alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Public Law 499]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ499.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2223]]

Public Law 106-499
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to 
 investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the 
  Salmon Creek watershed of the Upper Columbia River. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 
                          2000 -  [S. 2951]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SALMON CREEK WATERSHED, WASHINGTON, WATER MANAGEMENT 
                            STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may conduct a study 
to investigate the opportunities to better manage the water resources in 
the Salmon Creek Watershed, a tributary to the Upper Columbia River 
system, Okanagoan County, Washington, so as to restore and enhance 
fishery resources (especially the endangered Upper Columbia Spring 
Chinook and Steelhead), while maintaining or improving the availability 
of water supplies for irrigation practices vital to the economic well-
being of the county.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall be 
to derive the benefits of and further the objectives of the 
comprehensive, independent study commissioned by the Confederated Tribes 
of the Colville Reservation and the Okanagoan Irrigation District, which 
provides a credible basis for pursuing a course of action to 
simultaneously achieve fish restoration and improved irrigation 
conservation and efficiency.
    (c) Cost Share.--The Federal Government's cost share for the 
feasibility study shall not exceed 50 percent.

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2951:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-431 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 64

Providing for corrections to be made in the enrollment of H.R. 1119.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. DOMENICI submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for corrections to be made in the enrollment of

H.R. 1119.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of H.R. 1119, an Act

3 to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1998 for mili4 tary activities of the Department of Defense, for military

5 construction, and for defense activities of the Department

6 of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal

7 year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, the

8 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the fol9 lowing corrections:

10 In section 3165—
2

SCON 64 ATS

1 (1) in subsection (b)(1), strike out ‘‘under the

2 jurisdiction’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Los Ala3 mos National Laboratory’’ and insert in lieu thereof

4 ‘‘under the administrative jurisdiction of the Sec5 retary at or in the vicinity of Los Alamos National

6 Laboratory’’; and

7 (2) in subsection (e), strike out ‘‘, the Secretary

8 of the Interior’’ and all that follows through the end

9 and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘but not later than 90

10 days after the submittal of the report under sub11 section (d)(1)(C), the County and the Pueblo shall

12 submit to the Secretary an agreement between the

13 County and the Pueblo which allocates between the

14 County and the Pueblo the parcels identified for

15 conveyance or transfer under subsection (b).’’.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

November 17, 1966

No. P66/340.

#### Ashear Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/7174, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of handkerchiefs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ashear Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT AND RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) UNDER THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, Ross E. Roeder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smart & Final Inc. for the quarter ended March 21, 2004. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 27, 2004
 
/s/ Ross E. Roeder
  
Ross E. Roeder

 

2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheKotsina-Kuskulana district, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 0203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:745
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958869
 
August 1, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Recon Technology, Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2009 the Report), I, Jia Liu, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|September 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Jia Liu         
|                   |  |  |  | Jia Liu                
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00376-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF E.P.T., L.H.T., T.G.T., I.A.T., 

O.J.T., AND W.M.T., CHILDREN 

 

On Appeal from the 126th District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court No. D-1-FM-15-000462, Honorable Jan Soifer, Presiding 

 

June 29, 2020 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, father of the six children subject of the above referenced cause, appeals 

the trial court’s “Final Order” modifying an agreed divorce decree allowing for a change 

in conservatorship rights for one child and a reduction in child support. So too did it award 

Mother $6,597.09 in attorney’s fees. It is the award of attorney’s fees that prompted 

Father to file this appeal. In a single issue, he asserts that the trial court erred by granting 
2

Mother attorney’s fees because it failed to give a reason other than “good cause” for the 

award.

1

 We affirm.

2

Father’s objection to the attorney’s fee award to Mother was not made until he filed 

his appellate brief. This is fatal to his complaint. Father was required to broach the issue 

with the trial court first and after rendition of the order about which complaint is made. 

See Barndt v. Barndt, No. 03-17-00796-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 3180, at *13 (Tex. 

App.—Austin Apr. 19, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (requiring preservation of the issue in the 

trial court); Henry v. Henry, 48 S.W.3d 468, 481 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001,

no pet.) (requiring same). Because Father’s complaint was not brought to the trial court’s 

attention after rendition of the order, it was not preserved. See Barndt, 2019 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 3180, at *13. 

Abiding by controlling precedent of the Austin Court of Appeals in disposing of this

cause transferred from that court, we overrule the sole issue and affirm the judgment of 

the trial court.

Per Curiam

1 Appellee filed a letter with this Court that contained the following: “The amount in controversy in 

this appeal is an award of attorney’s fees of $6,597.09. The amount in controversy does not justify the time 

and expense of reviewing the record and preparing an Appellee’s Brief. As a result, Appellee Stacy Thomas 

does not plan to file an Appellee’s Brief unless requested by the Court. However, I do not believe that the 

Trial Court abused its discretion when it awarded Stacy Thomas $6,597.09 in attorney’s fees.”

2 Because this appeal was transferred from the Third Court of Appeals, we are obligated to apply 

its precedent when available in the event of a conflict between the precedents of that court and this Court. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
No. 68514.

protests 60/17352 and 63/3819 (New York).

#### Multivox Corp. of America and M. Hohner, Inc. *v.*United States

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chord organs and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Excelsior Accordions, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 148, C.D. 2328), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00496

- CV

ASA GROUP, LTD.
, Appellant

v.

THE UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and The Laredo Community College District
, Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Web b County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- TXA

- 000750

- D2 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED
Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1(a)(1). Appellant also requests that each party be ordered to bear its own appellate costs.

However, the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of

costs ; accordingly , all costs of appeal will be assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
## NO. 12

- 20

- 00228

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: HARRIS CENTER FOR

MEN T

AL HEALTH AND IDD ,
RELATOR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
The Harris Center for Mental Health and ID D filed this original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s conclusion that Harris Center lacked standing to file a moti o n to revoke and to participate in a hearing on outpatient treatment regarding patient W.R. 1 O n November 18 , 2020 , this Court conditional ly granted the petition and directed Re spondent to notify W.R. and set a hearing on Harris Center’s motion to revoke ou t patient treatment

. By a n order signed on
November 25 , Respondent c omplied with this Court’s opinion and order, ren dering th is proceedin g moot. Accordingl y, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot

. Opinion delivered December 16, 2020. Pane l c onsisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Respondent is the Honorable Campbell Cox, II, Judge of the 145th District Court in Nacogdoches County, Texas. T he Real Parties in Interest are the State of Texas and W.R.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DIS TRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 16 , 2020

NO. 12

- 20

- 00228

- CV

HARRIS CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND IDD , Relato r V.

HON. CAMPBELL COX, II , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petitio n for writ of mandamus filed by
Harris Cente r for Mental Health and IDD ; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12

- 20

- 00228

- CV and an interested pe rson in tri al cause number F1924026, pending on the docket of
the 145th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas . Said petition for wr it of
mandamus h aving been filed herein on September 29, 2020 , and the same having been duly considered, beca use it is t he opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for wri t of mandamus be,
and the sam e is, hereby dismissed as moot

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthe n, C.J., Ho yle, J. and Neeley, J.
No. 62307.

#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 94074-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain *358items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62319.

#### Far East Fur Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 101281-K (A) (New York).

*361Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 21

 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico 
  during fiscal year 1997, and to provide for the termination of the 
   withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the 
                              disapproval.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1997

 Mr. Coverdell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Helms) introduced 
 the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico 
  during fiscal year 1997, and to provide for the termination of the 
   withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the 
                              disapproval.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION.

    (a) Disapproval.--Pursuant to subsection (d) of section 490 of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j), Congress disapproves 
the determination of the President with respect to Mexico that is 
contained in the certification (transmittal no. 97-18) submitted to 
Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that section on 
February 28, 1997.
    (b) Termination.--Notwithstanding subsection (f) of that section, 
subsection (e) of that section (relating to the withholding of 
bilateral assistance and opposition to multilateral development 
assistance) shall cease to apply to Mexico during fiscal year 1997 if 
at any time after the enactment of this Act the President submits to 
Congress a certification pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(B) that the 
vital national interests of the United States require that such 
subsection (e) cease to apply to Mexico during that fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
No. 66598.

#### Raymor Mfg. Div., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21037, etc. (New York).

*383Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall-hung furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 781 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 31, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3920) to amend the Trade Act of 1974 to reauthorize trade 

adjustment assistance, to extend trade adjustment assistance 

to service workers and firms, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be 

considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 

as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, 

with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
2 

•HRES 781 EH 

Ways and Means and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Education and Labor; (2) the amendment in 

the nature of a substitute printed in part B of the report of 

the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative 

McCrery of Louisiana or his designee, which shall be in order 

without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as 

read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; 

and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3920 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ee BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 15

DEPTH OF SOIL SAMPLE, IN FEET

| fF] | Gi al =
; : [ rj
| j FE 4 i H ; |
i i d : Hi
s Hl | h IE
st H 7 rf
i i i I g
1 I Ht 4
‘ | | 1 i i 3
i 1 i H i :
i | Ht ' ! 4
j 1 i i j
| ' 1 i | :
' d q t ;
| i i | i
f \ H
} i i
Ei i
i it i !
: Y {
; i
H ‘4 .
\ |:
! i\ i
\ H
f
1
j j
Ls ae
aN
E
f ;
N, ie
ae t
H n
H Mg i
ee a
9 u #
144 ZINC, IN PARTS PER MILLION !
2 i
155 LEAD OR HEAVY METALS, IN PARTS PER MILLION q
d
i! j DISTANCE ALONG TRAVERSE IN FEET
‘2 = i 2 bi ape il ep ii bid ue od » Raid 28 i a big ae oid sy
300°
yor EXPLANATION
280° { ee eral,
Approximate position and direction _
EXPLANATION of known lead vein (located by disturbed soil)
260° ©200
Zine dicta 2B Point and the |
iS i
igs ih ees a Na
Heavy metals gene Direction and estimated amount
Lead and heavy metals ei —
values fall on same line 210°
ls
Component of slope 2008
parallel to traverse 190°
PERCENT OF RESIDUAL aps
MATERIAL IN SOIL 170¢
1600 ae
Less than 25 percent isos See
25 to 50 percent ad
50 to 100 percent ee
=
‘Where graphs are blank
data not available B00
Methods of sample digestion for
heavy metals test and lead and 60°
zinc tests were different, hence
data are not directly comparable
40° i N
Ise
20°
oe
Ss
aS
0 : 40 Feet

MAP SHOWING RELATIONSHIP OF THE SAMPLE TRAVERSE
TO KNOWN LEAD VEINS

DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD, ZINC, AND TOTAL HEAVY METALS IN SOIL NEAR POINT M IN THE POTOSI AREA

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 9
No. 62327.

#### Metasco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 155586-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

See Abstract 622363 for protest 306018-K, decided on August 29, 1958.