alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000875579
<NAME>                             WorldWideWeb Institute.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                           435132
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     81114
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 661821
<PP&E>                                                           418674
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    90734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  2573148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1050823
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             87
<OTHER-SE>                                                      1522238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    2573148
<SALES>                                                         3585613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                3685613
<CGS>                                                           1037881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   1919977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (530000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 1087755
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     219000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              868755
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     868755
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.11



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1.


                  COMPUTATION OF  NET INCOME  (LOSS) PER SHARE


                             ECO SOIL SYSTEMS, INC
                                        
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS                  NINE MONTHS
                                                     ENDED SEPTEMBER 30            ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
                                                --------------------------    --------------------------
                                                   1997          1996           1997           1996
                                               ----------      ---------      ---------      ----------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>        
   Net income (loss)                                  827           (813)           829          (2,431)
                                               ==========      =========      =========      ==========


Weighted average common shares outstanding         11,840          6,465         11,266           5,056

Adjustment to reflect requirements of
    the Securities and Exchange Commission
    (Effect of SAB 83)                                 --            994             --             994


Net effect of dilutive common share
equivalents
   based on the treasury stock method               3,176             --          3,075              --
                                               ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------

Shares used in computing net income
   (loss) per share                                15,016          7,459         14,341           6,050
                                               ==========     ==========     ==========      ==========


Net income (loss) per share                           .06          (0.11)           .06           (0.40)
                                               ==========     ==========     ==========      ==========
</TABLE>



                                       16
EXHIBIT 4.1

                 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE
                                 STATE OF NEVADA

Number                                                                    Shares
____________                                                         ___________





                            NuOasis Properties, Inc.


     This corporation is authorized to issue 75,000,000 Common Stock at $.001
Par Value



This Certifies that                                              is the owner of

                                                   fully paid and non-assessable

shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the

Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon

surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this______day of_______________A.D.

19_______.




President                                                    Secretary/Treasurer




                                                       [H:\NUOP\10SB\1999-8.wpd]
Before the First Division,

September 5, 1967

No. P67/285.

#### James A. Cole Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/16399, etc. (New York). Otto Kadmon, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/8902 (New York).

No. P67/286.

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of light sets *880similar in all material respects to *those the*subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 348, C.D. 2813), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5110RJB

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge J. Kelley Arnold (Dkt. 15), Plaintiff’s Motion to Issue Subpoena (Dkt. 17), and Plaintiff’s

Motion to Produce (Dkt. 18). The Court, having reviewed the file, the Report and

Recommendation, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the

court’s order to file a legible complaint. Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Issue Subpoena

(Dkt. 17) and Motion to Produce (Dkt. 18) are STRICKEN AS MOOT. (3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05110-RJB Document 20 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

April 22, 1963

No. 67613.

#### Louis Goldey Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/6281 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of merchandise similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 65376, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 231, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for opal glass tiles and tiling was sustained; the items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of earthenware unglazed floor tile, were held dutiable at 5 cents per square foot, but not less than 25 percent nor more than 35 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 202(a), as modified by T.D. 52739, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52857), for floor tiles, valued not over 40 cents per square foot, not wholly or in part of cement; and the items marked “C,” stipulated to consist of earthenware unglazed floor tiles, were held dutiable at 30 percent ad valorem under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for floor tiles, valued at more than 40 cents per square foot, other, as claimed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         113,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,153
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,184
<PP&E>                                          94,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,052
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,385
<SALES>                                         43,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,282
<CGS>                                            2,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   383
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,766
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 11048)

#### Reeves Equipment Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 832373, etc.

(Decided July 27, 1965)

*Brooks & Brooks (Thomas J. McKenna*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard, J. Kaplan,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, are directed against the appraiser’s action in determining the proper dutiable value of certain tape recorders, exported from Norway.

When this matter was first brought to trial, counsel for plaintiff introduced into the evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, a commission executed by Vedbjorn Tandberg, managing director of Tandbergs Radiofabrikk AS, the manufacturer of the involved tape recorders. The cases were subsequently continued for the purpose of arriving at an area of agreement for the stipulation of certain facts, or in the event that a stipulation could not be entered into based upon said agreed facts, that additional evidence would be adduced.

