alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000875579
<NAME>                      Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    20000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            221250
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6911
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (208,161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      20000
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    104299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (104299)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (104299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (104299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.02)




</TABLE>
No. 67615.

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Co., Inc., a/c Mark Ross & Co. (Eager Beaver Products),

protest 60/13887 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Mini Bachi stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  NUMBER T SHARES
  SPECIMEN TROVAGENE, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFIES THAT: CUSIP
  897238 30 9 SPECIMEN -NOT NEGOTIABLE IS THE OWNER OF  FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF
  COMMON STOCK OF $.0001 PAR VALUE EACH OF TROVAGENE, INC. transferable on the
  books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon
  surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and
  the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of
  Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of the
  Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until
  countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the
  Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
  DATED: COUNTERSIGNED BY: PHILADELPHIA STOCK TRANSFER, INC. 2320HAVERFORD RD.,
  SUITE 230, ARDMORE PA 19003 TRANSFER AGENT AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE  TROVAGENE, INC. CORPORATE SEAL 2009 DELWARE
  SPECIMEN  NOT NECOTIABLE SECRETARY CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0590

GRANITE COUNTY, MONTANA, a political

Subdivision of the State of Montana,

Plaintiff, Counter Defendant

and Appellee,

v.

RISING SUN ESTATES, LLC, JACK

McLEOD and JOHN DOES 1-5,

Defendants, Counter Plaintiffs

and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 12, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 10 2022

01/10/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0590
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/GILL — 1

CR05-393 JCC

Judge John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. CR05-393JCC

 )

 Plaintiff, ) ORDER CONTINUING

) TRIAL DATE AS TO

v. ) DEFENDANT GILL

)

RUPINDER SINGH GILL, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________________ )

On December 1, 2005, the Court issued an Order Continuing Trial date in the

above-captioned case (Dkt. No. 70). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) and United

States v. Daychild, 357 F.3d 1082, 1091–92 (9th Cir. 2004), the Court’s December 1,

2005 order applies to Defendant Rupinder Singh Gill because no motion to sever has

been filed by any party. 

The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by ordering this continuance as

to Defendant Gill outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in any speedier

trial, within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, 

Section 3161(h)(8)(A).

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:05-cr-00393-JCC Document 73 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/GILL — 2

CR05-393 JCC

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial for all defendants shall be continued

to April 17, 2006 for the reasons set forth in the Court’s December 1, 2005 order. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial date be continued from December 12, 2005, to

April 17, 2006, and that the time between the former trial date and the new trial date be

excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(8)(A). 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed on or before

February 21, 2006.

DATED this 7th day of December, 2005.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Jill Otake 

JILL OTAKE

Assistant United States Attorney

Washington Bar No. 28298

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: 206-553-4254

Fax: 206-553-0755

E-mail: Jill.Otake@usdoj.gov

Case 2:05-cr-00393-JCC Document 73 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-82M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

STEVE ATTILA CZINEGE, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine.

Date of Detention Hearing: March 7, 2006

 The Court, having conducted a contested detention hearing pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention

hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant

can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety

of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Jill Otake.

The defendant was represented by Carol Koller.

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00082-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Further supporting the risk of flight is the defendant’s Canadian

citizenship with no ties to the U.S.

(3) Defendant admitted this offense is his third time smuggling drugs over

the border.

(4) Based upon the foregoing information, it appears that there is no

condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future Court appearances and/or the safety of other persons or the

community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

Case 2:06-mj-00082-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 9th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00082-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 3
#### Elbert DAVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. XEROX, INC., Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-16412.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Elbert Davis, San Jose, CA, pro se.

Anthony R. Delling, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant — Appellee.

•Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elbert Davis appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing on res judicata grounds his Title VII employment discrimination action and enjoining Davis from initiating further actions concerning his employment with Xerox. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal based on res judicata, *Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp,*297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir.2002) *658and review for abuse of discretion the district court’s order restricting the filing of meritless claims, *Moy v. United States,*906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Davis’s action on the basis of res judicata because it involves the same claims and parties as his prior federal action which culminated in a final judgment on the merits in 1981. *See Stewart,*297 F.3d at 956.

The district court also properly enjoined Davis from filing further federal actions “arising out of alleged discrimination against Davis while he was employed by Xerox between 1975 and 1983.” *See*28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); *Moy,*906 F.2d at 470-71 (narrowly-tailored injunctions are justified in response to plaintiffs filing of numerous meritless claims).

Davis’s remaining contentions lack merit.

All of Davis’s outstanding motions are denied.

Xerox’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 38 is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                               JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                        12,130,000
<SECURITIES>                                                   1,507,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  5,158,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     535,000
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              19,885,000
<PP&E>                                                         8,032,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 3,649,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                32,402,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         14,210,000
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          47,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    13,989,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  32,402,000
<SALES>                                                       19,244,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              19,244,000
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 18,687,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                90,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  720,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     298,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              422,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     422,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.09 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.08
<FN>
<F1>Item consists of basic earnings per share
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 63852.

protests 313447-K, 316323-K, and 58/2186 (Philadelphia).

#### Eberling & Reuss Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artistic glass articles the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Eteling & Reuss Co.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 387, C.D. 2009), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2019

No. 04-18-00771-CV

Gail GILLETTE,

Appellant

v.

Stephen GRAVES,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI03140

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Rehearing and En Banc is 

GRANTED. Time is extended to January 4, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 382/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.382.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 382 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5430 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.382.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 382

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5430 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2011/C 382/01 | Thirteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2011/C 382/01

Thirteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**

I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that: 

          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Linear Corporation;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: May 17, 2006 |   |
|--------------------|--------|
|               |   |   |
|               | By:    | /s/ Timothy A. Richardson |
|               |   |  |
|               |   | Timothy A. Richardson |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice:12208]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Beyond the Great Wave: Works by Hokusai from the British Museum” at the Bowers Museum, Santa Ana, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22360 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P