alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98680]


Order Cancelling Registrations of Certain Municipal Advisors 
Pursuant to Section 15B(c)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

October 3, 2023.
    The municipal advisors whose names appear in the attached Appendix, 
hereinafter referred to as the ``registrants,'' are registered as 
municipal advisors pursuant to Sections 15B(a)(1)(B) and 15B(a)(2) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'').
    On August 29, 2023, a Notice of Intention to Cancel Registration of 
Certain Municipal Advisors, including the registrants, was published in 
the Federal Register (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-98208). 
The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing 
and stated that an order or orders cancelling the registrations would 
be issued unless a hearing was ordered. No request for a hearing has 
been filed by any of the registrants, and the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') has not ordered a hearing.
    Pursuant to Section 15B(c)(3) of the Act, the Commission has found 
that each of the registrants is no longer in existence or has ceased to 
do business as a municipal advisor.
    Accordingly,
    It is ordered, pursuant to Section 15B(c)(3) of the Act, that the 
registration of each registrant be, and hereby is, cancelled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 CFR 200.30-3a(a)(1)(ii).

    For the Commission, by the Office of Municipal Securities, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\1\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.

Appendix:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                SEC  ID
                       Registrant name                            No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betnun Nathan S.............................................   867-02495
Christen Group, Inc.........................................   867-02467
Southern Cross Financial Group LLC..........................   867-02544
OCONNOR & Co SECURITIES, INC................................   867-01245
Capital Alaska LLC..........................................   867-02604
Fray Municipal Securities...................................   867-02064
Massena Associates LLC......................................   867-02569
SUMMERS, CARROLL, WHISLER LLC...............................   867-01938
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-22349 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Manuel Antonio CARDENAS-BORJA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72489.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

*648Charles E. Nichol, Law Office of Charles E. Nichol, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, M. Jocelyn Wright, Larry P. Cote, M. Jocelyn Wright, Larry P. Cote, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Manuel Antonio Cardenas-Borja, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the conclusion that Cardenas-Borja is ineligible for asylum for substantial evidence. *Nahrvani v. Gonzales,*399 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005). We review due process contentions de novo. *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Cardenas-Borja is not eligible for asylum, as the record does not compel the conclusion that the threats the Peruvian guerillas made to Cardenas-Borja constituted past persecution, *see Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.2000) (unfulfilled threats may indicate a danger of future persecution, but generally do not constitute past persecution), or that Cardenas-Borja has an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground, see *Nahrvani*399 F.3d at 1154.

Cardenas-Borja contends that the IJ violated his due process rights by failing to fully inform him of hearing procedure or to fully develop the record. However, Cardenas-Borja failed to show prejudice resulting from the procedure followed by the IJ during his pro se asylum hearing. *See, e.g., Ramirez-Alejandre v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 365, 383-84 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc) (to establish prejudice, an alien must show the alleged due process violation potentially affected the outcome of the immigration proceedings). The record shows that the IJ asked Cardenas-Borja if he had any testimony to add in support of his asylum claim, and neither his responses at the hearing nor his subsequent contentions to the BIA and this court show any basis for fearing *649persecution on account of an actual or imputed political belief. *Compare Colmenar,*210 F.3d at 972 (finding prejudice where native and citizen of the Philippines made conclusory, yet specific, allegations of fear of political persecution by the New People’s Army).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13
                                 AMENDMENT No. 9

                                       to

                       AMETEK RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN



         WHEREAS, there was adopted and made effective as of October 1, 1984,
the AMETEK Retirement and Savings Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective
January 1, 1997; and

         WHEREAS, Section 10.1 of the Plan provides that AMETEK, Inc. ("AMETEK")
may amend the Plan at any time, and from time to time; and

         WHEREAS, AMETEK now desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         FIRST: Section 2.3(a) of the Plan shall be amended to read in its
entirety:

                  "a. Notwithstanding Sections 2.1 or 2.2, an Employee shall not
         be eligible to be a Participant in this Plan if (i) he is a Leased
         Employee, unless the participation of such Leased Employee in the Plan
         is required so that the Plan meets the applicable requirements of
         Section 414(n)(3) of the Code, (ii) he is eligible to participate in
         the AMETEK 401(k) Plan for Acquired Businesses; or (iii) he is an
         employee whose terms and conditions of employment are determined
         pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement; unless the
         collective bargaining agreement provides for the inclusion of such
         Employee in the Plan, in which case the Employee will be eligible to
         participate in the Plan, pursuant to Section 2.2, on the later of the
         date specified in the collective bargaining agreement or the next
         January 1st which is on or after the date he completes the eligibility
         requirements set forth in Section 2.2."




<PAGE>   2

                  SECOND: The provisions of this Amendment No. 9 shall be
         effective as of May 1, 1999.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMETEK has caused these presents to be executed, in
its corporate name, by its duly authorized officer on this 12th day of May,
1999.


                                          AMETEK, Inc.

                                          By:/s/ Donna F. Winquist
                                             ---------------------------
Attest:


/s/ Kathryn E. Londra
---------------------
No. 57484.

#### John Ambriola & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 202217-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, or not landed, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, or not landed, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the Second Division,

January 18, 1968

No. P68/13.

protests 66/34550, etc. (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Eao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
February 21, 1958

No. 61613.

#### S. P. Skinner Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 233045-K.

C. D. 1958. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-155-2023]

On August 18, 2023, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Louisville & Jefferson County Riverport authority, grantee of FTZ 29, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 29, on behalf of BlueOval SK LLC, in Glendale, Kentucky.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 57412, August 23, 2023). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 29U was approved on October 3, 2023, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 29's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: October 3, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-22306 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NIURKA DOMINGUEZ-SOLANO

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR06-133-RSM

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

An initial hearing on supervised release revocation in this case was scheduled before me

on April 19, 2006. The United States was represented by AUSA Lawrence Lincoln and the

defendant by Carol Koller. The proceedings were digitally recorded.

Defendant had been sentenced on or about July 11, 1997 by the Honorable Joan A. Lenard

in the Southern District of Florida on charges of Importation of Cocaine and Possession with

Intent to Distribute Cocaine, and sentenced to 34 months custody, 4 years supervised release.

The conditions of supervised release included the standard conditions plus the requirement

that defendant not remain illegally in the United States and not re-enter the United States without

permission.

In an application dated December 9, 2002 , U.S. Probation Officer Adalys Garcia alleged

Case 2:06-cr-00133-RSM Document 7 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -2

the following violation of the conditions of supervised release:

1. Entering the United States without the express written permission of the Attorney

General of the United States or her [sic] authorized representative and remaining illegally in the

United States. Ms. Dominquez-Solano illegally re-entered the United States on or about August

16, 2002.

Jurisdiction of this case was transferred to this court on April 19, 2006 and assigned to the

Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.

Defendant was advised in full as to those charges and as to her constitutional rights.

Defendant admitted the alleged violations and waived any evidentiary hearing as to

whether they occurred.

I therefore recommend the Court find defendant violated her supervised release as alleged,

and that the Court conduct a hearing limited to the issue of disposition. The next hearing will be

set before Judge Martinez.

Pending a final determination by the Court, defendant has been detained.

DATED this 19th day of April , 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

cc: District Judge: Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez

AUSA: Lawrence Lincoln

Defendant’s attorney: Carol Koller

Probation officer: Michael Banks

Case 2:06-cr-00133-RSM Document 7 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 76-5154.

#### Diaz *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 77-2 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 77-2 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00726-RSM Document 77-2 Filed 06/13/07 Page 3 of 3
H. Res. 760 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 13, 2007. 

Whereas children comprise one quarter of the population of 

the United States; 

Whereas nearly 1 in 5 children in the United States are overweight; 

Whereas 7 percent of children in the United States have limitations on activity due to chronic health conditions; 

Whereas an estimated 12 percent of high school seniors put 

themselves at risk by smoking cigarettes daily; 

Whereas children account for 30,000,000 annual visits to the 

emergency room to receive care for injuries or illnesses; 

Whereas asthma affects nearly 5,000,000 American children; 

Whereas allergies affect about 50,000,000 American children; 

Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the number one cause of 

death for children and adolescents ages 1 to 21; 

Whereas dental caries is the most common chronic disease affecting American children, and is 5 times more common 

than asthma and 7 times more common than hay fever; 

Whereas during fiscal year 2005, an estimated 899,000 children in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and 

Puerto Rico were determined to be victims of abuse or 

neglect; and 
2 

•HRES 760 EH 

Whereas every year since 1928 the President has issued a 

proclamation designating the month October as ‘‘Children’s Health Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Children’s 

Health Month; 

(2) invites the chief executive officers of the States, 

territories, and possessions of the United States to issue 

proclamations recognizing the goals and ideals of Children’s Health Month; 

(3) commends the efforts of States, territories, and 

possessions of the United States, localities, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the people of the United 

States who support the goals and ideals of Children’s 

Health Month; 

(4) recognizes and reaffirms our Nation’s commitment to providing access to health care, ensuring preventative care, seeking cures for debilitating diseases and 

chronic conditions, and promoting healthy living habits 

for America’s children; 

(5) recognizes and salutes the health care professionals who provide care and treatment for childhood illnesses and afflictions; 

(6) recognizes and salutes the officials who protect 

children from environmental health and safety risks; 
3 

•HRES 760 EH 

(7) recognizes and salutes the officials who educate 

parents, schools, and communities about health risks 

and related issues for children; and 

(8) encourages States, territories, and possessions 

of the United States to educate children about healthy 

living habits when they are young so that they will be 

more likely to lead healthy lives as adults. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 61

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the publication

3 entitled ‘‘Our Flag’’, revised under the direction of the

4 Joint Committee on Printing, shall be reprinted as a Sen5 ate document.

6 (b) There shall be printed—

7 (1)(A) 250,000 copies of the publication for the

8 use of the House of Representatives, distributed in

9 equal numbers to each Member;

10 (B) 51,500 copies of the publication for the use

11 of the Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each

12 Member;

13 (C) 2,000 copies of the publication for the use

14 of the Joint Committee on Printing; and
2

SCON 61 RFH

1 (D) 1,400 copies of the publication for distribu2 tion to the depository libraries; or

3 (2) if the total printing and production costs of

4 copies in paragraph (1) exceed $150,000, such num5 ber of copies of the publication as does not exceed

6 total printing and production costs of $150,000,

7 with distribution to be allocated in the same propor8 tion as in paragraph (1).

Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Before the Third Division,

April 17, 1963

No. 67609.

#### Better Houseware Company, Inc. v. United States,

protest 62/12311 (New York).

*270Opinion by

Richardson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 66597.

#### Impecco, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 61/5436, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing reels with two spools similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Charles Garcia & Co., Inc.*(48 C.C.P.A. 140, C.A.D. 780), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 22, 2020

t1214 

# Order

Clerk December 22, 2020

161154

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161154

COA: 351730

Kent CC: 19

- 000770

- FH

GAIL VERONICA BOWMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Janua ry 28, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 54418.

#### Emil Langer & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 154042-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 118

Expressing condolences on the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, and designating September 6, 1997, as a ‘‘National Day of Recognition for

the Humanitarian Efforts of Diana, Princess of Wales’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 3, 1997

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. BIDEN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DODD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing condolences on the death of Diana, Princess of

Wales, and designating September 6, 1997, as a

‘‘National Day of Recognition for the Humanitarian

Efforts of Diana, Princess of Wales’’.

Whereas the Senate and the American people heard the announcement of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales,

with profound sorrow and deep regret;

Whereas the Princess of Wales touched the lives of millions

of Americans and people throughout the world as an example of compassion and grace;

Whereas the Princess of Wales was a committed and caring

mother who successfully raised two young sons under

great pressure and public scrutiny;
2

SRES 118 ATS

Whereas the Senate recognizes the tireless humanitarian efforts of the Princess of Wales, including the areas of—

(1) raising awareness of and attention to breast

cancer research and treatment;

(2) HIV/AIDS, particularly in the areas of pediatric

AIDS, educating the public regarding the facts of HIV/

AIDS transmission, and fostering a public attitude that

is intolerant of discrimination against people with HIV/

AIDS;

(3) banning antipersonnel landmines from the arsenals of war, as these indiscriminate weapons often result

in casualties to civilians, including children, sometimes

many years after the armed conflict in which the mines

were used; and

(4) eliminating the problem of homelessness around

the world: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) extends to the people of the United King3 dom sincere condolences and sympathy on the death

4 of Diana, Princess of Wales;

5 (2) recognizes the extraordinary impact of the

6 Princess of Wales’ humanitarian efforts around the

7 world; and

8 (3) designates September 6, 1997, as a ‘‘Na9 tional Day of Recognition for the Humanitarian Ef10 forts of Diana, Princess of Wales’’.
3

SRES 118 ATS

1 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

2 an enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of Diana,

3 Princess of Wales.

Æ