alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**
I, Michael Schradle, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Linear Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: May 18, 2005
Exhibit 10.41
 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
 2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD GRANT NOTICE AND  RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Company Plan Participant Restricted Share Units RSUs Exhibit A Agreement
 Participants Name:Participants Employee
Identification Number:Grant Date:Total Number of RSUs:Vesting Commencement Date:Vesting Schedule:
    
    The RSUs subject to this Grant Notice and the Agreement shall
vest according to the following schedule:




---



##### 



Exhibit B
 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED:

    
    PARTICIPANT:By:
    
    
    
    By:Print Name:
    
    
    
    Print Name:Title:Address:
    
    
    
    Address:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 TO RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD GRANT NOTICE
 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Grant Notice Agreement Company  Restricted Share
Units  RSUs  Plan
 ARTICLE I
 GENERAL
 Defined Terms
 Termination of Consultancy
 Termination of Directorship
 Termination of Employment
 A-1




---



##### 



Termination of Services
 General
 Incorporation of Terms of Plan
 ARTICLE II
 GRANT OF RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS
 Grant of RSUs Grant Date
 Companys Obligation to Pay
 Vesting Schedule Vesting Schedule
 Change in Control Treatment
 Forfeiture, Termination and Cancellation upon Termination of Services
 Payment after Vesting
 A-2




---



##### 



th
    provided
   Rights as Shareholder
 Conditions to Delivery of Ordinary Shares
 A-3




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 OTHER PROVISIONS
 Administration
 Adjustments Upon Specified Events
 Grant is Not Transferable
 A-4




---



##### 



Binding Agreement
 Notices
 Titles
 Governing Law; Severability
 Conformity to Securities Laws
 Amendments, Suspension and Termination , provided,
 Successors and Assigns
 Limitations Applicable to Section 16 Persons
 A-5




---



##### 



Not a Contract of Employment
 Entire Agreement
 Section 409A Section 409A
 Limitation on Participants Rights
 Additional Terms for Participants Providing Services Outside the United States Exhibit B Exhibit B
 A-6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
TO AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Exhibit B Plan Agreement Exhibit B
  FRANCE
 Sub-Plan
  Data Privacy
 Data
 B-1




---



##### 



French Language Provision
 En acceptant ce Contrat vous confirmez ainsi avoir lu et compris les documents
relatifs au Plan qui vous ont été communiqués en langue anglaise. Vous en acceptez les termes en
connaissance de cause.
 JAPAN
 Data
 MALAYSIA
  SINGAPORE
  B-2
S. Con. Res. 4 Agreed to March 5, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas Secretary Warren Christopher served as Secretary of State

from 1993 until 1997, and maintained the tradition of that Office

by representing the international interests of the United States

with great dignity, grace, and ability;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, during his tenure as Secretary

of State, engaged in more international travel than any other

Secretary of State in United States history, reflecting his indefatigable commitment to advancing peace and justice, protecting

and promoting United States interests, and preserving United

States leadership in international affairs;

Whereas Secretary Christopher has played a key leadership role

in United States foreign policy achievements, including ending

the war in Bosnia, restoring an elected government in Haiti,

and advancing peace in the Middle East;

Whereas Secretary Christopher served with distinction as Deputy

Secretary of State from 1977 until 1981 and, among his accomplishments as Deputy Secretary, is credited with skillfully negotiating the release of American hostages in Iran;

Whereas Secretary Christopher has had a distinguished career in

law and public service in California;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, born in Scranton, North Dakota,

is one of North Dakota’s most distinguished native sons and

has always displayed the quiet strength and work ethic associated

with the people of the Great Plains;

Whereas in 1997 Secretary Christopher leaves his position as the

sixty-third Secretary of State; and

Whereas Secretary Christopher has earned the respect and admiration of Congress and the American people: Now, therefore, be

it
S. Con. Res. 4—2

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That Congress commends and thanks the Honorable Warren

Christopher for his exemplary diplomatic service, and for his skillful

and indefatigable efforts to advance peace and justice around the

world.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Joseph F. Longo, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Startech
     Environmental Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading With respect to the period covered by this
     report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, and results of operations and cash flows
     of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision
         to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
         including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
         within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
         report is being prepared;

     b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls over financial reporting.

Date: June 19, 2007

By:    /s/ Joseph F. Longo
       --------------------
       Joseph F. Longo
       Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 4.25



 


SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANT TALMEI YOSEF (ISRAEL)


 


Lease Agreement


 


English summary of the Hebrew version1





 


1. Preliminary Note


 





Ellomay has acquired, through the acquisition of equity of an Israeli company (Sun Team Group Ltd.) a solar photovoltaic plant called “Talmei Yosef”, with an installed capacity of approximately 9 MW and located in Talemi Yosef, Israel (the “Plant”).







The site where the Plant is located consists of a plot of land with an aggregate surface area of 164,000 m2 that was leased by Besor Sheva – Cooperative Village for Agricultural Settlement Ltd. from the Israel Land Authority under a long-term lease agreement expiring on March 4, 2037.










2. Main content of the Lease Agreement


 




	
1. Execution date

	
January 1, 2010


	
2. Parties

	
Besor Sheva – Cooperative Village for Agricultural Settlement Ltd. and Sun Team Ltd. and Sun Team Talmei Yoesef Ltd.


	
3. Location of the Land

	
Block - 100301, Parcel - 5


	
4. Commencement Date

	
December 31, 2012


	
5. Duration

	
Twenty (20) years commencing on the commercial operation of the photovoltaic plant.


	
6. Consideration


 


 


 

	
Annual rent in the amount of NIS 3,532 per 1,000 m2 plus the difference between an amount equal to 4%+VAT of the annual income from sale of electricity and the aggregate annual rent, to the extent the 4%+VAT is higher than the aggregate annual rent. The rent is payable in advance on a quarterly basis and linked to the Israeli CPI based on the same mechanism for linkage on the payments due from the Israel Electric Company (“IEC”) to the lessee.  In addition, the lessee undertook to pay all taxes, levies, fees, capitalization fees, the construction costs, etc.


	
7. Termination

	
The lessee may terminate with 180 day prior notice in the event the IEC terminates its contract with the lessee for any reason unrelated to the lessee.





 








1 The original language version is on file with the Registrant and is available upon request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Potentialhazards from future eruptions in the vicinity of Mount Shasta volcano, northernCalifornia**
 
Report | Plates: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1503
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959919
 
August 10, 2018
Case 2:06-cv-00159-MJP-JPD Document 20 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00159-MJP-JPD Document 20 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 7

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 12 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-3 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 7 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEITH L. NASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5127-RJB/KLS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Presently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. # 121). 

Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the motion was on October 5, 2007. (Dkt. 154). Plaintiff signed his

response on October 3, 2007, but it was processed by DOC staff on October 9, 2007. (Dkt. # 178).

Plaintiff’s response was filed in this action on October 11, 2007 with numerous attachments (about 311

pages). (Id.). In the copy Plaintiff served on Defendants’ counsel, however, the only attachment provided

was Plaintiff’s declaration. (Dkt. # 177, Exh. 1, Declaration of Amanda M. Migchelbrink). Defendants

move to strike Plaintiff’s response because it was untimely filed and the service copy did not contain all

attachments which are referred to in the response. (Dkt. 177, p. 2-3). 

Plaintiff opposes the motion to strike, stating that he served the motion in a timely manner. 

Plaintiff admits that he served a copy of his response upon defense counsel without its numerous exhibits

because it would have exceeded his weekly postage limit. (Dkt. # 181, Plaintiff’s Declaration, p. 1). 

Plaintiff sent a letter to defense counsel on October 7, 2007, explaining the lack of exhibits in an attempt

to “meet and confer,” and stating that he would send the exhibits the following week. (Dkt. # 179).

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 183 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

The Court is at a loss as to why the parties did not confer and resolve this issue short of a motion

to strike. Conversely, Plaintiff is aware that the filing of the letter does not relieve him of the obligation

to properly and timely serve opposing counsel with the exhibits. In fact, Plaintiff indicates in his

Declaration that he fully intended to do so the next week. However, there is nothing in the record to

indicate that Plaintiff has served Defendants with copies of the exhibits referred to in his response. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) On or before December 21, 2007, Plaintiff shall provide the Court with proof that he

served Defendants with copies of the exhibits referred to in his response or, if Plaintiff has

not served Defendants with copies of the exhibits referred to in his response, he shall

provide the Court with an explanation of why he has not done so.

(2) The Clerk of the Court shall re-note Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #

121) for the Court’s calendar on December 21, 2007.

DATED this 29th day of November, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 183 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 18, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/ Etienne Snollaerts
|Etienne Snollaerts    
|July 24, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 1

JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

 ALEXANDER ZADORIN,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5803FDB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE 

Upon the stipulation of the parties to continue the trial date in the abovecaptioned case, the Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance n this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial; therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued to May 8, 2006. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:05-cr-05803-RBL Document 32 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2

The period of delay resulting from this continuance from March 20, 2006, up to and

including the new trial date of May 8, 2006, is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes

under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

DONE this 14th day of March, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

/s/ /s/ 

 Linda R. Sullivan David R. Jennings 

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:05-cr-05803-RBL Document 32 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2
From: kathyhuffaker@frontier.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:20:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Huffaker

,