1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 

SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE SELLER PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANTS - 1 

Case No. C06-0089 RSM 

1918 EIGHTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 • SEATTLE, WA 98101 

(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

WANECHEK MINK RANCH, and SMITH 

MINK RANCH CORPORATION, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ALASKA BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL, 

et al., 

 Defendants. 

 

No. C06-0089 RSM 

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY 

APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 

SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE 

SELLER PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANTS DELTA TRADING 

CORPORATION; DEAN BRENNER; 

KLONDIKE INTERNATIONAL FURS, 

LIMITED; LEONARD TAX; IRVING 

TAX; ALLEN TAX; RICHARD TAX; 

MECHUTAN FUR CORPORATION; 

DAVID MECHUTAN; STEVEN 

MECHUTAN; JAY MECHUTAN; 

ALVIN GLICKMAN, INC.; ALVIN 

GLICKMAN; HURWITZ EXPORTS, 

LTD.; STEVEN HURWITZ; POLAR 

FURS, LTD. AND AUTHORIZING THE 

DISSEMINATION OF NOTICE 

Upon consideration of the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement 

Between the Direct Seller Plaintiffs and; Delta Trading Corporation; Dean Brenner; Klondike 

International Furs, Limited; Leonard Tax; Irving Tax; Allen Tax; Richard Tax; Mechutan Fur 

Corporation; David Mechutan; Steven Mechutan; Jay Mechutan; Alvin Glickman, Inc.; Alvin 

Glickman; Hurwitz Exports, Ltd.; Steven Hurwitz; Polar Furs, Ltd.; (the “Defendants”); and for 

Authorization to Disseminate Notice (“Motion”), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

Case 2:06-cv-00089-RSM Document 204 Filed 11/05/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 

SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE SELLER PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANTS - 2 

Case No. C06-0089 RSM 

1918 EIGHTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 • SEATTLE, WA 98101 

(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594 

1. The Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

2. The Court finds that the proposed settlement with Alaska Brokerage International, 

Inc., et al., as set forth in the Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”), and subject to 

final determination following a hearing after notice to the proposed Settlement Class, is 

sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate to authorize dissemination of notice to the Settlement 

Class. 

3. Notice shall be provided to the following proposed Settlement Class (the 

“Settlement Class”): 

All sellers of Furs who sold Furs at the American Legend Auction 

in Seattle, Washington, and whose Furs were purchased by any of 

the Defendants or their subsidiaries or affiliates (including all 

predecessors thereof) at any time during the period from June 1, 

2000 to June 1, 2004. Excluded from the Settlement Class are 

governmental entities and the Defendants, or their subsidiaries or 

affiliates (including all predecessors thereof). 

4. The Court appoints the firms of Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C., Preti Flaherty, and 

Hagens Berman as Class Counsel for the proposed Settlement Class. Plaintiffs Wanechek Mink 

Ranch, and Smith Mink Ranch Corporation, are appointed as the class representatives for the 

proposed Settlement Class. 

5. The Court approves the form of the Notice and Summary Notice (the “Notices”), 

attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibits “B” and “C” respectively, upon the condition 

that the content of the Notice and Summary Notice, including all dates, times, and addresses, 

conform to the requirements of this Order. The Court further finds that the mailing and 

publication of the Notices in the manner set forth in ¶¶ 7 and 8 below constitutes the best notice 

practicable under the circumstances as well as valid, due and sufficient notice to all persons 

entitled thereto and complies fully with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 

and the due process requirements of the Constitution of the United States. 

6. Defendants are hereby directed to provide Class Counsel, within 30 days of the 

entry of this Order, the names and addresses of direct sellers of Furs, if known, to them and their 

Case 2:06-cv-00089-RSM Document 204 Filed 11/05/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 

SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE SELLER PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANTS - 3 

Case No. C06-0089 RSM 

1918 EIGHTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 • SEATTLE, WA 98101 

(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594 

subsidiaries and affiliates (and all predecessors thereof) during the period from and including 

June 1, 2000 to and including June 1, 2004. Defendants will ask ALC to provide this 

information. To the extent possible the seller information should be provided in electronic and 

machine readable formats. Class Counsel shall treat the Fur seller information as confidential, 

and shall not disclose it to anyone outside of Class Counsel’s law firms, except to the Court in 

camera or under seal or to vendors selected to assist in the preparation and dissemination of the 

Notice. 

7. Class Counsel are hereby directed to cause the Notice, in the form attached to the 

Settlement Agreement as Exhibit “B,” to be: (a) mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, 

within 30 days of receipt of the last of the seller information from Defendants (the “Notice 

Date”), to all members of the Settlement Class identified by Defendants; and (b) provided to all 

persons who request it. Class Counsel shall also post a copy of the Notice on the Internet at a 

readily accessible web address. Class Counsel shall identify the web address in all Notices that 

Class Counsel caused to be mailed, provided, or distributed pursuant to this paragraph. 

8. Class Counsel are hereby directed to cause the Summary Notice, in the form 

attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit “C,” to be published within 10 days of the 

Notice Date on one occasion in the National Edition of The Wall Street Journal. 

9. The Court will hold a hearing (the “Hearing”) on February 9, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 

at the United States Courthouse, 700 Stewart Street, Lobby Level, Courtroom 13206, Seattle, 

Washington, 98101-1271 to determine the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the proposed 

settlement with the Defendants and whether the settlement should be finally approved and a final 

judgment entered thereon. Any Settlement Class member who follows the procedure set forth in 

the Notice may appear and be heard at this Hearing. The Hearing may be continued without 

further notice to the Settlement Class. 

10. Class Counsel shall file with the Court their motion for final approval of the 

Settlement Agreement no later than thirty (30) days prior to the Hearing date. 

Case 2:06-cv-00089-RSM Document 204 Filed 11/05/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 

SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE SELLER PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANTS - 4 

Case No. C06-0089 RSM 

1918 EIGHTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 • SEATTLE, WA 98101 

(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594 

11. All requests for exclusion from the Settlement Class shall be postmarked no later 

than 20 days prior to the Hearing date, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements set 

forth in the Notices. 

12. Any member of the Settlement Class who wishes to object to the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement or to Class Counsel’s motion for expenses must do so in writing, filed 

with the Clerk and served on Class Counsel and counsel for Defendants no later than 20 days 

prior to the Hearing date, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements set forth in the 

Notices. 

13. Ten (10) days before the date fixed by this Court for the Hearing, Class Counsel 

shall cause to be filed with the Clerk of this Court an affidavit or declaration of the person under 

whose general direction the mailing of the Notice and the publication of the Summary Notice 

were made, showing that mailing and publication were made in accordance with this Order. 

14. The Court finds that the account set forth in the Settlement Agreement is a 

qualified settlement fund (“QSF”) pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 468B and the 

Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. Class Counsel are, in accordance with the 

Settlement Agreement, authorized to expend funds from the QSF for the payments of the costs of 

notice, payments related to taxes, and settlement administration costs. 

15. The litigation against the Defendants is stayed except to the extent necessary to 

effectuate the Settlement Agreement. 

SO ORDERED this 5th day of November 2010. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00089-RSM Document 204 Filed 11/05/10 Page 4 of 4