alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MEMORANDUM ORDER

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

OMAR WILEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1948RSM

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ second Motion for Summary Judgment. 

(Dkt. #92). Defendants argue that plaintiffs’ negligent supervision claim against Washington State

Patrol should be dismissed because there is no evidentiary support for the claim, and because that

defendant has not consented to suit against it in federal court. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion

on substantive grounds; but, plaintiff does object that the motion is untimely. (Dkt. #98).

The Court, having reviewed defendants’ motion, plaintiff’s response, defendants’ reply, and

the remainder of the record, hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #92) is GRANTED. The Court notes

that plaintiff correctly points out the instant motion is untimely. The dispositive motion deadline in

this case was March 27, 2007 – nearly four months before the instant motion was filed. Although

the Court did re-set the trial date in this case, the Court declined to extend any pre-trial deadlines

Case 2:05-cv-01948-RSM Document 101 Filed 08/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Further, the Court notes that defendants have provided no explanation at all as to why they

chose to ignore the negligent supervision claim in their first motion for summary judgment, and appear to

address the claim now only because the Court pointed out that failure in its previous Order on summary

judgment.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

PAGE - 2

that had already passed at the time the date was changed. Accordingly, the instant motion was not

timely filed, and ordinarily would not be reviewed.1

 However, because plaintiff does not

substantively oppose this motion, and in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will grant

defendants’ motion. Defendants are advised to review and follow the Court’s Orders and deadlines,

as the Court will not excuse such untimely filings in the future.

(2) Plaintiff’s state law negligent supervision claim is DISMISSED, and defendant

Washington State Patrol is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant to this action.

(3) The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 17th day of August, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-01948-RSM Document 101 Filed 08/17/07 Page 2 of 2
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Richard RudmanRichard RudmanChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
No. 55000.

#### Salentine and Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 158751-K (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the items passed upon in Abstract 54717, therein held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (f), as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.A. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Sync2 Networks Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commision (the "Report"), John Moore as
Chief Executive Officier and Chief Financial Officier of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.A. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:

     1.The Report fully complies with the reguirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     2.   The information contained in thee Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

September 26, 2011
                                            By /s/John Moore
                                               --------------------------------
                                               CEO/CFO/DIRECTOR
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 92 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 92 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 92 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 92 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 4 of 4
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

TONY WRIGHT JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

SANDRA CARTER, et al, CASE NUMBER: C06-5151RJB 

 

 

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has

rendered its verdict.

 _X__ Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and

a decision has been rendered.

The Report and Recommendation, Dkt #32, is ADOPTED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure

to exhaust administrative remedies.

 March 13, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

/s/Dara L. Kaleel 

By Dara L. Kaleel, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05151-RJB Document 37 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 162A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.162.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 162A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 567 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.162.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 162A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 567 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2013/C 162A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/166/S — Director-General (function group AD, grade 15) — Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2013/C 162A/01

Recruitment notice PE/166/S — Director-General (function group AD, grade 15) — Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           26,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,968,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     475,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             11,067,000
<PP&E>                                        1,798,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               36,173,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        36,249,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     37,157,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (37,457,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 36,173,000
<SALES>                                      27,728,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             27,728,000
<CGS>                                        21,136,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                21,136,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             12,077,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              4,789,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,679,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (11,953,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (11,953,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (11,953,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        




</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CORWIN TYRELL WOODSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-94-79, CA-99-213-3)

Submitted: January 26, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corwin Tyrell Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2000), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Woodson, Nos. CR-94-79;

CA-99-213-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                           875579
<NAME>                          WorldWideWeb Institute.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                         1
<CASH>                                                             726416
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      205435
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   950375
<PP&E>                                                             714465
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     196731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    4026117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              177816
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                       1120000
<COMMON>                                                             9779
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (7361478)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      4026117
<SALES>                                                            764919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   764919
<CGS>                                                             1016003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     3330346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  3907891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  13125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (7489321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (7489321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     219953
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (7269368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.72)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 12, 2007                      /s/ Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 67197.

protest 139159-K (New York).

#### Jacob Levin *v.*United States,

*305Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64266, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 167

Recognizing the outstanding achievement of the Denver Bronco’s quarterback,

John Elway, in the victory of the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl XXXII.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself and Mr. ALLARD) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the outstanding achievement of the Denver

Bronco’s quarterback, John Elway, in the victory of the

Denver Broncos in Super Bowl XXXII.

Whereas, since becoming quarterback for the Denver Broncos

in 1983, John Elway has been involved in some of the

most striking comeback victories in the history of the National Football League (referred to in this resolution as

the ‘‘NFL’’);

Whereas John Elway has been a Pro Bowl quarterback, was

named NFL Most Valuable Player in 1987 and the

American Football Conference’s Most Valuable Player in

1993, holds numerous NFL passing records, and is the

all-time winningest quarterback in the history of the

NFL;
2

•SRES 167 ATS

Whereas John Elway’s leadership, dedication, and perseverance symbolizes excellence in these qualities for the entire

Nation and represents these qualities for America to the

world; and

Whereas John Elway, an exceptional athlete, has sustained a

high level of personal competitiveness and has finally led

his team to the honor of a Super Bowl championship:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the outstanding achievement of

3 the Denver Broncos’ quarterback, John Elway; and

4 (2) congratulates John Elway as the winning

5 quarterback of Super Bowl XXXII.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, November 8, 2023, 10:00 
a.m. to November 8, 2023, 5:00 p.m., National Institute on Drug Abuse, 
301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in 
the Federal Register on October 3, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-21775, 88-FR 
68128. This notice is being amended to change the meeting contact 
person from Dr. Preethy Nayar to Dr. Jenny Raye Browning, Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, (301) 443-4577, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204a454e4e590e42524f574e494e47604e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f8f7fcfcebbcf0e0fde5fcfbfcf5d2fcfbfabcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>. The meeting date, time and location will remain 
the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 4, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22444 Filed 10-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 66074.

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/6948, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic camera viewers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65082, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Donald HARDING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dean R. WALKER, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7822.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided June 27, 2001.

Donald Harding, pro se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Donald Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his *101petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Harding v. Walker,*No. CA-00-140-5-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2000). We also deny Harding’s motion to compel preparation of a trial transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 798 

Referring the bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ‘‘For the relief of Francisco Rivera 

and Alfonso Calderon’’, to the chief judge of the United States Court 

of Federal Claims for a report thereon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2007 

Mr. FILNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Referring the bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ‘‘For the relief of 

Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon’’, to the chief 

judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims 

for a report thereon. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. REFERRAL. 

3 The bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ‘‘For the relief of 

4 Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon’’ and now pending 

5 in the House of Representatives, is referred to the chief 

6 judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 798 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT. 

2 Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief 

3 judge shall— 

4 (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of 

5 title 28, United States Code; and 

6 (2) report back to the House of Representa7 tives, at the earliest practicable date, providing— 

8 (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law 

9 that are sufficient to inform the Congress of the 

10 nature, extent, and character of the claim for 

11 compensation referred to in such bill as a legal 

12 or equitable claim against the United States; 

13 and 

14 (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably 

15 due from the United States to Francisco Rivera 

16 and Alfonso Calderon. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS