alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 826 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 5, 2007.
Whereas in the past two months, nooses have been found in a North Carolina high 
        school, a Home Depot in New Jersey, a Louisiana school playground, the 
        campus of the University of Maryland, a Columbia University professor's 
        office door and a factory in Houston, Texas;
Whereas the Southern Poverty Law Center has recorded between 40 and 50 suspected 
        hate crimes involving nooses since September;
Whereas since 2001, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed more 
        than 30 lawsuits that involve the displaying of nooses in places of 
        employment;
Whereas nooses are reviled by many Americans as racist symbols of lynchings that 
        were once all too common;
Whereas according to Tuskegee Institute, more than 4,700 people were lynched 
        between 1882 and 1959 in a campaign of terror led by the Ku Klux Klan;
Whereas the number of dead lynching victims in the United States exceeds the 
        amount of people killed in the horrible attack on Pearl Harbor (2,333 
        dead) and Hurricane Katrina (1,836 dead) combined; and
Whereas African-Americans, as well as Italians, Jews, and Mexicans, have 
        comprised the vast majority of lynching victims and only when we erase 
        the terrible symbols of the past can we finally begin to move forward: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the hanging of nooses is a horrible act when used for the 
        purpose of intimidation and which under certain circumstances can be 
        criminal;
            (2) this conduct should be investigated thoroughly by Federal 
        authorities; and
            (3) any criminal violations should be vigorously prosecuted.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1009 PLATE 10

EXPLANATION

is

ws

(QUATERNARY

Landslide material

Ta

‘Arikaree formation

‘group
ae
N

White Rwer

Yy
dddddldddda

Chadron formation

u

&

Ludlow member of the
Fort Union formation,

ou

Outcrop of carnotite-
bearing sandstone

Contact, dashed where
approximately located

Strike and dip of beds

‘Sample locality

TRUE NORTH

—~_

= \newent 37 MES

SN

GEOLOGIC MAP OF CEDAR CANYON, HARDING COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA Me Lvish, and RE: Mein,

ROE. “Geology and topography from planotabia Suva
he Gi, GW. Moore, RC Keptere,
69

100 ° 500 Feet
j

‘Contour interval 20 feet
CNTR LIS 343704 0-5 (In pocket) No. 1

TERTIARY
5 10

4

3

1

9

6

8

2 7

snack tips 

for parents 

10 tips for healthy snacking

Snacks can help children get the nutrients needed to grow and maintain a healthy weight. 

Prepare single-serving snacks for younger children to help them get just enough to satisfy their hunger. Let older 

kids make their own snacks by keeping healthy foods in the kitchen. Visit ChooseMyPlate.gov to help you and 

your kids select a satisfying snack.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series

Fruits Grains

Vegetables Protein

Dairy

save time by slicing veggies 

Store sliced vegetables in the refrigerator and serve 

with dips like hummus or low-fat dressing. Top half a 

whole-wheat English muffin with spaghetti sauce, chopped 

vegetables, and low-fat shredded mozzarella and melt in 

the microwave. 

mix it up

For older school-age kids, mix dried fruit, 

unsalted nuts, and popcorn in a snack-size 

bag for a quick trail mix. Blend plain fat-free or 

low-fat yogurt with 100% fruit juice and frozen 

peaches for a tasty smoothie.

 

grab a glass of milk

A cup of low-fat or fat-free milk or milk alternative 

(soy milk) is an easy way to drink a healthy snack.

go for great whole grains

Offer whole-wheat breads, popcorn, and 

whole-oat cereals that are high in fiber 

and low in added sugars, saturated fat, and 

sodium. Limit refined-grain products such as 

snack bars, cakes, and sweetened cereals. 

nibble on lean protein

Choose lean protein foods such as low-sodium deli 

meats, unsalted nuts, or eggs. Wrap sliced, lowsodium deli turkey or ham around an apple wedge. Store 

unsalted nuts in the pantry or peeled, hard-cooked (boiled)

eggs in the refrigerator for kids to enjoy any time.

 keep an eye on the size

Snacks shouldn’t replace a meal, so look for ways 

to help your kids understand how much is enough. 

Store snack-size bags in the cupboard and use them to 

control serving sizes.

 fruits are quick and easy

 Fresh, frozen, dried, or canned fruits 

 can be easy “grab-and-go” options that 

need little preparation. Offer whole fruit and limit 

the amount of 100% juice served.

 consider convenience

 A single-serving container of low-fat or 

 fat-free yogurt or individually wrapped 

string cheese can be just enough for an 

after-school snack. 

 swap out the sugar

 Keep healthier foods handy so kids avoid cookies, 

 pastries, or candies between meals. Add seltzer water 

to a 1⁄2 cup of 100% fruit juice instead of offering soda.

 prepare homemade goodies

 For homemade sweets, add dried fruits like 

apricots or raisins and reduce the amount of 

sugar. Adjust recipes that include fats like butter or shortening 

by using unsweetened applesauce or prune puree for half 

the amount of fat.

 

DG TipSheet No. 24

March 2013

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov 

for more information.

 

United States

Department of 

Agriculture
No. 69714.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 65/10482 and 65/10484 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of stethoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 68126, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# L_2008286EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 286/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 286/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
From: dgrimm341@netzero.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:42:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dennis Grimm

Latrobe, PA 15650
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.8



2018 AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS 2018 AMENDMENT (this "Amendment"), made and entered into this 15 day of March, 2018, by and between Origin Bank (formerly Community Trust Bank), a bank organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"), and M. Lance Hall, an Employee of the Bank, an adult resident and domiciliary of Ruston, LA. ("Employee").
WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, Bank and Employee previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective the first day of October, 2008 (as amended, the "Agreement"), and 
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, Employer and Employee agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
Section 10.E. of the Agreement is hereby amended by the deletion of the first paragraph of that section, such that it shall read in its entirety as follows:
		
	E. 
	Notwithstanding the specific provisions as stated herein, all amounts to be paid to Employee pursuant to this Section 10 shall be paid, transferred or provided to the Employee by the Employer no later thm1 sixty (60) days following the Employee's termination of employment.


This Amendment shall be effective the 1st day of January 2018. To the extent that any term, provision, or paragraph of the Agreement is not specifically amended herein, or in any other amendment thereto, said term, provision, or paragraph shall remain in full force and effect as set forth in said Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto acknowledge that each has carefully read this Amendment and executed the original thereof on the first day set forth hereinabove, and that, upon execution, each has received a conforming copy.
	
				
	Origin Bank
	 
	M. Lance Hall

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	s/ Linda W. Tuten
	 
	/s/ M. Lance Hall

	 
	(Bank Officer other than Employee)
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Title:
	EVP/Chief People & Diversity Officer
No. 61597.

#### Judson Sheldon Division and National Carloading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 303891-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 15.1[Conyers Dill & Pearman Letterhead]5 May 2008   Focus Media Holding Limited DIRECT LINE: 2842 955628-30/F Zhao Feng World Trade Building E-MAIL: christopher.bickley@conyersdillandpearman.com369 Jiangsu Road OUR REF: RH/M#670853/D#214021(HK)Shanghai 100032 YOUR REF:China  Attention: Mr. Alex YangDear Sirs:We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Taxation — Cayman Islands” inthe annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of Focus Media HoldingLimited to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 5, 2008.     Yours faithfully,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER ON MOTION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THE EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST, et al, 

Plaintiffs, 

v.

ETHAN ENTERPRISES, INC., a 

Washington corporation; REBECCA S.

JOHNSON, individually, and 

GREGORY S. TIFT, individually, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C06-657RSM

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RELIEF

FROM PROTECTIVE ORDER 

This matter is now before the Court for consideration of plaintiffs’ motion for relief from a

protective order. Dkt. # 40. Plaintiffs seek relief from that portion of the Order on Motion to compel

(Dkt. # 22) which prohibits “disclosure of confidential personal or financial information to any third party,

apart from the Judgment Creditors’ legal counsel and involved representatives of the Judgment Creditors

themselves” so that they may respond to a subpoena duces tecum issued in Cause No. M08-069JPD. As

defendants have not opposed the motion, the motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs are relieved of

the requirements of ¶1, p.3 of the Court’s prior Order (Dkt. # 22) for the limited purpose of responding

to the subpoena duces tecum. Disclosure shall be limited to counsel for the judgment creditors in Cause

No. M08-069JPD and no other persons or agencies, absent further leave from the Court. 

DATED this 2 day of March 2009.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER (NO. C06-5292RBL) – 1

61211-0001/LEGAL12083808.1

THE HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP,

INC.; BERGDORF GOODMAN, INC.; AND 

NM NEVADA TRUST,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

DOTSTER, INC. A/K/A 

REVENUEDIRECT; AND

SCOTT FISH,

Defendants.

NO. C06-5292RBL

ORDER 

Good Cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave

to Amend and Supplement Complaint filed by Plaintiffs, the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.,

Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., and NM Nevada Trust, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file an amended

and supplemental Complaint in a form substantially identical to Exhibit A attached to Plaintiffs'

Motion for Leave. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: ADATED: November 21, 2006

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05292-RBL Document 21 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      1,165,1200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,200,950
<PP&E>                                         353,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,588,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,419,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,051
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,588,534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,098,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,102,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,104,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,104,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)


</TABLE>
Case No. 14,274.

#### The TUSKER.

[1 Spr. 71.] 1

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Dec., 1843.

Shipping — Carriers—Bill of Lading — Error in —Liability of Officers.

1. If through the negligence of the mate of a vessel, in taking account of cargo, a loss to the owner has necessarily resulted, he may be responsible therefor.

[Cited in The T. F. Whiton, Case No. 13,849.]

2. But if a mate by mistake, give drayage receipts for a greater quantity of merchandize than has been received, and a bill of lading is given for the amount of such receipts, the master is not bound to deliver to the shipper more than was actually received.

[Cited in Robinson v. Memphis & C. R. Co., 9 Fed. 139.]

3. If the master, having it in his power to prove the error in the bill of lading, voluntarily and without notice to the mate, pay to the consignee, who is acting only for the shipper, the difference between the amount delivered to him, and that stated in the bill of lading, the mate is not liable therefor.

In admiralty.

Edward Blake, for libellant.

A. H. Fiske, for claimant.

SPRAGUE, District Judge.

This is a libel for wages. The answer alleges that the li-bellant as mate of this brig, had the sole charge of taking on board a cargo at New Orleans, — and that through carelessness, he gave drayage receipts for 109 barrels of pork and received only 101. That the master being misled by such receipts, signed bills of lading for 109 barrels, and on arriving at Pos-ton having only 101 to deliver, paid to the consignee the value of the other eigljt barrels embraced in the bill of lading, and insists that the amount so paid should be deducted from the libellant’s wages. There are two insurmountable, objections to this defence; First, it is not proved that' the mate signed receipts for too many barrels, — second, if he had. and the error in the bill of lading was occasioned thereby, still he would not be bound to refund the amount paid, to the consignee. There had been no transfer of the bill of lading, or of the property. It still belonged to the shipper, and the consignee was merely his agent. The bill of lading consists of two parts, a receipt and a promise. It acknowledges that certain goods have been shipped and engages to deliver them. The receipt may be contradicted by parol. The master had it in his power to show that only 101 barrels were shipped. And the shipper had no claim whatever for more than that quantity. The master voluntarily paid the consignee for eight barrels for which he had no claim, and without any notice to the mate; this certainly cannot bind the mate to refund. If through the negligence of the libel-*392lant, a loss had necessarily resulted, he might have been responsible therefor, but it does not appear that any loss has necessarily resulted from the error in the bill of lading.

See Sutton v. Kettell [Case No. 13,647].

Decree for the amount of wages without deduction.
ORDER - 1 of 2 

(C05-5835 RJB) 

[pierce.reply.extend.ord.doc] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

LAW OFFICES

GORDON, THOMAS, HONEYWELL, MALANCA, 

PETERSON & DAHEIM LLP

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 2100 

POST OFFICE BOX 1157 

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98401-1157 

(253) 620-6500 - FACSIMILE (253) 620-6565

THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. BRYAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

CAMERON PIERCE and PATRICIA PIERCE, 

husband and wife; KAREN KIRBY, a single 

woman; MARY J. RAY, a single woman; 

GREGORY SHERMAN and PAULA 

SHERMAN, husband and wife, et al, 

 Plaintiffs 

vs. 

NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC, a foreign 

corporation, 

 Defendant. 

NO. C05-5835 RJB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE 

REPLY BRIEF ON FEBRUARY 27, 2006. 

This Court has considered defendant Novastar Mortgage, Inc.’s motion for one 

additional court day in which to file its reply brief to its underlying motion to dismiss. This 

Court acknowledges that the plaintiffs have agreed that one additional day is appropriate. 

THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that defendant Novastar Mortgage, Inc.’s motion to 

file its reply brief to the underlying motion to dismiss on Monday, February 27, 2006, is 

GRANTED. 

Dated this 15th day of February, 2006. A

ROBERT J. BRYAN 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 13 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER - 2 of 2 

(C05-5835 RJB) 

[pierce.reply.extend.ord.doc] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

LAW OFFICES

GORDON, THOMAS, HONEYWELL, MALANCA, 

PETERSON & DAHEIM LLP

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 2100 

POST OFFICE BOX 1157 

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98401-1157 

(253) 620-6500 - FACSIMILE (253) 620-6565

Presented By: 

GORDON, THOMAS, HONEYWELL, 

MALANCA, PETERSON & DAHEIM LLP 

By s/ 

 Salvador A. Mungia, WSBA No. 14807 

 smungia@gth-law.com 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 13 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyof the Taylorsville region, California**
 
Report | Plates: 0203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:353
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958188
 
July 30, 2018
Exhibit 10.14
 
  
 Re:
    
    Extension of Expatriate Employment Agreement between Hercules Offshore, Inc. and Don P.
Rodney
     1.
    
    Extension of Term: The Term of the Contract is hereby extended through October 31,
2011.2.
    
    Reporting Person. The person to whom you shall report as designated in Section 1 of
the Contract shall be changed from Lisa W. Rodriguez to Stephen M. Butz.3.
    
    Full Force and Effect. Except as modified herein, the Contract shall continue in
full force and effect according to its terms and conditions. This Letter, when accepted by
you, will become part of the Contract. In the event of any conflict or ambiguity between the
terms and provisions of this Letter and the terms and provisions of the Contract, the terms
and provisions of this Letter shall control.4.
    
    Entire Agreement. This Letter and the Contract contain the entire agreement between
the Company and you with respect to the subject matter of the Contract, and there are no
agreements, understandings, representations or warranties between the Company and you other
than those expressly referred to herein and in the Contract.




---



##### 



/s/ Stephen M. Butz
  By:/s/ Don P. Rodney
Don P. Rodney