alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT D

EMAIL COMMUNICATION

DATED 2/21/2007

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-5 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 117 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
(3/14/2007) Roger Townsend - Re: Virtumundo Case -- Stipulation re Mediation 2007-02-20.pdf Page 1

From: Roger Townsend

To: bob@ijusticelaw.com; Derek Newman

Date: 2/21/2007 8:14 AM

Subject: Re: Virtumundo Case -- Stipulation re Mediation 2007-02-20.pdf

CC: Roger M. Townsend

Derek & Bob:

Have you had the opportunity to discuss depositions of the newly disclosed witnesses in Plaintiffs' recent filings (i.e., Omni's 

customers & the expert witness)? We need to coordinate those as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Roger

>>> On 2/21/2007 at 7:52 AM, Derek Newman <DN@newmanlaw.com> wrote:

Bob, 

I appreciate your suggestion about how all parties can save (or at least defer) costs and fees, but our clients decline to accept the 

proposal. We feel a stay could prejudice our client's ability to prepare for trial. 

Please file the stipulation re mediation. 

Thank you. 

-Derek 

-----Original Message----- 

From: "Bob Siegel" <Bob@iJusticelaw.com> 

To: Derek Newman <dn@newmanlaw.com> 

CC: Roger Townsend <roger@newmanlaw.com> 

Creation Date: 2/21 7:49 am 

Subject: RE: Virtumundo Case -- Stipulation re Mediation 2007-02-20.pdf 

Gentlemen, 

 

This Stipulation looks good, however, I will reiterate what I 

raised with Derek. That is, we believe it would be in 

the interests of all to stay all litigation pending these decisions. 

That would further put the onus on the Court to decide the 

motions. If you are amenable to such a Stipualation, please 

revise this one accordingly. Otherwise, this one is acceptable. 

Sincerely, 

Bob Siegel 

 

________________________________ 

From: Derek Newman [mailto:dn@newmanlaw.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:09 PM 

To: Bob Siegel 

Cc: Roger Townsend 

Subject: Virtumundo Case -- Stipulation re Mediation 2007-02-20.pdf 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-5 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
(3/14/2007) Roger Townsend - Re: Virtumundo Case -- Stipulation re Mediation 2007-02-20.pdf Page 2

Bob, 

 

Attached, please find a stipulation requesting the court stay the 

mediation deadline pending the outcome of our cross-motions for summary 

judgment. 

 

If you approve, please fill in the date and file it. If you do not 

approve, please call Roger with your comments. 

 

Thank you. 

 

-Derek 

 

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 

Seattle 

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610 * Seattle, Washington 98104 

(206) 274-2800 Seattle phone * (206) 274-2801 Seattle fax 

Los Angeles 

1801 Century Park East, Suite 2400 * Los Angeles, California 90067 

(310) 385-5955 Los Angeles phone * (310) 385-5956 Los Angeles fax 

(206) 274-2828 Direct Dial 

http://www.newmanlaw.com ( http://www.newmanlaw.com/ ) <http://www.newmanlaw.com/> 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-5 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
<EX-31(a)>
                                                 Exhibit 31(a)
                        CERTIFICATIONS
I, Daniel G. Reynolds, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
   Calloway's Nursery, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
   material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
   of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
   not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
   report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
   other financial information included in this report, fairly
   present in all material respects the financial condition,
   results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
   and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
   responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
   controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
   15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
       caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
       under our supervision, to ensure that material information
       relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
       subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this report
       is being prepared;
  b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
       disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
       report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
       disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
       period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
       internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
       the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
       fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
       has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
       the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
       and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
     control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
     and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
       the design or operation of internal control over financial
       reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
       registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
       financial information; and
  b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
       management or other employees who have a significant role in
       the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     February 13, 2004
/s/ Daniel G. Reynolds
Daniel G. Reynolds
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20

To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) of

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding foreign assistance for

Mexico during fiscal year 1997.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1997

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. HELMS) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove the certification of the President under section

490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding

foreign assistance for Mexico during fiscal year 1997.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That pursuant to subsection (d) of section 490 of the For4 eign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j), Congress

5 disapproves the determination of the President with re6 spect to Mexico for fiscal year 1997 that is contained in

7 the certification (transmittal no. 97–18) submitted to
2

•SJ 20 IS

1 Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that

2 section on February 28, 1997.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 21

To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) of

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding assistance for Mexico

during fiscal year 1997, and to provide for the termination of the

withholding of and opposition to assistance that results from the disapproval.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1997

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. HELMS) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove the certification of the President under section

490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding

assistance for Mexico during fiscal year 1997, and to

provide for the termination of the withholding of and

opposition to assistance that results from the disapproval.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION.

4 (a) DISAPPROVAL.—Pursuant to subsection (d) of

5 section 490 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
2

•SJ 21 IS

1 U.S.C. 2291j), Congress disapproves the determination of

2 the President with respect to Mexico that is contained in

3 the certification (transmittal no. 97–18) submitted to

4 Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that

5 section on February 28, 1997.

6 (b) TERMINATION.—Notwithstanding subsection (f)

7 of that section, subsection (e) of that section (relating to

8 the withholding of bilateral assistance and opposition to

9 multilateral development assistance) shall cease to apply

10 to Mexico during fiscal year 1997 if at any time after the

11 enactment of this Act the President submits to Congress

12 a certification pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(B) that the

13 vital national interests of the United States require that

14 such subsection (e) cease to apply to Mexico during that

15 fiscal year.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000875194
<NAME> CATHERINES STORES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1998             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998             AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                          10,190                  10,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,481                   2,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,895                  51,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,936                  70,936
<PP&E>                                          69,114                  69,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,306)                (36,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,993                 128,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,188                  43,188
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        46,701                  46,701
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,993                 128,993
<SALES>                                         74,827                 151,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,827                 151,279
<CGS>                                           49,208                 100,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,208                 100,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,601                  40,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 154                     434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,864                  10,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,405                   4,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,459                   5,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,459                   5,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.48                   $0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.47                   $0.80
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL B. CHAVEZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5227

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( X ) Two prior DUI DEFERRED SENTENCES within past year.

 ( X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( X ) Failure to comply with recent court orders. 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 January 5, 2007.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05227-MAT Document 12 Filed 01/05/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Hock E. Tan        
|Hock E. Tan            
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2004
# Official Journal C 273/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5818 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5818 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2015/C 273/01 | Corrigendum to Position (EU) No 10/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters — Adopted by the Council on 15 June 2015( OJ C 239, 21.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2015/C 273/01

Corrigendum to Position (EU) No 10/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters — Adopted by the Council on 15 June 2015( OJ C 239, 21.7.2015 )

( OJ C 239, 21.7.2015 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 18.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Corrigendum to Position (EU) No 10/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters — Adopted by the Council on 15 June 2015

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 239 of 21 July 2015
  )

(2015/C 273/01)

On page 10, in Article 1, point (15), the following point is added:

| ‘(c) | paragraph 3 is deleted;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

paragraph 3 is deleted;’.

---
NOTICE & ORDER OF VOL DISMISSAL OF GARNISHMENT 

PROCEEDINGS - CASE NO. MS05-5032 FDB PAGE 1 OF 2 

EKMAN, BOHRER & THULIN, P.S. 

QUEEN ANNE SQUARE 

220 WEST MERCER ST., SUITE 400 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 

TELEPHONE (206) 282-8221 

FAX (206) 285-4587

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Honorable Franklin D. Burgess 

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, AT TACOMA 

PUGET SOUND ELECTRICAL WORKERS 

HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 

(INCLUDES VACATION ALLOWANCE), 

PUGET SOUND ELECTRICAL WORKERS 

PENSION TRUST, PUGET SOUND 

ELECTRICAL JOINT APPRENTICESHIP 

AND TRAINING TRUST, NATIONAL 

ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND, and LABOR 

MANAGEMENT COOPERATION TRUST, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

KAREN A. KAMERER and "JOHN DOE" 

KAMERER, wife and husband and the martial 

community comprised thereof, D/B/A HEYZ 

ELECTRIC, 

 Defendants, 

and 

SOUND CREDIT UNION, 

 Garnishee. 

CAUSE NO.: MS05-5032 

NOTICE AND ORDER OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF 

GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS 

TO: CLERK OF THE COURT 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiffs Puget Sound Electrical Workers Health 

and Welfare Trust (Includes Vacation Allowance), Puget Sound Electrical Workers Pension 

Case 3:05-mc-05032-FDB Document 7 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE & ORDER OF VOL DISMISSAL OF GARNISHMENT 

PROCEEDINGS - CASE NO. MS05-5032 FDB PAGE 2 OF 2 

EKMAN, BOHRER & THULIN, P.S. 

QUEEN ANNE SQUARE 

220 WEST MERCER ST., SUITE 400 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 

TELEPHONE (206) 282-8221 

FAX (206) 285-4587

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Trust, Puget Sound Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust, National Electrical 

Benefit Fund, and Labor Management Cooperation Trust voluntarily dismiss the above-entitled 

garnishment action against Defendants Karen A. Kamerer and "John Doe" Kamerer, wife and 

husband and the martial community comprised thereof, d/b/a Heyz Electric and Garnishee 

Sound Credit Union. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action against Defendants Karen 

A. Kamerer and "John Doe" Kamerer, wife and husband and the martial community comprised 

thereof, d/b/a Heyz Electric and Garnishee Sound Credit Union shall be and hereby is 

dismissed. 

DATED this 18th day of July, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by: 

s/Robert A. Bohrer 

WSBA #5050 

Ekman, Bohrer & Thulin, P.S. 

220 W. Mercer, Ste. 400 

Seattle, WA 98119 

Telephone: (206) 282-8221 

Fax: (206) 285-4587 

E-mail: r.bohrer@ekmanbohrer.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

S:\Collections\PSEW-3460\Pleadings\2006\Heyz Electric 3460 USDC GARN Dismissal M&O.doc

Case 3:05-mc-05032-FDB Document 7 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of DNA Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Principal Executive Officer July 29,2009