alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the Veterans' Family, Caregiver and Survivor Advisory Committee previously scheduled to be held on October 25-26, 2023, at The American Legion, 1608 K Street NW, 7th floor, Washington, DC 20006 has                     *been cancelled.*                     For more information, please contact Dr. Betty Moseley Brown, Designated Federal Officer at (210) 392-2505 or                     *VHA12CSPFAC@va.gov.*

Dated: October 3, 2023.

Jelessa M. Burney,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-22303 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
No. 61589.

#### Bloch Freres *v.*United States,

protest 299735-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question consists of handkerchiefs, not in part of hand-made lace but in part of machine-made lace, valued at over $1.50 per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS


I, John T. Rynd, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Hercules Offshore, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





Date: April 29, 2016





By:/s/ John T. RyndJohn T. RyndChief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 407
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 41

                          [Report No. 105-210]

 Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in the 
                           Nation's Capital.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 1998

  Mr. Sarbanes (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

                             June 10, 1998

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in the 
                           Nation's Capital.

Whereas section 508 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 
        (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat. 4157) authorized the Alpha Phi Alpha 
        Fraternity to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of 
        Columbia to honor Martin Luther King, Jr.;
Whereas section 6(a) of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1006(a)) provides 
        that the location of a commemorative work in the area described as Area 
        I (within the meaning of the Act) shall be deemed not authorized unless 
        approved by law not later than 150 days after notification to Congress 
        that the Secretary of the Interior recommends location of the 
        commemorative work in Area I; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of the 
        recommendation of the Secretary that the memorial be located in Area I: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., MEMORIAL.

    The location of the commemorative work to honor Martin Luther King, 
Jr., authorized by the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 
1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat. 4157), within Area I is approved 
under section 6(a) of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1006(a)).

                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 407

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 41

                          [Report No. 105-210]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in the 
                           Nation's Capital.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 10, 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
From: yeolddreamer@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:14:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I urge you in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust, foolish, and coercive mandate that

all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay

to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have stated any moral or religious

objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing "free" insurance coverage on Americans especially

for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and

Plan B).

I also urge you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and or business that has any moral or religious objection to providing

such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws

which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral

or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only

include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience

objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer

employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again make my request in the

strongest way possible for you to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the

list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Annan

Mcminnville, OR 97128
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2012, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Con Unerkov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    Oakridge International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
/s/ Con    Unerkov
--------------------------
Con    Unerkov
Chief    Financial Officer
July 13,    2012 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# IMMC.EESC-2018-03925-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2018-03925-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

European Economic and Social Committee

European Economic and Social Committee

ECO/478

ECO/478

Pericles IV programme

Pericles IV programme

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (the ‘Pericles IV programme')
  [COM(2018) 369 final - 2018/0194 (CNS)]

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (the ‘Pericles IV programme')
  [

COM(2018) 369 final - 2018/0194 (CNS)]

Consultation

| Consultation | European Commission, 18/06/2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 133 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 19/09/2018 |
| Plenary session No | 537 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 207/0/1 |

Consultation

European Commission, 18/06/2018

European Commission, 18/06/2018

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 133 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 133 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

19/09/2018

19/09/2018

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

537

537

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

207/0/1

207/0/1

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 537th plenary session of 19 and 20 September 2018 (meeting of 19 September 2018), by 207 votes with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 537th plenary session of 19 and 20 September 2018 (meeting of 19 September 2018), by 207 votes with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 19 September 2018

Brussels, 19 September 2018

Luca JAHIER

  The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

Luca JAHIER

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
First Amendment to Agreement

         First Amendment to Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2000, by and
between Fleet Boston Corporation (formerly Fleet Financial Group, Inc.), a Rhode
Island Corporation (the "Company"), and Terrence Murray (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, as of December 17, 1997, the Company and the Executive entered
into an Agreement (the "Agreement") as part of a retention strategy for the
Executive and in recognition of his invaluable contributions to the Company's
success;

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have determined that it would be
desirable to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth in this First
Amendment;

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Agreement, the Company
and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.       Section 2(c)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the
         words "one year" in the first and second sentences of the first
         paragraph and in the second paragraph thereof, and inserting in their
         place the words "three years".

2.       All of the terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby
         shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be
executed by the duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this
First Amendment.

                                              Fleet Boston Corporation

                                         By:  /s/ M. ANNE SZOSTAK
                                              -------------------


                                              /s/ TERRENCE MURRAY
                                              Terrence Murray
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 2 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 3 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 4 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 5 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 38 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 6 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/29/06 Page 6 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5293RJB

ORDER DISMISSING

COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find

and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies prior to filing. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold.

DATED this 2nd day of October, 2006.

A

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM’s DUE DATE 

(Edward Brazier; #05-0014RSL)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

1 (206) 553-1100

 JUDGE JAMES L. ROBART

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CARL D. MATTOS,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-0053 JLR

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

AND EXTEND TIME FOR PRETRIAL

MOTIONS

THE COURT having considered the stipulated motion of the parties to continue the trial

date and extend the due date of the pretrial motions, and the records and files herein, the Court

hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuances would deny counsel the

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering the

continuances in this case and that the continuances are necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial,

within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date be continued from April 25, 2006, to

July 18, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00053-JPD Document 18 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL & EXTEND PTM’s DUE DATE 

(Edward Brazier; #05-0014RSL)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

2 (206) 553-1100

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pretrial motions be due June 29, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of April

25, 2006, up to and including the new proposed trial date of July 18, 2006, shall be excludable

time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. 

DONE this 12th day of April, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/ Jennifer E. Wellman

WSBA # 29193

Attorney for Carl D. Mattos

Federal Public Defender’s Office

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

Phone: (206) 553-1100

Fax: (206) 553-0120

jennifer_wellman@fd.org

s/ William Redkey

Assistant United States Attorney

Telephonic Approval

Case 2:06-cr-00053-JPD Document 18 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-123M

)

v. )

)

MATIAS VALENCIA-MERAZ, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: March 15, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. The defendant was represented by Jay Stansell.

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00097-MJP Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Washington are unknown/unverified; and the Bureau of Immigration,

Customs and Enforcement (“BICE”) has filed a detainer.

(2) Due to his extensive criminal record and numerous drug convictions, 

defendant is viewed as a risk of danger to the community.

(3) Defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

//

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00097-MJP Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00097-MJP Document 8 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3