alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23


 





[Letterhead of theglobe.com, Inc.]


 


Michael S. Egan


[Insert Address]


 


		Re:	Amendment of Employment Agreement



 


Dear Mr. Egan:


 


The globe.com, Inc. (the “Company”)
has requested, and you have agreed, to the agreements documented herein with respect to your compensation.


 


By countersigning this letter in the space
indicated below, you hereby agree that all salary and any allowances which were payable to you by the Company but the payment of
which has been deferred (the “Deferred Salary”), is hereby cancelled.


 


In order to incentivize Delfin Midstream,
LLC (the “Purchaser”) to purchase a controlling interest of the Company’s common stock, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, you hereby irrevocably and unconditionally
release and fully discharge the Company, its stockholders and the Purchaser, and its and their respective members, partners, trustees,
directors, officers, employees and agents, and the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of each of the foregoing,
from any and all liabilities and obligations that may have arisen or accrued on or before the date hereof or may arise or accrue
thereafter under, in connection with or related to the Deferred Salary (the “Released Claims”). You further
agree that you shall not commence or institute any legal actions, including litigation, arbitration or any other legal proceedings
of any kind whatsoever, in law or equity, or assert any claim, demand, action or cause of action concerning, the Released Claims.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank;
Signature Page Follows]


 




     

    
 


    

 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	Theglobe.com, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Edward A. Cespedes
	 	Name:	Edward A. Cespedes
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer


 





	ACKNOWLEDGED
    AND AGREED TO	 
	AS OF THIS
    ___ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017,	 
	EFFECTIVE
    JANUARY 1, 2018	 
	 	 
	/s/ MICHAEL S. EGAN	 
	MICHAEL S.
    EGAN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY, et al.,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

GALE NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et

al.,

 Defendant.

 C05-1835 RSL

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C05-1835 RSL and

bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 28th day of February, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01835-RSL Document 14 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

October 26, 1966

No. P66/304. —

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 63/12744 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnart*Imports, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 2531), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62250.

#### Worby Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 196329-K, etc.

Protests abandoned July 15, 1958. (Not published.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 57742.

protest 208306-K (New York).

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Urecoats Industries Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:
 
 (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:

May 21, 2004

URECOATS INDUSTRIES INC.By:Michael T. AdamsPrincipal Executive Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Urecoats Industries Inc. and will be retained by Urecoats Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Urecoats Industries Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:
 
 (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:

May 21, 2004

URECOATS INDUSTRIES INC.By:Dennis A. DolnickChief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Urecoats Industries Inc. and will be retained by Urecoats Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Dewey TOMBLIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. *Jo*Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-2407.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 3, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 18, 2005.

Dewey Tomblin, Appellant Pro Se. Roxanne Andrews, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dewey Tomblin appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny him Social Security Disability and Supplemen*182tal Security Income benefits. On appeal, Tomblin asserts that he was denied the right to counsel before the administrative law judge. Although Tomblin was represented by counsel in the district court, he did not raise this issue either before the administrative forum or the lower court.

It is well-settled law that issues raised for the first time on appeal generally are not considered by this court. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993) (holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are generally waived absent exceptional circumstances); *Pleasant Valley Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala,*32 F.3d 67, 70 (4th Cir.1994) (“it is inappropriate for courts reviewing appeals of agency decisions to consider arguments not raised before the administrative agency involved”). Here, Tomblin submitted a counseled brief in the district court that did not raise this issue. Accordingly, we conclude that Tomblin has waived this claim. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. *Tomblin v. Barnhart,*No. CA-03-286-3 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CHADRICK JOHN DERBYSHIRE,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-507M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession of Cocaine With Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

and 841(b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: November 7, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), there is a rebuttable presumption that defendant

is a flight risk and a danger to the community based on the nature of the pending charges.

Defendant has not overcome these presumptions.

(2) Defendant’s instant offense is a serious charge and involves a large amount of

drugs.

Case 2:05-cr-00412-JLR Document 10 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) Defendant is a Canadian citizen and has no known ties to the Western District of

Washington or to this community.

(4) Defendant has no employment or legitimate means of support.

(5) Defendant’s current living arrangements appear to be unstable.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00412-JLR Document 10 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (372 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (36 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (14 KB PDF)
Flows tables (160 KB PDF)
Level tables (130 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (20 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (30 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical data | AboutCurrent release | 
Screen reader |  
PDF (560 KB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 20, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [234A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Sixth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact between the Suquamish Tribe and the State of Washington.

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on September 27, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment permits the Tribe to offer Electronic Table Games, updates the Compact to reflect this change in various sections, and incorporates Appendix G, Electronic                           ( print page 66500)                        Table Games. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-20973 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
No. 64592.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3099 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass ornamental novelties similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62984, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 59254.

protests 221606-K, etc. (New York).

#### Ch. Chraime et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves and squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

August 28, 1967

No. P67/277.

#### Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. *v.*United States, protests 63/9071, 63/15390, and 63/22584 (New York).

Beckworth, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Philippine mahogany sticks or slats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 563, C.D. 2704), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 69277.

#### Hap Jones Distributing Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 63/9513, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of spark plugs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lodge Spark Plug Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58262.

protest 155881-K/2591 (Chicago).

#### Naumes Forwarding Service *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *E. J. Petro-semolo Co., Inc.,*and *Parian Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 159, C. D. 1461), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT U

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-22 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 41 Att. 21

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-22 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 41-22 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 3
Mandamus Di smissed and Opinion Filed November 21, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 01602
- CV IN RE MICHAEL STOUT , Relator Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F91
- 02544
- MT 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice Myers In this original mandamus proceeding, relator asks this Court to order t he director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, to recalculate relator’s parole eligibility date on his 25

- year sentence and to notify relator when the 25

- year sentence ceases to operate and relator’s 60

- year sentence start s. This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over the director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. See T EX
. G OV
. C ODE A NN . § 22.221(b) (West 2010) (writ power of courts of appeals). We dismiss the petition for writ of mand amus for want of jurisdiction.

131602F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
No. 64584.

#### Empire Brushes, Inc., and Wood Niebuhr & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 273939-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER RE: MEDIATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PROPET USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LLOYD SHUGART,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0186-MAT

ORDER RE: MEDIATION

This case is currently set for a 5-day jury trial commencing September 24, 2007. The

parties were ordered by this court to participate in the alternative dispute resolution program

authorized by CR 39.1 no later than August 20, 2007, but were unable to agree on a mediator and

asked for the assistance of the court. After three CR 39.1 panel members were designated by the

court as potential mediators, the parties agreed on Thomas Brewer. The parties now advise that

they are unable to agree on the method for paying the expense of mediation.

The parties could have selected a mediator by agreement, including a pro bono mediator,

but were unable to do so. If a fee is charged by the mediator chosen from those designated by the

court, the fee will be shared equally by the two parties.

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 90 Filed 08/27/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER RE: MEDIATION

PAGE -2

A copy of this Order shall be provided to all counsel of record.

DATED this 27th day of August, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 90 Filed 08/27/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tyrone McClay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1)

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stealth Resources Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



Date:    August 25, 2008





/s/ Tyrone McClay

Tyrone McClay,

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)