alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
fund_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF DIRECTORS

 

(Nevada Revised Statutes 78.315(2))

 

OF

 

FUNDTHATCOMPANY

 

A Nevada Corporation 


 


 

  

The undersigned, Sole Director of FUNDTHATCOMPANY a Nevada Corporation (the "Corporation") pursuant to the Bylaws of the Corporation and the Nevada Revised Statutes, hereby consents to the following actions of the Corporation as of April 9, 2018. 

 

1. APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

 

RESOLVED: That the Board of Directors hereby accepts the Resignation Letter submitted by Chayut Ardwichai from the offices of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman, Secretary, and Treasurer effective April 9, 2018, and acknowledges that Mr. Ardwichai’s resignation from the Board of Directors is not effective the Company’s transfer agent has finalized the transfer of 43.750,000 shares of common stock from Mr. Ardwichai to Crypto Ventures Capital, Inc., a Florida corporation beneficially owned and controlled by Mr. Yosef Biton.

 

RESOLVED: That the following individuals were appointed to serve as officers and/or directors:

 

	
 
	
Yosef Biton
		
CEO, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director, Chairman



 

2. OMNIBUS RESOLUTION

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the foregoing officer of the Corporation, and such persons appointed to act on his behalf pursuant to the foregoing resolutions, are hereby authorized and directed in the name of the Corporation and on its behalf, to execute any additional certificates (including any officer's certificates), agreements, instruments or documents, or any amendments or supplements thereto, or to do or to cause to be done any and all other acts as they shall deem necessary, appropriate or in furtherance of the full effectuation of the purposes of each of the foregoing resolutions.

 

This Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of FUNDTHATCOMPANY may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes constitute one Written Consent, notwithstanding that all directors are not signatories to the same counterpart, effective as of the date first written above. This Unanimous Written Consent may be executed by facsimile and such facsimile copy shall be conclusive evidence of the consent and ratification of the matters contained herein by the undersigned director.

 

Dated: April 9, 2018

 

/s/ Chayut Ardwichai                                   

 

Chayut Ardwichai, Director
Before the First Division,

April 2, 1957

No. 60593.

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 240765-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dime savings banks in chief value of tin or tin plate the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), except as to the component material of chief value, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 11



               MEDIWARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended                       Six Months Ended
                                                         December 31,                           December 31,
                                             -------------------------------         -------------------------------
                                                 1999                1998                1999                1998
                                             -----------         -----------         -----------         -----------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>                   <C>               <C>
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share

      Net earnings (loss)                    $   433,000         $   883,000          $  794,000         $(2,823,000)

      Weighted-average shares:
        Outstanding                            6,344,000           6,049,000           6,258,000           5,840,000
                                             -----------         -----------          ----------         -----------

         Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share     $      0.07         $      0.15          $     0.13         $     (0.48)
                                             ===========         ===========          ==========         ===========


Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

      Net earnings (loss)                    $   433,000         $   883,000          $  794,000         $(2,823,000)

      Weighted-average shares:
        Outstanding                            6,344,000           6,049,000           6,258,000           5,840,000
        Options and Warrants                     857,000           1,008,000             918,000                --
                                             -----------         -----------          ----------         -----------
                                               7,201,000           7,057,000           7,176,000           5,840,000
                                             -----------         -----------          ----------         -----------

         Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share   $      0.06         $      0.13          $     0.11         $     (0.48)
                                             ===========         ===========          ==========         ===========
</TABLE>


                                       12
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Virtual Medical International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Francis D’Ambrosio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of April, 2011.








FRANCIS D’AMBROSIOFrancis D’AmbrosioChief Executive Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 146 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 794 

[Report No. 110–427] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 3043) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, 

Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2007 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3043) making appropriations for 

the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, 

and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3043) making appropriations for 

4 the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 794 RH 

1 and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year 

2 ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. All 

3 points of order against the conference report and against 

4 its consideration are waived. The conference report shall 

5 be considered as read. 

6 SEC. 2. A motion to proceed to consideration of H.R. 

7 3688 pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 

8 shall be in order only if offered by the Majority Leader 

9 or his designee. 

10 SEC. 3. Upon receipt of a message from the Senate 

11 transmitting H.R. 3043, with a Senate amendment there12 to, it shall be in order to take the same from the Speaker’s 

13 table and to consider in the House, without intervention 

14 of any point of order, a motion offered by the chairman 

15 of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that 

16 the House concur in such amendment. The Senate amend17 ment and the motion shall be considered as read. The mo18 tion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

19 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

20 of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous ques21 tion shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its 

22 adoption without intervening motion. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 146 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 794 

[Report No. 110

–427] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

tember 30, 2008, and for other purposes. related agencies for the fiscal year ending SepHealth and Human Services, and Education, and propriations for the Departments of Labor, to accompany the bill (H.R. 3043) making apNOVEMBER 5, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-124M

)

v. )

)

MATEO GASPAR-TOMAS, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offenses charged:

1) Illegal Reentry After Deportation

2) Unlawful Entry

Date of Detention Hearing: March 15, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. The defendant was represented by Jay Stansell.

//

Case 2:06-mj-00124-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Washington are unknown/unverified; and the Bureau of Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (“BICE”) has filed a detainer.

(2) The defendant represents a risk of danger due to his extensive criminal

history to include theft and violation of protection order.

(3) The defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

//

//

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00124-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2005.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00124-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 104 ) ll-E-6 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06

AM Sheet 104 of 264" MAR

- 5-9 7 WE D 4:4 3 P M 03/05/87 12;0 1

From : Date : Contact : Company : rMI * D ! A C T T r f

- —D o m PLASTIC

S FA

A NO . ^04374U4 l P f\-tf4=SJ r ©1919941023 4 PE S RT P N C @|003/00;^ - £-/ U

Contae tRepor t Valeri e Everette , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Marc h 5,199 7 ^^^^ sa: ' i ^^^ ' 

### Mr . Mar k Wilco x \^3^S^^^" ^ \ G&WPlastic

s U \ f^ e 

### ^ \ Telephon e Numbe r(704 ) 324-700 2 V V—J^SoOC ^ - - Fa x Number : (704)324-0486 \^-^^^

Contac tSummary : Mr . Wilco x wa s contacte d t o clarif y informatio

n provide d in the 199

3 EP A screening surve y submitte d b y G& W Plastics . Mr

. Wilco x explaine d tha tG& W Plastics use s unsaturate d polyeste rresin in ope

n face d mold s t o mak e furniture . H e state d tha tthei rproces s woul d likel y b e considered polyme

rcasting . Base d o n mformatio

n provide d b y Mr . Wilcox , G&

W Plastic s used approximatel

y 495,00 0 pound

s o f resi n i n 1996 . Approximatel

y 61,500 pound

s o f styren e monome rwere als o use d i n the process . Approximatel y 49,00 0 pound

s o f peca n shel l filleran d 36,00 0 pound s o f glas s bea d filler wer

e used as well . Mr

. Wilco x estimate d tha tthes e amount

s showe d approximatel

y a 5 0 percen

tincreas e i n usag e from th e company' s 1992 usage . INFORMATIO

N I S ACCURAT

E 

# ( 0 iXficr P1601& rfS

fOU*"'*'* Ofi^ryri/liAv^him-lsS/A)- 3^SO0POOMOS.



# StilllM. ~ b&i 3Jo Ptcm) smu ?M- 7<J,37Sg/A-SS P/*-<- rt

" (%i Ob 7 

# X &ots$to /birrTM. 6



# A some. 0fJ



# ^^ /., /. .sc 

# -t-at.\t

frzi Ac c <J&rrz~ \AA
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 28, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31325 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. BRANDON O. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana No. 3:05-CR-145-ALL

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Having entered a conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and marihuana, carrying a firearm during and in relationNo. 06-31325

2 to a drug trafficking offense, and possession of a firearm by a felon, Brandon Smith appeals the denial of a motion to suppress evidence seized during an inventory search of his vehicle. Smith’s vehicle was impounded and inventoried when he was unable to provide proof of insurance following a valid traffic stop. We see no error in the district court’s implicit finding that the vehicle inventory occurred before Smith’s arrest and the discovery of contraband on his person. See United States v. Casteneda, 951 F.2d 44, 48 (5th Cir. 1992). We agreewith thedistrict court that the impoundment ofSmith’s vehicle was proper under Louisiana law and that the procedure used to inventory the vehicle was acceptable. See Fields v. State , 714 So. 2d 1244, 1250-56 (L a. 1998); U nited Statesv. Lage

