alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 147 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 801 

[Report No. 110–432] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) to implement the United 

States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2007 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) to implement the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3688) to implement the United States-Peru Trade Pro4 motion Agreement. All points of order against consider5 ation of the bill are waived except those arising under 

6 clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered 

7 as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 801 RH 

1 are waived. The bill shall be debatable for three hours, 

2 with 45 minutes in favor of the bill controlled by Rep3 resentative Rangel of New York or his designee, 45 min4 utes in favor of the bill controlled by Representative 

5 McCrery of Louisiana or his designee, 45 minutes in oppo6 sition to the bill controlled by Representative Michaud of 

7 Maine or his designee, and 45 minutes in opposition to 

8 the bill controlled by the Minority Leader or his designee. 

9 Pursuant to section 151(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, 

10 the previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

11 the bill to final passage without intervening motion. 

12 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3688 pursuant 

13 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

14 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid15 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

16 the Speaker. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 147 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 801 

[Report No. 110

–432] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3688) 

motion Agreement. to implement the United States-Peru Trade ProNOVEMBER 6, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Global Ship
Lease, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I Ian J. Webber, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 9, 2009



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ian J. Webber            
|    |  | Ian J. Webber                
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
From: 63singer@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:30:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lori Singer

Harrisburg, SD 57032
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6070
LONNIE K. MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJOE RACKLEY; L. M. PERTELLI; L. EDWARDS, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-678-R) Submitted: June 16, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lonnie Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lonnie K. Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Rackley , No. CA-97-678-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: buddydeen@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:27:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Deen

Dry Prong, LA 71423
---

|EXHIBIT 11



MEDIWARE INFORMATION
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESComputation of Net Earnings Per Share
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                           | Three monthsEndedSeptember 30,2000 | Three monthsEndedSeptember 30,1999
|-------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|
|Basic Earnings Per Share   |                                    |                                   
|Net earnings (loss)        |                                    | $  (310,000                       
|Weighted-average shares:   |                                   
|Outstanding                |                                    | 7,109,000                         
|                          
|Basic Earnings Per Share   |                                    | $       (0.04                     
|                          
|Diluted Earnings Per Share |                                   
|Net earnings (loss)        |                                    | $  (310,000                       
|Weighted-average shares:   |                                   
|Outstanding                |                                    | 7,109,000                         
|Options and Warrants       |                                    |                                  
|                          
|                           |                                    | 7,109,000                         
|                          
|Diluted Earnings Per Share |                                    | $       (0.04                     
|
EXHIBIT L 

MSN website offering internet access 

service 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 102-13 Filed 01/23/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 102 Att. 12

Dockets.Justia.com
MSN - Set Location https://broadband.msn.com/

1 of 1 1/21/2007 9:13 AM

Great local deals

on high-speed access!

Plans as low as $14.95* per month!

Most plans don't require a contract.

Find great deals on high-speed Internet access from

providers in your area. Search now!

Street Address 

 (Ex: 123 Main St)

Apt # 

Zip Code 

Phone Number 

This information is required to check for availability. If you don't order 

service, it is not saved and you will not be contacted.

See our Privacy policy.

How to shop on this site

What's the difference between Cable, DSL, and Broadband?

What are system requirements for high-speed access?

Learn more

*Prices may vary by service area.

Discover the power of broadband!

 © 1999-2007 GetConnected, Inc.TM All rights reserved. Terms of Use

 Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!

 MSN Home | My MSN

 © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use Advertise TRUSTe Approved Privacy Statement GetNetWise

 MSN Home | My MSN

High-Speed Marketplace FAQ | Check Order Status | Rebate Center 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 102-13 Filed 01/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Gerald Moise, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 486]

—Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), all rendered February 10, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts; one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
ex-10.1

 

 BRIDGE NOTE AGREEMENT
 

 	 	
	 $55,000
	 March 15, 2018


 

 For value received, SPINDLE, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), promises to pay to LegendCap Opportunity Fund (the “Purchaser”), the sum of Fifty Five Thousand Dollars ($55,000.00) (the “Bridge Note” or the “Note”). This Note is subject to the following terms and conditions.
 

 1.
 The Bridge Note will be secured by a copy the Company’s Payment Service Provider (“PSP”) software code and the Note is to be repaid by the Company out of the proceeds of Equity Financing or from cash otherwise available to the Company and in no event later than September 15, 2018.
 

 2.
 The Bridge Note can be converted to restricted stock at $0.080 per share at any time prior to September 15, 2018 in satisfaction of provision 1 above.
 

 3.
 This Note shall be considered subordinate to the Amended and Restated convertible promissory note (as amended for up to $359,000) with an issuance date of October 17, 2017 and held by Michael Kelly.
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Bridge Note Agreement as of the date first set forth above. 
 

 	 	 	
	 Agreed and Accepted: 
	  
	 THE COMPANY

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 LegendCap Opportunity Fund
	  
	 SPINDLE, INC.

	  
	  
	 a corporation organized under

	  
	  
	 the laws of Nevada

	  
	  
	  

	 By: /s/ Evan Greenberg
	  
	 By: /s/ Dr. Jack A. Scott

	 Name: Evan Greenberg
	  
	 Name: Dr. Jack A. Scott

	  
	  
	  

	 Address:  565 Plandome Road #270
	  
	 Address: 1201 S. Alma School Road,

	 Manhasset, NY 11050
	  
	 Suite #12500, Mesa, AZ 85210
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHARLES P. FRICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAREN SWENSON,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0104-JLR

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United

States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s § 2254 petition (Doc. #4) is DISMISSED as untimely. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d);

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 5th day of June, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00104-JLR Document 13 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheSan Francisco earthquake and fire of April 18, 1906: and their effects onstructures and structural materials**
 
Report | Plates: 5657
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:324
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957803
 
July 26, 2018
No. 67135.

protests 140631-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gunn & Latchford, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*265Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64266, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57450.

#### Hudson Shipping Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 201919-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 61548.

#### D. Hauser, Inc., and Everbest Jewelry Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 306967-K and 308070-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT F

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 18

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 73 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 73-7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 18 of 18
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE

U.S. v. Friend/CR06-5061FDB - 1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

(253) 428-3800

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-5061FDB 

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER 

v. ) GRANTING UNOPPOSED

) MOTION TO CONTINUE

MITCHELL A. FRIEND, ) TRIAL DATE AND

) PRETRIAL MOTIONS DATE

Defendant. ) )

Upon the unopposed motion of Defendant to continue the trial and pretrial motions

due date in the above-captioned case, and based upon the facts set forth in Defendant’s

motion, which are hereby incorporated by reference, the Court finds that a failure to grant

the continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A); therefore,

//

//

Case 3:06-cr-05061-BHS Document 17 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE

U.S. v. Friend/CR06-5061FDB - 2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

(253) 428-3800

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued to September 5, 2006 

The period of delay resulting from this continuance from April 17, 2006, up to and

including the new trial date of September 5, 2006 , is hereby excluded for speedy trial

purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B) for the purpose of computing the time

limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial motions due date be extended to July

17, 2006. 

DATED this 6th day of April, 2006. 

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ James N. Turner (telephonic approval)

JAMES N. TURNER

Attorney for Defendant Mitchell Friend

s/ Michael Dion 

MICHAEL DION

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-05061-BHS Document 17 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 62264.

#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 318561-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 686 

Condemning personal attacks on the honor, integrity and patriotism of those 

with distinguished military service to our Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning personal attacks on the honor, integrity and 

patriotism of those with distinguished military service 

to our Nation. 

Whereas the men and women of the United States Armed 

Forces and our veterans deserve to be honored for their 

service, supported in their duties, and defended when 

their patriotism is attacked; 

Whereas in 2002, a Senator from Georgia who is a Vietnam 

veteran and the recipient of a Silver Star and Bronze 

Star, and a triple amputee had his courage and patriotism attacked in an advertisement in which he was visually linked to Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein; 

Whereas in 2004, a Senator from Massachusetts who is a 

Vietnam veteran and the recipient of a Silver Star, 

Bronze Star with Combat V, and three Purple Hearts, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 686 IH 

was personally attacked and accused of dishonoring his 

country; and 

Whereas in 2007, a Senator from Nebraska who is a Vietnam 

veteran and the recipient of two Purple Hearts and many 

other military decorations and honors, was personally attacked and had his patriotism called into question: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms its strong support for all of the 

3 men and women of the United States Armed Forces; 

4 (2) strongly condemns all such personal attacks 

5 on the honor, integrity and patriotism of those with 

6 distinguished military service to our Nation; and 

7 (3) encourages all individuals and organizations 

8 to refrain from such personal attacks and to conduct 

9 the public discourse with civility and with the high10 est respect for those who have served our country 

11 honorably. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
No. 62828.

#### Vandergrift Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6944 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after' liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.