alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 665

[RTID 0648-XD434]


Pacific Island Fisheries; 2023 Northwestern Hawaiian Islands 
Lobster Harvest Guideline

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notification of lobster harvest guideline.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS establishes the annual harvest guideline for the 
commercial lobster fishery in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) 
for calendar year 2023 at zero lobsters.

DATES: October 6, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Kamikawa, NMFS PIRO Sustainable 
Fisheries, 808-725-5177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the NWHI commercial lobster 
fishery under the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the Hawaiian Archipelago. 
The regulations at 50 CFR 665.252(b) require NMFS to publish an annual 
harvest guideline for lobster Permit Area 1, comprised of Federal 
waters around the NWHI.
    Regulations governing the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National 
Monument in the NWHI prohibit the unpermitted removal of monument 
resources (50 CFR 404.7), and establish a zero annual harvest guideline 
for lobsters (50 CFR 404.10(a)). Accordingly, NMFS establishes the 
harvest guideline for the NWHI commercial lobster fishery for calendar 
year 2023 at zero lobsters. Harvest of NWHI lobster resources is not 
allowed.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 3, 2023.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22288 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
No. P67/151.

No. P67/152.

#### William Adams, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/8350 and 66/17237 (New York).

#### William Adams, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 66/28986 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of various decorated glassware items similar in all material respects to those the subject of *William Adams, Inc. v. United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670) the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEITH L. NASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5127 RJB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS

IN EXCESS OF RULE 

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Presently

before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to take more than ten depositions as provided by Fed. R. Civ.

P. 30(a)(2)(A). (Dkt. # 79). Plaintiff seeks to depose the thirteen named Defendants in this case. 

Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s motion, but request that Plaintiff seek Court approval prior to

agreeing to the depositions in excess of those allowed by the rules. (Dkt. # 79 at 3).

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to take the depositions of the named Defendants in this case

is GRANTED.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 84 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 1
October 20, 2010

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System

400 7th Street SW, Plaza 401

Washington, DC 20591-0001

Re: Exemption No. 4298, Docket No. 23290

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR) § 11.61, the Air Transport Association of 

America, Inc. (ATA), on behalf of its member airlines1/and other similarly situated part 121 certificate holders, 

petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 4298L (Docket No. 23290). This exemption is scheduled to expire on 

March 31, 2011.

Exemption No. 4298L provides relief from §§ 121.311(f) and 121.391(d) of Title 14 CFR and permits ATA 

member airlines and other similarly situated part 121 certificate holders’ required flight attendants to be located at 

the mid-cabin flight attendant station during takeoff and landing on Boeing 767 airplanes.

The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, which warranted the 

original grant of exemption, continue to exist. This exemption and its predecessor, Exemption No. 4298, have been 

in use for almost eighteen years with no known compromise of safety.

____________________________________

1/Operator Members: 

ABX Air, AirTran Airlines, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, ASTAR Air Cargo, Atlas Air, Continental Airlines, Delta 

Air Lines, Evergreen International, Federal Express, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Polar Air Cargo, Southwest 

Airlines, United Airlines, UPS, US Airways.

Associate Members: 

Aeromexico, Air Canada, Air Jamaica, and Mexicana. 
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

Docket No. 23290

October 20, 2010

Page Two

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. ATA believes that there is just cause to waive the 

requirement of public notice of this petition. There is no substantial change to the exemption and the renewal of this 

exemption is not precedent setting, therefore, ATA requests that publication in the Federal Register be waived as 

unnecessary.

A summary of this petition as required by 14 CFR §11.81 is attached. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (202) 626-4012.

Very truly yours,

AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION

OF AMERICA, INC.

 By: __________________________ 

Paul W. Railsback

Director - Operations

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Suite 1100

Washington, D.C. 20004-1707 

(202) 626-4012

prailsback@airlines.org

Attachment
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

Docket No. 23290

October 20, 2010

Attachment

SUMMARY OF ATA PETITION

The Air Transport Association, Inc., on behalf of its member airlines and other similarly situated Part 

121 operators, petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 4298 Exemption No. 4298 provides relief 

from 14CFR §§ 121.391(d) and 121.311(f) and permits required flight attendant(s) to be located at the 

mid-cabin flight attendant station during takeoff and landing on Boeing 767 aircraft.
Exhibit32.1

 

**Section      1350 Certification**

 

In    connection with the filing of the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A    for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") by Cellular Technical    Services Company, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies    that:

 

|   | 1. | The          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the          Registrant.                                                         |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | By:    | /s/Stephen            Katz                                                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Stephen        KatzChief        Executive Officer        August 29, 2007

  |

 

|   | By:    | /s/Kenneth            Block                                                                  |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Kenneth Block        Secretary    and Chief Financial Officer        August 29, 2007

  |

 

A    signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has    been provided to Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and will be retained    by Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities    and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

 

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rene VICIOSO-AYRA, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 01-1051.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 19, 2001.

*32Gene V. Primomo, Ass’t Pub. Defender, Albany, NY, for appellant.

Barbara D. Cottrell, Ass’t U.S. Att’y, NDNY, Albany, NY, for appellee.

Present Van GRAAFEILAND, KEARSE, Circuit Judges, and SEYBERT, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Joanna Seybert, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Defendant Rene Vicioso-Ayra, appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, following his plea of guilty before Lawrence E. Kahn, *Judge,*convicting him of being found in the United States without the permission of the United States Attorney General, after having been deported following conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and sentencing him principally to 49 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, he contends that a sentence longer than two years was improper under *Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530*U.S. *466, 120*S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the indictment did not allege his prior conviction of an aggravated felony, and such a conviction was neither admitted by him nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that such a sentence was nonetheless permissible in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-*Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and that *Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres;*however, he pursues this appeal in order to preserve the issue for review in the Supreme Court. *(See*Vicioso-Ayra brief on appeal at 6.) We conclude that the appeal lacks merit for the reasons stated in *United States v. Latorre-Benavides,*241 F.3d 262, 264 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2013, 149 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2001).

We have considered all of Vicioso-Ayra’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
PEORIA

Lake Pleasant

Regional Park

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

Sheep

Mountain

RMZ

Castle Hot Springs

SRMA

Yavapai

Marico

C

pa C

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Tule

Creek

ACEC

Hieroglyphic

Mountains RMZ

Lake Pleasant/

Agua Fria SCRMA

Baldy Mt RMZ

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 21

Castle Hot Springs

Management Unit

Multiple Resource Allocations &

Special Area Designations

0 1 2 3 4

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Resource Allocations

Special Area Designation

Area of Critical

Environmental Concern

(ACEC)

County Boundary

Special Recreation

Management Area (SRMA)

Recreation Management

Zone (RMZ)

Special Cultural Resource

Management Area

(SCRMA) - Public Use
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                       MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                   823,517
<SECURITIES>                           1,217,679
<RECEIVABLES>                             74,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              550,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,713,113
<PP&E>                                   537,964
<DEPRECIATION>                           471,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,187,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    355,550
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                              16,436,870
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,187,341
<SALES>                                   84,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          84,480
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            126,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         677,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (669,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (669,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           (669,064)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.12)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





The undersigned certify that:



(1)       The accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)       The information contained in the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/Afairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 29, 2010
     /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. Drill
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)






Date:  January 29, 2010
     /s/ Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. Shireman
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)








---
No. 55003.

#### William E. Emig *v.*United States,

protest 163828-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the record disclosing that the protest was prematurely filed, the motion to dismiss was granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,338
<PP&E>                                         384,816
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,441,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,946,423
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     55,035
<COMMON>                                       723,177
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,415,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,441,360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,552,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,551,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (568)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,552,521)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.023)


</TABLE>
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[proposed] ORDER GRANTING

DEFS’ MOTION TO FILE AN OVER-LENGTH BRIEF

CASE NO. CV06-0204C - 1

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM';

OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a

Washington limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

NO. CV06-0204JCC

[proposed] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

FILE AN OVER-LENGTH BRIEF

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:

January 22, 2007

THIS MATTER has come before the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 7(f), on the

Defendants Scott Lynn, Virtumundo, Inc. ("Virtumundo") and Adknowledge, Inc.

("Adknowledge") (collectively, "Defendants"), hereby request that the Court grant leave

to file a brief in excess of the twenty-four (24) page limit imposed by LR 7(e)(3), in

support of the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”).

Having reviewed the Defendants’ Motion to File Overlength Brief in Support of

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 97-2 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 97 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[proposed] ORDER GRANTING

DEFS’ MOTION TO FILE AN OVER-LENGTH BRIEF

CASE NO. CV06-0204C - 2

Motion for Summary Judgment, and finding good cause for granting Defendants’ motion,

the Court hereby rules as follows:

Defendants’ Motion to File Overlength Brief is hereby GRANTED. Defendants

are granted leave to file a brief in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment with six

(6) additional pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages. Plaintiffs may likewise file a thirty

(30) page brief in support of their repsonse.

DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.

_______________________________________

HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 97-2 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-123M

)

v. )

)

MATIAS VALENCIA-MERAZ, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: March 15, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. The defendant was represented by Jay Stansell.

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00123-MJB Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Washington are unknown/unverified; and the Bureau of Immigration,

Customs and Enforcement (“BICE”) has filed a detainer.

(2) Due to his extensive criminal record and numerous drug convictions, 

defendant is viewed as a risk of danger to the community.

(3) Defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

//

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00123-MJB Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00123-MJB Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3