alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 25, 2013*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.219 Multifamily Residential Mortgages** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Jones, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 456]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered April 19, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant and an unapprehended accomplice shot and killed the manager of a clothing store in Brooklyn during a robbery.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his two arguments concerning the court’s charge to the jury *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the charge, as a whole, conveyed the proper standards to the jury *(see, People v Smalls,*185 AD2d 863; *People v Nelson,*171 AD2d 702).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.
No. 55698.

protests 148151-K, etc. (New York).

#### Artisan Products Import, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TOIVO L. REDDITT, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SU NAM LEE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-486RSL

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff Toivo Redditt, who is

proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for non payment of child support. On April 19, 2006, the

Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for two

reasons: (1) plaintiff alleges claims under 18 U.S.C. § 228, 28 U.S.C. § 1738A, and various

subsections of 28 U.S.C. § 1738B, but those statutes do not provide for a private cause of action,

and (2) the allegations of the complaint raise issues that appear to fall squarely within the

domestic relations exception to federal jurisdiction.

Plaintiff filed a response on May 26, 2006. He does not dispute that the statutes he cites

in his complaint do not provide for a private cause of action. Furthermore, although plaintiff

alleges that the state failed “to follow its own rules” and evidenced gender bias, he has not sued

any government entity. Response to Order to Show Cause at p. 2. Instead, the only defendant is

Ms. Lee, the child’s mother. Most tellingly, the only relief plaintiff seeks is for Ms. Lee to “pay

Case 2:06-cv-00486-RSL Document 6 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2

what she owes her son.” Id. Adjudication of plaintiff’s claims would interfere with the state’s

child support obligations. Therefore, even if plaintiff’s complaint stated a valid claim, which it

does not, the Court would decline jurisdiction.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. 

DATED this 1st day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00486-RSL Document 6 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Kristin O. Dominick V. et al., Respondents; Louis O., Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 52]

—In a private placement adoption proceeding, the natural father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), entered November 17, 1993, which, after a hearing, determined that his consent to the adoption of his child by the child’s stepfather was not required because he had abandoned her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the appellant’s . consent was not required in the proceeding to adopt the child because he had abandoned her *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]). Under Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a), consent to adoption is not required of a parent "who evinces an intent to forego his or her parental or custodial rights and obligations as manifested by his or her failure for a period of six months to visit the child and communicate with the child or person having legal custody of the child, although able to do *„^99*SO .

At the hearing, the child’s natural mother and stepfather testified that from February 1989 until August 1992, the appellant had not contacted or communicated with them or the child. Although the appellant claimed that he made telephone calls and had written to the child during this period, he presented no objective proof of his efforts.

The appellant’s testimony that he regularly sent cards to the child on her birthday and on certain holidays and continued to do so even after he was incarcerated in June 1989 was contradicted by the child’s testimony that she had received only one card from the appellant, which was in January 1993, after the petition to adopt was filed. The child further testified that, other than the one card and two letters she had received *671after the petition was filed, she had not received any other correspondence from the appellant.

There is no support in the record for the contention that the natural mother and the stepfather interfered with the appellant’s attempts to communicate with the child *(compare, Matter of Corey L v Martin L,*45 NY2d 383, 390; *Matter of Shawn P.,*187 AD2d 432, 433). The record unequivocally establishes that the appellant knew at all times where the child was living and could have communicated with her *(cf., Matter of Shawn P., supra).*

Thus, on this record, the credible evidence establishes that the appellant abandoned his child and that his consent to the adoption was not required *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; *Matter of Devorah Leah B.,*152 AD2d 566, 567; *Matter of Corey L v Martin L,*45 NY2d 383, 391, *supra).*Furthermore, there is no basis to disturb the Family Court’s determination on the issue of credibility *(see, Matter of Devorah Leah B., supra; Matter of Christopher Rene T.,*189 AD2d 692).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
III

Calendar No. 181

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 126

[Report No. 105–87]

Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1997

Mr. SPECTER, from the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

RESOLUTION

Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on

Veterans’ Affairs.

