alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                           2,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,393
<PP&E>                                          37,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,465
<BONDS>                                          2,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,241
<SALES>                                         57,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,574
<CGS>                                           33,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,639)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,539)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,539)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

August 20, 1953

No. 57468.

#### I. Magnin & Co. v. United States,

protests 168317-K and 169759-K (New York).

*242Opinion by

Ford, J.

The record established that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags similar in all material respects to the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSAMERICAN WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.  FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,693
<PP&E>                                          47,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,621
<BONDS>                                         55,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,311
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,650
<SALES>                                         24,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,420
<CGS>                                           16,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    858
<INCOME-TAX>                                        93
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        


</TABLE>
Case No. 12,965.

#### SMEDLEY v. YEATON.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 181.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1827.

Shipping — Master—Supercargo.

The master of a vessel, who is also consignee of the cargo, has thereby the authority of supercargo during the voyage.

Assumpsit Lby Smedley’s executor against W. Yeaton], for not delivering fifty barrels of flour, shipped on board the defendant’s schooner, Hero, for Barbadoes, consigned to the master, AY. Sowle. The pumps being choked by corn, 113 barrels of the cargo of flour were damaged. The vessel put into Norfolk, where the damaged flour was taken out and sold, and the same number of barrels of good flour put on board in place of the damaged flour.

In order to prove the replacing of the flour, Mr. Taylor, for defendant, offered to read in evidence an account rendered by J. B. Har-wood, of the sales of 113 barrels of damaged flour, and the supply of 113 barrels of good flour, which account was verified in the usual manner by the signature of W. Sowle, the master and consignee, who died before the trial.

Mr. Hewitt, for plaintiff,

objected that it was the mere act of the master, in his character of master of the defendant’s vessel, and not in his character of consignee, which did not arise, nor did his agency for the shipper commence until the arrival of the flour at Barbadoes.

Taylor & Mason, for defendant,

contended that the master, who was consignee, had thereby the authority of supercargo to receive the good flour in lieu of the damaged; and that his certificate or acknowledgment of the receipt of the flour was evidence for the defendant.

And of that opinion was

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, contra).

See Biggs v. Lawrence, 3 Term R. 454.
IV 

House Calendar No. 152 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 809 

[Report No. 110–438] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3996) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2007 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3996) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain 

expiring provisions, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3996) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

4 extend certain expiring provisions, and for other purposes. 

5 All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

6 waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 

7 XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:50 Nov 08, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR809.RH HR809

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 809 RH 

1 ommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now 

2 printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, 

3 as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of 

4 order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are 

5 waived. The previous question shall be considered as or6 dered on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment 

7 thereto, to final passage without intervening motion ex8 cept: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 

9 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

10 Committee on Ways and Means; (2) an amendment in the 

11 nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative 

12 McCrery of Louisiana or his designee, which shall be con13 sidered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 

14 hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 

15 an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 

16 without instructions. 

17 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3996 pursuant 

18 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

19 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid20 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

21 the Speaker. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 152 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 809 

[Report No. 110

–438] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3996) 

purposes. extend certain expiring provisions, and for other to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

NOVEMBER 8, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
AIR QUALI TY M ANAGEMENT 

SECTION 

STATE OF D ELAWARE 

D EPARTMENT OF N ATURAL R ESOURCES 

& II ~O NMEN AL C ONTROL 

DIVISIO N OF A IR & WASTE MANAGEMENT 

156 S . STATE STREET 

D OVER , DELAWARE 19 901 

Mr. Lyle Laverty, Assistant Secretary 

Fish, Wildlife and Parks 

Department ofInterior 

1849 C Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20240 

Dear Mr. Laverty: 

TELEPHONE: (302) 739 ~ 9402 

FAX No.: (302) 739 ~ 3106 

Thank you for your June 27, 2008 letter to Secretary Hughes on Delaware's draft Visibility State 

Implementation Plan (SIP)~ As you know this SIP is the first of a series of actions that Delaware 

will take to aid in the achievement of natural visibility conditions at all of our nations Class I areas. 

I agree that cooperative efforts between our organizations, Class I states, and regional planning 

organizations are essential for us to continue to make progress toward the Clean Air Act's goal of 

achievement of natural visibility conditions at all Federal Class I areas by 2064. 

Despite this being the first step in a process that extends through the next fifty six (56) years, I am 

proud of what Delaware has accomplished. Through the consultation process, sulfur dioxide was 

detennined to affect the maximum impact on visibility impainnent. As you no-doubt gleaned from 

our draft SIP, Delaware will reduce sulfur dioxide more than seventy four (74) percent by the first 

program milestone (i.e., 2018). Other visibility impairing pollutants are projected to decrease by 

twenty four (24) percent. These significant reductions are due to actions that include stringent 

regulation of Delaware's coal and residual oil fired power plants, the regulation of lightering 

operations in the Delaware Bay, various regulatory and enforcement actions at our petroleum 

refinery, and many others. Delaware remains committed to continue to do its fair share toward 

achievement of visibility goals. 

My staff is now reviewing your comments, and in response we are making several changes to our 

draft SIP. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.308(i)(3) Delaware will include a description of how it addressed 

each of your comments as part of our SIP adoption process. At this point we anticipate holding a 

public hearing at the end of September. 

We appreciate the help you have provided, and look forward to working cooperatively in the future. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me at (302) 739-9402 if you have questions or need additional 

infonnation. 

;:;I ~~ 

Ronald A. Amirikian 

Planning Branch Manager 

PR I"lED ON 

RECYCLED "' P~R
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Community strategic plan:volume I, school years 2013/14 - 2017/18**
 
2001 | 2006 | 2017/18: Vol 1Vol 2
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.136:C 73/
Item Number:0306-A-78 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000851474
 
February 12, 2018
No. 69276.

#### Baldwin Hdwe. Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 64/12276 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Zanin & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 37, C.D. 2385), and Abstract 67834, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.6

 

AMENDMENT

TO THE

LEVEL ONE BANCORP, INC.

2007 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Level One Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Level One Bancorp, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated April 15, 2015 (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 10 of the Plan, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company has reserved to itself the power, authority and discretion to amend the Plan from time-to-time;

 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan in order to clarify the effect of a change in control on outstanding options; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board has duly authorized the undersigned officer to carry out the foregoing.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of August 29, 2017 the Plan be and hereby is amended in the following particulars:

 

1.             Section 6(f)(iii) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 6(f)(iii):

 

“Effect of Change in Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, each Option that has not yet become fully exercisable will become fully exercisable upon the earlier of (1) the effective date of a Change in Control of the Company or a liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or (2) the third anniversary of the date on which the Option was granted.”

 

2.             In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 29th day of August, 2017.

 

	
 
    	
LEVEL   ONE BANCORP, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Gregory   Wernette
    
	
 
    	
Its:
    	
 EVP & Corp. Sec.
No. 59291.

protests 216058-K, etc. (New York).

#### Durlacher & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.
	The Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and2.
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification this 12th day of May, 2009.

/s/ Thomas L. Wegman_______________________ Thomas L. Wegman

President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ______________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 131655(96)(98) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PAMELA PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 131655 v COA: 249737 Wayne CC: 01-134649-CL FORD MOTOR COMPANY and DANIEL P. BENNETT, Defendants-Appellants.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plai ntiff-appellee for extension of the time fore filing her supplemental brie f is considered and it is GRANTED. The motion by the Michigan Trial Lawyers A ssociation for leave to file a brief amicus curiae
is considered an d it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bion Environmental Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
that to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Lawrence R. Danziger
-------------------------------
Lawrence R. Danziger
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ROBERTO RAMOS-SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 06-17M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Illegal reentry after Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance January 12, 2006

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant was not interviewed by Pretrial Services. He was born in Mexico.

There is no additional information available regarding his personal history, residence, family ties,

ties to this District, income, financial assets or liabilities, physical/mental health or controlled

substance use, if any.

(2) The defendant has a criminal record that includes prior deportation proceedings.

(3) An immigration detainer has been placed. Based on this, the defendant does not

Case 2:06-cr-00013-RSL Document 8 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

contest detention.

(4) The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance due to prior failure to appear,

unknown background information, and status as a citizen and native of Mexico. The defendant

poses a risk of danger due to his criminal record.

(5) There does not appear to be any condition or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings while addressing the danger

to other persons or the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00013-RSL Document 8 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS EUGENE JOSEPH,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5200RBL

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial

Services Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision under Bond, by

(1) having contact with Gypsy Joker member(s) on or about July 15, 2006; and 

 (2) traveling to Bend Oregon on July 15, 2006.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, GREGORY GRUBER; and

Pretrial Services Officer, JENNIFER BENNETT.

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, COLIN FIEMAN.

The defendant has been advised of the allegations. The United States withdrew allegation (1)

above set forth. With regard to allegation (2) the parties stipulated that defendant traveled to Bend

Oregon on July 15, 2006 without having secured the approval of Pretrial Services, and presented

argument to the court as to whether or not that travel was in fact in violation of the terms and

conditions of the bond. The court considered the Appearance Bond, the arguments of counsel and the

Conditions of Supervision document signed April 7, 2006 by the defendant with pretrial services.

The court finds the defendant to be in violation of the conditions of his Appearance Bond and

agreement with Pretrial Services by traveling to Bend, Oregon July 15, 2006 without prior approval

from Pretrial Services.

The defendant is to be continued on bond, subject to the following amendments/clarifications:

1) The defendant must obtain prior written approval from Pretrial Services before leaving the

Western District of Washington;

2) The condition precluding contact with the Gypsy Joker Motorcycle Gang/Club is deleted.

 August 24, 2006.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold ______________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05200-RBL Document 25 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 1