### 4 / 21 /10



### 1 ENCLOSURE 2

Test Procedures, Methods and Reporting Requirements for the Information Collection Request for the Ferroalloys Production Manufacturing Emission Points

This document provides an overview of approved methods, target pollutant s and units of

me asure, and reporting requirements for ferroalloys manufacturing facilities required to provide emission test data and material sampling data based on the section 114 letter. The purpose for this testing is to gather data on air pollutant emissions from em issions points in this source category. All recipients must complete and submit test results no later than August 31, 2010, unless you are able to negotiate a plant

- specific deadline with EPA. Any requests for such an extension should be supported by a v alid reason why the deadline cannot be met as specified. This document will be referred to as the “Ferroalloys Production test program”. The document is organized as follows:

1.0 Testing Procedures and Methods 2 .0 How to Report Data 3 .0 How to Submit Data 4 .0 Contact Information for Questions on Test Plan and Reporting

1.0 Testing Procedures and Methods

The EPA test program requires emissions and other test data for several pollutants. EPA understands that you own a ferroalloy production manufact uring facility that is a potential major

source of hazardous air pollutant emissions. For each ferroalloy production manufacturing facility that you own, you are required to perform a stack test or conduct sampling to determine your emissions, if any, of the following pollutants:

### 4 / 21 /10



### 2

 Particulate Matter (PM)

 Sulfur Oxides (SO x )

 Dioxin/Furans (D/F) 2,3,7,8

- TCDD (1746

- 01

- 6); 1,2,3,7,8

- PeCDD (40321

- 76

- 4); 1,2,3,4,7,8

- HxCDD (39227

- 28

- 6); 1,2,3,6,7,8

- HxCDD (57653

- 85

- 7); 1,2,3,7,8,9

- HxCDD (19408

- 74

- 3); 1,2, 3,4,6,7,8

- HpCDD (35822

- 46

- 9); OCDD (3268

- 87

- 9); 2,3,7,8

- TCDF (51207

- 31

- 9); 1,2,3,7,8

- PeCDF (57117

- 41

- 6); 2,3,4,7,8

- PeCDF (57117

- 31

- 4); 1,2,3,4,7,8

- HxCDF (70648

- 26

- 9); 1,2,3,6,7,8

- HxCDF (57117

- 44

- 9); 2,3,4,6,7,8

- HxCDF (60851

- 34

- 5); 1,2,3,7,8,9

- HxCDF (72918

- 21

- 9); 1,2,3,4,6,7,8

- HpCDF (67562

- 39

- 4); 1,2,3,4,7,8,9

- HpCDF (55673

- 89

- 7); OCDF (39001

- 02

- 0); Other TCDD (41903

- 57

- 5); Other PeCDD (36088

- 22

- 9); Other HxCDD (34465

- 46

- 8); Other HpCDD (37871

- 00

- 4); Other TCDF (5722

- 27

- 5); Other PeCDF (30402

- 15

- 4); Other HxCDF (55684

- 94

- 1); Other HpCDF (38998

- 75

- 3); Total Dioxins; Total Furans

 Formaldehyde (50

- 00

- 0)

 Hexavalent Chromium (Hex Chrome) (1854

- 02

- 99)

 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) (7664

- 39

- 3)

 Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) (7647

- 01

- 0)

 Method 29 HAP: A rsenic (7440

- 38

- 2), Chromium (7440

- 47

- 3), Lead (7439

- 92

- 1), Manganese (7439

- 96

- 5), Mercury (7439

- 97

- 6), Nickel (7440

- 02

- 0), Phosphorous (7723

- 14

- 0)

### 4 / 21 /10



### 3

 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Naphthalene (91

- 20

- 3); 2

- Methylnaphthalene (91

- 57

- 6); Acenaphthylene (208

- 96

- 8); Acenaphthene (83

- 32

- 9); Fluorene (86

- 73

- 7); Phenanthrene (85

- 01

- 8); Anthracene (120

- 12

- 7); Fluoranthene (206

- 44

- 0); Pyrene (129

- 00

- 0); Benzo(a)Anthracene (56

- 55

- 3); Chrysene (218

- 01

- 9); Benzo(b)Fluoranthene (205

- 99

- 2); Benzo(k)Fluoranthene (20 7

- 08

- 9); Benzo(e)Pyrene (192

- 97

- 2); Benzo(a)Pyrene (50

- 32

- 8); Perylene (198

- 55

- 0); Indeno(1,2,3

- cd)Pyrene (193

- 39

- 5); Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene (53

- 70

- 3); Benzo(ghi)Perylene (191

- 24

- 2);

 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 3,3',4,4'

- TCB (PCB77) (32598

- 3

- 3); 3,4 ,4',5

- TCB (PCB81) (70362

- 50

- 4); 2,3,3',4,4'

- PeCB (PCB105) (32598

- 14

- 4); 2,3,4,4',5

- PeCB (PCB114) (74472

- 37

- 0); 2,3',4,4',5

- PeCB (PCB118) (65510

- 44

- 3); 2',3,4,4',5

- PeCB (PCB123) (57465

- 28

- 8); 3,3',4,4',5

- PeCB (PCB126) (57465

- 28

- 8); 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3 ',4,4',5'

- HxCB (PCBs156/157) (38380

- 08

- 4/69782

- 90

- 7); 2,3',4,4',5,5'

- HxCB (PCB167) (52663

- 72

- 6); 3,3',4,4',5,5'

- HxCB (PCB169) (32774

- 16

- 6); 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'

- HpCB (PCB189) (39635

- 31

- 9); Other Mono

- CBs (27323

- 18

- 8); Other Di

- CBs (25512

- 42

- 9); Other Tri

- CBs (25323

- 68

- 6); Other Tetra

- CBs (26914

- 33

- 0); Other Penta

- CBs (25429

- 29

- 2); Other Hexa

- CBs (26601

- 64

- 9); Other Hepta

- CBs (28655

- 71

- 2); Other Octa

- CBs (55722

- 26

- 4); Other Nona

- CBs (53742

- 07

- 7); DeCB (2051

- 24

- 3); Total PCBs (1336

- 36

- 3); Total TEQ


### Depending on the configuration of the facility , the type of ferroalloys produced, and the design of the overall test program, you will be required to determine emissions using stack tests, material analyses, and/or visual emissions observations. We und erstand that emission testing for

### 4 / 21 /10



### 4

air pollutants may have been recently completed for some or all of the facilities. In that case, we are not requesting additional emission testing, but only the submittal of the test reports representative of your current operations. Please note that it may be acceptable to test a subset of the operations if you demonstrate that the operations in the subset are representative of the other untested subsets. Prior EPA approval would be required if you choose to test a subs et of the sources. If you intend to submit past test data or test data representative of subset operations, you must do so by May 15, 2010 because if EPA determines that such data are not representative, you will need to conduct the testing required by th is ICR and submit the test results by August 31, 2010

. Please refer to the cover letter of this packet (CAA section 114 letter) for additional testing information , including the specific sources to be tested at your facility . Please note that you do no t have to submit a test plan to EPA for approval prior to testing ; h owever , we recommend that you prepare a test plan for your own use to assist in the planning and to verify that you address all of the testing and reporting requirements. Please note that you also must report your process and emissions testing data using the EPA Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT)
, where applicable. The ERT requires you to report most elements of a test plan. Enclosure 7 of this ICR provides an example of the EPA ERT test pl an. You are directed to the ERT ( http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/ert_tool.html ) for a more complete and interactive description of these test plan elements.

1.1 How to Select Sample Location and Gas Composition Analysis Methods You must use EPA Method 1 of Appendix A of Part 60 to select the locations and number of traverse points for sampling except as otherwise specified in section 1.2 and the associated tables below except as otherwise spe cified in section 1.2 and the associated tables below

. See http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/method1.html for a copy of the method and guidance information for sampling situations not meeting Method 1 criteria. For analysis of flue gas composition, incl uding oxygen concentration, you must use EPA Method 3A or 3B of Appendix A of Part 60. See http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/method3a.html for Method 3A or http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/method3b.html for Method 3B information.

For information on whe re you must conduct simultaneous sampling, see Tables 1 through 5

. 1.2 Test Methods and Reporting

Table s 1 through 5 present a summary of the recommended test methods for each pollutant and possible alternative methods. For copies of the recommended U. S. EPA methods, Performance Specifications (if applicable) and additional information, please refer to EPA’s

### 4 / 21 /10



### 5

Emission Measurement Center website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/

. For copies of the recommended U.S. E PA SW

- 846 methods, please refer to EPA’s SW

- 846 Online website: http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/index.htm

. If you would like to use a method not on this list, pl ease contact EPA for approval of an alternative method. Please direct test method and reporting questions to the contacts identified in Section 4.0 of this enclosure

. Each test should include three test runs at each sampling location. In some cases, t e sting is to be performed for the identified pollutants after the last control device (i.e., stack or other point representing the composition of the flue gases at the exit to the atmosphere). In other cases, testing at the inlet of the control device is s pecified. In the case of positive pressure fabric filters, conduct a single line multi

- point sampling traverse of the exhaust of one compartment of the fabric filter using the procedure for setting isokinetic sampling rates as described in Method 5D. Ple ase note that each emission source selected for testing must be operated under conditions that are representative of normal production and operation during testing. If conducting a test on a fabric filter, the compartment selected should be one recently r efitted with new bags.
All pollutant concentrations should be corrected to 7% oxygen and should be reported on the same moisture basis. The recommended units of concentration for each pollutant vary, and are listed in the test method tables. Report t he results of your stack tests according to the directions provided in Section 2 .0 of this enclosure. In addition to the emission test data, we also require a report of the following process information taken at the time of the emissions test: heat input; material description, composition and feed rate; production rate, emissions control devices in use during the test; control device operating or monitoring parameters (including, as appropriate to the control device, flue gas flow rate, pressure drop, scru bber liquor pH, scrubber liquor flow rate, sorbent type and sorbent injection rate); and any pollution prevention or other hazardous air pollutant emission reduction approaches being implemented during the test program. Make clear, using the Notes section of the Electronic Reporting Tool ( ERT ) 1 

### or spreadsheet the correlation between emissions measurements and process data (e.g., identify Method 23, run 1 for the associated process data on the process data details tab of the ERT).

1.2.1 Electric Arc Furnace Emission Sources

Table 1 lists the pollutants and associated methods for positive pressure fabric filter at FeMn/SiMn producers.

1 See Section 2.0 of this enclosure for more information on reporting information in t he ERT.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 6

Table 1: Electric Arc Furnace C ontrolled by Positive Pressure Fabric Filter at FeMn/SiMn Producer s

– Pollutants and Test Methods Location/ Pollutant 2 Recommended Test/Analysis

Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack filterable PM Method 5; Use Method 5D
,

section 8.3 for establishing isokinetic sampling rates a
, sample a minimum of 4 cubic
meters b

, an d operate with a filter temperature of 250°F +/

- 25
Conduct a single line multi

point sampling traverse of the exhaust of one compartment of the fabric filter

. May determine filterable PM emissions using Method 29, section 8.3.1.1. Total PM (filterable) gr/dscf at 2 % C O 2

Outlet Stack Metal HAP (As, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni , P) Method 29 c,d No permanganate

solution needed if alternative method for Hg is used. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters per run. Use Method 5D, section 8.3 for establishing iso kinetic sampling rates. Use IC(A)P/MS for the analytical finish for front and back half samples separately

. Hg

– ASTM D6784

- 02 (Ontario Hydro Method). Collect a minimum volume of 2.5 cubic meters per run

. May also use U.S. EPA Method 30B , apply the minimum sample volume determination procedures as per the method

. May use Method 29 to collect filterable PM and metals samples in one sampling train , see section 8.4.1.1, in lieu of conducting separate Method 5 testing

.

The Ontario Hydro Method opt ion is available to sources who wish to report speciated Hg in addition to total Hg in order to allow more refined risk modeling. gr/dscf at

2 % C O 2

Outlet Stack

or Inlet HCl and HF Method 26A. Collect a

minimum volume of 2 cubic
meters. Method 26 or M ethod 320 (target in stack DL

< 0.25 ppmv) if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct

. ppmvd at 2 % C O 2

2 Outlet stack refers to sampling locations in the control device outlet. Inlet refers to sampling locations in the duct(s) upstream of the control device.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 7

Location/ Pollutant 2 Recommended Test/Analysis

Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack

or Inlet Hex Chrome U.S. EPA SW

- 846 Method

0061

. Collect a minimum volume of 3 cubic meters. If detection limit much smaller or larger than 0.5 micrograms/m3, alternative sampling volume may be required. gr/dscf at

2 % C O 2

Outlet Stack

or Inlet Formaldehyde Method 316

. Collect a

minimum volume of 1.0 cubic
meter. Method 320. (target in

stack DL of < 25 ppbv) if there a re no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. Method 316 is isokinetic, and Method 320 is nonisokineti c ppmvd at

2 % C O 2

FF Dust PAH, PCBs Extraction by SW 846 Method

3500C/3600, analysis by SW

846 Method 8270D. n g/ K g of dust

FF Dust D/F Ext raction by SW 846 Method

3500C/3600, analysis by SW 846

- 828OB n g/ K g of dust

Coal S Collect three representative

samples of coal during test program with ASTM D2234/2234M

- 10

. Analyze each sample with D3177

- 02 for sulfur in coal, D3172

- 07 for proximate a nalysis, D3176

- 09 for ultimate analysis

. Other ASTM methods providing similar results, including historical ASTM methods, may be used Percent

mass

Inlet CO U.S. EPA Method 10, 10A, or

10B . Collect one 1

- hour test

run corresponding (e.g., overlapping in time) to each of the three formaldehyde test

runs. ppmvd at 2 % C O 2

Outlet Stack and Inlet O 2 /CO 2 U.S. EPA Method 3A U.S. EPA Method 3B M easure O 2 and CO 2 s imultaneous ly with each pollutant
test run to correct for inlet/outlet dilution and to
correct to u nits of

measure

. Volume

%, dry

### 4 / 21 /10



### 8

Location/ Pollutant 2 Recommended Test/Analysis

Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack and Inlet Moisture U.S. EPA Method 4 Method 320 if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. M easure moisture

s imultaneous ly with each pollutant test

run to correct to units of measure

. Volume %

Inlet flow rate EPA Method 2 (see Method

5D, section 8.3 for determining outlet stack flow rate) a Simultaneous with each pollutant test

run ds cf m , acfm

a) Note that you must measure CO2 concentrations at both the inlet and outlet of the positive pr essure fabric filter in conjunction with the pollutant sampling in order to correct pollutant concentrations for dilution and to determine isokinetic sampling rates. You may use either Method 3A or 3B (with integrated bag sampling).
b) For Method 5 testin g only, you may choose to collect less tha n 4 cubic meters per run provided that the filterable mass collected (e.g., net filter mass plus mass of nozzle, probe and filter holder rinses) is equal to or greater than 10

m g. If the total mass collected for two or thr ee of the runs is less than 10 m g, you must conduct at least one additional test run that produces at least 10 m g of filterable mass collected (i.e., at a greater sample volume). Report the results of all test runs.
c) If both mercury and oth er metals will be tested using EPA Method 29, the stack test company should be diligent in the set

- up and handling of the impingers to avoid cross contamination of the manganese from the permanganate into the metals catch. Alternately, the contractor may w ant to collect mercury using a separate train from the train used to collect the other metals
d) Method 29 in Appendix A

- 8 to part 60 of this chapter can also be used for Hg, but follow the procedures for preparation of Hg standards and sample analysis in sections 13.4.1.1 through 13.4.1.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in sections 7.5.33 and 11.1.3 of Method 29, and perform the QA/QC procedures in section 13.4.2 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in section 9.2.3 of Method 29. The tes ter may also opt to use the sample recovery and preparation procedures in ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the Method 29 procedures, as follows: sections 8.2.8 and 8.2.9.1 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.9.1 through 13.2.9.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 ; sect ions 8.2.9.2 and 8.2.9.3 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.10.1 through 13.2.10.4 of ASTM D6784

- 02; section 8.3.4 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.4 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate); and section 8.3.5 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.5 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate).


### Table 2 lists the pollutants and associated methods for positive pressure fabric filter s at FeSi and Si metal producers.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 9

Table 2 Electric Arc Furnace C ontrolled by Positive Pressure Fabric Filter at FeSi/Si Metal Producers

– Pollutants and Test Methods Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack filterable PM Method 5; Use Method 5D,

section 8.3 for establishing isoki netic sampling rates a
, sample a minimum of 4 cubic
meters b , and operate with a filter temperature of 250°F +/

- 25 Conduct a single line multi

point sampling traverse of the exhaust of one compartment of the fabric filter. May determine filterable PM emissi ons using Method 29, section 8.3.1.1. Total PM (filterable) gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack or Inlet HCl and HF Method 26A. Collect a

minimum volume of 2 cubic
meters. Method 26 or Method 320 (target in stack DL of 0.25 ppmv) if there are no entraine d water droplets in the stack or duct (minimum 2 cubic meters sample volume).

. Also measure O2 and

CO2 to correct for dilution and to correct
to measurement conditions. C ombine with Method 5 to collect filterable PM and metals samples in one sampling tra in. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack Speciated Hg Hg

– ASTM D6784

- 02 (Ontario Hydro Method). Collect a minimum volume of 2.5 cubic meters per

run . May also use U.S. EPA Method 30B , apply the minimum sample volume determination procedures as per the method

. This option is available

to sources who wish to report speciated Hg in addition to total Hg in order to allow more refined risk modeling. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack or Inlet Formaldehyde Method 316

. Collect a

minimum volume of 1.0 cubic meter. Method 320 (target in

- stack DL of < 25 ppbv) if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct Method 316 is

isokinetic, and Method 320 is nonisokineti c P pmvd at 2%CO 2

### 4 / 21 /10



### 10

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure FF Dust Metal HAP Metal HAP (As, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni , P) Coal Dust Mercury Collect one representative FF

dust sample for each pollutant test run. Prepare and analyze each sample: e xtraction by SW 846 Method 3052,

Collect three representative samples of coal during test program with ASTM D2234/2234M

- 10

.

ASTM D6357

- 04, analysis by SW

- 846 Method 6010B /C , ASTM D3683

- 94 (2000), SW

- 846 Method 6020, 6020A for trace metals analyses. Other ASTM methods providing similar results, including historical ASTM methods, may be used

. May prepare dust or coal samples for analyses with SW

846 Method 3050B or 3050 for total selected metal. mg/ K g of dust

FF Dust Hex Chrome Extraction by SW 846

Method 3060A, analysis by SW

- 846

- 7195, 7197, 7198. mg/ K g of dust

FF Dust PAH, PCBs Extraction by SW 846

Method 3500C/3600, analysis by SW

- 846 Method 8270D. n g/ K g of dust

FF Dust D/F Extraction by SW 846

Method 3500C/3600, analysis by SW 846

- 828OB n g/ K g of dust

Coal S Collect three representative

samples of coal during test program with ASTM D2234/2234M

- 10

. Analyze each sample with D3177

- 02 for sulf ur in coal, D3172

- 07 for proximate analysis, D3176

- 09 for ultimate analysis

. Other ASTM methods providing similar results, including historical ASTM methods, may be used Percent mass

Inlet CO U.S. EPA Method 10, 10A, or

10B . Collect one 1

- hour test

run corresponding to each of the three formaldehyde test

runs. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack and Inlet U.S. EPA Method 3A U.S. EPA Method 3B M easure O 2 and CO 2

s imultaneous ly with Volume %, dry

### 4 / 21 /10



### 11

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure O 2 /CO 2 each pollutant test run to correct for inlet/outlet dilution and
to cor rect to units of

measure

.
Outlet Stack and Inlet Moisture U.S. EPA Method 4 Method 320 if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. Simultaneous with each

pollutant test run Volume %

Inlet F low R ate EPA Method 2 (see Meth od

5D, section 8.3 for determining outlet stack flow rate) a Simultaneous with each pollutant test run ds cf m , acfm

a) Note that you must measure CO2 concentrations at both the inlet and outlet of the positive pressure fabric filter in conjunction with t he pollutant sampling in order to correct pollutant concentrations for dilution and to determine isokinetic sampling rates. You may use either Method 3A or 3B (with integrated bag sampling).
b) For Method 5 testing only, you may choose to collect less tha n 4 cubic meters per run provided that the filterable mass collected (e.g., net filter mass plus mass of nozzle, probe and filter holder rinses) is equal to or greater than 10

m g. If the total mass collected for two or thr ee of the runs is less than 10 m g, you must conduct at least one additional test run that produces at least 10 m g of filterable mass collected (i.e., at a greater sample volume). Report the results of all test runs.



### Table 3 lists the pollutants and associated methods for scrubber s

.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 12

Table 3 : Electric Arc Furnace C ontrolled by a Scrubber at FeMn/SiMn Producers

– Pollutants and Test Methods Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack filterable PM Method 5 with a filter

temperature of 250°F +/

- 25 May determine filterable PM emissions using Method 29, section 8.3.1.1. Total PM (filterable) gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack Metal HAP (As, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, P) Method 29 a,b No

permanganate solution needed if alter native method for Hg is used. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters per run. Determine total filterable PM emissions according to

sec tion 8.3 .1.1 . Use IC(A)P/MS for the analytical finish for front and back half samples separately

. Hg

– ASTM D6 784

- 02 (Ontario Hydro Method). Collect a minimum volume of 2.5 cubic meters per

run . May also use U.S. EPA Method 30B , apply the minimum sample volume determination procedures as per the method

. May use Method 29 to

collect filterable PM and metals samp les in one sampling train , see section 8.4.1.1, in lieu of conducting separate Method 5 testing

.

The Ontario Hydro Method option is available to sources who wish to report speciated Hg in addition to total Hg in order to allow more refined risk mod eling. gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack HCl and HF Method 26A. Collect a

minimum volume of 2 cubic
meters. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack Hex Chrome U.S. EPA SW

- 846 Method

0061

. Collect a minimum volume of 3 cubic meters If detection limit much smalle r or larger than 0.5 micrograms/m3, alternative sampling volume may be required. gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack PAH, PCBs, and D/F Method 23 for D/Fs and

PCBs

. Method 0010 for PAHs. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters per run

. For Method 0010

s amples, u se Method 8270C or 8270D with isotope dilution mass spectrometry combined with high resolution GC for the analytical finish. May analyze Method 23 samples also for 19 PAHs listed above using HRGC/HRMS in lieu of separate Method 0010. ng/dscm at 2 %CO 2

### 4 / 21 /10



### 13

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack Formaldehyde Method 316. Collect a

minimum volume of 1.0 cubic meter ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Coal S Collect three representative

samples of coal during test program with ASTM D2234/2234M

- 10

. Analyze with D3177

- 02 for sulfur in coal, D3172

- 07 for proximate analysis, D3176

- 09 for ultimate analysis

. Other ASTM methods providing similar results, including historical ASTM methods, may be used Percent mass

Outlet Stack CO U.S. EPA Method 10, 10A, or

10B

. Collect one 1

- hour test

run corresponding to each of the three formaldehyde test

runs. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack O 2 /CO 2 U.S. EPA Method 3A U.S. EPA Method 3B Simultaneous with each

pollutant test run to correct for units of

measure Volume %, dry

Outlet Stack Moisture U.S. EPA Method 4 Method 320 if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. Simultaneous with each

pollutant test run Volume %

Outlet Stack F low R ate EPA Method 2 Simultaneous with each pollutant test run ds cf m , acfm

a) If both mercury and other metals will be tested using EPA Method 29, the stack test company should be diligent in the set

- up and handling of the impingers to avoid cross contamination of the manganese from the permanganate into the metals catch. Alternately, the contractor may want to collect mercury using a separate train from the train used to collect the other metals
b) Method 29 in Appendix A

- 8 to part 60 of this chapter can also be used for Hg, but follow the procedures for preparation of Hg standards and sample analysis in sections 13.4. 1.1 through 13.4.1.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in sections 7.5.33 and 11.1.3 of Method 29, and perform the QA/QC procedures in section 13.4.2 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in section 9.2.3 of Method 29. The tester may also op t to use the sample recovery and preparation procedures in ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the Method 29 procedures, as follows: sections 8.2.8 and 8.2.9.1 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.9.1 through 13.2.9.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 ; sections 8.2.9.2 an d 8.2.9.3 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.10.1 through 13.2.10.4 of ASTM D6784

- 02; section 8.3.4 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.4 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate); and section 8.3.5 of Method 29 can be replaced wi th section 13.3.5 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate).

### 4 / 21 /10



### 14

Table 4 lists the pollutants and associated methods for a semi

- sealed furnace with uncontrolled vent stacks.

Table 4 Semi

- sealed Electric Arc Furnaces Uncontrolled Vent Stack at FeMn/SiMn

Pro ducer

--- Pollutants and Test Methods

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack filterable PM Method 5 with a filter

temperature of 250°F +/

- 25 Total PM (filterable) gr/dscf at 2%C O 2 Outlet St ack Metal HAP (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, P) Method 29 a,b No

permanganate solution needed if alternative method for Hg is used. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters per run. Determine total filterable PM emissions according to section 8.3.1.1. Use IC(A)P/MS for the analytical finish for front and back half samples separately

. Hg

– ASTM D6784

- 02 (Ontario Hydro Method). Collect a minimum volume of 2.5 cubic meters per

run . May also use U.S. EPA Method 30B , apply the minimum sample volume d etermination procedures as per the method

. May use Method 29 to

collect filterable PM and metals samples in one sampling train , see section 8.4.1.1, in lieu of conducting separate Method 5 testing

.

The Ontario Hydro Method option is available to so urces who wish to report speciated Hg in addition to total Hg in order to allow more refined risk modeling. gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet HCl and HF Method 26A. Collect a

minimum of 2 cubic meters. Method 26 or Method 320 (target in stack DL of 0.25 ppmv). if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Hex Chrome Method 306. Collect a

minimum volume of 3 cubic meters and use either GFAAS or IC/PCR analysis. U.S. EPA SW

- 846 Method 0061



### . Collect a minimum volume of 3 cubic meters If detection limit much

smaller or larger than 0.5 micrograms/m3, alternative sampling volume may be required. gr/dscf at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack PAH, PCBs, and D/F Method 23 for D/Fs and

PCBs

. Method 0010 for PAHs. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters using Method 5D, section 8.3, for establishing isokinetic sampling rates. For Method 0010 samples, May analyze Method 23 samples also for 19 PAHs listed above using HRGC/HRMS in lieu of separate Method 0010. .

. ng/dscm @ 2%CO 2

### 4 / 21 /10



### 15

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Method Comments Units of Measure

u se Method 8270C or 8270D with isotope dilution mass spectrometry combined with high resolution GC for the analytical finish. Outlet Formaldehyde Method 316. Collect a

minimum volume of 1.0 cubic meter. Method 320. (target in

- stack DL of < 25 ppbv) if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack CO U.S. EPA Method 10, 10A,

or 10B . Collect one 1

- hour
test run corresponding to each of the three formaldehyde test runs. ppmvd at 2%CO 2

Outlet Stack O 2 /CO 2 U.S. EPA Met hod 3A U.S. EPA Method 3B Simultaneous with each

pollutant test run to correct for units of

measure

. Volume %, dry

Outlet Stack Moisture U.S. EPA Method 4 Method 320 if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. Simultaneous with each

pol lutant test run Volume %

Outlet Stack F low R ate EPA Method 2 Simultaneous with each pollutant test run ds cf m , acfm

a) If both mercury and other metals will be tested using EPA Method 29, the stack test company should be diligent in the set

- up and hand ling of the impingers to avoid cross contamination of the manganese from the permanganate into the metals catch. Alternately, the contractor may want to collect mercury using a separate train from the train used to collect the other metals
b) Method 29 in Appendix A

- 8 to part 60 of this chapter can also be used for Hg, but follow the procedures for preparation of Hg standards and sample analysis in sections 13.4.1.1 through 13.4.1.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in sections 7.5.33 and 11.1.3 o f Method 29, and perform the QA/QC procedures in section 13.4.2 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in section 9.2.3 of Method 29. The tester may also opt to use the sample recovery and preparation procedures in ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the Method 29 procedures, as follows: sections 8.2.8 and 8.2.9.1 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.9.1 through 13.2.9.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 ; sections 8.2.9.2 and 8.2.9.3 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.10.1 through 13.2.10.4 of ASTM D6784

- 02; section 8.3.4 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.4 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate); and section 8.3.5 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.5 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate). Table 4 lists the pollutants and associated methods for a semi

- sealed furnace with uncontrolled vent stacks.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 16

1.2.2 Other Controlled Emissions Sources

Table 5 lists the pollutants and associated methods for negative pressure fabric filters that control tapping , raw material handling, an d product handling emissions.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 17

Table 5 : Negative Pressure Fabric Filter at Tapping , Raw Material Handling, Product Handling and Metal Oxygen Refining Emissions Points

– Pollutants and Test Methods

Pollutant Recommended

Test/Analysis Method Alternate Met hod Comments Units of Measure Outlet Stack filterable PM Method 5 with a filter

temperature of 250°F +/

- 25 Total PM (filterable) gr/dscf

Outlet Stack Metal HAP (As, C r, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, P) Method 29 a,b No

permanganate solution needed if alternative method for Hg is used. Collect a minimum volume of 4.0 cubic meters per run. Determine total filterable PM emissions according to section 8.3.1.1. Use IC(A)P/MS for the analytical finish for front and back half samples separately

. Hg

– ASTM D6784

- 02 (Ontario Hydro Method). Collect a minimum volume of 2.5 cubic meters per

run . May also use U.S. EPA Method 30B , apply the minimum sample volume determination procedures as per the method

. May use Method 29 to

collect filterable PM and metals samples in one sampling train , see section 8.4.1.1, in lieu of conducting separate Method 5 testing

.

