# Patent

## Title
Method and kit for the classification and prognosis of wounds

## Abstract

The invention relates to a method and kit for identifying chronic or acute mammalian wound tissue or for determining the prognosis of mammalian wound tissue based upon the identification of at least one key set of molecular markers or genes whose expression pattern is indicative of a given wound type and so representative of a given prognosis.

## Background
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a filing under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT/GB2010/001696 filed with the Patent Cooperation Treaty on Sep. 8, 2010, which claims priority to and benefit of Great Britain Patent Application No. GB 0916124.1, filed Sep. 15, 2009, all of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.
REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING
The Sequence Listing submitted Mar. 12, 2012, as a text file named “UCC—0029P_ST25.txt,” created on Mar. 9, 2012, and having a size of 6.88 Kilo bytes is hereby incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method and kit, including parts thereof, for the classification and prognosis of mammalian and, in particular, human wounds. More specifically, the method involves identifying one or more gene expression patterns that enables one to distinguish between ‘abnormal or non-healing’ chronic wounds or ‘normally healing’ acute wounds. Advantageously, the said gene expression pattern(s) allow(s) informed decision making in the selection of treatment and the prediction of outcome following use of a given therapy. Further the invention identifies new targets for use in wound therapy.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In one form or another, non-healing or chronic i.e. poorly healing wounds constitute a major burden on the UK health system. Moreover, in certain member countries of the EU health expenses relating to wound healing are already approaching the third most expensive drain on health care funding.
Chronic foot ulcers are a major complication of diabetes, accounting for up to 25% of all hospital admissions involving diabetes, and at a cost to the UK National Health Service of £250M annually. Chronic foot ulcers cause substantial morbidity, impair the quality of life, and are the major cause of lower limb amputation. Despite careful attention to foot care, as many as 25% of diabetics develop foot ulcers in their lifetimes. The causes of lower limb ulceration are the same in diabetics as in non-diabetics, namely neuropathy, ischaemia and trauma. Moreover, this “pathogenic triad” predisposes wounds to infection, which can also contribute to the non-healing nature of the wounds.
Current treatment involves removing pressure from the area, debridement, wound dressing and management of infection: surgical resection and vascular reconstruction may be required in more advanced disease which, ultimately, may necessitate amputation.
In addition to lower limb ulcers in diabetics, another major resource health cost is created by pressure wounds or ulcers that result, for example, from failure to provide routine nursing or medical care. In the UK 412,000 people are affected annually by this sort of wound at a cost of £1.4-2.1 billion.
The healing of a wound is controlled by complex biological processes that involve a diverse number of cell types; complex interactions between cells and tissues; the activation of the immune system and the activation of the angiogenic process.
A typical healing process can be divided into 5 distinct, but closely related, stages: clotting stage, acute inflammation stage, matrix deposition stage, capillary formation stage and re-epithelialisation stage. A diverse number of factors controls each of these stages. Deficiencies in any aspect of the process may result in defective wound healing. Thus, a ‘normal’ healing process may be defective as a result of either intrinsic or external factors, which manifest as ‘abnormal or non-healing’ i.e. chronic wounds. It is these ‘non-healing’ or chronic wounds that present the greatest challenge to the quality of a patient's life and mounting expenses to the healthcare system.
Although some common clinical/pathological factors may assist in pre judging if a wound may be ‘healing’ or ‘non-healing’, or if an acute wound may become chronic, there is no specific laboratory test(s) to distinguish wound type. Additionally, there is no clear way to define how to predict the healing process and a patient's likely response to treatment in wound care.
We have therefore developed a method for determining the prognosis of a given wound which is relatively straightforward to perform, efficient to undertake and provides an accurate indication of the likely outcome, before or during treatment, of a wound. Our method uses a small but highly representative sample of markers which distinguishes between acute wounds and chronic wounds and is therefore particularly relevant in the selection of treatment for a given wound and particularly accurate in determining the likely outcome, following treatment, of a given wound.
In summary, we have identified a plurality of molecular markers that have relevance in determining the prognosis of a given wound. Collectively these markers constitute at least one molecular signature and the expression of these markers in wound tissue from a patient constitutes a gene expression pattern that is indicative of a given wound type and prognosis. In addition to this, we have analysed the said molecular signature in order to identify which markers are the best indicators of wound type and prognosis, in other words those that contribute most to the predictive ability of the molecular signature. This subset of markers is known, collectively, as the refined molecular signature and the expression of these markers constitutes a refined gene expression pattern.
Reference herein to the term marker is reference to one named gene whose full identity is available on the www.NCBI.LM.NIH.gov database via its accession details, or is well known to those skilled in the art, please see Appendix-1. Moreover, a collection of these markers, or molecular signature, is to be construed accordingly.
The elucidation of the molecular signatures described herein has involved the systematic and careful examination of, in the first instance, 34 samples of wound tissue and 110 genetic molecular markers and, in the second instance, validation studies involving 71 samples of wound tissue and investigations to identify the use of the markers described herein.
However, having completed this arduous task we have, surprisingly, found that, in fact, very few genes need to be examined in order to provide an accurate classification and prognosis for a given sample of wound tissue. Even more surprisingly, we have been able to further reduce this number by identifying those molecular markers that contribute most to the predictive ability of our molecular signature, so for example, only 25 or, more ideally, 14 genes need to be examined. This means that our methodology has immediate application and can be performed quickly and routinely in a clinical context. In fact, we suggest that our methodology forms part of the standard treatment regime of wound care so that the relevant clinician can, at an early stage, determine the classification and outcome of a particular wound and so match the treatment accordingly. Thus, for example, in the case of an individual who presents with a signature indicative of an ‘abnormal’ or chronic wound a thorough and aggressive form of therapy might be prescribed. Conversely, if an individual has a signature indicative of a ‘normally healing’ or acute wound, the clinician can prescribe a less aggressive treatment, thereby saving the patient from any unnecessary distress and unwanted side effects and also saving the NHS from any costly and unnecessary, intervention. Our method therefore not only serves to ensure that individuals receive treatment tailored to their wound status, but it can improve the quality of a patient's life during treatment, by ensuring that aggressive therapy is only prescribed in those cases where it is necessary.
STATEMENTS OF INVENTION
Accordingly, in one aspect of the invention there is provided a method for identifying chronic mammalian wound tissue or for determining the prognosis of mammalian wound tissue, which method comprises:
(a) examining a sample of wound tissue from an individual in order to determine the levels of expression of genes encoding the molecular markers shown in Table 2, and;
(b) where the following genes show decreased expression:

