alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND

DEADLINE FOR JOINING ADDITIONAL PARTIES

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PROPET USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LLOYD SHUGART,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0186-MAT

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR JOINING ADDITIONAL

PARTIES

Defendant filed a Motion to Extend Deadline for Joining Additional Parties. (Dkt. 16.)

Plaintiff does not object to defendant’s request. (Dkt. 18.) Having considered defendant’s

unopposed motion, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. The deadline for joining additional parties is

extended thirty days to July 24, 2006.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for plaintiff and

defendant.

DATED this 29th day of June, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 19 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.23

                         LETTER OF INTENT

For the purposes of elevating Countrywide's Quality Control Division to
Primis Select Client status, Primis and Countrywide's Quality Control
division hereby indicate their mutual intent to work together on the
following terms. The relationship may be terminated by either party upon 30
days notice.

1.  Primis will offer Field Review services in each of our 16 core market
    states, prepared by our employed staff appraisers;

2.  Primis will offer Field Review services in the remaining 34 states,
    prepared by our affiliated "PrimisNet" appraisers;

3.  Electronic delivery (EDI) of our reports via a .PDF e-mail attachment, or
    other suitable method, will be made available in our core markets and we
    will target a 50-60% overall EDI delivery for your account. As our
    acquisitions continue, this percentage will increase.

4.  Primis will make available archival system for (EDI) review reports on CD
    at month-end, or other mutually agreeable periodic basis. With the
    complete Adobe Acrobat software (we can make it available to you), we
    have been advised you will be able to COPY AND PASTE sections from the
    .PDF files we provide to your internal management reports.

5.  Primis will provide Countrywide QC with all of the benefits of being a
    "Select Client" which will include a dedicated team of service
    specialists handling your account and providing you with comprehensive
    communication services including confirmations, updates, event tracking,
    management reports and consolidated billing services. Reports are made
    available to you on a daily, weekly and monthly basis;

6.  Field Review fees to be $165 in our core market areas (see attached grid
    of states/counties) and $250 for the rest of the United States. As we add
    additional core market areas, we will revise the pricing to match this
    concept.

7.  Primis will provide you with a color printer by which the reports we
    transmit to Countrywide electronically can be printed in your Simi Valley
    office. Cost of maintenance and toner cartridges will be the
    responsibility of Countrywide.

8.  Subject to the satisfactory performance of Primis, Countrywide Quality
    Control will use its best efforts over the next twenty four (24) months
    to direct field review orders in Primis' core market areas to Primis.
    Countrywide Quality Control will direct other national orders to Primis
    such that Primis will receive an aggregate of 50% of Countrywide Quality
    Control's monthly orders.

9.  The parties will seek to execute an agreement, satisfactory to the
    parties and their respective legal departments, which will more formally
    document their mutual agreement on the above general terms.

10. Additional Terms:

    A. Oregon and Washington at $250

Dated this 6th day of January, 2000.


/s/ Lee Trumble
----------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
Lee Trumble, Countrywide Quality Control      Joseph D. Mathews, Primis, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ELLSTROM MANUFACTURING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BORDEN CHEMICALS, INC., and

HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS,

INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1780JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received the parties’ stipulation to continue certain case management

deadlines (Dkt. # 9). The court DENIES the stipulation, because, inter alia, it would

place the close of discovery (which must necessarily precede the deadline for filing

dispositive motions) less than 90 days before the scheduled April 24, 2007 trial. If the

parties wish to enter a new stipulation to continue case management deadlines, they must

do so in compliance with this order.

The court enters orders setting trial dates and related dates to provide a reasonable

schedule for the resolution of disputes. That schedule generally provides approximately

90 days between the deadline for filing dispositive motions and the trial date. With

dispositive motions due 90 days before trial, they will generally be ripe for consideration

Case 2:05-cv-01780-JLR Document 10 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

one month later. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(d)(3). The court’s calendar

generally permits it to enter a decision on dispositive motions within 30 days. See Local

Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(b)(5). In order to permit the parties to consider the court’s

decision on dispositive motions and plan for trial or an alternative resolution, the court

generally requires at least 30 days between the court’s decision and the trial date. For

these reasons, the court will rarely set the deadline for dispositive motions less than 90

days before the trial date. 

The court will deny any stipulation that does not provide a compelling reason to

abandon these case management principles. Thus, if the parties seek to modify case

management deadlines in a manner inconsistent with this order, they must provide the

court with a compelling reason for doing so. If appropriate, the parties may consent to a

shortened schedule for briefing dispositive motions, but they must explicitly state the

shortened schedule in their stipulation.

When entering a stipulation to change a case management deadline, the parties

must explicitly state the effect that the change will have on all subsequent case

management deadlines, if any. The stipulation must expressly request a specific new date

for each subsequent deadline.

Filed and entered this 16th day of October, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01780-JLR Document 10 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify that:

(1)      The accompanying Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the
accompanying Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                         |                                       
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------
|Date:
 September 9, 2011 | /s/ Scott F.
 Drill                   
|                         | Scott F. Drill                        
|                         | President
 and Chief Executive Officer
|                         | (principal
 executive officer)        
|                         |                                       
|Date:
 September 9, 2011 | /s/ John C.
 Gonsior                  
|                         | John C.
 Gonsior                      
|                         | Vice
 President, Finance and          
|                         | Chief
 Financial Officer              
|                         | (principal
 financial officer)        

37

---
Case No. 12,950.

#### In re SLOCUM et al.1

Circuit Court, D. Vermont.

Dec. 16, 1879.2

Bankruptcí — Partnership—Creditors.

[In the matter of A. M. Slocum & Co., bankrupts. See Case No. 12,951. Heard on petition of review.]

1

**[Not previously reported.]

2

 [Affirming Case No. 12.951.]

BLATCHFORD, Circuit Judge.

I have carefully examined the facts and questions in this ease, and the authorities cited by the petitioners for review, and concur in the conclusion of the district court, following that of the register, that the firm creditors are entitled to share pari passu with the individual creditors of A. M. Slocum in his individual estate. The petitioners for review claim in their petition that the $140. 40, excess of expenses in collecting the $124.25 should not come out of the private creditors, but should come out of the firm creditors in the dividend. I do not understand that the court below, or the register, decided otherwise; and it is now admitted before me by the counsel for the firm creditors that the firm creditors, in sharing in the individual estate of A. M. Slocum, should reimburse to that estate the $146.40. The court below will doubtless so order. The prayer of the petition of review is denied, with costs.
U.S. v. Rodney Less Rollness, CR 06-041 RSL 

Order Resetting Briefing Schedule 

Page 1 of 2

	

 



	 

 !"#$$

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Petitioner, 

 vs. 

RODNEY LESS ROLLNESS, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CR 06-041 RSL 

ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Motion of the Parties to Reset the Briefing 

Schedule for the motion for reduction in sentence hereby states that IT IS ORDERED that the 

motion be granted. The briefing schedule shall be as follow: 

a. Any amended or supplement motion by counsel on behalf of the defendant should be 

filed on or before June 18; 

b. The government’s response to the motion should be filed on or before July 9, 2021; 

c. Any reply should then be filed on or before July 15, 2021 and the matter noted July 26, 

2021. 
U.S. v. Rodney Less Rollness, CR 06-041 RSL 

Order Resetting Briefing Schedule 

Page 2 of 2

	

 



	 

 !"#$$

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DATED this 7th day of June, 2021. 

A

Robert S. Lasnik 

United States District Judge

Presented by: 

/s/ Anna M. Tolin 

Anna M. Tolin 

Tolin Law Firm
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 9, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00062

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.M., B.M. AND A.B.M., MINOR CHILDREN,

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 09419

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In the trial court, David Avila and Carrie Avila filed an Original Petition for Name Change of Minor Children , requesting that the minor children’s names be changed to their stepfather’s name “Avila.” The trial court granted the petition and ordered the name change. Philip Martin, t he children’s father, filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s order

. Martin, who is incarcerated, filed a pro se brief on March 9, 2021. The brief of Appellees David

Avila and Carrie Avila is currently due. On May 2 4 , 2021, Appellant Martin filed a letter with this court, stating that Carrie Avila ha d passed away. O n May 27, 2021, Appellees’ attorney filed a letter confirming the death of Carrie Avila, the mother of the children and their sole managing

conservator. Appellees’ attorney requests guidance from this Court in light of Carrie Avila’s

death.

