alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

September 27, 1961

No. 66103.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 269714-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of otoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2148), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61111.

protest 277918-K (Savannah).

#### Sphinx Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Robert G. GrossRobert G. GrossChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board  21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000875983
<NAME> GLOBAL VILLAGE COMMUNICATION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,216
<PP&E>                                          16,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,867
<OTHER-SE>                                    (41,073)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,606
<SALES>                                         66,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,207
<CGS>                                           53,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,401)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (9,489)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,414)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.71)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-9 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-9 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-9 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 31, 1997 QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON
ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                      15,134,920
<SECURITIES>                                    45,877     
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,711,511
<PP&E>                                       4,151,853
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,410,596)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,466,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          769,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,333
<COMMON>                                        40,076
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,534,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,466,026
<SALES>                                      1,810,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,810,508
<CGS>                                        1,466,157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,466,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,554,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,000                        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,990,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,990,391)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7398

GREGORY RENARD DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

B. M. ANTONELLI,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-01275-HMH)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 25, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Renard Davis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Renard Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues 

raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does 

not challenge the district court’s conclusion that Davis failed to satisfy administrative 

exhaustion requirements, Davis has forfeited appellate review of this dispositive 

conclusion. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal 

brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 52 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 52

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    relative to limiting the terms of Senators and Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 1998

Mr. Murkowski introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    relative to limiting the terms of Senators and Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. A person may not serve as a Senator for more than 2 
terms. If a person has served or is serving as a Senator on the date of 
ratification of this article, that person may serve only 1 more term.
    ``Section 2. A person may not serve as a Representative for more 
than 3 terms. If a person has served or is serving as a Representative 
on the date of ratification of this article, that person may serve only 
2 more terms.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.46

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Employment Agreement") is made effective as of
March 3, 2010 (the "Effective Date") by and among Cloud Peak Energy Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and Bryan Pechersky (the "Executive").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Executive possesses skills, experience and knowledge that are of value to the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to enter into this Employment Agreement.

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valid consideration the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Section 1.Employment.



---





Section 2.Compensation.



2

---





Section 3.Employment Termination.



3

---





4

---





Section 4.Unauthorized Disclosure; Non-Solicitation; Non-Competition; Proprietary
Rights.



5

---





6

---







Section 5.Representations.The Executive represents and warrants that he (i) is not subject to
any contract, arrangement, policy or understanding, or to any statute, governmental rule or regulation, that in any way limits his or its ability to enter into and fully perform his or its obligations
under this Employment Agreement and (ii) is not otherwise unable to enter into and fully perform his or its

7

---



obligations
under this Employment Agreement. The Company represents and warrants that this Employment Agreement will, by its effective date, have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the
Company.

Section 6.Withholding; Taxes.All amounts paid to the Executive under this Employment Agreement during
or following the Term shall be subject to any required withholding and other employment taxes imposed by applicable law.

Section 7.Miscellaneous.



8

---





9

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC./s/ Bryan Pechersky

By:

/s/ Colin MarshallBryan Pechersky



Name: Colin Marshall
Title: President & CEO


10

---



QuickLinks
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cr-00137-RSM Document 42 Filed 01/26/07 Page 11 of 11
# CE2004065EN.01014301.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/143

---

(2004/C 65 E/158)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2410/03

by Freddy Blak (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   German road charge

Subject:

According to the Danish newspaper Børsen of 10 July 2003 (front page), the Commission is considering initiating proceedings against Germany for introducing road charges as this will result in unequal terms of competition.

Can the Commission confirm this?

If so, will the Commission say what new circumstances have led it to consider this course of action?

I would refer back here to my Written Question No E-2684/02 (1), pointing out the competition-distorting nature of the German road charge, which the Commission, however, denies in its answer.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 110 E, 8.5.2003, p. 89.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

April 29, 1965

No. 69275.

#### Baldwin Manufacturing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/17828, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Zanin & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 37, C.D. 2385), and Abstract 67834, the claim *of*the plaintiffs was sustained.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 125

Commending Dr. Jason C. Hu, Representative of the Taipei Economic and

Cultural Representative Office in the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. LOTT) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending Dr. Jason C. Hu, Representative of the Taipei

Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the

United States.

Whereas Dr. Jason C. Hu has served with distinction as Representative of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) since June 1996, and has

ably represented the interests of the Republic of China on

Taiwan;

Whereas Dr. Hu has been a firm and consistent advocate of

democratic principles throughout his distinguished career;

Whereas Dr. Hu has established many deep friendships with

Members of Congress and other Americans during his

tenure in Washington; and
2

•SRES 125 ATS

Whereas Dr. Hu has been asked to return to Taiwan to serve

as the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of

China: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby—

2 (1) commends Dr. Jason C. Hu for his service

3 as Representative of the TECRO office; and

4 (2) expresses to Dr. Hu and his family its best

5 wishes for his continued success in the future.

Æ
Case No. 12,963.

#### SMALLWOOD v. WORTHINGTON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 431.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term. 1823.

Evidence — Parol—Written Contract — Pleading at Law — Breach of Promise,

1. When the assignment of the time of service of a servant is in writing, parol evidence of a promise that the servant had a certain time to serve cannot be admitted.

2. A count averring that the defendant promised that a servant, whose time the plaintiff had bought of the defendant, had three years to serve: and that the defendant, not regarding *368his said promise, but contriving and fraudulently intending to injure the plaintiff, craftily and subtilely deceived the plaintiff in this, that the servant had not three years to serve, is not a count founded upon fraud, but upon the breach of the promise.

Assumpsit, charging that the defendant [William Worthington] promised that the servant, whose time of service the plaintiff; [H. Smallwood] had bought of the defendant, had three years to serve, when, in truth, she had only one year to serve. The declaration does not aver fraud, or a knowledge on the part of the defendant that she had only one year to serve. The plaintiff, upon the call of the defendant, produced a written contract, by which one Lowe hired the servant to the defendant, stating that she had seven years to serve from that date, November, 1815. In 1819, the defendant transferred his right, by a written assignment, to the plaintiff, which assignment did not contain any warranty. The plaintiff offered parol evidence to prove that the defendant affirmed, at the time of the contract, that she had three years to serve.

THE COURT (nem. con.) rejected the parol evidence.

Mr. Ivey, for plaintiff,

then contended that one of the counts was for deceit, and that the parol evidence was admissible to show the deceit. The count averred that upon the sale of the time of the servant, the defendant, promised that she had three years to serve, yet the defendant not regarding his promise, but contriving and fraudulently intending to injure the plaintiff in this behalf, craftily deceived the plaintiff in this, that the said slave, at the time of making the said promise and undertaking of the defendant, had not three years to serve, but was entitled to her freedom in one year, &c., and had only one year to serve, whereby the plaintiff lost the benefit of her service for a long time, &c.

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) said, that the count was not for deceit, and did not aver fraud; and rejected the evidence.
# Official Journal L 238/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 238 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5812 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 238

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5812 September 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1512 of 11 September 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1512 of 11 September 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 57038.

protest 189382-K (New York).

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification of the merchandise-made by the collector, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Frederick J. (Rick) Mandelbaum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this special financial report of Gateway Pacific Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



/s/    Frederick J. (Rick) MandelbaumFrederick J. (Rick) MandelbaumChief Financial Officer


Date: July 7, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,966
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          65,183
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,303
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,913
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,288
<LOANS>                                         58,633
<ALLOWANCE>                                        423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,568
<DEPOSITS>                                      82,716
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                731
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,993
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  92,568
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,765
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  824
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   295
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,884
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,670
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,211
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       27
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    764
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         579
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       579
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       311
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   378
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        5
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  423
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               423
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>