alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in his capacity and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      April 8, 2009
            
            
            
            /s/
      Xiaosong
      ZhongName:
            
            Xiaosong
      ZhongTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
Before The First Division,

April 15, 1963

No. 67596.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/9024 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of propane, butane, and similar gases the same as those the subject of *Arthur J. Humphreys*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2112), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company.  The list omits some subsidiaries which, in the aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

 
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Other Names under which** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|
| **Name**                                               | ** ** | **Subsidiary Does Business**     | ** ** | **Organization**         |
| CISMIS   Springfield Corp.                             |       |                                       |       | Delaware                 |
| Conam   Inspection and Engineering Services, Inc. |       |                                       |       | Delaware                 |
| DIAPAC   Ltd.                                          |       |                                       |       | Russia                   |
| Envirocoustics   A.B.E.E.                              |       |                                       |       | Greece                   |
| Mistras   Canada Inc.                                  |       |                                       |       | Canada                   |
| Mistras   Group B.V.                                   |       |                                       |       | The   Netherlands        |
| Mistras   Group Limited                                |       |                                       |       | England   and Wales      |
| Mistras   Group S.A.                                   |       |                                       |       | France                   |
| Nippon   Physical Acoustics Ltd.                       |       |                                       |       | Japan                    |
| Physical   Acoustics Argentina S.A.                    |       |                                       |       | Argentina                |
| Physical   Acoustics Corporation                       |       |                                       |       | Delaware                 |
| Physical   Acoustics India Private Ltd.                |       |                                       |       | India                    |
| Physical   Acoustics South America LTDA                |       |                                       |       | Brazil                   |
| Quality   Services Laboratories, Inc.             |       |                                       |       | Delaware                 |
| QSL   NDT Inc.                                         |       |                                       |       | Delaware                 |
| QSL   NDT Alberta Inc.                                 |       |                                       |       | Canada                   |
| ThermTech   Services, Inc.                        |       |                                       |       | Florida                  |

 

----
## Request for Information Dr one Fleet & Aerospace Ma nagement (FAA-2014-0817) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Nielsen: This letter is to inform you that wehave received and review ed your request for an amendment to Exemption No. 11253, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0817. Upon initial review, it was determ ined that more information was needed in order to move forward with your amendment. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to pr ocess your full amendment.

z 

### Please clarify the aircraft below. The list represents an in itial assessment of the aircraft that the FAA is unable to move forward with.

Please make any needed changes to the list, and submit th e additional information (non-pr oprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, pleasealso send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your co mment tracking number from re gulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 11, 2015. If we do not receivethe information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-1538.

Sincerely, /S/ Joshua Parker Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Monday , November 02, 2015 9:08 AM To: Simon.Nielsen@drone-fleet.com

UAS Model Comment s 4. 3D Robotic s Bumblebe e -S Manufactured by Shenzen, not 3D Robotic s 6. 3D Robotics RT F X8 Duplicat e 33. Aeryon SkyRange r Duplicat e 53. Arch Aeria lOctobe r N ot UAS. Arch Aerial Octo Copter is approved UAS. 66. DJI Flame Whee lF550 S Duplicat e 82. DJI Ronin Octo N o t UA S 103. Foxtech Kraken 13 0 V2 Duplicat e 125. LOCOR C N o t UA S 180. Tarot X8 Duplicate
(Reap. Dec. 10792)

#### Montgomery Ward & Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 27795; 1536; 5611.

(Decided July 8, 1964)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Earl R. Lidsirom*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Andrew P. Vance,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain 'bicycle coaster brakes, imported from Austria, forms the subject of the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made a part of this decision.

At the call of this case for hearing, the parties hereto entered into an oral stipulation to the effect that the bicycle coaster brakes in controversy are not included in the list of articles appearing on the official final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury (93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521), pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165). It was also stipulated and agreed that the instant merchandise consists of “Hawthorne” coaster brakes, exported by Steyr Daimler Puch of Austria, and that, on or about the dates of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was $1.59 each, as invoiced. It was further stipulated and agreed that the instant appeals are limited to the mer-*376cliandise described on the invoices as coaster brakes with or without other words of description.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra*(19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the bicycle coaster brakes in issue and that said value is $1.59 each, as invoiced.

As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ANC USA Incorporated. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  William P.
Williams, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Registrant
            
            American
      Nortel Communications, Inc.Date:
      March 31, 2008
            
            By:
      /s/ William P. WilliamsWilliam
      P. WilliamsChairman,
      President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle
      Financial Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Boating uses, economic significance, and information inventory for NorthCarolina�s offshore area, "The Point."**
 
Volumes: One | Two | Three
 
SuDoc Number:I 42.12/2:2002-044 -045 -046 | I72.12/2:2002-044 -045 -046
Item Number:0671-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000785314
 
June 18, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

RE: CASE SCHEDULING – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ALVIN DAMPIER,

Plaintiff,

v.

KING COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY

DONAGLIA, et al.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-1954-MJP-MJB

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

RE: CASE SCHEDULING

This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding pro

se and in forma pauperis. On August 9, 2006, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment

which was noted on the Court’s calendar for consideration on September 8, 2006. Plaintiff has

filed no response to that motion. Also pending before the Court are plaintiff’s motion to amend

the case schedule and defendants’ motion for relief from the deadline for filing a joint pretrial

statement. 

Case 2:05-cv-01954-MJP Document 31 Filed 10/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

RE: CASE SCHEDULING – 2

The Court, having reviewed the pending motions, does hereby find and ORDER as

follows:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion to amend the case schedule (Dkt. No. 28) is STRICKEN

because it does not appear from the record that plaintiff ever served a copy of his motion on

counsel for defendants as required by Local Rule CR 7(b).

(2) Defendants’ motion for relief from the deadline for filing a joint pretrial statement

(Dkt. Nos. 29 and 30) is GRANTED. The joint pretrial statement deadline is STRICKEN to be

re-set, if necessary, after the Court rules on defendants’ pending summary judgment motion.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for

defendants, and to the Hon. Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 25th day of October, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01954-MJP Document 31 Filed 10/26/06 Page 2 of 2
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00222 - CV SANJAY JOSHI, APPELL ANT V. SOUTHLAKE AUTOMOTIVE , LLC, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016 - 006369 - 1, Honorable Don Pierson, Presiding



### September 30 , 2019 ORDER REINSTATING APPEAL Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER , JJ. Appellant, Sanjay Joshi, appeals from the trial court’s take - nothing judgment. Appellee, Southlake Automotive, LLC has filed a cross - appeal. On June 21, 2019, w e abated th e appeal and suspended all appellate deadlines to allow the parties time to mediate the case. On September 26, 2019, Appellant notified the Court that the mediation was unsuccessful. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on our docket . T he reporter’s record is due on or before October 30 , 2019. T EX . R. A PP . P . 35.3(b), (c). It is so ordered. Per Curiam
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30483

Conference Calendar

 

HENRY HARRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PAROLE BOARD ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-89

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Henry Harris, Louisiana inmate #116174, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Harris’ arguments fail

to challenge the district court’s judgment. Thus, any issue as

to the propriety of the dismissal, without prejudice, for failure

to exhaust Harris’ available state remedies, is deemed abandoned

on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir.

1994).
No. 96-30483

- 2 -

The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. 

5th Cir. R. 42.2. Because it is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               704,545
<PP&E>                                         219,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,056,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,081,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,128,782
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,433,647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,056,995
<SALES>                                        357,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,916
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,258,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,547,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,547,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,547,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fw: RIA Ch. 6 for OMB Distribution 12/14/2011 04:56 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Attached below is an updated Chapter 6 for the EGU MACT RIA.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/14/2011 04:56 PM

----- From: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, DavidA Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/14/2011 04:31 PM Subject: RIA Ch. 6 for OMB Distribution

Hi Bob,

Attached is an updated version of Chapter 6 for OMB. This includes the analysis using BEA data (section 6.5).

Amanda

Amanda Curry Brown OAQPS/HEID/AEG919.541.3808 CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov

Chapter 6_EmploymentEconomicImpactAnalysis_1214.docx
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 820 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 820

Recognizing and celebrating the commitment of the Student Conservation 
   Association to the United States national parks and public lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2007

Mr. Kind submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and celebrating the commitment of the Student Conservation 
   Association to the United States national parks and public lands.

Whereas Elizabeth Cushman Titus Putnam founded the Student Conservation 
        Association in 1957 to provide opportunities for young people to learn 
        about environmental conservation and put their knowledge to work by 
        volunteering in national parks;
Whereas the Student Conservation Association has helped to protect vital 
        habitats, threatened wildlife, and other at-risk resources in the United 
        States parks, forests, and urban green spaces;
Whereas since its inception, the Student Conservation Association has grown to 
        become the largest conservation service program in the United States, 
        placing volunteers in all 50 States and internationally in Canada, 
        Mexico, Brazil, Germany, and Latvia;
Whereas the Student Conservation Association has nearly 50,000 alumni, many of 
        whom have dedicated their professional careers to environmental 
        stewardship and preservation;
Whereas in 2005, volunteers of the Student Conservation Association performed 
        more than 1,600,000 hours of service;
Whereas the Student Conservation Association has been recognized for its 
        achievements in conservation and youth development by the White House, 
        the National Park Service, the United States Forest Service, the 
        Wilderness Society, the National Wildlife Federation, the National Fire 
        Plan Council, and the Garden Club of America; and
Whereas the people of the United States owe a debt of gratitude to the Student 
        Conservation Association, whose outstanding work to preserve and protect 
        the United States natural treasures helps ensure that they will be 
        available to enrich future generations of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) applauds the Student Conservation Association for its 
        decades of dedicated service to conserving the United States 
        national parks and public lands; and
            (2) expresses its best wishes to the Student Conservation 
        Association for its continued success and growth.
                                 <all>
```
### SERVED : JUL Y 14,201 1

• JEPART^'/IEN TO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N. jKANSPCRIAnO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S OCfxE I OPERATION

S WASHIN GTON , D C 

### m \ JU L 

### i U 

### P 2 : 1 3 I NTH EMATTERO F CLOU D DANCERAVIATIO N F A A DOCKE T NO . CP1OSOOO O (Civi l Penall y Proceeding ) FDMSNO . FAA-2010-0I9 2

ORDE RREASSIGNIN GPROCEEDIN G I n Ih e interes t o f judicia l erficicncy , th e above-caplione dproceedin g i s reassigne dfro m Chie f Administrativ e Ua

w .ludg e Ronni e A . Yodert o Administrativ e La w Judg e Jesly nE . Sullivan . All hiture pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l be serve don the Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o

nth e attache dServic e List . S O ORDEI^b .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t Ronni e A . Yodc r

Chie f Administrativ e LawyOud

iFA A Docke t No . CP l OSOOO

O (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y I'cdera l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Denni s R . Haber , Respondent' s Coinise l Denni s R . Haber , P.A . 892 5 S.W . 14 8 Street , Suit e 20 0 Miami , F L3317 6 TEL: . 305-256-300 2 FAX : 305-256-300 4 Andre aMichell e Harper , Complainanl' s Counse l Oftlc e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n Federal'Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Allanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Jesly n E . Sullivan , Adininislraliv c La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mEl2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington . D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b v U.S . Mail . I-o

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : Hearin

g Docket , l-edcra l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 . 

### - 2 -