alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICHAEL COYNER,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-152M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged: 

Count 1, 2, and 4: Distribution of Methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B).

Count 3: Distribution of Ecstacy in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(C).

Count 5: Distribution of Cocaine Base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(B).

Date of Detention Hearing: April 11, 2006

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), there is a rebuttable presumption that

defendant is a flight risk and a danger to the community based on the nature of the pending

Case 2:06-mj-00152-MAT Document 7 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

charges. 

(2) Defendant’s background history check reveals a lengthy criminal record.

(3) Defendant has had past substance-abuse problems, and it appears that those

problems are ongoing.

(4) Defendant has failed to appear in court on at least seven (7) separate

occasions.

(5) There are no conditions or combination of conditions, other than detention,

that will reasonably assure the appearance of defendant as required, or the safety of the

community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 11th day of April, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00152-MAT Document 7 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 178

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate

Legal Counsel in United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries, Inc., et

al. v. Trafalgar House Construction, Inc., et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by Senate Legal Counsel in United States f.u.b.o.

Kimberly Industries, Inc., et al. v. Trafalgar House Construction, Inc., et al.

Whereas, in the case of United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries v. Trafalgar House Construction, Civil Case No.

97–0462, pending in the United States District Court for

the Southern District of West Virginia, documents have

been requested from the offices of Senator Robert C.

Byrd and Senator John D. Rockefeller IV;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Sen-
2

SRES 178 ATS

ate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the offices of Senator Byrd and Sen2 ator Rockefeller are authorized to produce documents in

3 the case of United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries v.

4 Trafalgar House Construction, except concerning matters

5 for which a privilege or objection should be asserted.

6 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

7 to represent employees of Senator Byrd and Senator

8 Rockefeller in connection with any subpoena or request for

9 documents or testimony in United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly

10 Industries v. Trafalgar House Construction.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xenith Bankshares, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Osgood, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                                            
|-------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|March 31, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas W. Osgood                                                                                                       
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 23.1







July 24, 2013
   To Whom It May Concern:
  The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Form 10K for BigSky Productions, Inc. our report dated November 1, 2010 with respect to the balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and the period February 28, 2008 (date of inception) through June 30, 2010.
  We also consent to our reference to the Firm under the caption “Experts” In the prospectus included in such Registration Statement.
 
 Kyle L. Tingle
 Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC
      
 3145 E. Warm Springs Road s Suite 200 s Las Vegas, Nevada 89120 s PHONE: (702) 450-2200 s FAX: (702) 436-4218
 E-MAIL: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
No. 57019.

protest 188723-K (New York).

#### Artamount, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial it was stipulated "that the articles are in chief value of leather, not reptile leather, and that they are flat goods.” On the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55673.

protest 166132-K (San Francisco).

#### David Komisar & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PAUL VOORHEES, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned officers of BlueStar Financial Group,  Inc. hereby certify that (a) BSFG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b)
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BSFG.


/s/ PAUL VOORHEESDate: September 25, 2009
Paul VoorheesChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer














1
Before the Third Division,

November 13, 1962

No. 67188.

protests 61/14486, etc. (New York).

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. et al. v. United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the merchandise, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 67081.

protests 59/18163, etc. (Boston).

#### Falcon Sales Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit No. 32.1


SMSA Palestine Acquisition Corp.


File No.  0-53343


Form 10-K


For the year ended December 31, 2009








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of SMSA Palestine Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  March 29, 2010
By:
/s/ Yang JongjieYang JongjieChief Executive and

Chief Financial Officer













A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMSA Palestine Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by SMSA Palestine Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         33,024
<SECURITIES>                                   19,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                   9,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                      400
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,259
<PP&E>                                         25,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,021
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,234
<OTHER-SE>                                     73,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,966
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,144
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                      670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.04
        


</TABLE>
No. 60260.

protests 194183-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Keer, Maurer Company and Wallworth Company *v.*United States,

*373Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of thread waste of wool threads and threads which are a combination of wool and cotton, wool and rayon, or all cotton of the same kind in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59622, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 787 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 6, 2007. 

Whereas in the early morning of October 28, 2007, flames 

broke out at a beach house in Ocean Isle Beach, North 

Carolina; 

Whereas the fire spread quickly and took the lives of seven 

college students, six attended the University of South 

Carolina and one went to Clemson University: Lauren 

Mahon of Simpsonville, South Carolina; Allison Walden 

of Chagrin Falls, Ohio; Travis Cale, Justin Anderson and 

Emily Yelton of Greenville, South Carolina; William Rhea 

of Florence, South Carolina, and Cassidy Pendley of 

Chapin, South Carolina; 

Whereas 6 University of South Carolina students were injured while escaping the flames and were treated at 

Brunswick Community Hospital; 

Whereas local community members rushed to alert and assist 

emergency personnel to support the students and their 

families in the aftermath of the tragedy; 

Whereas firefighters, paramedics, police officers, and other 

emergency personnel from the surrounding communities 

responded quickly and worked bravely to rescue the injured and extinguish the fire; 
2 

•HRES 787 EH 

Whereas the State of North Carolina and local government 

officials responded to the fire and its aftermath quickly, 

effectively, and compassionately; 

Whereas the immediate outpouring of support, assistance and 

compassion from the Nation and South Carolinians is 

greatly appreciated; and 

Whereas the students, faculty, staff, and officials at Clemson 

University and University of South Carolina have come 

together as a university community to remember the fallen students and provide strength and support to its respective campuses through this difficult time: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses its deepest condolences to the families 

and friends of Lauren Mahon, Allison Walden, Travis 

Cale, Justin Anderson, Emily Yelton, William Rhea, and 

Cassidy Pendley; and offers its hope for the quick and 

full recovery of those students who were injured in the 

fire; 

(2) expresses immense gratitude for the efforts of 

countless emergency response personnel, local, State, 

and Federal officials, health care providers, volunteers, 

and citizens who have been part of the response; and 

(3) expresses its support for all of the students, faculty, administration, and staff at the University of South 
3 

•HRES 787 EH 

Carolina and Clemson University as they heal from this 

tragedy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PHILLIP IRA SCHEFFLIN,

Petitioner,

v.

RICHARD MORGAN,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5696FDB

ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

RETURN, § 2254 PETITION

(l) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent and the Attorney

General for the State of Washington, copies of the petition, all documents in support thereof, and the

Notice of Initial Assignment and Consent Procedure and Consent to Proceed before a United States

Magistrate Judge. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble

the necessary documents to effect service. In addition, the Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order,

along with a copy of the Court’s General Order regarding pro se litigation. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent(s) shall file and serve an answer in

accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. As part of

such answer, respondent(s) should state whether petitioner has exhausted available state remedies, whether

an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse or delay under Rule 9. 

Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why

an answer is inadequate. Respondent(s) shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court and serve a copy

of the answer upon petitioner.

Case 3:05-cv-05696-FDB Document 8 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon receipt

of the answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the answer is filed,

petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately preceding the Friday

appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent my file and serve a reply brief not later than on

the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for consideration of the matter.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05696-FDB Document 8 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER OF REMAND

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

FRANKLIN O. RAMEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1913-RSL

ORDER OF REMAND

The Court has reviewed the entire record, including the Administrative Record, the

memoranda of the parties, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Mary Alice Theiler. It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The Court remands this matter for further administrative proceedings; and

(3) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to all counsel and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 29th day of August, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01913-RSL Document 19 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARK FARRELL,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5832RBL

 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

 RETURN, § 2254 PETITION

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

amended petition, (Dkt. # 15), of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of

service shall be advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to

effect service. The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order.

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Case 3:05-cv-05832-RBL Document 3 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05832-RBL Document 3 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 43
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 43
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 43
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 43