alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000875579
<NAME>                              Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    21351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            187500
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6911
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (173060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      21351
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     69198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (69198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (69198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (69198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.01)





</TABLE>
No. 64570.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/18120 (Portland, Oreg.)

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

November 21, 1966

No. P66/342.

#### Dayco Co. *v.*United States, protest 64/15710 (New York).

*831Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars, of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to and most resembling with respect to applicable use manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, *Bruckmann &*Lorbacher, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P67/184.

No. P67/185.

#### William Shaland Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 66/9687, etc. (New York).

#### William Shaland Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 66/21670,etc. (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1 (I)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  AmeriResource  Technologies,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Report"),  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date
hereof (the "Report), the  undersigned, Delmar Janovec, Chief Executive Officer
and the person performing functions  similar  to  that of a Principal Financial
Officer  of  the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, that:

      (1) The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations  of  the
Company.

                                    /s/ Delmar Janovec
Dated: September 18, 2007           ------------------
                                    Delmar Janovec
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                    Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--1EdTech Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 25, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 1EdTech Consortium, Inc. 
(``1EdTech Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Authentica Solutions, San Antonio, TX; Elula, Inc., 
Astoria, NY; Siemens, Munich, GERMANY; and Follett Higher Education, 
Westchester, IL, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, LearnPlatform, Raleigh, NC; Willo Labs, Whitestown, IN; 
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Pioneer RESA, Cleveland, GA; 
California CC Tech Center, Oroville, CA; OESIS, Santa Monica, CA; 
Northwest Tri County, Edinboro, PA; and Hamilton County, Chattanooga, 
TN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and 1EdTech Consortium intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, 1EdTech Consortium filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 8, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2023 (88 FR 44843).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22254 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     Date: May 11,2006

----
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

GINA HOWDEN,

Petitioner,

v.

DONNA CAYER, and

BELINDA STEWART,

Respondents.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0252-JLR-MAT

ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

The Court, having considered respondents’ motion for extension of time, and the balance

of the record, does hereby find and ORDER as follows:

(1) Respondents’ motion for an extension of time to file an answer to petitioner’s

federal habeas petition (Dkt. Nos. 13) is GRANTED. Respondents are directed to file and serve

their answer to the petition not later than July 26, 2006. Once respondents file their answer,

petitioner will have an opportunity to file a response to the answer as explained in this Court’s

Order for Service and Answer, dated May 8, 2006. (See Dkt. No. 8).

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondents, and to the Honorable James L. Robart.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2006.A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00252-JLR Document 15 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VISHAL SINGH UPPAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH WILLIES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5167FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the detainee’s account or the

average monthly balance in the detainee’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the detainee’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:06-cv-05167-FDB Document 3 Filed 04/14/2006 Page 1 of 2

Uppal v. Willies et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the detainee’s preceding month’s income credited to

the detainee’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the detainee’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the detainee’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the detainee account manager for the Northwest Detention Center.

DATED this 14th day of April, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05167-FDB Document 3 Filed 04/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7495

LAWRENCE W. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

PARKER EVATT; RICKIE HARRISON; JOHN DOE; ANNIE

ADDY; JOE HILTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge; Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-2545-3-21-BC)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence W. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Lee Reeves, Amy

Dare Lohr, LEWIS, REEVES & STONE, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order denying Appellant's objections to the removal of this case from state court. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny Appellant's motion for a stay of the district court's

proceedings and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) (Mod. 10/93) Judgment in a Civil Case "

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AMENDED 

 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

MAJOR MARGARET WITT,

v. CASE NUMBER: CV06-5195 RBL

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE

AIR FORCE; et al,

[ % ] Decision by Court. This action came under consideration before the Court. The issues have

been considered and a decision has been rendered.

THE COURT HAS ORDERED THAT 

The application of “Dont’s Ask Don’t Tell” to Major Margaret Witt does not significantly further

the government’s interest in promoting military readiness, unit morale and cohesion. Her discharge from

the Air Force Reserves violated her substantive due process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the

United States Constitution. She should be reinstated to the Air Force Reserve as soon as is practicable,

subject to meeting applicable regulations touching upon qualifications necessary for continued service.

DATED : 10/11/2011

 WILLIAM M. McCOOL 

Clerk

 /s/ Jean Boring 

(By) Deputy Clerk, Jean Boring

Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 196 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 1
#### TIKAL DISTRIBUTING CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1342.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 5, 2001.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36
From: anitasmarykay@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:41:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anita Meschberger

Stafford, KS 67578
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID CARROLL, STEPHENSON, an

individual, and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN McKAY, et al. ,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5054FDB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By order of June 20, 2002, the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik entered an order that, among

other things, provided that “any pro se complaint/petition submitted for filing in this district in which

David Carroll, Stephenson is a named plaintiff or purports to act as party representative shall be

subject to review by the Court prior to issuance of summons or service of process by the Court.” 

The Order further provides: “As to any non-habeas action, the Court will review the

complaint/petition to determine whether good cause exists to permit the action to proceed in light of

the claims raised therein and David Carroll, Stephenson’s past litigation abuses.” 

Plaintiff Stephenson has filed a cause of action against 22 individuals, including judges and

court officers, in which he alleges racketeering claims relating to “a series of off-shore scams” where

parties are lured to investing their time and good names and then claim the parties are indebted to

them for business expenses relative to the fictitious business enterprise.” 

Case 3:06-cv-05054-FDB Document 3 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Plaintiff’s Complaint was mistakenly processed by being opened and given a cause number by

the Clerk’s office when the above-referenced order was in place. Plaintiff’s Complaint is

preposterous and good cause does not exist to permit this cause of action to proceed. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s cause of action is DISMISSED. 

DATED this _____ day of February, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05054-FDB Document 3 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 65220.

#### Global Gifts & Gadgets, Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 293555-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of *kleenex*dispenser covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Zhengdong Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of China Distance Education Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended September 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: January 31, 2013



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Zhengdong Zhu      
|Name:  |  | Zhengdong Zhu          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer