alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

January 20, 1954

No. 57782.

protest 166371-K (New York).

#### Import Export Service of N. J. and Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Iñ accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a powder filling machine the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Yardley of London, Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 37, C. D. 1495), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
  
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines,
IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Ellen Z. Lamale
Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary March 13, 2006




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and
 2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Micro Linear Corporation
                                        Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                                         (Unaudited)
                                            (In thousands, except per share data)




                                                  Three Months Ended June 30,
                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          1998                                   1997
                          -------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
<S>                       <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>            <C>
                                                        Per-                                    Per-
                             Income        Shares     Share         Income         Shares     Share
                          (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount     (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
   Basic Income Per
   Share:
   Net income available
     to common
     stockholders                  $61         11,692    $0.01          $2,486       11,829     $0.21

   Effect of dilutive
   securities:                                    395                                 1,565
     Stock options

   Diluted Income Per
   Share:
   Net income available
     to common
     stockholders
   assuming                        $61         12,087    $0.01          $2,486       13,394     $0.19
     dilution



                                                   Six Months Ended June 30,
                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          1998                                   1997
                          -------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
                                                        Per-                                    Per-
                             Income        Shares     Share         Income         Shares     Share
                          (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount     (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
   Basic Income Per
   Share:
   Net income available
     to common
     stockholders                 $631         11,671    $0.05          $4,691       11,912      $0.39

   Effect of dilutive
   securities:                                    484                                 1,434
     Stock options

   Diluted Income Per
   Share:
   Net income available
     to common
     stockholders
   assuming                       $631         12,155    $0.05          $4,691        13,346     $0.35
     dilution
</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Berman Center, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/ Laura
      A.
      Berman





Name: 
      Laura A. Berman, LCSW, PHD.


Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer and President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)







/s/ Carlos
      Bernal





Name:  Carlos
      Bernal


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




November
      14, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required y Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Berman Center, Inc. and will be retained by Berman Center, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 66112.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/14040, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of nylon gill nets similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 63947, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1006, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for gill nets, wholly or in chief value of flax or ramie, by similitude, or at 22% percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877). The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of nylon or manryo fish netting the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 63947, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, for cotton fishing nets, by similitude. The items marked “C,” stipulated to consist of nylon mending twine similar in use to flax rope or twine used in tying together gill nets, were held dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 1004(b), as modified by T.D. 51802, for twines and cords, composed of two or more yarns wholly or in chief value of flax, by similitude. The items marked “D,” stipulated to consist of nylon or manryo twine or rope used with nets similar in use to cotton rope, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 912 of the act as cotton cords, by similitude, or at 31% percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108). *(United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD A. HOOPES,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5316KLS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s filing of an application to proceed in forma

pauperis and a complaint to review and set aside a decision of the Social Security Administration under 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). To file a complaint and initiate legal proceedings plaintiff must pay a filing fee of $350.00

or file a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis.

By requesting the court to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is asking the government to incur

the filing fee because he allegedly is unable to afford the costs necessary to proceed with his cause of

action. Local Rule CR 3(b) provides in relevant part:

At the time application is made under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or other applicable acts of

Congress, for leave to commence any civil action or to file any petition or motion without

being required to prepay fees and costs or give security for them, each petitioner, movant

or plaintiff shall:

(1) Complete the in forma pauperis affidavit approved for use in this district; and

(2) File a written consent that the recovery, if any, in the action, to such amount as

the court may direct, shall be paid to the clerk who may pay therefrom all unpaid fees and

costs taxed against the plaintiff, and to his attorney the amount which the court allows or

Case 3:06-cv-05316-RJB Document 2 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

approves as compensation for the attorney’s services.

Plaintiff, however, has not submitted the written consent required by Local Rule CR 3(b)(2). 

Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS as follows:

(1) Plaintiff shall seek to cure this deficiency by filing no later than July 22, 2006, the written

consent required by Local Rule CR 3(b)(2). 

Failure to cure this deficiency by the above date shall be deemed a failure to properly

prosecute this matter and the Court will recommend dismissal of this matter.

(2) The clerk is directed to send a copies of this Order to counsel for plaintiff.

DATED this 22nd day of June, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05316-RJB Document 2 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      237
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (55)
<INVENTORY>                                         18
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,826
<PP&E>                                           4,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,321
<SALES>                                         12,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,718
<CGS>                                            9,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (22)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      90
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00177-CR

No. 05-15-00178-CR

CHARNEEQUA ANETASI SHERRIA HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-53802-R, F14-59240-R

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,521
<SECURITIES>                                    33,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,646
<PP&E>                                          25,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,053
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,528
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,504)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.88)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 66596.

#### Impecco, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 61/646, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing reels with two spools similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Charles Garcia*& *Co., Inc.*(48 C.C.P.A. 140, C.A.D. 780), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
October 31, 1962

No. 67163.

Appeal 5089.

#### Lanston Industries, Inc. *v.*United States.

Abstract 65690 reversed August 2, 1962. C.A.D. 807.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31980L0368

**Eleventh Council Directive 80/368/EEC of 26 March 1980 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - exclusion of the French overseas departments from the scope of Directive 77/388/EEC***Official Journal L 090 , 03/04/1980 P. 0041 - 0041 Finnish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0003  Greek special edition: Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0120  Swedish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0003  Spanish special edition: Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0125  Portuguese special edition Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0125*

ELEVENTH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE  of 26 March 1980  on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - exclusion of the French overseas departments from the scope of Directive 77/388/EEC  (80/368/EEC)

  THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 

 Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Articles 99 and 100 thereof, 

 Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, 

 Whereas the third subparagraph of Article 227 (2) of the Treaty requires that the institutions of the Community should, within the framework of the procedures provided for in the Treaty, take care that the economic and social development of the French overseas departments is possible; 

 Whereas, in accordance with the judgment handed down by the Court of Justice on 10 October 1978 in Case 148/77, the Treaty and secondary legislation apply in the French overseas departments unless a decision is taken by the Community institutions adopting measures particularly suited to the economic and social conditions of those departments; 

 Whereas, for reasons connected with their geographic, economic and social situation, the French overseas departments should be excluded from the scope of the common system of value added tax as established by Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1); 

 Whereas implementation of this Directive does not involve any amendment of the laws of the Member States, 

 HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

   Article 1

 The following indent shall be added to Article 3 (2) of Directive 77/388/EEC: 

 "- French Republic:   - the overseas departements." 

 Article 2

 This Directive shall apply with effect from 1 January 1979. 

 Article 3

 This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

   Done at Brussels, 26 March 1980. 

 For the Council 

 The President 

 G. MARCORA  (1)OJ No L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1.
Exhibit 32
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an officer of Urecoats Industries Inc., that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Urecoats Industries Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Urecoats Industries Inc.
 
 
 Date: August 14, 2003
**URECOATS INDUSTRIES INC.**By:Michael T. AdamsPrinciple Executive Officer ****By:John G. BarbarChief Financial Officer
- HOME
      - NEWS  PodcastsIG Statements and ReleasesNew Audit / Evaluation StartsCongressional TestimonyIG ScheduleCongress / Media Protocols
      - REPORTS  **Audit and Evaluation Reports****Special Reports**SemiannualCompendium of Unimplemented RecommendationsAnnual SuperfundCongressionally RequestedEPA's Key Mgmt ChallengesFAIR ActPlanning and Performance
      - INVESTIGATIONS  Employee Integrity CasesResults of InvestigationsAudit Reports
      - OIG HOTLINE  Recognizing Fraud, Waste, and AbuseAbout the HotlineWhat to ReportWhistleblower ProtectionWhistleblower Ombudsman**File a Hotline Complaint Now**
      - ABOUT  Who, What, WhyVision and Mission StatmentIG BiographyOffice OrganizationU.S. Chemical Safety BoardResource Links
      - CONTACT  Full Contact Info**Subscribe to EPA OIG**Suggestions for Audits and EvaluationsOIG CareersReport a ViolationFOIA Requests

# EPA's Key Management Challenges

 The Office of Inspector General annually identifies top management challenges for EPA. 

----

Special Reports Sorted by Type: **EPA's Key Management Challenges**           « All Reports

 You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.  See EPA's PDF page to learn more.
| Challenges Reports                                                          | Date              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2013 [PDF, 18pp, 3,872KB]                   | July 1, 2013      |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2012 [PDF, 20pp, 2,762KB]                   | June 5, 2012      |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2011 [PDF, 19pp, 4,821KB]                   | June 29, 2011     |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2010 [PDF, 21pp, 180KB]                     | May 11, 2010      |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2009 [PDF, 24pp, 274KB]                     | April 28, 2009    |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2008 [PDF, 18pp, 227KB]                     | July 2, 2008      |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2007 [PDF, 18pp, 215KB        					      ] | April 19, 2007    |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2006 [PDF,        					      14pp, 161KB]  | April 21, 2006    |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2005 [PDF, 22pp, 393KB]                     | April 25, 2005    |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2004 [PDF,                27pp, 172KB]     | April 21, 2004    |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2003 [PDF,                22pp, 311KB]     | May 22, 2003      |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2002 [PDF, 18pp, 212KB]                     | September 6, 2002 |
| EPA's Key Management Challenges 2001 [PDF, 18pp, 95KB]                      | December 17, 2001 |
Top of page

EPAFOIARECOVERY.govUSA.govWhite HouseCSB.govPrivacy and Security@EPAoigOIG Site Map**Office of Inspector General**OIG Hotline:

Follow @EPAoig