alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued October 18 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 00 680 - CV

——————————— DEBRA HUETT , Appellant

V. PAUL CHENG , Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 2010 - 09881

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Debra Huett , ha s neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by2

statute or Supreme Court order.” ), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judici al Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 ( Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) ( listing fees in court of appeals). On September 7 , 2012, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee by September 19, 2012, or the appeal would be dismissed

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing i nvoluntary dismissal of case). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant responded, but the response did not demonstr ate grounds for continuing the appeal , and the appellant has not paid the fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5; 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                       875359
<NAME>                                             Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        1291
<SECURITIES>                                                 23419
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 6258
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   258
<INVENTORY>                                                  10740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             47748
<PP&E>                                                       39221
<DEPRECIATION>                                               17543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               70190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         9591
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        13
<OTHER-SE>                                                   57651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 70190
<SALES>                                                      16137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             16137
<CGS>                                                         6955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               3444
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  1240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           2204
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  2204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.16
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit






PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
2801 HIGHWAY 280 SOUTH
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35223


ENDORSEMENT


The Certificate to which this Endorsement is attached is amended as of its Certificate Date as follows:


WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGES


The provision entitled "Waiver of Surrender Charges" that appears in the Section entitled "Surrenders -- Termination" is deleted in its entirety and a new "Waiver of Surrender Charges" provision is inserted in lieu thereof to read as follows:


WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGES
We will waive any applicable Surrender Charges if at any time after the first Certificate Year:
(1)    you are first diagnosed as having a Terminal Illness by a Physician that is not related to you or the Annuitant, or
(2)    you enter for a period of at least ninety (90) days a facility which is:
(a)    licensed by the state and
(b)    qualifies as a skilled nursing home facility under Medicare or Medicaid.


The term Terminal Illness means that you are diagnosed as having a noncorrectable medical condition that, with a reasonable degree of medical certainty, will result in your death in less than 12 months. Written proof satisfactory to the Company must be submitted. The Company reserves the right to require an examination by a physician of its choice.


Signed for the Company as of the effective date, which is the Certificate Date.


PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Secretary




IPD-2025
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND REFERRING

MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER, now )

known as ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS, )

) Case No. C05-1812RSL

Petitioner, ) 

v. )

) ORDER GRANTING MOTION

NEIL CLARK, et al., ) FOR RECONSIDERATION AND 

) REFERRING MATTER TO 

Respondents. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_______________________________________)

On or about June 5, 2006, the Court issued an order adopting the Report and

Recommendation of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler in the above-captioned

matter. Petitioner filed a timely motion to reopen the case, which the Court has considered as a

motion for reconsideration. The order adopting the Report and Recommendation erred:

petitioner had been returned to the Northwest Detention Center and US Immigration and

Customs Enforcement custody on April 11, 2006. His removal proceedings were reopened on

May 2, 2006, making dismissal on the grounds of mootness inappropriate.

 

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3), respondents were given an opportunity to

respond to petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. No response having been filed, petitioner’s

motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The above-captioned matter is hereby reopened and

Case 2:05-cv-01812-RSL Document 78 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND REFERRING

MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

referred to Judge Theiler for consideration of respondents’ original motion to dismiss (Dkt. 

# 34). 

DATED this 17th day of July, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik,

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01812-RSL Document 78 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

FRANKLIN R. DASHIELL, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-0372-JLR

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Court, having reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and

Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining

record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s federal habeas petition is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure

to exhaust available state remedies; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Judge

Theiler.

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00372-JLR Document 6 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: November 05, 2010
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 56

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on October 29, 1997, for a ceremony to honor

4 Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope by conferring upon him the

5 status of an honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of the

6 United States. Physical preparations for the conduct of

7 the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such

8 conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the

9 Capitol.

Passed the Senate October 22, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 56

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol

United States.honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of theHope by conferring upon him the status of anfor a ceremony honoring Leslie Townes (Bob)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 682 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2007.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3567) to amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to expand 
opportunities for investments in small businesses, and for other purposes. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Small Business. After general debate the bill shall 
be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill are 
waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall 
be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 
order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against such amendments are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 3567 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 82 

Commending the University of Louisville Cardinals football team for their 

victory in the 2007 Orange Bowl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2007 

Mr. YARMUTH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Louisville Cardinals football 

team for their victory in the 2007 Orange Bowl. 

Whereas on January 2, 2007, the University of Louisville 

Cardinals football team defeated the Wake Forest Demon 

Deacons 24–13 at Dolphin Stadium in Miami, Florida, to 

win the Orange Bowl; 

Whereas the Cardinals victory marked the climax of a 12–1 

season, which yielded the most wins in the program’s history, a Big East Championship, and the school’s first 

Bowl Championship Series victory; 

Whereas junior quarterback Brian Brohm was named the 

most valuable player of the game after completing 24 of 

34 passes for 312 yards, and junior wide receiver Harry 

Douglas tied an Orange Bowl record with 10 catches and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 82 IH 

165 receiving yards to finish the season with a school 

record 1,265 receiving yards; 

Whereas the Cardinals offensive line provided protection and 

momentum throughout the season and was a major factor in the team’s 475 yards of offense in the Orange 

Bowl; 

Whereas the relentless defense of the Cardinals played a vital 

role in the Orange Bowl victory; 

Whereas the Cardinals defense was led by senior cornerback 

William Gay, who broke up 2 passes late in the game and 

extinguished the final hope of the Demon Deacons with 

an interception; 

Whereas the success of the Cardinals is due in no small part 

to the dedication of Coach Bobby Petrino and his staff, 

as well as the Cardinals coaches of the last 2 decades, 

who led a magnificent ascent begun by Coach Howard 

Schnellenberger; 

Whereas Cardinals fans, who stuck with the program through 

darker times, now have the team they deserve; 

Whereas the University of Louisville has achieved a formidable football program, which is consistently among the 

strongest in college football; and 

Whereas the exceptional group of young men who comprised 

the 2006 Cardinals should be publicly recognized as the 

greatest football team in the history of the University of 

Louisville: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the University of Louisville Car3 dinals football team for their victory in the 2007 Or4 ange Bowl; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 82 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

2 Coach Bobby Petrino and his staff, Director of Ath3 letics Tom Jurich, and President James Ramsey at 

4 the University of Louisville for the hard work and 

5 dedication that led to the Cardinals Orange Bowl 

6 victory; and 

7 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent8 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to the di9 rector of athletics at the University of Louisville for 

10 appropriate display. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit
10.38





 


Frankly
Inc.


27-10
Queens Plaza North, Suite 502


Long
Island City, NY 11101


 


March
28, 2018


 


Mr.
Pat LaPlatney


Raycom
Media, Inc.


201
Monroe Street


RSA
Tower, 20th Floor


Montgomery,
AL 36104


 


Re:
Amendments of Frankly Agreements


 


Dear
Pat,


 


When
signed below, the agreements referenced below between Frankly Inc. (“Frankly”) and Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”)
will be further amended as follows:


 


	 	1.	Share
    Purchase Agreement:  Under Section 4.2.1 of the Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2017 (as previously
    amended, the “SPA”) between Raycom and Frankly, Frankly is required to increase the number of directors on its
    Board by two by March 31, 2018.  Section 4.2.1 of the SPA is hereby amended to change the December 31, 2017 date
    to June 30, 2018.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	Credit
    Agreement: (a) Interest Payments - Reference is made to the Credit Agreement between Raycom and Frankly dated August
    31, 2016 (as previously amended, the “Credit Agreement”).  Monthly payment of the interest on the outstanding
    Loan balance for the period commencing on January 1, 2018 and continuing thereafter will be suspended and each such suspended
    interest payment will be added to the outstanding principal balance of the Loan, and the 12% rate for overdue interest set
    forth in Section 3.1.1 of the Credit Agreement will not apply to such suspended interest.
	 	 	 
	 	 	(b)
    Financial Covenants – Sections 9.2.1 (Total Leverage Ratio) and 9.2.2 (Interest Coverage Ratio) of the Credit
    Agreement each provide a schedule of dates when Frankly will become subject to various financial covenant ratios.  Each
    of the calendar quarter end dates identified in the Section 9.2.1 (Total Leverage Ratio) schedule and the Section 9.2.2 (Interest
    Coverage Ratio) schedule of the Credit Agreement is hereby revised to a later date, so that the first period on each schedule
    is the fiscal quarter ending on June 30, 2019.  


 


Except
as amended herein, SPA and Credit Agreement will continue in full force and effect. If the foregoing is acceptable, please return
a signed copy of this amendment to us at your earliest convenience.


 


	 	 	 	 	Franky Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	By:
    	/s/
    Lou Schwartz
	 	 	 	 	 	Lou
    Schwartz
	 	 	 	 	 	CFO/COO
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Accepted
    and Agreed:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Raycom
    Media, Inc.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Pat LaPlatney	 	 	 
	 	Name:	Pat
    LaPlatney	 	 	 
	 	Title:	CEO	 	 	 


 






    	1
Before the Third Division,

March 2, 1961

No. 65222.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/10979, etc. (New York).

*360Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plagues similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify that:



(1)The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the accompanying Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  August 11, 2006 |                                                                    
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | /s/ Scott F. Drill                                                 
|                       | Scott F. Drill                                                     
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)





|Date:  August 11, 2006 | /s/ Justin W. Shireman                                                                              
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Justin W. Shireman
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)



---
No. 66084.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 59/9178, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO FILE INDICTMENT - 1 

JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

HECTOR ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: CR05-0413RSM 

STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME

TO FILE INDICTMENT 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(b), the government being 

required to file an indictment on or before December 14, 2005, 

and the defendant concurring in the waiver of his rights to a 

speedy indictment through January 14, 2006: 

The Court has considered the parties’ stipulated motion, 

and it appears it would be unreasonable to expect the filing of 

an indictment to occur in this case within thirty (30) day 

period because of the need for further case evaluation prior to 

indictment, without which government and defense counsel would 

be denied reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. 

By their consent given below approving the entry of this order, 

Case 2:05-cr-00413-RSM Document 15 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO FILE INDICTMENT - 2 

the government and the defendant are agreeable to an extension 

of time within which an indictment must be filed from December 

14, 2005 to January 14, 2006. 

Therefore the ends of justice that are served by granting 

the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

IT IS ORDERED that the date on or before which the 

indictment must be filed is extended from December 14, 2005 to 

January 14, 2006. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of delay from 

December 14, 2005 through January 14, 2006, is excludable time 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A), for the purpose of 

computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

DATED this _6__ day of December, 2005. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Presented by: 

/s/______________________

William T. Hines 

Attorney for Defendant 

 

Case 2:05-cr-00413-RSM Document 15 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 2