alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHIHULY, INC., and PORTLAND PRESS,

INC.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1801 JPD

ROBERT KAINDL, et al.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

ROBERT KAINDL, et al., )

 Counter-claimants )

 vs. )

CHIHULY, INC., and PORTLAND PRESS, )

and DALE CHIHULY, )

 )

 Counter-Defendants )

______________________________________

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Dale Chihuly, an individual, has been added as a party to this matter. (Dkt #72). Counsel

representing Mr. Chilhuly are hereby directed to advise the Court whether Mr. Chilhuly Consents

to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and have the matter continue to remain on

the docket of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge. Counsel are to

advise Deputy Clerk, Peter H. Voelker, within seven (7) days of an appearance being filed for

“counter-defendant” Dale Chihuly. The consent or decline to consent may be conveyed to Mr.

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 74 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

Voelker either by phone (206) 370-8422, or by fax (206) 370-8425. The consent or decline to

consent should not be filed on the case docket, or forwarded to the chambers of Judge Donohue

in any form. Should Mr. Chihuly decline to consent, the matter will be reassigned to a district

judge.

Dated this 8th day of May, 2006

Bruce Rikfin, Distirct Executive

/s/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 74 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 58741.

protests 179508-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of magnesium articles similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 316, C. D. 1620) and that the said articles are unfinished parts of internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type similar to those involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited decisions, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

DEC 112014 

Mr. Franyois Duclos 

Airbus SAS 

D2202 

1 rond-point Maurice Bellonte 

31707 Blagnac Cedex 

FRANCE 

Dear Mr. Duclos: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated December 8, 2014, requesting a time limited 

exemption from§§ 25.981(a)(3) Amendment 25-125, and 25.901(c) Amendment 25-126 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This exemption, if granted, would allow time for 

Airbus to incorporate necessary design changes of the center wing tank fuel system wiring 

and fuel pump ground fault protection to reach full compliance with these requirements, and 

allow on-schedule delivery to its US launch customer. 

This request was submitted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket 

Management System (at Regulations.gov) on December 9, 2014, and has been assigned 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1021. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will 

contact you if we need additional information. 

A summary of your petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in 

accordance with the requirements of§ 11.85. You will be advised of the agency's decision 

on your petition as soon as possible. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. Doug Bryant at (425) 227-2384, or by e-mail at Douglas.N.Bryant@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, '\ 

j J)j).ML 4. M~ Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

COPY 

OF ORIGINAL
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JASON JOHN FUHR,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR05-391RSM

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S.

Martinez, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the

Court’s Order re: Child Support (Dkt. #859). Having reviewed the motion and attached exhibits,

the State’s petition and the remainder of the record, the Motion for Reconsideration is

GRANTED. The Court’s January 9, 2007 Order granting the State of Washington’s petition for

forfeited cash for child support payment is STRICKEN (Dkt. #854). Counsel for the government

shall submit a proposed briefing schedule on the State’s petition in this matter and on a similar

petition filed in USA v. COREY ALLEN BROWN, CR05-391RSM (Dkt. #771), no later than

July 31, 2007. After both matters are fully briefed, the Court will schedule a consolidated

ancillary hearing on the petitions pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n).

DATED this 20th day of July, 2007.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

 By /s/ Lowell Williams 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 935 Filed 07/20/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 66576.

#### Rice-Bayersdorfer Company *v.*United States,

protests 61/6649 and 61/6663 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber tree corsages similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SIDNEY CHARLES RANDALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

THEODORE LARSON, 

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0798-JCC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice

Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the balance of the record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69);

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 52) is GRANTED;

(3) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 64) is DENIED; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to appoint counsel from the Pro Bono Panel to represent

Plaintiff, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Clerk is further directed to send

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 74 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAGE -2

copies of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel of record, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 30th day of October, 2007.

A

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 74 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 151

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require the Committee on

Rules and Administration to develop, implement, and update as necessary

a strategic planning process for the functional and technical infrastructure support of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. FORD) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require the

Committee on Rules and Administration to develop, implement, and update as necessary a strategic planning

process for the functional and technical infrastructure

support of the Senate.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE STANDING RULES OF THE

3 SENATE.

4 Paragraph 1(n)(2) of rule XXV of the Standing

5 Rules of the Senate is amended—

6 (1) in division (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

7 end;
2

•SRES 151 ATS

1 (2) in division (B), by striking the period and

2 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(C) develop, implement, and update as

5 necessary a strategic planning process and a

6 strategic plan for the functional and technical

7 infrastructure support of the Senate and pro8 vide oversight over plans developed by Senate

9 officers and others in accordance with the stra10 tegic planning process.’’.

11 SEC. 2. COOPERATION BY OFFICES OF THE SENATE.

12 (a) SECRETARY OF THE SENATE.—The Secretary of

13 the Senate shall assist the efforts of the Committee on

14 Rules and Administration with respect to the development

15 and implementation of a strategic plan for the functional

16 and technical infrastructure support of the Senate. The

17 Secretary shall prepare for approval by the Committee im18 plementation plans, including proposed budgets, for the

19 areas of infrastructure support for which the Secretary is

20 responsible.

21 (b) SERGEANT AT ARMS.—The Sergeant at Arms

22 shall assist the efforts of the Committee on Rules and Ad23 ministration with respect to the development and imple24 mentation of a strategic plan for the functional and tech25 nical infrastructure support of the Senate. The Sergeant
3

•SRES 151 ATS

1 at Arms shall prepare for approval by the Committee im2 plementation plans, including proposed budgets, for the

3 areas of infrastructure support for which the Sergeant at

4 Arms is responsible.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SHARNELL HORNE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-607 MJP

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Report and Recommendation

of the Honorable Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record,

finds and Orders as follows:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for the

defendant and the Hon. Monica J. Benton.

DATED this _21st day of February 

A

, 2007.

Marsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00607-MJP Document 25 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 1
R t 10GAOeport10-23ENERGY-WATER NEXUSWATERNEXUSImprovementstoFederal WaterUseDataWouldo e e ts to ede a ate Use ata ou dIncrease Understanding of Trends in Power PlantWater UseU.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Department of EnergyGAO 10-23 focuses on advanced cooling technologies andalternative water sources and their role in the use of freshwater foralternativewatersourcesandtheirroleintheuseoffreshwaterforelectric power generation.This report lays out seven Energy Information Administration andrecommendations for the US Geological Survey to consider in thefuture efforts in this area to improve the collection, analysis anddistribution of information about this important water use.Water withdrawals by categoryLi t kP bli S lTh l t i PSelfSupplied DomesticvesockPublicSupplyThermoelectricPower-SuppliedDomesticLess than 1 percent 11 percent 49 percent1 percent31 percent1 percent 4 percent2 percentIrrigationMiningSelf-Supplied IndustrialAquacultureGAO 10-23In the process of conducting their reviewIntheprocessofconductingtheirreview,the GAO interviewed the two agencies alongwith:Case Studies in: Regulatory Agencies:ArizonaNevadaCalifornia TexasGeorgiaAlabamaIllinoisRecommendations - EIAAdministrator of EIA consider four actions:• Add cooling technology reporting codes for alternative cooling technologies,such as dry and hybrid cooling, or take equivalent steps to ensure thesecooling technologies can be identified in EIA’sdatabase;• Expand reporting of water use and cooling technology data to include allsignificant types of thermoelectric power plants, particularly by reinstatingd t ll ti f l l t d i iti ti ll ti f d t f lldata collectionfor nuclear plants andinitiating collection ofdatafor allcombined cycle natural gas plants;•Collect and report data on the use of alternative water sources such asCollectandreportdataontheuseofalternativewatersources,suchastreated effluent and groundwater that is not suitable for drinking or irrigation,by individual power plants; and• Include USGS and other key users of power plant water use and coolingsystem data as part of EIA’s triennial review process.Recommendations - USGSSecretary of Interior consider two actions:• Expanding efforts to disseminate available data on the use of alternativewater sources, such as treated effluent and groundwater that is not suitablefor drinking or irrigation, by thermoelectric power plants, to the extent thatthis information becomes available from EIA; and• Reinstating collection and distribution of water consumption data atth l t i l tthermoelectric power plants.Recommendations – USGS & EIATo improve the overall quality of data collected on wateruse from power plants we recommend that EIA and USGSusefrompowerplants,werecommendthatEIAandUSGSestablish a process for regularly coordinating with eachother, water and electricity industry experts, environmentalgroups, academics, and other federal agencies, to identifyand implement steps to improve data collection anddissemination.
April 25, 1963

No. 67640.

Appeal 5102.

#### United States *v.*Border Brokerage Co. et al.

C.D. 2311 affirmed January 16, 1963. C.A.D. 811.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2023-N-3636]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is correcting a notice entitled “Food and Drug Administration Information Technology Strategy; Request for Comments” that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 19, 2023. The document announced the availability of an information technology (IT) strategic plan entitled the “FDA Information Technology Strategy” and a request for comment on this IT Strategy. The document was published with an incorrect set of fiscal year information. This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Casi Alexander, Office of Digital Transformation, Food and Drug Administration, FDA Library, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1087, Rockville, MD 20857, 240-402-5171, email:                         *Casi.Alexander@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 19, 2023 (88 FR 64435), in FR Doc. 2023-20136, the following correction is made:                

On page 64436, in the third column, in the second paragraph, “Fiscal Years 2024-2026” is corrected to read “Fiscal Years 2024-2027.”

Dated: October 4, 2023.

Lauren K. Roth,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-22388 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL - 1

C05-2021-JLR-JPD

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

District Judge James L. Robart

Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RAMI KADDUMI, A# 27-104-178

Petitioner,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

of the United States; MICHAEL CHERTOFF,

Secretary of the United States Department of

Homeland Security; A. NEIL CLARK, Seattle

Field Office Director, Bureau of Immigration

and Customs Enforcement; WARDEN of

Immigration Detention Facility; and the Bureau

of Immigration and Customs Enforcement,

Respondents. 

No. C05-2021-JLR-JPD

ORDER ON STIPULATION

FOR DISMISSAL

The parties having stipulated and agreed that the Petitioner has been released from

DHS/ICE detention under an Order of Supervision and that this habeas corpus proceeding has

become moot and may be dismissed without prejudice,

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

s/Thomas S. Zilly

 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02021-JLR-JPD Document 9 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL - 2

C05-2021-JLR-JPD

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Recommended for Entry

this 18th day of January, 2006.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

Darwin P. Roberts 

DARWIN P. ROBERTS

WSBA # 32539

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-7970

Fax: (206) 553-4067

E-mail: darwin.roberts@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Respondents

Case 2:05-cv-02021-JLR-JPD Document 9 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Appendix E 

Comprehensive Conservation Plan Preparers 
Appendix E 

Alaska Peninsula and Becharof NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan E-1 

Preparers 

NAME EXPERTISE/FUNCTION DEGREE(S) EXPERIENCE (YRS) 

Refuge Staff 

Daryle R. Lons Refuge Management BS Natural Resource 

Biology

Refuge Management (29)

Ronald C. Squibb Wildlife 

Management 

BS Wildlife Ecology 

MS Fisheries & Wildlife 

PhD Range Science

Planning (7) 

Wildlife Biology (19)

Susan Savage Wildlife 

Management 

BA Biology 

MS Zoology

Wildlife Biology (11) 

Subsistence Management 

(4) 

Resource Mgt (5)

Region 7 Planning Staff 

Peter E. Wikoff Planning Team 

Leader 7/99–present 

General 

Coordination

BS Forest Management 

Master of Business 

Administration

Resource Planning (10) 

Resource Management (14)

Helen Clough Planning Team 

Leader until 6/99 

Initial Scoping and 

Alternative 

Development

BA Anthropology Refuge Planning (13) 

Public Land Management 

(18)

Karen Murphy Natural Resource 

Planner 

6/99–10/01

BS Wildlife Biology 

MEM Resource 

Management

Biology and Planning (8) 

Wildlife Biology (10)

Stewart Allen Social Science, 

Social Analysis, 

Economic Analysis 

until 4/02

BA Psychology 

BA Journalism 

MA Social Psychology 

PhD Recreation 

Management 

Social Aspects of Public 

Land and Natural 

Resource Management (21)

Kenneth W. Rice NEPA, Policy and 

ANILCA 

Compliance

MS Wildlife Resource Management (32)

Charles D. 

Ardizzone 

Wildlife Biologist BA pre-Vet Medicine 

MS Terrestrial Ecology 

PhD Wildlife (candidate)

Planning (5) 

Wildlife Management(9)

Brian Glaspell Social Science 

since 12/02 

BS Geography 

MS Natural Resource 

Management 

PhD Recreation/ 

Wilderness Management 

Social Aspects of Public 

Land and Natural 

Resource Management (10) 
Appendix E: Preparers 

E-2 Alaska Peninsula and Becharof NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

Karen L. Lew Technical Writer 

and Editor 

since 2/03 

BA Humanities Writing and Editing (34) 

Region 7 Fisheries and Ecological Services

Jim Larson Fishery 

Management

BS Fishery 

Management 

MS Natural Resources

Fishery Biology (25) 

Refuge Planning (7)

State of Alaska

Brad Palach Liaison with State of 

Alaska; ADF&G

BA Justice Fish and Wildlife 

Management (20)

Bruce Talbot Liaison with State of 

Alaska; DNR

BS Wildlife Management 

MS Natural Resource 

Planning

Planning and Policy (22)

Brandon 

McCutcheon 

Liaison with State of 

Alaska; DNR

BS Natural Resource 

Management

Resource Management (8)
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 1, 2010

d0928 

# Order

October 1, 2010

140359(24)

KARLA ONDRUS Guardian and Conservator for ANDY ONDRUS, a Pr otected Person, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140359 COA: 293373 Macomb CC: 2 008-004408-NF CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s May 21, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C ORRIGAN

, J. ( dissenting ).

For the reasons stated in Justice M ARKMAN ’s dissent to this Court’s May 21, 2010, order denying leave, I would grant defendant’s motion for re consideration and direct the trial court to reconsider its decision certifying the plaintiff class in light of this Court’s
decision in Henry v Dow Chemical Co, 484 Mich 483 (2009).

M ARKMAN

, J. ( dissenting ).

I would grant reconsideration and remand to the trial court for class certification proceedings for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in this case, 486 Mich 925 (May 21, 2010).

Y OUNG , J., joins the st atements of C ORRIGAN , J., and M ARKMAN , J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

EDWIN NIEMEIER,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5295 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and

Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 6th day of November, 2006.

 ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05295-RBL Document 16 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 1