alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 7, 2012

t1031 

# Order

November 7, 2012

143805

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 143805

COA: 297809

Macomb CC: 2009

- 004557

- FC

ANTONIO JAVON CUMMINGS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of March 5, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v

Vaughn (Docket No. 142627). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on

Ju ly 9, 2012, 491 Mich 642 (2012), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed

by this Court.

M ARILYN K ELLY and H ATHAWAY , JJ., would remand this case to the Court of

Ap peals for reconsideration in light of People v Vaughn

.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Oiland gas fields of the Carnegie quadrangle, Pennsylvania**
 
Report |�Plates: 0405
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:456
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959513
 
August 8, 2018
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CARLOS ANTONIO HOLCOMBE,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-17-00008-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20160D02495)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

January 4, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 4, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
No. 67608.

#### Banner Hardware Company and Koeller-Struss Company *v.*United States,

protest 61/9238 (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vises, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59420, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
December 30, 1954

No. 58683.

protest 215412-K.

#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Watchcases and Movements — -Clerical Error. — Abstract 58530. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         949,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,098,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,092,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,098,972
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,539
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (20,129)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,548)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Decentralized Storage Alliance Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Decentralized Storage Alliance 
Association (``DSAA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Protocol Labs, Inc., Wilmington, DE; Filecoin 
Foundation, Middletown, DE; PiKNiK & Company, San Diego, CA; and 
International Computer Concepts, Inc., Northbrook, IL. The general area 
of DSAA's planned activity is to (a) develop and promote decentralized 
storage technologies and protocols and (b) undertake such other 
activities as may from time to time be appropriate to further the 
purposes and achieve the goals set forth above.
    Membership in DSAA remains open and DSAA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-22246 Filed 10-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Kenneth DeMott, as Executor of Raymond N. DeMott, Deceased, Appellant, v John P. Walsh, Individually and as General Partner of National Manufacturing Representatives, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 961]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about October 4, 1994, which, after a non-jury trial, placed a $40,000 valuation on the deceased’s interest in the partnership at the *372time of his death, unanimously reversed, on the facts, with costs, and the valuation placed at $130,000 in accordance with the recommendation of defendant’s expert.

Under the circumstances, we find that the valuation by defendant’s expert best reflected the fair market value of the partnership at the time in question. Concur—Asch, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
U.S. v. Rodney Rollness, CR 06-041 RSL 

Order Granting Extension of Time to Reply 

Page 1 of 1

	

 



	 

 !"#$$

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Petitioner, 

 vs. 

RODNEY ROLLNESS, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CR 06-041 RSL 

ORDER GRANTING EXENTION OF 

TIME TO REPLY REGARDING 

COMPASSIONATE RELEASE 

MOTION 

The Court, having reviewed the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply in Mr. 

Rollness’ request for sentence reduction, IT IS ORDERED that the motion be granted. The reply 

brief shall be filed on or before August 25, 2021 and the matter noted for August 26, 2021. 

DATED this 17th day of August, 2021. 

ROBERT S. LASNIK 

United States District Court Judge 

Presented by: 

/s/ Anna M. Tolin 

Anna M. Tolin 

Tolin Law Firm 

2021. 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 1089 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 1
# Wichit a S I 0-100401-00 2

Marc h 18.201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t of Transportatio n 120 0 NewJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docket DOT-OST-2010-IM k Dea rMr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s ou rsuppor t fo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit yan d propose d join t busines s agreemen t file d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo roneworl d t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliance . Thi s increase d interallianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y- firs t bysolidifyin g U.S.-Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfurthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra thoroug h review , w e encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai rtransportatio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA L allianc e wil l have a positiv e impact o n ai rtrave l byofferin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customers continu e t o benefi t fro m havin g thre e competitiv e ai ralliance s t o choos e from . W e appreciat e you rpromp t revie wan d approva l o f thi s application . Respectfully , Monic a J . Morri s Airport s Administrato r Cit yo f Wichit a Falls , Texa s Departmen t o f Aviation , Traffi can d Transportatio n 400 0 Armstron g Drive , Suit e 8 Wichit a Falls . T

X 7630 5 (940 ) 855-362 3 Monica.Morris@wichitafallstx.go v

130 0 7lhStroe t P.O . Box143 1 Wichit a Falls . Toxa s 7630 7
Before the Second Division,

May 31, 1966

No. P66/73.

protests 323780-K, 323883-K, and 327087-K (New York).

#### Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hats, bonnets, and hoods, composed wholly or in chief value of straw or ramie, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Morris Shoenthal, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2431), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WILLIAM C. ULERY,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5192RBL

 ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file an answer. In the

supporting documentation counsel explains that verbatim transcripts were not originally sent from

the state court to counsel. Respondent’s counsel states the transcripts have been found and will be

supplied. 

Respondent has shown good cause for an extension of time and will have until August 18th,

2006 to file an answer

The clerk is directed to send copies of this order to petitioner and counsel for respondent. And

to note the August 18th, 2006 due date.

DATED this 31st , day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05192-RBL Document 15 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Executive Officer

            The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Allied Healthcare
            Products, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of
            18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on
            Form 10-Q for the Company's fiscal quarter ending March 31 2003 (the
            "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
            May 14, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information
            contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



                                 /s/  Earl R. Refsland
                                 --------------------------
                                     Earl R. Refsland, Chief Executive Officer



                                     May 12, 2003


                                       22
No. P66/90.

protests 65/3747, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,013
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,440
<PP&E>                                          22,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,964
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,744
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,374
<SALES>                                         53,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,245
<CGS>                                           48,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,736
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,415
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          66,746
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,244
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,939
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,244
<LOANS>                                         59,312
<ALLOWANCE>                                        384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,954
<DEPOSITS>                                      85,157
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                839
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,993
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  93,954
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,337
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  283
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    74
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,694
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 585
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 585
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,109
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    266
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         192
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       192
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.86
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   372
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  384
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               384
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended March 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Schreiman,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

May 12, 2003

/s/ David E. Schreiman
David E. Schreiman
Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-2 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 1 of 5

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 16 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-2 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-2 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-2 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 16-2 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7893
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSE ELMER DIAZ D'CAMPO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-232, CA-96-123-2-11) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Elmer Diaz D'Campo, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of an earlier order granting his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). Appellant seeks a greater reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Diaz D'Campo , Nos. CR-90-232; CA-96-123-2-11 (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 1996). Additionally, we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED