01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY COLIN SOLOMON, JR.

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR06-134-RSL

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS TO 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

An evidentiary hearing on supervised release revocation in this case was scheduled before

me on December 21, 2010. The United States was represented by AUSA Sarah Kate Vaughan

and the defendant by Kevin Peck. The proceedings were digitally recorded.

Defendant had been sentenced on or about November 6, 2006 by the Honorable Robert

S. Lasnik on a charge of Sexual Assault of a Minor, and sentenced to thirty-three months custody,

three years supervised release. (Dkt. 32.)

The conditions of supervised release included the standard conditions plus the

requirements that defendant abstain from alcohol and participate in alcohol treatment, be

prohibited from entering any establishment where alcohol is the primary commodity for sale,

Case 2:06-cr-00134-RSL Document 57 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -2

participate in a drug testing program, submit to search, participate in a mental health

program/sexual offender treatment program and make reasonable progress therein, have no

unsupervised contact with minor children, submit to polygraph examination, follow all other

lifestyle restriction or treatment requirements imposed by his therapist, and not possess or use any

sexually explicit material.

On September 26, 2008, defendant’s supervised release was modified to require

satisfactory participation in a residential reentry program for up to 180 days. (Dkt. 34.)

On August 24, 2009, defendant admitted violating the conditions of supervised release

by failing to follow the instructions of his probation officer, failing to register with the state sex

offender registration agency, and failing to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of

release from the federal Bureau of Prisons. (Dkt. 45.) Defendant was sentenced to 10 months in

custody, 26 months supervised release. (Dkt. 49.) Additional conditions required the defendant

to not go to places within 100 feet of an area where minors are known to frequent, have his

residence pre-approved by the probation office, have no direct or indirect contact of any kind

with the victim, and reside in a residential reentry center for up to 120 days.

In an application dated December 6, 2010 (Dkt. 50, 51), U.S. Probation Officer Donald

E. Moon alleged the following violations of the conditions of supervised release:

1. Committing the crime of Theft 3rd, on or about November 1, 2010, in violation of

a general condition not to commit another federal, state, or local crime.

2. Associating with persons engaged in criminal activity, Clarissa A. Hill-Old Crow,

on or about November 1, 2010, in violation of standard condition number 9.

3. Failing to truthfully answer all inquiries of the probation office on November 5,

Case 2:06-cr-00134-RSL Document 57 Filed 12/21/10 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

PAGE -3

2010, in violation of standard condition number 3.

4. Failing to notify the probation office at least ten days prior to any change in

residence on or about November 15, 2010, in violation of standard condition number 6.

5. Failing to submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five days

of each month for the months of May, June, July, August, and September 2010, in violation of

standard condition number 2.

Defendant was advised in full as to those charges and as to his constitutional rights.

Defendant admitted alleged violation 1 and waived any evidentiary hearing as to whether

it occurred. The government moved to dismiss alleged violations 2-5.

I therefore recommend the Court find defendant violated his supervised release as alleged

in violation 1, and that the Court conduct a hearing limited to the issue of disposition. I

recommend the Court dismiss alleged violations 2-5. The next hearing will be set before Judge

Lasnik.

Pending a final determination by the Court, defendant has been detained.

DATED this 21st day of December, 2010.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik

AUSA: Sarah Kate Vaughan

Defendant’s attorney: Kevin Peck

Probation officer: Donald E. Moon

Case 2:06-cr-00134-RSL Document 57 Filed 12/21/10 Page 3 of 3