alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEATING FIBRE INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Defendant.

NO. C05-1986JLR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court having been notified of the settlement of this matter and it appearing that no

issue remains for the court’s determination,

IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with

prejudice and without costs to any party.

In the event settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case,

provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and

pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. 

DATED this 19th day of September, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01986-JLR Document 61 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 57764.

protests 185482-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT

FABEL’S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) No. CR06-0041RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

RICHARD ALLEN FABEL, ) DEFENDANT FABEL’S MOTION

) FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Fabel’s Motion for Return of

Property” (Dkt. #828). Based on the government’s July 3, 2008 response, the property

referenced in defendant’s motion, namely the 1987 Harley-Davidson motorcycle and the

“numerous other items,” has been returned. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that defendant’s

motion (Dkt. #828) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED this 14th day of July, 2008.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 974 Filed 07/14/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 579 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2831) to amend title VII of the Civil 
Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the 
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to 
clarify that a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is 
unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the 
discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, and for other purposes. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 
arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and Labor now printed in 
the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Education and Labor; and (2) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 2831 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                   5

<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  4,233
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          26,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,328
<INVENTORY>                                            17,196
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       57,319
<PP&E>                                                148,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                         75,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        156,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  36,639
<BONDS>                                                44,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                19
<COMMON>                                                  109
<OTHER-SE>                                             76,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          156,584
<SALES>                                                12,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       48,004
<CGS>                                                   7,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          30,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           987
<INCOME-TAX>                                              703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       284
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        13,269
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           13,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            1.29
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the periodic report of IBI Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Patsy Sessions, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Patsy SessionsPrincipal Executive Officer Date: August 30, 2010
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CNC Development Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 12, 2011




By:
/s/ William C. MorroName: William C. MorroTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNC Development Ltd. and will be retained by CNC Development Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. P66/316. —

No. P66/317. —

#### Jean R. Graef, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 58/25130, etc. (New York). Jean R. Graef, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 61/13, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Benrus Watch Company et al.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), wherein said watch movements were held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                     0000875359
<NAME>                                             Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        7390
<SECURITIES>                                                 22854
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 6532
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   810 
<INVENTORY>                                                   8236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             49897
<PP&E>                                                       43281
<DEPRECIATION>                                               21967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               71865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         9840
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        13
<OTHER-SE>                                                   59260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 71865
<SALES>                                                      12239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             12239
<CGS>                                                         5611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                890
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            570
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.05
        


</TABLE>
From: estelwieder@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:23:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Estella Wieder

East Brunswick, NJ 08816
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-0466 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-188-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 11 $ 935.00 $ 935.00 24 $22,440.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $22,440

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

BRANDOM LEMARK ESTRADA,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5048M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 March 10, 2006.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom_______________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05048-KLS Document 9 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Justin W. Shireman, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Systems, Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Registrant, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.






Date:   November 13, 2006
        
        /s/ Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. Shireman
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)


---
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

OCT 2 6 2012 

Eastern Region · 

Regional Counsel 

Telephone: 718 553-3278 

Facsimile: (718) 995-5699 

VIA FACSIMILE AND EMAIL 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310} 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

diane.mays@dot.gov 

1 Aviation P.laza 

. Jamaica, NY-11434 

Re: In the Matter of Daniel Johnathan Sterling 

Docket No. F AA-20 12-0779 

Case No. 2011-EA-030050 

Dear Judge Sullivan, 

This is to inform you that above-referenced matter (the first Litigation Scheduling 

Conference is scheduled for ll/08/2012)was settled on 08/28/2012, on the terms. satisfactory 

to each party, and there would be no necessity to keep it in Your Honor's calendar. 

Respondent withdrew his appeal and informed so the Office of Hearing Docket Clerk (copy · 

of the Respondent Withdrawal Notice is attached here). Accordingly, parties would like to 

ask for the above-captioned matter to be removed from the docket. 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Leonid Talisman 

Attorney· 

cc: Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Fax: (202) 385-8225 

Daniel Sterling and Janet Marks Long 

1124 James Street 

Monroeville, P A 15146 

RECEIVED 

NOV- 2 2012 

HEARING DOCKeT 
•. 

ZWZ b ! lJO 

£0Q-V3V- 03AI303ij