alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

AHMAD GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5273FDB

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

Plaintiff moves to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted his application. The information

in the application reveals that it is not unreasonable to require Plaintiff to pay the filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED. 

DATED this 23rd day of May 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05273-FDB Document 2 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1114

_____________________________

JAMES L. QUEEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

December 4, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance 

of appellate counsel on the merits.

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James L. Queen, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
No. P67/367.

#### Gulf States Trading Company and Leslie B. Canion *v.*United States, protest 309120-K (Galveston).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of seamless steel oil well casing advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C.D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62811.

#### F. E. McCartney *v.*United States,

protest 170251-K (Duluth).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62858.

#### Imperial International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3732 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 59819.

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 198828-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 22 May 2006 — Permesaen v Office national des pensions

(Case C-233/06)

(2006/C 190/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Noëlle Permesaen

Defendant: Office national des pensions

Questions referred

----

(1)  Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24).

----
Exhibit 31.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN Holdings,
Inc.;
        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and
               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert       Chief Executive Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert        July 22, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 and 
BOEM's regulatory restrictions on joint bidding, BOEM is publishing 
this list of restricted joint bidders. Each entity within one of the 
following groups is restricted from bidding with any entity in any of 
the other groups listed below at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas 
lease sales held during the bidding period of November 1, 2023, through 
April 30, 2024.

DATES: This list of restricted joint bidders covers the bidding period 
of November 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024, and succeeds all prior 
published lists.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Group I

    BP America Production Company
    BP Exploration & Production Inc.

Group II

    Chevron Corporation
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
    Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.
    Unocal Corporation
    Union Oil Company of California
    Pure Partners, L.P.

Group III

    Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.
    Eni Petroleum US LLC
    Eni Oil US LLC
    Eni Marketing Inc.
    Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
    Eni US Operating Co. Inc.
    Eni BB Pipeline LLC

Group IV

    Equinor ASA
    Equinor Gulf of Mexico LLC
    Equinor USA E&P Inc.

Group V

    Exxon Mobil Corporation
    ExxonMobil Exploration Company

Group VI

    Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS)
    Progress Resources USA Ltd.
    Progress Resources Gulf of Mexico LLC

Group VII

    Shell Oil Company
    Shell Offshore Inc.
    SWEPI LP
    Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
    SOI Finance Inc.
    Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group VIII

    Total E&P USA, Inc.

    Even if an entity does not appear on the above list, BOEM may 
disqualify and reject certain joint or single bids submitted by an 
entity if that entity is chargeable for the prior production period 
with an average daily production in excess of 1.6 million barrels of 
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. See 30 CFR 556.512.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6213 and 30 CFR 556.511-556.515.

Laura Daniel-Davis,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, 
Department of the Interior.

    The action taken herein is pursuant to an existing delegation of 
authority.

[FR Doc. 2023-22317 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4340-98-P
#### In re: STUDIO 2000 USA, INC., a Corporation, Debtor, *685Studio 2000 USA, Inc., Appellant, v. United States Trustee; Timea Terestyak, Appellees. In re: Studio 2000 USA, Inc., Debtor, Studio 2000 USA, Inc.; Albert M. Kun, Esq., Appellants, v. United States Trustee; Timea Terestyak, Appellees.

No. 03-57221, 04-15423.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 22, 2005.

Albert Miklos Kun Esq., Law Office of Albert M. Kun, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant.

Edward G. Myrtle, Esq., Office of the U.S. Trustee, Lawrence D. Murray, Esq., Murray *&*Associates, San Francisco, CA, for Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants Studio 2000 USA Inc. (“Studio”) and Studio’s bankruptcy counsel, Albert Kun, appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decisions affirming the bankruptcy court, which dismissed Studio’s Chapter 11 case and imposed sanctions on Kun. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

After a careful review of the record and briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the well-reasoned BAP opinions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of YouChange Holdings Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jeffrey I. Rassás, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard A. Papworth, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Jeffrey I. Rassás


Jeffrey I. Rassás


Chief Executive Officer





/s/  Richard A. Papworth


Richard A. Papworth


Chief Financial Officer








October 13, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part of this report or on a separate disclosure document.





1
No. 58739.

protest 240148-K (New York).

#### W. Pearce & Brothers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was dismissed.
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 99,410

In the Matter of EDWARD F. WALSH, IV,

Petitioner.

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

On May 16, 2008, this court entered an order indefinitely suspending the 

petitioner's license to practice law. See In re Walsh, 286 Kan. 235, 182 P.3d 1218

(2008). 

