alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOX ENERGY CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 Exhibit 11.1
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
  
  
                                             Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                1997             1996
                                             ----------       ----------
  Net income for primary income per share     $  1,807         $  2,417
  Interest expense on 8 1/4% convertible
     subordinated notes                          1,120            1,133
  Income tax effect (assumed to be 35%)           (392)            (397)
                                             ----------       ----------
  Net income for fully-diluted income
     per share                                $  2,535         $  3,153
                                             ==========       ==========
  
  Primary income per share                    $   0.09         $   0.12 
                                             ==========       ==========
  
  Fully-diluted income per share              $   0.10         $   0.12 
                                             ==========       ==========
  
  Calculation of weighted average shares
    Class A (Voting) common stock                3,250            3,250
    Class B (Non-Voting) common stock           17,553           17,553
    Stock options considered common stock
        equivalents                                  0                3
                                             ----------       ----------
      Total shares used for primary income
        per share                               20,803           20,806
  Contingent shares from remaining stock 
        options granted                            310              619
  Contingent shares from 8 1/4% convertible
        subordinated notes                       5,007            5,007
                                             ----------       ----------
      Total shares used for fully-diluted
        income per share                        26,120           26,432
                                             ==========       ==========
No. 68503.

protest 62/11527 (Galveston).

#### Patrick & Graves *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the dry charging machine in question consists of an oven, which has as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 49A/28 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 49A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4928 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 49A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4928 February 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 049A/1 | Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 23rd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 049A/1

Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 23rd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
HON. ROBERT S. LASNIK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) No. CR06-0069RSL 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) ORDER 

 v. ) 

 ) 

MARTIN LYNN GUITARD, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 DEFENDANT MARTIN LYNN GUITARD has moved to continue trial 

from the current trial date, September 25, 2006, until January 

2007 or as soon thereafter as convenient. The defense contends 

that the case is extended and complex; the defendant recently 

retained new counsel; the motion is made in good faith; all 

other defendants have pled and the defense submits that the 

defendant’s need for a continuance outweighs the public’s 

interest in a trial on the current trial date. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the 

public’s interest in a speedy trial and justify a trial 

continuance. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). Accordingly the 

current trial date is stricken. The defendant’s trial is 

continued. The new trial date is January 8, 2007. The 

Case 2:06-cr-00069-RSL Document 110 Filed 09/01/06 Page 1 of 2
defendant shall execute a speedy trial waiver extending his 

speedy trial expiration date through January 31, 2007. The 

period of delay from the date of this Order, until January 8, 

2007, is excludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(8)(A), for the purpose of computing the time 

limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

 Dated this 1st day of September 2006. 

 Robert S. Lasnik 

 United States District Judge

A

Case 2:06-cr-00069-RSL Document 110 Filed 09/01/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

February 18, 1960

No. 63823.

protests 754295-G, etc. (New York).

#### Morrison Co. of N.Y., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

*348Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOTREX
CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 4, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                               194,653
<SECURITIES>                          13,127
<RECEIVABLES>                         93,196
<ALLOWANCES>                           3,647
<INVENTORY>                           69,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     386,695
<PP&E>                                83,518
<DEPRECIATION>                        19,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       626,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 92,288
<BONDS>                              229,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 196
<OTHER-SE>                           164,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         626,525
<SALES>                              257,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     257,007
<CGS>                                158,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        158,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      30,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     7,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       29,343
<INCOME-TAX>                          10,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   15,373
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          15,373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.73
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
January 31, 1998 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         833,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,333
<PP&E>                                          48,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,053,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,862
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,598,906
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,762,391)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,053,377
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (177,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        







</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 6, 2013*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.126 Real Estate Investment Trusts REITs** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-4251
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN ALGERIO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-95-103) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Judson W. Collier, Jr., HOOKER, BODE, COLLIER & DICKINSON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, M. Hannah Lauck, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant Kevin Algerio appeals from a sentence imposed as aresult of his pleading guilty to violating the terms of his supervised release. Algerio contends that the district court abused its discretion by sentencing him to the high end of the guideline range. However, a claim that a court erred by imposing a sentence at the high or low end of a correctly calculated guideline range is generally not reviewable. United States v. Jones , 18 F.3d 1145, 1151 (4th Cir. 1994). Because Algerio has not alleged that his sentence was based on an unconstitutional classif ication, see United States v. Holmes , 60 F.3d 1134, 1137 (4th Cir. 1995), the sentence of the district court is unreviewable. Accordingly, we dismiss Algerio's challenge to his sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139127

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139127 COA: 291632 Washtenaw CC: 07-000440-FC JOSEPH WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET

SUITE 5220

(206) 553-7970

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

FILING INDICTMENT/FINLEY - 1

(05-5220M)

Magistrate Judge Strombom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. 05-5220M

)

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER GRANTING SECOND

v. ) STIPULATED MOTION TO

) TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

RONALD DEAN FINLEY, ) INDICTMENT 

)

Defendant. ) 

_________________________________)

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the stipulated motion of the parties for

a second order extending the time within which an indictment shall be filed, and the Court

having considered the stipulated motion of the parties, together with the balance of the records

and files herein, the Court now finds and rules as follows:

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested extension for

filing the indictment outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

in that the defendant is cooperating in an ongoing investigation and that the parties need

additional time for the defendant to complete his cooperation prior to charges being filed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the second stipulated motion of the parties to extend

the time within which an indictment shall be filed is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the date by which the indictment shall be obtained and

filed in this case is extended from January 30, 2005, to February 24, 2006.

Case 3:06-cr-05125-RBL Document 14 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET

SUITE 5220

(206) 553-7970

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

FILING INDICTMENT/FINLEY - 2

(05-5220M)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of delay from November 30, 2005, through

February 24, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section

3161(h)(8)(A), for the purpose of computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial

Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161 through 3164.

DATED this 20th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/MIKE LANG 

MIKE LANG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

s/ Colin Fieman via telephone 

COLIN FIEMAN

Attorney for Ronald Finley

Case 3:06-cr-05125-RBL Document 14 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The full title of petitioner’s petition is “1. Amicus curiae brief filed in the interest of justice

by non-defendant injured party: Keith Eldon Anderson, Secured Paty for Defendant. 2. Acceptance

by Keith Eldon Anderson of Plaintiff Agent’s refusal to allow Keith Eldon Anderson to be the

defendant. 3. Correction of Record. 4. Criminal Complaint. 5. Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus.” (Doc. #1 at 1) (emphasis added). 

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KEITH E. ANDERSON, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C06-208-RSM-JPD

) CR02-423-JCC

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

Petitioner is a federal prisoner who has filed a pro se petition that describes itself in myriad

ways.1

 Although unclear, the petition appears to challenge petitioner’s recent conviction for mail

fraud and assisting others in filing false income tax returns. (Doc. #1259 in Case No. CR02-423-

JCC). Consequently, it appears that petitioner’s intent is to file a motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Ordinarily, when a pro se prisoner files a petition such as that filed by petitioner, the court

will seek petitioner’s consent to recharacterize the petition as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. See Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 (2003). However, in the present case, the court

need not seek petitioner’s permission to recharacterize his petition as a § 2255 motion. A review of

the history of petitioner’s underlying criminal case reveals that petitioner’s direct appeal of that

Case 2:06-cv-00208-RSM Document 3 Filed 02/14/2006 Page 1 of 2

Anderson v. United States of America Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

PAGE 2

case is still pending before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (See, e.g., Doc. #1244 in

Case No. CR02-423, Order issued on October 3, 2005 by Ninth Circuit denying petitioner’s motion

to represent himself on appeal.) 

A district court should not entertain a petitioner’s collateral attack on a conviction while the

petitioner also has a direct appeal pending in the Ninth Circuit, because to do so would thwart

judicial economy. See United States v. Deeb, 944 F.2d 545, 548 (9TH Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the

court recommends that petitioner’s petition be dismissed without prejudice. A proposed Order

accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

DATED this 14th day of February, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00208-RSM Document 3 Filed 02/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Stevia Corp.(the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2011

                                        /s/ George Blankenbaker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  George Blankenbaker
                                        Title: President
                                               (Principal Executive Officer,
                                               Principal Financial Officer
                                               and Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      143
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (25)
<INVENTORY>                                        191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,628
<PP&E>                                           3,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,007
<SALES>                                         12,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,840
<CGS>                                            9,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (22)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      90
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,627)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Joseph
Koegel, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director of
Entertainment Art, Inc., certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations
of the Company.
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  Date:
      June 17, 2009
                ENTERTAINMENT
      ART, INC.By:
                /s/
      Joseph KoegelName:
      Joseph KoegelTitle:
      President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director (Principal
      Executive Officer)
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 61106.

protest 287545-K (New York).

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of printing boards and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59555, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.