U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

October 15, 2015 

Ms. Diana Aguilar 

Parent of Azul Garduno 

2828 South Tripp A venue 

Chicago, IL 60623 

Dear Ms. Aguilar: 

Exemption No. 13204 

800 Independence Ave . S W 

Washington. D.C 20591 

Regulatory Docket No. F AA-20 15-4078 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for an exemption. It transmits 

our decision, expla ins its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated September 30, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of your daughter Azul Garduno for an exemption from § 121.311 (b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Azul to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved child restraint 

system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint 

system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.)-registered aircraft. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Azul. 

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety , support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons 

with disabilities. 

AFS- 15-4070-E 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that-

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(t), 40113 and 44701 , which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Azul Garduno an exemption from 

§ 121 .311 (b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 

while Azul is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121 .311 (b) to the 

extent necessary to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S-registered aircraft. 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with Azul's parent or a caregiver 

accompanying her. Azul may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind 

her. In addition, Azul's parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise 

the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each 

flight. 

This exemption tenninates on October 31 , 2020, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ 

John Barbagallo 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure