alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of WNC Housing
Tax Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

April 15, 2010
129 STAT. 470 PUBLIC LAW 114–43—AUG. 6, 2015 

Public Law 114–43 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To reduce duplication of information technology at the Department of Homeland 

Security, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS IT Duplication Reduction 

Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DUPLICATION REDUCTION. 

(a) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DUPLICATION REDUCTION.—Not 

later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the 

House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that includes 

the following: 

(1) The number of information technology systems at the 

Department of Homeland Security. 

(2) An assessment of the number of such systems exhibiting 

duplication or fragmentation. 

(3) A strategy for reducing such duplicative systems, 

including an assessment of potential cost savings or cost avoidance as a result of such reduction. 

(4) A methodology for determining which system should 

be eliminated when there is duplication or fragmentation. 

(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

(1) The term ‘‘duplication or fragmentation’’ of information 

technology systems means two or more systems or programs 

that deliver similar functionality to similar user populations. 

(2) The term ‘‘information technology’’ has the meaning 

given such term in section 11101 of title 40, United States 

Code. 

Deadline. 

Reports. 

DHS IT 

Duplication 

Reduction Act 

of 2015. 

Aug. 6, 2015 

[H.R. 1626] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 114–43—AUG. 6, 2015 129 STAT. 471 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1626: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–162 (Comm. on Homeland Security). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

June 23, considered and passed House. 

July 23, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(c) NO NEW AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING.—This section shall 

be carried out using amounts otherwise appropriated or made available to the Department of Homeland Security. No additional funds 

are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section. 

Approved August 6, 2015. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12206]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “La Magia di Giotto” at the Italian Cultural Institute, New York, New York, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of                           ( print page 69677)                        Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-22308 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Page 1 - ORDER OF CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE br71(muncey0postpone) LARRY R. ROLOFF

ATTORNEY AT LAW

SUITE 233

132 EAST BROADWAY

EUGENE, OR 97401-3154

(541) 686 8695

FAX (541) 686 8751

THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL KENT MUNCEY,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5201FDB

ORDER OF CONTINANCE OF

TRIAL DATE

THIS MATTER having come before the above entitled Court upon the Motion of the

Defendant, MICHAEL KENT MUNCEY, by and through his local counsel, ZENON PETER

OLBERTZ, and counsel of record, LARRY R. ROLOFF, for a continuance of the pre-trial

conference which is presently scheduled for Friday, September 1, 2006 and the trial for

Monday, September 11, 2006.

The Court finds, after consideration of all relevant information, the circumstances of

this case, and the reasons set forth in the Motion, that without this continuance the Defendant

will be prejudiced and the ability to properly prepare for trial would be impaired. Failure to

grant a continuance under these circumstances would result in a miscarriage of justice. The

ends of justice would best be served by the granting of the Motion for Continuance. The ends

Case 3:06-cr-05201-FDB Document 26 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Page 2 - ORDER OF CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE br71(muncey0postpone) LARRY R. ROLOFF

ATTORNEY AT LAW

SUITE 233

132 EAST BROADWAY

EUGENE, OR 97401-3154

(541) 686 8695

FAX (541) 686 8751

of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in having the matter

brought to trial sooner. For these reasons, the Court finds the Defendant’s Motion for

Continuance should be granted. The pre-trial conference scheduled for Friday, September 1,

2006 is VACATED. The trial scheduled for Monday, September 11, 2006 is VACATED.

The trial shall be rescheduled to October 30, 2006 in Tacoma, Washington.

Any and all period of delay resulting from the granting of this continuance, from the

current trial date of September 11, 2006, up to and including the new trial date of October 30,

2006, shall be excludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 316(h)(1)(F) and (H)(8)(A.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2006. 

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

Larry R. Roloff, Attorney at Law

132 East Broadway, Suite 233

Eugene, Oregon 97401-3154

Attorney for Defendant

/s/

Larry R. Roloff, OSB No. 72216 

Case 3:06-cr-05201-FDB Document 26 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD L. BASKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEVIN BOVENKAMP,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5150RJB

SECOND ORDER TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT 

This civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff was given leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

alleges defendant Bovenkamp is a regional administrator for the Washington State Department of

Corrections. Plaintiff alleges he asked defendant Bovenkamp for a new probation officer because

[the defendant] alleged an unlawful seizure against the officer assigned to Mr. Baskett and because

Mr. Baskett was going to be re-located. The request was not honored and plaintiff filed this action

alleging a due process violation. (Dkt. # 3).

The Court, reviewed plaintiff's complaint, and issued an order to amend the complaint

because of deficiencies including failure to state a claim against defendant Bovenkamp. (Dkt. # 60). 

Since entry of that order plaintiff has filed two motions neither of which properly address the issues

Case 3:06-cv-05150-RJB Document 9 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

enumerated in the court’s order to amend the complaint. (Dkt. # 7 and 8). 

Plaintiff will file a proposed amended complaint on or before June 24th, 2006 or this court

will recommend dismissal of this action. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and note this matter for June 24th,

2006.

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05150-RJB Document 9 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

REGINALD PURDOM,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-479M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Count 1. Conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), and

841(b)(1)(A), and 846.

Count 2: Conspiracy to distribute ecstacy in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(C).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 12, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a native and a citizen of British Columbia, Canada.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, but reserves the right to contest his

continued detention if there is a change in circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

Case 2:05-mj-00479-JPD Document 23 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 14th day of October, 2005.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00479-JPD Document 23 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of Percon Incorporated and Subsidiaries as
of September 30, 1999 and the related condensed consolidated statements of
income and cash flows for the nine months in the period ended September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (192)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,525
<PP&E>                                           5,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,721)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,335
<BONDS>                                            554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,836
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,319
<SALES>                                         25,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,710
<CGS>                                           12,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,282
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period ended  September 30,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 16, 2005
#### In re: Robert HAYDEN, Petitioner.

No. 05-1265.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. April 29, 2005.

Decided Aug. 25, 2005.

Robert W. Hayden, Lewisburg, PA, pro se.

Laura S. Irwin, Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, for Respondent.

Before Chief Judge SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hayden, proceeding *pro se,*seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to act on the motion that he filed in this matter in August 2003, which he styled as a Rule 60(b) motion.1

Mandamus is an appropriate remedy only in the most extraordinary of situations. *In re Pasquariello,*16 F.3d 525, 528 (3d Cir.1994). To warrant such a remedy, a petitioner must show that he has (I) no other adequate means of obtaining the desired relief and (ii) a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. *See Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.,*975 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir.1992) (citing *Kerr v. United States District Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976)).

Hayden’s motion was pending at the time he filed this mandamus petition. However, the District Court denied Hayden’s motion by order entered August 3, 2005. Thus, the request for relief before us is now moot.

Accordingly, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

1

. In 1994, Hayden was convicted of using extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit; he was sentenced to 188 months of imprisonment. In July 2002, he filed a § 2255 motion, which the District Court denied. We denied his request for a certificate of appealability in May 2003.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) I, Wenjian Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 24, 2018  Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc.  By:/s/ Wenjian Liu Name: Wenjian Liu Title: Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the General
Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 10, 2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyof the Great Falls coal field, Montana**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:356
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958207
 
July 30, 2018
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 50

To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services on June 1, 1998,

relating to surety bond requirements for home health agencies under

the medicare and medicaid programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1998

Mr. BOND (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LOTT, Mr. BREAUX,

Mr. BURNS, Mr. MACK, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. FRIST, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. DODD, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

HATCH, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. ROBB,

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. CRAIG, and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human

Services on June 1, 1998, relating to surety bond requirements for home health agencies under the medicare

and medicaid programs.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the

4 Health Care Financing Administration, Department of
2

•SJ 50 IS

1 Health and Human Services on June 1, 1998 (volume 63,

2 number 104, page 29648 of the Federal Register), relat3 ing to surety bond requirements for home health agencies

4 under the medicare and medicaid programs, and such rule

5 shall have no force or effect.

Æ