alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BRYAN BUCHANAN,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-302-M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Felon in possession of firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and

924(e).

Date of Detention Hearing: August 2, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is facing the possibility of substantial time in prison, with mandatory

minimums of ten (10) or fifteen (15) years in prison and the possibility of life. 

(2) Defendant has a substantial criminal history.

(3) Defendant has at least ten (10) alias names, three alias social-security numbers,

and seven (7) alias dates of birth.

Case 2:05-cr-00392-JCC Document 9 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(4) Defendant has at least two convictions for attempt to elude, one of which

occurred in 2002. 

(5) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings and that will address the

danger to other persons or the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00392-JCC Document 9 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05248-CBM Document 19 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-05248-CBM Document 19 Filed 02/01/07 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-05248-CBM Document 19 Filed 02/01/07 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-05248-CBM Document 19 Filed 02/01/07 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-05248-CBM Document 19 Filed 02/01/07 Page 5 of 5
No. 55685.

protests 162072-K, etc. (New York).

#### Joseph J. Edel et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(Lennie Hennings; CR06-137 RSM) (206) 553-1100

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

LENNIE HENNINGS, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-137 RSM

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 

THE COURT having considered the stipulated motion of the parties, the records

and files herein, the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. Based on the facts set forth in the parties stipulated motion, the Court finds

that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary

for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the

meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more

speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 30 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(Lennie Hennings; CR06-137 RSM) (206) 553-1100

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL - 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date for Lennie Hennings is

extended from September 5, 2006 to January 16, 2007. Pretrial motions shall be filed by

December 7, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time between September 5, 2006 and 

January 16, 2007 shall be excluded in the computation of time under the Speedy Trial

Act as this is a reasonable period of delay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

DONE this _28_ day of August 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Nancy Tenney 

WSBA No. 35304

Attorney for Lennie Hennings

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

206/553-1100

206/553-0120

nancy_tenney@fd.org

Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 30 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-14T22:08:55-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.42



                         CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                               THIRD AMENDMENT
                                      TO
                  1993 AMENDED AND RESTATED SOCK OPTION PLAN


     This THIRD AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") to the Amended and Restated 1993
Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is being adopted by resolution of the
board of Directors at a meeting held on September 25, 1999 (the "Effective
Date"). Effective from and after the Effective Date, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows:

     1.  Section 6 of the Plan hereby is amended by deleting Section 6 in its
entirety and inserting inits place the following, said amendment being for
the purpose of making directors eligible to receive Awarded Options.

               6.  ELIGIBILITY.  An Awarded Option may be granted only to an
         employee or Eligible Director of officer of or consultant to one or
         more of the Company and its Subsidiaries, PROVIDED that Incentive
         Options may be granted only to an employee (including an officer that
         is an employee) of the Company or one or more of its Subsidiaries.
         Each Eligible Director shall receive Formula Options pursuant to
         Section 8 hereof. Subject to adjustment pursuant to Secion 15 hereof,
         no person in any year may be granted Options with respect to more than
         500,000 Shares.

     2.  Section 8.1 of the Plan hereby is amended by replacing the reference
therein to "7,000 Shares" with "15,000 Shares", said amendment being for the
purpose of increasing the number of Shares subject to the Nonstatutory Option
granted to Directors elected for the first on the Formula Grant Date.

     3.  Section 8.2 of the Plan hereby is amended by replacing the reference
therein to "700 Shares" with "2,000 Shares", said amendment being for the
purpose of increasing the number of Shares subject to the Nonstatutory Option
granted to Directors on the business day immediately following the annual
meeting of stockholders of the Company.

     Except to the extent amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions and
conditions set forth in the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
remain in full force and effect. The Plan and this Amendment shall be read
and construed together as a single instrument.
No. 51788.

#### Brunswig Drug Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 913315-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES BACON

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIE THURMAN et al.,

Defendants

Case No. C06-5185RBL

ORDER SENDING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR COUNSEL TO THE

SCREENING COMMITTEE FOR

CONSIDERATION 

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR

3, and MJR 4. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion asking appointment of counsel (Dkt. # 34). This

case is in an unusual procedural posture. No dispositive motions were filed by ether party. The

deadline for filing such a motion was February 3, 2007 (Dkt. # 25). Thus, it appears this action is

going to trial.

In considering plaintiff’s motion for counsel the court notes there is a standard for

appointment of counsel in the Ninth Circuit. There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although the court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), can request

counsel to represent a party proceeding in forma pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional

Case 3:06-cv-05185-RBL Document 37 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy,

745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984); Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of

exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and

the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues

involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331.

Here, plaintiff claims an Eighth Amendment violation as a result of force used against him

when he was housed in a juvenile facility. He alleges permanent physical injury (Dkt. # 4). The

defendants have not responded other than to file an answer (Dkt. # 23). The answer amounts to a

general denial.

The court orders this case be sent to the screening committee for consideration of plaintiff’s

request for appointment of counsel. The committee will report back to this court.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants and

refer this case to the screening committee.

DATED this 27 day of April 2007.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05185-RBL Document 37 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                                       389
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             38,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               3,900
<INVENTORY>                                                               44,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          87,881
<PP&E>                                                                     2,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             3,369 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            91,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     40,335
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                      44
<OTHER-SE>                                                                23,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                              91,076
<SALES>                                                                  310,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         310,665
<CGS>                                                                    289,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            289,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          23,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         1,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (3,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               (750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (2,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             (2,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.64)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                   VANS, INC.

               Vans, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Delaware Law"), does hereby certify as follows:

               FIRST: That Article VII of the Corporation's Restated Certificate
of Incorporation is amended to delete the second sentence of Article VII thereof
and replace such sentence with the following:

               "The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the
Corporation has authority to issue is 45,000,000 shares, consisting of
40,000,000 shares of Common Stock, each having a par value of $.001, and
5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, each having a par value of $.001."

               SECOND: That the foregoing amendment to the Corporation's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly approved by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation on June 29, 2001.

               THIRD: That the foregoing amendment was duly approved by the
shareholders of the Corporation at the Corporation's 2001 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, at which a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote
thereon voted in favor of the aforementioned amendment as required by the
Delaware Law.

               FOURTH: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware Law.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate
to be signed by Gary H. Schoenfeld, its President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Craig E. Gosselin, its Secretary, this first day of November, 2001.

                                            /s/ GARY H. SCHOENFELD
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Gary H. Schoenfeld, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer

Attest:

/s/ CRAIG E. GOSSELIN
---------------------------------
Craig E. Gosselin, Secretary
##### 



Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Greenville Federal
Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 61




---



##### 



Date: September 26, 2007
    /s/ Susan J. AllreadSusan J. AllreadChief Financial Officer and Secretary 62
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc., a
company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 11, 2011               /s/ Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 61081.

#### Murmac Importing Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 216928-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: dibeben@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:44:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Benvenuti

West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 184 Filed 11/04/13 Page 16 of 16