alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| i.   | A      review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. Subservicer during the      period, and of its performance under this Subservicing Agreement, has been      made under my supervision. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | To      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as      Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Subservicing      Agreement in all material respects throughout the  period. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |  Capmark Finance      Inc. |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |  116 Welsh      Road       |   |
|  Real Estate      Finance, Investoments, Services |  Horsham, Pa      19044    |   |

----
# Official Journal C 125/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 125 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5726 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 125

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5726 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 125/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 125/02 | List of ports in EU Member States where landings and transhipment operations of fishery products are allowed and port services are accessible for third country fishing vessels, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 125/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 125/02

List of ports in EU Member States where landings and transhipment operations of fishery products are allowed and port services are accessible for third country fishing vessels, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 125/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7093 — DLG/Lantmännen/HaGe Polska) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2014/C 125/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7232 — Charterhouse/Nuova Castelli) (1) | 7 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 125/05 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 8 |
| 2014/C 125/06 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 15 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 125/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7093 — DLG/Lantmännen/HaGe Polska) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2014/C 125/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7232 — Charterhouse/Nuova Castelli) (1)

7

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 125/05

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

8

2014/C 125/06

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MARGARITO CRUZ-ROJAS,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-237M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: May 17, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Pretrial Services Report of May 17, 2006, reveals that there is an

immigration detainer lodged against the defendant. 

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of Mexico.

(3) There is no information available to show that defendant has any ties to this

community or to the Western District of Washington.

Case 2:06-mj-00237-JPD Document 6 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(4) Defendant has a criminal background history revealing prior charges and

convictions.

(5) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance because of the nature of the

instant charge and as a risk of danger based on his criminal history.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00237-JPD Document 6 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 101 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 101

 To authorize representation of Members, officers, and an employee of 
  the Senate in the case of Douglas R. Page v. Richard Shelby, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize representation of Members, officers, and an employee of 
  the Senate in the case of Douglas R. Page v. Richard Shelby, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Douglas R. Page v. Richard Shelby, et al., C.A. No. 97-
        0068, pending in the United States District Court for the District of 
        Columbia, the plaintiff has named all Members of the Senate, and the 
        Secretary, the Sergeant at Arms, and the Parliamentarian, of the Senate, 
        as defendants;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members, officers, and employees of the 
        Senate in civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
the Members, officers, and employee of the Senate who are defendants in 
the case of Douglas R. Page v. Richard Shelby, et al.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 175

To designate the week of May 3, 1998, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers

and Employees Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 9, 1998

Mr. ROBB submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 3, 1998, as ‘‘National

Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of our criminal justice system;

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care,

custody, and dignity of the human beings charged to

their care; and

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives:

Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 175 IS

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of May

2 3, 1998, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employ3 ees Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

5 States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies

6 and activities.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Decentralized Storage Alliance Association (“DSAA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Protocol Labs, Inc., Wilmington, DE; Filecoin Foundation, Middletown, DE; PiKNiK & Company, San Diego, CA; and International Computer Concepts, Inc., Northbrook, IL. The general area of DSAA's planned activity is to (a) develop and promote decentralized storage technologies and protocols and (b) undertake such other activities as may from time to time be appropriate to further the purposes and achieve the goals set forth above.

Membership in DSAA remains open and DSAA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22246 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
No. 59289.

protests 188749-K, etc. (New York).

#### Durlacher & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July 30 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013

- 0602 FROM: Lora Strine , EPA SUBJECT: May 26 , 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants

**SUMM ARY**  A phone call was held between EPA and Patrick Cummins, CNEE on May 26 , 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

**ATTENDEES Center for New Energ** **y Economy** Patrick Cummins Jeff Lyng **US EPA** Implementation Workgroup Godfrey, Janice; Strine, Lora; Boswell, Colin; Burns, Ward; Cain, Alexis; Culligan, Kevin; Dalcher, Debra; Donaldson, Guy; Drake, Robert; Dressler, Jason; Farris, Laura; Fellner, Christia n; Fulton, Abby; Gonzalez, Larry; Gordon, Michael; Haber, Matt; Hackel, Angela; Hoffman, Howard; Hutson, Nick; Johnson, Mary; Johnson, Terry; Kakade, Seema; Ketcham

- Colwill, Jim; Lau, Gavin; Lawrence, Rob; Lee, Anita; Linn, Emily; Lloyd, David; McConnell, Robert; Miller, Julia; Mitchell, Ken; Mulholland, Denise; Murray, Beth; Narvaez, Madonna; Newman, Erin; Orlando, Danny; Ortega, Kellie; Patel, Ketan; Rosenberg, Julie; Santiago, Juan; Saracino, Ray; Sherry, Christopher; Solomon, David; Srivastava, Ravi; St eib, Clovis; Stevens, Gabrielle; Torres, Elineth; Wieber, Kirk; Williamson, Timothy; Wong, Shutsu; Zenick, Elliott; Moskal, John; Elman, Barry; Conroy, David; Greene, Cynthia; Shatas, Angie; Raymond Forde; Gardella, Anthony; Mangels, Karl; Mark, Jeremy; Vi ctor, Meg; Daly, Carl; Aisling, Kathleen; Swanson, Nicholas; Wortman, Eric; Hansen, Mark; Olszewski, Joshua; Thomas, Carrie; Vijayan, Abi; Argentieri, Sabrina; Evans, DavidA; Marten, Alex; Sheriff, Glenn
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Lake Forest Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Taylor, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Taylor
------------------------------------------
Jeffrey Taylor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
September 28, 2010

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORD ON REQUEST FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

A PLACE FOR MOM, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DANNY LEONHARDT, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-457

 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR 

 PROTECTIVE ORDER

 

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman, United States District Judge:

(1) The Court declines to sign the proposed protective order, Dkt No. 54. The Court will

not sign stipulated protective orders to authorize documents to be filed under seal simply based on the

fact that they were marked by the parties as confidential in the course of discovery. “There is a strong

presumption of public access to the court’s files and records which may be overcome only on a

compelling showing that the public’s right of access is outweighed by the interests of the public and

the parties in protecting files, records, or documents from public review.” Local Rule CR 5(g)(1). 

The parties have not made a compelling showing that the public and the parties’ interests in protecting

the documents marked “confidential” from public review outweigh the public’s right of access. 

Parties seeking an order to seal any documents must provide a specific description of particular

documents or categories of documents they seek to protect and “a clear statement of the facts

justifying a seal and overcoming the strong presumption in favor of public access.” Local Rule CR

5(g)(2) (emphasis added). The facts supporting any motion to seal must be provided by declaration or

Case 2:06-cv-00457-MJP Document 55 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORD ON REQUEST FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2

affidavit. To obtain a court order sealing documents attached to a non-dispositive motion, the parties

must make a particularized showing under the “good cause” standard of FED. R. CIV. P. 26(c). See

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006). To obtain a court

order sealing documents attached to a dispositive motion, such as a summary judgment motion, the

parties must meet a “compelling reasons” standard and not the lesser “good cause” standard. Id. at

1177-79; Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1136 (9th Cir. 2003).

The parties may agree on confidentiality among themselves, but when they ask that the Court

be involved, they must make the requisite showing. The stipulated protective order received by the

Court does not make sufficiently clear that the parties cannot seal any court filings in this matter

absent a motion to do so which is granted by the Court. The stipulated protective order will remain on

the docket, but will not be signed and entered by the Court in its present form.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record.

Dated: December 6, 2006

AMarsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00457-MJP Document 55 Filed 12/06/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 19 of 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                         JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                                                       974
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             39,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               2,275
<INVENTORY>                                                               45,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          89,428
<PP&E>                                                                     2,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             3,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            92,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     37,944
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                      44
<OTHER-SE>                                                                25,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                              92,641
<SALES>                                                                  200,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         200,184
<CGS>                                                                    186,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            186,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          14,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (1,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               (142)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        (892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                               (892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.20)
        

</TABLE>