alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), Ross Lavnikevich and Rafael Abdurachmanov, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of iGenii, Inc, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of iGenii, Inc fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of iGenii, Inc as of the dates presented and the results of operations of iGenii, Inc for the periods presented.











/s/ Ross Lavnikevich


Ross Lavnikevich,


Chief Executive Officer

















/s/ Rafael Abdurachmanov


Rafael Abdurachmanov,


Chief Financial Officer




Date: November 22, 2011














The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to iGenii, Inc and will be retained by iGenii, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00247-CV

In the Matter of M. A. L.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. J-21,897, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The district court found beyond a reasonable doubt that M.A.L. committed criminal

trespass and adjudicated him delinquent. The court committed him to the Texas Youth Commission

for an indeterminate period.

M.A.L. stipulated at trial that he intentionally and knowingly entered the premises

of Lanier High School with notice that such entry was forbidden and without the permission of a

school employee, who is the owner of the school for this purpose. By his sole issue on appeal,

M.A.L. contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because he should have been

tried under a more specific statute with a less severe punishment range. Compare Tex. Educ. Code

Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996) (trespass on school grounds, Class C misdemeanor), with Tex. Pen. Code

Ann. § 30.05 (West 2004-05) (trespass, Class B misdemeanor). He argues that because the lesser

offense is a Class C misdemeanor and is not within the definition of delinquent conduct, the district

court lacked jurisdiction. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 51.03(a) (West Supp. 2004-05);see also Tex.

Const. art. V, § 19 (justice court has original jurisdiction over offenses punishable by fine only).
2

This Court has recently concluded in a similar juvenile case that these statutes are not

in pari materia, that the State could charge the juvenile under either statute, and that the district court

had jurisdiction over the allegation of criminal trespass against the juvenile. See In re J.M.R., 149

S.W.3d 289, 294-95 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.); see also In re K.M., No. 03-04-00315-CV,

2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 4661, at *2 (Austin June 17, 2005, no pet. h.). This appeal is controlled by

that decision. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: July 13, 2005
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3178

___________________________

Kevin Tharp, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant ,

v. CitiMortgage, Inc., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee .

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: June 2, 2020 Filed: June 5, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Tharp appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his pro se action against CitiMortgage, Inc. Upon careful de novo review, we affirm. We agree that Tharp

1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.failed to state a claim regarding interference with his right to redemption, as he did

not plead facts sufficient for the court to infer that CitiMortgage was liable for any wrongdoing. See Minn. Stat. § 580.23; Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). We also agree that Tharp’s claims arising under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and his state law claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress, were time-barred. See 12 U.S.C. § 2614; Minn. Stat. §§ 541.05, 541.07. Finally, we deny the request in Tharp’s reply brief to supplement the record on appeal. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc. , 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
No. P69/68.

protest 66/47336-1557 (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Newman, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of pistol grips, which are chiefly used as parts of motion picture cameras, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. E. Bernard &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 143, C.D. 2744), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
----

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August      19, 2008 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |                          |   |
|   |                 |   |                          |   |
|   |                 |   | By:                           | /s/  Douglas      J. Kramer, CEO |
|   |                 |   |                          | Douglas      J. Kramer |
|   |                 |   |                          | Principal      Executive Officer |

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August      19, 2008 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |                          |   |
|   |                 |   |                          |   |
|   |                 |   | By:                           | /s/  Paul      Smiertka, CFO |
|   |                 |   |                          | Paul      Smiertka |
|   |                 |   |                          | Principal      Financial Officer |

----
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2012-1033

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM266AD

A330-27-3137, R02 --- 1/18/10

A330-27-3137, R01 --- 12/6/07

A330-27-3137 --- 3/20/07

A340-27-4136, R02 --- 2/24/10

A340-27-4136, R01 ---12/6/07

A340-27-4136 --- 3/20/07

A330-92-3046, R04 --- 7/16/10

A330-92-3046, R05 --- 11/7/11

A340-92-4056, R03 --- 7/16/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

DEPTH OF SOIL SAMPLE, IN FEET
2

BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 15

MAP SHOWING RELATIONSHIP OF THE SAMPLE TRAVERSE
TO KNOWN LEAD VEINS

DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD, ZINC, AND TOTAL HEAVY METALS IN SOIL NEAR POINT M IN THE POTOSI AREA

