alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 10,279.

#### The NIVETO.

[7 Ben. 09.] 1

District Court. E. D. New York.

Nov., 1873.

Seamen — Wages—Security for Costs — Shipping Commissioner.

A libel was filed by a seaman for balance of wages due and clothing destroyed. The claimant moved that he be required to file security for costs, showing by an affidavit of the United States shipping commissioner that a receipt in full for the wages had been given before such commissioner by the seaman. *Reid,*that the creation of the office of shipping commissioner gives courts of admiralty greater assurance than formerly that the just demands of the seaman have been discharged in any settlement made before the commissioner; and that the rule, allowing a seaman to libel without giving security, must be modified in eases where the seaman has been paid off before the shipping commissioner.

In admiralty.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict. Esq., and B. Lincoln Benedict, Esq. and here reprinted by permission.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a motion to compel a seaman to give security for costs in an action brought to recover a balance of wages and the value of some clothes, alleged to have been appropriated or destroyed by the master. The motion is based, among other things, upon the affidavit of the United States shipping commissioner, which shows that the seaman was paid his wages, and his receipt in full was taken, before the shipping commissioner in his official capacity.

It has hitherto been usual to relieve seamen from the requirement to give security for costs, for the reason that to compel security from a seaman is in effect to compel him to abandon a suit, often made necessary to relieve him from attempts to defraud. The creation of the office of shipping commissioner, and the designation of an official before whom the payment of wages may be made, full explanation given, and misrepresentation thus prevented, gives to the courts of admiralty, in cases where wages are claimed to have been so paid, a greater assurance that the just demands of the seaman have been recognized and discharged, in any settlement made with him, than they have been able to derive from receipts taken by a private shipping master or by the master of •the ship.

It seems, therefore, proper to modify the rule with regard to security for costs in cases where the seaman has been paid off before the shipping commissioner. In this case, therefore, I shall direct that the seaman give security for costs, and that all proceedings in the action be stayed until such security be given. I shall, however, give leave to apply to vacate this order at a future day, if so advised, because the application was not made until the seaman had departed on a voyage from which he has not yet returned, and therefore his affidavit could not be presented to me; and because the shipping commissioner does not say in his affidavit that the claim for the clothing was settled before him, or that no claim for lost clothing was then made by the seaman.
Definition of resinated wood and resinated trim :

Resinated wood means wood products (containing resin binders and adhesives) derived from produced by primary and secondary wood products manufacturing

.
Resinated wood includes residues from the manufacture and use of resinated wood, including materials and comprised of such items as board trim, sander dust, and panel trim , and off

- specification resinated wood products.

Suggested changes to March 2011 NHSM definitions.

 Clarifies the spectrum of resinated materials currently used as fuels throughout the wood product manufacturing process

 Includes definition of resinated wood trim to include broad class of materials produced at wood product mills.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to, and solely for purposes of, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies in the capacity and on the date indicated below that:

1. The Quarterly Report of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
(Monro) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Monro.



|                                                               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Robert G. Gross                                            |  |  |  | Dated: October 29, 2010
|Robert G. Gross                                                |  |  |  |                        
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board              |  |  |  |                        
|                                                               |  | 
|/s/ Catherine DAmico                                          |  |  |  | Dated: October 29, 2010
|Catherine DAmico                                              |  |  |  |                        
|Executive Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                        



22
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 141 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 141

  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National Concern About 
                   Young People and Gun Violence Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 1997

Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
    Craig, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Bryan, Ms. 
  Collins, Mr. Ford, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
   Roth, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Torricelli, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Abraham, Mr. 
Warner, Mr. Frist, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Specter, and Mr. Robb) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National Concern About 
                   Young People and Gun Violence Day.

Whereas every day in America, 15 children under the age of 19 are killed with 
        guns;
Whereas in 1994, approximately 70 percent of murder victims aged 15 to 17 were 
        killed with a handgun;
Whereas in 1995, nearly 8 percent of high school students reported having 
        carried a gun in the past 30 days;
Whereas young people are our Nation's most important resource, and we, as a 
        society, have a vested interest in helping children grow from a 
        childhood free from fear and violence into healthy adulthood;
Whereas young people can, by taking responsibility for their own decisions and 
        actions, and by positively influencing the decisions and actions of 
        others, help chart a new and less violent direction for the entire 
        Nation;
Whereas students in every school district in the Nation will be invited to take 
        part in a day of nationwide observance involving millions of their 
        fellow students, and will thereby be empowered to see themselves as 
        significant agents in a wave of positive social change; and
Whereas the observance of this day will give the students the opportunity to 
        make an earnest decision about their future by voluntarily signing the 
        ``Student Pledge Against Gun Violence'', and sincerely promise that the 
        students will never take a gun to school, will never use a gun to settle 
        a dispute, and will use their influence to keep friends from using guns 
        to settle disputes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) November 6, 1997, should be designated as ``National 
        Concern About Young People and Gun Violence Day''; and
            (2) the President should be authorized and requested to 
        issue a proclamation calling upon the school children of the 
        United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies 
        and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1


