alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 258

To authorize testimony and representation of Senate employee in State of

Tennessee v. Ronald W. Byrd.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 28, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and representation of Senate

employee in State of Tennessee v. Ronald W. Byrd.

Whereas, in the case of State of Tennessee v. Ronald W.

Byrd, Case No. S 113068, pending in the Court of General Sessions for Sullivan County, Tennessee, testimony

has been requested from Kathy Tipton, an employee in

the office of Senator Fred Thompson;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their

official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evi-
2

SRES 258 ATS

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Kathy Tipton is authorized to testify

2 in the case of State of Tennessee v. Ronald W. Byrd, ex3 cept concerning matters for which a privilege should be

4 asserted.

5 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

6 represent Kathy Tipton in connection with the testimony

7 authorized in section one of this resolution.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZOLTAN BIRO,

Defendant.

Case No. CR89-71T

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EARLY TERMINATION OF

SUPERVISED RELEASE

Defendant Biro was sentenced to 170 months with five years supervised release for

conspiracy to distribute and distribution of Cocaine following his plea. Biro was indicted with

sixteen other individuals and received a two-point aggravating enhancement for his managerial role in

the scheme. Biro began the supervised release portion of his sentence in April 2004, and now moves

for early termination for the reasons that he has complied with the terms of his supervised release,

has committed no violations, has satisfied all financial obligations, has a stable residence, and has

worked continuously at the same job. Biro has been employed at the Newport Beach Tennis Club

since he was in the halfway house at the close of his prison term, and has worked his way up to the

position of Facilities Manager. Biro’s employer writes in support of the motion for early termination

of supervised release and states that the Newport Beach Tennis Club limits any further official

advancement for Biro because of his current parole status. 

Case 2:89-cr-00071-RBL Document 526 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

The United States Probation Office has responded setting forth the relevant history of this

case and citing the relevant statutory authority as well as referencing the Federal Supervision

Monograph. Title 28 U.S.C. § 994(h) provides that drug offenders should not be considered for

early termination. 

Considering Defendant’s aggravated role in the drug offense, that the offense is one for

which early termination is discourage, and that he is only a little over two years into his supervised

release period, early termination is inappropriate. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Early Termination of

Supervised Release [Dkt. # 524] is DENIED. 

DATED this 20th day of July, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:89-cr-00071-RBL Document 526 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. (ET).

# PLACE:

                        The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov*.                    

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov*.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt a rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to increase the transparency and efficiency of the securities lending market.

2. The Commission will consider whether to adopt a rule under the Exchange Act that is designed to provide greater transparency to investors and other market participants by increasing the public availability of short sale-related data and whether to approve a proposed amendment to the national market system plan governing the consolidated audit trail (“CAT”) created pursuant to the Exchange Act to require a CAT reporting firm that is reporting short sales to indicate whether such firm is asserting use of the bona fide market making exception under Rule 203(b) of Regulation SHO.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552b)

Dated: October 6, 2023.

J. Lynn Taylor,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22619 Filed 10-10-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
No. 55684.

protests 154547-K, etc. (New York).

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000876716
<NAME>                             Smith Barney International Currency Fund L.P.

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                              1,868,869
<SECURITIES>                          (26,264)
<RECEIVABLES>                           8,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,850,685
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,850,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  85,688
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          1,764,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,850,685
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     (442,074)
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       18,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (460,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                         (460,799)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (2.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Howmuch does it matter how sick you get? : consumers responses to foodbornedisease outbreaks of different severities**
 
Summary | Report
 
SuDoc Number:A 93.73:193
Item Number:0042-V (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959468
 
August 6, 2018
#### Jeffrey Lee HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tim BARBOUR, Lieutenant Colonel, Assistant Superintendent; Kimberly K. Royal; Timothy Lightbourne, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6567.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Jeffrey Lee Hall, pro se.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Lee Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district *148court. *Hall v. Barbour,*No. CA-01-236-AM (E.D.Va. filed Mai’. 26, 2001; entered Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 160

To commend the exemplary leadership of the majority leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the majority leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished majority leader, the Senator

3 from Mississippi, the Honorable Trent Lott, for his exem4 plary leadership and the cooperative and dedicated man5 ner in which he has performed his leadership responsibil6 ities in the conduct of Senate business during the first

7 session of the 105th Congress.

Æ
# Official Journal L 52/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6222 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 52

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6222 February 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2019/259 of Amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2019/259 of Amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2018

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Budgetary remarks are only executable insofar as they do not modify or extend the scope of an existing legal base, impinge on the administrative autonomy of institutions and can be covered by available resources (as indicated in the annex to the executability letter dated 28 October 2015).

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Maddox Ungar Silberstein, PLLC CPAs
and Business Advisors





Phone
(248) 203-0080


Fax
(248) 281-0940


30600
Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham
Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.maddoxungar.com




November
25, 2009







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of
Directors


Lux
Digital Pictures, Inc.


Berkeley,
California





To Whom
It May Concern:





Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual
Report Pursuant to Section 3 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, filed by Lux Digital Pictures, Inc. of our report dated November 25, 2009,
relating to the financial statements of Lux Digital Pictures, Inc., a Wyoming
Corporation, as of and for the periods ending August 31, 2009 and
2008.





Sincerely,






/s/ Maddox Ungar
      Silberstein, PLLC


Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inscrutor, Inc. (the Company )
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Jesper Toft, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the
disclosure of deficiencies in the Company ’ s disclosure controls and procedures
set forth in Item 9A  of the Report:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 10, 2009







/s/ Jesper
      ToftJesper
      ToftChief
      Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,703
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,901
<PP&E>                                          34,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,314
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,332)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,850)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. P67/343.

#### Frankford Rubber Corp. *v.*United States, protests 66/5792 and 66/5419 (New York).

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of synthetic rubber sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear*Co., *Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 29A/26 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 29A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 29A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 January 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 29 A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/167/21 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2021/C 29 A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/167/21

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10981

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Hugo Alejandro Castilleja, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-102-1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo Alejandro 

Castilleja has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castilleja has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10981 Document: 00516307485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2022
No. 21-10981

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10981 Document: 00516307485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2022
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 54 Filed 04/27/07 Page 11 of 11
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus FACUNDO-MALDONADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51393.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Facundo-Maldonado raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almenda*
      *377
      *rez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE - 1 

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN R. ILLA, INC. P.S. 

600 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 433 

SEATTLE, WA 98104 

(206) 464-4142

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ELEAZAR BASILIO, 

 Defendant. 

No. CR 06 – 106 RSM 

ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT ELEAZAR BASILIO’S 

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE 

Defendant ELEAZAR BASILIO’S motion to continue the pretrial motions deadline 

came on regularly for hearing, and the court being fully advised, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the deadline for filing 

pretrial motions is continued to Monday, November 13, 2006. 

 Dated this _31__ day of October, 2006. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by: 

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN R. ILLA

Stephan R. Illa 

WSBA No. 15793 

Attorney for Defendant 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 187 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 1