alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1917

ROBERT LOVE TAYLOR, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STATE OF VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; 

ELAINE JACKSON KERNS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00803-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Love Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Love Taylor, Jr. appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus show cause. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Taylor v. State of Va. Div. of Child Support 

Enforcement, No. 1:10-cv-00803-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. July 22, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ida M. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METWEST MORTGAGE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 2001.

Decided June 29, 2001.

Ida M. Jackson, pro se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ida M. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, deny Jackson’s motion for stay pending appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Jackson v. Metwest Mortgage Servs., Inc.,*No. CA-01-279-S (D.Md. Mar. 21, 2001); *see also*28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a)(3) (West Supp.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 To the extent that Jackson seeks to challenge the district court’s February 6, 2001, order denying relief on her complaint, the appeal is not timely as to that order. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review that order.
Exhibit 10.7


                              PROMISSORY NOTE


$2,000.00                                             Date:  June 12th, 2008

   FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, hereinafter referred to as "Payor",
unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Jerod Edington, hereinafter
referred to as "Payee or Holder", at his home located at 230 Bethany Rd.
#128; Burbank, CA 91504, or at such other places as the Holder hereof may
designate in writing, the principal sum of $2,000.00 with no interest, to
maturity on or before December 31st, 2008.  Payment of principal and any
other sum due hereunder shall be made in lawful money of the United States of
America.

   Upon default by Payor in the payment of the principal amount of or any
other sum due in accordance with the terms of this note, the Payee, at its
option, may proceed against the Payor.  In the event of such default, the
Payor agrees to pay all cost and expenses of collection, including reasonable
attorney's fees and interest from the date of such default, on the principal
amount unpaid, at the maximum rate permitted by law.

   Presentment and demand for payment, notice or dishonor, protest and notice
of protest, are hereby waived by the Payor.  This note (i) may not be
changed, waived, discharged or terminated except by an instrument in writing
signed by the party against which enforcement of such change, waiver,
dischargement or termination is sought and (ii) shall be binding upon Payor,
its successors, assigns and transferees and shall inure to the benefit of and
be enforceable by Payee, its successors and assigns.

   This note shall be construed and governed in all respects by the laws of
the state of Nevada applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein.

   If any provisions of this note are declared invalid, illegal or
unenforceable, the balance of this note shall remain in full force and
effect.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Payor has executed this note on the day and year
first written above.


                                          /s/ Blaine Davidson
                                          -------------------
                                          Name

                                          Hydrodynex, Inc.
                                          -------------------
                                          Company

                                          CFO
                                          -------------------
                                          Title


Paid in full on July 24, 2008

/s/ Jerod Edington
-------------------

<PAGE>
---

Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Certification of Principal Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 12, 2009





LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
/s/ Douglas J. Kramer, CEODouglas J. KramerPrincipal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Certification of Principal Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 12, 2010





LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
/s/ Michael T. Adams, PFOMichael T. AdamsPrincipal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 8,816.

#### McGUNNIGLE v. BLAKE.

[3 Cranch. C. C. 64.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1826.

Landlord and Tenant — Bent—Partial Eviction.

In an action for mere use and occupation, not founded on an express contract for an entire rent, eviction of part is not a bar to the whole action.

This was an action of assumpsit [by Ann McGunnigle against Betty H. Blake] for use and occupation. Plea, eviction of part, in bar of the whole action.

Mr. Wallacli. for plaintiff,

contended that if Mrs. Blake resumed the occupation, it was a waiver of the eviction, and restored the plaintiff to her right of action. 1 Esp. N. P. pp. 2, 72; 4 Starkie, Ev. 1520,1521; Smith v. Kaleigh, 3 Camp. 513; Stokes v. Cooper, Id. 514; Fitchburg C. M. Co. v. Melvin, 15 Mass. 270.

Mr. Morfit, for defendant.

THE COURT

said that in an action for mere use and occupation, not founded on an express contract for an entire rent, eviction of part is not a bar to the whole action; because the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the actual use and occupation; and if the defendant was deprived of the use for a certain part of the time, and afterwards resumed the occupation and use of the premises, the jury will consider that circumstance in estimating the damages.
From: myers327@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:16:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan myers

Daphne, AL 36526
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------



                      CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ITEC  Attractions,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul M.
Bluto,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  Paul M. Bluto
-------------------
Paul M. Bluto
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
From: bethh1676@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:11:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Harris

Oceanside, CA 92057
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W.
Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|/s/    David W. Wallis                                                                       
|Name: David W. Wallis Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer Date:   November 9, 2009
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

**AS      ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects the financial condition and results of operations                of                Union National as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                   |               |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------|
|        | By           | /s/ Mark D. Gainer |
|   | Chairman/President/CEO |
|   | Date: August 14, 2007  |

|   |                                                  |                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|        | By                                          | /s/ Diane W. Rodkey |
|   | Vice              President, Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Date: August 14, 2007                                 |

----
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Developing Digital Therapeutics for Substance Use 
Disorders.
    Date: November 14, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jenny Raye Browning, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, 
MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-4577, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701a151e1e095e12021f071e191e17301e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660c0308081f4804140911080f080126080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22045 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 64552.

#### Alfred H. Marzolf *v.*United States,

protests 322661-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Renato Dela Rama,
principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Renato Dela
      RamaRenato
      Dela Ramaprincipal
      financial officerJanuary 13, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.