alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1

 The motion was filed prior to the close of discovery and before the motions deadline.

Dkt. No. 13. 

ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JOE AND LAURA SPRINKLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SB&C LTD, a/k/a Skagit Bonded Collectors,

Defendant.

____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV-05-1898-JPD

ORDER

 This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiffs’ “motion on discovery.”1 Dkt.

No. 18. The motion appears to request an extension of time to conduct additional depositions

and to compel responses to certain interrogatories. Defendants oppose the motion and

requests that sanctions be imposed on plaintiffs’ counsel. Dkt. No. 19. Having carefully

reviewed the parties’ papers, supporting materials, and the balance of the record, the Court

ORDERS as follows:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion on discovery (Dkt. No. 18) is DENIED. In its January 24,

2006, scheduling order, the Court explained that the pretrial schedule would be amended

“only upon good cause shown: failure to complete discovery within the time allowed is not

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 27 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE -2

recognized as good cause.” Dkt. No. 13. Plaintiffs’ motion provides no showing of good

cause. To the contrary, the motion seems to indicate that plaintiffs did not think to seek the

now-sought-after discovery during the proper discovery period. Additionally, it appears that

plaintiffs have failed to comply with the meet-and-confer provision of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 37 and Local Rule CR 37. The motion is therefore denied.

The Court notes that defendant’s have filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt.

No. 21. Plaintiffs are advised to consult the local rules in order timely file an opposition

and/or their own motion for summary judgment. 

(2) Defendant’s request for sanctions (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties.

DATED this 7th day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 27 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 61576.

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 306056-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Before the Second Division,

March 12, 1957

No. 60563.

#### Air Express Int’l Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 266927-K and 266928-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom an examination of the papers in these cases, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protests were therefore overruled.
#### Sidney N. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian WEIR, Officer, Gaston County Sheriff Detention Office; R. Cobb, Sergeant, Gaston County Jail; Rhonda Neese, R.N., Gaston County Jail-Medical; L. Marsh, Gaston County Jail-Medical; Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Detention Office, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-6313.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 24, 2005.

Sidney N. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Sidney N. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Hoffman v. Weir,*No. CA-04-497 *216(W.D.N.C. Filed Feb. 2, 2005 & entered Feb. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING

PLAINTIFF’S JOURNALS - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PETER TILTON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0098RSL

ORDER REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S JOURNALS

Defendants, in their motion to dismiss (Dkt. #36), argued that plaintiff had refused to

produce copies of his journals in this action. The Court subsequently ordered plaintiff to

provide relevant portions of the journals for an in camera review.

The Court has now reviewed the journals, and based on that review, ORDERS that

plaintiff is not required to produce a copy of them. Plaintiff has stated that he created the

journals at the direction of counsel for purposes of this litigation. Declaration of Peter Tilton,

(Dkt. #55) at ¶ 100. Some of the entries contain plaintiff’s litigation strategies. A few of the

entries reference communications between plaintiff and his counsel. Defendants have not shown

substantial need to obtain the documents. The information in the journals is, for the most part,

of marginal relevance and cumulative of other evidence already produced. Also, the journals

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 120 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING

PLAINTIFF’S JOURNALS - 2

contain very private and personal writings. Defendants can obtain and have obtained similar

information from other, less private sources with less embarrassment to plaintiff. 

Now that the Court has ruled on all outstanding discovery issues, defendants may briefly

continue plaintiff’s deposition. The Court had suggested during oral argument that it might

order the deposition continued in the courtroom. Although the Court is not requiring that, if

either party desires it, counsel should contact the Court’s judicial assistant, Teri Roberts, at 206-

370-8810 to arrange to have the deposition continued in a courtroom before the Court or a

Magistrate Judge. The parties would be responsible for providing the court reporter. Otherwise,

after the conclusion of plaintiff’s deposition, the parties should contact Ms. Roberts to schedule

a pre-trial conference.

 

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 120 Filed 04/23/07 Page 2 of 2
From: Gina Jones

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:34:31 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Gina Jones
Pasco, Washington
EXHIBIT B

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-3 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 73 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-3 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I John Moore certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Sync2 Networks Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to a state material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and financial information
     included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
     financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintain disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
     the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared.
     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant's fourth quarter in the case
          of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my recent evaluation of internal control over
     financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record,process,summarize and report financial information;and
     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's control over
          financial reporting

January 17, 2013
                                            /s/ John Moore
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            CEO/CFO/DIRECTOR
Before Judge Ford,

March 20, 1969

No. R69/7.

reappraisements R64/21809, etc. (Pembina).

#### J. L. Wood *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *J. L. Wood*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 682, R.D. 11292), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the involved bus shells and that said value is $18,188.02, Canadian currency, per shell, less the cost of United States components as invoiced, packed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended April 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert C. Sepucha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as
an officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report. May 10, 2005 /s/ Robert C. SepuchaRobert C. SepuchaChief Executive Officer
 - 23 -
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 78 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 5

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 78

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 78 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 78 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 78 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 78 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

|                            |   | Chief Financial Officer   (principal financial officer   and principal accounting officer) |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |                                                                                       |
| Matthew   C. Wolsfeld, CPA |   |                                                                                       |

Lino Lakes, MinnesotaApril 20, 2005
Exhibit
23.2
   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  To: GMS
Capital Corp.
  As
independent registered certified public accountants, we consent to the use in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GMS Capital Corp. of our report for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of GMS Capital Corp. and its subsidiaries, which appear in such
Annual Report.
  /s/
      KBL, LLPKBL,
      LLP
                    New
      York, NY
                    
                    March 18,
      2009
Order entered September 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00778-CV

D. REGINALD STOVER, JACE HARKEY,

ROBERT H. HOLMES, AND THE HOLMES LAW FIRM, INC., Appellants

V.

ADM MILLING CO., INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13400

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ September 13, 2018 joint motion for additional oral 

argument time. Appellants request an additional ten (10) minutes of argument time and three (3) 

minutes of rebuttal time.

The Court GRANTS appellants’ September 13, 2018 joint motion for additional oral 

argument time. Appellants will present oral argument for the time requested in the joint motion.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
No. 68967.

#### Aristo Craft Distinctive Miniatures *v.*United States,

protests 63/21109—13978 (Chicago).

*336Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust IMTN 38 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. SoethoutDwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 714 

Supporting the work of firefighters to educate and protect the Nation’s 

communities, and the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week, October 

7–13, 2007, as designated by the National Fire Protection Association. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2007 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. DENT, Mr. 

KING of New York, Mr. REICHERT, and Mr. CUELLAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the work of firefighters to educate and protect 

the Nation’s communities, and the goals and ideals of 

Fire Prevention Week, October 7–13, 2007, as designated by the National Fire Protection Association. 

Whereas firefighters have maintained their dedication to the 

health and safety of the American public since Benjamin 

Franklin founded the first fire department in 1735; 

Whereas today’s firefighters provide a multitude of services, 

including emergency medical services, special rescue response, hazardous material and terrorism response, and 

public safety education; 

Whereas more than 1,130,000 firefighters protect the United 

States through their heroic service; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 714 IH 

Whereas the Nation’s fire departments respond to emergency 

calls nearly once per second and dispatch to fire emergencies every 20 seconds; 

Whereas approximately 1,600,000 fires are reported annually; 

Whereas firefighters respond with courage to all disasters, 

whether they be acts of terrorism, natural disasters, or 

other emergencies; 

Whereas 343 firefighters sacrificed their lives responding heroically to the events of September 11, 2001; 

Whereas firefighters from across the Nation responded with 

remarkable selflessness throughout the areas affected by 

Hurricane Katrina; 

Whereas 106 firefighters lost their lives in 2006, and over 

80,000 were injured in the line of duty; 

Whereas we have honored firefighters for educating the 

American public since President Harding declared the 

first Fire Prevention Week in 1922; 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has designated the week of October 7–13, 2007 as Fire Prevention Week; and 

Whereas educating Americans on methods of fire prevention 

and escape planning continues to be a priority for all firefighters: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the work of firefighters to educate 

3 and protect the Nation’s communities; and 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HRES 714 IH 

1 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Fire Pre2 vention Week as designated by the National Fire 

3 Protection Association. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000517

31-JUL-2013

07:58 AM