alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Solarte Hotel Corporation  (the "Company") on Form  20-F for the  period  ending  June 30, 210, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Karen Campo, President of Esthetics World, the  Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 24, 2011

/s/ Karen Campo

Karen Campo, for Esthetics World

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)



|Date
|----
|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
DUANE MONTRIK BURTON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00105-F-1)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duane Montrik Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Michael Gordon James, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton , No. 7:00-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2009). We further deny Burton’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 60540.

#### C. A. Swanson & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 259198-K/6940 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

In Re: 

 NEAL D. HARRINGTON fdba ALLSTATE

INSURANCE, WEEKIRK DEVELOPMENTS

and ABBIE SL JOSEPH-HARRINGTON fdba

A LITTLE BIT OF HEAVEN,

Debtors,

Case No. C06-5100FDB

ORDER VACATING EARLIER

ORDER AND SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

The Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs, through its counsel, David B. Schumacher, moves for an

order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) setting aside the Court’s Order of Dismissal entered October

17, 2006. The dismissal was entered because it appeared from the docket that a briefing schedule

had been entered on May 18, 2006, a schedule set forth by the Bankruptcy Clerk when entering the

Certificate of Bankruptcy Record on Appeal. [Dkt. # 5] Under that schedule, the opening brief was

due June 27, 2006, the response brief was due July 27, 2006, and the reply brief was due by August

10, 2006. On May 18, 2006, the date of the Bankruptcy Clerk’s Certification of the Record on

appeal, the District Court Clerk entered a notice on the docket (unnumbered) that the Bankruptcy

Appeal was ready for consideration on August 11, 2006, the day after the final brief was to have

been filed. Notice of that entry was sent to counsel of record. There was no activity in this case –

evidently not even an inquiry – until the Court entered its Dismissal on October 17, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-05100-BHS Document 9 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Since Counsel for Appellant Veterans’ Affairs has filed a motion to set aside the dismissal,

the Court has made inquires with the Bankruptcy Clerk’s Office and has learned that while the

pleadings associated with Docket entry No. 5 were mailed in hard copy to the non-electronic filers,

the Certificate screen for Docket entry No. 5 showing the briefing schedule was not mailed to

counsel in hard copy. It is not clear why Mr. Schumacher, who, according to the Bankruptcy

Clerk’s Office, receives electronic notices from that Court, was not aware of the briefing schedule. 

Nevertheless, owing to the confusion over receipt of notice of the briefing schedule, the Court will

set aside its Order of Dismissal entered on October 17, 2006 and will set a new briefing schedule. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Motion of Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs to Set Aside Order of Dismissal [Dkt. # 7] is

GRANTED, and the Court’s Order entered October 17, 2006 [Dkt. # 6] is VACATED; 

2. The following briefing schedule is set: 

• Appellant’s Brief due December 29, 2006;

• Appellee’s Response due January 29, 2007;

• Appellant’s Reply due February 12, 2007.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05100-BHS Document 9 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1


                       FILENE'S BASEMENT CORP.         EXHIBIT 11

                   Computation of Net Income per Common Share

                             (dollars in thousands)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Thirteen Weeks       Thirteen Weeks
                                                Ended                 Ended
                                             May 3, 1997           May 4, 1996
                                            --------------       --------------
<S>                                           <C>                   <C> 
The computation of net in-
  come available and adjusted
  shares outstanding follows:

     Net income as
       reported ...........................   $      557            $      564
                                              ==========            ==========
Net income used for
  primary and fully diluted
  computations ............................   $      557            $      564
                                              ==========            ==========

Weighted average number
  of common shares
  outstanding .............................   20,622,580            20,500,589

Add (where dilutive):
     Assumed exercise of those
       options that are common
       stock equivalents net of
       treasury shares deemed to
       have been repurchased at
       average market price for
       the period .........................      773,476               412,742
                                              ----------            ----------

Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding used for
  primary computations ....................   21,396,056            20,913,331
                                              ==========            ==========

Add: Additional dilution assuming
  exercise of options net of
  treasury shares deemed to have
  been repurchased at the end of
  the period market price ................             -                     -

Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding used for fully
  diluted computations ....................   21,396,056            20,913,331
                                              ==========            ==========
</TABLE>
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 3 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 4 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 5 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 6 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 7 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 8 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 9 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 10 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 11 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 12 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 13 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 14 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 15 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 16 of 17
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 1 Filed 04/12/06 Page 17 of 17
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. J. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the convening of the Second Session of the One Hundred 
                            Fifth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the second regular 
session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress shall begin at noon on 
Tuesday, January 27, 1998.
    Sec. 2. Prior to the convening of the second regular session of the 
One Hundred Fifth Congress on January 27, 1998, as provided in the 
first section of this joint resolution, Congress shall reassemble at 
noon on the second day after its Members are notified in accordance 
with section 3 of this joint resolution.
    Sec. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to assemble whenever, in 
their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate November 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 To provide for the convening of the Second Session of the One Hundred 
                            Fifth Congress.
```
#### Ronald J. FARRELLY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 00-3425.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: July 13, 2001.

Before LOURIE, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
From: jpobanz@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:35:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeri Pobanz

Grand Island, NE 68803
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 201 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 

Administration in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD (for herself and Mr. EHLERS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

House Administration in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on House Admin4 istration hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $10,214,461 for the One Hundred 

9 Tenth Congress. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 201 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,033,242 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2007, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $5,181,219 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2008, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 34 Filed 03/07/08 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 34 Filed 03/07/08 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2242

NELSON RIVAS ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE 

SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00175-IMK-JSK)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelson Rivas Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell 

Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West 

Virginia, Jonathan S. Cohen, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, U.S. 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Rivas Alvarez appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his civil complaint 

filed pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (West 

2007 & Supp. 2012), and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.

§ 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. Alvarez v. United States Dep’t of Treasury, 

No. 1:10-cv-00175-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 24, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-2 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 41 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Return-Path: <mailcenter309104@vmadmin.com>

Delivered-To: virtual-gordonworks_com-jim@gordonworks.com 

Received: (qmail 31266 invoked by uid 10003); 20 Jun 2004 05:43:30 -0000

Delivered-To: virtual-gordonworks_com-jay@gordonworks.com 

Received: (qmail 31263 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2004 05:43:30 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO vm125.vmadmin.com) (216.64.222.125)

 by ns48.webmasters.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2004 05:43:30 -0000

Received: from vmadmin.com (192.168.3.11)

 by vm125.vmadmin.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2004 00:43:27 -0500

X-ClientHost: 106097121064103111114100111110119111114107115046099111109

X-MailingID: 309104

From: Scooters Unlimited <ScootersUnlimited@vmadmin.com>

To: Jay <jay@gordonworks.com> 

Errors-To: errors@vmadmin.com 

Reply-To: Scooters Unlimited <ScootersUnlimited309104@replies.virtumundo.com>

Subject: You may be eligible for a power wheelchair at no cost to you. 

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/html

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This has been presented by 

Scooters Unlimited, 02:13 AM 6/20/2004, You may be eligible for a power wheelchair at no cost to you. Page 1 of 2

Printed for 10/19/2006 CONFIDENTIAL VM 039043

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-2 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 3
Southeast Mobility Group LLC/Scooters Unlimited 

1702 Ridgewood Ave. Suite A&B 

Daytona Beach, FL 32117 

If you wish to unsubscribe from Scooters Unlimited in the future, please visit us here.

Scooters Unlimited, 1702 Ridgewood Ave., Suites A&B, Daytona Beach, FL 32117

Scooters Unlimited, 02:13 AM 6/20/2004, You may be eligible for a power wheelchair at no cost to you. Page 2 of 2

Printed for 10/19/2006 CONFIDENTIAL VM 039044

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-2 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 10.1.3
                      FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
                     THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                 KEY EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
             AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 11, 1991,
                    EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.5 of The Coca-Cola Company Key
Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January
1, 1990 by indenture dated March 11, 1991, which was last amended
by the Third Amendment (the "Plan"), the Corporate Retirement
Plan Administrative Committee (formerly the Key Executive
Retirement Plan Committee) (the "Committee") has the authority to
amend the Plan; and

WHEREAS, by resolutions duly adopted, the Committee has approved
an amendment to the Plan to clarify the meaning of "Pay" by
correcting a scrivener's error contained in the definition
thereof;

NOW THEREFORE, Section 2.1(1) of the Plan is hereby amended,
effective January 1, 1990, by deleting the words "incentive plan"
from the end of part (c) in the second sentence thereof, so that
the same shall read as follows:

	"(c)  severance payments made after involuntary termination
        under a formal severance pay policy in a form other than a
        lump-sum payment, and"

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized representatives
of the Committee have executed this Fourth Amendment to the Plan as
of the 16th day of February, 1999.  Except as specifically amended
hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to
this Fourth Amendment.


                                  CORPORATE RETIREMENT PLAN
	      	                  ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

                                  By:  /s/ Peggy Horn
                                       Chairman


ATTEST:

/s/ Barbara S. Gilbreath
Secretary
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 22 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 10 of 10
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 E0 04 5 . FARAH et a l. v

. MARTI N EZ et a l.
Ap p el l an t s Al i ci a Fara h , Fo xx i e Real Es t at e In ves t m en t s , LLC, Co l o s s al P r o p ert y Dev el o p m en t , LLC, Eri c W al t o n , an d Pri st in e Pal aces , LLC (co l l ect i v e l y

“ Ap p el l an t s ”) fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry rev i ew i n t h i s Co u rt on Ap ri l 1 5, 2 0 1 9

. Th e ap p l i cat i o n d id n o t i n cl u d e t h e fi le s t am p ed Cert i fi cat e o f Im

m ed i at e Rev iew as req ui red u n der Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 0 (c).

On Ap ri l 1 6 , 2 01 9 , Ap p el l an t s fi l ed t h e i n st an t em erg en cy m o t i o n , seek i n g an

ex t en s i o n o f t i m e to refi l e th e ap p l i cat i o n wi t h th e fi l e s t am p ed co p y o f th e Cert i fi cat e

o f Im m ed i at e Rev i ew. Ho w ev er, u nd er o u r ru l es , t h ere are no ex t en s i o n s o f t i m e to fi le i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p l i c a t i o n s

. See Co u rt o f A p p eal s Ru l e 30 (i ). Acco rd in g l y , t h e

em erg en cy

m o t i o n i s DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 17, 2019

04/17/2019