alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

AIRON CORPORATION,

 Defendant(s).

 Case No. C06-327P

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

At the request of counsel, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The

report will be due on June 22, 2006. All other FRCP 26-related dates are adjusted accordingly.

Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this

action.

Filed this 15th day of June, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00327-MJP Document 9 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

October 31, 1962

No. 67155.

protest 61/5644 (New York).

#### Lipman’s *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ball cocks, which are constituent and integral parts of *281toilet-box assemblies, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C.D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 1

U.S. v. Timoteo; CR06-5048FDB

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ISRAEL TIMOTEO,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5048FDB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DUE DATE

Based on the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the trial date, and the

Defendant’s Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights, the Court makes the following findings of

fact and conclusions of law:

1. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

2. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense to prepare would

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(I). 

3. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of some complexity,

including all relevant issues and defenses applicable to the case, which would make it

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself

within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act and currently set for this case. 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B(ii). 

Case 3:06-cr-05048-FDB Document 20 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2

U.S. v. Timoteo; CR06-5048FDB

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

4. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a continuance is necessary

to allow the defendant the reasonable time for effective preparation of his defense. 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from April 3, 2006 to

June 5, 2006 at 9:00 am. The resulting period of delay from April 3, 2006, up to and

including the new trial date of June 5, 2006, is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes

under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

Pre-trial motions are due no later than April 5, 2006.

DONE this 15th day of March, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented By:

/s/ Colin A. Fieman /s/ Tessa Gorman 

Colin A. Fieman Tessa Gorman 

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-05048-FDB Document 20 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2
From: Baldyga, Lyndsey [LBaldyga@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 1:40 PM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Subject: Re: Circuit Breakers

Art, 

The alarms are low pressure. 

Thanks,

- Lyndsey Baldyga 

Engineer I Air Programs 

Sent from my Blackberry 

From: Hofmeister, Art [mailto:Hofmeister.Art@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 01:04 PM

To: Baldyga, Lyndsey 

Subject: Circuit Breakers 

Hi, Lyndsey:

Are the alarms on the circuit breakers low-density of low-pressure? Thanks.

Art Hofmeister

Environmental Engineer

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

(404) 562-9115

***** This email is from an external sender. Be cautious about clicking links or opening 

attachments from unknown sources. *****

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have 

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or disclose it to 

anyone else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses 

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | March 23, 2011 | By:    |  /s/  Scott E. Lied |
|-------------------|----------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|              |           |   | Scott E. Lied, CPA                 |
|              |           |   | Treasurer                          |
|              |           |   | (Principal Financial Officer)      |

----
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 9 

SIGN-IN SHEET FOR Nc.£\vYo Cre.eJ( uVI;+ 'Pv\bl:c.. H�Q(lr'\C) DATE No\/. Z.O; ZD\4 

.J 

You are not required to provide personal contact information unless you want to receive notice of EPA's final decision. 

Name (Please Print Clearly) Representing Mailing List? 

Circle: Y ore:, 

C 4{U I� e,7Jte,m� J#f'r!!//� If Y, provide contact

information 7

p /n1l1 '*- h-vf rJ ,J 

Circle: Y or N

{leS--t> (JA ·f""L.._

If Y, provide contact

information 7

Circle: Y or N

�" Alu It� �oL� If Y, provide contact

information 7

I ' Circle: Y or N

J(;tfy �<:R.,01"� Qb�-� If Y, provide contact

information 7

Circle: Y or N

ft/\ l . c ... J.A,0- e, \ \\f'-l � �5 (7" / .... + <. 

If Y, provide contact

information 7

Circle: &or N

DIO:'j "'T Mc.i.�\0<"1 ?<-.,.2> L,tc.. If Y, provide contact

information 7

Circle: Y or N

1? c,{-ai, 'vJW4oy-.5� <f<. e..s h \ lv"" -eIf Y, provide contact

information 7

Circle: ©,r N

Jh_s1MSl0�� If Y, provide contact 

information 7

Contact Information 

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)

 

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly)
.-

U. S. En·vironmental Protection Agency - Region 9 

SIGN-IN SHEET FOR "1\t �G �� \As\,t μ�-(,\, DATE N�v J-D,W\� 

You are not required to provide personal contact information unles receive notice of EPA's final decision. 

Name (Please Print Clearly) Representing Mailing List? Contact Information 

CrPtrA'W �cnf/!av U{t,j Circle0rN Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

./f1&Lt11/\/ I/IA/l'tf If Y, provide contact 

information "7 

A ... 1.e.� Circle: Y or N

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

��lo]�,"'- If Y, provide contact 

information "7 

Circle: Y or N

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

>=J ��u�l-c <}-- A� If Y, provide contact 

information 7 

--

Circle(por N

Email or Postal Address: {Please print clearly) 

----

If Y, provide contact 

-\<C/� '':...::> e "J � h !'-...._'"Y\. information 7 . 

Circle: Y or N

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

�I"- �a- /1,NG f'"r

If Y, provide contact 

information "7 

Circle: Y or N

Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

If Y, provide contact 

information 7 

Circle: Y or N

Email"or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

' 

If Y, provide contact 

information "7 

Circle: Y or N Email or Postal Address: (Please print clearly) 

If Y, provide contact 

information "7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aaron Murreld, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 329]

—Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), rendered March 1, 1994, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court, dated October 7, 1994, which denied the defendant’s *pro se*motion to set aside his sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20.

Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s pretrial ruling that the jury would be excused for all sidebar discussions so that the defendant could participate therein did not deprive him of the opportunity to be present during all material stages of his trial *(see generally, People v Pondexter,*215 AD2d 409; *cf., People v Gilliam,*215 AD2d 401). The defendant did not waive his right to be present and the court based its ruling on reasonable security considerations and its concern for potential prejudice to the defendant if the jury were to see him escorted to the bench by court officers *(see, People v Lopez,*207 AD2d 658).

The defendant’s further contention that he was unduly prejudiced by the complainant’s testimony relating to the order of protection which she had obtained against him was not preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, the testimony was properly admitted because it constituted the factual predicate for the defendant being charged with criminal contempt in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 215.50 [3]).

In addition, the defendant’s failure to challenge the constitutionality of his 1989 violent felony conviction at the time of his 1991 arraignment as a second violent felony offender constituted a waiver of his right to challenge the 1989 conviction at this time *(see, People v Dickerson,*202 AD2d 247).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.
Before the Second Division,

April 17, 1963

No. 67604.

#### Victoria Distributors et al. *v.*United States,

protests 316996-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of bicycle horns and sirens similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), tbe claim of tbe plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--UHD Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2023 pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UHD Alliance, Inc. (``UHD 
Alliance'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Realtek Semiconductor Corp., Hsinchu Hsein, TAIWAN; and 
Vu Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, INDIA have withdrawn as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 11, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 17, 2023(88 FR 16461).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22256 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                  489,757
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        43,584,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                          8,917,961
<INVENTORY>                                         108,109,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    147,392,509
<PP&E>                                               61,472,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      363,883,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               156,232,674
<BONDS>                                              11,152,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 51,055
<OTHER-SE>                                          194,886,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        363,883,074
<SALES>                                             125,472,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    125,472,058
<CGS>                                                93,096,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        93,096,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    4,202,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (23,139,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             10,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (23,149,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (23,149,625)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.47)


</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 205

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Nation should recognize the

contributions of public health and prevention services to this Nation

and celebrate ‘‘National Public Health Week’’ during the week of April

6 through April 12, 1998.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. FAIRCLOTH (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. BOND, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

CHAFEE, and Mr. INOUYE) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Nation should

recognize the contributions of public health and prevention services to this Nation and celebrate ‘‘National Public Health Week’’ during the week of April 6 through

April 12, 1998.

Whereas over the past 50 years, the United States has

achieved significant increases in life expectancy and reductions in the incidence of injury, disability, and disease;

Whereas the public health approach is credited with the majority of improvements in our Nation’s health status and

expanded life expectancy of 30 additional years since the

turn of the century;
2

•SRES 205 IS

Whereas public health services are successful in identifying

and addressing patterns of disease, illness, and injury in

populations and ensuring healthy living and working environments;

Whereas the 3,000 public health departments of the Nation

provide the critical frontline of defense against the dangers posed by infectious disease outbreaks, natural disasters, terrorist acts, and other serious threats to the

health of Americans; and

Whereas ‘‘National Public Health Week’’ provides an opportunity to highlight and commend the efforts of public

health professionals to protect, promote, and enhance the

health of all citizens in communities across this country:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the outstanding dedication of

3 community, State, and Federal public health profes4 sionals and services and commends the professionals

5 for their role in safeguarding communities and work6 places, and improving health and well-being of

7 Americans; and

8 (2) calls upon Americans to celebrate ‘‘National

9 Public Health Week’’ during the week of April 6

10 through April 12, 1998, with appropriate activities

11 and ceremonies.

Æ
No. P68/17.

protest 65/20373 (San Francisco).

#### Holly Sugar Corporation *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest, described in schedule “A,” attached to the decision, as “Weibull Blender and Conditioner (industrial machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, and parts thereof)” is the same in all material respects 'as those the subject of *Union Sugar Div. Consolidated Foods Corp.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 113, C.D. 2559), affirmed, *United States*v. *Union Sugar*Div., *Consolidated Foods Corp.*(54 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 892), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Lifetime

SURVIVAL FUNCTION OF HEAT PUMPS

Lifetime Distribution 18.4 years Average Life 18.4 years

Fraction Fraction

Age Retired Surv

0 0.000 1.0001 0.002 0.9982 0.002 0.9963 0.002 0.9944 0.002 0.9925 0.002 0.9906 0.002 0.9887 0.001 0.9878 0.012 0.9769 0.019 0.956

10 0.026 0.93011 0.033 0.89712 0.039 0.85813 0.043 0.81514 0.046 0.76915 0.049 0.72016 0.051 0.66917 0.053 0.61618 0.056 0.56019 0.060 0.50020 0.067 0.43321 0.078 0.35522 0.093 0.26223 0.116 0.14624 0.146 0.000

Wt.Avg 18.4Source: M.E. Bucher, C.M. Grastataro, W.R. Coleman. 1990. "Heat Pump Life and Compressor Longevity in Diverse Climates." ASHRAE Transacti

Survival Function of Heat Pumps

0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

0 5 10 15 20 25

Age (year)

% Surviving

Page 1
Case 3:05-cr-05344-RBL Document 32 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2   I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.;  2.   Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and  c)   presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect   internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert      Chief Financial Officer -------------------------- Scott Emerson Lybbert      October 31, 2007
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 1 524

_____________________________ G ARY E LLISON A DLER , Appellant,

v.

J OSEPH P OLETTO , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Katie L. Dearing , Judge

. September 2, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Michael R. D’Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O’Hara, McCoy & Ford, P .A., Orlando
, for Appellant.

Theresa Carli Pontieri of Carli Law, PLLC, Jacksonville
, for Appellee.