alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MATTHEW G. SILVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5731RJB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s

motion to extend the time within which to respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 

(Dkt. # 90). The motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 87) is presently noted for December 15,

2006. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that requested extension shall be granted. 

I. DISCUSSION

Pursuant to a joint motion filed by the parties, the Court entered an Order setting the

dispositive motions deadline for November 17, 2006. (Dkt. # 63). Defendants filed their motion

for summary judgment November 17, 2006 with a noting date of December 15, 2006. (Dkt. # 87). 

Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time was filed on December 21, 2006. (Dkt. # 90). Plaintiff’s

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 93 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

request for an extension is therefore, untimely. However, Plaintiff states that he has been in

segregation since November 14th with limited access to his legal files and the law library. The

Court finds this is sufficient reason in this case to grant the additional two weeks requested by

Plaintiff. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a two week extension of time to respond to Defendants’

motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 90) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s response shall be due no

later than February 2, 2007. Defendants may file a reply no later than February 8, 2007. The

Clerk is directed to re-note Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the Court’s calendar for

February 9, 2007. Plaintiff shall file no further papers in response to Defendants’ motion other

than the response noted above. The parties are reminded that briefs in opposition to a motion for

summary judgment shall not exceed twenty-four pages and reply briefs shall not exceed twelve

pages. 

The Court also notes that Plaintiff has filed a letter to Judge Bryan (Dkt. # 92), which was

not served on Defendants. Plaintiff is advised that this letter has been filed, but the Court will take

no action with regard to it, as the letter was not properly filed as a motion and served on

Defendants as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 93 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 69289.

#### N. S. Meyer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/16055 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 547 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 17, 2007.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3043) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and 
Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back 
to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 3043 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Official Journal C 27A/27 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 27A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5827 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 27A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5827 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2015/C 027A/01 | Corrigendum to Call for Expressions of Interest — contract staff — researchers (function group IV) in the field of parliamentary research — (OJ C 55 A, 26.2.2014 ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2015/C 027A/01

Corrigendum to Call for Expressions of Interest — contract staff — researchers (function group IV) in the field of parliamentary research — (OJ C 55 A, 26.2.2014 )

(OJ C 55 A, 26.2.2014 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2009, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Michael Burney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to    the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
A signed    original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oakridge    International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/s/    Michael Burney
--------------------------
Michael    Burney
Chief    Executive Officer
September    28, 2009
# Official Journal C 299A/5 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 299A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 575 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 299A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 575 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 299A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking, Brussels — (Temporary Agent Grade AD14) — COM/2014/10364 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2014/C 299A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking, Brussels — (Temporary Agent Grade AD14) — COM/2014/10364

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 299A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 6 |

2014/C 299A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Before the Second Division,

January 11, 1968

No. P68/9.

protests 62/9358 and 62/7460 (Los Angeles).

#### Marubeni-Iida. (America), Inc. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cotton velveteen similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Amity Fabrics, Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES W. CRISE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 352 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# FILED
July 30, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE DON L. HANC

OCK, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C

01-9710-CR-00489 Appellant, ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) (No. 2554 Belo w) ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) The Hon. Thomas H. Sh river ) Appellee. ) (Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition)
O R D E R This matter is before the Court up on the state’s motion request ing that the judgmentin the above-styled cause be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. Findin g that the trial court l acked jurisdiction to c onsider the appellant’s claim, we affirm the denial of the appellant’s peti tion for habeas corpus

relief.

In this appeal, theappellant contends that his sentence is expired based on sentence credits to which he c laims he is entitled but w as not given. In deny ing rel ief, the trial court found that it was without jurisdiction to review the calculatio n of sentence reduction credits.

A habeas corpus petition must contain allegations suggesting either that the petitioner's convict ions are void or that his sentence has expired. Otherwise the petition is facially invalid and subject to summary dismis sal. Ar cher v. State , 851 S.W.2d 157 (Tenn.1993). Habeas corpus relief is not availabl e to challenge Department of Cor rection matters that have no beari n g on the validity of the restraining convi ction, the resulting sentence, or

the expiration of the sentence. See , e.g ., State v. Warren , 740 S.W.2d 425, 428 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986). Thus, c omplaints regarding

sentence credit miscalcul ations that relate to release elig ibility short of full s ervice of the sentence do not warrant habeas corpus relief.

In the prese nt case, t he appel lant’s co ntentio n deals wi th inac tions by the Departmentof Correction relativ e to properly crediting

him with sentence reduction credits. As the trial court conclude d, the ap pellant’s claim does not st ate a ground for habeas-2-

corpus relief.
Accordingly, based on our review of the appellant’s brief, the state’s motion, and the record in this case, we conclude that this is an appropriate case for aff ir manc e under Rule 20.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuantto Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals R ules. The appellant being indigent, costs are taxed to the state.

