alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                             538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,636
<PP&E>                                         124,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,233
<BONDS>                                          4,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,083
<SALES>                                        399,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,251
<CGS>                                          302,458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Eads St. Corp. et al., Petitioners, and Joseph Realty Co. et al., Appellants, v Town of Babylon et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 878]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review three resolutions of the Town Board of the Town of Babylon dated June 7, 1994, October 18,1994, and October 28, 1994, respectively relating to the establishment of a commercial refuse and garbage collection improvement area, the petitioners Joseph Realty Co., World Sanitation Corp, N.P.R. Corp., Paragon Carting Corp., and Steven Joseph appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated November 10, 1994, which *sua sponte*dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings.

The Town of Babylon commenced procedures to establish a commercial refuse and garbage collection improvement area, pursuant to Town Law § 54. Town Law § 54 (3) requires publication of a notice of hearing which recites, *inter alia,*"the proposed method of apportioning the costs of such improvement”. Town Law § 54 (4) provides, in relevant part, that "[i]f the town board shall determine, after the hearing * * * that *415the proposed method of apportioning the costs of such improvement should be changed, the board shall specify the changes and shall call a further public hearing”. In the instant case, a cause of action was properly alleged because the Town of Babylon failed to hold a hearing prior to adopting the resolutions dated October 18, 1994, and October 28, 1994, which altered the method of the apportionment of costs. It was therefore error for the Supreme Court to dismiss the petition. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
List of Documents Submitted from the State of Virginia

 July 23, 2012, Letter from David K. Paylor, Director, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Ms. Dana Esher, Director, Air Programs Division, U.S. EPA Region III, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  Enclosure 1, State of Virginia 110(a)(2) requirements in the state implementation plan for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS.  Enclosure 2, State of Virginia certification of public participation activities.  Enclosure 2a, State of Virgini a general notices of the proposed state implementation plan.  Enclosure 3, State of Virginia 110(a)(2) Public Participation Record.
Exhibit 10.03.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                    TRAVELERS GROUP 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                       (AS AMENDED THROUGH JULY 23, 1997)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Section 17 of the Travelers Group 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is hereby
amended to add the following sentence at the end of such Section:

                  "The value of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered
                  for tax withholding may not exceed the amount allowed
                  consistent with fixed plan accounting in accordance with
                  generally accepted accounting principles."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40061 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KARL GAYWIN ACLESE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-81-2

-------------------- December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Karl Gaywin Aclese (# 04913-078) appeals from the denial of a motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and a motion for reconsideration. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A motion filed pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) is a further motion filed by a defendant in a criminal case, and a notice of appeal in a criminal case must be filed within ten days of the judgment or order appealed. SeeNo. 99-40061 -2- § 3582(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). A timely filed motion for reconsideration extends the time for taking an appeal so that the period begins to run when the motion is denied. United States v. Lewis , 921 F.2d 563, 564 (5th Cir. 1991). Although Aclese’s timely filed motion for reconsideration extended the period for filing a notice of appeal, orders issued by the magistrate judge are not appealable directly to this
court. See Mendes Junior Int'l Co. v. M/V SOKAI MARU , 978 F.2d 920, 924 (5th Cir. 1992)(entry of judgment by magistrate judge without the appropriate consent and reference or special order of designation results in a lack of jurisdiction); see also Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. , 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984)(orders issued by magistrate judge are not appealable to this court). Accordingly, Aclese’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PETER TILTON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0098RSL

ORDER REGARDING 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of

law, filed on December 7, 2007 at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief. (Dkt. #258). For

the reasons set forth during the trial, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the

motion. Plaintiff’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is dismissed. Even if the

conduct about which plaintiff complains occurred, it is not outrageous. Plaintiff may proceed

with his claims for promissory estoppel and invasion of privacy. 

Defendants also filed a motion for summary judgment on December 3, 2007 (Dkt. #250) 

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 263 Filed 12/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

which is DENIED as untimely.

