70640 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–39–2023] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 121; 

Authorization of Production Activity; 

GE Vernova Operations, LLC; 

(Turbines and Generators); 

Schenectady, New York 

On June 8, 2023, GE Vernova 

Operations, LLC submitted a 

notification of proposed production 

activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 

within FTZ 121, in Schenectady, New 

York. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (88 FR 39400, June 16, 

2023). On October 6, 2023, the applicant 

was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision 

that no further review of the activity is 

warranted at this time. The production 

activity described in the notification 

was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act 

and the FTZ Board’s regulations, 

including section 400.14. 

Dated: October 6, 2023. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22571 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–38–2023] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 163; 

Authorization of Production Activity; 

Puerto Rico Steel Products 

Corporation; (Construction and 

Fencing Products); Coto Laurel, Puerto 

Rico 

On June 8, 2023, Puerto Rico Steel 

Products Corporation submitted a 

notification of proposed production 

activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 

within Subzone 163L, in Coto Laurel, 

Puerto Rico. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (88 FR 38811, June 14, 

2023). On October 6, 2023, the applicant 

was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision 

that no further review of the activity is 

warranted at this time. The production 

activity described in the notification 

was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act 

and the FTZ Board’s regulations, 

including section 400.14. 

Dated: October 6, 2023. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22572 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–40–2023] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 255; 

Authorization of Production Activity; 

Lenox Corporation; (Kitchenware, 

Tableware, Home De ́cor Sets); 

Hagerstown, Maryland 

On June 8, 2023, the Board of County 

Commissioners of Washington County, 

Maryland, grantee of FTZ 255, 

submitted a notification of proposed 

production activity to the FTZ Board on 

behalf of Lenox Corporation, within 

FTZ 255, in Hagerstown, Maryland. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (88 FR 39823, June 20, 

2023). On October 6, 2023, the applicant 

was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision 

that no further review of the activity is 

warranted at this time. The production 

activity described in the notification 

was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act 

and the FTZ Board’s regulations, 

including section 400.14. 

Dated: October 6, 2023. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22573 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–53–2023] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 124; Application 

for Expansion of Subzone 124A; Valero 

Refining—New Orleans L.L.C.; 

Destrehan, Louisiana 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the Port of South Louisiana, grantee of 

FTZ 124, requesting an expansion of 

Subzone 124A on behalf of Valero 

Refining—New Orleans L.L.C. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the provisions of the Foreign-Trade 

Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a– 

81u), and the regulations of the FTZ 

Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally 

docketed on October 5, 2023. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to expand Subzone 124A to include a 

new site located at 11842 River Road in 

St. Rose (Site 2, 2.63 acres). No 

authorization for additional production 

activity has been requested at this time. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ 

Staff is designated examiner to review 

the application and make 

recommendations to the FTZ Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The 

closing period for their receipt is 

November 21, 2023. Rebuttal comments 

in response to material submitted 

during the foregoing period may be 

submitted during the subsequent 15-day 

period to December 6, 2023. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection in the 

‘‘Online FTZ Information Section’’ 

section of the FTZ Board’s website, 

which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ 

ftz. 

For further information, contact 

Camille Evans at Camille.Evans@

trade.gov. 

Dated: October 5, 2023. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–22484 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–869] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From India: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

certain producers/exporters subject to 

this administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2021, through February 28, 

2022. 

DATES: Applicable October 12, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian or Caroline Carroll, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6412 or (202) 482–4948, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 70641 

1See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 

20471 (April 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022,’’ dated June 26, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2021– 

2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Certain Now Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from India: Antidumping Duly Order, 82 FR 12553 

(March 6, 2017) (Order). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Preliminary Results PDM. 

6For a full description of changes, see Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

7See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Cash 

Deposit Rate for Non-Selected Companies,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

9The exporters or producers not selected for 

individual review are listed in Appendix II. 

Background 

On April 6, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

June 26, 2023, Commerce extended the 

time period for issuing the final results 

of this review until October 3, 2023.2

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain new pneumatic off-the-road 

tires, which are tires with an off road 

tires size designation.5 The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

4011.20.1025, 4011.20.1035, 

4011.20.5030, 4011.20.5050, 

4011.70.0010, 4011.62.0000, 

4011.80.1010, 4011.80.1020, 

4011.90.1050, 4011.70.0050, 

4011.80.2010, 4011.80.8010, 

4011.80.2020, 4011.80.8020, 

8431.49.9038, 8431.49.9090, 

8709.90.0020, and 8716.90.1020. Tires 

meeting the scope description may also 

enter under the following HTSUS 

subheadings: 4011.90.2050, 

4011.90.8050, 8424.90.9080, 

8431.20.0000, 8431.39.0010, 

8431.49.1090, 8431.49.9030, 

8432.90.0020, 8432.90.0040, 

8432.90.0050, 8432.90.0060, 

8432.90.0081, 8433.90.5010, 

8503.00.9560, 8708.70.0500, 

8708.70.2500, 8708.70.4530, 

8716.90.5035, 8716.90.5056 and 

8716.90.5059. While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the subject 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised, and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, is attached 

to this notice in Appendix I. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

margin calculations for ATC and ATF.6

Rates for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

Generally, Commerce looks to section 

735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides 

instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation, for 

guidance for calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted-average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

2.29 percent and 8.57 percent for ATC 

and ATF, respectively. With two 

respondents under individual 

examination, Commerce normally 

calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the 

estimated dumping rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple 

average of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined 

respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 

of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s publicly-ranged 

U.S. sale values for the merchandise 

under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects 

the rate closest to (A) as the most 

appropriate rate for all other producers 

and exporters.7

Consistent with our practice, we have 

determined that 2.56 percent, which is 

the weighted average of ATC and ATF’s 

margins based on publicly ranged data, 

will be assigned to the non-examined 

companies under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act.8 These companies are listed in 

Appendix II. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine the following estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period March 1, 2021, through 

February 28, 2022: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

ATC Tires Pvt. Ltd ...................... 2.29 

Asian Tire Factory Ltd ................ 8.57 

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 9 ..................... 2.56 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for ATC and 

ATF in connection with these final 

results to interested parties within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because ATC reported the entered value 

of its U.S. sales, we calculated importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the sales for which entered 

value was reported. ATF did not report 

the actual entered value for its U.S. 

sales; thus, we calculated importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rates 

by aggregating the total amount of 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
70642 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 

10See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

11See Order, 82 FR at 12554 (the dumping margin 

of 3.67 percent assigned to all other producers/ 

exporters was adjusted for export subsidies found 

in the companion countervailing duty 

investigation). 

12Subject merchandise produced and exported by 

Balkrishna Industries Ltd. (BKT) was excluded from 

the Order. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires from India: Notice of Correction to 

Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 25598 (June 2, 

2017). Accordingly, BKT is only covered by this 

administrative review for subject merchandise 

produced in India where BKT acted as either the 

manufacturer or exporter (but not both) 

13The name of this company was incorrectly 

listed as Celle Tyre Corporation in the Preliminary 

Results. See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 20473. 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales and dividing this 

amount by the total quantity of those 

sales. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies not selected for 

individual review, we used an 

assessment rate based on the weighted 

average of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for ATC and ATF. The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for the future deposits of 

estimated duties where applicable.10

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by ATC or ATF for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

covered in this review will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

that is established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be zero percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.11

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 3, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Margin Calculations 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Reconsider its Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Make an Export Subsidy Adjustment for 

ATC 

Comment 3: Whether to Deduct 

Countervailing Duties in the Net U.S. 

Price Calculation for ATC 

Comment 4: Whether to Grant a 

Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset for 

ATC 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Deduct Certain Duties ATC Reported 

from its Home Market Gross Unit Price 

Comment 6: Assigning YOHTA as Importer 

for ATC 

Comment 7: Miscellaneous Verification 

Issues for ATC 

Comment 8: Treatment of ATF’s Billing 

Adjustments as Freight Revenue 

Comment 9: Inclusion of Certain Expenses 

in ATF’s U.S. Duties 

Comment 10: Whether Upward 

Adjustments to ATF’s U.S Gross Unit 

Price for Duty Drawback or Certain Other 

Programs are Warranted 

Comment 11: Exclusion of Balkrishna 

Industries Ltd.’s (BKT’s) Sales 

Comment 12: ATC’s General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expenses 

Comment 13: ATC’s Purchases of 

Electricity from Affiliated Parties 

Comment 14: Whether ATC’s Duties Paid 

on Raw Materials Should be Treated as 

Direct Selling Expenses 

Comment 15: Interest Expense Adjustment 

for ATF 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Selected for Individual Examination 

Receiving the Review-Specific Rate 

1. Apollo Tyres Ltd. 

2. Balkrishna Industries Ltd.12

3. Cavendish Industries Ltd. 

4. CEAT Ltd. 

5. Celite Tyre Corporation 13

6. Emerald Resilient Tyre Manufacturer 

7. Forech India Private Limited 

8. HRI Tires India 

9. Innovative Tyres & Tubes Limited 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2023 / Notices 70643 

1See Difluoromethane from the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, Partial Rescission, and 

Preliminary Intent to Rescind, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2022, 88 FR 20473 (April 6, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results,’’ dated June 30, 2023. 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Difluoromethane from the People’s Republic of 

China; 2020–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Difluoromethane (R–32) from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 

13886 (March 11, 2021) (Order). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

6For a full description of these changes, see 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7See Preliminary Results, 88 FR 20487. 

10. JK Tyres and Industries Ltd. 

11. K.R.M. Tyres 

12. M/S. Caroline Furnishers Pvt Ltd. 

13. Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited 

14. MRF Limited 

15. MRL Tyres Limited (Malhotra Rubbers 

Ltd.) 

16. OTR Laminated Tyres (I) Pvt. Ltd. 

17. Rubberman Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 

18. Speedways Rubber Company 

19. Sun Tyres & Wheel Systems 

20. Sundaram Industries Private Limited 

21. Superking Manufacturers (Tyre) Pvt., Ltd. 

22. TVS Srichakra Limited 

[FR Doc. 2023–22452 Filed 10–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–121] 

Difluoromethane From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission; 2020– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the sole mandatory respondent under 

review, Taizhou Qingsong Refrigerant 

New Material Co., Ltd./Taixing Meilan 

New Materials Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

Qingsong), made sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

August 27, 2020, through February 28, 

2022. Additionally, we are rescinding 

this review with respect to Zhejiang 

Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. 

(Zhejiang Sanmei). 

DATES: Applicable October 12, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5673. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 6, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

June 30, 2023, we extended the deadline 

for these final results to October 3, 

2023.2 For a complete description of the 

events that occurred subsequent to the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is difluoromethane (R–32), or its 

chemical equivalent, regardless of form, 

type, or purity level.5 R–32 is classified 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheading 

2903.39.2035. Other merchandise 

subject to the scope may be classified 

under 2903.39.2045 and 3824.78.0020. 

While HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the subject 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all the issues raised in 

the case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. A list of 

the issues that parties raised is provided 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding the Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

margin calculations for Qingsong.6

Partial Rescission 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

notified parties of our intent to rescind 

this administrative review for Zhejiang 

Sanmei because it did not have any 

reviewable entries during the POR.7

Because we continue to find that the 

record does not contain any evidence of 

reviewable entries for Zhejiang Sanmei, 

we are rescinding this review with 

respect to Zhejiang Sanmei in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we are 

assigning the following dumping margin 

to the respondent for the period August 

27, 2020, through February 28, 2022: 

Exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Taizhou Qingsong Refrigerant New Material Co., Ltd.; Taixing Meilan New Materials Co., Ltd ....................................................... 145.23 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these final results to interested 

parties within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1