alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the Bank) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Riccobono, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

Date: March 27, 2009



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard M. Riccobono                                  
|Richard M. Riccobono President and Chief
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                 <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-2000         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   23,487              23,487
<SECURITIES>                             12,158              12,158
<RECEIVABLES>                             3,581               3,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                859                 859
<INVENTORY>                                   0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         39,885              39,885
<PP&E>                                   31,337              31,337
<DEPRECIATION>                           25,007              25,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           49,349              49,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     6,688               6,688
<BONDS>                                       0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                   0                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,314               2,314
<OTHER-SE>                               40,347              40,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             49,349              49,349
<SALES>                                       0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,848              14,634
<CGS>                                         0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,795               6,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,863               7,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,593)             (8,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,593)             (8,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0                   0
<CHANGES>                                     0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,593)             (8,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.11)              (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.11)              (0.36)


</TABLE>
No. 64601.

#### Fastening Devices, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3669, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of studs and nails similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fastening Devices, Inc., et al.*v. *United cStates*(40 Cust. Ct. 345, C.D. 2004), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at two-tenths of 1 cent per pound under the provision in paragraph 331, as modified by T.D. 51802, for nails, made of iron or steel wire, not less than 1 inch in length nor smaller than sixty-five one-thousandths of 1 inch in diameter; and (2) the items marked “B” at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 332, as modified, *supra,*for machined studs.
GZA Engineers and

GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Scientists

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/V/H

380 Harvey Road

Manchester

New Hampshire 

03103-3347

603-623-3600

FAX 603-624-9463

www.gza.com

VIA EMAIL

October 12, 2012

File No. 04.0029307.00

Mr. Bruce Kudrick

Superintendent, Hooksett Sewer Commission

Town of Hooksett

1 Egawes Drive

Hooksett, New Hampshire 03106

Re: Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report

September 2012

Merrimack Station

Public Service Company of New Hampshire

Bow, New Hampshire

Dear Bruce:

On behalf of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH), GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 

is pleased to submit the attached Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the 

period September 1, 2012 through September 30, 2012. Wastewater flow was approximately 

24,000 gallons for the monitoring period and was estimated based on the actual number of tanker 

trucks sent to the Hooksett Wastewater Treatment Facility (Hooksett) in September and assumed 

full tanker capacity (i.e., 8,000 gallons). Table 1 included in the Wastewater DMR summarizes 

the data contained in the attached Analytical Data Report for the distillate sample collected on 

September 6, 2012. Distillate was the only approved waste stream discharged to Hooksett in 

September 2012 as authorized under Waste Disposal Agreement WDA-001. 

Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 

(603) 232-8744.

Very truly yours,

GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Ronald A. Breton, P.E.

Senior Principal

RAB:rkl P:\04Jobs\0029300s\04.0029307.00\Work\SAMPLING AND REPORTING\REPORTS\Hooksett\Monthly\Sept 2012\FINAL Hooksett SEPT RPT 101212.docx

Attachments: Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report

Analytical Data Report
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT

WASTEWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT

HOOKSETT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Public Service Company of New Hampshire - Merrimack Station

Waste Disposal Agreement No. WDA-001

Issued October 1, 2011

Expires September 30, 2012

Permitted Flow: 70,000 gallons per day

FLOW DATA

Daily Flow Rate 8,000 gallons (average of actual discharge days)

Monitoring Period Flow 24,000 gallons (9/01/12 - 9/30/12)

P:\04Jobs\0029300s\04.0029307.00\Work\SAMPLING AND REPORTING\DATA\04.0029307.00 RESULTS 06122012.xlsxHooksett Report Cover GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

Public Service Company of New Hampshire

Merrimack Station

Bow, New Hampshire

PARAMETER

DISTILLATE

RESULTS

9/6/12

(mg/L)

Arsenic 0.006

Chloride 130

Chromium (T) 0.001

Lead <0.001

Mercury <0.0002

pH 7.87

Selenium 0.020

TSS <5

P:\04Jobs\0029300s\04.0029307.00\Work\SAMPLING AND REPORTING\DATA\04.0029307.00 RESULTS 06122012.xlsx GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JUAN AYALA-CERDA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-201M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Unlawful entry, second offense — violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(2).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance, 4/28/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required. If new issues surface, then the defendant may request

another hearing on release.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Complaint for Violation dated April 25, 2005, criminal records are cited that

reflect prior offenses committed by Defendant, including violations of deportation and removal

orders. 

