alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STORZ & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

Page 1 - STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER STRIKING Attorneys at Law

PRETRIAL DATES 1014 Franklin Street, Suite 220

 Vancouver, WA 98660

 (360) 696-9600

 (503) 286-2949

HONORABLE ROBERT B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ARDIS A. MAUNE, ) 

) Case No. C06-05083 RBL

Plaintiff, ) 

) STIPULATION AND AGREED

v. ) ORDER STRIKING PRETRIAL 

) DATES

BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY; ) 

GARY A. DOWNING; and )

RICHARD E. CARTER, )

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

STIPULATION

COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through her attorney, and the defendants by

and through their attorney, and give notice that this matter has been fully settled by

correspondence and e-mails, and that the parties are in the process of memorializing such

in a formal document.

Case 3:06-cv-05083-RBL Document 44 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STORZ & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

Page 2 - STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER STRIKING Attorneys at Law

PRETRIAL DATES 1014 Franklin Street, Suite 220

 Vancouver, WA 98660

 (360) 696-9600

 (503) 286-2949

Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and requested that the court strike all motions,

and the remaining dates in the current case schedule order, including the trial date.

THE LAW OFFICE OF

STORZ & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 

 /s/ Edwin N. Storz 

Date Edwin N. Storz, WSBA#14161

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

1014 Franklin Street, Suite 220

Vancouver, WA 98660

Telephone: (360) 696-9600

HUFFER & WEATHERS, P.C.

 /s/ Steven K. Huffer Date Mr. Steven K. Huffer

Huffer & Weathers, P.C.

Of Attorneys for Defendants

1850 Market Square Center

151 North Delaware Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2522

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the court hereby orders that all

pending matters and all remaining dates in the current case schedule order, including the

trial date, be stricken.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05083-RBL Document 44 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STORZ & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

Page 3 - STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER STRIKING Attorneys at Law

PRETRIAL DATES 1014 Franklin Street, Suite 220

 Vancouver, WA 98660

 (360) 696-9600

 (503) 286-2949

Presented by:

/s/ Edwin N. Storz 

Edwin N. Storz, WSBA#14161

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

Approved as to form; Notice of presentation waived:

/s/ Steven K. Huffer Mr. Steven K. Huffer

Huffer & Weathers, P.C.

Of Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:06-cv-05083-RBL Document 44 Filed 03/02/07 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6439

JASON BRADLEY MATTHEWS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE N. MARTIN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-93-3102-3-17-AJ)

Submitted: December 19, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Bradley Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka,

Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant a certificate of probable

cause to appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Matthews v. Martin, No. CA-93-3102-3-17-AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies
Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|1. | The Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
      31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.                                              

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification this 10th day of May, 2011.

|/s/ Thomas L.
      Wegman                                                   | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Thomas L. Wegman                                                             | 
|President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer | 

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11150

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BOBBY MENDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:00-CR-124-2

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bobby Mendez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Mendez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Mendez’s

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-11150 Document: 00511963271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-11150

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-11150 Document: 00511963271 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 62 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 62

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 62 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 62 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
No. P66/318. —

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States, protest 66/5197 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register: June 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 106)]
[Notices]               
[Page 31419]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03jn10-37]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Arizona Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Arizona Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. 
and adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m. on Monday, June 21, 2010, at 500 
East Coronado Road, Phoenix, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is for 
the committee to discuss its education project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by July 23, 2010. The 
address is 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, California 
90012. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments or who desire 
additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Administrative 
Assistant, at (213) 894-3437 or (800) 877-8339 for individuals who are 
deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail 
to: atrevino@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who wish to submit written comments and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 28, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-13290 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEITH L. NASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5127RJB

ORDER DIRECTING FILING

 OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

 DISMISSING PRELIMINARY 

 INJUNCTION MOTIONS AS MOOT

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status. (Dkt. # 7). 

Plaintiff’s Complaint is before the court for an order of service. Also before the court is Plaintiff’s

motion requesting dismissal of his motions for preliminary injunction.

A. Pleading Deficiencies 

Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Complaint is typed with very light ink. When the original Complaint

was scanned into the court’s electronic filing system, the result was an almost entirely illegible

Complaint, making it impossible for the parties or any appellate court to decipher Plaintiff’s claims. 

The Clerk will send plaintiff a copy of the Complaint so that he may see how difficult it is to decipher

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 17 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 2

lightly typed or written documents when they are scanned. Plaintiff may re-file his Complaint in a

legible form if he wishes the court to consider his pleading.

Plaintiff’s Complaint is also over 40 pages long. Plaintiff should amend his Complaint so that

it contains a short and plain statement of the claims showing that he is entitled to relief, in

accordance with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

B. Dismissal of Preliminary Injunction Motions

Plaintiff moves for dismissal (Dkt. # 8) of his motions for preliminary injunctions (Dkt. # 3

and Dkt. # 4). Plaintiff advises the court that his legal property has been returned to him, making his

motions moot. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions (Dkt. # 3 and Dkt. # 4) are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order and the copies of plaintiff’s filings to

plaintiff. 

DATED this 4th day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 17 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         789,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               905,598
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 905,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,137,823
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       653,834
<OTHER-SE>                                     886,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   905,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,042<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>Interest Income
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.25



 Exhibit 4.25 

Free translation for information purposes only 
  

			
	First amendment to lease agreement dated October 31, 2007	  	14 11 2017

  

AXISPARC 
 Office
Buildings sis 
 rue Edouard Belin 12 a 1435 Mont-St-Guibert 

AMDEMENT LEASE CONTRACT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2007 

 
  

			
	Between:	  	 L’Immobilière Belin 12 SA, having its head office at 2 rue Fond Cattelain 1435

Mont St Guibert,

		
		  	represented by Mr. Henri Fischgrund,, Chief executive officer,
		
		  	hereinafter referred as the lessor,
		
	AND	  	Celyad, having its head office at 12 Rue Edouard Belin, Axis Parc 1435 Mont-Saint-Guibert
		
		  	Represented by Mr. Christian Homsy, Chief executive officer
		
		  	hereinafter referred as the lessee,

 It was agreed as follows: 
 This
results in the following change in the lease 
  

	 	0	Article 4:Term 

 The lease term is extended for a period of 3 years 

 

	 	0	Article 5: Annual rent 

  

									
	 Annual basic rent
	  				  	€	58.724,00	 
	 September 2007 base index
	  	 	105,71	 	  			
	 Index September 2017
	  	 	127,42	 	  			
	 New annual rent indexed
	  				  	€	70.784,341	 
		  				  	  
	  
	 

 Other conditions remain unchanged 

Executed at Mont-St-Guibert, on November 22, 2017. 
  

					
	The lessor,	 		 	The lessee,
			
	 /s/ Patrick Jeanmart
	 		 	




	Celyad SA Patrick Jeanmart* Chief Financial Officer
*Representative of PAJE sprl
(Reap. Dec. 11043)

#### Avildsen Tools and Machines, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 769783-1/3.

*560(Decided July 20, 1965)

*Jordan é Klvngaman*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

The question of the proper value for duty purposes of certain, steel twist drills imported from West Germany is presented by the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

By stipulation of the parties, the following facts have been agreed upon—

> XT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeal for reappraisement consists of steel twist drills imported from West Germany in October 1955, that the said merchandise and the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the merchandise and issues involved in *United States*v. *J. J. Boll et al,,*A.R.D. *179,*appeal dismissed Abstract 68908, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise neither such nor similar merchandise was freely offered for sale in West Germany for home consumption or for export to the United States, nor was such or similar exported merchandise freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the United States.

> That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise, the cost of production as defined in Section 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, was the entered values plus 5 per centum.

Upon tbe record before tbe court and following tbe cited authority, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402'a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is tbe proper basis of value for tbe steel twist drills in issue and that said value is tbe entered values, plus 5 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
December 30, 2009 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Changes to the Identification of Additional Classes of Facilities for Development 

of Financial Responsibility Requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b) 

FROM: Barbara Foster 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0265 

The attached documents are two drafts of the Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingIdentification of Additional Classes of Facilities for Development of Financial Responsibility 

Requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b): 

• The draft submitted to OMB for review, dated 11-18-09; and 

• A redline/strikeout document, which resulted from a comparison of that 11-18-09 draft v. 

the 12-29-09 post-OMB draft of the notice. 

In the redline/strikeout document, changes that were made in response to comments submitted to 

the Agency as part of the OMB review process are italicized. 

Attachments
Before Judge Ford,

March 22,1966

No. R66/3.

reappraisements R60/3207, R60/3208, and R60/5092 (Baltimore).

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, net, packed, exclusive of inland freight and f.o.b. charges.
H. Res. 764 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 24, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 505) 

to express the policy of the United States regarding the 

United States relationship with Native Hawaiians and to provide a process for the recognition by the United States of the 

Native Hawaiian governing entity. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against provisions of the bill are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, and any amendment thereto, to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; (2) 

the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules, if offered by Representative Flake of Arizona or his 

designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any 

point of order (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 
2 

•HRES 764 EH 

rule XXI) or demand for division of the question, shall be 

considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for ten 

minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 

an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 

instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 505 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

EMAD E. AHMED,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-191 JCC

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the entire record, including the administrative record, the

memoranda of the parties, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Monica J. Benton, finds and orders as follows. It is therefore ORDERED: 

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The Court REVERSES AND REMANDS the decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security.

DATED this 16th day of February, 2007.

AJohn C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00191-JCC Document 25 Filed 02/16/07 Page 1 of 1