alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                   5
<LEGEND>
     Amounts restated to reflect reversal of discontinued
     operations presentation of wagering systems segment.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  3,291
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          31,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                            3,241
<INVENTORY>                                            33,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       73,926
<PP&E>                                                134,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                         65,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        170,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  57,565
<BONDS>                                                33,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                19
<COMMON>                                                  107
<OTHER-SE>                                             86,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          170,662
<SALES>                                                 8,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       44,745
<CGS>                                                   5,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          28,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        6,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (4,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (985)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (3,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         4,014
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .04
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                       STARTECH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert L. DeRochie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                               /s/ Robert L. DeRochie
                               ----------------------
                               Robert L. DeRochie
                               Chief Financial Officer & Vice President,
                               Investor Relations
                               September 13, 2002
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JULIUS ADAIR WILEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr
- 00048

- CCE

- 5; 1:16

- cv
01252

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Julius Adair Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, fo r Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Juli u s Adair Wiley appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, construing his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
sentence reduction as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion , and dismissing that motion as
second or successive

. Although the district court should not have construed Wiley’ s motion as one arising under § 2255 , we nevertheless agree with the court’s alternati ve reasoning that Wiley is not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2) because the Sentencing Commission has not authorized resentencing under Amendment 794 to the Sentencing
Guidelines

. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(a)(1), (d) (2016) ; Unit ed
States v. McHan , 386 F.3d 620, 622 (4th Cir. 2004). We therefore affirm the denial of
relief on that basis

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                               JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                         7,293,000
<SECURITIES>                                                   1,502,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  5,325,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     552,000
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              16,004,000
<PP&E>                                                         6,046,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 1,979,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                28,494,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         12,893,000
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                        7,000
<COMMON>                                                          44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    11,607,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  28,494,000
<SALES>                                                       14,742,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              14,742,000
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 14,537,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                91,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  305,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     117,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              188,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     188,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
 OF THE STATE OF OREGON

 SEE REVERSE FOR
 CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

 CUSIP 218725 10 9

 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
 is the registered holder of

 FULLY PAID SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF

 CORILLIAN CORPORATION
 transferable on the books of the Bank by the holder hereof in person or by duly
 authorized attorney on surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.
        This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the
 Transfer Agent and Registrar.
 WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Bank and the facsimile signatures of its duly
 authorized officers.

 Dated:





SECRETARY AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES, L.L.C.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
BY





AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE


<PAGE>

 CORILLIAN CORPORATION

 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
 certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
 according to applicable laws or regulations:

 TEN COM -
 TEN ENT -
 JT TEN -

 as tenants in common
 as tenants by the entireties
 as joint tenants with right of
 survivorship and not as tenants
 in common


 (Oregon Custodians use the following)
 (Name) CUST UL OREG (Name) MIN-D                                         as
 Custodian under
                                                        the laws of Oregon, for
                                                        a minor

 (Name) CUST (Name) (State) UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-D                    Custodian

 (Cust)                                     (Minor)

                                                           Under

 Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

 (State)


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,                                        hereby sell, assign
 and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

Shares

of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint

Attorney

to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated

X
X
NOTICE:

THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.



Signature(s) Guaranteed


By
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION
(BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
COR

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6339 

RASHAD DWAYNE VICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Wallens Ridge Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1441-AM)

Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rashad Dwayne Vick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rashad Dwayne Vick, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Vick has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEITH L. NASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5127 RJB/KLS

ORDER REQUESTING

RESPONSE AND RE-NOTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to

compel discovery presently noted for October 20, 2006. (Dkt. # 66). Prior to the Court’s consideration of

any order to compel and/or sanctions, the Court requests Defendants to submit a response.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall re-note Plaintiff’s motion to compel for December 1,

2006, within which time Defendants shall file their response according to the rules.

DATED this 9th day of November, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05127-RJB Document 74 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-05194-RBL Document 24 Filed 05/02/07 Page 6 of 6
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ANTHONY WALLER,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1904-MJP-MAT

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME

This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s request for additional time to file his

brief in support of his federal habeas petition. The Court, having considered petitioner’s request,

and the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Petitioner’s request for additional time to file his brief in support of his federal

habeas petition (Dkt. No. 7) is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file his brief not later than

February 20, 2006. Petitioner is advised that no further extensions will be granted.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to and to the Honorable Marsha

J. Pechman.

DATED this 19th day of January, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01904-MJP Document 8 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS NO. AP - 75,992
EXP AR TE JOS HU A ST EV EN RO M O , A pplic ant
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W05-73295-P IN THE 203 DISTRICT COURT RD F RO M DA LLA S CO UN TY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedure , the cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to this Court t his application for writ of habe as cor pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant plea ded guilty , was c onvicted of second de g ree robber

y and after a period of defe rre d adjudication was revoke d, was sentenced to five y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. After Applicant plea ded guilty and wa s sentenc ed, the victim e x ecute d an af fidavit stating that Applicant did not steal a bicy cle from him, a s was alleg ed in the indictment. Applicant a lleg es that th e ne w a ff

ida vit sh ow s that he is a c tua lly inn oc e nt of the se c on d de g re e fe lony of wh ic h h e isconvicted.

The trial c ourt has dete rmined that the aff idavit is c redible a

nd that Applicant has e stablished by clea r and c onvincing evidenc e that a jur y would acquit him of the sec ond deg ree offe nse of robber y . The State a

nd the trial cour

t both recommend granting relief
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 05-73295-P in the 203 J udicial District Court rd of Da llas County

is set aside, and A

pplicant is rema

nded to the Da llas County Sheriff to a

nswer the
c ha rg e a g a ins t hi m. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te x as De partment of C r im in a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r r e c tional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Deliver ed: September

10, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL B. CHAVES,

Defendant.

CR 06-5227

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney,CAPT PATRICK O’BRYAN;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD.;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable J. K. ARNOLD

Date: JULY 25, 2008

Time: 2:00 P.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

JULY 18, 2008

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05227-MAT Document 26 Filed 07/18/08 Page 1 of 1
#### 885 W.E. Residents Corp., Respondent, v Coronet Properties Company et al., Appellants.

[632 NYS2d 556]

—Order, *306Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered July 1, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, denied portions of defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

By serving one of GSR Corporation’s officers pursuant to CPLR 311 (1), plaintiff effected service on the two named partnerships, since said corporation is a general partner of GSR Associates, which, in turn, is the general partner of Coronet Properties Co., (CPLR 310 [a].) We also find that the defendants have failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the service of the individually named defendants.

Although General Business Law § 352-c, the Martin Act, does not give rise to a private cause of action, it does not preclude plaintiff from bringing a common-law breach of contract claim *(see, 1113 8th Ave. Owners Corp. v Rivieccio,*165 AD2d 714; *Horn v 440 E. 57th Co.,*151 AD2d 112, 117). Finally, the suit was timely commenced, as it was brought within six years of the alleged breach of the contract *(see, Kassner & Co. v City of New York,*46 NY2d 544, 550), when the property was conveyed on January 12, 1988. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.
----

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      20, 2008 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                   |   |                          |   |
|   |                   |   |                          |   |
|   |                   |   | By:                           | /s/  Douglas J. Kramer,      CEO |
|   |                   |   |                          | Douglas      J. Kramer |
|   |                   |   |                          | Principal      Executive Officer |

|   | (i) | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the      period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      20, 2008 |   | LAPOLLA      INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|--------|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                   |   |                          |   |
|   |                   |   |                          |   |
|   |                   |   | By:                           | /s/  Paul Smiertka,      CFO |
|   |                   |   |                          | Paul      Smiertka |
|   |                   |   |                          | Principal      FinancialOfficer |

----