alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

          - [Docket Number USTR-2023-0008]

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) sought public comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on China's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). USTR is canceling the public hearing that was scheduled to take place on October 4, 2023.

# DATES:

The public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2023 is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China Affairs at                         *Thomas.A.Martin@ustr.eop.gov*                         or (202) 395-9625.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 17, 2023, the TPSC sought public comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on China's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the WTO.                     *See*88 FR 56117 (Aug 17, 2023). The notice included a September 20, 2023 deadline for the submission of written comments and requests to testify at a public hearing that was scheduled to take place on October 4, 2023. In response to the request for comments, USTR received 22 submissions. USTR also received three requests to participate in the public hearing, which subsequently were withdrawn. Therefore, USTR is canceling the October 4, 2023 public hearing.                

Laura Buffo,

Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2023-21841 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3390-F3-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40266

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS NARVAEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-371-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 26, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Iturbe Narvaez appeals his conviction of possession

with the intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). He asserts that the

district court erred in denying his motion to suppress all

evidence obtained through a search of his residence. Narvaez

contends that the affidavit offered in support of the warrant to

search his home lacked sufficient indicia of probable cause that
No. 98-40266 

-2-

evidence of drug-trafficking activities would be found there. He

further asserts that the affidavit was so conspicuously lacking

in probable cause that the good-faith exception does not apply. 

He also urges that the district court’s factual findings were

clearly erroneous in light of the fact that the bulk of the

affidavit refers not to his actions, but rather to those of some

individual named “Nerves.”

The district court’s factual findings were not clearly

erroneous. The district court found, albeit implicitly, that all

references in the affidavit to “Nerves” were, in fact, references

to the appellant. This finding is supported by the record. See

United States v. Rivas, 157 F.3d 364, 367 (5th Cir. 1998).

Narvaez’s assertion that the good-faith exception is inapplicable

is also unavailing. The affidavit was not so facially deficient

that the executing officers could not reasonably have presumed it

to be valid. See United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 923

(1984). Because the good-faith exception is applicable and no

novel question of law is presented, this court need not address

whether the affidavit contained sufficient indicia of probable

cause. See United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th

Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Narvaez’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 05-563M

)

v. )

)

JUAN GUEVARA-VIELMA ) DETENTION ORDER 

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation, in violation of Title 8, U.S.C., Section 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: November 23, 2005

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by

Done Reno.

The defendant was represented by Tim Lohraff.

//

Case 2:05-cr-00419-RSL Document 8 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -2-

//

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

He is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported

and has several illegal reentry convictions; he has no ties to this district;

his ties to the Western District of Washington are unknown/unverified;

and BICE has filed a detainer.

(2) The defendant represents a risk of danger to the community due to his

extensive criminal history to include burglary, criminal trespass and

assault.

(3) The defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and

//

//

Case 2:05-cr-00419-RSL Document 8 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER

PAGE -3-

//

4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 6th day of December, 2005.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00419-RSL Document 8 Filed 11/23/05 Page 3 of 3
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geologyand lignite resources of the Marmarth field, southwestern North Dakota**
 
Report | Plates: 08091011121314
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:775
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959864
 
August 6, 2018
No. 66514.

#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/29256 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of manryo fishing nets similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 63947, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68905-68906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is updating the identifying information on its Specially 
Designated Nationals and Blocked

[[Page 68906]]

Persons List (SDN List) for one entity whose property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked pursuant to Executive 
Order 13224, as amended.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley Smith, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Enforcement, Compliance & Analysis, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (ofac.treasury.gov).

Notice of OFAC Action

    On September 27, 2023, OFAC published the following revised 
information for the entry on the SDN List for the following entity 
whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to 
Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, ``Blocking Property and 
Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, 
or Support Terrorism,'' as amended by Executive Order 13886 of 
September 9, 2019, ``Modernizing Sanctions to Combat Terrorism.''

