alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,068
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,548
<PP&E>                                          10,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               94
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,464
<SALES>                                         24,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,440
<CGS>                                            7,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    492
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning United Nations General Assembly

Resolution ES–10/6.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations General Assembly voted on February 9, 1999, to

pass Resolution ES–10/6, Illegal Israeli Actions In Occupied East Jerusalem And The Rest Of The Occupied Palestinian Territory, to convene for the first time in 50

years the parties of the Fourth Geneva Convention for

the Protection of Civilians in Time of War;
2

•HCON 117 EH

Whereas such resolution singles out Israel for unprecedented

enforcement proceedings, which have never been invoked,

even against governments with records of massive violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention;

Whereas such resolution unfairly places full blame for the deterioration of the Middle East Peace Process on Israel

and dangerously politicizes the Fourth Geneva Convention, which was established to address humanitarian crises; and

Whereas such vote, initiated by the Arab Group at the behest

of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), serves to

prejudge and undercut direct negotiations, puts added

and undue pressure on Israel to influence the results of

those negotiations, and contravenes the written commitment that Yasser Arafat gave to then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin that issues of permanent status

would only be dealt with directly by the parties: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the Department of State for the

4 vote of the United States against United Nations

5 General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6 affirming

6 that the text of such resolution politicizes the

7 Fourth Geneva Convention for the Protection of Ci8 vilians in Time of War which was primarily humani9 tarian in nature;

10 (2) urges the Department of State to continue

11 its efforts against convening and participating in the
3

•HCON 117 EH

1 conference, which is scheduled to be held in Geneva,

2 Switzerland, on July 15, 1999;

3 (3) urges the member states of the United Na4 tions to vigorously oppose any and all efforts to ma5 nipulate the Fourth Geneva Convention for the pur6 pose of attacking Israel; and

7 (4) urges United Nations Secretary General

8 Kofi Annan and Switzerland, which serves as the de9 pository of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to refrain

10 from assisting in the convening of the conference.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT P. CASTO and MOLLY L.

CASTO, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,

Defendant.

 Case No. C06-5152JKA

MINUTE ORDER SETTING 

 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold, United

States Magistrate Judge: 

A pretrial conference will be held with the Honorable J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge, at

9:30 a.m. on September 14, 2007, at 1717 Pacific Avenue, Courtroom D, Tacoma, Washington 98402. 

If not filed earlier, the proposed Pretrial Order, motions in limine, proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law, and trial briefs are to be filed no later than September 12, 2007. 

The foregoing Minute Order entered by /s/ Allyson P. Swan , Deputy Clerk,

this August 24, 2007. 

Case 3:06-cv-05152-JKA Document 51 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 1
# Comments **i n Response to**  **NPRM**

**Docket No.: FAA -**  **20 12**  **- 0299**  **Directorate Identifier: 20 11**  **- NM**  **- 029**  **- AD**  Comments have been received in response to : **“ Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)**  **,”** Airw orthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above . (Project engineer: Please review these comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please check the appropriate response, below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **includ e in your name and date**  in the spaces provided, and this return it to the AD directorate focal .) The FAA has revie wed comment(s) related to the FAA AD Docket that we received from : **UPS** . **(Please check one.)** 

## X These comme nts **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or revision of this AD.

___ These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives M **anual FAA -** 

**AIR -**  **M -**  **8040.1, page 19, paragraph 21.d., FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)** 

_ ____

### Bill Ashforth

_______ ___________ __ __ 

### 02/28/13

__

__________ Name: Date:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-206 RSM

)

v. )

)

STEVEN BRUCE MCKAY ) BOND REVOCATION AND

) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Date of Hearing: November 20, 2006

Violations charged:

(1) Violation of the bond condition that he not use, consume or possess a

controlled substance, unless the substance is prescribed to him by a

physician, by using cocaine on or about October 27, 2006;

(2) Violation of a special condition which requires that he comply with drug

testing, by failing to call the telephone scheduling system as directed by

Pretrial Services, on October 30, 2006 and October 31, 2006;

(3) Violation of a special condition requiring he submit to drug and alcohol

testing as directed by Pretrial Services, by failing to submit to testing on

October 30, 2006 and November 1, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00206-RSM Document 172 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

At today’s bond revocation hearing, I advised the defendant of these charges and

of his constitutional rights. The defendant admitted to all violations. Accordingly, the bond

was revoked as defendant poses a risk of nonappearance and danger to the community. 

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of November, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00206-RSM Document 172 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2
| Name                         | Jurisdiction     |
|------------------------------|------------------|
|                         |             |
| Ann Tanker Corporation       | Marshall Islands |
| Cathy Tanker Corporation     | Marshall Islands |
| Chris Tanker Corporation     | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Chartering, Inc.         | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Eagle, Inc.              | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Falcon Limited           | Hong Kong        |
| DHT Hawk Limited             | Hong Kong        |
| DHT Management AS            | Norway           |
| DHT Maritime, Inc.           | Marshall Islands |
| DHT Phoenix, Inc.            | Marshall Islands |
| London Tanker Corporation    | Marshall Islands |
| Newcastle Tanker Corporation | Marshall Islands |
| Sophie Tanker Corporation    | Marshall Islands |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-314 M

)

v. )

)

HILDEBERTO P. MACHADO, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Offenses charged: 

Count I: Bank Robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

2113(a);

Count II: Bank Robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

2113(a);

Count III: Bank Robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

2113(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: June 14, 2006.

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Bruce Miyake. The defendant was represented by Carol Koller

The Government filed a Motion for Detention, to which the defendant stipulates

reserving the right to revisit the matter of detention should new information become

available.

