alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. §1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In connection with the annual report of Circle Star Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Brow, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  
  Dated: July 29, 2011                                                             By:  /s/ David Brow
 David Brow, President
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Circle Star Energy Corp. and will be retained by Circle Star Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Form 10-Q of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc., a company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 11, 2011 /s/ Mark A. Smith Mark A. Smith Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer   This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME 3-31-97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         798,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,055,243
<PP&E>                                       5,466,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 514,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,323,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,284,462
<BONDS>                                      5,995,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,179
<OTHER-SE>                                   (965,556)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,323,935
<SALES>                                      1,673,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,317,865
<CGS>                                          559,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,206,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             576,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (448,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (448,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (448,176)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

[exhibit23for10k001.jpg]



Sam Kan & Company

1151 Harbor Bay Pkwy., Suite 101

Alameda, CA 94502  Phone: 510.517.7874 Fax: 866.848.1224

http://www.skancpa.com





We consent to the incorporation by reference on Forms 10-K of American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. of our reports dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of American Smooth Wave Ventures, Inc. included in this Report on Form 10-K for the period from the date of inception on July 11, 2008 to December 31, 2009.







[exhibit23for10k002.jpg]



Alameda, CA

December 17, 2010
From: james.moseley@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:32:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Moseley

Dallas, TX 75243
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 6 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 1 of 2 Bay Bank v. Order of Magnitude et al Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 6 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Honorable Thomas S. Zilly

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station

[Proposed] Order Washington, D.C. 20044-

0683

Civ. No. C05-1890Z Telephone: (202) 307-6422

 - 1 - 1591509.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ABS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

 v. )

)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, )

)

 Defendant. )

 )

 Civ. No. C05-1890Z

 ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Federal Defendant’s “Motion (1) for Summary Judgment 

Regarding CDP Appeal and (2) to Dismiss Petition to Quash Summons.” Having considered the motion,

the submissions, and the applicable law, the Court

ORDERS that the Federal Defendant’s unopposed “Motion (1) for Summary Judgment Regarding

CDP Appeal and (2) to Dismiss Petition to Quash Summons,” docket no. 10, is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s claim concerning the IRS administrative summonses at issue in the

above-captioned proceeding is hereby DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that each side is to bear its own costs. It is further

ORDERED that all dates that have been set by the Court in this matter should be vacated.

//

Case 2:05-cv-01890-TSZ Document 12 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Honorable Thomas S. Zilly

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station

[Proposed] Order Washington, D.C. 20044-

0683

Civ. No. C05-1890Z Telephone: (202) 307-6422

 - 2 - 1591509.1 

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Presented by:

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

ROBERT BROUILLARD, WSB #19786

Assistant United States Attorney

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271 

By: /s/ Richard A. Latterell 

RICHARD A. LATTERELL

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683 Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0683

Telephone: (202) 307-6422

Attorneys for the United States

Case 2:05-cv-01890-TSZ Document 12 Filed 04/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Honorable Thomas S. Zilly

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station

[Proposed] Order Washington, D.C. 20044-

0683

Civ. No. C05-1890Z Telephone: (202) 307-6422

 - 3 - 1591509.1 

Case 2:05-cv-01890-TSZ Document 12 Filed 04/28/06 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MATTHEW G. SILVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5731 RJB/KLS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

 TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the Court is

Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to complete discovery. (Dkt. # 77). For the reasons stated

below, the Court finds that the motion should be denied.

The Court originally set the discovery deadline for August 25, 2006. (Dkt. # 33). The

parties agreed to extend the discovery deadline to October 27, 2006 (Dkt. # 63), “to permit

depositions to be taken and to finish exchanging discovery documents.” (Dkt. # 59). The parties

advised the Court that the purpose of the extension was to allow scheduled depositions to take place

and to allow the parties to complete the exchange of documents. (Id.). Plaintiff took the depositions

of Defendants Porter, Wentland and Coppola. (Dkt. # 80, Exh. 1). The parties have had

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 88 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

approximately ten months to complete discovery.

Plaintiff provides no good faith reason for yet another extension of the discovery deadline. In

the declaration attached to his motion, Plaintiff complains of the receipt of discovery which was

delayed by two weeks, discovery made the subject of a motion to compel which has been addressed

by the Court (Dkt. # 86), and the refusal of defense counsel to accept service of deposition

subpoenas for non-party witnesses. Defendant also refers to testimony needed from proposed

defendants named in his proposed second amended complaint, although leave to amend the

complaint has now been denied. Leave to amend was denied as Plaintiff failed to provide the Court

with a basis for adding seventeen additional defendants and seven new claims. The Court found that

the proposed amendment would require reopening discovery, causing undue prejudice and delay. 

(Dkt. # 85). Plaintiff’s action was filed almost one year ago and the parties have already engaged in

a substantial amount of discovery. The discovery deadline, which was extended until October 27,

2006, is now long passed.

