alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                       733
<INVENTORY>                                        119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,020
<PP&E>                                          13,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,931
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,555
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,063
<SALES>                                          9,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,854
<CGS>                                            3,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

February 10, 2000

Mr. Neil Friedman
President Fisher-Price Brands
Mattel, Inc.
333 Continental Boulevard
El Segundo, California 90245-5012

Re:  Amendment to Your Employment Agreement and Stock Option Grant Agreements
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Neil:

          Pursuant to action taken by Mattel's Board of Directors and
Compensation Committee on February 1, 2000 to amend Mattel's 1990 and 1996 Stock
Option Plans (the "Plans") and to amend the Grant Agreements for Non-Qualified
Stock Options ("Grant Agreements") with respect to all of the stock options
which you hold under the Plans and which are outstanding as of February 1, 2000
(the "Outstanding Options"), this letter agreement constitutes an amendment to
each of your Grant Agreements and your Employment Agreement with Mattel.

          Notwithstanding any provision of your Grant Agreements or of your
Employment Agreement to the contrary, in the event that your employment with
Mattel is terminated (i) by Mattel without Cause (as defined in your Employment
Agreement), (ii) by you for Good Reason (as defined in your Employment
Agreement), (iii) by you for any reason during the 30-day period immediately
following the six (6) month anniversary of a Change of Control (as defined in
your Employment Agreement) or (iv) by reason of your death or Disability (as
defined in you Employment Agreement), all of the Outstanding Options shall
become immediately exercisable and you shall have until the date which is ten
(10) years from the date each Outstanding Option was granted to exercise such
Outstanding Option.

          I would appreciate it if you would sign, date and return a copy of
this letter agreement to me.  As such, it will constitute a written amendment to
your Grant Agreements and your Employment Agreement.

Sincerely yours,
Mattel, Inc.

By /s/ Alan Kaye
  ________________________________
  Alan Kaye
  Senior Vice President, Human Resources

Agreed to and accepted by:

   /s/ Neil Friedman
__________________________________          Dated: February 16, 2000
Neil Friedman
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 6, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.206 Money Market Mutual Fund Shares** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
April 6, 1964

No. 68436.

protests 61/727 and 61/1600.

#### Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. *v.*United States,

Protests dismissed February 5, 1964.

(Not. published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Lake Forest Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Taylor, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Taylor
------------------------------------
Jeffrey Taylor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
September 28, 2015

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC  50249

      Re:   Medwave, Inc.
            File No. 0-26192
            Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
            as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentleman:

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medwave Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Timothy O'Malley, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any
      other purpose whatsoever.

Date: February 28, 2003               Medwave, Inc.


                                      By: /s/ Timothy J. O'Malley
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Timothy J. O'Malley
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Financial Officer)




                                       11
No. 65269.

#### F. J. Strauss Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22855 and 60/22856 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the vinyl bags weighed 32 grams each, the merchandise was held dutiable on said weight, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
#### Erno SETHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MALEV-HUNGARIAN AIRLINES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-9325.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 12, 2001.

Erno Sethy, pro se.

Andrew J. Harakas, Condon & Forsyth, Stephen J. Fearon, Anthony U. Battista, of counsel, New York, NY, for appellees.

Present CABRANES, STRAUB, and SACK, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Erno Sethy, *pro se,*appeals from a grant of summary judgment entered in favor of Malev-Hungarian Airlines by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 5, 2000. *See Sethy v. Malev-Hungarian Airlines, Inc.,*2000 WL 1234660 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.31, 2000). The District Court held that Seth/s claim against Malev-Hungarian Airlines did not involve an “accident” under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, *see*Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air concluded at Warsaw, Poland, October 12, 1929, 49 Stat. 3000, T.S. No. 876, *reprinted in*49 U .S.C. § 40105.

We have considered all of Sethy’s claims on appeal and find them to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Schwartz in his opinion dated August 31, 2000.
# Official Journal L 224/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.224.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5326 August 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.224.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 224

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5326 August 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 761/2010 of 25 August 2010 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance methylprednisolone (1) | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 762/2010 of 25 August 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2010/466/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 24 August 2010 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of penthiopyrad in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
  (notified under document C(2010) 5556)

   (1) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 761/2010 of 25 August 2010 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance methylprednisolone (1)

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 762/2010 of 25 August 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

DECISIONS

2010/466/EU

*

Commission Decision of 24 August 2010 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of penthiopyrad in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
  (notified under document C(2010) 5556)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2010) 5556)

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**D.3 Credit Market Debt Outstanding by Sector1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Before the Second Division,

June 5, 1967

No. P67/182.

#### Baumrin Bros. *v.*United States,

protest 66/53637 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consist of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,103,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  599,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,403,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,204,996
<PP&E>                                       1,190,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 243,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,327,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,727,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,615
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,865,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,327,181
<SALES>                                      1,549,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,549,604
<CGS>                                        1,392,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,695,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (23,924)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,514,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,516,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,516,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DALEA A. WALLACE,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-0073 JPD

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, MATTHEW THOMAS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable JAMES P. DONOHUE.

Date: FEBRUARY 1, 2008

Time: 11:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

January 28, 2008.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00073 Document 41 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-157129) pertaining to the China Distance Education Holdings Limited Share Incentive Plan and the China Distance Education Holdings Limited 2008 Performance Incentive Plan of China Distance Education Holdings Limited
(the Company) of our report dated December 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended September 30, 2008.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming              
|Shenzhen, the Peoples Republic of China
|March 13, 2009
No. 53299.

protest 144296-K (New York).

#### Gedeon Richter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-1 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-1 Filed 10/25/12 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-1 Filed 10/25/12 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 176-1 Filed 10/25/12 Page 4 of 4
September 9, 1958

No. 62337.

Suit 4935.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1897 reversed June 24, 1958. C. A. D. 685.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Ocean Optique Distributors, Inc. For the six months
ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         (165)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                   343
<INVENTORY>                                    4,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,546
<PP&E>                                         1,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                 751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,870
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,106
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,969
<SALES>                                        4,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,316
<CGS>                                          2,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Report and Recommendation

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT W. SHEAFFER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5001RBL

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S

I.F.P. APPLICATION

Noted for February 3, 2006

The court has reviewed petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1). The

court finds and recommends:

(1). Plaintiff is in state custody at the Special Commitment Center and in his application, plaintiff

indicates that he has $500.00 in savings and a bi-weekly income of approximately $100.00 

(2). The district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed in forma pauperis upon completion

of a proper affidavit of indigency. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, the court has broad discretion in

denying an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963),

cert. denied, 375 U.S. 845 (1963). Several district courts have ruled that denial of in forma pauperis

status is not unreasonable when the plaintiff is able to pay the initial expenses required to commence a

lawsuit. See Temple v. Ellerthorpe, 586 F.Supp. 848 (D.R.I. 1984); Braden v. Estelle, 428 F.Supp. 595

(S.D.Tex. 1977); U.S. ex rel. Irons v. Com. of Pa., 407 F.Supp. 746 (M.D.Pa. 1976); Shimabuku v.

Britton, 357 F.Supp. 825 (D.Kan. 1973), aff'd, 503 F.2d 38 (10th Cir. 1974); Ward v. Werner, 61 F.R.D.

Case 3:06-cv-05001-RBL Document 3 Filed 01/09/2006 Page 1 of 2

Sheaffer v. Lehman Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Report and Recommendation

Page - 2

639 (M.D.Pa. 1974).

(3) Based on the above, the Court should deny plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis,. 

Plaintiff has not shown that he is unable to pay the full filing fee ($250.00) to proceed with his lawsuit. 

(4) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.R.Civ.P.

6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to

set the matter for consideration on February 3, 2006, as noted in the caption.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05001-RBL Document 3 Filed 01/09/2006 Page 2 of 2