Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices 729 

The States of South Dakota and Utah 

have been authorized permitting 

authority for sewage sludge, therefore 

the EPA’s general permits will be 

reissued only for Indian country in 

those States. The general permit for 

Indian country in Utah does not include 

the portions of the Goshute Indian 

Reservation and the Navajo Nation in 

Utah because the permitting activities 

for these reservations are done by 

Region 9 of the EPA. The State of 

Colorado has not been authorized 

permitting authority for Federal 

facilities, so a general permit is 

proposed for Federal facilities not 

located in Indian country. 

Authorization for use/disposal of 

sewage sludge under the general permits 

may be for one of the following three 

categories: Category 1—Facilities/ 

operations that generate and/or partially 

treat sewage sludge, but do not use/ 

dispose of sewage sludge; Category 2— 

Facilities/operations that use/dispose of 

sewage sludge and may also generate 

and/or treat sewage sludge; and 

Category 3—Wastewater lagoon systems 

that need to land apply sewage sludge 

on an occasional, restricted basis. 

Authorization for use/disposal of 

sewage sludge under the general permit 

will be limited to one of the three 

categories, but authorization may be 

granted to one or more subcategories 

under Category 2. In applying for 

authorization for use/disposal of sewage 

sludge under the general permit, the 

applicant will be required to specify 

under which category or subcategory(s) 

authorization is being requested. 

However, the permit issuing authority 

will have the final determination as to 

which category or subcategory(s) the 

authorization will be granted. The 

requirements in the permit for the use/ 

disposal of sewage sludge are based 

primarily on 40 CFR Part 503. 

Other Legal Requirements 

Economic Impact (Executive Order 

12866): The EPA has determined that 

the issuance of this general permit is not 

a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 

FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) and is 

therefore not subject to formal OMB 

review prior to proposal. 

Paperwork Reduction Act: The EPA 

has reviewed the requirements imposed 

on regulated facilities in these proposed 

general permits under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. § 501 

et seq. The information collection 

requirements of these permits have 

already been approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget in submissions 

made for the NPDES permit program 

under the provisions of the Clean Water 

Act. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the 

Small Business regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act (SBREFA): The RFA 

requires that the EPA prepare a 

regulatory flexibility analysis for rules 

subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 

553(b) that have a significant impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

The permit proposed today, however, is 

not a ‘‘rule’’ subject to the requirements 

of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and is therefore not 

subject to the RFA. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: 

Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law 104–4, 

generally requires Federal agencies to 

assess the effects of their ‘‘regulatory 

actions’’ defined to be the same as 

‘‘rules’’ subject to the RFA) on tribal, 

state, local governments and the private 

sector. The permit proposed today, 

however, is not a ‘‘rule’’ subject to the 

RFA and is therefore not subject to the 

requirements of the UMRA. 

Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 

et seq. 

Dated: December 17, 2012. 

Derrith R. Watchman-Moore, 

Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of 

Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–31716 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9767–6; CERCLA–04–2012–3780] 

Ellman Battery Superfund Site; 

Orlando, Orange County, FL; Notice of 

Settlement 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of settlement. 

SUMMARY: Under 122(h)(1) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency has 

entered into an Ability To Pay 

settlement to recover outstanding cost 

from two parties concerning a previous 

Removal Action at the Ellman Battery 

Superfund Site located in Orlando, 

Orange County, Florida. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until 

February 4, 2013. The Agency will 

consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations which 

indicate that the settlement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are 

available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. 

Submit your comments by Site name 

Ellman Battery Superfund Site by one of 

the following methods: 

• www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/ 

programs/enforcement/ 

enforcement.html. 

• Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov. 

• U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 

Georgia 30303. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula V. Painter at 404/562–8887. 

Dated: December 10, 2012. 

Anita L. Davis, 

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information 

Management Branch, Superfund Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–31733 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9767–7; CERCLA–04–2013–3752] 

Leonard Chemical Superfund Site; 

Catawba, York County, SC; Notice of 

Settlement 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of settlement. 

SUMMARY: Under 122(h)(1) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency has 

entered into a settlement to recover 

outstanding cost from three parties who 

did not participate in a previous 

Consent Decree to perform a Remedial 

Action at the Leonard Chemical 

Superfund Site located in Catawba, 

York County, South Carolina. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until 

February 4, 2013. The Agency will 

consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations which 

indicate that the settlement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are 

available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. 

Submit your comments by Site name 

Leonard Chemical Superfund Site by 

one of the following methods: 

• www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/ 

programs/enforcement/ 

enforcement.html 

• Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with