alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 4

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending and thanking the Honorable Warren

Christopher for his exemplary service as Secretary of State.

Whereas Secretary Warren Christopher served as Secretary

of State from 1993 until 1997, and maintained the tradition of that Office by representing the international interests of the United States with great dignity, grace, and

ability;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, during his tenure as Secretary of State, engaged in more international travel than

any other Secretary of State in United States history, reflecting his indefatigable commitment to advancing peace

and justice, protecting and promoting United States interests, and preserving United States leadership in international affairs;
2

SCON 4 RFH

Whereas Secretary Christopher has played a key leadership

role in United States foreign policy achievements, including ending the war in Bosnia, restoring an elected government in Haiti, and advancing peace in the Middle

East;

Whereas Secretary Christopher served with distinction as

Deputy Secretary of State from 1977 until 1981 and,

among his accomplishments as Deputy Secretary, is credited with skillfully negotiating the release of American

hostages in Iran;

Whereas Secretary Christopher has had a distinguished career in law and public service in California;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, born in Scranton, North Dakota, is one of North Dakota’s most distinguished native

sons and has always displayed the quiet strength and

work ethic associated with the people of the Great Plains;

Whereas in 1997 Secretary Christopher leaves his position as

the 63d Secretary of State; and

Whereas Secretary Christopher has earned the respect and

admiration of Congress and the American people: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress commends and thanks the

3 Honorable Warren Christopher for his exemplary diplo4 matic service, and for his skillful and indefatigable efforts

5 to advance peace and justice around the world.

Passed the Senate January 22, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
From: Carlosatobonh@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:15:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carlos Tobon

Orangeburg, SC 29118
From: btlunt@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:24:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

I no longer feel like this is my country--the country that I love. The United States of America that was

built on Judeo Christian Principles is no longer thanks to the current administration.

Sincerely,

Terry and Barbara Lunt

Sincerely,

Terry and Barbara Lunt

Fort Wayne, IN 46835
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In
connection with this Annual Report of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ending August
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Lorraine Evanoff, Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1.
      Such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ending August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
      The information contained in such amended Yearly
Report on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc.
   Dated:December
      17, 2008
  RED
ROCK PICTURES HOLDINGS INC.
  By:
      /s/ Lorraine
      EvanoffLorraine
      EvanoffPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Victor A. De Jesus,
do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,
and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Exchange
Note Servicing Supplement 2012-A to Closed-End Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2012 (the “Exchange Note Servicing
Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp. as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as
follows:



(i)        A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and
covered by the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing
Supplement) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the
Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement),
has been made under my supervision.



(ii)        To
the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange
Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



| |  | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 14, 2014.
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.                          
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | By:                                                 
| | Name:  Victor A. De Jesus                           
| | Title:  Vice President, Finance and Administration /
| | Chief Financial Officer
No. 59306.

protest 258735-K (New York).

#### Dan Brechner & Co. *v.*United States,

*253Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MIKE KREIDLER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DANNY L. PIXLER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0697RSL

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

On October 17, 2007, the Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff’s

motion to compel defendants to produce various financial, corporate, and accounting

documents from the corporate and the individual defendants (Dkt. #105, the “Order”). 

Defendant Sheri Huff now moves the Court to reconsider the portion of the Order which

requires her to produce her personal financial documents, including tax returns and bank

statements, from 2002 to 2005. 

“Motions for reconsideration are disfavored. The court will ordinarily deny such

motions in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of

new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier

with reasonable diligence.” Local Rule 7(h). 

Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 114 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2

Ms. Huff argues that the Court should reconsider its prior ruling based on “her

extremely tenuous relation to the claims at issue in this case and the consequent

irrelevance of the requested documents, and the overly burdensome nature of the

request.” Ms. Huff’s Motion at p. 2. In response to the motion to compel, Ms. Huff did

not argue that her relationship to the case was tenuous. Nor did she submit the facts

related to the power of attorney she gave Mr. Huff. She has not shown manifest error in

the prior ruling or shown new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought

to the Court’s attention earlier with reasonable diligence.

In addition, Ms. Huff’s connection to the relevant transactions is sufficient to

warrant compelling the production of her financial records. Although she was not

directly involved in the Cascade transactions or in the operations of Midwest Merger

Management, LLC (“Midwest”), she had an ownership interest in Midwest. Plaintiff also

alleges that Ms. Huff conspired with the other defendants to defraud and to engage in the

wrongful transactions, and she accepted profits from those transactions. For these

reasons, and for the reasons set forth in the Order, the Court denies the motion for

reconsideration.

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00697-RSL Document 114 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2
1 Magistrate Judge Donohue

2

3

4

5

6

7

; WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9 AT SEATTLE

10 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO. CR06-0069RSL

Plaintiff,
12
v, REPORT AND
3 RECOMMENDATION
CONCERNING PLEA
14 |] CHRISTOPHER MAXWELL,
15 Defendant. ;
16
7 The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R.

