alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL GORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT HEWLIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5841FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the Department of Corrections

Case 3:05-cv-05841-FDB Document 6 Filed 01/13/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gore v. Newlin et al Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

is directed to collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income

credited to the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s

account below $10.00, the Department of Corrections should collect and forward only that amount which

would reduce the prisoner’s account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply

to the initial partial filing fee described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and

forwarded to the court until the entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) contact person, the inmate account manager at

Kitsap County Jail, c/o the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office.

DATED this 13th day of January, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05841-FDB Document 6 Filed 01/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

November 1, 1962

No. 67161.

protests 62/3276-16423 and 62/3279-16426 (New Orleans).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CLYDE MCKNIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5254RJB-KLS

ORDER REGARDING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

EXTEND TIME FOR

DISCOVERY COMPLETION

This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), Local Magistrates Rules MJR 3 and 4, and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

The case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to extend time for discovery completion. After

reviewing plaintiff’s motion and the balance of the record, the Court finds and orders as follows:

On October 5, 2006, plaintiff filed his present motion, wherein he requests an extension of the time

for completion of discovery until November 5, 2006, due to defendant counsel’s alleged refusal to provide

a definite date for giving plaintiff certain discovery material. Plaintiff’s motion was noted for consideration

on October 20, 2006. While it appears plaintiff served counsel for defendant with the motion, no response

therefrom has yet been received by the Court. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby directs defendant to file a response to plaintiff’s motion by no later

than November 13, 2006. If such a response is filed, plaintiff shall file a reply thereto, if any, by no later

than November 16, 2006. The Clerk, therefore, shall re-note this motion for consideration on November

Case 3:05-cv-05254-RJB Document 43 Filed 10/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

17, 2006. 

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and counsel for defendant.

DATED this 26th day of October, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05254-RJB Document 43 Filed 10/26/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD AND DEBORAH KEAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5737RJB

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The plaintiffs are proceeding in forma pauperis. (Dkt. #

4). Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend. (Dkt. # 94).

Plaintiff has already amended the complaint and defendants have answered.. Thus leave of

court is needed to file any further amendment. See, Fed. R. Civ. P 15 (a). Plaintiffs do not provide a

proposed amended complaint or state why amendment is needed. The motion is DENIED. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and to note the January 9th,

2006 due date on the court’s calendar.

DATED this 21st day of April, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 120 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY EX PARTE

MOTION TO PROVIDE INVOLUNTARY 

MEDICAL TREATMENT - 1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

5220 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

700 STEWART STREET

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

TEL. (206) 553-7970

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

) No. MS 06-5004FDB

)

IN THE MATTER OF JACQUES ) ORDER GRANTING 

COTHIERRE, INS No. 24-650-779 ) EMERGENCY EX PARTE

) MOTION TO PROVIDE

) INVOLUNTARY MEDICAL

 ) TREATMENT 

_______________________________________)

The Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (hereafter

“ICE”) has filed an ex parte motion for an order permitting it to pursue involuntary feeding of

Jacques Cothierre (A 24-650-779), who is currently incarcerated as a civil detainee at the

Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington.

Based on the declarations of Dr. Philip Farabaugh and Ms. Deanna Gephart, and

information submitted by ICE, I find that there is sufficient cause to believe that without the

requested medical testing and treatment, Mr. Cothierre is in danger of irreparable injury, and

possible death. Mr. Cothierre’s current hunger strike poses a serious medical risk to himself. 

A review of the applicable law reveals that the ICE has an affirmative statutory and

constitutional duty to care for and treat inmates in its custody. This Court has inherent authority

to issue an Order requiring the ICE to undertake this affirmative duty, which includes provision

of forced feeding with plastic tubes through the nasal passage. Such treatment should be limited

Case 3:06-mc-05004-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY EX PARTE

MOTION TO PROVIDE INVOLUNTARY 

MEDICAL TREATMENT - 2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

5220 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

700 STEWART STREET

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

TEL. (206) 553-7970

to that which is medically necessary for Mr. Cothierre.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ICE may undertake the medical procedures

and treatment described herein. ICE is directed to provide a copy of this order to Mr. Cothierre

and his attorney forthwith. 

DATED this 1st day of March, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

/s/ Rebecca S. Cohen 

REBECCA S. COHEN

Assistant United State Attorney

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-7970

Fax: (206) 553-4073

E-mail: rebecca.cohen@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Moving Party Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs

Enforcement

Case 3:06-mc-05004-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 57741.

protest 208191-K (New York).

#### Millmaster Chemical Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 60559.

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Co., a/c S. E. Edgar & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 292395-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
H. Res. 682 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 27, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3567) to amend the Small Business Investment 

Act of 1958 to expand opportunities for investments in small 

businesses, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Small Business. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions of the bill are waived. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be 

in order except those printed in the report of the Committee 
2 

•HRES 682 EH 

on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 

may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 

shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 

proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of 

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. 

All points of order against such amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3567 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid-
3 

•HRES 682 EH 

eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 57743.

protest 208848-K (New York).

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,815
<INVENTORY>                                        860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,916
<PP&E>                                          51,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,940
<BONDS>                                         19,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,501
<SALES>                                        480,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,914
<CGS>                                          442,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  465,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (440)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (465)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 PROPOSED ORDER- [C06-310-MJP]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

RICHARD M. CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C06-310-MJP

PROPOSED ORDER FOR REMAND

 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned

case be reversed and remanded for de novo administrative proceedings, including the following:

the administrative law judge (ALJ) will re-evaluate the medical source evidence, particularly the

opinions of Drs. Okey, Litsky, Cove, and the State disability medical consultants; re-evaluate

Plaintiff’s subjective complaints; ensure that all lay witness testimony and statements are fully

evaluated and specific reasons are given for discounting such testimony; further evaluate

Plaintiff’s mental impairments in accordance with the special technique described in 20 C.F.R. §§

404.1520a, 416.920a, and document application of the technique in the decision by providing

Case 2:06-cv-00310-MJP Document 23 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 PROPOSED ORDER- [C06-310-MJP]

specific findings and appropriate rationale for each of the functional areas described in 20 C.F.R.

§§ 404.1520a(c), 416.920a(c);further evaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity and provide

appropriate rationale with specific references to evidence of record in support of the assessed

limitations; and, if warranted by the expanded record, obtain supplemental vocational expert

testimony.

This remand is pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon proper

presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff’s application for costs and attorney’s fees under 

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

 DATED this 21st day of August 2006. A

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

Recommended for Entry

this 18th day of August, 2006.

s/ Mary Alice Theiler 

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ Thomas M. Elsberry 

THOMAS M. ELSBERRY WSB # 26456

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Phone: 206-615-2112

Fax: 206-615-2531

thomas.elsberry@ssa.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00310-MJP Document 23 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Orofino Gold Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shih Long Ning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of May 31, 2011.  By:/s/ Shi Long NingShi Long Ning
Chief Executive Officer, President, acting Chief
Financial Officer, acting Principal Accounting
Officer and Director
Case 3:06-cv-05148-FDB Document 14 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 1
December 30, 2009

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: C hanges to the Identification of Additional Cl asses of Facilities for Development

of Financial Responsibility Requi rements under CERCLA Section 108(b)

FROM: Barbara Foster

O ffice of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0265

The attached documents are two drafts of the Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingIdentification of Additional Classes of Faciliti es for Development of Financial Responsibility

Requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b) :

• The draft submitted to OMB for review, dated 11-18-09; and

• A redline/strikeout document, which resulted from a comparison of that 11-18-09 draft v.

the 12-29-09 post-OMB draft of the notice.

In the redline/strikeout document, changes that were made in response to comments submitted to

the Agency as part of the OMB review process are italicized.

Attachments
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period  ended  December 31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 16, 2005
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify that:

(1)     The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the accompanying Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                       | 
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|Date:  August 12, 2009 | /s/ Scott F. Drill                    | 
|                       | Scott F. Drill                       
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       | (principal executive officer)        
|                       |                                       | 
|Date:  August 12, 2009 | /s/ Justin W. Shireman                | 
|                       | Justin W. Shireman                   
|                       | Vice President, Finance and          
|                       | Chief Financial Officer              
|                       | (principal financial officer)        

23

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 5, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 64 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-279, CP2023-282.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-22136 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P