alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo Efrain CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41686.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eduardo Efrain Chavez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for pos*382session of more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b)(1)(A). He argues that the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Chavez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir.2000). *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 731 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005)(No. 05-5556). He raises the issue only to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Chavez’s argument is foreclosed, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
August 11, 1965

Reap. Dec. 11057.

#### Ercona Camera Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Entered at New York, N.Y. Reap. Dec. 10989. Motion by plaintiffs.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Cenozoicrocks in the Barstow basin area of southern California--stratigraphicrelations, radiometric ages, and paleomagnetism**
 
Report | Plates: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1529-E
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960979
 
August 15, 2018
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Tao
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:





(1)           The
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Legend Mining Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 ( the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.








Date:  February
16, 2010








/s/ Tao
Chen


Tao
Chen


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Before the Second Division,

March 14, 1962

No. 66562.

#### Dorf International, Inc. (Phila.), et al. *v.*United States,

protests 317020-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

*369Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel tbat tbe merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

|  | 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.   | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the      Report. |
|--|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      11, 2009 | By:    |  /s/  Scott      E. Lied  |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Scott      E. Lied, CPA                       |
|                                 |   | Treasurer                                     |
|                                 |   | Principal      Financial Officer              |

----

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 of BookMerge Technology,  Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Richard CarterRichard CarterChief Executive Officer/s/ Richard CarterRichard CarterChief Executive Officer  Dated: Sept. 29, 2011    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to BookMerge Technology, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 145

Designating the month of November 1997 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

BAUCUS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BREAUX, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS,

Mr. CONRAD, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI,

Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FEINGOLD,

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FORD, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

HATCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT,

Mr. MCCAIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. THOMAS, Mr.

THURMOND, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MURKOWSKI and Mr. STEVENS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Committee discharged; considered and agree to

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November 1997 as ‘‘National

American Indian Heritage Month’’.

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives were the

original inhabitants of the land that now constitutes the

United States;

Whereas American Indian tribal governments developed the

fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separa-
2

SR 145 ATS

tion of powers that form the foundation of the United

States Government;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have traditionally exhibited a respect for the finiteness of natural

resources through a reverence for the earth;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have served

with valor in all of America’s wars beginning with the

Revolutionary War through the conflict in the Persian

Gulf, and often the percentage of American Indians who

served exceeded significantly the percentage of American

Indians in the population of the United States as a

whole;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have made

distinct and important contributions to the United States

and the rest of the world in many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives deserve to be

recognized for their individual contributions to the United

States as local and national leaders, artists, athletes, and

scholars;

Whereas this recognition will encourage self-esteem, pride,

and self-awareness in American Indians and Alaska Natives of all ages; and

Whereas November is a time when many Americans commemorate a special time in the history of the United

States when American Indians and English settlers celebrated the bounty of their harvest and the promise of

new kinships: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates November 1997

2 as ‘‘National American Indian Heritage Month’’ and re-
3

SR 145 ATS

1 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling on

2 the Federal Government and State and local governments,

3 interested groups and organizations, and the people of the

4 United States to observe the month with appropriate pro5 grams, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
No. 62834.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 314105-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro LinearCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: May 12, 2004         By: /s/ Timothy A. Richardson       Timothy A. Richardson    Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Before the Second Division,

March 17, 1959

No. 62850.

#### Shell Oil Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 285894-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59764.

#### Regal Accessories, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 255445-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered September 18, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00778

- CV

D . REGINALD STOVER, J ACE HARKEY, ROBERT H. HOLMES , AND THE HOLMES LAW FIRM, INC., Appel lant s

V.

ADM MILLING CO., INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 13400



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ September 13, 2018 joint motion for additional oral

argument time. Appellants request an additional ten (1 0 ) minutes of argument time and three (3)

minutes of rebuttal time.

The Court GRANTS appellants ’ September 13, 2018 joint motion for additional oral

argument time. Appellants will present oral argument for the time r equested in the joint motion.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE
**CERAM Budgetary Proposal**

**Hartenstein RFP**

**(CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)**
#### In the Matter of Dimitri I., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 471]

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated March 11, 1994, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the petition. The respondent’s initial appearance was scheduled more than 10 days after the Supreme Court’s order of removal, thus violating the requirement of CPL 725.05 (7) *(see,*Family Ct Act § 320.2 [1]; *Matter of Frank C.,*70 NY2d 408; *Matter of Satori R.,*202 AD2d 432; *Matter of Robert S.,*192 AD2d 612; *cf.,*Family Ct Act §§ 310.2, 332.1 [8]).

In view of the foregoing determination, we need not consider the remaining issues raised on this appeal. Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 12

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 76 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-7 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 12 of 12
# C_2022198EN.01003701.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commission

(Case T-579/20) (1)

(Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Fibrogelnet project - Recovery of an amount receivable - Risk avoidance mechanism - Amount receivable effectively recovered from the Guarantee Fund - Decision establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision - Article 299 TFEU - Competence of the author of the act - Termination of the applicant’s participation in the project - Eligible costs - Reports and deliverables)

(2022/C 198/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Genekam Biotechnology AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Hertwig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, J. Estrada de Solà and R. Pethke, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5548 final of 7 August 2020 establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision against the applicant for the amount of EUR 119 659,55, together with default interest, arising from the grant that it received in respect of the Fibrogelnet project.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Genekam Biotechnology AG to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Genekam Biotechnology AG to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD449]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MAFMC's Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will meet via 
webinar to develop recommendations for future Spiny Dogfish 
specifications.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, November 6, 2023, from 12:30 
p.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the MAFMC calendar prior to the meeting at 
www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee will 
meet to review options for future specifications and management 
measures, and make any appropriate recommendations.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22124 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
No. 65228.

Suit 5042.

#### United States *v.*Clarence S. Holmes, a/c Best Products Mfg. Co.

C.D. 2161. (Appeal dismissed on motion October 10, 1960.)
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1424 V

UNPUBLISHED

JENNIFER MITCHELL

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: December 12, 2019

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)

Edward Zwilling, Schwartz, Zweben & Sli ngbaum, LLP, Birmingham, AL , for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On September 18, 2018

, Jennifer Mitchell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that the suffered a left Shoulder Injury Relat ed to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving the influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccination on
November 4, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 5, 2019

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent sta tes that Petitioner “ had no history of pain,

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 inflammation or d ysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to [the vaccine]

, ” that Petitioner had onset of pain within fort y

- eight hours of vaccine administration, that

P etitioner ’ s symptoms were limited to her left shoulder, and that Petitioner had no other condition that would explain her symptoms. Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that the case was timely filed, the vaccine was received in the United States, and th e Petitioner experienced the resid ual effects or complications of her injury for more than

six months after vaccine administration

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master