alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 10, 2010 |   | LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|-------------------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|              |              |   |                     |   |
|              |              |   |                     |   |
|              |              |   | By:            | /s/  Douglas J. Kramer, CEO |
|              |              |   |                     | Douglas J. Kramer |
|              |              |   |                     | Principal Executive Officer |

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 10, 2010 |   | LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|-------------------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|              |              |   |                     |   |
|              |              |   |                     |   |
|              |              |   | By:            | /s/  Charles Zajaczkowski, CFO |
|              |              |   |                     | Charles Zajaczkowski |
|              |              |   |                     | Principal Financial Officer |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
                     1992 MOHAWK-HORIZON STOCK OPTION PLAN


     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, made as of the 17th day of February, 2000, by MOHAWK
INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Company"):

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Company has established the Mohawk Industries, Inc. 1992
Mohawk-Horizon Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it advisable to amend the Plan as of
the effective date hereof;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the effective
date hereof, by substituting the following for Plan Section 5(g):

     "(g)  provide that, if an optionee dies or becomes disabled (as defined in
Code Section 22(e)(3)) while he or she is a director or employee of the Company
or a Subsidiary, as applicable, the Option shall become immediately vested and
exercisable in full and may be exercised by the optionee or by a legatee or
legatees of the optionee under his or her last will, or by his or her personal
representative or representatives, at any time until the first anniversary of
the optionee's death or disability or, if earlier, the expiration of the Option
term."

     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect as prior to this Second Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be
executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                        MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                        By:
                                           -----------------------------------

ATTEST:


By:
   -----------------------------

[CORPORATE SEAL]
# "Doc^-t f l)or'O^T'Xcc h io((>8 5 JOHNN Y L . DUPREE , PH.D .

MAYO R CouncU-Ward l CouncU-Ward 2 CouncU - Ward3 CouncU-Ward 4 Counc U - War d5 Ki mBradle y Debora

h Denar dDelgado Carte

r Carroll Dave J . Ware , I I Henr

y Naylo r Apri l 13,201 0 Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Z. ^ Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division , X-5 3 ; ] Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Departmertt

o f Transportatio n S" " Floor , Roo mW86-47 2 S^ ^ 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . S[ ^ Washington , D C 2059 0 : - ; c 5 Re : EA S Orde r

2010-2-2 9 Dea r Mr . DeVany : Th e City o f

Hattiesbur g i s i n receip t

o f th e proposal s fromMesab aAirlines , d/b/ aDelt aAirline s an d Sovereig n Air , Inc . t o provid e essentia l ai r servic e t o th e citizen s o f th e Hattiesburg-Laure l region . Currentl y th e Cit y o f

Hattiesbur g ha s weathere dth e recessio n du e t o th e vita l rol e o f Camp Shelb y a s a mobilizatio n cente r

for ou r arme dforces . Th e Universit y o f Souther n Mississippi' s enrollmen t continue s t o grow , an dit s worl dclas s Polyme r Scienc e Departmen t

continue s t o develo p hig h tec h job s for th e area . Therefore , th e City o f

Hattiesbur g propose s acceptanc e o f Mesab aAirline s t o provid e essentia l ai r service . Base do n pas t

servic e an dperformanc e t o th e area , sea t capacity , hu b locatio n an dmor e coimection s for

travelers , w e fee l tha t

Mesab ai s abette r

choic e an dwil l continu e t o hel p ou r communit y grow. W e appreciat e you r

pas t effort s i n securin g a n essentia l ai r servic e carrie r

an dyou r cooperatio n i n ou r endeavo r t o maintai n th e highest^ossibl e leve l o f ai r servic e for

ou r citizens . Sinc^ly , DuPree , Ph.D . , City o f Hattiesbur g JLD/kmh Telephon e (601 ) 545-450 1 • Fa

x (601 ) 545-460 8 Email nutyor@hattiesburgms.com• Websit e www.hattiesburgms.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                        WINNERS ALL INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                            FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

                         QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998

                                 10-QSB DATA

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF WINNERS ALL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,868
<PP&E>                                         124,070<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,311<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,458,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,743,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     55,035
<COMMON>                                       463,766
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,439,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,458,660
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,297,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,297,295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,297,295)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.034)
<FN>
<F1>Figure is Property and Equipment, including Accumulated Depreciation.
<F2>According to the registrant's records, Depreciation and Amortization
are $11,311 and $7,459, respectfully, for a total of $18,770.
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

ORDER SEALING – page 1 (253) 593-6710

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LARRY BAILEY, JR.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-5206RBL 

ORDER SEALING DEFENDANT’S

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

The Court having considered the Motion for Order Sealing Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, are to be sealed. 

DONE this 16th day of January, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

/s______________________

Russell V. Leonard

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:06-cr-05206-RBL Document 36 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-122M

)

v. )

)

MARIO TINOCO-GONZALEZ, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: March 15, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. The defendant was represented by Jan Stansell.

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00122-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Washington are unknown/unverified; and the Bureau of Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (“BICE”) has filed a detainer.

(2) The defendant represents a risk of danger due to his extensive criminal

history to include domestic assault and driving under the influence. The

numerous charges of driving while licence suspended reflects disregard

to State Law.

(3) The defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

Case 2:06-mj-00122-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00122-MJB Document 9 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Startech Environmental Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph F. Longo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request





/s/ Joseph F. Longo
-------------------
Joseph F. Longo
Chief Executive Officer, President
June 20, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TONY WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA CARTER et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5151RJB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

This civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff was given leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. # 2).

Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (Dkt. # 12).

In considering plaintiff’s motion for counsel the court notes there is a standard for

appointment of counsel in the Ninth Circuit. There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although the court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), can request

counsel to represent a party proceeding in forma pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional

circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy,

745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984); Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of

Case 3:06-cv-05151-RJB Document 17 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and

the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues

involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331.

Plaintiff has demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate his claims pro se. Moreover, it

appears that this case does not involve exceptional circumstances which warrant appointment of

counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. # 12) is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff and counsel for defendant’s a copy of this Order.

DATED this 14th, day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05151-RJB Document 17 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 of Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Executive Officer/s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Financial OfficerDated: February 11, 2014   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 197/12 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 197 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4812 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 197

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4812 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 197/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 197/2 | Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 197/3 | Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 197/4 | Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 197/5 | Notice to importers — Imports of garlic into the Community | 8 |
| 2005/C 197/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3915 — Apax/Versatel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |
| 2005/C 197/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3914 — Tele2/Versatel) (1) | 10 |
| 2005/C 197/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3845 — PAI/CHR. Hansen) (1) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 197/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 197/2

Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1)

2

2005/C 197/3

Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1)

4

2005/C 197/4

Notification according to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty — Request for an authorisation to extend the application of national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure (1)

6

2005/C 197/5

Notice to importers — Imports of garlic into the Community

8

2005/C 197/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3915 — Apax/Versatel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

2005/C 197/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3914 — Tele2/Versatel) (1)

10

2005/C 197/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3845 — PAI/CHR. Hansen) (1)

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00025- CV In re Jam es Barre ntine and P atric ia Barrentine ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B ASTROP CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Filed: Mar ch 13, 2014