alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-60912 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus J.D. BELL, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

No. 1:11-CR-124-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

J.D. Bell pleaded guilty, pursuant to a conditional gu i l t y plea, to failure to register as a convicted s ex o ffender in violation of t he Sex Offender RegistraU n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 24, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-60912 Document: 00512284355 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2013No. 12-60912

tion a nd Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), reserving his right to appeal the challenges to SORNA made i n h i s motion to dismiss t h e indictment. The district court sentenced Bell to twenty-four months in prison and ten years’ supervised release. Bell argues that the district court e rred when it denied his motion to dismiss the indictment. He contends that the Attorney G eneral’s 2007 interim rule, which made SORNA retroactively applicable to pre-SORNA offenders, such as himself, was not validly p romulgated b ecause of certain Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) violations, and, t hus, SORNA was n o t a p p licable to him. In support, Bell asserts that Reynolds v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 9 75 (2012), overruled United S tates v. Johnson , 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2011). In the alternative, Bell argues that, in light of Reynolds , this court should reconsider Johnson

. Bell’s complaints as to the APA and his reliance on Reynolds are unavailing. Bell’s SORNA violations occurred in 2011, after the 2008 effective date of the Attorney G eneral’s final regulations applying SORNA t o pre-SORNA offenders. 73 Fed. Reg. 38,030, 38,063. Those final regulations were not under scrutiny i n Reynolds o r Johnson , and, on appeal, Bell does not challenge the validity of those regulations. F urthermore, the Attorney G e neral’s final regulations “were p ublished w ith proper notice and comment rulemaking.” United States v. Davis , 471 F. App’x 363, 364 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 1 33 S

. Ct. 493 (2012). As for Bell’s r equest that we revisit Johnson , this panel may n ot reconsider the c ourt’s precedent absent an overriding Supreme C o u r t decision, a change in s tatutory law, or en banc consideration. See United S tates v. ZunigaSalinas , 952 F.2d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 1992) (en banc). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-60912 Document: 00512284355 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/24/2013
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 4

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following joint resolution; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

8 within seven years after its submission to the State for

9 ratification:
2

•SJ 4 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Any officer of the United States appointed by the

3 President with the advice and consent of the Senate, upon

4 conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude, shall for5 feit office and all prerogatives, benefits, or compensation

6 thereof.’’.

Æ
From: beckein@speednetllc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:53:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Keinath

Reese, MI 48757
III

Calendar No. 143

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. Res. 110

To permit an individual with a disability with access to the Senate floor

to bring necessary supporting aids and services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30, 1997

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BYRD, Mr. REID, Mr. KERRY,

Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BINGAMAN,

Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HATCH, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr.

HARKIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

JULY 31, 1997

Reported by Mr. WARNER, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To permit an individual with a disability with access to

the Senate floor to bring necessary supporting aids and

services.

1 Resolved, That an individual with a disability who has

2 or is granted the privilege of the Senate floor under rule

3 XXIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate may bring nec4 essary supporting aids and services (including service

5 dogs, wheelchairs, and interpreters) on the Senate floor,
2

•SRES 110 RS

1 unless the Senate Sergeant at Arms determines that the

2 use of such supporting aids and services would place a

3 significant difficulty or expense on the operations of the

4 Senate in accordance with paragraph 2 of rule 4 of the

5 Rules for Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United

6 States Capitol.

Calendar No. 143

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 110

RESOLUTION

To permit an individual with a disability with acporting aids and services. cess to the Senate floor to bring necessary supJULY 31, 1997

Reported without amendment
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18143 and #18144; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-00158]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4738-DR), dated 09/07/2023.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Idalia.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/30/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/02/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/06/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/07/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business                               ( print page 69978)                            Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of GEORGIA, dated 09/07/2023, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Berrien, Brooks.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Georgia: Atkinson, Coffee, Irwin, Thomas.

