alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CALVIN ROUSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5183RJB/JKA

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A

CONTINUANCE OF

THE JOINT STATUS REPORT, 

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,

RE-NOTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND SETTING

A BRIEFING SCHEDULE

This Civil Rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

On March 25, 2008, the court entered an order addressing a discovery dispute in this action (Dkt #

76). Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment, (Dkt # 70), was removed from the court’s

calendar until the dispute was over. The court stated it would re-note the motion after the dispute was

settled. Since that time three motions have been filed. Defendant’s filed a motion to continue the due date

for filing a joint status report (Dkt # 81). In that motion defendants state the discovery in question was
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

sent to plaintiff on June 2, 2008. Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions for not meeting with him to prepare

a joint status report, (Dkt # 83). In that motion plaintiff objects to the requested continuance. Plaintiff then

filed a motion asking for a continuance to respond to the pending motion for summary judgment (Dkt #

85).

Defendant’s motion for a continuance of the Joint Status Report due date, (Dkt # 81), is

GRANTED. The Report will be due November 21, 2008. 

Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, (Dkt. # 83), is DENIED. As defendant’s counsel notes the content

of the report may change given a ruling on the pending dispositive motion.

Plaintiff’s motion for a continuance to respond to the motion for summary judgment, (Dkt # 85), is

premature. The court has not re-noted the summary judgment motion. The motion is therefore DENIED.

The court now re-notes defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. # 70), for August 22,

2008. Plaintiff’s response is due on or before August 15, 2008. Defendant’s optional reply is due on or

before August 22, 2008. Plaintiff is warned he must allow three days for delivery of his pleading to

defense counsel. This means he must deliver his response to prison officials for mailing by August 12,

2008. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants, remove

Dkt. # 81, 83, and 85 from the court’s calendar, and note the November 21, 2008, due date for the Joint

Status Report, the August 15, 2008, for plaintiff’s response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment,,

and the August 22, 2008, noting date for defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt # 70).

DATED this 22 day of July 2008.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,413
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             629
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                31,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     93,263
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          83,429
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            82,694
<LOANS>                                        266,379
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (3,990)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 507,079
<DEPOSITS>                                     350,426
<SHORT-TERM>                                   115,176
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,180
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           661
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 507,079
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,072
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,772
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,107
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,951
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,366
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,239
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,712
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      285
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  25
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,116
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,345
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.93
<LOANS-NON>                                        363
<LOANS-PAST>                                       128
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,842
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      317
<RECOVERIES>                                       180
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,990
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,990
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            499
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Focus Media Holding Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason Nanchun Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 13, 2012



By:

/s/ Jason Nanchun JiangName:

Jason Nanchun JiangTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 67625.

#### Louis Goebel *v.*United States,

protest 60/21472 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the importations consist of wild giraffes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Louis Goebel*and *F. L. Kraemer & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 273, C.D. 2269), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MOHAMUD HASSAN ALI,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: CR05-316-JLR

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine Base and Cocaine; Possession with Intent to Distribute

Cocaine Base; Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine

Date of Detention Hearing: September 23, 2005

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

There is probable cause to believe defendant committed the drug offense charged in this

case. The maximum penalty for this offense is in excess of ten years. There is therefore a

rebuttable presumption against defendant as to both dangerousness and flight risk, under 18

Case 2:05-cr-00316-JLR Document 13 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

U.S.C. §3142(e). Further, the Court finds:

(1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance based on his substance abuse,

unemployment, residential instability, conflicting information about where the defendant lives, and

noncompliance with Department of Corrections supervision.

(2) The defendant represents a risk of danger based on the nature of the pending

charges, criminal history, substance abuse, and history of noncompliance with supervision.

(3) Nothing in this record satisfactorily rebuts the presumption against release. 

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00316-JLR Document 13 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-05261-FDB Document 1-2 Filed 05/12/06 Page 12 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0000875579
<NAME>                           Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    20000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            433750
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6911
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (420661)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      20000
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     36250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (36250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (36250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (36250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.01)




</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

AIRON CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-327JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The Honorable James L. Robart recuses himself and the case is reassigned in

rotation to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman. All future pleadings shall bear the cause

number C06-327P.

Filed and entered this 31st day of May, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00327-MJP Document 8 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 88 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2015*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.8 Saving and Investment by Sector 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 59311.

protests 189255-K, etc. (New York).

#### P. Robertet, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55705.

protests 158241-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. & A. Kohnstamm (London), Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      

</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                                       875359
<NAME>                                             Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        2773
<SECURITIES>                                                 22236
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 7694
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   273
<INVENTORY>                                                   9997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             47474
<PP&E>                                                       40793
<DEPRECIATION>                                               18635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               70368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         8730
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        13
<OTHER-SE>                                                   58727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 70368
<SALES>                                                      19502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             19502
<CGS>                                                         9439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               3885
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  1399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           2486
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  2486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.19
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

                          CERTIFICATION

I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

        1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN
Holdings, Inc.;

        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

        4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and

               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert      Chief Financial Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert      August 14, 2003
Swanson, Brian (OST) b0T>o£>r-i<l^V-i2^(^ 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Duane DuRay [iwdairplane@charterintemet.com] 

Monday, July 19, 2010 1:23 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Jim Gallagher; Barry Lind; Swanson, Brian (OST) 

EAS IWD 

Dennis, 

In response to an email I had received from Mr. Gallagher I want to inform your office the Airport Board and I are well 

aware of the lack of an interline agreement between CAT and any other carrier, but we have been informed by Mr. 

Gallagher of the continued contact with Frontier Airlines to try to ink a deal with them for an interline agreement. Even with 

that knowledge, we are supportive in the proposal submitted by CAT and we remain hopeful and supportive of this bid. 

As I am well aware of, an interline agreement is a very important item to insure our passengers are given the service they 

would receive at other airports and I believe CAT will be able to accommodate our passengers with an alternate system 

until an interline agreement could be established. We are stepping into a very different arrangement with CAT and we 

know some of these waters are uncharted as to date, but my Board and I feel our alternatives show less hope and we are 

willing to make these steps. 

Duane