alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martha Carrillo, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 976]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), rendered September 9, 1994, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (three counts), upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
From: jmkjwest@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:10:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary West

Malcolm, NE 68402
From: jsalmieri@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:48:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

joseph salmieri

Clementon, NJ 08021
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Ron Kunisaki , certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hydrodynex, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 31a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 12, 2009



/s/ Ron Kunisaki



Ron Kunisaki

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Justine F. Lien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Justine F. Lien    
|Justine F. Lien        
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States Short Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard
Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, General
Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:
      March 30, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Howard MahName:
              Title:
            Howard
      Mah
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
      Partner of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP
No. 58221.

protests 216653-K, etc. (New York).

#### Copeland & Thompson, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Abstract 57915, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) As to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) as to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption subsequent to May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547 (a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

EON-NET, LP, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v.

FLAGSTAR BANCORP, 

 

 Defendant. 

 CASE NO. C05-2129RSM

 MINUTE ORDER 

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S.

Martinez, United States District Judge:

Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s surreply (Dkt. # 184) is GRANTED. The surreply was

filed without notice of intent as required by the local rules, as well as for an improper purpose. A

surreply is allowed solely for the purpose of moving to strike material contained with a reply brief, not for

additional argument. Local Rule CR 7(g). Plaintiff’s surreply (Dkt. # 181) is accordingly STRICKEN.

DATED this 1st day of June, 2009.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By__/s/ Rhonda Stiles__________________

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 185 Filed 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

GARY GERBER, on behalf of himself and others

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

NO. C05-1554RSL

ORDER VACATING MINUTE ORDER

SETTING TRIAL DATE AND

RELATED DATES

Per the Stipulation and Order Consolidating Civil Action No. 05-1554 and Civil Action 

No. 06-669, the Court’s Minute Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates, docket #50, entered May 2,

2006, in the above captioned case, is hereby VACATED. 

DATED this 30th day of August, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01554-RSL Document 55 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 2 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt PichlerPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 1, 2011
";i:R^.RTW£Hi OF 

•RAi-i^^POHTATlON 

\2Vo li. niJI'ON ! \iO.W) 

, , , , _, „ ^ 3 3 ,:ORT WAYNE. IN 4„.2. 

r,\.\ 1260) -i.^O-lOf-O 

ROTII WtllRL Y ^v^vw(lmvn^m,1 

GRABtR 

Augiuii26, 2010 

Ms. Susan Kuibii d 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and Internationa! Affairs 

U.S. Depailment of Transportation 

400 7"' Sl„ SW 

Wasiiington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Ms . Kurland: 

I am writing in support of the Fort Wayne-Allen Count>' Aiiport Authority's application for the 

Small Community Air Service Development Program (Docket OST-2010-0124). The Authority 

is taking a novel and unique approach toward encouraging competitive activity' and cost 

reduction among passenger air service providers at the Fort Wayne Inteniational Airport (FWA). 

Please: give this applicnlion every possible consideralion. The geography of the Fort Wayne 

market presents a difficult challenge for passenger sei^'ice development at FWA. Wc are 

surrounded by large hiib airports that provide direct service to a number of deslmalions as well as 

medium-sized airports that have the advantage of greater competition that helps to keep ticket 

prices lower in their markets. 

Traditionally aiiports have sought to bring in low-cost carrieis or sell their passenger service 

providers on additional destinations. Both of these tactics have met with limited success in this 

market. As the airline industry continues to consolidate, the oppoilunities to "sell" the aii lines 

on expanding their air service to smaller airports are increasingly difficult. The Authority's 

solution to this i>roblem is unique and is a credit to their focus on developing appropriate niarkcl 

research and identifying creative applications for the air service development challenge. 

I would like to express my strong suppoit for this application and again urge you to give it every 

possible consideration, 'f hank you. 

Sincerely, 

/(TV 

Ken Steiiry - ABR, CRS. ePRfUii^J' 

Real Estate's "Infonnalion Central" 

260.969.2750 

Coldwcll Banker Roth Wehrly Graber Realtors 

Sales Manager 

120 6 C. DupontRd . -..••;;• ^-x^,. 

Fort Wayne, FN 46825 A^AI.M;.;?! . 

Ilj,|,..rJ'.l,,l>.i„, .-. 

Each Odice Is liiclepeiiclently Owned And Opcralecl ii,n,u,.iL-a^;..n.i.'^u..-c
14 Dam-Breach Analysis and Flood-Inundation Mapping for Selected Dams in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and near Atoka, Oklahoma

Appendix 1. Limitations Regarding Use of Flood-Inundation Maps

Inundated areas and selected points of interest should not be used for navigation, regulatory permitting, or other legal purposes. 

The U.S. Geological Survey provides the flood-inundation maps in this report “as-is” for a quick-reference, emergency-planning tool 

but assumes no legal liability or responsibility resulting from the use of this information. Actual areas inundated will depend on the 

particular failure mechanism and preexisting flood conditions and may differ from areas shown on the maps (Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 2007). For this reason, isolated inundation areas (those disconnected from the main inundation area) were included on the 

flood-inundation maps. In some locations, the sunny-day inundation area may extend slightly beyond the 75-percent PMF inundation area 

because of necessary differences in the placement of levees between the two model scenarios for the same dam. 

Although the flood-inundation maps represent the boundaries of inundated areas with a distinct line, some uncertainty is associated 

with these maps. Water-surface elevations along the stream reaches were estimated by unsteady-flow hydraulic modeling, assuming 

unobstructed flow, and using measured streamflows and anticipated hydraulic boundary conditions. The hydraulic models include the landcover characteristics and any bridge, dam, levee, or other hydraulic structures existing in 2013. Features such as pipelines, transmission 

lines, and footbridges were outside the scope of this report and were not included in the hydraulic model. Unique meteorological factors 

(timing and distribution of precipitation) may cause actual streamflows along the modeled reach to vary from those assumed during a 

flood, which may lead to deviations in the water-surface elevations and inundation boundaries shown. Additional areas may be flooded 

because of unanticipated conditions such as changes in the streambed elevation or roughness, backwater into major tributaries along a main 

stem river, or backwater from localized debris or ice jams. The accuracy of the floodwater extent portrayed on these maps will vary with 

the accuracy of the digital elevation model used to simulate the land surface. Additional uncertainties and limitations pertinent to this study 

are described elsewhere in this report.

Appendixes
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim D. Blickenstaff, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 6 , 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/ Kim D. Blickenstaff                        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Kim D. Blickenstaff                            
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING RETURN OF

SUMMONS

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JEFFERY A. WALSH,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0117-MAT

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING

RETURN OF SUMMONS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does

not appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

(1) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff’s counsel, and to issue

summonses to plaintiff’s counsel to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate

parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is his and his attorney’s responsibility to properly serve

copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-00117-MJP Document 2 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING RETURN OF

SUMMONS

PAGE -2

(2) The Clerk is directed to send to plaintiff’s counsel a copy of the Notice of Initial

Assignment and Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.

DATED this 25th day of January , 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00117-MJP Document 2 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 57411.

#### Chatham Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

protests 193014-K, etc. (Wilmington, N. C.).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth, in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.