alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12221]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary conservation and display in the exhibition “On Thin Ice: Dutch Depictions of Extreme Weather” at the J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary conservation and exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22763 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JAKOREAN D. BRADLEY ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 901 LT Case No. 20 19

- CF

- 12790

STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed April 25, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Ste ve Henderson , Judge. Jakorean D. Bradley, Perry, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.

MAKAR , JAY and SOUD , JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

BRYAN ALLEN DONEY,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5357FDB

 ORDER DIRECTING

SERVICE AND RETURN,

§ 2254 PETITION

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254. This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Magistrates’ Rules MJR 3 and MJR 4. Petitioner

has amended the caption of the petition to name Maggie Miller-Stout as the respondent.

Review of the petition shows petition rasing the issues in his attached Washington Court of

Appeals brief. Respondent should address which, if any, of those issues were exhausted as federal

constitutional claims. (Dkt. # 5 exhibit 1). 

(1). The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner’s counsel a copy of this Order, the General Order. The clerk will
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

also send a courtesy copy of the petition to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office Criminal

Justice Division. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner, through counsel, may file and serve a response not later than on the

Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent

may file and serve a reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday

designated for consideration of the matter.

DATED this 6th day of September, 2006. 

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Justin W. Shireman, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Systems, Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Registrant, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.




Date:  May 14, 2007
        /s/ Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. ShiremanVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)




---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-192 JCC

)

v. )

)

ALVIN LOUIS GLASS, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Offense charged: 

Count I: Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C.,

Section 1349

Date of Detention Hearing: June 26, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Patricia Lally. The defendant was represented by Lee Covel.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant is viewed as a danger to the community due to the nature of

the instant offence and criminal history. He is currently on probation in

California for an assault charge with a deadly weapon.

(2) Defendant is viewed as a flight risk as he is homeless and unemployed; his

ties to this district are unknown/unverified and he has a history of failing to 

appear.

Case 2:06-cr-00192-JCC Document 55 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

(3) The defendant stipulated to detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the

United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of June, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00192-JCC Document 55 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 2
1 / 2

Environmentally Friendly Fastener Coating Demonstration (WP-201315)

Objective

Traditionally, steel fasteners have been used with cadmium electroplated coatings followed by a

hexavalent chrome rinse. The environmental hazards associated with cadmium and hexavalent

chromium are well established and significant legislation has been put in place recently to limit their

continued usage. It is critical that suitable replacement technologies be identified that can provide

these high performance characteristics in a cost effective manner. The objective of this project is to

demonstrate for the Department of Defense (DoD) high performance coating technologies which

eliminate the need for cadmium or hexavalent chromate coatings on high-strength fasteners. This will

provide high-strength, corrosion resistant fasteners for use on legacy weapon systems and new

weapon platforms.

Technology Description

Two separate fastener coatings systems have been selected for the demonstration and validation

program. Both coating systems include a sacrificial metal base coat (zinc or aluminum), and an

organic electrocoat topcoat technology that eliminates environmental concerns associated with

currently fielded cadmium and chromium replacement coating systems. The zinc/electrocoat coating

system consists of an inorganic metal flake dip-spin coating based on unique inorganic binder and

zinc flake technologies. This, in combination with the topcoat, will offer a high end corrosion option

which is commercially available at equal or lower cost versus cadmium or other plating alternatives. In

contrast, the aluminum/electrocoat coating system consists of high purity aluminum plating, (HPAP),

coupled with the electrocoat topcoat. This combination provides the highest level of corrosion

performance, closest to that of cadmium, but at potentially higher cost versus cadmium. Each of the

basecoat technologies provide the corrosion resistance and performance characteristics required of a

number of high strength fastener designs. The organic electrocoat topcoat layer provides the

additional barrier properties, corrosion resistance and the required torque tension characteristics.

Benefits

Elimination of hazardous materials currently used for high-strength fasteners will substantially

improve the life cycle costs as well as environmental and occupational health issues associated with

the manufacture and maintenance of DoD weapon systems. During parts processing, cadmium

presents both personnel, and environmental hazards. The approach would impart high end sacrificial

corrosion resistance properties without the use of hazardous chrome or cadmium and without

embrittlement of fasteners. (Anticipated Project Completion - 2016)

Points of Contact
2 / 2

Principal Investigator

Mr. Matt Scott

PPG Industries Inc.

Phone: 412-492-5594

Fax: 412-492-5522

msscott@ppg.com

Program Manager

Weapons Systems and Platforms

SERDP and ESTCP

wp@serdp-estcp.org
June 18, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk 

Price Daniel, Sr. Building 

209 West 14th Street, Room 101 

Austin, Texas 78701

RE: Case No. 03-12-00453-CV; State Bd. For Educator Certification v. Robert D. 

Lange; In the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas at Austin 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Please be advised that the undersigned counsel will be on vacation and out of town

or unavailable from Monday, August 24th through and including Friday, August 28th, 

2015. I respectfully request that no hearings or deadlines be scheduled during that 

period.

Thank you for your attention, and please advise if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Ellen Sameth 

Ellen Sameth

Assistant Attorney General

Administrative Law Division

Telephone: (512) 936-1838

Facsimile: (512) 474-1062

cc: Kevin F. Lungwitz Via: Electronic Service

LUNGWITZ & LUNGWITZ, P.C.

3005 S. Lamar Blvd

Box D-109-362

Austin, Texas 78704-4785

Kevin@LungwitzLaw.com

 

Post Of fice Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov 

ACCEPTED

03-12-00453-CV

5742747

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/19/2015 9:37:38 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/19/2015 9:37:38 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
# Official Journal L 286/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5830 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 286

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5830 October 2015

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/1929 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 2015 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/1929 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 2015 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerra Mccrea LYLES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6747.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Jerra McCrea Lyles, pro se. Harvey Eisenburg, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Jerra McCrea Lyles seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district *156court. *See United States v. Lyles,*Nos. CR-76-083-Y; CA-01-224-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# C_2007082EN.01000701.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v The Slovak Republic

(Case C-114/06) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 96/48/EC - Trans-European networks - Interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system - Failure to transpose)

(2007/C 82/12)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos and T. Kukal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: The Slovak Republic (represented by: R. Procházka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system (OJ 1996 L 235, p. 6)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96 of 22.4.2006.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****New names for units in thelower part of the Green River Formation, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1529-I
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960990
 
August 21, 2018
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2013

NO. 03-13-00563-CR

Kelvin Pedro Bester, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appeal be 

dismissed in accordance with the opinion of this Court; and it appearing that the appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs be made; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2013

NO. 03-13-00564-CR

Kelvin Pedro Bester, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appeal be 

dismissed in accordance with the opinion of this Court; and it appearing that the appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs be made; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.