    ARP2, CREB1l, VEGF-C, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, CAR1 and Endomuscin-2, and;


(c) where the following gene shows normal expression:

    TEM4 and;


(d) where the following genes show increased expression:

    Psoriasin, IL22R, KAI1, PTPRK, and TEM7R,


(e) concluding that the individual from whom the tissue sample has been taken has a chronic wound.
In yet a further preferred method of the invention additional studies are undertaken to determine whether any one or more of the following markers show a decreased level of expression:

    VEGF-D, IL17C, β-Catenin, RON, BMP15, PEDF, RhoGDI-G and N-WASP and/or;


any one or more of the following markers show a normal level of expression:

    WAVE2, AMFR, PAR4;


and, where this is the case, concluding that the individual from whom the tissue sample has been taken has a chronic wound.
In a second independent aspect of the invention there is provided a method for identifying acute mammalian wound tissue or for determining the prognosis of mammalian wound tissue, which method comprises:
(a) examining a sample of wound tissue from an individual in order to determine the levels of expression of genes encoding the molecular markers in Table 2, and;
(b) where the following genes show increased expression:

    ARP2, CREB1l, Psoriasin, IL22R, TEM4, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, KAI1, PTPRK, CAR1 and TEM7R; and


(c) concluding that the individual from whom the tissue sample has been taken has an acute wound.
In yet a further preferred method of the invention additional studies are undertaken to determine whether either of the following markers shows normal expression VEGF-C and Endomuscin-2 and, where this is the case, concluding that the individual from whom the sample has been taken has an acute wound.
In yet a further preferred method of the invention additional studies are undertaken to determine whether any one or more of the following markers show an increased level of expression:

    VEGF-D, IL17C, RON, WAVE2, N-WASP and AMFR, PAR4 and/or;


any one or more of the following markers show a normal level of expression:

    β-Catenin, BMP15 and/or;


any one or more of the following markers show a decreased level of expression PEDF, RhoGDI-G; and
where this is the case, concluding that the individual from whom the tissue sample has been taken has an acute wound.
In the above methods of the invention said first and second aspects may be undertaken on a selected sample of wound tissue either simultaneously or sequentially and, when the said methods are undertaken sequentially the skilled worker may choose whether the method pertaining to the first aspect of the invention is undertaken before or after the method pertaining to the second aspect of the invention and, in any event, the invention described herein is intended to cover any order or combination of said methods.
In each of the above methods of the invention, the assay is, ideally, undertaken using human tissue.
In each of the above methods of the invention, ideally, the sample of tissue that is examined is assayed for the presence of RNA, preferably total RNA and, more preferably still, the amount of mRNA. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that techniques available for measuring RNA content are well known and, indeed, routinely practiced by those in the clinical diagnostics field. Such techniques may include reverse transcription of RNA to produce cDNA and an optional amplification step followed by the detection of the cDNA or a product thereof.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention the method involves assaying for the protein encoded by each of the said molecular markers and so, typically, but not exclusively, involves the use of agents that bind to the relevant proteins and so identify same. Common agents are antibodies and, most ideally, monoclonal antibodies which, advantageously, have been labelled with a suitable tag whereby the existence of the bound antibody can be determined. Assay techniques for identifying proteins are well known to those skilled in the art and, indeed, used every day by workers in the field of clinical diagnostics. Such assay techniques may be applied by the skilled worker to utilise the invention.
In further preferred methods of working the invention the level of expression of a given molecular marker is determined having regard to a reference gene (such as, but not limited to, GAPDH) within a control sample, wherein the control sample is a sample of normal tissue, ideally normal skin tissue, more ideally still, normal tissue taken from the same limb or region as the wound tissue to be assayed and, further, from the same or a different individual as the patient providing the test sample. Thus increased expression refers to an increase in expression of a selected gene having regard to the expression of, for example, GAPDH in the respective tissue. Conversely, decreased expression refers to a decrease in expression of a selected gene having regard to, for example, GAPDH expression in the respective tissue. Alternatively, the level of expression of a given molecular marker is determined having regard to a reference gene, wherein the reference gene is the same gene or another selected gene (such as a housekeeping gene) within a control sample, wherein the control sample is a sample of known non-healing chronic wound tissue or known acute wound tissue, ideally from the same limb or region as the wound tissue to be examined and, in this instance, one is looking to see whether the same expression pattern of the selected genes exists as that in the known wound tissue.
Alternatively still, the said control is a recognised standard for expression of each relevant gene in a healthy individual.
Ideally, increased or decreased expression is statistically relevant at the 5% confidence level or less.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention the level of gene expression may be measured by real-time quantitative PCR, using a method disclosed in Jiang et al 2003a and 2004. [Jiang W G, Watkins G, Lane J, Douglas-Jones A, Cunnick G H, Mokbel M, Mansel R E. Prognostic value of Rho family and rho-GDIs in breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003a, 9, 6432-6440; Jiang W G, Watkins G, Fodstad O, Douglas-Jones A, Mokbel K, Mansel R E. Differential expression of the CCN family members Cyr61 from CTGF and Nov in human breast cancer. Endocrine Related Cancers, 2004, 11: 781-791].
According to yet a further aspect of the invention there is provided a kit for performing any one or more of the aforementioned methods wherein said kit comprises:
(a) a plurality of probes limited to those for detecting and quantifying the expression level of all the molecular markers specified in Table 2; and
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes.
In yet a further preferred aspect of the invention there is provided a kit for determining the prognosis of mammalian wound tissue which comprises:
(a) a plurality of probes limited to those for detecting and quantifying the expression level of at least one transcript or polypeptide/protein of each one of the genes in Table 2, and;
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes.
Ideally, the instructions describe how to determine the expression level of each of said genes.
In yet a further embodiment of the invention, said kit additionally comprises:
(a) a plurality of probes limited to those for detecting and quantifying the expression level of at least one further molecular marker specified in Table 1 but not shown in Table 2; and
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes.
In yet a further embodiment of the invention, said kit additionally comprises:
(a) a plurality of probes limited to those for identifying and quantifying the expression level of at least one transcript or polypeptide/protein of at least one gene shown in Table 1 but not shown in Table 2; and
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes.
Ideally, the instructions describe how to determine the expression level of each of said genes.
In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a kit comprising or containing any selected combination of the aforementioned sets of probes for identifying the aforementioned sets of molecular markers or genes.
According to a yet further aspect of the invention there is provided a microarray comprising or containing any one or more of the aforementioned sets of probes for identifying the expression of any one or more of the aforementioned molecular markers or genes.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a kit for determining wound type in a patient, which kit comprises:
(a) at least one microarray comprising a plurality of probes limited to those for identifying at least one set of the molecular markers described in the above methods; and, optionally,
(b) a second microarray comprising a plurality of probes limited to those for identifying the same set of molecular markers in an internal standard that represents the normal level of expression of said markers.
The invention also provides a set of probes as described above.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method for treating a wound which comprises performing any one or more of the above methods for determining the classification or prognosis of wound tissue in order to identify whether said wound tissue is non-healing chronic wound tissue or acute wound tissue and then selecting an appropriate course of treatment based upon the said classification or prognosis of said tissue.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a collection of target genes, as shown in Table 2, for use in the development of novel wound healing treatments.



