alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B Arysta LifeScience March 3, 2014 .. lr;**obcume~i ·co~tr61**  Office (DCP) (7407M) .. 'Office of**P~flution** Prevention and Toxics. (o'PPT) .

U.S.**Envir~nmental** Protection Agency . . ··

.. '**.~.:·** REC .;\'.tr•J)**~·**e.PI' 00 cv..e:·r cc.N1ER

!

..)r·'"',...t,1r-,...**·,.,;:Ct:.~vc.d** OPPT CBlC tO**I~ 1~1AR**  II.AH 6: 08 CBIC Control Number358893 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington,: be 20460-0001 )-r**~** /\\**~1}** Attn: TSCA Section 4- Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, 1H,3H-Benzol [1,2-c:4,5-c']difuran-1,3,5,7- tetrone, CAS# 89-32-7, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No.5, January 7, 2011,40 CFR 799.5087. ' .'•'· DearSir or Madam: . ' ··,f \ Arysta 'LifeScience America lrlC.**("Ar\r~ta")** submits this application for exemption from the requirements for testing**1H,3H-Benzol[1,2-c:4,5-c']"ifuran~1,l,5,7-tetrone,** CAS# 89-32-7 under TSCA Section 4 Test Ruie as noted• above:

As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information: (a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No.5, January 7, 2011,40 CFR 799.5087, 1H,3H-Benzol [1,2-c:4,5- c']difuran-1,3,5,7-tetrone, CAS# 89-32-7. (b) We are requesting an exemption from all testing requirements for 1H,3H-Benzol [1,2-c:4,5- c']difuran-1,3,5,7-tetrone, CAS# 89-32-7 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we believe that this material is already being sponsored for testing (per above) by another party. (c) Name, address and telephone number of applicant: Arysta LifeScience America Inc.

1450 Broadway (20th Floor) New York, NY 10018 212-930-5101 (d) Name, address and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. Toyokazu Matsumoto President Arysta LifeScience America Inc. 1450 Broadway (20th Floor) New York, NY 10018 212-930-5101 Arysta LifeScience America Inc. 1 1450 Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Telephone: 212-930-5100 Fax: 212-930-5119 www .arystalifescience.com

.sz "gQ mo::: fl<( 2::J:a.. en ""....,>. :g..o cUJ..,_**~0**•As per 40 CFR 790.99, Arysta provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption:I (Arysta LifeScience America Inc.) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) ofTSCA expires, Arysta must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. If you have any further questions please contact me. Arysta LifeScience America Inc. 0565 2 Arysta LifeScience America Inc.
No. 67191.

protests 60/4471(B), etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Cajo Trading, Inc. (Williams, Clarke Co.), et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 13 Filed 02/19/03 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 13 Filed 02/19/03 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 13 Filed 02/19/03 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 13 Filed 02/19/03 Page 4 of 4
Sep 30 2010 

Mr. Dahl Cooper 

4901 N. Axtell 

Marana, AZ 85653 

Dear Mr. Cooper: 

This is in response to your letter that was posted to public docket No. FAA-2010-0291 on 

March 17, 2010, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption 

from § 91.319 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. That exemption, if granted, would 

allow you to provide flight training operations in experimental aircraft for compensation or 

hire. 

Section 91.319(h) permits for-hire flight training in experimental aircraft in accordance with 

a Letter of Deviation Authority (LODA). The FAA guidance for the issuance of the required 

LODA was published on September 15, 2010. Please contact your local Flight Standards 

District Office to submit a LODA request. 

Because the relief you seek is covered under the rule, we will take no further action on your 

petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
No. 57469.

#### K. Shewakram & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 175626-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The official papers disclosing no reason for disturbing the classification of the collector, the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>   1
FRANKLIN BANCORPORATION, INC.

EXHIBIT 11


COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:


(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS - EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD       FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD
                                                                ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,              ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                1997             1996           1997               1996
                                                                ----             ----           ----               ----
<S>                                                                                      <C>                  <C>
Net earnings                                                $    1,541       $    1,221       $   4,345       $     3,237

Primary earnings (A)                                             1,541            1,221           4,345             3,237

Fully diluted earnings (B)                                       1,541            1,221           4,345             3,237

Weighted average shares outstanding                          6,538,702        6,343,411       6,504,845         6,329,166

Dilutive common stock equivalents for primary
 earnings per share                                            406,144          258,676         361,797           266,856 
                                                             ----------       ----------      -----------      -----------


Weighted average shares and common equivalent shares
 outstanding for primary earnings per share (C)              6,944,846        6,602,087        6,866,642        6,596,022

Equivalent shares assuming full dilution                       435,210          277,419          432,217          276,587 
                                                             -----------      ----------      -----------      -----------


Weighted average shares and common equivalent
shares  outstanding for fully diluted earnings
per share (D)                                                6,973,912        6,620,830        6,937,062        6,605,753

Earnings per share


Primary (A)/(C)                                             $     0.22       $     0.18       $     0.63       $     0.49

Fully diluted (B)/(D)                                       $     0.22       $     0.18       $     0.63       $     0.49
</TABLE>



                                       49
No. 61580.

#### Manca, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 266993-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiffs at 20 percent was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, David
Lichtenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) The
Special Financial Report of the Company for the period April 28, 2008 (date of
inception) through December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C
78m); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ David
Lichtenstein


David
Lichtenstein


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


June 10,
2010
May 25, 1965

No. 69328.

#### Mexican Petroleum Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 184205-K.

C.D. 2523. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
PeopleSoft, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
his knowledge:

     o    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Dated:  August 6, 2004




/s/ Craig A. Conway
-------------------------------------
Craig A. Conway
President and Chief Executive Officer
PeopleSoft, Inc.


/s/ Kevin T. Parker
-------------------------------------
Kevin T. Parker
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer
PeopleSoft, Inc.
Appendix E 

Comprehensive Conservation Plan Preparers 
Appendix E 

Alaska Peninsula and Becharof NWR Draft Conservation Plan E-1 

Preparers 

NAME EXPERTISE/FUNCTION DEGREE(S) EXPERIENCE (YRS) 

Refuge Staff 

Daryle R. Lons Refuge Management BS Natural Resource 

Biology

Refuge Management (27)

Ronald C. Squibb Wildlife 

Management 

BS Wildlife Ecology 

MS Fisheries & Wildlife 

PhD Range Science

Planning (6) 

Wildlife Biology (15)

Susan Savage Wildlife 

Management 

BA Biology 

MS Zoology

Wildlife Biology (10) 

Subsistence Management 

(3) 

Resource Mgt (5)

Region 7 Planning Staff 

Peter E. Wikoff Planning Team 

Leader 7/99–present 

General 

Coordination

BS Forest Mgt 

Master of Business 

Administration

Resource Planning (8) 

Resource Management (13)

Helen Clough Planning Team 

Leader until 6/99 

Initial Scoping and 

Alternative 

Development

BA Anthropology Refuge Planning (11) 

Public Land Management 

(17)

Karen Murphy Natural Resource 

Planner 

6/99–10/01

BS Wildlife Biology 

MEM Resource 

Management

Biology and Planning (7) 

Wildlife Biology (9)

Stewart Allen Social Science, 

Social Analysis, 

Economic Analysis 

until 4/02

BA Psychology 

BA Journalism 

MA Social Psychology 

PhD Recreation 

Management 

Social Aspects of Public 

Land and Natural 

Resource Management (20)

Kenneth W. Rice NEPA, Policy and 

ANILCA 

Compliance

MS Wildlife Resource Management (30)

Charles D. 

Ardizzone 

Wildlife Biologist BA pre-Vet Medicine 

MS Terrestrial Ecology 

PhD Wildlife (candidate)

Planning (4) 

Wildlife Management(8)

Brian Glaspell Social Science 

since 12/02 

BS Geography 

MS Natural Resource 

Management 

PhD Recreation/ 

Wilderness Management 

Social Aspects of Public 

Land and Natural 

Resource Management (8) 
Appendix E: Preparers 

E-2 Alaska Peninsula and Becharof NWR Draft Conservation Plan 

Karen L. Lew Technical Writer 

and Editor 

since 2/03 

BA Humanities Writing and Editing (32) 

Region 7 Fisheries and Ecological Services

Jim Larson Fishery 

Management

BS Fishery 

Management 

MS Natural Resources

Fishery Biology (24) 

Refuge Planning (6)

State of Alaska

Brad Palach Liaison with State of 

Alaska; ADF&G

BA Justice Fish and Wildlife 

Management (18)

Bruce Talbot Liaison with State of 

Alaska; DNR

BS Wildlife Management 

MS Nat Resource 

Planning

Planning and Policy (20)

Brandon Ducsay Liaison with State of 

Alaska; DNR

BS Nat Resource 

Management

Resource Management (6)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00127

- CV

C AROLYN W ILLIAMS

, Appellant

V

.

L ADERA

, A ppellee §

§

§

§ O n Appeal f

rom Cou nty Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County ( CV

- 2020

- 00600

- JP )

January 21, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appe al is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
Before the First Division,

August 21, 1958

No. 62318.

#### Hagen & Strandgaard, Inc., and Harper, Robinson & Co., Agts., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 296647-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 669, C. A. D. 669), the claim at 20 percent or at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C. A. D. 669, *supra,*were held dutiable at *12%*percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*for other furniture.
ACCEPTED 12-14-00100-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/23/2015 9:11:01 AM CATHY LUSK CLERK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROBERT GARRISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5837 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DENYING

MOTION FOR CLASS

CERTIFICATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge that Plaintiff’s motion for class certification be denied. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the

Report and Recommendation. As detailed by the Magistrate Judge, the Plaintiff has not met the

requirements for class certification. Plaintiff’s objection does not convince this Court otherwise.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Action Certification (Dkt. #106) is DENIED; and 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 2nd day of January, 2008.AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05837-FDB Document 127 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MYRON COSMO CURRY,

 

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-110RSM

 

 Minute Order

 

THIS matter was referred to Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold for purposes of a settlement conference

by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. Prior to the Settlement Conference, and without any input from

Magistrate Judge Arnold, the parties entered into a signed plea agreement. At the direction of District Judge

Martinez the reference to Magistrate Judge Arnold for settlement purposes is rescinded as moot and

unnecessary.

At the request of the parties and with the consent of the defendant pursuant to Rule 11, the defendant

will present the plea agreement to Magistrate Judge Arnold who will thereafter tender a Report and

Recommendation to Judge Martinez the assigned trial judge.

Entered by Deputy Clerk, /s/Kelly Miller, this 23rd day of January 2007, at 11:30 a.m.

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 119 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 58743.

protest 226707-K (Los Angeles).

#### Rattancraft of California and James Loudon & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Republic Bank of Savings, Respondent, v Harry J. Stein et al., Appellants, and United States of America et al., Defendants.

[632 NYS2d 980]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendants Harry J. Stein and Harriet Stein appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated April 5, 1994, which, upon granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and directs the sale of the subject property at public auction.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the ap-. pellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). The Supreme Court therefore properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
From: pastorjlange@stpaulmerced.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:22:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Lange

Merced, CA 95340
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Buyonate,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  the annual Report on Form 10-K of Buyonate, Inc. for the year ended
          December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the annual Report on Form 10-K for the
          year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Buyonate, Inc.


By: /s/ Husni Hassadiyeh
   ------------------------------------------------------------
Name:  Husni Hassadiyeh
Title: Principal Executive Officer and Director

Date:  February 11, 2010



By: /s/ Inbar Kuta
   ------------------------------------------------------------
Name:  Inbar Kuta
Title: Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting
       Officer and Director

Date:  February 11, 2010
| 1.     | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Metha Energy      Solutions Inc. |

|                      | Metha      Energy Solutions Inc. |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      |                             |
| Date:      March 31, 2010 | By:                    | /s/      Jesper Toft |
|                      |                             | Jesper      Toft |
|                      |                             | Chief      Financial Officer, |