alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laser-Pacific  Media Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert McClain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Robert McClain
Robert McClain
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Laser-Pacific  Media  Corporation  and will be  retained  by
Laser-Pacific  Media  Corporation  and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

 Differences in Terms and Conditions of Executive Officer Employment Agreements

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Annual                 Target Bonus
Name of                    Position                             Base                   (as % of Annual
Executive                  of Executive                         Salary                 Base Salary)
---------                  ------------                         ------                 ------------
<S>                        <C>                                  <C>                    <C>
Gary Anderson              Corporate Vice President,            $270,000                50%
                           Worldwide Operations
                           Technology

Susan Bailey               Corporate Vice President,            $350,000                60%
                           U.S/Canada Sales
                           and Service

James Bartlet              Corporate Vice President             $225,000                40%
                           and Chief Marketing Officer

Jeffrey Dumas              Corporate Vice President             $245,000                45%
                           General Counsel

Karen Niparko              Corporate Vice President             $220,000                45%
                           Chief Administrative Officer

Robert Kocol               Corporate Vice President             $290,000                50%
                           and Chief Financial Officer

Victor Perez               Executive Vice President             $460,000                75%
                           and Chief Operating Officer

Jean Reiczyk               Corporate Vice President             $315,000                45%
                           Solutions Business Group
</TABLE>
Industrial Hygiene Issues Concerning the EPA NCEL
CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Focus Media Holding Limited, as amended;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
    By:
    /s/ Jason Nanchun JiangName:
    Jason Nanchun JiangTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 3, 1968

No. P68/1.

protests 66/1381 (B), etc. (New York).

#### Mitsui & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of waterproof cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inv.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 122

Declaring September 26, 1997, as ‘‘Austrian-American Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 15, 1997

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER,

Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BYRD, Mr.

CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. COATS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr.

CONRAD, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr.

FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FORD, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr.

HATCH, Mr. HELMS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. INHOFE,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr.

LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LOTT, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MACK, Mr.

MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. REED, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr.

ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH of

Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr.

THURMOND, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Declaring September 26, 1997, as ‘‘Austrian-American Day’’.

Whereas 1997 marks the 50th anniversary of General George

C. Marshall’s plan for assisting the free countries of Europe in their post-World War II rebuilding process;

Whereas on September 26, 1945, upon the insistence of the

United States, a conference was held in Vienna by the
2

•SRES 122 IS

Allies and the 9 Austrian Federal State Governors, that

laid the foundation for the first post-war Austrian government recognized by the United States and the other

Allied Forces;

Whereas this treaty saved Austria from being divided into an

East and West, as in Germany;

Whereas Austrians are thankful for the generosity demonstrated by the citizens and the Government of the

United States after World War II;

Whereas Austrian-Americans have made important contributions to the American way of life as well as in industry,

education, culture, and the arts and sciences; and

Whereas Austrian born Americans, or Americans of Austrian

descent, have brought prestige and recognition to the

United States as Nobel laureates in medicine, economics,

and the sciences: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) declares September 26, 1997, as ‘‘Austrian3 American Day’’; and

4 (2) authorizes and requests the President to

5 commend this observance to the citizens of the Unit6 ed States in honor of this momentous occasion.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medwave, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 12, 2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates listed below, herebycertifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and shall not be deemedpart of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Date: August 12, 2005         By:  /s/ Timothy J. O’Malley    Timothy J. O’Malley    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer)   
21
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 121

Urging the discontinuance of financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority

unless and until the Palestinian Authority demonstrates a 100-percent

maximum effort to curtail terrorism.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 10, 1997

Mr. SPECTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Urging the discontinuance of financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority unless and until the Palestinian Authority demonstrates a 100-percent maximum effort to

curtail terrorism.

Whereas United States law requires the Palestinian Authority

to exert a maximum 100-percent effort to fight terrorism

in order to continue to receive United States foreign assistance;

Whereas the Palestinian Authority has failed to make that

100-percent maximum effort as evidenced by Chairman

Yassir Arafat’s open embrace of Hamas leader Abdel

Aziz al-Rantisi on August 20, 1997;
2

•SRES 121 IS

Whereas a Palestinian terrorist bombed a Tel Aviv restaurant

on March 21, 1997, killing 3 Israelis and wounding 12

others;

Whereas 2 Hamas suicide bombers attacked a crowded outdoor market in Jerusalem on July 30, 1997, killing 13

Israelis and wounding over 150 others;

Whereas 3 Hamas suicide bombers detonated their bombs in

a popular pedestrian mall in Jerusalem on September 4,

1997, killing 5 Israelis and wounding approximately 170

others;

Whereas Secretary of State Madeleine Albright conceded in

testimony before the Appropriations Subcommittee on

Foreign Operations on May 22, 1997, that Chairman

Arafat had not given a red light to stop Palestinian terrorism;

Whereas in fact the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)

and the Palestinian Authority are at war with Israel;

Whereas the PLO has built up a police force of more than

30,000 men and armed it with sophisticated weapons;

and

Whereas continued United States assistance and assistance

from allies of the United States will only strengthen the

ability of the PLO to continue terrorism and ultimately

wage an all-out war: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States should discontinue

2 all financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority, and

3 the United States should urge allies of the United States

4 to do the same, unless and until the Palestinian Authority
3

•SRES 121 IS

1 demonstrates a 100-percent maximum effort to curtail ter2 rorism.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-132206) pertaining to the 2005 Stock Award Plan and 1999 Stock Plan of Vocus, Inc. of ourreports dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofVocus, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofVocus, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLPMcLean, Virginia
From: tdtron@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:14:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tom Troncalli

Stone Mountain, GA 30087
From: daskins@insight.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:01:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B). I

strongly beleive their are cost free methods of avoiding pregnancy and that THOSE should be the

methods encouraged as it also reduces other medical cost associated with transmitted diseases as well

as a host of other elements that I will refrain from going into at this time.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Askins

Delaware, OH 43015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Myers, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 487]

—Appeal by the defen*537dant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered September 2, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE - 1

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARNOLD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JARRAY ANTWON BROWN,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 06-5035M

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO EXTEND INDICTMENT

DEADLINE

Upon the stipulation of the parties to extend the indictment deadline and the

waiver of right to speedy indictment executed by the defendant, the Court finds that such

an extension would serve the ends of justice and outweighs the interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy indictment; now, therefore,

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:06-mj-05035-KLS Document 14 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE - 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the indictment deadline be extended to May 11,

2006. The period of delay resulting from this extension is hereby excluded for speedy

trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h).

DONE this 6th day of April, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. KELLEY ARNOLD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

/s/ 

MIRIAM F. SCHWARTZ

Attorney for Defendant

/s/ 

J. TATE LONDON

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-mj-05035-KLS Document 14 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 2
#### William N. ODOM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 05-1183.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 2005.

Decided Aug. 12, 2005.

William N. Odom, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William N. Odom, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment in favor of Odom’s employer on his retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Odom v. Potter,*No. CA-03-913-3 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 17, 2004 *&*entered Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
Before the Second Division,

October 5, 1967

No. P67/337.

#### Uni Import Corp. and United Merchandising Corp. *v.*United States, protests 59/29246 and 59/12908 (Los Angeles).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCCP 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58309.

protests 146959-K, etc. (Pembina).

#### W. F. Mackay Estate et al. *v.*United States,

*335Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained as to said items.