alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P67/347.

#### Baumrin Brothers et al. *v.*United States, protests 66/3870, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks, cabinet, or drawer locks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SCOTT BOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendants,

Case No. C06-5077RBL

ORDER DISMISSING

THE COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This Civil Rights corpus action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR 4. 

Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. When the court reviewed the complaint prior to service

the court noted several defects. The court entered an order to amend and in response plaintiff asks to

dismiss the action. (Dkt. # 7).

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss his case when no answer or

motion for summary judgment has been filed by an adverse party. Rule 41(a)(1) specifically provides that

dismissal as a matter of right can be foreclosed only by the filing of an answer 

 This complaint has not been served and plaintiff may dismiss the action.

Case 3:06-cv-05077-RBL-JKA Document 9 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner and to DISMISS this action

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED this 24th day of May, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for entry this

23rd day of May, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05077-RBL-JKA Document 9 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Defendant.

________________________________________

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington

corporation,

Counterclaim Plaintiff,

v.

VERITAS OPERATING CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation, and VERITAS

SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

 Counterclaim Defendants.

 CASE NO. C06-0703C

ORDER

 

 

 

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Common Law Claims

(Dkt. No. 24), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 43), and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. No. 49). The

Case 2:06-cv-00703-JCC Document 59 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Errol WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6170.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 28, 2001.

Michael Errol Wilson, pro se.

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit J.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Errol Wilson appeals the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion seeking to alter or amend the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Wilson,*Nos. CR-97-39-BO; CA-00-55-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *108and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

;:RARTMENT OF 

Af'SPORWION 

A i OlEMWl^ , SCOUTT & RASENBERGER 

L.L.P. 

';EC - b P U: 3"^88 17"^ Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

December 6, 2010 

Re: Termination of Codesharing Services CDocket OST-2002-14057) 

Pursuant to the statements of authorization granted to Aerovias Del Continente 

Americano S.A. Avianca ("Avianca"), Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta"), and Comair, Inc. 

("Comair") in the above-referenced docket, this letter is to advise that all codesharing among the 

three carriers will cease effective June 1, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director - Government Affairs 

& Associate General Counsel 

Jeff Morgan 

Regional Director - Government Affairs 

'/ii^t^ ^ 

Richard D. Mathias 

David M. Endersbee 

Counsel for Aerovias Del Continente 

Americano S.A. Avianca 

cc: service list 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 6th day of December, 2010, 

upon the following persons via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@coair.com 

hershel.kamen@coair.com 

rbkeiner@crowell.com (for Continental) 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

dkirstein@ykiaw.com (for Spirit) 

jyoung@yklaw.com (for Spirit) 

jhill@dowlohnes.com (for JetBlue) 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov 

george.wellington@dot.gov 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

Kathy L. Luhfrman
<PAGE>

                                     FORM OF
                      BRIDGE NOTE EXTENSION AND CONVERSION

March 15, 1999

---------------------------
---------------------------
---------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter agreement sets forth our mutual agreement with respect the
Convertible Promissory Note, dated October 9, 1997, in the principal amount of
$25,000.00 issued by LSC, Incorporated (the "Company") to you (the "Note"),
pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement, dated September 11, 1997, among the
Company and the other purchasers of Convertible Promissory Notes (the
"Agreement"). As you will recall, on July 15, 1998, you agreed to amend the Note
and the Agreement. The Company is requesting that you agree to further amend the
Note and the Agreement as set forth in this letter agreement.

1.       MATURITY DATE. Section 2 of the Agreement and the first paragraph of
         the Note are each hereby amended to the extent necessary to provide
         that the Note will be due and payable on the earlier of (a) thirty (30)
         days after the initial closing of the Financing, as defined in the
         Agreement, or (b) December 31, 1999.

2.       WARRANT. In exchange for your agreement to extend the Note, the Company
         will grant to you a warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase ________ shares
         of Common Stock (which is equal to 50% of the principal amount of the
         Note, divided by $3.20 per share, which is 80% of the anticipated per
         share price in the financing that the Company has been conducting. The
         Warrant will be exercisable for a period of five years from the date of
         issuance at an exercise price equal to the lesser of (a) $3.20 per
         share or (b) 80% of the per share price of the Company's next equity
         financing that raises gross proceeds of at least two hundred fifty
         thousand dollars ($250,000), if such financing occurs on or before
         December 31, 2000. The Warrant again will be in the same form as the
         warrant attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement. The Company will issue
         the Warrant to you promptly after receipt of a signed copy of this
         letter agreement from you.

3.       CONVERSION. Section 2 of the Agreement and Section 2.1 of the Note are
         each hereby amended to the extent necessary to provide that the
         conversion price of the Note will not exceed $4.00 per share.


<PAGE>

March 15, 1999
Page 2


Please execute a copy of this letter agreement and return it to us acknowledging
your agreement to amend the Note and the Agreement and convert principal and
interest under the Note into shares of Common Stock of the Company, as set forth
above.

LSC, INCORPORATED


By:
   ------------------------------------------
     J. B. (Brad) Balogh,
     President and Chief Executive Officer


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO
AS OF ____________________, 1999


By:
   ------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 113

   Congratulating the people of Jamaica on the occasion of the 35th 
 anniversary of their nation's independence and expressing support for 
 the continuation of strong ties between Jamaica and the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

 Mr. Graham submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Congratulating the people of Jamaica on the occasion of the 35th 
 anniversary of their nation's independence and expressing support for 
 the continuation of strong ties between Jamaica and the United States.

Whereas on August 6, 1962, the people of Jamaica were granted their independence 
        from Great Britain;
Whereas the people of Jamaica will celebrate their 35th anniversary of 
        independence during a four-day ``Emancipation Day'' celebration from 
        August 1 to August 4, 1997;
Whereas the people of Jamaica have practiced a representative democracy for 53 
        years since the establishment of internal self-governance in 1944;
Whereas under the Administration of Prime Ministers Michael Manley and PJ 
        Patterson, Jamaica has played a leadership role in stimulating trade-
        based economic development, promoting democracy, fighting the illicit 
        narcotics trade, and fostering the observance of human rights in the 
        Caribbean region;
Whereas more than 2,000,000 Americans are of Jamaican descent, and Jamaican-
        Americans have made a rich contribution to our society;
Whereas Jamaica and the United States benefit from a healthy commercial 
        relationship that, in 1996, exceeded $2,300,000,000; and
Whereas Jamaica and the United States enjoy strong cultural and social links: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the people of Jamaica on the occasion of 
        the 35th anniversary of Jamaica's independence from Great 
        Britain;
            (2) celebrates the strong, entrenched tradition of 
        democratic governance in Jamaica;
            (3) recognizes the richness of the contribution to United 
        States of economic, political, social, and cultural life by 
        Americans of Jamaican descent;
            (4) commends the Government of Jamaica for its efforts to 
        promote stability and economic growth in the Caribbean region; 
        and
            (5) looks forward to the continuance of strong relations 
        and cooperation between the United States and Jamaica.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 98

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and House

of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 21, 1998

Mr. GREGG (for Mr. LOTT) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and House of Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, May 21, 1998, Fri4 day, May 22, 1998, Saturday, May 23, 1998, or Sunday,

5 May 24, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority

6 Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent

7 resolution, it stands recessed or adjourned until noon on

8 Monday, June 1, 1998, or until such time on that day

9 as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee

10 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the
2

SCON 98 ATS

1 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur2 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

3 occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the

4 legislative day of Friday, May 22, 1998, or Saturday, May

5 23, 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority

6 Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent

7 resolution, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednes8 day, June 3, 1998, or until noon on the second day after

9 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

10 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

11 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

12 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

13 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

14 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen15 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

16 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

January 26, 1954

No. 57795.

protests 194526-K and 194527-K (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Salem Linen Mills *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KRISTA M. ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5125 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING 

COMMISSIONER’S DECISION

Magistrate Judge J. Kelly Arnold recommends that the Court should conclude that Krista Ellis was

properly denied social security benefits because application of the proper legal standard and substantial

evidence support the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) finding Plaintiff is not disabled. Plaintiff has not

filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff's counsel, Defendant's counsel

and Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold.

Case 3:06-cv-05125-FDB Document 20 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

DATED this 8th day of January, 2007.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05125-FDB Document 20 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities


Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; National 
Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities 
will hold a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts International Indemnity 
Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, November 16, 2023, from 
12:00 p.m. until adjourned.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by videoconference originating at 
the National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Committee 
Management Officer, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506, 
(202) 606-8322; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8eebf8e1f7effaf4e7fdcee0ebe6a0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2045564f5941545a4953604e45480e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities, for exhibitions beginning on or after January 1, 
2024. Because the meeting will consider proprietary financial and 
commercial data provided in confidence by indemnity applicants, and 
material that is likely to disclose trade secrets or other privileged 
or confidential information, and because it is important to keep the 
values of objects to be indemnified and the methods of transportation 
and security measures confidential, I have determined that that the 
meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. I have made this 
determination under the authority granted me by the Chairman's 
Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated 
April 15, 2016.

    Dated: October 4, 2023.
Jessica Graves,
Paralegal Specialist, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2023-22398 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50271

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-99-CR-241-1-F

--------------------

June 15, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Manuel Lopez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, and he has not filed a response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ODVA, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 29, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ODVA, Inc. (``ODVA'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Tocho Marking 
Systems America, Inc., Torrance, CA; and Guangzhou Zhiyuan Electronics 
Co., LTD, Guangzhou, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, Rocon L.L.C., Hazel Park, MI; and InterTech Development 
Company, Skokie, IL, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 2, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 38534).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22255 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

DETERMINATION AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL ROBERT CLARY,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-385-JCC

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 

AND DETERMINATION AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE

INTRODUCTION

I conducted a hearing on alleged violations of supervised release in this case on January 3, 

2013. The defendant appeared pursuant to a warrant issued in this case. The United States was 

represented by Michael J. Lang, and defendant was represented by Suzanne Elliot. Also present 

was U.S. Probation Officer Calvin Bouma. The proceedings were digitally recorded.

SENTENCE AND PRIOR ACTION

Defendant was sentenced on May 26, 2006, by the Honorable John C. Coughenour for Felon 

in Possession of Firearms and False Statement in Connection with Acquisition of Firearm. He 

received 64 months of detention and 3 years of supervised release.

PRESENTLY ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

In a petition dated December 17, 2012, U.S. Probation Officer Calvin Bouma alleged that 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

DETERMINATION AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2

defendant violated the following conditions of supervised release:

1. Using alcohol in violation of the special condition stating that he shall abstain from 

the use of alcohol and/or other intoxicants.

2. Committing the crime of Assault in violation of the standard condition that he not 

commit another federal, state, or local crime.

FINDINGS FOLLOWING EVIDENTIARY HEARING

The government withdrew violation 2. Defendant admitted to violation 1, waived any 

hearing as to whether it occurred, and was informed the matter would be set for a disposition 

hearing February 18, 2014, 9:00 a.m. before District Judge John C. Coughenour.

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based upon the foregoing, I recommend the court find that defendant has violated the

conditions of his supervised release as alleged above, and conduct a disposition hearing.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2013. 

A

BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA

United States Magistrate Judge
Before the Third Division,

June 20, 1951

No. 55688.

protest 121109-K (New York).

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

*259Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.