alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: keel@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:24:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Kuehl

Chippewa Falls, WI 54729
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THOMAS ALLEN CLARK,

Petitioner,

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5015RJB

 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

 RETURN, § 2254 PETITION

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order. The clerk will also send

a courtesy copy of the petition to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office Criminal Justice

Division. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondent should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

Case 3:06-cv-05015-RJB Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 10th day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05015-RJB Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

FELT PAD
TO BE GLUED

BULLETIN 1006 PLATE 5

2 NUMBER wa
SLIDE ADAPTER AING 7 BRASS
i
i
C z
i
BUTTON - Tz Z
BUTTON - HEAD SCREW. z
FLUORIMETER HOUSING r |
SAMPLE SLIDE r " |
SLIDE GUIDE, RIGHT T
SLIDE GUIDE. LEFT i
. SHUTTER SLIDE a 7
SHUTTER r
BOTTOM FILTER PLATE H
PLATE SLANGE t _—
SPANNER NUT T "
RILTER CLIP t
PILTER CLIP a
PIL PLATE T —
TILTER RING z
BLACK - OUT PLATE I T m
‘TOP PLATE i i
"FLUORIMETER" ASSEMBLY WITH BOTTOM FILTER PLATE TYPE “A"
CUTAWAY SECTION EXPOSING CONSTRUCTION, SHUTTER OPEN
i a
—-——_| — 1.
© | |-—FLUORIMETER HEAD
@ 1 ra Z|
Yue) Ws
BY t IN i
' |
LS | TuBE HOUSING — .
CROSS SECTION OF BOTTOM FILTER PLATE “B"
-, AT ASSEMBLY IN TUBE
4 0
FLUORIMETER
: TAP 6-32 THD.
TAP 4-40 THD. 4 HOLES TAP 8-32 THD, - 2 HOLES
OCATE FROM TOP. 2 HOLES —>| 376 i564}
L—3/a—
a 8"
L
i
DRILL ‘AND TAP 10-32 THD. SPOT be f
AT ASSEMBLEY 4 HOLES Mas R. we ow
38
CENTER ues ri
DRILL AND COUNTERSINK oF HOUSING. ————
FOR NO 8-32 FLAT HEAD
SCREW 4 HOLES SLIDE GUIDE:2 REQUIRED! RIGHT HAND
AS SHOWN AND | LEFT HAND OR OPPOSITE
s j
tie. syse"
878%} | ya
ve"R. e T —
|_s/e" —_
= q g
2° 0 = — als
ee ae 22+ VuaeR—| Arvo. f 2 [
TAP 8-32 rH. / + Le |
SPOT FROM "BLACK. 1 & tq
OUT PLATE" = § =
® 2 ver. aa
4, n 4 ve" R.
Zz WZ ” — T to
ver 0 a | byeas Suurten pate A
1 $ % bean 216" wanoue
ZA, + 1 S :
ue" unpencur | weet
= ~ ZA), {-
saat = ee tHe] i iG YU At
(O)FLUORIME TER’ HOUSING: | REQUIRED i { {
® @) SAMPLE SLIDE: 1 REQUIRED 5
ORILL AND COUNTERSINK
PB ig geSOHN EEN . Wo.25 omit aino 0)
SCREW 4 HOLES .| 2" R . .
l_sve! 8 Lisi" 0
i 64 fe ao § _—
4
= . zn ot
S4 af _ - .
36a OF "R
PY a >=
Li3rie'R, sg ~ 7
7 Lisie’R 218" ce x |}
2 ~ Pp it : ot oN
. Be tH . ° 0
7 6 _ =! a nef whee |
pe OS zg ai
d i 8 ag EE (ber[reqd| om a y
g INTO SHUTTER _? $ ut 4 9/32" a
© SHUTTER!| REQUIRED FILTER CLIP:8 REQUIRED a

® SHUTTER PLATE:| REQUIRED

SEH Mobs
TAP_4-40 THD “
fein

TAP 4-40 THO,
se" DEEP 4 HOLES

——4inéo

jz” so. —

Za

—3 wig >————

35/8'-24 THO

\ié UNDERCUT

AN

Langst

kn.

UNDERCUT

BOTTOM FILTER PLATE, TYPE A:
| REQUIRED

YS ORILL 78 DEEP

& 4-40 TAP FOR

HEADLESS SET
‘SCREW

2520

Zs. |

vw
33d

BOTTOM FILTER PLATE, TYPE B:

| REQUIRED

iC)

ae 5/32

rT 5/648

user

kwuRt —— 36 THO]

REQ'D | DIM.A DIM. B
t L050. Lado.
n 80D. LISD.
i 600 950
1 .393D. +7430,

TO FIT FILTER PLATE

SPANNER NUT:1 REQUIRED

CUTAWAY VIEW,

ADAPTER RINGS:4 REQUIRED

CROSS SECTION, AND DETAILS OF

36 DRILL ON ALL
CORNERS 4 HOLES

No. 32 DRILL (0.116"0)

© O

a HOLES:

3/16" DRILL AND END.
Mit BOTTOM To DEPTH
OF SQUARE

9/32" END MILL
Vie" DEEP.

ef 3/4 to}
SHUTTER SLIDE:| REQUIRED

®

FILTER RING:
| REQUIRED

ve

rs

aD

a
TOP PLATE: | REQUIRED

une”>|

}-———« 1 ——|

"BLACK-OUT PLATE": | REQUIRED;
EXTENDED LENGTH 5"

PARTS -OF

“FLUORIMETER”

268681 O ~ 54 (In pocket) No, 3

SY
DISTRIBUTION SUB-LICENSING AGREEMENT
                  Addendum to the original licensing agreement

This agreement was entered into effect on June 15th, 1998 between Integrated
English International, Inc., whose registered office is at 7000 SW 59th Place
Miami FL. 33143

and

American Video Language Institute, whose registered office is at International
Building 2455 E Sunrise Blvd. Suite 512, Ft. Lauderdale whereas:

The Licensor has produced an International Business Language Course. This course
consists of:

a] 4 video lessons, a total of 2.40 Hours of duration,
b] A work book with full translations in Spanish
c] Trade manual: Lanze, Export Import can Make You Rich

AVLI is interested to distribute the Business Course in the USA and Canada.

Licensee:

The Licensor herewith grants to AVLI, for the duration of this Agreement, the
exclusive license to distribute in the named territory the International
Business Language Course.

With the understanding that Philips at the Netherlands has obtained previously
the exclusive right for worldwide distribution of the International Business
Language Course, Integrated English International, Inc. has obtained from
Philips a sublicense for AVLI, against the payment of US$ 75.00 royalty to
Philips for every unit sold.

This exclusive licensing agreement will be in force for the period of one year,
and will be automatically extended, if not canceled by either party 30 days
prior to the end of the licensing year.
<PAGE>

either party 30 days prior to the end of the licensing year.

The royalty due to Philips on the Business Course has to be paid directly to
Philips Media Distribution as set forth in the basic licensing agreement between
IEI and AVLI.

This licensing agreement will automatically be void if sales do not initiate
within a period of 90 days.

Licensor will provide Licensee with the VHS video tapes, while Licensee will
complete the packaging.

Licensee will send quarterly statements to Philips on the amount of units sold,
and shall pay the royalties due within 30 days from the end of each quarterly
period.

Licensee shall defend and hold harmless Philips and it affiliated companies
within the Philips group against any third party claim in connection with the
distribution of the International Business Language program.

The Licensor will have the right to audit, at its own expense, AVLI's books of
accounting related to the distribution of the product, in order to verify the
royalty statement in respect of the sales.

Agreed to:


           /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
--------------------------------------
Integrated English International, Inc.


--------------------------------------
American Video Language Institute

Date:________________
Case No. 9,665.

#### MILLER v. BUTLER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 470.] *1*

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1807.

Bilí, op Exchange — Acceptance — Given por Award — Mistake op Arbitrators.

1. A bill of exchange may be accepted, by the drawee’s writing the word “accepted” [“excepted”] upon it.

[Cited in Cortelyou v. Maben, 22 Neb. 700, 36 N. W. 160.]

2. In an action by the indorsee, against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, drawn for the amount of an award, the acceptor cannot avail himself of a mistake of the arbitrators in making up the award.

Assumpsit on anjnland bill of -exchange, drawn by Reed on the defendant, in favor of W. Hartshome, Jr., or order, stating it to be the amount of an award between Reed and the defendant, which bill was underwritten. “Excepted, Tristam Butler,” in the handwriting of the defendant Hartshome indorsed it to the plaintiff.

Mr. Swann, for defendant,

objected that that was not an acceptance, but THE COURT (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent) overruled the objection.

Mr. Swann then offered to read the award,. (Hartshome being one of the referees who had signed the award,) and to read an acknowledgment by the arbitrators made subsequent to the award, that if a certain affidavit (then produced,) had been produced to-them before the award, it would have reduced their award sixty dollars, and contended that the defendant had a right to discount those sixty dollars against the plaintiff.

1

 [Reported, by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But THE COURT rejected the evidence, the bill being negotiable, and in the hands of a third person.
**EXHIBIT
        15**
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 To
        the
        Board of Directors and Stockholders of
 Mediware
        Information Systems, Inc.
 
 
 We
        have
        reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company
        Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim condensed
        consolidated financial statements of Mediware Information Systems, Inc. and
        subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and for the three-and six-month
        periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our review report
        dated January 25, 2006. Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed
        no opinion on those financial statements.
 
 We
        are
        aware that our review report, which is included in your Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated by
        reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-07591, No.
        333-83016, No. 333-119503, No. 333-123496 and No. 333-130576).
 
 We
        are
        also aware that our review report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
        Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), is not considered a part of the Registration
        Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
        certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
        Act and the accountants' Section 11 liability does not extend to such
        report.
   Eisner
        LLP
 New
        York,
        New York
 January
        25, 2006
No. 62309.

#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 226251-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66487.

#### American Express Co. and Gamble Vargish & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4481, etc. (Los Angeles).

*350Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pigtails similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63984, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: stvwbr@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:41:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Weber

Janesville, WI 53545
Exhibit 10.17

 

Director Compensation Policy

 

Certain of our non-employee directors will be eligible to receive compensation for their board service. Our board of directors has adopted a compensation program for these directors that will enable us to attract qualified directors, provide them with compensation at a level that is consistent with our compensation objectives and, in the case of equity-based compensation, align their interests with those of our stockholders.

 

These directors will be eligible to receive the following annual cash retainers, payable in annual installments in arrears:

 

·                  Board Chair: $30,000

 

·                  Board Member: $35,000

 

·                  Audit Committee Chair: $20,000

 

·                  Audit Committee Member: $10,000

 

·                  Compensation Committee Chair: $15,000

 

·                  Compensation Committee Member: $7,500

 

These directors will be eligible to receive the following equity-based compensation in the form of restricted stock units with respect to shares of Class A common stock granted pursuant to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan:

 

·                  an initial grant in the amount of $300,000, vesting in equal annual installments over three years, to be made in connection with this offering; and

 

·                  an annual grant in the amount of $200,000, vesting after one year, to be made on or about the date of our annual stockholder meeting.

 

We will also reimburse all of our directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our board of directors or committees.
No. *67539*.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protests 62/10964 and 62/13263 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc..*(47 CCPA 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Relevant Meetings**  **with External Stakeholders since Publication of the 2011 IFR :** 

September 7, 2011 –Williams & Associates t o discuss his comments on the IFR September 13, 2011 – David Doniger, NRDC t o discuss the IFR and the allocation of HCFC - 22 September 16, 2011 – National Refrigerants t o discuss the IFR and allocation of HCFC - 22 October 20, 2011 – Arkema, Inc. to discuss the allocation of HCFC- 22 November 10, 2011 – AGC Chemical to discuss the HCFC phaseout November 15, 2011 – DuPont to discuss the all ocation of HCFC- 22 December 14, 2011 – Hudson Technologies to discuss the allocation of HCFC - 22
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 49

Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ‘‘America Recycles Day’’ national

kick-off campaign.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. JEFFORDS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Governmental

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ‘‘America

Recycles Day’’ national kick-off campaign.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR AMERICA RE4 CYCLES DAY NATIONAL KICK-OFF CAMPAIGN.

5 The ‘‘America Recycles Day’’ campaign and its

6 agents may sponsor a public event on the Capitol Grounds

7 on September 30, 1997, or on such date as the Speaker

8 of the House of Representatives and the President pro

9 tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.
2

•SCON 49 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized under sec3 tion 1 shall be free to the public and arranged so as not

4 to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions

5 to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the

6 Capitol Police.

7 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—‘‘America Recy8 cles Day’’ and its agents shall assume full responsibility

9 for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities as10 sociated with the event.

11 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

12 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

13 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, ‘‘America Recy14 cles Day’’ and its agents are authorized to erect on the

15 Capitol Grounds any stage, tent, sound amplification de16 vices, and other related structures and equipment required

17 for the event authorized under section 1.

18 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

19 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized

20 to make any other reasonable arrangements as may be re21 quired to plan for or administer the event.

Æ
No. 60256.

protests 283913-K, etc. (New York).

#### A. Bram, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D, 52836), for imitation *372semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.