alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HAROLD GLEN BROWN, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5073 RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff’s “Appeal” of Order to

Amend [Dkt. #8].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

This matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636. Under Fed. R. Civ. P.

72(a), the non-dispositive order of a magistrate judge to whom a matter has been referred for pretrial matters

may be reviewed by the district court upon the objection of a party. The court construes Mr. Brown’s

“appeal” in this instance to be such an objection.

The Magistrate Judge’s Order to Amend the Complaint [Dkt. #5] directed the plaintiff to correct the

deficiencies in his Civil Rights Complaint. The Magistrate Judge found the Complaint to be deficient because

it failed to allege the violation of a constitutional right. Plaintiff’s objection to the Order is nonsensical: he

objects because “We did not have to put in addresses.” There is no directive to the plaintiff to “put in

addresses.” It is therefore

Case 3:06-cv-05073-RBL Document 10 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Appeal” is DENIED. This matter is re-referred to Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom for further proceedings. 

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 25th day of May, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05073-RBL Document 10 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 2
From: roberta_fitzsimmons@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:28:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Fitzsimmons

Osseo, MN 55369
ex-10.8

 Exhibit 10.8
 

 

 CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
 

 This CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is dated as of May 15, 2016 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation (d/b/a Cornerstone Sustainable Energy), a Delaware corporation, (“CSE”) and Peter Fazio (the “Consultant”), each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties” hereto.
 WHEREAS, CSE engaged the Consultant and entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 15, 2013 embodying the terms of such engagement; and
 WHEREAS, Consultant desires to continue providing services to CSE on the terms and conditions set forth therein and as amended herein,
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to renew said Agreement, amended as follows:
 

 A.
 Term.  Paragraphs 1.b. and 7 shall be amended as follows:
 

 The term of the Agreement shall be renewed for an additional three (3) year period, commencing on the Effective Date, and shall continue until terminated pursuant to Paragraph 7 below. 
 

 B.
 Compensation.  Paragraph 3 shall be amended as follows:
 

 Consultant shall receive no base compensation until, upon the determination of the CSE Board of Directors, CSE’s funding or revenues are adequate to pay Consultant any compensation.  Upon such determination, the Board of Directors shall determine the level of such compensation, which it may elect to change from time to time, otherwise subject to the terms of Paragraph 3.(a). 
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
 

 	 	
	 Consultant: 
	 __/s/ Peter Fazio _____________

	  
	 Peter Fazio

	  
	  

	 CSE:
	 __/s/ Thomas Telegades_____________

	  
	 Thomas Telegades

	  
	 Chief Executive Officer
No. 61563.

#### E. Leitz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 251640-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiffs at 20 percent was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 455 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Internet Safety Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Ms. BEAN (for herself, Mr. UPTON, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. HILL, and Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Internet Safety 

Month. 

Whereas, on May 16, 2007, the United States Senate passed 

a resolution designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Internet 

Safety Month’’; 

Whereas there are more than 1,000,000,000 Internet users 

worldwide; 

Whereas, in the United States, 35,000,000 children in kindergarten through grade 12 have Internet access; 

Whereas approximately 80 percent of the children of the 

United States in grades 5 through 12 are online for at 

least 1 hour per week; 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 455 IH 

Whereas approximately 41 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 do not share with their parents what they do 

on the Internet; 

Whereas approximately 24 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 have hidden their online activities from their 

parents; 

Whereas approximately 31 percent of the students in grades 

5 through 12 have the skill to circumvent Internet filter 

software; 

Whereas 61 percent of the students admit to using the Internet unsafely or inappropriately; 

Whereas 20 percent of middle school and high school students have met face-to-face with someone they first met 

online; 

Whereas 23 percent of students know someone who has been 

bullied online; 

Whereas 56 percent of parents feel that online bullying of 

children is an issue that needs to be addressed; 

Whereas 47 percent of parents feel that their ability to monitor and shelter their children from inappropriate material on the Internet is limited; and 

Whereas 61 percent of parents want to be more personally 

involved with Internet safety: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of recognizing 

3 National Internet Safety Month; 

4 (2) recognizes that National Internet Safety 

5 Month provides the citizens of the United States 

6 with an opportunity to learn more about— 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 455 IH 

1 (A) the dangers of the Internet; and 

2 (B) the importance of being safe and re3 sponsible online; 

4 (3) commends and recognizes national and com5 munity organizations for— 

6 (A) promoting awareness of the dangers of 

7 the Internet; and 

8 (B) providing information and training 

9 that develops critical thinking and decision10 making skills that are needed to use the Inter11 net safely; and 

12 (4) calls on Internet safety organizations, law 

13 enforcement, educators, community leaders, parents, 

14 and volunteers to increase their efforts to raise the 

15 level of awareness for the need for online safety in 

16 the United States. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JAMES LEROY HENDERSON,

Defendant. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-23M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Counts 1 and 2: Aggravated Identity Theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A.

Date of Detention Hearing: February 27, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is both an economic danger and a risk of flight to the community based

on the instant offense and on defendant’s criminal background history.

(2) Defendant has a history of a series of probation revocations for failure to comply

with the terms of his supervision.

(3) Defendant has a substantial number of previous failures to appear.

(4) Defendant is associated with 11 alias names, 2 social security numbers, and 2

Case 2:06-mj-00023-MAT Document 9 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

dates of birth.

(5) Defendant is also associated with 4 counterfeit Florida drivers licenses, one

counterfeit New Jersey license, and two counterfeit Wyoming licenses.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably address the risk of flight and economic danger to other persons

or the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of February, 2006.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00023-MAT Document 9 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60227.

protest 285615-K (New York).

#### William Bram *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Magnolia Solar Corporation, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Dr. Ashok K. Sood, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 28, 2011





/s/ Ashok K. SoodDr. Ashok K. Sood

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 63870.

protests 58/7802, 58/23197, and 58/23250 (Philadelphia).

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ceramic rods, not decorated, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Protest 58/23250 having been abandoned as to entry No. 12762, was dismissed to that extent.
From: rlprice@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rosa Lea Price

Antioch, TN 37013
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2013-27

Issue Date 

 25 September 2013 

Number: CF-2013-27 

Subject: Ice Protection System – Inoperative Timer and Monitor Unit 

Effective: 8 October 2013 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model DHC-8-400, -401 and -402 aeroplanes, serial numbers 4001 

through 4446. 

Compliance: Within 2000 hours air time or 12 months, whichever occurs first, from the effective 

date of this AD, unless already accomplished. 

Background: There have been several in-service reports of the failure of high pressure shutoff valves 

(HPSOV) causing the Timer and Monitor Unit (TMU) to become inoperative since the 

HPSOV and TMU are on the same circuit breaker. 

An inoperative TMU would result in the loss of the automatic de-icing mode and would 

lead to an increased workload for the flightcrew. In the case where additional failures 

occur during a critical flight phase, the significantly increased workload could lead to loss 

of control of the aeroplane. 

This AD mandates a wiring modification to segregate the HPSOV power supply from the 

TMU. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Incorporate Bombardier ModSum 4-110595. Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 84-36-04, 

Revision A, dated 17 April 2013, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing 

Airworthiness, Transport Canada, provides approved instructions for incorporating 

ModSum 4-110595. 

Incorporation of Modsum 4-110595 in accordance with the Initial Issue of SB 84-36-04, 

dated 13 March 2013, also satisfies the requirements of this AD. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Derek Ferguson 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Robert Farinas, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
EXHIBIT 11.2


                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

    Three Months Ended March 31,                                                    1997                1996
    --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------- -------------------

<S>                                                                                    <C>                 <C>     
    Net income                                                                         $832,000            $171,000
                                                                          == =================== ===================

    Shares used in computing net income per share:

       Weighted average Common shares outstanding                                     7,902,036           7,564,830

       Weighted average Common shares issuable
       upon the exercise of outstanding stock
       options and warrants                                                           1,748,024           1,923,213

       Application of assumed proceeds towards
       repurchase of outstanding common shares
       using the Treasury Stock method (a)                                          (1,085,276)         (1,091,366)
                                                                          -- ------------------- -------------------

             Shares used in computation                                               8,564,784           8,396,677
                                                                         ===========================================

   Net income per share assuming full dilution                                          $  0.10             $  0.02
   =================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

      (a)     Computed using assumed  proceeds of $8,546,548 and $8,267,000 and,
              with respect to the  repurchase of outstanding  common  shares,  a
              closing  market value of $7.88 in 1997 and an average market value
              of $7.58 in 1996.

                                       E-3