alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 19, 2023 pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Silicon Integration Initiative, Inc. (“Si2”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Rapidus Corporation, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN; and HW21 Org Limited, San Francisco, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Mythic, Inc., Austin, TX; and Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Andover, MA have withdrawn as parties to this venture. Additionally, TexEDA Design GmbH, Brandenburg, GERMANY has changed its name to Silicon Radar.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Si2 intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On December 30, 1988, Si2 filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10456).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 13, 2022. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29378).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-22233 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT



I hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-SB Registration  Statement, of Anmore
Management,  Inc.  my report for the period  from March 3, 2000  (inception)  to
March 6, 2000,  dated March 8, 2000,  relating to the  financial  statements  of
Anmore Management, Inc. which appear in such Form 10-SB.

                                                     STEPHEN S. BUSH, C.A.
                                                     Chartered Accountant

Port Moody,B.C.
Canada
March 8, 2000

                                    By:/s/ Stephen S. Bush
                                    Chartered Accountant
Law Office of Lori D. Hansen 

2000 112th Avenue NE 

Bellevue, WA 98004 

Tele. 425.637.3067 

Fax 425.637.1214 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Honorable J. Kelley Arnold 

 COME NOW the Plaintiffs Robert P. Casto and Molly L. Casto, individually 

and the marital community comprised, by and through their attorney of record Lori D. 

Hansen, and Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company, by and through its attorney of 

record Leigh Ann Tift of Littler Mendelson, P.C. and hereby stipulated that the abovecaptioned matter be dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorney fees to either 

party. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

Robert P. Casto and Molly L. Casto, individually 

and the marital community comprised thereof, 

Plaintiff, 

 

 v 

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO.:C06-5152 JKA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL

Case 3:06-cv-05152-JKA Document 52 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
Law Office of Lori D. Hansen 

2000 112th Avenue NE 

Bellevue, WA 98004 

Tele. 425.637.3067 

Fax 425.637.1214 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Dated this 29 day of October, 2007. 

By: /s/ By: /s/ 

Lori D. Hansen Leigh Ann Collings Tift 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

WSBA # 13129 WSBA 

2000 112th Ave. NE Littler Mendelson. P.C. 

Bellevue, WA 98004 Columbia Center 

 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6500 

 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 

 

 ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, it is hereby ORDERED 

that the above-captioned matter shall be and the same is hereby: 

 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without cost or attorney fees to either 

party. 

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 1st day of November, 2007. 

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

 U.S. Magistrate Judge Presented by: 

 /s/ 

Lori D. Hansen 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

WSBA # 13129 

2000 112th Ave. NE 

Bellevue, WA 98004 

(425) 637-3067 

Approved as to Form; 

Notice of Presentation Waived: 

 /s/ 

Leigh Ann Collings Tift 

Attorney for Defendant 

WSBA 

Littler Mendelson. P.C. 

Columbia Center 

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6500 

Seattle, WA 98104-7097 

Case 3:06-cv-05152-JKA Document 52 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

MARTIN MENERA-RAMIREZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5019M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( X ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 February 9, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05111-FDB Document 6 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 1
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

DEPTH, IN FEET

HOLE 11

7.4
inv Too reer

DEPTH, IN FEET

Water table

HOLES DISTANT FROM KNOWN ORE

HOLES PENETRATING ORE

HOLE 16
pH-NOT DETERMINED

Water table

WoLE 3 HOLE 4 HOLES
pay pH-NOT DETERMINED pH. NOT DETERMINED
ar 200 Feer
© £| |_— water table
|-—— Water table =| [--~ Water tabie 3
3 3
air gL
EB :
HY] j
s(C 4
£
0.11.0)
ty oe ae é
HEAVY METALS IN WATER.IN PARTS PER MILLION
HOLE 12 HOLE 13 HOLE 14 HOLE 15
Bead Beis Bian ine
ar igo Feer av Bye eer arS00 fee arts Fer
- Weter table Water table
= Loxzn|
>5xzn ace

BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 17

HOLES NEAR KNOWN ORE

a2

a2

02

HEAVY METALS IN WATER,IN PARTS PER MILLION

ANALYSIS OF WATER FROM DRILL HOLES SOUTH OF SHULLSBURG

a2

HOLE 6 HOLE 7 HOLE @ HoLE 9 HOLE 10
m7 pH. NOT DETERMINED peers a 8 ote
ar"7s FEET nv "T00' FEET At 75 FEET ar foo eter
= = EXPLANATION
| ~- Water table |.-- Water table |
= Water table = Water table ae Sees
. Z depth range shown
24 3 — ‘Water slightly turbid
= : Fa -s
32 — Water moderately turbid
5 SE <= 0.15Kzn : i
Be Pa Ie ate ey tb
EH fH osnzn => fe
4 se First anatysis of water
23) 22
Second andisis of water
a eter Gopth ot whch cil holes
oh ‘a
¥ ee A = ie we Be me ae were open at time of sampling
HEAVY METALS IN WATER, IN PARTS PER MILLION
HOLE 18 HOLE 19 HOLE 20 HOLE 21 Hote 22
HNO DETERMINED sere eer 2 e738 Bina
‘AT '130 FEET ‘AT 200 FEET AT 100 FEET ‘AT 200 FEET
—Woter table
58] atria
Ds r
8
0.-0.25%2n x
os L.
Be
asxzn >3Kin ei . —
o.tKzn £ >sxzn
0.25.1%2n e3 fs
2a —
| Lb = —
6 02 oe ° 2 Ly a 6 02

HEAVY METALS IN WATER, IN PARTS PER MILLION

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 11
# L_2013215EN.01S00302.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Nitratedeposits of the United States**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:838
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000961463
 
August 22, 2018
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

 

I, Matthew Hoole, do herebycertify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of WorldOmni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2021-A to Closed-EndServicing Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2021 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp., asClosed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)             Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K and coveredby the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made undermy supervision.

 

(ii)             Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand as of March 22, 2024.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Greg Curry, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 980]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated November 15, 1993 *(People v Curry,*198 AD2d 371), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 19, 1991, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
From: leetandus@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:52:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lee Tandus

Aurora, CO 80013
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

MARAMBA, et al/CR06-106RSM — 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) CASE NO. CR06-106RSM

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

)

)

FELIPE MARAMBA, )

ELEAZAR BASILIO, )

JONATHAN ESCALANTE, and )

ROLANDO HERNANDEZ, )

)

 Defendants. ) )

The Court having reviewed the motions by defendants ELEAZAR BASILIO and

JONATHAN ESCALANTE to continue the trial date, and having reviewed the records

and files herein, in particular the Government’s response to the motion, and having

considered arguments made at a status conference held on this matter on August 14,

2006, makes the following findings and enters the following order:

The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and §3161(h)(8)(B)(i),

(ii) and (iv), the ends of justice served by continuing the trial date from August 28, 2006

to November 20, 2006, outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a

speedy trial. This matter is complex due to the number of defendants and amount of

discovery involved. Moreover, defendants BASILIO and ESCALANTE were recently

arraigned and it is therefore unreasonable to expect their attorneys to adequately prepare

for trial before August 28, 2006. Additionally, failure to grant a continuance to

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 157 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order to Continue Trial Date/

MARAMBA, et al/CR06-106RSM — 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

November 20, 2006 would deny the defendants the time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a

miscarriage of justice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that trial in this matter is continued from 

August 28, 2006 to November 20, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of computing the time limitations

imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3164, the period of delay from

August 28, 2006, up to and including November 20, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

DATED this 16 th day August, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

 /s Jill Otake 

JILL OTAKE

Assistant United States Attorney

WA Bar # 28298

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-4254

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: jill.otake@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00106-RSM Document 157 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6251
DWAYNE ORALLIS SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-749-5BR) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne Orallis Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Dwayne Orallis Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. United States , No. CA-99-749-5BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Alphonso Roy LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YAKIMA POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-35835.

D.C. No. CV-99-03037-WFN.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Aphonso Roy Lee appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for de*544fendants in his civil rights action, which alleged racially discriminatory traffic stops. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the summary judgment, *Bagdadi v. Nazar,*84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order granting summary judgment filed September 7, 2000.

We decline to reach Lee’s contention that based on new evidence he is entitled to a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) because he raises this issue for the first time on appeal. *See Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp.,*953 F.2d 510, 515 (9th Cir.1992).

Lee’s contention that he was not properly served lacks merit.

Appellee’s motion to strike is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *544courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
13 CA ADC § 2263.7 Page 1

13 CCR s 2263.7 

Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13, s 2263.7 

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF 

REGULATIONS

TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES

DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUELS

ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE

SUBARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE 

SOLD BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1996

This database is current through 12/26/2003, Register

2003, No. 52.

s 2263.7. Multiple Notification Requirements.

Where a producer or importer is subject to multiple notification requirements pursuant to sections 2264(a)(2)(A), 

2264.2(a)(2), 2264.2(b)(2), 2265(a)(2), 2266(c) or 

2266.5(b), the producer shall combine the notifications to 

the extent practicable.

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or 

Tables>

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 

43013.1, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and 

Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 

(1975). Reference: Sections 39000, 39001, 39002, 39003, 

39010, 39500, 39515, 39516, 41511, 43000, 43013, 

43013.1, 43016, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety 

Code; and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County 

Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. 

Rptr. 249 (1975). 

HISTORY 

1. New section filed 2-28-96; operative 2-28-96 pursuant to Government Code

section 11343.4(d) (Register 96, No. 9).

2. Amendment of Note filed 8-3-2000; operative 9-2-2000 (Register 2000, No.

31).

13 CA ADC s 2263.7 

END OF DOCUMENT