Florida: Jefferson.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-22392 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69625-69626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22275]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete product(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: November 05, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcfff1e8f9fad9d8eed9dbfcfdded5d0d5c8c5f3d2d992dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc9f9188999ab9b88eb9bb9c9dbeb5b0b5a8a593b2b9f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following product(s) are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Product(s)

NSN(s)--Product Name(s):
    7510-01-600-8023--Dated 2023 12-Month 2-Sided Laminated Wall 
Planner, 24'' x 37''
    7510-01-600-7581--Wall Calendar, Dated 2023, Wire Bound w/
hanger, 15.5'' x 22''

[[Page 69626]]

    7510-01-600-7588--Monthly Wall Calendar, Dated 2023, Jan-Dec, 8-
1/2'' x 11''
    7510-01-600-7634--Wall Calendar, Dated 2023, Wire Bound w/
Hanger, 12'' x 17''
    7510-01-682-8100--Wall Calendar, Recycled, Dated 2023, Vertical, 
3 Months, 12-1/4'' x 26''
    7510-01-682-8093--Monthly Planner, Recycled, Dated 2023, 14-
month, 6-7/8'' x 8-3/4''
    7510-01-682-8112--Professional Planner, Dated 2023, Recycled, 
Weekly, Black, 8-1/2'' x 11''
    7530-01-600-7580--Daily Desk Planner, Dated 2023, Wire bound, 
Non-refillable, Black Cover
    7530-01-600-7606--Monthly Desk Planner, Dated 2023, Wire Bound, 
Non-refillable, Black Cover
    7530-01-600-7615--Weekly Desk Planner, Dated 2023, Wire Bound, 
Non-refillable, Black Cover
    7530-01-600-7626--Weekly Planner Book, Dated 2023, 5'' x 8'', 
Black
Designated Source of Supply: Chicago Lighthouse Industries, Chicago, 
IL
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2, NEW YORK, 
NY

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-22275 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
!

'f-,AA- 2. 010- OJ.-74

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Air(Taft Association Eli Colti 211/10

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotlcrer 211110

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 2/1/10

ATA Craig Fabian 2/1/10

Contacted by Dan Rodina.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 49]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 489]]

Public Law 114-49
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the ``PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway'' 
      in the State of Texas. <<NOTE: Aug. 7, 2015 -  [H.R. 2559]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The segment of Interstate Route 10 between milepost 535 and milepost 
545 at Kendall County, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``PFC 
Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 10 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``PFC 
Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway''.

    Approved August 7, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2559:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            June 15, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenith Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, T. Gaylon Layfield, III,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|February 25, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ T. Gaylon Layfield, III                                                                
|                  |  |  |  | T. Gaylon Layfield, III
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER - 1

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIGUEL GARCIA-GUIZAR,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 06-200M

DETENTION ORDER

Offense charged:

Illegal re-entry by alien, with prior aggravated felony conviction, previously arrested and 

 deported.

Date of Detention Hearing: 04/27/06

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based

upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds that no

condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the

appearance of defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community.

Case 2:06-cr-00144-RSM Document 7 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER - 2

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is reportedly a citizen of Mexico.

(2) The United States alleges that his presences in this country is illegal. There is an

immigration detainer pending against him. The issue of detention in this case is

therefore essentially moot.

(3) Defendant and his counsel offered nothing in opposition to the entry of an order of

detention.

(4) Upon advice of counsel, defendant declined to be interviewed by this court’s pretrial

services officer. There is therefore limited information available about him.

(5) His criminal record includes conviction a 1995 conviction for continuous sexual abuse

of a child.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the Attorney

General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable,

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an

appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cr-00144-RSM Document 7 Filed 04/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER - 3

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel

for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States Pretrial

Services Officer.

DATED this 27th day of April, 2006.

s/ John L. Weinberg 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00144-RSM Document 7 Filed 04/27/06 Page 3 of 3
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Economic Implications of the "Too Big to Fail" Policy

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization, 1977-[1995]					 and 	One Hundred Second Congress, 1991-1993. 						*Economic Implications of the "Too Big to Fail" Policy : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, May 9, 1991*,												Washington, DC: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										May 9, 1991,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/89,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER