alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: cwalker408@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:18:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindi Walker

Felton, DE 19943
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Mato, Also Known as Pedro Matos, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 841]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered October 8, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled *222substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 3 to 9 years, 3 to 9 years and 2 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (P*eople v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932), defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The undercover offered credible, corroborated testimony that defendant actively solicited him and knowingly offered and agreed to sell him cocaine and that defendant intentionally aided his accomplice who distributed the drugs and collected the money. The evidence that defendant exercised control over the apartment that was used solely to distribute drugs and into which he brought the undercover, was sufficient to support the conclusion that defendant constructively possessed the additional cocaine and gun found therein (Penal Law § 10.00 [8]; *People v Robertson,*48 NY2d 993).

Defendant has failed to preserve his contention that there was insufficient evidence of his knowledge of the weight of the drugs *(People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10), and we decline to review the issue in the interest of justice.

The court did not preclude defendant’s girlfriend from testifying and even if counsel’s decision not to call her was a tactical error, defendant has failed to prove that he was deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation *(People v Flores,*84 NY2d 184, 186-187).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

	I, Matthew Hoole, do herebycertify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of WorldOmni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2023-A to Closed-EndServicing Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2023 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp., as Closed-EndCollateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)                 A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K andcovered by the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange Note ServicingSupplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement), has been made under my supervision.

 

(ii)               To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ExchangeNote Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand as of March 22, 2024.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134856 & (14) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134856 

 COA: 276899 
 Wayne CC: 03-010594-01 

CHRISTOPHER WESLEY HOPKINS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to add issue is DENIED. 

s1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2007 

 Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEVIN G. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5751RBL

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION FROM THE

CALENDAR 

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status. (Dkt. # 7). 

On December 29th, 2005 the clerk’s office received a notice of motion for preliminary

injunction from the plaintiff. (Dkt. # 5). Even through the motion was not received until the 29th,

plaintiff attempted to set his motion for December 9th, 2005, twenty days before the court received

the pleading. This is not the only defect in the pleading. Plaintiff indicates the notice is accompanied

by an attached motion, but there is no motion. (Dkt. # 5)

The clerk is instructed to remove this item, (Dkt. # 5), from the court’s calendar. The court

will not consider this filing. If plaintiff wishes to file a motion for injunctive relief he will need to reCase 3:05-cv-05751-RBL Document 11 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

file the pleading, properly note the matter, and provide the supporting documentation he references.

The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this order and remove Docket entry 5 from

the court’s calendar. 

DATED this 1st day of February, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05751-RBL Document 11 Filed 02/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SCOTT BOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5077RBL

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Case 3:06-cv-05077-RBL-JKA Document 4 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager) at the Washington State

Department of Corrections.

DATED this 12th day of April, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05077-RBL-JKA Document 4 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD AND DEBORAH KEAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5737RJB

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO FILE AN OVER

LENGTH BRIEF

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Before the court is a motion to file an over length summary

judgment motion (Dkt. # 199). The motion is filed by the 38 defendants represented by the

Washington State Attorney General’s Office. These defendants have filed a summary judgment

motion totaling 50 pages (Dkt. # 204). The number of defendants involved and complexity of the

issues provide good cause for the over length document. The motion is GRANTED. 

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants and

remove (Dkt. # 199) from the court calendar.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 206 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 57020.

protest 194833-K (New York).

#### Eskil Halle and George G. Lippelgoes *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wooden animal figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55996, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61043.

protests 245717-K and 245718-K (Savannah).

#### Trans Atlantic Co. *v.*United States,

*362Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of butt hinges, imported with wood screws of steel, the hinges measuring 3 inches by 3 inches or 3)4 inches by 3)4 inches, being packed 2 hinges and 12 screws to a box (12 screws for each pair of hinges), and the hinges, size 4 inches by 4 inches, being packed 2hinges and 16 screws to a box (16 screws for each pair of hinges), of the same kind in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of *Trans Atlantic Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1712). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, the value of the screws being as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision, which values were included in the value of the screws and hinges, as invoiced and appraised.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adam Chris LAMBERT Defendant-Appellant

No. 00-5338.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 14, 2001.

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES, SUHRHE INRICH, DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
No. 69711.

#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States,

protest 65/4436 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *National Carloading Corp.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529),'the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,022,153
<SECURITIES>                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                 639,264
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,481,417
<PP&E>                        24,860,643
<DEPRECIATION>                (12,058,519)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14,303,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         919,054
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    13,384,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  14,303,329
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,390,478
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,766,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (375,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (375,522)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                  (375,522)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0
        

</TABLE>
EXHBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, Michael T. Adams, certify that:
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Urecoats Industries Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 (4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 (5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 (6) The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  **URECOATS INDUSTRIES INC.**Date: August 14, 2003
By:Michael T. AdamsPrincipal Executive Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 153 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 813 

[Report No. 110–440] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 1429) to reauthorize the Head Start Act, to improve program 

quality, to expand access, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2007 

Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1429) to reauthorize the Head 

Start Act, to improve program quality, to expand access, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1429) to reauthorize the Head 

4 Start Act, to improve program quality, to expand access, 

5 and for other purposes. All points of order against the conVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:44 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 069060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR813.RH HR813

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 813 RH 

1 ference report and against its consideration are waived. 

2 The conference report shall be considered as read. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 153 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 813 

[Report No. 110

–440] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

to expand access, and for other purposes. the Head Start Act, to improve program quality, to accompany the bill (H.R. 1429) to reauthorize 

NOVEMBER 9, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)



In connection with
the Annual Report of ARX Gold Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ending April 30, 2013, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brian Smith, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350), that:



| | 1. | The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     



|Date: October 31st, 2013 | By:  /s/ Brian
    Smith                                    
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Brian Smith                                                 
|                         | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer