alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 785 

Recognizing the 100th Anniversary of Robstown, Texas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, 

Mr. REYES, Mr. DOGGETT, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. PAUL, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. HENSARLING, 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. 

SHUSTER, Mr. POE, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mrs. 

BOYDA of Kansas, Mr. SAXTON, and Mr. SALAZAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th Anniversary of Robstown, Texas. 

Whereas in 2007, the city of Robstown, Texas, celebrates its 

centennial as the ‘‘Biggest Little Town in Texas’’; 

Whereas before Robstown became a city in Nueces County, 

Robstown was a major thoroughfare north of the National Mexican Railway, making it vital for trade and 

commerce between Mexico and the United States; 

Whereas rancher and businessman Robert Driscoll conveyed 

territories encircling the boundaries of Robstown, inspiring Robstown’s name; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 785 IH 

Whereas Robstown enters the 21st century as the crossroads 

of international trade, being the location where the Texas 

Mexican Railway connects the Port of Laredo with the 

Port of Corpus Christi and Interstate 69 will intersect 

Texas State Highway 44; 

Whereas Robstown is the home of a new fairgrounds and entertainment venue; the future home of an inland port, 

which will be the first such port in the United States; 

and the future home of an Army storage facility; 

Whereas Robstown is one of the leading cotton producing 

areas in the United States, at one time operating the 

most cotton gins in the United States and later naming 

the mascot of the Robstown high school the ‘‘Cotton 

Picker’’; 

Whereas, a steadfast community in Nueces County, the residents of Robstown have included legendary National 

Football League Hall of Famer Gene Upshaw; Federal 

Judge Hilda Tagle; and numerous county, State, and 

Federally elected officials; 

Whereas Robstown has scheduled ‘‘Century of Celebration’’ 

festivities throughout 2007, beginning on January 1 and 

including a formal celebration on June 1 and the 

Cottonfest festival in October; and 

Whereas Robstown’s contributions to the history of the 

United States include being the site of the first game of 

Texas Hold ’em poker: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 100th anniversary of Robstown, Texas, and comVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:24 Oct 31, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR785.IH HR785

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 785 IH 

1 mends all of the residents of Robstown and all other indi2 viduals who call Robstown home. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
ATTACHMENT II 

CAS NAME
SM Energy /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 1, 2013

No. 04-12-00772-CV

W.H. SUTTON, Arctic Royalty Limited Partnership, Julie S. Mueller, Janet Lee Smith as 

Trustee of the Janet Lee Smith Family Trust, Anita Louise Davies as Trustee of the Anita Louise 

Davies Family Trust and Frederick Jackson Bell Jr., et al.,

Appellants

v.

SM ENERGY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVQ001903 D3

Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's first unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Appellant's reply brief is due on or before July 26, 2013.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of July, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 2 3
- 0026

) STATE OF MONTANA )

P laint iff/ Appellee, ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION vs. ) TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO **)** STAY APPEAL ) THOMAS WOJTOWICZ , )

Defendant /Appellant. ) Upon review of the Defendant/Appellant’s U nopposed Moti on to wi th draw the Opposed Moti on to Stay

A ppeal an d Remand for Motion for New Trial , and good cause therefrom; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendant /Appellant ’s to Wit hdraw his Motion to Stay Appeal is granted. Appellant’s reply b ri ef rem ains due February

29, 2024. ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

_______________________________________ Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

cc: Jam i Rebso m Brad Fjeldheim

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 26 2024

02/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0026
H. Res. 663 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2007. 

Whereas veterans of the Spanish-American War and Philippine Insurrection, the Nation’s first major foreign conflicts, faced hardships to include a complete lack of medical care and pensions upon discharge from the service; 

Whereas on September 29, 1899 the American Veterans of 

Foreign Service and in December 1899, the National Society of the Army of the Philippines, were established to 

advocate for the rights and benefits then denied to veterans of the Spanish-American War and Philippine Insurrection; 

Whereas, in subsequent years, membership in these and other 

veterans organizations continued to grow; 

Whereas these veterans organizations, recognizing their common goals and the importance of unity, merged to form 

the present-day Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 

States in 1914; 

Whereas membership in the Veterans of Foreign Wars continued to grow and reached nearly 200,000 in 1936 when 

the organization received its Congressional Charter; 

Whereas the 2.3 million members of the Veterans of Foreign 

Wars and Ladies Auxiliary remain committed to the organization’s mission of ‘‘ensuring rights, remembering 
2 

•HRES 663 EH 

sacrifices, promoting patriotism, performing community 

services, and advocating for a strong national defense’’; 

Whereas the organization continues this honorable mission by 

effectively advocating for our Nation’s veterans, to include helping establish the present-day Department of 

Veterans Affairs, creating the Montgomery G.I. Bill, developing the national cemetery system, and assisting combat wounded veterans receive compensation for their injuries; and 

Whereas the members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars celebrate the organization’s establishment and achievements 

on September 29th while carrying on the vital mission of 

their predecessors: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the goals and ideals of Veterans of Foreign Wars Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN WINTERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 290 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# Official Journal L 16/20 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 16 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4920 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 16

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4920 January 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required | 1 |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 52/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea for 2006 | 184 |
| | * | Addendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required | 200 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required

1

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 52/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea for 2006

184

*

Addendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required

200

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
** We acted on this motion without awaiting the expiration of the answer period with the consent of all 

parties served with the request.

