alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Compound Natural Foods, Inc., a company duly
formed under the laws of Nevada (the "Company"), for the year ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Joey Canyon, President (Chief Executive Officer) and
Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except that the financial statements for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 filed herewith are unaudited. Although the
Company's auditors are working to complete their audit, it was not completed at
the time this filing was due. The Company will amend this filing with audited
information once the audit is completed; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



January 14, 2009                          /s/ Joey Canyon
                                         Joey Canyon
                                         President and
                                         Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Compound Natural Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Compound
Natural Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER ON STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE PTM

(Channing Mayo; CR06-5031JKA) - 1

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

MAGISTRATE JUDGE J. KELLEY ARNOLD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHANNING MAYO,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 06-5031 JKA

ORDER ON STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DEADLINE

THE COURT having considered the stipulation of the parties, the records, and files

herein, hereby makes the following findings:

The Court finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance, that 

a continuance is necessary to ensure a fair and just resolution of this case, and that these

factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a more speedy trial,

within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

/ / /

Case 3:06-cr-05031-JKA Document 9 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

(PROPOSED) ORDER ON STIPULATED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE PTM

(Channing Mayo; CR06-5031JKA) - 2

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

/ / /

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that any pretrial motions are due no later than March

24, 2006. 

DONE this 22nd day of March, 2006.

/s/ J.KelleyArnold_____________________ THE HONORABLE J. KELLEY ARNOLD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Jennifer E. Wellman

WSBA # 29193

Attorney for Channing Mayo

Assistant Federal Public Defender 

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-1100

Fax No.: (206) 553-0120

Jennifer_Wellman@fd.org

s/ Lieutenant Sean Cogley

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Telephonic Approval

Case 3:06-cr-05031-JKA Document 9 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         3,298,849
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                   12,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,623,083
<PP&E>                                         324,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,140,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          96,802
<BONDS>                                        8,700,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,926,588
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,583,422)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,140,874
<SALES>                                        78,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               94,771
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,822,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             473,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,509,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,509,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,509,364)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.32)



</TABLE>
No. 68182.

#### China Bazaar and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/31556, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Mini Baehi stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 51 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 51

     Expressing the sense of Congress regarding elections for the 
      legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 1997

 Mr. Helms (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Thomas, and Mr. 
Mack) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of Congress regarding elections for the 
      legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Whereas the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on Hong Kong guarantees Hong 
        Kong a high degree autonomy in all matters except defense and foreign 
        affairs, and an elected legislature;
Whereas the United States policy regarding Hong Kong, as stated in the United 
        States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-383), is based on 
        the autonomy and self-governance of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong people;
Whereas a democratically elected legislature enabling the Hong Kong people to 
        elect representatives of their choice is essential to the autonomy and 
        self-governance of Hong Kong;
Whereas the provisional legislature of Hong Kong was selected through an 
        undemocratic process controlled by the People's Republic of China;
Whereas this provisional legislature has adopted rules for the creation of the 
        first legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region which 
        rules are designed to disadvantage and reduce the number of pro-
        democracy politicians in the legislature; and
Whereas the autonomy of Hong Kong cannot exist without a legislature that is 
        elected freely and fairly according to rules approved by the Hong Kong 
        people or their democratically elected representatives: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress urges Hong Kong Chief Executive C.H. Tung and the 
government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to schedule 
and conduct elections for the first legislature of the Hong Kong 
Special Administrative Region according to rules approved by the Hong 
Kong people through an election-law convention, referendum, or both.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DANIEL FROID

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5079JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

OTHER EXPENSES UNDER

THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

JUSTICE ACT

This matter comes before the court on a stipulated motion for attorney’s fees and other expenses

under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel Teal M. Parham should be awarded

attorney fees in the amount of $3.078.00, expenses totaling $52.40, and costs totaling $264.00 pursuant to

the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

DATED this 17th day of November, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05079-JKA Document 20 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1
From: froggy@durey.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:16:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Durey

Manchester, IA 52057
Order entered July 11, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00641
- CV PETER PARK, SUE PARK AND MEGAN CHOI , Appellant s V. NEW FALLS CORPORATION , Appellee On App eal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 05488

O RDER The clerk’s record in this appeal reflects appellant Megan Choi has filed for bankr uptcy

. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further action in this cause is automatically suspended. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2. Accordingly, the Court will take no action at this time on appellants’ June 29, 2022 motion to extend time to file notice of appeal and, for administrative purposes, ABATE S and tre at s this cause as a closed case. It may be reinstated on motion by any party showing,in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, that the appeal is permitted by

federal law or the bankruptcy court. See id. 8.3.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
From: jaedyo@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:24:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jason Young

Gentry, AR 72734
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
AMERICAN  NORTEL  COMMUNICATIONS,  INC.  THREE  MONTHS  ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
10-QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     1-13134
<NAME>     American Nortel Communications, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-01-2000
<CASH>                                   1,089,163
<SECURITIES>                             7,477,620
<RECEIVABLES>                            4,424,122
<ALLOWANCES>                               148,080
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        13,357,150
<PP&E>                                      83,759
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,397,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,874,246
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                21,980,202
<OTHER-SE>                               1,859,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,397,194
<SALES>                                  3,199,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,199,036
<CGS>                                    2,587,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,587,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           427,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            208,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                89,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        183,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               119,280
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .010
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .010


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.4

I, James B. Boyd, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 24, 2017                                           
|                                                               
|/s/ James B. Boyd                                              
|James B. Boyd Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that such  provisions  require the filing of an opinion of registiered
          public  accountants to accompany the  Partnership's  annual  financial
          statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 21, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HENRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5063 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 18) is GRANTED as to Claims 1, 3 and 5; and 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 1st day of May, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 43 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 11.1




                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


    Three Months Ended March 31,                                                  1997                   1996
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -- -------------------

<S>                                                                                  <C>                    <C>     
    Net income                                                                       $832,000               $171,000
                                                                           =================== == ===================

    Shares used in computing net income per share:

       Weighted average Common shares outstanding                                   7,902,036              7,564,830

       Weighted average Common shares issuable
       upon the exercise of outstanding stock
       options and warrants                                                         1,748,024              1,923,213

       Application of assumed proceeds towards
       repurchase of outstanding Common shares
       using the Treasury Stock method (a)                                        (1,095,571)            (1,091,366)
                                                                           ------------------- -- -------------------

              Shares used in computation                                            8,554,489              8,396,677
                                                                           =================== == ===================

    Primary net income per share                                                        $0.10                  $0.02
    ====================================================================== =================== == ===================
</TABLE>

     (a)  Computed using assumed proceeds of $8,547,000 and $8,267,000 and, with
          respect to the  repurchase of outstanding  common  shares,  an average
          market value of $7.80 and $7.58 in 1997 and 1996, respectively.

                                      E-2