alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: nancybrownbailey@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:00:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Bailey

Marion, IN 46953
Before the Second Division,

May 1, 1967

No. P67/131.

#### Astra Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 66/8748, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise classified as flashlights is,similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 555, C.D. 2703), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Bao, Ford, and Bichardson, Judges.)
H. Res. 816 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 17, 2007. 

Whereas on October 15, 2007, the Colorado Rockies completed a remarkable 21 out of 22 game-winning streak, 

with a 4-game sweep of the Arizona Diamondbacks, and 

won the 2007 National League Championship series; 

Whereas the Colorado Rockies then played in the franchise’s 

first World Series against the Boston Red Sox; 

Whereas the Colorado Rockies demonstrated remarkable 

team unity, as well as individual initiative and personal 

determination, and serve as a prime example of good 

sportsmanship; 

Whereas the Colorado Rockies fans demonstrated their passion for their team, their love of baseball, and their character as some of the world’s greatest baseball enthusiasts; 

and 

Whereas the city of Denver and the State of Colorado exhibited their ability to host a fantastic Major League Baseball post-season: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates— 

(A) the Colorado Rockies on winning the 2007 

National League Championship; 
2 

•HRES 816 EH 

(B) the players, manager, coaches, support 

staff, ownership, and executives whose commitment 

to the game made all this possible; and 

(C) the Boston Red Sox for their extraordinary 

success in winning the 2007 World Series; and 

(2) directs the Enrolling Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to— 

(A) the 2007 Colorado Rockies and Boston 

Red Sox baseball teams; 

(B) Colorado Rockies manager Clint Hurdle; 

and 

(C) Colorado Baseball Partnership’s chief executive officer and chairman Charlie Monfort. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                       520
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,159
<PP&E>                                          17,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,374
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,777
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,942
<SALES>                                         18,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,834
<CGS>                                           17,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    78
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                       598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
No. 55672.

protests 161571-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
I, Peter J. Scanlon, certify that:                                  Exhibit 31.2

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Startech
     Environmental Corporation.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our report about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          control over financial report which are reasonably likely to adversely
          affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
          report financial information; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: September 14, 2004

By: /s/ Peter J. Scanlon
-----------------------------
Peter J. Scanlon
Chief Financial Officer Vice President, and Principal Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

September 19, 1967

No. P67/308.

#### Bloomingdale Bros. (a div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) *v.*United States, protest 66/47145 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc.,*and *J. J. Murphey & Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and *United States*v. *M. & D. Miller, Inc.*(41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30,
2000 and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months
ended  September  30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,857,000
<SECURITIES>                                     1,935,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,695,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,801,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,953,000
<PP&E>                                          67,234,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,611,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,140,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,933,000
<BONDS>                                         15,019,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           138,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,140,000
<SALES>                                          2,382,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,181,000
<CGS>                                            2,015,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,949,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,423,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,699,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,724,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,724,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .33



</TABLE>
No. 64593.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/6306 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass ornamental novelties similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62984, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### DAH Chris Makarov Nov 13, 2012 to Feb Other. List below. 

### 15, 2013

Other/Additional Information: 

### Details about previous ADs and SBs that are related to this one.

10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,606,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,062,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,053,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,062,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,657
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (24,082)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

October 11, 1966

No. P66/257. —

#### Gessler Products Corp. *v.*United States, protest 63/14962 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of forks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *National Carloading Corp.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: chaz4539@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:28:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

charles wilson

Troy, MT 59935
Case 3:05-cr-05822-RBL Document 33 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cr-05822-RBL Document 33 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALLAN AQUINO LAFUENTE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10415

D.C. No. 1:06-cr-00095-DAE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Allan Aquino Lafuente appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 300-month

sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams

or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

FILED

SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10415

841(b)(1)(A), and 846; distribution of five or more grams of methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B); distribution of 50 grams or more

of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A); and

possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), Lafuente’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lafuente filed a pro

se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 5, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage*                    ®                     *Contract 68 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-285, CP2023-288.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-22140 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P