alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 87 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 87

                  To correct the enrollment of S. 419.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1998

 Mr. Jeffords submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                  To correct the enrollment of S. 419.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 419) to provide surveillance, 
research, and services aimed at prevention of birth defects, and for 
other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
            (1) In section 1 of the bill, strike ``1997'' and insert 
        ``1998''.
            (2) In section 2 of the bill:
                    (A) In subsection (d) of section 317C of the Public 
                Health Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such 
                section 2) strike ``1998'' and insert ``1999''.
                    (B) In subsection (f) of section 317C of the Public 
                Health Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such 
                section 2) strike ``1998'' and all that follows through 
                ``2001'' and insert ``1999, $40,000,000 for fiscal year 
                2000, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the 
                fiscal years 2001 and 2002''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 66593.

#### Charles Garcia & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 261253-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing reels with two spools similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Charles Garcia & Co., Inc.*(48 C.C.P.A. 140, C.A.D. 780), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 245

Expressing the sense of the Senate that it is the interest of both the United

States and the Republic of Korea to maintain and enhance continued

close U.S.-ROK relations, and to commend President Kim Dae Jung

and the Republic of Korea for the measures already implemented and

those it has committed to implement to resolve the country’s economic

and financial problems.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9, 1998

Mr. ROTH (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

JUNE 11, 1998

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that it is the interest

of both the United States and the Republic of Korea

to maintain and enhance continued close U.S.-ROK relations, and to commend President Kim Dae Jung and

the Republic of Korea for the measures already implemented and those it has committed to implement to

resolve the country’s economic and financial problems.

Whereas the United States maintains a close, critical, and robust bilateral partnership with the Republic of Korea,

and has a profound interest in furthering that relationship;
2

SRES 245 ATS

Whereas the U.S. security relationship with the ROK, based

on the 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty, bilateral consultations, and combined military forces, is one of our most

important, and it is in both countries’ interest, as well as

in the interest of the countries of the Asia Pacific region,

for that relationship to be maintained;

Whereas the ROK is the United States seventh largest trading partner, fifth largest export market and fourth largest market for U.S. agricultural products;

Whereas the recent presidential election of Kim Dae Jung,

formerly one of his country’s most prominent dissidents,

further demonstrates the strength and vibrancy of democracy in the ROK;

Whereas the ROK has already made significant strides in reforming, restructuring, and opening its economy in response to the Asian financial crisis; and

Whereas the President Kim has committed his administration

to making an array of further structural reforms that

over the medium- to long-term, will produce a more open,

competitive, and dynamic Korea, benefiting the Korean

people, U.S.-ROK relations and the global economy: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the United States and the Republic of

3 Korea should continue to advance already close bi4 lateral security and economic and political ties for

5 the mutual benefit of both countries, and for the

6 maintenance of peace, stability, and prosperity in

7 the Asia Pacific region; and
3

SRES 245 ATS

1 (2) commends President Kim Dae Jung and

2 the Republic of Korea for the measures already im3 plemented and those measures it has committed to

4 implement to resolve the country’s economic and fi5 nancial problems.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5

Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the

appointment of the United States Trade Representative.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. ROTH (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating

to the appointment of the United States Trade Representative.

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act

of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(3)) became effective on January 1, 1996, and provides certain limitations with respect to the appointment of the United States Trade

Representative and Deputy United States Trade Representatives;

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act

of 1974 does not apply to any individual who was serving

as the United States Trade Representative or Deputy

United States Trade Representative on the effective date

of such paragraph (3) and who continued to serve in that

position;
2

•SJ 5 IS

Whereas Charlene Barshefsky was appointed Deputy United

States Trade Representative on May 28, 1993, with the

advice and consent of the Senate, and was serving in that

position on January 1, 1996;

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act

of 1974 does not apply to Charlene Barshefsky in her capacity as Deputy United States Trade Representative;

and

Whereas in light of the foregoing, it is appropriate to continue to waive the provisions of paragraph (3) of section

141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the appointment of Charlene Barshefsky as the United States

Trade Representative: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (3) of

4 section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

5 2171(b)(3)) or any other provision of law, the President,

6 acting by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,

7 is authorized to appoint Charlene Barshefsky as the

8 United States Trade Representative.

Æ
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 33 Att. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
No. P67/298.

#### Illfelder Importing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/8656, etc. (New York).

Bichardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called “miniature hunting knives” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Integrated                           ( print page 69672)                        Photonics Institute for Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (“AIM Photonics”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD; Nonlinear Materials Corporation (dba NLM Photonics), Seattle, WA; and Trustees of Boston University, Boston, MA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AIM Photonics intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 16, 2016, AIM Photonics filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48450).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 10, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 38533).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22247 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 195 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 195

Designating the week of March 22 through March 28, 1998, as ``National 
                      Corrosion Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 1998

 Mrs. Hutchison submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of March 22 through March 28, 1998, as ``National 
                      Corrosion Prevention Week''.

