alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P66/295. —

#### Crown Handkerchief, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/4514, 64/20158, and 65/23750 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of silk handkerchiefs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ashear Bros. Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NO. 07-13-0008-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 28, 2013

____________________________

In re TERRY BLANKENSHIP, Relator

___________________________

Order of Dismissal

__________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Relator Terry Blankenship filed a petition for writ of mandamus on June 5, 2012, 

but failed to pay the $125 filing fee required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. 

We informed relator, by letter dated January 11, 2013, that the filing fee was 

outstanding and that the appeal would be dismissed unless it was paid by January 22, 

2013. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.–

Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d). The fee has not been paid to date. Nor does the record show 

him to be indigent or having requested leave to proceed as an indigent.

Because relator has failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the court, 

we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

 Per Curiam
## SERVED FEBRUAR Y 23 , 201 1 v-fi|§|^g ^

; ^ fOPERATION S ! ^F 3 2 U Ao . 2 8

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTERO F 

## GOJE T AIRLINES , LL C FA A DOCKE T No . CP10CE000 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-002 5 I N TH E MATTERO F 

## GOJE T AIRLINES , LL C FA A DOCKE T No . CP10CE000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-019 0 

## SECON D ORDE REXTENDIN G TIM E FO RFILIN GBRIEF S Fo r goo dcaus e shown , th e motio n o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) for

a n extensio n o f

tim e t o fil e it s Rebutta l Brie f i n thes e matter s i s GRANTED .

### V

The Pos t Hearing Briefing Schedul e i s hereb y amendedas follows : friShall file it s Rebutta

l Brief o n or The Federa

l AviatitiQ^l^l l befor e March31,2Dir * «

v 

## L^ijf^ociU'^ ^

IC

- Goodwi

n ' J -f(.^|J^'i4^fcinistrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t Nos . CP10CE000 3 & CP10CE000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Mr . Richar dA . Leac h GoJe t Airlines , LLC , Responden t 1149 5 Navai dRoad , Suit e 30 3 St . Louis , M O 6304 4 Davi dJ . A . Haye s III , Respondent' s Counse l Vice-Presiden t

& Genera l Counse l Tran s State s Holdings , Inc . 1149 5 Navai dRoa d Bridgeton , M O 6304 4 TEL : 314-222-431 6 FAX : 314-222-431 1 Davi dB . Kessler , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Centra l Region , ACE- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n DO T Buildin g 90 1 Locust , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1 TEL : 816-329-376 3 FAX : 816-329-377 1 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e in person o

r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR05-391RSM

)

v. )

)

ELIJAH VICTOR FUHR, ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

)

_____________________________ )

Offense charged: 

Violation of the special condition of his bond that he have no direct or indirect

contact with co-defendants.

Date of Detention Hearing: January 4, 2006

The Court, having conducted a bond revocation and a detention hearing pursuant

to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons

for detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which

the defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required

and the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Ron Friedman and Rich Cohen. The defendant was represented by Robert Goldsmith.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant admitted to the violation of passing a non-threatening

message to co-defendant, Colleen Flock, through her niece, Brandy

Williams, on December 29, 2005 and by attempting to contact Ms. Flock

at her residence in Auburn Washington on December 30, 2005.

(2) The Court finds no justification to warrant a 3:00 a.m. visit by the

defendant to co-defendant Flock. 

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 328 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

(3) Due to the nature and seriousness of the crime alleged, release of the 

 defendant would pose a risk to the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility separate, to

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences, or being

held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in which

Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States

Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the

United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00391-RSM Document 328 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00040-MJB Document 1 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00040-MJB Document 1 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 26, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Richard N. Phegley
|Richard N. Phegley    
|May 1, 2006
No. 67567.

#### Advance Pet Supply Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/14851, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic feeders or fountains similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,139,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,931,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,918,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,931,324
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (295,006)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (142,040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KARA FATTY,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

MS “ER PERTH,” et al.,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-258-P 

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than June 16, 2006, Defendants must either

provide the answers Interrogatory No. 16 or show good cause for failing to do so.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff wishes an extension of the deadline to add

parties, the Court will entertain a motion to do so upon a showing of good cause for the extension.

Filed this 8th day of June, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00258-MJP Document 11 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60093 Conference Calendar

CHARLES EDWARD WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DICK WILSON; TOMMY DAUGHDRILL; KEN ESTES; NORMAN TRAVIS; H.N. JENSEN; ALONZO H. STURGEON; LEONARD ROSENTHAL, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:00-CV-881-LN

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Edward Wilson, Mississippi prisoner # 44482, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Wilson argues that his complaint was timely because he did not discover the legal basis for his cause of action until May 2000. When applying the discovery rule under Mississippi law, the focus is upon the time that the would-be plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence,No. 01-60093 -2- that he probably had an actionable injury, and it is not necessary that the plaintiff becomes absolutely certain that he has a cause of action. First Trust Nat’l Ass’n v. First Nat’l Bank of Commerce , 220 F.3d 331, 336 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which alleged a conspiracy to falsely arrest him for, and accuse and convict him of rape and kidnaping from October 1982 through March 1983, as time-barred.
See Gartrell v. Gaylor , 981 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993). Wilson is cautioned that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Wilson is further cautioned that if he accumulates three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). AFFIRMED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 10.9.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


10% FIXED SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO 10% FIXED SECURED
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 16th day of November 2017, by and
between HELIX TCS, INC. (the “Company”), and REDDIAMOND PARTNERS, LLC (“Lender”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.      The
Company and the Lender are parties to a 10% Fixed Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Agreement”), signed
February 13, 2017 in the face amount of $25,000.


