alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gunars Ivins, Appellant, v County of Suffolk, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 889]

—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine title to real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated November 30, 1992, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant acquired tax liens on the plaintiff’s property at a tax sale on or about November 26, 1979, due to the plaintiff’s failure to pay real property taxes for the 1978-1979 tax year. There is no indication in the record that the defendant mailed to the plaintiff a notice of the sale pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 1002 (4).

Upon the expiration of the redemption period, the County Treasurer conveyed the property to the defendant by a tax deed dated February 7,1983, and recorded on February 8,1983. Pursuant to a Suffolk County local law that allows a property owner nine months from the date the deed is recorded to reacquire his property *(see,*Local Laws, 1976, No. 16 of County of Suffolk §§ 1, 2), on November 8, 1983, the plaintiff’s agent delivered to the defendant applications to reacquire the plaintiff’s property. The defendant’s clerk refused to accept the applications, claiming they were one day late.

This action was commenced on October 18, 1988. The Supreme Court granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely.

Pursuant to Suffolk County Tax Act § 53 (L 1920, ch 311, as amended), the presumption of regularity that arises when the County Treasurer conveys real property becomes conclusive after the expiration of three years from the date of the recording of the tax deed. Section 53 has been interpreted to bar actions not brought within the prescribed time limitation *(see, Mareterra Corp. v Sgroi,*156 AD2d 344; *Bridgehampton Dunes v County of Suffolk,*137 AD2d 644; *Terramare Dev. v County of Suffolk,*123 AD2d 317). Since the plaintiff had until February 8, 1986, three years from the recording of the tax deed on February 8, 1983, to commence a lawsuit, this action, which was commenced on October 18, 1988, is clearly untimely.

We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Balletta and Hart, JJ., concur.
No. 61487.

#### John J. Ryan & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 288073-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the respective invoices in question.
Case 2:05-cr-00182-MJP Document 265 Filed 10/03/12 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cr-00182-MJP Document 265 Filed 10/03/12 Page 2 of 2
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2009, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Sau Shan Ku, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
A signed    original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oakridge    International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/s/ Sau    Shan Ku
--------------------------
Sau Shan    Ku
Chief    Financial Officer
September    28, 2009
Before the Second Division,

August 6, 1953

No. 57455.

#### Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 197374-K (New York).

*237Opinion by

La whence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of lead scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and which is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.
EXHIBIT 12
            Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation

          Computation Of Ratio Of Profit To Fixed Charges
                            (Unaudited)
                       (Millions of Dollars)

                                    Three Months          Nine months
                                       Ended                 Ended
                                September  September  September   September
                                30, 1999   30, 1999   30, 1998    30, 1998

Net Income                        $   37       $ 35     $  104      $  84

Add:
  Provision for income taxes          21         22         58         50

Deduct:
  Equity in profit of
partnerships                         (1)        (1)        (1)        (2)

Profit before taxes                 $ 57       $ 56       $161      $ 132

Fixed charges:
  Interest on borrowed funds        $144       $136       $416       $366
  Rentals at computed                  1          1          3          3
interest*

Total fixed charges                 $145       $137       $419       $369

Profit before taxes plus fixed
charges                             $202       $193       $580       $501

Ratio of profit before taxes
plus fixed charges to fixed
charges                             1.39       1.41       1.38       1.36

*Those portions of rent expense that are representative of interest
cost.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARY A. THRESHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5071RBL

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge J.

Kelley Arnold, United States Magistrate Judge, and objections to the report and recommendation, if any,

and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant's counsel

and Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 8th day of January, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05071-RBL Document 27 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2020

No. 04-20-00119-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Nadine REALME,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI14297

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s plea to the 

jurisdiction. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 26, 2020. The 

appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the 

brief to April 15, 2020. On April 15, 2020, the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional 

extension of time to file the brief until May 5, 2020, for a total extension of forty days. The 

motion is GRANTED. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED 

ABSENT EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by May 

5, 2020.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of April, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Graham, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 16]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J., at suppression hearing; Herbert Altman, J., at plea and sentence), rendered May 19, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to a term of 7 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion as a condition of his guilty plea, and is foreclosed from having his claims reviewed on appeal, including review in our interest of justice jurisdiction *(People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 44 ) ll-K - (B ) -3 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 44 of 325P. 2 

# /&^gP II-K-(B)-3 2
ALGORITHM S FO

R EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES . Lette r from

E . Medine , EE

A t o A . Wehe , EPArSASD . Marc h25 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-3 2
From: b_koontzjr@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:16:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Koontz

Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953
From: reyjudy@grics.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:54:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judith Guerrero

Lacon, IL 61540
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Executive Officer, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-K of IBI Acquisitions, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.         I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, C. Steven Smoot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AGY Holding Corp. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2011



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ C. Steven Smoot                                  
|Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Before the Third Division,

April 27, 1964

No. 68490.

protest 62/9163 (Mobile).

#### Irving M. Sobin Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

On the record presented, the protest was -dismissed.
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Zhengdong Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of China Distance Education Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the
year ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: March 16, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Zhengdong Zhu      
|Name:  |  | Zhengdong Zhu          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
From: danielwmartin@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:47:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Daniel Martin

Selma, AL 36701
BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 12

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

.

’ gauzgoss,»
a
z

015

oon —[
ocxas<oane

TENNYSON

Zeon

EXPLANATION

2

Worked-out orebody

Worked-out ore body, inferred
R.3W. R.2W.

N

Leadbearing ground indicating strike of vein
75°

oz <0.0)

Miter analyse, showing parts po
Phang neil and pee ot Ga ae
show tales Shglellne iniesteg
esr 1871 doable ng 1948! te hie; 1950

AGRETIO NORTH

TRUE

to
Points Yeferred fo in text

Soll sample taverse
Water aanyes by oman, Ha, and Rennod
iy aa uy ard August 1948, and May 1950

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 6

‘Geology, culture, and drainage ater
Heyl, Lyons, and Agnew, 1°
; . 5000 Feet

L

MAP SHOWING GEOCHEMICAL STUDIES IN THE POTOSI LEAD-ZINC AREA, GRANT COUNTY, WISCONSIN

te