alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dele
Liu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Youku.com Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [intentionally omitted.]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 10, 2011



|    |  |              |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------ |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Dele Liu
|    |  | Name:        |  | Dele Liu               
|    |  | Title:       |  | Chief Financial Officer
*

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch has elected to participate in further proceedings in this

matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). 

Emily ADLER, individually; on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated, Seth Finck,

individually; on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Duval County Public School District, Defendants-Appellees.

Emily Adler, individually; on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated, Seth Finck,

individually; on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Susan Boles, as parent & next friend of Rebecca Boles, a minor child and on behalf of all public school

students within the Duval County Public School District, Movants-Appellants.

Nos. 98-2709, 98-2720.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

June 3, 1999.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 98-460-Civ-J-10C);

Wm. Terrell Hodges, Judge.

(Opinion May 11, 1999, 11th Cir., 1999, --- F.3d ---- ).

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK,

CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*

.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be

reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted

in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.
No. 61588.

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States,

protests 272080-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of harness hardware for use with harness for dogs the same in all material respects as that involved in *International Expediters, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1868), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HEIDE ANN POWERS,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR06-48-JLR-JPD

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Counts 1 through 22: Acquiring a Controlled Substance by Deception in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 843(a)(3) and 843(d).

Date of Detention Hearing: February 24, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth,

finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant has serious and significant drug problems.

(2) Defendant has committed the theft of identities to obtain drugs.

(3) A check of defendant’s criminal background history reveals several failures to

appear.

(4) Defendant has no stable residence.

(5) In the Pretrial Services Report of February 24, 2006, it is noted that defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00048-JLR Document 11 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

is unable or unwilling to change her past and present conduct.

(6) Based upon the foregoing findings of the Court, there appear to be no

conditions or combination of conditions other than detention that will address the risk of

flight or danger to the community posed by the defendant.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal

for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 27th day of February, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00048-JLR Document 11 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 13, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Etienne Snollaerts
|Etienne Snollaerts    
|July 20, 2004
No. 57031.

protests 142636-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### D. N. & E. Walter & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: The items marked *“A”*in protest 142636-K were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). As to the remaining protests, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable as *12%*percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT

JENKS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) No. CR06-0041RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

RICKY JENKS, ) DEFENDANT JENKS’ MOTION FOR

) JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Jenks’ Motion for Judgment of

Acquittal” (Dkt. #782). In light of defendant Jenks’ plea agreement and the pending sentencing

hearing set for December 20, 2007 (Dkt. ##854, 855), it is hereby ORDERED that defendant

Jenks’ motion (Dkt. #782) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 934 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 742 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 16, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2102) to maintain the free flow of 
information to the public by providing conditions for the federally compelled 
disclosure of information by certain persons connected with the news media. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 
arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill 
shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) the amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Boucher of 
Virginia or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any 
point of order (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI) or demand 
for division of the question, shall be considered as read, and shall be 
separately debatable for ten minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 2102 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JEREMY D. BAKER,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5196

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( X ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( X) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 September 28, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05196-MAT Document 11 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL A. BURNHART,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEN SANDERS, M.D., et al,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-361 JCC

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Report and Recommendation

of the Honorable Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record,

finds and Orders as follows:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #20) is GRANTED and the

matter is DISMISSED with prejudice; 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for

defendants, and the Hon. Monica J. Benton.

DATED this 14th day of May, 2007.

AJohn C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00361-JCC Document 34 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 1
Law Offices of Jeffrey H. Smith 

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 

Seattle, WA. 98101 

(206) 340-0053 

Fax (206) 624-1767 

Order Granting Motion to Continue 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

 JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JAMES LEROY HENDERSON, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Cause No. CR06-0074RSM 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

CONTINUE TRIAL AND MOTIONS 

DATES 

 

 ORDER

 THE COURT, having considered defendant's Motion to continue and the records and files 

herein, makes the following findings: 

 1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii); 

 2. The Court finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance of 

this case, that a continuance is necessary to ensure effective trial preparation and that these factors 

Case 2:06-cr-00074-RSM Document 34 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
Law Offices of Jeffrey H. Smith 

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 

Seattle, WA. 98101 

(206) 340-0053 

Fax (206) 624-1767 

Order Granting Motion to Continue 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 

Sec. 3161(h)(8)(A). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date in this matter is continued from 

September 18, 2006 to November 6, 2006, and the pretrial motions date is continued to 

September 28, 2006. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the period of time from the current trial date of September 

18, 2006 up to and including the new trial date of November 6, 2006 shall be excluded time 

pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 et seq. 

DATED this _28_ day of August, 2006 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00074-RSM Document 34 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2
No. R69/8.

reappraisement R64/21813 (Pembina).

#### J. L. Wood *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *J. L. Wood*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 682, R.D. 11292), tire court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the involved bus shells and that said value is $18,188.02, Canadian currency, per shell, less the cost of United States components as invoiced, and in the case of entries 832, 845, 879, 903, and 920, less $150, Canadian currency, per entry, for fuel tanks not delivered.
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-3 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-3 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-3 Filed 03/28/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05163-RJB Document 2-3 Filed 03/28/06 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68904-68905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12210]


Notice of Release of the Department of State's FY 2021 Service 
Contract Inventory

SUMMARY: Acting in compliance with section 743 of Division C of the

[[Page 68905]]

Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, the Department of State is 
publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the 
FY 2021 Service Contract Inventory. The FY 2021 Service Contract 
Inventory includes the FY 2021 Planned Analysis, and the FY 2020 
Meaningful Analysis. The inventory was developed in accordance with 
guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). The Department of State has posted 
its FY 2021 Service Contract Inventory at the following link: https://csm.state.gov/index2.html.

DATES: The inventory is available on the Department's website as of 
September 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlon D. Henry, Management and 
Program Analyst, A/EX/CSM, 771-204-7977, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8f0ddd6cac1f5fcf8cbccd9ccdd96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09416c677b70444d497a7d687d6c276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>

Marlon D. Henry,
Management and Program Analyst, Collaborative Strategy and Management 
Division, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-22072 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>