alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 15

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 13 Att. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 13-9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 15 of 15
No. 69713.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/24272 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “S” and “P” consist of stethoscopes or parts thereof, *525respectively, and that the items marked “H” consist of percussion hammers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Arthur Salm, Inc.*v. *United*States (46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2012013EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

2012/C 13/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 6, 7.1.2012

OJ C 6, 7.1.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 370, 17.12.2011

OJ C 362, 10.12.2011

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

OJ C 340, 19.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
No. 66062.

#### Service Cycle Supply Corporation v. United States,

protests 60/28218 (B) and 60/28218 (C) (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom a review of the record in these cases, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protests were, therefore, overruled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Developing Digital Therapeutics for Substance Use Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         November 14, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jenny Raye Browning, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-4577,                         *jenny.browning@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 29, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-22045 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,013,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  835,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    423,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,337,717
<PP&E>                                         307,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,691,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          618,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,340,658
<COMMON>                                     6,350,439
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,639,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,691,909
<SALES>                                        250,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,000
<CGS>                                          169,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  897,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (109,402)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (713,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)





</TABLE>
#### Herbert A. MANN, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor, Respondent.

No. 05-1376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 23, 2005.

Herbert A. Mann, Petitioner Pro Se. Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*193PER CURIAM:

Herbert A. Mann seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits and denying reconsideration pursuant to 80 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. *See Mann v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs,*No. 04-439-BLA (BRB Nov. 18, 2004; Feb. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
From: Linda.Brazy@dwd.Wisconsin.gov

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:40:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Brazy

Madison, WI 53704
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT SHEAFFER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5001RBL

ORDER DENYING I.F.P.

APPLICATION AND DENYING

APPEAL OF ORDER DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT

The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Plaintiff's application for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is DENIED. This action shall therefore proceed only if plaintiff pays

the applicable filing fee ($250.00) within 30 days after entry of this order. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing

fee within this time period, the clerk shall dismiss plaintiff’s causes of action. 

The plaintiff’s “appeal” of the Magistrate Judge’s Order that directs him to file an amended complaint

or face dismissal is DENIED. However, this Court will extend the due date for the amended complaint from

February 6, 2006 until February 27, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 4th day of February, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05001-RBL Document 7 Filed 02/04/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

EDDY RODRIGUEZ-SANTIAGO,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5067M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 (X) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 (X) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (X) Defendant waived detention hearing.

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 April 3, 2006.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom______________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05067-KLS Document 15 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 1
th | .
-

N
200, 30 NS
* Bi Mb
GH Y
030 08/486 pCO G00 «

\
\

\

NN

mon tions
y Vj \
, Ae,
“/ SS ~
eae
ee \
 & & Ba Ie Hip Bie Be ie Be He

\

MAP SHOWING LEAD AND ZINC CONTENT OF SOIL, CROW BRANCH AREA

ce ER a a

369614 O—56 (In pocket) NO. 3
Exhibit 10(a)


 





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 267 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our report dated November 21, 2012,
relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Global Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock Health Sciences
Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock International Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock Science & Technology Opportunities Portfolio
and BlackRock U.S. Opportunities Portfolio, each a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock
Funds for the year ended September 30, 2012, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights”
and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Prospectuses and “Financial Statements” in the
Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.


	 
	/s/ Deloitte &Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 January 24, 2013
# Official Journal L 401/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 401 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4930 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 401

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4930 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Directive 2006/141/EC of 22 December 2006 on infant formulae and follow-on formulae and amending Directive 1999/21/EC (1) |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

*

Commission Directive 2006/141/EC of 22 December 2006 on infant formulae and follow-on formulae and amending Directive 1999/21/EC (1)

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 19 January 2005 on State aid which Italy plans to grant to agricultural undertakings in Sicily
  (notified under document number C(2005) 52) |
| | * | Commission Decision of 15 December 2006 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as regards guidelines and procedures for the electronic identification of ovine and caprine animals
  (notified under document number C(2006) 6522)

   (1) |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 19 January 2005 on State aid which Italy plans to grant to agricultural undertakings in Sicily
  (notified under document number C(2005) 52)

(notified under document number C(2005) 52)

*

Commission Decision of 15 December 2006 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as regards guidelines and procedures for the electronic identification of ovine and caprine animals
  (notified under document number C(2006) 6522)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 6522)

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | |

*

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theclimax molybdenum deposit, Colorado**
 
Report |Plates: 23323334353637
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:846-C
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962404
 
August 27, 2018
H. Res. 363

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 2, 2007.

Resolved, That clause 15 of rule XXIII of the Rules of 

the House of Representatives is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘15. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not use personal funds, official funds, or campaign funds for a flight on 

an aircraft. 

‘‘(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply if—

‘‘(1) the aircraft is operated by an air carrier or 

commercial operator certificated by the Federal Aviation 

Administration and the flight is required to be conducted 

under air carrier safety rules, or, in the case of travel 

which is abroad, by an air carrier or commercial operator certificated by an appropriate foreign civil aviation 

authority and the flight is required to be conducted 

under air carrier safety rules; 

‘‘(2) the aircraft is owned or leased by a Member, 

Delegate, Resident Commissioner or his or her family 

member (including an aircraft owned by an entity that 
2

•HRES 363 EH 

is not a public corporation in which the Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner or his or her family member has an ownership interest, provided that such Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner does not use 

the aircraft any more than the Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or family member’s proportionate 

share of ownership allows); 

‘‘(3) the flight consists of the personal use of an 

aircraft by a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner that is supplied by an individual on the basis of 

personal friendship; or 

‘‘(4) the aircraft is operated by an entity of the 

Federal government or an entity of the government of 

any State. 

‘‘(c) In this clause—

‘‘(1) the term ‘campaign funds’ includes funds of 

any political committee under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, without regard to whether the committee is an authorized committee of the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner involved under such Act; 

‘‘(2) the term ‘family member’ means an individual 

who is related to the Member, Delegate, or Resident 

Commissioner, as father, mother, son, daughter, brother, 

sister, husband, wife, father-in-law, or mother-in-law; 

and 
3

•HRES 363 EH 

‘‘(3) the term ‘on the basis of personal friendship’ 

has the same meaning as in clause 5 of rule XXV and 

shall be determined as under clause 5(a)(3)(D)(ii) of 

rule XXV.’’. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Attachment 3—Effect of 15%Q Minimum Torque on Life 

As shown in the calculations below, a REL cycle which goes from 15 to 103%Q has a 

vibratory amplitude which is 85% of a REL cycle which goes from 0 to 103%Q. 

max

min

max

min

REL Cycle: 0 to 103%Q

Q 103

0

103 0 51.5

2

103 0 51.5

2

REL Cycle: 15 to 103%Q

Q 103

15

103 15 59.0

2

103 15 44

2

Reduction is Vibratory Amplitude:

44 .85

51.5

steady

vib

steady

vib

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

=

=

+

= =

−

= =

=

=

+

= =

−

= =

=

The effect of the change in the valley for the REL cycle is shown below for both the nonchafing and chafing SN curves. Assuming that the mean stress correction is negligible, 

the life is roughly doubled for both the chafing and non-chafing cases. 

103%Q Max

0%Q Min

15%Q Min

Vibratory Q(0%Q Min)

Vibratory Q(15%Q Min)

REL Cycles for 0 to 103%Q and 15 to 103%Q