alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68784-68785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21928]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-114, OMB Control No. 3235-0102]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Tender Offer--
Regulation 14D and Regulation 14E, Schedule 14D-9

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Regulation 14D (17 CFR 240.14d-1--240.14d-11) and Regulation 14E 
(17 CFR 240.14e-1--240.14e-8) and related Schedule 14D-9 (17 CFR 
240.14d-101) require information important to security holders in 
deciding how to respond to tender offers. Schedule 14D-9 takes 
approximately 260.56 hours per

[[Page 68785]]

response to prepare and is filed by approximately 63 companies 
annually. We estimate that 25% of the 260.56 hours per response (65.14 
hours) is prepared by the company for an annual reporting burden of 
4,104 hours (65.14 hours per response x 63 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication by December 4, 2023.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John 
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
[email protected].

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21928 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PaperWorks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rhoda Rizkalla, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of November, 2011.


/s/ Rhoda Rizkalla
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
From: elizabethboll@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: elizabethboll@yahoo.com

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:19:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth O'Connor-Boll

Lancaster, PA 17601
No. 68161.

#### Magnesium Elektron, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/2089, etc. (New York).

*281Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of magnesium alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Magnesium, Mehtron, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 71, C.D. 2391), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20095

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE BADILLO, JR., also known as Joe Badillo, also known as Jose A. 

Badillo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-493-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Badillo, Jr.,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Badillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20095 Document: 00513721839 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-20095

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20095 Document: 00513721839 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 56802.

#### S. Twitchell Company *v.*United States,

protest 151413-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of

flavoring extracts manufactured in the United States from domestic alcohol upon which domestic internal revenue taxes were paid, which were exported from the United States; that all of the applicable laws and regulations to permit drawback upon the taxi-paid domestic alcohol contained in said exported flavoring extracts were complied with, except that the drawback entry and its accompanying certificate of manufacture were not filed with the collector until more than 2 years from the dates when the flavoring extracts were exported, as specified in section 22.16 *(a),*Customs Regulations of 1943; and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Sterling Drug, Inc., Successor to Dr. D. Jayne & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 151, C. D. 1361), wherein it was held that the failure of an exporter to complete his drawback claim of expor*349tation was not a bar to obtaining drawback under the provisions of section 313 (d). Upon the entire record, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HARRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5063 RBL/KLS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the

Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction. (Dkt. # 42). After carefully reviewing

Plaintiff’s motion and Defendants’ response (Dkt. # 44), the Court concludes that Plaintiff shall be

ordered to show cause why the Court should not find Plaintiff in violation of this Court’s previous

admonition that Plaintiff should not submit pleadings prepared on his behalf by Mr. Scott.

I. DISCUSSION

In this Court’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 36), Plaintiff was advised that Richard

Roy Scott is in violation of the Case Management Order under which Mr. Scott litigates, that Mr.

Scott has been prohibited from filing documents in other cases for other residents of SCC, and that

appropriate sanctions against Mr. Scott in his litigation (Case No. C06-5340, Dkt.# 6, ¶ 8), were

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 46 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

being considered. Additionally, Plaintiff was specifically advised that Mr. Scott may not file

documents on Plaintiff’s behalf and that any future filings submitted by Mr. Scott on Plaintiff’s behalf

will not be considered by the Court. 

Plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunction (Dkt. # 42) appears to be written in Mr. Scott’s

hand-writing. If so, this is a clear violation by Mr. Scott of the Case Management Order under

which he litigates and a violation by Plaintiff of this Court’s Order. 

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not

find Plaintiff in violation of this Court’s previous Order that it will not consider pleadings filed on

Plaintiff’s behalf by Mr. Scott. Plaintiff shall respond to this Order to Show Cause no later than

June 22, 2007. If Plaintiff fails to respond, the Court will consider appropriate sanctions.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 46 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2015-06658]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 3160

[LLWO300000 L13100000.PP0000 14X]
RIN 1004-AE26

Oil and Gas; Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands

Correction

    In rule document 2015-06658, appearing on pages 16128-16222, in the 
Issue of March 26, 2015, make the following corrections:

Sec.  3162.3-3  Subsequent well operations; Hydraulic fracturing. 
[Corrected]

    1. On page 16218, in Sec.  3162.3-3 (a)(5), in the table in the 
first column, in the fifth row, the entry ``(5) Authorized drilling 
operations were completed after September 22, 2015.'' should read ``(5) 
Authorized drilling operations were completed after December 26, 
2014.''

    2. On the same page, in Sec.  3162.3-3, in the same table, in the 
first column, in the sixth row, the entry ``(6) Authorized drilling 
activities were completed before September 22, 2015'' should read ``(6) 
Authorized drilling activities were completed before December 26, 
2014.''

[FR Doc. C1-2015-06658 Filed 3-26-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
March 22, 1957

No. 60579.

Suit 4864.

#### United States *v.*C. J. Tower & Sons.

C. D. 1733 reversed November 30, 1956. C. A. D. 626.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    



|By:/s/ Joseph F. LongoJoseph F. LongoChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentJune 17, 2009
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000875278
<NAME>                        WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             335,808
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   335,808
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,306,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,731,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,306,747
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11,944
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      286,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   540,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (814,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (814,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (814,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 33 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION


OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A)


I, William J. Keneally, certify that:





|   |                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CTPartners Executive Search Inc.;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




/s/ William J. Keneally


William J. Keneally


Date: April 30, 2015    Chief Financial Officer
No. 60557.

#### Associated Customhouse Brokers *v.*United States,

protest 279453-K (Rochester).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
Before the Third Division,

May 6, 1964

No. 68512.

protest 63/8596 (Los Angeles).

#### L. E. Coppersmith, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000875579
<NAME>                          WorldWideWeb Institute.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                              US Dollars

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                                  189452
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            83826
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        288499
<PP&E>                                                  721428
<DEPRECIATION>                                          122870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4030321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1428510
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    92
<OTHER-SE>                                             2601719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4030321
<SALES>                                                6083581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6083581
<CGS>                                                  1012146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          4714363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (530000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         887072
<INCOME-TAX>                                            219000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     668072
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            668072
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.08



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       STARTECH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph S. Klimek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                              /s/ Joseph S. Klimek
                              --------------------
                              Joseph S. Klimek
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              September 13, 2002
No. 63877.

protests 58/12803 and 58/17219 (New York).

#### The Brammer Vee Link Belting, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron or steel rivets the same as those the subject of *Brammer Vee Link Belting, Inc.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 1947), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.