alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 24,      2010 |   |   /s/ Donald R.      Ramon |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Donald      R. Ramon                 |
|                     |   | Chief      Financial Officer         |
Exhibit









March 30, 2018


Titan Machinery, Inc.
644 E Beaton Dr.
West Fargo, ND 58078


Attn: Mark Kalvoda
Chief Financial Officer
via electronic mail


Re: Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility


Dear Mr. Kalvoda,


Titan Machinery, Inc. (“Titan”) and CNH Industrial Capital America LLC (“CNHI”) are parties to that Amended and Restated Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility and Security Agreement dated November 13, 2007, as amended from time to time, most recently amended in a letter dated November 20, 2012 (the “Agreement”). This letter will confirm that, effective April 1, 2018, the current total wholesale floor plan credit limit for Titan is $350,000,000.00.  


Best Regards,


CNH Industrial Capital America LLC




     /s/ Mike VanVlaenderen                                      
Mike VanVlaenderen, Strategic Accounts Manager




Titan agrees to the above described amendment to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility and Security Agreement dated November 13, 2007, as amended.


Titan Machinery, Inc.




     /s/ Mark Kalvoda                                                 
Mark Kalvoda, Chief Financial Officer


CNH Industrial Capital America LLC
5729 Washington Ave
Racine WI 53406
## ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 05-13-01137-CR OFFENSE: 21.1 Luis Rodolfo Lopez v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas 

# l<H-75"

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 194th Judicial District Court DATE: 02/02/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1160773-M



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS LuisRodolfo Lopez v.The State of STYLE: Texas 

### PKfl S£ FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: 06/#3/*&/** JUDGE: 

# £4 ASU^—t^ Petition CCA#: 

# \y\-is CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC RECORD
April 1st, 2013

Sirs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

REF. Comments in Support of Resolution 787

To Whom It May Concern,

By means of the following communication, we want to confirm that Taca International Airline, S.A., Avianca 

and TACA Airlines, support IATA ́s Resolution 787 – termed as New Distribution Capability – NDC- taking into 

account that it constitutes an updated data transmission standard based on XML, and thus it will make it 

easier, faster and more economic to provide the customer with more information about fare alternatives, 

ancillary services, on board amenities and graphics such as pictures and seat maps.

Given the fact that NDC will further include new technology using messaging through XML based protocols and 

web services that will enable transparency and consistency in airline pricing, products and services across all 

channels and greater customer personalization and offering in the shopping process, we consider that we 

should support the initiative. 

In addition to the above, it is important to bear in mind that carriers and travel agents need real time dynamics 

that allow interactive contact with their customers; and through the use of NDC, it seems that we will be able 

to avoid current constraints with existing EDIFACT messages.

NDC will also enable a dynamic distribution model that will provide a better access to distribution channels for 

providers and customers that is currently possible only through the airlines’ own websites.

Yours sincerely, 

Jorge Andrés Serrano

Aeronautical Affairs manager

Jorgeandres.serrano@aviancataca.com

Transamerican Airlines, S.A.
**Exhibit23.2** 

 

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

BluerockResidential Growth REIT, Inc.

NewYork, New York

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-200359, 333-203415,333-208956, 333-208988) and Form S-8 (No. 333-202569) of Bluerock Residential Growth REIT, Inc. of our report dated March 31,2017, relating to the financial statements of BR T&C BLVD JV Member, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016; ourreport dated March 31, 2017, relating to the financial statements of BR Southside Member, LLC as of and for the year ended December31, 2016; our report dated March 31, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements of BR Cheshire Member, LLC as ofand for the year ended December 31, 2016; our report dated March 31, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements ofBR Lake Boone JV Member, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016; and our report dated March 31, 2017, relating tothe consolidated financial statements of BR Whetstone JV Member, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, which appearin this Form 10-K/A.

 

 

/s/BDO USA, LLP

NewYork, New York

 

March31, 2017
S. Con. Res. 70 Agreed to November 13, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1026) to reauthorize

the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Secretary of

the Senate shall strike subsection (a) of section 2 and insert the

following:

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7 of the Export-Import Bank Act

of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635f) is amended by striking ‘until’ and all

that follows through ‘but’ and inserting ‘until the close of business

on September 30, 2001, but’.’’.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Senior
Vice-President  and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/Thomas J. Riha.
------------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

September 21, 2009
1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

CASE NO. C 05-2129 RSM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

Eon-Net, L.P., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Flagstar Bancorp, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 05-2129 RSM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

NON-INFRINGEMENT AND OF 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

OF COUNTERCLAIMS AND 

DEFENSES CONCERNING 

INVALIDITY 

Plaintiff Eon-Net, L.P. (“Eon-Net”), by and through its counsel, and Defendant Flagstar 

Bancorp, Inc. (“Flagstar”), by and through its counsel, hereby stipulate to entry of a judgment of 

non-infringement by Flagstar of United States Patent Nos. 6,683,697, 7,075,673, and 7,184,162 

(collectively “the Patents”), based on the Court’s Order on Claim Construction of March 4, 2009. 

This stipulation is made subject to Eon-Net’s reservation of its right to appeal the Court’s 

constructions of claim terms of the Patents. 

Eon-Net and Flagstar, by and through their respective counsel, also hereby stipulate to 

the dismissal without prejudice of Flagstar’s counterclaims and defenses involving invalidity of 

the Patents. The stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is made subject to Flagstar’s 

reservation of its rights to reassert such counterclaims and defenses should Eon-Net’s 

infringement claim regarding the Patents be revived for any reason (including but not limited to 

modification of the Court’s claim constructions on appeal). 

Further, should the Court’s Markman decision be altered on appeal, nothing herein shall 

be deemed an admission by Eon-Net that Flagstar is entitled to judgment of non-infringement 

based upon the altered claim construction of the claims. 

Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 166 Filed 04/06/09 Page 1 of 2
2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

CASE NO. C 05-2129 RSM

Respectfully submitted, this 27th day of March, 2009. 

DATED: March 27, 2009 ZIMMERMAN, LEVI & KORSINSKY, L.L.P 

 By: /s/ Jean-Marc Zimmerman 

 Jean-Marc Zimmerman 

 226 St. Paul Street 

Westfield, NJ 07090 

Tel: (908) 654-8000 

Fax: (908) 654-7207 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eon-Net, L.P. 

DATED: March 27, 2009 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By: /s/Melissa J. Baily 

Melissa J. Baily

Charles K. Verhoeven

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 875-6600 

Jon Steiger

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 

(213) 443-3000 

Bradley S. Keller

Jofrey M. McWilliam 

Byrnes & Keller LLP 

1000 Second Avenue, 38th Floor 

Seattle, Washington 98104 

(206) 622-2000 

Attorneys for Defendant Flagstar Bank 

SO ORDERED this 6 day of April, 2009. A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 166 Filed 04/06/09 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

November 30, 1966

No. P66/354.

#### Aloha Factors and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/3599, etc. (Honolulu).

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

	


	

 	
  

!"   

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

$%&'
		()
)$*'*+"$,0,'1%$2

IES Order Number: 379944-1

Registry Number: 1581757-23-4

CA Index Name:

1,3-Propanediamine, N1,N1-diisooctadecylX
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,409,171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  835,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,312,730
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,014,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          453,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,526,530
<COMMON>                                     5,816,631
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,782,797)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,014,000
<SALES>                                        598,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,000
<CGS>                                          239,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  690,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (47,634)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 3 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt PichlerPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 1, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY C. ROSENAU,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR06-157MJP

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR A BILL OF

PARTICULARS

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars (Dkt. 

No. 31). Having reviewed the motion, the Government’s consolidated response (Dkt. No. 36),

and all related documents, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion.

The three purposes of a bill of particulars are to inform the defendant of the nature of the 

charge against him with sufficient precision to enable him to prepare for trial, to avoid or 

minimize the danger of surprise at trial, and to enable a defendant to plead his acquittal or 

conviction in bar of another prosecution for the same offense. United States v. Ayers, 924 F.2d 

1468, 1483 (9th Cir. 1990). To the extent that the indictment or information itself provides 

details of the alleged offense, a bill of particulars is unnecessary. United States v. Giese, 597 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS- 2

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

F.2d 1170, 1180 (9th Cir. 1979). Full discovery also obviates the need for a bill of particulars. Id. 

(citing United States v. Clay, 476 F.2d 1211, 1215 (9th Cir. 1973)).

A bill of particulars is appropriate when an indictment does not apprise the defendant of 

the offense with which he was charged and of the overt acts which allegedly contributed to his 

participation in a conspiracy. Giese, 597 F.2d at 1180. However, a bill of particulars is not 

necessary when the government provides the accused with a large volume of information, 

including physical evidence, grand jury testimony, and memoranda which reveal the 

government’s theory of the case. Id. 

Here, the substantial discovery provided by the Government, including the indictment 

(Dkt. No. 1), the reports provided by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Dkt. No. 36, 

Attachments A-B), and grand jury testimony (Dkt. No. 39), render a bill of particulars 

unnecessary. Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars is therefore DENIED.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Dated this 18th day of October, 2011.

A
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2242** 

NELSON RIVAS ALVAREZ , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg
. Irene M. Keeley , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00175

- IMK

- JSK )

Submitted : March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Nelson Rivas Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Jonathan S. Cohen, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUST ICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nelson Rivas Alvarez appeals the district co urt’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his civil complaint filed pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a ( West 2007 & Supp. 2012 ), and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 ( West 2007 & Supp. 2012 ) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

. Alvarez v. United States Dep’t of Treasury , No. 1:10

- cv - 00175

- IMK

- JSK ( N.D.W. Va. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 155

Designating April 6 of each year as ‘‘National Tartan Day’’ to recognize

the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ABRAHAM, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr.

CLELAND, Mr. HELMS, Mr. WARNER, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. BUMPERS,

Ms. SNOWE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. KOHL, Mr. AKAKA, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. MACK, Mr. REID, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. INOUYE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. COCHRAN, Mrs. HUTCHISON,

Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. BURNS, and

Mr. COATS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

MARCH 19, 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

MARCH 20, 1998

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating April 6 of each year as ‘‘National Tartan Day’’

to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States.

Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans,

and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and
2

SRES 155 ATS

the American Declaration of Independence was modeled

on that inspirational document;

Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish

Americans played in the founding of this Nation, such as

the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration

of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors

in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,

Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country

in its formative years and guide this Nation through its

most troubled times;

Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by Scottish

Americans that have led to America’s preeminence in the

fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual

and performing arts;

Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish

heritage, tradition, and culture, representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; and

Whereas these numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs,

and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each

2 year as ‘‘National Tartan Day’’.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LEWIS JOHN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY C. BERRY, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5694RJB-KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION SEEKING AN

INJUNCTION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, plaintiff’s motion seeking an

injunction (Dkt. 19), plaintiff’s objections (Dkt. 33), and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted;

(2) plaintiff’s motion seeking an injunction (Dkt. 19) is DENIED; and

(3) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and any other party that has

appeared in this action.

DATED this 31st day of July, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05694-RJB Document 34 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1

                       GLOBAL VILLAGE COMMUNICATION, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended June 30,
                                                               1997             1996
                                                             --------         --------
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>
Loss from continuing operations                              $ (1,975)        $ (4,806)

Loss from discontinued operations                                  --             (257)
                                                             --------         --------
Net loss                                                     $ (1,975)        $ (5,063)
                                                             ========         ========


Weighted average shares outstanding during the period          16,933           16,809

Loss per share from continuing operations                    $  (0.12)        $  (0.29)
Loss per share from discontinued operations                        --            (0.01)
                                                             --------         --------
Net loss per share                                           $  (0.12)        $  (0.30)
                                                             ========         ========

</TABLE>









                                       20