alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0454 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. NEIL LYNN NUNES ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 2 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 28 2023

11/28/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

BRANDON SCOTT TRAVER, ,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5747RBL

CR05-5767RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X) Defendant’s extensive prior criminal history.

 (X) HISTORY OF FAILURES TO COMPLY WITH PAST COURT ORDERS. 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 (X) Defendant currently in state custody 

 ( ) Immigration and Naturalization Service detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 November 16, 2005.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05747-RBL Document 45 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMOTREX CORPORATION'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 1,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                                 57,144
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           8,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                              813
<INVENTORY>                                             5,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      221,693
<PP&E>                                                 12,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        284,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  43,576
<BONDS>                                               176,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  233
<OTHER-SE>                                             (5,710)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          284,559
<SALES>                                                23,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       35,438
<CGS>                                                  18,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          28,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      4,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (2,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (126)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (1,963)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (64,878)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (66,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (2.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (2.99)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERIC EUGENE TURNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CR-94-102, CA-96-1188-AM)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Eugene Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Marcus John Davis, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Turner, Nos. CR-94-

102; CA-96-1188-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 66063.

#### R. H. Newmark, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/28601 (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the protest disclosing that it was untimely filed under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1514), the protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATION AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER DWAYNE PORTER, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR05-417-RSM 

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 

AND DETERMINATION AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE

INTRODUCTION 

I conducted a hearing on alleged violations of supervised release in this case on January 21, 

2010. The defendant appeared pursuant to a warrant issued in this case. The UniJames L. 

Vonasch. Also present was U.S. Probation Officer Jonathan M. Ishii. The proceedings were 

digitally recorded. 

SENTENCE AND PRIOR ACTION 

Defendant was sentenced on September 15, 2006 by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez for 

Conspiracy to Engage in Money Laundering. He received 24 months of detention and 3 years of 

supervised release. 

PRESENTLY ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

In a petition dated January 11, 2010, U.S. Probation Officer Jonathan M. Ishii alleged that 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATION AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

defendant violated the following conditions of supervised release: 

1. Using oxycodone and xanax, on or about November 30, 2009, without a 

prescription by physician, in violation of standard condition 7. 

FINDINGS FOLLOWING EVIDENTIARY HEARING 

Defendant admitted the above violations, waived any hearing as to whether they occurred, 

and was informed the matter would be set for a disposition hearing February 5, 2010 at 10:00 

a.m. before District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. 

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

Based upon the foregoing, I recommend the court find that defendant has violated the 

conditions of his supervised release as alleged above, and conduct a disposition hearing. 

DATED this 21st day of January, 2010. 

A 

BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA 

United States Magistrate Judge
# Official Journal C 114E/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.114.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 114E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 534 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CE2010.114.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 114E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 534 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 114E/01 | Position (EU) No 2/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning a European rail network for competitive freightAdopted by the Council on 22 February 2010 (1) | 1 |
| 2010/C 114E/02 | Position (EU) No 3/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the marketAdopted by the Council on 1 March 2010 (1) | 17 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

Council

2010/C 114E/01

Position (EU) No 2/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning a European rail network for competitive freightAdopted by the Council on 22 February 2010 (1)

1

2010/C 114E/02

Position (EU) No 3/2010 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the marketAdopted by the Council on 1 March 2010 (1)

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22142]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 787 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-284, 
CP2023-287.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-22142 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 87

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 419)

3 to provide surveillance, research, and services aimed at

4 prevention of birth defects, and for other purposes, the

5 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc6 tions:

7 (1) In section 1 of the bill, strike ‘‘1997’’ and

8 insert ‘‘1998’’.

9 (2) In section 2 of the bill:

10 (A) In subsection (d) of section 317C of

11 the Public Health Service Act (as proposed to

12 be amended by such section 2) strike ‘‘1998’’

13 and insert ‘‘1999’’.

14 (B) In subsection (f) of section 317C of

15 the Public Health Service Act (as proposed to

16 be amended by such section 2) strike ‘‘1998’’

17 and all that follows through ‘‘2001’’ and insert

18 ‘‘1999, $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2000, and
2

SCON 87 ES

1 such sums as may be necessary for each of the

2 fiscal years 2001 and 2002’’.

Passed the Senate March 25, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 87

To correct the enrollment of S. 419.

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-115M

)

v. )

)

) DETENTION ORDER

RAUL MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Possession of Cocaine with the Intent to Distribute

Date of Detention Hearing: March 16, 2006

 The Court, having conducted a contested detention hearing pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention

hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the defendant

can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety

of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Lisca

Borichewski. The defendant was represented by Lee Covell.

//

//

Case 2:06-cr-00084-TSZ Document 11 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) There is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the drug

offense. The maximum penalty is in excess of ten years. There is

therefore a rebuttable presumption against the defendant’s release based

upon both dangerousness and flight risk, under Title 18 U.S.C. §

3142(e).

(2) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance. He is a citizen of

Mexico with no significant ties to the Western District of Washington. 

The defendant’s unstable resident history and lack of employment give

further reason of concern of nonappearance.

(3) Due to the nature of the instant offense, the Court finds defendant to be a

risk to the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) The defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

Case 2:06-cr-00084-TSZ Document 11 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00084-TSZ Document 11 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended January 31, 2010, of FusionTech, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
David Lu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 19, 2010
              By:
              /s/ David LuDavid
      LuChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(PrincipalExecutive
      Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

January 27, 1955

No. 58728.

protest 215908-K (New York).

#### Witkowski New York Agency, Inc., and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021 as modified, *supra)*and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Laredo Oil, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark See, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark See


Mark See


Chief Executive Officer








Date: September 27, 2011
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:02 PM

To: 'me@stphntylr.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Stephen J. Tyler (FAA-2015-0738)



### May 28, 2015

Dear Mr. Tyler:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0738). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**
     I, Michael Schradle, the chief financial officer of Micro LinearCorporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 ofchapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of myknowledge,
     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 27, 2004 (the “Report”), complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
August 11, 2004    /s/ Michael Schradle  Michael Schradle Chief Financial Officer