The parties have had ten months to complete discovery. There is no good cause to grant yet

another extension of discovery in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. # 77) is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 7th day of December, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 88 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben HERNANDEZ-RODARTE, also known as Sevastian Castillo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40887.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 23, 2005.

*252Ernest Gonzalez, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jose Alwin Stewart, Plano, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ruben Hernandez-Rodarte appeals his jury convictions for reentry of a deported alien after a prior aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b), making a false claim to United States citizenship, and making a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 911*&*1001. He argues that the Government did not present sufficient evidence to establish that his identity is Ruben Hernandez-Rodarte. Specifically, Hernandez-Rodarte asserts that the testimony of the Government’s expert, Terry Kimbell, did not meet the standards set in *Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,*509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). Because he did not raise this issue in the district court, review is limited to plain error. *See United States v. Vonn,*535 U.S. 55, 59, 122 S.Ct. 1043, 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002).

The Government presented evidence to show that Kimbell was an expert in the area of fingerprint analysis and that his testimony was reliable and relevant to the issue of the defendant’s true identity. Therefore, the objective of *Daubert*“to ensure the reliability and relevance of the expert testimony” was met in this case. *See United States v. Norris,*217 F.3d 262, 269 (5th Cir.2000). Hernandez-Rodarte has not shown that the district court’s admission of Kimbell’s testimony constituted plain error.

Because Hernandez-Rodarte did not move for a judgment of acquittal, review of his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is limited to determining whether there was a “manifest miscarriage of justice.” *United States v. Green,*293 F.3d 886, 895 (5th Cir.2002). To find a miscarriage of justice, the court must find that the record is “devoid of evidence of guilt or the evidence must be so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” *United States v. Avants,*367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir.2004). The Government presented evidence that the defendant’s identity was Hernandez-Rodarte, that he unlawfully purchased a forged, counterfeit birth certificate in the name of Sevastian Castillo, that the defendant’s fingerprints matched those of Hernandez-Rodarte, and that Hernandez-Rodarte was a Mexican citizen who had previously been deported. Hernandez-Rodarte has not shown that the record is “devoid of evidence of guilt” or *253“so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” *See Avants,*367 F.3d at 449.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DARREL WAYNE VANDERGRIFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

LYNNE DELANO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5062 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in part;

(2) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #99] is GRANTED IN PART

AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice except as

to plaintiff’s claim of excessive use of force against Defendants Barnes, Bernard and

Faulks. The excessive force claim as to Defendants Barnes and Bernard is dismissed

without prejudice for failure to effect service. Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment as to plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant Faulks is DENIED. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 27th day of June, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05062-BHS Document 106 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 1
Befoee the Third Division,

October 6, 1966

No. P66/255. —

#### Taiyo Trading Co. and American Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States, protests 60/4883, etc. (Honolulu).

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso Peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Ayers Exploration Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ayers Exploration Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Greg Curson                                                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Greg Curson                                                                              |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                           |

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 612 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table 

RESOLUTION 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

Whereas clause one of House rule XXIII (Code of Official 

Conduct) states, ‘‘A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer or employee of the House shall conduct 

himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect 

creditably on the House,’’; 

Whereas the House Ethics Manual states that, ‘‘The public 

has a right to expect Members, officers and employees to 

exercise impartial judgment in performing their duties’’ 

and ‘‘This Committee has cautioned all Members to avoid 

situations in which even an inference might be drawn 

suggesting improper action’’; 

Whereas during proceedings of the House on August 3, 2007, 

with the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murtha) presiding, a question occurred on approval of the Journal of 

the previous day’s proceedings; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HRES 612 LTH 

Whereas following the vote, the gentleman from Wisconsin, 

Representative Sensenbrenner, inquired ‘‘Could the chair 

tell me how many Members rose to request a recorded 

vote and [the] total number of Members present in the 

House upon which the chair made his decision?’’; 

Whereas Representative Murtha replied, ‘‘It is up to the 

chair. Let me tell you this, the vote will show that the 

approval would be approved by the House as it has 

been.’’; 

Whereas the Speaker, as the presiding officer, has a duty to 

be a fair and impartial arbiter of the proceedings of the 

House, held to the highest ethical standards in deciding 

the various questions as they arise with impartiality and 

courtesy toward all Members, regardless of party affiliation; 

Whereas a presiding officer of the House cannot achieve the 

requisite standard of impartiality while attempting to influence the outcome of a vote, predict the outcome of a 

vote, or express a preference for a particular outcome of 

a vote; and 

Whereas when the chair imbues his parliamentary statements 

with a partisan hue or with language more appropriate 

to a participant in the debate than to its presiding officer, Members’ essential confidence in the impartiality of 

the chair is impaired: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That by his actions on August 3, 2007, the 

2 gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, has brought 

3 dishonor and discredit to the United States House of Rep4 resentatives by misusing the powers of the chair. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS