alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JOSE DOLORES CANO,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5024M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 (X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 February 8, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05024-JKA Document 9 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 1
From: rem@mvbcwm.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:53:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

rick mcphearson

West Monroe, LA 71292
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Timothy Armes, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of MedCareers Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MedCareers Group, Inc.  By:/s/ Timothy Armes Timothy Armes Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)  May 18, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Person, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 601]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered December 9, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In the early evening hours of February 14, 1991, in the vicinity of 102nd Street and Northern Boulevard in Queens, the defendant sold two vials of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. The back-up team of police officers arrived shortly after the sale to arrest the defendant, but was unable to find him. Approximately one hour later, the undercover officer and his partner observed the defendant at 104th Street and Northern Boulevard, approximately two blocks from the location of the sale, and apprehended the defendant.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it precluded the defendant from presenting an alibi witness whom the defendant requested to present after the People rested their case-in-chief.

*627The defendant failed to comply with CPL 250.20 because he did not file a proper notice of alibi with the People and the trial court, and he failed to proffer a sufficient reason for his failure to comply with the statute *(see, People v Toro,*198 AD2d 532, 533; *People v Caputo,*175 AD2d 290; *People v Corpas,*150 AD2d 710).

We reject the defendant’s contention that the court improperly permitted the undercover police officer to testify concerning his radioed description of the perpetrator of the crime. The court properly charged the jury that it was to employ the description as an aid to evaluating the undercover officer’s ability to observe the perpetrator at the time of the event and to remember the physical features of the perpetrator, and to consider whether or not the description matched the physical characteristics of the defendant *(see, People v Huertas,*75 NY2d 487).

Finally, the sentence imposed was neither excessive nor harsh *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COREY P. CLAIRMONT, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR05-404-RSL 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An initial hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release was held before the 

undersigned Magistrate Judge on July 27, 2011. The United States was represented by 

Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Friedman, and the defendant by Nancy Tenney. 

 The defendant had been charged and convicted of Possession of an Unregistered 

Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). On or about April 20, 2006, defendant was 

sentenced by the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, to a term of 60 months in custody, to be 

followed by 3 years of supervised release. 

 The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in substance abuse 

program, financial disclosure, possess no firearms; submit to a search, cooperate with DNA 
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

collection as directed, and provide the probation officer with access to any requested financial 

information. 

 In a Petition for Warrant or Summons, dated June 20, 2011, U.S. Probation Officer 

Andrew J. Lorenzen asserted the following violation by defendant of the conditions of his 

supervised release: 

1. Failure to participate in and successfully complete the Location Monitoring 

program as directed on or before June 20, 2011, in violation of the special 

condition. 

 The defendant was advised of his rights, acknowledged those rights, and admitted to 

alleged violation number 1. 

 I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of his supervised release as set forth in violation number 1, and that the Court 

conduct a hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on this violation has been set 

before the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik on August 26, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.. 

 Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

 DATED this 28th day of July, 2011. 

A

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

 AUSA: Andrew Friedman 

 Defendant’s attorney: Nancy Tenney 

 Probation officer: Andrew J. Lorenzen
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Melanie  R.  Wenk,  Vice
President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of
the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.



/s/MELANIE R. WENK
------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

Date:  April 15, 2010
Before the First Division,

May 11, 1967

No. P67/149.

No. P67/150.

#### Gillespie & Co. of New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/8639 (San Francisco).

#### Louis Marx & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/25521, etc. (San Francisco).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley*Co., *a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 59

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 31, 2007.

Whereas engineers use their professional, scientific, and technical knowledge and skills in creative and innovative ways 

to fulfill society’s needs; 

Whereas engineers have helped meet the major technological 

challenges of our time—from rebuilding towns devastated 

by natural disasters to designing an information superhighway that will speed our country into the future; 

Whereas engineers are a crucial link in research, development, and demonstration and in transforming scientific 

discoveries into useful products, and we will look more 

than ever to engineers and their knowledge and skills to 

meet the challenges of the future; 

Whereas engineers play a crucial role in developing the consensus engineering standards that permit modern economies and societies to exist; 

