UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHI NGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No.

_______________
**IN THE**  **MATTER OF**  **THE PETITION**  **FOR EXEMPTION**  **OF :** 

**Michael Todd**  **Hacker FOR**  **AN EXEMPTION**  **SEEKING RELIEF**  **FROM THE**  **REQUIREMENTS OF** 

**TITLE 14**  **OF THE**  **CODE OF**  **FEDERAL REGULATIONS**  **SECTIONS 61.113(a)**  **& (b),**  **91.7(a), 91.121,**  **91.151(b), 91.405(a),**  **91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)**  **& (a)(2),**  **AND 91.417(a)**  **& (b)**  **CONCERNING COMMERCIAL**  **OP ERATION**  **OF DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision+ AND**  **DJI INSPIRE**  **1 UNMANNED**  **AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS** 

**PURSUANT TO**  **SECTION 333**  **OF THE**  **FAA MODERNIZATION**  **AND REFORM**  **ACT OF**  **2012**

**(PUBLIC LAW**  **112**
**- 95)** 

Submitted on April 3, 2015
Michael Todd Hacker 2366 Sunburst Rd Evington VA, 24550 434

-426

-6037 toddhacker@gmail.com**TABLE OF**  **CONTENTS** Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................

.................3 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER.................................................4 BACKGROUND.....................

...........................................................................................5 BASIS FOR PETITION.....................................................................................................................

......6 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER...........................................................8 THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH MICHAEL TODD HACKER SEEKS EXEMPTION.................................................................................8 THE EXTENT OF RELIEF MICHAEL TODD HACKER SEEKS AND THE REASON MICHAEL TODD HACKER SEEKS THE RELIEF

..........................11 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING MICHAEL TODD HACKER’S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

.../...................................................14 THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY.........................................................................17 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................32**GLOSSARY OF**  **ABBREVIATIONS**

AGL Above Ground Level AOI Area ofInterest ATC Air Traffic Control ATO Air Traffic Organization AV Aerial Vehicle CFR Code ofFederal Regulations COA Certificate ofAuthorization FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulation GCS Ground Control Station GPS Global Positioning System LOL Loss ofLink NAS National Airspace System NOTAM Notice to Airman PIC Pilot In Command Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA) Section 333 SO Safety Observer SOP Standard Operating Procedures UA Unmanned Aircraft UAS Unmanned Aircraft System VFR Visual Flight Rules VLOS Visual Line of Site VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VTOL Vertical Takeoffand Landing**SUMMARY**

Michael Todd Hacker seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b),
to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Michael Todd Hacker to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography oflandscapes, commercial shoot sets, scenery, construction sites, real estate, and privately owned historical sites over certain areas ofthe United States.

**INTRODUCTION AND**  **INTERESTS OF**  **THE PETITIONER**  My name is Michael Todd Hacker, I am 35 years old. I am a director ofvideo and cinematography at Prototy pe Advertising in Forest Virginia. I lead a team ofcreative people who develop various video and photography projects for clients all over the United States. I have been with Prototy

pe for 9 years and have seen several evolutions ofcamera technology change over the years. To remain commercially viable and relevant I like to stay current with
many ofthose technologies. Many clients look to us to provide timely solutions and unique ideas for their products and campaigns. My interests include videography, photography, computers, electronics and new technologies that provide creative outputs. The objective for my petition is to provide high quality video and images for commercial clients ranging from hospitality, healthcare, not for profit, and private industries with a specific focus on:

• Aerial photography and videography of client projects, ranging from housing developments, construction, corporate headquarters overviews• Privately owned historical site surveys.

• Motion picture filming.

• Local television commercials.

**BACKGROUND** Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 2, DJI Inspire 1 UASs Michael Todd Hacker seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Inspire 1 are vertical takeoffand landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 2 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and

a maximum speed ofapproximately 29 knots. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed ofapproximately 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Inspire 1UAs are equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Poly mer battery powered electric motors. The DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Inspire 1 UAs that will be operated by Michael Todd Hacker will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration ofAircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

.

**BASIS FOR**  **PETITION**Petitioner, Michael Todd Hacker, pursuant to the provisions ofthe Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rulesfor Certain UnmannedAircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Inspire 1 UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). In consideration ofthe speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Michael Todd Hacker operation ofDJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meets the conditions ofFMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Accordingly, Michael Todd Hacker requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91 .409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Michael Todd Hacker submits that the requested reliefis proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. Michael Todd Hacker will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Michael Todd Hacker will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Privatepilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Michael Todd Hacker to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as
well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive andemergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and

structures. Michael Todd Hacker seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Michael Todd Hacker submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1UASs

are in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UASs are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition safe for flight. Michael Todd Hacker also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will not have a ty pical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1UAs will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring ofthe flight path. This altitude information, combined with Michael Todd Hacker’s operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure an appropriate level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. Additionally, Michael Todd Hacker seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirementsforflight in VFR conditions

. Michael Todd Hacker submits that safety will not be affected by operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration ofapproximately 13.5 minutes to the first point ofintended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Michael Todd Hacker provides the following information in support ofits petition for exemption:**A. Name**  **And Address**  **Of The**  **Petitioner.**

The name and address ofthe Petitioner and point ofcontact is: Michael Todd Hacker 2366 Sunburst Rd Evington VA, 24550 434

-426

-6037 Email: Toddhacker@gmail.com

**B. The**  **Specific Sections**  **Of 14**  **C.F.R. From**  **Which Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption.**  **1. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 61.113(a)**  **And (b).**  Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: (a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC ofan aircraft. (b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC ofan aircraft in connection with any business or employ ment if

— (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employ ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. **2. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 91.7(a).**  Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: (a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. **3. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 91.121.** 
Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: (a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

-- (1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to
-- (i) The current reported altimeter setting ofa station along the route and within 100 nautical miles ofthe aircraft; (ii) Ifthere is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) ofthis section, the current reported altimeter setting ofan appropriate available station; or(iii) In the case ofan aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation ofthe departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. **4. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Section 91.151(b).**  Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirementsforflight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states the following: (b ) Noperson may begin aflight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind andforecast weather conditions) there is enoughfuel tofly to the firstpoint ofintended landing and, assuming normal cruising s peed, tofly after that for at least 20 minutes. **5. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirement Of**  **Section 91.405(a).**  Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each

owner or operator ofan aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E ofthis part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) ofthis section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 ofthis chapter[.] **6. Micha** **el Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.407(a)(1)** Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: (a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

-- (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] **7. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Sections 91.409(a)(1)**  **And 91.409(a)(2).**  Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) ofthis section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

-- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 ofthis chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 ofthis chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance ofan airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 ofthis chapter. **8. Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Exemption**  **From The**  **Requirements Of**  **Sections 91.417(a)**  **And 91.417(b).**  Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following:(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) ofthis section: (1) Records ofthe maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records ofthe 100

-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

-- (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) ofthe work performed; and (ii) The date ofcompletion ofthe work performed; and (iii) The signature, and certificate number ofthe person approving the aircraft for return to service. (2) Records containing the following information: (i) The total time in service ofthe airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. (ii) The current status of life

-limited parts ofeach airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. (iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. (iv) The current inspection status ofthe aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. (v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method ofcompliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. Ifthe AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. (vi) Copies ofthe f

orms prescribed by § 43.9(d) ofthis chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. (b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: (1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) ofthis section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. (2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) ofthis section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. (3) A list ofdefects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 ofthis chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service. **C. The**  **Extent Of**  **Relief Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks And**  **The Reason**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **The Relief.**  **1. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Relief**  **From Section**  **61.113(a) And**  **(b).** Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Privatepilotprivileges and limitations:Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or

higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. This reliefis requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC ofan aircraft in connection with any business or employ

ment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employ ment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. As set forth more fully below, Michael Todd Hacker submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ UAS or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Further, Michael Todd Hacker submits that all flights ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant ofthis Petition: (1) will be incidental to Michael Todd Hacker's business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. **2. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Relief**  **From Sectio** **n 91.7(a).** 
Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to allow Michael Todd Hacker to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., the Michael Todd Hacker Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual).Michael Todd Hacker seeks the requested reliefbecause the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and

DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Michael Todd Hacker will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below. **3. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Relief**  **From Section**  **91.121.**
Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Michael Todd Hacker seeks the requested reliefbecause the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. Considering the limited altitude ofthe proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information ofthe UA on the heads

-up display ofthe GCS. **4. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Relief**  **From Section**  **91.151(b).**
Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, isrequested to the extent required to allow flights ofthe battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point ofintended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. Michael Todd Hacker seeks the requested reliefbecause without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration ofthe battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that Michael Todd Hacker proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 operating documents, and Michael Todd Hacker’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Michael Todd Hacker will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. **5. Extent**  **Of Relief**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **And The**  **Reason Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks Relief**  **From Sections**  **91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),**  **91.409(a)(1) &**  **(a)(2), And**  **91.417(a) &**  **(b).**
Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Michael Todd Hacker requests relief from these Sections because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions ofFMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Michael Todd Hacker will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Michael Todd Hacker Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Michael Todd Hacker will document and maintain allmaintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs.

**D. The**  **Reasons Why**  **Granting Michael**  **Todd Hac** **ker Request**  **Would Be**  **In The**  **Public Interest;**  **That Is,**  **How It**  **Would Benefit**  **The Public**  **As A**  **Whole.** Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Michael Todd Hacker to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas ofthe United States. Additionally, use ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will decrease congestion ofthe NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits ofMichael Todd Hacker’s proposed operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be realized without implicating any privacy issues. **1. The**  **Public Will**  **Benefit From**  **Decreased Congestion**  **Of The**  **NAS.** The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery

. By reducing the amount ofmanned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions,

an exemption allowing the use ofa DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS would reduce the amount ofmanned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety oflife and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, by reducing the number ofmanned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs do not require an airport to takeoffor land. Likewise,

a reduction ofmanned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. **2. The**  **Public Will**  **Benefit From**  **The Safety**  **And Efficiency**  **Of The**  **DJI Pha** **ntom 2**  **Vision+ and**  **DJI Inspire**  **1 UASs.**  Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, instead ofmanned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels ofairand noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight

operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are ty pically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20

-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. By using the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced

or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs (weighing approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces and 6 pounds 7.5 ounces respectively, at their maximum gross weights with lengths of 16 inches and 17.3 inches respectively, widths of 16 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that ty pically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan ofapproximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). **3. Performing**  **Aerial Video**  **and Photography**  **Operations With**  **The DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision+ and**  **DJI Inspire**  **1 UASs**  **Will Benefit**  **The Economy.** 
In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will allow United States based companies, like Michael Todd Hacker, to remain competitive and contribute to growth ofthe U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels,U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to

remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. By operating the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, companies such as Michael Todd Hacker, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greaterjob stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth ofthe U.S.

economy. Improved financial performance ofU.S. companies, through commercial use ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, provides a stable workforce that increases

consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.**4. There**  **Are No**  **Privacy Issues.**  Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, Michael Todd Hacker’s proposed operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., the Michael Todd Hacker Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

**E. The**  **Reasons Why**  **Granting The**  **Exemption Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety,**  **Or How**  **The Exemption**  **Would Provide**  **A Level**  **Of Safety**  **At Least**  **Equal To**  **That Provided**  **By The**  **Rule From**  **Which Michael**  **Todd Ha** **cker Seeks**  **Exemption. 1.**  **Reasons Why**  **The DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision+ and**  **DJI Inspire**  **1 UAs**  **Meet The**  **Conditions Of**  **The FAA**  **Modernization and**  **Reform Act**  **of 2012**  **(FMRA) Section**  **333.**In consideration ofthe size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Michael Todd Hacker’s operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions ofFMRA Section 333, and will not require

an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users ofthe NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security

. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: (a ) In General.

--Notwithstanding any other requirement ofthis subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date ofenactment ofthis Act, the Secretary ofTransportation shall determine ifcertain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion oftheplan and rulemaking required by section 332 ofthis Act or the guidance required by section 334 ofthis Act. (b ) Assessment ofUnmannedAircraft Systems.