 


B.       The
Company and the Lender desire to amend the Agreement upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
recitals, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and in the Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.       Each party agrees that the “Principal Amount”, including accrued interest, is $38,440.97 as of
the date of this Amendment.


 


2.       The
definition of “Conversion Price” is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“Conversion Price” shall be
equal to a 40% discount to the lowest one-day Volume Average Weighted Price (“VWAP”) during the 30 trading days preceding
such conversion.”


 


3.       The
definition of “Maturity Date” is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“Maturity Date” shall be the
6-month anniversary of the date of this Amendment.”


 


4.       The
interest rate of the Agreement, effective on the Issuance Date, is 5% per annum.


 


5.       All
references to prepayment are deleted and the parties agree that the Agreement is prepayable at any time at 110% of the unpaid
principal and accrued interest.


 


6.       In the event the
Company tenders payment in full on or before November 21, 2017, then the principal amount outstanding will be reduced by
15%.


 


7.       Except
as specifically amended or modified by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unimpaired, unaffected
and unchanged in every particular as set forth therein. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


8.       This
Amendment may be executed in several counterparts and delivered by electronic transmission, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but which counterparts shall together constitute one and the same Amendment.


 






    	 		 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date first written above.







 


	 	HELIX TCS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Zachary L. Venegas, CEO
	 	 	Zachary L. Venegas, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	LENDER:
	 	 
	 	REDDIAMOND PARTNERS, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Neil B Rock
	 	Name:	Neil B Rock
	 	Title:	Member
Exhibit 31.3  Certification  I, John A. Galea, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 of Interval Leisure Group, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  Dated: March 9,   2016
/s/ JOHN A.   GALEAJohn A. GaleaChief   Accounting Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geneticanalyses of common murre (Uria aalge) populations from British Columbia toCalifornia, with emphasis on restoration planning in Washington : final reportsubmitted to: Tenyo Maru Trustee Committee**
 
Files: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.2:M 96/5
Item Number:0250-E-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000622527
 
July 25, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VISHAL SINGH UPPAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH WILLIE et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5167 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING

ACTION AS ABANDONED

This civil rights action comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge that the action be dismissed as abandoned. Plaintiff has not filed objection. 

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This

dismissal is based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the action and

Plaintiff’s failure to take the steps ordered by the court to file a joint

status report. It appears plaintiff has abandoned this action.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for any

Defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2007.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05167-FDB Document 38 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 1
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 4

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Secretary Warren Christopher served as Secretary

of State from 1993 until 1997, and maintained the tradition of that Office by representing the international interests of the United States with great dignity, grace, and

ability;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, during his tenure as Secretary of State, engaged in more international travel than

any other Secretary of State in United States history, reflecting his indefatigable commitment to advancing peace

and justice, protecting and promoting United States interests, and preserving United States leadership in international affairs;

Whereas Secretary Christopher has played a key leadership

role in United States foreign policy achievements, including ending the war in Bosnia, restoring an elected government in Haiti, and advancing peace in the Middle

East;

Whereas Secretary Christopher served with distinction as

Deputy Secretary of State from 1977 until 1981 and,

among his accomplishments as Deputy Secretary, is credited with skillfully negotiating the release of American

hostages in Iran;
2

SCON 4 ES

Whereas Secretary Christopher has had a distinguished career in law and public service in California;

Whereas Secretary Christopher, born in Scranton, North Dakota, is one of North Dakota’s most distinguished native

sons and has always displayed the quiet strength and

work ethic associated with the people of the Great Plains;

Whereas in 1997 Secretary Christopher leaves his position as

the 63d Secretary of State; and

Whereas Secretary Christopher has earned the respect and

admiration of Congress and the American people: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress commends and thanks the

3 Honorable Warren Christopher for his exemplary diplo4 matic service, and for his skillful and indefatigable efforts

5 to advance peace and justice around the world.

Passed the Senate January 22, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 4

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending and thanking the Honorable Warren

retary of State.Christopher for his exemplary service as Sec-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Releasing Evidence - 1

United States v. Richard Allen Fabel et al., 06-41RSL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD ALLEN FABEL ET AL.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR06-41RSL

ORDER RELEASING EVIDENCE

Based upon the representations in the government’s motion and the entirety of

the files and record in this case, the Court FINDS and RULES as follows:

On April 6, 2007, Evan Thompson, the Forensic Scientist who had examined

items of evidence in this case, resigned from the Washington State Patrol Crime

Laboratory. The government had planned on calling Mr. Thompson to testify about the

findings and conclusions he made based upon his examination.

The government has represented that a current Forensic Scientist at the

Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory will have to re-examine the evidence that

Mr. Thompson examined so that a current employee can testify in this case.

Some of the items that will need to be re-examined have been admitted as

evidence in this case. Specifically, Exhibits 10.5a & b (the bullets recovered from Mr.

Walsh’s body), and Exhibit 10.51 (Mr. Walsh’s vest) have been entered into evidence

and are now in the Court’s custody. 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 620 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Releasing Evidence - 2

United States v. Richard Allen Fabel et al., 06-41RSL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Therefore, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

Exhibits 10.5a & b and Exhibit 10.51 be released to the government so that they

can be re-examined at the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory. They are to be

returned to evidence once the examinations are completed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 10th day of April, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

 

Presented by:

JEFFREY C. SULLIVAN

United States Attorney

s/ Tessa M. Gorman 

WSBA #35908

Assistant United States Attorneys

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 553-4994 (Gorman)

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: Tessa.Gorman@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 620 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 2