alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: actingup@citlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:38:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Delores Sibley

Athens, WV 24712
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT

I hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-SB Registration  Statement, of Burnam
Management,  Inc.  my report for the period  from March 3, 2000  (inception)  to
March 6, 2000,  dated March 8, 2000,  relating to the  financial  statements  of
Burnam Management, Inc. which appear in such Form 10-SB.

                                                   STEPHEN S. BUSH, C.A.
                                                   Chartered Accountant

Port Moody,B.C.
Canada
March 8, 2000

                                        By:/s/ Stephen S. Bush
                                        Chartered Accountant
Before the Third Division,

February 24, 1969

No. P69/53.

protest 63/21136 (Cleveland).

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of statuary figures, valued at $2.50 or more each, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69525-69526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 52

[FAC 2023-06; Item IV; Docket No. FAR-2023-0052; Sequence No. 4]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendments

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes an amendment to the Federal Acquisition

[[Page 69526]]

Regulation (FAR) in order to make needed editorial changes.

DATES: Effective November 6, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lois Mandell, Regulatory 
Secretariat Division (MVCB), at 202-501-4755 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b1a5b7a49391a59395b6918597d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45021604172022162026052236246b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Please cite FAC 2023-06, Technical Amendments.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document makes editorial changes to 48 
CFR part 52.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 52

    Government procurement.

William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.

    Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 52 as set forth 
below:

PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 52 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 4 and 10 U.S.C. 
chapter 137 legacy provisions (see 10 U.S.C. 3016); and 51 U.S.C. 
20113.


0
2. Amend section 52.212-3 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the provision;
0
b. Removing from paragraph (k)(1) introductory text ``(1) [ballot] 
Maintenance'' and adding ``[ballot] (1) Maintenance'' in its place; and
0
c. Removing from paragraph (k)(2) introductory text ``(2) [ballot] 
Certain'' and adding ``[ballot] (2) Certain'' in its place.
    The revision reads as follows:


52.212-3  Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial 
Products and Commercial Services.

* * * * *

Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Products and 
Commercial Services (NOV 2023)

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-21323 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:06-cr-00107-JCC Document 3 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00107-JCC Document 3 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 68174.

#### Berolio Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/6599 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers in the case showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Management Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David Walters, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew Szot, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
              The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





Date:
August 13, 2010






/s/ David
Walters





Chief
Executive Officer




/s/ Matthew
Szot





Matthew
Szot


Chief
Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Management Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Management Energy,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of the Minarets Wilderness and adjacent areas, Madera and Monocounties, California**
 
Report | Plates 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1516 A-D
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959980
 
August 13, 2018
To : Cc: Bcc: Subject: Fw: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions language ----- Forwarded by Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/31/2010 04:42 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_ J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/03/2010 05:50 PM Subject: RE: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions language

-----Original Message----- From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:57 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Subject: Re: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions language Hi Christine, Thanks for these comments. We are reviewing and considering the edits and will get back to you asap. raj Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709 919-541-5344 919-541-5509 fax Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential.

From: "Kymn, Christine J." < Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Raj Rao/RTP/ USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/03/2010 12:03 PM Subject: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions language

Raj, Lisa, Anna, Greetings. Attached please find proposed edits to EPA’s suggested biogenicGHG language. Let’s chat sometime today about these if possible. Thanks, Christine 202.395.4638(See attached file: Interagency edits1_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx)(See attached file: Interagency edits2_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx)

Interagency edits3_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

SANBINO GARCIA QUIROZ ,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5101 RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 February 17, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05101-RBL Document 25 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 1
High Mid Low

 Altostratus Altocumulus Altocumulus Altocumulus

 Stratocumulus Nimbostratus 

 

 Fog Stratus Cumulonimbus Cumulus

3 km 

2 km 

1 km 

0 km 

4 km 

5 km 

6 km Altitude of Cloud Base

CONVECTIVE CONVECTIVE

CLOUDS

Cirrostratus Cirrostratus Cirrus Cirrocumulus

 Cirrus Cirrus Contrail Contrail

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

http://www.nasa.gov 

http://education.nasa.gov

http://scool.larc.nasa.gov

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

http://www.noaa.gov

http://www.weather.gov

http://www.education.noaa.gov

NP 2007-07-33-LaRC http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jetstream 

YPA-200752-L

Ever wonder how

clouds got their names?

Well you may be surprised

to find out!

Cloud Cover

Visual Opacity

•Opaque

•Translucent

•Transparent

•Clear

•Partly Cloudy

•Mostly Cloudy

•Overcast

(0% - 5%)

(5% - 50%)

(50% - 95%)

(95% - 100%)

Visual Opacity

 The thickness of a cloud determines

the amount of light being transmitted 

 through the cloud. Shadows often 

provide a clue.

Three levels of clouds have

been identified based on the

altitude of a cloud’s base. 

Cloud Level

Cloud Cover

Determination of the amount of

cloud cover is done by estimating the 

percentage of the sky covered with clouds. 

This is one of several possible scales 

or categories for cloud cover.

In 1803 Luke Howard used Latin terms to classify four main cloud types. 

•Cumulus means pile and describes heaped, lumpy clouds. 

•Cirrus, meaning hair, describes high level clouds that look wispy, like locks of hair. 

•Featureless clouds that form sheets are called Stratus, meaning layer. 

•The term Nimbus, which means “precipitating cloud”, refers to low, grey rain clouds. 

•Alto is used to describe mid level clouds. 

•Finally, convective clouds have a vertical development extending through large portions of the atmosphere. 

Convective Clouds

form because of large updrafts

of warm, moist air moving

up into cold air!

 Introduction to Clouds Introduction to Clouds

The Earth’s Water Cycle

The water on Earth is always on the 

move, changing state from liquid to 

vapor back to liquid and snow and 

ice near the poles and mountains. 

The process used to describe the 

continuous movement of water 

between the Earth and atmosphere is 

known as the water cycle, and is 

often referred to as the hydrologic 

cycle. There is no beginning or end to 

the water cycle; it behaves much like 

a Ferris wheel at an amusement 

park, moving around and around.

http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/cloud_chart
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Company's  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet at June 30,  1996 and  Consolidated
     Statement of Operations  for the six (6) months ended June 30, 1996, and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,106,157
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,248,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                       580,339
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,342,883
<PP&E>                                         109,077,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,102,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,185,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,068,424
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,594
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,050,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,185,662
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,188,957
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,014,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,083,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,981,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,072,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,909,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,909,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .20
        


</TABLE>
No. 67600.

#### Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc., a/c J. Eisenberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/12539 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, X

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic textile noils, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1108

PHILLIP B. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. BUSH; JANET RENO; STATES ATTORNEY; 

6 UNKNOWN AGENCY FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-630-3)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip B. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Phillip B. Anderson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Anderson v. Bush, No. CA-03-630-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2003 & Feb.

13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund III, L.P. (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

November 14, 2007