alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Rapinett, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 981]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated September 30, 1985 *(People v Rapinett,*113 AD2d 959), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 9, 1980, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 58290.

protest 222152-K.

#### A. J. Van Dugteren & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Protest abandoned June 30,1954. (Not published.) (Initial No. 221543-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 16th day of February, 2007, I electronically 

filed the foregoing REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF DEREK LINKE IN SUPPORT OF,

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which

will send notification of such filing to the following:

Via Notice of Electronic Filing to:

Robert Siegel, Esq.

i.Justice Law, P.C.

Email: bob@ijusticelaw.com

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of

Washington that the forgoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on

February 16th, 2007, at Seattle, Washington.

________________________

Diana Au

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 108-2 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 108 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10717

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mearvin Eugene Hamilton, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-26-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mearvin Eugene 

Hamilton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hamilton has filed a response and an incorporated 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10717 Document: 00515699325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
No. 20-10717

2

motion to appoint new counsel, which is DENIED. See United States v. 

Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hamilton’s claim of 

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim

without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 

829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Hamilton’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 20-10717 Document: 00515699325 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
"Page: 117  September 18, 2014"
""
"B.100 Balance Sheet of Households and Nonprofit Organizations 1"
"Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted                                                                                                                                                   "
""
"","2009","2010","2011","2012","2013","2013","2013","2013","2013","2014","2014","",
"Description","","","","","","Q1","Q2","Q3","Q4","Q1","Q2","",
"Life insurance companies, general accounts; deferred and unpaid life insurance premiums; asset","      22.1","      24.7","      24.3","      24.9","      27.9","      25.9","      27.8","      26.8","      27.9","      28.9","      30.2","   41",
"Households and nonprofit organizations; net worth","   58268.8","   62483.6","   63698.1","   69523.5","   78868.0","   72290.3","   73814.1","   76159.9","   78868.0","   80102.4","   81492.8","   42",
"Households and nonprofit organizations; residential structures, current cost basis","   12680.7","   12730.1","   12845.4","   13228.8","   14187.3","   13468.0","   13671.9","   13892.8","   14187.3","   14518.8","   14584.3","   43",
"Households; residential structures, current cost basis","   12479.0","   12526.6","   12641.9","   13020.5","   13967.6","   13256.8","   13458.5","   13676.8","   13967.6","   14293.8","   14358.3","   44",
"Nonprofit organizations; residential structures, current cost basis","     201.7","     203.5","     203.4","     208.3","     219.7","     211.2","     213.4","     216.0","     219.7","     225.0","     226.1","   45",
"Nonprofit organizations; nonresidential structures, current cost basis","    1409.3","    1420.7","    1464.6","    1508.4","    1596.2","    1527.2","    1554.8","    1572.0","    1596.2","    1609.0","    1618.4","   46",
"Households and nonprofit organizations; disposable personal income","   10942.5","   11237.9","   11801.4","   12384.0","   12505.1","   12340.4","   12470.7","   12585.8","   12623.7","   12772.9","   12979.5","   47",
"Households and nonprofit organizations; net worth as a percentage of disposable personal income","     532.5","     556.0","     539.8","     561.4","     630.7","     585.8","     591.9","     605.1","     624.8","     627.1","     627.9","   48",
"Households; owners' equity in real estate","    6532.8","    6461.0","    6362.2","    7986.7","   10215.4","    8626.1","    9239.7","    9706.1","   10215.4","   10667.0","   10844.3","   49",
"Households; owners' equity in real estate as a percentage of household real estate","      38.5","      39.5","      39.6","      45.7","      52.0","      47.7","      49.5","      50.7","      52.0","      53.2","      53.6","   50",
No. 63888.

protest 59/19330 (New York).

#### Byn Watch Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 64583.

#### Amity Mills, Inc., and Amity Silk Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 325865-K and 305984-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant*& *Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal L 301/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6425 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 301

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6425 August 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1399 of 24 August 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of ergot sclerotia and ergot alkaloids in certain foodstuffs (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1400 of 24 August 2021 fixing the interest rates to be used for calculating the costs of financing intervention measures comprising buying-in, storage and disposal for the 2022 EAGF accounting year | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1399 of 24 August 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of ergot sclerotia and ergot alkaloids in certain foodstuffs (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1400 of 24 August 2021 fixing the interest rates to be used for calculating the costs of financing intervention measures comprising buying-in, storage and disposal for the 2022 EAGF accounting year

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSHUA SEAN MACKE,

Defendant.

Case No.

ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION BY UNITED STATES

PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

defendant violated the conditions of supervision as set forth in said Petition.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, Richard Cohen;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Jay Stansell;

The defendant has been advised of (a) the alleged violations; (b) the right to a hearing; and c) that

defendant’s release on supervision could be revoked if found to be in violation of supervision. 

The defendant having acknowledged the right to a hearing on the merits, voluntarily waived that

hearing, and acknowledged violating the following conditions of supervision as set forth below:

1) Failing to obtain permission of the court or probation officer to leave the judicial district on or about

August 10, 2011.

2) Failing to report for urinalysis testing on or about May 12, 2011.

The court having accepted the defendant’s admission to the above listed violations, releases the

defendant on an appearance bond with continued supervision of the US Probation Office and the

additional condition that defendant participate in the home confinement program which includes active

GPS.

Disposition Hearing set for Tuesday, August 30, 2011, at 2:00 pm before the Honorable Richard S.

Martinez.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

August 18, 2011.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge
No. 59810.

#### DuCaire Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 248666-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with *391the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DEBORAH DOMINIQUE,

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR06-110RSM

 

 Minute Order

Re: Settlement Conference

THIS matter was referred to these chambers for purposes of a settlement conference by the Honorable

Ricardo S. Martinez. The Assistant United States Attorney, defense counsel, and defendant met with U.S.

Magistrate Judge, J. Kelley Arnold, this date for purposes of exploring settlement. A plea agreement was

reached between the parties and presented to the Honorable Franklin D. Burgess this date.

Entered by Deputy Clerk, /s/Kelly Miller, this 21st day of September 2005.

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 78 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                       946
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,092
<PP&E>                                          11,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,719
<SALES>                                         13,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,063
<CGS>                                            6,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (809)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICIA BELL WATKINS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON 

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5141FDB

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO STAY HER STATE

SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT

 WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This habeas corpus petition has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR

4. Petitioner seeks federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. # 1 and 2). 

Before the court is a motion asking the court to stay petitioner’s judgment and sentence in state

court. (Dkt. # 8). This motion was filed July 6th, 2006. The court ordered the petition served on the

Pierce County Prosecutor’s Office July 18th, 2006, (Dkt # 9).

Petitioner has failed to show she served her motion on the state or on the Pierce County

Prosecutor’s Office. The motion was made prior to the court ordering service and is premature. 

Case 3:06-cv-05141-FDB Document 11 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Petitioner may renew her motion after the Pierce County Prosecutor’s Office has entered a

notice of appearance or after the time for entering such a notice has expired. Petitioner is reminded

to follow Local Rule 7 (b)(1) regarding proof of service. 

The clerk is ordered to send copies of this order to the petitioner and to the Pierce County

Prosecutor’s Office and remove (Dkt. # 8) from the court’s calendar.

DATED this 31st, day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05141-FDB Document 11 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 91 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 91

Expressing the sense of Congress that a postage stamp should be issued 
 to commemorate the life of George Washington and his contributions to 
                              the Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1998

   Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Robb, and Mr. Graham) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a postage stamp should be issued 
 to commemorate the life of George Washington and his contributions to 
                              the Nation.

Whereas 1999 marks the 200th anniversary of the death of George Washington;
Whereas George Washington's extraordinary virtue commanded the respect of 
        America's early leaders, who called on him to preside over the framing 
        of the Constitution;
Whereas George Washington was an indispensable figure in the founding of our 
        Nation, and served as our country's first commander in chief and 
        President with unparalleled distinction;
Whereas all Americans remain indebted to George Washington for the liberties we 
        enjoy today;
Whereas the death of George Washington on December 14, 1799, marked the first 
        instance of national mourning in this country;
Whereas George Washington's tremendous accomplishments over the course of a 
        remarkable lifetime are studied and admired in this Nation and around 
        the world; and
Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the life and contributions of George 
        Washington, ``The Father of Our Country'', is proper and fitting: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service to commemorate the life of George Washington and 
        his contributions to the Nation; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a postage stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999
and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2000 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         11,806,000
<SECURITIES>                                    1,942,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,742,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      129,000
<INVENTORY>                                     4,301,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               39,462,000
<PP&E>                                         61,880,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,797,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 91,853,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,220,000
<BONDS>                                         8,741,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          138,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     71,006,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   91,853,000
<SALES>                                         1,734,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,265,000
<CGS>                                           1,151,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  32,732,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,618,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,125,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,493,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,493,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .31



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Robert Vivian certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)       the annual report on Form 10-K of Aultra Gold, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.
  Dated: August 25, 2011
  /s/ Robert VivianName:  Robert VivianTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Shamika 2 Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Shamika 2 Gold, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.