alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 1 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 65 

[Report No. 110–1] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to amend the Higher 

Education Act of 1965 to reduce interest rates for student borrowers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2007 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to amend 

the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce interest 

rates for student borrowers. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 5) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce 

4 interest rates for student borrowers. All points of order 

5 against the bill and against its consideration are waived 

6 except those arising under clauses 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

7 The bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 65 RH 

1 shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 

2 without intervening motion except: (1) three hours of de3 bate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

4 ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 

5 and Labor; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

6 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5 pursuant to 

7 this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the pre8 vious question, the Chair may postpone further consider9 ation of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 1 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 65 

[Report No. 110

–1] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5) to 

duce interest rates for student borrowers. amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reJANUARY 16, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Cook, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 193]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered October 22, 1993, convicting him of assault in the second degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During an altercation that was instigated by the defendant and his companions, they attempted to rob the complainant, *523and the defendant cut the complainant’s neck with the jagged edge of a broken glass bottle, necessitating 125 stitches. The complainant’s girlfriend ran to a nearby telephone and dialed 911.

The tape recording of the telephone call to 911 was properly admitted into evidence under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. The telephone call was made while the altercation was occurring. Moreover, the girlfriend’s voice betrayed her concern for her boyfriend’s safety and her frustration due to her perception that the operator was not reacting quickly. Thus, the remarks were not the product of studied reflection *(see, People v Nieves,*67 NY2d 125; *see also, People v Edwards,*47 NY2d 493).

The tape recording of a second telephone call to 911 that was made by an unidentified caller while the altercation continued was properly admitted into evidence under the present sense exception to the hearsay rule. It contained a spontaneous description of events that occurred contemporaneously with the caller’s observations, and the description was sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of the other witnesses *(see, People v Brown,*80 NY2d 729; *cf., People v Orth,*201 AD2d 510).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 20

 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding foreign assistance for 
                    Mexico during fiscal year 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1997

 Mr. Coverdell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Helms) introduced 
 the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To disapprove the certification of the President under section 490(b) 
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding foreign assistance for 
                    Mexico during fiscal year 1997.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That pursuant to subsection 
(d) of section 490 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2291j), Congress disapproves the determination of the President with 
respect to Mexico for fiscal year 1997 that is contained in the 
certification (transmittal no. 97-18) submitted to Congress by the 
President under subsection (b) of that section on February 28, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
THE GORDON GROUP

James S. Gordon, President 

1419 Jadwin Avenue 

Richland, WA 99352

-------------------------

Telephone/Fax 509/943-4715 

email: jim@gordonworks.com

http://www.gordonworks.com

August 26, 1999 

Tri-Cities Office 

2715 St. Andrews Loop, Suite D 

Pasco, WA 99301 

The Honorable Doc Hastings: 

I’m a small business entrepreneur having an on-line Health & Nutrition business. The genesis 

of my Internet “problems” was in January 1999 when I decided to unsubscribe from three online 

newsletters. My on-line business was picking up and I didn’t have time to spend reading the 

many emails that I was being sent (8-10/day). 

I tried, unsuccessfully, to unsubscribe from early February 1999 to Mid-March 1999. The daily 

emails kept on coming. In early April 1999, I asked my Internet Service Provider (ISP) to help 

me put a stop to the emails...nothing changed...the emails kept on coming. 

I then asked my new Internet Presence Provider (IPP) to help me...nothing changed...the 

emails kept on coming. 

In June 1999, I asked a private attorney to send the “spammer” a “cease and desist” 

letter...nothing changed...the emails kept on coming. 

In July 1999 (actully June 1999), I asked the Washington State Attorney General’s Office in 

Kennewick, WA for help. They sent a letter to the “spammer”...nothing changed...the emails 

are still coming in-but at an accelerated pace. 

Yesterday, I received a computer “virus” from the “spammer”... the emails keep on coming. 

I have been in contact with the FBI as my business ad page was being "hacked". They say that 

they can not help as the US Attorney has a "threshold" amount of damages that a business 

must sustain to be able to receive help ($15,000)...we calculate our losses in excess of $20,000 

(roughly 15% of annual revenues) due to the hacking. Further, they said there is nothing that 

they could do about the spamming, either. The agents that I talked to acknowledged that a 

crime had been committed-but stated they did not have the resources... 

Where does a small business go when their lawyer, AG, and FBI can not provide relief? 

Thanks for listening! 

Regards, 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 136-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 136 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Washington, D.C. Office 

1323 Longworth House Office Building 

Washington, DC 20515-4704 

(202) 225-5816 

Fax: (202) 225-3251 

Tri-Cities Office 

2715 St. Andrews Loop, Suite D 

Pasco, WA 99301 

(509) 543-9396 

Fax: (509) 545-1972 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 136-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
No. 64571.

#### Associated Commercial Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 953062-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0577 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-042-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters Model EC135P1, 

EC135T1, EC135P2, EC135T2, EC135P2+, EC135T2+, and MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 385 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions are intended to prevent loss of concerned control axis and subsequent loss of 

control of the helicopter.

Costs: Inspecting for movement of the washers requires 1.5 work hours for a labor cost of $128 

per helicopter and $49,280 for the U.S. fleet. Replacing the screws and related work requires an 

additional 0.5 work-hours for a labor cost of $43. Screws cost $4 each while washers cost $10

each. We estimate the cost at $79 per repair. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Wilbanks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; NIH-DoD-VA Pain Management Collaboratory—Coordinating Center (U24).                    

*Date:*                         December 5, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         MARTA V Hamity, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *marta.hamity@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21483 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheRuby-Kuskokwim region, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:754
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959257
 
August 2, 2018
# Official Journal L 214/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 214 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6123 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 214

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6123 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1194 of 21 June 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1195 of 16 July 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1194 of 21 June 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

1

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1195 of 16 July 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (
  1
  )

1

3

| | | III   Other acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 18/18/COL of 9 February 2018 concerning the disease-free status of Norway regarding Marteilia refringens and Bonamia ostreae [2018/1196] | 5 |

III   Other acts

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Delegated Decision No 18/18/COL of 9 February 2018 concerning the disease-free status of Norway regarding Marteilia refringens and Bonamia ostreae [2018/1196]

Marteilia refringens

Bonamia ostreae

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
From: fajump@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:19:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Jump

Garner, IA 50438
September 28, 1960

No. 64617.

Suit 5014.

#### United States *v.*Glanson Co.

A.R.D. 110 reversed June 14, 1960. C.A.D. 740.
From: maryrita@webenet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:10:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

mARY GRIFFIN

Coos Bay, OR 97420
# Official Journal C 315/21 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 315 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4721 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 315

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4721 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 315/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 315/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3662 — XSTRATA/WMC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 315/3 | Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Bulgaria on its participation in the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007 | 3 |
| 2004/C 315/4 | Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Romania on its participation in the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007 | 3 |
| 2004/C 315/5 | State aid — United Kingdom — State aid C 39/2004 (ex N 613/2003) — Nuclear Decommissioning Agency — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 315/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 315/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3662 — XSTRATA/WMC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2004/C 315/3

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Bulgaria on its participation in the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007

3

2004/C 315/4

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Romania on its participation in the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007

3

2004/C 315/5

State aid — United Kingdom — State aid C 39/2004 (ex N 613/2003) — Nuclear Decommissioning Agency — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN