alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  September      8, 2010 |   |  /s/      Michael B. Campbell                                                                              |
|-------------|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |                         |   | Michael      B. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)                             |
|        |                         |   |                                                                                                            |
| Date:       |  September      8, 2010 |   |  /s/      Jeff A. Hanks                                                                                    |
|        |                         |   | Jeff      A. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer) |

| * | A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Resource Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Resource      Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its      staff upon request. |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

TRIPLE STAR LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

RICHARD REINKE,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

) C05-1947 JPD

)

)

) ORDER STRIKING SHOW 

 CAUSE and RESETTING

) DEADLINES

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The plaintiff having served the defendant, and filed a response to the Show Cause Order

(dkt #7), the Show Cause Order is hereby stricken. 

The Court directs the plaintiff to serve the defendant with a copy of the Order Regarding

Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (dkt. # 3), as well as a copy of this

instant order. The parties will adhere to the following schedule with respect to these deadlines:

FRCP 26f Conference deadline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 4, 2006

Initial Disclosure deadline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 11, 2006

Joint Status Report due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 18, 2006

 The plaintiff is hereby directed to serve the defendant with a copy of the Notice of Initial

Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge & Consent Form (dkt # 2). The date by which the Clerk

is to be informed whether the individual parties are consenting to have this matter heard by the

Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, is extended to April 18, 2006. 

The parties may indicate in the Joint Status Report their desire to consent to Judge Donohue, or

Case 2:05-cv-01947-JPD Document 9 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

have the case reassigned to a district judge; should the parties decide earlier than April 18, 2006,

to consent or decline, deputy clerk Peter H. Voelker may be notified at (206) 370-8422, or by fax

at (206) 370-8425. An individual party’s decision on consent is not to be filed electronically or

forwarded in any form to the chambers of Judge Donohue.

Dated this 21st of March, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

/s/ PETER H. VOELKER 

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01947-JPD Document 9 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 56790.

#### Pongees Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 142858-K, etc. (New York).

*346Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the involved merchandise consist of woven silk fabrics, valued at more than $5.50 per pound, similar in all material respects to the merchandise passed upon in Abstract 56470. Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise imported or withdrawn from warehouse prior to January 1, 1948, is dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1205, as modified by T. D. 48316, and that which was imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to said date is dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Applying Seized Funds Towards Restitution/Edwards

CR06-0058RSL - 1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Chief Judge Robert S. Lasnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-0058RSL

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER TO APPLY SEIZED FUNDS

) TOWARDS RESTITUTION

SHANNON K. EDWARDS, )

)

Defendant. )

) It is ORDERED that $1,010.00 currently in the possession of the Mercer Island

Police Department and $250.00 currently in the possession of the Edmonds Police

Department shall be provided to the United States District Court Clerk to be applied

towards the defendant’s restitution obligations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Presented by:

JEFFREY C. SULLIVAN

United States Attorney

NORMAN M. BARBOSA

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00058-RSL Document 43 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
(the “Report”) of Green Stream Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2023, the undersigned
James C. DiPrima, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: August 15, 2023 | /s/ __James C. DiPrima_________________________                                         
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: James C. DiPrima Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director
|                       | (Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2098

JAMES MARCELLO; OLIVIA MARCELLO,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

James C. Marcello and Olivia A. Marcello on brief pro se.

G. Steven Rowe, Attorney General, and Andrew S. Hagler,

Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

November 19, 2001
-2-

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and

the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the magistrate judge's recommended decision, dated

June 26, 2001, and affirmed by the district court on July 6,

2001.

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VICKI L. McCOMBER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendant.

Case No. 06-5089 FDB

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

This matter comes before the Court on motion of Plaintiff Vicki L. McComber for

reconsideration of this Court’s Order dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. After reviewing the motion and this Court’s previous order, the Court is

fully informed and hereby denies the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated below.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are disfavored,

and will ordinarily be denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in the prior ruling, or (b)

facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the attention of the court earlier,

through reasonable diligence. Plaintiff’s has not made the requisite showing as to either of the

grounds for reconsideration under CR 7(h)(1). Plaintiff rather, attempts to use this motion to revisit

Case 3:06-cv-05089-FDB Document 19 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

the factual arguments made in support of the contention that she exhausted her administrative

remedies. The Court is not persuaded by this reargument. Plaintiff’s motion does not demonstrate a

manifest error in the Court’s prior ruling dismissing the complaint nor does it provide the Court with

any new information not previously considered

Plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies and as such, the intentional infliction of

emotional distress claim is subject to dismissal. 

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt #18] is

DENIED.

DATED this 29th day of August, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

.

Case 3:06-cv-05089-FDB Document 19 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of James Forbes, Petitioner, v Sheri Roman, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 979]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, *inter alia,*to prohibit the respondent from trying the petitioner under Queens County Indictment No. 5867/94, until a trial under Kings County Indictment No. 14860/94 has been commenced and concluded on the ground that trial of the Queens County indictment before that of the Kings County indictment will violate the defendant’s constitutional right against self-incrimination.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available *713only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569; *see, Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 69 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 7, 2007.
Whereas Benny Parsons was born in Wilkes County, North Carolina, on July 12, 
        1941, and resided in the towns of Ellerbe and Concord, North Carolina in 
        the Eighth Congressional District;
Whereas Benny Parsons was the son of Hazel and the late Harold Parsons and the 
        brother of Steve, Phil and Patty;
Whereas Benny Parsons started racing in 1963 at the Mt. Clemens Speedway in Mt. 
        Clemens, Michigan;
Whereas Benny Parsons was the Automobile Racing Club of America (ARCA) Rookie of 
        the Year in 1965 and ARCA Champion in 1968 and 1969;
Whereas Benny Parsons was the first ARCA Champion inducted into the 
        International Sports Hall of Fame;
Whereas Benny Parsons made his Winston Cup debut in 1970 and had his first 
        Winston Cup victory at South Boston Virginia Speedway in 1971;
Whereas Benny Parsons was Winston Cup Champion in 1973;
Whereas Benny Parsons had an extraordinary career as a National Association for 
        Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR) driver, winning 21 races, including the 
        1975 Daytona 500;
Whereas in 1982 Benny Parsons qualified for the NASCAR Winston 500 at Talladega 
        Superspeedway at 200.175 miles per hour, the first NASCAR qualification 
        run over 200 mph;
Whereas in 1998 Benny Parsons was named one of the 50 Greatest Drivers in NASCAR 
        History;
Whereas after a successful career as a driver, Benny Parsons developed a 
        successful career in broadcasting, further expanding his sport through 
        his insight and commentary;
Whereas Benny Parsons was known for his kindness by all who had the good fortune 
        to meet him;
Whereas Benny Parsons was a loving husband to his wife Terri and an exceptional 
        father to his sons Kevin and Keith;
Whereas Benny Parsons was a man of strong faith and character; and
Whereas Benny Parsons passed away on January 16, 2007, prompting friend and 
        former competitor Darrell Waltrip to state that ``Benny Parsons was the 
        kindest, sweetest, most considerate person I have ever known. He was a 
        great champion, a great ambassador for our sport but more than that, he 
        was a great person. He exemplified that good guys can be winners too.'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Benny Parsons as one of the greatest race car drivers 
        ever to participate in the sport of auto racing and recognizes his many 
        contributions to the Nation throughout his lifetime;
            (2) honors Benny Parsons for transcending the sport of auto racing 
        to become a role model as both a talented competitor and mentor and as a 
        loving husband and father; and
            (3) extends its deepest condolences to the family of Benny Parsons.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the Third Division,

September 15, 1959

No. 63334.

protest 329339-K (San Juan, P.R.).

#### Jorge Blanch *v.*United States,

*336Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, Government counsel stated that the merchandise herein is that which is described in paragraph 1604. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20934 Summary Calendar

LE-MOYNE NELSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JERRY PETERSON; WAYNE SCOTT; JAMES COLLINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-206

- - - - - - - - - - June 19, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Le-Moyne Nelson, Texas state prisoner #657292, moves for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal under the Prison

Litig ation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). The motion for leave to

appeal IFP is GRANTED.

The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action

to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. As Nelson does not

have funds for immediate payment of this fee, he is assessed aninitial partial filing fee of $7.77, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(1). Following payment of the initial partial filing fee,

funds shall be dedu cted from Nelson’s prisoner account until the

full filing fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2).

IT IS ORDERED that Nelson pay the appropriate initial filing

fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of

Texas. Nelson shall authorize the appropriate prison authorities

to withdraw this fee from his trust fund account in accordance with

their policy and local procedures and to forward the fee to the

Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of Texas. IT

IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of Nelson’s

inmate account shall collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee

and forward for payment, in accordance with

§ 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern

District of Texas each time the amount in Nelson’s account exceeds

$10, until the appellate filing fee is paid.

Nelson argues t hat the district court erred by denying his

motion for injunctive relief and by construing his complaint as a

civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have

carefully reviewed the appellate record, and we conclude that

Nelson’s asserted claims are legally frivolous because they have no

arguable basis in federal law. This appeal is frivolous and is

therefore DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DI SMISSED. IFP GRANTED. INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE

ASSESSED.
P e t i t i o n f or	Exe m p t i o n 1 4 CFR	§ 1 1 . 81
Exem p t i on p etit i o n u n d er 14	CFR	section	21	(§§	21.171	-	21.199) and SEC 3 33
Yo u r n am e a n d ma il i n g a ddr e ss. You ma y in c l u d e	o th e r c o n tact in f o r m a t i on s u ch a s a f a x nu m b e r , te l e ph o n e nu m b e r , o r ema i l a d dr e s s :
N am e : Donald	Lee
A dd r e ss: 22705	NE	Mountain	View	Ct.	Ridgefield,	WA	98642
P h o n e:	360-474-7366
Em a il: donlee98@yahoo.com
Description	of	the	aircraft	make(s),	model(s),	and	type(s)(i.e.	-	fixed-wing,	rotorcraft,	lighterthan-air)	of	the	DJI	Phantom	Series	that	you	intend	to	use	for	your	operation.		The description(s)	should	include	the	maximum	weight	(including	payload)
. **All	Aircraft	will	be	flown	at	the	specs	listed	below	as	maximum	weight	(including	payload):



### 1. DJI	Phantom	2

### 2. DJI	Inspire	1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 08-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the
accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

March 31, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Comprehensive Annual Report of Consumer Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Jianmin Gao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    July 19, 2016 | By: | /s/
    Jianmin Gao                                                
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Jianmin
    Gao                                                    
|                        |     | Chief
    Financial Officer                                        
|                        |     | (Principal
    Executive Officer and 
Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
| Circle Pines, Minnesota               |   |
| January 12, 2011                 |   |

 

----