alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 49 Reference Change Senate (RCS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 49

  Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ``America Recycles Day'' 
                      national kick-off campaign.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

   Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Jeffords) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

                           September 10, 1997

     Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing use of the Capitol Grounds for ``America Recycles Day'' 
                      national kick-off campaign.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR AMERICA RECYCLES DAY NATIONAL 
              KICK-OFF CAMPAIGN.

    The ``America Recycles Day'' campaign and its agents may sponsor a 
public event on the Capitol Grounds on September 30, 1997, or on such 
date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President 
pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized under section 1 shall be free 
to the public and arranged so as not to interfere with the needs of 
Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol and the Capitol Police.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--``America Recycles Day'' and its 
agents shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, ``America Recycles Day'' and its agents are 
authorized to erect on the Capitol Grounds any stage, tent, sound 
amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
required for the event authorized under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any other reasonable 
arrangements as may be required to plan for or administer the event.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MATTHEW G. SILVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5731RJB

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local MJR 3 and 4. 

Noted on the Court’s docket for consideration on May 9, 2006, is Defendant Gregoire’s

motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Dkt. # 39). Plaintiff previously filed a motion for an

extension of time, stating that he anticipated placing his response in the mail by May 9, 2006. The

court granted that extension. (Dkt. # 47). Plaintiff now states that he is unable to meet that deadline

because the law library computer crashed on May 6, 2006. Plaintiff asks for a two week extension

until today, May 23, 2006. The court will grant the requested extension. There will be no further

extensions of this motion.

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 49 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. # 48) is GRANTED, and the Clerk is instructed

to re-note Defendant Gregoire’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 39) for May 23,

2006.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 49 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-12 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 4

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 63 Att. 11

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-12 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-12 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 63-12 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 4 of 4
III

Calendar No. 173

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 51

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding elections for the legislature of

the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. HELMS (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. THOMAS, Mr.

MACK, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. ROBB, Mr. FRIST, and Mr. DODD) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Foreign Relations

SEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding elections for

the legislature of the Hong Kong Special Administrative

Region.

Whereas the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on Hong

Kong guarantees Hong Kong a high degree autonomy in

all matters except defense and foreign affairs, and an

elected legislature;

Whereas the United States policy regarding Hong Kong, as

stated in the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of
2

•SCON 51 RS

1992 (Public Law 102–383), is based on the autonomy

and self-governance of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong

people;

Whereas a democratically elected legislature enabling the

Hong Kong people to elect representatives of their choice

is essential to the autonomy and self-governance of Hong

Kong;

Whereas the provisional legislature of Hong Kong was selected through an undemocratic process controlled by the

People’s Republic of China;

Whereas this provisional legislature has adopted rules for the

creation of the first legislature of the Hong Kong Special

Administrative Region which rules are designed to disadvantage and reduce the number of pro-democracy politicians in the legislature; and

Whereas the autonomy of Hong Kong cannot exist without a

legislature that is elected freely and fairly according to

rules approved by the Hong Kong people or their democratically elected representatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress urges Hong Kong Chief Exec3 utive C.H. Tung and the government of the Hong Kong

4 Special Administrative Region to schedule and conduct

5 elections for the first legislature of the Hong Kong Special

6 Administrative Region according to rules approved by the

7 Hong Kong people through an election-law convention,

8 referendum, or both.

Calendar No. 173

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 51

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding eleccial Administrative Region. tions for the legislature of the Hong Kong SpeSEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Reported without amendment
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services.
 ACTION: Notice of supplemental award.
 SUMMARY: HRSA will provide supplemental funding to the National Center for Newborn Screening Systems Excellence in fiscal year 2023.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Morrison, Public Health Analyst, Division of Services for Children with Special Health Needs, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, at 
                        *KMorrison@hrsa.gov*
                         and 301-443-6672.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  *Intended Recipient of the Award:*
                     The Association of Public Health Laboratories. *Amount of Non-Competitive Award:*
                     $425,000. Supplemental funding for similar activities may be considered in fiscal year 2024, subject to availability of funding for the activity and satisfactory performance of the recipient. *Project Period:*
                     July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2028. *CFDA Number:*
                     93.110. *Award Instrument:*
                     Supplement for Services. *Authority:*42 U.S.C. 300b-8 (Public Health Service Act section 1109, as amended). Table 1—Recipient and Award Amount
Grant No.
Award recipient name
City, state
Award amountU22MC24078
Association of Public Health Laboratories
Silver Spring, MD
$425,000
 *Justification:*
                     The National Center for Newborn Screening Systems Excellence provides national leadership, technical assistance, and quality improvement expertise to state and territory newborn screening programs. Additional funding will support emerging needs in the newborn screening community and state laboratories, specifically addressing newborn screening condition naming, counting, testing, assessing health gaps in follow-up, and assessing domains of family outcomes. Carole Johnson, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-21512 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 6

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 33 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 33-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 503 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 503

           Commending the Middle East Investment Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2007

     Mr. Baird (for himself and Mr. Shays) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Commending the Middle East Investment Initiative.

Whereas economic development enhances peace, security, and prosperity in the 
        Palestinian areas of Gaza and the West Bank and is essential to the 
        well-being of people throughout the Middle East and the prospects for 
        regional peace;
Whereas small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make up 90 percent of the 
        registered Palestinian businesses;
Whereas the MEII has instituted anti-terrorism procedures to ensure that 
        beneficiaries are not connected with terror groups or acts of terror;
Whereas studies suggest that creation of a loan guarantee facility of sufficient 
        scale could increase employment by 400 percent for small enterprises and 
        240 percent for medium enterprises;
Whereas the Middle East Investment Initiative (MEII) is a loan guarantee program 
        created to increase access to financing, technical assistance, and 
        market information for Palestinian entrepreneurs;
Whereas the MEII is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation supported by an 
        international public private partnership including Palestinian, 
        American, and European partners;
Whereas the MEII was established by the Aspen Institute's Middle East Strategy 
        Group working with the Palestinian Investment Fund and the Overseas 
        Private Investment Corporation;
Whereas the MEII is working with the West Bank and Gaza Political Risk Insurance 
        Project (a project under the Clinton Global Initiative) and the British 
        Based Portland Trust; and
Whereas the Palestinian Investment Fund has committed $50,000,000 in guarantee 
        funds while the Overseas Private Investment Corporation is providing 
        $110,000,000 in guarantee funds: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the MEII and its contributors for their vision 
        and initiative;
            (2) believes that improved economic activity can help bring 
        about regional stability and peace;
            (3) encourages the active participation and contributions 
        of individuals, public and private institutions, and foreign 
        governments in supporting the MEII; and
            (4) pledges support for the MEII and other efforts to 
        stimulate the economy of the Palestinian people.
                                 <all>
```
No. 68452.

protest 62/9734 (Philadelphia) .

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER EXCUSING PARTIES FROM

MEDIATING RELATOR’S FEE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.,

JAMES MARCHESE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0168-MJP

ORDER EXCUSING PARTIES FROM

MEDIATING RELATOR’S FEE

The parties are excused from the requirement of attempting to resolve this issue before the

undersigned. A hearing will be scheduled before Judge Pechman for a ruling on the dispute over

the relator’s fee. The undersigned remains the settlement judge for other issues in the case.

A copy of this Order shall be sent to all counsel of record and to Judge Pechman.

DATED this 1st day of August, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00168-MJP Document 63 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 1
Attachment 3—Effect of 15%Q Minimum Torque on Life

As shown in the calculations below, a REL cycle which goes from 15 to 103%Q has a vibratory amplitude which is 85% of a REL cycle which goes fr om 0 to 103%Q.

max min

max min REL Cycle: 0 to 103%Q Q 103 0 103 0 51.5 2 103 0 51.5 2 REL Cycle: 15 to 103%Q Q 103 15 103 15 59.0 2 103 15 44 2 Reduction is Vibratory Amplitude: 44 .85 51.5 steady vib

steady vib Q Q Q Q Q Q = = + = =

− = =

= = + = =

− = =

= The effect of the change in the valley for the REL cy cle is shown below for both the nonchafing and chafing SN curves. Assuming that the mean stre ss correction is negligible, the life is roughly doubled for both the chafing and non-chafi ng cases.

103%Q Max
0%Q Min

15%Q Min Vibratory Q(0%Q Min)

Vibratory Q(15%Q Min) REL Cycles for 0 to 103%Q and 15 to 103%Q
Exhibit
31.2
  Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  I, Howard
Mah, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
      May 24, 2010
                  By:

            /s/
              Howard MahName:
                  Howard
      MahTitle:
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP
No. P67/309.

#### Shopping Int’l., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 66/40959, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stone lanterns *886and similar merchandise similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc.,*and *Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALASKA BROKERAGE

INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CR06-11JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court held a status conference and heard oral argument on several pending

motions in this case (Dkt. ## 42, 43, 44, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55). The following memorializes

the court’s oral rulings for the reasons provided on the record. 

The court GRANTS the motion requesting a status conference filed by Plaintiff

United States of America (“United States”) (Dkt. # 44). The court DENIES the motion to

dismiss the indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by Defendant Alaska

Brokerage International, Inc (“ABI”) (Dkt. # 49). The court directs the parties that if they

wish to present disparate theories of the case as raised in the underlying briefing, they

may do so in the context of proposed jury instructions. The court GRANTS the United

States’ motion in limine permitting use of statements made by Defendant David Karsch

(Dkt. # 43) and DENIES ABI’s counter-motion regarding the same (Dkt. # 47). At the

Case 2:06-cr-00011-JLR Document 69 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

status conference, the United States offered to present such evidence in the format set

forth in their briefing. 

Although the court provided direction to the parties regarding their motions in

limine on various topics (Dkt. ## 42, 53), the court reserves the right to make definitive

rulings when such issues become ripe during the course of trial. The court directs the

parties to produce the Brady material at issue in ABI’s motion to compel (Dkt. # 51) for

the court’s in camera review. The court understands that the parties do not have a dispute

as to providing witness statements as raised in ABI’s motion (Dkt. # 55) and thus

STRIKES the motion. The court directs the parties to cooperate in exchanging such

statements in a timely manner with respect to one another. 

The court schedules the pre-trial conference for May 8, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Jury

selection will begin on May 18, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

Filed and entered this 19th day of April, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett By Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cr-00011-JLR Document 69 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Dr. Bergfelt:
 
I hope you will accept our comments on EPA?s ?Weight-of-Evidence Guidance Document: 
Evaluating Results of EDSP Tier 1 Screening To 
Identify Candidate Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing'' which are attached.  I had mistakenly 
believed the deadline had been extended until today, Feb 4, 2011.
 
Thank you,
 
Catherine Willett, PhD
Science Policy Advisor
Regulatory Testing Division
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animal
May 3, 1965

No. 69295.

#### Shell Oil Co. *v.*United States,

protest 195630-K.

C.D. 2509, rehearing denied Abstract 69233. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied as untimely filed.
Case 2:06-cv-00131-TSZ Document 33 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00131-TSZ Document 33 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2