alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5193M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons/Flight Risk:

 ( X ) Nature of charges involve both (1) fraud and deceit which give rise to questions of credibility regarding defendants

conduct if released on bond; and (2) activity designed to assist persons desiring to illegally relocate. The allegations are

not consistent with assurances that the defendant himself would not flee the jurisdiction of the court..

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

<

 October 31, 2005

.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-mj-05193-JKA Document 16 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 55681.

protest 152994-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 5, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.127.m Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts REITs** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THE CHRISTENSEN FIRM,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHAMELEON DATA CORPORATION, and

DEREK S. DOHN,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-337TSZ

TAXATION OF COSTS

Having considered briefs in support of, and in opposition to, the cost bill herein, costs in the cause

indicated above are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFF THE CHRISTENSEN FIRM , and on behalf of

DEFENDANTS CHAMELEON DATA CORPORATION and DEREK S. DOHN in the amount of

$2,573.15 as follows:

Requested Disallowed Allowed

I. COPY COSTS $1,706.34 $1,194.34 $512.00

General copying costs are not allowed. Clerk allowed 30% of requested costs. These allowed costs

represents clerks estimate of copying directly related to filing of pleadings in case.

II. RESEARCH COSTS(PACER,

LEXIS NEXIS, COURIERS)

$2,459.66 $2,459.66 0

Costs for research and couriers are not taxable.

III. MEDIATION COSTS $1,025.00 $1,025.00 0

Costs for mediation are not taxable.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Requested Disallowed Allowed

TAXATION OF COSTS -- 2

IV. DEPOSITION COSTS $3,231.15 $2,061.15 $1,170.00

Costs for both deposition transcripts and video depositions are not taxable. Clerk allowed costs

reporter’s appearance fees and transcripts. Costs for video deposition were not allowed.

Dated this 28th day of AUGUST, 2008 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 768 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 11, 2007.
Whereas Thomas ``Tommy'' Makem was born on November 4, 1932 in Keady, County 
        Armagh, in Northern Ireland;
Whereas Thomas Makem emigrated from Ireland to Dover, New Hampshire in 1955, 
        after having won the All-Ireland Championship in acting, to pursue a 
        career in acting and carrying with him only a makeshift suitcase, a pair 
        of bagpipes, and proof of his health;
Whereas in 1956 Thomas Makem joined the Clancy Brothers, all of whom had 
        immigrated to the United States from Ireland, and began performing 
        musically together as ``The Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem'' and were 
        signed by Columbia Records;
Whereas in 1961 Thomas Makem performed at the Newport Folk Festival and, along 
        with Joan Baez, was named as the most promising newcomer;
Whereas in 1963 the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem performed at the White House 
        at the request of President John F. Kennedy;
Whereas the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem continued to perform and record 
        music together, performing in venues such as Carnegie Hall and on 
        programs including The Ed Sullivan Show and The Tonight Show until 1969 
        when Thomas Makem left the band amicably to pursue a solo career;
Whereas in 1975 Thomas Makem again joined with Liam Clancy and the duo performed 
        together until 1988, including a Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem reunion 
        at the Lincoln Center in New York City, New York;
Whereas in 1997 Thomas Makem wrote a book, Tommy Makem's Secret Ireland, and in 
        1999 premiered his own one-man theatre show, Invasions and Legacies, in 
        New York, and established the Tommy Makem International Festival of Song 
        in South Armagh, Ireland in 2000;
Whereas throughout his performing career Thomas Makem was highly regarded as an 
        exceptional musician by both his colleagues and the public and received 
        many awards and honors including the World Folk Music Association's 
        Lifetime Achievement Award in 1999 and honorary doctorates from the 
        University of New Hampshire in 1998, the University of Limerick in 2001, 
        and the University of Ulster in 2007; and
Whereas Thomas Makem died on Wednesday, August 1, 2007 in Dover, New Hampshire 
        and will now be remembered as a dedicated husband, father, and 
        grandfather and as one of the greatest Irish-Americans of the 20th 
        Century: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life of Thomas 
``Tommy'' Makem, and his accomplishments as a musician, composer and performer.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 61598.

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 303984-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In conformity with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Order entered August 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00789-CR

No. 05-19-00791-CR

BRANDON NORMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F18-51705-Q & F18-51706-Q

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s August 12, 2019 motions entitled “Motion for Extension 

of Time to File Appeal,” requesting additional time in which to file his brief. Construing these 

motions as requests for extension of time to file his brief, we GRANT the motions and ORDER 

appellant’s brief filed on or before September 23, 2019.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 1 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 2 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 3 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 4 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 5 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 6 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 7 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 8 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 9 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 10 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 11 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 12 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 13 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 14 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 15 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 16 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 17 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 18 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 19 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 20 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 21 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 22 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 23 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 24 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 25 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 26 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 27 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 28 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 29 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 30 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 31 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 32 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 33 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 34 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 35 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 36 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-2 Filed 08/14/03 Page 37 of 37
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              NOV-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,985
<PP&E>                                          48,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,063,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,793,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,874,932
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,629,458)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,063,831
<SALES>                                        305,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,422
<CGS>                                            6,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,658,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,359,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,359,705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,359,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                           2,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,956
<PP&E>                                          35,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,710
<BONDS>                                         11,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,775
<SALES>                                         10,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,075
<CGS>                                            7,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD C. SPRUEL JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5021RJB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF

TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY

AND RE-NOTING DEFENDANTS 

MOTION TO DISMISS

This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000, has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Before the court is plaintiff’s motion

to extend discovery (Dkt. # 41). Plaintiff asks for a 90 day extension of time.

Defendants have responded (Dkt. # 44). Defendants note they have a motion to dismiss at

the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (c) stage pending. The motion to dismiss is (Dkt. # 42). Defendants ask

discovery be stayed until after a ruling on their motion to dismiss. Defendants state they do no

oppose a 45 day extension of time to conduct discovery, but believe a 90 day extension is too long a

time frame. 

A short extension of time to conduct discovery until January 12th, 2007 is GRANTED. 

Case 3:06-cv-05021-RJB Document 47 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

Defendants motion to dismiss, (Dkt. #42), is re-noted for January 26th, 2007. 

The clerk’s office is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff and counsel for

defendants. The Clerk’s office should remove (Dkt. # 41 and 44) from the court’s calendar, note the

January 12th, 2007 discovery cutoff date and the January 26th, 2007 noting date for defendants

motion to dismiss.

DATED this 22nd, day of November, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05021-RJB Document 47 Filed 11/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 50 CFR Part 665
          - [RTID 0648-XD434]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notification of lobster harvest guideline.

# SUMMARY:

NMFS establishes the annual harvest guideline for the commercial lobster fishery in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) for calendar year 2023 at zero lobsters.

# DATES:

October 6, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Keith Kamikawa, NMFS PIRO Sustainable Fisheries, 808-725-5177.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

NMFS manages the NWHI commercial lobster fishery under the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the Hawaiian Archipelago. The regulations at 50 CFR 665.252(b) require NMFS to publish an annual harvest guideline for lobster Permit Area 1, comprised of Federal waters around the NWHI.

Regulations governing the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in the NWHI prohibit the unpermitted removal of monument resources (50 CFR 404.7), and establish a zero annual harvest guideline for lobsters (50 CFR 404.10(a)). Accordingly, NMFS establishes the harvest guideline for the NWHI commercial lobster fishery for calendar year 2023 at zero lobsters. Harvest of NWHI lobster resources is not allowed.

Authority:16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: October 3, 2023.

Jennifer M. Wallace,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-22288 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-7 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 16 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-7 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-7 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 3 of 3
No. P67/329.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/7149, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of handkerchiefs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ashear Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the Government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 4.13 percent for the October-December quarter of fiscal year 2024. Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

David Parrish,

Chief, Secondary Markets Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-21712 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

(253) 428-3800

[PROPOSED] ORDER

U.S. v. FERGUSON/CR06-5040FDB - 1

Judge Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CRO6-5040FDB

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING 

) GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE

EDWARD DUANE FERGUSON, ) TO DEFENDANTS’ PRETRIAL 

) MOTIONS

Defendant. ) 

_________________________________)

The Court having reviewed the records and files herein and considered the

stipulation of the parties, enters the following order:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government’s response to the defendant’s 

pretrial motion shall be due no later than April 20, 2006. 

DATED this 12th day of April, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Presented by:

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

s/ Kent Y. Liu s/ Miriam Schwartz (Per telephonic approval)

KENT Y. LIU MIRIAM SCHWARTZ

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Edward Ferguson

Case 3:06-cr-05040-RBL Document 30 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 1