alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 30

Designating March 1, 1998 as ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic Fleet Memorial

Day’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. THURMOND, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 1, 1998 as ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic

Fleet Memorial Day’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States established the Asiatic Fleet of

the Navy in 1910 to protect American nationals, policies,

and possessions in the Far East;

Whereas the sailors and Marines of the Asiatic Fleet ensured

the safety of United States citizens and foreign nationals,

and provided humanitarian assistance, in that region during the Chinese civil war, the Yangtze Flood of 1931, and

the outbreak of Sino-Japanese hostilities;

Whereas in 1940, due to deteriorating political relations and

increasing tensions between the United States and

Japan, a reinforced Asiatic Fleet began concentrating on

the defense of the Philippines and engaged in extensive
2

•SJ 30 IS

training to ensure maximum operational readiness for

any eventuality;

Whereas following the declaration of war against Japan, the

warships, submarines, and aircraft of the Asiatic Fleet

singly or in task forces courageously fought many naval

battles against a superior Japanese armada; and

Whereas the Asiatic Fleet directly suffered the loss of 22

ships, 1,826 men killed or missing in action, and 518

men captured and imprisoned under the worst of conditions with many of them dying while held as prisoners of

war: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL COMMENDATION.

4 Congress—

5 (1) commends the personnel who served in the

6 Asiatic Fleet of the United States Navy during the

7 period 1910 to 1942; and

8 (2) honors those who gave their lives in the line

9 of duty while serving in the Asiatic Fleet.

10 SEC. 2. UNITED STATES NAVY ASIATIC FLEET MEMORIAL

11 DAY.

12 (a) DESIGNATION.—March 1, 1998 is designated as

13 ‘‘United States Navy Asiatic Fleet Memorial Day’’.

14 (b) PROCLAMATION.—The President is authorized

15 and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the

16 people of the United States to observe United States Navy
3

•SJ 30 IS

1 Asiatic Fleet Memorial Day with appropriate programs,

2 ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 7 October 2004         

amending Decision 2002/840/EC adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods

(notified under document number C(2004) 3679)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/691/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 2002/840/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 16. Directive as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 287, 25.10.2002, p. 40.

----

ANNEX

List of irradiation facilities in third countries approved by the Community

Reference No: EU-AIF 01-2002

Reference No: EU-AIF 02-2002

Reference No: EU-AIF 03-2002

Reference No: EU-AIF 05-2004

Reference No: EU-AIF 06-2004

----
Summary of Tribal Coordination and Consultation Process for a General Permit for the Ocean 

Disposal of Marine Mammal Carcasses

Time frame of tribal consultation: 6-2-2015 to 7-2-2015 

1. Nature of the action:

EPA proposes to issue a general permit to authorize local governments to transport 

from the United States and dispose of marine mammal carcasses in ocean waters. 

2. Chronologically of coordination and consultation:

A briefing on the general permit was provide to the National Tribal Water Council on 6-

11-2014. 

A Tribal Leader Notification letter with a consultation plan was mailed on 6-2-2015. 

Coordination and consultation consisted of two teleconferences, which were held on 6-

16-2015 and 6-30-2015. 

A reminder notification was emailed to Alaskan Native Tribes on 6-16-2015. 

Via teleconference and email, the Agency received input from three tribes: Aleutian 

Pribilof Island Association, Coquille tribe, and Trinidad Rancheria tribe. 

A briefing on the general permit was provide to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission 

on 7-17-2015. 

After the end of the formal consultation period, additional outreach was conducted with 

Alaska Native villages. 

3. Nature of the tribal concerns and potential impacts to tribal interests:

Tribal concerns focused on 1) the potential to impact traditional hunting and 

whaling practices, and 2) providing coverage under the permit to tribes. 

4. Extent to which tribal concerns of officials have been addressed:

The initial scope of the proposed permit would have applied to only the at sea disposal 

of large carcasses (e.g., whales, walruses), from land, which have died and subsequently 

washed ashore or died after becoming stranded. Once the narrow applicability of the 

permit was explained, the tribal representatives stated they had no concerns regarding 

impacts to traditional practices. 

Initially, coverage under the permit was intended for state and municipal 

governments; however, based upon comments from two tribal representatives, 

coverage will be extended to tribal governments.

Through additional outreach with Alaska Native villages, we learned that the initial 
scope of the permit (i.e., large carcasses) was inadequate for subsistence users; 

consequently, we broadened the scope to include all marine mammal carcasses.
# Official Journal C 121/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.121.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 121 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 538 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.121.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 121

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 538 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 121/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5804 — Samsung Electronics CO/Samsung Digital Imaging CO) (1) | 1 |
| 2010/C 121/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5745 — Akzonobel/Rohm and Haas Powder Coating Business) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 121/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5804 — Samsung Electronics CO/Samsung Digital Imaging CO) (1)

1

2010/C 121/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5745 — Akzonobel/Rohm and Haas Powder Coating Business) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 121/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2010/C 121/04 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 121/03

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2010/C 121/04

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 121/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2010/C 121/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
From: jolet4@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:42:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Dahle

Saint Paul, MN 55105
H. Res. 7

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 4, 2007.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Obey, Chairman; 

Mr. Murtha, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Mollohan, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Visclosky, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Serrano, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Moran 

of Virginia, Mr. Olver, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Farr, Mr. Jackson 

of Illinois, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mr. Boyd of Florida, 

Mr. Fattah, Mr. Rothman, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. 

Berry, Ms. Lee, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Schiff, Mr. 

Honda, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Israel, Mr. Ryan of 

Ohio, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Chandler, Ms. Wasserman 

Schultz, and Mr. Rodriguez. 
2

•HRES 7 EH 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Skelton, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Spratt, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR: Mr. George 

Miller of California, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Dingell, 

Chairman; Mr. Waxman, Mr. Markey, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 

Towns, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Gordon of Tennessee, Mr. Rush, 

Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Engel, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Gene 

Green of Texas, Ms. DeGette, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Doyle, Ms. 

Harman, Mr. Allen, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Solis, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Inslee, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Ross, Ms. Hooley, Mr. 

Weiner, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Melancon, Mr. 

Barrow, and Mr. Hill. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Frank of 

Massachusetts, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Lantos, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Thompson 

of Mississippi, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Ms. 

Millender-McDonald, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Conyers, Chairman. 
3

•HRES 7 EH 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Rahall, 

Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Waxman, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Ms. Slaughter, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: Mr. Gordon of Tennessee, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez, 

Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: 

Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Oberstar, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Filner, Chairman. 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Rangel, Chairman; Mr. Stark, Mr. Levin, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Lewis of 

Georgia, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Pomeroy, Mrs. Jones of 

Ohio, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Kind, Mr. 

Pascrell, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
4

•HRES 7 EH 

Meek of Florida, Ms. Schwartz of Pennsylvania, and Mr. 

Davis of Alabama. 

Attest:

Clerk.
NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WILKINSON DECL. IN SUPPORT OF

DEFS' MOTION FOR FEES

[NO. CV06-0204JCC] - Page 1

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM';

OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a

Washington limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

NO. CV06-0204JCC

DECLARATION OF SETH

WILKINSON IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

I, Seth Wilkinson, declare and testify as follows:

1. I am over eighteen years of age, competent to testify to the matters stated in

this declaration, and make this declaration based upon personal knowledge.

2. Since 2001, I have been an attorney licensed to practice in Washington

State. I am admitted to practice in the Western District of Washington and

regularly have cases in this district. 

3. I am an attorney at the law firm of Yarmuth, Wilsdon, Calfo, PLLC. My

practice focuses on complex litigation, including technology and

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 132 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 132

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 132 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
No. 66585.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/5780, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of drawing instrument cases similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD ROY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALTER WEINBERG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5172FDB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

APPEALS

The Magistrate Judge issued an order filed August 3, 2006 [Dkt. # 38] in which he addressed

eight motions filed by Plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals the Magistrate Judge’s ruling regarding depositions.

The Magistrate Judge noted that Plaintiff Scott must seek leave of Court to conduct discovery,

owing to past discovery abuses, and granted in part and denied in part such leave on sound bases. 

Plaintiff’s appeal reiterates his position relative to the discovery, but this Court is not persuaded by

his arguments. 

Plaintiff also appeals the Magistrate Judge’s order denying appointment of counsel, but

Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances (requiring an evaluation of the

likelihood of success on the merits and of a plaintiff’s ability to articulate his claims in light of the

complexity of the legal issues involved). ACCORDINGLY, 

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 52 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff Scott’s Appeal To Judge of Order Dkt. # 38 [Dkt. # 39] is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff Scott’s Appeal To Judge of Order To Deny Depositions and Response to

Show Cause [Dkt. # 40] is DENIED. 

DATED this 8th day of September, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05172-FDB Document 52 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 62821.

#### Zenith Novelty Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6473 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                                   0000875359
<NAME>                                       Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        8257
<SECURITIES>                                                 21246
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 7142
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   755
<INVENTORY>                                                   7680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             48923
<PP&E>                                                       44147
<DEPRECIATION>                                               23061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               70635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         8040
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        14
<OTHER-SE>                                                   59880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 70635
<SALES>                                                      11745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             11745
<CGS>                                                         6641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 6641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 95
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             61
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    61
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.01
        
 
</TABLE>
Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 102-2 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 102-2 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2
Wdesk | Exhibit








Exhibit 10(a)(5)
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and effective as of April 3, 2018, by and between Jeffrey L. Buhr (hereinafter “Executive”), and 1st Source Bank, an Indiana corporation (hereinafter “Employer”).
WHEREAS, Executive is currently employed as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Employer, pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2017 (“Employment Agreement”); and 
WHEREAS, Executive and Employer have agreed to further amend the Employment Agreement as provided below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement and this Amendment, Executive and Employer hereby agree that Section 6(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
“6(b).  If such termination occurs within one (1) year after a Change in Control of Employer or Employer’s parent, 1st Source Corporation, then as severance pay and in lieu of any further compensation for periods subsequent to the effective date of such termination, Executive shall receive, within thirty (30) days following such termination, an amount in cash equal to 2.99 times his “annualized includable compensation for the base period” (as defined in Section 280G(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)), provided that, for purposes of such calculation, Executive’s average annual compensation shall be determined by excluding all compensation other than Executive’s annual base pay and any bonuses awarded under the Company’s bonus plans, and specifically excluding any accelerated vesting or conversion of stock awards or exercise of stock options regardless of their inclusion in the Executive’s reportable gross income.”      
As hereby modified, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.
1st Source Bank
	
					
	By:
	/s/ Christopher J. Murphy III
	 
	 
	/s/ Jeffrey L. Buhr

	 
	Christopher J. Murphy III
	 
	 
	Jeffrey L. Buhr

	 
	Chairman of the Board and 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Chief Executive Officer