Case 2:05-cr-00177-RSL Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(3) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserves the right to the possibility

of a subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances. 

(4) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably assure

the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2005.

s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00177-RSL Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MOHAMUD MOHAMED,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

NORTHERN VICTOR F/V, et al.,

 Defendants.

 ORDER

CASE NO. C05-2019JLR

This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ motion to amend their answer

to add a counterclaim (Dkt. #16). For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS the

motion.

Defendants seek leave to amend their answer in order to allege that Plaintiff

intentionally concealed a preexisting medical condition, which they contend entitles them

to reimbursement of maintenance and cure payments already paid. The court notes that

in order to prevail on such a claim, Defendants must show that Plaintiff concealed a

medical condition that he knew or should have known was related to the injury for which

he requested maintenance and cure. See Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 990

(9th Cir. 1987). Notwithstanding this relatively high standard of proof, the court must

Case 2:05-cv-02019-JLR Document 23 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 2

consider Defendants’ motion against the liberal standard for granting leave to amend

under the federal rules. Against this backdrop, the court concludes that Defendants’

motion is timely and that Plaintiff has not met his burden to show undue prejudice. 

Lastly, although the court strongly suspects that additional discovery is unnecessary,

Plaintiff is free to move to reopen discovery and seek relief from the court’s scheduling

order if he can provide a basis for doing so. 

For these reasons, the court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to amend their answer

to add a counterclaim. Defendants should file their amended answer no later than

October 13, 2006. 

Dated this 10th day of October, 2006.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02019-JLR Document 23 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 81-4 Filed 03/08/12 Page 6 of 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the                           ( print page 70661)                        standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 27, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60690-1414. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@chi.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *George B. Bley II, Palm Harbor, Florida, individually, and acting in concert with the Bley Family Control Group;*                     to retain voting shares of Petefish, Skiles Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Petefish, Skiles & Company, both of Virginia, Illinois.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-22582 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MONDO VALDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

RICHARD MORGAN,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5222 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and

Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 5) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for

Respondent and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05222-RBL Document 19 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 56175.

protest 162485-K (Baltimore).

#### H. Klaff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*346Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of stainless steel scrap; that said scrap is a ferrous material in chief value of metal; and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse fit only to be re-manufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
Exhibit 10.43

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Employment Agreement") is made effective as of
November 14, 2009 (the "Effective Date") by and among Cloud Peak Energy Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and Gary Rivenes (the "Executive").

RECITALS

WHERAS, the Executive currently serves as Vice-PresidentMine Operations of Rio Tinto Energy
America Inc., pursuant to an employment agreement with Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. dated December 4, 2007 (the "Previous
Agreement");

WHEREAS,
the Executive possesses skills, experience and knowledge that are of value to the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to enter into this Employment Agreement in connection with the proposed initial public offering of shares of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.
(the "IPO").

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valid consideration the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Section 1.Employment.



---





Section 2.Compensation.



2

---





Section 3.Employment Termination.



3

---





4

---





5

---



Section 4.Unauthorized Disclosure; Non-Solicitation; Non-Competition; Proprietary
Rights.



6

---





7

---





Section 5.Representations.The Executive represents and warrants that he (i) is not subject to
any contract, arrangement, policy or understanding, or to any statute, governmental rule or regulation, that in any way limits his or its ability to enter into and fully perform his or its obligations
under this Employment Agreement and (ii) is not otherwise unable to enter into and fully perform his or its obligations under
this Employment Agreement. The Company represents and warrants that this Employment Agreement will, by its effective date, have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Company.

Section 6.Withholding; Taxes.All amounts paid to the Executive under this Employment Agreement during
or following the Term shall be subject to any required withholding and other employment taxes imposed by applicable law.

Section 7.Miscellaneous.



8

---







9

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC./s/ Gary Rivenes Gary Rivenes

By:

/s/ Colin Marshall Name: Colin Marshall
Title: President & CEO


10

---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

147510(70)

AMY M. OGILVIE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147510

COA: 310935

Alpena CC: 11-004212-DM

ERIC ARLINGTON OGILVIE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 31, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
| 1.     | the forgoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |

|   |   /s/ Adam Langley                                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Adam Langley, Senior Vice President & Chief Compliance Officer |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                                           |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC                  |   |

----