alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

AMENDMENT 
 TO THE
UNIMIN CORPORATION PENSION RESTORATION PLAN 
 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JULY 31, 2008 

WHEREAS, Unimin Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Pension Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain of its
executives; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section V(2) of the Plan, the right is reserved to the Company to amend the Plan in whole, or in part, at any
time, subject to certain conditions not now relevant; 
 WHEREAS, the Company deems it advisable to amend the Plan to pay all Participants therein
their Grandfathered Benefit, as such term is defined in the Plan, without regard to the current timing provisions applicable to such benefit; 

WHEREAS, the Company recognizes that such amendment constitutes a material modification of the Grandfathered Benefit that requires a time and form of
payment that complies with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to be specified under the amendment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, it is 

RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended effective December 10, 2012 in the manner described below: 

Section IV(3)(b)(i) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“the Benefit Commencement Date for the Grandfathered Benefit payable to or on behalf of such Eligible Participant shall be
December 17, 2012, such benefit being equal to the amount that would have been paid if the Eligible Participant had a Separation from Service on such date; and notwithstanding any contrary provisions in Section IV(2) and Section II(9), the
Grandfathered Benefit referenced in the immediately preceding sentence shall be paid in a single lump sum only; and” 
 RESOLVED, that the
Administrative Committee of the Unimin Corporation Pension Plan be, and hereby is, authorized to take any other actions on the advice of counsel which may be necessary or appropriate to implement the foregoing resolution. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Unimin Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
officer, this 13th day of December 2012. 
  

							
		 		 		 	UNIMIN CORPORATION
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Richard M. Solazzo

		 		 		 	SR VICE PRESIDENT
				
	Attest:	 		 		 	
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ George Kalapos

		 		 		 	Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the 3rd Quarter 2003 ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jay Mealey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Jay Mealey
-------------------------------
Jay Mealey
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

RUPINDER SINGH GILL,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Nos. 05-595M-5

 CR05-0393-JCC-5

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Conspiracy to Distribute MDMA and Marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(C), and 846.

Date of Detention Hearing: October 14, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There appear to be no apparent conditions or combination of conditions existing

that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to an immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00393-JCC Document 66 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 10th day of November, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00393-JCC Document 66 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew L. Guggenhime, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Facet Biotech Corporation, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Facet Biotech Corporation;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 30, 2009

|                                                                                                                              |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ ANDREW L. GUGGENHIME Andrew L. Guggenhime Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.7


 





Summary of Lease Agreement by and
among Tefen Yazamut Ltd. and Medigus Ltd.


 


Note: this summary does not contain
a full or direct translation of the terms of the original Hebrew-language lease agreement, and is designated solely for the purpose
of providing a general presentation of such agreement.


 


On January 6, 2004, Tefen Yazamut Ltd.
(the “Lessor”) and Medigus Ltd. (the “Company”) entered into a lease agreement, as amended
from time to time, as further elaborated below.


 


		1.	Leased Premises:



 


Certain areas in building
number 7A located in the Omer Industrial Park.


 


Total square meters
of leased premises: approximately 807.


 


		2.	Term of Lease:



 


The premises are currently leased
until December 31, 2018.


 


		3.	Purpose of the Lease:



 


The premises are to be used
by the Company for the purpose of offices, laboratories and clean rooms.


 


		4.	Consideration:



 


In consideration for the leased
premises the Company will pay Lessor a total amount of NIS 24,670 + VAT, per month, linked to the Israeli consumer price index
The consideration shall be paid by the Company on a monthly basis.


 


The Company has provided the
Lessor a deposit in the amount of NIS 45,000 for the purpose of guaranteeing its financial obligations under the lease agreement.


 


		5.	Termination of the Lease Agreement:



 


The Lessor may immediately terminate
the lease agreement upon: (i) the transfer or assignment of the Company’s rights in the premises to a third party contrary
to the terms and conditions stipulated in the lease agreement; or (ii) the Company’s failure to pay any due amount to the
Lessor within thirty (30) days of its due date; or (iii) use of the premises for purposes others than those stipulated in the agreement;
or (iv) the Company creates a nuisance that may disturb the surrounding businesses.


 


		6.	Liability for Injury, Damage or Loss:



 


		(a)	The Company shall be liable for any injury, damage or loss caused by its act or omission in, or
in connection with, the premises, to the body or property of any person or corporation, including to the Company or its employees
or the Lessor and its subsidiaries.



 


		(b)	The Company shall be liable and indemnify its employees or any other party for the damages, losses
or expenses incurred by them due to injuries caused in relation with the Company’s activities in the premises and the Lessor
shall not be liable for any such damages losses or expenses.



 


		7.	Insurance and Indemnity:



 


The Company shall maintain such
standard practice insurance policies as required by any applicable law and as customary with respect to the Company’s operations.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Growth of tribal gamingrevenues**
 
1995-2005 | 1996-2006
 
SuDoc Number:I 1.117/4:
Item Number:0603-B-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000648343
 
December 23, 2019
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenville Federal Financial
Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: September 28, 2009
    /s/ Susan J. AllreadSusan J. AllreadChief Financial Officer and Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) NO. CR06-157 MJP

)

v. )

) [PROPOSED]

HENRY C. ROSENAU, ) ORDER CONTINUING

) TRIAL AND SETTING NEW

) PRETRIAL MOTIONS DATE

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

This matter having come on before the undersigned Court on motion of the

Government for a continuance of the trial date, and the Defendant having opposed the

motion,

The Court having considered the files and records herein, and the Status Report

Regarding the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty filed by the government, and having

considered the law,

Now therefore makes the following findings of fact:

1. Essential witnesses continue to be unavailable to testify in the trial as

currently scheduled; however, it appears likely that the witnesses will become available,

pursuant to a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty Request which has been submitted to, and

accepted by, Canada.

2. It appears that the unavailability of the witnesses may be cured within a

reasonable period of time, albeit not by the March 19, 2012, trial date.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1291

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 1

ROSENAU/CR06-157 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 74-1 Filed 02/16/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The processing of the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty Request is within

control of the government of Canada.

4. The United States believes the Request will be processed and the witnesses

likely will be available within 30 days of the current trial date of March 19, 2012.

5. The time period necessary for the processing of the Mutual Legal

Assistance Treaty is excludable time, up to one year, pursuant to Title 18, United States

Code, Section 3161(h)(8).

NOW therefore, the Court makes the following Conclusions of Law:

1. The government has made a request pursuant to a Mutual Legal Assistance

Treaty, and as required in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3292, for evidence from a

foreign country;

2. The trial is continued from March 19, 2012 until ____________________,

2012.

3. The time between the previously-scheduled trial date of March 19, 2012,

and the new trial date of ______________________, 2012 is hereby excluded from the

speedy trial calculation under the Speedy Trial Act and is within the allowable one year

time limit. Therefore, the speedy trial statute is tolled from March 19, 2012, until

________________________________________, 2012.

DATED this day of February, 2012.

MARSHA J. PECHMAN

Chief Judge, United States District Court

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1291

(206) 553-7970

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 2

ROSENAU/CR06-157 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 74-1 Filed 02/16/12 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4334-017]


EONY Generation Limited; Notice of Waiver Period for Water 
Quality Certification Application

    On September 29, 2023, EONY Generation Limited submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its 
application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality 
certification filed with New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation (New York DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned 
project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section 4.34(b)(5) of the 
Commission's regulations,\1\ we hereby notify the New York DEC of the 
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: September 26, 2023.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year (September 26, 2024).
    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: October 4, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22478 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the 1st Quarter 2004 ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay Mealey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Jay Mealey
------------------------
Jay Mealey
Chief Executive Officer
July 2, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 65255.

#### Eastern Commission Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/10129, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of The *Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 70000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Appointment of Members of the Legal Division to the Performance 
Review Board, Internal Revenue Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Acting Chief Counsel of the 
Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of 
the Treasury by General Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Civil 
Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal 
Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Eric S. Nguyen, Deputy General Counsel, Department of the 
Treasury--Chair
2. Holly O. Paz, Commissioner, Large Business and International 
Division (IRS)
3. Edward T. Killen, Deputy Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and 
Government Entities (IRS)
Alternate: James C. Lee, Deputy Chief, Criminal Investigation (IRS)

    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

William M. Paul,
Chief Counsel (Acting), Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22416 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 66558.

#### Max Eckardt & Sons Division of Allied Paper Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/3322 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as nativity sets, item Nos. 9402 and 9405, is, in fact, plastic nativity sets similar in material and use to papier-mache nativity sets, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62283.

#### Ready Foods de Mexico, S. A. *v.*United States,

protests 189641-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
November 4'h, 2010 Q

To: Lisa P. Jackson Administrator t niicd States Environment Protection Agency Fr: Jeff Pagenkopf Sandy Acres Dairy Elk Mound, Wis. 

## 2010 NOY -9 AM8: I 7 JF-1~~ UF Iht 

# EXED;UTPIEt SEUAi ;,~~T

Dear Administrator Jackson, In late October a petition was filed in your office in regarding the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines rule. I am contacting you today to show my support ofthe NRECA submitted petition. You see. I run a small farm in northeastern Wisconsin. As a small, family farmI wanted to make sure that ifthere was an extended power outage, l could still take care of things. So with the help of my cooperative I purchased two l 50kW back up generators for the farm . Having a back up power supply not only helps me during extended power outages, occasionally the co-op asks me to switch to standby generation in order to decrease demand on the system . For helping themout when they need it, I save about $8,800per year on m}~ electric bill . The rules youragency, are trying to incorporate will take away that peak alert rate my Cooperative can offer. That means a $8,800 increase in my electric bill! As a self-employed farmer, that's a huge impact on my wallet. The money we save by participating in this programhelps us support many other local businesses. And in these hard economic times, every little bit helps. I'd like your agency to reconsider not allowing peak shaving controls of generators like mine within the proposed 100 hour limits. The request NRECAfiled does not ask for more hours of operation;just to include peak shaving use within the 100 hour limit . Since I'ma part ofa Cooperative I see the savings and revenue fromthis type of arrangement, not them . Plus, we are helping to reduce energy demand during the peak times. This is a significant savings to my small business. Sincerely. JetT Pagenkopf Elk Mound, VJisconsino Cl) l-o2 qw N V tll "" 2 C~ J

` tV 

# inx

' ]~~~/~ N G Q OKllIYI~ J k,

SSbl :) 1S2i1I a312lOS 32id

aw~

)- 9 3 WLn ~ az~Z w - . . as ~2t (n - - I m Q O

c O (D p =_ U Q O c : cm.- cV C C n .Y~_ >U C m En c N ~ .O C O

.r E~°nn~~ O > C N p c~~~cv J wQQ, 5 r

LL ^'1 3,L ti N W