alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSAMERICAN WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,233
<PP&E>                                          43,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,188
<BONDS>                                         51,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,051
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,276
<SALES>                                         14,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,901
<CGS>                                            9,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    71
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    253
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (59)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LILIA BELKOVA, individually and as successor trustee of the LAND

TRUST AGREEMENT, NO:072003 DATED 2/9/04,

Appellant,

v.

DEER RUN PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1202

[August 23, 2023]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Sarah L. Shullman, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017CC001472XXXXMB.

Thomas L. Hunker and Sarah Hafeez of Hunker Appeals, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Steven R. Braten and Dina L. Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum, PLLC, West 

Palm Beach, for Appellee Deer Run Property Owners’ Association.

Anthony A. Arsali of Arsali LLC, Delray Beach, for Third Party 

Purchaser Nicholas Arsali.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Belkova v. Deer Run Prop. Owners’ Ass’n, 4D21-2924 

(Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 23, 2023).

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Corrected: 4/17/06 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

01-5011, -5012 

ANAHEIM GARDENS, B-L ASSOCIATES, CEDAR GARDENS ASSOCIATES, 

 C-W ASSOCIATES, DENISE A. KELLENBECK (doing business as VICTORIAN ARMS 

APARTMENTS), EARL W. KELLENBECK, FLORIN MEADOWS I, LTD., FLORIN 

MEADOWS II, LTD., FRANCES T. WARD, GLENVIEW GARDENS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, HILLVIEW TOWNHOUSES LIMITED, HILLVIEW TOWNHOUSES 

LIMITED NO. 1, INDIAN HEAD MANOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, J.D.V. WARD, 

JAMES W.Y. WONG, JEWEL LAKE VILLA II, JOSEPH BIAFORA and STEFI 

BIAFORA, METRO WEST LIMITED, MILLWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, NAPA PARK APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, NORMAN M. 

KRONICK and LOUIS DULIEN (doing business as HALAWA VIEW APARTMENTS), 

ONTARIO TOWNHOUSES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PETER H.Y. HSI and 

PRISCILLA L.F. HSI (doing business as GENERAL PARTNERS OF WAIPAHU 

TOWER), ROCK CREEK TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SIERRA VISTA ONE, 

SILVERLAKE VILLAGE, THE PALOMAR APARTMENTS, THETFORD PROPERTIES 

III, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, THETFORD PROPERTIES IV, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

WASHINGTON PLAZA PARTNERS, LTD., 185-225 PARKHILL CORP., 

 620 SU CASA POR CORTEZ, 825 SAN TOMAS APARTMENTS, 

 3740 SILVERLAKE VILLAGE, and 5324 FOOTHILL APARTMENTS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

----------------------------------------------------------------- 

ALGONQUIN HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES, L.P., BRANDY HILL COMPANY, BROOKSIDE 

MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BUCKMAN GARDENS LIMITED 
PARTNERSHIP, CHAUNCY HOUSE COMPANY, CROMWELL COURT COMPANY, 

COUNTRY TOWNE APARTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, DOLLY ANN APARTMENTS 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, EMORY GROVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FIRST 

LANDMARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FOREST GLEN LIMITED 

DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION, FORT HEATH ASSOCIATES, GARRISON 

FOREST ASSOCIATES, GLENARDEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JODANI 

ASSOCIATES, L.P., KIMBERLY ASSOCIATES, KING’S GRANT COMPANY, LEADER 

HOUSE ASSOCIATES AND LEADER HOUSING CO., INC., 

 NEW AMSTERDAM ASSOCIATES AND NEW AMSTERDAM HOUSES, INC., PINE 

CREST COMPANY, RIVERSIDE VILLAGE COMPANY, SUBURBIA ASSOCIATES 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SUEHAR ASSOCIATES, L.P., TOWER WEST 

ASSOCIATES, L.P. AND TOWER WEST, INC., and TOWN & COUNTRY 

APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Harry J. Kelly, Nixon Peabody LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffsappellants. Of counsel was Charles L. Edson. 

David Harrington, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, 

David M. Cohen, Director, and Brian M. Simkin, Assistant Director. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims 

Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2012-0108

 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM049AD

767-57A0079, R1 --- 5/6/10

767-57A0076, R2 --- 11/22/06

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 25 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 25

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 25 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 25 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 178 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 178

   To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by 
  Senate Legal Counsel in United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries, 
       Inc., et al. v. Trafalgar House Construction, Inc., et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize production of Senate documents and representation by 
  Senate Legal Counsel in United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries, 
       Inc., et al. v. Trafalgar House Construction, Inc., et al.

Whereas, in the case of United States f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries v. Trafalgar 
        House Construction, Civil Case No. 97-0462, pending in the United States 
        District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, documents 
        have been requested from the offices of Senator Robert C. Byrd and 
        Senator John D. Rockefeller IV;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for evidence relating to their official 
        responsibilities; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the offices of Senator Byrd and Senator Rockefeller 
are authorized to produce documents in the case of United States 
f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries v. Trafalgar House Construction, except 
concerning matters for which a privilege or objection should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
employees of Senator Byrd and Senator Rockefeller in connection with 
any subpoena or request for documents or testimony in United States 
f.u.b.o. Kimberly Industries v. Trafalgar House Construction.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6873

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NYRON JOEL NICHOLS, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:07-cr-00006-GEC-1; 7:12-cv-80544-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nyron Joel Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nyron Joel Nichols seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Nichols has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

FERNANDO MARTINEZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-054M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: February 8, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required or the safety of the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by the Bureau of Immigration and

Customs Enforcement.

(2) Defendant was born in Mexico. There is no information available regarding any

ties to this community, or to the Western District of Washington.

Case 2:06-cr-00044-TSZ Document 7 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Defendant has been previously deported to Mexico after removal proceedings on

or about March 11, 2003.

(4) Defendant has failed to appear in Court as required on three separate occasions.

(5) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 7th day of February, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00044-TSZ Document 7 Filed 02/08/06 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICHAEL ROBERT CLARY,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-389M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Felon in possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Count 2: False statement in connection with acquisition of firearms in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922(a)(6).

Date of Detention Hearing: 8/12/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has a lengthy criminal-background history, with several charges

involving crimes of violence. 

(2) The defendant has admitted to having issues with his mental-health, substanceabuse, and addiction problems.

Case 2:05-cr-00385-JCC Document 9 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) At the time of his arrest, defendant was in possession of two altered Washington

State driver’s licenses. He has also used two aliases.

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of April, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00385-JCC Document 9 Filed 08/12/05 Page 2 of 2
AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                 Employment Agreement executed October 15, 1999
                                     between
                James K. Rash and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc.


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of
this 15th day of December, 1999, by and between James K. Rash (the "Employee")
and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc. ("Eagle").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Employee and Eagle are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement executed October 15, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement effective
December 15, 1999 to take into account the resolutions adopted by Eagle's Board
of Directors at its special meeting on December 15, 1999.


         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements
hereinafter contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows:

         1. Section 3.b Annual Bonus of the Agreement shall be changed in its
entirety to read as follows:

         "The Employee and Eagle acknowledge that they are entering into this
         Agreement upon the consummation of Eagle's acquisition of Pacific
         Western Extruded Plastics Company ("PW Pipe"), and that the Employee is
         a former employee of PW Pipe. As such, for calendar year 1999 under the
         term of this Agreement, the Employee shall be entitled to a bonus equal
         to the bonus to which he would have been entitled under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan for the remainder of calendar year 1999, which shall be payable at
         such time and under such schedule as set forth under PW Pipe's bonus
         plan. For subsequent calendar years during the term of this Agreement,
         the Employee shall be entitled to participate in the Company's
         Performance Bonus Plan."

         2. Except as amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Employment Agreement effective as of the date first written above.

EAGLE PACIFICS INDUSTRIES, INC.



By:   /s/ William H. Spell                        /s/ James K. Rash
Its:  Chief Executive Officer                         James K. Rash
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000877273
<NAME> VANS INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,370,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,163,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,562,710
<INVENTORY>                                 22,849,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,837,699
<PP&E>                                      15,275,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,717,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,538,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,336,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                91,717,158
<SALES>                                     43,956,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,956,181
<CGS>                                       26,404,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,404,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,608,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               238,885
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             192,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,051,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,970,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,081,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,081,643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Hardy Hoheisel, Chief Financial Officer, of Biozoom, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  
(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: July 2, 2013

By:

/s/ Hardy Hoheisel

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Accounting Officer)
EPA File No. 56228-EUP-40















































Pages 49-50 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
No. 57482.

#### North Atlantic Seed Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 206696-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus corniculatus)*similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport,*
      *247
      *Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.