alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                                  ------------

                        EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT DESCRIPTION
                        --------------------------------


ARTHUR K. GUYTON, PH.D.
-----------------------

The Company, pursuant to an employment arrangement, hired Dr. Guyton as Vice
President of Special Projects on August 17, 2001, subject to a 90 day
probationary period, for an annual salary of $105,000.  In connection with his
employment arrangement, Dr. Guyton is to receive, subject to satisfactory
performance during the time periods described below, restricted common stock
in accordance with the following schedule:

                             Period           Shares
                      --------------------    ------
                      08/17/01 to 11/30/01    25,000
                      12/01/01 to 02/28/02    25,000
                      03/01/02 to 05/31/02    25,000
                      06/01/02 to 08/31/02    25,000
                      09/01/02 to 11/30/02    25,000
                      12/01/02 to 02/28/03    25,000






























                                    Page 34
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 815 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that staff-led tours 

of the United States Capitol should be preserved. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2007 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. CAPUANO, and Mr. MATHESON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

staff-led tours of the United States Capitol should be 

preserved. 

Whereas the Capitol Visitor’s Center is scheduled to open in 

the fall of 2008 and it has been proposed that professional staff will exclusively begin to give tours; 

Whereas Members of Congress should retain the ability to 

provide their constituents staff-led tours; 

Whereas staff-led tours have become a longstanding tradition 

in the United States Capitol; 

Whereas Capitol tours provide constituents an opportunity to 

meet their Member of Congress and personal staff and 

receive unique local perspectives and insights regarding 

the history of the United States Capitol; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 815 IH 

Whereas staff-led tours allow for smaller more personalized 

tours; 

Whereas staff-led tours provide constituents a closer look at 

the work of the Member’s office; and 

Whereas explicitly limiting Capitol tours to just 1 provider, 

United States Capitol Guide Service, will severely limit a 

constituent’s experience of their Representative’s congressional office: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the continuation of staff-led tours of the United States 

3 Capitol. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2015

114th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–57 

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR PAY INCREASES FOR 

CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR PAY INCREASES FOR CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE GENERAL SCHEDULE AND 

CERTAIN OTHER PAY SYSTEMS IN JANUARY 2016, PURSUANT TO 

5 U.S.C. 5303(b) AND 5304a 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2015.—Referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 28, 2015. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 

pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the General 

Schedule and certain other pay systems in January 2016. 

Title 5, United States Code, authorizes me to implement alternative pay plans for pay increases for civilian Federal employees 

covered by the General Schedule and certain other pay systems if, 

because of ‘‘national emergency or serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare,’’ I view the adjustments that would 

otherwise take effect as inappropriate. 

Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to exercise 

my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 U.S.C. 5303(b) and 

5304a to set alternative January 2016 across-the-board and locality 

pay adjustments. Specifically, I have determined that for 2016, 

across-the-board pay increases will be 1.0 percent. Also, I will make 

a decision by November 30, 2015, regarding an alternative plan for 

locality payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304a. The alternative plan for 

locality payments will be limited so that the total combined cost of 

the 1.0 percent across-the-board base pay increase and the varying 

locality pay increases will be 1.3 percent of basic payroll, consistent 

with the assumption in my 2016 Budget. These decisions will not 

materially affect our ability to attract and retain a well-qualified 

Federal workforce. 

The adjustments described above shall take effect on the first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2016. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
From: jfuqua@watvc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:21:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jmaes Fuqua

Winfield, AL 35594
H. Res. 73

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 18, 2007.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Edwards, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Allen, Ms. Schwartz of 

Pennsylvania, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Doggett, Mr. 

Blumenauer, Mr. Berry, Mr. Boyd of Florida, Mr. McGovern, 

Ms. Sutton, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. 

Etheridge, Ms. Hooley, Mr. Baird, Mr. Moore of Kansas, and 

Mr. Bishop of New York. 

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000875983
<NAME> ONE WORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       45
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (36)
<INVENTORY>                                        188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,689
<PP&E>                                           3,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,138
<SALES>                                            232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   232
<CGS>                                              157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,254)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ALAN SCOTT ANDRE,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

CASE NO. CV-06-503-JCC

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) of the

Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 26), Petitioner’s Objection to

the R&R (Dkt. No. 27), and Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Objection (Dkt. No. 28). After

reviewing the parties’ submissions and the remaining record, the Court adopts the R&R. 

I. ANALYSIS

In his Objection to the R&R, Petitioner takes issue with Judge Theiler’s analysis of his juror

misconduct and Miranda rights claims. (Dkt. No. 27 at 1–3.) Petitioner introduces no new evidence or

argument in his Objection, and the Court adopts the R&R’s analysis and conclusions as to these claims. 

Judge Theiler concluded that because they were procedurally barred by Washington Revised Code

section 10.73.090, five of Petitioner’s claims must be dismissed with prejudice. (R&R at 9–11 (Dkt. No.

Case 2:06-cv-00503-JCC Document 30 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

26).) Petitioner requests that those claims be dismissed without prejudice so that he may pursue them in

state court. (Pet.’s Obj. to R&R at 4 (Dkt. No. 27).) Washington Revised Code section 10.73.090 bars

Petitioner from pursing these claims in state court, and the Court must dismiss habeas claims with

prejudice when they are procedurally barred. See Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1, 9 (1984); Franklin v.

Johnson, 290 F.3d 1223, 1231 (9th Cir. 2002). 

II. CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS the R&R. Petitioner’s habeas petition and this action are DISMISSED, with

prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, to counsel for Respondent, and

to Judge Theiler. 

SO ORDERED this 30th day of May, 2007.

AJohn C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00503-JCC Document 30 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and the Statements of Revenue and Expenses and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,174,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,356,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,343,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,356,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (12,006)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (189,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Wholly Owned Subsidiaries:



| |  |  | DL Education Service, LLC, incorporated in Delaware, the United States of America
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | China Distance Education Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Practice Enterprises Network China International Links Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Champion Distance Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Champion Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consolidated Affiliated Entity:



| |  |  | Beijing Champion Hi-Tech Co., Ltd, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Caikaowang Company Limited, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Champion Wangge Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Zhengbao Yucai Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Beijing Haidian District Champion Training School, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JEREMY LOYD GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KENNEDY, et

al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5697FDB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s filing of an

application to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. To file a

complaint and initiate legal proceedings plaintiff must pay a filing fee of $250.00 or file a proper

application to proceed in forma pauperis.

On October 21, 2005, the clerk received plaintiff’s civil rights complaint. (Dkt. #1). On October 28,

2005, the clerk sent plaintiff a letter informing him that he must either pay the $250.00 court filing fee or file a

proper application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. #2). That same day, apparently, plaintiff did file an in

forma pauperis application. (Dkt. #3). Plaintiff’s application, however, is deficient. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), a prisoner seeking to proceed in forma pauperis also is required

to submit with his application a written acknowledgment and authorization form, authorizing the agency

Case 3:05-cv-05697-FDB Document 6 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

having custody over him to collect from his prison trust account an initial partial filing fee and subsequent

monthly payments until the full filing fee is paid. Plaintiff has not submitted the acknowledgment and

authorization form approved for use by this court. 

Accordingly, this court orders the following:

(1) Plaintiff shall seek to cure this deficiency by filing no later than January 5, 2006, a

completed and signed copy of the acknowledgment and authorization form pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(b).

Failure to cure this deficiency by the above date shall be deemed a failure to properly

prosecute this matter and the court will recommend dismissal of this matter.

(2) The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff along with the appropriate

acknowledgment and authorization form.

DATED this 5th day of December, 2005.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05697-FDB Document 6 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 66586.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., and I. Freeman & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 181003-K and 194954-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabra similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that the merchandise assessed with duty at 30 percent is composed in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Management Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David Walters, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew Szot, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 13, 2009/s/ David WaltersChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Matthew SzotMatthew
      SzotChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Management Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Management Energy,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.