alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134408 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan LAURA K. FUNDUNBURKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134408 COA: 274928 Ingham CC: 06-000062-NI CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and MICHELLE BEARD, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applicati on or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties are di rected to discuss (1) whether the fact that the bus driver’s deposition had not been taken was a sufficient reason to deny her motion for summary disposition; and (2) whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial on the claim that defendant Beard’ s conduct, including her action of closing the doors of the bus while the plaintiff was attempting to exit the vehicle, constituted gross negligence or, on the contrary, that no reas onable juror could conclude th at defendant Beard’s conduct amounted to reckless conduct showing a substan tial lack of concern as to whether injury would result, MCL 691.1407(7 )(a), and thus that summa ry disposition should have entered for defendant Beard. MCL 691.1407(2)(c). See Stanton v City of Battle Creek

, 466 Mich 611, 620-621 (2002). The parties may file suppleme ntal briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not subm it mere restatements of their application
papers.

s0205 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 8, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.   By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert Title: Chief Executive Officer      I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.   By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert Title: Chief Financial Officer
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Robert G. GrossRobert G. GrossChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

DESIGNERS EDGE, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

NATIONAL - JLR GEAR, et al.,

 Defendant.

 C06-612 MJB

 

 MINUTE ORDER

The above referenced case has been initially assigned to the Honorable Monica J.

Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, subject to the consent of the parties pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1)(C).

On May 8, 2006, notice of the parties rights with regard to consenting to the case

being assigned to Magistrate Judge Benton for all purposes was filed by the Clerk of

Court. The parties were advised they had until June 19, 2006, to consent, if they wished.

In the interim, a Motion to Dismiss and to Strike has been filed and noted for

June 23, 2006. Accordingly, pending dates are adjusted as follows:

 Consent to Assignment to Magistrate Judge Benton .................. June 15, 2006

 

In the event the parties (or any party) choose not to consent, the case will be

reassigned to a District Judge.

Case 2:06-cv-00612-RSM Document 14 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 8th day of June, 2006

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00612-RSM Document 14 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1
 Exhibit 21  Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    JurisdictionTHE Hercules Offshore Drilling Company LLC
    
    DelawareHercules Drilling Company, LLC
    
    DelawareHercules International Asset Company, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules International Drilling Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules International Finance Company, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules International Holdings, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules International Management Company Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules International Offshore, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules Liftboat Company, LLC
    
    DelawareHercules Marketing International, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules Offshore (Nigeria) Limited
    
    NigeriaHercules Offshore Holdings Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules Offshore Middle East Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules Offshore Arabia, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHQ Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsHercules Offshore International, LLC
    
    DelawareHercules Offshore Services LLC
    
    DelawareHercules Oilfield Services Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsTHE Offshore Drilling Company
    
    DelawareTODCO Mexico Inc.
    
    DelawareServicios TODCO S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoTODCO Management Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareTODCO Servicios de Apóio Marítima Ltda.
    
    BrazilCliffs Drilling Company
    
    DelawareTODCO Americas Inc.
    
    DelawareTODCO International Inc.
    
    DelawareTODCO Trinidad Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsCliffs Drilling Trinidad L.L.C.
    
    DelawareCliffs Drilling (Barbados) Holdings SRL
    
    BarbadosCliffs Drilling (Barbados) SRL
    
    BarbadosCliffs Drilling Trinidad Offshore Limited
    
    TrinidadDelta Towing Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareDelta Towing, LLC
    
    DelawareTHE Onshore Drilling Company
    
    DelawareHercules Offshore Disaster Relief Fund (non-profit)
    
    TexasHercules Offshore Labuan Corporation
    
    MalaysiaHercules Tanjung Asia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    Malaysia
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this Form 10-K report of Recon Technology,
Ltd for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof and pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Liu Jia, certify that:



(1)	This report containing the financial statements fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the this period report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Recon Technology, Ltd.





|Date: September 28, 2012 | /s/ Liu Jia                                          
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|                         | Liu Jia                                              
|                         | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
From: Johnson, Steffan

Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:44 PM

To: rtysar@btecinc.com

Cc: Fairchild, Susan; Angus Crane; tims.rockwool@gmail.com

Subject: RE: Rock Wool Method 316 Testing



### Randy,

Thank you very much for your prompt attention and response. I appreciate the level of detail your letter

provides and given that no further information is available regarding what the lab actually measured (or

ju st what was submitted to them), I agree with your findings.

