alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Daniel C. DunnDaniel
      C. DunnVice
      President, Chief Financial Officer &
  Secretary


February
8, 2011
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, Frank Rossana, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BigWest Environmental, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I; are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and   c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date: November 12, 2009   /s/ Frank Rossana Frank Rossana Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

FRANCISCO R. CASTRO,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5175RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 (X) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (X) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 April 13, 2006.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom_______________

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05175-RBL Document 9 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 1
March 5, 1962

No. 66547.

#### Hercules Division of the Cleveland Welding Co. v. United States,

protest 58/430.

Protest abandoned February 6, 1962. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of United States Oil and Gas Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Tawse, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  June 3, 2011



/s/ Alex TawseAlex TawseChief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United States Oil and Gas Corp and will be retained by United States Oil and Gas Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is made solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and not for any other purpose
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 1, 

2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00109-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.S. AND G.R.S., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 306th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-FD-2488

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed February 12, 2021. On March 8, 

2021, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Wilson.
EXHIBIT 10.47

LETTER AGREEMENT

March
28, 2003

Special
Devices, Incorporated
14370 White Sage Road
Moorpark, CA 93021

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

This
letter agreement is entered into by and between Special Devices, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Foothill Capital Corporation (the "Lender") (this "Letter
Agreement"). Reference is made to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 27, 2001, between the Company and Lender, as amended by that certain letter agreement dated as of
July 17, 2002, and that certain letter agreement dated as of October 23, 2002 (as amended, the "Loan Agreement"). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Letter
Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement. The term "Loan Documents" as defined in the Loan Agreement is hereby amended and supplemented to include this Letter
Agreement.

The
Company and Lender desire to amend the Loan Agreement to permit Interest Periods of four (4) months for LIBOR Rate Loans (in addition to permitting 1, 2, 3 and 6 month
Interest Periods).

Therefore,
the Loan Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement.The definition of "Interest Period" appearing in Section 1.1
of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the clause "1, 2, 3, or 6 months" where it appears in both places of such definition with the clause "1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 months."

2.Section 2.13(a) of the Loan Agreement.Section 2.13(a) of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended
by replacing the clause "1, 2 or 3 months" with the clause "1, 2, 3 or 4 months."

Except
as specifically set forth above and as set forth in other amendments and agreements in writing between the parties in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Loan Agreement,
the respective rights and obligations of the parties under the Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged.

This
Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The terms
and conditions of the Loan Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Letter Agreement.

This
Letter Agreement shall become effective upon the Company returning a executed copy of this Letter Agreement to Lender.

Please
indicate your agreement by signing as indicated below.

Very
truly yours,

|FOOTHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION  |                       
|----------------------------- | ----------------------
|/s/JOHN NOCITA                |                       
|Agreed and Acknowledged:      |                       
|SPECIAL DEVICES, INCORPORATED |                       
|By:                           | /s/JAMES E. REEDER    
|Name:                         | JAMES E. REEDER       
|Title:                        | VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE
|Date:                         | MARCH 28, 2003        
|                              |                       

---

QuickLinks
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21

- 0212 V

UNPUBLISHED

DA VID C. JOHNSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 12, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

Petitioner.

Matthew Murphy , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On January 7, 2021

, David C. Johnson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulde r injury related to flu

vaccin ation ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu) vaccine he received on Sep tember
19, 2019 . Petition at 1

. Petitioner further alleges that he cont inued to suffer the sequelae

of his SIRVA for more th an six months . Petition at ¶ 3

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 11, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 6

.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I wil l redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 Specifically, R espondent states that “ Petitioner ’ s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA

of the left arm and that it meets the require ments o f a Table injury claim for SIRVA stemming from the flu vaccination on September 19, 2019

. Id . Respondent further agrees

that “ records show that he suffered the se quela of this injury for more than six months

. ”

Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### In the Matter of James T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 279]

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard N. Ross, J.), entered May 20, 1994, which dismissed, on speedy trial grounds, the juvenile delinquency petition, without prejudice, unanimously reversed, on the law, the petition reinstated and the matter remanded for further proceedings, without costs.

Where respondent was not in detention and the complainant, who had been subpoenaed by mail, failed to appear on May 20, 1994, the date set for the fact-finding hearing, which date was the 36th day after respondent’s initial court appearance on April 14, 1994, it was an improvident exercise of the Family Court’s discretion to deny the presentment agency’s request for an adjournment so that the complainant could be personally served with a subpoena.

