alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING

 § 2254 PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ALVIN WILLIS, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C06-544-TSZ-MJB

)

v. )

)

DAREN SWENSON, et al., ) ORDER DENYING § 2254 

) PETITION AND DISMISSING 

Respondents. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed petitioner's federal habeas petition, respondents’ answer thereto,

the Report and Recommendation of Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and this action

is DISMISSED with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondents, and to Judge Benton.

DATED this 13th day of November, 2007.

ATHOMAS S. ZILLY

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00544-TSZ Document 16 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 1
### SERVED: AUGUST 27,2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF GREAT WESTERN AIR, LLC. DOCKETNO. FAA2014-0114 (Civil Penalty Action).



### ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed a Complaint dated April 8, 2014. GREAT WESTERN AIR, LLC. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed an Answer dated May 12, 2014. Respondentwithdrew its Request for Hearing on August 20, 2014. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw arequest for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint ot a party withdraws the request for ahearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, Respondent having withdrawn its Hearing Request, it be and is ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's Withdrawal ofRequestfor Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 2. Thisproceedingbe and is hereby dismissed withprejudice. 

### \ ,) Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

MarkJ. Connor, Respondent's Counsel Fox Rothschild, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 FAX: 702-597-5503 ONE COPY

·Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Ave, Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0114 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000875278
<NAME>                        WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund III, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             315,133
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   315,133
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,517,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,752,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,517,522
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    21,077
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      197,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   302,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (479,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (479,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (479,001)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6479

WILLIAM ALLEN LARUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAPT. RUSSELL MATHENEY; CHRISTY FLORES, In their Official 

Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber, 

Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00983)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen LaRue, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William A. LaRue appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. LaRue v. Matheney, No. 2:08-cv-00983 

(S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                   ECOLAB INC.
                             ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENT
                         FOR NON-QUALIFIED BENEFIT PLANS

                         THIRD DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT


Pursuant to Sections 5.1 and 2.6 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for
Non-Qualified Benefit Plans ("Administrative Document") and the authority
delegated to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company by resolutions of the
Company's Board of Directors, dated May 14, 1999, the Company amends the
Administrative Document as set forth below. Words and phrases used herein with
initial capital letters which are defined in the Administrative Document are
used herein as so defined.

1.   Section 2.6 of the Administrative Document is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:

     "SECTION 2.6. LIABILITY OF PAYMENT.

     (1)  The Employer by which the Executive was most recently employed at the
     time of his termination of employment with the Controlled Group shall pay
     the Benefits (or cause the Benefits to be paid) to the Executive or his
     Death Beneficiary under the Plans. In the event that an Executive transfers
     employment from one Employer to another, the Executive's Benefits (and the
     underlying assets and liabilities related thereto) shall automatically be
     transferred from the Executive's former Employer to the Executive's new
     Employer.

     (2)  Notwithstanding subsection (1) above, the Company may (but shall not
     be required to) guarantee some or all of the obligations of one or more
     Employers under any one or all of the Plans, with respect to one or more
     Executives or Death Beneficiaries, to the extent determined by the Company
     in its sole and absolute discretion.

     (3)  The Company hereby guarantees all of the Employer obligations of
     Ecolab Finance Inc. under all of the Plans, with respect to Executives or
     Death Beneficiaries."

2.   This amendment is designated the "Third Declaration of Amendment" because
two amendments precede it, which preceding amendments are designated "Amendment
No. 1" and "First Declaration of Amendment."

3.   This amendment to the Administrative Document shall be effective as of
July 1, 1999.


<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its
authorized officers and its corporate seal affixed, this 30th day of June, 1999.


                                      ECOLAB INC.



(Seal)                                By: /s/Michael E. Shannon
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Michael E. Shannon
                                          Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                          Financial and Administrative
                                          Officer



Attest: /s/Kenneth A. Iverson
        -----------------------------------
        Kenneth A. Iverson
        Vice President and Secretary


                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 81 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 81

                      Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 1998

Mr. Coverdell submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                      Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

Whereas the date of June 26, 1998, marks the 50th anniversary of the 
        commencement of the Allied effort to supply the people of Berlin, 
        Germany, with food, fuel, and supplies in the face of the illegal Soviet 
        blockade that divided the city;
Whereas this 15 month Allied effort became known throughout the free world as 
        the ``Berlin Airlift'' and ultimately cost the lives of 78 Allied 
        airmen, of whom 31 were United States fliers;
Whereas this heroic humanitarian undertaking was universally regarded as an 
        unambiguous statement of Western resolve to thwart further Soviet 
        expansion;
Whereas the Berlin Airlift was an unqualified success, both as an instrument of 
        diplomacy and as a life saving rescue of the 1,000,000 inhabitants of 
        West Berlin, with 2,326,205 tons of supplies delivered by 277,728 
        flights over a 462-day period;
Whereas historians and citizens the world over view the success of this 
        courageous action as pivotal to the ultimate defeat of international 
        tyranny, symbolized today by the fall of the Berlin Wall; and
Whereas this inspiring act of resolve must be preserved in the memory of future 
        generations in a positive and dramatic manner: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the 50th anniversary of the Berlin Airlift should 
        include the presentation of a suitable gift of representational 
        art from the citizens of the United States to the citizens of 
        the Federal Republic of Germany, commemorating the fall of the 
        Berlin Wall and the reunification of the great city of Berlin; 
        and
            (2) civic and corporate leaders across the Nation are 
        entrusted to fulfill the intent of paragraph (1) by using 
        private subscription and volunteer effort with the 
        encouragement and support of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 106

To commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Presidential Management Intern

Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 9, 1997

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SANTORUM, and

Mr. KERRY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Presidential

Management Intern Program.

Whereas, the Presidential Management Intern Program was

created 20 years ago to attract to federal service men

and women of exceptional management potential and special training in public policy;

Whereas, more than 3500 persons have been appointed to

federal service under the Presidential Management Intern

Program;

Whereas, these men and women contribute to raising the

standards of public service through their hard work and

dedication: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 106 IS

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognize the skill and

2 dedication of Presidential Management Intern Program

3 participants and commemorate the 20th anniversary of

4 the Presidential Management Intern Program.

5 That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the

6 Presidential Management Alumni Group as an expression

7 of appreciation for their continued support for federal

8 service and the Presidential Management Intern Program.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH CRITTENDON JR,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5657RBL

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, David Jennings. 

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Colin Fieman. 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge Ronald B. Leighton:

Date of hearing: October 17, 2008 

Time of hearing: 9:30 am

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered 

 by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

October 9, 2008.

__s/Karen L. Strombom _ Karen L. Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Case 3:06-cr-05176 Document 2 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-05176 Document 2 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Unsealing Plea Agreement/

HILLIARD/CR06-0103JPD-1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

JUDGE JAMES P. DONOHUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) Case No. CR06-0103JPD

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER UNSEALING 

) PLEA AGREEMENT

)

FRANK BENTLEY HILLIARD, V, )

)

)

Defendant. ) )

The Court having reviewed the stipulated motion by the government and defendant

FRANK BENTLEY HILLIARD, V, to unseal the plea agreement in this matter, enters

the following order:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plea agreement in this matter shall be

unsealed for the purpose of providing discovery to those parties requiring copies of the

plea agreement for trial preparation in case number CR06-106RSM. 

 DATED this 20th day of September, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by:

 /s Jill Otake 

JILL OTAKE

Assistant United States Attorney

WA Bar # 28298

Case 2:06-cr-00103-JPD Document 71 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SafeStitch
Medical, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SafeStitch
      Medical, Inc.




By:
                          /s/ Jeffrey G.
      SpragensJeffrey
      G. SpragensChief
      Executive Officer and PresidentAugust
      7,
2009





The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of SafeStitch Medical, Inc.
or the certifying officers.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DEVONNE MICHAEL LEE,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-67M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Possession of Cocaine Base with Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A).

Date of Detention Hearing: February 17, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has a lengthy criminal background history.

(2) Defendant has a prior history of failures to comply with the conditions of his

probation.

(3) When charged with the instant offense, defendant was on supervised release from

a prior conviction involving possession of cocaine.

(4) There is no information that is verifiable regarding defendant’s residence.

Case 2:06-cr-00062-JLR Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(5) Defendant has a past and present history of substance-abuse problems.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings and that will address the

danger to other persons or the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 21st day of February, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00062-JLR Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21414]



[[Page 67420]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12201]


Certification Related to Foreign Military Financing for Colombia 
Under Section 7045(B)(2)(B) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2023

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including under section 7045(b)(2)(B) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2023 (Div. 
K, Pub. L. 117-328), I hereby certify that:
    (I) the Special Jurisdiction for Peace and other judicial 
authorities, as appropriate, are sentencing perpetrators of gross 
violations of human rights, including those with command 
responsibility, to deprivation of liberty;
    (II) the Government of Colombia is making consistent progress in 
reducing threats and attacks against human rights defenders and other 
civil society activists, and judicial authorities are prosecuting and 
punishing those responsible for ordering and carrying out such attacks;
    (III) the Government of Colombia is making consistent progress in 
protecting Afro-Colombian and Indigenous communities and is respecting 
their rights and territories;
    (IV) senior military officers credibly alleged, or whose units are 
credibly alleged, to be responsible for ordering, committing, and 
covering up cases of false positives and other extrajudicial killings, 
or of committing other gross violations of human rights, or of 
conducting illegal communications intercepts or other illicit 
surveillance, are being held accountable, including removal from active 
duty if found guilty through criminal, administrative, or disciplinary 
proceedings; and
    (V) the Colombian Armed Forces are cooperating fully with the 
requirements described in (I) through (IV) above.
    This Certification shall be published in the Federal Register and 
shall be transmitted, along with the accompanying Memorandum of 
Justification, to Congress.

    Dated: September 15, 2023.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-21414 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P