After appearing on the docket a number of times, counsel for plaintiff submitted these cases on the record as made.

A review of the record as made indicates that the evidence adduced by the commission, received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, does not contain sufficient facts to establish the necessary elements of value under the provisions of section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Therefore, plaintiff has failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching by law to the finding of value by the appraiser, 28 U.S.C., section 2633.

*565Accordingly, I bold the value found by the appraiser to be the correct dutiable value of the merchandise covered by the appeals listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STATE OF TEXAS §

§

v. § CASE NO. ____________

§

LUIS SOLIS GONZALEZ §

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS

That Respondent Honorable Judge Luis Aguilar is the duly elected and qualified judge of 

the 243rd Judicial District Court. By virtue of his office, Respondent has jurisdiction over the 

instant case in which Defendant/Relator is seeking relief.

Defendant/Relator seeks relief in the instant case from Respondent’s abuse of discretion, 

to wit; Respondent has ordered Defendant/Relator to trial for a capital offense in which State is 

seeking the death penalty before required DNA testing of biological evidence has been 

completed, in violation of T.C.C.P. 38.43.

The act or acts that Defendant/Relator seeks to compel of Respondent are ministerial, 

rather than discretionary.

Defendant/Relator has no other adequate remedy at law to compel Respondent to grant 

the above request.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED Defendant/Relator’s right to Due Process, 

as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; and 

Art. I, Sec. 10 and Sec. 19 of the Texas Constitution; and Art. 38.43 of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure, has been denied and the Defendant/Relator is entitled to a writ of 

mandamus to compel the Honorable Trial Judge to grant the instant requests. 

WR-82,831-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 2/6/2015 3:39:05 AM

Accepted 2/6/2015 9:42:33 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 2/6/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
Respectfully submitted, 

JOE A. SPENCER

ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW 

1009 Montana Ave. 

El Paso, Texas 79902

(915) 532-5562

(915) 532-7535 fax 

 /s/

JOE A. SPENCER

State Bar No. 18921800

JOSHUA C. SPENCER

ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW 

1009 Montana Ave. 

El Paso, Texas 79902

(915) 532-5562

(915) 532-7535 fax

 /s/

JOSHUA C. SPENCER

State Bar No. 24067879

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned does hereby certify that a copy of the above motion was sent by hand delivery 

to State’s Assistant District Attorney, Denise Butterworth and to the trial court: the Honorable 

Luis Aguilar, 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas.

/s/

JOE A. SPENCER
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 111 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 111

   Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

   Mr. Thurmond (for himself, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Levin, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
D'Amato, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Conrad, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Robb, Mr. Warner, 
  Mr. Cleland, Mr. Lott, Mr. Kerrey, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mrs. Boxer) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                           September 10, 1997

                   Considered, amended, and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 14, 1997, as ``National 
  Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week'', and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas there are 116 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 14, 1997, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President of the United States issue 
        a proclamation calling on the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000876716
<NAME>      SMITH BARNEY INTERNATIONAL ADVISORS CURRENCY FUND L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   3,271,060
<SECURITIES>                                               215,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                               11,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         3,498,750
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,498,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      119,682
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,379,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,498,750
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           138,572
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            33,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            105,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               105,456
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 15, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Cooperative Research Group Separation Technology Research (STAR) Program: Phase 3 (“STAR Phase 3”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: AMISTCO Separation Products dba AMACS, Houston, TX; Saudi ARAMCO dba ARAMCO Services Company, Houston, TX; Chevron Technical Center, Houston, TX; ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company, Spring, TX; Koch-Glitsch, Wichita, KS; Linde, Pullach, GERMANY; and Sulzer Chemtech, Winterthur, SWITZERLAND.

The general area of Separation Technology Research (STAR) Program: Phase 3's planned activities is to systematically research, test, and qualify separation equipment and increase fundamental knowledge in separation.

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22249 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
No. 69318.

#### R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/23786 and 64/16243 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s dessert powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 68309, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.