18 || Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the Indictment. After examining the

19 | defendant under oath, I determined that the guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently,

20 || and voluntarily made, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis
21 || in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore ordered a
22 || presentence report. Subject to the Court's consideration of the Plea Agreement

23 I //

24 f/f

25 f/
TAIL RA NO A

26
oy) UU EY
06-C:R-00042-RPT
RULE 1] PLEA/CHRISTOPHER MAXWELL UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
CRNS-IOARP seatde,Washingan 8161-1271

(206) 583-7970,



1 | pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3), I recommend that the defendant be adjudged
24 guilty and have sentence imposed.

3 DATED this ph day of Mv + 2006.

4 q

5 .

6 ID STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7 TICE

8

Objections to this Report and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within ten (10) days.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

RULE 11 PLEA/CHRISTOPHER MAXWELL UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
CRORAWM42F 700 Stewart Strevt, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 533-7970)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Act Amendment

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					,	Steagall, Henry Bascom					 and 	Seventy-Eighth Congress, 1943-1945. 						*Federal Reserve Act Amendment : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Seventy-Eighth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 1699, March 25, April 1, 2, 5, 7, 1943*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										March 25, April 1, 2, 5, 7, 1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/366,			accessed on September 9, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 673 

Recognizing the importance of National Preparedness Month and encouraging 

all Americans to take precautions to preserve lives and minimize the 

effects of a terrorist attack. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of National Preparedness Month 

and encouraging all Americans to take precautions to 

preserve lives and minimize the effects of a terrorist 

attack. 

Whereas terrorist attacks could strike any part of the United 

States at any time; 

Whereas less than 1 percent of the United States population 

is formally trained to respond to an act of terrorism; 

Whereas National Preparedness Month during September 

2007 provides an opportunity to highlight the importance 

of public emergency preparedness and to encourage the 

people of the United States to take steps to be better prepared for emergencies at home, work, and school; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 673 IH 

Whereas all citizens can help promote the overall emergency 

preparedness of the United States by taking steps such 

as assembling emergency supply kits, creating family 

emergency plans, and staying informed about possible 

emergencies; 

Whereas Federal, State, and local officials and private persons are working to deter, prevent, mitigate, and respond 

to all types of emergencies; 

Whereas Federal intelligence agencies are working diligently 

and cooperatively to prevent a terrorist attack; 

Whereas radicalized violent ideologues, including Al Qaeda 

leaders, have made clear their intent to wreak terrible 

havoc by attacking Americans at home and abroad; 

Whereas the United States Armed Forces are bravely battling 

our enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq to dismantle international terror networks; 

Whereas all Americans can help defeat the sworn enemies of 

the United States by taking immediate action to ensure 

they are fully prepared for a catastrophic attack on our 

homeland; and 

Whereas additional information about public emergency preparedness may be obtained through the Ready Campaign 

of the Department of Homeland Security or the American Red Cross: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and supports the efforts of the 

3 Department of Homeland Security and its govern4 mental, nongovernmental, and private sector part5 ners to strengthen the Nation’s readiness for a terVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:30 Sep 25, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR673.IH HR673

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 673 IH 

1 rorist attack during National Preparedness Month; 

2 and 

3 (2) encourages the Department of Homeland 

4 Security, localities, schools, nonprofit organizations, 

5 businesses, other entities, and the people of the 

6 United States to observe National Preparedness 

7 Month with appropriate events and activities to pro8 mote public emergency preparedness for acts of ter9 rorism. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 11, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.100 Households and Nonprofit Organizations 1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
July 9, 2015

Mr. Matthew Dunn

Aerolens

208 7-17 William Street

North Sydney, Australia NSW 2060

Dear Mr. Dunn:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your July 6

th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2733), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 8

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that Federal retirement cost-of-
 living adjustments should be effective on the same date as other cost-
      of-living adjustments given to Federal retirement programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 1997

   Mr. Robb submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that Federal retirement cost-of-
 living adjustments should be effective on the same date as other cost-
      of-living adjustments given to Federal retirement programs.

Whereas over the years Federal retirees have been asked to share in efforts to 
        reduce the deficit by delaying their annual cost-of-living adjustment 
        while retirees under other Federal programs who also receive cost-of-
        living adjustments were not delayed; and
Whereas it would be inequitable to continue delaying cost-of-living adjustments 
        for Federal retirees when like delays for similarly situated retirees 
        under other systems are not under consideration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that cost-of-living adjustments 
for Federal retirees should be paid at the same time as other retirees 
receiving Federal cost-of-living adjustments.
                                 <all>
```