversary of the Library of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 203

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the University of Tennessee Lady

Volunteers basketball team is the new dynasty in collegiate women’s

basketball.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the University of

Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team is the new

dynasty in collegiate women’s basketball.

Whereas the Lady Volunteers (referred to in this resolution

as the ‘‘Lady Vols’’) won its third straight National

Championship in the National Collegiate Athletic Association women’s basketball tournament on March 29,

1998;

Whereas the Lady Vols finished the 1997–1998 basketball

season with a perfect record of 39 wins and zero losses;

and

Whereas the Lady Vols have won 6 National Championships

in the last 12 years: Now, therefore, be it
2

•SRES 203 ATS

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 University of Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team

3 should be recognized as the new dynasty in collegiate wom4 en’s basketball.

Æ
From: mcthoms21@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:31:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Matthew Thomas

Memphis, TN 38134
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 31, 2008



/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,605,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,808,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,000
<INVENTORY>                                    573,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,180,249
<PP&E>                                       1,896,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 918,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,171,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          616,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,126
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,352,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,171,880
<SALES>                                      6,532,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,532,957
<CGS>                                        3,084,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,084,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,696,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                   900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,796,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,796,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-300M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

JOSE MANUEL NAMBO-SILVA, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Heroin, Methamphetamine and Cocaine

Date of Detention Hearing: June 9, 2006

 The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Todd Greenberg. The defendant was represented by Michele Shaw.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

Case 2:06-mj-00300-MJB Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Defendant stipulates to detention due in part to the placement of an ICE

detainer.

(3) Based upon the foregoing information, it appears that there is no

condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future Court appearances and/or the safety of other persons or the

community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006. AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00300-MJB Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX A

Elk capture and response to drug administration in the Upper Klamath Basin, OR. 1985.

a males were not radio-collared; equipped w/yellow ear streamers

b deceased

http://www.nps.gov/crla/elk/elkaa.htm

Date: 31-May-2001

CRATER LAKE

Report: Ecology Of Elk Inhabiting Crater Lake National Park And Vicinity

Date Sex/age Collar#

Transmittor

Frequency

(MHz)

Dosage

(mg)

Reaction

Time

(min)

Recovery

Time

(min) Comments

4/30/85 ad. fem. 1 151.500 18 11 27 Nosebleed from trap

5/3/85 ad. fem. 2 151.510 18 11 34

5/4/85 ad. fem. -

b -b 18 2 Deceased at 8 min. Gash on jaw from trap

5/4/85 ad. fem. 4 151.530 18 5 29 None

5/13/85 ad. fem. 5 151.540 18 4 20

5/25/85 yr. male -

a

-

a 18 2 58 Labored breathing

5/25/85 yr. male -

a

-

a 16 5 34

5/27/85 yr. fem. 6 151.550 15 2 12 Labored breathing

5/28/85 yr. fem. 7 151.560 16 7 38

5/31/85 yr. male -

a

-

a 14 8 24

5/31/85 yr. fem. 8 151.570 16 3 37

6/11/85 ad. fem. -

b -b 14 2 105 Euthanized after 24 hrs. and no full recovery

6/11/85 ad. fem. 9 151.580 18 6 17

6/12/85 ad. fem. 11 151.600 18 5 19

6/12/85 ad. fem. 12 151.610 18+18+20 5 38

4/16/86 ad. fem. 18 5 25

5/14/86 yr. fem. -

b -b 18 -- -- Fractured skull

<<< PREVIOUS CONTENTS

Crater Lake NP: Elk Ecology Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20081228095045/http://www.nps.gov/archive/crla/elk/elkaa.htm 11/29/2011
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 8

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 13 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-2 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 8 of 8
#### State of Maine *vs.*Reed Dyer.

Androscoggin.

Opinion, September 19, 1939.

*Edward J. Beauchamp,*County Attorney.

*Armand A. Dufresne, Jr.,*Assistant County Attorney, for the State.

*Neal A. Donahue,*for the respondent.

Sitting : Dunn, C. J., Sturgis, Thaxter, Hudson, Manser, JJ.

*283Dunn, C. J.

A single indictment contained two counts, one for robbery, a crime punishable, upon conviction, by imprisonment for any term of years, the other for assault with intent to rob, the assailant being then and there armed with a dangerous weapon. For such offense, the punishment or penalty imposable on a person found guilty is imprisonment for not less than one year and not more than twenty years. See, as to the first, R. S., Chap. 129, Sec. 15; as to the second, the same chapter, Sec. 24.

In the pending case, the respondent pleaded below, in respect to each charge, that he was not guilty.

While a jury was being formed to try him, he claimed and was allowed four peremptory challenges. R. S. Chap. 146, Sec. 20; Chap. 96, Sec. 95. Then, invoking a statute, R. S., Chap. 146, Sec. 13, granting the exercise, in absolute right, while a jury is being impanelled for the trial of a defendant upon an indictment for a crime the penalty for which is imprisonment for life, of twenty challenges, he essayed a fifth challenge. This was denied.

The trial resulted, as to the robbery charge, in acquittal thereof.

The respondent’s discharge from that accusation of guilt completely altered the situation under which the exception here urged was reserved.

Argument of the exception brings up a moot question only. Had the respondent been found guilty of robbery, room might have presented, on the record, for discussion, and decision, with regard to the ruling by which, allegedly, he was aggrieved. Having been acquitted, he is not now, from any judicial point of view, aggrieved by the ruling.

It may be added, however, that the penalty of imprisonment for any term of years, and that of imprisonment for one’s life, are of different specific significations in the law. *State*v. *Howard,*117 Me., 69, 102 A., 743.

*Exception overruled. Judgment for the State.*
Before the Second Division,

April 5, 1956

No. 59813.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 230067-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycles, having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing under 36 pounds complete without accessories, not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter over *1%*inches, valued at over $16.66% each, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.