alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 747 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 29, 2007.
Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian Americans and the 
        people of India, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and 
        Jains throughout the United States and the world;
Whereas there are more than 2,000,000 Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains in the 
        United States;
Whereas the word ``Diwali'' is a shortened version of the Sanskrit term 
        ``Deepavali'', which means ``a row of lamps'';
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants light small oil 
        lamps, place them around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, and 
        peace;
Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps symbolize the light 
        within the individual that rids the soul of the darkness of ignorance;
Whereas Diwali, falling on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar, 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving and the beginning of the new year 
        for many Hindus;
Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the victory of good over evil;
Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day that the sixth founding Sikh Guru, 
        or revered teacher, Guru Hargobind ji, was released from captivity from 
        the ruling Mughal Emperor; and
Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha or 
        liberation by Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras, who were the great 
        teachers of Jain dharma, at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) during this time of celebration, in order to demonstrate support 
        for Indian Americans and the Indian Diaspora throughout the world, 
        recognizes Diwali as an important festival;
            (2) acknowledges the international religious and historical 
        importance of the festival of Diwali;
            (3) recognizes and appreciates the religious diversity in both India 
        and the United States and throughout the world;
            (4) acknowledges and supports the new relationship of collaboration 
        and dialogue in international efforts between the United States and 
        India; and
            (5) in observance of and out of respect for the start of Diwali, the 
        festival of lights, acknowledges the onset of Diwali and expresses its 
        deepest respect to Indian Americans and the Indian Diaspora throughout 
        the world on this significant occasion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 53295.

protests 137016-K, etc. (New York).

#### E. Meer *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT SHEAFFER,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5232 RJB/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to any counsel who may

have appeared on behalf of defendants, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05232-RJB Document 6 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 61097.

protests 299176-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### A. Giurlani & Bro. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of clams, other than razor clams, packed in airtight containers, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### SERVE D FEBRUAR

Y 29 , 201 2 0[-':ARTMENrO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N .•,. - VJ/llt'iJ'^iilW ^ OFFIC EOFHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C -•^CKE I OPERATION S M >MA R - I p |: 2 8 I N TH EMATTERO F PATHFINDE RAVIATION , INC . FAA DOCICE

T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2012-002 8 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2012AL030004 ) ha s been assigne d t o Administrativ e Law Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g this proceedin g shal l b e serve don th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r

person s on th e attache dServic e List .

Attachment

- Servic e Lis t n e

-.. . Chie f Administrat

eFDM S No . FAA-2012-002 8 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Michae l W . Fell , Presiden t Pathfinde r

Aviation , Inc . P.O . Bo x 37 5 Homer , A K

9960 3 Glen n H . Brown , Complainant' s Coitnse / Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Alaska n Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 W . 7' ^ Avenu e #1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 ' TEL : 907-271-527 1 FAX ; 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : . 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assistant/Paralega l FAX : 202-366-753 6

. ' Ser\'ice wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r sewic c i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independence Avenue . S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Wasliington . D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC^30 .



### - 2 -
No. 56183.

protest 173921-K (New York).

#### M. H. Shiman & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 

E.W. a minor, by and throughCRAIG

SCHAUERMANN, her Guardian Ad Litem,

 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

THOMAS HENRY MOODY, BATTLE

GROUND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 119, a

public corporation, MARLA D. ERATH; and

CYNTHIA S. LARSON,

 

 Defendants.

Case No. C06-5253 BHS 

 Minute Order

Re: Settlement Conference

THIS matter was referred by the Honorable Benjamin H. Settle to U.S. Magistrate Judge, J. Kelley

Arnold, for purposes of a Settlement Conference.

The parties and/or their representatives appeared this date with counsel. The matter was fully and

finally resolved; the November 27, 2007 trial date may be stricken. The Settlement Agreement was placed

on the record. The file is returned to Judge Settle pending receipt of disposition documents.

Entered by Deputy Clerk, /s/Kelly Miller, this 7th day of November 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-05253-BHS Document 159 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 1
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 02-2140 WANDA ROLDAN,

Administratrix of the Estate of Rene M. Roldan,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Morris E. Lasker, Senior U.S. District Judge ]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lipez, Circuit Judge . Michael James Kelly on brief for appellant. George B. Henderson, II , Assistant United States Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan , United States Attorney, and Michael E. Kerpan, Jr. , Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Region I, Social Security Administration on brief for appellee. April 29, 2003-2- Per Curiam . After carefully reviewing the briefs and recordon appeal, we affirmsubstantially for the reasons stated by the district court.

