alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b))

I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                   By:  /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Name: S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Title: Chairman of the Board and

    Chief Executive Officer

                   (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: July 22, 2009

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b)

I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                   By: /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Name: S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer

           (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: July 22, 2009
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Catherine DAmico

Catherine DAmicoExecutive Vice President  Finance andChief Financial Officer
## S10-li()l21-00 7 Pettiford , Mari e (OST ) CONTRO L N O From : Sent : To : 

## Cc : Subject : wrgbbb@gci.ne t o n behal f o f Ev i Fennimor e [wrgbbb@gci.net ] Thursday , Januar y 20 . 201 1 1:4 2 P M LaHood , Ray(OST ) Kurland , Susa n (OST ) Alask a airline s Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d an d Ms . Susa n Kurland , Thi s e-mai l i s t o expres s stron g suppor t fo rth e sectio n of Alask

a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l service t o ou r communit yo f Wrangell . Alaska' s curren t patter n of service - usin g je t aircraf t - meets crucia l need s that woul d b e difficult , i f not impossibl e t o mee t wit h an yothe rtyp e of servic e o raircraf t style . A t a tim e o f economi c hardshi p 1 fee l i t i s imperative t o hav e dail y je t service . Ou rinclemen t weathe rat time s make s an y othe rtyp e of smal l plan e servic e unreliable . Ou rfisherme n sen d thei rcatc h ou t o n th e 737-40 0 comb o plane s that carr y V i passenger

s an d 7 % freight . I f the

y coul d no

t get thei rfres h produc

t t o th e market i n a timel y wa y i t woul d impac

t the m severely . As th e owne ro

f a smal l be d an d breakfas t I rel y o n onl y approximatel y 10 0 day s o f summe rt o mak

e o rbrea k m yseason . Withou t reliabl e Dail yje t service m

ybusines s woul d b e impacte d severely . W e hav e alway s looke d t o ou rgovernmen t t o hav e ou rback

s as th e distance s i n Alask a ar e great an d ou rweathe ri s unpredictable . I a m askin g yo u t o selec t Alask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l service d t o Southeast Alaska , as th e airlin e has fo rmor

e the n 3 0 years . Ro n an d Ev i Fennimor

e



### - 0 e n rnS m

' J--y-^ n o 5
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 25, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Richard N. Phegley        
|Richard N. Phegley May 3, 2007
Before the First Division,

March 2, 1960

No. 63874.

protests 58/13046, etc. (New York).

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise was erroneously classified as medicinal preparations and should have been classified as drugs, advanced, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63899.

protests 59/1362 and 59/1936 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 11 of 11
EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS ANALYSIS

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U. S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Residential Furnaces and Boilers

July 17, 2001

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02NN
Employment Impacts Analysis:

Both Direct and Indirect Employment

Impacts Occur

• Direct employment impacts are estimated in

the manufacturer impact analysis

• Indirect employment impacts occur from

- shifting consumer expenditures among goods

(substitution effect)

- changing equipment and energy costs (income

effect)

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02NN
Employment Impacts Analysis:

DOE Requests Input from Stakeholders

• What methods should be used to estimate

employment impacts?

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02NN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BOND REVOCATION AND DETENTION ORDER 

PAGE -1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

RANDY NADAL SOBREO,

 Defendant.

 CASE NO. CR06-57 JPD

 BOND REVOCATION AND 

 DETENTION ORDER

INTRODUCTION

I conducted a hearing on alleged violations of appearance bond on January 4, 2007.

The United States was represented by Michael Lang. The defendant was represented by

Cassandra Stamm.

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION

USPO Brenda Amundson alleges that Defendant violated the conditions of the bond

in five respects:

(1) Failing to appear for a drug test on November 30, 2006, in violation of the

special bond condition that he submit to drug and alcohol testing as directed

by Pretrial Services;

(2) Failing to appear for drug testing on December 1, 2006, in violation of special

bond condition that he submit to drug and alcohol testing as directed by

Pretrial Services;

Case 2:06-cr-00057-JPD Document 85 Filed 01/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BOND REVOCATION AND DETENTION ORDER 

PAGE -2- 

(3) Committing the offense of No Valid Operators License in the City of Seattle

on or about October 30, 2006, in violation of the standard condition that he not

commit any federal, state or local crimes during his period of release;

(4) Failing to report his law enforcement contact from October 30, 2006 to U.S.

Pretrial Services, in violation of the condition which requires him to report any

law enforcement contact within one business day; and

(5) Committing the offense of Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree in the

City of Seattle on or about November 21, 2006, in violation of the standard

condition that he not commit any federal, state or local crimes during his

period of release.

I advised the defendant of these charges and of his constitutional rights. At today’s hearing

Defendant admitted to violations 1-4, waived any hearing as to whether they occurred, and

the Government agreed to dismiss violation # 5. The bond is revoked and defendant shall

be detained pending further disposition by the court.

DATED this 4th day of January, 2007.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Sentencing Judge : Hon. James P. Donohue Assistant U.S. Attorney : Michael Lang

Defense Attorney : Cassandra Stamm

U. S. Probation Officer : Brenda Amundson

Case 2:06-cr-00057-JPD Document 85 Filed 01/04/07 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

May 6, 1965

No. 69292.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/7331 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature American flags mounted on bamboo sticks, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL GORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT NEWLIN et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5841 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 

AND RECOMMENDATION 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

 This civil rights action alleging a violation of the Eighth Amendment right to be free from

cruel and unusual punishment comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment be granted and Plaintiff’s action

be dismissed. As detailed by the Magistrate Judge, it appears that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. 

Plaintiff has not placed any evidence before the Court to support his claims and the Defendants are

entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff has not filed an objection.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and

to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 22nd day of January, 2007.

Case 3:05-cv-05841-FDB Document 38 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05841-FDB Document 38 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 245/24 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 245 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6324 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 245

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6324 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 245/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 245/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                      17,875,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,703,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,507,000
<PP&E>                                      13,250,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,670,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,183,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,531,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,618,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,183,000
<SALES>                                     53,483,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,483,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,283,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,922,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   826,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,096,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,096,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

January 9, 1968

No. P68/7.

protest 67/34532 (New York).

#### The H. J. Ashe Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg.*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein the court held that the flashlights and batteries were separate entities rather than an entirety and were separately dutiable, the claim of the plantiff was sustained.
No. 69300.

#### Design International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 64/3642 and 64/64 (New York).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall-hung furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA                                       |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary                |   |
| (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |   |
|                                                           |   |
| Circle Pines, Minnesota                                        |   |
| January 12, 2011                                          |   |

 

----
No. 59801.

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 173075-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000875579
<NAME>                        Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    29747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             60000
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6911
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (37164)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      29747
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     64198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (64198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (64198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (64198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.01)




</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10559)

#### Glencourt Importing Company et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13305, etc.

(Decided July 8, 1963)

*Lawrence é Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, relate to certain canned clams, exported from Japan and entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

Stipulated facts, upon which the appeals have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is American selling price, as defined in section. 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value was $'7!50 per 2 dozen tins, less 1% per centum cash discount, less one-tenth of 1 per centum swell allowance, net, packed.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President -Chief Financial
Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK


Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date:  August
6, 2010