alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




This
      Certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
      31, 2006 of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp.





The
      undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the “Company”),
      DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




|1. | The
              Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the
              “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | Information
              contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operation of the
              Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 25th
      day of May, 2007.







/s/
      Thomas L. Wegman


Thomas
      L.
      Wegman


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and will be retained by BioSpecifics
      Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
No. 65184.

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 228782-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of scarves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61833, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1873

ELIGIO V. SANCHEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CLINTON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-78-7-F) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 30, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel F. Read, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Patricia L. Holland, Maranda J. Freeman, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eligio V. Sanchez appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanchez v. City of Clinton , No. CA-99-78-7- F (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT

Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SADIE YVONNE COLEMAN, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-788L

) (CR01-309L)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

Petitioner has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her

sentence. Respondent has filed a response that is 26 pages in length, accompanied by 90 pages of

exhibits. (Dkt. #9). Thus, the response exceeds the 12-page limit set forth in Local Rule CR

7(e)(2). Accordingly, respondent has filed a motion to exceed the page limit. Having considered

the motion and the balance of the record, the court does hereby find and ORDER that:

(1) Respondent’s motion to exceed the page limit (Dkt. #10) is GRANTED. 

However, it appears that respondent has not complied with Local Rule CR 10(e)(8), which

requires a party to file a paper copy of a document when the document exceeds 100 pages. 

Therefore, respondent shall file a paper copy of its response and exhibits no later than July 5,

2005.

(2) The Clerk shall direct a copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik.

DATED this 1st day of July, 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-00788-RSL Document 13 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 1
STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING 

Page 1 of 2 

The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

RANDY LANGLEY, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CLUB BROADWAY ENTERTAINMENT 

CENTER, INC., d/b/a BIG APPLE 

CASINO and d/b/a BROADWAY 

CLUB/ENTERTAINMENT CLUB., a 

Washington Corporation, and ALLEN 

HEMMAT and MRS. JANE DOE 

HEMMAT and their marital community, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 06-0070 RSM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING 

STIPULATION

 WHEREAS, this Court filed an Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status 

Report, and Early Settlement on June 2, 2006 setting the date for parties to exchange Initial 

Disclosures on July 7, 2006 and the dates for parties to file a Combined Status Report on 

July 14, 2006, parties have already completed the FRCP 26(f) conference, and that parties 

will be meeting before a mediator in an attempt to resolve this matter on July 11, 2006. 

IT IS THEREFORE AGREED, by and between the parties to the above-entitled 

matter, that these dates shall be rescheduled as follows: 

Case 2:06-cv-00070-RSM Document 7 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING 

Page 2 of 2 

Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) – Friday, July 21, 2006; 

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan – Friday, July 28, 2006. 

DATED this _____ day of July, 2006. 

THE BLANKENSHIP LAW FIRM, P.S. 

By: 

 Scott C.G. Blankenship 

 WSBA No. 21431 

 Garrett R. Ferencz 

 WSBA No. 32883 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED this ______ day of July, 2006. 

SINSHEIMER & MELTZER, INC. 

By: 

 Ronald J. Meltzer 

 WSBA No. 1203 

 

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2006. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00070-RSM Document 7 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 68469.

protest 63/9375 (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Max Eckardt & Sons, Div. of Phillips-Eckardt Electronic Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66559.

#### Pez Haas, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/81, etc. (New York).

*368Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pez candy dispensers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 65026, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Searched for **http://www.fireleadership.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.fireleadership.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
From: cacwfc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:02:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole Christy

Apple Valley, CA 92307
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874690
<NAME> SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,084<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    110,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,870
<PP&E>                                          41,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,643<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                         660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,643
<SALES>                                        231,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,183
<CGS>                                          179,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               120,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.27)
<FN>
<F1>Trade accounts receivable net allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,975.
<F2>Includes assets held for sale of $4,344 and other noncurrent assets of $4,509.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21570]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18195 and #18196; Wyoming Disaster Number WY-
00073]


Administrative Disaster Declaration of a Rural Area for the State 
of Wyoming

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of 
a rural area for the State of Wyoming dated 09/25/2023.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/15/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/25/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/24/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/25/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Natrona.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.000
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.500
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18195 6 
and for economic injury is 18196 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-21570 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 786 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that general 

appropriations for military construction and veterans’ affairs be considered as stand-alone measures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2007 

Mr. GINGREY (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. BUYER, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. 

BILIRAKIS, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. 

POE, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BONNER, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. WAMP, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MCCOTTER, 

Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, 

and Mr. AKIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that general appropriations for military construction and veterans’ affairs be considered as stand-alone 

measures. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 786 IH 

1 ‘‘Stand-alone requirement for military construction 

2 and veterans’ affairs appropriations 

3 ‘‘11. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or 

4 joint resolution, or conference report thereon, containing 

5 appropriations within the jurisdiction of the Subcommittee 

6 on Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs, and Re7 lated Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations if such 

8 measure also contains appropriations within the jurisdic9 tion of any other subcommittee of that committee. The 

10 preceding sentence shall not apply to any measure making 

11 supplemental appropriations or to any measure continuing 

12 appropriations for a period of not to exceed 60 days.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
H. Res. 74

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 18, 2007.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Bonner, Mr. Garrett 

of New Jersey, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. McCotter, 

Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. Simpson, Mr. McHenry, 

Mr. Mack, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Campbell of California, Mr. 

Tiberi, Mr. Porter, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Manzullo, to 

rank after Mr. Rohrabacher. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 775 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 775

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1366) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative minimum tax on 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2007

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1366) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative minimum tax on 
                              individuals.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 1366) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to repeal the alternative minimum tax on individuals. The bill shall be 
considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final adoption without intervening motion or 
demand for division of the question except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the resolution equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; (2) an amendment in 
the nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative Rangel of New 
York, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41032.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hector Martinez-Hernandez (“Martinez”) appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.

Martinez’s sole argument on appeal is that a Border Patrol agent lacks authority to conduct a vehicle stop based on a reasonable suspicion of a non-immigration offense. This argument is foreclosed by our *335decision in *United States v. Perkins,*352 F.3d 198 (5th Cir.2003), *cert. denied,*541 U.S. 980, 124 S.Ct. 1894, 158 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004). Martinez concedes that the issue is foreclosed, but he raises it to preserve the matter for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
From: NormaSG@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:23:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Norma Ganucheau

Covington, LA 70433