alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the periodic report of Knight Capital Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dean Sessions, the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Dean SessionsPrincipal Financial Officer Date: August 28, 2009
Case No. 12,938.

#### The SLAUGHTER HOUSE CASE.

[See Case No. 8,408.]
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     Exhibit 11


                    FILENE'S BASEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                      Thirty-nine Weeks Ended             Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                    ----------------------------      ----------------------------
                                    November 1,      November 2,      November 1,      November 2,
                                       1997             1996             1997             1996
                                    -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
<S>                                  <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>       
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding          20,722,787       20,530,131       20,818,470       20,576,153

Assumed exercise of stock
  options net of treasury
  shares deemed to have been
  repurchased at an average
  market price for the period         1,244,596          205,690        1,357,755          453,750
                                     ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
Weighted average primary
  Shares outstanding                 21,967,383       20,735,821       22,176,225       21,029,903


Assumed exercise of stock
  options net of treasury
  shares deemed to have been
  repurchased at the end of
  the period market price                16,026             --               --               --
                                     ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------


Weighted average fully diluted
  shares outstanding                 21,983,409       20,735,821       22,176,225       21,029,903
                                     ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
</TABLE>
----

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      2, 2009 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                  |   |                          |   |
|   |                  |   | By:                           | /s/  Douglas J. Kramer,      CEO |
|   |                  |   |                          | Douglas      J. Kramer |
|   |                  |   |                          | Principal      Executive Officer |

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      2, 2009 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                  |   |                          |   |
|   |                  |   | By:                           | /s/  Michael T. Adams,      PFO |
|   |                  |   |                          | Michael      T. Adams |
|   |                  |   |                          | Principal      Financial Officer |

----
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT - 1 

Case No. C06-5324 FDB

THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES, N.V., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SEASIDE TRADING LLC, A Washington 

limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. C06-5234 FDB 

ORDER OF DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT 

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: 

July 28, 2006 

THIS MATTER having come on for consideration upon the motion of Plaintiff, 

Safmarine Container Lines, N.V., for entry of default judgment, the Court having 

heretofore entered an Order of Default against Defendant Seaside Trading, LLC and after 

review of the records and files herein, including Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment 

and the affidavits of Michael Atkins and Daniel S. Potts in support thereof, and being 

otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby 

ORDERED and adjudged that Plaintiff Safmarine Container Lines, N.V. shall have 

judgment against Defendant Seaside Trading, LLC as follows: 

Case 3:06-cv-05234-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT - 2 

Case No. C06-5324 FDB

1. Judgment Creditor: Safmarine Container Lines, N.V. 

 

 2. Judgment Debtor: Seaside Trading, LLC 

 3. Principal Judgment Amount: $3,800.00 

 4. Attorney’s Fees: $2,577.50 

 5. Costs: $ 533.99 

 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND OWING: $6,911.49 

 6. Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Daniel S. Potts 

 Holmes Weddle & Barcott, P.C. 

 999 3rd Ave, Suite 2600 

 Seattle WA 98104. 

 DATED this 3rd day of October 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Presented by: 

HOLMES WEDDLE & BARCOTT 

 /s/Daniels S. Potts 

Daniel S. Potts, WSBA #32866 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

G:\4642\20252\Pldg\Ord - Judgment 6.26.06.doc 

Case 3:06-cv-05234-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1




Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
No. 68508.

protest 62/12334 (New York).

#### James Betesh Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Hibachis similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Oregon Gold, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




(Registrant)

OREGON GOLD, INC.By:

/s/ Yinfang YangYinfang Yang, CEO, CFODate:

March 31, 2010
EXHIBIT 32





BLUFOREST INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bluforest Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles Miller as Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 18, 2013
By:
/s/ Charles MillerName:
Charles MillerTitle:
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the periodic report of IBI Acquisitions, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Jay Lutsky, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/Jay Lutsky Principal Executive Officer Date: August 31, 2011
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyand mineral resources of the Nizina district, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 0203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:448
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959445
 
August 6, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

FRANCESCA HARON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CSC NARDONE, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5003RBL

ORDER DENYING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

The Court, having reviewed the report and recommendation, petitioner’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is approved and adopted;

(2) petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

(3) petitioner shall pay the required filing fee ($250.00) to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days

of the date of this Order, otherwise this action will be dismissed.

(4) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and any other party that has

appeared in this action.

DATED this 31st day of March, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05003-RBL Document 6 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 1
From: phoff@csuchico.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:40:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Phil Hoff

, 95973-0603
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Johnson, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 964]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered July 13, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Applicant ID No.: 99001222]


Everside SBIC I, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under the Small 
Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Everside SBIC I, L.P., 1290 Avenue of 
the Americas, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10104, an applicant to become a 
Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as 
amended (``Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, 
has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730 
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Financings which Constitute 
Conflict of Interest. Everside SBIC I, L.P. is proposing to provide 
financing to Athenix Holdings LLC (``Company'') to support its growth.
    The proposed transaction is brought within the purview of 13 CFR 
107.730 because Resolute Capital Partners Fund V-A, L.P., Resolute 
Capital Partners Fund V-B, L.P. and Resolute Capital Partners Fund IV, 
L.P (collectively, ``Resolute''), Associates of Everside SBIC I, L.P., 
as defined in 13 CFR 107.50, hold a 10% or greater equity interest in 
the Company. By virtue of Resolute's equity ownership of the Company, 
the Company is also considered an Associate of the Licensee.
    Therefore, the proposed transaction requires a regulatory exemption 
pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730. Notice is hereby given that any interested 
person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen 
days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, 
Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. 
Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-22432 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Applications of

AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

for certificates of public convenience and

necessity under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 to engage in

interstate and foreign charter air transportation of

persons, property and mail

     

     Dockets DOT‐OST‐2001‐10985

                     DOT‐OST‐2001‐10986

                 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO

NOTICE OF AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

OF INTENT TO RESUME CERTIFICATED AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS

and

UPDATED FITNESS INFORMATION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

       Aaron A. Goerlich

       Jason E. Maddux

       Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

       1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW   

       Washington, DC 20036‐6802

       (202) 776‐3974

       agoerlich@ggh‐airlaw.com

jmaddux@ggh‐airlaw.com

   

       Counsel for Aerodynamics Incorporated

May 30, 2014
1 

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Applications of

AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

for a certificate of public convenience and

necessity under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 to engage in

interstate and foreign charter air transportation of

persons, property and mail

       Dockets DOT‐OST‐2001‐10985

                       DOT‐OST‐2001‐10986

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO

NOTICE OF AERODYNAMICS INCORPORATED

OF INTENT TO RESUME CERTIFICATED AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS

and

UPDATED FITNESS INFORMATION

Aerodynamics Incorporated provides the following information and attached

documentation in support of its application.

1.    Aerodynamics Incorporated’s Balance Sheet as of February 28, 2014, is

attached as Exhibit A.

The certification required by the Department’s regulations is attached as Exhibit B.

EXHIBIT A


EXHIBIT B
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyof the Lewistown coal field, Montana**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:390
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958623
 
July 31, 2018
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DUMITRU NICULESCU,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-132M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Conspiracy to Effect Fraudulent Transactions with Access Devices Issued to

Other Persons in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(b)(2).

Count 2: Use of Means of Identification of Another During and in Relation to

Enumerated Offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1).

Date of Detention Hearing: May 15, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

Defendant has stipulated to detention but has reserved the right to contest his continued

detention upon his appearance in court in the District of Nevada.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

Case 2:06-mj-00132-JPD Document 9 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 15th day of May, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00132-JPD Document 9 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 2