alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

 

I, Joseph A. Venezia, do herebycertify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of WorldOmni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2020-B to Closed-EndServicing Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2020 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp.,as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)            Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K and coveredby the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made undermy supervision.

 

(ii)            Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand as of March 24, 2023.
No. P67/174.

#### Fusek’s *v.*United States,

protests 64/16736 and 64/13893 (Los Angeles).

Beokworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wood statuary similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fusek's*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 109, C.D. 2480), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Addendum to the Tribal-State Compact for Control of Class III Blackjack between the Prairie Island Indian Community and the State of Minnesota.

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on October 4, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, email                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov,*                         phone (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment updates the Compact to add definitions, regulatory standards for Class III Card Games, and provides for enforcement and disputes. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-22027 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
No. 66085.

#### Associated Custom House Brokers *v.*United States,

protest 59/21354 (Rochester).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
| Lino Lakes,   Minnesota               |   |
| July 14, 2006                         |   |

** **
Exhibit 99.2


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bion Environmental Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
that to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


/s/ Lawrence R. Danziger
----------------------------
Lawrence R. Danziger
Chief Financial Officer
January 17, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-18-2000
<CASH>                                          39,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,924
<INVENTORY>                                    150,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               271,242
<PP&E>                                         334,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 568,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,567
<BONDS>                                        136,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   568,041
<SALES>                                        842,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               842,359
<CGS>                                          727,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,828
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TROY DEIMERLY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVE JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5002 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff’s Letter/Motion regarding Lost Correspondence [Dkt. #63] will be

considered by the Court as an Objection to the Report and Recommendation. One

basis for the recommendation to grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment is

that plaintiff failed to respond in opposition to the motion in violation of Local Rule

CR 7(b). Plaintiff’s objection relates to the failure of Safford Creek Correction

Center to send out some of his legal mail dated September 5, 2006 and October 3,

2006. This lawsuit involves allegations that defendants acted with deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. This motion for summary judgment was

filed after plaintiff complained that his legal papers were not mailed out by Safford

Creek; therefore, his objection does not relate to or explain why he failed to respond

to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. As such, plaintiff’s objection is

DENIED. 

(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(3) The motion for summary judgment of Defendants Dave Johnson, Detective Sergeant

C. J. Chastain and Officer Ron Morella (Dkt. #49) is GRANTED; and

Case 3:06-cv-05002-RBL Document 72 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 18th day of December, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05002-RBL Document 72 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Retirement of $30 Billion of Government Bonds Held by the Federal Reserve Banks

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					,	Patman, Wright, 1893-1976					 and 	Eighty-Ninth Congress, 1965-1967. 						*Retirement of $30 Billion of Government Bonds Held by the Federal Reserve Banks : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Eighty-Ninth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 7601, July 6 and 7, 1965*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										July 6 and 7, 1965,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/281,			accessed on September 18, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b))

I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                   By:  /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Name: S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Title: Chairman of the Board and

    Chief Executive Officer

                   (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 23, 2010

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (a) and (b)

I, S. Emerson Lybbert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that: (1) the quarterly report of TGFIN Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                   By: /s/ S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Name: S. Emerson Lybbert

                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer

    (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 23, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution 
of the United States of America'', prepared under the direction of the 
Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a Senate document, 
with appropriate illustration.
    (b) There shall be printed--
            (1)(A) 440,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        House of Representatives, distributed in equal numbers to each 
        Member;
            (B) 100,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the 
        Senate, distributed in equal numbers to each Member;
            (C) 2,000 copies of the pamphlet for the use of the Joint 
        Committee on Printing; and
            (D) 1,400 copies of the pamphlet for distribution to the 
        depository libraries; or
            (2) if the total printing and production costs of copies in 
        paragraph (1) exceed $120,000, such number of copies of the 
        pamphlet as does not exceed total printing and production costs 
        of $120,000, with distribution to be allocated in the same 
        proportion as in paragraph (1).

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the pamphlet entitled ``The Constitution of the 
                      United States of America''.
```
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-123-CR

DATHAN HALL APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; TEX.

R. APP. P. 43.2(f). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: July 10, 2008
[Cite as Barnes v. Hanna, 2021-Ohio-1588.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

DEMETRIUS A. BARNES, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, : 

 No. 109859 

 v. : 

 

HOWARD HANNA, ET AL., : 

 

 Defendants-Appellees. : 

 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

 JUDGMENT: APPLICATION DENIED

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: May 3, 2021 

 

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas 

Case No. CR-15-600442-A 

 Cleveland Heights Municipal Court 

Case No. B8-2425-J 

Application for Reopening 

Motion No. 546019 

 

Appearances: 

Demetrius A. Barnes, pro se. 

 

MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J.: 

On April 22, 2021, the applicant, Demetrius A. Barnes, pursuant to 

App.R. 26(B) and State v. Murnahan, 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204 (1992) 

filed an application to reopen. In the caption, Barnes refers to two different cases, 

State v. Barnes, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-15-600442-A, and Barnes v. Howard 
Hanna, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109859. Thus, it is difficult to discern which case 

he seeks to reopen. For the following reasons, this court denies the application. 

In State v. Barnes, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-15-600442-A, (hereinafter 

the “Criminal Case”), on April 5, 2017, Barnes pled guilty to burglary and theft. The 

trial court imposed two years of community control on each count. The docket of 

this case shows that on March 13, 2019, the trial court terminated Barnes’s 

community control sanction. Barnes never appealed this case. 

In Barnes v. Howard Hanna, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109859 

(hereinafter the “Civil Case”), Barnes, pro se, tried to appeal from Cleveland Heights 

M.C. No. B8-2425-J, on July 31, 2020. However, on August 5, 2020, this court 

dismissed the appeal, because Barnes did not file the notice of appeal in the trial 

court as required by App.R. 3(A). He now files this application to reopen in which 

he refers to Howard Hanna, the sale of property, lack of notice of the sale, and lack 

of a contract. 

To the extent that Barnes is trying to reopen his appeal in the Civil 

Case, App.R. 26(B) is the wrong remedy. This rule applies only to appeals from 

judgments of convictions and sentences, in other words, only to criminal cases. To 

the extent that Barnes is trying to file a motion for reconsideration under 

App.R. 26(A), this court denies the motion, because such motions for 

reconsideration are to be filed within ten days of this court’s judgment. 

To the extent that Barnes is seeking to reopen the Criminal Case, 

App.R. 26(B) is inapplicable because there was never an appeal. To the extent that 
he is seeking to file a motion for delayed appeal under App.R. 5, this court declines 

to grant such a motion, because the criminal case does not appear to be the focus of 

the application and because Barnes has been released from his community control 

sanction after pleading guilty. 

Accordingly, this court denies the application to reopen. 

 

MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, JUDGE 

MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and 

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

V.

RYAN BROWN,

Defendant.

No. CR06-0125-MJP

 ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL 

MOTIONS DEADLINE AND 

TRIAL DATE

 This matter comes before the Court on a stipulated motion by the defendant, Ryan 

Brown, to continue the pretrial motions due date and trial date and the Court having 

considered the entirety of the record and files herein, the Court finds as follows:

1. John Henry Browne and Jessica Riley, attorneys for Ryan Brown, need additional 

time to review the discovery to adequately prepare pretrial motions and prepare for trial. 

2. Defense counsel cannot accomplish a complete review of the discovery and 

adequately prepare pretrial motions by the original cut-off date. Now, therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial motions due date be continued from 

May 25, 2006 to August 7, 2006 and the trial date be continued from June 19, 2006 to 

September 18, 2006, on the ground that the ends of justice served by a continuance 

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial under the 

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, and that the time between the date of this Order and 

the new trial date be excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, 

USC Sections 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 6th day of June, 2006.

/S/Marsha J. Pechman 

THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00125-MJP Document 17 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 2
Ryan Brown, represented by:

LAW OFFICES OF 

JOHN HENRY BROWNE

s/ John Henry Browne

WSBA # 4677

2100 Exchange Building

Seattle, Washington 98104

206-388-0777 fax 388-0780

johnhenry@jhblawer.com

Case 2:06-cr-00125-MJP Document 17 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bion Environmental Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
that to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David J. Mitchell
------------------------------------
David J. Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002