alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRIAN PLASKON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF

KING COUNTY d/b/a VALLEY MEDICAL

CENTER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0367RSL

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

FILE AMENDED ANSWER

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for leave to file an amended

answer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (Dkt. #18). Defendants seek to add

counterclaims in this matter. The counterclaims include a claim for malicious prosecution and

all relate to defendants’ contention that plaintiff has initiated this lawsuit for an improper

purpose.

Leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 

The Court considers four factors in deciding whether to grant leave to amend: “bad faith, undue

delay, prejudice to the opposing party, and the futility of amendment.” Kaplan v. Rose, 49 F.3d

1363, 1370 (9th Cir. 1994). A proposed amendment is futile if it could be defeated by a motion

to dismiss or if plaintiff cannot prevail on the merits. See, e.g., Smith v. Commanding Officer,

Case 2:06-cv-00367-RSL Document 24 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER - 2

555 F.2d 234, 235 (9th Cir. 1977).

Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion. When defendants filed this motion and at

the time that plaintiff’s opposition was due, plaintiff was represented by counsel. In the interim,

however, his counsel successfully moved to withdraw. It is therefore unclear whether plaintiff’s

failure to file a response represents non-opposition or whether other factors caused the nonopposition. The Court, therefore, will not assume that the failure to respond is a concession that

the motion has merit, and scrutinizes the motion carefully.

Defendants have not previously sought leave to amend. The amendment will not cause

delay because no discovery has been conducted in this matter and the trial date is almost six

months away. There is no evidence of bad faith, futility, or that the amendment will prejudice

plaintiff. There will likely be substantial overlap between the discovery on plaintiff’s underlying

claims and on the counterclaims.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendants may file their amended answer

to plaintiff’s second amended complaint in the docket within ten days of the date of this order.

DATED this 19th day of June, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00367-RSL Document 24 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.17.2
                    LETTERHEAD OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

                             December 15, 1999




Mr. M. Douglas Ivester
Atlanta, Georgia

Dear Doug:

We are writing to clarify the letter we sent to you dated December 6, 1999.

By way of clarification, the release of restrictions on the 1,950,000 shares
of restricted stock will be effective the earlier of the first board meeting
in 2000 or February 4, 2000, as long as you do not voluntarily resign before
that earlier date.




/s/ Herbert A. Allen                  /s/ Douglas N. Daft
---------------------------           -------------------------------------
Herbert A. Allen                      Douglas N. Daft
Chairman, Compensation Committee      President and Chief Operating Officer
The Board of Directors of             The Coca-Cola Company
The Coca-Cola Company



Agreed and accepted this 15 day of December, 1999.



/s/ M. Douglas Ivester
----------------------------
M. Douglas Ivester
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22209]



[[Page 69244]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18209 and #18210; TENNESSEE Disaster Number TN-
00152]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-
4742-DR), dated 09/27/2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, and Tornado.
    Incident Period: 08/07/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/27/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/27/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/27/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/27/2023, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Bledsoe, Coffee, Cumberland, Jefferson, Knox, Loudon, 
Meigs, Rhea, Roane, Van Buren.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18209 B 
and for economic injury is 18210 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-22209 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-192-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone 144; Application for Expansion of Subzone 
144C; Orgill, Inc.; Tifton, Georgia

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Brunswick and Glynn County Development Authority, grantee 
of FTZ 144, requesting an expansion of Subzone 144C on behalf of 
Orgill, Inc., located in Tifton, Georgia. The application was submitted 
pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 
400). It was formally docketed on September 28, 2023.
    The applicant is requesting authority to expand the subzone to 
include an additional site: Proposed Site 2 (87 acres)--10 Orgill Way, 
Tifton, Georgia. No authorization for production activity has been 
requested at this time. The expanded subzone would be subject to the 
existing activation limit of FTZ 144.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Christopher Kemp of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e382a241e2a2c3f3a3b70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f2e0eed4e0e6f5f0f1baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is November 14, 
2023. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to November 29, 2023.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecaf849e859f98839c84899ec2a789819cac989e8d8889c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efac879d869c9b809f878a9dc1a48a829faf9b9d8e8b8ac1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22129 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; High Quality Reference Genomes (HQRG).
    Date: November 29, 2023.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
6908, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-8739, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7808170202190c0c0a381519111456161110561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a0a1500001b0e0e083a171b131654141312541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 28, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21889 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of BAETA Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Burkland, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 1, 2011
By: /s/ JEFF BURKLANDName: Jeff Burkland

Title: Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer)
From: richb499@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:42:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard

Racine, WI 53405
(Reap. Dec. 11050)

#### Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 211916.

(Decided August 4, 1965)

*Stein £ ShostaJo*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, manufactured by Otsubo Kogyo, consists of chairs and other wood furniture, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit values, net packed.

> 2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> 3. That the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 4. That the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in *Authentic Furniture Products*v. *United States,*Reappt. No. R61/23233, etc., 51 Cust. Ct. 438, Reap. Dec. 10614, Advance Treasury Decisions, Vol. 98, No. 45, page 113, and that the record in said case may be incorporated with the record herein.

> 5. That the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*567On the agreed facts and on the authority of the decision cited, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 59787.

#### The Keepnews Co. *v.*United States,

protest 240520-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figurines similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Amendment No.2 on Form 10-K for the year ending    June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof    (the "Report"), Con Unerkov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies    to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.    906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    Oakridge International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    /s/ Con Unerkov
--------------------------
Con    Unerkov
Chief    Financial Officer
May 29,    2012 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Civil Av iation Safety Regulations 1998 ( CASR 1998 ) CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUT HORITY Regulation 39.001

Page 1 of 1 

### AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive ( AD ) under subregulation 39.001 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being actio n that the delegate considers necessary to correct an unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product menti oned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement sect ion; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section. GippsAero GA8 Series Aeroplanes 

### AD/GA8/8 Engine Mount Fire Seal Washer 24/2014

Applicability: All GA8-TC 320 aircraft. Requirement: Comply with GippsAero Servi ce Bulletin SB-GA8-2014-115 Issue 1, or later approved revision. Compliance: Within 300 hours flight time or 12 m onths, from the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

The effective date of this AD is 1 December 2014. Background: A recent review of the engine m ount installation on the GA8-TC 320 aircraft has highlighted the omission of engine mount fire seal washers during the assembly process. The current engine mount configuration does not meet the certification basis for the aircraft, specifically regulation 23.865 of the Federal Aviation Regulations of the United States of America, where engine m ounts located in designated fire zones are required to be suitably shielded so that th ey are capable of with standing the effects of a fire. The Gippsland Aeronautics GA8-TC 320 aircra ft require the installation of an approved steel washer at each of the engine mount locations to address a potential risk of reduced engine retention capab ility in the event of a fire.

Peter Nikolic Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority

24 November 2014
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I, Basilio Chen, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Advanced Water Technology Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Date: April 11, 2011





|By: | /s/ Basilio Chen                                
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Basilio Chen                                    
|    | Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
|    | (Principal Accounting Officer)