alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

phone: (206) 274-2800

fax: (206) 274-2801

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 29th day of August, 2006, I electronically 

filed the foregoing DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE with the Clerk of

the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Via Notice of Electronic Filing to:

Robert Siegel, Esq.

Email: bob@msfseattle.com

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of

Washington that the forgoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on August

29th, 2006, at Seattle, Washington.

________________________

Diana Au

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 31-2 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 31 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Before the Third Division,

March 2, 1960

No. 63880.

protests 730032-G, etc. (New York).

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: howfarisheaven@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:58:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terry Graham

D Hanis, TX 78850
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 27 

To institute a Pay-As-You-Go rule in the House of Representatives for the 

110th Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. SPRATT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

To institute a Pay-As-You-Go rule in the House of 

Representatives for the 110th Congress. 

1 Resolved, That it shall not be in order to consider any 

2 bill, joint resolution, amendment, or conference report if 

3 the provisions of such measure affecting direct spending 

4 and revenues have the net effect of increasing the deficit 

5 or reducing the surplus for either the period comprising 

6 the current fiscal year and the five fiscal years beginning 

7 with the fiscal year that ends in the following calendar 

8 year or the period comprising the current fiscal year and 

9 the ten fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year that 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 27 IH 

1 ends in the following calendar year. The effect of such 

2 measure on the deficit or surplus shall be determined on 

3 the basis of estimates made by the Committee on the 

4 Budget relative to— 

5 (1) the most recent baseline estimates supplied 

6 by the Congressional Budget Office consistent with 

7 section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 

8 Deficit Control Act of 1985 used in considering a 

9 concurrent resolution on the budget; or 

10 (2) after the beginning of a new calendar year 

11 and before consideration of a concurrent resolution 

12 on the budget, the most recent baseline estimates 

13 supplied by the Congressional Budget Office con14 sistent with section 257 of the Balanced Budget and 

15 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Before Judge Ford,

March 30, 1966

No. R66/5.

reappraisements R60/3209, R60/3210, and R60/3211 (Baltimore).

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban*Company, *Inc.*v. *United*States, 52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851, the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, net, packed, plus special packing charges of $2.30 per metric ton, exclusive of inland freight and f .o.b. charges.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PETE HINSKEN et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALYSSA ZACH et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5107RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The only remaining claim

in this action was the cross claim filed by defendant Alyssa Zach. Defendant Zach has

voluntarily dismissed her counterclaim [Dkt. #58]. The Clerk shall close this case. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants,

and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 1st day of May, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05107-RBL Document 59 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 1
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jean-Marc Zimmerman (Pro Hac Vice) 

Zimmerman& Levi, LLP 

226 St. Paul Street 

Westfield, NJ 07090 

Tel: (908) 654-8000 

Fax: (908) 654-7207 

 

John W. Hathaway 

Law Offices John W. Hathaway, PLLC 

4600 Bank of America Tower 

701 Fifth Avenue 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Tel: (206) 624-7100 

Fax: (206) 624-9292 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eon-Net, L.P. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

EON-NET, L.P., 

 Plaintiff-Sanctioned 

 Party-Appellant 

 and 

 

ZIMMERMAN & LEVI, L.L.P. and 

JEAN-MARC ZIMMERMAN, 

 

 Sanctioned Parties- 

 Appellants, 

 v. 

FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 Case No. C05-2129P 

 AMENDED 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 

 Further to the Notice of Appeal filed on April 14, 2008 which was 

Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 201 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

assigned appeal number 2009-1308, notice is hereby given that Eon-Net, 

L.P. and its counsel Zimmerman & Levi, L.L.P. and attorney Jean-Marc 

Zimmerman in the above-named case hereby appeal to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Judgment in favor of 

Defendant entered in this action on June 21, 2010. This appeal includes any 

and all findings, conclusions and determinations including but not limited to 

the Order on Claim Construction entered on March 4, 2009, the Order on 

Costs and Fees entered on January 4, 2010, and the Supplemental Order on 

Fees and Costs entered on May 17, 2010. The filing fee is being 

electronically submitted with this filing 

 /s/Jean-Marc Zimmerman 

 Jean-Marc Zimmerman (Pro Hac Vice) 

 Zimmerman & Levi, L.L.P. 

 226 St. Paul Street 

 Westfield, NJ 07090 

 Tel: (908) 654-8000 

 Fax: (908) 654-7207 

 John W. Hathaway 

 Law Offices John W. Hathaway, PLLC 

 4600 Bank of America Tower 

 701 Fifth Avenue 

 Seattle, WA 98104 

 Tel: (206) 624-7100 

 Fax: (206) 624-9292 

 Attorneys for Appellants 

Dated: July 5, 2010 

 Westfield, NJ 07090 

Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 201 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2
No. 65218.

#### N. M. Albert Co., Inc., and Tally Ho Creations *v.*United States,

protest 309450-K (New York).

*359Opinion by

Mollison, .T.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C.C.P.A. 229, C.A.D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21019]



[[Page 66477]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4721-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Oklahoma; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-4721-DR), dated July 19, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of July 19, 2023.

    Atoka, McIntosh, Muskogee, and Wagoner Counties for Public 
Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21019 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Before the Third Division,

May 9, 1967

No. P67/147.

#### Bruce Duncan and Don Juan Junior, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/11738 (Los Angeles).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the facts and issues involved in the foregoing protest are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 CCPA 112, C.A.D. 351), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 694 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 694

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2905) to prevent the 
  Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness 
                               doctrine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2007

    Mr. Pence (for himself and Mr. Walden of Oregon) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2905) to prevent the 
  Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness 
                               doctrine.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the Speaker shall, 
pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into 
the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2905) to prevent the Federal 
Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising 
under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an 
amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 
XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it 
has come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day 
the House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business 
under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
    Sec. 3.  The requirements of clauses 9(a)(1) or (2) of rule XXI 
shall be satisfied if the sponsor of the measure made in order by this 
resolution causes the list or statement otherwise required by such 
clauses to be printed in the Congressional Record prior to the 
measure's consideration.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

March 30, 1967

No. P67/89.

#### Harper, Robinson *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 63/16000 (Seattle).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of testers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
JaSED S7,~ T

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

2 < WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

41lq 

~1. 

~ PRO~ E 

NOV 10 2011 

J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

On Apri15, 2011 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of contact-handled (CH) solids (S3000) 

summary category group (SCG) as a Tier 1(T1) change. The Central Characterization Project (CCP) at 

the Hanford Site used components of the CH TRU waste characterization program that EPA approved in 

December 2010 to characterize waste stream RLCCPPUNIT. With this letter, EPA approves only the 

subject waste stream and is not approving solids as an SCG at this time. EPA generally approves the 

complete SCG at once for CH TRU waste; EPA is not ready to do that for S3000 waste at Hanford for 

the reasons described below. The enclosed report provides the approval details (A-98-49: II-A4-1 54) and 

will be placed in the Agency's public docket. 

The reason for providing a limited approval is two-fold. First, EPA has determined that the waste 

characterization information provided for this waste stream RLCCPPUNIT is not likely to be applicable 

for other unique Hanford solid waste streams such as the Hanford Tank Waste or K-Basin waste. 

Second, due to the budgeting constraints, in Fiscal Year 2012 and beyond, no CH TRU waste 

characterization will occur at Hanford. As a result, at Hanford, no CH TRU solid waste is being 

characterized at this time. In the future, when TRU waste characterization at Hanford is reactivated, 

EPA's evaluation of TRU waste characterization program for the December 2010-approved debris waste 

(S5000), new solid waste streams, and soils (S4000) will be necessary. 

In June and July 2011, EPA conducted a desktop evaluation of the CBFO-provided waste 

characterization documentation for three characterization components: acceptable knowledge, nondestructive assay, and nondestructive examination. EPA has determined that the documentation is 

sufficiently detailed and technically adequate. 

Recycled/Recyclable 

~

Printed wlth Soy/Canola Ink on paper that 

contalns at ieast 50 % recycled tlber 
If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422 or 

Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

1. — 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

cc: Electronic Distribution 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Nonma Castaneda, CBFO 

Mike Sensibaugh, CCP 

Tim Hall, NMED 

Raymond Lee, EPA HQ 

Site Documents
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Plaintiff also asks the court to issue a “general statement regarding the rights of detainees to

send their matters to the Courts and to the Parties of litigation.” However, the court cannot give

legal advice.

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. WIGEN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5662FDB

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 NOTED:

 MAY 26, 2006

This Civil Rights action been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title

28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A), 636(b)(1)(B), and Local Magistrates’ Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4.

The court is advised by plaintiff that he no longer wishes to pursue this action. Plaintiff states that

the conduct on which he based his Complaint has ceased and is not likely to reoccur, and that he has

suffered no compensable injury.1

 DISCUSSION

Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part:

[A]n action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by

filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an

answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs . . . . 

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 28 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

CONCLUSION

The court should dismiss this action as plaintiff has stated that defendants have changed their

behavior and that he has no injury of which to complain. No answer or motion for summary

judgment has been filed by defendants. A proposed order accompanies this Report and

Recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

the parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report and Recommendation to file written

objections. See also Fed. R.Civ.P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those

objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time

limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on May 26,

2006, as noted in the caption.

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 28 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt PichlerPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 1, 2011
No. 58738.

protest 238437-K (New York).

#### Royal Coin Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was dismissed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of the Cougar Lakes-Mount Aix study area, Yakima and Lewis Counties,Washington**
 
Report | Plates: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1504
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959929
 
August 10, 2018