alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| ·   | Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships. |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Provide public disclosure of information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies. |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing one’s independent judgment to be subordinated. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of one’s work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Confidential information acquired in the course of one’s work will not be used for personal advantage. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to Bluewave |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Proactively promote and be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers, in the work environment and the community. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources employed or entrusted. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = LGA Operator = 0001(Exclude) Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future) 01/11/2010 11:39:04



### Query Parameters:

### 01/11/2010 11:39:04

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

LGA
98 AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 37 ACA AIR CANADA 7 ASH MESA AIRLINES 84 AWI AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION 65 CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 20 CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 29 COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 42 COM COMAIR AIRLINES 81 DAL DELTA AIR LINES 118 EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 5 FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 10 FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 17 JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 10 JIA JETSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 6 JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 2 MES MESABA AVIATION 22 NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 63 NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 130 PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 31 RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 15 SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 58 TCF SHUTTLE AMERICA 38 TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 40 UAL UNITED AIRLINES 92 USA US AIRWAYS

Page 2
From: MPIERCE98@YAHOO.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:50:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

MARK PIERCE

Owensboro, KY 42303
No. P67/157.

#### A. C. Gilbert Co. and Milton Snedeker Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 65/14792, etc. (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” covered by the foregoing protests consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Polk's Model Graft Hobbies Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
No. 69251.

#### Louis Marx & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/20404, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

January 27, 1955

No. 58731.

protests 194755-K, etc. (New York).

#### Rorstrand, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: shredmill@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:06:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doug Stukes

Eddy, TX 76524
| 1.     | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending Decemer 31, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Metha Energy      Solutions Inc. |

|                      | Metha      Energy Solutions Inc. |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      |                             |
| Date:      March 31, 2010 | By:                    | /s/      Jesper Toft |
|                      |                             | Jesper      Toft |
|                      |                             | Chief      Executive Officer, |
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 93

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to documentation requirements for physicians who submit claims to Medicare for office visits

and for other evaluation and management services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 4, 1998

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself and Mr. COVERDELL) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to documentation requirements for physicians who submit claims

to Medicare for office visits and for other evaluation

and management services.

Whereas adequate documentation is necessary to assure quality and appropriateness of services;

Whereas effective strategies to eliminate waste, fraud, and

abuse in the Medicare program should not result in excessive documentation requirements being imposed on

physicians that will interfere with patient care;

Whereas if the documentation in the medical record does not

meet program requirements, payments for such claims

may be denied and an investigation into potential fraud

and abuse may result;
2

•SCON 93 IS

Whereas the administrative complexity of the documentation

requirements may increase the risk that physicians will

make inadvertent coding errors; and

Whereas inadvertent errors or legitimate differences of opinion on coding and documentation of physician services

under current law are not grounds for concluding that

fraud has occurred: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Health Care Financing Administration should—

4 (1) further postpone its plans to implement the

5 documentation guidelines for evaluation and man6 agement services, as currently constituted;

7 (2) continue consultation with organizations

8 representing physicians on how to reduce the com9 plexity of any such guidelines prior to their use by

10 Medicare or its agents in review of claims submitted

11 to the program;

12 (3) conduct a pilot study of any such docu13 mentation requirements prior to use in audits and

14 other review activities; and

15 (4) assure that any such documentation guide16 lines, if applied by Medicare or its agents in review

17 activities, contribute to quality care and do not de18 tract from good patient care by requiring physicians

19 to spend undue time documenting their services—at

20 the expense of spending less time with patients—or
3

•SCON 93 IS

1 lead to sanctions being imposed for unintentional

2 coding and documentation errors.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

RAILEN JAINI WHEELER,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5244

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 History of violating prior court orders. ( X) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( x ) Association with alias forms of identification.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 December 23, 2005.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05000-RBL Document 7 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00156

- CV

CITY OF HALTOM CITY, TEXAS APPELLANT

V.

TEXAS MIDSTREAM GAS

SERVICES, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

AND

NO. 02

- 10

- 001 68

- CV

CITY OF HALTOM CITY, TEXAS APPELLANT

V.

TEXAS MIDSTREAM GAS

SERVICES, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant = s unopposed A Motion To Dismiss

Consolidated Appeal s

. @ It is the court = s opinion that the motion should be

granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal s

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

Costs of the appea ls shall be paid by the party incurring them , for which let

execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 23, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CELERINO CARRASCO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5104RJB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 5), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order.

DATED this 22nd day of June, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05104-RJB Document 6 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1
December 30, 1952

No. 57013.

Suit 4701.

#### United States *v.*Old Rose Distributing Co.

C. D. 1347. (Appeal dismissed December 4, 1951.) (See Abstract 57014 below, relating to suit 4702.)
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:

Hi Dennis and Brian, Joleen Jones <joleen@us.ibm.com> Monday, August 06, 2012 12:09 PM Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Rhinelander, WI air carrier 

## ZO!l**·~** 

## b '3: r:: ,.

- .,J

My name is Joleen Jones. I am a consultant for IBM and Iflyto client sites every week. My home is in Madison, WI and mycabin is in Rhinelander, WI. When Northwest and then Delta operated out of the Rhinelander airport, Iflew into or out of the Rhinelander airport a couple times a month. Since Frontier has been providing service, I have been flying into/out of Wausau, WI or driving backto Madison. I support SkyWest as the air carrierfor Rhinelander, WI. Theywill fly under Delta Connection and have2 flights a day. Iam Platinum, soon to be Diamond, Medallion memberwith Delta so it is important to meto have an airline that is affiliated with Delta. Thankyou, Joleen Jones JoleenJones IBM Certified Consultant IBM Global Business Services Email: joleen@us.ibm.com Mobile: 608-217-1880

1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K/A of Imperial Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rob Durbin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:      May 16, 2011





/s/ Rob DurbinRob DurbinPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                3,756,555
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                        86,295,020
<ALLOWANCES>                          4,925,000
<INVENTORY>                             821,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     78,731,053
<PP&E>                                1,378,884
<DEPRECIATION>                          706,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       89,768,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                51,970,329
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                             21,836,466
<OTHER-SE>                           15,961,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         89,768,448
<SALES>                             118,538,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    127,239,535
<CGS>                               110,178,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       114,260,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,670,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      2,044,198
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,081,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,264,849
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,225,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   4,039,849
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          4,039,849
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.79
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





GREENWOOD GOLD RESOURCES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Greenwood Gold Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Branislav Jovanovic, as Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Branislav JovanovicName:
Branislav JovanovicTitle:
Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)