alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DONALD O. SALAVE’A,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON CORRECTION CENTER

RELIGIOUS PROGRAM,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5704FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, does hereby find

and ORDER. 

Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security therefor. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below, an initial

partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent

of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the filing fee is

satisfied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis,

the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial filing fee

equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average

monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of this

Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:05-cv-05704-FDB Document 6 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid. 

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy of

this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager at the Department of

Corrections).

DATED this 12th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05704-FDB Document 6 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Retrophin, Inc. (the Company), for the period ended
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Aselage          
|                     |  |  |  | Stephen Aselage              
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David E. Schreiman, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. August 11, 2004 /s/ David E. SchreimanDavid E. SchreimanChief Financial Officer
 - 22 -
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RONALD L. BASKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

TAMARA PAPINI, 

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1565-JCC-JPD

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Ronald L. Baskett is incarcerated at the Monroe Correctional Complex in

Monroe, Washington. He has filed a proposed civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when he was arrested for violating the

terms of his probation. Dkt. No. 1. He seeks lost wages for the term of his allegedly unlawful

incarceration. Id. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court has reviewed the complaint and

recommends that the suit be dismissed without prejudice, because plaintiff has failed to raise a

cognizable § 1983 claim.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION

Based upon the record before the Court, it appears that a state court ordered plaintiff

to attend a treatment program and suspended his sentence while he was receiving treatment. 

Dkt. No. 1. The program, however, released plaintiff, because he was not making adequate

Case 2:05-cv-01565-JCC Document 9 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 If plaintiff wishes to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, he may instead

file a state habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). See Heck, 512 U.S. at 481

(citing Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 488-90 (1973)). 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE - 2

progress. Id. Plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to bring a § 1983 suit against the treatment

center, claiming that he was indeed making progress. Case No. C05-1166-JLR-MAT. In the

case at bar, plaintiff alleges that his probation officer, defendant Tamara Papini, wrongfully

arrested him after his release from the treatment program. Dkt. No. 1. 

A prisoner who seeks monetary damages for a violation of his constitutional rights

must file a § 1983 action. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 482-83 (1994). However, if

plaintiff’s § 1983 suit implies that his sentence is invalid, he must prove that the sentence was

in fact reversed, expunged, or invalidated before he can proceed, otherwise, “the complaint

must be dismissed.” Id. at 481, 487. Because plaintiff’s complaint calls into question the

validity of his sentence as it relates to his probation revocation, and because he has failed to

demonstrate that his sentence has been invalidated, he has failed make out a cognizable § 1983

claim.1

 Id. at 487. Therefore, plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Court recommends that plaintiff’s complaint be

dismissed without prejudice. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and

Recommendation.

DATED this 6th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01565-JCC Document 9 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 68921.

Appeal 5193.

#### United States *v.*Benrus Watch Company, Inc., et al.

C.D. 2469. Appeal dismissed September 28, 1964.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 635 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 2, 2007.
Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 1,500,000,000 Muslims 
        worldwide;
Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, 
        some threats and incidents of violence have been directed at law-
        abiding, patriotic Americans of African, Arab, and South Asian descent, 
        particularly members of the Islamic faith;
Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent 
        resolution condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, 
        American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the 
        terrorist attacks on the United States;
Whereas some extremists have attempted to use selective interpretations of Islam 
        to justify and encourage hatred, persecution, oppression, violence and 
        terrorism against the United States, the West, Israel, other Muslims, 
        and non-Muslims;
Whereas some Muslims in the United States and abroad have courageously spoken 
        out in rejection of interpretations of Islam that justify and encourage 
        hatred, violence, and terror, and in support of interpretations of and 
        movements within Islam that justify and encourage democracy, tolerance 
        and full civil and political rights for Muslims and those of all faiths;
Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims 
        worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and
Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan commenced at dusk on 
        September 13, 2007, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of 
        the world;
            (2) expresses friendship and support for Muslims in the United 
        States and worldwide;
            (3) acknowledges the onset of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of 
        fasting and spiritual renewal, and conveys its respect to Muslims in the 
        United States and throughout the world on this occasion;
            (4) rejects hatred, bigotry, and violence directed against Muslims, 
        both in the United States and worldwide; and
            (5) commends Muslims in the United States and across the globe who 
        have privately and publicly rejected interpretations and movements of 
        Islam that justify and encourage hatred, violence, and terror.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HARRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5562FDB

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and

the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to perfect service

within the time frame prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m).

