# RFA/SBREFA S CREENING 

# A NALYSIS 

# F OR



# W ATER 

# Q UALITY 

# S TANDARDS 

# F OR 

# N UTRIENTS 

# I N 

# L AKES 

# A ND 

# F LOWING



# W ATERS 

# I N 

# F LORIDA



# September 2009

Prepared for:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Water

Office of Science and Technology

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460

Prepared by:

Science Applications In ternational Corporation

12100 Sunset Hills Road

Reston, VA 20190

GSA Contract Number: GS-10F-0076J

SAIC Project No. 06-6319-04-0232

# September 2009 i 

# Table of Contents

1. Introduction................................................................................................................ ..........1-1

1.1 Background................................................................................................................. . 1-1

1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Analysis..............................................................................1-1

1.3 Organization of the Report...........................................................................................1-2

2. Method ...................................................................................................................... ...........2-1

2.1 Compliance Costs ........................................................................................................2-1

2.2 Definition of Small Entities .........................................................................................2-2

2.3 Identifying Small Entities ............................................................................................2-3

2.3.1 Governments........................................................................................................ 2-3

2.3.2 Businesses............................................................................................................2-3

2.4 Evaluating Potential Economic Impact........................................................................2-3

3. Results..................................................................................................................... .............3-1

3.1 Potential Small Entities................................................................................................3-1

3.2 Potential Impact ........................................................................................................... 3-1

3.3 Summary and Conclusion............................................................................................ 3-2

4. References.................................................................................................................. ..........4-1

Appendix A. Small Government Analysis ........................................................................... A-1

Appendix B. Small Business Analysis................................................................................. B-1

# September 2009 ii 

# List of Exhibits

Exhibit 2-1. Summary of Prelimin ary Cost Estimates for Point Source Controls Associated with

Numeric Nutrient Criter ia (2009 dollars) ............................................................................ 2-1

Exhibit 2-2. SBA Size Standards for Busine sses Potentially Affected by the Rule...................2-2

Exhibit 3-1. Potential Numb er of Small Entities ........................................................................3-1

Exhibit 3-2. Comparison of Potential Annual Compliance Costs to Revenues or Sales for

Identified Small Entities ...................................................................................................... 3-1

# September 2009 iii 

# Acronyms and Abbreviations

BNR Biological nutrient removal

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CPI Consumer Price Index

CWA Clean Water Act

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

FRS Facility Registry System

LOT Limit of technology

NAICS North American Indus try Classification System

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

PCS Permit Compliance System

RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act

SBA Small Business Administration

SBREFA Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

SIC Standard Industrial Classification

TMDL Total maximum daily load

TN Total nitrogen

TP Total phosphorus

WQBEL Water quality based effluent limit

WQS Water quality standards

WWTP Wastewater treatment plant

# September 2009 1. Introduction 1-1 

# 1. Introduction

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (E PA) is promulgating water quality standards

(WQS) for nutrients applicable to freshwater lakes and flowing waters in th e state of Florida. The

proposed rule does not establish any requirements di rectly applicable to regulated entities or

other sources of nutrient pollution to these waters. However, state implementation of the criteria

may result in specific requirements for a number of sources of nutrients, including small entities.

This report presents screening analysis of the potential for economic impacts on small entities

that may result from state implementation of the WQS.

1.1 Background

Section 303(c) of the Clean Wate r Act (CWA) requires States to adopt WQS for waters of the

United States within their applicable ju risdictions. Section 30 3(c)(2)(A) and EPA’s

implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 131 requ ire that State WQS include the designated use

or uses to be made of the waters and the cr iteria necessary to pr otect those uses. EPA’s

regulations at 40 CFR § 131.11(a)(1) provide that States shall “adopt those water quality criteria

that protect the designated use” and that such criteria “must be based on sound scientific

rationale and must contain suffici ent parameters or constituents to protect the designated use.”

CWA section 303(c) also requires States to review their WQS at least once every three years

and, if appropriate, revise or adopt new standards. States must submit these new or revised WQS

to EPA for review and approval or disappr oval. Section 303(c) also directs the EPA

Administrator to promulgate WQS to supersede St ate standards that it has disapproved or in

cases where it determines that a new or revised standard is needed to meet CWA requirements.

The state of Florida currently us es narrative criteria to protect waters from nutrient pollution. In

January of 2009, EPA determined that new or revi sed WQS for nutrients in the form of numeric

nutrient criteria are necessary in Florida to meet the requirements of the CWA (U.S. EPA, 2009).

EPA identified a schedule for proposing numeric nut rient criteria for lakes and flowing waters

within 12 months, and for estuaries and coastal waters within 24 months . In the event that

Florida adopts and EPA approves new or re vised WQS that sufficiently address the

determination before EPA promulgates federal WQS, EPA would no longer be obligated to

promulgate federal WQS.

1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Analysis

To meet its analytical requirements under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as

amended by the Small Business Regulatory En forcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), EPA

evaluates the potential economic impacts of pro posed rules on small entities. The purpose of the

RFA is to increase agency awareness of the impact of regulations on small entities, to allow for

public comments on regulations that affect sma ll entities, and to enc ourage agency use of

flexibility in regulating small entities. The SBREFA amended the RFA to strengthen its

analytical and procedural requirements.

# September 2009 1. Introduction 1-2 

# The proposed WQS do not contain specific require ments for any dischargers, including small

entities. Ultimately, however, state implementation of the rule will result in compliance costs for

a number of sources. EPA developed preliminary es timates of these potential compliance costs,

which could include efflue nt treatment for point sources, best management practices for farmers,

and septic system upgrades for homeowners (SAI C, 2009). Some of these dischargers may be

small governments or businesses, based on Small Business Administration (SBA) definitions.

This report provides screening-leve l analysis of the potential co mpliance costs with respect to

small entities. Included are the municipal and indust rial point sources that are likely to receive

water quality based effluent limitations (WQBELs) in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES) permits. Not addressed are agricultural and septic sources for which

requirements to implement nutrien t controls may result from the total maximum daily loads

(TMDLs) process. The specific loading reductions that these sources will need to achieve will

vary depending on relative source contributions to nutrient impaire d waters as identified in

TMDLs, and the ultimate strategy for attaining the TMDL.

1.3 Organization of the Report

This report contains the fo llow sections and appendices:

Section 2 - describes the method for evaluating the ex tent and potential ma gnitude of economic

impacts on small governments, businesses, and organizations

Section 3 – presents the screening results

Section 4 – provides references

Appendix A – provides the detailed analyses for municipal governments

Appendix B – provides the detailed analyses for businesses.

# September 2009 2. Method 2-1 

# 2. Method

This section describes the method for the analys is, including sources of data, definitions, and

characterization of economic impacts.

2.1 Compliance Costs

As described in the preliminary cost analysis fo r the rule (SAIC, 2009), wa stewater point sources

may incur costs for end-of-pipe treatment (m unicipal facilities) a nd pollution prevention

(industrials, general permittees) to control nutrient discharges. Exhibit 2-1 summarizes these

estimates.

Exhibit 2-1. Summary of Prelimin ary Cost Estimates for Point S ource Controls Associated with

Numeric Nutrient Criteria (2009 dollars)

Source Sector Number Affected Potential Controls Basis of Preliminary Cost Estimate

Major Municipal WWTPs 47 BNR to reduce TN

and/or TP Facility-specific information on current

treatment train and flow; average unit costs

to achieve LOT

Minor Municipal WWTPs 47 BNR to reduce TN

and/or TP Facility-specific information on current

treatment train and flow; average unit costs

to achieve LOT

Industrial Dischargers 91 Process

optimization/source

control Category-wide assumption of need for

controls and average annual cost ($25,000)

General Dischargers 23 Process

optimization/source

control Category-wide assumption of need for

controls and average annual cost ($25,000)

Source: SAIC (2009).

BNR = biological nutrient removal

LOT = limit of technology

TN = total nitrogen

TP = total phosphorus

WWTP = wastewater treatment plants.



# All of the compliance cost estimates can be cons idered preliminary, in part because there are no

accompanying procedures for implementing the nu meric criteria. However, as shown in the

exhibit, the preliminary estimates of complian ce costs for the municipa l wastewater treatment

plants (WWTPs) are based on information about th e facility. Specifically, the estimates reflect

the capability to discharge low leve ls of nutrients based on current treatment with the cost of any

additional treatment needed based on facility fl ow. In comparison, the pr eliminary estimates of

compliance costs for businesses, which include industrial and general permittees, can be

characterized as “one-size fits all.” Thus, these estim ates are more uncertain.

The preliminary compliance costs for WWTPs (muni cipal costs) include a nnualized capital costs

(annualized at 7% over 20 years) and annual operation and maintenance costs. Not reflected are

any state or federal funds that, if available, would offset a portion of capital costs. Thus, to the

extent that such funding is available, annuali zed compliance costs for small governments will be

overstated.

# September 2009 2. Method 2-2 

# 2.2 Definition of Small Entities

To identify which of the potentially affected entities may be considered “small” governments

and businesses, we used the definitions established by the RFA/SBREFA and the SBA. 1 

# The

RFA/SBREFA defines a small governmental juri sdiction as the government of a city, county,

town, school district, special dist rict, or a tribal jurisdiction with a population of fewer than

50,000. The SBA defines small businesses based on industrial classification codes and size

standards that are usually expressed either in number of employees or annual receipts in millions

of dollars (13 CFR ' 121.201). Exhibit 2-2 shows the size standards for the business entities that

may incur costs under the rule.

Exhibit 2-2. SBA Size St andards for Businesses Potentially Affected by the Rule

NAICS Code NAICS U.S. Industry Title Standard 1



# 212392 Phosphate Rock Mining 500 employees

212393 Other Chemical and Fertilizer Mineral Mining 500 employees

221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation 4 million MW-hr

221119 Other Electric Power Generation 4 million MW-hr

221310 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems $7 million

221320 Sewage Treatment Plants $7 million

311421 Fruit and Vegetable Canning 3,500 employees

311615 Poultry Processing 500 employees

312120 Breweries 500 employees

312140 Distilleries 750 employees

322110 Pulp Mills 750 employees

325120 Industrial Gas Manufacturing 1,000 employees

325311 Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing 1,000 employees

325312 Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing 500 employees

325314 Fertilizer (Mixing Only) Manufacturing 500 employees

325320 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing 500 employees

325920 Explosives Manufacturing 750 employees

335129 Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing 500 employees

336611 Ship Building and Repair 1,000 employees

482111 Line-Haul Railroads 1,500 employees

531110 Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings $7 million

562910 Remediation Services $14 million

713110 Amusement and Theme Parks $7 million

1. Source: 13 CFR part 121.201.

NAICS = North American Indu stry Classification System

SBA = Small Business Administration

1. Maximum in number of employees, revenue, or production (electricity) to meet small business definition.

1 

# For comparison, the appendix also shows the potentially small governments and businesses based on the

definitions in Florida Statutes: city or town with populations less than 10,000 and counties with populations less

than 75,000; independently owned and operated business that employs 200 or fewer permanent full-time employees

and that, together with its affiliates, has a net worth of not more than $5 million, or any firm based in Florida that

has a Small Business Administration 8(a) certification.

# September 2009 2. Method 2-3 

# 2.3 Identifying Small Entities

To identify the potential classification of government and business entities based on the

applicable definitions, we relied on publicly available data and information accessible online.

2.3.1 Governments



# Governmental entities that may be affected by the rule include m unicipalities operating

wastewater treatment plants a nd other utilities (e.g., drinking water, electric). EPA’s Permit

Compliance System (PCS) database contains th e fields identifying: f acility name, ownership,

city, and county. For those discha rgers that may be affected by the rule, we classified all

facilities for which PCS lists ownership as Federal or State, or the facility = s name indicates

Federal or State ownership, as large entities. For the remaining dischargers, we used the

discharger name field in PCS, the owner name field in EPA’s Facility Registry System (FRS)

database, or the applicant company name in Fl orida Department of Environmental Protection’s

(FDEP’s) permit application database to determ ine whether a city, county, or region is the

appropriate governmental unit for the analysis. We then identified the population in each unit

using the most recent Census data for that unit (e.g., 1999 or 2007). For re gional authorities, we

summed the relevant Census populations. We then classified all entitie s with a population of

fewer than 50,000 as small entities.

2.3.2 Businesses



# Exhibit 2-2 identifies the industria l classifications of businesses th at may be affected by the rule.

A number of online sources provide informati on on business revenue and number of employees,

including company websites, financial reports , and websites reporting industry data (e.g.,

www.manta.com). We used information from so urces to identify revenues and number of

employees of the discharger or parent company, if applicable. We then a pplied the relevant size

standard to classify entities as large or small, or uncertain if sufficient information was not

available.

2.4 Evaluating Potential Economic Impact

To estimate the potential magnitude of economic impacts on small entities, we compared the

preliminary estimates of annual compliance cost s to estimates of governmental revenues or

business sales.

For the governmental entities that meet the defi nition of small, we identified revenues from the

Census of Governments. The Census of G overnments contains revenues for counties and

municipalities with populations greater than 25,000, and revenue per capita for populations less

than 25,000. For those municipalities with le ss than 25,000 people, we multiplied the population

by the average per capita revenue in the applicable size category. 2 

# In Florida, these values are

$1,403.18 for populations less than 10,000 and $1,543.00 for populations between 10,000 and

2 

# This method may understate the revenue base for treatment plants with service populations greater than the city or

county population.

# September 2009 2. Method 2-4 

# 25,000. We then updated all of the revenue estimates to 2009 dollars using the Consumer Price

Index (CPI). 3



# For small businesses, we compared the prelim inary estimates of annual compliance costs to

estimates of business sales (revenues). The estimate s of business sales are from the same sources

described above for identifying small entities.

3 

# The Finance Phase of the 2007 Census of Governments is not yet available. Thus, we used the 2002 Census of

Governments and escalated revenues to July 2009 dollars using the CPI (2001 Index = 177.1; July 2009 Index =

215.351)

# September 2009 3. Results 3-1 

# 3. Results

This section summarizes the results of the screen ing analysis by type of entity and for all small

entities combined. The Appendices provide results for individual entities.

3.1 Potential Small Entities

Exhibit 3-1 summarizes the potential classification of en tities that are potentially affected by the

rule. Based on available data, there are potentia lly 46 small governments and 29 small businesses

that may be affected by the rule. In total, fewe r than 100 small entities ar e potentially affected.

Exhibit 3-1. Potential Number of Small Entities

Category Small Entities Insufficient Data to Classify

Government 1 

# 46 0

Businesses 2 

# 29 4

Total 75 4

1. Municipal water and wastewater treatment plants or pr ivate companies providing municipal wastewater service.

2. Industrial and general dischargers. Data are insufficient to classify: Estech Inc. - Ag ricola Plant (NAICS 212392);

Lake Tippecanoe RO WTP (NAICS 221310); Florida Cypr ess Gardens Ind. (NAICS 713110), and Mid-County

Services Inc (NAICS 221320).



# The 2002 Census of Governments indicates that th ere are 328 small munici palities in Florida (71

with populations between 25,000 and 49,999 and 257 with populations less than 25,000). Thus,

the small governments that are potentially affected by the rule represent approximately 14% of

small governments in Florida.

In 2003 there were a total num ber of 1,540,500 small businesses in Florida (SBA, 2004). Of the

426,245 employer firms in 2003, 98.8% or an estimated 421,100 were small firms (SBA, 2004).

Thus, small businesses that may incur costs under the rule represent 0.002% of small businesses,

or 0.007% of small employer firms in Florida.

3.2 Potential Impact

Exhibit 3-2 summarizes the comparison of complianc e costs to revenues or sales using

benchmarks of 1% and 3% for the entities that meet the definitions of small.

Exhibit 3-2. Comparison of Pote ntial Annual Compliance Costs to R evenues or Sales for Identified

Small Entities

Category Governments Businesses 1 

# Combined

Total 46 29 75

Costs ≥ 1% of revenues or sales 35 (76%) 15 (52%) 50 (67%)

Costs ≥ 3% of revenues or sales 20 (43%) 9 (31%) 29 (39%)

1. Does not include three businesses for which insufficient data are available to classify as small entities and

compare potential compliance costs to sales; potential compliance costs for Mid-County Services Inc are zero.



# Annual compliance costs may exceed 1% of a nnual revenues for 35 out of the 46 potentially

affected small governments (76%). Costs may exceed 3% of annual revenues for 20 (43%) of

# September 2009 3. Results 3-2 

# potentially affected small governments. The es timated annual compliance costs are less than

10% of estimated annual revenues for all of th e potentially affected small governments (see

appendix).

Annual compliance costs may exceed 1% of sales for 15 of the 29 (52%) potentially affected

small businesses. Costs may exceed 3% of sale s for 9 potentially affected small businesses

(31%). The estimated compliance costs are 10% or less of estimated sales for all of the

potentially affected smal l businesses (see appendix).

3.3 Summary and Conclusion

Based on preliminary estimates of compliance cost s and publicly available data on characteristics

of municipal governments and businesses, fewer th an 100 small entities are likely to incur costs

under the rule. Annual compliance costs may equal or exceed 1% of revenues or sales for 50

small entities, and 3% of revenues or sales for 29 small entities. These estimates suggest that the

rule will not result in a si gnificant impact on a substantia l number of small entities. 4



# In addition, the comparison of potential annual co sts to revenues for the 46 small governments

does not reflect any potential for offsetting of co sts (i.e., through state or federal funding). Thus,

to the extent that such funding is available, the estimated im pact ratios for small governments

may be overstated.

4 

# For comparison, only 32 governments would be consider ed small based on Florida statutes (i.e., cities with

populations less than 10,000 and counties with populations less than 75,000). Of these, 26 may have compliance

costs that exceed 1% of revenues and 16 may have compliance costs exceeding 3% of revenues. To identify small

businesses based on Florida statutes (independently owned businesses with fewer than 200 employees and a net

worth less than $5 million), information on net worth is needed. However, most of the businesses with fewer than

200 employees are private companies and information on net worth is not publicly available. Thus, it is uncertain

whether the 35 businesses with fewer than 200 employees would meet the definition of a small business based on

net worth.

# September 2009 4. References 4-1 

# 4. References

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2009. Historic Consumer Price Index.

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt

.

Science Applications International Corpor ation (SAIC). 2009. Preliminary Assessment of

Potential Compliance Costs for Water Quality St andards for Nutrients in Lakes and Flowing

Waters in Florida.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. American Fact Finder.

http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en

.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Census of Governments: Finance Phase.

http://www.census.gov/govs/www/cog2002.html

.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Letter from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant

Administrator, Office of Water to Michael Sole, Secretary, Florida Depart ment of Environmental

Protection. January 14.

http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/sta ndards/rules/fl-determination20090114.pdf

.

U. S. Small Business Administration (SBA). 2008. Table of Small Business Size Standards

Matched to North American Industry Cla ssification System. Effective August 22, 2008.

http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/docum ents/sba_homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf

.

U. S. Small Business Administration (SBA). 2004. Small Business Profile: Florida. Office of

Advocacy. http://www.sba.gov/advo/s tats/profiles/04fl.pdf

.September 2009 Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisA-1Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisExhibit A-1shows the screening analysis of potential impact on smallgovernments for the municipalities potentially affected by theproposed numeric nutrient criteria. For comparison, the exhibit also shows the determination ofsmall governments based on thedefinition in Florida Statutes(i.e., city or town with populations less than10,000 and counties with populations less than 75,000).Exhibit A-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small GovernmentsNPDES No.Facility NameFlow(mgd)City1County1PopBasis2Pop forAnalysis3SBASmallGovt4F.S.SmallGovt5Annual CostRevenue6% ofRevenueFL0033251 Altamonte Springs/ Swofford 12.5AltamonteSpringsSeminole City 41,200 Y N $1,266,992 $65,867,0721.9%FL0038857 Apalachicola WWTP 1 Apalachicola Franklin City 2,334 Y Y $101,873 $2,960,695 3.4%FL0027511 William Tyson WWTP 2 Arcadia De Soto City 6,604 Y Y $782,306 $8,377,219 9.3%FL0021466 Auburndale Allred WWTP 0.65 Auburndale Polk City 11,032 Y N $141,876 $20,699,2090.7%FL0027812 Baldwin WWTP 0.4 Baldwin Duval City 1,634 Y Y $87,308 $2,072,740 4.2%FL0026867 Blountstown STP 1.5 Blountstown Calhoun City 2,444 Y Y $152,039 $3,100,231 0.9%FL0027731 Bonifay STP 1.4 Bonifay Holmes City 4,078 Y Y $305,578 $5,172,971 5.9%FL0021369 Bradenton WTP 6 Bradenton Manatee City 49,504 Y N $2,346,917 $54,767,4244.3%FL0020907 Bunnell WTP 0.3 Bunnell Flagler City 2,122 Y Y $65,481 $2,691,772 2.4%FL0038407 Callahan WWTP 0.3 Callahan Nassau City 962 Y Y $65,481 $1,220,304 5.4%FL0027669 Chattahoochee STP 0.5Chattahoo-cheeGadsden City 3,287 Y Y $109,135 $4,169,582 2.6%FL0027570 Chipley STP) 1.2 Chipley Washington City 3,592 Y Y $261,924 $4,556,477 5.7%FL0021610 Crescent City STP 0.35 Crescent CityPutnam City 1,776 Y Y $76,395 $2,252,868 3.4%FL0027791 Cross City-STP #1 0.4 Cross City Dixie City 1,775 Y Y $87,308 $2,251,600 3.9%FL0020303Deland/Wiley M. Nash WaterReclamation Facility7.37 De Land Volusia City 20,904 Y N $750,803 $39,221,9241.9%FL0134589 Dolomite Utilities Fruitville 1.5 Fruitville Sarasota City 12,741 Y N $586,729 $23,905,7852.5%FL0038555 Graceville WWTP 1.1 Graceville Jackson City 2,402 Y Y $240,097 $3,046,954 7.9%FL0020915 Green Cove Springs WTP 0.75Green CoveSpringsClay - - - - $0 - -FL0030210Green Cove Springs -Reynolds0.5Green CoveSpringsClay - - - - $0 - -Green Cove Springs Subtotal City 5,378 Y Y $0 $6,822,030 0.0%September 2009 Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisA-2Exhibit A-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small GovernmentsNPDES No.Facility NameFlow(mgd)City1County1PopBasis2Pop forAnalysis3SBASmallGovt4F.S.SmallGovt5Annual CostRevenue6% ofRevenueFL0042315 Hastings STP 0.12 Hastings St. Johns - - - - $12,225 - -FL0169226 Hastings WTP 0.087 Hastings St. Johns - - - - $25,000 - -Hastings Subtotal City 521 Y Y $37,225 $660,892 5.6%FL0043079 Hilliard 0.32 Hilliard Nassau City 2,702 Y Y $69,846 $3,427,506 2.0%FL0027880 Jasper WWTP 1.2 Jasper Hamilton City 1,780 Y Y $0 $2,257,942 0.0%FL0042358 Jupiter Water Treatment 2 Jupiter Palm Beach City 39,328 Y N $25,000 $54,178,8800.0%FL0036251 Wekiva Hunt Club STP 2.9 Longwood Seminole City 6,968* Y Y $293,942 $8,838,956 3.3%FL0040495 MacClenny WTP 1.3 Macclenny Baker City 4,459 Y Y $283,751 $5,656,272 5.0%FL0113743 Middleburg Bluffs 0.009 Middleburg Clay City 134* Y Y $1,964 $169,536 1.2%FL0021903 Milton STP 2.5 Milton Santa Rosa City 7,045 Y Y $254,682 $8,936,631 2.8%FL0027839 Monticello-STP 1 Monticello Jefferson City 2,533 Y Y $218,270 $3,213,128 6.8%FL0020338 Mulberry STP 0.75 Mulberry Polk City 3,230 Y Y $293,365 $4,097,277 7.2%FL0119644 Lake Suzy Utility WWTP 0.087 Na De Soto City 221* Y Y $34,030 $23,264,5120.1%FL0026271 Naples-Municipal Plant 10 Naples Collier City 20,976 Y N $2,182,702 $39,357,0175.5%FL0040207 Noma STP 0.025 Noma Holmes City 213 Y Y $5,457 $270,192 2.0%FL0023922 Orange Park-Ash St STP 2.5 Orange Park Clay City 9,081 Y Y $254,682 $11,519,3112.2%FL0040061 Palatka WWTF 3 Palatka Putnam City 10,033 Y Y $0 $12,726,9300.0%FL0026387 Perry STP 1.25 Perry Taylor City 6,847 Y Y $272,838 $8,685,467 3.1%FL0026557 Plant City STP 8 Plant City Hillsborough City 29,915 Y N $810,875 $50,012,8641.6%FL0029033 City Of Quincy WWTP 1.5 Quincy Gadsden City 6,982 Y Y $152,809 $8,856,715 1.7%FL0020141 Sanford-Municipal WTP 7.3 Sanford Seminole City 38,291 Y N $1,593,373 $49,678,5863.2%FL0028126 Starke-Municipal STP 1.65 Starke Bradford City 5,593 Y Y $645,402 $7,094,759 9.1%FL0103349 Titusville South – Blue Heron 4 Titusville Brevard City 40,670 Y N $0 $51,863,6160.0%FL0041441 Venice - Eastside WWTP 3 Venice Sarasota City 17,764 Y N $1,173,459 $33,330,3803.5%FL0020125 Wewahitchka STP 0.2 WewahitchkaGulf City 1,722 Y Y $43,654 $2,184,369 2.0%FL0020109 Winter Gardens STP 2WinterGardensOrange City 14,351 Y N $0 $18,204,3420.0%FL0036048 Winter Haven #3 Wahneta 5 Winter HavenPolk City 26,487 Y N $1,091,351 $50,292,5442.2%FL0355259Dunes CommunityDevelopment DistrictFlagler City 4,014* Y Y $25,000 $7,531,420 0.3%FL0102202 Pace Water Systems WWTP 0.45 Santa Rosa City 18,500* Y N $0 $34,711,3280.0%September 2009 Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisA-3Exhibit A-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small GovernmentsNPDES No.Facility NameFlow(mgd)City1County1PopBasis2Pop forAnalysis3SBASmallGovt4F.S.SmallGovt5Annual CostRevenue6% ofRevenueFL0039896 Pebble Creek Village WWTF 0.4 Hillsborough City 3,333** Y Y $0 $6,254,293 0.0%FL0122076 Rice Creek Utility Company 0.225 Hillsborough City 533** Y Y $88,009 $1,000,687 8.8%FL0040088 Cape Coral WTP 0.05 Cape Coral Lee City 102,286 N N $25,000 NA NAFL0186261City of Clearwater - MasterUrban Reuse40 Clearwater Pinellas - - - - $0 - -FL0128937 Clearwater City of Northeast 13.5 Clearwater Pinellas - - - - $0 - -Clearwater Subtotal City 108,787 N N $0 NA NAFL0027251 Gainesville-Main St WTP 1&2 7.5 Gainesville Alachua - - - - $764,046 - -FL0112895 G.R.U. STP #5-Kanapaha 10 Gainesville Alachua - - - - $1,018,729 - -FL0026646 John R Kelly Steam 0.005 Gainesville Alachua - - - - $25,000Gainesville Subtotal City 95,447 N N $1,807,775 NA NAFL0039772 W. Carl Dicks WWTP 13.7 Lakeland Polk - - - - $5,358,795 - -FL0026301 Lakeland-McIntosh Steam Lakeland Polk - - - - $25,000 - -FL0026298 Larsen Memorial Power Plant Lakeland Polk - - - - $25,000 - -Lakeland Subtotal City 78,452 N N $5,408,795 NA NAFL0037966 Orlando-Iron Bridge WWTF 40 Orlando Seminole City 185,951 N N $0 NA NAFL0031801 Escambia - Bayou Marcus 8.2 Pensacola Escambia City 56,255 N N $1,789,816 NA NAFL0043621 Sarasota WTP 2.8 Sarasota Sarasota City 52,715 N N $25,000 NA NAFL0025518Arvah B. Hopkins GeneratingStation (Tallahassee)1.87 Tallahassee Leon - - - - $25,000 - -FL0025526Sam O. Purdom Gen Station(Tallahassee)Tallahassee Wakulla - - - - $25,000 - -Tallahassee Subtotal City 262,315 N N $50,000 NA NAFL0187691 Tampa Bay Regional WTP Tampa Hillsborough City 303,447 N N $25,000 NA NAFL0428523 North Bay WWTP 1.5 Bay County148,217 N N $0 NA NAFL0102920 CCAFS/Regional (DW) 0.8 Brevard NA NA N N $174,616 NA NAFL0102920 CCAFS/Regional (DW) 0.8 Brevard Region476,230 N N $174,616 NA NAFL0102679BCUD/South CentralRegional DW5.5 Brevard Region476,230 N N $0 NA NAFL0040291 Charlotte Co Util - East Port 0.385 Port CharlotteCharlotte County141,627 N N $150,594 NA NAFL0032875Clay Co. - Fleming OaksWWTP0.49 Orange Park Clay - - - - $49,918 - -September 2009 Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisA-4Exhibit A-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small GovernmentsNPDES No.Facility NameFlow(mgd)City1County1PopBasis2Pop forAnalysis3SBASmallGovt4F.S.SmallGovt5Annual CostRevenue6% ofRevenueFL0025151 Clay Cty Miller St WWTP 5 Orange Park Clay - - - - $509,364 - -FL0039721Clay Cty Ridaught LandingWWTP1.875 Clay County Clay - - - - $409,257 - -FL0043834Fleming Island RegionalWWTF4 Orange Park Clay - - - - $407,491 - -Clay County Subtotal County140,814 N N $1,376,030 NA NAFL0022853USA Nat Guard CampBlanding0.9 Starke Clay NA NA N N $196,443 NA NAFL0141399Collier County North RegionalWRF13.5 Collier County251,377 N N $2,946,648 NA NAFL0031402 FL State Hospital 1.3Chattahoo-cheeGadsden NA NA N N $283,751 NA NAFL0028061Hillsborough Co-SouthwestWTP3.95HillsboroughCountyHillsborough - - - - $1,545,054 - -FL0036820 Hillsborough Cty - Dale Mabry 6 Tampa Hillsborough - - - - $1,309,621 - -FL0040983Hillsborough Cty ValricoWWTP6 Valrico Hillsborough - - - - $2,346,917 - -FL0027821 River Oaks AWWTP 10HillsboroughCountyHillsborough - - - - $2,182,702 - -Hillsborough County Subtotal County998,948 N N $9,731,212 NA NAFL0043214Martin Co ConsolidatedReuse1.97 Stuart Martin - - - - $0 - -FL0184152 South Martin Regional Utility 2 Martin - - - - $25,000 - -Martin County Subtotal County126,731 N N $25,000 NA NAFL0043591 JEA - Julington Creek WWTF 1Saint JohnsCountySt. Johns - - - - $101,873 - -FL0023493 JEA - Mandarin WWTF 7.5 Jacksonville Duval - - - - $764,046 - -FL0117951 WWTP - Ponte Vedra WWTF 0.5 St. Johns - - - - $109,135 - -JEA Subtotal JEA 186,000 N N $1,073,276 NA NAFL0038849Orange Cty East Svc AreaWWTP11.2 Orange County896,344 N N $0 NA NAFL0039446 Buenaventura Lakes 1.8 Kissimmee Osceola County172,493 N N $0 NA NAFL0034649 Loxahatchee Rv Reg WWTP 11 Jupiter Palm Beach Region100,000 N N $2,400,972 NA NASeptember 2009 Appendix A. Small Government AnalysisA-5Exhibit A-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small GovernmentsNPDES No.Facility NameFlow(mgd)City1County1PopBasis2Pop forAnalysis3SBASmallGovt4F.S.SmallGovt5Annual CostRevenue6% ofRevenueFL0038768 Seacoast Util-Pga WWTP 12Palm BeachCountyPalm Beach - - - - $2,619,243 - -FL0170224Seminole ImprovementDistrict0.06 Palm Beach - - - - $13,096 - -Palm Beach County Subtotal County1,131,184 N N $1,210,374 NA NAFL0127272Pasco County Master ReuseSystem26.75 Pasco County344,765 N N $0 NA NAFL0040436Pinellas Co - S. Cross BayouWRF33SaintPetersburgPinellas County921,482 N N $7,202,917 NA NAFL0040029 Avon Park Correctional Inst 0.5 Polk County Polk NA NA N N $109,135 NA NAFL0043176 Paradise Point STP 0.005 Putnam - - - - $1,091 - -FL0042617 Point Buena Vista MHP 0.015 Putnam - - - - $3,274 - -Putman County Subtotal County70,423 N Y $4,365 $70,307,9040.0%FL0042625 Seminole Cty Dep of Evio Srv 2.5 Sanford Seminole County365,196 N N $0 NA NAFL0117471SJCUD - State Road 207WWTF0.25 St. Johns County123,135 N N $54,568 NA NA“-“ = not applicable; entity controls multiple plantsF.S. = Florida Statutemgd = million gallons per dayNA = not applicableSBA = Small Business AdministrationSTP = sewage treatment plantWWTP = wastewater treatment plantWRF = water reclamation facilityWTP = water treatment plant*Represents the service population, not city or county population.**Population calculated based on flow, assuming an average of 120 gallons per person per day.1. Source: EPA PCS Database (2009).2. Based on discharger name or municipality/discharger websites.3. Source: U.S. Census4. Represents municipalities with populations less than 50,000.5. Represents cities with populations less than 10,000 and counties with populations less than 75,000.6. From 2002 Census of Governments, updated to 2009 dollars using the Consumer Price Index.September 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-1Appendix B. Small Business AnalysisExhibit B-1shows the screening analysis of potential impacts on small businesses associated with the proposed numeric nutrientcriteria. For comparison, the exhibit alsoshows employment data for identifying small businesses based on the definition in FloridaStatutes [i.e., independently owned andoperated business with 200 or fewer permanent full-time employees and that, together with itsaffiliates, has a net worth of not more than $5 million, or any firm based in the state with a SBA 8(a) certification]. However, becausedata on net worth is limited for small private companies, the small business determination is uncertain for a number of entities.Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFL0160083 1475 212392 Estech Inc - Agricola Plant U U 500 emp U N $25,000 UFL0188981 4941 221310 Lake Tippecanoe RO WTP 0.014 U U $7m U U $25,000 UFL0042463 7996 713110 Florida Cypress Gardens Ind U U $7m U U $25,000 UFL0034789 4952 221320 Mid-County Services Inc 0.9 U U $7m U U $0 0.0%FL0188859 4941 221310 King's Gate Club Inc. WTP 0.01 $0.70 U $7m Y U $25,000 3.6%FL0140023 4941 221310 Spanish Lake Fairways 1.036 $0.25 U $7m Y U $25,000 10.0%FL0345547 4941 221310 Spanish Lakes CC Village WTP 0.055 $0.70 U $7m Y U $25,000 3.6%FL0175412 2033 311421 Silver Springs Citrus/Sprayfields 1 $33.0 220 3500 empY N $25,000 0.1%FLR05F392 2813 325120 Western International Gas & Cylinder $20.6 109 1000 empY U $25,000 0.1%FLR05G493 2875 325314 Agrachem Sales Co Inc $0.73 8 500 emp Y U $25,000 3.4%FLRNEE477 2875 325314 Agrikan Innovative Agriculture $0.50 3 500 emp Y U $25,000 5.0%FLR05G563 2875 325314 Agro Distribution LLC $2.0 2 500 emp Y U $25,000 1.3%FLRNEE545 2875 325314 Chemical Dynamics Inc $15.0 26 500 emp Y U $25,000 0.2%FLR05G665 2875 325314 Escambia Grain Corp $0.77 5 500 emp Y U $25,000 3.2%FLR05G274 2875 325314 Florida Fertilizer Company Inc $87.0 40 500 emp Y U $25,000 0.0%FLR05C000 2875 325314 Growers Fertilizer Corp $2.5 4 500 emp Y U $25,000 1.0%FLR10GT75 2875 325314 Gulf Coast Landfill Closure $0.31 5 500 emp Y U $25,000 8.1%FLR05G137 2875 325314 Harrells Inc $750 250 500 emp Y N $25,000 0.0%FLR05G661 2875 325314 Howard Fertilizer Co $35 106 500 emp Y U $25,000 0.1%FLR05C068 2875 325314 Sunniland Corporation $182 249 500 emp Y N $25,000 0.0%FLR05G093 2875 325314 TCSC Sebring Plant $74. 435 500 emp Y N $25,000 0.0%FLR05G475 2875 325314 The Liquid Plant Inc $3.9 18 500 emp Y U $25,000 0.6%September 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-2Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFLR05G266 2875 325314 Washington County Farm Supply $1.0 6 500 emp Y U $25,000 2.5%FL0043842 4952 531110 Cypress Landing WWTP 0.007 $0.11 U $7m Y U $1,528 1.4%FL0043389 4952 531110 Hiawatha Condominiums 0.036 $0.25 U $7m Y U $3,667 1.5%FL0043419 4952 531110 Study Estates 0.017 $0.70 U $7m Y U $3,711 0.5%FL0115231 4952 531190 Bailey's MHP 0.003 $0.25 U $7m Y U $655 0.3%FL0040215 4952 531190 Brittany Estates MHP WWTP 0.06 $0.70 U $7m Y U $0 0%FL0188999 4941 531190 Camelot Lakes (Ell Cap 66) 0.041 $0.70 U $7m Y U $25,000 3.6%FL0032662 4952 531190 Goodbread MHP 0.005 $0.25 U $7m Y U $1,091 0.4%FL0023426 4952 531190 Ideal Mobile Home Park WWTF 0.011 $0.25 U $7m Y U $2,401 1.0%FL0188948 4941 531190 Kings Gate R.V. Park Ro WTP 0.009 $0.70 U $7m Y U $25,000 3.6%FL0043150 4952 531190 Napoli's Trailer Park 0.015 $0.13 U $7m Y U $3,274 2.5%FL0000299 1475 212392 Agrifos - Nichols Prep Pit (Mosaic) 13.4 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0033294 1475 212392Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Hookers PrairieMine- - - - - $25,000 -FL0033332 1475 212392 Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Lonesome Mine - - - - - $25,000 -FL0036412 1475 212392Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Four CornersMine2 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0001198 1475 212392 Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Ft Meade Mine - - - - - $25,000 -FL0037958 1475 212392 South Fort Meade Mine (Mosaic) 2 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0032522 1475 212392 Wingate Creek Mine (Mosaic) - - - - - $25,000 -FL0267911 2874 325312Bartow Phosphogypsum Stack Cl.(Mosaic)- - - - - $25,000 -FL0177130 2874 325312Riverview Closed Phosphogypsum(Mosaic)- - - - - $25,000 -FL0001589 2874 325312Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Bartow ChemicalPlant- - - - - $25,000 -FL0000752 2874 325312Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - Green BayChemical Plant- - - - - $25,000 -FLR05B883 2874 325312 Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - - - - - $25,000 -FL0030139 2874 325312Mosaic Fertilizer LLC - NicholsConcentrates- - - - - $25,000 -Mosaic Subtotal NA 7,400 500 emp N N $325,000 NAFL0035271 1475 212392 CF Industries - Hardee - - - - - $25,000 -September 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-3Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFL0040177 1475 212392 CF Industries - Hardee Complex 1.2 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0000523 2874 325312 CF Industries - Bartow Phos. - - - - - $25,000 -FL0187313 2874 325312CF Industries Inc.-Tampa AmmoniaTerminal- - - - - $25,000 -FL0000078 2874 325312 CF Industries Plant City - - - - - $25,000 -CF Industries Subtotal NA >500 500 emp N N $125,000 NAFL0002666 1475 212392ExxonMobil Refining & Supply CoElectrophos SiteNA >500 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0000671 2874 325312Cargill Fertilizer Inc - Mulberry ChemicalPlantNA 159,000 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0027600 1475 212392 IMC-Agrico Co - Ft Green Mine - - - - - $25,000 -FL0032590 1475 212392 IMC-Agrico Co - Hopewell 2.3 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0000256 1475 212392 IMC-Agrico Co - Kingsford 5.753 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0000230 1475 212392 IMC-Agrico Co - Noralyn/Pho. 12.09 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0036421 2874 325312 IMC-Agrico Co - New Wales Chem - - - - - $25,000 -FL0000370 2874 325312 IMC-Agrico Co - S Pierce Chem 1.8 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0178527 2874 325312 IMC-Agrico Company - - - - - $25,000 -IMC-Agrico Subtotal NA >500 500 emp N N $175,000 NAFL0001902 1475 212392 US Agri-Chemicals-Ft Meade - - - - - $25,000 -FL0001961 2874 325312 US Agri-Chemicals Bartow Plant - - - - - $25,000 -FL0174106 2874 325312 US Agri-Chemicals - Bartow - - - - - $25,000 -US Agri-Chemicals Subtotal NA >500 500 emp N N $75,000 NAFL0036226 1479 212393PCS Phosphate White Springs-SwiftCreek Chemical Complex (Potash Corp)26.9 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0000655 1479 212393PCS Phosphate White SpringsSuwannee River Chem Complex (PotashCorp)200 - - - - - $25,000 -Potash Corp Subtotal NA 5,301 500 emp N N $50,000 NAFL0183750 4931 221112 Indiantown Generating Plant 0.05 NA U4m MW-hr/yrN U $25,000 NAFL0001490 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Ft Myers Steam 590.6 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0032174 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Manatee Steam - - - - - $25,000 -FL0030988 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Martin County Steam - - - - - $25,000 -September 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-4Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFL0032166 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Putnam Steam 125 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0001546 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Riviera Steam - - - - - $25,000 -FL0001554 4911 221119 FL Pwr & Lt-Sanford Steam 180 - - - - - $25,000 -FL Pwr & Lt Subtotal NA >2004m MW-hr/yrN5N $150,000 NAFL0000183 4911 221119FL Pwr Corp-Suwannee Riv Steam(Progress Energy Corp)342 NA >2004m MW-hr/yrN5N $25,000 NAFL0002275 4911 221119Gulf Pwr Co-Crist Steam (SouthernCompany)18 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0002283 4911 221119Gulf Pwr Scholz Steam (SouthernCompany)129.6 - - - - - $25,000 -Southern Company Subtotal NA >2004m MW-hr/yrN5N $50,000 NAFL0041751 4911 221119Hardee Power Station Units 1 & 2(Invenergy LLC)NA U4m MW-hr/yrN5U $25,000 NAFL0037869 4911 221119 JEA - Saint Johns River Power - - - - $25,000 -FL0001023 4911 221119 JEA Kennedy Generating Station 222 - - - - $25,000 -FL0001031 4911 221119 JEA Northside Units 1 2 3 827 - - - - $25,000 -JEA Subtotal NA U4m MW-hr/yrN5U $75,000 NAFL0044229 4911 221119 Seminole Elec.