alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Stacie K. Yamane, the Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of her knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant. 

Date: March 31, 2008
Exhibit 23.01

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of 1st
Financial Services Corporation and Subsidiaries

Hendersonville, North Carolina

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No: 333-155812) of
1stFinancial Services Corporation (the Registration
Statement) of our report dated March 29, 2010, relating to the financial statements of 1stFinancial Services Corporation, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of 1stFinancial Services Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.



LOGOCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Bluefield, WV

March 29, 2010
No. 57024.

protest 172082-K (B) (New York).

#### Hillman Importing & Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair pencils similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Solo Horton Brush Co. (Inc.)*v. *United States*(63 Treas, Dec. 143, T. D. 46123), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Members’ Committee 

TVaura LLC: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 001-34108) on Form 10 and (No. 333-154524) on FormS-8 of Digimarc Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2011, with respect to the balance sheet of TVaura LLC as of December 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, members’ equity, and cash flows for the year endedDecember 31, 2010, period from June 11, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009, and cumulative period from June 11, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annualreport on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

March 3, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL D. SIMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SETH HUBER, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5171FDB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s filing of an

application to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. To file a

complaint and initiate legal proceedings plaintiff must pay a filing fee of $250.00 or file a proper

application to proceed in forma pauperis.

On March 29, the Clerk received plaintiff’s complaint and application to proceed in forma

pauperis. (Dkt. #1). On April 5, 2006, the Clerk sent plaintiff a letter informing him that his application

contained a number of deficiencies. (Dkt. #2). Although plaintiff has cured most of those deficiencies

(Dkt. #3), the following deficiency remains. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2):

A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or

Case 3:06-cv-05171-FDB Document 4 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

proceeding without prepayment of fees or security therefor . . . shall submit a certified

copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for

the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal,

obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was

confined.

Plaintiff thus was required to submit a statement showing the balance and activity of his account for the

six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. Plaintiff has submitted what appears to

be documentation of one account transaction for dental services performed on March 17, 2006. This,

however, does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 

Accordingly, the Court orders the following:

(1) Plaintiff shall seek to cure the above deficiency by filing no later than June 2, 2006, a copy

of his prison trust account statement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) showing the

balance and activity of his account(s) for the six-month period immediately preceding the

filing of his complaint. 

Failure to cure this deficiency by the above date shall be deemed a failure to properly

prosecute this matter and the court will recommend dismissal of this matter.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, along with the appropriate

written consent form. 

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05171-FDB Document 4 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC  50249

      Re:  Medwave, Inc.
           File No. 0-26192
           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
           as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentleman:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medwave Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Timothy O'Malley, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    December 10, 2002                   Medwave, Inc.


                                             By: /s/ Timothy J. O'Malley
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Timothy J. O'Malley
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer
                                                 (Principle Executive Officer
                                                   and Principle Financial
                                                   Officer)
#### Sara Paduano, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Paduano, Deceased, Appellant, v Chemical Mortgage Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[633 NYS2d 183]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to foreclose an alleged vendor’s lien on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered April 14, 1994, which, upon an order of the same court, dated February 25, 1994, granting the motion of the defendants Chemical Bank and Chemical Mortgage Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them, dismissed the complaint as against the moving defendants and declared their mortgage on the subject property to be entitled to priority over the plaintiff’s alleged interest in the property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In moving for summary judgment, the respondents established prima facie that they possessed a first mortgage entitled to priority over any lien held by the plaintiff’s decedent. We conclude that the plaintiff failed to submit admissible evidence indicating the existence of a vendor’s lien, i.e., that the attorney-in-fact of the plaintiff’s decedent did not receive the full purchase price for the property in question *(see,*91 NY Jur 2d, Real Property Sales and Exchanges, § 157). Because the plaintiff failed to submit sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion for summary judgment *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-2-2000
<CASH>                                          12,675
<SECURITIES>                                    18,783
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,968
<PP&E>                                          20,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,853
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,507
<SALES>                                         11,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,381
<CGS>                                            5,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    463
<INCOME-TAX>                                       162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       301
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of First Bankshares, Inc., respectively, certify
that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Bankshares, Inc., at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the
foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                  |  |                                             
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|February 13, 2009 |  | /s/ Darrell G. Swanigan                     
|Date              |  | Darrell G. Swanigan                         
|                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                  | 
|February 13, 2009 |  | /s/ Robert E. Clary                         
|Date              |  | Robert E. Clary, CPA                        
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



77
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         355,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,201
<PP&E>                                          40,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,415,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,473,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,757,739
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,841,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,415,549
<SALES>                                        108,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  679,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (571,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (571,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (571,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
September 20, 1965

Reap. Dec. 11063.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Entered at Buffalo, N.Y. Reap. Dec. 11058. Motion by plaintiff.
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 4.13

Rodney R. Schoemann Sr.
Managing Member SVC,LLC
3904 Wheat Drive
Metairie, Louisiana 70002
August 25, 1999
1(504) 454-6455
RE: Consulting Agreement

Mr. Daniel Brandano
President of AFFT
1000 Second Ave. South
Suite 1100S
St. Petersburg, FL

Dear Dan,

Starting September 1st, 1999 until such time that all of the shares from the
various agreements with Schoemann Venture Capital, LLC ("SVC,LLC") and AFFT have
been fully registered and unrestricted or other financing has been obtained by
AFFT; SVC,LLC in an effort to help AFFT to conserve there cash position and cash
flow needs, will elect to defer future "Consulting Fee" payments that are
presently being made to SVC,LLC on a monthly basis of $13,333.32. If AFFT agrees
to the above, as evidenced by execution of this letter agreement, SVC,LLC will
charge interest on any future outstanding balance at a rate of 5% per annum
until the amount of principle and interest is paid in full, BUT must be fully
paid before 3/01/2000. The full amount of principle and interest starting on
9/01/99 will become due when the company and/or any of its subsidiaries obtain
any funding, working capital, interim financing or financing, but definitely
become due before 3/01/2000.

This offer is being made to AFFT in an effort to help the company conserve its
cash flow until such time that the company obtains additional funding as to be
in a better financial condition to pay the agreed upon consulting fee. A balance
of $12,500.00 is due 8/25/99. This amount must be paid in full 8/25/99, as
stated in previous agreements between AFFT and SVC,LLC, and before the terms of
this letter become binding on SVC,LLC. Furthermore, AFFT will still remain
obligated to pay any and all expenses, other than the consulting agreement, that
are stated in the various contracts with SVC,LLC. These expenses must be paid
within 10 days of receipt by AFFT.

Sincerely,


/s/ Rodney R. Schoemann, Sr.
----------------------------
Rodney R. Schoemann, Sr.
Managing Member
Schoemann Venture Capital, LLC


/s/ D.G. Brandano
----------------------------
Daniel Brandano
President
Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc. ("AFFT")
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON 

MTN TO STAY - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

J.L. and M.L., et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

MERCER ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-494P

ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY

The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 43)

2. Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 45)

3. District’s Reply in Support of Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 46)

and all exhibits and declarations attached thereto, makes the following ruling:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

Defendant provides no statutory or case authority for their request to stay this Court’s order

remanding the matter to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) pending the Ninth Circuit’s

consideration of the appeal of that order. In opposition to the stay, Plaintiffs cite Shapiro By &

Through Shapiro v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 69, 152 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1998). The

case holds that IDEA administrative proceedings on remand from the District Court must be

completed before they may be considered an appealable final order.

Defendant’s response is to cite dicta from Shapiro concerning “unusual circumstances in which

[the courts] treat a remand order as final for the purposes of appeal.” Id. at 1160. The District then

attempts to characterize the “unusual circumstances” of this case by claiming that appellate review will

somehow be foreclosed if a stay and interlocutory appeal are not permitted. Defendant’s argument

Case 2:06-cv-00494-MJP Document 47 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON 

MTN TO STAY - 2

that “[o]nce the ALJ replaces her original findings and conclusion the District will be unable to premise

an appeal on those original findings...” (Reply, p.2) does not make sense, as the appellate process will

continue to provide the parties opportunities to request review of all phases of this proceeding.

Defendant’s motion for stay will be DENIED.

The clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to all counsel of record.

Dated: April 5, 2007

AMarsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00494-MJP Document 47 Filed 04/05/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JERRY E. SPICER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5132FDB

ORDER DENYING APPEAL AND

RE-REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

This prisoner civil rights matter began March 7, 2006 with Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom noted certain deficiencies in the application

with respect to Plaintiff’s motion, and ordered him to cure the deficiencies by May 10, 2006. Rather

than respond to the Magistrate Judge’s order, Plaintiff filed his “Appeal To Judge Of Order To Show

Cause.” This appeal is out of order, and is denied, and this matter is re-referred to the Magistrate

Judge. SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 11th day of May, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05132-FDB Document 5 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Rafael Abdurachmanov, the Chief Financial Officer of iGenii, Inc.
(the Company), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March
31, 2009

|                                             |                          | 
|-------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|By:                                          | /s/ Rafael Abdurachmanov | 
|                                             |                          | 
|Name: Rafael Abdurachmanov                  
|                                            
|Title:
 Chief Financial Officer             
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---