alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: arlenewatkins@lcs.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:37:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

arlene watkins

Jefferson City, TN 37760
|               | (1)                                  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                             |
|          | (2)                                  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|  Date:      August 14, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk      A. Montgomery                               |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               592,711
<PP&E>                                         233,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 950,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          974,592
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     95,482
<COMMON>                                     9,075,870
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,509,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   950,198
<SALES>                                         24,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,837
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               469,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (613,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (613,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (613,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 57028.

protests 157583-K, 158943-K, and 161320-K (New York).

#### Walco Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of crystal ballotini the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 56282, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 807 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 4, 2008.
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas was born on April 7, 1890, in Minneapolis, 
        Minnesota, the daughter of Frank Stoneman, the first publisher of the 
        Miami Herald;
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas graduated from Wellesley College in 1912 where 
        she was a member of the literary group Scribblers, editor-in-chief of 
        the yearbook, and served on the executive board of the Equal Suffrage 
        League;
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas served in the Red Cross in Europe during World 
        War I;
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas moved to Miami in 1915 and became a reporter 
        and writer at The Miami Herald where she wrote about progressive issues 
        such as the fight for women's rights, racial justice, and environmental 
        conservation;
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas wrote dozens of short stories that were 
        published in the Saturday Evening Post, Collier's, and Woman's Home 
        Companion throughout the 1920s, 30s, and 40s;
Whereas in 1947 Marjory Stoneman Douglas wrote a ground-breaking book titled The 
        Everglades: River of Grass that helped to draw national attention to a 
        vast and little-known area that South Florida developers had deemed a 
        worthless swamp;
Whereas in the same year, Marjory Stoneman Douglas' book mustered the public 
        support to guard this subtropical marshland through a declaration from 
        President Harry Truman, officially protecting the Everglades as a 
        National Park;
Whereas at the age of 78, Marjory Stoneman Douglas founded the Friends of the 
        Everglades, an educational and advocacy group dedicated to the 
        protection and restoration of this ecosystem that continues to be at 
        forefront of Florida conservation;
Whereas in November 1993, President Bill Clinton awarded Marjory Stoneman 
        Douglas the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest honor given to a 
        civilian;
Whereas 2007 marked the 60th anniversary of the publication of her book, The 
        Everglades: River of Grass; and
Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas passed away in 1998 living to the age of 108, 
        her ashes scattered in the Everglades she worked so tirelessly to 
        preserve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life, achievements, 
and distinguished career of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, pioneer in the field of 
conservation, on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the publication of The 
Everglades: River of Grass.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:




(i)       The accompanying annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







DATE: January 19, 2011                                                                      /s/ R. Ramin Kamfar


R. Ramin Kamfar


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


(Principal Executive Officer)












DATE: January 19, 2011                                                                      /s/ Jerold E. Novack


Jerold E. Novack


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
No. 59288.

protests 171803-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Zado Goldenberg & Co. *v.*United States,

*243Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# San Joaquin Valley AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

October 8, 2009 Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 281

### 5 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Mr. Guzzetta: Attached is the RuleAction Package for Rule4692 (Commercial Charbroiling), which was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board on September 17, 2009. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4692 and the appropriate documentationto the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. ARB APCDIAQMD Rule Evaluation Form 3. Clean Copy of Rule 4692 4. StrikeoutlUnderline Copy of Rule 4692 5. Governing Board Resolution 6. Evidence of Public Hearing 7. Governing Board Memo 8. Final Staff Report with appendices-

. . 9. Charbroiler Incentive Program (ChlP) Guidelines The Rule Action Package is being transmitted by e-mail to ARB staff. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Sandra Lowe-Lesethat (559) 230-6100 or by e-mail at 

### sandra.loweleseth@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. Sincerely,



# 6m 

# ~6 Scott Nester Director of Planning Attachments Seyed Sadredin Executive DirectorlAir Pollution Control Officer

Northern Region Central Region(MainOffice) Southern Region 4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 34946 Flyover Court Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93308-9725 Tel: (209)557-6400 FAX: (209)557-6475 Tel: (559)230-6000 FAX: (559)230-6061 Tel: (661)392-5500 FAX: (661)392-5585 www.valleyair.org Printed on recycled paper. 0
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 63

Authorizing printing of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution of the 
                      United States of America''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 1997

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Ford) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing printing of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution of the 
                      United States of America''.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution 
of the United States of America'', prepared under the direction of the 
Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a Senate document, 
with appropriate illustration.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 440,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 100,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the Joint 
        Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the pamphlet for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $120,000, such number of copies of the 
        pamphlet as does not exceed total printing and production costs 
        of $120,000, with distribution to be allocated in the same 
        proportion as in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
No. 66565.

#### Trans Atlantic Company *v.*United States,

protests 316092-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brackets for door closers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Trans*Atlantic *Company*v. *United States*(48 C.C.P.A. 30, C.A.D. 758), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

December 19, 1963

No. 68183.

#### John F. McEvoy, Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/17821 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a wool woven fabric, valued over $4 per pound and imported to be used in the manufacture of apparel for members of religious orders, the claim of the plaintiffs was 'sustained.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 28, 1998 and
Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine month periods ending 
February 28, and January 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         121,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,155,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,144,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,845,000
<PP&E>                                       7,555,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,440,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,233,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,478,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,995,238
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,233,000
<SALES>                                     21,339,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,339,000
<CGS>                                       15,767,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,767,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,514,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             642,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (584,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (590,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (590,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fernando Torres, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 85]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial by the questions and comments on his pretrial silence is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law for failure to object (CPL 470.05; *People v Holland,*174 AD2d 508, 510, *Iv denied*78 NY2d 1011), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review the claim, we would find that defendant’s failure to contact the police after learning that the victim had been shot in the altercation was proper rebuttal to defendant’s theory of self-defense *(see, People v Kearse,*177 AD2d 392, *Iv denied*79 NY2d 1003), especially in light of his subsequent trip to Florida, and that any error in this regard was in any event harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
No. 68494.

protests 63/14719, etc. (New York).

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*332Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of integral, necessary components of electrical X-ray apparatus or instruments, which are not X-ray tubes or parts thereof, the claim •of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### James Michael RASNICK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-6491.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2005.

Decided Aug. 11, 2005.

James Michael Rasnick, Appellant pro se. Amy L. Marshall, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

James Michael Rasnick seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).* The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a eonstitution*150al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rasnick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

S.L., FATHER OF S.L., S.L., S.L.,

AND S.L., CHILDREN,

Appellant, 

Case No. 5D22-0971 

LT Case No. 2019-DP-103

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed October 13, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Osceola County, 

Laura Shaffer, Judge. 

Angela B. Wright, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Kelley Schaffer, of Children’s Legal

Services, Department of Children and 

Families, Bradenton, for Appellee. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director 

of Appeals and Desiree Erin Fernandez,

Senior Attorney, of Guardian ad Litem

Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem 

Program. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Laredo Oil, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Bradley E. Sparks


Bradley E. Sparks


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer











Date: September 27, 2011