alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Chemicalanalyses and physical properties of 12 coal samples from the Pocahontas field,Tazewell County, Virginia, and McDowell County, West Virginia**
 
Report | Plates: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1528
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960914
 
August 15, 2018
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Justin W. Shireman, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Systems, Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Registrant, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.






Date:   November 14, 2007
        /s/   Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. ShiremanVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)






---
Case 2:02-cv-01768-BJR Document 66 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00052-CV

JOHN FALTYNSKI, F&F LAND 

COMPANY, INC., AND KELLI 

FREEMAN AS ADMINISTRATOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY 

FREEMAN

APPELLANTS

V.

SONYA BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS SURVIVING PARENT AND

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF JEFFREY MURIEL, 

JR., DECEASED; DONALD CAIN, 

SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

SURVIVING PARENT AND

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF DONALD CAIN, JR., 

DECEASED; CYNTHIA DENTON, 

INDIVIDUALLY; DESSANDRA 

TATE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

SURVIVING SPOUSE AND 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF CHARLES TATE, JR., 

DECEASED, AND AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF AALIYAH TATE, A 

MINOR; CHARLES TATE, SR., 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

SURVIVING PARENT OF 

CHARLES TATE, JR., DECEASED; 

TERESA COLEMAN JORDAN, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

SURVIVING PARENT OF 

CHARLES TATE, JR., DECEASED; 

AND VERNITA WALKER, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

APPELLEES
2

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF CARL MELVIN 

FIELDS, JR., DECEASED

------------

FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On July 31, 2012, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
No. 66592.

#### Pez Haas, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/5221 and 61/7089 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pez candy dispensers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 6'5026, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMaterials Testing on the DC-X and DC-XAFlight testing of thermal protection materials has been carried out over a two year period on the base heat shield of the Delta Clipper (DC-X and DC-XA), as well on a body flap. The purpose was to use the vehicle as a test bed for materials and more efficient repair or maintenance processes which would be potentially useful for application on new entry vehicles (i.e., X-33, RLV, planetary probes), as well as on the existing space shuttle orbiters. Panels containing Thermal Protection Systems (TPS) and/or structural materials were constructed either at NASA Ames Research Center or at McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (MDA) and attached between two of the four thrusters in the base heat shield of the DC-X or DC-XA. Three different panels were flown on DC-X flights 6, 7, and 8. A total of 7 panels were flown on DC-XA flights 1, 2, and 3. The panels constructed at Ames contained a variety of ceramic TPS including flexible blankets, tiles with high emissivity coatings, lightweight ceramic ablators and other ceramic composites. The MDS test panels consisted primarily of a variety of metallic composites. This report focuses on the ceramic TPS test results.Document ID19970012468Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSmith, Dane*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Carroll, Carol*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Marschall, Jochen*(Thermoscience Inst. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Pallix, Joan*(Thermoscience Inst. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberA-975493NAS 1.15:110430NASA-TM-110430Accession Number97N16820Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-30-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970012468.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Preservation of Confi nement 

Sites Continues to Resonate

The NPS fi rst became involved in 

the identifi cation, recognition and 

preservation of these confi nement sites 

in the mid-1980’s to determine which 

site would be suitable as a national park 

unit. In 1992, Congress directed the 

establishmen

National Mo

Groups comm

and interpret

also successf

Historic Lan

Tule Lake, To

Amache, Ma

internment c

from the NPS

provide pres

assistance to 

our nation’s h

the importan

and the stori

camps, and t

the actions o

The stories a

associated w

of Japanese A

resonate with 

inspire futur

Seeking Public Comment 

Through a series of public listening 

sessions, the NPS is seeking your 

comments to help us develop 

criteria for the grant program. We 

would like to hear your concerns 

and ideas, and meet with you to 

discuss guidelines for the new 

grant program, the eligibility 

requirements, and criteria that 

will be used to fund projects. Your 

involvement is critical to make this 

program successful. 
ment and Ethnicity. 

It is not meant to be 

a comprehensive list 

of sites. Additional 

sites may be identifi ed 

as determined by 

the Secretary of the 

Interior. 
considerations that could be used to 

evaluate the proposals:

• How does this proposal preserve 

or improve the conditions of confi nement site resources?

• How eff ectively does this program convey the stories of the 

confi nement sites?

• Is there support from other partners or stakeholders for this confi nement site project?

• Does the applicant demonstrate 

fi scal and project management 

capabilities? 

For additional information and 

details on existing NPS grant 

programs, please visit the following 

website: http://www.nps.gov/

history/hps/hpg/

other states no

Contact: Tom 

Phone: 510-8

Email: tom_le

INTERMOUN

Wyoming, Col

Arizona, Mon

Oklahoma, N

Contact: Kara 

Phone: 303-9

Email: kara_m

MIDWEST RE

Arkansas, Mis

Nebraska, Sou

Minnesota, Io

Illinois, Indian

Contact: Rach

Phone: 402-6
Denver, CO 80225

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Recon Technology, Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2010 (the Report), I, Shenping Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|September 27, 2010 |  | /s/ Yin Shenping       
|                   |  | Yin Shenping           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 42/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 621 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 42

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 621 February 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2019/C 42/01 | Opinion No 8/2018
  (pursuant to Article 325(4), TFEU)
  on the Commission's proposal of 23 May 2018 on amending OLAF Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2019/C 42/01

Opinion No 8/2018
  (pursuant to Article 325(4), TFEU)
  on the Commission's proposal of 23 May 2018 on amending OLAF Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations

(pursuant to Article 325(4), TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113

Congratulating the people of Jamaica on the occasion of the 35th anniversary

of their nation’s independence and expressing support for the continuation of strong ties between Jamaica and the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. GRAHAM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of Jamaica on the occasion of

the 35th anniversary of their nation’s independence and

expressing support for the continuation of strong ties

between Jamaica and the United States.