We will grant the carrier’s request for a further extension of the start-up date.1

 1 See Docket DOT-OST-2008-0228 for the applicant’s previous extension requests and our actions in response.

 We will require the 

carrier to institute service no later than 90-days from the date of this action document. In taking this 
action, however, we put Centurion on notice that there should be no expectation that an additional 

waiver request to further extend the start-up date will be granted. Any future request to extend the 

waiver at issue here will have to be considered in light of any specific arguments offered and responses 

thereto, and in the context of the circumstances present at that time. In this regard, we further put 

Centurion on notice that in any application for subsequent extension we would expect to see specific 

evidence that Centurion has taken all necessary steps to secure Brazilian Government approval, 

including submission of a complete application to the Brazilian Government (citing the specific date it 

was filed). We reserve the right to not further extend the start-up date should Centurion fail to submit 

this evidence and all related supporting details.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,594
<SECURITIES>                                    33,747
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,501
<PP&E>                                          25,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,998
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,754)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,754)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.84)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER RENOTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO PROCEED FIRST

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PROPET USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LLOYD SHUGART,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0186-MAT

ORDER RENOTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO PROCEED FIRST

Defendant filed a Motion to Proceed First at the trial scheduled to begin on September 24,

2007. (Dkt. 85) Defendant noted this motion for two Fridays after the date of filing (the same

noting date for the motions in limine), however the court’s Local Rules, specifically CR 7(d)(3),

require that motions not specifically identified in CR 7(d)(1) and (2) must be noted for three

Fridays out. Therefore, the court RENOTES defendant’s Motion to Proceed First for Friday,

September 14, 2007. Plaintiff’s opposition response is due by September 10, 2007, and

defendant’s reply by the noting date itself.

The parties are also reminded of the schedule for the pending in limine motions.

Opposition responses are due by Tuesday, September 4, 2007 (the preceding Monday is a

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 88 Filed 08/27/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER RENOTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO PROCEED FIRST

PAGE -2

holiday), and replies are again due by the noting date itself.

DATED this 27th day of August, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 88 Filed 08/27/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>




                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Medwave, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005 (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates listed below, hereby
certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and shall not be deemed part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




Date:    February 14, 2005



                                   By:      /s/ Timothy J. O'Malley
                                          Timothy J. O'Malley
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer)

                                       4
No. 54998.

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc., and Amtorg Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 145341-K and 146128-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of animal hair the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in Abstract 54616, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ANDREW C. STRICK,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-5221-JPD

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

On March 15, 2006, petitioner pleaded guilty to trespassing on federal land and was

sentenced to pay a $60 fine. Dkt. No. 1. This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s

pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct this sentence. Id. Petitioner

argues that, although he pleaded guilty, he did not know that he was trespassing because he

did not see posted signs. Id. Having carefully reviewed the motion and balance of the Court

record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Petitioner is directed to SHOW CAUSE as to why this petition should not be

denied. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that 

A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress

claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was

imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the

court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence

was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to

collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set

aside or correct the sentence.

(emphasis added). Hence, pursuant to the plain terms of the statute, a petitioner must claim

that he has the right to be released from custody in order for his motion to be properly

Case 3:06-cv-05221-JPD Document 4 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

PAGE -2

cognizable under § 2255. United States v. Kramer, 195 F.3d 1129, 1129-30 (9th Cir. 1999). 

“Claims for other types of relief . . . cannot be brought in a § 2255 motion[.]” United States v.

Thiele, 314 F.3d 399, 400 (9th Cir. 2002). Every other circuit court to have considered this

question has arrived at the same conclusion. Kramer, 195 F.3d at 1130 (collecting cases). 

Here, petitioner’s motion does not seek release from custody and does not appear to

raise a constitutional challenge to his sentence. Rather, it appears to only seek to have the $60

fine vacated. Dkt. No. 1. This is not cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Petitioner is

directed to advise the Court no later than June 5, 2006, whether his 2006 sentence included a

period of incarceration or any other restraints on his liberty. Additionally, petitioner shall

indicate whether he is raising a federal constitutional challenge to the sentence. If petitioner

fails to respond adequately within the above-described time period, the Court may deny the

motion. 

DATED this 19th day of May, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05221-JPD Document 4 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
     3RD QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
                       
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                    1              
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars             
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 MAY-01-1996      
<PERIOD-END>                   JAN-31-1997      
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1      
<CASH>                           175,376      
<SECURITIES>                   4,122,026      
<RECEIVABLES>                      5,323      
<ALLOWANCES>                           0      
<INVENTORY>                      107,116      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               4,519,518      
<PP&E>                           474,113      
<DEPRECIATION>                   319,568      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 6,039,041      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             85,820      
<BONDS>                                0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0      
<PREFERRED>                            0      
<COMMON>                      12,752,726      
<OTHER-SE>                             0      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   6,039,041      
<SALES>                           25,476      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  25,476      
<CGS>                            666,714      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 694,618      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0      
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,335,856)      
<INCOME-TAX>                           0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,335,856)      
<DISCONTINUED>                         0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0      
<CHANGES>                              0      
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,086,396)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.23)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.23)     
        


</TABLE>