alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 17, 2023, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (“MCDC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Specifically, Flambeau Diagnostics LLC, Monona; WI; Next Earth LLC, Ashburn, VA; and Revagenix, Inc., San Francisco, CA have been added as parties to this venture.

                    Also, GAP Solutions, Inc., Herndon, VA; Novici Biotech LLC, Vacaville, CA; Presco, Inc., Woodbridge, CT; and WhiteSpace Enterprise Corp., Inc., Fountain Hills, AZ have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                          ( print page 69232)    

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and MCDC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 6, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 12, 2023 (88 FR 38096).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22227 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000875315
<NAME>                        TCSI CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                       <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         21,309                  8,788
<SECURITIES>                                   16,992                 22,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,672                 13,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,028                  1,208
<INVENTORY>                                         0                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,797                 46,041
<PP&E>                                         31,172                 30,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,290                 22,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 55,562                 58,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,306                  8,681
<BONDS>                                             0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                      0
<COMMON>                                        2,305                  2,268
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,951                 47,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   55,562                 58,163
<SALES>                                             0                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,347                 10,069
<CGS>                                               0                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,347                  4,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,733                  3,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,412)                (1,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,412)                (1,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                      0
<CHANGES>                                           0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,412)                (1,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.15)                 (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)                 (0.08)



</TABLE>
No. 63868.

protests 148837-K/1995, 148838-K/2083, and 148839-K/2073 (Chicago).

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DANNY GRIFFITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5022FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is 

currently detained at the Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island, and does not appear to have funds

available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 20th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05022-FDB Document 3 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000875296
<NAME> WINNERS ALL INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          483,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     55,035
<COMMON>                                       144,717
<OTHER-SE>                                   (683,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WILLIAM C. ULERY,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5192RBL

 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

 RETURN, § 2254 PETITION

Petitioner has paid the filing fee and the petition has been reviewed. Petitioner has asked that

the petition be dismissed, (Dkt. # 3 and 5), and he has withdrawn his motions to dismiss, (Dkt. # 4). 

The petition shall proceed. 

 (1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order. The clerk will also send

a courtesy copy of the petition to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office Criminal Justice

Division. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Case 3:06-cv-05192-RBL Document 6 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 15th day of May, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge.

Case 3:06-cv-05192-RBL Document 6 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60569.

#### Cortez Trading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 272656-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest .was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         539,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,063,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    330,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,956,220
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,110,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,444,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,708,524
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,042,461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,110,566
<SALES>                                      1,048,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,048,246
<CGS>                                          785,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (16,955)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                PROMISSORY NOTE


$55,387,505                                            Dated:  November 13, 1998


          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SMART & FINAL INC., a Delaware
corporation ("Borrower"), HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY to the order of CASINO USA,
INC., a California corporation ("Lender") the principal sum of Fifty-Five
Million Three-Hundred Eighty-Seven Thousand Five-Hundred Five Dollars
($55,387,505).

          The Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount
of the Advances (as defined below) from the date hereof until such principal
amount is paid in full, at such interest rates, and payable at such times, as
are specified in the Loan Agreement (as defined below).

          Both principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United
States of America in same day funds to the Lender in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of the Loan Agreement.

          This Promissory Note is the New Note referred to in, and is entitled
to the benefits of, the Loan Agreement dated as of November 13, 1998 (as the
same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, "Loan
Agreement") among the Borrower and the Lender.  The Loan Agreement, among other
things, provides for the consolidation of certain obligations owed by the
Borrower to the Lender more particularly described in the Loan Agreement (the
"Existing Notes", the"Advances", and the "Structuring Fee") in the U.S. dollar
amount first above mentioned, the indebtedness of the Borrower resulting from
such Advances now being evidenced by this Promissory Note, and contains
provisions for acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain
stated events and also for prepayments on account of principal hereof prior to
the maturity hereof upon the terms and conditions therein specified.

          This Promissory Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the State of California.


                                 SMART & FINAL INC.



                                 By:   /s/ MARTIN A. LYNCH
                                    ---------------------------

                                    Martin A. Lynch
                                    Executive Vice President &
                                    Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE - 1

JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARTIN MENERA-RAMIREZ,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5111FDB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO EXTEND INDICTMENT

DEADLINE

Upon the stipulation of the parties to extend the indictment deadline and the

waiver of right to speedy indictment executed by the defendant, the Court finds that such

an extension would serve the ends of justice and outweighs the interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial; now, therefore,

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:06-cr-05111-FDB Document 13 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO EXTEND INDICTMENT DEADLINE - 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the indictment deadline be extended to April 9,

2006. The period of delay resulting from this extension is hereby excluded for speedy

indictment purposes under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h).

DONE this 6th day of March, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

________________________________

Russell V. Leonard

Attorney for Defendant

________________________________

David Jennings

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-05111-FDB Document 13 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00253

- CR

_____________

_ ____ _________

On Appeal from the 415th District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CR21

- 10 13

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Justice Womack 

### L ARRY 

### J OE 

### B REWER 

### J R



### . , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Larry Joe Brewer Jr. attem pts to a ppeal a judgment adjudicating him guilty of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.51 (c) (1). Brewer pleaded true to the State ’ s probation

- violation allegations , and the trial court sentenc ed hi m to thirteen months ’ confinement

. Pursuant to the written plea admoni shments that were signed by Brewer , Brewer waived his right to appeal. T he “ Trial Co urt ’ s Certific ation of Defenda nt ’ s Right of App eal ” in th is case
states that “ the defe ndant has waived the right of appeal ” a nd that this “ is a plea

b arg ain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See Tex. R. App.
P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
On November 8 , 2022 , w e notified Brewer of the cer tification and warned him
that we would di smiss the appeal unl ess we received a response by November 18 , 2022, showing grounds for continuing the appeal

. S ee Tex. R. A pp. P. 25.2 (a)(2 ), (d ),
44.3. While Brewer filed a respons e, it d oes not show groun ds for continu in g the
ap peal. 1 In accordance with the trial court ’ s ce rtification, we dismiss Brewer ’ s ap peal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); see, e.g. , Turntine v. State , No. 02

- 1 8

- 003 48

- C R ,

1 In his response, Brewer c laims that he “ was forced to plead guilty ” and that he

“ was never pr operly advised of [his] rights ” by his counsel. We have reviewed the transcript of the subject revocation hearing. During that hearing, Brewer indicated that he had signed his plea “ volu nta rily , ” tha t he had “ [h]ad ple nty of time to talk to [his] lawyer about [ the c harge s brought against him ], ” that it was “ true ” that he had violated his probation, and that he was telling the court about that violation

“ voluntarily. ”3

2018 WL 5074612 , at *1 (Tex

. App.

— Fort Worth Oct. 18 , 2018, n o pet .) (per curiam) (mem . op., not designated for publication). /s/ Dana Wo mack
Dana Womack Justice
Do Not P ubl ish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered : March 16, 2023
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:06-mj-00076-JPD Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 15 of 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                       3,241,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,492,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,132,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,488,889
<PP&E>                                       2,464,510
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,271,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,796,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          595,214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,403
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,063,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,796,590
<SALES>                                      5,525,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,525,546
<CGS>                                        2,696,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,696,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,657,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                   510,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,147,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,147,990
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>