Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-580-870]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were sold in the United States at prices below normal value. The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2021, through August 31, 2022. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable October 5, 2023.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475 or (202) 482-6312, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background These preliminary results are made in accordance with section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce published the notice of initiation of this administrative review on November 3, 2022.[1]
                    
                     Commerce selected Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) as the two mandatory respondents in this review.[2]
                    
                     On May 4, 2023, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce extended the preliminary results of review by 119 days, until September 29, 2023.[3] For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[4]
                    
                     A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Scope of the Order [5] The product covered by the 
                    *Order*
                     is OCTG from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of the 
                    *Order, see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Act. Commerce has calculated export prices in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act. Constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772(b) of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On November 8, 2022, HiSteel Co., Ltd. (HiSteel) submitted a letter certifying that it had no exports or sales of subject merchandise into the United States during the POR.[6]
                    
                     U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) did not have any information to contradict this claim of no shipments during the POR.[7]
                    
                     Therefore, we preliminarily determine that HiSteel did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to HiSteel but will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.[8] Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.” For these preliminary results, we calculated a dumping margin of 1.18 percent for SeAH and zero percent for Hyundai Steel, the mandatory respondents in this review. Consistent with our normal methodology, we have assigned to the companies not individually examined (
                    *see*
                     Appendix II for a full list of these companies) a margin of 1.18 percent, which is the margin calculated for SeAH. Preliminary Results of Review Commerce preliminarily finds that, for the period September 1, 2021, through August 31, 2022, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: Exporter/producer
Estimated weighted-average dumping margin
                             (percent)Hyundai Steel Company
0.00SeAH Steel Corporation
1.18Non-examined companies 9
1.18
 Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days after public announcement of the preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.[10]
                    
                     Rebuttal briefs may be filed no later than seven days after case briefs are due and may 
                    ( print page 69120)
                    respond only to arguments raised in the case briefs.[11]
                    
                     Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[12]
                    
                     Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.[13] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[14]
                    
                     Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results of review, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.[15] For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above 
                    *de minimis*
                     (
                    *i.e.,*
                     greater than or equal to 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer, and we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[16]
                    
                     Where the individually-selected respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we intend to assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the “Rates for Non-Examined Companies” section. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[17]
                    
                     If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the final results of review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.24 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.[18]
                    
                     These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: September 28, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the 
                        *Order* IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VI. Affiliation VII. Discussion of the Methodology VIII. Currency Conversion IX. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Individually Examined 1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 2. Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd. 3. Husteel Co., Ltd. 4. ILJIN Steel Corporation 5. K Steel Corporation 6. Keonwoo Metals Co., Ltd. 7. Kukje Steel 8. MSTEEL Co., Ltd. 9. NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 10. Nissei Trading Co., Ltd.
                        ( print page 69121) 11. POSCO International Corporation 12. Sungwon Steel Co., Ltd. 13. TGS Pipe


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*87 FR 66275 (November 3, 2022). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “2021-2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Respondent Selection,” dated December 8, 2022. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated May 4, 2023. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2021-2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,*79 FR 53691 (September 10, 2014) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         HiSteel's Letter, “No Shipments Letter,” dated November 8, 2022. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea 2021-22: No Shipment Inquiry for HiSteel Co., Ltd., During the Period 09/01/2021 through 08/31/2022,” dated September 26, 2023. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013,*79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in 
                        *Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013,*79 FR 51306, 51307 (August 28, 2014). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix II. Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d). Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period,*85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         For a full discussion of this clarification, see 
                        *Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings,*86 FR 884 (January 15, 2021). Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         
                        *See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Determination,*81 FR 59603 (August 30, 2016). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2023-22132 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P