The present invention will now be described by way of the following examples with particular reference to Tables 1-2 and FIGS. 1-3 wherein:
Table 1 shows the 25 genes comprising the molecular signature of the invention;
Table 1b shows the primers used to quantify the expression of the genes shown in Table 1;
Table 2 shows the 14 genes comprising the refined molecular signature of the invention;
Tables 3-12 show the data obtained when using the 25 gene molecular signature or the 14 refined gene molecular signature to classify wound tissue;
FIG. 1 shows monitoring the healing process by electric cell sensing (ECIS). A monolayer of cells in the ECIS chambers were wounded at 5 v 30 sec (indicated). The change of electric impedance was monitored before and after wounding. Three hours after wounding, the migration/healing reached its stable phase;
FIG. 2 shows morphological evaluation of wounding using the ECIS based wounding assay. Confluent cells on electrode were wounded at 6 v for 60 seconds, after which the migration of cells into the wounding space was recorded over a 4 hour period. After 3 hours, the wounds were largely healed; and
FIG. 3 shows morphological evaluation of wounding using the scratch wounding assay. Confluent cells on electrode were wounded, after which the migration of cells into the wounding space was recorded over a 6 hour period. After 3 hours, the wounds were largely healed.



MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE
Cells (A431, HECV, MRC5, HaCaT,) were purchased from ATCC, InterLab, ECACC and German Cancer Institute and maintained in tissue culture media supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics. Recombinant human HGF was from the applicants' research laboratory. (Metastasis and Angiogenesis Research Group, University Department of Surgery, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK).
Tissues Processing
Tissue preparation and construction of cDNA bank from human wound/skin tissues.
Tissues were frozen sectioned on a cryostat (Leica). A portion of the sections were kept for histological analysis. Approximate 20 sections were pooled and homogenised using a hand-held homogenizer using a procedure to extract RNA from the tissues. See below.
RNA extracted from the tissues was quantified and a cDNA bank was generated from equal amount of RNA.
Expression levels of sets of gene transcripts were analysed on a cohort of samples from patients with acute or chronic wounds as well as normal skin. The tissues and normal skins were collected under an approval from the local ethical committee (Ethical approval ID: 05/WSE03/92). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient who agreed to a biopsy being taken. Chronic wound tissues were from patients with chronic leg ulcers. Acute wound tissues were obtained from patients with acute surgical wounds after under going excision of pilonidal disease. Normal tissues were from normal volunteer's normal skin.
Extraction of RNA From Cells and Tissues and cDNA Synthesis
Frozen sections of tissues were cut at a thickness of 5-10 μm and were kept for immunohistochemistry and routine histology (Jiang W G, Watkins G, Lane J, Douglas-Jones A, Cunnick G H, Mokbel M, Mansel R E. Prognostic value of Rho family and rho-GDIs in breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003a, 9, 6432-6440). A further 15-20 sections were homogenised using a hand-held homogeniser, in ice-cold RNA extraction solution (RNA isolation reagent, ABgene, Surrey, England). The concentration of RNA was determined using a UV spectrophotometer (Jiang W G, Watkins G, Lane J, Douglas-Jones A, Cunnick G H, Mokbel M, Mansel R E. Prognostic value of Rho family and rho-GDIs in breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003a, 9, 6432-6440). Reverse transcription was carried using a RT kit with an anchored oligo-dt primer supplied by AbGeneTM, using 1 μg total RNA in 96-well plate. The quality of cDNA was verified using β-actin primers. RNA extraction kit and RT kit were obtained from AbGene Ltd, Surrey, England, UK. PCR primers (see Table 1b) were designed using Beacon Designer (California, USA) and synthesised by InvitrogenTM Ltd (Paisley, Scotland, UK). Molecular biology grade agarose and DNA ladder were from Invitrogen. Mastermix for routine PCR and quantitative PCR was from AbGene.
Quantitative Analysis of Genetic Markers
The transcript level of the said genes (Tables 1 and 2) from the above-prepared cDNA was determined using a real-time quantitative PCR, based on the AmplifuorTM technology (Nazarenko I A, Bhatnagar S K, Hohman R J. A closed tube format for amplification and detection of DNA based on energy transfer. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Jun. 15; 25(12):2516-21); modified from a method previously reported (Jiang W G, Watkins G, Lane J, Douglas-Jones A, Cunnick G H, Mokbel M, Mansel R E. Prognostic value of Rho family and rho-GDIs in breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003a, 9, 6432-6440; and Jiang W G, Douglas-Jones A, and Mansel R E. Level of expression of PPAR-gamma and its co-activator (PPAR-GCA) in human breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 2003b, 106, 752-757). Briefly, a pair of PCR primers (see Table 1b) were designed using the Beacon Designer software (version 2, Biosoft, Palo Alto, Calif., USA). To one of the primers (routinely to the antisense primer in our laboratory), an additional sequence, known as the Z sequence (5′ actgaacctgaccgtaca′3) which is complementary to the universal Z probe (Nazarenko et at 1997, as above) (Intergen Inc., England, UK), was added. A TaqmanTM detection kit for β-actin was purchased from Perkin-ElmerTM.
The reaction was carried out using the following: Hot-start Q-master mix (Abgene), 10 pmol of specific forward primer, 1 pmol reverse primer which has the Z sequence, 10 pmol of FAM-tagged probe (Intergen Inc.), and cDNA from approximate 50 ng RNA (calculated from the starting RNA in the RT reaction). The reaction was carried out using IcyclerIQTM (Bio-RadTM, Hemel Hamstead, England, UK) which is equipped with an optic unit that allows real time detection of 96 reactions, using the following condition: 94° C. for 12 minutes, 50 cycles of 94° C. for 15 seconds, 55° C. for 40 seconds and 72° C. for 20 seconds (Jiang W G, Douglas-Jones A, and Mansel R E. Level of expression of PPAR-gamma and its co-activator (PPAR-GCA) in human breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 2003b, 106, 752-757 and Jiang W G, Grimshaw D, Lane J, Martin T A, Parr C, Davies G, Laterra J, and Mansel R E. Retroviral hammerhead transgenes to cMET and HGF/SF inhibited growth of breast tumour, induced by fibroblasts. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003c, 9, 4274-4281). The levels of the transcripts were generated from an internal standard (Jiang W G, Watkins G, Lane J, Douglas-Jones A, Cunnick G H, Mokbel M, Mansel R E. Prognostic value of Rho family and rho-GDIs in breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2003a, 9, 6432-6440) that was simultaneously amplified with the samples. The results are shown here in two ways: levels of transcripts based on equal amounts of RNA, or as a target/GAPDH ratio.
Deciphering the Expression Pattern and Deduction of the Molecular Signature
The pattern of expression of the gene transcripts was first analysed against the nature of the samples using Minitab software (Minitab Inc., State College, Pa. 16801, USA). ‘refining’—Selection of potential candidates: this is based on a Macro (WD-Sig Macro) written for the study cohort by the Inventors that allows automatic statistical analysis of expression levels in different tissue type within the Minitab application window. ‘selection of final list’: this is based on the characteristics of a given gene transcript and its ability to discreetly separate the chronic group from other groups. This involved the use of Excel (Microsoft Office 2007 version, used for grouping and calculation of basic statistics), SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., US, for advanced statistical analysis within the three groupings) and Minitab analysis (for non-parametric Kriskul Wallis test) tool. ‘compilation of expression signature’. This is again based on an ‘add one and minus one’ procedure by using the multiple cells tabulation methods, using a macro written for the study. The macro allows one to automatically and rapidly conduct statistical analysis within Minitab software, after removing candidate genes from the list.
Manufacturing the ‘refined’ kit. After finalising the gene signature, we manufactured the testing kit, based on the signature, by first making up all the test materials for the test genes and then automatically pipetting into 96 well plates, which were ready for use in testing clinical and cell materials. The kit was made in the laboratory and stored at −20° C. until use.
In Vitro Wound Assays and Validation Studies.
Monitoring the healing process using electric cell sensing (ECIS).
