alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HARJEEVAN PARHAR,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-38-RSM-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Conspiracy to Smuggle and Transport Illegal Aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1324.

Counts 12, 14, 16, and 18: Bringing Illegal Aliens for Financial Gain in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Counts 13 and 15: Transporting Illegal Aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(ii), and 1324 (a)(1)(B)(i).

Date of Initial Appearance and Detention Hearing: May 25, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a citizen of Canada and viewed as a risk of nonappearance.

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 74 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant has no ties to this community or to the Western District of

Washington.

(3) The defendant has stipulated to detention, but reserves the right to continued

detention if circumstances should change.

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably address the risk of flight and assure the defendant’s appearance

at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in

which defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and

to the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2006. AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 74 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 54-4 Filed 10/31/11 Page 6 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 19th day of January , 2007

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) CR06-38 RSM

SUKHVEER SANDHU,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The initial bond revocation hearing, originally scheduled for Tuesday, January 16, 2007, is

hereby rescheduled to Tuesday, February 6, 2007 at 11:30am. The hearing will be held in

Courtroom 12A, United States Courthouse, Seattle, Washington.

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 294 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Name of Entity
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or FormationVocus Acquisition LLC
    
    MarylandVocus GS Holdings, LLC
    
    MarylandPAT LLC
    
    MarylandVocus International Holdings LLC
    
    MarylandVocus Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyVocus UK Limited
    
    United KingdomVocus PRW Holdings LLC
    
    MarylandVocus NM LLC
    
    MarylandVocus Holdings BV
    
    NetherlandsBDL Media Ltd.
    
    Hong KongBeijing Yazhou Life Network Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaData Presse SAS
    
    FranceArchipel Productions, S.A.R.L.
    
    MoroccoVocus Social Media LLC
    
    CaliforniaVocus International BV
    
    NetherlandsVocus International Financing BV
    
    Netherlands
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Berman Center, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/  Samuel
      Chapman





Name: Samuel
      Chapman


Title:  Executive
      Officer and Chairman of the Board


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/  William
      McDunn


Name:  William
      McDunn


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




August
      14, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required y Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Berman Center, Inc. and will be retained by Berman Center, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KIEWIT PACIFIC CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF

COWLITZ COUNTY, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5274RJB

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENT TO

JOINT STATUS REPORT

It appears that the above-entitled case is related to Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corp.

v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Cowlitz County, C04-5052RBL. The court hereby requests that

the parties address, in the Joint Status Report due on August 21, 2006, the question of whether these

two cases are related to the extent that they would benefit from being assigned to the same judge

under the authority of Western District of Washington General Order Re: Division of Court

Business, dated October 4, 2004, paragraph 10, which states as follows:

10. A. When civil or criminal actions involving a common question of law and

fact (but not necessarily the same parties) are assigned to different Judges and it

appears to any Judge of this court that there may be good reason to assign all of said

actions to one Judge, such may be assigned to the Judge to whom the case bearing

the earliest filing date was assigned, at his or her option.

B. Motions to consolidate civil or criminal actions for trial, or otherwise, shall

be heard by the Judge to whom the case bearing the earliest filing date has been

assigned, and in the event consolidation is ordered, the consolidated cases shall be

heard by said Judge.

Case 3:06-cv-05274-RBL Document 9 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of

record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address, and to sent courtesy

copies of this Order to the judge and counsel in Cause Number C04-5052RBL.

DATED this 21st day of July, 2006.

A

Robert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05274-RBL Document 9 Filed 07/21/06 Page 2 of 2
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.226 Pension Entitlements** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Official Journal L 82/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 82 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6029 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 82

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6029 March 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/600 of 28 March 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/601 of 6 March 2017 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council set up by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part, with regard to the adoption of the EU-Algeria Partnership Priorities | 4 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/602 of 27 March 2017 appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions | 8 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2017 of the EU-Algeria Association Council of 13 March 2017 agreeing on EU-Algeria partnership priorities [2017/603] | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/600 of 28 March 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/601 of 6 March 2017 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council set up by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part, with regard to the adoption of the EU-Algeria Partnership Priorities

4

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/602 of 27 March 2017 appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions

8

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2017 of the EU-Algeria Association Council of 13 March 2017 agreeing on EU-Algeria partnership priorities [2017/603]

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Chief Judge Marshal J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-157MJP

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) PRAECIPE TO ATTACH DOCUMENT

) TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION

) TO CONTINUE

)

HENRY CARL ROSENAU, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

The United States of America, by and through Jenny A. Durkan, United States

Attorney for the Western District of Washington, and Susan M. Roe, Assistant United

States Attorneys, files this praecipe to attach document to the above-referenced case.

Please take note that the attached document is Exhibit 2a to Government's Motion

to Continue Trial (Dkt. 54). Exhibit 2a contains additional correspondence of Les Rose,

Counsel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2011.

Respectfully submitted,

JENNY A. DURKAN

United States Attorney

s/ Susan M. Roe

SUSAN M. ROE

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-1077

Facsimile: (206) 553-4659

E-Mail: susan.roe@usdoj.gov

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Praecipe To Attach Document

United States v. Henry Rosenau/CR06-157MJP- 1

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 56 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 1, 2011 I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the attorney(s) of record for the defendant(s).

s/Tove Rogers

TOVE ROGERS

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Phone: (206) 553-4214

FAX: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: tove.rogers@usdoj.gov

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Praecipe To Attach Document

United States v. Henry Rosenau/CR06-157MJP- 2

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 56 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20309 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE HERNANDEZ-BENAVIDEZ, also known as Jose Hernandez Benavidez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-677-1

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In this appeal following his guilty-plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States after having been deported, Jose Hernandez-Benavidez challenges the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues that use of his prior aggravated-felony conviction to enhance his sentence violates due process, the “jury guarantees” of the Sixth Amendment, his right to indictment by a grand jury, his protection from double jeopardy, and his right to a unanimousNo. 00-20309 -2- jury verdict on each element of the offense. Because HernandezBenavidez failed to raise his challenge in the district court, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Meshack , 225 F.3d 556, 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 834 (2001).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), the Supreme Court held that a prior felony conviction under § 1326(b)(2) was merely a sentencing factor and thus need not be included in the indictment. In light of the clear precedent in Almendarez-Torres , Hernandez-Benavidez has failed to show error, plain or otherwise, in his indictment or sentence. See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Jan. 26, 2001) (No. 00-8299).
AFFIRMED.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam by judgment of that court of 28 December 2004 in Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods BV (trading under the name Friesland Supply Point Ede) v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Noord/kantoor Groningen

(Case C-11/05)

(2005/C 82/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands) of 28 December 2004, received at the Court Registry on 14 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods BV (trading under the name Friesland Supply Point Ede) and Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst (Taxation Service)/Douane Noord (Customs North)/kantoor Groningen (Office) on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

(2)OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1.

(3)  Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2001 of 4 May 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Custom Code (OJ 2001 L 141, p. 1).

----
EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER 86004-3 

 VOL. 2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER

_______________________________________________________________ 

Page 122 is not included in this copy. 

Pages _______ through _ are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ ___ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__x___ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1744

SANTA ESPERANZA VILLANUEVA GUERRERO,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: November 14, 2014 Decided: November 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Santa Esperanza Villanueva Guerrero, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael 

Christopher Heyse, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Santa Esperanza Villanueva Guerrero, a native and 

citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing 

her appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding her 

removable. We deny the petition for review. 

In her pro se informal brief, Guerrero contends her 

counsel was ineffective and that her removal would be an extreme 

hardship to her children. Because she does not challenge the 

Board’s conclusion that she was removable, the issue is waived. 

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Guerrero’s issues in her informal brief 

were not raised on appeal to the Board. Because she failed to 

exhaust the issues, we are without jurisdiction to review them. 

See Asika v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NO. C06-5179KLS 

1 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

Torts Division

629 Woodland Square Loop SE

PO Box 40126

Olympia, WA 98504-0126

(360) 459-6600

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

JOHN L. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD C. PIGMON,

Defendant.

NO. C06-5179-RBL 

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court, having reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting

documents, the remainder of the pleadings filed herein, and being fully advised in the premises,

does hereby find and ORDER;

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED; and the Plaintiff’s

complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DATED this 7th day of September, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

ROB MCKENNA

Attorney General

/s/ Kenneth Orcutt

KENNETH D. ORCUTT, WSBA #10858

Assistant Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:06-cv-05179-RBL Document 13 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         289,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  987,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         170,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,990,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          133,363
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       199,215
<OTHER-SE>                                     365,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,990,115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>