alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-1271]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambridge 
Isotope Laboratories, Inc

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc has applied to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for 
further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
December 12, 2023. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before December 12, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. 
Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have 
received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully 
submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on August 25, 2023, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc 
50 Frontage Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810-5413, applied to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Controlled substance           Drug code           Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols...........            7370  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to synthetically bulk manufacture the controlled 
substance Tetrahydrocannabinols to produce analytical standards for 
distribution to its customers. No other activities for this drug code 
is authorized for this registration.

Claude Redd,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-22623 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32 (I)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  AmeriResource  Technologies,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September  30,  2006
(the "Report"),  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the
date hereof (the "Report), the  undersigned,  Delmar  Janovec,  Chief Executive
Officer  and  the  person  performing functions similar to that of a  Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 20, 2006

/s/ Delmar A. Janovec
----------------------------------------------
Delmar A. Janovec, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
#### Timothy Roosevelt BOLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 99-16496.

D.C. No. CV-97-00918-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 2001.*

Decided July 19, 2001.

*730Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Boles’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Timothy Roosevelt Boles appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition on procedural default grounds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258 and we dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(c). This court reviews de novo the district court’s decision to deny the habeas petition on grounds of procedural default. *Manning v. Foster,*224 F.3d 1129, 1133 (9th Cir.2000).

Boles contends the district court erred by denying his petition based on procedural default. Boles was sentenced on April 23, 1993, after a jury convicted him of various burglary, kidnaping, and sexual offenses. Boles filed an appeal after being granted a petition for post-conviction relief allowing him to file a delayed appeal. The Arizona Supreme Court eventually affirmed Boles’s convictions on March 13, 1997. Boles then filed the instant federal habeas corpus petition contending that DNA evidence and related testimony admitted at trial was highly prejudicial and inadmissible, the prosecutor improperly characterized evidence, and that insufficient evidence existed as to two victims. The district court denied the petition based on its conclusion that Boles had procedurally defaulted his claims by not raising them properly in the state court.

Boles contends that appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness in failing to preserve his claims for review is cause for his procedural default and resulted in prejudice. *Edwards v. Carpenter,*529 U.S. 446, 451, 120 S.Ct. 1587, 146 L.Ed.2d 518 (2000). This contention was raised for the first time in Boles’s response to the order to show cause issued by the magistrate judge and was never presented in his habeas petition or in any appeal to the Arizona state courts. Consequently, Boles has not exhausted this claim in state court and the petition should have been dismissed without prejudice. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(c); *Edwards,*429 U.S. at 451, 453 (holding that an ineffective assistance of counsel claim alleged to be cause for the procedural default of other claims is itself an independent claim subject to the procedural requirements of exhaustion.).

VACATED and REMANDED with instructions to dismiss without prejudice and stay the petition pending exhaustion.1

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. All outstanding motions are denied.
Before the First Division,

March 3, 1960

No. 63892.

protests 58/21294, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,

*369Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63893.

protests 59/1810, etc. (New York).

#### Gitkin Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. *N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 105

Expressing the Sense of the Senate that the people of the United States

wish the people of Hong Kong good fortune as they embark on their

historic transition of sovereignty from Great Britain to the People’s

Republic of China.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27, 1997

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. MACK, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ROBB, Mr. THOMAS,

Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. ROTH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. CRAIG)

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the Sense of the Senate that the people of the

United States wish the people of Hong Kong good fortune as they embark on their historic transition of sovereignty from Great Britain to the People’s Republic

of China.

Whereas at one minute past midnight on July 1, 1997, Hong

Kong will cease to be a colonial possession of Great Britain and will return to Chinese sovereignty;

Whereas the people of Hong Kong enjoy civil liberties and political freedoms based on the democratic rule of law and

the functions of a free market;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has promised

through international agreements and Chinese law to pre-
2

SRES 105 ATS

serve Hong Kong’s way of life and to grant the people

of Hong Kong substantial autonomy in self-government;

Whereas the United States is committed through the Hong

Kong Policy Act of 1992 to monitoring, advocating and

reporting on the continuation of Hong Kong’s freedoms

under Chinese rule; and

Whereas the United States enjoys a longstanding commercial,

cultural and political relationship with Hong Kong and a

developing relationship with the People’s Republic of

China: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the people of the United States wish good

3 fortune to the people of Hong Kong as they embark

4 on their historic transition of sovereignty;

5 (2) the United States urges the People’s Repub6 lic of China to honor both the spirit and the letter

7 of its commitments to accord Hong Kong substantial

8 autonomy as a separate administrative region in a

9 China characterized as ‘‘one country, two systems’’;

10 (3) the executive branch should exercise due

11 diligence in enforcing the terms and conditions of

12 the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 and subsequent

13 acts and provisions concerning the protection of civil

14 liberties and the rule of law in Hong Kong;

15 (4) the United States looks forward to continu16 ing its close, productive relationship with the people

17 of Hong Kong; and
3

SRES 105 ATS

1 (5) the United States hopes to develop a posi2 tive, productive relationship with the People’s Re3 public of China based upon shared respect for

4 human dignity and responsible behavior in the inter5 national community of nations.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1





EX-32   ·   Section 1350 Certifications





LUX DIGITAL PICTURES INC.





Pursuant to Section  18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002 (subsection  (a) and (b) of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United  States  Code), each of the undersigned  officers of Lux Digital Pictures Inc., a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual  Report of Form 10-k for the year ended  August 31, 2011  (the  "Form  10-K") of  the Company fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in the  Form  10-K  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Ingo JuchtIngo Jucht,Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

NEIL GRENNING,

Plaintiff,

v.

EILEEN W. BISSON, et al., 

Defendants.

 Case No. C06-5298RJB

ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s letter dated July 25, 2006, and the records and files herein,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The record does not show that the Clerk has received the necessary documentation to conduct

service in this matter. Specifically at issue is the required and completed Marshal’s forms for each of the

named defendants. In his letter, plaintiff states that he would seek to provide those to the court in a timely

fashion but he was unsure as to whether or not he could meet the court’s deadline of August 4, 2006. 

In order to provide Plaintiff a final opportunity to provide the necessary documentation, Plaintiff

shall have until September 26, 2006 to provide the Clerk with the necessary documents. 

(2) The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel of record

DATED this 5thth day of September, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. KELLEY ARNOLD

United States District Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05298-RJB Document 12 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001189

29-DEC-2014

07:48 AM
SCWC-20-0000565

IN THE SUPRME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

__________________________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LOGOVII TALO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and JASON M. 

KRAMBERG, Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000565; CR. N). 1PC161000667)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., 

and Circuit Judge Malinao, in place of Nakayama, J., recused.)

The application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 

2022, by Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant Jason M. 

Kramberg is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 28, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000565

28-SEP-2022

07:57 AM

Dkt. 22 ODAC
Exhibit 31.2


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

        1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN
Holdings, Inc.;

        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and

               c)   presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert      Chief Financial Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert      August 13, 2007
Before the First Division,

October 23, 1967

No. P67/351.

#### Carmichael International Service, a/c Revell, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/11465, etc. (Los Angeles).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - Page 1

Multani, et al./CR06-38RSM

 Judge Ricardo S. Martinez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

The UNITED STATES of AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. CR06-38RSM

)

v. )

) ORDER CONTINUING 

HARMINDER SINGH, et al., ) TRIAL DATE

)

 Defendants. )

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States of America’s motion

to continue the trial date. Having considered the entirety of the record and files herein,

and based on the stipulation of the parties and the waiver of speedy trial filed by

defendant Harminder Singh, the Court finds that due to the complexity of the case, the

recent disclosure of foreign evidence which the government intends to use at trial against

defendant Harminder Singh, and the need for continuity of counsel and effective assistance

of counsel, a failure to grant the continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of

justice. This continuance will allow the government and defendant Harminder Singh to

adequately prepare for trial. 

The Court further finds that the interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial in this case are outweighed by the ends of justice.

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 230 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - Page 2

Multani, et al./CR06-38RSM

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that trial is continued from October 16,

2006, to January 16, 2007, and that the time between the date of this Order and the new

trial date be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United States

Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B(i), and 3161(h)(B)(ii).

Dated this 17 day of October, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

s/ Ye-Ting Woo 

YE-TING WOO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271

(206) 553-2268, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: ye-ting.woo@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar No. 21208

s/ Lisca Borichewski 

LISCA BORICHEWSKI 

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271

(206) 553-2266, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: lisca.borichewski@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar No. 24300

Case 2:06-cr-00038-RSM Document 230 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Ageologic reconnaissance of the Dennison Fork district, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:827
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000961321
 
August 21, 2018
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mistras Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2010, I, Paul Peterik, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.




Date: August 16, 2010

/s/ PAUL PETERIKPAUL PETERIK

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)