alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Review the FDIC's strategic plans and its performance.
              - 2022-2026 FDIC Strategic Plan  The long-term strategic goals and objectives for carrying out its core mission responsibilities for insuring depositors, supervising insured institutions, and resolving the failure of insured institutions.
              - 2024 Annual Performance Plan  The specific annual performance goals, indicators, and targets for each of the FDIC's three major business lines - Insurance, Supervision, and Receivership Management.
              - CIO Organization Strategic Plan 2020-2023  The opportunities to improve internal operations in a constantly evolving information technology (IT) environment.
              - Diversity Strategic Plan  The course to achieve workforce diversity by recruiting from a diverse, qualified group of potential applicants; cultivating workplace inclusion through collaboration, flexibility, and fairness; and ensuring sustainability of our diversity and inclusion achievements by equipping leaders with the ability to manage diversity, measure results, and refine approaches on the basis of data.
              - Chief Data Officer  The person responsible for implementing the FDIC’s data strategy.

Last Updated: April 5, 2024
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 143

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election Law

Guidebook.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. FORD) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate

Election Law Guidebook.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration is directed to prepare a revised edition of the Sen3 ate Election Law Guidebook, Senate Document 104–12,

4 and that such document shall be printed as a Senate docu5 ment.

6 SEC. 2. There shall be printed 600 additional copies

7 of the document specified in section 1 of this resolution

8 for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.

Æ
No. 55696.

protests 137660-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. R. Benedict *&*Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 57751.

protest 201500-K (New York).

#### Emery, Russell & Goodrich, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 57043.

protests 191461-K, etc. (New York).

#### Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers.. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax, wherever such has been levied, are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SUN CHUL LEE,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-231M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Conspiracy to Commit False Use of Passport and Bank Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 1344 and 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: May 16, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a native and citizen of Korea. There is no information available

regarding any family ties to this community or to the Western District of Washington.

(2) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

Case 2:06-mj-00231-JPD Document 21 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00231-JPD Document 21 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.C., A MINOR

PETITION OF: M.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 138 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                           1,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,593
<PP&E>                                          39,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,041 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,041
<BONDS>                                          3,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,546
<SALES>                                         16,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,987
<CGS>                                            9,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2023 pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), UHD Alliance, Inc. (“UHD Alliance”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Realtek Semiconductor Corp., Hsinchu Hsein, TAIWAN; and Vu Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, INDIA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 11, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 17, 2023(88 FR 16461).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22256 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00119

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

Nadine REALME

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Tr ial Court No. 2018CI14297 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 26, 2020 . The appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to April 15, 2020 . On April 15, 2020 , the appellant filed a motion request ing an additional extension of time to file the brief until May 5, 2020 , for a total extension of forty days. The motion is GRANTED. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES . The Appellant’s brief must be filed by M ay 5, 2020

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
No. 59816.

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 261016-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consists of building shores or jacks the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Order entered August 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00789 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 0079 1 - CR BRANDON NORMAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F18 - 51705 - Q & F18 - 51706 - Q



### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s August 12, 2019 motions ent itled “Motion for Extension of T ime to File Appeal , ” requesting additional time in which to file his brief. Construing these motions a s requests for extension of time to file his brief, we GRANT the motions and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before September 23, 2019.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CLINTON HECK,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARC STERN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 06-5030 RJB/KLS

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

COUNSEL

This Civil Rights action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. The plaintiff has been granted leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. # 7). Before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for

appointment of counsel. (Dkt. # 32). The court finds that the motion should be DENIED.

There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Although the court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), can request counsel to represent a party proceeding

in forma pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon,

789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984);

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires

an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to

Case 3:06-cv-05030-RJB Document 41 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d

at 1331.

Plaintiff has demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate his claims pro se, to navigate the

legal system and has begun the discovery process. While plaintiff may not have vast resources or

legal training, he meets the threshold for a pro se litigant and the court finds that counsel is not

necessary in this case. Moreover, plaintiff has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the

merits of his claims or exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel. Accordingly,

plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. # 32) is DENIED.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05030-RJB Document 41 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2006154EN.01002502.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/25

---

Action brought on 8 May 2006 — Aimi and Others v Commission

(Case F-47/06)

(2006/C 154/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Naomi Aimi (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the appointing authority adopt transitional measures in order to ensure, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the appointing authority adopt transitional measures in order to ensure, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their application, the applicants claim that in rejecting their requests that it adopt transitional measures with the aim of taking account of their individual situations resulting from the creation of supplementary grades, the defendant disregarded their right to reasonable career prospects in the same conditions as their colleagues in the same category and also their acquired rights, in so far as their career prospects were significantly altered.

