alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0000875579
<NAME>                     Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                             3487
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     1410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    40220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           (57500)
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6881
<OTHER-SE>                                                        90839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      40220
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     70498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (70498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (70498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (70498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.01)






</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: "RedBeds" and associated formations in New Mexico : with an outline of thegeology of the State**
 
Report | Plates: 1724263337404244
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:794
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960034
 
August 13, 2018
FjLD

NO. 04-14-00742-CR if^ANi :M

2015 HAR 16 AM If: U2

In The Court Of Appeals For The

Fourth Supreme Judicial District Of Texas

San Antonio, Texas t) •" '*::.'■

ANDRES SOLIS VIELMA,

Defendant-Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Pla intiff-Appellee,

In The County Court Of Uvalde County, Texas

Cause No. 2013-09- 12304-CR

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR PRO SE

ACCESS TO THE APPELLATE RECORD

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES ANDRES SOLIS VIELMA, Appellant in the above-styled and

numbered cause, and respectfully files this Motion For Pro Se Access To The

Appellate Record. In support of this motion, Appellant shows this Court as follows.
I.

Appellant's appointed counsel have filed motion to withdraw, along with

and brief in support of the motion, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967).

II.

The undersigned Appellant wishes to exercise his right to review the appellate

record in preparing his pro se response to the Anders brief that court-appointed

counsel have filed. The undersigned Appellant now moves this Court to provide him

with free,pro se access to the appellate record, including the Clerk's Record and the

Reporter's Record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318-19 (Tex.Crim.App.

2014).

III.

The undersigned Appellant is presently incarcerated and lacks access to

computer. For that reason, Appellant respectfully requests that paper copy of the

appellate record be provided to him. Appellant also requests 30-day extension of

time from his receipt of the record to file his pro se brief.

IV.

This motion is addressed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, Cadena-Reeves

Justice Center, 300 Dolorosa Street, Suite 3200, San Antonio, Texas 78205. This
motion is delivered to the Fourth Court of Appeals by United States mail, on this the

It day of [M^hcW 2015.

PRAYER

FOR ALL OF THESE REASONS, Appellant Andres Solis Vielma respectfully

prays that this Court will GRANT his Motion For Pro Se Access To The Appellate

Record.

Respectfully submitted,

ANDRES SOLIS VIELMA

Appellant Pro Se
ynw'

First Class Mail

From: Mr. Andre.. Vielma

TDCJ No. 1964402

Garza VVcM Unit

4250 Highvay 202

Becvillc, T.xas 78102

TO: Fourth Court of Appeals

Office of tie Clerk

Cadena-Rrevcs Justice Center

300 Dolorcsa, Suite 3200

San Anton o, Texas 78205-3037
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350The undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscalquarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.              /s/ Earl R. Refsland   Earl R. Refsland   President & Chief Executive Officer   February 7, 2007
21
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Wei Tao Wang, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the
    Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.2) of Eternity Healthcare Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2017 (the
    “Report”) fully     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of Eternity Healthcare Inc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: January 12, 2018





| |  | /s/
    Wei Tao Wang                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Wei Tao
    Wang                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| |  | President,
Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial
Officer
                                                       (Principal Executive Officer,
                                                       Principal Financial Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer)
| |  | Eternity Healthcare Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Eternity Healthcare Inc. and will be retained by Eternity Healthcare Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 65211.

#### Clear Spring Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 972328-G/88287, etc. (Chicago).

*355Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyof the Muddy Mountains, Nevada : with a section through the Virgin Range to theGrand Wash Cliffs, Arizona**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:798
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000960036
 
August 13, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AKRAM ASWAD ALMUSSA and JOSHUA

KEBEDE,

Defendants.

No. CR05-381Z

ORDER

Defendant, Akram Almussa, having filed an unopposed motion to continue the trial date and

extend the deadline for motions and the Court, having reviewed the Motion and Declaration of Counsel,

finds that a failure to grant the requested continuance would deny him reasonable time to obtain counsel

and reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within

the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The Court also finds that the ends of justice will be served

by continuing the trial date and that a continuance is necessary to ensure effective trial preparation, and

these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial within the meaning of 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

For these reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS that the trial date be continued from May 22, 2006,

to September 25, 2006. Pre-trial motions shall be due on August 1, 2006.

Case 2:05-cr-00381-TSZ Document 75 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

It is ORDERED that the time between May 22, 2006, and September 25, 2006, shall be excluded

in the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act as to all defendants as this is a reasonable period

of delay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of April, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00381-TSZ Document 75 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Elizabeth Marie ROACH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS SEVERANCE PAY PLAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-55063.

DC NO. CV-99-05585-DDP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2001.

Decided July 6, 2001.

Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Elizabeth Marie Roach appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Southern California District Council of Laborers Severance Pay Plan (“Pay Plan”) in an ERISA action for severance benefits. Because no genuine issue of material fact exists with respect to whether the Pay Plan abused its discretion by determining that Roach was not a participant in the plan, we affirm.

The Pay Plan’s definition of “fulltime dispatcher” as a “person who performs no other duties” is not facially implausible and is consistent with at least two prior determinations. Although Roach was listed as a participant in benefits illustrations pre*645pared by an actuary between 1978 and 1982, these documents are not governing plan documents. The record is devoid of evidence that would suggest an abuse of discretion, such as evidence that Roach worked all day as a dispatcher; that the Pay Plan’s board had made inconsistent decisions or actually favored men over women; that the position of “fulltime dispatcher” as defined by the board does not exist at any of the participating Locals and that the definition therefore renders the term a nullity; or that the board had a conflict of interest. In the absence of such evidence, the Pay Plan did not abuse its discretion. *See McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.,*203 F.3d 1099, 1113 (9th Cir.2000); *Bendixen v. Standard Ins. Co.,*185 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. 65253.

#### Ditbro Pearl Co. and Liebermann Waelchli & Co., N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/18360 and 60/18405 (New York).

*367Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass stones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2019

No. 04-19-00044-CV

TITLE SOURCE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

HOUSECANARY, INC., formerly known as Canary Analytics, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI06300

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed by May 10, 2019. Appellant’s first 

unopposed motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief 

to June 10, 2019. Appellant has filed a second unopposed motion for extension of time to file the 

brief until July 10, 2019, for a total extension of sixty (60) days. The motion is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief must be filed by July 10, 2019. Appellant is advised that additional requests for 

extension of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 19th day of July , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CHIHULY, INC. Et al.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1801 JPD

ROBERT KAINDL, et al.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

A motion for Protective Order (dkt #92) was filed with a request for oral argument.

The request is GRANTED.

The Court hereby Orders Oral Argument be held on:

Monday, 31 July 2006 at 11:00am 

The hearing will be held in Courtroom 12A, U.S. Courthouse, Seattle, Washington. Counsel will

be allowed to twenty (20) minutes per side to argue.

Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 99 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

ORDER REFERRING AND REOPENING CASE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DARRYL WILLIAM YOUNG, 

Petitioner,

v.

ROB MCKENNA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1746L

ORDER VACATING ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL; ORDER REOPENING

AND REFERRING CASE

This matter comes before the Court on a motion filed by petitioner Darryl William Young

(“petitioner”) to reconsider the Court’s prior order dismissing the case for failure to pay the

filing fee or file an adequate application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. #5). Petitioner

states that the Court ordered him to correct the deficiency or pay the filing fee by November 17,

2005, and that he paid the fee on October 31, 2005. A review of the docket in this case shows

that petitioner paid the filing fee on October 31, 2005, but that due to a clerical error, the

payment was not posted until December 12, 2005.

Accordingly, the order dismissing the case (Dkt. #4) is VACATED. The Clerk of the

Court is directed to reopen this case. Petitioner’s § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

Case 2:05-cv-01746-RSL Document 6 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

ORDER REFERRING AND REOPENING CASE - 2

referred to United States Magistrate Judge Monica J. Benton. 

DATED this 12th day of December, 2005.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01746-RSL Document 6 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

March 29, 1956

No. 59796.

#### Doulton & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 247579-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures or figurines similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
823 

OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

H~orablo T. 1. mmblo 

pint A8Si8taw 

Sate 8ttperlatendent of l’ubllo fnstruotion 

m8tltt, Texa8 

Dear art 

ulo or l o&u301 

bm we4 for the 

carerully Cea8la8 

request a8 follau~r 

ior the ptwpo8. 

over whloh their 

Of Uy 8ChoO1 di8triOt, 

CNlCe88 pre8crfbUWi8&bl8, 

may mske 8ale Of 8ay propercy beloa&ttg to 8tia 

8ChoOl ai8criCt, ud apply the plrg(Peeaa CO the 

pU'Cht48e Of tleCe88w /IOWh%8, Or t0 t& build- 

& or repairlag of mcbeolhou8e8, or place the 

pm~eeds t~,the Or&it of the available 8Chool 

fund Of Lhe di8triOt.* 
lion. 1. 1. ‘PrialtB - Iago 2 

Th6 a b o ve q uo ted l rticlr (2753) l p p llo a to c o mmo n 

8ChaO1 districts. 

1179. 

bee il. 8. mtttaer h co. v. mwn, 198 3.w. 

By vir tue 0P conwtiLul;tonal rsd *Lawtory proriaatu, the Crwrirsloner** Court 1s rads a aourt of ganoral 

jitrirdiatiott for the 68Iabli.8km6iat O? W&48. 21 rexA JW18- 

imtdatae p. 570. 

"Each COSMi88iOtWrE’ Cowt 8hall.r 

(I . l . 

*3, I,a00y % a m2 l rt&bli8h, Ohurge aad dir- 

%OntinlW PUbliC -8 rad hllLbwy8. 

* 

. . . 

"6. Exeroi8o 8aneral oeatrol over all -8, 

hQhuays s ferri.8 aad Bridges in their eoUatie8. 

YOUam l'88&38UtN~dVi88& -tit i8 th. OptDi6l& 

Ofthi8d8~~tth&t thr, pFOiWd8 ?MliMti f’mrth8 8&h 

Of th0 8ahOOi p~$W?ty Of U&&t a- BOh001 Di8trfGt 

cattzmt lmf~llybbr mtpad& for tb8 b~lldlng or rep8lriee a5 

aoumi~ Pod8 ovfw vhlah tha ruEa bU8 Of SWh da8trict lwn8. 

@tiale 2753, @upfar dlreo%r JWV l uoh pFC+68&8 8-1 be 

applied or plum%. 

YOU'8 very truly 

08u88AL OF !?xAn
Before the Third Division,

February 26, 1960

No. 63866.

protests 950444-G, etc. (New York).

#### Alliance Distributors, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 (206) 553-7970

Order Granting Bench Trial - 1

Dong Wan Park/CR05-5811RBL

HON. RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

DONG WAN PARK,

Defendant. ______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5811RBL

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION FOR BENCH TRIAL

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the stipulated motion of the

parties for a bench trial, and the Court having considered the stipulated motion of the

parties, together with the written waiver of jury trial by Defendant, Dong Wan Park,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulated motion for bench trial is

GRANTED. 

DATED this 15th day of May 

A

, 2006.

Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05811-RBL Document 53 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40355

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VIDAL RICO-TOVAR, also known as Vidal Rico,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1925-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Vidal Rico-Tovar raises an

argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno,

700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2044 (2013), which

held that the sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i)

applies to a conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal

drug-trafficking offense. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40355 Document: 00512419672 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013