alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 63883.

protests 58/14649, etc. (New York).

#### The Caledonian Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
- FOIA Home
- FOIA Contacts
- FOIA Guidance
- Access NASA Records   - NASA FOIA Reports
  - FOIA E-Libraries
  - Submit a Request

# 							Annual FOIA Reports						

						The FOIA requires each federal agency to submit an Annual Report to the Attorney General each year. Below are NASA’s reports which contain detailed statistics on the numbers of requests received and processed by NASA, the time taken to respond, the outcome of each request, as well as many other vital statistics regarding the administration of the FOIA at NASA.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

JAN 1 5 2016 

Mr. Robert Glasscock 

Director, ODA Programs 

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

PO Box 2206, MIS R-02 

Savannah, Georgia 31402-2206 

Dear Mr. Glasscock: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated November 20, 2015, requesting exemption from 

§ 25.8 13(e) ofTitle 14, Code off ederal Regulations (14 CFR), at amendment 25-1 28. This 

exemption, if granted, would allow the installation of mid-cabin pocket doors in Gulfstream 

Mode l GVJI-G500 airplanes and derivatives for pri vate-use operations (not for hire, not for 

common carri age). 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on January 5, 2016, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA20 16-0079. We arc in the process of reviewing your request. We will contact you if we 

need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. Dan Jacquet by telephone at (425) 227-2676, or by e-ma il at 

Danie i.Jacquet@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

J~v(.~ 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
No. 55009.

#### Wm. M. Allison & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 164252-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying
report of Nano Dimensions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011 (the “Report”),
I, Chene Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 20, 2011



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/s/ Chene Gardner                                  
|Chene Gardner                                      
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER REGARDING MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KAVU, INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

OMNIPAK CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-109RSL

ORDER REGARDING MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

(Dkt. #55). After plaintiff filed its motion, the parties notified the Court that they have

negotiated a settlement agreement in this case, pending the Court’s approval. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s pending motion for summary judgment is denied as moot. The

Court will retain the motion papers, and plaintiff may subsequently file a notice to renote

the motion if necessary.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 70 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.2

    FOR RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF SHARES AND OTHER RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS
                      SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CERTIFICATE

     INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ON OCTOBER 9, 1998


NUMBER                                                          SHARES

_______________                                                 _______________


                                VALUECLICK, INC.
             TOTAL AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK - 120,000,000 SHARES
                       COMMON STOCK - 100,000,000 SHARES


THIS CERTIFIES THAT ______________________________ is the recordholder of

______________________________ Shares of Common Stock of


                                VALUECLICK, INC.


TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF SAID CORPORATION, IN PERSON OR BY
DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY, UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY
ENDORSED OR ASSIGNED.

THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE ISSUED AND SHALL BE
HELD SUBJECT TO ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND
THE BYLAWS OF SAID CORPORATION AND ANY AMENDMENTS THEREOF, TO ALL OF WHICH
THE HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE, BY ACCEPTANCE HEREOF, ASSENTS.

A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, AND RELATIVE
PARTICIPATING OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OF THE
CORPORATION OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR
RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS MAY BE OBTAINED BY ANY
STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE
CORPORATION.

WITNESS  THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS THIS ________________ DAY OF______________, _____.




-----------------------------------                ---------------------------
PRESIDENT                                          SECRETARY
No. 63897.

protest 59/6641 (Detroit).

#### The J. D. Richardson Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 144

To express support for an interpretive site near Wood River, Illinois, as

the point of departure of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

RESOLUTION

To express support for an interpretive site near Wood River,

Illinois, as the point of departure of the Lewis and

Clark Expedition.

Whereas President Thomas Jefferson selected Meriwether

Lewis and William Clark to be co-leaders of an expedition

to explore the Missouri and Columbia rivers;

Whereas Lewis and Clark staged their epic journey at the

confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers in December, 1803;

Whereas they camped for the winter at the mouth of Wood

River, on the Illinois side of the Mississippi, opposite the

entrance to the Missouri River;

Whereas the 2 captains recruited young woodsmen and enlisted soldiers who volunteered from nearby Army out-
2

•SRES 144 IS

posts, selecting a roster of approximately 45 men for the

expedition;

Whereas Meriwether Lewis recorded that the mouth of the

Wood River was ‘‘to be considered the point of departure’’ for 1 of the most important journeys into the

American West; and

Whereas the bicentennial of this monumental expedition will

be observed beginning in 2003: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) expresses its support for an interpretive site

3 near Wood River, Illinois, as the point of departure

4 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition;

5 (2) expresses its support for the people of Illi6 nois in recognizing the site as a site of monumental

7 historical impact; and

8 (3) calls on the President, the Secretary of the

9 Interior, the Director of the National Park Service,

10 other public officials, and the people of the United

11 States to support and promote the site near Wood

12 River, Illinois, as the starting point of 1 of the

13 greatest journeys in American history.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Carnotite-bearingsandstone in Cedar Canyon, Slim Buttes, Harding County, South Dakota**
 
Report | Plates 1011
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1009-I
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962379
 
August 23, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,619
<INVENTORY>                                     30,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,106
<PP&E>                                          17,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,996
<BONDS>                                        145,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,300
<SALES>                                        132,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,750
<CGS>                                           72,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   718
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                       905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78



</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen VintzStephen VintzChief Financial Officer,
Treasurer  and Secretary
No. 65252.

#### Langfelder, Homma *&*Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/19174 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of animal criers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 37663, except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of paper and not composed of mineral or earthy substances, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GLOBAL DIVING & SALVAGE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

F/V PREDATOR, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

F/V PREDATOR, INC.,

 Third-Party Plaintiff,

 v.

COASTAL MARINE FUND, FEDERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY THROUGH

CHUBB GROUP, and GREAT AMERICAN

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK,

 Third-Party Defendants.

Case No. C06-5066FDB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Federal Insurance Company (Federal) has responded to the Court’s Order To Show Cause

why its cross-claim against Great American Insurance Company (Great American) should not be

dismissed and this cause of action closed. Great American has filed a reply, and the matter is ripe for

Case 3:06-cv-05066-FDB Document 53 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

the Court’s consideration. 

The parties have called to the Court’s attention the fact that a new case has been filed in this

Court by Fishing Vessel Predator against Federal Insurance Company and Great American Insurance

Company of New York, Cause No. C08-5080RBL. In its response to the Show Cause Order,

Federal moves again for leave to deposit the subject funds into the Court’s Registry and then

requests that F/V Predator’s lawsuit, C08-5080RBL be consolidated with this case. Great American

replies opposing both deposit of the funds that Federal holds and consolidation. 

There is no dispute that the cross-claim between Federal and Great American is moot, Great

American having spent all of its policy limits plus more since the time that Federal first asserted its

cross-claim for contribution of insurance proceeds. Moreover, F/V Predator’s lawsuit against

Federal and Great American (C08-5080RBL) brings all three entities before the Court in one action.

Accordingly, the Court can find no reason to keep this cause of action open or to consolidate it with

the other. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Cross-claim of Federal Insurance Company is found to be MOOT and is

DISMISSED; 

2. Renewed Motion of Federal Insurance Company to deposit funds into the Court’s

Registry is DENIED;

3. There being no parties or claims remaining in this case, this cause of action is

DISMISSED. 

DATED this 27th day of March, 2008.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05066-FDB Document 53 Filed 03/27/08 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10812)

#### Berben Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 989067, etc.

*396(Decided August 26, 1964)

*Barnes, Riohardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached to and made a part of the decision herein, controvert the value found by the appraiser on certain shotguns with or without other words of description and parts thereof and fittings therefor, imported from Italy.

The instant appeals have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of fact agreed to by the parties—

> That the appeals for reappraisement listed on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are limited to the merchandise described on the invoices as shotguns with or without other words of description, and parts thereof and fittings therefor, exported by the firm of Pietro Beretta, Italy.

> That the merchandise in question was entered after February 28, 1958, and that said merchandise does not appear on the Secretary’s Final List, T.D. 54521.

> That at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise in question, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the entered value.

Upon tbe agreed facts of record, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the shotguns and parts thereof and fittings therefor in issue and that said value is represented by the entered value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1008 PLATE 4

Zz
—=

iS
=

SS sania

GEOLOGIC PLAN OF UNDERGROUND WORKINGS

Breceia zone

L 7180!

+ 710°

+ 7050!

SECTION ALONG A-A'

150 Feet
i 1 J

Contour interval 10 feet *
Datum is approximate sea level

EXPLANATION

~

&

<

Zz

&

1 ti

‘Atuwura &

jaw s

z ro

7 >

&

Dacite <

&

a7 if
von
‘Andesite

Massive quartz vein

Fluorspar

bweee
Breccia zone mineralized in part

Gangue minerals in the breccia zone
(Quartz or caleite, or both)

Approximate contact

————
Fault showing dip,
dashed where approximately located

i

Inclined shaft

19
30

Quarter section corner
17.308, R17

Ally

Mine dump

Geology and topography by

Trenches by U. S. Bureau of Mines

GEOLOGIC MAP, PLAN, AND SECTION OF THE JB PROSPECT, BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH

WR. Thurston and E. 0. Washburn, 34., August 1944

286657 © - 54 In Pocket No. 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL C06-5243RJB

 - 1 Freeman Law Firm, Inc.

1107 1⁄2 Tacoma Avenue South

Tacoma, WA 98407

253-383-4500

253-383-4501, facsimile

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

BITE ME, INC., a Washington Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JUST BITE ME BAKING COMPANY, LLC,

a Washington company; and MARY JANE

LEWIS and JOHN DOE LEWIS, individually,

the marital community comprised thereof, and

D/B/A JUST BITE ME BAKING

COMPANY, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5243 RJB

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO

FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1)

)

)

STIPULATION

It is hereby stipulated by and among plaintiff Bite Me, Inc. and defendants Just Bite Me

Baking Company, LLC and Mary Jane Lewis, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) that the

following Order of Dismissal be entered by the Court without further notice or process:

1. Plaintiff Bite Me, Inc. and defendants Just Bite Me Baking Company, LLC and

Mary Jane Lewis, pursuant to a Settlement Agreement entered into on or about the 21st day of

Case 3:06-cv-05243-RJB Document 6 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL C06-5243RJB

 - 2 Freeman Law Firm, Inc.

1107 1⁄2 Tacoma Avenue South

Tacoma, WA 98407

253-383-4500

253-383-4501, facsimile

August stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice and without attorney’s fees or

costs.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2006.

/s/ Spencer D. Freeman

Spencer D. Freeman 

The Freeman Law Firm, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

1107 1⁄2 Tacoma Ave South

Tacoma, WA 98407

sfreeman@freemanlawfirm.org

(253) 383-4500

Facsimile (253) 383-4501

/s/ Gregory J. Lawless

Gregory J. Lawless

The Lawless Partnership, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

6018 Seaview Ave NW

Seattle, WA 98107-2657

glawless@lawless2.com

(206) 782-9535

Facsimile (206) 782-9569

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2006.

AThe Honorable Robert J. Bryan

United States District Judge

c 

Case 3:06-cv-05243-RJB Document 6 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
S. Con. Res. 61 Agreed to November 12, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the publication entitled ‘‘Our

Flag’’, revised under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be reprinted as a Senate document.

(b) There shall be printed—

(1)(A) 250,000 copies of the publication for the use of the

House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each

Member;

(B) 51,500 copies of the publication for the use of the

Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;

(C) 2,000 copies of the publication for the use of the Joint

Committee on Printing; and

(D) 1,400 copies of the publication for distribution to the

depository libraries; or

(2) if the total printing and production costs of copies

in paragraph (1) exceed $150,000, such number of copies of

the publication as does not exceed total printing and production

costs of $150,000, with distribution to be allocated in the same

proportion as in paragraph (1).

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.