alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

FELIPE ORTIZ-SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-202M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count I: Unlawful entry, first offense (misdemeanor) in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1325(a)(2).

Count II: Unlawful entry, second offense (felony) in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(2).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance, 4/28/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required. If new issues surface, then the defendant may request

another hearing on release.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Complaint for Violation dated April 26, 2005, criminal records are cited that

reflect prior serious offenses committed by Defendant. In addition, the Complaint notes several

Case 2:05-cr-00175-JLR Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

violations relating to deportation and removal.

(2) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(3) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserves the right to the possibility

of a subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances. 

(4) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably assure

the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2005.

s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00175-JLR Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 8,824.

#### M'INTIRE’S CASE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 157.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1803.

Juror — Oath—Affirmation.

Juror not permitted to affirm.

Samuel M’Intire being summoned as a juror in the cause of Whelan v. Whelan [unreported], and refusing to be sworn, although offering to affirm, and stating that he never had been sworn, but had been often affirmed •on juries in other states as well as in this court; that he preferred affirming to swearing; that he was not a Quaker, nor attached to any particular religious sect; was ordered into custody of the marshal until the further order of this court Upon his offering to be sworn without kissing the book, but holding up his hand, he was discharged.
### Section 10 Any Public Comments and Responses See Attachments : 

# +Public Comments and Responses
Exhibit 31.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN Holdings,
Inc.;
        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of and updated to the date of this quarterly report
(the Evaluation Date); and

               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert       Chief Executive Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert        May 16, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 159 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 159

     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic leader.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
distinguished Democratic leader, the Senator from South Dakota, the 
Honorable Thomas A. Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the 
cooperative and dedicated manner in which he has performed his 
leadership responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business during 
the first session of the 105th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HAROLD GLEN BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5073 RBL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. # 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. Karen

L. Strombom.

DATED this 5th day of July, 2006.ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05073-RBL Document 12 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 76-5726.

#### Auler *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 12.1



|                                                                                  |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                                                                  |  | For Years Ended December 31,
|Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                          |  | 2007                         |           | 2006
|(in thousands, except ratios)                                                     |  |                             
|Earnings                                                                          |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|Income before assessments and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                            | 96,257    |      | $ | 35,087   
|Fixed charges                                                                     |  |                              | 2,835,663 |      |   | 2,456,559
|                                                                                  |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|Earnings available for fixed charges                                              |  | $                            | 2,931,920 |      | $ | 2,491,646
|                                                                                  |  |                             
|Fixed Charges                                                                     |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|Interest expense on consolidated obligations                                      |  | $                            | 2,786,847 |      | $ | 2,413,097
|Interest expense on deposits and borrowings                                       |  |                              | 48,267    |      |   | 42,876   
|Interest portion of rental expense                                                |  |                              | 549       |      |   | 586      
|                                                                                  |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|Fixed charges                                                                     |  | $                            | 2,835,663 |      | $ | 2,456,559
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                |  |                              | 1.03      |      |   | 1.01
I, Kenneth Edmundson, the President, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of Claridge Ventures, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  November 15, 2012/s/Kenneth EdmundsonBy:Kenneth EdmundsonPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
# 018-I5" ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 03-13-00037-CR OFFENSE: 21.1 Eddie Matthews v. The State of 

# STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Bastrop COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 21st District Court 

### DATE: 12/23/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 13992



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Eddie Matthews v. The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# oq*-;^ A?P£/lAa/T-'s Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: njl/SI^O/S' JUDGE: 

## &kL^ct^**-"— CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR


### ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                              By:  /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                              Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                              Title: Chief Executive Officer





I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of TGFIN Holdings, Inc.


                              By: /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert
                              Name: Scott Emerson Lybbert
                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07

- 12

- 00336

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

OCTOBER 18 , 2012

IN RE LEANNE FARRELL COLLIER, RELATOR

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER

With the issuance of this Court’s opinion in cause number 07

- 12

- 0084

- CV,

Leanne Collier’s Petition for Writ of Prohibition is denied as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52.8(d). Furthermore, the stay of all trial court proceedings in trial court cause number

20 07

- 539,120, issued by this Court on August 1, 2012, is hereby lifted.

Per Curiam
No. 69698.

#### Parksmith Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 65/12865 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise (invoice item NN 764 and 6204) consists of earthenware coin banks, which are not tableware, kitchenware, or table or kitchen utensils, and that they are valued under $3 per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DONALD DURAY BROWN,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-208M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Drug Conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A),

and 841(b)(1)(C).

Count 2: Possession of Controlled Substances with Intent to Distribute in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C).

Count 3: Distribution of Cocaine Base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(A).

Date of Detention Hearing: May 2, 2006

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

Defendant has stipulated to detention but has reserved the right to contest his continued

detention upon his appearance in court in the District of Alaska.

Case 2:06-mj-00208-JPD Document 7 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00208-JPD Document 7 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 24, 2017

p0321

Order 

Clerk

March 24, 2017

153049

KEITH TODD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 153049

COA: 323235

Wayne CC: 14-004589-CZ

NBC UNIVERSAL (MSNBC),

Defendant-Appellee,

and

EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT and

A-ONE LIMOUSINE,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On March 9, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the December 10, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

BERNSTEIN, J., would reverse Part IV of the Court of Appeals judgment and 

remand this case to the circuit court to hear the plaintiff’s motion to amend.
Case No. 12,939.

#### The S. L. DAVIS.

[6 Blatchf. 138; 1 2 N. B. R. 3.]

Gircuit Court, S. D. New York.

May 29, 1868.2

Salvage — Cargo—Property of United States.

A cargo of cotton belonging to the United States, on transportation, on freight, under bills of lading, on board of a vessel, from Savannah, Georgia, to New York, is liable to •contribute, in a suit in rem against vessel and ■cargo, toward compensation for salvage services rendered to the vessel and cargo.

[Cited in The Siren, 7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 161.]

[On appeal to the supreme court the above decree was affirmed. 10 Wall. (77 U. S.) 15.]

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.]

This was a libel in rem, filed in the district •court, against the schooner S. L. Davis and a •cargo of cotton, on transportation by her from Savannah, Georgia, to the city of New York, to recover for salvage services. The cotton belonged to the United States, and was shipped by a treasury agent of the United States, under bills of lading, which provided that he should pay freight at the rate of fifteen cents per ton per day, registered tonnage, dangers of the seas excepted. The cotton was attached; in this suit, before its delivery to, or acceptance Dy, the agent of the United States at New York. The district court dismissed the libel as to the cotton, holding that it was not hable to contribute [case unreported], and, from such dismissal, the libellant appealed to this court.

Charles Donohue, for libellant.

William M. Evarts, for the United States.

2

 [Affirmed in 10 Wal’. (77 U. S.) 15.]

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The only question in this case is, whether the cotton is liable to contribute. The salvage service is not in dispute, and was exceedingly meritorious, and saved the vessel and cargo, the former valued at $8,000, and the latter at $150,000. The court below allowed $19,500 for salvage, which I think not unreasonable, regarding the condition and imminent peril of the vessel,' and the value of the cargo on board.

The mere fact of the ownership of the cotton by the government, in the act of being carried to its port of destination for the purposes of a market, as merchandise, did not, I think, exempt it from the lien in case of salvage service. I shall not enter into an argument in support of this position, as the subject, or rather a kindred one — the liability of property of the government for general average — and the present question incidentally, have been most elaborately examined by Mr. Justice Story, in U. S. v. Wilder [Case No. 16,694], I am inclined, also, to the opinion, that, it is the doctrine of the admiralty in England (The. Marquis of Huntly, 3 Hagg. Adm. 246,) and of the most approved modern elementary writers on the subject in this country (1 Pars. Mar. Law, p. 324, bk. 1, c. 9; 2 Pars. Mar. Law, p. 625, bk. 3, c. 7; Marv. Wreck & Salv. § 122. See, also, The Santissima Trinidad, 7 Wheat. [20 U. S.] 283 .

The decree below dismissing the libel as to the cotton is reversed, and a decree will be entered charging it with contribution, with costs.