alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                27
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          25
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                     724
<CASH>                                              20
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,581
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,158
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  4,690
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,158
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                 73
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (1)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       2
<BENEFITS>                                       (174)
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         48
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    171
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                170
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   5,687
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  4,690
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 02-6951

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-44-71-N)

Submitted: September 20, 2002

Decided: October 10, 2002

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Haywood Williams, Jr., alleges that he filed a timely notice of

appeal from the denial of his motion for release of his sealed medical

records and his motion for reconsideration. However, the district

court docket sheet reflects only the filing of a later letter from Williams inquiring about his appeal. Because, under Houston v. Lack,

487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988), a notice of appeal is considered filed as of

the date Williams delivered it to prison officials for mailing to the

court, the district court docket sheet is not conclusive on this issue.

Thus, we remand the case for the district court to determine whether

Williams filed a timely notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented,

will then be returned to this court for further consideration. 

REMANDED

2 UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS
No. 65183.

#### The Durst Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/13523, etc. (New York).

*347Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass water mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(47 C.C.P.A. 129, C.A.D. 744), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: slschock@students.nwc.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:38:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sarah Schock

Sioux Falls, SD 57105
No. 66524.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/19015, etc. (Buffalo).

*360Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nickel-bearing materials similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. *W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 90, C.D. 2239), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: yaelra@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:11:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

J Arsenault

Albertson, NY 11507
EX-10.6.a



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 

June 1, 2017 

Willowbridge Associates Inc. 

101 Morgan Lane – Suite 180 

Plainsboro, N.J. 08536 

Attention: Mr. Steve R. Crane 
  

	 	Re:	 Management Agreement Renewals 



Dear Mr. Crane: 
 We are
writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2018 and all other
provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 CMF Willowbridge Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Ceres Tactical Macro L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808. 

Very truly yours, 
  

			
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC

	
	 By: /s/ Patrick T. Egan

	 Patrick T. Egan

	 President and Director

	
	WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.
	
	 By: /s/ Steven R.
Crane                    

	
	 Print Name: Steven R.
Crane           


 PE/tr
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00111-MJP Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 15 of 15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UCHECHI LOUD,

Defendant.

CR06-5002 RBL

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, BARBARA SIEVERS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable RONALD B. LEIGHTON.

Date: FEBRUARY 6, 2009

Time: 11:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( x ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

January 27, 2009.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60720

JEREMY NEWSOME, by His Mother and Next Friend, Lyndia Traylor;

LYNDIA TRAYLOR, Individually

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

MISSISSIPPI HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION INC; 

NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:07-CV-293

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Having heard oral argument and reviewed the record and the briefs, we

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its opinion.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 17, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
From: jimstrimble@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:32:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jim Trimble

Effingham, SC 29541
|    |                                                                               |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Immune Design Corp.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |
|                                  |
| /s/ Carlos Paya, M.D., Ph.D.          |
| Carlos Paya, M.D., Ph.D.              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.




Certification of Principal Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 20, 2012
LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
/s/ Douglas J. Kramer, CEODouglas J. KramerPrincipal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Certification of Principal Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 20, 2012
LAPOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
/s/ Charles A. Zajaczkowski, CFOCharles A. ZajaczkowskiPrincipal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-487 and 731-TA-1197-1198 (Second Review)]


Steel Wire Garment Hangers From Taiwan and Vietnam; 
Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on steel wire 
garment hangers from Taiwan and Vietnam and the countervailing duty 
order on steel wire garment hangers from Vietnam would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on April 3, 2023 (88 FR 
19669) and determined on July 7, 2023 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (88 FR 55068, August 14, 2023).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on September 29, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5464 (October 2023), 
entitled Steel Wire Garment Hangers from Taiwan and Vietnam: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-487 and 731-TA-1197-1198 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 29, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-21980 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P