alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 14,263.

#### TURNER v. WADDINGTON.

[3 Wash. C. C. 126.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. Term, 1811.

Authentication of Records — Debt on Judgment — Pleading-.

Upon the plea ‘of nul tiel record to debt, on a judgment in another state, the seal -of the court must be annexed to the record itself; and it is not sufficient, that it is annexed to the certificate of the judge of the court, authenticating the attestation of the clerk who certifies the record.

[Cited in Carpenter v. Ritchie (Wash,) 28 Pac. 382; Howe v. Nickerson. 14 Allen, 405; Kirschner v. State, 9 Wis. 145.)

Debt on a judgment recovered in a court in the state of Massachusetts; plea, no -such record. The record produced, has only the attestation of the clerk, without the seal of the court annexed. But- annexed to the record, is the certificate of the judge of the •court, with the seal of the court attached to it, stating that the attestation of the clerk is in due form. This was objected to.

1

 [Originally published from the MS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington. Associate Justice of tbe Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters. Jr.. Esq.]

BY THE COURT.

The seal ought to have been annexed to the record, of which the certificate of the judge is no part. Juror withdrawn by consent
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CHARLES FRANK LOWERY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DARREN SWENSEN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5112 RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration

[Dkt. #23]. 

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows: 

Under Local Rule 7, Motions for Reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied absent

a showing of manifest error, or a new factual or legal basis which could not have been raised earlier. Local

Rule 7(h). This standard has not been met in this case, and the Court will not reconsider its prior ruling

[Dkt. #21]. It is therefore

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05112-RBL Document 24 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 65225.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/22894.

Protest abandoned January 13, 1961. (Not published.) (Initial No. 295035-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 66089.

Suit 5055.

#### Firth Sterling, Inc. *v.*United States.

C.D. 2176 reversed July 14,1961. C.A.D. 779.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135107 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135107 

 COA: 279092 

Kent CC: 06-002814-FC 

KEVIN MICHAEL MEYERS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

l0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2008 

 Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MART LIIKANE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1829L

ORDER DENYING SECOND

MOTION FOR AFFIDAVIT OF

PREJUDICE

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Response to ‘Order Denying

Request for a Conference’ and Second Motion for Affidavit of Prejudice.” (Dkt. #54). 

On September 21, 2006 and in response to plaintiff’s motion, the Court issued an order

declining to voluntarily recuse. The motion was then referred to the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman for review. Judge Pechman denied plaintiff’s motion to recuse on September

27, 2006.

Plaintiff subsequently filed a “Response” to the order, which the Court construed

as a motion for reconsideration. The Court denied the motion as untimely and without

merit.

In his Response and Second Motion for Affidavit of Prejudice, plaintiff again

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 55 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION - 2

accuses the Court of bias, as well as calling it a coward and other epithets. However,

plaintiff has not provided any new arguments or facts to support his renewed allegation of

bias. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED for the same reasons his first motion

and motion for reconsideration were denied.

DATED this 21st day of November, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 55 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 53307.

protest 117061-K (New York).

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

B-ao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was-therefore sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Alfredo Lopez Hernandez, also known as David Rodriguez, also known as David Rodriguez Flores, also known as Richard Olvera, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50211.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Hernandez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior convic*339tion is a sentencing factor under U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

HAROLD PADDYAKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor, Monroe

Correctional Complex,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-0103-JCC-JPD

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s proposed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint (Dkt. No.

1), the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Judge James P. Donohue, United States

Magistrate Judge (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 3), and Plaintiff’s objections to the R&R (Dkt. No. 5). Having

reviewed the record, and having determined that oral argument is not necessary, the Court hereby finds

and rules as follows:

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center in Aberdeen, is proceeding pro se in

this proposed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against an unidentified employee of the Monroe Correctional

Complex. Plaintiff alleges that while he was working in the Correctional Complex’s kitchen, he observed

several falling hazards, including water and food on the kitchen floor. Plaintiff further alleges that,

although he requested work boots because of these hazards, his request was denied by kitchen supervisor

Diane “Doe,” and that as a result of this denial he slipped in the kitchen and injured his lower back. 

Case 2:06-cv-00103-JCC Document 6 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

The Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections do not raise any issues that were not properly addressed

by Magistrate Judge Donohue. Aside from a new request for court-appointed counsel, Plaintiff’s

objections merely restate the allegations in his proposed § 1983 complaint—that the Correctional

Complex’s kitchen supervisor was negligent for failing to provide work boots for Plaintiff. As a matter of

law, however, simple negligence is not actionable under § 1983. Buckley v. County of Los Angeles, 968

F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 333 (1986) (holding that negligent

conduct does not give rise to a due process deprivation); Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344, 347 (1986)

(holding that due process is not implicated by the lack of care of an official causing unintended injury). 

