alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CEDRICK B. ALDERMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-0117JCC

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial Services Office

alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of the Appearance Bond supervision as set forth

in the Petition filed by U.S. Pretrial Services

The plaintiff appears through Special Assistant United States Attorney, KENT LIEU;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD;

The defendant has been advised of the allegation(s)and that he/she could be detained pending

resolution of the underlying charges in the Complaint/Indictment/ or Information if found to be in

violation; maximum potential sanction if substantiated; and 

The court finding probable cause with regard to the allegation(s); the matter is scheduled for hearing

on the following time and date before the Honorable 

Date: JUNE 19, 2007

Time: 1:30 P.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

June 11, 2007.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold _________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00117-JCC Document 78 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 63901.

protest 59/22526 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification



Re:
2005-CB3 TRUST, C-BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-CB3
I, Larry B. Litton, Jr. certify that:
l.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing  a copy of the monthly statement to certificateholders set forth in Section 4.06 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"), among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, as seller (the "Seller"), Litton Loan Servicing LP, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"), filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annul report, of the 2005-CB3 trust (the "Trust");

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the
Trustee by the Servicer under the Agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer under the Agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the Agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement; and
5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in Agreement, that is included in these reports.
6.  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.

LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP
Date:  3/30/2006



By:  /s/ Larry B. Litton, Jr.




Name:  Larry B. Litton, Jr.






Title:    President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           7,781,000
<SECURITIES>                                     1,921,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,871,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       691,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,696,000
<PP&E>                                           6,186,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,587,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,559,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,971,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          7,000
<COMMON>                                            44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,976,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,559,000
<SALES>                                         49,693,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,693,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,281,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,409,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (121,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,288,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,288,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 104

 To state the Sense of the Senate regarding the tax status of payments 
      made as a result of the recent tobacco liability settlement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 1997

Mr. Harkin (for himself, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. Kennedy) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To state the Sense of the Senate regarding the tax status of payments 
      made as a result of the recent tobacco liability settlement.

Whereas the tobacco industry, state attorneys general, and individual 
        plaintiffs' attorneys have reached an agreement to settle tobacco 
        litigation in 40 states and the tobacco industry has agreed to pay 
        $368.5 billion over 25 years, most of which would go to States;
Whereas, under the terms of this agreement, this payment will be counted as a 
        ``normal and necessary'' business expense and will therefore be 
        considered tax deductible for federal tax purposes, potentially 
        requiring American taxpayers to subsidize up to $147 billion of the 
        settlement payment; and
Whereas, while many of the details of the agreement will require further 
        examination and possible alteration, the United States Senate should go 
        on record stating its concern about this provision's potential impact on 
        federal revenues and the deficit: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that to protect the 
interests of the American taxpayer, any legislation implementing the 
tobacco liability settlement shall prohibit parties to the agreement 
from claiming federal tax deductions for these payments.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 206

To recognize 50 years of efforts with respect to the creation of the Crazy

Horse Memorial, honoring the great Oglala Sioux leader, Tasunke Witko,

popularly known as ‘‘Crazy Horse’’, and to express the Sense of the

Senate with respect to the Crazy Horse Memorial.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. JOHNSON, and

Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Indian Affairs

RESOLUTION

To recognize 50 years of efforts with respect to the creation

of the Crazy Horse Memorial, honoring the great Oglala

Sioux leader, Tasunke Witko, popularly known as ‘‘Crazy

Horse’’, and to express the Sense of the Senate with

respect to the Crazy Horse Memorial.

Whereas Tasunke Witko, popularly known as ‘‘Crazy Horse’’,

was one of the greatest Native American warriors and

spiritual leaders of the United States;

Whereas Crazy Horse fought to defend the rights and lives

of the Sioux Indians and all Native Americans;

Whereas Crazy Horse is best known for leading a force of

Cheyenne and Oglala Sioux warriors to victory over
2

•SRES 206 IS

George Armstrong Custer in the Battle of Little Big

Horn;

Whereas in 1940, several Sioux Indian chiefs invited the late

sculptor, Korczak Ziolkowski, to create a memorial to

their great leader, Crazy Horse, by carving a tribute to

Crazy Horse into the Black Hills in South Dakota on a

mountain popularly known as ‘‘Thunderhead Mountain’’;

Whereas on June 3, 1948, the Crazy Horse Memorial was

dedicated, which is the date on which the first blast was

made to shape the memorial on Thunderhead Mountain;

Whereas at the time of that dedication, Korczak Ziolkowski

vowed that the Crazy Horse Memorial would be a nonprofit educational and cultural project that would be financed solely through private, nongovernmental sources;

Whereas Korczak Ziolkowski dedicated his life to the creation

of the Crazy Horse Memorial and continued that work

through his death on October 20, 1982; and

Whereas once complete, the Crazy Horse Memorial, with a

height of 563 feet and length of 641 feet, will be the

largest sculpture in the world: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the Senate recognizes—

3 (A) that June 3, 1998, commemorates the

4 50th anniversary of the blast on the mountain

5 known as Thunderhead Mountain in the Black

6 Hills of South Dakota that constituted the first

7 step made toward the completion of the Crazy

8 Horse Memorial;
3

•SRES 206 IS

1 (B) the admirable efforts of the late

2 Korczak Ziolkowski, the sculptor responsible for

3 the design and techniques involved in the cre4 ation of the Crazy Horse Memorial; and

5 (C) that the creation of the Crazy Horse

6 Memorial, from its inception, has been accom7 plished through private donations and without

8 any Federal funding; and

9 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that the Crazy

10 Horse Memorial will constitute a tribute to—

11 (A) Tasunke Witko, a great Oglala Sioux

12 warrior and spiritual leader; and

13 (B) all Native Americans.

Æ
No. 62286.

#### John Alban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143127-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 184

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support

Italy’s inclusion as a permanent member of the United Nations Security

Council if there is to be an expansion of this important international

body.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself and Mr. TORRICELLI) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States

should support Italy’s inclusion as a permanent member

of the United Nations Security Council if there is to

be an expansion of this important international body.

Whereas Italy organized and led a multi-national peace enforcement operation in Albania last spring under United

Nations authority to restore order and organize democratic elections;

Whereas Italy provided the second largest United Nations

troop contingent in Somalia;

Whereas in 1983 Italy joined the United States in a multilateral force to bring peace and stability to Lebanon and
2

•SRES 184 IS

Italy still participates in the ongoing United Nations

peacekeeping force in Lebanon;

Whereas Italy brokered the peace settlement in Mozambique

and led the peacekeeping force that implemented it;

Whereas Italy hosts at Brindisi the sole United Nations

logistical base supporting peacekeeping operations worldwide;

Whereas Italy’s strategic location in the Mediterranean

makes it an indispensable partner in security operations

in multiple zones of instability;

Whereas Italy hosts air bases from which the United States

and its NATO partners have conducted air operations

over the former Yugoslavia;

Whereas Italy is the world’s fifth largest economy and next

year becomes the U.N.’s fifth largest assessed contributor;

Whereas Italy’s contribution to the United Nations is greater

than that of Britain, Russia and China, three permanent

members of the Security Council;

Whereas President Clinton stated, ‘‘Italy has been and continues to be one of our closest allies and strategic partners in the world community’’; and

Whereas the United States Department of State has been actively supporting a reorganization plan that would give

Germany and Japan permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council, to the exclusion of Italy: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—
3

•SRES 184 IS

1 (1) urges the President to oppose any reorga2 nization plan for the expansion of the Security

3 Council which does not include Italy;

4 (2) urges the President to support Italy’s inclu5 sion as a permanent member if there is to be an ex6 pansion of the United Nations Security Council; and

7 (3) urges the Department of State to develop a

8 reorganization plan of the United Nations Security

9 Council that would incorporate nations that have

10 played a significant role in fostering world peace and

11 stability such as Italy.

12 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

13 a copy of this resolution to the President and the Sec14 retary of State.

Æ
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0639 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-020-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 80 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a failure of the T/R blade and subsequent 

loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

 Visually inspecting a blade (2 per helicopter) for a crack or other damage will require .25 

work-hour. No parts are needed. For the expected 12 annual inspections, the total cost per 

helicopter will be $510 a year, and $40,800 for the U.S. fleet.

 Replacing a T/R assembly will require 6 work-hours for a labor cost of $510. Parts will 

cost $23,048, bringing the total cost to $23,558 per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Kohner
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 87 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 419) to provide surveillance, 
research, and services aimed at prevention of birth defects, and for 
other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
            (1) In section 1 of the bill, strike ``1997'' and insert 
        ``1998''.
            (2) In section 2 of the bill:
                    (A) In subsection (d) of section 317C of the Public 
                Health Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such 
                section 2) strike ``1998'' and insert ``1999''.
                    (B) In subsection (f) of section 317C of the Public 
                Health Service Act (as proposed to be amended by such 
                section 2) strike ``1998'' and all that follows through 
                ``2001'' and insert ``1999, $40,000,000 for fiscal year 
                2000, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the 
                fiscal years 2001 and 2002''.

            Passed the Senate March 25, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                  To correct the enrollment of S. 419.
```
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Alex Deyi YangName:
    Alex Deyi YangTitle:
    Acting Chief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 25
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41013 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
HELBER VALDEZ , also known as Helber Valdez Carrion

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the South ern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 208

- 1

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
Helbe r Valdez was convicted of illegal reentry after deportation . When entering judgment, the court classified the offense as illegal reentry following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The judgment the district court entered was consistent with the state

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 10, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41013 Document: 00514595724 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2018No. 15

- 41013

2 of the law at that time. Valdez’s Texas conviction for burglary qua l ifi ed as an aggravated felony because it was a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). And we had rejected vagueness challenge to § 16(b). United States v. Gonzalez

Longoria , 831 F.3d 670 (5 th Ci r. 2016) (en banc). Since that time, however, the Supreme Court has taken the opposing view and held that section 16(b) violates the Due Process Clause. Sessions v. Dimaya , 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018). After deciding Dimaya, the Supreme Court granted Va ldez ’s petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of that decision. Dimaya means that § 16(b) can no longer serve as a basis for classifying the prior offense as an aggravated felony.
And the Texas burglary statute does not qualify as generic burglary, so that

cannot serve as a basis for treating the prior offen se as an aggravated felony.
See United States v. Herrold , 883 F.3d 517 (5thCir. 2018) (en banc) , petition for cert. filed (Apr. 18, 20 18) (No. 17

- 1445). We reject the government’s request to hold this decision pending the petition for certiorari filed in Herrold

. See United States v. Valle

- Jaimes , No. 16

- 50993, 2018 WL 3634782 (July 30, 2018). In light of Dimaya , we therefore VACAT E the district court’s judgment and REMAND for entry of judgment under 8 U. S.C. § 1326(b)(1) rather than § 1326(b)(2). Case: 15-41013 Document: 00514595724 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2018
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarter Report of Startech Environmental Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




By: /s/ Joseph F. Longo
-----------------------
    Joseph F. Longo
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
    June 9, 2006




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Joan Jordan, Respondent, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents, and Dennis Link, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 469]

—Appeal by the defendant Dennis Link, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered March 25, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Nicolai at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
No. 60597.

#### Maatschappij Van Berkel’s Patent N. V. *v.*United States,

protest 253376-K/6685 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meat-slicing machines and parts thereof similar in all *447material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Company*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 278, C. D. 1665), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.