alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 81

Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 1998

Mr. COVERDELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

Whereas the date of June 26, 1998, marks the 50th anniversary of the commencement of the Allied effort to supply

the people of Berlin, Germany, with food, fuel, and supplies in the face of the illegal Soviet blockade that divided

the city;

Whereas this 15 month Allied effort became known throughout the free world as the ‘‘Berlin Airlift’’ and ultimately

cost the lives of 78 Allied airmen, of whom 31 were

United States fliers;

Whereas this heroic humanitarian undertaking was universally regarded as an unambiguous statement of Western

resolve to thwart further Soviet expansion;

Whereas the Berlin Airlift was an unqualified success, both

as an instrument of diplomacy and as a life saving rescue
2

•SCON 81 IS

of the 1,000,000 inhabitants of West Berlin, with

2,326,205 tons of supplies delivered by 277,728 flights

over a 462-day period;

Whereas historians and citizens the world over view the success of this courageous action as pivotal to the ultimate

defeat of international tyranny, symbolized today by the

fall of the Berlin Wall; and

Whereas this inspiring act of resolve must be preserved in the

memory of future generations in a positive and dramatic

manner: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the 50th anniversary of the Berlin Airlift

4 should include the presentation of a suitable gift of

5 representational art from the citizens of the United

6 States to the citizens of the Federal Republic of

7 Germany, commemorating the fall of the Berlin Wall

8 and the reunification of the great city of Berlin; and

9 (2) civic and corporate leaders across the Na10 tion are entrusted to fulfill the intent of paragraph

11 (1) by using private subscription and volunteer ef12 fort with the encouragement and support of Con13 gress.

Æ
No. 65227.

Suit 5036.

#### Lador, Inc. *v.*United States.

Abstract 63602 affirmed November 3, 1960. C.A.D. 753.
# Official Journal L 267/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6314 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 267

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6314 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1198 of 7 August 2020 approving a non-minor amendment to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Piave’ (PDO)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1199 of 13 August 2020 amending Annex VI to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 to temporarily prohibit the introduction into the Union of certain fruits originating in Argentina to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Van der Aa | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1198 of 7 August 2020 approving a non-minor amendment to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Piave’ (PDO))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1199 of 13 August 2020 amending Annex VI to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 to temporarily prohibit the introduction into the Union of certain fruits originating in Argentina to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Van der Aa

Phyllosticta citricarpa

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 108

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the European Commission’s handling

of the Boeing/McDonnell-Douglas merger.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 16, 1997

Mr. GORTON (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the European Commission’s handling of the Boeing/McDonnell-Douglas

merger.

Whereas the Boeing Company and McDonnell-Douglas have

announced their merger;

Whereas the Department of Defense has approved that merger as consistent with the national security of the United

States;

Whereas the Federal Trade Commission has found that

merger not to violate the antitrust laws of the United

States;

Whereas the European Commission has consistently criticized

and threatened the merger before, during, and after its

consideration of the facts; and
2

SRES 108 IS

Whereas the sole true reason for the European Commission’s

criticism and imminent disapproval of the merger is to

gain an unfair competitive advantage for Airbus, a government-owned aircraft manufacturer: Now, therefore be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the Sense of the Senate that any

2 such disapproval on the part of the European Commission

3 would constitute an unwarranted and unprecedented inter4 ference in a United States business transaction that would

5 threaten thousands of American aerospace jobs; and be

6 it further

7 Resolved, That the Senate suggest that the President

8 take such actions as he deems appropriate to protect

9 United States interests in connection therewith.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35

                SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN


     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, made as of the 17th day of February, 2000, by MOHAWK
INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Company"):

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Company has established the Mohawk Industries, Inc. 1992 Stock
Option Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it advisable to amend the Plan as of
the effective date hereof;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the effective
date hereof, by substituting the following for Plan Section 5(g):

     "(g)  provide that, if an optionee dies or becomes disabled (as defined in
Code Section 22(e)(3)) while he or she is a director or employee of the Company
or a Subsidiary, as applicable, the Option shall become immediately vested and
exercisable in full and may be exercised by the optionee or by a legatee or
legatees of the optionee under his or her last will, or by his or her personal
representative or representatives, at any time until the first anniversary of
the optionee's death or disability or, if earlier, the expiration of the Option
term."

     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect as prior to this Second Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be
executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                        MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                        By:
                                           -----------------------------------


ATTEST:


By:
   ------------------------------

[CORPORATE SEAL]
#### Edward E. STROUPE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1389.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2001.

Decided July 19, 2001.

Edward E. Stroup, Jr., pro se. Margaret J. Krecke, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, PA; Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

*210PER CURIAM.

Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying him Social Security benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Stroupe v. Apfel,*No. CA-00-54-1 (W.D.Va. Mar. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 10.19
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 pursuant to the
 CLEARWIRE CORPORATION
2008 Stock Compensation Plan
 * * * * *
 Optionee:Grant Date:Vesting Date:Per Share Exercise Price:
    
    $[___]Number of Option Shares subject to this Option:
  Agreement Company Optionee Plan
   1. Incorporation By Reference; Plan Document Receipt .




---



##### 



2. Grant of Option . Stock Option Option Shares
 3. No Dividend Equivalents .
 4. Exercisability of this Stock Option .
  Option Period
  Disability Disability Disability
 5. Method of Exercise and Payment . Exercise Notice
 2




---



##### 



6. Termination of Service Relationship
      7. Non-transferability
  3




---



##### 



Immediate Family provided however
 8. Entire Agreement; Amendment . provided however
 9. Notices .
   10. Governing Law .
 11. Compliance with Laws .
 4




---



##### 



12. Binding Agreement; Assignment .
 13. Counterparts .
 14. Headings .
 15. Further Assurances .
 16. Severability .
  CLEARWIRE CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:Optionee
 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q
DATED OCTOBER 30, 1999 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          26,975
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     39,361
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,154
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,200
<LOANS>                                        518,791
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,144
<DEPOSITS>                                     516,466
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,268
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,739
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,520
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 608,144
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,820
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,766
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   546
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,132
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,384
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,748
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,174
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,275
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,450
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,450
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.62
<LOANS-NON>                                        705
<LOANS-PAST>                                       621
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,187
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       34
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,364
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,364


</TABLE>
No. 59309.

protests 141097-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Frank T. Smith, Jr., Senior Vice President/Finance (Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose. /s/ Frank T. Smith, Jr.Frank T. Smith, Jr.Senior Vice President/Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)
July 28, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") by Cellular Technical Services
Company, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

                  By: /s/Stephen Katz
                      ---------------
                       Stephen Katz
                       Chief Executive Officer
                       May 22, 2006

                  By: /s/Kenneth Block
                      ----------------
                       Kenneth Block
                       Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                       May 22, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been
provided to Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and will be retained by
Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       13
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 172 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 172

  Congratulating President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and the 
    people of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the 
                celebration of 50 years of independence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1998

   Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Robb) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and the 
    people of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the 
                celebration of 50 years of independence.

Whereas February 4, 1998, is the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the 
        independence of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka from 
        Britain;
Whereas the present constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri 
        Lanka has been in existence since August 16, 1978, and guarantees 
        universal suffrage; and
Whereas the people of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka and the 
        United States share many values, including a common belief in democratic 
        principles, a commitment to international cooperation, and promotion of 
        enhanced trade and cultural ties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates President Chandrika Bandaranaike 
        Kumaratunga and the people of the Democratic Socialist Republic 
        of Sri Lanka on the celebration of 50 years of independence;
            (2) expresses best wishes to the Government and people of 
        the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka as they 
        celebrate their national day of independence on February 4, 
        1998; and
            (3) looks forward to continued cooperation and friendship 
        with the Government and people of the Democratic Socialist 
        Republic of Sri Lanka in the years ahead.

SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF RESOLUTION.

    The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit an enrolled copy of this 
resolution to the Government of the Democratic Socialist Republic of 
Sri Lanka.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHERYL CARAMPOT,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C06-437 RSM

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

) REASSIGNING and REFERRING CASE

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martninez, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C06-437 RSM and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the

document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:06-cv-00437-RSM-JPD Document 11 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 28th day of June, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:06-cv-00437-RSM-JPD Document 11 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.3


                   THE HOLLANDBROOK GROUP, LLC



February 14, 2003

via fax: 212-758-8844


David Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc.
18 East 50th St., 10th Floor
New York, NY  10022

Dear David:

As you know, I have resigned from Bion's Board, effective today.  I and
certain business colleagues are currently engaged in intensive negotiations to
acquire a business.  This matter is now consuming essentially all of my time.

I wish Bion every success in its continuing financing efforts and in
exploiting its promising technology.

Sincerely,


/s/ Howard E. Chase

Howard E. Chase







1661 Route 22 West * Bound Brook, NJ 08805 * hechase@hollandbrook.com
    phone: 732-537-0500 * fax: 732-537-0600 - cell: 908-400-3995
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 13 - 0639 Directorate I D : 20 13 - SW - 020 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 80 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a failure of the T/R blade and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs : Visually

inspecting a blade (2 per helicopter) for a crack or other damage will require .25 work - hour. No parts are needed. For the expected 12 annual inspections, the total cost per helicopter will be $510 a y ear, and $40,800 for the U.S. fleet. Replacing a T/R assembly will require 6 work - hours for a labor cost of $510. Parts will cost $23,048, bri nging the total cost to $23,558 per helicopter. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regul atory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Michael Kohner
No. 62824.

#### R. S. D., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/7571 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 8.1



List of Subsidiaries of China Mass Media
Corp.



|Name                                                       | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                                                           |                              
|Subsidiary                                                 |                              
|                                                           |                              
|Universal International Advertising Limited                | British Virgin Islands       
|                                                           |                              
|Mass Media & Universal International Advertising Co., Ltd. | People’s Republic of China   
|                                                           |                              
|Mass Universal Film Production (Hong Kong) Limited         | Hong Kong                    
|                                                           |                              
|Consolidated Affiliated Entity                             |                              
|                                                           |                              
|Beijing Mass Universal Film Production Company Limited     | People’s Republic of China