Accordingly, the Court finds that the R&R is supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

For these reasons, the Court does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s objections;

(2) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation;

(3) Plaintiff’s proposed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice;

(4) Plaintiff’s request for court-appointed counsel and his application to proceed in forma

pauperis are DENIED as moot;

(5) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, and to the Honorable

James P. Donohue. 

SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2006.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00103-JCC Document 6 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                               JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                         9,367,000
<SECURITIES>                                                   1,502,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  3,311,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     575,000
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              15,131,000
<PP&E>                                                         6,554,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 2,333,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                27,646,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         11,822,000
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                        7,000
<COMMON>                                                          44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    11,774,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  27,646,000
<SALES>                                                       30,845,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              30,845,000
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 30,524,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               193,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  532,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     177,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              355,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     355,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify that:

(1) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the accompanying Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                         |  |                                        | 
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------- | 
|Date:
 November 13, 2009 |  |                                        | 
|                         |  |                                        | 
|                         |  | /s/ Scott F.
 Drill                    | 
|                         |  | Scott F.
 Drill                        | 
|                         |  | President
 and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  | (principal
 executive officer)        
|                         |  |                                        | 
|Date:
 November 13, 2009 |  |                                        | 
|                         |  |                                        | 
|                         |  | /s/ Justin
 W. Shireman                | 
|                         |  | Justin W.
 Shireman                    | 
|                         |  | Vice
 President, Finance and          
|                         |  | Chief Financial
 Officer              
|                         |  | (principal
 financial officer)        

23

---
September 2012

Biodiversity 

increases the 

success of 

most agricultural systems. 

Biodiversity helps to prevent disease and pest 

problems associated with monocultures. Using 

cover crops and increasing diversity within crop 

rotations improves soil health and soil function, 

reduces costs, and increases profitability. 

Diversity above ground improves diversity 

below ground, which helps create healthy 

productive soils.

Cover Crops

Cover crops can be an integral part of a cropping 

system. Cover crops can be managed to 

improve soil health, as they help to develop an 

environment that sustains and nourishes plants, 

soil microbes and beneficial insects.

Cover crops are typically planted in late summer 

or fall around harvest and before spring planting 

of the following year’s crops. Examples of cover 

crops include rye, wheat, oats, clovers and other 

legumes, turnips, radishes, and triticale. Planting 

several cover crop species together in a mixture 

can increase their impact on soil health. Each 

cover crop provides its own set of benefits, so 

it’s important to choose the right cover crop 

mixture to meet management goals.

discover 

the cover

unlock your farm’s potential
Cover Crop Benefits

Restoring Soil Health – Cover crops 

help increase organic matter in the 

soil and improve overall soil health by 

adding living roots to the soil during 

more months of the year. Cover crops 

can improve water infiltration into the 

soil. Deep-rooted crops like forage 

radishes create natural water passages. 

Legume cover crops serve as natural 

fertilizers while grasses scavenge 

nutrients that are often lost after harvest 

or during winter.

Natural Resource Protection – Along 

with crop residue above ground, cover 

crops protect the soil against erosive 

heavy rains and strong winds. Cover 

crops trap excess nitrogen, keeping 

it from leaching into groundwater or 

running off into surface water – releasing 

it later to feed growing crops.

Livestock Feed – Cover crops 

can provide livestock producers 

with additional grazing or haying 

opportunities.

Wildlife Habitat – Cover crops provide 

winter food and cover for birds and other 

wildlife. During the growing season, they 

can provide food for pollinators.

Soil Health 

Management Systems

Implementing Soil Health Management Systems 

can lead to increased organic matter, more soil 

organisms, reduced soil compaction and improved 

nutrient storage and cycling. As an added bonus, 

fully functioning, healthy soils absorb and retain 

more water, making them less susceptible to 

runoff and erosion. This means more water will be 

available for crops when they need it. Soil Health 

Management Systems allow farmers to enjoy profits 

because they spend less on fuel and energy while 

benefiting from the higher crop yields resulting 

from improved soil conditions.

Contact your local NRCS office to learn more about 

Soil Health Management Systems and the technical 

and financial assistance available to help “Unlock 

the Secrets in the Soil.”