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. Karen L.

Strombom.

DATED this 24th day of May 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05562-FDB Document 12 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Presidential Documents

66669 

Federal Register 

Vol. 88, No. 186 

Wednesday, September 27, 2023 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of September 15, 2023 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 404(c) of the Child 

Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State for Fiscal 

Year 2024 the authority under section 404(c)(1) of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (22 U.S.C. 2370c–1(c)(1)) (CSPA) to waive the application 

of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Rwanda, 

to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA 

with respect to Turkey to allow for the provision of Foreign Military Financing and Excess Defense Articles, and to make the determination and certification necessary for such waivers. I hereby also delegate to the Secretary 

of State the authority under section 404(c)(2) of the CSPA to notify the 

appropriate congressional committees of such waivers and the justification 

for granting such waivers, and to publish the determination for such waivers 

in the Federal Register. 

You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 15, 2023 

[FR Doc. 2023–21372 

Filed 9–26–23; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Before the First Division,

April 13, 1967

No. P67/106.

#### M. C. Liss *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/8634 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of articles in chief value of plastic similar in use and in all material respects to those the subject of *Ace Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 468, Abstract 64185) and *Ace Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 226, Abstract 67488), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 745 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2007 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. MCDERMOTT) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian 

Americans and the people of India, is celebrated annually 

by Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains throughout the 

United States and the world; 

Whereas there are more than 2,000,000 Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains in the United States; 

Whereas the word ‘‘Diwali’’ is a shortened version of the 

Sanskrit term ‘‘Deepavali’’, which means ‘‘a row of 

lamps’’; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place them around the home, and 

pray for health, knowledge, and peace; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 745 IH 

Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps 

symbolize the light within the individual that rids the 

soul of the darkness of ignorance; 

Whereas Diwali, falling on the last day of the last month in 

the lunar calendar, is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

and the beginning of the new year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the victory of 

good over evil; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day that the sixth 

founding Sikh Guru, or revered teacher, Guru Hargobind 

ji, was released from captivity from the ruling Mughal 

Emperor; and 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha or liberation by Mahavira, the last 

of the Tirthankaras, who were the great teachers of Jain 

dharma, at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the international religious and historical significance 

3 of the festival of Diwali. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
H. Res. 765 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 23, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

1483) to amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the authorization for certain 

national heritage areas, and for other purposes. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment 

in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 

on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, modified by the 

amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
2 

•HRES 765 EH 

the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to 

recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 1483 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF

PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Randy May, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
Such Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ecoark Holdings, Inc.



Date:
July 6, 2016



|/s/
    Randy May                 | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Randy
    May                     | 
|(Principal
    Executive Officer) |
Case 2:05-cv-01818-TSZ Document 23 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-01818-TSZ Document 23 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-01818-TSZ Document 23 Filed 09/12/06 Page 3 of 3
No. 68435.

protest 60/29436 (New York).

#### Daprato Statuary Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of compositions of Venetian mosaic figures, produced by a ■professional artist, and valued for their aesthetic appeal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DORLA F. NOKES,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5834RBL

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge J.

Kelley Arnold, United States Magistrate Judge, and objections to the report and recommendation, if any,

and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) the ALJ erred as described in the report;

(3) the matter is therefore REMANDED to the administration for further consideration; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant's counsel

and Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05834-RBL Document 20 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1