alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41367

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ALVARO DAVILA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 51

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Alvaro Davila raises an

argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562

(5th Cir. 2013 ) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary

definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be

below 17 years old. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH

C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

June 21 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 15-41367 Document: 00513557248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
July 9 , 2015

Mr. M atthew Dunn

Aerolens

208 7

- 17 William Street

North Sydney, Australia N SW 2060

Dear Mr. Dunn :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 6 th 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-
2733 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief , the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safet y or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to p rocess your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Ana lyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 61090.

Suit 4882.

#### Socony Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1777 affirmed March 29, 1957. C. A. D. 641.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEITH L. NASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5127 RJB/KLS

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s emergency

motion for pretrial conference regarding scheduling and management. (Dkt. # 59). This case is currently

governed by the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order. (Dkt. # 50). Plaintiff has provided no good cause to

amend the Court’s pretrial schedule. Plaintiff makes unspecified allegations of impediments to his ability to

file and serve his pleadings in a timely manner. However, Plaintiff has missed no deadlines in this case.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency pretrial conference (Dkt. # 50) is DENIED.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 64 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 1
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6

 38.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 16, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-474

Lower Tribunal No. 18-1100

________________

Brenda Abrams,

Appellant,

vs.

In re: Guardianship of Esther Klepach,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Celeste Hardee 

Muir, Judge.

Arthur J. Morburger, for appellant.

Waserstein & Nuñez, PLLC, Carlos A. Nuñez-Vivas and Denise L. BenDavid, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 57041.

protest 186846-K (New York).

#### Wing Fat Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vegetables, prepared or preserved, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55731, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL OF PARTY 

No. CV06-05050 FDB – Page 1 of 2 

MORAN WINDES & WONG 

5608 17th Avenue Northwest 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98107 

Phone: 206.788.3000 Facsimile: 206.788.3001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

STEPHEN INGLE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STELLAR J. CORPORATION, a Texas 

corporation, STELLAR J. DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, 

Defendants. 

No. CV06-05050 FDB 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL OF PARTY 

Noted on Calendar: 

Friday, April 7, 2006 

STIPULATION

THE PARTIES HEREBY stipulate and move the Court for an Order 

dismissing the party STELLAR J. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, with prejudice, 

as a named defendant in the above-captioned matter. Parties also request the 

caption be changed to reflect this dismissal. 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-05050-FDB Document 11 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL OF PARTY 

No. CV06-05050 FDB – Page 2 of 2 

MORAN WINDES & WONG 

5608 17th Avenue Northwest 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98107 

Phone: 206.788.3000 Facsimile: 206.788.3001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

DATED this 28th day of March, 2006. 

MORAN WINDES & WONG, PLLC 

/s/ Angela K. Wong

Angela K. Wong, WSBA #28111 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

5608 17th Avenue Northwest 

Seattle, Washington 98107 

Telephone: 206-788-3000 

Facsimile: 206-788-3001 

E-Mail: angela@mwwlaw.net

FORSBERG & UMLAUF, P.S. 

/s/ Ann C. McCormick

Ann C. McCormick, WSBA #15832 

Attorneys for Defendants 

900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1700 

Seattle, Washington 98164-1039 

Telephone: 206-689-8500 

Facsimile: 206-689-8501 

E-Mail: amccormick@forsberg-umlauf.com

ORDER

THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that STELLAR J. DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, is dismissed as a party and named defendant in the abovecaptioned matter, with prejudice and the caption will reflect such dismissal. 

 DATED this 29th day of March 2006. 

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Presented by: 

MORAN WINDES & WONG, PLLC 

/s/ Angela K. Wong

Angela K. Wong, WSBA #28111 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

E-Mail: angela@mwwlaw.net

FORSBERG & UMLAUF, P.S. 

/s/ Ann C. McCormick

Ann C. McCormick, WSBA #15832 

Attorneys for Defendants 

E-Mail: amccormick@forsberg-umlauf.com

Case 3:06-cv-05050-FDB Document 11 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 806 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 8, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3222) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD C. SPRUEL JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5021RJB

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’ MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE AN OPENING BRIEF

This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. 2000, has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. This court has denied a motion for injunctive relief and plaintiff has filed an appeal

from that denial with the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff has now file a motion for an extension of time to file

an opening brief. (Dkt. # 37). 

This court lacks authority to grant an extension of time as the brief is for another tribunal. 

Plaintiff will need to address this issue with the Court of Appeals and not this tribunal. 

The clerks office is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff and counsel for

defendants and remove Dkt. # 37 from the courts calendar.

DATED this 31st day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05021-RJB Document 39 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 30, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00632-CV

C&G WELDING, INC., Appellant

V.

DANNY GRAY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-19356

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 30, 2014. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On August 20, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21022]



[[Page 66479]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4723-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


New York; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-4723-DR), dated July 22, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 3, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of July 22, 2023.