--In making the determination under subsection (a

), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

-- (1 ) which types ofunmanned aircraft systems, ifany, as a result oftheir size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports andpopulated areas, and operation within visual line ofsight do not create a hazard to users ofthe national airspace system or thepublic orpose a threat to national security; and (2 ) whether a certificate ofwaiver, certificate ofauthorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 oftitle 49, United States Code, is required for the operation ofunmanned aircraft systems identified underparagraph (1 ). (c) Requirementsfor Safe Operation.

--Ifthe Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirementsfor the safe operation ofsuch aircraft systems in the national airspace system.
In seeking this exemption, Michael Todd Hacker submits that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

**a. The**  **S pecifications**  **Of The**  **DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision+**  **and DJI**  **Inspire 1**  **UASs Demonstrate**  **Its Safe**  **Characteristics.**
The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not create a hazard to users ofthe NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight,

speed, and operational capability

.

**i. Technical**  **Specifications Of**  **The DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision+ and**  **DJI Inspire**  **1 UASs.** 
The technical specifications ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are set forth by the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Specifications and Data Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A and B.

**ii. The**  **DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision+**  **and DJI**  **Inspire 1**  **UASs Autonomous**  **Flight And**  **Navigation Modes**  **Enable The**  **UASs To**  **Remain Within**  **A Defined**  **Operational Area.** 
The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A complete description ofthe flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is provided at pages 25

-35 ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and pages 12

-16 and 45

-50 ofthe DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached hereto as Exhibit C and D.

**iii. The**  **DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision+**  **and DJI**  **Inspire 1**  **UASs Are**  **Designed For**  **Automatic Return**  **To Home**  **Point Or**  **Hover In**  **The Event**  **Of Loss**  **Of The**  **Control Link**  **Or Navigation.** 
When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs do not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAs will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoffposition and shutdown. A complete description ofthe Failsafe Functions ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ UAS are set forth at pages 27 through 29 and for the DJI Inspire 1 at pages 13 through 15 ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached hereto as Exhibit C and D.

**iv. The**  **DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision+**  **and DJI**  **Inspire 1**  **GCS And**  **Its Opera** **tion.**
A complete description ofthe operation and specifications ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through 43 ofthe DJIPhantom 2 Vision+ User Manual and pages 40 through 47 ofthe DJI Inspire 1 User Manual. DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibits C and D.

**b. Flight**  **Operations Of**  **DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision+**  **and DJI**  **Inspire 1**  **UASs Are**  **Limited To**  **The Line**  **Of Sight**  **Of A**  **Certificated Pilot**  **in Command**  **With A**  **Safety Observer.** 
Michael Todd Hacker will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and valid airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots during flight time.

**c. Flights**  **Of DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision+ and**  **DJI Inspire**  **1 UASs**  **Will Be**  **Conducted Pursuant**  **To Specific**  **Operating Limitations.** 
In seeking this exemption, Michael Todd Hacker proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs for the special purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography over certain areas ofUnited States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations: 1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the f ollowing aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose ofaerial video and photography

. 3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 4. The UA must be operated at an altitude ofno more than 500 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) ofthe PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

-issued airman medical certificate. 6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability

. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration ofthe flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operatingdocuments.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 9. The operating documents and the grant ofexemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents ifit petitions for extension or amendment to the grant ofexemption. Ifthe operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant ofexemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. Ifthe inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation ofthe UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement ofa flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records. 12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections ofthe operating documents. 13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status ofreplacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description ofwork accomplished, and the signature ofthe authorized person returning the UAS to service. 15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record ofthe corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

class medical certificate.18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms ofthe exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1. 1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area ofoperations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles ofan airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA

-published aeronautical chart unless a letter ofagreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 22. Ifthe UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents. 23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event ofunpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents. 24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class ofairspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements. 26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control ofthe UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station ofthe UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right ofway to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times. 30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet ofthe UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment ofthe risk ofoperating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

-access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries ofthe operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

. **2. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **61.113(a) And**  **(b) Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety.** 
Michael Todd Hacker submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Considering Michael Todd Hacker’s proposed area ofoperations, and the operating limitations set forth

-above; the parallel nature ofprivate pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS, Michael Todd Hacker submits that the additional manned airmanship experience ofa commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Michael Todd Hacker’s specific proposed flight operations. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). Michael Todd Hacker will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours oftotal time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model ofUAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that

was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safetyduring Michael Todd Hacker’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior

documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would

ensure safe operations, stating as follows: In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose ofmotion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours oftotal time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model ofUAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours ofmulti

-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours ofUAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

-hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

-building flights can also be conducted under the grant ofexemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience

-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. Accordingly, Michael Todd Hacker will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. **3. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.7(a) Would**  **Not Ad** **versely Affect**  **Safety.**
The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every flight, Michael Todd Hacker will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein. Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific toUAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption

Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **4. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.121 Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety.** 
The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude information ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring ofthe flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with Michael Todd Hacker’s operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **5. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Section**  **91.151(b) Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety.** 
A grant ofthis exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location ofthe proposed flight operations. Accordingly, Michael Todd Hacker will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point ofintended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications ofthe DJI Phantom 2

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location ofthe proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will descend and land automatically

. Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations ofthe UAS are considered. Reliefhas been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **6. Reasons**  **Why An**  **Exemption From**  **The Requirements**  **Of Sections**  **91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),**  **91.409(a)(1) &**  **(a)(2), And**  **91.417(a) &**  **(b) Would**  **Not Adversely**  **Affect Safety.** 
In seeking this exemption, Michael Todd Hacker submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Michael Todd Hacker will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the Michael Todd Hacker Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Michael Todd Hacker will document and maintain all maintenance records for theDJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs.

Since the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, Michael Todd Hacker will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibit C and D; a copy ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Exhibit E. Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely af fect safety because Michael Todd Hacker will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log. Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations ofthe UAS are considered. In consideration ofMichael Todd Hacker’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, Michael Todd Hacker submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). **7. The**  **FAA May**  **Prescribe Any**  **Other Conditions**  **For Safe**  **Operation.**In accordance with Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012

(FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Michael Todd Hacker requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation ofthe UAs for the limited purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography
over certain areas ofthe United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users ofthe NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation ofthe UAS in the NAS. Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features ofthe aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: Ifthe FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations ofthis subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because ofa novel or unusual design feature ofthe aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 ofthis chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.
See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21,Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). **1. A**  **Summary That**  **Can Be**  **Published In**  **The Federal**  **Register, stating:**  **The Rules**  **From Which**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker Seeks**  **Exemption:** Michael Todd Hacker seeks exemptionfrom the requirements of14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a )(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). **A Brief**  **Description Of**  **The Nature**  **Of The**  **Exemption Michael**  **Todd Hacker**  **Seeks:** This exemption willpermit Michael Todd Hacker to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)for thepurpose ofconducting aerial video andphotography over certain areas ofthe United States. **1. Any**  **Additional Information,**  **Views, Or**  **Arguments Available**  **To Support**  **Michael Todd**  **Hacker ’** **s Request.** 
This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary ofTransportation to determine ifcertain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Michael Todd Hacker’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority ofFMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create
a hazard to users ofthe NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. As discussed in detail above, Michael Todd Hacker will operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users ofthe NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.**CONCLUSION**

As set forth herein, Michael Todd Hacker seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation ofthe DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography over certain areas ofthe United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, while also advancing the interests ofthe public, by allowing Michael Todd Hacker to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially within the NAS. **WHEREFORE**, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, Section 333, Michael Todd Hacker respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ andDJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially for the purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography

over certain areas ofthe United States. Dated: April 3, 2015

Thank you, Michael Todd Hacker

Michael Todd Hacker 2366 Sunburst Rd Evington VA, 24550 434

-426

-6037