_____________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
CONCUR:

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE

_____________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
EXHIBIT 11.1


                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months                               Nine Months
                                                            Ended September 30,                        Ended September 30,
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1997                1996                1997                     1996
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>                  <C>                  <C>     
   Net income                                          $1,608,000             $251,000             $3,843,000           $624,000
                                                     ===============================================================================

   Shares used in computing net income per share:

     Weighted average Common shares
      outstanding                                       8,196,979            7,799,014             8,016,508           7,708,261

     Weighted average Common shares
      issuable upon the exercise of
      outstanding stock options and
      warrants                                          1,703,060            1,336,573             1,915,825           1,430,849

     Application of assumed
      proceeds towards repurchase
      of outstanding Common shares
     using the Treasury Stock
      method                                             (615,058)(a)         (892,764)(a)         (987,743)(b)         (834,615)(b)
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Shares used in computation                     9,284,981            8,242,823            8,944,590            8,304,495
                                                      ==============================================================================
  Primary net income per share                               $.17                 $.03                 $.43                 $.08
====================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

       (a) Computed  using  assumed  proceeds of $9,690,846  and average  market
           value of $15.76 in 1997 and  proceeds  of  $5,679,766  and an average
           market value of $6.36 in 1996.

       (b) Computed using assumed  proceeds of $10,608,363 and an average market
           value of $10.74 in 1997 and  proceeds  of  $5,833,961  and an average
           market value of $6.99 in 1996.



                                      E-57
Case No. 10,235.

#### NICHOLLS v. WHITE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 58.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Jan. Term, 1802.

Deposition — Notice — Objections — Secondary Evidence of Contents of Papers— Necessary Affidavit.

1. One hour’s notice of taking a deposition in Alexandria is sufficient.

2. It is not a good objection to a deposition taken by dedimus, that it is in the handwriting of the counsel of the opposite party.

[Cited in Jones v. Oregon Cent. Ry. Co., Case No. 7,486. Cited, but not followed, in United States v. Pings. 4 Fed. 716.]

[See Atkinson v. Glenn, Case No. 610.]

3. The affidavit of the party is sufficient to prove to the court the loss of papers, so as to admit secondary evidence of their contents.

Mr. Simms, for plaintiff,

objected to the deposition of Thomas White, that the notice given of the time and place of caption was not reasonable. The notice was served between eleven and twelve o’clock a. m. to attend at Gadsby’s tavern betweefi twelve and one o’clock of the same day.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But THE COURT decided the notice to be reasonable.

Mr. Simms then objected, that the deposition was in the handwriting of the defendant’s counsel, contrary to the act of congress (1 Stat. 89).

But the deposition being taken by dedimus from this court, and according to common •usage, THE COURT unanimously decided that it might be read. The deposition was to prove the contents of certain papers which had been used at a former trial of the same cause.

Mr. Simms objected to the reading of the deposition, until the loss of the papers was proved.

THE COURT thought the loss was sufficiently proved by the affidavit of the defendant himself, which was made to procure the new trial.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 79 

Recognizing the establishment of Hunters for the Hungry programs across 

the United States and the contributions of those programs efforts to 

decrease hunger and help feed those in need. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2007 

Mr. GINGREY (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. HAYES, Mrs. 

MILLER of Michigan, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. MCCOTTER, 

Mr. CARTER, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. COBLE, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

CALVERT, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. PEARCE, and Mr. ENGLISH of 

Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the establishment of Hunters for the Hungry 

programs across the United States and the contributions 

of those programs efforts to decrease hunger and help 

feed those in need. 

Whereas Hunters for the Hungry programs are cooperative 

efforts among hunters, sportsmen’s associations, meat 

processors, State meat inspectors, and hunger relief organizations to help feed those in need; 

Whereas during the past three years Hunters for the Hungry 

programs have brought hundreds of thousands of pounds 

of venison to homeless shelters, soup kitchens, and food 

banks; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 79 IH 

Whereas each year donations have multiplied as Hunters for 

the Hungry programs continue to feed those in need: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the cooperative efforts of hunt3 ers, sportsmen’s associations, meat processors, State 

4 meat inspectors, and hunger relief organizations to 

5 establish Hunters for the Hungry programs across 

6 the United States; and 

7 (2) recognizes the contributions of Hunters for 

8 the Hungry programs to efforts to decrease hunger 

9 and help feed those in need. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                       647
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,435
<PP&E>                                          10,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,996
<SALES>                                         13,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,573
<CGS>                                           12,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.64)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc., general partner
of the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 11, 2003



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 11, 2003