The Ontario Hydro Method option is available to sources who wish to report speciated Hg in addition to total Hg in order to allow more refined risk modeling. gr/dscf

Outlet Stack Moisture U.S. EPA Method 4 Method 320 if there are no entrained water droplets in the stack or duct. Simultaneous with each

pollutant test run Volume %

Outlet Stack F low rate EPA Method 2 Simultaneous with each pollutant test ru n ds cf m , acfm

a) If both mercury and other metals will be tested using EPA Method 29, the stack test company should be diligent in the set

- up and handling of the impingers to avoid cross contamination of the manganese from the permanganate into the metal s catch. Alternately, the contractor may want to collect mercury using a separate train from the train used to collect the other metals
b) Method 29 in Appendix A

- 8 to part 60 of this chapter can also be used for Hg, but follow the procedures for preparat ion of Hg standards and sample analysis in sections 13.4.1.1 through 13.4.1.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedures in sections 7.5.33 and 11.1.3 of Method 29, and perform the QA/QC procedures in section 13.4.2 of ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the procedur es in section 9.2.3 of Method 29. The tester may also opt to use the sample recovery and preparation procedures in ASTM D6784

- 02 instead of the Method 29 procedures, as follows: sections 8.2.8 and 8.2.9.1 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.9. 1 through 13.2.9.3 of ASTM D6784

- 02 ; sections 8.2.9.2 and 8.2.9.3 of Method 29 can be replaced with sections 13.2.10.1 through 13.2.10.4 of ASTM D6784

- 02; section 8.3.4 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.4 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as approp riate); and section 8.3.5 of Method 29 can be replaced with section 13.3.5 or 13.3.6 of ASTM D6784

- 02 (as appropriate). Table 4 lists the pollutants and associated methods for a semi

- sealed furnace with uncontrolled vent stacks.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 18

1. 2.3 Visible Emissions fro m Furnace Building Fugitive Emission Sources and Control Device Outlets As instructed in the ICR cover letter, if you do not conduct routine visible emissions (Method 22 or Method 9) monitoring of the furnace building roof monitor and/or control device

ou tlet, conduct the following observations, consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR 63 .11528(b) and (c).

 Conduct a 60

- minute Method 9 opacity observation of the furnace building roof monitor during normal operations.

 Conduct a 60

- minute Method 22 visibl e emissions observation of each EAF control device outlet that is tested

. 2 .0 How to Report Data The method for reporting the results of any testing and monitoring requests depend on the type of tests and methods used to complete the test requirements. This section discusses the requirements for reporting the data.

2 .1 Reporting Stack Test Data If you conduct testing using one of the methods listed in Table 2, you must report your data using the EPA ERT. At present, only these methods are supported b y the ERT. ERT is a Microsoft ® 

### Access database application. Two versions of the ERT application are available. If you are not a registered owner of Microsoft ® 

### Access, you can install the runtime version of the ERT Application. Both versions of the ERT a re available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/ert_tool.html

. The ERT supports an Excel spreadsheet application (which is included in the files downloaded with the ERT) to document the coll ection of the field sampling data. After completing the ERT, you will also need to attach an electronic copy of the emission test report (i.e., complete reports with process description, field and analytical data sheets, and the calculations and preferably in PDFformat) to the Attachments module of the ERT.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 19

Table 7 : List of Test Methods Currently Supported by ERT

EPA Test Methods (40 CFR parts 60 and 61; EMC website, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html; and SW 846, http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazar d/testmethods/sw846/online/index.htm) Methods 1 through 4 (testing locations, velocity, moisture, dilution gases) Method 3A (O 2 and CO 2) Method 5 (filterable PM) Method 10 (CO) Method 23 (PCDDS and PCDFs) Methods 26 and 26A (HCl and HF) Method 29 (m ultiple metals including Hg) Method 0011 (SW 846) (aldehydes including formaldehyde)



### If you conducted a stack test or material analysis using a method not currently supported by the ERT (e.g., Method 306 or SW

- 846 ) , use the spreadsheets in the attached Microsoft ® 

### Excel Emission Test Reporting file for each method. The Excel spreadsheets are specific to the pollutants measure d and test method. You must report the results of each test on the appropriately labeled worksheet corresponding to the specific tests requested at your facility. If more than one source at your facility was tested using methods not currently supported by the ERT, you must make a copy of the worksheet and update the source ID in order to distinguish between each separate test. Aft er completing the worksheet, you must also submit an electronic copy of the emission test report (i.e., complete reports with process description, field and analytical data sheets, and the calculations and preferably in PDF format)

. 2

. 2 Required Fields for ERT Reporting

Enclosure 7 provides an EPA ERT Version 3 example test plan and lists each field within the ERT and notes whether or not the field is required or optional.

2

. 3 Calculating and Reporting Values Measured Below Detection Levels
See Appendix A

– Guidance for calculating and reporting measurements less than detection levels for emissions data collection (ICR) programs

3 .0 How to Submit Data Where applicable, you must submit your data using the ERT or, if the ERT does not support a particular p ollutant or method, the data reporting spreadsheet we provide. Use one of
two transmittal ways listed below. In order to avoid duplicate data and keep all data for a particular facility together, we request that you submit all of the data requested from your facility

### 4 / 21 /10



### 20

in the same way. To submit your data , m ail a CD or DVD containing an electronic copy of all requested files to the EPA address below:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA Mailroom (D243

- 02) Attn: Mr. Conrad Chin 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

If the process data or other information you are providing is considered confidential, please create a separate CD or DVD containing only the confidential portion of you r data or prepare a copy of the hard copy materials containing only the pages that include the information you consider confidential. Clearly mark the disk and/or materials with the words “Confidential Business Information.” Send these confidential files u nder separate cover to the attention of Mr. Roberto Morales at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA Mailroom (C404

- 02) Attn: Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

For the security of your data, EPA recommends sending your confidential files to Mr. Morales via Registered U.S. Mail using return receipt requested, Federal Express, or other method for which someon e must provide a signature upon receipt. Do not electronically transmit confidential business information (CBI) to EPA. E

- mail and facsimile are not secure forms of communication and should never be used to transmit CBI.

### 4 / 21 /10



### 21

4 .0 Contact Informatio n for Questions on Test Plan and Reporting

For questions on how to report data using the ERT, contact:

Ron Myers (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 5407 Myers.Ron@epa.gov

Barrett Parker (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 5635 Parker.Barrett@epa.gov

For questions on the test methods contact:

Jason DeWees (U.S. EPA) 919

- 541

- 9724 Dewees.Jason@epa.gov

Gary McAlister (U.S. EPA) 919

- 541

- 1062 McAlister.Gary@epa.gov

Peter Westlin (U.S. EPA) 919

- 541

- 1058 Westlin.Peter@epa.gov

For questions on the Ferroalloys test plan, test methods, reporting mechanisms other than the ERT, contact:

Conrad Chin (U.S. EPA) (919) 541

- 1512 chin.conrad@epa.gov

### 4 / 21 /10



### 1 Appendix A

Guidance for Calculating and Reporting Values Measured Below Method Detection Levels Identify the status of measured v alues relative to detection levels on the spreadsheet or in the ERT using the following descriptions:

 BDL (below detection level)

– all analytical values used to calculate and report an in

stack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s reported detec tion level(s);

 DLL (detection level limited)

– at least one but not all values used to calculate and report an in

- stack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s); or

 ADL (above detection level)

– all analytical values used to calculate and report an in

stack emissions value are greater than the laboratory’s reported detection level(s).

 For reporting and calculating individual test run data

o For analytical data reported from the laboratory as “nondetect” or “below detection level;”

 Include a brief description of the procedures used to determine the analytical detection and in

- stack detection levels:

 In the Notes line of Excel spreadsheet template; or

 In the Comments line of Lab Data tab in the Run Data Details in the ERT.

 Des cribe these procedures completely in the full test report including the measurements made, the standards used, and the statistical procedures applied.

 Calculate the in

- stack emissions rate for any analytical result reported as below detection level using t he relevant analytical detection level as the reported value. Note that the analytical detection level used in this calculation is not the analytical reporting level many laboratories provide. The analytical detection level is most often defined as the

m inimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99 percent confidence that the value is above zero. 3 

### The analytical reporting level is often an arbitrary multiplication of the method detection level.

 Report the calculated emi ssions concentration or rate result:

 As a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<0.0105]) in the Excel spreadsheet template and include the appropriate flag in the Note line (see below); or

 As a numerical value in the ERT with the appropria te flag in the Comments line (see below).

3 SW 836 Method 8000B, Determinative Chromatographic Separations, http://www.epa.gov/waste/ hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/8000b.pdf

### 4 / 21 /10



### 2  Report as numerical values (i.e., no brackets or < symbol) any analytical data measured above the detection limit including any data between the analytical detection level and a laboratory

- specific reporting or qua ntification level (i.e., flag as ADL, see below).

 Apply these reporting and calculation procedures to measurements made with Method 23 :

 Report data in the ERT for each of the D/F congeners measured with Method 23 below the detection level as [< detection l evel];

 Do not report emissions as zero, as described in the method.

 For identifying the status of measured values relative to in

- stack method detection levels on the spreadsheet or in the ERT; for each reported emissions value, insert the appropriate flag (BDL, DLL, or ADL as defined below) in the Notes line of the Excel spreadsheet template or the Comments line of the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT).

o BDL (below detection level)

– all analytical values used to calculate and report an in

- stack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s method detection level(s);

o DLL (detection level limited)

– at least one but not all values used to calculate and report an in

- stack emissions value are less than the laboratory’s method detection level(s); or

o ADL (abo ve detection level)

- all analytical values used to calculate and report an in

- stack emissions value are greater than the laboratory’s method detection level(s).

### 4 / 21 /10



### 3

 For pollutant measurements composed of multiple components or fractions (e.g., Hg and other m etals sampling trains) when the result for the value for any component is measured below the analytical detection level:

o Calculate in

- stack emissions rate or concentrations as outlined above for each component or fraction;

o Sum the measured and detection l evel values as outlined above using the in

- stack emissions rate or concentrations for all of the components or fractions; and

o Report the sum of all components or fractions:

 As a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<0.0105]) in the Excel spr eadsheet template and include the appropriate flag in the Note line; or

 As a numerical value in the ERT with the appropriate flag in the Comments line.

o Report also the individual component or fraction values for each run if the Excel spreadsheet template or ERT format allows; if not (i.e., the format allows reporting only a single sum value):

 For the Excel spreadsheet template, next to the sum reported as above report in the Notes line the appropriate flag along with the values for the measured or detectio n level value for each component or fraction as used in the calculations (e.g., 0.036, [<0.069], 1.239, [<0.945] for a four fraction sample)

 For the ERT, next to the sum reported as above, report on the Comments line the appropriate flag and the measured o r detection level value for each component or fraction as used in the calculations (e.g., 0.036, [<0.069], 1.239, [<0.945] for a four fraction sample)

 For measurements conducted using instrumental test methods (e.g., Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, 25A):

o Record ga seous concentration values as measured including negative values and flag as ADL; do not report as BDL

o Calculate and report in

- stack emissions rates using these measured values

o Include relevant information relative to calibration gas values or other techni cal qualifiers for measured values in Comments line in the ERT

 For reporting and calculating average emissions rate or concentration for a test when some results are reported as BDL

o Sum all of the test run values including those indicated as BDL or DLL as numerical values

o Calculate the average emissions rate or concentration (e.g., divide the sum by 3 for a three

- run test)

o Report the average emissions rate or concentration average:

 As a bracketed “less than” detection level value (e.g., [<20.06]) in the Exc el spreadsheet template and include the appropriate flag in the Note line As a numerical value in the ERT and include the appropriate flag in the relevant Comments lineWorksheet Title: Inlet Hexavalent Chromium Emission Test Data

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Process Unit ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate whether the test occurred upstream or downstream of a control device(s) For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Required Operating Parameters During Test Production Rate (Tons/hr) Tons/hr Emission Data Hexavalent Chromium mg/m 3 @ 2% CO2 Other Operating Parameters During Test Exhaust Stream % Moisture % Exhaust Stream % O 2 % O 2 Exhaust Flowrate dscfm Exhaust Temperature degrees F

Notes: Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response Facilities that were selected to test for Inlet Hexavalent Chromium using SW-846 Method 0061

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Inlet or Outlet Formaldehyde Emission Test Data

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Process Unit ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate whether the test occurred upstream or downstream of a control device(s) For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Required Operating Parameters During Test Production Rate (Tons/hr) Tons/hr Emission Data Formaldehyde ppmvd @ 2% CO 2 Other Operating Parameters During Test Exhaust Stream % Moisture % Exhaust Stream % O 2 % O 2 Exhaust Flowrate dscfm Exhaust Temperature degrees F

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test for Inlet Formaldehyde using Method 316

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Fabric Filter Dust Metal HAP Test Data

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Fabric Filter ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate which fabric filter the dust was sampled from. For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Lab Results Data Arsenic (dry basis) mg/Kg Chromium (dry basis) mg/Kg Lead (dry basis) mg/Kg Manganese (dry basis) mg/Kg Mercury (dry basis) mg/Kg Nickel (dry basis) mg/Kg Phosphorus (dry basis) mg/Kg % Moisture (as received) %

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test for Fabric Filter Metal HAP using SW 846 Method 3052 analysis by SW 846 Method 6010B, ASTM D 3683-94 (2000), SW 846 Method 6020, 6020A

