5386 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

producers could be classified as small 

entities under the SBA definition. Thus, 

a majority of handlers and producers of 

Far West spearmint oil may not be 

classified as small entities. 

The use of volume control regulation 

allows the industry to fully supply 

spearmint oil markets while avoiding 

the negative consequences of oversupplying these markets. Volume 

control is believed to have little or no 

effect on consumer prices of products 

containing spearmint oil and likely does 

not result in fewer retail sales of such 

products. Without volume control, 

producers would not be limited in the 

production and marketing of spearmint 

oil. Under those conditions, the 

spearmint oil market would likely 

fluctuate widely. Periods of oversupply 

could result in low producer prices and 

a large volume of oil stored and carried 

over to future crop years. Periods of 

undersupply could lead to excessive 

price spikes and could drive end users 

to source flavoring needs from other 

markets, potentially causing long term 

economic damage to the domestic 

spearmint oil industry. The order’s 

volume control provisions have been 

successfully implemented in the 

domestic spearmint oil industry for 

nearly three decades and provide 

benefits for producers, handlers, 

manufacturers, and consumers. 

This rule continues in effect the 

action that increased the quantity of 

Scotch and Native spearmint oil that 

handlers may purchase from, or handle 

on behalf of, producers during the 

2011–2012 marketing year, which ends 

on May 31, 2012. The Scotch spearmint 

oil salable quantity was increased from 

693,141 pounds to 733,913 pounds and 

the allotment percentage from 

34 percent to 36 percent. Additionally, 

the Native spearmint oil salable quantity 

was increased from 1,012,949 pounds to 

1,266,161 pounds and the allotment 

percentage from 44 percent to 

55 percent. 

The Committee reached its 

recommendation to increase the salable 

quantity and allotment percentage for 

both Scotch and Native spearmint oil 

after careful consideration of all 

available information, and believes that 

the levels recommended will achieve 

the objectives sought. Without the 

increase, the Committee believes the 

industry would not be able to 

satisfactorily meet current market 

demand. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the order’s information 

collection requirements have been 

previously approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) and 

assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, 

Vegetable and Specialty Crop Marketing 

Orders. No changes in those 

requirements as a result of this action 

are necessary. Should any changes 

become necessary, they would be 

submitted to OMB for approval. 

This rule will not impose any 

additional reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements on either small or large 

spearmint oil handlers. As with all 

Federal marketing order programs, 

reports and forms are periodically 

reviewed to reduce information 

requirements and duplication by 

industry and public sector agencies. In 

addition, USDA has not identified any 

relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 

overlap or conflict with this rule. 

Further, the Committee’s meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the 

spearmint oil industry and all interested 

persons were invited to attend the 

meeting and participate in Committee 

deliberations. Like all Committee 

meetings, the August 17, 2011, meeting 

was a public meeting and all entities, 

both large and small, were able to 

express their views on this issue. 

Comments on the interim rule were 

required to be received on or before 

December 5, 2011. No comments were 

received. Therefore, for the reasons 

given in the interim rule, we are 

adopting the interim rule as a final rule, 

without change. 

To view the interim rule, go to: 

http://www.regulations.gov/ 

#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-10-0094- 

0003. 

This action also affirms information 

contained in the interim rule concerning 

Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 

U.S.C. 101). 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, it is found that 

finalizing the interim rule, without 

change, as published in the Federal 

Register (76 FR 61933, October 6, 2011) 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985 

Marketing agreements, Oils and fats, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Spearmint oil. 

Accordingly, the interim rule that 

amended 7 CFR part 985 and that was 

published at 76 FR 61933 on October 6, 

2011, is adopted as a final rule, without 

change. 

Dated: January 30, 2012. 

Robert C. Keeney, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–2376 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1206; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–216–AD; Amendment 

39–16868; AD 2011–24–04] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an 

airworthiness directive (AD) that 

published in the Federal Register. That 

AD applies to certain Model DC–10–10, 

DC–10–10F, and MD–10–10F airplanes. 

The airplane manufacturer name stated 

in the subject line, product 

identification section, and paragraph (c) 

of that AD, is incorrect. Also, the email 

address provided in paragraphs (i)(1) 

and (j) of that AD is incorrect. This 

document corrects those errors. In all 

other respects, the original document 

remains the same. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

February 3, 2012. The effective date for 

AD 2011–24–04, Amendment 39–16868 

(76 FR 73491, November 29, 2011) 

remains January 3, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: (800) 647–5527) 

is Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los 

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 

3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 

California 90712–4137; phone: (562) 

627–5234; fax: (562) 627–5210; email: 

nenita.odesa@faa.gov. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 5387 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Airworthiness Directive 2011–24–04, 

amendment 39–16868 (76 FR 73491, 

November 29, 2011), currently requires 

repetitive inspections for cracking on 

the lower cap of the rear spar of the left 

and right wings between stations 

Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the 

lower cap splice of the wing rear spar 

at station Xors=400; temporary and 

permanent repairs if necessary; and 

repetitive inspections of repaired areas, 

and corrective actions if necessary, for 

certain Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, 

and MD–10–10F airplanes. 

As published, the airplane 

manufacturer name specified in the 

subject line, product identification 

section, and paragraph (c) of AD 2011– 

24–04, Amendment 39–16868 (76 FR 

73491, November 29, 2011), is incorrect. 

As published, the email address 

provided in paragraphs (i)(1) and (j) of 

AD 2011–24–04, Amendment 39–16868 

(76 FR 73491, November 29, 2011), is 

incorrect. 

No other part of the preamble or 

regulatory information has been 

changed; therefore, only the changed 

portions of the final rule are being 

published in the Federal Register. 

The effective date of this AD remains 

January 3, 2012. 

Correction of Non-Regulatory Text 

In the Federal Register of November 

29, 2011, AD 2011–24–04, Amendment 

39–16868 (76 FR 73491, November 29, 

2011), is corrected as follows: 

On page 73491, in the second column, 

in the subject line, change the subject 

line to read as follows: 

‘‘Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes.’’ 

Correction of Regulatory Text 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

■ In the Federal Register of November 

29, 2011, on page 73492, in the third 

column, the product identification line 

of AD 2011–24–04, Amendment 39– 

16868 (76 FR 73491, November 29, 

2011), is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

2011–24–04 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–16868; Docket No. 

FAA–2010–1206; Directorate Identifier 

2009–NM–216–AD. 

* * * * * 

■ In the Federal Register of November 

29, 2011, on page 73492, in the third 

column, paragraph (c) of AD 2011–24– 

04 Amendment 39–16868 (76 FR 73491, 

November 29, 2011), is corrected to read 

as follows: 

* * * * * 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, and MD–10– 

10F airplanes; certificated in any category; as 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

DC10–57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23, 

2011. 

* * * * * 

■ In the Federal Register of November 

29, 2011, on page 73493, in the third 

column, paragraph (i)(1) of AD 2011– 

24–04 Amendment 39–16868 (76 FR 

73491, November 29, 2011), is corrected 

to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office, (ACO) FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: 

Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 

Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 

3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 

California 97012–4137; phone: 562–627– 

5234; fax: 562–627–5210; email: 

nenita.odesa@faa.gov. 

* * * * * 

■ In the Federal Register of November 

29, 2011, on page 73494, in the first 

column, paragraph (j) of AD 2011–24–04 

Amendment 39–16868 (76 FR 73491, 

November 29, 2011), is corrected to read 

as follows: 

* * * * * 

(i) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los 

Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 

Lakewood, California 97012–4137; phone: 

562–627–5234; fax: 562–627–5210; email: 

nenita.odesa@faa.gov. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

23, 2012. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–2295 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 110718395–1482–01] 

RIN 0694–AF30 

Amendment to the Export 

Administration Regulations: Addition 

of a Reference to a Provision of the 

Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (ISA) and 

Statement of the Licensing Policy for 

Transactions Involving Persons 

Sanctioned Under the ISA 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of 

Industry and Security (BIS) amends the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) to add a reference to the Iran 

Sanctions Act of 1996 (ISA), which 

states BIS’s licensing policy for export 

and reexport transactions that involve 

persons sanctioned pursuant to certain 

enumerated statutes. In this rule, BIS 

provides notice to the public that it has 

a general policy of denial for export and 

reexport license applications in which a 

person sanctioned by the State 

Department under the ISA is a party to 

the transaction. BIS also makes 

technical corrections to enhance clarity 

and consistency. 

DATES: This rule is effective February 3, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Theodore Curtin, Sr. Export Policy 

Analyst, Foreign Policy Controls 

Division, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, by 

telephone (202) 482–1975 or by email to 

theodore.curtin@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Basis of Amendment 

The Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 

U.S.C. 1701 note) (ISA) requires the 

President to sanction persons 

determined to have engaged in certain 

actions that help Iran develop 

petroleum resources, produce refined 

petroleum resources, or acquire refined 

petroleum products. Sanctions must 

also be imposed, pursuant to the ISA, on 

persons determined to have taken 

certain actions to help Iran acquire or 

develop certain weapons of mass 

destruction, missiles, or advanced 

conventional weapons. In a September 

23, 2010 Presidential Memorandum, the 

President delegated the authority to 

impose sanctions under the ISA to the 

Secretary of State. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES