alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

A- Lamp

B- Primary filter

C- Primary-filter frame
D- Housing

E- Housing

F- Secondary-filter frame
G- Secondary filter

H- Shutter-base frame

I- Standard 13 Packard shutter J \

J- Shutter cover plate
K- Shutter trigger
L- Search-unit connector

REAR-VIEW ASSEMBLY

1Y4'x1 Yq D, tubing- one end
threaded to fit search unit

Drill 4 holes (one each corner )
“to’suit Packard shutter: ‘

Slot for extended arm
to’ Packard ' shutter

Drill 2 holes for placement
of. shutter trigger mechanism

Provide | /4" 0, hole-
SEARCH-UNIT
CONNECTOR

SHUTTER COVER
PLATE

SHUTTER BASE
FRAME

SECONDARY-FILTER
“FRAME

friction fit for search-unit connector

Drill 4 holes (one each corner)
to suit Packard shutter

EXPANDED DETAILS

BULLETIN.1006 PLATE 3

counter bore to provide

PZ

REAR-VIEW ASSEMBLY AND EXPANDED DETAILS OF THE MODIFIED FLUORIMETER

268681 O - 54 (In pocket) No, 1
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00312-TSZ Document 273 Filed 07/08/08 Page 45 of 45
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER (PROPOSED) - 1

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a

‘GORDONWORKS.COM'; OMNI

INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington

limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

No. CV 06-0204JCC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

[PROPOSED]

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Virtumundo,

Inc., Adknowledge, Inc., and Scott Lynn for an order to compel Plaintiffs to produce to

Defendants files in .mbx format containing all emails produced in Plaintiffs’ production

of November 29, 2006, but excluding all emails produced by Plaintiffs prior to that date. 

Based upon the submissions of the parties, declarations, and pleadings previously filed

herein, the Court hereby ORDERS THAT Defendants’ Motion to Compel is GRANTED

in its entirety and Plaintiff is ordered to produce to Defendants files in .mbx format

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 71-2 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 71 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER (PROPOSED) - 2

containing all emails produced in Plaintiffs’ production of November 29, 2006, but

excluding all emails produced by Plaintiffs prior to that date, such files to be produced no

later than 5:00 pm on December _____, 2006.

DATED this day of ________________, 2006.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

Presented By:

NEWMAN & NEWMAN

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

BY:

Derek A. Newman, WSBA No. 26967

Roger M. Townsend, WSBA No. 25525

505 5th Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, WA 98104

phone: 206-274-2800

fax: 206-274-1801

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 71-2 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-153

C. HOLMES, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, M.D., a/k/a Cynthia Collie 

Holmes,

 Petitioner,

v.

HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A.,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Permission to Appeal. (2:20-cv-00234-BHH )

Submitted: November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cynthia C. Holmes, Petitioner Pro Se. Mary McFarland Caskey, Mary Cothonneau 

Eldridge, HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

C. Holmes petitions for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the district 

court’s orders: (1) adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying her 

motion to remand the case to the bankruptcy court, and (2) denying her motion for 

reconsideration of that order. The bankruptcy court has since granted Holmes’ motion to 

dismiss her bankruptcy case. Due to the dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy case, this 

court “is without the power to afford effective relief.” See Central States, Se. & Sw. Areas 

Pension Fund v. Central Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 96 (4th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we 

deny Holmes’ motion to exceed length limitations for the petition and deny the petition to 

appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Law Offices of Jeffrey H. Smith 

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 

Seattle, WA. 98101 

(206) 340-0053 

Fax (206) 624-1767 

Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

 JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JAMES LEROY HENDERSON, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Cause No. CR06-0074RSM 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND 

PRETRIAL MOTIONS DATES 

 

 ORDER

 THE COURT, having considered the stipulation of the parties and the records and files 

herein, makes the following findings: 

 1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U..C. Sec. 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

 2. The Court finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance of 

this case, that a continuance is necessary to ensure effective trial preparation and that these factors 

Case 2:06-cr-00074-RSM Document 31 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 2
Law Offices of Jeffrey H. Smith 

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 

Seattle, WA. 98101 

(206) 340-0053 

Fax (206) 624-1767 

Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 

Sec. 3161(h)(8)(A). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued from June 

12, 2006 to September 18, 2006, and the pretrial motions date is continued to August 7, 2006. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the period of time from the current trial date of June 12, 

2006 up to and including the new trial date of September 18, 2006 shall be excluded time 

pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 et seq. 

 DATED this 7th day of June, 2006. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:06-cr-00074-RSM Document 31 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 2
#### DILLARD’S, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Arlene JOHNSON, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-2528.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 2005.

Decided Aug. 25, 2005.

*223Katherine Dudley Helms, William L. Duda, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak *&*Stewart, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Allen D. Smith, Thomas K. Barlow, Childs *&*Halligan, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dillard’s Incorporated appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Johnson. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Dillard’s Inc. v. Johnson,*No. CA-03-2522 (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
No. 64612.

#### New York Mdse. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/28556 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), and that 15 packages of toys, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 15 packages of toys, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 10.18.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                       CITICORP DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Section 8.3 of the Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended
to add the following sentence at the end of such Section:

                  "In the event the Company permits shares to be withheld or
                  tendered to satisfy any tax withholding obligations, the value
                  of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered for tax
                  withholding may not exceed the amount allowed consistent with
                  fixed plan accounting in accordance with generally accepted
                  accounting principles."
# Official Journal C 7/8 Ja

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 7 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 7

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 January 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 7/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 7/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 7/02 | State aid – Poland – State aid SA.53903 (2020/C) (ex 2019/NN) – Regional Investment Aid to LG Chem 2 – LIP – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 23 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 7/02

State aid – Poland – State aid SA.53903 (2020/C) (ex 2019/NN) – Regional Investment Aid to LG Chem 2 – LIP – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

23

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 18, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.125 Issuers of Asset-Backed Securities ABS** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PATRICIA BELL WATKINS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5141FDB

 ORDER DIRECTING

SERVICE AND RETURN,

§ 2254 PETITION

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254. This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Magistrates’ Rules MJR 3 and MJR 4.

Petitioner challenges a sentence of five years court supervision and two days jail time. (Dkt.

# 7). The sentence is the result of a conviction for DUI out of Pierce County District Court

Petitioner avers her state remedies have been exhausted.

(1). The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon the Pierce County

 Prosecutors Office, a copy of the amended petition, Dkt. # 2, of Dkt. # 7 and 8., and of this Order. 

All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary

documents to effect service. The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General

Order.

Case 3:06-cv-05141-FDB Document 9 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, the Pierce County Prosecutors

Officer shall file and serve an answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254

Cases in United States District Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether

petitioner has exhausted available state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and

whether there is any issue of abuse or delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive

motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. 

Respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon

petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 17th, day of July, 2006. 

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05141-FDB Document 9 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 56801.

#### General Drug Co. *v.*United States,

protest 13650-MK (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40519 Conference Calendar

DANIEL IFY IWEGBU, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JONATHON DOBRE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-95

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daniel Ify Iwegbu, federal prisoner #22600-077, has appealed the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu contends that the district court erred in finding that he did not meet the actual innocence prong of the test set forth in Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). He maintainsNo. 02-40519 -2- that, under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he should be permitted to pursue relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu has failed to establish that he was convicted of a non-existent offense. He has thus failed to meet the first prong of the two-prong test set forth in Reyes-Requena
. See 243 F.3d at 904. This appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Iwegbu is cautioned that should he, or any counsel on his behalf, file any further frivolous pleadings relating to his heroin conspiracy conviction, in this court or any court subject to the jurisdiction of this court, he shall be subject to sanctions. To avoid sanctions for any matter that may be pending, Iwegbu shall review all pending matters and move to voluntarily dismiss any that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
No. 57771.

protests 143508-K and 143911-K (New York).

#### Beatty & Hyde, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United Stales*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable *374as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
# Official Journal C 269/4 No

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 474 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 269

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 474 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2004/C 269/1 | Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy together with the Commission’s replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2004/C 269/1

Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy together with the Commission’s replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT
32 (i)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AmeriResource Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof (the
“Report), the undersigned, Delmar Janovec, Chief Executive Officer and the
person performing functions similar to that of a Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





s/
      Delmar A. JanovecDated:
      November 19, 2008
            _______________________________Delmar
      A. JanovecChief
      Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial
      Officer