alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 802 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 8, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3355) to ensure the availability and affordability of homeowners’ insurance coverage for catastrophic 

events. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order 

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 

Services now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 
2 

•HRES 802 EH 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 

XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for 

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma 

amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so 

printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to 

be printed or a designee and shall be considered as read. At 

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3355 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid-
3 

•HRES 802 EH 

eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 68501.

protests 61/17709, etc. (New York).

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of integral, necessary components of electrical X-ray apparatus or instruments, which are not X-ray tubes or parts thereof, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-2 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-2 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

In re AIDAVEL LOZANO LAIGO. CASE NO. MS05-0201JLR

ORDER

Plaintiff Aidavel Lozano Laigo frequently files civil complaints and other papers 

with the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. On 

December 8, 2005, the court entered an order imposing standing litigation restrictions on 

Ms. Laigo (Dkt. # 1-2). The court’s standing litigation restrictions on Ms. Laigo provide, 

inter alia: 

If the court determines that the complaint meets the requirements of Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 8(a), it will direct the clerk to assign a civil case number and issue 

summons. If the complaint does not meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 8(a), the court will enter an order declining to treat the case as a civil 

action.

(Standing Litig. Restrictions (Dkt. # 1) at 1.)

Case 2:05-mc-00201-JLR Document 123 Filed 01/11/21 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER - 2

In her proposed complaint, docketed on January 6, 2021, Ms. Laigo alleges 

unspecified acts of discrimination by the Social Security Administration, Seattle Public 

Utilities, Seattle City Light, Eye Associates, Amazon, and the Unemployment Office of 

the State of Washington. (1/6/21 Prop. Compl. (Dkt. # 122) at 1-2.) Ms. Laigo seeks 

damages in the amount of “$10,000,000,000,000,000,000 DOLLARS.” (Id. at 2.) She 

provides no facts in support of her allegations of discrimination. (See generally id.) 

Having reviewed Ms. Laigo’s proposed complaint and pursuant to the court’s 

standing litigation restrictions, the court declines to treat Ms. Laigo’s proposed complaint

as commencing a civil action because she has failed to comply with the notice pleading 

requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The court DIRECTS the clerk not 

to calendar, take any other action, or file any further pleading in this matter other than a 

notice of appeal. 

Dated this 11th day of January, 2021.

A

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-mc-00201-JLR Document 123 Filed 01/11/21 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 233

To authorize testimony and document production and representation of Senate

employees in People v. James Eugene Arenas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 21, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and document production and representation of Senate employees in People v. James Eugene Arenas.

Whereas, in the case of People v. James Eugene Arenas,

Case No. 98F2403, pending in the Municipal Court for

Fresno, California, testimony and document production

have been requested from Kelly Gill, an employee on the

staff of Senator Barbara Boxer;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or the production

of documents relating to their official responsibilities;
2

SRES 233 ATS

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Kelly Gill, and any other employee

2 from whom testimony or document production may be re3 quired, are authorized to testify and produce documents

4 in the case of People v. James Eugene Arenas, except con5 cerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.

6 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

7 to represent Kelly Gill, and any other employee from

8 whom testimony or document production may be required,

9 in connection with People v. James Eugene Arenas.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

STORY WORLDWIDE LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

ASSOCIA LIVING INC.,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

) C06-720 JPD

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER RESETTING

) DEADLINES

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Counsel have requested additional time in which to comply with the Order Resetting

Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (dkt. #4). The request is

GRANTED.

The parties will adhere to the following schedule:

FRCP 26f Conference deadline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 21, 2006

Initial Disclosure deadline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 28, 2006

Joint Status Report due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 5, 2006

The date by which the Clerk is to be informed whether the individual parties are

consenting to have this matter heard by the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States

Magistrate Judge, is extended to September 5, 2006. (See Notice of Initial Assignment to a U.S.

Magistrate Judge & Consent Form (dkt # 2). The parties may indicate in the Joint Status Report

their desire to consent to Judge Donohue, or have the case reassigned to a district judge; should

the parties decide earlier than September 5, 2006, to consent or decline, deputy clerk Peter H.

Case 2:06-cv-00720-MJP Document 7 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Voelker may be notified at (206) 370-8422, or by fax at (206) 370-8425. An individual party’s

decision on consent is not to be filed electronically or forwarded in any form to the chambers of

Judge Donohue.

Dated this 20th of July, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

/s/ PETER H. VOELKER 

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00720-MJP Document 7 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 2
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

TIME - NO. C06-0334-RSL 

1 ERROR! AUTOTEXT ENTRY NOT DEFINED.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The Honorable MARY ALICE THEILER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

JOSEPH KRANKOTA, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

DOUG WADDINGTON, 

 Respondent. 

NO. C06-0334-RSL 

 

ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

 (Proposed) 

 Respondent, having filed a Motion for Extension of Time in this matter, and the Court 

being fully advised and having examined the records and files herein; 

 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time in this matter be and the 

same is hereby granted. 

 Respondent's answer to Mr. Krankota’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus shall be due 

on or before June 22, 2006. 

 DATED this 19th day of May, 2006. 

 s/ Mary Alice Theiler 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Submitted by: 

ROB MCKENNA 

Attorney General 

/s/Gregory J. Rosen 

GREGORY J. ROSEN, WSBA #15870 

Assistant Attorney General 

Case 2:06-cv-00334-RSL Document 11 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

TIME - NO. C06-0334-RSL 

2 ERROR! AUTOTEXT ENTRY NOT DEFINED.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 19, 2006, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. I certify that I mailed by 

United States Postal Service the document to the following non CM/ECF participants: 

JOSEPH KRANKOTA, DOC #843579 

STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER 

191 CONSTANTINE WAY 

ABERDEEN WA 98520 

/s/Debbie Y. Miller 

DEBBIE Y. MILLER 

Legal Assistant 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00334-RSL Document 11 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140
February 18, 2015 Mr. Dick Pedersen Director Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 811 Southwest Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Dear Mr. Pedersen: This letter is in response to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality's November 12, 2014 submittal regarding the elevated 24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard levels at the Peterson School monitor in Klamath Falls during 2012 and 2013. The ODEQ has requested that the Environmental Protection Agency concur that the elevated PM2.5 levels for multiple days from this location were due to wildfire exceptional events. These exceedances led to violation of the 2012-2014 design value of 35μg/m 3 PM2.5 for the 24-hour NAAQS for the Klamath Falls PM2.5 non-attainment area. Our response to the ODEQ's request is governed by the Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events rule (72 FR 13560, March 22, 2007). After careful consideration of the information provided, we concur with the ODEQ's exceptional events flags for three days in 2012 and two days in 2013 at the Peterson School monitor in Klamath Falls. These elevated PM2.5 levels led to violation of the n4 2.5 24-hour NAAQS for the 2012-2014 design value period. The enclosed analyses and concurrence documents provide the basis for our decisions on the Klamath Falls flags, including a table for each analysis that lists the days, monitors, and elevated values that the EPA has evaluated and concurred. Note, the EPA's decisions on exceptional event exclusions are not considered final agency action until they are acted upon as part of a final regulatory action subject to public notice and comment. For example, such actions could include decisions to exclude the affected data from use in an approval of a non-attainment plan, maintenance plan, or determination of attainment. Thank you for the ODEQ's timely submittal of this exceptional event documentation. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me or have your staff contact Justin Spenillo, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, at (206) 553-6125 or via email spenillo.justin@epa.gov

. Sincerely,

Dennis J. McLerran Regional Administrator OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOREnclosure

1. Review of Exceptional Event Request 2012 2. Review of Exceptional Event Request 2013

cc: Mr. David Collier Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Mr. Anthony Barnack Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

2
Exhibit 32.2




Certification of Principal Financial Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt PichlerPrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 1, 2011
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ZACKARY DANIEL HILLEGASS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3197

[ October 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No. 31

- 2016

- CF

000378

- A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

T

AYLOR , K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-59;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,184
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,710
<PP&E>                                          10,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,164
<SALES>                                         15,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,939
<CGS>                                            4,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.01)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 369/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 369 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6414 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 369

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6414 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 369/01 | Euro exchange rates — 13 September 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 369/01

Euro exchange rates — 13 September 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 369/02 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 2 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 369/02

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

2

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Notice of open competition ( OJ C 363, 9.9.2021 ) | 13 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Notice of open competition ( OJ C 363, 9.9.2021 )

( OJ C 363, 9.9.2021 )

13

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 16

Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit congressional terms.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. ASHCROFT (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ALLARD,

Mr. BOND, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Ms. COLLINS,

Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GRAMM,

Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. MACK, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. SMITH of

Oregon, and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following joint resolution;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit congressional

terms.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. After this article becomes operative, no

8 person shall be elected to a full term as a Senator more
2

•SJ 16 IS

1 than twice, or to a full term as a Representative more than

2 thrice; no person who has been a Senator for more than

3 three years of a term to which another person was elected

4 shall subsequently be elected as a Senator more than once;

5 and no person who has been a Representative for more

6 than a year of a term to which another person was elected

7 shall subsequently be elected as a Representative more

8 than twice.

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall be inoperative unless

10 it is ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the

11 legislatures of three-fourths of the States within 7 years

12 after the date of its submission to the States by Con13 gress.’’.

Æ