alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

May 24, 1965

No. 69317.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/3788, etc. (Los Angeles).

Donlon, Judge:

Counsel have submitted the protests recited in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision and of the judgment, on a stipulation reciting that the entry invoice items marked “T” and initialed by an examiner are the same in all material respects as the merchandise in *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States,*53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484, and that the entry invoice items marked “A” and initialed by an examiner are the same in all material respects as the merchandise in *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio*
      *435
      *R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company,*47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719. In those decisions, it was held that the cups and saucers of the protests were not dutiable as tableware under modified paragraph 212, as classified by the collector, but were dutiable as decorated chinaware, other than tableware, under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), effective September 10,1955 (T.D. 53877), at the modified rate in effect on the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption.

Accepting the stipulation as a statement of facts and on authority of the decisions cited, *supra,*we hold that the cups and saucers represented by the items marked with the letter “T” and with the letter “A” and initialed by an examiner on the invoices covered by the protests and entries recited in schedule A, are dutiable as decorated chinaware, other than tableware, not containing 25 per centum or more of calcined bone under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), effective September 10, 1955 (T.D. 53877), at the rate in effect on the date when the cups and saucers were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption.

To the extent indicated, the protests are sustained. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the protests are overruled.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD L. BASKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMANDA MIGCHELBRINK

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5200 RJB/KLS

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial

partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent

of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is

satisfied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis,

the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee

equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average

monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this

Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

Case 3:06-cv-05200-RJB Document 5 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($350.00) for this matter has been paid. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of

this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager of plaintiff’s correctional facility.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05200-RJB Document 5 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

September 30, 1959

No. 63400.

protests 58/1746 and 58/6614 (New York).

#### Bel-Art Products *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise described on the invoices as “KAUTEX-Weithalsflasehen aus PA,” identified by numbers 315/520, 316/520, 317/521, 318/521, “with or without the numbers following the stroke,” consists of polyethylene bottles, having a capacity of less than 300 cubic centimeters, similar in use to the articles provided for in paragraph 217, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108). Said merchandise was held dutiable, as stipulated, under paragraph 217, as modified by T.D. 54108, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended, as follows: The bottles holding less than 14 pint, imported on and subsequent to June 30, 1957, but prior to June 30, 1958, at 22 cents per gross and those imported on and subsequent to June 30, 1958, at 21 cents per gross. The bottles with a capacity of more than 1 pint and not less than % pint were held dutiable at three-fourths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217, as modified by the Annecy Protocol .to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476). It was further stipulated that the merchandise described on the invoices as “Urinfiaschen mit Deckel,” identified by number 3155, is similar in use to the steel hospital utensils provided for in paragraph 339, as modified by T.D. 54108. Accordingly, said merchandise was held dutiable, as stipulated, under paragraph 339, as modified by T.D. 54108, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended, as follows: The articles imported on and subsequent to June 30, 1957, but prior to June 30, 1958, at 18 percent and those imported on and subsequent to June 30, 1958, at 17 percent.
No. 66548.

#### Ottavia, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/11586 (B) and 59/170.

Protests abandoned February 5, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 59/170.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,683
<PP&E>                                       1,813,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,620,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,123
<BONDS>                                      1,679,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,844
<OTHER-SE>                                     742,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,620,115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               514,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
"Doc^-tf l)or'O^T'Xcch io((>85 

JOHNNY L. DUPREE, PH.D. 

MAYOR 

CouncU-Wardl CouncU-Ward2 CouncU - Ward 3 CouncU-Ward4 CouncU - Ward 5 

Kim Bradley Deborah Denard Delgado Carter Carroll Dave J. Ware, II Henry Naylor 

April 13,2010 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Z.^ 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 ; ] 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Departmertt of Transportation 

S"" Floor, Room W86-472 S^^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. S[^ 

Washington, DC 20590 : -; c5 

Re: EAS Order 2010-2-29 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

The City of Hattiesburg is in receipt of the proposals from Mesaba Airlines, d/b/a Delta Airlines and 

Sovereign Air, Inc. to provide essential air service to the citizens of the Hattiesburg-Laurel region. 

