alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.7.2



                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                   SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT


                         Effective as of August 1, 1999

         WHEREAS, the Connecticut Water Company (hereinafter referred to as the
"Employer") and Marshall T. Chiaraluce (hereinafter referred to as the
"Employee") entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated as
of December 16,1991 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement in accordance with the
provisions of Section 5(a) thereof;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agreement is hereby amended
effective as of the date first above written as follows:

1. The second paragraph of Section l(a) of the Agreement is amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

"For purposes of the foregoing, "Average Earnings" shall have the meaning set
forth in the Retirement Plan, except that in determining Average Earnings,
Annual Earnings (as defined in the Retirement Plan) shall not be limited to the
OBRA '93 annual compensation limit."


/s/   Marshall T. Chiaraluce              Connecticut Water Service, Inc.
--------------------------------
      Marshall T. Chiaraluce
                                          By:  /s/  Michele G. DiAcri
                                               --------------------------
August 13, 1999                                Michele G. DiAcri
                                               Corporate Secretary
                                               August 13, 1999
No. 57774.

protests 202323-K, etc. (Boston).

#### W. *N.*Proctor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bumgardner, Kelsey and Senior Judge Hodges

RAMADA PLAZA RESORT AND ZURICH U.S. MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1788-05-1 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 15, 2005 JACKIE A. MUISE

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, M uncie & Ross, P.C., on briefs), for appellants. (T. Gregory Evans; Joynes & Gaides Law Group, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

Ramada Plaza Resort and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Jackie A. Muise proved she injured her le ft hand and thumb as a result of an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her em ployment on April 14, 2002.

We have reviewed the record and the commission ’s opinion and find that th is appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons st ated by the commission in its final opinion. See

Muise v. Ramada Plaza Resort , VWC File No. 211-91-59 (June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid th e decisional process.

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B 
Research Study Section Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B 
Research Study Section.
    Date: November 1-2, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5199, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c6f697e7e657869614c616d656022626564226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c5c3d4d4cfd2c3cbe6cbc7cfca88c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21816 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 68477.

protests 61/16660, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Alsi, Inc., and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Mini Bachi stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63896.

protests 58/10018-9866 and 59/19021-10881 (Chicago).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*370Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Fluorinein a closed drainage basin, Saguache and Alamosa Counties, Colorado**
 
Plate | Report
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1533
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000961023
 
August 21, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

MITCHELL FRIEND,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5061FDB

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( X ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ) Crime of Violence (X)

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Use of alias names.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 February 17, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05061-BHS Document 13 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 1