SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ROY COLUMBUS GOLD, III, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR05-391-RSM 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An evidentiary hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release was held before 

the undersigned Magistrate Judge on March 13, 2013. The United States was represented by 

Assistant United States Attorney Sarah Vogel, and the defendant by Peter Camiel. 

 The defendant had been charged and convicted of Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine and 

Cocaine Base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846. On or 

about September 22, 2006, defendant was sentenced by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, to 

a term of 36 months in custody, to be followed by 5 years of supervised release. 

 The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in substance abuse and 

mental health programs, financial disclosure, search, prohibited from gambling and/or entering 

gambling establishments, consume no prescription drugs without the specific permission of the 
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

probation officer, and participate in a RRC for up to 180 days as directed by the probation 

officer.. 

 In a Petition for Warrant or Summons, dated January 3, 2013, U.S. Probation Officer 

Andrew J. Lorenzen asserted the following violations by defendant of the conditions of his 

supervised release: 

(1) Failing to report to the probation officer as directed, on or about December 27, 

2012, in violation of standard condition number 2. 

(2) Failing to reside in and satisfactorily participate in a residential reentry center 

program for up to 180 days as directed by the probation officer, on or about 

December 29, 2012, in violation of the special condition of supervision. 

(3) Failing to report change in residence as directed, on or about December 29, 

2012, in violation of standard condition number 6. 

 On March 6, 2013 defendant made his initial appearance. The defendant was advised 

of his rights and acknowledged those rights. On March 13, 2013, this matter came before the 

Court for an evidentiary hearing. Defendant admitted to violations 1, 2 and 3. 

 I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of his supervised release as to violations 1, 2 and 3, and that the Court conduct a 

hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on these violations has been set before the 

Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez on April 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. 

 Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

 DATED this 14th day of March, 2013. 

A
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

cc: District Judge: Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 

 AUSA: Sarah Vogel 

 Defendant’s attorney: Peter Camiel 

 Probation officer: Andrew J. Lorenzen