alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1





Certification





In connection with the annual report of China Mass Media Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shengcheng Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1).               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2).               the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 29, 2011




By:
/s/ Shengcheng WangName:
Shengcheng WangTitle:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of the Tracy Arm-Fords Terror Wilderness study area and vicinity,Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1525
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960232
 
August 14, 2018
No. 58744.

protests 167434-K, etc. (New York).

#### Modernophone, Inc., and H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd FEURTADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6087.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided June 28, 2001.

Todd Feurtado, pro se.

Cameron Glenn Chandler, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit J.

PER CURIAM.

Todd Feurtado appeals three district court orders, the first denying relief on his *106motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000), the second denying his motion for a certificate of appealability, and the third denying his amended motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.**United States v. Feurtado,*Nos. CR-95-669; CA-99-350 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2000, Dec. 1, 2000 & Jan. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 We recently held in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Feurtado’s *Apprendi*claim is not cognizable.
No. 64633.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/13127, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68523.

protest 60/22458 (San Francisco).

#### Titus Pacific Corp. and Arthur J. Fritz *&*Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the vacuum brushes the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 99,410

In the Matter of E DWARD F. W ALSH , IV,

Petitioner

.
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

On May 16, 2008, this c ourt entered an order indefinitely suspending the petitioner ' s license to practice law

. See In re Walsh
, 286 Kan. 235
, 182 P.3d 1218 ( 2008 ).

On December 23, 2016, the petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement under Supre me Court Rule 219 (2017 Kan. S . Ct. R. 263)

. On June 14, 2017 , a hearing panel of
the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorney s conducted a hearing on the petitioner ' s petition for reinstatement. Thereafter, on July 12 , 2017, the hearing panel entered a final hearing report, recommending that the petitioner ' s petit i on for reinstatement be granted.

Th e court, after carefully considering the record, grants the petitioner ' s petition for reinstatement of his license to practice law in Kansas.

I T I S T HEREFORE O RDERED that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon hi s compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. Upon proof provided to the Clerk of the Appellate Cou rts that the petitioner has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing L egal Education Commission, the c lerk is
directed to enter the petitioner ' s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice
of law in Kansas.2

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED that this order be pu blished in the official Kansas R eports and that the costs herein be assessed to the petitioner.

Dated this 29th day of September, 2017.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theroutine mineralogical analysis of clay-bearing samples**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1563
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000962372
 
May 15, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEBORAH DOMINIQUE,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-110RSM

MINUTE ORDER SETTING 

 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold, United

States Magistrate Judge: 

A settlement conference will be held with the Honorable J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge,

at 9:00 a.m. on September 21, 2006. 

Settlement briefs/memorandums will be due by 4:00 p.m. on September 18, 2006. The briefs are

to be delivered to Judge Arnold’s chambers at 1717 Pacific Avenue, Courtroom D, Tacoma, Washington

98402, or delivered by facsimile to 253-882-3881. They are not to be filed. 

Counsel and the defendant are directed to be present in person. 

The foregoing Minute Order entered by /s/ Allyson P. Swan , Deputy Clerk,

this September 5, 2006. 

Case 2:06-cr-00110-RSM Document 71 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

November 2, 1966

No. P66/323.

#### Ucagco, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 284877-K/14740 (New Orleans).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 23-0026

)

STATE OF MONTANA )

Plaintiff/Appellee, ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION

 vs. ) TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO 

) STAY APPEAL

)

THOMAS WOJTOWICZ, ) 

 Defendant/Appellant. )

Upon review of the Defendant/Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to withdraw the Opposed 

Motion to Stay Appeal and Remand for Motion for New Trial, and good cause therefrom;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendant/Appellant’s to Withdraw his Motion to Stay

Appeal is granted. Appellant’s reply brief remains due February 29, 2024.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

_______________________________________

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

cc: Jami Rebsom

 Brad Fjeldheim

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 26 2024

02/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0026
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

AKLILUTA GIRMU, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-1798-MJB

)

v. ) ORDER

)

NORTHWEST BASEBALL UMPIRES, )

ASSOCIATION

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee. Plaintiff may proceed without

prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, and to issue summonses to

plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note

that it is his and/or his attorney’s responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint

along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2005.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01798-MJP Document 5 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 453/14 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 453 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6114 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 453

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6114 December 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2018/C 453/01 | Twentieth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2018/C 453/01

Twentieth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SafeStitch
Medical, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SafeStitch
      Medical, Inc.




By:
                      /s/
      Adam S. JacksonAdam
      S. JacksonChief Financial OfficerMay
      12,
2009





The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of SafeStitch Medical, Inc.
or the certifying officers.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 785 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 11, 2007.
Whereas in 2007, the city of Robstown, Texas, celebrates its centennial as the 
        ``Biggest Little Town in Texas'';
Whereas before Robstown became a city in Nueces County, Robstown was a major 
        thoroughfare north of the National Mexican Railway, making it vital for 
        trade and commerce between Mexico and the United States;
Whereas rancher and businessman Robert Driscoll conveyed territories encircling 
        the boundaries of Robstown, inspiring Robstown's name;
Whereas Robstown enters the 21st century as the crossroads of international 
        trade, being the location where the Texas Mexican Railway connects the 
        Port of Laredo with the Port of Corpus Christi and Interstate 69 will 
        intersect Texas State Highway 44;
Whereas Robstown is the home of a new fairgrounds and entertainment venue; the 
        future home of an inland port, which will be the first such port in the 
        United States; and the future home of an Army storage facility;
Whereas Robstown is one of the leading cotton producing areas in the United 
        States, at one time operating the most cotton gins in the United States 
        and later naming the mascot of the Robstown high school the ``Cotton 
        Picker'';
Whereas, a steadfast community in Nueces County, the residents of Robstown have 
        included legendary National Football League Hall of Famer Gene Upshaw; 
        Federal Judge Hilda Tagle; and numerous county, State, and Federally 
        elected officials;
Whereas Robstown has scheduled ``Century of Celebration'' festivities throughout 
        2007, beginning on January 1 and including a formal celebration on June 
        1 and the Cottonfest festival in October; and
Whereas Robstown's contributions to the history of the United States include 
        being the site of the first game of Texas Hold 'em poker: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 100th anniversary 
of Robstown, Texas, and commends all of the residents of Robstown and all other 
individuals who call Robstown home.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO MALDONADO-SANCHEZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5085M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( X ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 May 11, 2006.

__s/ Karen L. Strombom________________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05085-GHK Document 7 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
[westernluc10k123110ex231001.jpg]  Exhibit 23.1  Sam Kan & Company 1151 Harbor Bay Pkwy., Suite 101 Alameda, CA 94502 Phone: 510.517.7874 Fax: 866.848.1224 http://www.skancpa.com  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Forms 10-K of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2011, with respect to balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for the period from inception on July 14, 2008 through December 31, 2010 of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from the date of inception on July 14, 2008 to December 31, 2010.   /s/ Sam Kan & Company Firms Manual Signature Alameda, CA City, State March 15, 2011 Date
No. 62826.

#### Excel Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/3888 (New York).

*301Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
From: pfarina4@gmail.com [mailto:pfarina4@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Phil Farina

Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:47 PM

To: Jordan, Ronald

Cc: Flanders, Phillip; Matuszko, Jan; Thomas Finseth; Hall, Jessica; Sharon Demeo; Mark J. Kropilak Esq.; 

John Taylor

Subject: Re: ZVI technology for Se control (Mtg with Liberty Hydro)

We wanted to thank you all once again for your courtesy in visiting with the Liberty 

Hydro team last week. I have attached for your consideration some of the information 

you requested including a description of the technology, pilot plant installations and cost 

estimates.

If you have any further needs please do not hesitate to contact me directly. I would like 

to contact you in 2 weeks to schedule further discussions.

We look forward to working with you in meeting your clean water goals.

Phil Farina

Sales Executive

Liberty Hydro

Phil.farina@libertyhydro.com

419-346-8848
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SafeStitch Medical, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey G. Spragens, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Jeffrey G. SpragensJeffrey G. SpragensChief Executive Officer and PresidentAugust 14, 2012
CAUSE NO. 03-14-00315-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JADON NEWMAN

Appellant

v. 

FIRSTMARK CREDIT UNION

Appellee

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

Respectfully submitted,

Craig S. Smith

SBN 18553570

14493 S.P.I.D., suite A, P.M.B. 240

Corpus Christi, Tx. 78418

361 728 8037

csslawrr@gmail.com

ACCEPTED

03-14-00315-CV

6815264

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/7/2015 2:15:31 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/8/2015 12:00:00 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW Jadon Newman, respectfully showing the Court as follows:

1. Appellant is Jadon Newman; Appellee is Firstmark Credit Union.

2. This motion is filed on September 8, 2015. The deadline for filing

Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is September 8, 2015. 

3. Appellant requests an additional 7 days to file his Motion for Rehearing,

extending the time until September 15, 2015. 

4. This is Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file his Motion

for Rehearing. 

5. Appellant needs additional time to file his Motion for Rehearing because his

counsel is carefully studying the Court’s Opinion and needs more time to draft a

Motion for Rehearing. Counsel also has several other pressing cases which

consuming professional time. 

6. This motion is unopposed.
PRAYER

Appellant moves the Court for a 7 day extension of time within which to file

his Motion for Rehearing and for all other relief to which he is entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Craig S. Smith

Craig S. Smith

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND CONFERENCE

I Craig S. Smith certify that on September 8, 2015, I served the following

Counsel by email with this motion for extension of time. On September 2, 2015,

my co-counsel Peter Ruggero consulted with Lessie Fitzpatrick and she does not

oppose this motion.

Lessie Fitzpatrick

Lfitzpatrick@FBHS.com

Lisa Fancher

Lfancher@FBHS.com

98 San Jacinto Blvd, suite 2000

Austin, Tx. 78701

/s/ Craig S. Smith

Craig S. Smith