alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lee F. PARKER; Diane K. Parker Petitioners-Appellants v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-71517.

Tax Ct. No. 0971-3: 9590-98.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Lee and Diane Parker appeal the tax court’s decision sustaining the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s assessment of a deficiency on their 1991 tax returns. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated herein except as necessary. We affirm on the basis of the tax court’s memorandum disposition.

I

The tax court held that, in order to defer recognition of the gain on the 1991 sale of their principal residence under 26 U.S.C. § 1034, the Parkers were required, within two years of the sale of their old residence, *both to purchase and to put into use*a new *612principal residence which cost more than the sales price of their old principal residence. This conclusion of law is correct. 26 U.S.C. § 1034(a) (setting forth that the “new residence” includes only “property ... *purchased and used*... as [the] principal residence” within “a period ... ending 2 years” after the sale of the “old residence” (emphasis added)); *see Kern v. Granquist,*291 F.2d 29, 33 (9th Cir.1961) (“We can only conclude, as did the trial court, that the Congress intended to permit the taxpayer to obtain the benefit, taxwise, *only of so much*of the cost of construction of, or improvements to, a new house *as the taxpayer had constructed and used*within the [statutory] period .... ” (emphasis added)).

II

The tax court found that, although the Parkers spent a total of $380,045.96 within the statutory period to purchase a new 1400 square-foot home and to begin construction on a detached 3000 square-foot house,1 the Parkers did not put their unfinished 3000 square-foot house into residential use within two years. Because their new 1400 square-foot home cost the Parkers only $169,500, and because the Parkers sold their old residence for $363,353, the tax court found that the sales price of the Parkers’ old residence exceeded the purchase price of the portion of the Parkers’ new residence which was both purchased and put into use within two years. These findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. The cost of "purchasing” a new residence includes costs due to buying a residence, costs due to constructing a residence, or some combination of the two. 26 U.S.C. § 1034(c)(2) (“A residence any part of which was constructed or reconstructed by the taxpayer shall be treated as purchased by the taxpayer.”).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 7 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk June 7 , 2019

15 9 51 4 ( 2 1 )

SUZANNE RUBBA and DANIEL LEBLANC,

Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF

PATRICIA E. LEBLANC,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 159514

v COA: 3445327

Macomb CC: 2013

- 002255

- NH

EUGENE J. AGNONE, M.D., and MICHIGAN

CANCER SPECIALISTS, P.C.,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

CHAKRAPANI RANGANATHAN, M.D.,

MICHAEL F. ROMANELLI, M.D., MACOMB

NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., and WOODS

CARDIOVASCULAR INTERNAL MEDICINE

ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Defendants

.

_________ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff s

- appellee s to extend the time

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on May 3 0 , 2019 , is accepted as timely filed

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel;  Implementing Comprehensive HIV Services in Syringe Service Program Settings.                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 to 2:00 p.m.                              ( print page 69936)    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Trinh T. Tran, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Office of Extramural Policy, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 827-5843,                         *trinh.tran@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 3, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-22361 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 10795)

#### Rex-Spanall, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5247.

(Decided July 14, 1964)

*Brady, Tyrrell & Bruce (Richard 3. Tyrrell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *{Andrew P. Vance,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

Certain steel shores were imported from West Germany. Their proper value for dutiable purposes forms the sub j ect of the instant appeal for a reappraisement.

When this case was called for hearing in Milwaukee, the parties hereto entered into the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated that the merchandise involved in the subject appeal consists of shores steel entered on August 28, 1962; that such merchandise is on the so-called final list, T.D. 54521, and as such is subject to appraisement under section 402(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended; that there is no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar steel; that accordingly cost of production under section 402a (f) constitutes the proper basis for appraisement, and that such unit value is at price list units less 2 percent cash discount, packed, as set forth in the corrected special customs invoice (Form 5515) filed by the importer and as appraised; * * *.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis of value for the steel shores in issue and that such value is the pricelist units, less 2 percent cash discount, packed, as set forth in the corrected special customs invoice (Form 5515), filed by the importer and as appraised.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Uni-Tec Trade, Inc. v. Schneider Electric Services and ECP Electrical 

Supply, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00745-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-80650

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Uni-Tec Trade, Inc., has filed a motion for rehearing. Construing this motion 

in part to be a motion for rehearing, the panel has voted to overrule the motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____Justice Richard Hightower___________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower

Date: __December 8, 2020__________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SIMON WILLIAMS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATTORNEY MICHAEL EVANS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5288RBL-KLS

ORDER DISMISSING

COMPLAINT

The Court, having reviewed the complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L.

Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The docket reflects that plaintiff has been given three previous opportunities to amend his

complaint and has failed to satisfactorily cure the deficiencies. In the Court’s Fourth Order

to Show Cause [Dkt. #26], the plaintiff was warned that his complaint would be dismissed

if he failed to follow the Court’s Order. Plaintiff’s most recent request for an extension of

time to amend his complaint [Dkt. #28] indicates that his address has changed; however, the

address noted is the same address plaintiff had on September 25, 2006 when previous

Orders to Show Cause had been entered and sent to plaintiff. Plaintiff has been given ample

opportunity to cure the deficiencies in his complaint and has failed to do so. Therefore,

plaintiff’s request for an extension of time [Dkt. #28] is DENIED.

(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(3) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

Case 3:06-cv-05288-RBL Document 29 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to Magistrate Judge Karen

L. Strombom.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05288-RBL Document 29 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer





I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                           By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 296

Expressing the sense of the Senate that, on completion of construction of

a World War II Memorial in Area I of the District of Columbia and

its environs, Congress should provide funding for the maintenance, security, and custodial and long-term care of the memorial by the National

Park Service.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 9 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. KERREY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that, on completion of

construction of a World War II Memorial in Area I

of the District of Columbia and its environs, Congress

should provide funding for the maintenance, security,

and custodial and long-term care of the memorial by

the National Park Service.

Whereas World War II is the defining event of the 20th century;

Whereas in World War II, over 16,000,000 American men

and women served the Nation, of which nearly 300,000

were killed and over 670,000 were wounded;

Whereas in Public Law 103–422 (108 Stat. 4356), Congress

approved the location of a memorial to this epic event in
2

•SRES 296 ATS

Area I of the District of Columbia and its environs, as

described in the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide standards for placement of commemorative works on certain

Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes’’, approved November 14,

1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.); and

Whereas Congress has traditionally provided funding for the

memorials commemorating President Thomas Jefferson

and President Abraham Lincoln, the monument to President George Washington, and the Korean War Veterans

Memorial: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. FUNDING OF A WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

3 It is the sense of the Senate that, on completion of

4 construction of a World War II Memorial in Area I of

5 the District of Columbia and its environs, as described in

6 that Act, Congress should provide funding for the mainte7 nance, security, and custodial and long-term care of the

8 memorial by the National Park Service.

Æ
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01813-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/22/07 Page 9 of 9
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CLAUDIA SUSANA MARTINEZ 

JARDON,

 

 Appellant,

v.

GERD PFISTER,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00183-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2013DCM4404)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until August 2, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John P. Mobbs, Appellee’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 2, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
IN THESAN ANTONIO, F APPEALS
r
ABELARDO G. GONZALEZ 1622682 APPELLANT / PROSE

VS. STATE OF TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS No. 04-15-00530-CR Trail Court No. 2008-CRR-U00662-D1

PKOSB DOCKETINGSTATEMENT UNDER T.R.A.P. 32.2
(a) (1) NONE (a) (2) APPELANT PROCEEDING PRQ-SE Abelardo G. Gonzalez 1622682 C-T. Terrell B-3-40 1300 F.M.655 Rosharon, Texas 77583 

### (b) NOTICEOFAPPEAL FILED ON 2015 AOG 10 AM9:33 (c) 49 th District Court Webb County/ Texas Honorable Judge Jose Antoino Lopez 