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





The undersigned certify that:



(1)       The accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)       The information contained in the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/Afairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 29, 2010
     /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. Drill
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)Date:  January 29, 2010
     /s/ Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. Shireman
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)










---
86 ([SRUWV RI &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYSHWSHWBPRYHBH[SBGFB186=BPEEOBDKWP 

3(752/(80 	 27+(5 /,48,'6

29(59,(: $1$/<6,6 	 352-(&7,216 */266$5< 3⁄4 )$46 3⁄4

([SRUWV

$UHD 86 3HULRG8QLW $QQXDO7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

6KRZ 'DWD %\

3URGXFW $UHD

'$7$

*UDSK

&OHDU      

9LHZ

+LVWRU\

7RWDO       

&UXGH 2LO       

1DWXUDO *DV 3ODQW /LTXLGV DQG

/LTXHILHG 5HILQHU\ *DVHV       

3HQWDQHV 3OXV       

/LTXHILHG 3HWUROHXP *DVHV       

(WKDQH(WK\OHQH      

3URSDQH3URS\OHQH       

1RUPDO %XWDQH%XW\OHQH       

,VREXWDQH,VREXW\OHQH 

2WKHU /LTXLGV       

+\GURJHQ2[\JHQDWHV5HQHZDEOHV

2WKHU +\GURFDUERQV       

2[\JHQDWHV H[FO )XHO

(WKDQRO       

0HWK\O 7HUWLDU\ %XW\O (WKHU

07%(       

2WKHU 2[\JHQDWHV       

5HQHZDEOH )XHOV LQFO )XHO

(WKDQRO      

)XHO (WKDQRO      

%LRPDVV%DVHG 'LHVHO     

8QILQLVKHG 2LOV   

1DSKWKDV DQG /LJKWHU   

.HURVHQH DQG /LJKW *DV 2LOV  

0RWRU *DVROLQH %OHQG &RPS       

5HIRUPXODWHG       

&RQYHQWLRQDO       

$YLDWLRQ *DVROLQH %OHQG &RPS 

)LQLVKHG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV       

)LQLVKHG 0RWRU *DVROLQH       

5HIRUPXODWHG    

&RQYHQWLRQDO       

)LQLVKHG $YLDWLRQ *DVROLQH 

.HURVHQH7\SH -HW )XHO       

.HURVHQH       

'LVWLOODWH )XHO 2LO       

 SSP DQG XQGHU 6XOIXU       

*UHDWHU WKDQ  WR  SSP

6XOIXU       

*UHDWHU WKDQ  SSP 6XOIXU       

5HVLGXDO )XHO 2LO       

1DSKWKD IRU 3HWUR )HHG 8VH     
 86 ([SRUWV RI &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYSHWSHWBPRYHBH[SBGFB186=BPEEOBDKWP 

2WKHU 2LOV 3HWUR )HHG 8VH 

6SHFLDO 1DSKWKDV     

/XEULFDQWV       

:D[HV       

3HWUROHXP &RNH       

$VSKDOW DQG 5RDG 2LO       

0LVFHOODQHRXV 3URGXFWV       

&OLFN RQ WKH VRXUFH NH\ LFRQ WR OHDUQ KRZ WR GRZQORDG VHULHV LQWR ([FHO RU WR HPEHG D FKDUW RU PDS RQ \RXU ZHEVLWH

 1R 'DWD 5HSRUWHG  1RW $SSOLFDEOH 1$ 1RW $YDLODEOH : :LWKKHOG WR DYRLG GLVFORVXUH RI LQGLYLGXDO FRPSDQ\ GDWD

1RWHV &UXGH RLO H[SRUWV DUH UHVWULFWHG WR  FUXGH RLO GHULYHG IURP ILHOGV XQGHU WKH 6WDWH ZDWHUV RI $ODVND
V &RRN ,QOHW  $ODVNDQ 1RUWK 6ORSH FUXGH RLO 

FHUWDLQ GRPHVWLFDOO\ SURGXFHG FUXGH RLO GHVWLQHG IRU &DQDGD  VKLSPHQWV WR 86 WHUULWRULHV DQG  &DOLIRUQLD FUXGH RLO WR 3DFLILF 5LP FRXQWULHV 7RWDOV PD\ QRW

HTXDO VXP RI FRPSRQHQWV GXH WR LQGHSHQGHQW URXQGLQJ 6HH 'HILQLWLRQV 6RXUFHV DQG 1RWHV OLQN DERYH IRU PRUH LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ WKLV WDEOH

5HOHDVH 'DWH 

1H[W 5HOHDVH 'DWH
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Dongliang Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA POLYPEPTIDE
GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.   The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th day of
January, 2011.





/s/ Dongliang ChenDongliang
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Polypeptide Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Polypeptide Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.