alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E.O. 12866 Review 2060-AQ42 Email 012011.txt

From: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 7:52 AM

To: cortney_higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Fruh.Steve@epamail.epa.gov; tierney.jan@epamail.epa.gov; 

Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov; Guinnup.Dave@epamail.epa.gov; 

Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov; French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov; 

Westlin.Peter@epamail.epa.gov; Hanzel, Veronica; Laney, Michael N.; 

Benner.Tim@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: EPA Staff Response regarding revised rule

text 

regarding ambient monitoring pertaining to Primary Lead RTR, RIN 2060-

AQ42

Hello CortneyI have not heard from OGC yet, but this is our revision to the language 

regarding the ambient monitoring. This language is in line with current 

efforts regarding the lead NAAQS, which also satisfies the RTR requirement for 

compliance. I believe this allows for the elimination of any duplicative 

requirements.

 (k) The owner or operator of each source subject to §63.1544(d) must 

operate a monitoring system for measuring the source’s contributions to the 

lead compound concentrations in the ambient air.

 (1) The owner or operator must operate ambient air monitors sufficient 

in number, location, and frequency of sample collection to detect expected 

maximum concentrations of lead compounds in the ambient air due to emissions 

from the affected source(s) in accordance with a written plan as described in 

(k)(2) of this paragraph and approved by the Administrator. The plan must 

include descriptions of the sampling and analytical methods used.

 (2) The owner or operator must submit a written plan describing and 

explaining the basis for the design and adequacy of the monitoring network, 

the sampling, analytical, and quality assurance procedures, and any procedures 

and the justification for any seasonal, background, or other data adjustments 

within 45 days after the effective date of this subpart.

(3) The Administrator at any time may require changes in, or expansion 

of, the monitoring program, including additional sampling and analytical 

protocols and network design. (l) If all rolling three-month average ambient concentrations of lead 

measured by the ambient monitoring system are less than [50 percent] of the 

concentration limit in §63.1544(d) for three consecutive years, the owner or 

operator may submit a revised plan to reduce the monitoring sampling and 

analysis frequency (e.g., from daily to weekly).

For any subsequent period, if any rolling three-month average ambient 

concentration measured at any monitor in the monitoring system exceeds [50 

percent] of the ambient concentration limit in §63.1544(d), the owner or 

operator must resume monitoring pursuant to paragraph (k)(1) at all monitors 

until another three consecutive years of ambient concentration measurements 

less than [50 percent] of the ambient concentration limit is demonstrated.

Page 1
Case 2:06-cv-00656-JLR Document 19 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00656-JLR Document 19 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2
evok-ex41_6.htm



 

Exhibit 4.1

 

FORM OF

 

AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

 

This Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant (this “Amendment”), dated as of March 22, 2018, is being entered into by and between Evoke Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and _________________ (the “Holder”).  

 

WHEREAS, the Holder is the record and beneficial owner of certain warrants (the “Existing Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, set forth on Exhibit A hereto; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder have agreed to amend the Existing Warrants in the manner provided in this Amendment (the Existing Warrants, as so amended, the “Warrants”).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows:

 

Section 1.Amendment to Warrant.  The Existing Warrants are amended by replacing the fourth sentence of Section 3(d) of each Existing Warrant in its entirety with the following sentence:

“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in the event of a Fundamental Transaction, the Company or any Successor Entity (as defined below) shall, at the Holder’s option, exercisable at any time concurrently with, or within 30 days after, the consummation of the Fundamental Transaction, purchase this Warrant from the Holder by paying to the Holder an amount of cash equal to the Black Scholes Value of the remaining unexercised portion of this Warrant on the date of the consummation of such Fundamental Transaction; provided, however, if the Fundamental Transaction is a result of a transaction which has not been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, Holder shall not have the option to require the Company to purchase its Warrant.”

Section 2.Miscellaneous.

(A)No Other Amendment.  Except for the matters set forth in this Amendment, all other terms of the Warrants shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

(B)Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, and all questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by, the laws of the State of New York, except for its conflicts of law provisions.

(C)Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in the original or by facsimile in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]

 

 

 

US-DOCS\99820521.3



 

The parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

EVOKE PHARMA, INC.

