alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I John Moore certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Sync2 Networks Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to a state material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and financial information
     included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
     financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintain disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
     the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared.
     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant's fourth quarter in the case
          of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my recent evaluation of internal control over
     financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record,process,summarize and report financial information;and
     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's control over
          financial reporting

January 17, 2013
                                            /s/ John Moore
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            CEO/CFO/DIRECTOR
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert C. Sepucha, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. November 10, 2004 /s/ Robert C. Sepucha
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 194-2 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

April 20, 1967

No. P67/115.

#### W. Kay Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 297616-K, 317460-K, and 318667-K (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THOMAS ALLEN GORDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

LARRY MALCOLM,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5838RBL

ORDER DISMISSING

FRIVOLOUS COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

1915

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find

and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED; 

(3) The Clerk is directed to terminate this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and to count

this as a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold.

DATED this 17th day of April, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05838-RBL Document 8 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v.

FLENARD TYRONE NEAL, JR.,

DONALD JAMAR LEWIS,

FELIX ADEOKUN

Defendant. 

CASE NO.CR06-5058RBL

 

 ORDER GRANTING 

 CONTINUANCE OF

 TRIAL DATE

An Agreed Order to Continue the Trial has been filed by the parties.

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and for the reasons stated, the parties Joint Motion to

Continue the Trial Date is GRANTED

In view of the foregoing, the court finds and rules as follows:

1. Failure to grant a continuance in this matter would deny the defense the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Title 18

U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

2. The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Title 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). The period of delay

resulting from this continuance from MAY 30, 2006 to OCTOBER 10, 2006 is excluded for

speedy trial computation purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) as this is a

reasonable period of delay.

Case 3:06-cr-05058-RBL Document 42 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER -2

ACCORDINGLY:

The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to OCTOBER 10, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

No Pretrial Conference is scheduled.

The Motions Cutoff date is extended to JULY 17, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24TH day of May, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-05058-RBL Document 42 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-5 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 3

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 12 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-5 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 12-5 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 3 of 3
NO. 14

- 14

- 00062

- CV

IN RE CLIFFORD HALL



## WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TO THE SHERIFF OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS:

Clifford Hall, relator, has petitioned the Fourteenth Court of Appeals for a writ of habeas

corpus in Trial Court Cause No. 2003

- 20180, alleging that he is illegally restrained of his liberty

by you in the Harris County Jail, Harris County, Texas, by virtue of certain process issued out of

the 310th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals has granted the petition for writ of habeas corpus and

has ordered a writ of habeas corpus to issue in the following words:

This Court has reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus of relator, In Re Clifford Hall. The Court is of the opinion that relator’s petition requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(b)( 3). We therefore grant relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pending final

determination of the cause. We further order the Clerk of this Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus in this cause, returnable on February 26, 2014.

The relator will be a dmitted to bail upon his giving a good and sufficient bond, signed by relator as principal and his attorney, Tyesha Y. Elam, as surety, conditioned as required by law, or by any other surety acceptable to the Sheriff of Harris County, or cash

in lieu of bo nd, in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, pending the submission without oral argument on the return date of this writ, and until otherwise ordered by this Court.NOW, THEREFORE, you are commanded to produce the body of relator, Clifford Ha ll,

before the Fourteenth Court of Appe als, at Houston, Texas, on the 26 th Day of February 20 14 at

1:30 p.m. unless you take the bond of relator in th e sum of Five Hundred Dollars ( $500)

conditioned that he will abide by the decision of the Fourteenth Cour t of Appeals of Texas. If

you release the relator on bond, you will forward the bond to the Clerk of this Court.

YOU ARE COMMANDED TO OBEY this writ fully. If you fail to abide by the terms

of this writ, you are subject to legal penalty.

WIT NESS, The H onorable Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our said Fourteenth

Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at Houston, Texas, on January 24, 2014

.

CHRISTOPHER PRINE, Clerk

__________________________________ ____NO. 14

- 14

- 00062

- CV



## RETURN ON WRIT

To the Honorable Fourteenth Court of Appeals:

In response to a writ of habeas corpus, I respectfully state that I have in my custody and

under my restraint Clifford Hall by virtue of the authority of the copy of the writ attached as a

part of this return. I further bring Clifford Hall before the Fourteenth Court of Appeals at

Houston, Texas, in obedience to said writ of habeas corpus.

___________________________________ _ S HERIFF

, H ARRIS C OUNTY

By:_________________________________ Deputy
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 784 

Recognizing and honoring, in community post offices, the service of men 

and women of the U.S. Armed Forces deployed overseas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Mr. MCCARTHY of California submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring, in community post offices, the 

service of men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces 

deployed overseas. 

Whereas the American people are extremely grateful and appreciative of the service of all men and women serving in 

the U.S. Armed Forces; 

Whereas joining the U.S. Armed Forces is voluntary; 

Whereas men and women serving in the U.S. Armed Forces 

deployed overseas in combat zones or hostile areas risk 

their lives in service to the United States of America; 

Whereas there are more than 280,000 members of the U.S. 

Armed Forces currently deployed; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 784 IH 

Whereas each of these servicemembers leave behind family 

and friends in order to serve the United States of America; 

Whereas United States Post Offices are local community 

hubs; 

Whereas there are more than 33,500 U.S. postal facilities located throughout the United States; 

Whereas displaying portraits in U.S. Post Offices of local 

community members who are serving in the U.S. Armed 

Forces and are deployed overseas is an appropriate way 

to honor their service and their families’ sacrifice, as well 

as for their community to show pride in them; and 

Whereas it is important to recognize and honor the service 

of the men and women in the U.S. Armed Forces for 

their courage and dedication to their country, and for the 

risks they take in defense of freedom: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends all U.S. Post Offices that display 

3 photographs of local community members who are 

4 serving in the U.S. Armed Forces and are deployed 

5 overseas to honor their valor and their service to the 

6 United States of America; 

7 (2) reaffirms that the United States Postal 

8 Service’s Postal Operations Manual, Section 

9 125.361, enables official photographs of individuals 

10 serving in the U.S. Armed Forces and are deployed 

11 overseas to be displayed in U.S. Post Offices at the 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 784 IH 

1 request of the community or servicemember’s family; 

2 and 

3 (3) urges U.S. Post Offices to reserve or des4 ignate space in the public areas of the facilities in 

5 furtherance of this purpose. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
Honorable Karen L. Strombom 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DEFAULT AS TO TV 

MARKET LLC AND CHRIS J. REOCH 

(3:06-cv-05038) - 1 

STLN\2853PL2.DOC 

CHRISTENSEN 

 O'CONNOR 

 JOHNSON 

 KINDNESSPLLC

LAW OFFICES 

1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2800 

Seattle, WA 98101-2347 

TELEPHONE: 206.682.8100 

04/11/06 1:09 PM

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 

STL International, Incorporated., a Washington 

State corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TV Market LLC, a limited liability company of 

the state of Wisconsin, and Chris J. Reoch, and 

John Doe 2, Individuals, 

Defendant. 

No. 3:06-cv-05038 

ORDER OF DEFAULT AS TO TV 

MARKET LLC AND CHRIS J. 

REOCH 

Plaintiff, STL International, Incorporated ("STL"), has moved this Court for an Order 

of Default against Defendants TV Market LLC ("TV Market") and Chris J. Reoch ("Reoch"). 

TV Market and Reoch have not appeared herein nor answered STL's complaint. The Court 

finds that STL's motion is meritorious: from the evidence before this Court, Defendant TV 

Market appears to have been served with a summons and complaint on the 8th of February, 

2006 and Reoch appears to have been served with a summons and complaint on the 17th of 

February, 2006. 

////// 

///// 

///// 

Case 3:06-cv-05038-RBL Document 12 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DEFAULT AS TO TV 

MARKET LLC AND CHRIS J. REOCH 

(3:06-cv-05038) - 2 

STLN\2853PL2.DOC 

CHRISTENSEN 

 O'CONNOR 

 JOHNSON 

 KINDNESSPLLC

LAW OFFICES 

1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2800 

Seattle, WA 98101-2347 

TELEPHONE: 206.682.8100 

04/11/06 1:09 PM

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

Having been duly served, TV Market and Mr. Reoch have not appeared nor answered 

as required by the rules of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Defendants TV Market LLC and Chris J. Reoch 

are hereby in default. 

Dated this 11th day of April, 2006. 

Clerk of the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Washington 

s/Jean Boring 

By : Deputy Clerk 

Presented by 

CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR 

JOHNSON KINDNESSPLLC

_______________________________ 

James R. Uhlir, WSBA No.: 2,365 

Attorney for Plaintiff STL International, 

 Incorporated 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on March 30, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system. 

s/__________________________________ 

Anne Calico, paralegal 

Christensen O'Connor Johnson KindnessPLLC 

1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2800 

Seattle, WA 98101-2347 

Telephone: 206.682.8100 

Fax: 206.224.0779 

 

Case 3:06-cv-05038-RBL Document 12 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 68459.

protest 63/8653 (Los Angeles).

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Bahco Tools, Inc. *v.*United States,

*322Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nail pullers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *National Carloading Corp. et al.*(48 CCPA 70, C.A.D. 767), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61544.

#### Bunge Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 301921-K (A), 301921-K (B), and 301921-K (C) (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection, the motion was granted on the ground that the protests were prematurely filed.
SEYFARTH..., 

SHAW, 

ATTORNEY S 

ERuRTMENTOF 

". h >. : 0 n 

Writer's direct ptione 

(312)460-5976 

Writer's e-mail 

dflynn@seyfarth.com 

; ..XhT OPERATIONS 

•m HAR - U P !: U' 

131 Soutfi Dearborn Street 

Suite 2400 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

(312)460-5000 

fax (312) 460-7000 

WWW. seyfartti. com 

February 17, 2011 

VIA FACSIMILE (202) 366-7536 & U.S. MAIL " ] 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin _ r^ , 

Office of Hearings, M-20 '" -" ' ' - '''•' 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Hajoca Waterworks, FAA Case No. 2010SW700113 ^(Lf/ti5\» OOI S 

Dear Judge Goodwin: ' 

The parties have reached a settlement agreement in this matter. Hajoca Waterworks 

therefore withdraws its Request for a Hearing, dated November 29, 2010, and requests that this 

matter be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215. 

:• • Please let us know if you need any additional information. 

Very truly yours, 

SEYFARTH SI 

Daniel R. Flynn 

DRF:pep 

cc: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Federal Aviation Administration 

James Archier • • : ^ 

Sharilyn Christiansen 

Eric E: Boyd ': . ' : 

13149224V.1 

THIS I.ETTERHE.AD IS PRINTED ON RCCVtLED STOCK (£ #
From: timothy.harris@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:40:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Harris

Chicago, IL 60607
#### Jay Mikal BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRD, Deputy; Fitzgerald, Sargeant; Deputy Batch, Classification Officer, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-6145.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 2005.

Decided June 29, 2005.

Jay Mikal Brooks, Appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Jay Mikal Brooks seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court dismissed Brooks’ complaint by an order entered on December 9, 2004. On January 27, 2005, the district court received a letter expressing Brooks’ wish to appeal the order. Brooks stated that he had been in transit in the federal prison system and only learned of the dismissal of his case when he informed the district court of his new address. He submitted that the jail where he was originally confined did not forward his mail.

Brooks’ notice of appeal was made within the period of time applicable for a determination of excusable neglect or good cause under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and expressed a desire to preserve his appeal. *See Myers v. Stephenson,*781 F.2d 1036; 1038-39 (4th Cir.1986). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Brooks has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal. The record, as supple-*83merited, then will be returned to this court for further consideration.

*REMANDED*