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Fabric Filter Dust Test Data

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Fabric Filter ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate which fabric filter the dust was sampled from. For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Lab Results Data Hexavalent Chromium (dry basis) mg/Kg % Moisture (as received) %

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test for Fabric Filter Dust Hexavalent Chromium using SW 846 Method 3060A, analysis by SW 846 Method 7195, 7197, 7198

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Fabric Filter Dust PAH, PCB Test Data Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Fabric Filter ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate which fabric filter the dust was sampled from. For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Lab Results Data Naphthalene (91-20-3) ng/Kg 2-Methylnaphthalene (91-57-6) ng/Kg Acenaphthylene (208-96-8) ng/Kg Acenaphthene (83-32-9) ng/Kg Fluorene (86-73-7) ng/Kg Phenanthene (85-01-8) ng/Kg Anthracene (120-12-7) ng/Kg Fluoranthene (206-44-0) ng/Kg Pyrene (129-00-0) ng/Kg Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3) ng/Kg Chrysene (218-01-9) ng/Kg Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2) ng/Kg Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9) ng/Kg Benzo(e)pyrene (192-97-2) ng/Kg Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8) ng/Kg Perylene (198-55-0) ng/Kg Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5) ng/Kg Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3) ng/Kg Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2) ng/Kg 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) (32598-3-3) ng/Kg 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) (70362-50-4) ng/Kg 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) (32598-14-4) ng/Kg 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) (74472-37-0) ng/Kg 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) (65510-44-3) ng/Kg 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) (57465-28-8) ng/Kg 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) (57465-28-8) ng/Kg 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-HxCB (PCBs156/157) (38380-08-4/69782-90-7) ng/Kg 2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167) (52663-72-6) ng/Kg 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169) (32774-16-6) ng/Kg 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB (PCB189) (39635-31-9) ng/Kg Other Mono-CBs (27323-18-8) ng/Kg Other Di-CBs (25512-42-9) ng/Kg Other Tri-CBs (25323-68-6) ng/Kg Other Tetra-CBs (26914-33-0) ng/Kg Other Penta-CBs (25429-29-2) ng/Kg Other Hexa-CBs (26601-64-9) ng/Kg Other Hepta-CBs (28655-71-2) ng/Kg Other Octa-CBs (55722-26-4) ng/Kg Other Nona-CBs (53742-07-7) ng/Kg DeCB (2051-24-3) ng/Kg Total PCBs (1336-36-3) ng/Kg Total TEQ ng/Kg % Moisture (as received) %

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test for Fabric Filter PAH, PCB using SW 846 Method 3500C/3600, analysis by SW 846 Method 8270D

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Fabric Filter Dust Dioxins/Furans Test Data

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Fabric Filter ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate which fabric filter the dust was sampled from. For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Lab Results Data 2,3,7,8-TCDD (1746-01-6) ng/Kg 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD (40321-76-4) ng/Kg 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD (39227-28-6) ng/Kg 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD (57653-85-7) ng/Kg 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD (19408-74-3) ng/Kg 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (35822-46-9) ng/Kg OCDD (3268-87-9) ng/Kg 2,3,7,8-TCDF (51207-31-9) ng/Kg 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF (57117-41-6) ng/Kg 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF (57117-31-4) ng/Kg 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF (70648-26-9) ng/Kg 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF (57117-44-9) ng/Kg 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF (60851-34-5) ng/Kg 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF (72918-21-9) ng/Kg 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF (67562-39-4) ng/Kg 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF (55673-89-7) ng/Kg OCDF (39001-02-0) ng/Kg Other TCDD (41903-57-5) ng/Kg Other PeCDD (36088-22-9) ng/Kg Other HxCDD (34465-46-8) ng/Kg Other HpCDD (37871-00-4) ng/Kg Other TCDF (5722-27-5) ng/Kg Other PeCDF (30402-15-4) ng/Kg Other HxCDF (55684-94-1) ng/Kg Other HpCDF (38998-75-3) ng/Kg Total Dioxins ng/Kg Total Furans ng/Kg % Moisture (as received) %

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test for Fabric Filter D/F using SW 846 Method 3500C/3600, analysis by SW 846 Method 8280B

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010Worksheet Title: Coal SOx, SO2 Analysis

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?

Spreadsheet Instructions: You should report the results of your emission test here. If you submit more than one test for the units at the same facility, you may copy and paste this worksheet to a new worksheet within this file. To copy and paste a worksheet, follow these steps: 1. On the worksheet you want to copy, select Edit>>Move or Copy Sheet... 2. In the pop-up window, check the box next to "Create a copy" 3. Under "Before Sheet", select the name of the current sheet you are working in and then Click OK. 4. The copied worksheet will be inserted and named according to the current worksheet with a (#) after the name. (The (#) after the name indicates how many copies of the worksheet have been copied and inserted.)

When complete, submit this spreadsheet along with all other files for this facility according to the procedures outlined in Enclosure 2 to the Section 114 letter.

Facility ID: Coal Storage ID:

Parameter Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test Average Units Test Method Used Test Location Note

Provide sample results in the indicated unit. If other unit is provided, please describe units in column J at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used. Indicate source of coal from which the sample was taken. For all pollutants, provide any other information supporting information you think is necessary about this test report. Sample Date (mm/dd/yy) 3/24/10 3/24/10 3/24/10 Lab Results Data % Sulfur (dry basis) ASTM D3177-02 % % Moisture (as received) ASTM D3172-07 % % Ash (as received) ASTM D3172-07 % % Volatile Matter (as received) ASTM D3172-07 % % Fixed Carbon (as received) ASTM D3172-07 % Gross Calorific Value (as received) ASTM D3172-07 MJ/Kg % Carbon (as received) ASTM D3176-09 % % Hydrogen (as received) ASTM D3176-09 % % Nitrogen (as received) ASTM D3176-09 % % Total Sulfur (as received) ASTM D3176-09 % % Oxygen (as received) ASTM D3176-09 %

Notes: Facilities that were selected to test Coal for SOx, SO2 using ASTM D2234/2234M-10 for sampling, D3177-02 for Sulfur, D3172-07 for Proximate Analysis, and D3176-09 for Ultimate Analysis

Enter numerical value when available. If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]).

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

4/21/2010