alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 59835.

#### Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 200565-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pendants similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Brier Manufacturing Co.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 68, C. A. D. 465), the articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, prior to April 21, 1948, were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1528 as imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and the articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after April 21, 1948, were held dutiable at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, as claimed.
No. 59821.

#### Union Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 170299-K and 174472-K (Pembina).

*394Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro LinearCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: August 11, 2004      By: /s/ Timothy A. Richardson     Timothy A. Richardson  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 28, 2024

NO. 03

- 22

- 00337

- CR

James Logan Diez , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, J USTI CES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the r ecor d and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgments

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12217]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Monet and his Modern Legacy” at the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, Missouri; the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order                           ( print page 70693)                        12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22462 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, a corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. Mary MCKEATING; Gloria Dewolf; Stephan Schambach; Dale Spatz; Ron Coombs; Markel American Insurance Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellees, Robert McKeating; Frank Dewolf, Defendants-cross-defendants-Appellees, Emeryville City Marina, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee.

Nos. 04-17108, 04-17322.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2005.

Decided Aug. 2, 2005.

*592Stanley L. Gibson, Esq., Marker E. Lovell, Esq., Gibson Robb *&*Lindh LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

Mary McKeating, Emeryville, CA, pro se.

William E. Vaughan, Esq., Law Offices, Oakland, CA, Thomas C. Burch, Tarkington O’Neill Barrack *&*Chong, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Steven R. Anthony, Esq., Anthony *&*Carlson, LLP, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees.

Frederick J. Carr, Esq., Cox Wootton Griffin Hansen *&*Poulos, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppeUee.

Before: REAVLEY,* T.G. NELSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

For the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that Firemen’s Insurance Company has not shown that McKeating made any intentional misrepresentations or unintentional misrepresentations material to the risk.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. Rule 36-3.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

Authorizing printing of the pamphlet entitled ‘‘The Constitution of the United

States of America’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. FORD) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the pamphlet entitled ‘‘The

Constitution of the United States of America’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the pamphlet

3 entitled ‘‘The Constitution of the United States of Amer4 ica’’, prepared under the direction of the Joint Committee

5 on Printing, shall be printed as a Senate document, with

6 appropriate illustration.

7 (b) There shall be printed—

8 (1)(A) 440,000 copies of the pamphlet for the

9 use of the House of Representatives, distributed in

10 equal numbers to each Member;
2

SCON 63 ATS

1 (B) 100,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use

2 of the Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each

3 Member;

4 (C) 2,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of

5 the Joint Committee on Printing; and

6 (D) 1,400 copies of the pamphlet for distribu7 tion to the depository libraries; or

8 (2) if the total printing and production costs of

9 copies in paragraph (1) exceed $120,000, such num10 ber of copies of the pamphlet as does not exceed

11 total printing and production costs of $120,000,

12 with distribution to be allocated in the same propor13 tion as in paragraph (1).

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10(52)



                    Description of TARSAP Vesting Adjustment

                                 Gary W. Loveman



Date:    November 11, 1999

         The Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors modified the
TARSAP vesting schedule of Gary W. Loveman as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Current Performance              Performance Vesting
                             Vesting                        As Modified
Plan Year                 (cumulative)                      (cumulative)               Vest Date
---------             --------------------           ------------------------          ---------
<S>                   <C>                            <C>                               <C>

  1999                  43.4%                             50%
                        50.0% (target)                    60% (target)                   3/1/00
                        56.8%                             70%

  2000                  73.4%                             80%
                        80.0% (target)                    90% (target)                   3/1/00
                        86.8 %                            100%
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

WIniteb ~tate5 (!Court of ~peaI5

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

LEO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, LTD.

Appellant,

v.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

GALDERMA R&D,

Appellee.

2012-1520

(Reexamination No. 95/000,153)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Case: 12-1520 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 09/27/2012
LEO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS V. KAPpos 2

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Galderma R&D ("Galderma") each move

for a 50-day extension of time, until November 16, 2012,

to file their principal briefs. Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ltd. opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. Galderma's and the Director's principal briefs are due November 16, 2012.

