alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lmitch282@sc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laurie Mitchell

Conway, SC 29526
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laser-Pacific  Media Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James R. Parks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/James R. Parks
James R. Parks
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Laser-Pacific  Media  Corporation  and will be  retained  by
Laser-Pacific  Media  Corporation  and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**

I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that: 

          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Linear Corporation;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

|   | Date: August   16, 2006 |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |   |
|   | By:                     | /s/ Timothy   A. Richardson |
|   |                    |  |
|   |                    | Timothy A.   Richardson |
|   |                    | Chief   Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOTREX
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                                 33,065
<SECURITIES>                                           29,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                          81,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                            5,757
<INVENTORY>                                            82,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      328,188
<PP&E>                                                 37,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                         15,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        505,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 123,077
<BONDS>                                               186,211
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  233
<OTHER-SE>                                             62,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          505,359
<SALES>                                               235,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      265,400
<CGS>                                                 163,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         201,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      103,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        3,160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      6,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (130,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (8,233)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (116,690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (116,690)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (6.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (6.14)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Rafael Abdurachmanov, the Chief Financial Officer of iGenii, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: July 9, 2012
 By:
/s/ Rafael AbdurachmanovName: Rafael AbdurachmanovTitle: Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 61103.

protests 127635-K and 132906-K (New York).

#### Lampson, Fraser & Huth, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fox fur skins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388) and *Sam Forwand Co.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 232, C. D. 1829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

GEN ADS, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ANDREW BREITBART., et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C06-137JLR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court having been notified of the settlement of this matter and it appearing that no

issue remains for the court’s determination,

IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with

prejudice and without costs to any party.

In the event settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case,

provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and

pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. 

DATED this 6th day of July, 2006.

/s/ James L. Robart 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00137-JLR Document 37 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

IAN ELTON FUHR,

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR05-391RSM

 

 Minute Order

 Re: Settlement Conference

THIS matter came on for a settlement conference this date with U.S. Magistrate Judge J. K. Arnold

pursuant to Minute Order from the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. Counsel and defendant met with Judge

Arnold this date and reached a tentative settlement regarding all unresolved issues. Because some time is

required to implement the agreement the parties agreed as follows: 

(1) Judge Arnold will ask that Judge Martinez not reschedule the sentencing date in this matter until

Judge Arnold has been advised by all counsel that the settlement agreement has been fully implemented; 

(2) to track the matter for purposes of case management Judge Arnold will contact the parties on or

before January 8, 2007 if he has not been earlier advised that the conditions of settlement have been

implemented and a sentencing date scheduled.

Entered by Deputy Clerk, /s/Kelly Miller, this 8th day of December 2006.

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 839 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 66573.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/27266 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dish mops similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64603, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period ended  December  31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial  Officer of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the General
Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 16, 2005
No. 66569.

#### Associated Medical Products Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/24216, etc.,

abandoned February 9, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 58/22216.) Protests 61/5402, etc., abandoned February 2, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 59/673.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 63392.

Suit 4962.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States.

C.D. 1974 affirmed May 22, 1959. C.A.D. 707.
No. 62301.

#### Martin M. Jordan Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 283360-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of harness hardware for use with harness for dogs the same in all material respects as that involved in *International Expediters, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1868), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6878
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES ALEXANDER BRUNER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-93-F, CA-95-438-5-F) Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Alexander Bruner, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Franklin Askins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bruner , Nos. CR-94-93-F; CA-95-438-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 23, 1995). Regarding Appellant's claim that the district court erred in proceeding under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, we find the claim meritless. Wenote that the district court's order recognizes the discrepancy between the offense of conviction stated in the judgment (possession of an explosive) and the offense Bruner actually pled guilty towhich was "attempt to possess." Order at 6-7. To remedy this inconsistency, we suggest that the district court amend the judgment to reflect that Bruner was convicted of "attempt to possess" rather than "possession of an explosive." We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
  /s/ Robert C. SepuchaRobert C. SepuchaChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheKern River formation, southeastern San Joaquin Valley, California**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1529-D
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000960972
 
August 15, 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40134

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL ARREOLA-MARRON, also known as Leonardo Lopez-Ledezma,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CR-343-3

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Arreola-Marron has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Arreola-Marron has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 11, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40134 Document: 00514677491 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2018
No. 18-40134

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40134 Document: 00514677491 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/11/2018
No. 59290.

protests 191000-K, etc. San Francisco).

#### Zado Goldenberg & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60238.

protest 286845-K (New York).

#### Royal Bead Novelty Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*361Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opaque white glass stones of different sizes and shapes, not faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
----

|   | (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended April 30,      2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                           |

| Dated:      July 29, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Michael Frank Phillet           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Michael      Frank Phillet               |   |
|                      |   | President,      Chief Executive          |   |
|                      |   | Officer      and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
No. 66061.

#### D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States,

protest 60/27014 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vicente JAIMEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50059.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Vicente Jaimez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.