The appellant argues that the administrative l aw j udge ignored material evidence and substituted his judgment for expert medical opinion. However, substantial evidenc e supported the determination that the claimant would not have been disabled if he hadnot been drinking. 20 C.F.R . § 404.1535(b). The record contains ample evidence linking the claimant's symptoms to ongoing alcohol abuse, in addition to liver disease. Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services , 955 F.2d 765, 769 (1 st Cir. 1991).

Affirmed . Loc. R. 27(c).
No. 61118.

protest 293719-K (New York).

#### Parksmith Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the protest was not filed within the statutory time provided for in section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69979-69980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18110 and #18111; COLORADO Disaster Number CO-
00143]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Colorado

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Colorado 
(FEMA-4731-DR), dated 08/25/2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/08/2023 through 06/23/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/02/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/24/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Colorado, dated 08/25/2023, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.


[[Page 69980]]


Primary Counties: Baca, Kiowa, Prowers, Teller.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-22399 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
----

Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.3687 — Johnson&Johnson/Guidant

(pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2006/C 149/03)

On 15 March 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (‘the Merger Regulation’) by which the undertaking Johnson & Johnson, USA (‘J&J’) acquires control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Guidant Corporation, USA(‘Guidant’) by way of purchase of shares

At the end of the first phase of the investigation, the Commission concluded that the concentration raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. On 22 April 2005, the Commission therefore initiated proceedings in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation.

A statement of objections was sent to J&J on 20 June 2005. The following day, access to the Commission's file was granted. J&J was asked to reply by 27 June 2005. This deadline was complied with.

The parties did not request the opportunity to develop their arguments in a formal oral hearing.

Edwards Lifesciences SA, Sorin SpA, Abott Laboratories and Medtronic Inc were admitted as interested third parties according to Article 18(4) of the Merger Regulation. They were informed of the nature and subject matter of the case, as appropriate.

On 13 July 2005, J&J offered commitments in order to resolve the competition concerns identified in the Statement of Objections. A market test of the commitments was carried out. I have not been asked to verify the objectivity of the market enquiry. The parties did not request further access to the Commission's file, in particular the results of the market test.

In the light of the commitments proposed and having analysed the results of the market test, the draft decision concludes that the proposed concentration is compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement.

I consider that the rights to be heard of all participants to the present proceeding have been respected.

Brussels, 10 August 2005.

Karen WILLIAMS

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(Norman Gonzales; CR06-106 RSM) (206) 553-1100

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 1

 JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

 NORMAN GONZALES, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-106 RSM

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 

THE COURT having considered the stipulated motion of the parties, the records

and files herein, the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more

speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

//

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 78 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(Norman Gonzales; CR06-106 RSM) (206) 553-1100

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date for Norman Gonzales, Jecer

Belen and Rolando Hernandez is extended from June 5, 2006, to July 10, 2006, and

that the time between the date of this Order and the new trial date be excludable time

under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections

3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B)(I), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

Pretrial motions shall be filed by June 8, 2006.

DONE this 16 day of May 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Nancy Tenney 

WSBA No. 35304

Attorney for Norman Gonzales

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

206/553-1100

206/553-0120

nancy_tenney@fd.org

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 78 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 47

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 402(c)

of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 4 (legislative day, JUNE 2), 1998

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire (for himself and Mr. HELMS) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained

in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect

to Vietnam.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress does not approve the extension of the au4 thority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to Congress on June

6 3, 1998, with respect to Vietnam.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LAWRENCE A. HILDES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-707P

TAXATION OF COSTS

Costs in the above-entitled action are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFFS and on behalf of

DEFENDANTS in the amount of $20.90.

Dated this 20th day of APRIL, 2007 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:06-cv-00707-MJP Document 40 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 57793.

protests 193892-K, etc. (Boston).

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the de*384cision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 51359” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 3

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to voluntary school prayer.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following joint resolution; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to voluntary school prayer.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if rati7 fied by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 to the States by the Congress:
2

•SJ 3 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to

3 prohibit individual or group prayer in public schools or

4 other public institutions. No person shall be required by

5 the United States or by any State to participate in prayer.

6 Neither the United States nor any State shall compose

7 the words of any prayer to be said in public schools.’’.

Æ
# Official Journal L 97/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.097.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 97 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5729 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.097.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 97

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5729 March 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 50 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of front position lamps, rear position lamps, stop lamps, direction indicators and rear-registration-plate illuminating devices for vehicles of category L | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 129 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used on board of motor vehicles (ECRS) | 21 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 50 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of front position lamps, rear position lamps, stop lamps, direction indicators and rear-registration-plate illuminating devices for vehicles of category L

1

*

Regulation No 129 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used on board of motor vehicles (ECRS)

21

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.