FOR THE COURT

SEP 21 2012

Date

cc: Andrew D. Meikle, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

Martin B. Pavane, Esq.

s27

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

u.s.COuJ't~~ fOR 11fEFEDERAtCrRCUIT

SEP 272012

JAN HORBALY

ClERK

Case: 12-1520 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 09/27/2012
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, section 
122(d)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2), and Paragraph 4.1 
of the underlying Consent Decree, notice is hereby given that a 
proposed Amendment to the Consent Decree in United States v. Shell Oil. 
Co., Case No. 83-cv-2379, was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the District of Colorado on September 28, 2023.
    Previously, a Consent Decree resolving claims under CERCLA related 
to the former Rocky Mountain Arsenal outside of Denver, Colorado 
between the parties was entered in this case on February 12, 1993. That 
Consent Decree incorporated a February 12, 1989, Settlement Agreement 
between the United States and Shell Oil. Under the Consent Decree, the 
Army and Shell Oil are obligated to pay the Environmental Protection 
Agency's CERCLA oversight costs for Army-led environmental cleanup 
activities at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. The proposed Amendment to the 
Consent Decree changes the manner in which the Environmental Protection 
Agency's CERCLA oversight costs will be paid, and fully resolves those 
costs.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Amendment to the Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from 
the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to 
Phillip R. Dupr[eacute], Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044 
and/or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a0a0f18191517171f140e251f1e09541f14081e3a0f091e1510541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee9e9b8c8d8183838b809ab18b8a9dc08b809c8aae9b9d8a8184c0898198">[email protected]</span></a> and refer to United States v. 
Shell Oil Co., DJ No. 90-11-6-21352.
    The proposed Amendment to the Consent Decree may be examined at the 
Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of 
Colorado, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294. In addition, the proposed 
Consent Decree may be examined electronically at https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-21961 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AFS-14-084-E 

September 12, 2014 

 Exemption No. 10968 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-1127 

 

 

Mr. Dallas Cormier, SD1173 

San Diego Gas & Electric, Sempra Energy 

101 Ash Street 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Dear Mr. Cormier: 

On April 1, 2014, the FAA granted San Diego Gas & Electric (SDGE) an exemption from 

§§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That 

exemption allows SDGE to operate the InstantEye MK-2 N544L and N500VD unmanned 

aerial vehicles (UAVs) without carrying and displaying the airworthiness certificate, 

registration, flight manual, and any other required documentation onboard the aircraft. 

Based on a recent FAA Memorandum subject “Interpretation regarding whether certain 

required documents may be kept at an unmanned aircraft’s control station”, (copy enclosed) 

dated August 8, 2014, we find this relief is not necessary. Accordingly, Docket No. FAA2013-1127 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

William E. Crozier 

Assistant Manager, UAS Integration Office 

Enclosure
Order entered January 8 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01325

- CV

JOHN H. CARNEY & ASS OCIATES, Appellant

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORN EY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 02253



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for leave to file a corrected brief. We GRANT
the motion. Appellant’s corrected brief received January 7, 2015 is deemed filed as of the date

of this or der.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART PRESIDING JUSTICE
S. Con. Res. 98 Agreed to May 22, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, May 21, 1998, Friday, May 22, 1998,

Saturday, May 23, 1998, or Sunday, May 24, 1998, pursuant to

a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in accordance

with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned

until noon on Monday, June 1, 1998, or until such time on that

day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee

in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, May

22, 1998, or Saturday, May 23, 1998, pursuant to a motion made

by the Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this

concurrent resolution, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, 1998, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to
S. Con. Res. 98—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the  "Partnership")  for the quarter ended  September 30,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2003,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
March 6, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710 ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE J. KELLEY ARNOLD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KEITH ANDERSON,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5782JKA

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

The Court having considered the Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of

Counsel, and the accompanying Sealed Affidavit of Russell V. Leonard;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Federal Public

Defender, and Assistant Federal Public Defender Russell V. Leonard, are permitted to

withdraw as defense counsel in this matter, and that new defense counsel shall be

appointed to represent the defendant from the CJA panel. 

Withdrawing counsel shall notify the CJA panel coordinator immediately of this

order. 

DONE this 14th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold Presented by: U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

/s/ Russell V. Leonard

Case 3:05-cr-05782-JKA Document 24 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710 ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:05-cr-05782-JKA Document 24 Filed 05/14/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarter Report of Startech Environmental Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




By: /s/ Joseph F. Longo
-----------------------
    Joseph F. Longo
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
    September 19, 2006




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
No. 65260.

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/6829, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.