Case 2:06-mj-00314-MJB Document 9 Filed 06/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Due to the nature and seriousness of the crime alleged, release of the 

defendant would pose a risk of danger to the community;

(2) The defendant stipulates to detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the

United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 17th day of June, 2006.

AMonica J. Benton

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00314-MJB Document 9 Filed 06/17/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER OF DEFAULT – CASE NO. C06-5369 RBL - PAGE 1 OF 2 EKMAN, BOHRER & THULIN, P.S.

QUEEN ANNE SQUARE

220 WEST MERCER ST., SUITE 400

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119

TELEPHONE (206) 282-8221

FAX (206) 285-4587

Honorable Ronald B. Leighton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, AT TACOMA

IBEW PACIFIC COAST PENSION PLAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KAREN A. KAMERER and "JOHN DOE"

KAMERER, wife and husband and the marital

community comprised thereof, D/B/A HEYZ

ELECTRIC,

Defendants.

CAUSE NO.: C06-5369RBL

PROPOSED ORDER OF DEFAULT

Pursuant to Plaintiff IBEW Pacific Coast Pension Plan’s Motion for an entry of an

Order of Default against Defendants Karen A. Kamerer and "John Doe" Kamerer, wife and

husband and the marital community comprised thereof, d/b/a Heyz Electric, and the Court

having considered the pleadings on file, including the Declaration of Service and being

otherwise generally advised, it is hereby

ORDERED that more than twenty days have elapsed since the date of service of

Plaintiff Trust Fund’s Complaint and the Defendants have failed to appear, answer or defend

Case 3:06-cv-05369-RBL Document 6 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER OF DEFAULT 

CAUSE NO. C06-5369 RBL - PAGE 2 of 2

EKMAN, BOHRER & THULIN, P.S.

QUEEN ANNE SQUARE

220 WEST MERCER ST., SUITE 400

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119

TELEPHONE (206) 282-8221

FAX (206) 285-4587

this action within the time provided by law, and therefore, Defendants Karen A. Kamerer and

"John Doe" Kamerer, wife and husband and the marital community comprised thereof, d/b/a

Heyz Electric are in Default.

DATED this 14th day of August, 2006.

 S/ Jean Boring 

By: Deputy Clerk

BRUCE RIFKIN District Court Executive

Presented by:

s/Robert A. Bohrer

WSBA #5050

Ekman, Bohrer & Thulin, P.S.

220 W. Mercer, Ste. 400

Seattle, WA 98119

Telephone: (206) 282-8221

Fax: (206) 285-4587

E-mail: r.bohrer@ekmanbohrer.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-05369-RBL Document 6 Filed 08/14/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 147

To authorize testimony, production of documents, and representation in First

American Corp., et al. v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony, production of documents, and representation in First American Corp., et al. v. Sheikh

Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, et al.

Whereas, in the case of First American Corp., et al. v. Sheikh

Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, et al., C.A. No. 93–1309

(JHG/PJA), pending in the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff has requested

testimony from Jack Blum, a former employee on the

staff of the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the

production of documents of the Committee on Foreign

Relations;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members, employees, committees, and subcommit-
2

SRES 147 ATS

tees, of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order,

or request for testimony or documents relating to their

official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Jack Blum is authorized to testify in

2 the case of First American Corp., et al. v. Sheikh Zayed

3 Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, et al., except concerning matters

4 for which a privilege should be asserted, and the chairman

5 and ranking minority member of the Committee on For6 eign Relations, acting jointly, are authorized to produce

7 records of the committee relating to the investigation of

8 the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and Inter9 national Operations into the Bank of Credit and Com10 merce, International.

11 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

12 to represent Jack Blum, the Committee on Foreign Rela13 tions, and any present or former Member or employee of
3

SRES 147 ATS

1 the Senate, in connection with First American Corp., et

2 al. v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, et al.

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 78

To designate April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate and Eliminate

Racism Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 24, 1997

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. WARNER, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. GORTON, Mr. ABRAHAM, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. REID, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. DODD, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. GRAMM,

Mr. KERRY, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. KOHL, Mr. TORRICELLI,

Mr. CRAIG, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. ROBERTS,

Mr. SPECTER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. JOHNSON,

Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GREGG, Mr.

HAGEL, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr.

ROBB, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. SNOWE, and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

APRIL 30, 1997

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National Erase the Hate

and Eliminate Racism Day’’.

Whereas the term ‘‘hate crime’’ means an offense in which

one or more individuals, commits an offense (such as an

assault or battery (simple or aggravated), theft, criminal

trespass, damage to property, mob action, disorderly con-
2

•SRES 78 ATS

duct, or telephone harassment) by reason of the race,

color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation,

physical or mental disability, or national origin of another

individual or group of individuals;

Whereas there are almost 8,000 hate crimes reported to the

Department of Justice each year, and the number of hate

crimes reported increases each year;

Whereas hate crimes have no place in a civilized society that

is dedicated to freedom and independence, as is the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States must lead and set

the example for the world in protecting the rights of all

people;

Whereas the people of the United States should take personal

responsibility for and action against hatred and hate

crimes;

Whereas the Members of Congress, as representatives of the

people of the United States, must take personal responsibility for and action against hatred and hate crimes;

Whereas the laws against hate crimes, which have been

passed by Congress and signed by the President, must be

supported and implemented by the people of the United

States and by Federal, State, and local law enforcement

officials and other public servants: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates April 30, 1997, as ‘‘National

3 Erase the Hate and Eliminate Racism Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States
3

•SRES 78 ATS

1 and throughout the world to recognize the impor2 tance of using each day as an opportunity to take

3 a stand against hate crimes and violence in their na4 tions, states, neighborhoods, and communities.

Æ
From: jnealboy57@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:39:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jimmy boyett

Spartanburg, SC 29301