 

DATED this 11th day of December, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 263 Filed 12/11/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
     JULY 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1998          
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1997    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1    
<CASH>                              156,955              
<SECURITIES>                      2,544,438    
<RECEIVABLES>                       152,975    
<ALLOWANCES>                              0    
<INVENTORY>                         186,150    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,087,242    
<PP&E>                              492,026    
<DEPRECIATION>                      336,662    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    5,124,679    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               237,759    
<BONDS>                                   0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0    
<PREFERRED>                               0    
<COMMON>                         12,764,703    
<OTHER-SE>                                0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      5,124,679    
<SALES>                             186,709    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    186,709    
<CGS>                               188,836    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       188,836    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    623,024    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (563,150)    
<INCOME-TAX>                              0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (563,150)    
<DISCONTINUED>                            0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0    
<CHANGES>                                 0    
<NET-INCOME>                       (563,150)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.12)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.12)   
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medwave, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and dates listed below, hereby certifies that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and shall not be deemed part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




Date:    August 12, 2004


                                                   By:  /s/ Timothy J. O'Malley
                                                       -------------------------
                                                   Timothy J. O'Malley
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer (Principal Executive
                                                   Officer and Principal
                                                   Financial Officer)


                                       16
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1996 and Consolidated
     Statement of Operations  for the nine (9) months ended  September 3o, 1996,
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,601,079
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,983,634 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,102,575
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,402,219
<PP&E>                                         125,863,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,883,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,562,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,527,550
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             9,257
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,307,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,562,871
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,708,980
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,752,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   786,695
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,293,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,697,820)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       207,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,905,531)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,905,531)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.45)
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 5, 2023.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

                        The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.                              ( print page 67856)    

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 28, 2023.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-21848 Filed 9-28-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Catherine DAmicoCatherine DAmicoExecutive Vice President  Finance and
Chief Financial Officer  22
Before the Third Division,

September 30, 1960

No. 64605.

#### Austin-Nichols & Co., Inc., and Julius Wile Sons Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protects 59/19334 and 58/7283 (New York).

*292Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61245, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Searched for **http://www.healthit.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.healthit.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 61564.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 269563-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0613 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN MORRIS, Defendant and Appellant, TROY NELSON, Defendant and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 5 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2020

07/15/2020
Case 2:05-cv-01768-MJP Document 17 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1
From: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

To: David Putney/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Bilskis, Patricia A." <Patricia.Bilskis@alcoa.com>, "Mitchell, Kathryn M" 

<Kathryn.Mitchell@alcoa.com>

Date: 05/18/2012 02:21 PM

Subject: FW: POM test data for Intalco - Part 2 of 2

________________________________________

Second half of Intalco POM test report.

Mike

Michael Palazzolo

Alcoa Inc.

201 Isabella Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858

Ph: 412-553-4832
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0464

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) – Second Round

FROM: Rhea Jones

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS

DATE: April 25, 2016

SUBJECT: Available Air Dispersion Modeling Files Received in Response to the EPA’s 

Intended Designations Under the Court-Ordered July 2, 2016 Deadline

The EPA has air quality modeling files, submitted by states and third parties, which were

received in response to our intended designations for areas subject to this action to promulgate 

designations under the 2010 primary SO2 NAAQS. These files are located within the EPA 

Regional Offices for the respective states within each Region. The EPA Regional Offices will 

respond to specific requests for subsets of the data or for specific inputs and outputs of the 

modeling process, as available. Requests for these files should be sent to the following 

individuals, for the states within their Regions:

EPA Region 1: Leiran Biton (biton.leiran@epa.gov)

EPA Region 2: Henry Feingersh (feingersh.henry@epa.gov)

EPA Region 3: Irene Shandruk (shandruk.irene@epa.gov)

EPA Region 4: Twunjala Bradley (bradley.twunjala@epa.gov)

EPA Region 5: John Summerhays (summerhays.john@epa.gov)

EPA Region 6: Dayana Medina (medina.dayana@epa.gov)

EPA Region 7: David Peter (peter.david@epa.gov)

EPA Region 8: Adam Clark (clark.adam@epa.gov)

EPA Region 9: Gwen Yoshimura (yoshimura.gwen@epa.gov)

EPA Region 10: John Chi (chi.john@epa.gov)