alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual,

d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM’; OMNI

INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited

liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC., a Delaware corporation,

d/b/a ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a AKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1–X,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-204JCC

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 

Coughenour, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from Deadline (Dkt. No. 42). 

Plaintiffs incorrectly noted the motion for 6 judicial days after he filed it. Local Rule7(d)(2) requires 7

judicial days. Because November 10 is a federal holiday, Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby RENOTED for

November 15. 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 43 Filed 11/07/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 43

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 2

Further, Defendants’ Response, if any, shall be due by Thursday, November 9 at 12:00 noon. 

DATED this 7th day of November, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ C. Ledesma 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 43 Filed 11/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
July 24, 1957

No. 61088.

protest 160327-K.

#### Paolo Alonge, Inc. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1886. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM
INTERNATIONAL  TOURIST   ENTERTAINMENT   CORPORATION  JUNE  30,  1999  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  202,009
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            86,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             143,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        674,067
<PP&E>                                                7,359,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,528,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7,568,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   786,153
<BONDS>                                               3,763,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  7,938
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,990,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7,568,322
<SALES>                                               2,369,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,373,679
<CGS>                                                 1,671,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,673,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      160,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (460,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (460,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (460,482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc., a
company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 9, 2010                /s/ Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Additional Proposed Permit and Related

Documents

(Updated November 2013)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD AND DEBORAH KEAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5737RJB

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION AND

DENYING MOTIONS FOR

DEFAULT

 The Court, having reviewed the file, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J.

Kelley Arnold (Dkt. 122), and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s motions for default (Dkt. 90, 95, 108 and 109) are DENIED.

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiffs, to counsel for any

defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 135 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6290
FLOYD GLENN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBISHOP L. ROBINSON, Secretary Department Public Safety & Correctional Services, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 3752-AMD) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Floyd Williams appeals from a district court order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), complaint based on Williams' failure to comply with the court's prior orders directing him to amend his complaint. Because Williams may proceed with thisaction by amending his complaint as directed, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification

I, James Bright, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2009 of Cape Cod Aquaculture Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and have:

                  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

June 8, 2009                   By: /s/ James Bright
                                   ----------------
                                   James Bright, Principal Executive Officer and
                                   Principal Financial Officer
No. 62290.

#### The Lee-Herrmann Co. *v.*United States,

protest 311567-K (New York).

*354Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise, described as tinfoil centerpieces, are in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1044

ANDREA C. WEATHERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; HERBERT B. 

PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity; JONATHAN 

KOTCH, in his individual and official capacity; BARBARA K. 

RIMER, in her individual and official capacity; EDWARD M. 

FOSTER, in his individual and official capacity; SANDRA L. 

MARTIN, in her individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP)

Submitted: June 30, 2014 Decided: July 22, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea C. Weathers, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Thomas Tulchin, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrea C. Weathers appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her action for relief 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1), (3). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Weathers v. Univ. of N.C., No. 1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. 

Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1000_PLATE 3

MCNALL QUARRY

Location

Secyi ;
SHOWN ON FG 210" @ Manning

=° 5

ec.
i—~— ae ok
LA
°
SAswN On BIS” OS
°
S-G
gM °
°
e
° :
is ® a
°
= _F”
— = ce
a v
°
e B
Ys ‘647
WW
Osc

TRUE NORTH

¥

llln-z |

EXPLANATION

WATER WELLS SHOWING
HEAVY.METAL CONTENT

*

‘More than § ppm

e
25 ppm

°

1-2 ppm

fe]
‘Less than 1 ppm

HEAVY-METAL CONTENT OF DRILLED WATER WELLS IN THE
MANNING AREA, ORLEANS COUNTY, NEW YORK

1 Mile
L n 1 L J

344641 0 ~ 55 (10 pocket)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HENRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5063 RBL/KLS

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

COPIES OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for copies of his Amended Complaint. (Dkt. # 15). 

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send two copies of the Amended Complaint to

Plaintiff. 

Plaintiff will have 120 days from the date of this order to perfect service.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 16 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 1
SERVED AUGUST 26,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

;A(^iSPpR]ATION 

-M:T OPERATIONS 

nut) mm2 1 A q:29 

APPLICATION OF 

EMPIRE AIRWAYS 

For fees and expenses under the 

Equal Access to Justice Act 

EAJA-EA-0001 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0008 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0787 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (arising from civil penalty proceeding FAA Docket No. CP10EA0002) 

has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Isaac D. Benkin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

SO ORDERED. 

^onnie ^ Voder 

Chief AdminTOTative L 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0008 

(Equal Access to Justice Act) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Applicant's Counsel 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

RockviUe,MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachary M. Berman, Agency's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-0437 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 3, 1998, AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MAY 3, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1998
<CASH>                                         497,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,287,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (120,028)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,293,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,097,666
<PP&E>                                      96,489,057
<DEPRECIATION>                            (27,895,253)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,813,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,592,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,998
<OTHER-SE>                                  89,062,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,813,520
<SALES>                                     85,846,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            85,846,434
<CGS>                                       67,491,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,346,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,884)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               204,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,484,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,050,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,434,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,434,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 52 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 52

Relating to maintaining the current standard behind the ``Made in USA'' 
  label, in order to protect consumers and jobs in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 1997

  Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Abraham) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to maintaining the current standard behind the ``Made in USA'' 
  label, in order to protect consumers and jobs in the United States.

Whereas for the past several decades the ``Made in USA'' label has defined a 
        product as having all or virtually all of its parts and labor 
        originating in the United States;
Whereas the people of the United States depend upon the integrity of this label 
        when purchasing products;
Whereas the label projects a sense of pride for American workmanship and value;
Whereas the Federal Trade Commission has proposed regulations to lower this 
        standard to allow substantial amounts of a product to be of foreign 
        origin;
Whereas lowering this standard will be a misrepresentation to consumers in the 
        United States who presently believe products bearing the ``Made in USA'' 
        label were all or virtually all made in the United States;
Whereas consumers in the United States are entitled to purchase products with 
        the understanding that the labels on these products reflect consistent 
        definitions; and
Whereas the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for safeguarding the 
        consumer from unfair, deceptive, and fraudulent practices: Now, 
        therefore be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) maintains that the standard for the ``Made in USA'' 
        label should continue to be that a product was all or virtually 
        all made in the United States; and
            (2) urges the Federal Trade Commission to refrain from 
        lowering this standard at the expense of consumers and jobs in 
        the United States.

                                      <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF  BIOSPECIFICS  TECHNOLOGIES  CORP. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30,  1997,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,448,269  
<SECURITIES>                                 1,944,207  
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,421,386  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                  1,301,802  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,416,754  
<PP&E>                                       2,968,311  
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,070,181  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,032,672  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          675,695  
<BONDS>                                              0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                         4,883  
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,362,747  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,032,672  
<SALES>                                      1,453,154  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,453,154  
<CGS>                                          400,425  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  400,425  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               423,957  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 599  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,970  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   114,260  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,010  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,010  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04  
                                           
        

</TABLE>