alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Mastro, Donna

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:05 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa; Johansen, Amy

Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact 

Sheet.pdf

DC

Donna L. Mastro - EPA Region III – ORC - Air Branch Chief - (215) 814-2777 

From: Esher, Diana  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:44 PM

To: Beall, Cecily (DDOE); rama.tangirala@dc.gov

Cc: Arnold, David; Johansen, Amy; Mastro, Donna; Fernandez, Cristina

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

I’m writing to inform you that earlier today, the Administrator signed a final action to ensure states have in 

place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction (SSM). 

EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs), to 

protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and EPA’s current SSM Policy. In 

response to this action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as indicated in 

the final action. 

The Clean Air Act allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance of the final action to submit a SIP 

revision. Therefore your revised SIP submission is due to EPA by November 22, 2016. 

For your information, here is the link to the pre-publication version of the final action signed today. 

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html

SSM provisions for the District of Columbia are addressed in final action’s prepublication version, under 

section IX, at subsection D. 2 (p. 454). 

I have also attached a copy of a notification letter signed by Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe and a 

copy of the SSM Fact Sheet for your information. 

We will continue to work closely with you to ensure this SIP revision process is as efficient as possible. Please 

let me know if your have any questions. 

Diana Esher 

Director, Air Protection Division 

EPA Region 3 

215-814-2706 

esher.diana@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67324-67325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA RC2 High Impact Specialized 
Innovation Programs Review Meeting.
    Date: January 17, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jing Chen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review,

[[Page 67325]]

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1080, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, (301) 827-3268, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98fbf0fdf6f2f1f6ffd8f5f9f1f4b6f6f1f0b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="26454e43484c4f4841664b474f4a08484f4e08414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21442 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statements File No. 333-87176, File No. 333-09235, File No. 333-27085, File No. 333-125116, and File No. 333-175214
on Form S-8 of ENB Financial Corp of our report dated March 29, 2017, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENB Financial Corp
for the year ended December 31, 2016.







Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania

March 29, 2017













S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. • 2009 Mackenzie Way,
Suite 340 • Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066 • Phone: (724) 934-0344 • Fax: (724) 934-0345





131
No. P66/20.

protests 326624-K, 326625-K, and 328557-K (New York).

#### J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. DeJong &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                  [SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS LETTERHEAD]


                                                        August 31, 2000


Mr. Vaughn M. Kailian, CEO
COR Therapeutics, Inc.
256 East Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, California 94080

Dear Vaughn:

This is with regard to the Collaboration Agreement, dated April 10, 1995, by
and among COR Therapeutics, Inc. ("COR"), and Schering Corporation and Schering-
Pough Ltd. (collectively "Schering"), as amended, (the "Agreement").

In the Second Amendment to the Agreement, dated November 5, 1999, COR and
Schering agreed to make certain elements of the Second Amendment conditional on
the conduct of a Phase III clinical trial for acute myocardial infarction
("AMI") and have made provision in the Second Amendment for modification of the
Second Amendment based upon the status of such trial as of pre-established
dates, and the parties desire to modify those dates.

The parties are currently negotiating a Third Amendment to the Agreement to
address this and other issues relating to the Agreement. However, Section X.A
of the Second Amendment provides for the termination of certain provisions of
the Second Amendment in the event that "as of June 30, 2000, the JSC has not
voted to conduct the Phase III Study". Therefore, it is hereby agreed that the
deadline for the decision of the JSC with respect to the conduct of the Phase
III Study is extended until September 8, 2000.

Please indicate COR's acceptance and agreement to the provisions set forth in
this letter by signing below on behalf of COR and returning one signed original
to Schering.

Very truly yours,

Schering Corporation                         Schering-Plough Ltd.

/s/ THOMAS C. LAUDA                          /s/ DAVID POORVIN
-------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Thomas C. Lauda                              David Poorvin
Executive Vice President                     Prokurist
Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals


Acknowledged and Agreed to:

COR Therapeutics, Inc.

By: /s/ VAUGHN M. KAILIAN
    ---------------------------
    Vaughn M. Kailian
    Chief Executive Officer

Date:         09/05/00
      -------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Jackson, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 995]

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), both rendered February 2,1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. N10551/92, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. N12119/92, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and the defendant’s supplemental *pro se*brief and we agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw *774as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 31,978 4 RUSSELL RANKIN, 5 Defendant-Appellee. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Reed S. Sheppard, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 William H. Lazar, Assistant Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Clark, Grubesic, Jones & Baur, L.L.C. 13 Thomas M. Clark 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VIGIL, Judge. 182 The State appealed an order dismissing the charges against Defendant in this 1 case. In our notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to affirm, stating 2 that dismissal was appropriate pursuant toRule 5-203(A) NMRA, since the State had 3 failed to join these charges with the related charges in a prior case. The State has filed 4 a response in which it now concedes that jo inder was required. It therefore does not 5 oppose summary affirmance. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of 6 proposed summary disposition, we affirm. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8

__________________________________ 9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11

_________________________________ 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13

_________________________________ 14 LINDA M. VANZI , Judge 15
Before the First Division,

September 7, 1967

No. P67/290.

#### Riviera Trading Corp. *v.*United States, protests 66/613, etc. (New York).

Watson, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hair ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Brier Manufacturing Company*(52 CCPA 35, C.A.D. 854), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: archenadear@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:42:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Phylis Maddox

Troy, AL 36081
From: debpaape@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:18:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debra Paape

Baraboo, WI 53913
No. 59790.

#### Merchants Overseas Co. and Air Clearance Ass’n, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 193118-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
**EXHIBIT 32. 1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Element92 Resources Corp. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Geoff Armstrong

Geoff Armstrong, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer

Dated June 25, 2009

1

----
Case 2:06-cv-00279-RSL-JPD Document 1-1 Filed 02/22/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 2:06-cv-00279-MJP Document 6 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00279-RSL-JPD Document 1-1 Filed 02/22/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 2:06-cv-00279-MJP Document 6 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00279-RSL-JPD Document 1-1 Filed 02/22/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 2:06-cv-00279-MJP Document 6 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00279-RSL-JPD Document 1-1 Filed 02/22/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 2:06-cv-00279-MJP Document 6 Filed 04/11/06 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00279-RSL-JPD Document 1-1 Filed 02/22/2006 Page 5 of 5
 Case 2:06-cv-00279-MJP Document 6 Filed 04/11/06 Page 5 of 5
No. 67591.

#### Berkley Machine Co. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/1361 and 60/19748 (Portland, Oreg.).

*263Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of envelope-making machines and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Keer, Maurer Company*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 205, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS



I, Robert Smith Chief Executive Officer of Nugent Engine Technologies, Inc, a Florida corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report on Form 10-K for the period of the Registrant from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: April 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Robert Smith               | 
|                     |  | Name: Robert Smith            
|                     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7648
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC EUGENE TURNER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-94-102, CA-96-1188-AM) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Eugene Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Marcus John Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Turner , Nos. CR-94- 102; CA-96-1188-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 455 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2007.
Whereas, on May 16, 2007, the United States Senate passed a resolution 
        designating June 2007 as ``National Internet Safety Month'';
Whereas there are more than 1,000,000,000 Internet users worldwide;
Whereas, in the United States, 35,000,000 children in kindergarten through grade 
        12 have Internet access;
Whereas approximately 80 percent of the children of the United States in grades 
        5 through 12 are online for at least 1 hour per week;
Whereas approximately 41 percent of students in grades 5 through 12 do not share 
        with their parents what they do on the Internet;
Whereas approximately 24 percent of students in grades 5 through 12 have hidden 
        their online activities from their parents;
Whereas approximately 31 percent of the students in grades 5 through 12 have the 
        skill to circumvent Internet filter software;
Whereas 61 percent of the students admit to using the Internet unsafely or 
        inappropriately;
Whereas 20 percent of middle school and high school students have met face-to-
        face with someone they first met online;
Whereas 23 percent of students know someone who has been bullied online;
Whereas 56 percent of parents feel that online bullying of children is an issue 
        that needs to be addressed;
Whereas 47 percent of parents feel that their ability to monitor and shelter 
        their children from inappropriate material on the Internet is limited; 
        and
Whereas 61 percent of parents want to be more personally involved with Internet 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of recognizing National Internet 
        Safety Month;
            (2) recognizes that National Internet Safety Month provides the 
        citizens of the United States with an opportunity to learn more about--
                    (A) the dangers of the Internet; and
                    (B) the importance of being safe and responsible online;
            (3) commends and recognizes national and community organizations 
        for--
                    (A) promoting awareness of the dangers of the Internet; and
                    (B) providing information and training that develops 
                critical thinking and decision-making skills that are needed to 
                use the Internet safely; and
            (4) calls on parents, educators, Internet safety organizations, law 
        enforcement, community leaders, and volunteers to increase their efforts 
        to raise the level of awareness for the need for online safety in the 
        United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-10 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 4

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 63 Att. 9

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-10 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-10 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-10 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 4 of 4