Family Court Act § 340.1 (2) provides that "[i]f the respondent is not in detention the fact-finding hearing shall commence not more than sixty days after the conclusion of the initial appearance” *(see also, Matter of Nakia L.,*81 NY2d 898; *Matter of Randy K.,*77 NY2d 398). Moreover, Family Court Act § 340.1 (4) provides that the proceeding may be adjourned once for "not more than thirty days” after the expiration of the 60 day period on motion of the court or the parties "for good cause shown”. Inasmuch as the respondent was not in detention and May 20th was the 36th day after his initial court appearance, the presentment agency did not have to make a showing of good cause to be granted an adjournment within the 60 day period. In any event, in light of the reason proffered for the adjournment, to secure the attendance of the complaining witness who, although the court believed he was no longer interested in pursuing this matter, may just as likely have *353failed to receive the subpoena, forgotten to come to court or misunderstood the subpoena’s directive and, in light of the total lack of prejudice which the respondent would have suffered from the granting of a short adjournment, the court erred in concluding that good cause was not demonstrated (see, *Matter of Bryant J.,*195 AD2d 463, 464 [a case virtually identical to the instant case]). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
No. 62835.

#### “21” Brands, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 319310-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the *304importer. In accordance with, stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon the four cases reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 777 

Offering condolences regarding the tragic fire in Ocean Isle Beach, North 

Carolina, which killed six University of South Carolina students and 

one student from Clemson University on October 28, 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, 

Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. INGLIS of South 

Carolina, Mr. SPRATT, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. HAYES, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, 

Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. MCINTYRE, 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. ISSA, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. AKIN, and Mr. WALBERG) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Offering condolences regarding the tragic fire in Ocean Isle 

Beach, North Carolina, which killed six University of 

South Carolina students and one student from Clemson 

University on October 28, 2007. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives offers 

2 its heartfelt condolences to the victims and their families 

3 regarding the tragic fire on October 28, 2007, in Ocean 

4 Isle Beach, North Carolina, which killed six University of 

5 South Carolina students and one student from Clemson 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 777 IH 

1 University, and to the students, faculty, administration 

2 and staff and their families who have been deeply affected 

3 by the tragic events that occurred there. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, our financial condition and result of  operations. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                     |                                   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                           | Murals      by Maurice, Inc.(Registrant)                 |
|                           |                                                     |                                   |
| Date:      April 8, 2009  | By:                                                      | /s/ Maurice KatzMaurice      Katz |
|                           | Chief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer |
December 11, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Managements System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act Amendment to Document ID: FAA-2015-3860-0001 Dear FAA/FSS representative, It is in the public interest to grant this request for several reasons. The video and photos from the UAS are used to promote a product or service of a business, bring new perspective to a video project, and showcase real estate properties in an innovative way. The UAS is becoming a vital asset to video productions by adding a new, unique vantage point. Since a small UAS is much more accessible and easier to operate than a helicopter, they can replace helicopters for many video applications. Using a small UAS in place of a helicopter when possible substantially reduces risk of injury to persons or damage to property, especially if operation is in a confined area. Aerial views of properties can be beneficial to the real estate market by bringing potential buyers to local communities. Thanks for your consideration,

Patrick Sean McCurry
BULLETIN 1009 PLATE 1

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

= 142

—

TRUE NORTH
WignE
Ti
RoR

i
i

TRUE _NORTH.

WAR =

Pr 5
CoRR

Cae
aw aay
oT
7.
_—_ gg

i

—_— : mI
uly,

120 Feet

“w-22;0,020 }
40 °

PORTAL OF 5220 LEVEL
Dalaran ws approximate risan sea fave

UNDERGROUND WORKINGS

5228 (MAIN) LEVEL

ZN
CIM,

AI

5150'-
s100
64,0.001 _
\ ——
SECTIONS
40 ° 120 Feet
_— ——
Dai 6 Bop otimate a ToeT
EXPLANATION
a ane vo
__# S tack al sha
ceocafgeaeaus sapastone. | clashed where approximately located “ x
2 —4.y-__ Bottom of shaft
“appexmtenatad apton Sz
Ske 8, downtown side Inced workings
ee chia ont on
Fault, in section,
shomng isiave ovement Head of wnze
Carbonate vein
roe z at Foot ot wnze
what = Strike and dip of beds
Paginatite 3 ze Ore chute
Map and ran 2 stnke and dip of foliation a
7) a Ccaved workings
Uy Sirk and dip of ots
Metamarpiie rocks _.o0 Opencut
‘Strike of vertical joints anand Sy
Dump
W-73,0 002
«0 ° 200 Feet ample umber, percent uramum
: ~ Contour interval 10 feet
Dats apron See el
Geology and lopography by VR Wilmarth
GEOLOGIC MAP, UNDERGROUND WORKINGS, AND SECTIONS OF THE SILVER CLIFF MINE, LUSK, NIOBRARA COUNTY, WYOMING COM ETE Ae
205996 0 - 54 In pocket
No. 68120.

#### Rice-Bayersdorfer Company *v.*United States,

protests 62/6462, 62/6463, and 62/6466 (Philadelphia).

*259Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of tinsel wire, which are not artificial or ornamental fruits, etc., or parts thereof, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.