[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71302-71306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22508]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2023 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 71302]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1240

[Doc. No. AMS-LP-21-0028]
RIN 0581-AE07


Natural Grass Sod Promotion, Research, and Information Order; 
Referendum Procedures

AGENCY:  Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on the establishment of 
procedures for conducting a referendum to determine whether issuance of 
a proposed Natural Grass Sod Research and Promotion Order (Order) is 
favored by natural grass sod producers. The procedures would also be 
used for any subsequent referendum under the Order. The proposed Order 
is being published separately in this issue of the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 15, 2023 to be 
assured consideration. Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35) (PRA), comments on the information collection burden 
that would result from this proposal must be received on or before 
December 15, 2023 to be assured consideration.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments concerning 
this notice by using the electronic process available at https://www.regulations.gov. Written comments may also be submitted to Jeana 
Harbison, Director; Research and Promotion Division; Livestock and 
Poultry Program, AMS, USDA; Room 2625-S, STOP 0251, 1400 Independence 
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-0251. All comments should reference the 
document number and the date and page number of this issue of the 
Federal Register. All comments received will be posted without change, 
including any personal information provided, at https://www.regulations.gov and will be included in the record and made 
available to the public.
    Pursuant to the PRA, comments regarding the accuracy of the burden 
estimate, ways to minimize the burden, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, should 
be sent to the address above. In addition, comments concerning the 
information collection should be sent to the Desk Office for 
Agriculture; Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Office of 
Management and Budget; New Executive Office Building; 725 17th Street 
NW, Room 725, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeana Harbison; Director; Research and 
Promotion Division; Telephone: (202) 527-3398; or Email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf85aaaea1aee182e187aebdada6bca0a18fbabcabaee1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="612b04000f004f2c4f2900130308120e0f21141205004f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This proposed rule is issued pursuant to the Commodity Promotion, 
Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).

Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094

    Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health, and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity). 
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both 
costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting 
flexibility. Executive Order 14094 updates and modernizes E.O. 12866 
and directs agencies to conduct proactive outreach to engage interested 
and affected parties through a variety of means, such as through field 
offices, and alternative platforms and media. This rule has been 
designated as not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this action.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section 
524 of the 1996 Act provides that it shall not affect or preempt any 
other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating 
to an agricultural commodity.
    Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a person subject to an order may 
file a written petition with the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) 
stating that an Order, any provision of an Order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with an order, is not established in accordance 
with the law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption 
from an order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision 
of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, 
shall be filed within two years after the effective date of an order, 
provision, or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The 
petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
Thereafter, the Secretary will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 
Act provides that the district court of the United States for any 
district in which the petitioner resides or conducts business shall 
have the jurisdiction to review a final ruling on the petition, if the 
petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days 
after the date of the entry of Secretary's final ruling.

Executive Order 13175

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 13175--Consultation 
and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. E.O. 13175 requires 
Federal agencies to consult and coordinate with Tribes on a government-
to-government basis on: (1) policies that have Tribal implication, 
including regulation, legislative comments, or proposed legislation; 
and (2) other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct 
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
    AMS has assessed the impact of this proposed rule on Indian Tribes 
and determined that this rule would not have Tribal implications that 
require consultation under E.O. 13175. AMS hosts a quarterly 
teleconference with Tribal leaders where matters of mutual interest 
regarding the marketing of

[[Page 71303]]

agricultural products are discussed. Information about the proposed 
regulation will be shared during an upcoming quarterly call, and Tribal 
leaders will be informed about the proposed regulation and the 
opportunity to submit comments. AMS will work with the U.S. Department 
of Agriculture (USDA) Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful 
consultation is provided as needed with regards to the regulations.

Background

    This proposed rule invites comments on procedures for conducting a 
referendum to determine whether natural grass sod producers support the 
issuance of a natural grass sod Order. AMS would conduct the 
referendum. Should an up-front referendum be held, AMS would publish a 
final rule for the referendum procedures that would state the timing 
and voting method for the referendum. AMS would also conduct extensive 
outreach to natural grass sod producers to inform them of the 
referendum voting process and the deadlines for voting. As an up-front 
referendum, producers would cast a vote on the revised draft Order, 
based on comments received from the public, that will be published at 
the same time as the final rule for the referendum procedures. The 
program would be implemented if it is favored by a simple majority of 
natural grass sod producers voting in the referendum that have been 
engaged in the production and sale of natural grass sod products in the 
United States during a representative period determined by the 
Secretary. The proposed Order is being published separately in this 
issue of the Federal Register.
    Should the referendum result in support for the creation of the 
program, AMS would publish a final rule for the Order that would 
include the date for when assessments would begin to be collected. The 
referendum procedures in this proposed rule would also be used for any 
subsequent referenda conducted under the Order. This proposed rule also 
announces AMS's intent to request approval by OMB of new information 
collection requirements to implement the program.

Authority in the 1996 Act

    The Commodity, Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996 (7 
U.S.C. 7411-7425) authorizes USDA to establish agricultural commodity 
research and promotion orders that may include a combination of 
promotion, research, industry information, and consumer information 
activities funded by mandatory assessments. These programs are designed 
to maintain and expand markets and uses for agricultural commodities as 
defined under sec. 513(1) of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7412), agricultural 
commodities. The 1996 Act provides for alternatives within the terms of 
a variety of provisions. Paragraph (e) of sec. 518 of the 1996 Act (7 
U.S.C. 7417) provides three options for determining industry approval 
of a new research and promotion program: (1) By a majority of those 
persons voting; (2) by persons voting for approval who represent a 
majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity; or (3) by a 
majority of those persons voting for approval who also represent a 
majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity. In addition, sec. 
518 of the (7 U.S.C. 7417) Act provides for referenda to ascertain 
approval of an Order to be conducted either prior to its going into 
effect or within three years after assessments first begin under an 
Order.

Program Overview

    AMS received a proposal for a national research and promotion 
program for natural grass sod from Turfgrass Producers International 
(TPI). TPI is an industry organization made up of members from across 
the natural grass seed and sod industry worldwide. The program would be 
financed by an assessment on natural grass sod products and would be 
administered by a board of industry members selected by the Secretary. 
Initially, producers would pay one-tenth (1/10th) of one penny ($0.01) 
per square foot, or the equivalent thereof, of natural grass sod 
products. No natural grass sod producer would be exempt from paying the 
assessment unless producing a certified organic product under the 
National Organic Program.
    The purpose of the program would be to strengthen the position of 
natural grass in the marketplace, maintain and expand markets for 
natural grass, and develop new uses for natural grass. TPI proposed 
that a referendum be held among eligible natural grass sod producers to 
determine whether they favor implementation of the program prior to the 
Order going into effect. TPI recommended that the program be 
implemented if it is favored by a simple majority of the natural grass 
sod producers voting in the referendum.

Summary of Regulatory Text

    Because the regulatory text proposed herein contains the complete 
proposed Order, this section will highlight key proposed provisions.

Definitions

    Proposed Sec.  1240.81 of the Referendum Procedures defines certain 
terms that would be used throughout. All terms have the same meaning as 
set forth in Sec.  1240.20 of Subpart A.
    Proposed Sec.  1240.83 discusses eligibility and manner of persons 
voting. An eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer, officer or employee of 
an eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer, an administrator, executor, or 
trustee of an Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer may cast a ballot. 
Any individual so voting in a Referendum shall certify that such 
individual has the authority to take such action. Upon request of the 
Referendum Agent, the individual shall submit adequate evidence of such 
authority.
    Proposed Sec.  1240.84 discusses the Referendum Agent, appointed by 
the Administrator, who will provide instructions for voting and conduct 
the Referendum. The Referendum Agent will determine the time period 
during which ballots may be cast and give reasonable public notice of 
the Referendum, not less than thirty (30) days. No person who claims to 
be an Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer will be refused a ballot. At 
the end of the voting period the agent will tabulate the results, 
prepare a report on the Referendum, and announce the results to the 
public.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of this rule on small 
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis (RFA).
    The purpose of RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration defines, 
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those having annual 
receipts of no more than $750,000.
    According to 2017 USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service 
data, there are 1,465 farms in the U.S. producing natural grass; of 
those, approximately 70 percent (or 1,034 farms), would be classified 
as small agricultural producers based on value of sales per farm.
    This proposed rule invites comments on procedures for conducting a 
referendum to determine whether natural grass sod producers favor 
issuance of a proposed natural grass sod Order. AMS would conduct the

