alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000877357
<NAME> SEPRACOR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      65,990,000
<SECURITIES>                                41,463,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,662,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   320,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,271,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           115,081,000
<PP&E>                                      26,101,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,312,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,007,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,119,000
<BONDS>                                     80,880,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,752,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,207,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,007,000
<SALES>                                      4,994,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,824,000
<CGS>                                        2,926,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,347,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,903,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,990,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (260,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (260,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (260,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Catalyst for Improving the Environment

Special Report

EPA’s Unliquidated Obligations

for Grants

Report No. 09-N-0150

May 1, 2009
Report Contributors: Paul Curtis

Meg Hiatt

Javier Negron

Alfred Falciani
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF

INSPECTOR GENERAL

May 1, 2009

The Honorable Norman D. Dicks

Chairman

Subcommittee on Interior, Environment

and Related Agencies

Committee on Appropriations

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

On March 4, 2009, I briefed you and Ranking Member Simpson on some of the financial

and programmatic challenges facing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) based on

prior Office of Inspector General work. During this briefing, you requested that I provide

information regarding outstanding unliquidated obligations for the EPA.

Enclosed is the information we obtained from EPA’s records. It is listed in alphabetical

order, summarized by the program name, and includes outstanding unliquidated obligations

associated with that program as of March 31, 2009. The amounts are grouped by year beginning

with Fiscal Years 1980-1999 and 2000-2005; and by individual fiscal year for 2006, 2007, 2008,

and 2009. We also grouped those programs that had amounts outstanding under $100,000 on

one line.

We appreciate your interest in our work. Should you or your staff have any questions on

this report, please contact Melissa Heist, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

(202) 566-0824.

Sincerely,

Bill A. Roderick

Acting Inspector General

Enclosure
Enclosure 1






09-N-0150

Appendix A

Distribution

Office of the Administrator

Agency Follow-up Official (the CFO)

Agency Follow-up Coordinator

Acting General Counsel

Acting Associate Administrator for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations

Acting Associate Administrator for Public Affairs

Acting Inspector General

8
No. 66127.

#### James G. Wiley Co. and Steel, Unlimited *v.*United States,

protest 60/16786(A).

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
Before the Third Division,

October 24, 1967

No. P67/360.

#### Malt Diastase Co. *v.*United States, protests 66/43628 and 66/32491 (New York).

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of dehydrated leek similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corn Products Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 152, C.D. 2567), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8358

ANTONIO CHARLES BLOW, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. WARDEN STANSBERRY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM)

Submitted: May 14, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Charles Blow, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Charles Blow, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blow v. Stansberry , No. 2:08-cv-00426- RGD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 61095.

protest 295266-K/8433 (Chicago).

#### Davies Turner & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, “consists of metal combs not designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, and not colored with gold, lacquer, or wholly or in chief value of gold, and not plated, and not wholly or in chief value of platinum, and not wholly or in chief value of silver,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. As to all other merchandise, the protest was dismissed.
No. 61569.

#### Bates Thompson, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 132676-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
  /s/ David E. Schreiman

David E. SchreimanChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

U.S. v. Jackson, NO. CR06-5060FDB – page 1

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARNOLD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GARY L. JACKSON,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5060FDB

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

The Court having considered the Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of

Counsel, and the accompanying Affidavit of Jerome Kuh and Memorandum in Support

of the Motion;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Federal Public

Defender, and assistant Federal Public Defender Colin A. Fieman, are permitted to

withdraw as defense counsel in this matter, and that new defense counsel shall be

appointed to represent the defendant from the CJA panel. 

Withdrawing counsel shall notify the CJA panel coordinator immediately of this

order. 

DONE this 10th day of February, 2006.

 s/ J Kelley Arnold 

Presented by: J. KELLEY ARNOLD

 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/s/ Jerome Kuh for Colin A. Fieman Jerome Kuh for Colin A. Fieman

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:06-cr-05060-FDB Document 27 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 11
                             THERMOTREX CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                            Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                         ------------------------    ------------------------
                           March 29,    March 30,      March 29,    March 30,
                                1997         1996           1997         1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of
     Primary Earnings
     per Share:

   Net Income (a)        $   188,000  $ 2,103,000    $ 2,951,000  $16,275,000
                         -----------  -----------    -----------  -----------

   Shares:
     Weighted average
       shares outstanding 19,202,682   19,056,506     19,191,812   19,045,402

     Add: Shares issuable
          from assumed
          exercise of
          options (as
          determined by
          the application
          of the treasury
          stock method)            -      626,143              -      617,615
                         -----------  -----------    -----------  -----------

     Weighted average
       shares outstanding,
       as adjusted (b)    19,202,682   19,682,649     19,191,812   19,663,017
                         -----------  -----------    -----------  -----------

   Primary Earnings per
     Share (a) / (b)     $       .01  $       .11    $       .15  $       .83
                         ===========  ===========    ===========  ===========
Before the Second Division,

July 16, 1952

No. 56788.

#### Midwest Waste Material Co. and The A. W. Fenton Co. *v.*United States,

protest 160911-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that which was the subject of *The Midwest Waste Material Co.*and *E. J. Keller Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1382), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Ford, J.,

dissented from the conclusion reached by his associates in this case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1382, *supra.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 22 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 22

Relative to the death of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, formerly a Senator 
                from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 1997

   Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. Kerry) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relative to the death of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, formerly a Senator 
                from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Paul Tsongas, 
formerly a Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; be it 
further
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate these 
resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled 
copy thereof to the family of the deceased; and be it further
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it stands adjourned 
as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 250

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the third Saturday in June of

each year should be designated as ‘‘National Rivers Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 17, 1998

Mr. CHAFEE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the third Saturday

in June of each year should be designated as ‘‘National

Rivers Day’’.

