alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

June 9, 1966

No. P66/91.

protests 61/22360, etc. (New York).

No. P66/92.

protests 64/15798, etc. (New York).

#### T. Cohn, Inc., Lang & Marshall, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, J. Cohn, Inc., and Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley*Co., *a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIE CARY GUIDRY,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5055M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 (X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 March 24, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05055-JKA Document 6 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)




Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer ofTargetAcquisitions II, Inc., aDelawarecorporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the
Company.




Date:April 15, 2009




/s/Geoffrey
    AlisonGeoffrey
    AlisonPrincipal Executive Officer and
      PrincipalAccounting
      Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided
toTARGETACQUISITIONS
II,
INC. and will be retained byTARGETACQUISITIONS
II,
INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIE CARY GUIDRY,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5055M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 (X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 March 24, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05264-BHS Document 6 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of YouChange Holdings Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jeffrey I. Rassás, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard A. Papworth, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Jeffrey I. RassásJeffrey I. RassásChief Executive Officer/s/  Richard A. PapworthRichard A. PapworthChief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer








September 28, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part of this report or on a separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Savarese, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 998]

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), both rendered August 19, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree under Indictment No. 7/92 and perjury in the first degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 434/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
www.altusuas.com	

DELTA X8 – Industrial Grade Survey Multirotor

Wingspan (propellers fitted) 140cm (55”)

Motors 8 x 400kV

Propellors 8 x 18”

Battery type LiPo 6S, 22V, 16,000/22,000mAh

Empty Weight 5.5kg (12 lb)

Takeoff Weight 9.5kg (21 lb)

Max Takeoff Weight 22.5kg (49 lb)

Max climb rate (under AP) 2 m/s (6.6ft/s)

Max descent rate (under AP) 2 m/s (6.6ft/s)

Maximum speed (under AP) 12 m/s (27mph)

Endurance (with Payload) 10-14 minutes

Command and Control Frequency 2.4Ghz (Spektrum DSMX modulation)

Telemetry (WiFi) 2.4Ghz (meets Directive 1999/5/EC specs)

Telemetry (Datalink) 915-928 Mhz FHSS (complies with AS/NZS 4268:2012)

868-869 MHz FHSS

Failsafes Automatic Return to Home on Command & Control Failure

Automatic Parachute deployment at 70 degrees of roll

Automatic Parachute deployment on violent shake state

Automatic Parachute deployment on power loss

Dual AP, GPS and IMU for comparison checks

X-8/LRX: Motor redundancy configuration

Wind Speed (max tolerance) 16 m/s (35mph)

Minimum Air Temp -5° C (23° F)

Maximum Air Temp 50° C (122° F)

Humidity 0% to 95%

Visibility 400m +

Prohibited Environmental Conditions Heavy Rain (gimbal sensor is the limiting factor), Snow, Fog
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JERRY E. SPICER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5132FDB

ORDER DENYING

RECONSIDERATION

Defendant moves for denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and he submits a

statement of his prison account through July 11, 2006. His account indicates that he receives regular

income, although his account was depleted as of July 11, 2006. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. 

DATED this 6th day of September, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05132-FDB Document 12 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 1
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 15th day of December, 2006, I electronically 

filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CUTOFF

FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE with the Clerk of the

Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Via Email to:

Robert Siegel, Esq.

Merkle Siegel & Friedrichsen, P.C.

Email: bob@msfseattle.com

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of

Washington that the forgoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on

December 15th, 2006, at Seattle, Washington.

________________________

Diana Au

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 52-2 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 52 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

(206) 553-7970

ORDER TO SEAL/FREY 

(No. CR06-0094RSM) - 1

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-0094RSM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

JERRY B. FREY, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

Based upon the motion of the United States, and the representations made therein,

it is HEREBY ORDERED that

The United States’ Motion for a Downward Departure be FILED UNDER SEAL.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 6th day of September 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PRESENTED BY:

s/Andrew C. Friedman 

ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00094-RSM Document 19 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Irwin J. KirzIrwin J. KirzChief Executive Officer/s/ Irwin J. KirzIrwin J. KirzChief Financial OfficerDated: April 2, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2005245EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 6 October 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 247 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Fifth supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/......). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

Image

---
1845 - 0052

– Affected Public

– For - Profit Institutions 11 /26 /201 4

This request is for approval of an extension of OMB information collection number 1845 - 0052 the reporting requirements currently in the Student Assistance General Provisions, 34 CFR 668, Subpart I. This subpart governs the Immigration - Status Confirmation, as authorized by section 484(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1091). The regulations can be reviewed at 34 CFR 668, Subpart I . There is an increase in burden hours due to an increase in the number of respondents who need to present documentation to the school to be included with the G - 845 form to complete the confirmation of eligibility t o receive Title IV assistance. There has not been any change to the regulatory language requiring this activity.

# of Respondents # of Responses X Hours/ = Burden Response Hours For -profit institution:

2,1 51 30,701 .17 hours = 5,2 19 (10 min.)
#### James A. WASHINGTON, Appellee, v. FIRST DATA RESOURCES, INC., Appellant, Timothy Rosenthal; Theodore Henkenius; Ronald Doty; Pamela S. Wallman; Dianne M. Blum, Defendants.

No. 01-1474.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 29, 2001.

Filed July 9, 2001.

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James A. Washington sued his former employer, First Data Resources, Inc. (First Data), asserting, inter alia, claims under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. The district court1 granted summary judgment to First Data, and Washington appealed. In this related appeal, First Data challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to correct the judgment to include an amount for sanctions against Washington. We find no abuse of discretion, as First Data can move the district court for the proposed correction following our disposition of Washington’s summary judgment appeal. *482
      *See Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Serv. Co.,*789 F.2d 991, 993-94 (2d Cir.1986). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HENRY B. GARNIER,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5285RBL

 ORDER DIRECTING AN ANSWER

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to both 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 and 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Magistrates’ Rules

MJR 3 and MJR 4.

Before the court is a letter from the Washington State Attorney General’s Office asking the

court to sua sponte dismiss this action. (Dkt. # 16) Counsel indicates the petition deals with a

condition of confinement, “air quality”, and should be filed as a Civil Rights action. (Dkt. # 16). 

Accordingly counsel asks the court to dismiss the petition “sua sponte.” 

While the court agrees that petitioner is attempting to challenge air quality, a condition of

Case 3:06-cv-05285-RBL Document 19 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

confinement, petitioner has included two grounds for review in his petition. (Dkt. # 6). In the first

ground he alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and is challenging his conviction. The second

ground, air quality at a facility, is an issue that respondent can address in a motion or answer to the

petition. The court declines to recommend dismissal sua sponte.

The clerk’s Office is directed to send a copy of this order to petitioner and respondents

counsel.

DATED this 18th, day of September, 2006. 

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05285-RBL Document 19 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 1114

_____________________________
J AMES L. Q UEEN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

December 4, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits.

K ELSEY , M.K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 James L. Queen, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.