, 183 F.3d 374, 380 (5th Cir. 1999). We likewise agree that the relevant issue is the good-faith nature ofthe search rather than the exactnesswith which non-incriminating items were documented. See United Statesv. Outlaw , 319 F.3d 701, 704 (5th Cir. 2003). AFFIRMED.
Section 10 

Any Public Comments and Responses 

See Attachments : 

+ Public Comments and Responses
No. 61602.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., and Meadows, Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 294456-K, etc. (New York).

*465Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of small electric motors the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60545, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

September 25, 1961

No. 66091.

#### W. H. S. Lloyd Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22557, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In-accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of samples similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 118, C.D. 2243), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RICHARD G. HARMS, as personal

representative of the Estate of KURT

STANLEY HARMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 CASE NO. C06-572JLR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court having been notified of the settlement of this matter and it appearing that

no issue remains for the court’s determination,

IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED

with prejudice and without costs to any party.

In the event settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case,

provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and

pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED.

Dated this 15th day of October, 2007.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00572-JLR Document 50 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANLEY KELLEY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT K. WONG, Warden; 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 09-15939

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01713-ALA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Arthur L. Alarcón, Circuit Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 2, 2011 ** 

Before: RYMER, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Stanley Kelley appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

AUG 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15939

Kelley contends that the his due process rights were violated because the

Governor’s 2004 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some

evidence.” This claim is foreclosed by Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863

(2011) (holding that the only federal right at issue in the parole context is

procedural).

To the extent that Kelley contends that the Governor violated his due

process rights by failing to hold a hearing before reversing the grant of parole by

the California Board of Prison Terms, that contention is foreclosed by Styre v.

Adams, __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 2176465, at *1-2 (9th Cir. June 6, 2011) (holding

that Cooke implicitly rejects argument that the Governor was required to hold a

hearing before reversing the Board’s decision granting parole).

Kelly’s remaining claims lack merit.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Earl R. RefslandEarl
      R. RefslandPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer


November
6, 2009
AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

                                   Joe R. Love

         This Amendment to Stock Option Agreement is made as of the 4th day of
May, 1998, between Tatonka Energy, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("Company") and
Joe R. Love ("Optionee").

         WHEREAS, on May 4, 1988,  the Company  granted  Optionee  an option  to
purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000  shares of Company's  Common Stock, par value
of $0.001 (as presently  constituted),  on the terms and conditions  hereinafter
set forth,  at the purchase  price of $0.075 per share as presently  constituted
(250,000  shares at $0.75 per share,  after the  effectiveness  of the  proposed
1-for-10 reverse stock split); and

         WHEREAS,  the  option  was  contained  in  that  certain  Stock  Option
Agreement dated as of May 4, 1988; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Company  and the  Optionee  intended  that the option be
granted  at a price  equal to 100% of the  fair  market  value of the  Company's
Common Stock on the date of grant; and

         WHEREAS,  the  parties  believed  at the time that $0.075 per share (as
presently  constituted)  was the fair market  value of the Common  Stock on such
date,  but the parties have  subsequently  learned that the fair market value of
the Common Stock on such date was $0.13; and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Stock Option Agreement,  as of
May 4, 1998, to correct this error;

         NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth,  and other good and valuable  consideration,  the Company
and Optionee agree as follows:

         1. The purchase price shall be $0.13 per share as presently constituted
($1.30 per share, after the effectiveness of the proposed 1-for-10 reverse stock
split).

         2. Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the
Stock Option  Agreement  shall be  unchanged  and shall remain in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has caused  this  Amendment  to Stock
Option Agreement to be executed in its name by its President and attested by its
Secretary on the day and year first above written, and the Optionee has hereunto
set his hand and seal on the day and year specified below.

                                                TATONKA ENERGY, INC.


                                                By /s/ George C. Barker
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   George C. Barker, President
ATTEST:

/s/ Judith F. Barker
---------------------------
Judith F. Barker, Secretary


                                               By /s/ George C. Barker
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  George C. Barker, Optionee