1 Resolved, That section 18(b) of Senate Resolution 54,

2 105th Congress, agreed to February 13, 1997, is amended

3 by striking out ‘‘$1,123,430’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

4 ‘‘$1,698,430’’.
Calendar No. 181

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 126

[Report No. 105–87]

RESOLUTION

Authorizing supplemental expenditures by the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

SEPTEMBER 25, 1997

Placed on the calendar
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (2 MB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (500 KB PDF)
Summary tables (205 KB PDF)
Flows tables (550 KB PDF)
Level tables (525 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (70 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (130 KB PDF)
Integrated macroeconomic accounts table (290 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical data | About| Technical Q&AsCurrent release | 
Screen reader |  
PDF (2.3 MB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)  | Preliminary Z.1 Code Updates

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 11, 2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6598
CLARENCE EPPS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PROBATION AND PAROLE; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00274-TSE) Submitted: December 13, 2006 Decided: December 27, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Epps, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Clarence Epps, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Epps v. Virginia Dept. of Corr. , No. 1:06-cv-00274-TSE (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sheryl Gardner,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 30, 2006                        /s/  Sheryl Gardner
                                            --------------------------
                                            Sheryl Gardner
                                            Chief Financial Officer And
                                            Principle Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 156 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 156

 Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of the Senate 
  pro tempore, and the majority and minority leaders to make certain 
  appointments after the sine die adjournment of the present session.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of the Senate 
  pro tempore, and the majority and minority leaders to make certain 
  appointments after the sine die adjournment of the present session.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the sine die adjournment of the 
present session of the Congress, the President of the Senate, the 
President of the Senate pro tempore, the majority leader of the Senate, 
and the minority leader of the Senate be, and they are hereby, 
authorized to make appointments to commissions, committees, boards, 
conferences, or interparliamentary conferences authorized by law, by 
concurrent action of the two Houses, or by order of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
No. 57759.

protest 203493-K (New York).

#### Langfelder Homma *&*Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass bead Christmas tree ornaments the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43

                                    AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                           EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN
                                 OF AMETEK, INC.

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

         WHEREAS, there was adopted and made effective as of December 29, 1942,
the Employees' Retirement Plan of AMETEK, Inc. (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective
January 1, 1998; and

         WHEREAS, Section 9.2 of the Plan provides that AMETEK, Inc. ("AMETEK")
may amend the Plan at any time or from time to time; and

         WHEREAS, AMETEK now desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         FIRST: Section 1.18 of the Plan is amended by adding the following to
the end of the first sentence:

         "or any person who is hired as a temporary employee or intern"

         SECOND: The provisions of this Amendment No. 1 shall be effective as of
January 1, 1998.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMETEK has caused these presents to be executed in
its corporate name, by its duly authorized officer on this 31st day of March,
1998.

                                                AMETEK, Inc.




                                                By: /s/ Donna F. Winquist
                                                    -----------------------

Attest:

/s/ Kathryn E. Londra
----------------------
Kindest Regards, 

. David Totemoff-President of Native Village Tatitlek
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 111

Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as ‘‘National

Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DODD, Mr.

D’AMATO, Mr. KOHL, Mr. CONRAD, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. ROBB,

Mr. WARNER, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. LOTT, Mr. KERREY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN,

and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 10, 1997

Considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as

‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities

Week’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas there are 116 historically black colleges and universities in the United States;

Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality

education so essential to full participation in a complex,

highly technological society;

Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage

and have played a prominent role in American history;
2

SRES 111 ATS

Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many

underprivileged students to attain their full potential

through higher education; and

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates the week beginning September

3 14, 1997, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges

4 and Universities Week’’; and

5 (2) requests that the President of the United

6 States issue a proclamation calling on the people of

7 the United States and interested groups to observe

8 the week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and

9 programs to demonstrate support for historically

10 black colleges and universities in the United States.

Æ
No. 62285.

#### Eitinger Bead Co., Inc., v. United States,

protests 310549-K and 311805-K (New York).

*353Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of manufactures of shell the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Paramount Import Export Co. et al.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 82, C. A. D. 677), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe MEDRANO-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51180.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe Medrano-Aguilar raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (203)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,522
<PP&E>                                          32,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,896
<BONDS>                                         38,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               30
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,848
<SALES>                                         12,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,074
<CGS>                                            6,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    232
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 18, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.205 Time and Savings Deposits** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott Emerson Lybbert, certify that:

        1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TGFIN
Holdings, Inc.;

        2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

        4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

               a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

               b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the Evaluation Date"); and

               c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

               a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

               b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

        6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


     /s/ Scott Emerson Lybbert       Chief Executive Officer
    --------------------------
         Scott Emerson Lybbert        November 7, 2006