Whereas the United States has a total of 3,000,000 linear

miles of rivers, which have played a fundamental role in

the Nation’s culture, heritage, ecological health, economic

development, and overall quality of life;

Whereas rivers are used throughout the Nation as efficient

transportation routes for commerce and industry, are

used in urban areas as public transportation corridors,

and have facilitated economic growth by providing transportation, generating hydroelectric power, and supplying

water for farms and rural towns;

Whereas rivers support fish, waterfowl, and other wildlife

that need greenways and clean water to survive in their
2

•SRES 250 IS

habitats, and people throughout America live in close

proximity to rivers and streams and use them for swimming, fishing, boating, and other forms of recreation and

leisure;

Whereas the Nation’s rivers are important tourist destinations, which, each year, attract more than 46,000,000

international travelers and generate more than

$430,000,000 in tourism revenue;

Whereas the activities carried out along the Nation’s rivers

affect water resources, environment, and geography on

regional, national, and global scales;

Whereas the President and Congress have declared their support for rivers through the American Heritage Rivers

program; and

Whereas it is appropriate for the people of the United States

from time to time to reflect upon the manner in which

their activities and lifestyles affect the rivers of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 third Saturday in June of each year should be designated

3 as ‘‘National Rivers Day’’.

Æ
Before the First Division,

August 8, 1957

No. 61130.

protests 296202-K, etc. (New York).

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
 China Clean Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 We consent to the use of our report dated March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of China Clean Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, statements of equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of China Clean Energy, Inc.
 
 
 /s/ Frazer Frost, LLP
 
 Brea, California
 March 30, 2011









135 South State College Boulevard, Suite 300 | Brea, California 92821 | 714.990.1040 | frazerfrost.com




Los Angeles and Visalia, CA




FRAZER FROST, LLP is an independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International Limited.
No. 57496.

#### M. A. Katz & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 182712-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked *“A”*were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.206 Money Market Mutual Fund Shares  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineMoney market mutual funds; total financial assets
	FA634090005
	6.8
	30.1
	-84.4
	43.5
	43.4
	118.0
	257.0
	-94.7
	-263.9
	1Money market mutual funds; total financial assets
	FA634090005
	6.8
	30.1
	-84.4
	43.5
	43.4
	118.0
	257.0
	-94.7
	-263.9
	2Households and nonprofit organizations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA153034005
	-25.9
	-44.7
	-153.2
	96.2
	-140.2
	18.1
	110.7
	-28.0
	-236.9
	3Nonfinancial corporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA103034003
	-0.9
	18.6
	-51.9
	3.8
	50.2
	72.2
	-8.8
	9.7
	-7.2
	4Nonfinancial noncorporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA113034003
	2.9
	6.1
	5.2
	6.3
	4.5
	8.3
	6.1
	5.8
	5.3
	5State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA213034003
	6.3
	12.2
	15.1
	4.2
	14.9
	14.8
	3.9
	4.4
	9.5
	6Property-casualty insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA513034003
	-1.9
	3.2
	2.4
	2.3
	4.7
	3.3
	-4.3
	1.1
	-4.0
	7Life insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA543034005
	3.9
	2.8
	-7.2
	-4.2
	44.7
	-22.1
	9.0
	-14.6
	-2.8
	8Private pension funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA573034005
	0.9
	-4.6
	-31.5
	3.6
	10.1
	-0.6
	8.8
	2.2
	2.1
	9State and local government employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA223034005
	2.9
	0.3
	2.4
	2.8
	-6.4
	2.4
	-12.2
	7.2
	0.4
	10Funding corporations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA503034003
	13.4
	35.1
	147.6
	-66.6
	52.2
	7.2
	143.1
	-71.3
	-27.0
	11Rest of the world; U.S. money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FA263034003
	5.1
	1.3
	-13.3
	-4.9
	8.7
	14.5
	0.7
	-11.1
	-3.4
	12 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARVEL L. MORRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5058FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the detainee’s account or the

average monthly balance in the detainee’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the detainee’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:06-cv-05058-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the detainee’s preceding month’s income credited to

the detainee’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the detainee’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the detainee’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the detainee account manager for the Northwest Detention Center.

DATED this 3rd day of March, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05058-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 271

Designating October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 3 (legislative day, AUGUST 31), 1998

Mr. BIDEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National Mammography

Day’’.

Whereas according to the American Cancer Society, in 1998,

178,700 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and

43,500 women will die from this disease;

Whereas in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that

about 2,000,000 women will be diagnosed with breast

cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a

woman at age 70 having twice as much of a chance of

developing the disease as a woman at age 50;

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast

cancer have no family history of the disease;

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a

certified facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;
2

•SRES 271 IS

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is

the key to saving lives;

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers up to 2 years or more before a regular clinical breast

examination or breast self-examination (BSE), reducing

mortality by more than 30 percent; and

Whereas 47 States and the District of Columbia have passed

legislation requiring health insurance companies to cover

mammograms in accordance with recognized screening

guidelines: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates October 16, 1998, as ‘‘National

3 Mammography Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 to observe such day with appropriate programs and

7 activities.

Æ