Whereas the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report entitled ‘‘Rising Above the Gathering Storm’’ highlighted the 

worrisome trend that fewer students are now focusing on 

engineering in college at a time when increasing numbers 

of today’s 2,000,000 United States engineers are nearing 

retirement; 
2

•HRES 59 EH 

Whereas the National Society of Professional Engineers 

through National Engineers Week and other activities is 

raising public awareness of engineers’ significant, positive 

contributions to societal needs; 

Whereas National Engineers Week activities at engineering 

schools and in other forums are encouraging our young 

math and science students to see themselves as possible 

future engineers and to realize the practical power of 

their knowledge; 

Whereas National Engineers Week has grown into a formal 

coalition of more than 70 engineering, education, and cultural societies, and more than 50 major corporations and 

government agencies; 

Whereas National Engineers Week is celebrated during the 

week of George Washington’s birthday to honor the contributions that our first President, a military engineer 

and land surveyor, made to engineering; and 

Whereas February 18 to 24, 2007, has been designated by 

the President as National Engineers Week: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of National Engineers Week and its aims to increase understanding of 

and interest in engineering and technology careers and 

to promote literacy in math and science; and 

(2) will work with the engineering community to 

make sure that the creativity and contribution of that 
3

•HRES 59 EH 

community can be expressed through research, development, standardization, and innovation. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: dbennettfam@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:50:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sherry Bennett

Rockford, MI 49341
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         101,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,083
<PP&E>                                       3,844,715
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,281,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,789,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,789,532
<SALES>                                      4,662,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,662,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               599,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,887,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (112,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,999,439
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,887,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 57036.

protests 193439-K and 181849-K (New York).

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., and Hahne & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects-as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124, the claim of the-plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 1031 FINAL



		

			

		




		
			March 1, 2018
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Abel Pomar
		

		
			President and Chief Executive Officer
		

		
			Evangelical Christian Credit Union
		

		
			955 W. Imperial Highway
		

		
			Brea, CA 92821
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			RE: Addendum to Master Services Agreement dated April 1, 2016
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear Abel,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			The purpose of this letter is to formalize agreed upon changes of the aforementioned Master Services Agreement between Evangelical Christian Credit Union and Ministry Partners Investment Company, originally executed on April 1, 2016.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			As consideration “for the performance of the Services set forth in Exhibit 1, Credit Union (ECCU) shall continue to pay the Company (MPIC) the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500) per month to be invoiced to Credit Union by Company at the end of each month in which the services are performed. In addition, Credit Union shall pay to the Company the reasonable and necessary travel, marketing and business development costs associated with performing the Services provided, however, that any travel costs exceeding $1,000 shall require prior approval of the credit union.” In addition, the above referenced “Exhibit 1”, item 2, is amended as follows: “Company (MPIC) will visit each of the 21 ECCU specified churches/members in the 12 months following the execution of this agreement.  
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Furthermore, the Company will pay the Credit Union a 0.50% basis point referral fee on all loans successfully closed and funded that were formally referred to the Company by Credit Union personnel. Conversely, the Credit Union will pay the Company a 0.50% basis point referral fee on all loans successfully closed and funded that were formally referred to the Credit Union by Company personnel. In both cases, the referral fee will be paid within 15 days of the closing date of the loan. Formal referrals will be reported on a monthly basis for monitoring, with actual production results reported upon each quarter.   
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By signing below, both Evangelical Christian Credit Union and Ministry Partners Investment Company hereby agree to the terms outlined in the Addendum to the Master Services Agreement dated April 1, 2016. 
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						/s/Joseph Turner

					
						Joseph Turner

					
						President and Chief Executive Officer

					
						Ministry Partners Investment Company

					
					
						/s/Abel Pomar

					
						Abel Pomar

					
						President & Chief Executive Officer

					
						Evangelical Christian Credit Union

				



		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			915 W. Imperial Hwy  Suite 120, Brea, CA 92821

		


		

			Tel:  (714) 671-5720 | Fax: (714) 671-571-5767

		


		

			Email:info@ministrypartners.org

		


		

			Toll Free Nationwide (800) 753-6742
EXHIBIT 23.1  MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORSPCAOB REGISTERED
   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of PashminaDepot.com of our report dated July 13, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements of PashminaDepot.com as of May 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended May 31, 2009, and the periods from inception on November 13, 2007 through May 31, 2008 and 2009, and the reference to us under the caption Experts.  /s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered  Moore & Associates Chartered Las Vegas, Nevada July 20, 2009  6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501