alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~'ro~~te. 

\'\t-tet\ ~ 

?'-'01'1<-

~b"<-

\-\~+'-"e.r N~O EPA <"')o- h~er@ ~a..-C:fJv 

Ck.v~, {ll.,~ S't A"~.£,.. cs~i-s, " t, (3JIUY It /;,f- , ""+ Hv!J~ a. I ~d !EffrL h u~L , f21ac.k (S, ())tt~k-er-- r CcJ~~ WAri P~be-~1 . E-fA ,~,.,berH-.y. WAri#P erlt •,j"\1 

~ ~tofz.k l)~<"'r>~ '(a\~ .filohlu< @dotXo<n• rq CorY) 

;V{a_ rK Se. (rC:Gr V.?. G1A,. s e;-r-?:er. ,.\;-~ <?. {' '{ .;j-ov 

f)qv;o/ Tob1tf.S [PA -+ohiq5 . tJ/q.,,~GJ~f1, ~ov . -Xl <2-:~~ ch ccfJA e \c::.e D'("-cid,. kc_,..Ye,n €? e.po.. . cyv 

AnnQ_ !Ct~ EPA lCtm. anf)e.Ci; Q(/~ jo v 

tJ v~--"' tJq 4 ev.. d A ~" d '-"-'<1 e....- · V\ e_ ay,., ~ ¥ o... · <J "vI 

K ~ s"" M Morn Q..o'"f\~ ~r t"'Sfen '5 {'(1 ~ erVtf) fYI etJtl ~ . (D f"'} 

~ \Jc\.~ l Sttb~ ~~'en- \)0\. ~ \ e Cv¢\'\Qn ca f)~ ~ ~t'V\.. 

1\l \~5C(l S\ur\'f\a.J\1\ A:~l~'5f._, -A\ \~~(l-S\a..(~'\£tnnc!>aM~f'ICttt1Ch€m·~ ·u;tn 

_ . . '- r.,_ ... t) ~\·c ~ '" _- '-4.; 

r~ ~\AI\;, ~...,e) &.:,l?,\ ....... , 

• ve AnJers" {) 

e fi-ve 1"' 

Yl no. fV1 or rq l \ 

I3?A \-ew'>. ea" \ flf) -eeq , ~o v 

MAs~~~ -E{J~ ~~._,j, · te ~@_~~-~ov 

CPA ft"1d~.so..., .S-/ev{ ~ epQ ~ j oV 

f Pt\ f\vcwt. .)o"( ~ e(l'l. · 5~v 

Ef fV1 

£Ptl- G<'~Mc; . 'o1"-~\~ e <?..~·~ov 

SiHSc
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 6

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 76

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1










March 28, 2018




Richard B. Vilsoet 


Dear Rick:
In recognition of the value of your services and in order to induce you to remain in its employ as the General Counsel through May 2019, Dycom Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has decided to enter into this agreement (this “Agreement”) to amend the terms of your outstanding equity awards set forth on Exhibit A hereto as follows:
If your employment with the Company is terminated due to your retirement on or following the date of the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, your outstanding equity awards will be treated as follows: 
		
	•
	Time vesting restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards will continue to vest for the three-year period following the termination of employment date (or if the remaining vesting term of any such time vesting restricted stock or restricted stock unit award is less than three years, each such award will continue to vest for the remaining period of such vesting term); and




		
	•
	Subject to meeting the required performance conditions, performance vesting restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards will continue to vest for the two-year period following the termination of employment date (or if the remaining vesting term of any such performance vesting restricted stock or restricted stock unit award is less than two years, each such award will continue to vest for the remaining period of such vesting term).




In addition to amending your current outstanding equity awards, including the equity awards granted to you on March 26, 2018, this Agreement provides that any future equity awards granted to you will be subject to the terms set forth above.


Sincerely,
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC.
	
				
	By:
	 
	/s/ Steven E. Nielsen
	 

	 
	 
	Steven E. Nielsen
	 

	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 








1
No. 63886.

protest 59/19141 (New York).

#### Inter-American Minerals Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this, court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,010,080
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,744,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                   713,099
<INVENTORY>                                    223,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,758,893
<PP&E>                                         31,907,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18,030,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,175,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,213,316
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       752
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,828,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,175,193
<SALES>                                        13,535,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,593,556
<CGS>                                          8,935,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,342,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,111,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               134,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             583,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                555,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            541,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   541,122
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07



</TABLE>
No. 66067.

Suit 5062.

#### United States *v.*Rambush Decorating Co. and General Shipping & Trading Co.

C.D. 2204 reversed June 2, 1961. C.A.D. 776.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 5, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-14904

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-00123-CC-LTW-7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HERMILA LARIOS SANDOVAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 5, 2012)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Dennis C. O’Brien, appointed counsel for Hermila Sandoval in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandoval’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of BAETA Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leonid Pushkantser, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 1, 2011
By: /s/ LEONID PUSHKANTSERName: Leonid Pushkantser

Title: Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       STARTECH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph S. Klimek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Joseph S. Klimek
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joseph S. Klimek
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           March 14, 2003
#### Tammy THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Don H. CATLIN; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-55778.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

*674Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tammy Thomas appeals pro se the district court’s judgment for defendants in her action alleging public disclosure of private facts, invasion of privacy, and the violation of various state and federal health and research regulations in connection with her drug testing by the United States Olympic Committee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim and summary judgment. *Barnett v. Centoni*31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court properly entered judgment for defendants with respect to Thomas’ state tort claim for public disclosure of private facts because she failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant Catlin’s scientific article discussing the detection of steroids identified her in any way as the source of the positive urine samples. *See Shulman v. Group W Prod., Inc.,*18 Cal.4th 200, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 843, 955 P.2d 469, 478 (1998). Nor did Thomas allege facts sufficient to show that the article would be offensive or objectionable to a reasonable person, or that it is not a topic of legitimate public concern. *See id.*

The district court properly held Thomas failed to state a claim under 45 C.F.R. §§ 46.101, et seq., the federal statute regulating research involving human subjects, because the statute does not confer a private right of action. *See Alexander v. Sandoval,*532 U.S. 275, 286, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (“private rights of action to enforce federal law must be created by Congress.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Thomas’ motion for additional discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) because she did not show that the information she expected to gain from the suggested deponents would preclude summary judgment. *See Maljack Prods. v. GoodTimes Home Video Corp.,*81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir.1996).

We will not entertain Thomas’ negligence *per se*argument raised for the first time on appeal. *See Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.,*140 F.3d 1313, 1321 (9th Cir.1998).

Thomas’ remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT T

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-21 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 41 Att. 20

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-21 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-21 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 3
Before the Second Division,

April 22, 1963

No. 67614.

#### Guy B. Barham and C. J. Hendry Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/5795, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTA FRIEDLANDER,

Defendant..

Case No. C05-5714 RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Defendant Christa Friedlander’s

“Notice and Order of Dismissal” ]Dkt. #49].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

Defendant is attempting to dismiss a properly filed complaint against her by citing to various Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure without elaboration. As most if not all of the papers filed by defendant to date, this

“notice” is patently frivolous. The “notice”, to the extent it is a motion, is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 14th day of December, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05714-RBL Document 58 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 60562.

#### Bartolucci Arts, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 277615-K(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Before the Third Division,

November 7, 1962

No. 67168.

protests 61/2213, etc. (Galveston).

#### W. R. Zanes and Company *v.*United States,

*290Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of molded figures of alabasterite, which are not works of art and are not decorated in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. *International Lapidaries Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 230, C.D. 1780) and *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173) followed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 69240)    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 5, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage*                    ®                     *Contract 65 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-280, CP2023-283.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-22137 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: February 10, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

NORTHEASTERN 

AVIATION CORPORATION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012EA110028 

Respondent 

ORDER SETTING 

SECOND PRE-HEARING STATUS CONFERENCE 

On April17, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures ("Order") was filed. 

Among other things, this Order set a telephone Motion/Pre-Hearing Status Conference for 

Wednesday, February 10,2016, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time. 

On FebruaryJO, 2016, the parties appeared by telephone for a Pre-Hearing Status 

Conference. During this Conference, the parties agreed to appear for a second Pre-Hearing 

Status Conference on Wednesday, March 2, 2016. This order codifies the parties' February 10, 

2016 agreement and the Court's oral rulings. 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and 

motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

l. The parties shall appear by telephone for a Second Pre-Hearing Status Conference on 

Wednesday, March 2, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time. To access the Court's 

conference line, the parties shall ca11202-493-2343. 
2. For clarifications of this Order or questions with regard to the procedures to be 

followed in this case, please contact Mrs. Rachel Brown, Judicial Staff Assistant, at the 

Office ofHearings (202-366-2132). 

Attachment: Service List 

Page 2 of2 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Office of Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration · 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz II 

Respondent's Counsel 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

12th Floor 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-659-6619 

FAX: 202-659-6699 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202~366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION, AS DISCUSSED IN NOTE 1 IN NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, ALL AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MERGER WITH
RED PEPPER EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 16, 1996 AND ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF 
INTERESTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         135,434
<SECURITIES>                                    41,897
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,711
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,024
<PP&E>                                         125,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 468,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,016
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   468,211
<SALES>                                        167,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,385
<CGS>                                            8,274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
No. 62311.

#### H. Rosenhirsch Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 330270-K, 330291-K, and 330281-K (New York).

*359Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62306.

#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 57396-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.