alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 25, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 66 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-281, CP2023-284.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-22138 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: d_w_hepner@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:48:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Douglas Hepner

Troy, MI 48085
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip M. Lynch, Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

|                 |   | Chairman of the Board of   Directors & Chief Executive   Officer (principal executive officer) |
|-----------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                                                                               |
| Philip M. Lynch |   |                                                                                               |

Lino Lakes, MinnesotaApril 20, 2005
No. 63831.

protests 86173-K, etc. (New York).

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Slatky, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2004



/s/ John Slatky

John Slatky

Chief Executive Officer
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-060 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2010 of ZapNaps, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Peggy Irene Lalor, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date: March 31, 2010. 

 

/s/ Peggy Irene Lalor

Peggy Irene Lalor 

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, 

Principal Financial Officer and Director
Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Wholly Owned Subsidiaries:



| |  |  | China Distance Education Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Practice Enterprises Network China International Links Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Champion Distance Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Champion Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consolidated Affiliated Entity:



| |  |  | Beijing Champion Hi-Tech Co., Ltd, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Caikaowang Company Limited, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Champion Wangge Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Zhengbao Yucai Education Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Haidian District Champion Training School, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Zhejiang Champion Xinlixiang Education Management Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

166) M-K-(C)-2 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54 AM Sheet 166 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-(C)-2 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE INDUSTRIAL FUEL CHOICE ANALYSIS 

MODEL (IFCAM) DEVELOPED BY EEA. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to W. Marx, Council of 

Industrial Boiler Owners. 

October 26, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(C)-2
July 21, 1954

No. 58289.

protests 218339-K and 218350-K.

#### Louis Goldey and David L. Moss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Protests abandoned June 14, 1954. (Not published.) (Initial No. 164462-K.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Jan-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                         Feb-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Jul-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   3,157,040
<SECURITIES>                                               872,781
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,009,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                              1,671,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           208,057
<PP&E>                                                   4,215,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,374,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          10,662,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     4,891
<OTHER-SE>                                              11,582,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            10,662,755
<SALES>                                                  3,503,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,503,394
<CGS>                                                    1,243,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1,243,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           776,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           2,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             24,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 2,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         21,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.01


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avago Technologies Limited (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
November 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 15, 2009 |  | /s/    HOCK E.
TAN     
|                        |  | Hock E. Tan            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
From: kennan123@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:16:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Williams

Saint Clairsville, OH 43950
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of GMS Capital Corp., (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to
the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








GMS
CAPITAL CORP.


By:
      /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
      MetrakosChief
      Executive OfficerMarch 15, 2010
- Complete file          PDF (560 KB)     Summary statistics and table of contents 
       
   PDF (135 KB)
   | 
  CSV (11 KB)     Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables 
       
  PDF (13 KB)
   | 
  CSV (7 KB)    Flows tables 
       
  PDF (210 KB)
   | 
  CSV (134 KB)    Level tables 
       
  PDF (162 KB)
   | 
  CSV (115 KB)    Balance sheet tables 
       
  PDF(25 KB)
   | 
  CSV (14 KB)    Supplementary tables 
       
  PDF (37 KB)
   | 
  CSV (24 KB)    These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.
No. 63383.

protest 58/24232 (New York).

#### D. Aboudi *&*Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C.D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.