alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 81 

To express the sense of the House of Representatives that the maximum 

Pell Grant should be increased to $5,800. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2007 

Mr. WU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the maximum Pell Grant should be increased to $5,800. 

Whereas a college education has become increasingly important, not just to the individual beneficiary, but to the Nation as a whole, and the growth and continued expansion 

of the Nation’s economy is heavily dependent on an educated and highly skilled workforce; 

Whereas the opportunity to gain a college education also is 

important to the Nation as a means to help advance the 

American ideals of progress and equality; 

Whereas the Federal Government plays an invaluable role in 

making student financial aid available to ensure that 

qualified students are able to attend college, regardless of 

their financial means; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 81 IH 

Whereas, since the inception of the Pell Grant program in 

1973, nearly 80,000,000 grants have helped low- and 

middle-income students go to college, enrich their lives, 

and become productive members of society; 

Whereas nationwide, almost 65 percent of high school graduates continue on to higher education; 

Whereas this degree of college participation would not exist 

without the Federal investment in student aid, especially 

the Pell Grant program; 

Whereas nearly 25 percent of all undergraduate students receive some amount of Pell Grant funding; 

Whereas in the next 10 years, the number of undergraduate 

students enrolled in the Nation’s colleges and universities 

will increase by 11 percent to more than 11,000,000 students, many of these students will be the first in their 

families to attend college, and one in 5 of these students 

will be from families with incomes below the poverty level; 

Whereas the continued investment in the Pell Grant program 

is essential if college is to remain an achievable part of 

the American dream; 

Whereas increasing the maximum Pell Grant to $5,800 would 

result in a $1,750 increase in the maximum grant award; 

and 

Whereas because Pell Grant recipients are more likely to 

graduate with student loan debt and to amass more debt 

than other student borrowers, increasing the maximum 

Pell Grant to $5,800 will help remedy this disparity: 

Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 81 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the maximum Pell Grant should be in3 creased to $5,800. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-56;1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annualreport;2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included inthese reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.     Date: March 24, 2006       By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale  Name: Ellen Z. Lamale  Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Rinde v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 17 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1 Doc. 17

Dockets.Justia.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,049)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,949
<PP&E>                                          15,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,477)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,182
<SALES>                                         15,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,907
<CGS>                                           10,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
No. 58283.

protest 190307-K (Philadelphia).

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Allen Forwarding Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

September 22, 1955

No. 59285.

protest 243074-K (B) (New York).

#### E. Miltenberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dental instruments, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 165 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 165

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
```

[House Prints 114-1]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 

                      [COMMITTEE PRINT] 

________________________________________________________________

 
                       A COMPENDIUM OF 

                    LAWS AND RULES OF THE 

                 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET PROCESS 

                           __________

                  COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET 

               U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                        AUGUST 2015 

                      Serial No. CP-1 

     Printed for the use of the Committee on the Budget 

                          _____

                  U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

96-107                     WASHINGTON : 2015

_____________________________________________________________
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll 
free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 
Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 

[TEXT NOT AVAILABLE]
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Dated:  June 4, 2008
    /s/  SALLY FRAME KASAKSSally Frame KasaksChief Executive Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer) Dated:  June 4, 2008
    /s/  MICHAEL L. HENRYMichael L. HenryChief Financial Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD BASKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., 

Defendants,

Case No. C06-5130FDB

REPORT AND

 RECOMMENDATION

 

 NOTED FOR:

JULY 21st, 2006

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. 

This action was filed in March of 2006. (Dkt. # 1). Plaintiff alleges he was unlawfully denied a transfer to

work camp, that the amount of funds in his account is improper, and that he is not being properly medicated. 

Plaintiff failed to connect any allegation with a named defendant. Further, he has no liberty interest in transfer

to any given facility. Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983). The court ordered plaintiff to file an amended

complaint and he has not done so. (Dkt. # 10). The court specifically warned plaintiff:

If an amended complaint is not timely filed, or if plaintiff fails to adequately correct the

deficiencies identified in this Order, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action as

frivolous.

(Dkt. # 10).

Case 3:06-cv-05130-FDB Document 15 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 2

Plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order to amend and has instead filed “motions for

clarification” in which he argues he has a liberty interest in proceeding to work camp.

The court recommends the action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the

order to amend and for failure to comply with a court order. (Dkt. # 10). A proposed order accompanies this

Report and Recommendation. This dismissal will count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (g). 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ.

P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to

set the matter for consideration on July 14th, 2006, as noted in the caption. 

DATED this 29th day of June, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05130-FDB Document 15 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GARY F. ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v.

KEN QUINN,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5217 FDB/KLS

 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

 CHANGE CASE CAPTION AND

 FOR SERVICE AND RETURN,

 § 2254 PETITION

In response to the court’s order that petitioner must properly name the superintendent of the

facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated, petitioner has timely responded. (See, Dkt. # 5, 7). 

Accordingly, the court finds that Petitioner’s motion to change the case caption should be

GRANTED and directs service of his § 2254 petition, as follows: 

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order. The clerk will also send

a courtesy copy of the petition to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office Criminal Justice

Division. 

Case 3:06-cv-05217-RBL Document 8 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondent should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05217-RBL Document 8 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES, COSTS AND

EXPENSES [C06-5018KLS] - 1

Elie Halpern & Associates, P.S.

1800 Cooper Pt. Road SW, Bldg. 19

Olympia, WA 98502

(360) 753-8055

United States District Judge RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

MARY J. RETHKE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL NO. C06-5018KLS

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES, COSTS AND

EXPENSES

THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the undersigned upon by

Plaintiff’s Motion to Award EAJA Fees, Costs, and Expenses, the Defendant not

opposing said motion, and the Court agreeing that EAJA fees, costs, and expenses

should be awarded, good cause having been shown, now, therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorney Elie Halpern is hereby awarded EAJA fees of

$4,058.70 and expenses of $72.50 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412 and costs of $19.75 as

Case 3:06-cv-05018-RBL Document 22 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES, COSTS AND

EXPENSES [C06-5018KLS] - 2

Elie Halpern & Associates, P.S.

1800 Cooper Pt. Road SW, Bldg. 19

Olympia, WA 98502

(360) 753-8055

set out at 28 U.S.C. §1920, payable from the Judgment Fund pursuant to 31 U.S.C.

§1304.

DATED this 7th day of August, 2006.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

S/ELIE HALPERN____________

ELIE HALPERN, WSBA #1519

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-05018-RBL Document 22 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Transition  Report of Consumer  Capital Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the  transition  period  from July 1, 2010 to
December 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jianmin Gao, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Jianmin Gao
-----------------------------------
Jianmin Gao
Principal Financial Officer
March 31, 2011
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert
Smith, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report of Nugent Engine Technologies, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
other small business issuer's certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





/s/ Robert Smith


By Robert
Smith


Chief
Executive Officer


March 31,
2010