alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyand mineral resources of the St. Louis quadrangle, Missouri-Illinois**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:438
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959029
 
August 1, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES E. DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5110RJB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:06-cv-05110-RJB Document 5 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager) at the Washington State

Department of Corrections.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05110-RJB Document 5 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: SouthAtlantic Area : fiscal year ... research highlights [electronic resource].**
 
2008|2009-2011
 
SuDoc Number:A 77.2:SO 8/4/
Item Number:0026-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960774
 
July 2, 2018
From: ryan_owens@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:53:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If

you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives, especially when some of these

drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by the federal

government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest way

possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ryan Owens

Cincinnati, OH 45211
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form consolidated
balance  sheets,  and  consolidated  statements  of income of the Company in the
Company"  Form 10-QSB and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         133,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,367,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   930,171
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,998,920
<PP&E>                                         748,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,986,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,266,010
<BONDS>                                        213,849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                        27,856
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,521,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,986,234
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,679,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,405,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             937,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,669,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,669,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 536,664
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,127,408)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KRISTA M. ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5125JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is her responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05125-FDB Document 2 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JULIUS ADAIR WILEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00048-CCE-5; 1:16-cv01252-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius Adair Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, 

Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julius Adair Wiley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge, construing his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a

sentence reduction as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing that motion as 

second or successive. Although the district court should not have construed Wiley’s 

motion as one arising under § 2255, we nevertheless agree with the court’s alternative 

reasoning that Wiley is not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2) because the Sentencing 

Commission has not authorized resentencing under Amendment 794 to the Sentencing 

Guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(a)(1), (d) (2016); United 

States v. McHan, 386 F.3d 620, 622 (4th Cir. 2004). We therefore affirm the denial of 

relief on that basis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

USGS Washington Water Science Center

Skip Navigation
homeprojects/studieswater datadata requestspublicationslinksFOLLOW

Message From Our Water Science Center DirectorNewsroomSeminar ScheduleOutreach and EducationWater Science Center InformationEmployment and Volunteer OpportunitiesDirections and Locations MapOur Customers

| This is your direct link to all kinds of water resource information. Here you'll find information on Washington's rivers and streams. You'll also find information about groundwater, water quality, and many other topics. The USGS operates the most extensive satellite network of stream-gaging stations in the state, many of which form the backbone of flood-warning systems. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regional Water Science Issues
WaterAvailabilityAquaticEcosystemsEnvironment& HumanHealthClimate and Land Use ChangeNaturalHazards
Latest River Conditions:Statewide Streamflow TableReal-Time Map  - ESRI Maps

Annual Data Reports:Text Search                                                                                                                       | Water Science in the News

New Tools and Knowledge to Aid in Columbia Plateau Groundwater ManagementA comprehensive USGS report provides new knowledge and tools to aid in the management of critical Columbia Plateau resources while coping with declines in groundwater levels and the uncertainties of climate change....(more)

Predicting Pesticides in Streams and Rivers: Where is Water Quality at Risk?A new interactive mapping tool provides predicted concentrations for 108 pesticides in U.S. streams and rivers and identifies which streams are most likely to exceed water-quality guidelines....(more) 

Low 2015 Snowpack and River Flows Studied to Provide Insight Into Future DroughtsUSGS hydrologic technicians are currently taking measurements from hundreds of streams and rivers across the western United States as part of a low flow study....(more)  

SR 530 Landslide - Scientific Information |

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://wa.water.usgs.gov/index.html		Page Contact Information: webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 09-Jul-2015 16:13:49 EDT
H. Res. 770 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 5, 2007. 

Whereas the Veterans History Project was established by a 

unanimous vote of the United States Congress to collect 

and preserve the wartime stories of American veterans; 

Whereas Congress charged the American Folklife Center at 

the Library of Congress to undertake the Veterans History Project and to engage the public in the creation of 

a collection of oral histories that would be a lasting tribute to individual veterans and an abundant resource for 

scholars; 

Whereas there are 17,000,000 wartime veterans in America 

whose stories can educate people of all ages about important moments and events in the history of the United 

States and the world and provide instructive narratives 

that illuminate the meanings of ‘‘service’’, ‘‘sacrifice’’, 

‘‘citizenship’’, and ‘‘democracy’’; 

Whereas the Veterans History Project relies on a corps of 

volunteer interviewers, partner organizations, and an 

array of civic minded institutions nationwide who interview veterans according to the guidelines it provides; 

Whereas increasing public participation in the Veterans History Project will increase the number of oral histories 
2 

•HRES 770 EH 

that can be collected and preserved and increase the 

number of veterans it so honors; and 

Whereas ‘‘National Veterans Awareness Week’’ commendably 

preceded this resolution in the years 2005 and 2006: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes ‘‘National Veterans Awareness 

Week’’; 

(2) supports the designation of a ‘‘National Veterans History Project Week’’; 

(3) calls on the people of the United States to interview at least one veteran in their families or communities according to guidelines provided by the Veterans 

History Project; and 

(4) encourages local, State, and national organizations along with Federal, State, city and county governmental institutions to participate in support of the effort 

to document, preserve, and honor the service of American wartime veterans. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130850 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130850 COA: 256562 Calhoun CC: 00-004624-FH DESHAWN DAREL LE WITCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l0913 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 20, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 31.2


I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

        1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN
Holdings, Inc.;
        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and
               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and
        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert      Chief Financial Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert      July 22, 2004
Case 2:06-cv-00394-MJP Document 28 Filed 01/24/07 Page 1 of 1
From: susan1061@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:57:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Damron

Cedartown, GA 30125