alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 68186.

#### Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/15867(B) and 59/27006(B) (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wire, not larger than twenty one-hundredths and not smaller than eight one-hundredths of an inch in diameter, commonly used for fencing purposes, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 824 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 156
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 824

                          [Report No. 110-449]

 Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 3773) to amend 
   the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a 
procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2007

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 3773) to amend 
   the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a 
procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That during further consideration of the bill (H.R. 3773) 
to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish 
a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign 
intelligence, and for other purposes, as amended, pursuant to House 
Resolution 746, the further amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. Time for debate on the bill pursuant to House Resolution 746 
shall be considered as expired. The bill, as amended, shall be 
debatable for one hour, with 30 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence.
                                                 House Calendar No. 156

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 824

                          [Report No. 110-449]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 3773) to amend 
   the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a 
procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

d1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141191 

BILLIE J. MEADOWS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141191 

 COA: 288893 

Wayne CC Family Division: 

JOAN MEADOWS, 07-705162-DO 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND III,
L.P; (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK


Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date:
February 16, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SLIMAN FARRAN and FADUL FARRAN

dba JERUSALEM CAFÉ and JERUSALEM

RESTAURANT and CAFE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JIMI ABDULLAH JOUZINE,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5116FDB

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL

DATES AND TRIAL DATE 

Defendant Jouzine’s counsel moves to continue pretrial dates and trial date for the reasons

that Cheryl R.G. Adamson of the law firm of Rettig Osborne Forgette, LLP, was substituted in as

counsel for attorney Kurt Rylander on September 20, 2006 and that Ms. Adamson has been on

vacation out of the country since September 23, 2006, returning October 9, 2006; that Mr.

Rylander’s file consists of 6 1⁄2 “ of documents plus CDs and videotapes and that new counsel

requires at least 60 days to become familiar with the case. The November 20, 2006 discovery cut-off

date is approaching. 

One problem with Defendant’s new counsel’s motion is that Defendant’s previous counsel,

Mr. Rylander did not move to withdraw from this case and has not received leave of court. Local

Case 3:06-cv-05116-FDB Document 57 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Rule GR 2 (g). The parties merely filed a Notice of Substitution of Counsel on September 20, 2006. 

Plaintiffs object to any continuance now because of continued loss of customers and goodwill

in this trade dress/trade secrets case, and because the Defense has sought to take no depositions. 

Moreover, Defendant was ordered deported to Israel on August 2, 2002, and as of August 31, 2006,

when the Ninth Circuit denied his petition for rehearing, he has exhausted his remedies in federal

court. Plaintiffs also note that Defendant’s restaurant is for sale and that if he sells his restaurant

and/or if he is deported, Plaintiffs’ claims will be more difficult to pursue. 

Accordingly, under all the circumstances, and for the reason that Defendant’s original counsel

never properly moved to withdraw. The instant motion will be denied. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion To Continue Pretrial Dates

and Trial Date [Dkt. # 53] is DENIED. 

DATED this 11th day of October, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05116-FDB Document 57 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld,Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

 

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                                                                                                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA                                                                                        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary  (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |   |

 

CirclePines, Minnesota

April 13, 2010

 

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. Bev Harrison, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Culture Medium Holdings
      Corp., for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Culture Medium Holdings Corp.                                                             

Dated: August 15, 2011



| | /s/ R.
      Bev Harrison                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | R. Bev Harrison                                            
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director                       
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Culture Medium Holdings Corp.                              



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Culture Medium
Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Culture Medium Holdings Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
July 25, 1957

No. 61091.

Suit 4898.

#### H. Muehlstein & Co., Inc., and F. L. Kraemer & Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1806 affirmed March 29, 1957. C. A. D. 645.
## NUMB E R 1 3 - 1 8 - 00 533
- C R
C O U RT O F A PP E A L S
THI R TEENTH D I STRICT O F T E X A S
C O R P US CHRI S TI
- ED I NBU R G

MARY GRIGSBY , A p p e ll a n t,

v.
TH E S T A

T E OF T E X A S, A p p e ll ee.

On a pp eal f r o m t h e 1 30 th D i s t ri c t C ou r t o f Matagorda Coun t y , T exa s .


## MEMORANDUM OPINION B ef o r e J u s t i ces Rod ri gu e z , Contreras, and Benavides M em or a ndu m O pin i o n by Justice Benavides
Appellant, Mary Grigsby , attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of h er motion requesting a free copy of trial court records. It appears appellant is seeking these records in order to prosecute a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus. The trial court entered an order denying appellant’s motion on October 19, 2015

.2

On Sept ember 25, 2018 , t h e C l e rk o f t h is Co u rt no t i f i e d a p pe l l a n t t ha t it a pp e a red

t h a t t h e o rd e r f r o m w h ich t h e a p pea l w a s t a k e n w as no t an a p pea l ab le o rd e r a n d re q ue s t e d

c o r r e cti o n o f t h is de f e c t w i t h in t e n d a y s o r t h e ap p ea l w ou ld b e d is m isse d

. A p p e l l an t ha s
f a i l e d to re s po n d to t h e Co u r t ’s d i r e cti v e

. Appellant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole . Appellant pursued a direct appeal of h er conviction and on July 12, 2012 , 2005, this Court issued a memorandum opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court.
See Gri g sby v. State , No. 13

- 10

- 00650

- CR, 2012 WL 2861670 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi July 12, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
The trial c ourt’s refusal to provide appellant with a free copy of the record does not invoke our jurisdiction. An intermediate court of appeals is not vested with jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when such request is not presented in conjunction with a timely

- filed appeal. Everett v. State , 91 S.W. 3d 386 (Tex.App

– Waco 2002, no pet’n). Furthermore, an intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.
T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07 ( West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S. ); Hoang v.
State , 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Cr. App. 1993), cert. den’d , 513 U.S. 863 (1994). Even if this Court had jurisdiction, the appeal was untimely as it was filed almost three years after the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion. The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a), (c).3

All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

GINA M. BENAVIDES , JUSTICE

Do no t p u b l i s h

. S e e T E X

. R. A P P

. P

. 4 7

. 2 (b).
D e l i v e red an d f i le d t h e 8th d a y o f November , 2 0 1 8

.
No. 58268.

protest 196730-K (New York).

#### Sintered Carbide Corp. and Airport Clearance Service *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bars containing more than 50 percent of tungsten carbide, that the bars do not contain any of the elements or materials mentioned in paragraph 305 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 305) in excess of the minimum percentages enumerated therein, and that the present practice of the examiner is to advisorily classify such merchandise at 25 percent under said modified paragraph 316 (b), as claimed. Upon the uncontroverted facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
AMERICAN NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,
1999  FOR  YEAR  ENDING  JUNE  30,  2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      423242
<SECURITIES>                                927513
<RECEIVABLES>                              3655868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4353024
<PP&E>                                       83325
<DEPRECIATION>                               35982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             6894270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1871190
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                  21939402
<OTHER-SE>                                   50595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               6894270
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6763404
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4595306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            689565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1478533
<INCOME-TAX>                                132900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1478533
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               1343750
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .09


</TABLE>
No. 57463.

#### Wah Chang Corp. v. United States,

protests 199840-K (A), etc. (New York).

*239Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent/
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Bakken Energy Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shih Long Ning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of May 31, 2014.  By:/s/ Shi Long NingShi Long Ning
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 741 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 134
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 741

                          [Report No. 110-382]

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 734) expressing 
the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the withholding of 
              information relating to corruption in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2007

    Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 734) expressing 
the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the withholding of 
              information relating to corruption in Iraq.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 734) expressing the sense of the House of 
Representatives regarding the withholding of information relating to 
corruption in Iraq. The resolution shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to 
final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the 
question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform; and (2) one motion to recommit which 
may not contain instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 134

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 741

                          [Report No. 110-382]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 734) expressing 
the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the withholding of 
              information relating to corruption in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 15, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```