    Franklin County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21022 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit








[***] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS AND ASTERISKS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED INFORMATION.
    Exhibit  10.17


Amendment 1 to the Enterprise Subscription Agreement


This Amendment 1 (“Amendment 1”) is entered into as of October 31, 2017 (“Amendment 1 Effective Date”) by and between Cloudera, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with offices at 395 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94306 (“Cloudera”) and Intel Corporation and its Affiliates, a Delaware corporation, with offices at 2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, CA 94504 (“Customer”) and amends that certain Enterprise Subscription Agreement entered into by and between the parties dated April 25, 2014 (“Agreement”).


The parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary In Section 4.1 of the Agreement, Customer agrees that Cloudera may [***]. Such [***] will not modify the agreed payment due date as set forth in Exhibit C.


Integration; Conflict. The provisions of this Amendment will govern notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided or modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect, and the Agreement and this Amendment constitute the entire and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersede all proposals and prior agreements, oral or written, and all other communications.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.    


	
					
	Customer: Intel Corporation
	 
	Cloudera, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Signature:
	/s/ Sommer Starr
	 
	Signature:
	/s/ Wayne Kimber

	Printed:
	Sommer Starr
	 
	Printed:
	Wayne Kimber

	Title:
	Commodity Manager
	 
	Title:
	VP Finance & PAO

	Date:
	31-Oct-2017
	 
	Date:
	31-Oct-2017
Additional Proposed Permit and Related 

Documents 

(Updated November 2013)
Case No. 8,238.

#### LELAND v. PLATT.

[The case reported under above title in 16 N. B. R. 505, is the same as Case No. 8,235.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of CFTC's Fiscal Year 2021 Service Contract Inventory.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Livia Bykov, Procurement Analyst, at 202-418-5103 or                         *lbykov@cftc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with section 743 of division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law 111-117, 123 Stat. 3034, CFTC is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Service Contract Inventory. CFTC has posted its inventory documents on the agency website at the following link:                     *https://www.cftc.gov/​About/​CFTCReports/​index.htm.*

                    This inventory provides information on service contracts above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as determined by the base and all options value, that were awarded in FY 2021. CFTC's service contract inventory data is included in the government-wide inventory, which can be filtered to display the CFTC-specific data. A link to the government-wide inventory is included in the posting on the CFTC website, or it can be accessed directly at                     *https://www.acquisition.gov/​service-contract-inventory.*

The inventory documents posted on the CFTC website also include the CFTC FY 2020 Service Contract Inventory Analysis (dated February 15, 2022). This report provides information about the Product Service Codes that the CFTC analyzed from the 2020 inventory.

Dated: September 28, 2023.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-21842 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
No. 65205.

#### Alfred C. Toepfer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/17566, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Grilon yarn similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 64033, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00052

- CV

JOHN FALTYNSKI, F&F LAND COMPANY, INC., AND K ELLI FREEMAN AS ADMINISTR ATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HAR RY FREEMAN APPELLANTS

V.

SONYA BELL, INDIVIDU ALLY AND AS SURVIVING PARENT AND REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF JEFFREY MU RIEL, JR., DECEASED; DONAL D CAIN, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AN D AS SURVIVING PARENT AND REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF DONALD CAI N, JR., DECEASED; CYNTHIA DENTON, INDIVIDUALLY; DESSAN DRA TATE, INDIVIDUALLY A ND AS SURVIVI NG SPOUSE AND REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF CHARLES TA TE, JR., DECEASED, AND AS NEX T FRIEND OF AALIYAH TA TE, A MINOR; CHARLES TATE, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING PARENT OF CHARLES TATE, JR., D ECEASED; TERESA COLEMAN JORDA N, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVI VING PARENT OF CHARLES TATE, JR., D ECEASED; AND VERNITA WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLEES2

REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF CARL MELVI N FIELDS, JR., DECEASE D

------------

FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINI ON 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On July 31, 2012 , we notified appellant s that their brief had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecuti on unless

appellant s or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant s' brief has not b een filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant s shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
(Reap. Dec. 10800)

#### Popper Morson Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 732275, etc.

(Decided August 19, 1964)

*Barnes, Richardson & GoTburn (Rorma/n Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Bernard J. Babb,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

BichaRdson, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals enumerated in the attached schedule A consists of brandy which was exported from the Virgin Islands and entered at the port of New York. It is contended by the parties herein that the proper basis of value of the subject merchandise is foreign value and that such value is represented by the entered value. These appeals have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows:

> 2. That the merchandise was entered at its foreign value, as said value is defined in Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs *385Administrative Act of 1938, at a unit value of $4.50 per proof gallon; and that the merchandise was appraised as entered.

Upon the record, including the aforesaid stipulation, I find:

1. That foreign value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1402(c) (section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938), is the proper basis for determination of the value of the brandy covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in schedule A attached hereto.

2. That said foreign value is $4.50 per proof gallon and is represented by the entered value.

3. That the subject merchandise was appraised as entered.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SHERRIE L. WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5118JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is her responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05118-RJB Document 2 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1