On December 23, 2016, the petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement under 

Supreme Court Rule 219 (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 263). On June 14, 2017, a hearing panel of 

the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys conducted a hearing on the petitioner's 

petition for reinstatement. Thereafter, on July 12, 2017, the hearing panel entered a final 

hearing report, recommending that the petitioner's petition for reinstatement be granted. 

The court, after carefully considering the record, grants the petitioner's petition for 

reinstatement of his license to practice law in Kansas. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law 

in Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education 

requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate 

Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. Upon proof provided 

to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts that the petitioner has complied with the annual 

continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the 

Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the clerk is 

directed to enter the petitioner's name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice 

of law in Kansas. 
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports 

and that the costs herein be assessed to the petitioner. 

Dated this 29th day of September, 2017.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: In the Interest of L

. W

. and L.W. , Child ren
Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 102 5

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 7

- 0 3 500 J

Trial court: 3 13 th District Court of Harris County

Appellee

, the Department of Family and Protective Services , has filed an unopposed first motion for extension of time to file its brief. The motion is granted

. Appellee’s brief is due to be filed with this Court no later than Monday , March 18 , 201 9

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(d).

Th is appeal involve s the termination of the parent

- child relationship

. A ccordingly

, this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of November 12 , 201 8

, the date the notice of appeal w as filed

, so far as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2, reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

. , tit. 2, su btit. F app. Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted

. The case remains set for submission on Tu esday, March 19, 2019.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___ /s/ Justice Julie Countiss

____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ March 7, 2019

____
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (2 MB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (500 KB PDF)
Summary tables (205 KB PDF)
Flows tables (700 KB PDF)
Level tables (700 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (70 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (35 KB PDF)
Integrated macroeconomic accounts table (290 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical data | About| Technical Q&AsCurrent release | 
Screen reader |  
PDF (3 MB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)  | Preliminary Z.1 Code Updates

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update:September 18, 2015
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge F itzpatrick, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata

DEBORAH JEAN HOLT MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1022-05-1 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 1, 2005 GREENBRIER REALTY COMPANY, INC. AND THE UNINSURED EMPLOYER’S FUND

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert G. Byrum; Shames & Byru m, P.C., on brief), for appellant. No brief for appellee Greenbrier Realty Company, Inc. (Paul R. Schmidt; Huff, Pool e & Mahoney, P.C., on brief), for appellee The Uninsured Employer’s Fund.

Deborah Jean Holt (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that (1) her claim for knee a nd peroneal nerve injuries was time-barred by

the statute of limitations contai ned in Code § 65.2-601; (2) she failed to present a current opinion of disability resulting from her compensable 199 9 injuries; (3) she failed to prove that her ongoing right ankle problem and exacerbation of her Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) was causally related to her compensabl e 1999 injuries; (4) she failed to prove she was totally disabled as a result of her compensable 1999 injuries; and (5) her right ankle inju ry and exacerbation of her RSD had currently improved to their pre-injury status. 1 We have reviewed the record and the

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 Claimant also argues that the commission e rred in not considering “various independent medical examinations and videotapes from the th ree (3) treating physicians.” Initially, we note that in her two-sentence argument with respect to this question presented, claimant failed to identify the treating physicians by name, and the pa ges she referenced in th e record as the place where she preserved this question for appellate review do not relate to the question. “We will- 2 - commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without meri t. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Holt v. Greenbrier Realty Company,

Inc. , VWC File No. 196-62-14 (April 8, 2005). We di spense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not ai d the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

not search the record for errors in order to interpret appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief.” Buchanan v. Buchanan , 14 Va. App. 53, 56, 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992). Secondly, the commission ru led that claimant “did not ar gue against excl usion of the videotaped depositions,” and ther efore, she “waived and abandoned” that assignment of error. Accordingly, this question is not properly before us and we will not c onsider it on appeal. See Rule 5A:18.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m(a) or 780(d)); and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                         |                                                             |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                         |
|                           |                                    |                                                        |
| Date:                August 9, 2005 | By:                                | /s/     RAYMOND                W. COHEN |
|                                | **Raymond                  W. Cohen**        |
|                                | **Chief                  Executive Officer** |

----
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Laredo Oil, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




1.
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Dated: September 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Bradley E. SparksBradley E. SparksChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Case 3:05-cv-05780-RBL Document 46 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-05780-RBL Document 46 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2