alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

March 29, 1956

No. 59789.

#### George Shluger and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 270757-K (New York).

*382Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in O. D. 1643, *supra.*
Before the Second Division,

October 9, 1967

No. P67/339.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. *v.*United States, protest 66/40295 (New York).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of soup tureens with cords the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Silvine*Importers, *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 362, C.D. 2821), the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 18, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.203 Net Interbank Transactions** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       54
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (31)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,540
<PP&E>                                           3,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,066
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,022
<SALES>                                            150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   150
<CGS>                                               82
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       82
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 360/5 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 360 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 615 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 360

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 615 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 360/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 360/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 8 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 360/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 360/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
December 11, 1963

No. 68166.

#### Oriental Exporters, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/1846, etc. (initial No. 295614-K); protests 238926-K, etc. (initial No. 59/1809); protests 228534-K, etc. (initial No. 315721-K); protests 59/1032, etc. (initial No. 312200-K).

Protests abandoned November 4, 1963. (Not published).

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Youku.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor Wing
Cheung Koo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 10, 2011



|    |  |                            |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Victor Wing Cheung Koo
|    |  | Name:                      |  | Victor Wing Cheung Koo 
|    |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of Compound Natural Foods, Inc., a company duly formed under the laws of Nevada (the "Company"), for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Joey Canyon, President (Chief Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

November 5, 2010                          /s/ Joey Canyon             

                                         Joey Canyon

                                         Chief Executive Officer and

                                         Principal Financial Officer

 

----
Before the Second Division,

October 6, 1959

No. 63415.

#### Markt & Hammacher Co. *v.*United States,

protest 315751-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiff wqs sustained.
Before the First Division,

July 28, 1953

No. 57443.

#### Gaillet & Hartig Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 202195-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Coughlin Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and *Gillette Safety Razor Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 98 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 98

  Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 1998

Mr. Gregg (for Mr. Lott) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and 
                       House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 21, 1998, Friday, May 22, 1998, Saturday, May 23, 1998, 
or Sunday, May 24, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority 
Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent resolution, 
it stands recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 1, 1998, or 
until such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, May 22, 
1998, or Saturday, May 23, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent 
resolution, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, 
1998, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.15.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                 CITICORP EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Section 10.12 of the Citicorp Executive Incentive Compensation Plan is
hereby amended to add the following sentence at the end of such Section:

                  "The value of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered
                  for tax withholding may not exceed the amount allowed
                  consistent with fixed plan accounting in accordance with
                  generally accepted accounting principles."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-92M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

MYRON COSMO CURRY, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Count 1: Conspiracy to Distribute Oxycodone;

Count 2: Carrying a Firearm During and in Relation to a Drug Trafficking Crime.

Date of Detention Hearing: March 8, 2006

 The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter

set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant can meet

will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any

other person and the community. The Government was represented by Vince Lombardi.

The defendant was represented by Robert Leen.

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 14 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. There is therefore a rebuttable presumption against the 

defendant’s release based upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e).

(2) Defendant poses a risk of danger due to the nature of the instant offense,

inasmuch as he was arrested in possession of a semiautomatic weapon. 

This fact, alone, placed him in violation of state release conditions on

pending King County Superior Court charges. Accordingly, presumption

against release has not been overcome.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

//

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 14 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 13th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 14 Filed 03/13/06 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD BASKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5130 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge [Dkt. #15] that the complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

In March, 2006, Plaintiff filed this civil rights action alleging that he was unlawfully denied a

transfer to work camp, that the amounts of funds in his account is improper and that he is not being

properly medicated. As detailed by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff failed to connect any allegation to

a named defendant. Further, he has no liberty interest in transfer to any given facility. Hewitt v.

Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983). The magistrate Judge afforded Plaintiff an opportunity to file an

amended complaint and he has not done so, instead filing motions for clarification and “notice of

appeal” of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

The Court, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and

Case 3:06-cv-05130-FDB Document 19 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 2

Baskett v. Washington State of et al Doc. 19

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel for

Defendants, and to the Hon. J. Kelly Arnold..

 

DATED this 31st day of July, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05130-FDB Document 19 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
No. P69/114.

protests 64/22112, etc. (New York).

#### Chain Bike Corp. *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Seedman International Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285), -the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EX-33.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed
by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Shari Gillund

Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 11, 2009
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00327-CV

BILLY R. HIGH AND TRACI HIGH-WARD,

Appellants

v.

COUNTY OF FREESTONE,

Appellee

From the 77th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-016-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward filed their notice of appeal in this

case on September 17, 2019, stating that they are appealing from the trial court’s February 

9, 2017 judgment. The notice of appeal, however, is untimely; it must have been filed 

within thirty days after the judgment was signed, TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, and any motion for 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal must have been filed within fifteen days after 

the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, see id. R. 26.3.
High v. Cty. of Freestone Page 2

By letter dated September 24, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants that 

this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because it appeared that their 

notice of appeal was untimely. The Clerk of this Court notified Appellants that the Court 

may dismiss the appeal unless, within ten days from the date of the letter, Appellants 

showed grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellants have not done so.

Because our jurisdiction depends on a timely notice of appeal and because 

Appellants’ notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See id. R. 42.3(a); Howlett v. Tarrant Cty., 301 S.W.3d 840, 843 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, 

pet. denied) (“A timely-filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and absent 

a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal.” (citing Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)). Appellants’ Request for Appellate Court to Take Judicial 

Notice, filed on October 7, 2019, is therefore also dismissed. 

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Neill

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 23, 2019

[CV06]
From: lkubisch@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:31:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Kubisch

Santa Barbara, CA 93108