Currently the City of Hattiesburg has weathered the recession due to the vital role of Camp Shelby as a 

mobilization center for our armed forces. The University of Southern Mississippi's enrollment continues 

to grow, and its world class Polymer Science Department continues to develop high tech jobs for the 

area. 

Therefore, the City of Hattiesburg proposes acceptance of Mesaba Airlines to provide essential air 

service. Based on past service and performance to the area, seat capacity, hub location and more 

coimections for travelers, we feel that Mesaba is a better choice and will continue to help our community 

grow. 

We appreciate your past efforts in securing an essential air service carrier and your cooperation in our 

endeavor to maintain the highest^ossible level of air service for our citizens. 

Sinc^ly, 

DuPree, Ph.D. 

, City of Hattiesburg 

JLD/kmh 

Telephone (601) 545-4501 • Fax (601) 545-4608 

Email nutyor@hattiesburgms.com • Website www.hattiesburgms.com
From: corona4god@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gloria Pongs

Corona, CA 92882
Exhibit 31.2

I, Peter J. Scanlon, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Startech
     Environmental Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, and results of operations and cash flows
     of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision
         to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
         including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
         within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
         report is being prepared;

     b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls over financial reporting.

Date: September 14, 2007

By: /s/ Peter J. Scanlon
    ------------------------
    Peter J. Scanlon
    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Vice President and
    Principal Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 171/1 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 171 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 471 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 171

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 471 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 171/1

Euro exchange rates

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 1.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

30 June 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2155 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67075 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1451 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5242 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,33 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4365 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58150 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,755 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6570 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5236 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 626 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9900 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,875 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7554 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6343 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4803 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9210 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0901 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6177 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2155

JPY

Japanese yen

132,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67075

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1451

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5242

ISK

Iceland króna

88,33

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4365

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58150

CZK

Czech koruna

31,755

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6570

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4263

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5236

ROL

Romanian leu

40 626

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9900

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,875

TRL

Turkish lira

1 805 300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7554

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6343

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4803

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9210

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0901

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,45

ZAR

South African rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOTREX
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         135,720
<SECURITIES>                                    17,499
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,969
<INVENTORY>                                     48,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,005
<PP&E>                                          67,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,729
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,117
<SALES>                                        265,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,121
<CGS>                                          168,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,441
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        



</TABLE>
Wdesk | Exhibit








Exhibit 10(a)(2)
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and effective as of April 3, 2018, by and between Andrea G. Short (hereinafter “Executive”), and 1st Source Corporation, an Indiana corporation (hereinafter “Employer”).
WHEREAS, Executive is currently employed as the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Employer and Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Employer’s subsidiary, 1st Source Bank (“Bank”), pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2013, and amended as of February 6, 2014 (“Employment Agreement”); and 
WHEREAS, Executive and Employer have agreed to further amend the Employment Agreement as provided below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement and this Amendment, Executive and Employer hereby agree that Section 6(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
“6(b).  If such termination occurs within one (1) year after a Change in Control of Employer or Bank, then as severance pay and in lieu of any further compensation for periods subsequent to the effective date of such termination, Executive shall receive, within thirty (30) days following such termination, an amount in cash equal to 2.99 times her “annualized includable compensation for the base period” (as defined in Section 280G(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)), provided that, for purposes of such calculation, Executive’s average annual compensation shall be determined by excluding all compensation other than Executive’s annual base pay and any bonuses awarded under the Company’s bonus plans, and specifically excluding any accelerated vesting or conversion of stock awards or exercise of stock options regardless of their inclusion in the Executive’s reportable gross income.”      
As hereby modified, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.
1st Source Corporation
	
					
	By:
	/s/ Christopher J. Murphy III
	 
	 
	/s/ Andrea G. Short

	 
	Christopher J. Murphy III
	 
	 
	Andrea G. Short

	 
	Chairman of the Board and 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Chief Executive Officer