alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 189 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 189

  Honoring the 150th anniversary of the United States Women's Rights 
Movement that was initiated by the 1848 Women's Rights Convention held 
 in Seneca Falls, New York, and calling for a national celebration of 
                        women's rights in 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1998

Mr. Torricelli (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Snowe, Mrs. 
Murray, and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the 150th anniversary of the United States Women's Rights 
Movement that was initiated by the 1848 Women's Rights Convention held 
 in Seneca Falls, New York, and calling for a national celebration of 
                        women's rights in 1998.

Whereas 1998 will mark the 150th anniversary of the Women's Rights Movement in 
        the United States, a valiant civil rights movement that began in 1848 
        when the Women's Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York;
Whereas the Declaration of Sentiments, the document issued by the Women's Rights 
        Convention, is a strong reflection of this country's commitment to 
        liberty and personal freedom;
Whereas the Women's Rights Movement has had an irreversible effect on the 
        opportunities open to women in all areas of life, including business, 
        education, religion, the arts, science, and athletics;
Whereas the history surrounding the fight for women's equality over the past 
        century and a half is still greatly unknown and unrecognized by many of 
        our Nation's citizens and demands more acknowledgment in our children's 
        curriculum;
Whereas there is an ever-increasing need for both women and men to share in the 
        fundamental responsibilities of our national life with a full and equal 
        participation in society; and
Whereas March 1998, is National Women's History Month, celebrated with the theme 
        of ``Living the Legacy of Women's Rights'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes and celebrates 1998 as the 150th anniversary 
        of the Women's Rights Movement and March 1998 as National 
        Women's History Month under the theme ``Living the Legacy of 
        Women's Rights''; and
            (2) calls on educators, government officials, and 
        businesses to celebrate the legacy of the Women's Rights 
        Movement and remember the struggle that began 150 years ago.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012382EN.01000801.xml

| 12.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 December 2012

2012/C 382/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2993 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4593 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6449 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2115 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,290 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,14 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0921 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3173 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2381 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2820 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0697 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5515 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5868 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 397,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2800 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1157 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 519,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9720 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,091 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,785 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6951 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6090 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,5130 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2993

JPY

Japanese yen

107,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4593

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80740

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6449

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2115

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,290

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,14

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0921

RON

Romanian leu

4,5443

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3173

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2381

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2820

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0697

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5515

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5868

KRW

South Korean won

1 397,72

ZAR

South African rand

11,2800

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1157

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 519,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9720

PHP

Philippine peso

53,091

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8650

THB

Thai baht

39,785

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6951

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6090

INR

Indian rupee

70,5130

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 257

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 15, 1998, should be

designated as ‘‘National Inhalant Abuse Awareness Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 22, 1998

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. CLELAND, Mr.

DURBIN, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. INOUYE) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 15, 1998,

should be designated as ‘‘National Inhalant Abuse

Awareness Day’’.

Whereas inhalant abuse is nearing epidemic proportions with

over 20 percent of all students admitting to experimenting with inhalants by the time they graduate from high

school and only 4 percent of parents suspecting their

children of inhalant use;

Whereas according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse,

inhalant use ranks third behind use of alcohol and tobacco for all youths through the eighth grade;
2

•SRES 257 IS

Whereas the over 1,000 products that are being inhaled to

get high are legal, inexpensive, and found in nearly every

home and every corner market;

Whereas using inhalants even once can lead to kidney failure,

brain damage, and even death;

Whereas inhalants are considered a gateway drug, one that

leads to the use of harder, more deadly drugs; and

Whereas because inhalant use is difficult to detect, the products used are accessible and affordable, and abuse is so

common, increased education of young people and their

parents regarding the dangers of inhalants is an important step in our battle against drug abuse: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) it is the sense of the Senate that October

3 15, 1998, should be designated as ‘‘National Inhal4 ant Abuse Awareness Day’’, to be observed with ap5 propriate activities; and

6 (2) the Senate requests that the President issue

7 a proclamation designating October 15, 1998, as

8 ‘‘National Inhalant Abuse Awareness Day’’.

Æ
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Jason Nanchun JiangName:
    
    Jason Nanchun JiangTitle:
    
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Instructions and key

# Beach 1

# Beach 2

# QC samples
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas Silberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/ THOMAS SILBERG     
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas Silberg         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
No. 62857.

#### Loewengart & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 317139-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7395

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENWANIEE VONTORIAN TATE, a/k/a Keno , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr - 00265

- RJC

- DCK

- 1 ; 3:19

- cv 00146

- RJC )

Submitted : March 4, 2022 Decided: March 17, 2022

Before KING and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenwaniee Vontorian Tate , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenwaniee Vontorian Tate seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonst rate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tate has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Tate’s motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
|   | (1) | To      my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | CANCER      THERAPEUTICS, INC. |                         |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                           |                           |                         |   |
| Date: April      14, 2009 | By:                            | /s/ Chene      Gardner  |   |
|                           |                           | Chene      Gardner           |   |
|                           |                           | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                           |                           | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATION AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ERIC O’NEAL SOLIER, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR05-391-RSM 

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 

AND DETERMINATION AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE

INTRODUCTION 

I conducted a hearing on alleged violations of supervised release in this case on July 16, 

2010. The defendant appeared pursuant to warrant issued in this case. The United States was 

represented by Richard E. Cohen, and defendant was represented by James Vonasch. Also 

present was U.S. Probation Officer Joe Mendez. The proceedings were digitally recorded. 

SENTENCE AND PRIOR ACTION 

Defendant was sentenced on July 28, 2006 by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez for 

Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine and Cocaine Base, a Schedule II Controlled Substance. He 

received 60 months detention and 5 years of supervised release. 

PRESENTLY ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

In a petition dated July 2, 2010, U.S. Probation Officer Christopher S. Luscher alleged that 

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 1047 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATION AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

defendant violated the following conditions of supervised release: 

1. Possessing and distributing a controlled substance, oxycontin, on or about June 30, 

2010, in violation of the mandatory condition that he not commit another federal, state, or local 

crime. 

FINDINGS FOLLOWING EVIDENTIARY HEARING 

Auburn police officer Jeffrey Crawford testified that on June 30, 2010 defendant sold 

oxycontin to a confidential informant in a controlled buy. After the buy, defendant was arrested 

and police found in his possession the marked US currency the police had used in the controlled 

buy. Police also found additional oxycontin pills in the car defendant was driving at the time of 

his arrest. Based on the testimony presented, the Court found the government had proven that 

defendant had violation the alleged condition of supervision. Defendant was informed the matter 

would be set for a disposition hearing on July 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. before District Judge 

Ricardo S. Martinez. 

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

Based upon the foregoing, I recommend the court find that defendant has violated the 

conditions of his supervised release as alleged above, and conduct a disposition hearing. 

DATED this 16th day of July, 2010. 

A 

BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 1047 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Décor Products International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
April 15,
2010                                                                     By: /s/ Liu Rui
Sheng
 Liu Rui
Sheng
 President, Chief Executive Officer
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Manufacturers' Bids for WIC Infant Formula Rebate Contracts, 2003-2013

Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-142) 36 pp, July 2015

by David E.   Davis and Victor  Oliveira

USDA's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is the major purchaser of infant formula in the United States. WIC State agencies are required to have competitively bid infant formula rebate contracts with infant formula manufacturers. This study analyzes the winning and losing bids from the infant formula manufacturers.

**Keywords:** Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; WIC; infant formula; net price; rebates; bids

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Report summary 
-  Download zip file for EIB-142 

-  Food & Nutrition Assistance 
-  WIC Program 

**Last updated:** Tuesday, July 07, 2015

**For more information contact:** David E.   Davis and Victor  Oliveira
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

NETFLIX, INC., Appellant

v.

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1800, 2022

- 2208

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020

- 01582, IPR2021

- 00542.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

H ARPER B ATTS

, Sheppard Mullin Richter & HamptonLLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J EFFREY L IANG

, C HRISTOPHER S COTT P ONDER

.

D AN Y OUNG

, Quarles & Brady LLP, Littleton, CO, argued for appellee. Also represented by K ENT D ALLOW ; C HAD K ING , King IAM LLC, Lone Tree, CO.

______________________ Case: 22-1800 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2024THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, H UGHES

, and S TARK

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 1 1 , 2024
Date Case: 22-1800 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 03/11/2024
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SIDNEY CHARLES RANDALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. LARSON, 

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0798-JCC-MAT

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has

filed a motion to compel defendant to comply with plaintiff’s discovery requests (interrogatories

and a request for production of documents). (Dkt. #39). Defendant has filed a response to the

motion to compel. (Dkt. #40). Having reviewed plaintiff’s motion to compel and defendant’s

response, the court does hereby find and ORDER as follows:

(1) In the response to the motion to compel, counsel for defendant raises no objection

to the discovery sought by plaintiff and concedes that plaintiff’s request has been pending since

December 15, 2006. (Dkt. #40 at 2). Counsel explains that her delay in responding has been

caused by defendant’s health problems and unavailability. (Id.). Counsel admits that she should

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 43 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

PAGE -2

have contacted plaintiff to inform him of the reason for the delay and should have requested an

extension of time to respond. (Id. at 3). Finally, counsel assures the court that she can provide

the requested discovery to plaintiff by March 22, 2007. (Id.)

In order to assure that defendant complies expeditiously with plaintiff’s discovery request,

plaintiff’s motion to compel (Dkt. #39) is GRANTED. Because plaintiff’s discovery request has

already been pending for over two months, and the deadline for discovery is April 16, 2007,

defendant shall provide the requested discovery materials to plaintiff no later than March 9, 2007.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for

defendant, and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00798-JCC Document 43 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 2
#### Victoria A. JEDROWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GIANT FOOD INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Frank Podgorski, Store Manager, in his official capacity; Kevin Long, Assistant Store Manager, in his official capacity, Defendants. Victoria A. Jedrowicz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Giant Food Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee, and Royal Ahold; J. Sainsbury (USA) Holdings, Incorporated; Peter Manos, in his official capacity; Brian Kamiscinski, District Manager in his official capacity; Frank Podgorski, Store Manager in his official capacity, Defendants.

Nos. 00-1941, 01-1133.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 2001.

Decided July 9, 2001.

*158Jo Ann P. Myles, Largo, MD, for appellant. Robert G. Ames, Connie N. Bertram, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Victoria A. Jedrowicz appeals district court orders entered in the course of her litigating two complaints against Giant Foods, Incorporated. In No. 00-1941, we have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Jedrowicz v. Giant Food, Inc.,*No. CA-96-3562-WMN (D.Md. June 7, 2000). Likewise, in No. 01-1133, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Jedrowicz v. Giant Food, Inc.,*No. CA-98-3899-WMN (D.Md. Dec. 21, 2000). In No. 01-1133, we grant Appellee’s motion to file an attachment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*