Whereas on August 6, 1962, the people of Jamaica were

granted their independence from Great Britain;

Whereas the people of Jamaica will celebrate their 35th anniversary of independence during a four-day ‘‘Emancipation Day’’ celebration from August 1 to August 4,

1997;

Whereas the people of Jamaica have practiced a representative democracy for 53 years since the establishment of internal self-governance in 1944;
2

•SRES 113 IS

Whereas under the Administration of Prime Ministers Michael Manley and PJ Patterson, Jamaica has played a

leadership role in stimulating trade-based economic development, promoting democracy, fighting the illicit narcotics trade, and fostering the observance of human rights

in the Caribbean region;

Whereas more than 2,000,000 Americans are of Jamaican

descent, and Jamaican-Americans have made a rich contribution to our society;

Whereas Jamaica and the United States benefit from a

healthy commercial relationship that, in 1996, exceeded

$2,300,000,000; and

Whereas Jamaica and the United States enjoy strong cultural

and social links: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) congratulates the people of Jamaica on the

3 occasion of the 35th anniversary of Jamaica’s inde4 pendence from Great Britain;

5 (2) celebrates the strong, entrenched tradition

6 of democratic governance in Jamaica;

7 (3) recognizes the richness of the contribution

8 to United States of economic, political, social, and

9 cultural life by Americans of Jamaican descent;

10 (4) commends the Government of Jamaica for

11 its efforts to promote stability and economic growth

12 in the Caribbean region; and
3

•SRES 113 IS

1 (5) looks forward to the continuance of strong

2 relations and cooperation between the United States

3 and Jamaica.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1094/2004

of 10 June 2004         

amending the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the milk and milk products sector (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1030/2004 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2004.

For the Commission

Erkki LIIKANEN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1787/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 121).

(2)OJ L 190, 28.5.2004, p. 9.

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 11 June 2004 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

 BRIANA WATERS,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5828FDB

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

WATERS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO

FED. R. CRIM. P. 29, 33, and 34

Defendant Waters moves pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P 29(c) that the Court set aside the guilty

verdicts on Counts 5 and 7 and enter a judgment of acquittal as to those counts; also, Waters moves

that the Court enter a judgment of acquittal as to Counts 1, 4, and 6 on which the Jury could not

reach a unanimous verdict. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, Waters also moves that the jury verdict

be set aside and a new trial ordered. Finally, Waters moves for arrest of judgment under Fed. R.

Crim. P. 34 for lack of jurisdiction, this case having been tried in the Tacoma rather than the Seattle

Division as required by Rules of this Court. 

 There is no showing that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction, which is the

standard for an acquittal under Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(c)(1). On the contrary, the Court concludes that

the evidence to sustain the verdicts on Counts 5 and 7 was more than sufficient. 

Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 389 Filed 03/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Similarly, the Court finds no evidence to support a conclusion that a new trial must be

granted in the interest of justice. The record establishes sufficient and compelling evidence to

support the convictions. 

Finally, the motion for arrest of judgment for lack of jurisdiction is plainly frivolous, as Local

Criminal Rule 18 is not a jurisdictional rule, but one for a convenient division of the Court’s business.

The Court has already rejected a motion to reassign this case to the Seattle courthouse. Moreover,

under Rule 18, the matter was appropriately brought in Tacoma, because there was a conspiracy

charge alleging that certain overt acts, including arsons occurred in Olympia, Washington, and

Waters committed numerous acts in Olympia that aided and abetted the arson of the Center for

Urban Horticulture at the University of Washington in Seattle. For example, Waters’ attending

planning meetings in Olympia; allowing co-defendant Justin Solondz access to the garage in which

she lived in Olympia to build incendiary bombs for the arson; and arranging for the rental car to be

used in the arson through her cousin who lived in Olympia. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: Waters’ Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 29, 33,

and 34 [Dkt. # 376] is DENIED. 

DATED this 28th day of March, 2008.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cr-05828-RBL Document 389 Filed 03/28/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000876716
<NAME>                             Smith Barney International Currency Fund L.P.
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    3,202,667
<SECURITIES>                              (134,341)
<RECEIVABLES>                                11,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          3,079,925
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            3,079,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       128,554
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                2,951,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              3,079,925
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (78,840)
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             70,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (149,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (149,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 231 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 231

        To make a technical amendment to Senate Resolution 208.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 1998

 Mr. Bennett submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        To make a technical amendment to Senate Resolution 208.

    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 208, agreed to April 2, 1998 
(105th Congress), is amended--
            (1) in section 3(a)(8), by inserting ``reimbursable or'' 
        before ``non-reimbursable''; and
            (2) striking section 5 and inserting the following:

``SEC. 5. FUNDING.

    ``(a) In General.--There shall be made available from the 
contingent fund of the Senate out of the Account for Expenses for 
Inquiries and Investigations, for use by the special committee to carry 
out this resolution--
            ``(1) not to exceed $575,000 for the period beginning on 
        April 2, 1998, through February 28, 1999, and $575,000 for the 
        period beginning on March 1, 1999, through February 29, 2000, 
        of which not to exceed $200,000 shall be available for each 
        period for the procurement of the services of individual 
        consultants, or organizations thereof, as authorized by section 
        202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            ``(2) such additional sums as may be necessary for agency 
        contributions related to the compensation of employees of the 
        special committee.
    ``(b) Expenses.--Payment of expenses of the special committee shall 
be disbursed upon vouchers approved by the chairman, except that 
vouchers shall not be required for the disbursement of salaries paid at 
an annual rate.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 63860.

protest 59/16611 (New York).

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*360Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with, rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.