 

 

 

By:


	
 
	
Name:
	






	
 
	
Title:
	





 

 

[HOLDER]

 

 

 

By:


	
 
	
Name:
	






	
 
	
Title:
	





 

[Signature Page to Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant]



 



Exhibit A

 

Existing Warrants to be Amended

 


	
Holder
	
Issuance Date
	
Shares Underlying Warrant

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 




 

 

 

 

 

US-DOCS\99820521.3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Comprehensive Annual Report of Consumer Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Jianmin Gao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    July 19, 2016 | By: | /s/
    Jianmin Gao               
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------
|                        |     | Jianmin
    Gao                   
|                        |     | Chief
    Financial Officer       
|                        |     | (Principal
    Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 4.1












Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


April 11, 2018


 


Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 4-4


Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217








	Re:	
Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio (the “Trust”)












 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-223962) for the above captioned Trust.  We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 








	 	
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 
	 	
Alaia Capital, LLC

	 
	 	 	 	 
		
By: 

	
/s/ Oscar Loynaz          

	 
	 	 	
Name: Oscar Loynaz

	 
	 	 	
Title:  Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 152 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 152

 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
 name of the Senate in City of New York, et al. v. William Clinton, et 
                        al., and related cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 1997

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
 name of the Senate in City of New York, et al. v. William Clinton, et 
                        al., and related cases.

Whereas, in the cases of City of New York, et al. v. William Clinton, et al., 
        Civ. No. 97-2393, National Treasury Employees Union, et al., v. United 
        States, et al., Civ. No. 97-2399, and Snake River Potato Growers, Inc., 
        et al., v. Robert Rubin, Civ. No. 97-2463, all pending in the United 
        States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act, Public Law No. 104-130, 110 
        Stat. 1200 (1996), has been placed in issue; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c), 288e(a), and 2881(a), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name of 
        the Senate in any legal action in which the powers and responsibilities 
        of Congress under the Constitution are placed in issue: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to appear as amicus 
curiae on behalf of the Senate in the cases of City of New York, et al. v. 
William Clinton, et al.; National Treasury Employees Union, et al., v. United 
States, et al.; and Snake River Potato Growers, Inc., et al., v. Robert Rubin, 
to defend the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act.
    Sec. 2. That while the Senate is adjourned the Senate Legal Counsel is 
authorized to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in other cases in 
which the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act is placed in issue: 
Provided, That the Joint Leadership Group authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to 
appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in such other cases.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62827.

#### Gitkin Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/6494 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 63828.

protest 987112-G (Boston).

#### Price Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **8075**

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN ,
P laintiff

- Appell ant ,

v. D. BOYD, Officer , Defendant

- Appell ee .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. R ebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2: 11

- cr - 00 330

- RBS

- LRL )

Submitted : March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Keith Michael Brown , Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis , Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond , Virginia , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Boyd , No. 2:11

- cv - 00330

- RBS

- LRL (E.D. Va. Nov.
9, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 23, 2010



/S/    CHARLES J. SCHREIBER,
JR.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and Director
No. 62853.

#### Premium Wares, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 235392-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of table or kitchen utensils, similar in all material respects to merchandise composed of glass, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 25, 2011

On February 24th, 2011 we held a meeting in Ann Arbor, MI with the Hybrid 

Manufacturers Regulatory Collaboration (HMRC) to discuss concerns raised by members of the 

HMRC regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Concerns 

were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed 

rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.1,2 Attendees are 

presented in the table below.

Attendee Affiliation

Cleophas Jackson EPA

Anthony Neam EPA

Charles Schenk EPA

Chien Sze EPA

James Sanchez EPA

Peter Smith EPA

Carl Ryan EPA

Carl Fulper EPA

William Courtois EPA

Ryan Sparza EPA

Maria Peralta EPA

Robert Caldwell EPA

Anthony Neam EPA

Barbara Chance Allison Transmission

Kevin Rodgers Allsion Transmission

Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation

Derek Matthews BAE Systems

Thomas Apalenek BAE Systems

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 18, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.208 Open Market Paper** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on page 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                3,298,849
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            38,317
<ALLOWANCES>                             12,000
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      3,623,249
<PP&E>                                  324,513
<DEPRECIATION>                         (187,566)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        4,140,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    96,802
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                             22,632,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                          (24,009,133)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          4,140,874
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         94,771
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           270,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,603,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,622,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (6,440,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (6,440,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (6,440,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.59)



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY TERMS OF

SUPERVISED RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. CR06-142RSL

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

) MOTION TO MODIFY TERMS OF

v. ) SUPERVISED RELEASE

)

JOHN GIDIMIN KLIMAS, )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Post Judgment Motion Seeking to

Modify the Terms of Supervised Release Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. Rule 32.1(c)” (Dkt. #30). 

The Court, having considered the motion, and the records and files herein, hereby DENIES

defendant’s motion.

DATED this 4th day of February, 2008.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00142-RSL Document 31 Filed 02/04/08 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 
 I,
Raymond W. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Cardiac Science, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and(2)
    the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
      May 10, 2005
    /s/    RAYMONDW.
      COHEN**Raymond
      W. Cohen**
      **Chief
      Executive Officer**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on October 19, 2023.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes and production would disclose investigative techniques.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer,  Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-22685 Filed 10-10-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P