alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JEREMY LOYD GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KENNEDY, et

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5697FDB

REPORT AND

 RECOMMENDATION 

NOTED FOR:

May 26, 2006

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and

MJR 4. On February 13, 2006, the court entered an Order requiring plaintiff to submit service documents

including copies of the complaint. (Dkt. # 13). In response, Plaintiff sent a letter reiterating the allegations in

the complaint and asking for legal help. By Order dated March 21, 2006, the court granted an extension of

time to plaintiff until April 21, 2006 to provide service documents. (Dkt. # 15). Plaintiff has not complied. 

Plaintiff was specifically informed that failure to provide the documents would result in a report and

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. # 13 and Dkt. #

15). As plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order, the court now recommends this action be

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections. 

Case 3:05-cv-05697-FDB Document 16 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 2

See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes

of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b),

the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on May 26, 2006, as noted in the caption. 

DATED this 4th day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05697-FDB Document 16 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                              CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC.
                                        
                                        
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INFORMATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED                 SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                           JUNE 30, 1997  JUNE  30, 1996      JUNE 30, 1997  JUNE  30, 1996
                                                           -------------  --------------      -------------  --------------
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>                <C>             <C>
Earnings:
Net income (loss)                                             (271,078)      (200,129)          (439,553)       (418,066)
                                                              --------       --------           --------        --------
                                                              --------       --------           --------        --------
Computation of primary per share information:
    Shares: Weighted average number of 
           shares outstanding                               39,137,844     39,987,844         39,137,844      38,597,844
                                                            ----------     ----------         ----------      ----------
                                                            ----------     ----------         ----------      ----------
Primary earnings per share:
Net income (loss)                                                 (.01)          (.01)              (.01)           (.01)
                                                                  ----           ----               ----            ----
                                                                  ----           ----               ----            ----
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR06-149 RSM

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

TERRY T. RAYMOND, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Distribute Heroin and Cocaine.

Date of Detention Hearing: September 6, 2006

 The Court, having conducted a uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention

hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant

can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety

of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Tate London

for Sarah Vogel. The defendant was represented by Allen Ressler.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

Case 2:06-cr-00149-RSM Document 180 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) The defendant is serving a state sentence.

(3) Due to the nature of the instant offense, defendant poses a risk of danger

to the community.

(4) Defendant stipulates to detention at this time.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00149-RSM Document 180 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

Case 2:06-cr-00149-RSM Document 180 Filed 09/08/06 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 200 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 200

 Designating March 26, 1998, as ``National Maritime Arbitration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 1998

Mr. Inouye submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating March 26, 1998, as ``National Maritime Arbitration Day''.

Whereas Congress recognizes the integral role arbitration plays in expeditiously 
        settling maritime disputes;
Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators is a nonprofit, United States based 
        organization providing arbitration and other Alternative Dispute 
        Resolution (ADR) services to the international maritime industry;
Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators has successfully facilitated the 
        resolution of over 3,400 international commercial and maritime disputes 
        since its inception in 1963; and
Whereas the Society of Maritime Arbitrators celebrates its 35th anniversary on 
        March 26, 1998: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 26, 1998, as ``National Maritime 
        Arbitration Day''; and
            (2) requests the President to issue a proclamation 
        designating March 26, 1998, as ``National Maritime Arbitration 
        Day'' and calling upon the people of the United States to 
        observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
April 4, 1956

No. 59830.

#### John Wanamaker, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 189517-K, 190188-K, and 214585-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT TRACEY SPENCER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5310 RJB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial

partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent

of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is

satisfied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis,

the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee

equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average

monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this

Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

Case 3:06-cv-05310-RJB Document 4 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($350.00) for this matter has been paid. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of

this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager of plaintiff’s correctional facility.

DATED this 3rd day of July, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05310-RJB Document 4 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69989-69992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of 11 individuals that have been 
placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons 
List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal 
criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject 
to U.S. jurisdiction of these individuals are blocked, and U.S. persons 
are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with these 
individuals.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Compliance, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 69990]]

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (https://ofac.treasury.gov/).

Notice of OFAC Action

    On September 7, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
individuals are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC23.008


[[Page 69991]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC23.009


[[Page 69992]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC23.010


    Dated: October 2, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-22378 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
From: lsue.douglas@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Douglas

Elkridge, MD 21075
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF STEPHEN WILTON - 1 

(CV-06-0090-RSL) 

hi^onrfpq=pm^ohj^kI=iim 

999 Third Avenue, Suite 4200 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Telephone: 503-264-2960

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

SHAKESPEARE COMPANY, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SILSTAR CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA, INC., LFS, INC., and 

STEPHEN WILTON d/b/a 

SHINYSCREEN SOLUTIONS INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. CV-06-0090-RSL 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF STEPHEN 

WILTON d/b/a SHINYSCREEN SOLUTIONS 

INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Shakespeare Company, LLC dismisses 

without prejudice its claims against Defendant Stephen Wilton d/b/a Shinyscreen Solutions, Inc. 

 Respectfully submitted this 28th day of March, 2006. 

By: s/ J. Christopher Carraway___________ J. Christopher Carraway, admitted pro hac vice

chris.carraway@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 

121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Telephone: 503-595-5300 

Facsimile: 503-595-5301 

Cindy Caditz, WSBA No. 16,701 

cindy.caditz@klarquist.com 

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 

999 Third Avenue, Suite 4200 

Case 2:06-cv-00090-RSL Document 13 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF STEPHEN WILTON - 2 

(CV-06-0090-RSL) 

hi^onrfpq=pm^ohj^kI=iim 

999 Third Avenue, Suite 4200 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Telephone: 503-264-2960

Seattle, Washington 98104 

Telephone: 206-264-2960 

Facsimile: 206-624-2179 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Shakespeare Company, LLC 

Case 2:06-cv-00090-RSL Document 13 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE hi^onrfpq=pm^ohj^kI=iim 

999 Third Avenue, Suite 4200 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Telephone: 503-264-2960

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 28, 2006, a true copy of the foregoing was 

served to the following counsel by electronic filing of the document with the Court: 

Adele Conover 

Miller Nash LLP 

601 Union Street, Suite 4400 

Seattle, Washington 98101-1367 

adele.conover@millernash.com

Alice Carmichael Richey 

Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman, LLP 

Hearst Tower, 47th Floor 

214 N. Tryon St. 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 

arichey@kennedycovington.com 

Counsel for Defendant Silstar Corporation of 

America, Inc. 

Brian G. Bodine 

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

2600 Century Square 

1501 Fourth Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 

brianbodine@dwt.com 

Counsel for Defendant LFS, Inc. 

/s/ J. Christopher Carraway_________

J. Christopher Carraway 

Case 2:06-cv-00090-RSL Document 13 Filed 03/28/06 Page 3 of 3
No. 64635.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 58/2120, 58/14045, and 59/8919 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shrimp shells similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Co.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 231, C.D. 2132), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-071;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 153

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate

Legal Counsel in the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol Guide Board.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate Legal Counsel in the case of Sherry

Yvonne Moore v. Capitol Guide Board.

Whereas, in the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol

Guide Board, case No. 1:97CV00823, pending in the

United States District Court for the District of Columbia, a subpoena has been issued for the production of

documents of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of

the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the Senate

with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testi-
2

SRES 153 ATS

mony or document production relating to their official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be

taken from such control or possession but by permission

of the Senate;

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper

2 of the Senate is authorized to produce documents relevant

3 to the case of Sherry Yvonne Moore v. Capitol Guide

4 Board, except where a privilege should be asserted.

5 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

6 to represent the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the

7 Senate in connection with the production of documents in

8 this case.

Æ