The ECIS 1600R model instrument and 8W10 arrays (Applied Biophysics Inc, NJ, US) were used in the study. After treating the array surface with a Cysteine solution, the arrays were incubated with complete medium for 1 hour. The same number of lung cancer cells, HaCat, A431 and HECV (200,000 per well) were added to each well (cell free was the control). The cells were then immediately subject to wounding using the integrated elevated field module in the instrument in the 1600R model (5 v, 30 seconds for each well). The changes of cellular impedance were immediately recorded after wounding (400, 4000 and 40,000 Hz). The data was analysed using the ECIS RbA modelling software, supplied by the manufacturer. At the respective time point, images from cells were taken to verify the healing status of the cells.
Monitoring the healing process using time-lapsed videography.
In order to ascertain the healing process as seen in ECIS and in a scratch wounding assay, the healing was monitored morphologically using the following two methods on a time lapse video: electric induced wounding and scratch wounding assays. The former was based on the ECIS model, in which a confluent monolayer of cells was electronically wounded and the healing (migration of cells into the wounding space over the electrode) was monitored (before and after wounding). The latter was based on scratching the monolayer of cells using a fine plastic scraper, followed by monitoring. The monitoring lasted for up to 6 hours or until the wound closed.
Validation studies using in vitro cell models.
Human endothelial cells, fibroblasts, melanoma cells, and keratinocytes were used. Cells or cell mixtures were allowed to reach confluence in a 6 well plate. They were then wounded using a plastic scraper. Multiple wounds (20) were created in each well. A wounded cell layer was allow to recover over 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours and 7 hours periods, representing the ‘acute’ (1 and 2 hours) and ‘healed’ (4 and 7 hours) phases of the study (deduced from, FIG. 1). RNA was extracted and cDNAs were generated as above. The expression profile of the wound signature was tested on these samples.
Statistical Analysis
was conducted using Minitab, SPSS and an online Chi-square service tool (http://www.people.ku.edu/ ̃preacher/chisq/chisq.htm).
Part 1
Identification of Wound Signatures
34 human tissues were used, which comprised 14 chronic wound tissues, 10 acute wound tissues and 10 normal skins.
2 sets of gene signature were obtained:
WDsig-1: this has a list of 25 genes that allow evaluation of the fate of a given wound and guidance for treatment (gene list in Table-1).
WDsig-2: this refined molecular signature was deduced from WDsig-1 and has a list of 14 genes which form the final list of the product and allows one to predict the fate of a wound (gene list in Table-2)
Wound Signatures and Healing of Wounds
The refined molecular signature WDsig-2 allows clear distinction of a chronic wound from acute wound and normal skin.
We have used two criteria to distinguish the wounds:
To predict the nature of the wound by distinguishing chronic wounds from acute wounds and normal skin with near ‘zero’ overlapping a calculation pattern (referred to here as AO>10) was obtained that returns with a Chi-square value of 25.33 (p=0.00000316). 100% of chronic wounds were predicted and 90% of acute wounds predicted. (Table-3). To predict the nature of the wound by distinguishing chronic wounds from acute wounds with ‘zero’ overlapping a calculation pattern (referred to here as AO123d) was obtained that returns with a Chi-square value of 25.868 (p=0.00000268). 100% of chronic wounds were predicted and 100% of acute wounds predicted. (Table-4).
In Table 5 we show the data that demonstrates that acute wounds can be clearly distinguished from chronic wounds (Table-5), using the refined molecular signature and the F5>5 format of data analysis. The refined signature provided a clear distinction between the two types of wounds (p=0.00000676).
In Tables 6 we show the data that demonstrates that acute wounds can be distinguished from normal skin (Table-6a) and chronic wounds can be distinguished from normal skin (Table-6b). As shown in the respective table, the refined molecular signature also enables one to distinguish between normal skin and acute or chronic wounds, respectively, although the statistical power is weaker for normal/chronic wounds.
Moreover, work using the WDsig-1 also allows a clear distinction between chronic wound, acute wound and normal skin.
We have used two criteria to distinguish the wounds:
To distinguish acute wound from chronic wounds and normal skin we have used a two group fashion (Table-7).
To distinguish chronic wounds from acute wounds and normal skin we have also used a three group fashion (Table-8).
Validation of Signatures Using In Vitro Wound Healing Model.
The validation was first carried out using the ECIS model and wounding assay in order to obtain the best time point(s) for such a study, following which, the analysis was carried out using the manufactured refined molecular signature kit.
In Vitro Wounding Model and Point of Monitoring.
This experiment was to determine the appropriate time points for the ‘acute’ and ‘chronic/healed’ phases. Cell monolayer was electrically wounded and the healing process recorded. As shown in FIG. 1, 1-2.5 hours after wounding, the healing process was in its linear phase, thus representing the best time point for a rapid (acute) healing process. After 3 hours, the healing process reached its stable phase, thus representing the ‘healed/stable’ stage. The unwounded cells; 2 hours; and 4 hours were therefore chosen to represent the three possible stage of healing: unwounded, acute and healed. The electric signal was fully supported by the morphological changes of the cells (FIGS. 2 and 3).
A431 Cell Model.
The wounding and monitoring time points. The initial validation was based on a cell model, which may reflect the healing nature of a human wound: the co-cultured endothelial, fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Here, HECV endothelial cells, MRC5 fibroblasts and A431 melanocytes, in a ratio of 20:10:100, were allowed to reach confluence. The cells were wounded. The recovery allowed for 1 hour, 2 hours and 4 hours. We took the non-wounded monolayer as non-wound, 2 hours after wounding as acute wounding where the repair is at the most active stage, and 4 hours as near complete healing (as the wounds were mostly closed).
The refined molecular signature showed the rapid rise of expression profile during the ‘acute’ phase. The signature of expression returns to normal ‘non-wounded’ level. As shown in the following table, the pattern of expression and the power of prediction of the ‘in vitro wounding healing’ is similar to that seen in human wounds (p=0.00000374, Table 9).
HaCat Cell Model.
Similar to the A431 model, a similar pattern was seen with the HaCaT cell model. The keratinocytes migrate at a slower pace. The healing stage was therefore divided into acute (3 hours) and healed (6 hours). The change of gene pattern resulted in a significant difference between the unwounded, acute and healed (p=0.003887, Table-10).
Endothelial Cell Model.
Using the endothelial cell wounding model, the change of the refined signature was also found to be highly significant (Table-11).
We further adopted the Endothelial/fibroblast co-culture model by plate HECV and MRC5 cells at a ratio of 5:1. Wounding assay using this cell model showed a similar change of gene expression pattern (Table-12).
Discussion
The present invention has provided a novel tool in order to distinguish between non-healing, chronic or acute wounds. It is believed that this makes it the first such molecular signature derived from a clinical setting. In addition, the validation study using in vitro cell models has shown the validity of the signature in evaluating the healing process.
The biological impact of the signature can be read from the nature of the candidates genes in the signature. The signature list comprises clusters that link to cell migration (ARP2, KAI1, CAR-1), angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis (VEGF-C, TEM-4, TEM7R), gene transcription regulation (CREB1I), immune functions (IL-8RB, IL-22R, IL17BR), regulation of cellular adhesion behaviours (PTPRK, Claudin-5) and genes that link to skin disorder (Psoriasin). The complexity of the list therefore reflects the complex biological process underlying the healing process of a wound.
The validation study on an independent cohort further revealed the pivotal application of this genetic prognostic test in predicting the nature of wound healing. Using this cohort of chronic wound tissues with a single aetiology (venous ulcer) and in a double blinded test, the test clearly differentiated those wounds that healed from those that were non-healing (within 3 months). Collectively, it is concluded that the gene signature reported here provides vital information in predicting the clinical outcome of the nature of healing (to heal or to become chronic).
Thus, the clinical application is evident. A test using the signature on a given wound tissue would allow one immediately to distinguish the fate of the wound.
It has to be said that the signature is also highly able to distinguish acute wound tissue from normal tissue. The power to distinguish chronic wound tissue from normal tissue is significant, but nonetheless weaker than the acute-normal scenario. There are two important aspects to this information:

    
    
        1. A chronic wound has mechanisms switched-off that gives the tissues a similar status in terms of the healing mechanism to normal skin or below that of normal skin. Whereas the acute wound has a clear driving mechanisms for the healing process. Therefore one of the powers within the signature is that it has deciphered the key mechanism underlying these process.
        2. The tests on the cell models well mirrored the normal-acute-chronic situation, in that the ‘acute’ phase (within 2 hours after wounding) showed a dramatic change in its signature, compared with unwounded cells. On the other hand, in a ‘healed’ wound (after 4 hours), the signature appears similar to unwounded cell layer. Collectively, the signature provides some key molecular and cellular information with regard to the nature of the wound healing process.
    
    


In this study, we have adopted in vitro wound assays in order to evaluate if the changes in molecular signature seen in human wounds may be mirrored in vitro. We used two models to create cell wounds; to obtain the dynamics of the healing process. Using the ECIS model, both the ECIS trace and morphological observations have indicated that under the specified conditions, wound healing is at its linear phase between 0.5-3 hours after wounding. 4 hours after wounding, the wounds are virtually closed ‘healed’. This is of course dependent upon the type of cells, i.e. endothelial cells and melanoma cells healed at a faster pace than keratinocytes. This is fully supported by the conventional scratch wounding assay (FIGS. 1 and 2). Using this cell model, we have shown that the signature seen in human wounds is mirrored in vitro.
In summary, the invention describes a new molecular signature that allows the classification and prognosis of the nature of human wounds: if a wound is to heal or to become chronic.







TABLE 1







The 25 gene signature list








Molecule name
Change in human wounds





ARP2
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


VEGF-D
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


IL17C
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


VEGF-C
Decreased in chronic wounds 


beta-Catenin
Decreased in chronic wounds 


RON
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


Endomucin-2
Decreased in chronic wounds 


IL22R
Increased in both acute and chronic wounds


WAVE2
High in acute


IL8RB
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


Claudin-5
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


TEM7R
Increased in both acute and chronic wounds


PTPRK
Increased in both acute and chronic wounds


BMP15
Decreased in chronic wounds


PEDF
Decreased in human wounds


RhoGDI-G
Decreased in human wounds


N-WASP
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


AMFR
High in acute


Psoriasin
Increased in both acute and chronic wounds


Par4
High in acute 


TEM4
High in acute 


IL17BR
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


KAI1
Increased in both acute and chronic wounds


CAR1
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds


CREBL1
Decreased in chronic and increased in acute wounds
















TABLE 1b







Primers for the 25 gene signature list








MOLE-



CULE



NAME
PRIMER PAIR (5′-′3)












(SEQ ID NO: 1)


ARP2
attgagcaagagcagaaact,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 2)



actgaacctgaccgtacattctggtgcttcaaatctct


 



(SEQ ID NO: 3)


VEGF-D
agatgaagaatggcaaagaa



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 4)



actgaacctgaccgtacaatctgctgttcagatcgtt


 



(SEQ ID NO: 5)


IL17C
catctcaccctggagatacc,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 6)



actgaacctgaccgtacacatcgatacagcctctgc


 



(SEQ ID NO: 7)


VEGF-C
gctgctgcacattataacac



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 8)



actgaacctgaccgtacaaactccttccccacatctat


 



(SEQ ID NO: 9)


β-
agggattttctcagtccttc,


Catenin
and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 10)



actgaacctgaccgtacacatgccctcatctaatgtct


 



(SEQ ID NO: 11)


RON
catccacccagtgccaac,



and 


 



(SEQ ID NO: 12)



actgaacctgaccgtacaccacacagtcagccacag


 



(SEQ ID NO: 13)


Endo-
aaatgttgtcacaccaacaa,


mucin-2
and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 14)



actgaacctgaccgtacaagctgttgacatcagagaca


 



(SEQ ID NO: 15)


IL22R
agatgactgacaggttcagc,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 16)



actgaacctgaccgtacagaatcgactctcactttggag


 



(SEQ ID NO: 17)


WAVE2
cagctgactacccaactctg,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 18)



actgaacctgaccgtacaatctgcaccagtgaaagg


 



(SEQ ID NO: 19)


IL8RB
tcaaattcatatgtctcagca,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 20)



actgaacctgaccgtacagttgcccatgtcctcata,


 



(SEQ ID NO: 21)


Claudin-
ttcctggaccacaactac,


5
and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 22)



actgaacctgaccgtacacaccgagtcgtacactttgc


 



(SEQ ID NO: 23)


TEM7R
cttgattggcagtatggagt,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 24)



actgaacctgaccgtacagtctaccgccttgagaaag,


 



(SEQ ID NO: 25)


PTPRK
tatggctgtacctccattgt,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 26)



actgaacctgaccgtacaatatcgtagcatcccttcct


 



(SEQ ID NO: 27)


BMP15
gtgaagcccttgaccagt



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 28)



actgaacctgaccgtacattggtatagtcctcggtttg


 



(SEQ ID NO: 29)


PEDF
ggtgctactcctctgcatt



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 30)



actgaacctgaccgtacaagaaaggatcctcctcctc


 



(SEQ ID NO: 31)


RHOGDI-
agtcctcctggctgacaa


G
and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 32)



actgaacctgaccgtacaaaagaagtggcaggaagagt,


 



(SEQ ID NO: 33)


N-WASP
gagctggatgagaacaacac,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 34)



actgaacctgaccgtacaaaagaagtggcaggaagagt,


 



(SEQ ID NO: 35)


AMFR
cctacacagcggtcagatag,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 36)



actgaacctgaccgtacaagcagaagtttctccctctt


 



(SEQ ID NO: 37)


Psori-
aacttccccaacttccttag,


asin
and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 38)



actgaacctgaccgtacaagcaaggacagaaactcaga


 



(SEQ ID NO: 39)


PAR4
atgccaggagacgacctc



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 40)



actgaacctgaccgtacagatcttacgcttcccttacc


 



(SEQ ID NO: 41)


TEM4
gtctcgttcaagctggg



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 42)



actgaacctgaccgtacaggttgccgtgtcctcctc


 



(SEQ ID NO: 43)


IL17BR
agtgactggggatagtgaag,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 44)



actgaacctgaccgtacacagagcacaactgttccttt


 



(SEQ ID NO: 45)


KAI1
cattcgagactacaacagca ctgtactttgctttcctgct,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 46)



ctgtagtcttcggaatggac′


 



(SEQ ID NO: 47)


CAR1
atggatctgaagaaattgga,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 48)



actgaacctgaccgtacaagacaatttttgccactcat


 



(SEQ ID NO: 49)


CREBL1
ggggactatgaggagatgat,



and


 



(SEQ ID NO: 50)



actgaacctgaccgtacagtggaggtcttgatgtgaat,


















TABLE 2






The 14 gene refined signature list



















ARP2




CREB11




VEGF-C




Psoriasin




IL22R




TEM4




IL8RB




IL17BR




Claudin-5




KAI1




PTPRK




CAR1




Endomuscin-2




TEM7R
















TABLE 3







Prediction of wound healing using AO > 10












0
1















1
14
0



2
9
1



3
1
9







X2 = 25.33,



p = 0.00000316,



Yate's p = 0.00003741



(note:



in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute wound; in horizontal rows: 0, 1 are signature IDs













TABLE 4







Prediction of the healing wound using


the AO123d three set format.











1
2
3















1
14
0
0



2
9
1
1



3
1
9
9





X2 = 25.868,


p = 0.00003364,


Yate's p = 0.00054889


(note:


in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute wound) In Horizontal rows: 1, 2, 3 are signature IDs)













TABLE 5







Distinguishing the chronic from acute


using the refined F5 > 5 format












0
1















1
14
0



3
1
9







X2 = 20.26,



p = 0.00000676,



Yate's p = 0.00004297



(note:



in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute wound) In Horizontal rows: 0, 1 are signature IDs)













TABLE 6a





Distinguishing the acute from normal skin in two set format (6a-1left,


F5-5) or three set format (right ao123) using the refined signature







Table 6a1










0
1





2
8
2


3
0
10










X2 = 13.333, p = 0.00026078, Yate's p = 0.00139833


Table 6a2











1
2
3





2
6
4
0


3
0
2
8










X2 = 14.667, p = 0.00065328, Yate's p = 0.0053589


(note:


in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute


wound) In Horizontal rows: 0, 1 are signature IDs)
















TABLE 6b





Distinguishing the chronic from normal skin in two set format (6b1,


F2-8) or three set format (6b2 bd123) using the refined signature







Table 6b1










0
1





1
14
0


2
7
3










X2 = 4.8, p = 0.02846, Yate's p = 0.1176


Table 6b2











1
2
3





1
13
0
1


2
7
3
0










X2 = 5.280, p = 0.07136, Yate's p = 0.3144


(note:


in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute


wound) In Horizontal rows: 0, 1, 2, 3 are signature IDs)
















TABLE 7







Prediction of the healing wound using


the full list of the signature All19












0
1















1
13
1



2
7
3



3
1
9







X2 = 17.365, p = 0.00016953, Yate's p = 0.00101031



(note:



in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute wound) In Horizontal rows: 0, 1 are signature IDs)













TABLE 8







Prediction of the healing wound using


the full list of the signature All19abc











1
2
3















1
13
0
1



2
7
1
2



3
1
0
9





X2 = 21.325, p = 0.00027298, Yate's p = 0.00415619


(note:


in vertical columns: 1 = chronic wound; 2 - normal skin, 3 = acute wound) In Horizontal rows: 1, 2, 3 are signature IDs)













TABLE 9







Validation study using the refined signature kit


on in vitro wound healing: the A431/H/M model.













low
Unchange
rise


















Healed
6
5
0




Unwounded
0
11
0




‘acute’
2
1
8







X2 = 31.941 WITH D.F. = 4, p = 0.00000374













TABLE 10







Validation study using the refined signature kit


on in vitro wound healing: the HaCaT model.












low
rise

















Healed
7
3




Unwounded
10
0




‘acute’
3
7







X2 = 11.1 WITH D.F. = 2, p = 0.003887













TABLE 11







Validation study using the refined signature kit on in vitro


wound healing: the HECV endothelial model (set-2).












low
rise

















Healed
8
4




Unwounded
12
0




‘acute’
1
11







X2 = 21.257 WITH D.F. = 2, p = 0.00002422













TABLE 12







Validation study using the refined signature kit on in


vitro wound healing: the HECV-fibroblast model (set-2).










low
rise














Healed
7
3



Unwounded
10
0



‘acute’
9
1





X2 = 17.5 WITH D.F. = 2, p = 0.0001584






APPENDIX-1
List of gene transcript tested, name, and accession number














Name
Accession number









Cyr61
AF307860



CCN2
NM_001901



CCN3
NM_002514



Actin
NM_001101



GAPDH
NM_002046



ARP2
AF006082



TEM4
AF378754



IL8RB
NM_001557



TEM8
NM_032208



TEM7R
AF378757



WAVE1
AF134303



WAVE2
AB026542



NOTICH1
AF308602



AMFR
L35233



IL8R
U58828



CMG2
AY040326



IL17A
NM_002190



PAR4
AB108448



IL17B
NM_014443



BMP7
BC004248



CD24
BC064619



PlGF1
X54936



Chordinv2
AF209930



VEGF-D
D89630



IL17BR
AF212365



VEGF-R
E13256



N-WASP
D88460



HGFL
NM_020998



RGMa
NM_020211



VEGF-R2
AF063658



RGMc
BC085604



IL13
U70981



BMP15
NM_005448



Kiss1R
NM_032551



LYN
BC068551



L1CAM
M77640



VEGF
E14233



CD49F
NM_002203



RON
NM_002447



Claudin-5
NM_003277



BMP9
AF188285



CD34
M81104 X60172



CMG1
AY040325



KAI1
U20770



OSP-C
NM_001040060



SATB1
NM_002971



COM1
NM_012385



IL17C
NM_013278



TEM1
XM_006495



IL4
M13982



OSPA
NM_001040058



WAVE3
AB026543



TEM6
AF378756



PEDF
M76979



BMP8
NM_181809



RHO GDI-G
AF498928



JAK1
M64174 M35203



AAMP
M95627



SSTR1
L14865



SATB2
NM_015265



GDF9A
NM_005260



SHH
L38518



BMP10
NM_014482



CAR1
NM_001338



SDF1
XM_165565



PTPRK
AF533875



ROCK1
D87931



EHM2
AB032179



IL24
BC009681



KISS1
AY117143



VEGF-C
AF244813



Chordin V1
AF209929



STYK1
NM_018423



Chordin V3
AF283325



Psoriasin
M86757



β-Catenin
P35222



Endomuscin-2
AB034695



SNAIL
AF131208



RHO-C
L25081



CREB11
NM_004381



RHO-8
AF498969



IL22R
BC029273



FAP
U09278



DRIM
NM_014503

## Claims

1. A method for identifying chronic mammalian wound tissue or for determining the prognosis of mammalian wound tissue, which method comprises:
(a) examining a sample of wound tissue from an individual to determine the levels of expression of genes encoding molecular markers selected from the set of molecular markers consisting of:
ARP2, CREBL1, VEGF-C, Psoriasin, IL22R, TEM4, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, KaI1, PTPRK, CAR1, Endomucin-2, and TEM7R;
wherein the step of determining the level of expression of genes is determined by PCR using the molecular marker primer sets:

Psoriasin: SEQ ID NO: 37, SEQ ID NO: 38;
Claudin-5: SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22;
IL8RB: SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20;
IL22R: SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16;
PTPRK: SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO: 26;
TEM4: SEQ ID NO: 41, SEQ ID NO: 42;
TEM7R: SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24;
VEGF-C: SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8;
ARP2: SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 2;
CAR1: SEQ ID NO: 47, SEQ ID NO: 48;
Endomucin: SEQ ID NO: 13, SEQ ID NO: 14;
IL7BR: SEQ ID NO: 43, SEQ ID NO: 44;
KaI1: SEQ ID NO: 45, SEQ ID NO: 46; and
CREBL1: SEQ ID NO: 49, SEQ ID NO: 50; and
further wherein the wound tissue is from a chronic wound when:

(b) the following genes show decreased expression relative to control tissue:
ARP2, CREB1l, VEGF-C, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, CAR1 and Endomuscin-2, and;
(c) TEM 4 shows normal expression relative to control tissue; and
(d) the following genes show increased expression relative to control tissue:
Psoriasin, IL22R, KAI1, PTPRK, and TEM7R.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein additional studies are undertaken to determine whether any one or more of the following markers show a decreased level of expression indicative of chronic wound tissue relative to control tissue:
VEGF-D, IL17C, β-Catenin, RON, BMP15, PEDF, RhoGDI-G and N-WASP and;
any one or more of the following markers show a normal level of expression indicative of chronic wound tissue relative to control tissue:
WAVE2, AMFR, PAR4;
wherein the step of determining the level of expression of markers is determined by PCR using the molecular marker primer sets:

VEGF-D: SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4;
IL17C: SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6;
β-Catenin: SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10;
RON: SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12;
BMP15: SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 28;
PEDF: SEQ ID NO: 29, SEQ ID NO: 30;
RhoGDI-G: SEQ ID NO: 31, SEQ ID NO: 32;
N-WASP: SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34;
WAVE2: SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18;
AMFR: SEQ ID NO: 35, SEQ ID NO: 36; and
PAR4: SEQ ID NO: 39, SEQ ID NO: 40.

3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the method also involves identifying acute mammalian wound tissue, using a method which comprises:
(a) examining a sample of wound tissue from the individual in order to determine the levels of expression of genes encoding the following molecular markers ARP2, CREBL1, VEGF-C, Psoriasin, IL22R, TEM4, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, KaI1, PTPRK, CAR1, Endomucin-2, TEM7R, and;
(b) where the individual from whom the tissue sample has been taken has an acute wound when the following genes or markers show increased expression relative to control tissue: ARP2, CREBL1, Psoriasin, IL22R, TEM4, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, KaI1, PTPRK, CAR1 and TEM7R.

4. The method according to claim 3 wherein the individual from whom the sample has been taken has an acute wound when the molecular markers VEGF-C and Endomucin-2 show normal expression relative to control tissue.

5. The method according to claim 3 wherein the individual from whom the sample has been taken has an acute wound when any one or more of the following markers show an increased level of expression relative to control tissue:
VEGF-D, IL17C, RON, WAVE2, N-WASP AMFR, and PAR4 and;
any one or more of the following markers show a normal level of expression relative to control tissue:
β-Catenin, BMP15 and;
any one or more of the following markers show a decreased level of expression relative to control tissue:
PEDF, RhoGDI-G.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein said tissue is human tissue.

7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the levels of expression of genes are determined by measuring RNA.

8. The method according to claim 7 wherein said RNA is mRNA.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the levels of expression of genes are determined by measuring the corresponding encoded proteins.

10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the proteins are measured using antibodies.

11. The method according to claim 10 wherein said antibodies are monoclonal.

12. The method according to claim 10 wherein said antibodies are labelled with a tag whereby the existence of bound antibody to target protein can be determined.

13. The method according to claim 1 wherein the levels of expression of genes are determined relative to a reference gene.

14. The method according to claim 13 wherein said reference gene is a gene expressed within a control sample of tissue.

15. The method according to claim 14 wherein said control sample is normal skin tissue.

16. The method according to claim 15 wherein said normal skin tissue is taken from the same limb or region as said sample of wound tissue.

17. The method according to claim 13 wherein said reference gene is a housekeeping gene.

18. The method according to claim 17 wherein said reference gene is GAPDH.

19. The method according to claim 13 wherein said reference gene is a recognised standard for expression of one or more of said genes in a healthy individual.

20. A kit comprising:
(a) a plurality of probes for detecting and quantifying the expression level of all of the following molecular markers ARP2, CREBL1, VEGF-C, Psoriasin, IL22R, TEM4, IL8RB, IL17BR, Claudin-5, KaI1, PTPRK, CAR1, Endomucin-2, and TEM7R; and
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes;
wherein the probes comprise primer sequences selected from the group consisting of:

Psoriasin: SEQ ID NO: 37, SEQ ID NO: 38;
Claudin-5: SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22;
IL8RB: SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20;
IL22R: SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16;
PTPRK: SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO: 26;
TEM4: SEQ ID NO: 41, SEQ ID NO: 42;
TEM7R: SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24;
VEGF-C: SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8;
ARP2: SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 2;
CAR1: SEQ ID NO: 47, SEQ ID NO: 48;
Endomucin: SEQ ID NO: 13, SEQ ID NO: 14;
IL7BR: SEQ ID NO: 43, SEQ ID NO: 44;
KaI1: SEQ ID NO: 45, SEQ ID NO: 46; and
CREBL1: SEQ ID NO: 49, SEQ ID NO: 50.

21. The kit according to claim 20 wherein said kit additionally comprises:
(a) at least one probe limited to that/those for identifying and quantifying the expression level of at least one transcript or polypeptide/protein of at least one of the following genes VEGF-D, IL17C, beta-Catenin, RON, WAVE2, BMP15, PEDF, RhoGDI-G, N-WASP, Par4 and AMFR, and;
(b) optionally, reagents and instructions pertaining to the use of said probes which instructions describe how to determine the expression level of each of said genes;
wherein the probes comprise primer sequences selected from the group consisting of:

VEGF-D: SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4;
IL17C: SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6;
β-Catenin: SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10;
RON: SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12;
BMP15: SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 28;
PEDF: SEQ ID NO: 29, SEQ ID NO: 30;
RhoGDI-G: SEQ ID NO: 31, SEQ ID NO: 32;
N-WASP: SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34;
WAVE2: SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18;
AMFR: SEQ ID NO: 35, SEQ ID NO: 36; and
PAR4: SEQ ID NO: 39, SEQ ID NO: 40.

22. A microarray comprising or containing any one or more of the aforementioned sets of probes of claim 20 for identifying the expression of any one or more of the molecular markers.

23. A kit for determining wound type in a patient, which kit comprises:
(a) at least one microarray comprising a plurality of probes limited to those for identifying at least one set of the molecular markers described in the methods according to claims 1-19; and, optionally,
(b) a second microarray comprising a plurality of probes limited to those for identifying the same set of molecular markers in an internal standard that represents the normal level of expression of said markers;
wherein the probes comprise primer sequences selected from the group consisting of:

Psoriasin: SEQ ID NO: 37, SEQ ID NO: 38;
Claudin-5: SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22;
IL8RB: SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20;
IL22R: SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16;
PTPRK: SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO: 26;
TEM4: SEQ ID NO: 41, SEQ ID NO: 42;
TEM7R: SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24;
VEGF-C: SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8;
ARP2: SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 2;
CAR1: SEQ ID NO: 47, SEQ ID NO: 48;
Endomucin: SEQ ID NO: 13, SEQ ID NO: 14;
IL7BR: SEQ ID NO: 43, SEQ ID NO: 44;
KaI1: SEQ ID NO: 45, SEQ ID NO: 46;
CREBL1: SEQ ID NO: 49, SEQ ID NO: 50;
VEGF-D: SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4;
IL17C: SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6;
β-Catenin: SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10;
RON: SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12;
BMP15: SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 28;
PEDF: SEQ ID NO: 29, SEQ ID NO: 30;
RhoGDI-G: SEQ ID NO: 31, SEQ ID NO: 32;
N-WASP: SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34;
WAVE2: SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18;
AMFR: SEQ ID NO: 35, SEQ ID NO: 36; and
PAR4: SEQ ID NO: 39, SEQ ID NO: 40.