The applicants further plead an absence of relevant reasons, in that the defendant did not respond to the pleas and arguments set out in their requests and complaints.

---
No. 58298.

protests 223849-K and 225949-K (New York).

#### Wesley & Winter, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paper napkins the same in all material respects (except- that they are of crepe paper) as those the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable at 15 percent under said paragraph 1413, as modified, *supra.*
SILVERBERG 

GOLDMAN, L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

Georgetown Place • Suite 300 • 1101 30th Street, NW • Washington, D.C. 20007 

Voice Direct (202) 944·3300 • Facsimile (202) 944-3306 

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

Mr. Robert Finamore 

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Mr. Brett Kruger 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

May 28,2015 

Re: Application of Cimber A/S for an Exemption and Blanket Statement of 

Authorization, Docket DOT -OST -2015-0113; 

Application of United Airlines, Inc. for an Amended Exemption, Docket 

DOT -OST -2004-19148 

Dear Messrs. Finamore and Kruger: 

Counsel for Cimber A/S ("Cimber") has polled each of the carriers served with the Application of 

Cimber for an Exemption and Blanket Statement of Authorization and the Application of United Airlines, 

Inc. for an Amended Exemption filed in the above-referenced Dockets on May 26, 2015 (the 

"Applications"). Counsel for Cimber hereby reports that there are no objections to the Applications. In 

the absence of any objection, Cimber respectfully requests that the Department act promptly on the 

Applications so that the carriers can implement codeshare operations on or about June 8, 2015. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any 

questions. 

cc: Gerald Murphy, Esq. 

All parties on attached Service List 

Sincerely, 

Jt(~F~~ Michael F. Goldman 

Counsel for 

Cimber A/S 
dheflernan@cozen.com 

jere my .ross(~alaskaair .com 

howard.kass@aa.com 

robert. wirick@aa.com 

rpommer(~atlasair.com 

sascha. vanderbellen(mdelta.com 

sametta.c.bamett@delta.com 

Service List 

chris. walker@delta.com 

jhill@cooley.com 

perkmann(Zv.cooley.com 

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com 

matwood@cozen.com 

kevin.montgomerv(iV,po laraircargo .com 

jrichardson(cujolmlrichardson.com 

jcanny(~ameriietcom 

jo1m.fredericksenC{i1suncountty.com 

thomas. ting(a1suncounily .com 

nssparks({:V,fedex .com 

anbird@fedex.com 

cefelts(~fedex.com 

sllunsford@fedex.com 

anita.mosner@hk1aw .com 

jennifer.nowakaV,hklaw .com 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

john.varley@virginarnerica.com 

william.stallings@usdoj .gov 

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com 

dwight.rnoore@ustranscorn.mil 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov 

englets(m.state.gov
<PAGE> 1
                               UNITED STATES
                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C. 20549
                                    
                  -------------------------------------
                                    
                                FORM 10-Q/A
(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934
    
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996

or

[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934
    
For the transition period from ________________ to __________________

Commission file number 0-19377


                            TCSI Corporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
                                    
          Nevada                                  68-0140975
----------------------------        --------------------------------------
 (State of Incorporation)             (IRS Employer Identification No.)


2121 Allston Way, Berkeley, California               94704
----------------------------------------        ----------------
(Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (510) 649-3700


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant(1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes/X/  No/ /

As of July 31, 1996, there were 21,000,224 shares of common stock of the
Registrant outstanding.

<PAGE> 2
                            TCSI Corporation


                               SIGNATURES
         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto authorized.


                               TCSI Corporation
                              -----------------------------------------
                               (Registrant)
                               
    October 16, 1996           By: /s/Paul A. Farmer
------------------------      ------------------------------------------
         Date                  Paul A. Farmer, Chief Financial Officer,
                               Secretary, Treasurer, and Vice President