|                                                        |                                 
|------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|Sam Kan & Company                                       | [amsmooth10ka123110ex231001.jpg]
|1151 Harbor Bay Pkwy., Suite 101                       
|Alameda, CA 94502 Phone: 510.517.7874 Fax: 866.848.1224
|http://www.skancpa.com                                 
|                                                       
|                                                       
|                                                       
|                                                       

__________________________________________________________________________________    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-1 of American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. of our reports dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. included in this Report on Form S­1 for the period from the date of inception on July 11, 2008 to December 31, 2009.         /s/ Sam Kan & CompanyFirms Manual SignatureAlameda, CACity, StateDecember 17, 2010Date
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CYNTHIA ANAYA-CONTRERAS,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-191M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine (21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841

(b)(1)(A), and § 846.

Date of Detention Hearing: April 26, 2005.

The Court conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Based upon

the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, the Court finds that

no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the

appearance of defendant as required.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant by

the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserved the right to file a subsequent

Case 2:05-cr-00185-MJP Document 17 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

motion for release if new issues arise or there is a change of circumstances.

(2) The Pretrial Services Report dated April 22, 2005, indicates that defendant has

prior criminal violations.

(3) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(4) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 26th day of April, 2005.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00185-MJP Document 17 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 1 of 27

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 2 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 3 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 4 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 5 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 6 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 7 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 8 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 9 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 10 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 11 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 12 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 13 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 14 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 15 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 16 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 17 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 18 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 19 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 20 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 21 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 22 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 23 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 24 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 25 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 26 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 3 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 27 of 27
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 14th day of February , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHIHULY, INC., et al,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1801 JPD

ROBERT KAINDL, et al.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

A Status Conference is hereby scheduled for Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 4:00pm. 

The conference will be conducted in Courtroom 12 A, U.S. Courthouse, Seattle, Washington.

The status of discovery issues will be discussed at the conference. If other issues need to

be addressed, the parties are directed to notify the court in a filing(s) no later than the close of

business Friday, February 17, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 52 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60591

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE MARIA SALVADOR-REYES,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A29 766 843 

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Maria Salvador-Reyes (Reyes) petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) March 17, 2004, decision

dismissing the appeal from the denial of his motion to reopen a

1990 in absentia order of deportation. The BIA denied Reyes’s

motion for reconsideration of this decision on June 8, 2004. 

Reyes filed his petition for review on July 7, 2004. 

We are required to examine jurisdiction sua sponte if

necessary. See Williams v. Chater, 87 F.3d 702, 704 (5th Cir.
No. 04-60591

-2-

1996). Reyes had 30 days to file a timely petition for review

from the BIA’s decision. See Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft, 330

F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir. 2003); Ibrik v. INS, 108 F.3d 596, 597

(5th Cir. 1997). The BIA’s denial of an appeal and its denial of

a motion to reconsider are two separate final orders, each of

which requires its own petition for review. See Stone v. INS,

514 U.S. 386, 394, 401-02, 405-06 (1995). Because Reyes did not

file a petition for review of the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal

of the denial of his motion to reopen until more than three

months after this decision, his petition for review is not timely

as to the March 17, 2004 decision. Accordingly, this court lacks

jurisdiction to review this decision, and the petition to review

it is DISMISSED. See Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS, 997 F.2d 108, 111

(5th Cir. 1993). 

Although Reyes’s petition for review is timely as to the

BIA’s denial of his motion for reconsideration, he has not made

any arguments regarding this decision. Therefore, he has

abandoned any challenge to the denial of his motion for

reconsideration, and, to the extent that his petition for review

may be construed as extending to that decision, it is DENIED. 

See Al-Ra’id v. Ingle, 69 F.3d 28, 33 (5th Cir. 1995).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                            Micro Linear Corporation
                            Financial Data Schedule

     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
statements of income and balance sheets on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Second
Quarter  Form  10-Q  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          875359
<NAME>                                         Micro Linear Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-29-1996
<CASH>                                         3058
<SECURITIES>                                   23928
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3507
<ALLOWANCES>                                   288
<INVENTORY>                                    12132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47855
<PP&E>                                         37178
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 70331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8914
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13
<OTHER-SE>                                     58393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   70331
<SALES>                                        11713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11713
<CGS>                                          5681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                915
<INCOME-TAX>                                   366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            549
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   549
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Rangeford Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Frederick Ziegler,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated
this 30thday of June, 2009.








/s/ Frederick ZieglerFrederick
      ZieglerChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer











1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

2

23

24

25

26

27

STIPULAON DREJUSTING EXSTCAHDUL (CV6521-FDB) — 1

SEA 1924345v1 0013149-000089

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

LAW OFFICES

2600 Century Square  1501 Fourth Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 

(206) 622-3150  Fax: (206) 628-7699 

The Honrable FnkiD.Burges 

UNITED SARCOU

WESTRN DICOFWASHINGTO

AT COM

LONG BEACHMORTGAE COMPNY, aforeign corpatin, 

 Plaintf, 

 v. 

MYRNA L.ODHUGEN, 

 Defndat. 

No. CV6521-FDB

STIPULAON D 

ORDE AJUSTING EXSTCAHDUL

STIPULATION 

 The partis, byandthroug ndersig counsel, hrbystipulae tondrqust hfolwing adjustmen ohxistng caeshdul: 

 1. That edlinfor LR39.1mediaton beciudto Janury19, 207;and 

 2. That eimforLng Beachto depsM.Nordhugen adywites dnfbyher xtndoJaury 31,207and thelinfor thepais tofledsptv moinsbe xtdoFbruay 1,207. 

DATE this2

nd dayof Decmbr, 206. 

Davis WrghtTemain LP

Atorneys forPlaintf 

By /sradley L.Fisher 

Bradley L.Fisher, WSBA#1985 

Ofices oJhnA.Lg 

Atorneys forDendat 

By /sJohnA. Lg 

John A.Lg,WSBA #159 

ORDER 

Based uponthe frginStpulaion,s herbyORDE. 

DATE this8

th day ofJnury 207. 

Case 3:06-cv-05211-FDB Document 18 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

2

23

24

25

26

27

STIPULAON DREJUSTING EXSTCAHDUL (CV6521-FDB) — 2

SEA 1924345v1 0013149-000089

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

LAW OFFICES

2600 Century Square  1501 Fourth Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 

(206) 622-3150  Fax: (206) 628-7699 

A

FRANKLI D.BURGES

UNITED SARCJUDGE

 

Presntd by: 

Davis WrghtTemain LP

Atorneys forPlaintf 

By /sradley L.Fisher

Bradley L.Fisher, WSBA#1985 

Aproved fEnty: 

Ofices oJhnA.Lg 

Atorneys forDendat 

By /sJohnA. Lg

John A.Lg,WSBA #159 

Case 3:06-cv-05211-FDB Document 18 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

2

23

24

25

26

27

STIPULAON DREJUSTING EXSTCAHDUL (CV6521-FDB) — 3

SEA 1924345v1 0013149-000089

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

LAW OFFICES

2600 Century Square  1501 Fourth Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 

(206) 622-3150  Fax: (206) 628-7699 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I herbyctif haonDecmbr 2,06Ielctronialy fedthorgin wtheClrk oftheCur singthe CM/EFsytem whiclsend otifcan osuhfilng toheflwing: 

Sharon MichelGn sharon.gle@wamu.net; barice.olsn@wamu.et 

Jason C.Klein jason.klei@wamu.net; barice.olsn@wamu.et 

 John AlfredLong john@lgaw.com 

 DATE this2

nd dayof Jnury,207. 

Davis WrghtTemain LP

Atorneys forPlaintf 

By

 Bradley L.Fisher, WSBA#1985 

Davis WrghtTemain LP

260 Century Sqae 

150 FourthAvenu 

Seatl, WA9810-6 

Telphon: (206)8-73 

Fax: (206)8-79 

E-mail: brdfishe@wt.com 

Case 3:06-cv-05211-FDB Document 18 Filed 01/09/07 Page 3 of 3