1 a
i fi
p 1
H
) f
f
I H
iI It
f
1 f
I
f
11 { i
i { t
1
N
L q
{| q !
I a |
II 1 i
| | i !
H i
I 1 1
I!
I. i ‘ i } I.
i | | 1
! | |
|
| I 4
i
! l
i I
f
1000
ZINC, IN PARTS PER MILLION .
9 500 —
LEAD OR HEAVY METALS, IN PARTS PER MILLION
DISTANCE ALONG TRAVERSE IN FEET
0 150 0
a 40 60 190 120 140 § 160 1 180 190 290 210 220 280 390
300° ~
yo° EXPLANATION
280° { anenenne
Approximate position and direction
EXPLANATION of known lead vein (located by disturbed soil)
2608 Can
___ Sample point and the
nae distance along traverse, in feet
se
GD Direction and estimated amount
a 2208 of land slope
Lead and heavy metals
values fall on same line 2108
<—_
Component of slope 2000
parallel to traverse 190° 45° NS
~
180° f ~
PERCENT OF RESIDUAL
MATERIAL IN SOIL 1708
1606 SAL
Less than 25 percent — ~
25 to 50 percent Moe
50 to 100 percent 1208
1006 {
Where graphs are blank
data not available aoe
Methods of sample digestion for
heavy metals test and lead and 60°
zinc tests were different, hence
data are not directly comparable
40° | i
bp
20°
. O°
aN
N
N
. 9 40 Feet
t__ 4

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 9
Before the First Division,

February 3, 1955

No. 58737.

protests 237438-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. E. Laszlo et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and *275the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Husayn Gaskin, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 987]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before he committed the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Accordingly, the same act did not provide the basis of his convictions of both crimes and the imposition of consecutive sentences was not prohibited *(cf., People v Ali,*188 AD2d 476; *People v Ellis,*139 AD2d 662). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
March 27, 1957

No. 60586.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 250414-K/6590 and 254997-K/6810.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Before the First Division,

April 29, 1965

No. 69274.

#### Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 63/4314 (New York).

*420Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**
     I, Michael Schradle, the chief financial officer of Micro Linear Corporation (the “Company”),certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that,to the best of my knowledge,
     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 (the“Report”), complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
May 18, 2005         /s/ Michael W. Schradle   Michael W. Schradle   Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CALVIN ROUSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5183RJB

ORDER TO PROVIDE SERVICE

DOCUMENTS

This Civil Rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint as

ordered by the court. (Dkt. # 19). The complaint is 13 pages long and there are 22 pages of supporting

exhibits. Only one copy of the complaint and exhibits was provided by the plaintiff. The court will need

one full copy of the documents and a filled out Marshal Service form for each defendant.

The clerks office is directed to send Mr. Rouse seven Marshal service forms.

Plaintiff will fill out a form for each defendant and provide a copy of the complaint with

exhibits on or before October 20th, 2006 or the court will recommend this action be dismissed for failure

to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and note this matter for October 20th,

2006.

DATED this 18th day of September 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05183-RJB Document 21 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Safe Bulkers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report.

The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used
or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date:
February 23, 2010

| |                                      | 
| | ------------------------------------ | 
| | /s/ KONSTANTINOS ADAMOPOULOS         | 
| | Konstantinos Adamopoulos             | 
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director | 

Exhibit 13.2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff/Respondent,

v.

JAMES DALTON BELL,

Defendant/Petitioner.

 NO. C06-5148FDB

 CR00-5731FDB 

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Defendant’s Motion For

Renewed Action in the Case.

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as

follows:

The Court construes Defendant’s Motion For Renewed Action in case as a motion under 28

U.S.C. §2255, and incorporates by reference Defendant’s Notice of Lack of Sentencing, (Dkt. No.

Case 3:06-cv-05148-FDB Document 6 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 - 2

221), under civil case no. C06-5148FDB.

Defendant shall have 30 days from entry of this order to show cause why his motion should

not be construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255.

The clerk of the court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of

record.

DATED this 22nd day of March 2006.

A The Honorable Franklin D. Burgess

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05148-FDB Document 6 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Linear Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: May 18, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000875579
<NAME>                             Spectrum Pharmaceutical Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    20000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            511250
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                           6911
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (498161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      20000
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    113750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (113750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (113750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (113750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.02)





</TABLE>