alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                      Exhibit 11.1

                                             Micro Linear Corporation
                                  Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                                    (Unaudited)
                                       (In thousands, except per share data)

                                                Three Months Ended September 30,
                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          1998                                   1997
                          -------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
<S>                       <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
                                                        Per-                                    Per-
                             Income        Shares     Share         Income         Shares     Share
                          (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount     (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
  Basic Income Per Share:
  Net income available
    to common
    stockholders             $265         11,642       $0.02          $728       11,811        $0.06

  Effect of dilutive
  securities:                                350                                    868
    Stock options

  Diluted Income Per
  Share:
  Net income available
    to common
    stockholders assuming
    dilution                 $265         11,992       $0.02          $728       12,679       $0.06





                                                Nine Months Ended September 30,
                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          1998                                   1997
                          -------------------------------------  --------------------------------------
                                                        Per-                                    Per-
                             Income        Shares     Share         Income         Shares     Share
                          (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount     (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
  Basic Income Per Share:
  Net income available
    to common
    stockholders             $896         11,661       $0.08         $5,418      11,878       $0.46

  Effect of dilutive
  securities:                                440                                  1,268
    Stock options

  Diluted Income Per
  Share:
  Net income available
    to common
    stockholders assuming
    dilution                 $896         12,101       $0.07         $5,418      13,146       $0.41
</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00639-MJP Document 13 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 129/23 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 129 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4823 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 129

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4823 May 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers |
| | * | Decision No 201 of 15 December 2004 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 400 series) (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers

*

Decision No 201 of 15 December 2004 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 400 series) (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance and for the EU/Switzerland Agreement |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance and for the EU/Switzerland Agreement

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DECEMBER 31, 1997 TRANSITION
REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,438,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,122,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,661,472
<PP&E>                                       4,751,337
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,724,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,706,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,183,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,333
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,076
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,384,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,706,819
<SALES>                                        595,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               706,725
<CGS>                                          326,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  326,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,516,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,135,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00107-JCC Document 62 Filed 02/13/14 Page 1 of 1
#### Heberto Eli HERNANDEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70204.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2005.

Decided Aug. 9, 2005.

*629Susan E. Hill, Esq., Hill *&*Piibe, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Esq., Margot L. Nadel, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BROWNING, FISHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Heberto Eli Hernandez and his family, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying them asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and we deny the petition.

Even assuming Hernandez’s testimony was credible, there is insufficient evidence to compel the conclusion that Hernandez’s subjectively genuine fear of returning to Guatemala is objectively reasonable. *See Aguilera-Cota v. U.S. INS,*914 F.2d 1375, 1378 (9th Cir.1990). It has been ten years since Hernandez and his family left Guatemala, and six years since anyone has sought information regarding Hernandez’s whereabouts. There is no evidence that incidents similar to those Hernandez experienced have continued to occur.

Because Hernandez failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Chen v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 611, 617 (9th Cir.2004). Hernandez also failed to meet the standard for CAT relief. 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. P69/142.

protests 66/9336, etc. (New York).

#### A & P Import Co. *v.*United States,

Re, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gitkin Co.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997) or louvered folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 59296.

protests 193425-K, etc. (New York).

#### Antoine Chiris Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*245Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT B

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 128-3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 128 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Page 1 of 1 January 31, 2007

INVOICE

Hacker Factor Solutions

Neal Krawetz, Ph.D.

P.O. Box 270033

Fort Collins, CO 80527

(970) 282-0195

dr.krawetz@hackerfactor.com

Date: 31-January-2007

Customer

Information:

Name:

Company:

Work:

Email:

Derek Newman

Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, LLP

(206) 274-2800

dn@newmanlaw.com

Description of work performed:

12 Jan 2007 (Fri): 18:40 - 19:10 (0:30) Reviewing documents

13 Jan 2007 (Sat): 13:00 - 18:00 (5:00) Reviewing documents, writing expert report

14 Jan 2007 (Sun): 8:30 - 12:00 (3:30) Writing expert report

14 Jan 2007 (Sun): 13:00 - 16:00 (3:00) Writing expert report

14 Jan 2007 (Sun): 17:15 - 17:45 (0:30) Proof reading expert report

15 Jan 2007 (Mon): Short durations (0:15) Replying emailsto Derek Newman, Reviewing email samples from

Peter Hazelton

16 Jan 2007 (Tue): 8:00 - 11:00 (3:00) Revising report (one more question added, spelling errors)

16 Jan 2007 (Tue): 11:00 - 11:45 (0:45) Revised CV, one correction to report

16 Jan 2007 (Tue): 20:00 - 21:45 (1:45) Revised report based on feedback

16 Jan 2007 (Tue): 22:00 - 22:30 (0:30) Revised report based on feedback

19 Jan 2007 (Fri): 14:00 - 14:15 (0:15) Uploaded mail archives for Derek Newman and rechecked domain counts

19 Jan 2007 (Fri): 21:00 - 23:00 (2:00) Revised report with final transcript references

22 Jan 2007 (Mon): 8:00 - 8:30 (0:30) Reviewed declaration, submitted changes.

22 Jan 2007 (Mon): 10:30 - 12:00 (1:30) Revised expert report per feedback from Kit Winter and Derek Newman.

22 Jan 2007 (Mon): 19:30 - 20:00 (0:30) Revised declaration and signed it.

Charges:

Parts none 0.00

Labor 23.5 hours @ $250/hour 5875.00

Total 5875.00

Please direct payment to “Hacker Factor Solutions, Neal Krawetz”.

Thank you!

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 128-3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
S. J. Res. 39

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Joint Resolution

To provide for the convening of the Second Session of the One Hundred Fifth

Congress.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the second

regular session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress shall begin

at noon on Tuesday, January 27, 1998.

SEC. 2. Prior to the convening of the second regular session

of the One Hundred Fifth Congress on January 27, 1998, as provided in the first section of this joint resolution, Congress shall

reassemble at noon on the second day after its Members are notified

in accordance with section 3 of this joint resolution.

SEC. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to assemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant

it.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 61102.

protest 294454-K (New York).

#### Freder Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalkwhite stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59105, except that said stones were not faceted, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                            <ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                38,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,100
<INVENTORY>                                  25,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             69,706
<PP&E>                                       2,759
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               72,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        60,662
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     44
<OTHER-SE>                                   11,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 72,740
<SALES>                                      173,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             173,010
<CGS>                                        164,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                164,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             13,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (6,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (6,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.59)
        

</TABLE>
Submitted by: Ralph J. Apel

18565 W 158th Terrace, Unit 201

Olathe, KS 66062

(913) 579

- 4529

Ralph@ReeceNichols.com

Request: A revision to FAA exemption number 11410 issued to Mr. Ralph J Apel.

Petition: I request a revision t o the limitations fo und in the Air Traffic Control Special Provisions

section, subpart C (Flight Planning requirements)

.

Currently , the limitations in point 2 restrict the operation of the UAS within 5 NM from

an airport havi ng an operational control tower, or 3 NM from an airport having a

published instr ument flight procedure but not having an operational control to wer, or 2

NM from an airp ort not having a published instrument flight procedure or an

op erational control tower, or 2 NM from a heliport, gliderport or seaport.

Becau se the Certificate of Waiver or Authorization restricts the use of the UAS above

200 feet AGL , it is very likely that I will be conducting my operations in class G airspace.

Because of this, I am r equesting unrestricted access (see and avoid) during all flight

operations. In the event that I need to operate the UAS inside of airspace that is not

Class G , I will contact the airport's air traffic control tower prior to flight operations as

well as contact the tower after operations have ceased. This would be in addition to

filing a distant NOTAM to warn of un

- manned flight operations in the area during my

projected hours of operation.