As the children’s sole managing conservator has passed away, there is no party in this appeal who can represent the children’s interests. Therefore, we ABATE this appeal and ORDER the trial court to appoint an attorney ad litem, on or before July 9, 20 21 , to represent t he children’s interests in this appeal. We fu rther ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental
clerk’s record that includes the trial court’s or der within ten days of the trial court signing the order. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending f urther order of this court.

______________ ___________________ Liz a A . Rodriguez , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MIC HAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By: /s/ Joseph F. Longo
    -----------------------
    Joseph F. Longo
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
    March 16, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                         |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                         |   |   |
| G. Patrick. Lynch                       |   |   |
| President and Chief   Executive Officer |   |   |
| (principal executive   officer)         |   |   |
|                                    |   |   |
| Lino Lakes, Minnesota                   |   |   |
| January   11, 2007                      |   |   |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Domingo Rexach, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 131]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender because his prior Federal conviction for distributing cocaine within 1,000 feet of a public school was based on a statute (21 USC § 841 [a] [1]; former § 845a [a], now § 860 [a]) that is broader than its New York counterpart criminalizing the sale of a controlled substance in or near *363school grounds (Penal Law §§ 220.44, 220.00 [14]). This Court has specifically declined to accept the argument that 21 USC § 841 (a) (1) may not be used to enhance sentence because its requirement of "distribution” is not analogous to the State’s requirement of a "sale” *(People v Vasquez,*167 AD2d 236, *Iv denied*77 NY2d 912), or because, unlike its New York "sale” counterparts, it is not subject to the defense of agency *(People v Pinella,*137 Misc 2d 701, *affd*143 AD2d 1072, *Iv denied*73 NY2d 925). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Case 3:05-cv-05621-RBL Document 19 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-05621-RBL Document 19 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0010; FRL 9903-67-Region 9]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; 
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the El Toro Marine Corps 
Air Station Superfund Site; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published in the Federal 
Register on November 19, 2013, a document concerning the National Oil 
and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National 
Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the El Toro Marine Corps Air 
Station Superfund Site. Inadvertently, that publication included the 
incorrect docket number for this Site. This document corrects that 
error.

DATES: This correction is effective on January 21, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Aycock, U.S. EPA Remedial Project 
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; Telephone: 
(415) 972-3289; Fax: (415) 947-3528; Email: Aycock.Mary@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA published a document in the Federal 
Register on November 19, 2013 (78 FR 69302) that included the incorrect 
docket number for the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 
Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the El 
Toro Marine Corps Air Station Superfund Site. This correction corrects 
the incorrect docket number published on November 19, 2013.
    In rule FR Doc. 13-27724 published on November 19, 2013, (78 FR 
69302) make the following corrections.
    1. On page 69302, in the second column, correct the docket number 
for the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency 
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the El Toro Marine 
Corps Air Station Superfund Site to read:

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0010; FRL 9902-79-Region 9]

    2. On page 69302, in the third column, correct the first clause of 
the ADDRESSES caption to read:
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1990-0010, by one of the following methods:

    3. On page 69302, in the third column, correct the first sentence 
of the ``Instructions'' caption to read:

    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1990-0010.

    Dated: December 19, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-31265 Filed 12-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,135
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      8,397
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,464
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,417
<LOANS>                                         39,961
<ALLOWANCE>                                      (489)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,264
<DEPOSITS>                                      71,850
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                465
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,294
<OTHER-SE>                                         530
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  79,264
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,064
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  235
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   183
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,482
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 493
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 493
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              989
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    260
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         178
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.82
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       337
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   491
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  489
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               489
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>