alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Clinical Applications.
    Date: November 16, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, 6700 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jennifer C. Schiltz, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20817, 240-276-
5864, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#09636c6767606f6c7b277a6a6160657d7349676061276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="016b646f6f686764732f726269686d757b416f68692f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Translational Research Program for Therapeutics (R61/R33).
    Date: December 12, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, 6700 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ashley Fortress, Ph.D., Designated Federal 
Official, Division of Extramural Activities, National Eye Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700 B Rockledge Dr., Bethesda, MD 
20817, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e584968d89809ccb838a979197809696a58b8c8dcb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a4b5942464f53044c45585e584f59596a444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22114 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      April 15, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Yaru
      HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 12,955a.

#### SLOMAN v. WYSSMAN.

[19 Betts, D. C. MS. 165.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. Term, 1852.

Practice in Admiralty — Rehearing—Term.

[A rehearing or review cannot be had after the term at which the decree was rendered.]

[This was a libel by Robert L. Sloman against Frederick Wyssman. Motion for rehearing and review.]

BY

THE COURT.

In August term, 1851, a decree was rendered in this cause against the libellant, and, not being appealed from, became final the same term. [Unreported.] In January term, 1852, the libellant moved upon affidavits for a rehearing of the case, and for leave to file a bill of review, on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

The general authority of the United States courts to grant a rehearing or allow a bill of review to be filed has been fully considered in repeated cases. The rule is irrevocable that a rehearing or review cannot be had in a cause after the term at which sentence was rendered. [Hudson v. Guestier] 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 1; The Avery [Case No. 672]; The New England [Id. 10.151]; [Sibbald v. U. S.] 12 Pet. [37 U. S.] 489; [Whiting v. Bank of U. S.] 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 6; [Bank of U. S. v. Beverly] 1 How. [42 U. S.] 148, 149; [Kennedy v. Bank of State of Georgia] 8 How. [49 U. S.] 609. The standing rule of this court in no way relaxes that doctrine. It limits the application of the privilege to a narrower sphere than is necessarily defined by the cases quoted, for the application will not be entertained in this court in cases where the subject of dispute is less in amount than $50, nor unless made before the enrollment of the decree or return of final process issued in the cause, both of which may well happen within the period of the term in which the decree is pronounced. The 40th rule of the supreme court allows ten days to a party to move to rescind a decree against him by default, but that indulgence has no relation to the condition of a party against whom a final decree is rendered on hearing. Motion denied, with costs.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter J. Scanlon, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




By: /s/ Peter J. Scanlon
------------------------
    Peter J. Scanlon
    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
    March 21, 2006



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

BRAULIO BAUTISTA-MARTINEZ,

 Defendant.

Case No. 06-5009M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice per Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer, and

for reasons set forth in the Motion for Detention Order.

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 January 19, 2006.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom______________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05009-KLS Document 7 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 645 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 23, 2008.
Whereas the United States Capitol Police force consists of over 1,600 officers 
        who are dedicated to the protection and security of the Capitol Complex 
        and its employees and visitors;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police continually sacrifice to provide safety 
        and security to the Members, staff, and nearly 3 million visitors each 
        year to the Capitol Complex;
Whereas the officers of the United States Capitol Police face the danger of 
        physical and verbal assaults and continue to provide courteous, 
        responsible, and diligent services in an unbiased and nonpartisan 
        manner;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police face many threats to their safety and 
        must remain constantly alert for suspicious actions or for any failure 
        to respond to requests and instructions;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police are on the front lines of the War on 
        Terrorism and remain on constant alert against unauthorized access to 
        Capitol buildings, terrorism, and other threats to the Capitol Complex;
Whereas Capitol Police officers stationed throughout the Capitol Complex act in 
        a professional manner and treat Members, staff, and visitors with 
        dignity and respect;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police consistently apply security and safety 
        measures to all, including Members of Congress; and
Whereas the United States Capitol Police is one of the best trained, most highly 
        respected law enforcement agencies in the United States: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its gratitude and appreciation for the professional 
        manner in which the United States Capitol Police carry out their diverse 
        missions;
            (2) expresses appreciation for the dedication United States Capitol 
        Police officers display in protecting the Capitol Complex; and
            (3) commends the United States Capitol Police for their continued 
        courage and professionalism in protecting the Capitol Complex and its 
        employees and visitors.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 61073.

protests 270704-K, etc.

#### Walter Brooks and Milton Snedeker Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Protests abandoned May 29, 1957. (Not published.) (Initial No. 241820-K.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



April 23, 2007                         /s/ Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**     I, Timothy A. Richardson, the chief executive officer of Micro Linear Corporation (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United StatesCode that, to the best of my knowledge,     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2005 (the“Report”), complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        August 17, 2005 /s/ Timothy A. Richardson   Timothy A. Richardson   Chief Executive Officer
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph F. Longo, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



|By:/s/    Joseph F. LongoJoseph F. Longo
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
June 18, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|
|

---
No. 68158.

#### Reinhold A. Auerbach, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/6233 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the papers in the case showing that the protest was not filed within the 60-day period provided by section 614, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed as untimely.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Senior
Vice-President  and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 15, 2008
From: srwesthues@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:43:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Katherine Westhues

Leavenworth, KS 66048
#### Tanya O’Hearn, Appellant, v Shawn F. Gallagher et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 984]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated June 29, 1994, as granted the motion of the defendants Marsha A. Posner and Peter Posner, and the separate motion of the defendant Shawn F. Gallagher, respectively, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondents Peter Posner and Marsha A. Posner.

The record shows that the plaintiff did not meet her burden of establishing "serious injury” as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Consequently, the court properly granted the defendants’ respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see, Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Anthony Goodman, Chief Executive Officer of Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1)    | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KT/A of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2020 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                  |

 

 

| Date: July 14, 2020 | By:    | */s/ Anthony Goodman*                                              |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, 

Secretary, Treasurer and Chairman |   |