### (d) ORDERAPPEALED (Denial ofMotion to Recuse) singed on July 16. 2015 by the Honor David Peeple's (e) N/A 

### (f) Offense charged / Date AGGRAVATED ROBBERY ENG. ORG. CRIME 12/5/2008 12/5/2008 (q) NOT GUILTY PLEA (h) JURY TRIAL 

### (i) 30 years T.D-C.J. / $10,000.'"' fine 

### (l) THISAPPEALIS POSTTRIALORDER (DENIALOFMOTIONTORECUSE) (k) N/A 

### (i) NO REPORTER'S RECORD REQUESTED FOR THIS APPEAL (m) N/A NOT FOR THIS APPEAL (n) (1) 1/28/2010 MOTION TOPROCEED IFP on APPEAL (2) 1/28/2010 HEARING ON MOTION TOPROCEED IFP (3) 1/28/2010 MOTION 10 PROCEED IFP GRANTED (4) (a%Ain?ED 

## RespectfullysS^ ''y/r AbelardoG. Gdgz C.T. Terrell B*3 1300 F-M. 655 Rosharon, Texas 77583 APPELLANT/Pro-se 3 

## 1623582,^^To: THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL'S
ATTN: CLERK OF THE COURT FROM: Aoelardo G- Gonzalez APPELLANT / Pro-se
RE:

DATE: Submission of the DOCKETING SHEETS For Case COA No. 04-15-00529-CR Trail NoCOA No. 04-15-00531-CR Trail No. COA No- 04-15-00530-CR Trail No. 9-01-2015 2008 CRR 0657-Dl 2008 CRR 0665-Dl 2008 cRR 0562-01

Dear: Clerk of the court 

### GREETING'S. Now comes A^jpellant Abelatdo Gonzalez Pro-se and submitte's to the Clerkand court the Docketiny Sheets for the above mention cause's/ this Docketinq Sheets are submitted timel/ on 09-01-15 under the iiiailbox rule and are considered filed on this date, by placiny them in tne prision mailbox. 

### Appellantrespectfully request from the clerkto file stamp the enclosed copyofthis letter and return it timely in the enclosed SASE, so Appellant and have it for his records.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. 

### Respectruliy ;^bmitted
Abelardo G. Gonzalez 1622682 C.T. Terrell B-3-40 1300 F.M. 655 Rosharon, Texas 77583


### NOTICE to the clerkAppellant address was incorrect it the letterie by the S clerkto appellantin04-15-00531-CR and in 04-15-00529-CR ^

s; o 

### 3 I CO

CO zo

—
February 5, 1953

No. 57062.

protest 165283-K.

#### Engis Equipment Co. and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Evaluation of QualityManagement in Veterans Health Administration Facilities Fiscal Year**
 
2003 | 2004-05 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.55/3:
Item Number:0983-A-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000650463
 
December 30, 2019
.Case No. 6,553.

#### HOBSON v. JOHNSON.

[4 Biss. 505.] 1

Circuit Court, N. D. Illinois.

Oct., 1868.

Justification bt Surett.

The affidavit of the surety on an appeal bond, as to his responsibility, where he does not personally appear, is not sufficient; there must be independent evidence of his responsibility.

Defendant’s attorney presented an appeal bond signed by himself and sureties, all resident in Lee county, Illinois.

DRUMMOND, District Judge.

Where a bond is given by a person at a distance it should be accompanied by the certificate of an officer who has knowledge of the party. It is not sufficient to present the affidavit of the surety. If counsel will satisfy' me of the responsibility of the parties by any one the court can examine as to their pecuniary coni dition, then I would accept the bond. I have never been in the habit of accepting a bond upon the affidavit of the surety, unless there is no objection. If there is objection made, there must be independent evidence — evi-*268■denee of a reliable person who is acquainted with the pecuniary circumstances and condition of the parties.
# Official Journal L 237/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.237.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5414 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.237.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 237

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5414 September 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 914/2011 of 13 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 605/2010 laying down animal and public health and veterinary certification conditions for the introduction into the European Union of raw milk and dairy products intended for human consumption (1) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 915/2011 of 13 September 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 17 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 916/2011 of 13 September 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year | 19 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 914/2011 of 13 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 605/2010 laying down animal and public health and veterinary certification conditions for the introduction into the European Union of raw milk and dairy products intended for human consumption (1)

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 915/2011 of 13 September 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

17

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 916/2011 of 13 September 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year

19

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. P66/42.

protests 61/16980, etc. (New York).

No. P66/43.

protest 64/15671 (New York).

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States, Broadway Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear*Co., *Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.