alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Laura                A. Berman                                                                                                                                    |   |   |        |
| Name:                 Laura A. Berman, LCSW, PHD.Title:                  Chief                Executive Officer and President (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |   |        |

|                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Carlos                Bernal                                                                          |   |   |        |
|  Name: Carlos                BernalTitle: Chief                Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
| May                17, 2007                                                                                                   |   |   |   |

----
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 152

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the

name of the Senate in City of New York, et al. v. William Clinton,

et al., and related cases.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus

curiae in the name of the Senate in City of New York,

et al. v. William Clinton, et al., and related cases.

Whereas, in the cases of City of New York, et al. v. William

Clinton, et al., Civ. No. 97–2393, National Treasury Employees Union, et al., v. United States, et al., Civ. No.

97–2399, and Snake River Potato Growers, Inc., et al.,

v. Robert Rubin, Civ. No. 97–2463, all pending in the

United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act, Public Law No. 104–130, 110 Stat. 1200 (1996), has been

placed in issue; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of

the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c),
2

SRES 152 IS

288e(a), and 2881(a), the Senate may direct its counsel

to appear as amicus curiae in the name of the Senate in

any legal action in which the powers and responsibilities

of Congress under the Constitution are placed in issue:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to

appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in the cases

of City of New York, et al. v. William Clinton, et al.; National Treasury Employees Union, et al., v. United States, et

al.; and Snake River Potato Growers, Inc., et al., v. Robert

Rubin, to defend the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto

Act.

SEC. 2. That while the Senate is adjourned the Senate

Legal Counsel is authorized to appear as amicus curiae on

behalf of the Senate in other cases in which the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act is placed in issue: Provided, That the Joint Leadership Group authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of

the Senate in such other cases.

Æ
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.110 Private Depository Institutions 1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41140 Conference Calendar

JOHN C. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JANIE COCKRELL; AMADO IGLESIAS; BRENDA CHANEY; CRYSTAL IRVIN; UNKNOWN PICKET OFFICER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CV-61

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John C. Spurlock, Texas prisoner # 741571, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and moves this court for appointment of counsel. The district court determined that Spurlock’s claims against several of the defendants were duplicative of claims that had been raised in a prior § 1983 complaint that was dismissed as frivolous. Spurlock
v. Scott , No. V-00-0067 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2002). The districtNo. 04-41140 -2- court granted the remaining defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude that Spurlock’s claims against all of the defendants are duplicative of his claims in the earlier lawsuit that was dismissed by the district court as frivolous. As his instant claims are duplicative, the district court properly dismissed them as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). See Pittman v. Moore , 980 F.2d 994, 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993); Bailey v. Johnson , 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988); see also Sojourner T v. Edwards , 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992) (court may affirm on any grounds supported by the record)
. As Spurlock’s appeal is without arguable merit, it is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. His motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is denied. The dismissal of the instant appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Spurlock previously received two strikes when his prior § 1983 complaint was dismissed as frivolous in Spurlock v. Scott , No. V-00-0067 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2002), and this court dismissed his appeal as frivolous in Spurlock v. Scott , 90 F. App’x 743, 744 (5th Cir. 2004). Because Spurlock now has accumulated at least three strikes under § 1915(g), he is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detainedNo. 04-41140 -3- in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
     I, Timothy A. Richardson, the chief executive officer of Micro LinearCorporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 ofchapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of myknowledge,
     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 28, 2004 (the “Report”), complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
May 12, 2004         /s/ Timothy A. Richardson   Timothy A. Richardson   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 274 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 274

  To express the sense of the Senate that the Louisville Festival of 
  Faiths should be commended and should serve as a model for similar 
      festivals in other communities throughout the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 1998

Mr. Ford submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To express the sense of the Senate that the Louisville Festival of 
  Faiths should be commended and should serve as a model for similar 
      festivals in other communities throughout the United States.

Whereas a Festival of Faiths celebrating the diversity of religion has been held 
        in Louisville, Kentucky, in the month of November of each of the last 3 
        years;
Whereas the Louisville Festival of Faiths has provided an opportunity for 
        representatives of different faiths to communicate with each other and 
        learn about each other's heritage, experiences, and beliefs;
Whereas more than 60 faiths have participated in the Louisville Festival of 
        Faiths over the past 3 years;
Whereas the freedom to practice religion in diverse ways is a principle that the 
        United States was founded on and one that the United States has embraced 
        throughout its history;
Whereas religious diversity, in addition to its other benefits, expands the 
        perspectives and experiences available to this Nation as a whole;
Whereas the communication of diverse perspectives and experiences between 
        representatives of different religions can enrich the lives of such 
        individuals and can assist such individuals in developing an 
        appreciation of the commonality between different religions;
Whereas such communication can also diminish the potential for conflict between 
        religious groups at a time when the dangers of religious conflict pose 
        increasingly serious problems throughout the world; and
Whereas the Louisville Festival of Faiths experience can be replicated without 
        great difficulty in other communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Louisville 
Festival of Faiths--
            (1) should be commended for its concept and its 
        achievements to date; and
            (2) should serve as a model for similar festivals in other 
        communities throughout the United States.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 224

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning an international project to

evaluate and facilitate the international exchange of advanced technologies.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6, 1998

Mr. STEVENS (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr.

INOUYE, and Mr. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning an international project to evaluate and facilitate the international exchange of advanced technologies.

Whereas currently in the post Cold-War world, there are new

opportunities to facilitate international political and scientific cooperation on cost-effective and advanced innovative nuclear waste technologies;

Whereas there is increasing public interest in monitoring and

remediation of nuclear wastes; and

Whereas it is in the best interest of the United States to explore and develop options with the international community to facilitate the exchange of evolving advanced nuclear waste technologies: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—
2

SRES 224 ATS

1 (1) the President should instruct the Secretary

2 of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of

3 State, the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator

4 of the Environmental Protection Agency, and other

5 officials as appropriate, to consider the Advanced

6 Technology Research Project (known as ‘‘ATRP’’)

7 and report to the Committee on Energy and Natural

8 Resources of the Senate on—

9 (A) whether the United States should en10 courage the establishment of an international

11 project to facilitate the evaluation and inter12 national exchange of data (including cost data)

13 relating to advanced nuclear waste technologies,

14 including technologies for solid and liquid radio15 active wastes and contaminated soils and sedi16 ments;

17 (B) whether such a project could be funded

18 privately through industry, public interest, and

19 scientific organizations and administered by an

20 international non-governmental, nonprofit orga21 nization, with operations in the United States,

22 Russia, Japan, and other countries that have

23 an interest in developing such technologies; and
3

SRES 224 ATS

1 (C) any legislation that the Secretary be2 lieves would be required to enable such a

3 project to be undertaken.

Æ
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 13
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 13
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 13
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 13
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 13
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 13
# Official Journal L 229/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 625 September 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 229

English edition

Legislation

Volume 625 September 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1387 of 1 August 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards requirements for aeroplane landing performance calculations and the standards for assessing the runway surface conditions, update on certain aircraft safety equipment and requirements and operations without holding an extended range operational approval | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1387 of 1 August 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards requirements for aeroplane landing performance calculations and the standards for assessing the runway surface conditions, update on certain aircraft safety equipment and requirements and operations without holding an extended range operational approval

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1089 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 11 0 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
H. Res. 813 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 14, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 1429) to reauthorize the Head Start Act, to 

improve program quality, to expand access, and for other 

purposes. All points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Presidential Documents

70563 

Federal Register 

Vol. 88, No. 195 

Wednesday, October 11, 2023 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of September 21, 2023 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) and Section 

506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 621 of the Foreign 

Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State: 

(1) the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether 

it is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish 

approximately $128 million in assistance to Ukraine without regard to any 

provision of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA; and 

(2) the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown 

of approximately $128 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, to provide assistance 

to Ukraine and to make the determinations required under such section 

to direct such a drawdown. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 21, 2023 

[FR Doc. 2023–22631 

Filed 10–10–23; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
# Official Journal C 307A/2 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 307A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 512 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 307A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 512 December 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2008/C 307A/01 | Notice of vacancy No CDR/HC/29/08 concerning a post of secretary-general (m/f) in the general secretariat of the Committee of the Regions — Selection published under Articles 2(a) and 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2008/C 307A/01

Notice of vacancy No CDR/HC/29/08 concerning a post of secretary-general (m/f) in the general secretariat of the Committee of the Regions — Selection published under Articles 2(a) and 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TIMOTHY C. MYER and JOHN E.

GRISWOLD,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NITETRAIN COACH COMPANY, INC. And

NASHVILLE COACH, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-804C

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 

Coughenour, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ request (Dkt. No. 25). Because the scheduling

conference in this matter already has occurred, the parties who have not yet conferred pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) are hereby ORDERED to do so immediately. Further, any

outstanding Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures are due by Friday December 1, 2006. Such disclosures shall

be served on the parties but not on this Court’s electronic docket.

DATED this 20th day of November, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ C. Ledesma 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00804-JCC Document 26 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 1