alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HIGH IMPACT NIDDK RC2 
APPLICATIONS.
    Date: November 3, 2023.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of 
Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7015, Bethesda, MD 20892-
2542, (301) 594-4721, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#512328303f7f3c3e23233822113f38397f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="582a2139367635372a2a312b18363130763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 27, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21771 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: dove_song@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:20:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anna McCubbin

, 85122-3708
No. 60222.

protests 241977-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of *W. N. Proctor Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Sandra Hart, Appellant, v Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, Ltd., et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 100]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 18, 1994, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although timely brought, plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of an alleged oral contract involving an exchange of her services for a share of defendant’s corporate stock is barred by the Statute of Frauds contained in UCC 8-319 *(see, Dillon v Peretti,*176 AD2d 497, 498; *Goldfinger v Brown,*169 AD2d 702, 703). That plaintiff worked 20 years for defendants without any salary and without even asking what her share of the corporate stock would be or when she would receive it is not unequivocally referable to the alleged oral contract *(see, Anostario v Vicinanzo, 59*NY2d 662, 664). Nor do her allegations that she resigned her position with another company in order to work for defendants support a claim of promissory estoppel *(see, Cunnison v Richardson Greenshields Sec.,*107 AD2d 50, 52-54). In any event, even assuming the Statute of Frauds did *253not apply, the alleged agreement to make plaintiff a "part of the Windjammer family” is too vague to be capable of enforcement *(see, Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher,*52 NY2d 105, 109), making plaintiff at best an employee at will subject to termination for any reason or no reason *(Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 300-301). Finally, plaintiff’s vague allegations are devoid of the details necessary to support a claim of fraud *(see, Mariani v Dyer,*193 AD2d 456, *Iv denied*82 NY2d 658), and are also unsupported by proof that defendants never intended to fulfill their alleged promise *(see, Brown v Lockwood,*76 AD2d 721, 731-732). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard Kunisaki, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hydrodynex Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this Report;



4. The small business issuers other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 31a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the small business issuer and
we have:



a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.



Date:  May 20, 2009



/s/ Richard Kunisaki

Richard Kunisaki

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### , 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT and 

### NORTHEASTNUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8107 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENTA. DORDER MODIFICATION In the maner ofa Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Prmection ("Commissioner") and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (UNNECO"). 

### WHEREAS, the Commissioner and NNECO, having agreed to the terms and conditions set fonh in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8107 issued on OelOber 13, 1995, do now, 

### by mutual agreement, modify paragraphs C.1., c.1.e., C.6. and C.12. as follows; 1. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.l. from May 1, 1999 to 

### May 1,2003. 2. Replace paragraph C.l.e. as follows: No later than March 1. 1999 and on :-'1arch I, thereafter until 2004, include with its annual emissions report to the Commissioner, the fuel consumed and approved ERCs used monthly for the pre\'ious calendar year. 3. Change the date specified in paragraph C.6. from May 1, 1999 to May 1,2003. 4. Change the date specified in paragraph C.12. from May 1, J999 to 

### May 1,2003.

All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8107 issued by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-177 and 22a-l78 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

# Inilia1S:~ (Printc4 on**Rc~)'~lc4** Papcr) 79 El:n SUCCI • Hmfor4. CT 06106·5127 Imp:1I4ep.stal C.'1.us All EqIJQ/ OppOrlll1lily Employer

### NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY 2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8107 MODIFICATION



### 1999. NortheastNuclear Energy Company hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. Northeast**NU~y** 

### Company

# ~. 

# ------- Signature: J Type Name: Frank c. Rothen 

### Type Title: Vice 

### President--Nuclear 

### Work Services Date: April 

### 22,1999 

### Entered as amodification ofan Order ofthe CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection numbered 8107this 

# ;Z

# 9 dayof

# 4~ --==--'--- 

# fI

A ur 

### 1. 

### Rocque, Jr. ommlSSlOner TOWN OF WATERFORD LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

### Certified DocumentNo.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KELIN C HE, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-70454 Age n c y No. A099-462-646 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Ke lin C he , a

native and c itiz e n of C h ina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a l s ’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a

pplic ation for a sy l um , withholding of re m ova l, a n d prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion 

# FIL ED N OV 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge n c y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a

pply ing thesta

nda rds gove rning a dve rse c re dibility de te rm inations c re ate d by

the RE AL ID Ac t. Shre

stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility finding ba se d on the om ission from

C he ’ s writte n sta

te m e nt of the a lle ge d c orruption a nd C he ’ s inve stiga tion into it, a s we ll a s C he ’ s non-re sponsive ne ss re ga rding there solution he sought from

offic ia l s. S

e e id . at 1040-44 (a dve rse c re dibility de te rm i nation wa s re a s ona ble unde r the REAL ID Ac t’ s “ tota lity of the c irc um sta

nc e s” sta nda rd); se e also Zamanov

v . Holde r , 649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th C ir. 2011) (a dve rse c re dibility finding supporte d whe re inc ide nts omitte d from a pplic ation m ate ria lly

a lte re d c la im ). In the a

bse n c e of c re dible te s tim ony , C he ’ s a sy lum and withholding of re m ova l c la im s fa i l. Se e Farah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C i r. 2003). C he ’ s C AT c la im a l so fa ils be c a use it is ba se d on thesa

m e te stim ony

found not c re dible , a

nd he doe s not point to a

ny othe r e vide nc e that shows it is m o re like ly tha n not hewould betorture d if re t urne d to C hina . Se e id. at 1156-57. Fina lly , we de ny

a s m oot C he ’ s oppose d m otion to hold proc e e dings in a be y a nc e and the gove rnm e nt’ s m otion to c o nsolida t e . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D. 2 1 3 - 7 0 4 5 4
No. P67/88.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/9222 (Los Angeles).

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of so-called “miniature hunting knives” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner*& *Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.02

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mastech Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John J. Cronin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: March 19, 2009



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  |                        
| |  | /S/ JOHN J. CRONIN, JR.
| |  |                        
| |  | John J. Cronin, Jr.    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
p.1 

OAR Box 1878 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

93) 11-1-23 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 11/28/2008 1:21:24 PM Sheet 93 of 145 
P.2 

> K*•*/, 

A-90-19 

II-I-23 

•» /CTV l ^ /STfc 

U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy 

iUl ! 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Handbook of 

Small Business Data 

1988 

A Publication of the Small Business Data Base 
P.3 

November 1988 

Fdr sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 

Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 

Handbook of small business data. 

"A Publication of the small business data base." 

1. Small business—United States—Statistics. 2. Small business—United States—Statistical services. I. United States. 

Small Business Administration. Office of Advocacy. 

HD2346.U5H37 1988 338.6'42'0973021 88-600379 
P.4 

302 HANDBOOK OF SMALL BUSINESS DATA 

Table 9.1 Classification of Industry Dominance by the U.S. Small Business Administration 

Continued 

SIC 

Code Industry 

Small-BusinessDominated 

Large-BusinessDomi nated Indeterminate 

244 Wood containers X 

245 Wood buildings and mobile homes 

2451 Mobile homes 

249 Miscellaneous wood products X 

25 Furniture and fixtures X 

251 Household furniture 

2511 Wood household furniture X 

2512 Upholstered household furniture 

2514 Metal household furniture X 

2515 Mattresses and bedsprings X 

252 Office furniture 

253 Public building and related furniture X 

254 Partitions and fixtures X 

259 Miscellaneous furniture and fixtures X 

26 Paper and allied products 

261 Pulp mills 

262 Paper mills, except building paper 

263 Paperboard mills 

264 Miscellaneous converted paper 

products 

2641 Paper coating and glazing 

2642 Envelopes X 

2643 Bags, except textile bags 

265 Paperboard containers and boxes 

2651 Folding paperboard boxes X 

2653 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes 

2654 Sanitary food containers 

27 Printing and publishing 

271 Newspapers 

272 Periodicals 

273 Books 

2731 Book publishing 

2732 Book printing 

274 Miscellaneous publishing X 

275 Commercial printing X 

2751 Commercial printing, letterpress X 

2752 Commercial printing, lithographic X 

276 Manifold business forms 

278 Blankbooks and bookbinding X 

279 Printing trade services X 

28 Chemicals and allied products 

281 Industrial inorganic chemicals 

2819 Industrial inorganic 

chemicals, n.e.c. 

282 Plastics materials and synthetics 

2821 Plastics materials and resins 

2824 Organic fibers, noncellulosic 

283 Drugs 

2834 Pharmaceutical preparations 

284 Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods 

2841 Soap and other detergents 

2842,3 Polishing, sanitation, and 

finishing preparations 

2844 Toilet preparations 

285 Paints and allied products 

286 Industrial organic chemicals 

2865 Cyclic crudes and intermediates 

2861,9 Gum, -wood, and industrial organic 

chemicals, n.e.c. 

287 -Agricultural chemicals 

289 Miscellaneous chemical products 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X
No. 66549.

#### Judson Sheldon Division of National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/20652.

Protest dismissal January 31, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 159415-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Order Sealing Sentencing Memo PHIL BRENNAN, Esq. 

P.O. Box 22837 

Seattle, WA 98122 

(206) 372-5881 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISCTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THOMAS EVANS DUNIGAN, et. al. 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 05-5823 RBL 

Order Re Dunigan’s Motion to Seal 

Sentencing Memo 

Order 

Defendant Thomas Dunigan moves the Court to seal his sentencing memo. 

The Court has already ordered that the Government’s Sentencing memo be sealed. 

The reasons supporting that Order likewise apply to Mr. Dunigan’s sentencing 

memo. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Mr. Dunigan’s motion and his sentencing 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of June 2007 

 ARONALD B. LEIGHTON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Digitally Signed upon authorization (JAB) 

Presented By: 

By: /s/____________________________________ 

 PHIL BRENNAN, WSBA #25711* 

 Attorney for Def. Dunigan; Date: 6/19/07 

Case 3:05-cr-05823-RJB Document 256 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 1
From: pastor@pbcministry.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:40:31 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Philip Robertson

Pineville, LA 71360
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Orofino Gold Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shih Long Ning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of May 31, 2013.  By:/s/ Shi Long NingShi Long Ning
Chief Executive Officer