alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

June 7, 2019

Order 

Clerk

June 7, 2019

159514(21)

SUZANNE RUBBA and DANIEL LEBLANC,

Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF

PATRICIA E. LEBLANC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 159514

v COA: 3445327

Macomb CC: 2013-002255-NH

EUGENE J. AGNONE, M.D., and MICHIGAN

CANCER SPECIALISTS, P.C.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CHAKRAPANI RANGANATHAN, M.D.,

MICHAEL F. ROMANELLI, M.D., MACOMB

NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., and WOODS

CARDIOVASCULAR INTERNAL MEDICINE

ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on May 30, 2019, is accepted as timely filed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0148

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL QUERFURTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 25, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s response to the Anders Brief filed herein. 

The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the 

Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender 

Division’s Office.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2023

08/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0148
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER, a/k/a

ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARVEL L. MORRISON, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5058 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AND

CAUSES OF ACTION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge [Dkt. #52] that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims and causes of action. 

As detailed by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff is currently being held in custody pending the

outcome of a deportation proceeding. Plaintiff has filed a complaint with this court asserting claims

that he has been denied necessary medical care and not been given adequate nutrition during his

custody. The defendants have moved to dismiss the claims [Dkt. # 16 & 25] on the basis that

Plaintiff cannot maintain an action against the federal employees or federal agencies. As outlined by

Magistrate Judge J. Kelly Arnold, the federal agencies are immune from suit. Plaintiff, similarly

cannot maintain an action against the private corporation which manages and operates the custodial

Case 3:06-cv-05058-FDB Document 57 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

facility. The individual employees named in their official capacity care not subject suit. Finally,

Plaintiff has not presented a sufficiently serious medical need to support a claim against individual

defendants in their personal capacities.

Plaintiff has filed a lengthy objection to the Report and Recommendation [Dk. #56] in which

he argues the merits of his claim. The objection however, does not dispel the lack of jurisdiction.

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold, the Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s claims and causes of action are DISMISSED;

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants who

have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 17th day of October, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05058-FDB Document 57 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ZAVIER SANCHEZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 71 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
No. 57035.

protests 145046-K, etc. (New York).

#### Freund Mayer & Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the paper napkins which were the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise entered prior to January 1, 1948, is dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 1413 for paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes, and that which was entered subsequent to said date is dutiable at 15 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802. It was further stipulated that other items of the merchandise consist of manufactures of paper wadding or manufactures of pulp wadding similar in all material respects to importations of manufactures of paper wadding and manufactures of pulp wadding which are currently being so classified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 51802. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that such merchandise entered prior to January 1, 1948, is dutiable at 6 cents per pound and 15 percent ad valorem and that which was entered subsequent to said date is dutiable at 6 cents per pound and 7)4 percent ad valorem under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v.

BRANDON SCOTT TRAVER,

Defendant. 

CASE NO. CR05-5767RBL

 

 ORDER GRANTING 

 CONTINUANCE OF

 TRIAL DATE

The defendant orally moved to continue the trial date. The government has no objection. For the

reasons orally stated, on the record, the motion is GRANTED and the Trial Date is

CONTINUED to APRIL 17, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

In view of the foregoing, the court finds and rules as follows:

1. Failure to grant a continuance in this matter would deny the defense the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Title 18

U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

2. The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Title 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). The period of delay

resulting from this continuance from JANUARY 17, 2006 to APRIL 17, 2006 is excluded for

speedy trial computation purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) as this is a

reasonable period of delay.

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cr-05767-RBL Document 13 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -2

ACCORDINGLY:

The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to Monday, APRIL 17, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

The Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for APRIL 12, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

The Motions Cutoff date is extended to FEBRUARY 27, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of January, 2005.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cr-05767-RBL Document 13 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF M.B.B.