[[Page 71304]]

referendum. As previously mentioned, paragraph (e) of Sec.  518 of the 
1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7417) provides three options for determining 
industry approval of a new research and promotion program: (1) by a 
majority of those persons voting; (2) by persons voting for approval 
who represent a majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity; 
or (3) by a majority of those persons voting for approval who also 
represent a majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity. This 
program is an industry-led effort to drive consumer demand for natural 
grass sod products through the development and implementation of 
programs, plans, and projects of research, information, and promotion, 
with funding for such efforts provided by the industry through 
assessments paid by natural grass sod producers involved in the 
production of monostands or blends or mixtures of Bentgrass, 
Bermudagrass, Buffalograss, Centipedegrass, Fine fescue, Kentucky 
bluegrass, Ryegrass, Seashore Paspalum, St. Augustinegrass, Tall 
fescue, Zoysiagrass, Bahiagrass, and other native or adapted grasses 
harvested and sold as sod, and products containing natural grass with 
artificial elements that are sold as sod (``natural grass sod 
products''). In order to ensure that natural grass sod producers 
involved in the sale of natural grass sod products make the decision on 
whether this program should be implemented, and subsequently continue 
or not, this program would be implemented if it is favored by a 
majority of natural grass sod producers voting in a referendum. This 
procedure would also be used for any subsequent referendum under the 
Order. Eligible natural grass sod producers would have the opportunity 
to participate in the referendum. Voting in the referendum is optional 
and this proposal outlines the requirements for doing so, such as 
instructions outlining the referendum process.
    Regarding alternatives, AMS is considering a variety of options to 
hold the referendum vote including email, mail, electronic voting 
through a smartphone application or website, sending ballots to one 
central location by mail ballot or through electronic mail, or by other 
means selected by the Administrator. AMS has previously conducted 
referenda through USDA Farm Service Agency County Offices for some 
larger checkoff programs. For more recently created programs, AMS has 
utilized an online voting application. AMS would provide easy access to 
information for potential voters through an email, telephone number, 
and internet-based resources. AMS is seeking comments on the preferred 
option or if there are other alternatives to consider.
    This action would impose an additional reporting burden on natural 
grass sod producers. Natural grass sod producers would have the 
opportunity to complete and submit a ballot to AMS indicating whether 
or not they favor implementation of the proposed Order or, for 
subsequent referenda of an approved program, a continuance of the 
program. The specific burden for the ballot is detailed later in this 
document in the section titled Paperwork Reduction Act. As with all 
Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed 
to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and 
public sector agencies. Finally, AMS has not identified any relevant 
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    Regarding outreach efforts, AMS would keep these individuals 
informed throughout the program implementation and referendum process 
to ensure that they are aware of and are able to participate in the 
program implementation process. AMS would also publicize information 
regarding the referendum process so that trade associations and related 
industry media are informed and can amplify the information to eligible 
producers.
    AMS has performed this initial RFA analysis regarding the impact of 
this proposed rule on small businesses.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the referendum ballot, which represents the information 
collection and recordkeeping requirements that may be imposed by this 
rule, has been submitted to OMB for approval.
    Title: Natural Grass Sod Research and Promotion Program.
    OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
    Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from OMB date of approval.
    Type of Request: New information collection for research and 
promotion programs.
    Abstract: The information collection requirements in the request 
are essential to carry out the intent of the 1996 Act. The information 
collection concerns a proposal received by AMS for a national research 
and promotion program for natural grass sod. The program would be 
financed by an assessment on natural grass sod and would be 
administered by a board of industry members selected by the Secretary.
    A referendum would be held among natural grass sod producers to 
determine whether they favor the draft Order and subsequent 
implementation and operation of the program prior to it going into 
effect. The purpose of the program would be to help build the market 
for natural grass sod.
    The information collection requirements in this rule concern the 
referendum that would be held to determine whether the program is 
favored by the industry. The ballot would be completed by natural grass 
sod producers who want to indicate whether or not they support 
implementation of the program.
    For the purpose of estimating the cost of reporting and 
recordkeeping, this proposed rule uses $51 per hour. To arrive at this 
amount, AMS used the mean hourly earnings of farmers, ranchers, and 
other agricultural managers ($36.93) from the U.S. Department of Labor, 
Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2020 National Occupational Employment 
and Wages Estimates.\1\ The mean hourly wage rate of $36.93 plus an 
additional 38.1 percent to account for benefits and compensation,\2\ 
for a total hourly wage of $51, was used to calculate annual cost. 
Costs of benefits and compensation guidance was obtained from the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics News Release issued December 14, 2018.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2020; 11-9013 
Farmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural Managers https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119013.htm.
    \2\ News Release for Employer Costs for Employee Compensation--
June 17, 2021, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.
    \3\ Economic News Release: Employer Costs for Employee 
Compensation Summary for December 2020 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Information collection requirement that is included in this 
proposal is: LP-8 Referendum Ballot (OMB Form No. 0581-NEW).
    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.1 hours per referendum ballot.
    Respondents: Natural grass sod producers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,400.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1 every 7 years (Once 
implemented, subsequent referenda every 7 years thereafter) 0.14 per 
year.

[[Page 71305]]

    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 20 hours.
    Total Cost: (20 hours x $51) $1,020.
    The ballot would be added to the other information collections 
approved under OMB 0581-NEW.
    An estimated 1,400 respondents would provide information to the 
AMS. The estimated cost of providing the information to AMS by 
respondents would be $1,020. This total has been estimated by 
multiplying 20 total hours required for reporting and recordkeeping by 
$51 per hour, representing the average hourly earnings plus benefits by 
various occupations involved in keeping this information. Data for 
computation of this hourly rate was obtained from the U.S. Department 
of Labor Statistics.

Request for Public Comment Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the 
proposed Order and AMS's oversight of the proposed Order, including 
whether the information would have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of AMS's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (c) the accuracy of AMS's estimate of the number of natural grass 
sod that would be covered under the program; (d) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 
(e) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Comments concerning the information collection requirements 
contained in this action should reference OMB 0581-NEW. In addition, 
the docket number, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal 
Register also should be referenced. Comments should be sent to the same 
addresses referenced in the ADDRESSES section of this rule.
    A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
comment on this proposed information collection. All written comments 
received will be summarized and included in the request for OMB 
approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record.
    This proposed rule invites comments on the establishment of 
referendum procedures for the vote of the creation of an industry-
funded research, promotion, and information program for natural grass 
products. Comments should clearly indicate whether or not you support 
any or all of the provisions proposed in the referendum procedures. 
Indicate the reason for your position and include relevant information 
and data to further support your position.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1240

    Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer 
information, Marketing agreements, Natural grass sod, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reason set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural 
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 1240 to read as follows:

PART 1240--NATURAL GRASS SOD PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION 
ORDER

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1240 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 7411-7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401.

0
2. Add subpart B to part 1240 to read as follows:
Subpart B--Referendum Procedures
Sec.
1240.80 General.
1240.81 Definitions.
1240.83 Voting.
1240.84 Instructions.
1240.85 Subagents.
1240.86 Ballots.
1240.87 Referendum Report.
1240.88 Confidential Information.
1240.89 OMB Control Number.

Subpart B--Referendum Procedures


Sec.  1240.80  General.

    Referenda to determine whether eligible natural sod producers favor 
the issuance, continuance, amendment, suspension, or termination of the 
Natural Grass Sod Research and Promotion Order shall be conducted in 
accordance with this Subpart B.


Sec.  1240.81  Definitions.

    For purposes of this Subpart B, all defined terms shall have the 
same meaning as set forth in Sec.  1240.20 of Subpart A. In addition, 
the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
    Administrator means the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
Service, or any officer or employee of USDA to whom there has been 
delegated or may be delegated the authority to act in the 
Administrator's stead.
    Referenda refers, collectively, to the Initial Referendum and any 
Subsequent Referenda.
    Referendum refers, individually, to the Initial Referendum or a 
Subsequent Referendum.
    Referendum Agent or Agent means the individual or individuals 
designated by the Secretary to conduct the referendum.
    Person means any individual, group of individuals, partnership, 
corporation, association, cooperative, or any other legal entity.


Sec.  1240.83  Voting.

    (a) Each Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer as set forth in Sec.  
1240.20 of Subpart A, shall be entitled to cast only one ballot in any 
Referenda.
    (b) Proxy voting is not authorized, but an officer or employee of 
an eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer, or an administrator, executor, 
or trustee of an Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer may cast a ballot 
on behalf of such entity. Any individual so voting in a Referendum 
shall certify that such individual is an officer or employee of the 
Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer, or an administrator, executive, or 
trustee of the Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer and that such 
individual has the authority to take such action. Upon request of the 
Referendum Agent, the individual shall submit adequate evidence of such 
authority.
    (c) All ballots are to be cast by mail, electronic mail, electronic 
voting through a smartphone application or website or sending ballots 
to one central location by mail ballot or through electronic mail or by 
any other means set forth by the Department.


Sec.  1240.84  Instructions.

    The Referendum Agent shall conduct the Referendum, in the manner 
provided in this Subpart, under the supervision of the Administrator. 
The Administrator may prescribe additional instructions, consistent 
with the provisions of this Subpart, to govern the procedure to be 
followed by the Referendum Agent. Such Agent shall:
    (a) Determine the time period during which ballots may be cast;
    (b) Provide ballots and related material to be used in the 
Referendum. The ballot shall provide for recording essential 
information, including that needed for ascertaining whether the Person 
voting, or on whose behalf the vote is cast, is an Eligible Natural 
Grass Sod Producer;
    (c) Give reasonable public notice of the Referendum, not less than 
thirty (30) days:
    (1) By using available media or public information sources, without 
incurring advertising expense, to publicize the dates, places, method 
of voting,

[[Page 71306]]

eligibility requirements, and other pertinent information. Such sources 
of publicity may include, but are not limited to, print, radio, email 
communications, and social media; and
    (2) By such other means as the Agent may deem advisable.
    (d) Distribute to Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producers whose names 
and contact information are known to the Referendum Agent, the 
instructions on voting, a ballot, and a summary of the terms and 
conditions of the proposed Natural Grass Sod Promotion, Research, and 
Information Order or the continuance of the Natural Grass Sod 
Promotion, Research, and Information Order, as the case may be. No 
Person who claims to be an Eligible Natural Grass Sod Producer shall be 
refused a ballot;
    (e) At the end of the voting period, collect, open, number, and 
review the ballots and tabulate the results in the presence of an agent 
of a third party authorized to monitor the Referendum process;
    (f) Prepare a report on the Referendum; and
    (g) Announce the results to the public.


Sec.  1240.85  Subagents.

    The Referendum Agent may appoint any individual or individuals 
necessary or desirable to assist the Agent in performing such Agent's 
functions of this Subpart. Each individual so appointed may be 
authorized by the Agent to perform any or all of the functions which, 
in the absence of such appointment, shall be performed by the Agent.


Sec.  1240.86  Ballots.

    The Referendum Agent and subagents shall accept all ballots cast. 
However, if an Agent or subagent deems that a ballot should be 
challenged for any reason, the Agent or subagent shall endorse above 
their signature, on the ballot, a statement to the effect that such 
ballot was challenged, by whom challenged, the reasons therefore, the 
results of any investigations made with respect thereto, and the 
disposition thereof. Ballots deemed invalid under this Subpart shall 
not be counted.


Sec.  1240.87  Referendum report.

    Except as otherwise directed, the Referendum Agent shall prepare 
and submit to the Administrator a report on the results of the 
Referendum, the manner in which it was conducted, the extent and kind 
of public notice given, and other information pertinent to the analysis 
of the Referendum and its results.


Sec.  1240.88  Confidential information.

    The ballots and other information or reports that reveal, or tend 
to reveal, the vote of any Natural Grass Sod Producer and the voter 
list shall be strictly confidential and shall not be disclosed.


Sec.  1240.89  OMB control number.

    The control number assigned to the information collection 
requirement in this Subpart by the Office of Management and Budget 
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. is OMB 
control number 0581-NEW.

Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22508 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>