alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64607.

#### Asche Bandor Corp.-Trans. and Hulse Imports Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28955, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT – 1

(Jerry Frey; CR06-0094-RSM)

JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JERRY FREY,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-0094-RSM

ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT

THIS MATTER, having come before the undersigned on the motion of the

defendant to file the Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandum under seal; now, therefore, it

is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant shall be permitted to file his Sentencing

Memorandum under seal.

DATED this 6th day of September, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Peter J. Avenia

WSBA No. 20794

Case 2:06-cr-00094-RSM Document 18 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT – 2

(Jerry Frey; CR06-0094-RSM)

Attorney for Defendant Jerry Frey

Case 2:06-cr-00094-RSM Document 18 Filed 09/06/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 728 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 6, 2007.
Whereas heavy rainstorms brought severe flooding to Ohio and the upper Midwest 
        over the week of August 19, 2007;
Whereas, in many parts of Ohio, this was the worst flood since 1913 with nearly 
        15 inches of rain in some areas;
Whereas the record storms and flooding were responsible for up to 18 deaths 
        across parts of the upper Midwest--some of these in Ohio;
Whereas over 500 citizens were forced to flee their homes and businesses and 
        many hundreds of homes and businesses were damaged;
Whereas, on August 21, 2007, Allen, Crawford, Hancock, Hardin, Paulding, Putnam, 
        Richland, Seneca, Van Wert and Wyandot counties made initial local 
        emergency declaration;
Whereas, on August 22, 2007, Governor Ted Strickland issued a State disaster 
        declaration for Allen, Crawford, Hancock, Hardin, Putnam, Richland, 
        Seneca, Wyandot and Van Wert Counties;
Whereas, on August 27, 2007, President George W. Bush issued a Federal disaster 
        declaration for Allen, Crawford, Hancock, Putnam, Richland and Wyandot 
        Counties and later added Hardin and Seneca Counties; and
Whereas Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa and Indiana also 
        experienced serious, storms, flooding and tornadoes: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its support and profoundest sympathy for the victims 
        of the devastating flooding that occurred across much of Ohio and the 
        surrounding region in August 2007;
            (2) conveys its gratitude to the local, State and Federal officials 
        and emergency personnel who responded to this emergency and continue 
        working to restore normalcy in the affected counties;
            (3) thanks the many volunteers, charitable organizations, business 
        and individual donors, churches and religious organizations for their 
        generosity in responding to this crisis; and
            (4) commends the people of Ohio for their indomitable spirit and for 
        the grace and magnanimity with which they have supported one another 
        during the flooding and continuing recovery.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         309,842
<SECURITIES>                                   188,313
<RECEIVABLES>                                  381,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,174
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               950,560
<PP&E>                                         329,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                 157,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,249,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          663,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,493
<OTHER-SE>                                     476,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,249,795
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               617,618
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  792,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (827)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (163,620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (168,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (168,544)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Dennis Ray GRAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, In re Montgomery County Circuit Court, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-6791.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Dennis Ray Graves, pro se.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Ray Graves, a Virginia inmate, appeals two district court orders, the first dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(l) (West Supp.2000) for failure to state a claim, and the second denying his motion for reconsideration of the first order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Graves v. Supreme Court of Virginia,*No. CA-01-250-7 (W.D.Va. Apr. 25, 2001 & May 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998
and the  Condensed  Consolidated  Statement of  Operations  for the three months
ended March 31, 1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,676,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,664,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,924,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   141,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,068,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,650,000
<PP&E>                                      32,872,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,068,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,549,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,320,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,968,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,549,000
<SALES>                                        831,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,688,000
<CGS>                                          403,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,683,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,255,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,097,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,158,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,158,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        


</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

262) IV-C-8 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:04 AM Sheet 262 of 276 
P.2 

nuu _^.rx ^.-u_> tA a*t0"*0 & 

iv-c-8 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACIKNCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

NOV 2 0 1931 omciof ! 

AIX AND kAOIATIOM | 

Honorable Henry A. Waxman 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Health 

and the Environment 

House of Representatives 

Washington, n.C. 20515 | AZA^," A. Vn>•/-•-,->" 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

As you know, on July 22, 1991, the Health and Environment 

Subcommittee of the Committee on Energy and Commerce held a 

hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) proposed 

rulemaking concerning the applicability of new source 

requirements under the Clean A1r Act (Act) to electric utilities 

(commonly referred to as the WEPCO rule). During questions and 

answers on our proposed WEPCO rule, both you and Chairman Dingell 

expressed an interest in having the transcript of this hearinq 

placed in the public docket. As of yet, we still have not 

received a copy of thi6 transcript. We have reopened the comment 

period, starting on November 20 and closing on December io, 1991, 

to solicit public comment on the information in the draft 

tranecript ae it relates to our rulemaking. If the final 

transcript is received within the next week, we will also include 

it in the docket for purposes of this extended comment period. 

We appreciate your cooperation in expediting this important 

rulemaking action. 

A* 

William G. Rosenberg 

Assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation
No. 58665.

protests 233386-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dodge & Olcott, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: rgohl@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:58:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

rhonda gohl

La Mirada, CA 90638
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James A. Watt, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RemingtonOil and Gas Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 27, 2004      /s/ James A. Watt James A. Watt  *President and Chief Executive Officer*
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Sau Shan Ku, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    Oakridge International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    /s/ Sau Shan Ku
--------------------------
Sau    Shan Ku
Chief    Financial Officer
September    30, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

	
	













  
  

 
  

			
	 For value received,
........................................................................................ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

	
	 
	
	 
	
	 


					
		
	     	 	 	    Shares	 

 of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

 
  

Attorney or Public Notary to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated, ............................................... 
 ..............................................................................

 In Presence of 

.................................................................................
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 

MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PARAMJIT SINGH DHALIWAL,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-211-RSL-JPD

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH

BRIEF

Petitioner Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal, an inmate at the Monroe Correctional Complex in

Monroe, Washington, has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt.

No. 1. The present matter comes before the Court on the petitioner’s Motion to File OverLength Brief. Dkt. No. 28. After careful consideration of the motion, supporting documents,

governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Good cause having been established, petitioner’s motion (Dkt. No. 28) is

GRANTED. Pursuant to Local Rule CR 7(f), petitioner will be allowed to file a brief of 63

pages in length, 39 pages over the usual limit. 

(2) The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to

counsel for both parties, and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, Chief Judge.

Case 2:06-cv-00211-RSL-JPD Document 29 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 

MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF

PAGE - 2

DATED this 1st day of March, 2007. AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00211-RSL-JPD Document 29 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Seal — 1

U.S. v. Dunigan/CR05-5823RBL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

(253) 428-3800

Judge Ronald B. Leighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) CR05-5823RBL

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER TO SEAL

)

THOMAS EVANS DUNIGAN, )

)

Defendant. ) )

Having read the government’s Motion for Downward Departure and Government’s

Sentencing Memorandum pursuant to USSG § 5K1.1 in the above-captioned case, which

were filed under seal, and the government’s Motion to Seal, requesting that the motions

remain under seal,

It is hereby ORDERED that the government’s Motion for Downward Departure 

and Government’s Sentencing Memorandum pursuant to USSG § 5K1.1 in this matter

remain sealed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of June 2007. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Digitally Signed upon oral authorization (JAB) Proposed by:

s/ Kent Y. Liu 

KENT Y. LIU

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:05-cr-05823-RJB Document 253 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

September 13, 1967

No. P67/303.

#### United Import Sales, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 62/2957, etc. (Los Angeles).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2258), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin International, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.