Entity

    1. K2016212771 SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD (f.k.a. ``INEOS TRADING PTY 
LTD''), 118 Mallinson Rd, Asherville, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal 4001, South 
Africa; Secondary sanctions risk: section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as amended by Executive Order 13886; Organization Established 
Date 20 Jun 2016; Tax ID No. 9954121167 (South Africa); Trade License 
No. 2016/212771/07 (South Africa); Enterprise Number K2016212771 (South 
Africa) [SDGT] (Linked To: HOOMER, Farhad).

    Dated: September 27, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-21965 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KAMKAIDO CRAB, 

Plaintiff,

v.

NEREIDA INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0166RSL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Leave to

Take Discovery on January 31, 2006 seeking an order allowing it to obtain discovery from

entities in this judicial district to aid in a proceeding in Russia. The Court granted plaintiff’s

subsequent motion to take discovery in April 2006. Since then, plaintiff has not filed any

documents in this case. 

Because the only relief requested in this action was an order permitting discovery and the

Court has granted that motion, plaintiff must show cause within ten days of the date of this order

why this case should not be closed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this order to 

Case 2:06-cv-00166-RSL Document 14 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

show cause on the Court’s calendar for consideration on October 20, 2006.

DATED this 4th day of October, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00166-RSL Document 14 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

# Certification Pursuant
to
18 U.S.C. §1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Robert Patterson,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ J. Robert Patterson                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Director

| | Date:   February 10, 2005
| | -------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KRYPTIC ENTERTAINMENT INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shan
Qiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Shan Qiang
                                    --------------------------------------------
Date: October 2, 2009               Shan Qiang
                                    Secretary Treasurer and Director
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,010,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,967,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                    900,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,175,849
<PP&E>                                       1,923,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                 954,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,742,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,279,530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,906
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,262,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,742,543
<SALES>                                      2,682,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,682,741
<CGS>                                        1,387,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,387,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                814,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                   250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            564,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   564,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        


</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CELERINO CARRASCO,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, and

CORRECTIONAL SERVICE

CORPORATION,

Respondents.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0074-RSM

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, all papers and exhibits

in support and in opposition to that petition, the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the

Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s Emergency Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #24) is DENIED. Although

entitled as a Motion to Dismiss, this motion actually appears to raise the same

Case 2:06-cv-00074-RSM Document 25 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PAGE -2

issues previously raised in petitioner’s habeas petition. Accordingly, the motion

is denied for the same reasons set forth in the R&R;

(3) Petitioner’s § 2241 petition is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with

prejudice; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

Theiler.

DATED this 19th day of May, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00074-RSM Document 25 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4967

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY KINLAW LOCKLEAR, JR., a/k/a Bully,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (7:12-cr-00062-F-1)

Submitted: August 4, 2014 Decided: August 7, 2014

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip C. Zane, GEYERGOREY LLP, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer 

P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant United 

States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Kinlaw Locklear, Jr. appeals the district 

court’s judgment after pleading guilty to possessing firearms 

subsequent to a felony conviction. On appeal, he contends the 

district court erred in denying his request for a hearing under 

Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), which he made in his 

pre-plea motion to suppress evidence. We dismiss the appeal.

“This court has recognized that, pursuant to Rule 

11(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the direct 

review of an adverse ruling on a pretrial motion is available 

only if the defendant expressly preserves that right by entering 

a conditional guilty plea.” United States v. Abramski, 706 F.3d 

307, 314 (4th Cir.), cert. granted, 134 S. Ct. 421 (2013), and 

aff’d, 134 S. Ct. 2259 (2014) (citations and internal quotations 

omitted). Absent a valid conditional guilty plea, we “will 

dismiss a defendant’s appeal from an adverse pretrial ruling on 

a non-jurisdictional issue.” Id. (citation and internal 

quotations omitted); see also Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 

258, 267 (1973); Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306, 321 (1983). 

Because Locklear did not enter a conditional guilty plea, we may 

not review the district court’s adverse pretrial ruling.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED