alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         282,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    165,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               944,378
<PP&E>                                          18,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,345)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 960,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          447,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,598,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     512,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   960,308
<SALES>                                        485,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,972
<CGS>                                          208,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  792,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,325)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (501,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (501,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        






</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

December 18, 1951

No. 56174.

protest 170516-K (New York).

#### Associated Metals & Minerals Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the only evidence offered was an amended report of the United States Customs Laboratory, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1. It was conceded by counsel for the Government that the original laboratory report stating that the merchandise consisted of “needle antimony,” and which was the basis of the collector’s action, is erroneous. Upon the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 53 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 53

 Commending Dr. Jason C. Hu, Representative of the Taipei Economic and 
          Cultural Representative Office in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 1997

Mr. Murkowski submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending Dr. Jason C. Hu, Representative of the Taipei Economic and 
          Cultural Representative Office in the United States.

Whereas Dr. Jason C. Hu has served with distinction as Representative of the 
        Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) since June 
        1996, and has ably represented the interests of the Republic of China on 
        Taiwan;
Whereas Dr. Hu has been a firm and consistent advocate of democratic principles 
        throughout his distinguished career;
Whereas Dr. Hu has established many deep friendships with Members of Congress 
        and other Americans during his tenure in Washington; and
Whereas Dr. Hu has been asked to return to Taiwan to serve as the Minister of 
        Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby--
            (1) commends Dr. Jason C. Hu for his service as 
        Representative of the TECRO office; and
            (2) expresses to Dr. Hu and his family its best wishes for 
        his continued success in the future.
                                 <all>
```
```

[107th Congress Public Law 1]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ001.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 3]]

Public Law 107-1
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
    Recognizing the 90th birthday of Ronald Reagan. <<NOTE: Feb. 15, 
                        2001 -  [H.J. Res. 7]>> 

Whereas February 6, 2001, is the 90th birthday of Ronald Wilson Reagan;

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan have distinguished 
    records of public service to the United States, the American people, 
    and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming margins as 
    President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore ``the great, 
    confident roar of American progress, growth, and optimism'' and 
    ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan's leadership was instrumental in extending freedom 
    and democracy around the globe and uniting a world divided by the 
    Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of Americans, and 
    by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan's eloquence united Americans in times of triumph 
    and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First Lady but also 
    led a national crusade against illegal drug use;

Whereas together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their lives to 
    promoting national pride and to bettering the quality of life in the 
    United States and throughout the world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the country are 
    with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle with Alzheimer's 
    disease: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress, on behalf of 
the American people, extends its birthday greetings and best wishes to 
Ronald Reagan on his 90th birthday.

    Approved February 15, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 7:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Feb. 6, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Case No. 10,261.

#### NIETO v. CLARK.

[Boston Courier, March 23, 1858.]

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

1818. 1

Carriers — Conduct of Servants towards Lady Passengers.

This was a libel by Manuel Nieto, ex-steward, against William B. Clark, master of the bark Evangeline, to recover wages, as per shipping articles, at ?25, the libellant having shipped as steward for a voyage to Valparaiso and other ports in the Pacific, and back to Boston, but was discharged at Xalcahuana. The libellant claimed wages for the whole voyage, about $250. The respondent tendered to the libellant, when he discharged him, $70, or the amount due to him at that time, and that sum was also tendered to him here, and then paid into court after the libel had been commenced. To the libel itself the respondent answered, that Nieto at Talcahuana entered the stateroom of a lady passenger in the night time, and conducted himself in a grossly indecent manner; that she reported his behavior to the respondent, and declared that she would not stay in the vessel if Nieto was not discharged; and that he therefore did discharge him.

In giving his decision, SPRAGUE, District Judge, said there were several disingenuous suppressions of facts on the part of the libel-lant, and he held that the respondent was fully justified in dismissing him. Libel dismissed.

F. W. Sanger, for libellant.

J. H. Prince, for respondent.

1

 [Affirmed in Case No. 10,262.]

[Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible. I

[See Orne v. Townsend, Case No. 10.5S3; Whitton v. The Commerce, Id. 17.604; Atkyns v. Burrows, Id. 618; The Nimrod, Id. 10,267.]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roosevelt Arrington, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 483]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered November 30, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the conclusion that the defendant effectively waived his right to appeal *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273; *People v Khan,*201 AD2d 586). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
# C_2022482EN.01002001.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/20

---

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2022 — Coulter Ventures v EUIPO — iWeb (R)

(Case T-457/21) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 482/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Coulter Ventures LLC (Columbus, Ohio, United States) (represented by R. Dissmann, L. Jones and M. Lotz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by M. Eberl and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervener before the General Court: iWeb GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by T. Boddien, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2021 (Case R 2789/2019-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Coulter Ventures LLC and iWeb GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Coulter Ventures LLC and iWeb GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---
Before the Third Division,

April 24, 1963

No. 67624.

#### Porthales Valley Mills, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 274716-K, 274717-K, and 274718-K (Galveston).

Donlon, Judge:

When called for hearing at Dallas on January 29,1963, these cases were consolidated and submitted on a stipulation as follows:

> Me. Zanes : We offer to stipulate on these three cases. It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise herein consists of shelled peanuts assessed at a fee of 2 cents per pound under Presidential Proclamation number 3084, T.D. 53755, which proclamation is claimed *to*be invalid; that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*versus *Best Foods Inc.,*47 C.C.P.A., 163, C.A.D. 751; that the record in *United States*versus *Best Foods Inc.*47 C.C.P.A., 163, C.A.D. 751, be incorporated herein: that the official papers herein be received in evidence without marking.

> Mes. Ziff : After conferring with the Collector and Appraiser at Dallas, I am in agreement with said stipulation.

> Me. Zanes : We rest and submit.

> Mbs. Ziff : Best and submit.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts and on authority of the decision cited therein, we hold that the fee of 2 cents per pound assessed under Presidential Proclamation 3084, T.D. 53755, on merchandise described as peanuts with or without other words of description, as shown on the invoices covered by the entries in these protests, was invalid.

It appears from the entry documents that these peanuts were entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on April 1, 1955, and May 4, 1955, which is during the period when the Treasury Department liquidated under the purported authority of proclamation 3084, *supra.*

To this extent, the protests are sustained. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the protests are overruled.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 5 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. J. RES. 5

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 
         appointment of the United States Trade Representative.

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
        2171(b)(3)) became effective on January 1, 1996, and provides certain 
        limitations with respect to the appointment of the United States Trade 
        Representative and Deputy United States Trade Representatives;
Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 does not apply 
        to any individual who was serving as the United States Trade 
        Representative or Deputy United States Trade Representative on the 
        effective date of such paragraph (3) and who continued to serve in that 
        position;
Whereas Charlene Barshefsky was appointed Deputy United States Trade 
        Representative on May 28, 1993, with the advice and consent of the 
        Senate, and was serving in that position on January 1, 1996;
Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 does not apply 
        to Charlene Barshefsky in her capacity as Deputy United States Trade 
        Representative; and
Whereas in light of the foregoing, it is appropriate to continue to waive the 
        provisions of paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 
        with respect to the appointment of Charlene Barshefsky as the United 
        States Trade Representative: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding the 
provisions of paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(3)) or any other provision of law, the President, 
acting by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, is authorized 
to appoint Charlene Barshefsky as the United States Trade 
Representative.

            Passed the Senate March 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 5

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 
         appointment of the United States Trade Representative.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRIAN PLASKON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF

KING COUNTY d/b/a VALLEY MEDICAL

CENTER, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-367RSL

TAXATION OF COSTS

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motions For Attorney’s Fees And Referring

Motion For Costs, (Dkt. #58), the clerk considered briefs in support of, and in opposition to, the cost bill

herein. Costs in the cause indicated above are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFF BRIAN PLASKON , 

and on behalf of DEFENDANTS in the amount of $1,509.52 as follows:

Requested Disallowed Allowed

I. TRANSCRIPT COSTS $980.49 0 $980.49

II. LEXIS RESEARCH $215.01 $215.01 0

Lexis research fees are not taxable costs.

III. PACER FEES $7.20 $7.20 0

Pacer fees are not taxable.

IV. DELIVERY SERVICES $17.00 $17.00 0

Costs incurred for delivery services are not taxable.

Case 2:06-cv-00367-RSL Document 59 Filed 02/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Requested Disallowed Allowed

TAXATION OF COSTS -- 2

V. TRANSPORTATION COSTS $42.72 $42.72 0

Transportation expenses are not taxable.

VI. COPY COSTS $529.03 0 $529.03

Dated this 4th day of FEBRUARY, 2008 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:06-cv-00367-RSL Document 59 Filed 02/04/08 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto RIVERA-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41577

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*383Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Roberto Rivera-Mendez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Rivera-Mendez contends that his sentence is invalid in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the sentencing judge applied the sentencing guidelines as if they were mandatory. We review for plain error. *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556); *United States v. Malveaux,*411 F.3d 558, 560 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 11, 2005) (No. 05-5297). To prevail under a plain error analysis, Rivera-Mendez must show an error that is plain and that affects his substantial rights. *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005)(No. 04-9517).

To demonstrate that the plain error affected his substantial rights, Rivera-Mendez has the burden of showing that the error “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.” *Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d at 733 (internal quotations and citation omitted). He must demonstrate “that the sentencing judge — sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one — would have reached a significantly different result.” *Mares, 402*F.3d at 521.

As Rivera-Mendez concedes, he cannot show prejudice as there is nothing in the record to suggest that his sentence would have been any less had the court applied the sentencing guidelines as advisory rather than mandatory. *See Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d at 733-34. He thus fails to establish prejudice to his substantial rights. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 5, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136298 & (99)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. GARY HENRY and ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY Stephen J. Markman, SITUATED, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136298 

 COA: 266433 

Saginaw CC: 03-047775-NZ 

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae and for 

miscellaneous relief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 24, 

2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties 

shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the “rigorous analysis” 

requirement for class certification that is applied in the federal courts also applies to state 

class actions, see Gen Tel Co of the Southwest v Falcon, 457 US 147, 161; 102 S Ct 

2364; 72 L Ed 2d 740 (1982); (2) if so, whether the Saginaw Circuit Court engaged in the 

required rigorous analysis to determine if class certification was appropriate; (3) whether 

the plaintiffs met all of the requisites for class certification established in MCR 

3.501(A)(1), including the requirement that questions of law or fact common to the 

members of the class predominate over questions affecting only individual members; and 

(4) whether the plaintiffs established that they suffered injury on a classwide basis in 

order to justify class certification. 

The Litigation Section of the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Association 

for Justice are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in 

the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission 

to file briefs amicus curiae. 

t1029 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 5, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND RELATED NOTES CONTAINED
IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         299,792
<SECURITIES>                                   186,648
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,905
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               956,808
<PP&E>                                         342,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 173,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,279,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          669,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,520
<OTHER-SE>                                     543,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,279,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               920,756
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,091,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (154,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (163,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,334)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)


</TABLE>
No. 60605.

#### Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 229222-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ball cock assemblies, which are constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Protest 251653-K, insofar as it relates to entry 770813, having been abandoned, was dismissed.