alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the
annual report of WindStream Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December
31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Bates,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Daniel Bates             
| | -----------------------------
| | Daniel Bates                 
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: July 25, 2014



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to WindStream Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by WindStream Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**HYDRODYNEX, INC.**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with the periodic Report of HYDRODYNEX, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerod Edington, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: September 15, 2014

 

/s/ Jerod Edington

Jerod Edington

President and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operation Officer,

VP, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DARYL KEITH SILLS, a/k/a D, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-JEB-3) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Daryl Keith Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Daryl Keith Sills appeals the district court’s orders 

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Sills, No. 2:03-cr00148-JBF (E.D. Va. filed June 10, 2008; entered June 13, 2008; 

filed July 11, 2008; entered July 17, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
From: jeannepopke@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:06:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Popke

Oshkosh, WI 54904
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER STRIKING POST-JUDGMENT FILINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

JERRY BRENDEN, )

) Case No. C05-1681L

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER STRIKING POSTSELLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ) JUDGMENT FILINGS

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

On July 31, 2006, judgment was entered in the above-captioned matter in favor of

defendant and against plaintiff. Despite the fact that the case has been closed for a year and a

half, plaintiff recently started filing “notices” in this case. The “notices” are addressed to

various entities and cover a broad range of topics, none of which are properly before the Court. 

Some of the documents filed by plaintiff purport to be subpoenas issued to third-parties. 

Discovery as contemplated under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is no longer available in

the district court, however, and plaintiff is hereby precluded from the serving any additional

discovery on defendant or third-parties under Cause No. C05-1681RSL. Docket numbers # 67-

72 are hereby stricken and will not be considered further. 

Dated this 29th day of February, 2008.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01681-RSL Document 73 Filed 02/29/08 Page 1 of 1
No. P66/65.

protests 62/12447,etc. (New York).

No. P66/66.

protests 64/19677, etc. (New York).

No. P66/67.

protests 65/1442, etc. (New York).

#### Ashear Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, Ashear Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, Mann and Bros., Inc. *v.*United States, *908Dumont Handkerchiefs, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

No. P66/68.

protests 65/4047, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of handkerchiefs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ashear*Bros., *Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Annual Report of TouchIT Technologies, Inc f.k.aHotel Management Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,  Andrew Brabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.








By:
/s/Andrew BrabinName:
Andrew BrabinTitle:
Chief Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
August 13, 2010





This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TouchIT Technologies, Inc, f.k.a. Hotel Management Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Hotel Management Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. R69/18.

reappraisements R61/2411 and R61/4899 (Baltimore).

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Com*
      *1118
      *pany, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f .o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 1 

S:\Robart\ORDERS\CRIMINAL\CR05-0378- ord.doc

Gilbert H. Levy 

Attorney at Law 

200 Market Place Two 

2001 Western Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98121 

(206) 443-0670 Fax: (206) 448-2252

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

HONORABLE JAMES ROBART 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AARON SLOAN, 

 Defendant. 

Cause No. CR05-378JLR 

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 

 This matter having come before the Court on motion of the Defendant Aaron Sloan for a 

continuance of the trial based upon the Defendant’s need for additional time to prepare for trial, the 

Court hereby finds as follows: 

 1. The ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance, as the continuance is 

necessary to effective trial preparation. 

 2. Such ends supercede and outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant 

in a speedy trial. 

 3. The period from October 11, 2006 to the new trial date of December 12, 2006, shall 

be deemed to be excludable time under Title 18 USC § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

Case 2:05-cr-00378-MJP Document 59 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL - 2 

S:\Robart\ORDERS\CRIMINAL\CR05-0378- ord.doc

Gilbert H. Levy 

Attorney at Law 

200 Market Place Two 

2001 Western Avenue 

Seattle, Washington 98121 

(206) 443-0670 Fax: (206) 448-2252

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

 NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the trial is continued to December 12, 2006. 

Defendant shall have until the close of business on October 23, 2006, to file pre-trial motions. 

 Dated this 12th day of October 2006. 

 

 /s/ James L. Robart_____________ 

 JUDGE 

Presented by: 

/s/ Gilbert H. Levy 

Gilbert H. Levy, WSBA 4805 

Attorney for Defendant Aaron Sloan 

Case 2:05-cr-00378-MJP Document 59 Filed 10/12/06 Page 2 of 2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 555 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Minority Donor Awareness Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2007 

Mr. CLAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Minority Donor 

Awareness Day. 

Whereas more than 96,000 individuals in the United States 

are on the national waiting list for organ transplants; 

Whereas in 2006, 50 percent of individuals on the national 

waiting list for organ transplants were racial or ethnic 

minorities, including more than 27,000 African Americans, nearly 16,000 Hispanics and Latinos, more than 

6,000 Asians and Pacific Islanders, and nearly 900 

American Indians and Alaska Natives; 

Whereas individuals on the national waiting list for organ 

transplants are most likely to find well-matched organs 

within their own racial or ethnic group, but minority 

organ donors account for only about 30 percent of the 

available donor pool; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 555 IH 

Whereas 20 million individuals in the United States suffer 

from chronic kidney disease; 

Whereas more than 80,000 individuals in the United States 

die each year from chronic kidney disease; 

Whereas African Americans represented less than 13 percent 

of the population in the United States in 2005, but represented nearly 35 percent of individuals in the United 

States requiring a kidney transplant on the national waiting list for organ transplants; 

Whereas 17 individuals die each day waiting for organ transplants due to a shortage of donated organs; and 

Whereas the Minority Organ and Tissue Transplant Education Program, established by the National Institute of 

Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 

observes National Minority Donor Awareness Day on August 1 to increase awareness of organ donation among 

African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, and Native American populations 

and to recognize minority donors and their families: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Minority Donor Awareness Day; 

4 (2) recognizes the strength, resilience, struggle, 

5 and courage of all individuals in the United States 

6 suffering from chronic kidney disease; and 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 555 IH 

1 (3) salutes health care professionals and volun2 teers, families of organ donors, and all organ donors. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 15


To the Directors and Shareholders of
Mediware Information Systems, Inc.


We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim condensed
consolidated  financial  information of Mediware Information  Systems,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of March 31, 2000 and for the three and nine month periods then
ended, as indicated in our report dated May 9, 2000;  because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, is  incorporated  by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-07591).

We are also aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
May 12, 2000
No. 68947.

#### S. F. Pellas Co. and P. W. Bellingall, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/14510, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of soluble or instant coffee (containing no admixture of sugar, cereal, or other additive), a product of Nicaragua, entered or withdrawn from warehouse prior to August 31, 1963, the effective date of the Tariff Schedules of the United States; -that the protests were pending for decision by this court on June 30, 1964, the date of enactment of Public Law 88-337; and that within 120 days after the date of enactment a request was filed with the collector of customs for reliquidation and classification of the merchandise free of duty under said Public Law, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: pchance98@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:13:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

michael chance

Bernie, MO 63822
Box Energy Corporation
                          Computation of Earnings per Share
                                    Exhibit 11.1
                       (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                September 30,           September 30,
                                               1997        1996        1997        1996
                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income for primary income per share     $  (7,581)  $  (3,138)  $  (6,236)  $ (4,194)
Interest expense on 8 1/4 % convertible
 subordinated notes                             1,145       1,145       3,399      3,411
Income tax effect (assumed to be 35%)            (401)       (401)     (1,189)    (1,194)
                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------
Net income for fully-diluted income per
 share                                      $  (6,836)  $  (2,394)  $  (4,027)  $ (1,977)
                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  =========

Primary income per share                    $   (0.37)  $   (0.15)  $   (0.30)  $  (0.20)
                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  =========

Fully-diluted income per share              $   (0.27)  $   (0.09)  $   (0.16)  $  (0.08)
                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  =========

Calculation of weighted average shares
Class A (Voting) common stock                   3,219       3,250       3,238      3,250
Class B (Non-Voting) common stock              17,088      17,553      17,341     17,553
Stock options considered common stock
 equivalents                                       -           -           -           4
                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------
Total shares used for primary income per
 share                                         20,307      20,803      20,579     20,807
                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------

Contingent shares from remaining stock
 options granted                                  217         331         217        313
Contingent shares from 8 1/4% convertible
 subordinated notes                             5,007       5,007       5,007      5,007
                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------
Total shares used for fully-diluted
 income per share                              25,531      26,141      25,803     26,127
                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  =========
</TABLE>
From: vgfour@alaska.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:20:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shannon Guerra

Wasilla, AK 99654