alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 56812.

#### Gane & Ingram, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 185279-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 141

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National Concern About Young

People and Gun Violence Day.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 29, 1997

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. AKAKA,

Mr. CRAIG, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. BRYAN,

Ms. COLLINS, Mr. FORD, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. ROTH, Mr. KOHL, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr.

ABRAHAM, Mr. WARNER, Mr. FRIST, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. SPECTER, Mr.

ROBB, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. DEWINE, and Mr. GORTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

the Judiciary

OCTOBER 31, 1997

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National

Concern About Young People and Gun Violence Day.

Whereas every day in America, 15 children under the age of

19 are killed with guns;

Whereas in 1994, approximately 70 percent of murder victims aged 15 to 17 were killed with a handgun;

Whereas in 1995, nearly 8 percent of high school students reported having carried a gun in the past 30 days;
2

SRES 141 ATS

Whereas young people are our Nation’s most important resource, and we, as a society, have a vested interest in

helping children grow from a childhood free from fear

and violence into healthy adulthood;

Whereas young people can, by taking responsibility for their

own decisions and actions, and by positively influencing

the decisions and actions of others, help chart a new and

less violent direction for the entire Nation;

Whereas students in every school district in the Nation will

be invited to take part in a day of nationwide observance

involving millions of their fellow students, and will thereby be empowered to see themselves as significant agents

in a wave of positive social change; and

Whereas the observance of this day will give the students the

opportunity to make an earnest decision about their future by voluntarily signing the ‘‘Student Pledge Against

Gun Violence’’, and sincerely promise that the students

will never take a gun to school, will never use a gun to

settle a dispute, and will use their influence to keep

friends from using guns to settle disputes: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) November 6, 1997, should be designated as

3 ‘‘National Concern About Young People and Gun

4 Violence Day’’; and

5 (2) the President should be authorized and re6 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the
3

SRES 141 ATS

1 school children of the United States to observe such

2 day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-54;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:      /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 790 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 14, 2008.
Whereas every day, American men and women risk their lives serving the country 
        in the Armed Forces;
Whereas it is important to many Americans to be able to donate money directly to 
        causes about which they care;
Whereas it is important for residents to have a tangible way to demonstrate 
        their support for veterans;
Whereas despite Government funding for the Nation's veterans, many important 
        needs of veterans remain unmet;
Whereas citizens in the State of Washington have banded together in a grassroots 
        effort to create a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit;
Whereas any financial institution in the State of Washington can choose to offer 
        a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit;
Whereas the Bank of Clark County has become the first institution to offer these 
        Certificates of Deposit;
Whereas the Governor of the State of Washington and the Washington State 
        Veterans Affairs Department have expressed the State's support for this 
        program;
Whereas when a person buys a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit from a 
        participating financial institution, half of the interest is 
        automatically donated to the State of Washington's Veterans Innovation 
        Program to address the unmet needs of the State of Washington's veterans 
        and their families;
Whereas the Veterans Innovation Program provides emergency assistance to help 
        current or former Washington National Guard or Reserve service members 
        cope with financial hardships, unemployment, educational needs, and many 
        basic family necessities; and
Whereas the Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit will be officially 
        launched on November 8, 2007: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the people of the State of Washington for showing their 
        support for the needs of the State of Washington's veterans; and
            (2) encourages residents of other States to pursue creative ways to 
        show their own support for veterans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Angus Crane <acrane@naima.org>

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP /USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/10/2011 12:28 PM

Subject: Request for Clarification of Hex Chrome Information

Dear Susan, Please find attached a short letter requesting some clarification of the hex chrome data

relied upon by EPA and a request for add itional information on related matters.

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684

- 0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684

- 0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org

www.PipeInsulation.org
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FusionTech, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Linqiang Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Linqiang YangLinqiang Yang

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRESERVATION OF 

EVIDENCE AND TO COMPEL DISCOVERY- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY C. ROSENAU,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR06-157MJP

ORDER ON MOTION FOR 

PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE 

AND TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Henry Rosenau’s motion for 

preservation of evidence and to compel discovery. (Dkt. No. 102.) Having reviewed the motion, 

the government’s response (Dkt. No. 116), and the remaining record, the Court issues the 

following ruling:

The government is ORDERED to turn over any MLAT materials to the Court for in 

camera review. While Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 does not require the government to turn over internal 

government documents which relate to the preparation, writing, revising, consulting on and 

presenting of its case, certain elements of the MLAT materials, including the dates of 

communications with the Canadian government, may be relevant for the Defendant’s ability to 

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 126 Filed 04/20/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRESERVATION OF 

EVIDENCE AND TO COMPEL DISCOVERY- 2

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

prepare a defense concerning the Speedy Trial Act. The Court will review these documents and 

turn over any information material for the Defendant’s defense. 

Regarding the Defendant’s argument that the Court should preserve or produce 

documents relating to Zachary Miraback Bates stamped 1829-1907, the Court notes that the 

documents have been filed under seal as Dkt. No. 98, and that they shall be preserved. The Court 

has already reviewed the documents and determined they contain no potentially exculpatory 

material, so they will not be turned over. (Dkt. No. 99.)

The government is ordered to turn over MLAT materials to the Court by Tuesday, April 

24, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Dated this 20th day of April, 2012.

A

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 126 Filed 04/20/12 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 180

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the tax exclusion for employerprovided educational assistance programs should be made permanent.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1998

Mrs. BOXER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the tax exclusion

for employer-provided educational assistance programs

should be made permanent.

Whereas since its inception in 1978, section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 has enabled millions of workers to advance their education and improve their job

skills without incurring additional taxes or a reduction in

take-home pay;

Whereas a well trained and educated workforce is essential to

our Nation’s economy, competitiveness, and national security;

Whereas education and retraining will be necessary to maintain and strengthen the competitive position of American

industries through the next century;
2

•SRES 180 IS

Whereas much of our Nation’s workforce and many of our

Nation’s industries are experiencing the pressures of

rapid technological change and facing the pressures of

global competition;

Whereas many cutting edge American industries are facing a

dearth of qualified United States citizens to fill key positions in important disciplines such as engineering, mathematics, and computer science;

Whereas the United States Senate is on record supporting a

permanent extension of section 127 of such Code for both

graduate and undergraduate study; and

Whereas there is bipartisan support for a permanent extension of section 127 of such Code, as evidenced by the introduction of bills by Senators of both parties: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that legis2 lation to permanently extend section 127 of the Internal

3 Revenue Code of 1986 should be brought to the Senate

4 floor as expeditiously as possible in order to help ensure

5 that United States workers will not be discouraged from

6 advancing their education and job skills.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24401]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of additional meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held via telephone 
conference call from the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Advisory Committee 
Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, 
DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting 
the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meeting is for the purpose of 
advising the agency, under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, on the development of humanities 
programming and content for an upcoming Bridging Cultures Bookshelf 
project on the subject of Muslim history and cultures, including 
discussion of the early planning stages of the project, strategies for 
shaping and implementing the program, and the portion of the project 
focusing on Muslim art and architecture. Because the proposed meeting 
will consider information that is likely to disclose information the 
premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly 
frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action, pursuant to 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 
that the meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    1. Date: October 3, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Room: 421.
    Place: National Endowment for the Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Program: This meeting will provide advice about the Bridging 
Cultures Bookshelf project on the subject of Muslim history and 
cultures, focusing on the portion about art and architecture.

Elizabeth Voyatzis,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-24401 Filed 9-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.1





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Richard B. Carter, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of BookMerge Technologies Inc.





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I; are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.








Date: September 8, 2011








/s/ Richard B. Carter


Richard B. Carter


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
#### Jeffrey SHORT, Petitioner—Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-6420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 24, 2005.

Jeffrey Short, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Short seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A pi'isoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Short has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Short leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
No. 67622.

#### Oxford Int’l Corp. and National Carloading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/12739, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Minute Order - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEMWASHINGTON d/b/a PROVIDENCE

HORIZON HOUSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES H. BUSH in his role as Trustee of the

Sarah Block Special Needs Trust, and TERRI

BLOCK, in her role as Guardian of the Person

and Estate of SARAH BLOCK,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5268RBL

MINUTE ORDER

NOW on this 15th day of February 2007, the Court directs the Clerk to enter the following

Minute Order:

The Court's prior Order Granting Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt.71) is REVISED to reflect

fees outlined in the second declaration of Kari Lester (Dkt. 64). The amount of the fees

awarded to the Guardian on page 5 of the order ($22639.72) is AMENDED to $25925.83.

The foregoing Minute Order entered by s/Jean Boring , Deputy Clerk, 

BY DIRECTION OF THE HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON, UNITED STATES

DISTRICT JUDGE.

Case 3:06-cv-05268-RBL Document 73 Filed 02/15/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

B.L.F.,

Petitioner

v.

D.J.F.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 489 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.