- Hardee Unit 3 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0036498 4911 221119 Seminole Elec.-Seminole Steam - - - - - $25,000 -Seminole Electric Subtotal NA >2004m MW-hr/yrN N $50,000 NAFL0043869 4911 221119Tampa Elec.-Polk Power Station (TECOEnergy)NA U4m MW-hr/yrN N $25,000 NAFL0039951 4931 221119Timber Energy Resources Inc (MultitradeTelogia)NA U4m MW-hr/yrN U $25,000 NAFL0429333 4941 221310 School J WTP (St Johns County) >200 $7m N N $25,000 NAFL0105643 2033 311421 Florida's Natural Growers 0.8 - - 3500 emp- - $25,000 -FL0131474 2033 311421 Florida's Natural Growers - - 3500 emp- - $25,000 -Florida's Natural Growers Subtotal NA >3500 3500 empN N $50,000 NAFL0000043 2033 311421 Tropicana North America 0.8 NA >3500 3500 empN N $25,000 NASeptember 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-5Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFL0001465 2015 311615Goldkist Inc - Live Oak Processing(Pilgrim's Pride)1.5 $8,500 41,000 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0041556 2082 312120 Anheuser Busch Lem Turner (A-B Inbev)1.7 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0186066 7996 713110Busch Entertainment Corporation -Adventure Island (A-B Inbev)- - - - - $25,000 -FL0185833 7996 713110 Busch Gardens - Tampa (A-B Inbev) - - - - - $25,000 -A-B Inbev Subtotal >$7m >500500 emp/$7mN N $75,000 NAFL0003051 2085 312140Fl Distillers Co Auburndale (BelvédèreS.A)2.5 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0029017 2085 312140Imperial Brands Inc Alfred (BelvédèreS.A)1.7 - - - - - $25,000 -Belvédère S.A Subtotal NA >750 750 emp N N $50,000 NAFL0000876 2611 322110 Buckeye Florida 58 $826 1,500 750 emp N N $25,000 NAFLR05C556 2813 325120 Air Liquide Large Industries - - - - - $25,000 -FLR05F330 2813 325120 Air Liquide Large Industries - - - - - $25,000 -Air Liquide Subtotal NA >1000 1000 empN N $50,000 NAFLR05B178 2813 325120 Air Products And Chemicals Inc NA >1000 1000 empN N $25,000 NAFL0132381 2874 325312 Cytec Industries Inc Brewster Plant NA 6,700 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0334944 2874 325312Mulberry Phosphogypsum Stack SystemClosureNA >500 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0000124 2874 325312Piney Point Phosphates Inc.-Piney PointChemical Plant (HRK Holding Co, LLC)NA >500 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFLR05G471 2875 325314Douglass Fertilizer & Chemical (TheAndersons Inc)- - - - - $25,000 -FLR05G472 2875 325314Douglass Fertilizer & Chemical (TheAndersons Inc)- - - - - $25,000 -FLR05G473 2875 325314 Liquid Ag Systems (The Andersons Inc) - - - - - $25,000 -The Andersons Inc Subtotal NA 3,000 500 emp N N $75,000 NAFLS132683 2875 325314United Industries Corporation (SpectrumBrands)NA 10,000 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0034657 2879 325320 Coronet Industries Inc NA >500 500 emp N N $25,000 NASeptember 2009 Appendix A. Small Business AnalysisB-6Exhibit B-1. Analysis of Potential Impacts on Small BusinessesNPDESSIC1NAICS2Discharger Name (Parent Company)Flow(mgd)1Sales(million)3# ofEmployees3SBA SizeStd.4SBASmallBus.F.S.SmallBus.Annual Cost% ofRevenueFL0002518 2892 325920St. Marks Powder Inc. (GeneralDynamics)0.786 $24,200 81,000 750 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0171565 3699 335129 Sprague Electronics GW Remediation 0.028 NA >500 500 emp N N $25,000 NAFL0040592 4952 336611 Atlantic Dry Dock Corp STP 0.06 NA 2,000 1000 empN N $13,096 NAFL0032581 4011 482111 CSX Transportation Inc. 0.05 - - - - - $25,000 -FL0166154 4011 482111CSX Transportation Inc/Rockport BulkTerminal- - - - - $25,000 -CSX Transportation Subtotal NA >1500 1500 empN N $50,000 NAFL0043265 9999 562910 City Industries Superfund >$14 U $14m N U $25,000 NAFL0186651 7996 713110 Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa $16.3 U $7m N U $25,000 NAFL0168581 7996 713110 Universal Studios Florida/Jaws Lagoon 0.05 >$7 U $7m N U $25,000 NA“-“ = not applicable; company is subsidiary of parent companym = millionsmgd = million gallons per dayNA = not applicableNAICS = North American Industry Classification Systememp = employeesSIC = Standard Industrial ClassificationU = uncertain1. Source: EPA PCS Database (2009)2. Based on SIC code.3. From publicly available sources (e.g., manta.com and company websites).4. Source: 13 CFR part 121.201. Maximum in number of employees, revenue, or production (electricity) to meet small business definition.5. To be considered small, company would need to serve approximately 293,000 customers based on annual per capita consumption in the U.S. of 13.6 MW-hr(http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/energy-resources/variable-574.html); company websites indicate service populations greater than 293,000 customers.6. Based on size of parent company.