I would not commence flight operations using the UAS in less than VFR minimum

meteorological conditions

. For this reason, it is highly unlikely that my UAS would

encounter significant collision risk with aircraft flying at the recommended traffic

patt ern altitude of 1000 feet AGL (as prescribed in the Airplane Flying Handbook)

. Special care (and coordination with the operating air traffic control tower) would be

observed when the UAS operations may be near the upwind/final le g of the active

runway.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/SMITH (CR05-0390RSL) - 1 (206) 553-7970

Chief Judge Lasnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-0390RSL

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL

)

JASON D. SMITH, )

)

Defendant. ) )

The Court has considered the Stipulation executed by the parties pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) concerning a continuance of the trial in this case:

The Court finds that continuing the trial in this case is necessary in order to

allow defense counsel adequate time to investigate and effectively to prepare for trial.

The Court further finds, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), that the ends of

justice served by continuing the trial in this case outweigh the interest of the public and

of the defendant in a more speedy trial.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial in this case shall be continued until

September 25, 2006, and that the period of time from June 12, 2006, up to and

including September 25, 2006, shall be excludable time under 18

U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(8)(A); and

//

//

//

Case 2:05-cr-00390-RSM Document 33 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/SMITH (CR05-0390RSL) - 2 (206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing pretrial motions in this

case shall be July 14, 2006, and that responses to motions shall be due July 28, 2006.

DONE this 8th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/Andrew C. Friedman 

ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-3903

Telephone: (206) 553-7970

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: Andrew.Friedman@usdoj.gov

s/John Henry Browne/telephonic approval 

JOHN HENRY BROWNE

s/Jessica Riley/telephonic approval 

JOHN HENRY BROWNE

Counsel for Jason D. Smith

821 Second Avenue, Suite 2200

Seattle, Washington 98104-1592

Telephone: (206) 388-0777

Fax: (206) 388-0780

Case 2:05-cr-00390-RSM Document 33 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 80

Urging that the railroad industry, including rail labor, management and

retiree organizations, open discussions for adequately funding an amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to modify the guaranteed

minimum benefit for widows and widowers whose annuities are converted

from a spouse to a widow or widower annuity.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 5, 1998

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Urging that the railroad industry, including rail labor, management and retiree organizations, open discussions for

adequately funding an amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to modify the guaranteed minimum

benefit for widows and widowers whose annuities are

converted from a spouse to a widow or widower annuity.

Whereas for years, many in the railroad industry have argued

that annuities paid to widows and widowers under the

Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 are inadequate;

Whereas during the lifetime of the employee and the spouse,

the employee receives a full annuity and so does the

spouse;
2

•SCON 80 IS

Whereas after the employee’s death, however, only a widow’s

or widower’s annuity is payable, which under current law

is less than that widow or widower received as a spouse

in the month before the employee’s death;

Whereas this widow’s or widower’s annuity is often found inadequate and leaves the survivor with less than the

amount of income needed to meet ordinary and necessary

living expenses; and

Whereas no outside contributions from the American taxpayer are needed, and any changes will be paid for from

within the railroad industry itself: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress recognizes the concern of many in

4 the railroad industry that the widow’s and widower’s

5 annuity under the current system is inadequate and

6 often leaves the survivor with less than the amount

7 of income needed to meet ordinary and necessary liv8 ing expenses;

9 (2) Congress also recognizes that a process of

10 dialogue must take place among all parties of the

11 railroad community including rail labor, manage12 ment, and retiree organizations before railroad an13 nuity legislation can be enacted; and

14 (3) because of the self-sufficient and unique na15 ture of the Railroad Retirement System, Congress

16 urges and exhorts all parties of the railroad commu-
3

•SCON 80 IS

1 nity, including rail labor, management, and retiree

2 organizations to find a suitable way to fund an

3 amendment that would improve the survivor benefits

4 component to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974.

Æ
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000747 30-OCT-2019 08:13 AM
Case 2:06-cr-00026-RSL Document 671 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cr-00026-RSL Document 671 Filed 12/10/13 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cr-00026-RSL Document 671 Filed 12/10/13 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cr-00026-RSL Document 671 Filed 12/10/13 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cr-00026-RSL Document 671 Filed 12/10/13 Page 5 of 5
No. 68518.

protest 63/19622 (Los Angeles).

#### Perryman, Mojonier and Candle Enterprises, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

The protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of .section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.