Thank you, also, for providing the revised emissions calculations from your 2012 testing.

Should any other questions arise regarding the 2012 test results we will, again, contact you through

R ockwool and NAIMA.

Sincerely,



### Steffan Johnson

Environmental Scientist

OAQPS SPPD Measurement Policy Group

109 TW Alexander Drive

Mail Drop D243

- 05

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

- 541

- 4791

johnson.stef fan@epa.gov

From: rtysar@btecinc.com [ mailto:rtysar@btecinc.com ]

Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:23 PM

To: Johnson, Steffan

Cc: Fairchild, Susan; Angus Crane; tims.rockwool@gmail.com

Subject: Rock Wool Method 316 Testing

Mr. Johnson,

Attached is a letter summarizing the issues with the Method 316 testing conducted at the

Rock Wool Manufacturing facility in Leeds, Alabama. If you have any questions or need any

additional information, please call me.

Sincerely,

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC)

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

DIRECT: (248) 548

- 8070

FAX: (248) 548

- 8073

CELL: (313) 308

- 6891
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40020

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MARGARITO PECENO-MONTANEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas, Laredo

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1414-ALL

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court previously affirmed the conviction and

sentence of the Appellant Margarito Peceno-Montanez (“Montanez”).

On December 11, 2006, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the

case for reconsideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzalez, 127 S. Ct.

625 (2006).
2

In light of Lopez, the district court erred by enhancing

Montanez’s sentence based on a Texas conviction for simple

possession of a controlled substance. Because Montanez has

completed the confinement portion of his sentence, any argument

that the prison term should be reduced is moot and the only portion

of the sentence remaining for consideration is the defendant’s term

of supervised release.

However, as the Federal Public Defender notes, Montanez

presumably has been deported. In order to resentence him and

reduce his term of supervised release, FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE 43 requires the defendant to be present and have the

opportunity to allocute. Because the defendant has been deported

and is legally unable, without permission of the Attorney General,

to reenter the United States to be present for a resentencing

proceeding, there is no relief we are able to grant Montanez and

his appeal is moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis,

No. 05-41400, 2007 WL 926832 (5th Cir. March 29, 2007). The appeal

is therefore DISMISSED.
EX-4.9



 Exhibit 4.9 

Counterpart to Registration Rights Agreement 

The undersigned hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably agrees as a Guarantor (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 14, 2018 by and among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and each of the investors party thereto) to be bound by the terms and provisions of such Registration Rights Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of March 26, 2018 

 

			
	SEASPAN INVESTMENT I LTD., as a Guarantor
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark Chu
		 	Name: Mark Chu
		 	Title: Secretary
Order entered April 29 , 2020

In t he 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00460
- CV
IN RE MONTINE JANNET TE NYHAN, Relator
O riginal Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 3

Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 19
- 03495
- 3

ORDER Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s April 16, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. CR06-0164JLR
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION
v. FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF
SUPERVISED RELEASE
TRACY DAMON LEE,
Defendant.

Before the court is Defendant Tracy Damon Lee’s motion for early termination of
supervised release. (Mot. (Dkt. # 163).) Having reviewed the motion, the responses by
the parties, and the records and files herein, the court finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e), early termination of Mr. Lee’s supervised released is not warranted by Mr.
/
/
//
//

ORDER - 1



10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Lee’s conduct and the interests of justice. Accordingly, the court DENIES Mr. Lee’s
motion for early termination (Dkt. # 163).

Ma
Dated this \2. day of April, 2018.

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

ORDER - 2
May 8 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DIAMOND RENEE GUILL ORY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00326

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order app ellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05361-RBL Document 37 Filed 07/06/07 Page 9 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-05309-RBL Document 16 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-05309-RBL Document 16 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-05309-RBL Document 16 Filed 11/21/06 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmChem, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
A. Lattanzio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 11, 2003


                                                 /s/ David A. Lattanzio
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 David A. Lattanzio
                                                 Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

DUANE THORN RAY

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, CASE NUMBER: C06-5260RBL/KLS

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. #1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE..

 April 24, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05260-RBL Document 26 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 4th day of May , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHIHULY, INC, et al.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1801 JPD

ROBERT KAINDL, et al.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

In light of the motion to re-open, the Court ORDERS and DIRECTS:

If plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint, the amended complaint must be filed no

later than the close of business Wednesday, May 10, 2006. Answers thereto must be filed not

later than the close of business Tuesday, May 30, 2006.

Counsel are directed to meet and thereafter submit proposed dates for the conclusion of

discovery, a dispositive motion cutoff date, an agreed estimated length of trial, and a preferred

trial date. The Joint Report is to be filed no later than the close of business Wednesday, 

May 31,2006

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 71 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 4th day of May , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 71 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 45

Designating March 1, 1999 as ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic Fleet Memorial

Day’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 23, 1998

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. GREGG, Mr. KERRY, Mr.

JEFFORDS, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. DEWINE,

Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. REED, Mr. HELMS, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. DURBIN,

Mr. GRAMM, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. ROBB, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. FORD, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN,

Mr. ABRAHAM, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DODD,

and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 1, 1999 as ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic

Fleet Memorial Day’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States established the Asiatic Fleet of

the Navy in 1910 to protect American nationals, policies,

and possessions in the Far East;

Whereas the sailors and Marines of the Asiatic Fleet ensured

the safety of United States citizens and foreign nationals,

and provided humanitarian assistance, in that region during the Chinese civil war, the Yangtze Flood of 1931, and

the outbreak of Sino-Japanese hostilities;
2

•SJ 45 IS

Whereas in 1940, due to deteriorating political relations and

increasing tensions between the United States and

Japan, a reinforced Asiatic Fleet began concentrating on

the defense of the Philippines and engaged in extensive

training to ensure maximum operational readiness for

any eventuality;

Whereas following the declaration of war against Japan, the

warships, submarines, and aircraft of the Asiatic Fleet

singly or in task forces courageously fought many naval

battles against a superior Japanese armada; and

Whereas the Asiatic Fleet directly suffered the loss of 22

ships, 1,826 men killed or missing in action, and 518

men captured and imprisoned under the worst of conditions with many of them dying while held as prisoners of

war: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL COMMENDATION.

4 Congress—

5 (1) commends the personnel who served in the

6 Asiatic Fleet of the United States Navy during the

7 period 1910 to 1942; and

8 (2) honors those who gave their lives in the line

9 of duty while serving in the Asiatic Fleet.

10 SEC. 2. UNITED STATES NAVY ASIATIC FLEET MEMORIAL

11 DAY.

12 (a) DESIGNATION.—March 1, 1999 is designated as

13 ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic Fleet Memorial Day’’.
3

•SJ 45 IS

1 (b) PROCLAMATION.—The President is authorized

2 and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the

3 people of the United States to observe United States Navy

4 Asiatic Fleet Memorial Day with appropriate programs,

5 ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
Before the First Division,

June 7, 1967

No. P67/186.

#### Novik & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/3984 (New York).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bridal headdresses similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Novik &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 183, C.D. 2221), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56800.

#### Consumers Import Co., Inc., and F. W. Hagemann *v.*United States,

protests 129544-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc.,*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.