alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     FORM 10-Q FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,952,699
<SECURITIES>                        358,724
<RECEIVABLES>                       225,966
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         151,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,799,193
<PP&E>                              552,987
<DEPRECIATION>                      453,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    4,521,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               300,240
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         16,436,870
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      4,521,884
<SALES>                             371,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    371,023
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       444,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,924,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,819,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,819,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,819,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.33)



</TABLE>
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

In re : RAJ K. PATEL, Petitioner

______________________

2023

- 113

______________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal C laims

.

______________________
ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R
Raj K. Patel petitions for a writ of mandamus ask ing the court to direct the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket his complaint submitted to that court on December 1, 2022 . ECF No. 2

- 1 at 1. Mr. Patel also moves to proceed in forma pauperis , ECF No. 3, “for leave to serve the P resident directly ,” ECF No. 6

- 1 at 1 , and to expedite, ECF No. 9

. In October 2022, Mr. Patel filed his third complaint at the Court of Federal Claims asserting breach of a contract with the President s of the United States “about living under the stress weapon .” Compl aint at 52, Patel v. United States , No. 22

- 1446 (Fed. Cl. Oct

. 3 , 2022) , ECF No. 1 . On Case: 23-113 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2023IN RE : PATEL 2

November 17, 2022, the Court of Federal Claims dismissed Mr. Patel’s complaint . The court also issued an anti

- filing injunction directing that the c lerk of that c ourt “acce p t no further complaints from [Mr.] Patel without a motion for leave explaining how the complaint raises new matters properly before” that court

. Patel v. United States , No. 22

- 1446 , slip op. at 1 (Fed. Cl. Dec

. 9 , 2022) , ECF No. 16

. O n Decem ber 1, 2022, Mr. Patel submit ted his fourth complaint at the Court of Federal Claims with a motion for leave to file the complaint as a new matter

. On January 5, 2023, the Court of Federal Claims den ied Mr. Patel leave and directed the submission be returned to him , explaining that his “justification for his new cause of action .

. . is conclusory and lacks enough specificity to enable the [court] to determine whether Mr. Patel’s claims potentially fall within the subje ct matter jurisdiction of” that court. Patel v. United States , No. 23

- 7028, slip op. at 1

– 2 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 5, 2023) , ECF No. 1

. Mr. Patel’s petition asks us to compel the docketing of that complaint.
Mr. Patel separately appealed from the November 2022judgment of the Court of Federal Claims but raised no challenge to the court’s anti

- filing injunction. In a separate order issued today, we have affirmed the Court of Federal Claims ’ judgment in all respects. Patel v. United States

, No. 2023

- 1325 (Fed. C ir. March 7 , 2023). Because Mr. Patel presents no co herent argument here regarding how the allegations in his returned complaint a re new matters that fall within the Court of Federal Claims ’ jurisdiction , he has not shown entitlement to having his complaint docketed.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : ( 1 ) The petition is denied. Case: 23-113 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2023IN RE : PATEL 3

( 2 ) All pending motions are denied as moot

.

March 7 , 2023 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 23-113 Document: 10 Page: 3 Filed: 03/07/2023
Case 2:06-cv-00129-MJP Document 23 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00129-MJP Document 23 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2
SERVED: AUGUST 27, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GREAT WESTERN AIR, LLC. 

DOCKETNO. FAA2014-0114 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed a Complaint 

dated April 8, 2014. GREAT WESTERN AIR, LLC. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed an 

Answer dated May 12, 2014. 

Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing on August 20, 2014. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint ot 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent having withdrawn its Hearing Request, it be and is 

ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

\ ,) 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mark J. Connor, Respondent's Counsel 

Fox Rothschild, LLP 

3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 

Las Vegas, NV 89169 

FAX: 702-597-5503 

ONE COPY 

· Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Ave, Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 2 02-3 66-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0114 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69208-69209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant

[[Page 69209]]

applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Office of Research Infrastructure Programs 
Special Emphasis Panel; Office of Research Infrastructure Programs 
(ORIP) Special Emphasis Panel: Applications for Scientific 
Conferences.
    Date: November 13, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Tatiana V. Cohen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5213, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
455-2364, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8ccd9ccd1d9d6d996dbd7d0ddd6f8d6d1d096dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e1a0f1a070f000f400d01060b002e00070640090118">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22119 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Robert C. SepuchaRobert C. SepuchaChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0011. WILLIE F. JOHNSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

On June 14, 2024, the trial court entered an order denying Willie F. Johnson’s

“Motion to Order Clerk to Transmit Sentence Custodian Affidavit.” On July 18,

2024, Johnson filed this pro se application for discretionary appeal, seeking to appeal

that order. We lack jurisdiction.

 To be timely, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30

days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). “The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this [C]ourt cannot accept an

appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.App. 734, 734 (380

SE2d 57) (1989).As this application was filed 34 days after entry of the order Johnson

seeksto appeal, it is untimely. SeeCrosson v.Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220 (1) (728 SE2d

617) (2012). Accordingly, Johnson’s application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 14, 2024

08/14/2024
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, John G. Barbar, certify that:
 
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Urecoats Industries Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 (4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 (5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 
 (6) The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 **URECOATS INDUSTRIES INC.**Date: August 14, 2003
By:John G. BarbarChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph F. Longo,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By: /s/ Joseph F. Longo
    -----------------------
    Joseph F. Longo
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
    September 14, 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,992

EX PARTE JOSHUA STEVEN ROMO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W05-73295-P IN THE 203 DISTRICT COURT RD

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty, was convicted of 

second degree robbery and after a period of deferred adjudication was revoked, was sentenced to five

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

After Applicant pleaded guilty and was sentenced, the victim executed an affidavit stating

that Applicant did not steal a bicycle from him, as was alleged in the indictment. Applicant alleges

that the new affidavit shows that he is actually innocent of the second degree felony of which he is
convicted.

The trial court has determined that the affidavit is credible and that Applicant has established

by clear and convincing evidence that a jury would acquit him of the second degree offense of

robbery. The State and the trial court both recommend granting relief. Applicant is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 05-73295-P in the 203 Judicial District Court rd

of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the Dallas County Sheriff to answer the

charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 10, 2008

Do Not Publish
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Applications of

AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

for certificates of public convenience and

necessity under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 to engage in

interstate and foreign charter air transportation of

persons, property and mail Dockets DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2001

‐ 10985

DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2001

‐ 10986

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO

NOTICE OF AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

OF INTENT TO RESUME CERTIFICATED AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS

and

UPDATED FITNESS INFORMATION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Aaron A. Goerlich

Jason E. Maddux

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036

‐ 6802

(202) 776

‐ 3974

agoerlich@ggh

‐ airlaw.com

jmaddux@ggh

‐ airlaw.com

Counsel for Aerodynamics Incorporated

May 30, 20141 BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Applications of

AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

for a certificate of public convenience and

necessity under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 to engage in

interstate and foreign charter air transportation of

persons, property and mail Dockets DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2001

‐ 10985

DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2001

‐ 10986

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO

NOTICE OF AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

OF INTENT TO RESUME CERTIFICATED AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS

and

UPDATED FITNESS INFORMATION

Aerodynamics Incorporated provides the following information and attached

documentation in support of its application.

1. Aerodynamics Incorporated’s Balance Sheet as of February 28, 2014, is

attached as Exhibit A.

The certification required by the Department’s regulations is attached as Exhibit B.

# EXHIBIT A

# EXHIBIT B