alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2014 WI 105



# S UPREME 

# C OURT OF 

# W ISCONSIN

C ASE N O .: 2013AP2702

- D

C OMPLETE T ITLE : In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings

Against Jerry R. Albert, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation,

Complainant,

v.

Jerry R. Albert,

Respondent.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALBERT

O PINION F ILED : August 20, 2014

S UBMITTED ON B RIEFS :

O RAL A RGUMENT :

S OURCE OF A PPEAL :

C OURT :

C OUNTY :

J UDGE :

J USTICES :

C ONCURRED :

D ISSENTED :

N OT P ARTICIPATING :

A TTORNEYS :2014 WI 105

NOTICE

This opinion is subject to further

editing and modification. The final

version will appear in the bound

volume of the official reports.

No. 2013AP2702

- D

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings

Against Jerry R. Albert, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation,

Complainant,

v.

Jerry R. Albert,

Respondent. 

## FILED

AUG 20, 2014

Diane M. Fremgen

Clerk of Supreme Court

ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney publicly

reprimanded.

¶ 1 PER CURIAM. This is a reciprocal discipline matter.

On December 9, 2013, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed

a complaint and motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule

(SCR) 22.22 requesting tha t this court publicly reprimand

Attorney Jerry R. Albert as reciprocal discipline identical to

that imposed by the Arizona Supreme Court.

¶ 2 Attorney Albert was admitted to practice law in

Wisconsin in 1971. His Wisconsin law license is currentlyNo. 2013AP2702

- D

2 suspended for failure to pay State Bar of Wisconsin dues.

Attorney Albert is also admitted to practice law in Arizona.

¶ 3 The OLR's complaint noted that on June 25, 2013, the

Arizona Supreme Court reprimanded Attorney Alb ert for knowingly

making a false statement by omission when he failed to tell the

court that a question he planned to ask during a criminal trial

was redacted so as to make it appear that the defendant had

contradicted herself on the material point, when i n fact she had

not. The Arizona Supreme Court found that this act violated

ER 3.3(a) and 8.4(d) of the Arizona Rules of Professional

Conduct, Rule 42, Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. Attorney Albert admitted the

allegation and agreed that a reprimand was appropriate.

¶ 4 Attorney Albert did not notify the OLR of the Arizona

reprimand within 20 days of its effective date.

¶ 5 On February 18, 2014, Attorney Albert filed a response

to the OLR's complaint and motion, in which he stated th at he

did not object to the imposition of discipline reciprocal to

that imposed in Arizona.

¶ 6 Under SCR 22.22(3), in reciprocal discipline matters,

this court shall impose the identical discipline unless one of

the enumerated exceptions is shown. There is no indication that

any of those exceptions apply in this case.

¶ 7 IT IS ORDERED that Jerry R. Albert is publicly

reprimanded as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the

Arizona Supreme Court.No. 2013AP2702

- D

1
Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 22 Filed 05/03/2006 Page 1 of 1 Doc. 22

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BARRY THOMAS McGARVEY,

Defendant.

CR 05-5346 FDB

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, MARK PEREZ;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, LINDA SULLIVAN for RON NESS;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable FRANKLIN D. BURGESS.

Date: MARCH 12, 2009

Time: 10:00 P.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

March 3, 2009.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 7, 2013*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.128 Holding Companies 1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 68134.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,

protests 60/5510, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ballet dancing figures on jewelry boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66652, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: jjevans63@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:09:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Evans

, 48838-9404
BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 10

IRON, IN PERCENT

COMPARISON OF ZINC, LEAD, AND IRON CONCEN-
TRATIONS IN A SLIGHTLY-MINERALIZED AREA WITH
THOSE OF WELL-MINERALIZED AREAS.
CROW BRANCH

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 4
No. 76-245.

No. 76-252.

No. 76-5125.

No. 76-5242.

#### Hurley *v.*United States; DiMuro et al. *v.*United States; Doherty *v.*United States; and Lung et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: Dawniebou@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:28:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dawn Barbero

San Ramon, CA 94583
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza Goldfield Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  Chris Tomkinson, , Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






BONANZA GOLDFIELD CORPORATIONBy:
/s/ Chris TomkinsonChris TomkinsonPrinciple Financial officerNovember 12, 2010
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 25, 2013*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.127.m Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts REITs** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Before the Second Division,

August 14, 1958

No. 62292.

#### Linread Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 287192-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Tutch latches the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Linread Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1939), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
December 10, 1963

No. 68167.

Appeal 5153.

#### United States *v.*Geo. H. McFadden *&*Bro., Inc.

C.D. 2401. Appeal dismissed October 18,1963.
No. 59795.

#### Brian Fabrics, Inc., and Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 217655-K, etc. (New York).

*384Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
H. Res. 567 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 27, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the implementation of the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. All points of order against the 

conference report and against its consideration are waived. 

The conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: suzmhoff@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:42:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

S.M. Hoffmann

Saint Petersburg, FL 33710
No. 61508.

#### G. A. Westphal Co., Inc., and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 291020-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gift tags, composed wholly or in chief value of paper, lithographically printed, not over twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, which are not gift or social cards, the claim of the platintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                        WINNERS ALL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   
                       RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,1997 

                                  10-QSB DATA

THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF WINNERS ALL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.  THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
WAS RESTATED TO CONFORM WITH RESULTS OF THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
THE REGISTRANT FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1997 TO DECEMBER 31, 1997,
WHICH RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997.  THE RESTATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH
31, 1997, IS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
1998.  THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   473
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          848,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     55,035
<COMMON>                                       172,787
<OTHER-SE>                                    (162,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,973
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               467,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (467,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (467,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.029)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.029)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 774 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 141
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 774

                          [Report No. 110-408]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend title XXI 
of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health 
               Insurance Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2007

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend title XXI 
of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health 
               Insurance Program, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend title XXI 
of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health 
Insurance Program, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 
9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against provisions of the bill are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 3963 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 141

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 774

                          [Report No. 110-408]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend title XXI 
of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health 
               Insurance Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 24, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit
32.1




Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 4 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
No. 66563.

#### Rotel Corp. of America *v.*United States,

protests 61/3873, 61/16236, and 61/5911 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of food juicers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65798, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.