PETITION OF: C.B., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 13, 2014 518433

________________________________ In the Matter of WILLIAM VELEZ, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 16, 2014 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ William Velez, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. During a search of a single-occupant cube assigned to petitioner, a correction officer found an eyeglass arm with an attached nail secreted within a radiator. Petitioner was then charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon and possessing an altered item. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.-2- 518433

We confirm. Although petitioner did not have exclusive control over his cube, a "strong inference of possession [nevertheless] arises with respect to items found" there (Matter of Fong v Goord, 36 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2007]; see Matter of Morales v Fischer, 119 AD3d 1298, 1299 [2014]). The fact that petitioner had only lived in the cube for a few months did not serve to rebut that presumption, particularly in light of proof that he had several pairs of eyeglasses and that the condition of the improvised weapon suggested that it had not been in the radiator for very long. Petitioner's contention that the weapon was not his created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve and, inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt, we will not disturb it (see Matter of Cox v Fischer, 114 AD3d 973, 974 [2014]; Matter of Fong v Goord, 36 AD3d at 1100). McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RANDALL VARGA,

Plaintiff,

v.

STANWOOD-CAMANO SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

No. C06-0178P

ORDER STAYING CASE

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ request to stay the case. The Court

previously stayed the summary judgment proceedings pending the outcome of a motion for

reconsideration in McClarty v. Totem Pole, 157 Wn.2d 214, 137 P.3d 844 (2006). (Dkt. No. 37). In

McClarty, the Washington Supreme Court adopted the definition of “disability” used in the federal

Americans with Disabilities Act. McClarty, 157 Wn.2d at 228. Plaintiff has indicated that his case

turns, at least in part, on the definition of disability under Washington law. Because there is no

indication of when the Washington Supreme Court will issue a decision on that motion for

reconsideration, and because no mandate has yet issued in that case, the Court will stay this case. As

the Court explained during the telephonic conference held with counsel for the parties today, the

Court ORDERS:

Case 2:06-cv-00178-MJP Document 39 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER - 2

(1) This action is STAYED pending a decision by the Washington Supreme Court on the

motion for reconsideration in McClarty.

(2) The parties are directed to provide the Court with joint reports every six months from

the date of this order regarding the status of the motion for reconsideration or within ten (10) days of

a mandate issuing in McClarty.

(3) The parties must provide the Court with a joint status report within ten days of a

mandate issuing in McClarty. The report must propose a new trial date. The report

must also indicate whether the parties are renewing the summary judgment briefing

already filed or whether they will be filing new briefing. If the parties file new summary

judgment briefing, they should propose a schedule for doing so. The report should also

indicate in their report any other pertinent dates that need to be re-set in anticipation of

trial.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record.

Dated: January 18th, 2007.

AMarsha J. Pechman

 United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00178-MJP Document 39 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.2
 
 convert to HTML do not convert as gif or image file. insert Exhibit 4.2 in corner.Place on pn 420 in Y prefix Also convert in color. |
MB            C .£ CLASS A COMMON STOCK            CLASS A COMMON STOCK |§
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS            SEE REVERSE FOR            OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS            CLEARWIRE CORPORATION
cusip
FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF
$0.0001 EACH OF
CLEARWIRF
CORPORTION
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney on surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed.
This certificate is not valid until countersigned and
registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
Dated:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                                   0000875359
<NAME>                                       Micro Linear Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        6820
<SECURITIES>                                                 22285
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 6830
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   906
<INVENTORY>                                                   7608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             48058
<PP&E>                                                       44828
<DEPRECIATION>                                               24192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               69290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         8716
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        14
<OTHER-SE>                                                   57906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 69290
<SALES>                                                      11758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             11758
<CGS>                                                         5919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 5919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                415
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            265
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.02
        
 
</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 1 of 31

Rinde v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Doc. 5 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 2 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 3 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 4 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 5 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 6 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 7 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 8 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 9 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 10 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 11 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 12 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 13 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 14 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 15 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 16 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 17 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 18 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 19 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 20 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 21 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 22 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 23 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 24 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 25 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 26 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 27 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 28 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 29 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 30 of 31
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 5-2 Filed 05/16/2006 Page 31 of 31
Before the Third Division,

October 2, 1959

No. 63407.

protest 58/15130 (New York).

#### The Worcester Royal Porcelain Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 OF TCSI CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,866
<SECURITIES>                                    17,897
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,322
<PP&E>                                          10,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,144
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,744
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (289)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 21, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Richard N. Phegley
|Richard N. Phegley    
|April 27, 2004