alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: musicianary.sf@mailaka.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:16:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Faith Ann Flores

Mount Joy, PA 17552
No. 62304.

#### H. Bates Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 19271-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Submitted by: Ralph J. Apel

18565 W 158th Terrace, Unit 201

Olathe, KS 66062

(913) 579-4529

Ralph@ReeceNichols.com

Request: A revision to FAA exemption number 11410 issued to Mr. Ralph J Apel. 

Petition: I request a revision to the limitations found in the Air Traffic Control Special Provisions

section, subpart C (Flight Planning requirements).

Currently, the limitations in point 2 restrict the operation of the UAS within 5 NM from 

an airport having an operational control tower, or 3 NM from an airport having a 

published instrument flight procedure but not having an operational control tower, or 2 

NM from an airport not having a published instrument flight procedure or an 

operational control tower, or 2 NM from a heliport, gliderport or seaport.

Because the Certificate of Waiver or Authorization restricts the use of the UAS above 

200 feet AGL, it is very likely that I will be conducting my operations in class G airspace.

Because of this, I am requesting unrestricted access (see and avoid) during all flight 

operations. In the event that I need to operate the UAS inside of airspace that is not 

Class G, I will contact the airport's air traffic control tower prior to flight operations as 

well as contact the tower after operations have ceased. This would be in addition to 

filing a distant NOTAM to warn of un-manned flight operations in the area during my 

projected hours of operation. 

I would not commence flight operations using the UAS in less than VFR minimum 

meteorological conditions. For this reason, it is highly unlikely that my UAS would 

encounter significant collision risk with aircraft flying at the recommended traffic 

pattern altitude of 1000 feet AGL (as prescribed in the Airplane Flying Handbook). 

Special care (and coordination with the operating air traffic control tower) would be 

observed when the UAS operations may be near the upwind/final leg of the active 

runway.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHRISTOPHER DENIS WHITE,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBIN ARNOLD-WILLIAMS, et al.,

Respondents.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1794-JCC-MAT

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Court, having reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and

Recommendation of Judge Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining

record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, and this action, are DISMISSED

without prejudice.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:05-cv-01794-JCC Document 5 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PAGE -2

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Judge

Theiler.

DATED this 21st day of December, 2005.

A

John C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01794-JCC Document 5 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 57769. protest 946474-G (San Francisco).

#### F. F. G. Harper Co. a/c The China Silk Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL MILAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5842 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the Motion to Dismiss, [Dkt. # 31], the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the report and

recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Mr. Colby Richards motion to be dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim

is GRANTED.

(3) Plaintiff will have thirty (30) days from entry of this order to file a Second Amended

Complaint that names a person as a defendant and states a cause of action. Plaintiff is

reminded that the court will need service copies and a filled out Marshals Service

form for the newly named defendant. If the documents are not received or the

Second Amended Complain fails to state claim this action will be dismissed.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant,

and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold .

DATED this 17th day of November, 2006AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05842-FDB Document 34 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1
From: doctom57@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:30:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Oswald Thomas, III

Memphis, TN 38134
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000875579
<NAME>                    WorldWideWeb Institute.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                           125863
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    149006
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 339438
<PP&E>                                                           335194
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    63248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  1016851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            727408
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             76
<OTHER-SE>                                                       290267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    1016851
<SALES>                                                         1745794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                1745794
<CGS>                                                            512438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    947483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (530000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  815873
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     117000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              698873
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     698873
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.09



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,025                  11,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,855                  47,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    229,750                 229,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               299,355                 299,355
<PP&E>                                         231,950                 231,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,032                 663,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          767,826                 767,826
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     95,482                  95,482
<COMMON>                                     4,693,336               4,693,336
<OTHER-SE>                                     346,718                 346,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,032                 663,032
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,646                  37,839
<CGS>                                          396,169                 110,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,636,801                 471,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               118,855                 523,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,811                  71,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,788,621)               (667,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,788,621)               (667,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,788,621)               (667,167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)                   (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)                   (.34)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**
I, Michael Schradle, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro LinearCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: August 11, 2004      By: /s/ Michael Schradle     Michael Schradle  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-3-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         5,568
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    49,826
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60,452
<PP&E>                                         36,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 86,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          30,095
<BONDS>                                        7,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   86,720
<SALES>                                        17,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,458
<CGS>                                          9,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (38)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
BULLETIN 1005 PLATE 5

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Géology by M.H.Staatz and H.L, Bauer, August 24, 25, 1950

‘TRUE_NORTH

anys
ange of sickensides;
a

ae rout, tog apa plo of sc
Conglomerate (Lake Bonnevile beds) a

MAP SECTION Strike and dip of beds

Gray dot SS a
illllly,

50 Cc}
Gontgur interval 10 feet
Datum assumed

MAP AND SECTIONS OF THE BELL HILL PROPERTY, JUAB COUNTY, UTAH
No. 58227.

protest 222950-K (New York).

#### The Olson Sales Agency *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Prom an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 61566.

#### Ciro of Bond Street, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 302063-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 63873.

protest 252096-K (New York).

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a vase similar in all material respects to that the subject of *F. Lunning, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1941), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/216. —

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/15246, etc. (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered -by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), -the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,271,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,785,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                    823,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,259,233
<PP&E>                                       1,992,923
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,013,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,778,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,981
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,043,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,778,349
<SALES>                                      7,822,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,822,455
<CGS>                                        3,897,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,897,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,615,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                   820,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,795,709
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,795,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        



</TABLE>