alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY ROSENAU,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-157MJP

GOVERNMENT’S

SURREPLY

The United States of America, by and through Jenny A. Durkan, United States

Attorney for the Western District of Washington, and Susan M. Roe, Assistant United States

Attorney for said District, files this surreply, which is a transcript of the referenced testimony

of Special Agent Jesse Miller. This is provided to give the Court a complete picture of the

//

//

//

//

//

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

GOVERNMENT’S SUR-REPLY/ ROSENAU- 1

CR06-157MJP

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 39 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

context of remarks noted in the defense pleadings.

DATED this 29 day of September, 2011.

th

Respectfully submitted,

JENNY A. DURKAN

United States Attorney

s/Susan M. Roe

SUSAN M. ROE

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-1077

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: susan.roe@usdoj.gov

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

GOVERNMENT’S SUR-REPLY/ ROSENAU- 2

CR06-157MJP

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 39 Filed 09/29/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 29, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the attorney(s) of record for the defendant(s). I hereby certify that I have served the

attorney(s) of record for the defendant(s) that are non CM/ECF participants via telefax.

s/ Lissette Duran-Leutz

Lissette Duran-Leutz

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney’s Office

Western District of Washington

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-7234

Fax: (206) 553-2502

E-mail: Lissette.I.Duran-Leutz@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 39 Filed 09/29/11 Page 3 of 3
No. 56186.

protest 171361-K (Pembina).

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the case was called for trial, plaintiff moved for dismissal, to which defendant agreed. The protest was therefore dismissed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT**


**TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SafeStitch
      Medical, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SafeStitch
                Medical, Inc.




By:
            /s/
                Adam S. JacksonAdam
                S. JacksonChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                12, 2008





The
      certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
      of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of SafeStitch Medical, Inc.
      or the certifying officers.
# Official Journal C 428I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 428I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6311 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 428I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6311 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 428 I/01 | Notice on the Union-wide quantity of allowances for 2021 and the Market Stability Reserve under the EU Emissions Trading System (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 428 I/01

Notice on the Union-wide quantity of allowances for 2021 and the Market Stability Reserve under the EU Emissions Trading System (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Custom er Service Hotline: 1 - 800 - 438 - 2474 UNITED STA

TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029
January 26, 2011 Ms. Joy ce E. Epps, Director Pennsy lvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 2063 Dear Ms. Epps: On J anuary

4 , 2011, t he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsy lvania State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from th e Pennsy lvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). Th is revision pertains to amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129, which amends the existing regulations at §§ 121.1, 129.51, 129.52, an d adds new § 129.52b for control of volatile orga nic compound (VOC) emissions from paper, film, and foil surface coating processes. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). If members of y ou r staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Irene Shandruk , Office of Air Program Planning, at 215
- 814
- 2166
. Sh e is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher , Director A ir Protection Division
cc: Arle en Shulman, PADEP
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRIAN PLASKON, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF

KING COUNTY d/b/a VALLEY MEDICAL

CENTER et al.,

Defendants.

 No. CV6-367RSL

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ “Motion for Leave to File Overlength

Brief” (Dkt. #30). The motion is GRANTED.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00367-RSL Document 31 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 1
From: Mark.A

- CTR.Jordan@faa.gov [mailto:Mark.A

- CTR.Jordan@faa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 7:28 AM To: Smet, Robert Subject: FW: Information concerning the use of a drone at a community college_Wenatchee Valley Community College_Smet
My name is Mark Jordan and I am the point of contact for Universities and Colleges nationwide regarding COA application for Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) integration into the National Airspace System (NAS). The following information is provided to assist you in obtaining information on Certificate of Waiver/Authorization (COA) for the University/College for which you are affiliated. A public operation is one that is intrinsically governmental in nature (i.e., Federal, State, and local agencies). Proponent s requesting approval of public aircraft operations by UAS will use the COA application process. The operating authority for a UAS that supports type of operations you have described and is not a government function under Title 49 United States Code (49 U SC) section 40125(a)(2), therefore the proposed operation would not be a public aircraft operation for which the Certificate of Authorization (COA) authorization is intended. You will however, need some authority to operate under the conditions you describ e. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has released an interpretation which I have attached that goes into some detail regarding this. The FAA has implemented the provisions of Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, “Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” which will allow for commercial operations in low

- risk, controlled environments. Based on the information you have provided, this may be an option for you. I cannot at this time give you a timeline for how long this process will take, however Section 333 exemptions are being granted, as of the end of 2014. Proponents requesting approval for private a nd civil operation will use the Section 333 exemptions. If you have any additional questions about the Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 petition process, please contact Shanora Davis at (202) 267

- 7540 or email Shanora.Davis@faa. gov .
Please visit our website for additional details. Check the “news” links for recent “News and Updates Stories.” http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/ For Petition: http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/how_to_file_a_petition/

Mark Jordan Airspace Analyst JMA Solutions, supporting Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office, Emerging Technologies Team AJV

- 115 University/College Liais on 470 L’Enfant Plaza, SW Suite 7105 Washington, DC 20024 (202) 267

- 8174 Mark.A

- CTR.Jordan@faa.gov
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-063 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xinan Zeng, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bakhu Holdings Corp.
      for the year ended July 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Bakhu Holdings Corp.                                                           

Dated: December 14, 2009



| | /s/ Xinan Zeng                                                     
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Xinan Zeng                                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer    
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                                  
| | Bakhu Holdings Corp.                                               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bakhu
Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Bakhu Holdings Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 2:05-cr-00407-RSM Document 29 Filed 08/25/08 Page 1 of 1
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the date of June 26, 1998, marks the 50th anniversary of the commencement of the Allied effort to supply

the people of Berlin, Germany, with food, fuel, and supplies in the face of the illegal Soviet blockade that divided

the city;

Whereas this 15 month Allied effort became known throughout the free world as the ‘‘Berlin Airlift’’ and ultimately

cost the lives of 78 Allied airmen, of whom 31 were

United States fliers;

Whereas this heroic humanitarian undertaking was universally regarded as an unambiguous statement of Western

resolve to thwart further Soviet expansion;

Whereas the Berlin Airlift was an unqualified success, both

as an instrument of diplomacy and as a life saving rescue

of the 2,000,000 inhabitants of West Berlin, with

2,326,205 tons of supplies delivered by 277,728 flights

over a 462-day period;

Whereas historians and citizens the world over view the success of this courageous action as pivotal to the ultimate

defeat of international tyranny, symbolized today by the

fall of the Berlin Wall; and
2

SCON 81 ES

Whereas this inspiring act of resolve must be preserved in the

memory of future generations in a positive and dramatic

manner: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Berlin Airlift, which marks its 50th an4 niversary of commencement in June 1998, is one of

5 the most significant events in post-war European

6 history; and

7 (2) the Berlin Sculpture Fund should be com8 mended for commemorating the 50th anniversary of

9 the Berlin Airlift by presenting to the citizens of the

10 Federal Republic of Germany a gift of representa11 tional art, funded by private subscriptions from citi12 zens of the United States.

Passed the Senate June 26, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the Berlin Airlift and commending the

Berlin Sculpture Fund.
March 11, 1959

No. 62845.

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/1279.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 62325.

#### Stoffel & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 164355-K and 161408-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
SERVE D AUGUS T 29 , 201 1 

### p^PARTMEN TO f U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSl^ORTATlO N :''A;v3PORlAriO N •

OFFIC E O FHEARING S --'^^ ' OPER/^TION S WASHINGTON , D C 

### M MJ G 3 0 A9 : 3 3 I N TH E MATTERO F CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Aclion ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-077 7

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2010SW270072 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s an dothe r

eommunication s regardin g this proceedin g shal l b e ser\'e do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , andth e other person s o n th e attache dScr\'ic e List .

RonAie A . Yoder' ' Chie f Administrativ e Laji

^ Judg e Attaclimen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S NO . FAA-2011-077 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbur Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Thoma s Neurto n Boiling , Responden l ' s Counse l Vic e President

an dAssociat e General Counse l Unite dAirline s an

dContinenta l Airlines , Inc. , Responden l 1 1 W . Wacker

Drive-le'" " Floo r Chicago , I L 6060 1 TEL : 312-997-806 8 FAX : 312-997-806 8 Ti m Duff , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 Southwes t Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd . Ft . Worth , T

X 76193-000 7 TEL817-222-509 9 FA X 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwin , Administraiiv c La w Judg e U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-A dviso r

202

- 366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e lli e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Allenlion : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
— ~^t a ^ RECE8VEB ilk La fV (W^ Q£ Criminal fty^lSO^OFCRBfi^/ujS^

-AU8-22-2M5-

%s! ^soste, Cta

v .

^^aieOl_T^as_ AUG 2? 2015-

Abel Acosta, Cierk

ri^ELLftQT'S \&A\\vc>^ ^pR P\S(lJ-e^o(VX^y VNgVi£u)

Tp'rW>e> V\ptQfl^(ts^JtxM^s &$ "W- CoLt^A- 04- dfeifa'orvA hfrftgols ;

JX^idlW^JkUAaJ^H^^

~*VW C^ucV beW-> ts. fcimired ^v^TvcJr (Wet Uawber ^>ijdu\.

> 1 .'•'.'

'I
JL

Aad a. *10,000 £;n&. , ...

fVppe\W3r is> pro^geDin^ j>rosg 1a Hire abor>g. oa^sc

ie^aSj ; : : ; :

m. ;

Ta Support o-f V&jL tf)o\\Or> •ftpp&lWV ujfto vs praceeibifiCi

Prose, ;^> oAo^Qe£> &&Ges>s \o^y„ u^iH vVxu>Ubraca'' oniu 10 koars

^ef u>ee,Vl. r\^ \W.V must Mncw*A ~uXiW' q^ oC Wit aocur^a/iVs

'lAciu/^rva cwia c**^ Uu> Icr/tEeD fl.p/jt &-\Wfr disposal, n^p^iWV ^O^L

-——— WUUp-^> TRAP : ; V?>(WM^ ——~-~——r— rcaaiftgs, Upoo'&Um ~y —^y.&-^g\c4ton -_Fc

_^^£l^J3QQg^y-Jjc^^ -*?Agp VjOl^-^C

1 \ ( _ _ _ _

i ''

-2-
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR REMAND

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ROBIN JERMYN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0542-RSL-MAT

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR REMAND

Defendant has filed a Motion for Remand (Dkt. 14) and noted it on the court’s motions

calendar for September 29, 2006. The briefing scheduling order (Dkt. 10) sets out a time frame

for briefing from both parties, and in particular directs defendant to file a responsive brief in lieu

of a dispositive motion. In order to maintain the schedule already established by the court,

defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be considered by the court as an answering brief

requesting remand instead of a separate summary judgment motion, and the court hereby

STRIKES the noting date contained within the caption of defendant’s Motion. Plaintiff’s optional

reply brief is still due no later than September 25, 2006. Within the reply brief, plaintiff should

Case 2:06-cv-00542-RSL Document 15 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR REMAND

PAGE -2

indicate whether he agrees with the Commissioner’s request for remand.

DATED this 12th day of September, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00542-RSL Document 15 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. P67/363.

#### Traveler Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 66/33446, etc. (New York).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature hunting knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 301, Abstract 67195), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,058,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,038,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (147,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    184,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,200,000
<PP&E>                                      15,343,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,557,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,726,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,818,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       283,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,726,000
<SALES>                                      4,922,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,382,000
<CGS>                                        4,583,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,822,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             170,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                390,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    74,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            316,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   316,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>