Whereas corrosion undermines the physical integrity of structures and endangers 
        the public and environment;
Whereas corrosion leads to catastrophic failures and wastes scarce resources;
Whereas corrosion is the deterioration of a material resulting from a reaction 
        with its environment and costs the United States over $300,000,000,000 
        every year, which amounts to more than 4 percent of the gross national 
        product;
Whereas it is estimated that over \1/3\ of the costs from corrosion 
        (approximately $100,000,000,000) are preventable through the application 
        of existing corrosion control technology;
Whereas corrosion engineers in the United States and around the world save 
        taxpayers money through the application of state-of-the-art, time-proven 
        corrosion control technology; and
Whereas corrosion engineers are committed to protecting public safety, 
        preserving the environment, and preventing the premature deterioration 
        of infrastructure facilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of March 22 through 
March 28, 1998, as ``National Corrosion Prevention Week'', in order to 
raise public awareness of the problems associated with it and the 
measures available to prevent it.
                                 <all>
```
No. 61127.

protest 272564-K (Milwaukee).

#### M. E. Dey & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the paper in question does not exceed four one-thousandths of 1 inch in thickness and is of a class or kind of paper chiefly used for the printing of newspapers at and prior to June 17, 1930, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ricardo Angelo WHITE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10662.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Stacey P. Geis, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ricardo Angelo White, Adelanto, CA, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo A. White appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his coram nobis petition challenging his 108-month sentence for conspiracy and armed bank robbery in light of *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He contends that the district court erred in denying the petition on the ground that he is still in custody. The record shows that White is serving a sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. He states that he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed by the District Court for the Northern District of California but has not yet begun serving the term of supervised release imposed by that court. Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying coram nobis relief. *See Matus-Leva v. United States,*287 F.3d 758, 761 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the Third Division,

March 26, 1957

No. 60581.

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 280256-K, etc. (New York).

*441Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and the Statements of Revenue and Expenses and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Report on Form 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,774,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,163,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,091,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,163,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,993
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (124,669)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 11070)

#### Panation Trade Co. et al *v.*United States

Entry No. 33329, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson é Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Judge;

The following appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows;

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court as follows:

> *6051. That the involved merchandise consists of cigarette lighters exported from Japan after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165) ; that the involved merchandise is not identified on the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) and that appraisement was accordingly made under Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act.

> 2. That the merchandise, the facts, and the issues herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *P emotion Trade Co.*v. *United States,*A.R.D. 181, and that the *record*in the said cited case may be incorporated herein.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets in the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses, incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit ex-factory prices.

> 4. That the appeals enumerated in Schedule “A” annexed may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation and upon the incorporated record, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and hold that such statutory values for the involved merchandise are the invoice unit ex-factory prices.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DANIEL BLANCHARD, by his parents,

CHERYL BLANCHARD and JERRY

BLANCHARD; CHERYL BLANCHARD and

JERRY BLANCHARD,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; JOHN

FLAHERTY; JOSH BROOKS; DAVE

CRAYK,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5166 FDB

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ON APPEAL AND DENYING

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL ON APPEAL

Plaintiffs have filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal of the aboveentitled matter. A court may authorize a plaintiff to prosecute an action in federal court without

prepayment of fees or security if the plaintiff submits an affidavit showing that he or she is unable to

pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiffs have submitted an affidavit

detailing monthly income of $1,700 and expenses of $1,643. It is evident from this documentation

that an inability to pay expenses required to proceed with this action as not been established. 

Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal will be denied.

Plaintiffs also move for appointment of counsel on appeal. Generally, there is no

Case 3:06-cv-05166-JKA Document 48 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796,

801 (9th Cir. 1986). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the court has discretion to request

volunteer counsel for indigent plaintiffs in exceptional circumstances. Id.; Wood v. Housewright,

900 F.2d 1332, 1335 (9th Cir. 1990). While the court may request volunteer counsel in exceptional

cases, it has no power to make a mandatory appointment. Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court of Iowa, 490

U.S. 296, 301-08 (1989). In order to determine whether exceptional circumstances exist, the court

evaluates the plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate

his or her claim pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wood, at 1335-36;

Richards v. Harper, 864 F.2d 85, 87 (9th Cir. 1988).

Plaintiffs have demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate the claims pro se. Moreover,

Plaintiffs have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits or exceptional circumstances

which warrant appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel

will be denied.

ACCORDINGLY,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. #40] is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff’ motion for appointment of counsel on appeal [Dkt. #42] is DENIED.

DATED this 6th day of September, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05166-JKA Document 48 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 2