alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 49

Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ‘‘America Recycles Day’’ national

kick-off campaign.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. JEFFORDS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Governmental

Affairs

SEPTEMBER 10, 1997

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Rules and

Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ‘‘America

Recycles Day’’ national kick-off campaign.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR AMERICA RE4 CYCLES DAY NATIONAL KICK-OFF CAMPAIGN.

5 The ‘‘America Recycles Day’’ campaign and its

6 agents may sponsor a public event on the Capitol Grounds

7 on September 30, 1997, or on such date as the Speaker
2

SCON 49 RCS

1 of the House of Representatives and the President pro

2 tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

3 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized under sec5 tion 1 shall be free to the public and arranged so as not

6 to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions

7 to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the

8 Capitol Police.

9 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—‘‘America Recy10 cles Day’’ and its agents shall assume full responsibility

11 for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities as12 sociated with the event.

13 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

14 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

15 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, ‘‘America Recy16 cles Day’’ and its agents are authorized to erect on the

17 Capitol Grounds any stage, tent, sound amplification de18 vices, and other related structures and equipment required

19 for the event authorized under section 1.

20 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

21 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized

22 to make any other reasonable arrangements as may be re23 quired to plan for or administer the event.

Æ
APPENDIX C

 Page 1

SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

DOCKET OST-2011-0119

SUMMARY INFORMATION

All applicants must submit this information with their proposal, along with a completed form SF424 on http:// 

www.grants.gov. 

A. APPLICANT INFORMATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

X Not a Consortium ⁭ Interstate Consortium ⁭ Intrastate Consortium

⁭ Community now receives EAS subsidy

X Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient: Date of Grant: __2007 ______ Expiration date of grant: __________

B. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: (LIST ORGANIZATION NAMES)

Public Private

1. ___________________________________ 1.Coalition of community groups and the 

 Montgomery Chamber of Commerce 

 2.____________________________________ 2.______________________________________

 3.____________________________________ 3.______________________________________

 4.____________________________________ 4.______________________________________

 5.____________________________________ 5.______________________________________

C. PROJECT PROPOSAL: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

⁭ X Marketing ⁭ Upgrade Aircraft ⁭ X New Route

⁭ Travel Bank ⁭ Service Restoration ⁭ Subsidy

⁭ Surface Transportation ⁭ Regional Service Revenue Guarantee ⁭

X Launch New Carrier Start Up Cost Offset First Service

Study ⁭ Secure Additional Carrier Other (explain below)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
 APPENDIX C

 Page 2

⁭

D. EXISTING LANDING AIDS AT LOCAL AIRPORT:

⁭X Full ILS ⁭X Outer/Middle Marker X Published Instrument Approach

⁭ X Localizer ⁭X Other (specify) NDB, GPS

E. PROJECT COSTS: DO NOT ENTER TEXT IN SHADED AREA

LINE DESCRIPTION SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT

1 Federal amount requested $400,000

2 State cash financial contribution $ 80,000

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds

3b Non-airport cash funds $80,000

3 Total local cash funds (3a +3b) $480,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) $480,000

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind contribution**

5b Other In-Kind contribution**

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION

(5a + 5b)

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+8) $480,000

F. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS**

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 7b (Other In-Kind contribution), please describe the 

source(s) of fund(s) for each.
APPENDIX C

 Page 3

G. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS?

⁭ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on

(date)___________________.

⁭ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.

X c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? (IF “YES”, PROVIDE EXPLANATION)

⁭ No - X ⁭ Yes (explain) 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________
| 1.     | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending Decemer 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metha Energy Solutions Inc. |

|                 | Metha Energy Solutions Inc. |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 |                        |
| Date: April 15, 2011 | By:               | /s/ Jesper Toft |
|                 |                        | Jesper Toft |
|                 |                        | Chief Executive Officer, |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 532 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 532

  Recognizing the energy and economic partnership between the United 
                          States and Honduras.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2007

 Mr. Gohmert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the energy and economic partnership between the United 
                          States and Honduras.

Whereas the energy and economic partnership between the United States and 
        Honduras is mutually beneficial to both the citizens of the United 
        States and Honduras;
Whereas Honduras should be commended for seeking alternative fuel sources such 
        as bio-diesel;
Whereas the United States will be able to diversify its fuel supply and import 
        energy from a democratically-elected country such as Honduras;
Whereas the partnership between the United States and Honduras should help 
        Honduras with the necessary resources to improve its infrastructure, 
        such as roads and medical clinics; and
Whereas this should be the beginning of a long and prosperous energy and 
        economic partnership between the United States and Honduras: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the energy and economic partnership between 
        the United States and Honduras;
            (2) honors all who are working for the betterment of both 
        countries; and
            (3) offers its hope that this is the beginning of a long 
        and prosperous energy and economic partnership between the 
        United States and Honduras.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2013215EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFOMRATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      2,546
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                2,326
<INVENTORY>                                 22,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,829
<PP&E>                                      2,151
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,213
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    115
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,244
<SALES>                                     57,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,585
<CGS>                                       52,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            4,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (245)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00554-CV

Style: Robert Pearson

v. Roger Kroschel, III, Individually and as Representative of Rockin’ R Trucking

Date motion filed*: November 19, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file the reporter’s record and evidence

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: October 1, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested: February 18, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On October 21, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that a reporter’s record had not been filed. If 

additional time is necessary, the Court may extend the deadline to file the reporter’s record if the court reporter

requests. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3.(c). The court reporter has filed a request for an extension. Accordingly, we 

dismiss appellee’s motion.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting for the Court 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 10, 2013
Searched for **https://www.childwelfare.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.childwelfare.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

THOMAS A. CAMERON,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR05-0382-RSL-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged: 

Count 1: Possession of an Unregistered Firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and

5871.

Date of Detention Hearing: February 16, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is serving a sentence from state-court charges and is currently in

custody. Therefore, defendant has stipulated to detention reserving the right to contest his

continued detention if there is a material change in circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00382-RSL Document 8 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) There are no conditions or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required or ensure the safety of the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of February, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00382-RSL Document 8 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 5, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.6 Distribution of Gross Domestic Product 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 61603.

#### Carson M. Simon & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 282280-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures of animals in chief value of wood the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 60989 and 61017, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JERRY BUNNAO RACCA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-106-RSM

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: November 21, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

Defendant has stipulated to detention based on the prior California detention order issued

November 8, 2006, but has reserved the right to contest his continued detention if there are new

circumstances that should arise.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 210 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 21st day of November, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 210 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67626.

#### N. K. Greenebaum, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2713, etc. (New York).

*275Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
March 21, 1957

No. 60575.

#### E. Sasajima et al. *v.*United States,

petitions 7186-R, etc.

D. 1841. Petitioners’ application for rehearing denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 2, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-981 Lower Tribunal No. F10-24648

________________ 

### Roque Torres, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge. Roque Torres, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DAVID McMILLAN,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-202M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Counts 1: Failure to Appear for Arraignment on Charges of Bank Fraud.

Date of Detention Hearing: May 5, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has prior failures to appear in court.

(2) Defendant has prior and on-going substance-abuse issues.

(3) Defendant is viewed as a risk of flight based on his prior failures to appear.

(4) Defendant is being detained without prejudice to his right to raise detention

issues when he appears before the District of South Carolina, which appearance is scheduled

for June 8, 2006, at 9:45a.m.

Case 2:06-mj-00202-JPD Document 8 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(5) Based upon the foregoing findings of the Court, there appear to be no

conditions or combination of conditions other than detention that will address the risk of

flight.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00202-JPD Document 8 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 2