alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00253-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 415th District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR21-1013

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

LARRY JOE BREWER JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Larry Joe Brewer Jr. attempts to appeal a judgment adjudicating him 

guilty of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. See Tex. Penal Code 

Ann. § 32.51(c)(1). Brewer pleaded true to the State’s probation-violation allegations, 

and the trial court sentenced him to thirteen months’ confinement. Pursuant to the 

written plea admonishments that were signed by Brewer, Brewer waived his right to 

appeal. The “Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal” in this case 

states that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal” and that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. 

P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). 

On November 8, 2022, we notified Brewer of the certification and warned him 

that we would dismiss the appeal unless we received a response by November 18, 

2022, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 

44.3. While Brewer filed a response, it does not show grounds for continuing the

appeal.1In accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss Brewer’s appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); see, e.g., Turntine v. State, No. 02-18-00348-CR, 

1

In his response, Brewer claims that he “was forced to plead guilty” and that he 

“was never properly advised of [his] rights” by his counsel. We have reviewed the

transcript of the subject revocation hearing. During that hearing, Brewer indicated 

that he had signed his plea “voluntarily,” that he had “[h]ad plenty of time to talk to 

[his] lawyer about [the charges brought against him],” that it was “true” that he had 

violated his probation, and that he was telling the court about that violation 

“voluntarily.”
3

2018 WL 5074612, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 18, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication).

/s/ Dana Womack

Dana Womack

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: March 16, 2023
OFFICER
CERTIFICATE
 
 March 6,
2009
 
 J.P.
Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
 Series
2008-C2
 Pooling
and Servicing Agreement
 
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of Midland Loan Services,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), (i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the
calendar year 2008 (the "Reporting Period") and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; (ii) to the
best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period; and (iii) the Servicer has not
received any notice during the Reporting Period regarding qualification, or
challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant to the Agreement from the
IRS or any other governmental agency or body.
 
 
 
 MIDLAN
      LOAN SERVICES, INC./S/
      Steven W. SmithSteven
      W. SmithPresident
      and Chief Operating Officer
No. 57437.

#### Freund-Mayer & Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 177904-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Paper napkins stipulated to be similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474) were held dutiable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 1413, as modified by T. D. 51802, for paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes. Other items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of manufactures of paper wadding or manufactures of pulp wadding the same as importations which are currently being classified as manufactures of paper wadding or pulp wadding, pursuant to the provision therefor in paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 51802, were held dutiable under said paragraph at 6 centsjper pound¡and_7%]percent ad valorem.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of United States Oil and Gas Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Tawse, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  April 19, 2011



/s/ Alex TawseAlex TawseChief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United States Oil and Gas Corp and will be retained by United States Oil and Gas Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is made solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and not for any other purpose
Exhibit 32**Section 1350 Certification**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (“Section 906”), John D. Kavazanjian and Robert W. Fishback, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of UltralifeBatteries, Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultralife Batteries, Inc.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UltralifeBatteries, Inc. and will be retained by Ultralife Batteries, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.        Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ John D. Kavazanjian   John D. Kavazanjian   President and Chief Executive Officer           Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ Robert W. Fishback   Robert W. Fishback   Vice President — Finance andChief Financial Officer   
41
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40519

Conference Calendar

 

DANIEL IFY IWEGBU,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JONATHON DOBRE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-95

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Ify Iwegbu, federal prisoner #22600-077, has appealed

the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu contends that

the district court erred in finding that he did not meet the

actual innocence prong of the test set forth in Reyes-Requena v.

United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). He maintains
No. 02-40519

-2-

that, under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he should

be permitted to pursue relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

Iwegbu has failed to establish that he was convicted of a

non-existent offense. He has thus failed to meet the first prong

of the two-prong test set forth in Reyes-Requena. See 243 F.3d

at 904. This appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Iwegbu is cautioned that should he, or any counsel on his

behalf, file any further frivolous pleadings relating to his

heroin conspiracy conviction, in this court or any court subject

to the jurisdiction of this court, he shall be subject to

sanctions. To avoid sanctions for any matter that may be

pending, Iwegbu shall review all pending matters and move to

voluntarily dismiss any that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### Eddie O. LUELLEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-3233.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 1, 2001.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure, to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DATE/WOOLRIDGE - 1

CR05-5839FDB UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 ) NO. CR05-5839FDB 

Plaintiff, )

 ) 

 v. ) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

 ) FOR GOVERNMENT TO FILE A 

) RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S 

MELISSA VANESSA WOOLRIDGE, ) MOTION TO SUPPRESS

 )

Defendant. ) )

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the parties Stipulated Motion to

Extend Deadline for Government to File a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress,

and the Court being fully advised on the matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Government to files its

response shall be extended to February 3, 2006.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/ David Reese Jennings s/ Ronald D. Ness 

DAVID REESE JENNINGS RONALD D. NESS

Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:05-cr-05839-FDB Document 26 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1
From: jmj4laurie@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:52:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laurie Bowden

, 20136-2018
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 266 Agreed to House (ATH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 266

 Supporting the goals and ideals of Professional Social Work Month and 
                         World Social Work Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

 Ms. Shea-Porter (for herself, Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
 Rodriguez, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Towns, and Mrs. Jones of Ohio) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

                             March 26, 2007

The Committee on Education and Labor discharged; considered and agreed 
                                   to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of Professional Social Work Month and 
                         World Social Work Day.

Whereas social workers have the demonstrated education and experience to guide 
        individuals, families, and communities through complex issues and 
        choices;
Whereas social workers connect individuals, families, and communities to 
        available resources;
Whereas social workers are dedicated to improving the society in which we live;
Whereas social workers are positive and compassionate professionals;
Whereas social workers stand up for others to make sure everyone has access to 
        the same basic rights, protections, and opportunities;
Whereas social workers have been the driving force behind important social 
        movements in the United States and abroad; and
Whereas Professional Social Work Month, and World Social Work Day, which is 
        March 27, 2007, will build awareness of the role of professional social 
        workers and their commitment and dedication to individuals, families, 
        and communities everywhere through service delivery, research, 
        education, and legislative advocacy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Professional Social 
        Work Month and World Social Work Day;
            (2) acknowledges the diligent efforts of individuals and 
        groups who promote the importance of social work and who are 
        observing Professional Social Work Month and World Social Work 
        Day;
            (3) encourages the American people to engage in appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities to further promote awareness of the 
        life-changing role of social workers;
            (4) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of the 
        millions of caring individuals who have chosen to serve their 
        communities through social work; and
            (5) encourages young people to seek out educational and 
        professional opportunities to become social workers.
                                 <all>
```
|   |   | (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (2)        | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |       |                                                                                                                                                 |

|   | /s/ Ashok K. Sood                                                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Dr. Ashok K. SoodPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.5
	
	
	Notice of Grant of
Restricted Stock Units and Incentive Stock Options

	[Name]




Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Award Agreements, and the Summary of Performance Objectives accompanying this Notice, you have been granted awards of Restricted Stock Units and Incentive Stock Options (“Awards”) as follows:
	
		
	Grant Date:
	January 10, 2018

	Number of Shares:
	Your Awards consist of the following:
          Restricted Stock Units (each a “Unit”)1
          Restricted Stock Units (ROIC) (each a “Unit”)2
          Restricted Stock Units (EPS) (each a “Unit”)3
          Incentive Stock Options (ISO) (each an “Option”)

	Vesting Schedule:
	Your Units and Options will be subject to vesting on the third anniversary of the Grant Date.

	Settlement:
	Your Awards of Units will be settled in Shares, the number of which will depend on whether the terms and conditions described in the Award Agreement, the Summary of Performance Objectives, this Notice of Grant, and the Plan are satisfied. Payment for Shares purchased upon the exercise of Options may be made in cash, by tendering previously acquired Shares, by cashless exercise (including by withholding Shares deliverable upon exercise or through a broker-assisted arrangement to the extent permitted by applicable law), or by a combination of these methods.




This Notice of Grant, the Award Agreement and the Summary of Performance Objectives describe your Awards and the terms and conditions of your Awards.  To ensure you fully understand these terms and conditions, you should:
		
	•
	Read the Plans carefully to ensure you understand how the Plans works; and


		
	•
	Read this Notice of Grant and the corresponding Award Agreements and Summary of Performance Objectives carefully to ensure you understand the nature of your Awards and what you must do to earn them.


You may contact Katie Pickle, Global Total Rewards Senior Manager, by telephone ((713) 705-0428) or email (Katie.Pickle@aschulman.com) if you have any questions about your Awards or the Award Agreements.














____________________________________________
1 Determined by (i) multiplying $[______] (the target dollar amount used to determine your total Awards for fiscal year 2018) by .25, and (ii) dividing the result in (i) by $[xx.xx], the average reported closing price of a Share during the 30-day period ending on the last trading day prior to the Grant Date. The resulting number of Units were rounded to the nearest multiple of 10. 
2 Determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Stock Units determined in note 1 times 2.
3 Determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Stock Units determined in note 1 times 2.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                        Computation of Earnings per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three months ended
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     February 2,      February 1,
                                                        1997             1998
                                                     ----------       ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>       
Basic net earnings per share:

   Weighted average common shares
    outstanding during the period                     7,676,610        7,794,013
                                                     ==========       ==========

   Net earnings for the period -unaudited            $1,914,129       $3,386,978
                                                     ==========       ==========

   Basic net earnings per share                      $      .25       $      .43
                                                     ==========       ==========



   Diluted net earnings per share:

   Weighted average common
   shares outstanding during the period               7,676,610        7,794,013

   Common stock equivalents                              76,442          247,114
                                                     ----------       ----------

                                                      7,753,052        8,041,127
                                                     ==========       ==========

   Net earnings for the period - unaudited           $1,914,129       $3,386,978
                                                     ==========       ==========

   Diluted net earnings per share                    $      .25       $      .42
                                                     ==========       ==========
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF TRANSFER 

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SEBASTIAN ZIGA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security,

Respondent.

CASE NO. C05-816-RSL-MJB

ORDER OF TRANSFER TO THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE NINTH

CIRCUIT AS A PETITION FOR

REVIEW

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition (Dkt. #1), all papers

and exhibits in support and in opposition to that petition, the Report and Recommendation of

the Honorable Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) This Court is without jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to his

removal order. Accordingly, this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as a Petition For Review

pursuant to § 106(c) of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-13, 119 Stat.

Case 2:05-cv-00816-RSL Document 11 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF TRANSFER

PAGE -2 -

231.

(3) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE this case and TRANSFER all pleadings

and related documents to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Clerk shall,

however, retain a copy of the Court’s electronic file. The Clerk is further

directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record, and to Judge

Benton.

DATED this 17th day of August, 2005.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-00816-RSL Document 11 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 2