alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ignatzmouse42@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:20:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Erin McClain

Federal Way, WA 98023
Exhibit








	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Exhibit 10.11

	***** Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [*****]. A complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SHOP YOUR WAY RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("First Amendment") is effective as of  October  31, 2014 (the "Amendment Effective Date"), and modifies and amends that certain Shop Your Way Retail Establishment Agreement dated as of April 4, 2014 (the "Agreement") by and between Sears Holdings Management Corporation ("SHMC") and Lands' End, Inc. ("LE").


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, SHMC and LE (individually or collectively referred to as
		
	•
	the "Party" or "Parties") agree as follows: 




		
	1.
	Surprise Points Fees. The Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement by substituting


the following for Section B of Exhibit  2:


"B. Surprise Points Fee. The Surprise Points Fee will be [*****] for every thousand (1,000) Surprise Points redeemed in LE Formats; provided that, from November 2, 2014 until May 2, 2015, the Surprise Points Fee shall be [*****] for every thousand (1,000) Surprised Points redeemed in LE Formats. SHMC, in its sole discretion, shall thereafter have the right (but no obligation) to reduce the Surprise Points Fee during the remainder of the term."


2.  Effective Date of Fees.  Notwithstanding the Effective Date of the Agreement, the Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the Points Issuance and Redemption Fees described
in Exhibit 2 of the Agreement went into effect as of February 1, 2014.


3.Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.    


		
	4.
	Interpretation. Except as expressly amended herein; the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, in accordance with its terms, without any waiver, amendment or other modification of any provision thereof. In the event of a conflict between any term or condition of the Agreement and this First Amendment, this First Amendment shall govern.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the Effective Date.
	
						
	SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT
	 
	LANDS' END, INC.
	 

	CORPORATION:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Michael Anderson
	 
	By:
	/s/ Michael A. Holahan
	 

	Name:
	Michael Anderson
	 
	Name:
	Michael A. Holahan
	 

	Title:
	VP, SYW
	 
	Title:
	Vice President Marketing
	 



    






[*****] Confidential Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to this omitted information.


1
# Fo urth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00372

- CR

Andres Ramon JUAREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0936B

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

It is so ORDERED o n October 27, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO : _

__________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING 

DESIGNATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. CR06-0041RSL

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

) MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING

v. ) DESIGNATION

)

PAUL FOSTER, )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Paul Foster’s Motion for Release

Pending Designation” (Dkt. #958). The Court, having considered the motion, the government’s

opposition (Dkt. #959), and the records and files herein, hereby DENIES defendant’s motion.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2008.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 960 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ALEJANDRO MENCHU,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

AMERICAN DYNASTY, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NO. C06-154P 

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

The Court has received and reviewed the Status Report filed in this matter on August 3, 2006

(Dkt. No. 11). The deadline for the Joint Status Report will be extended to September 15, 2006 to

permit Defendants to enter a notice of appearance and consult with Plaintiff’s counsel. 

The FRCP 26(f) Conference deadline is extended until September 8, 2006; the Initial

Disclosure deadline will be continued to September 8, 2006.

Filed this 4th day of August, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00154-MJP Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

March 21, 1957

No. 60570.

#### Sintered Carbide Corp. and Airport Clearance Service *v.*United States,

protests 243085-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bars containing more than 50 percent of tungsten carbide the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 58268, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 745 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 745

 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2007

Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. McDermott) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian Americans and the 
        people of India, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and 
        Jains throughout the United States and the world;
Whereas there are more than 2,000,000 Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains in the 
        United States;
Whereas the word ``Diwali'' is a shortened version of the Sanskrit term 
        ``Deepavali'', which means ``a row of lamps'';
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants light small oil 
        lamps, place them around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, and 
        peace;
Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps symbolize the light 
        within the individual that rids the soul of the darkness of ignorance;
Whereas Diwali, falling on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar, 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving and the beginning of the new year 
        for many Hindus;
Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the victory of good over evil;
Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day that the sixth founding Sikh Guru, 
        or revered teacher, Guru Hargobind ji, was released from captivity from 
        the ruling Mughal Emperor; and
Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha or 
        liberation by Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras, who were the great 
        teachers of Jain dharma, at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 
international religious and historical significance of the festival of 
Diwali.
                                 <all>
```
No. 68150.

#### Coles Cranes, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/9912 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mobile cranes or parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67483, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Cornelio A. PAZ, III, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 00-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 17, 2001.

Before WILLIAMS, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court *3for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 24, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Before the First Division,

April 22, 1969

No. P69/111.

protests 67/60486-5044, etc. (Chicago).

#### Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, *J.*

In accordance with submission on agreed statement of facts that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made therefrom, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of *Armbee Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and *Zunold Trading Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 778 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 30, 2007. 

Whereas beginning on October 21, 2007, Southern California 

experienced a number of devastating wildfires destroying 

over five-hundred-thousand acres—the largest in the history of California—and over fourteen-hundred homes and 

countless other properties; 

Whereas high temperatures and erratic winds caused the 

multiple fires to rapidly progress in the counties of Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, Santa Barbara, 

San Bernardino, and San Diego; 

Whereas loss of life and serious injuries have resulted from 

the fires; 

Whereas approximately one million residents of Southern 

California have been forced to evacuate their homes and 

businesses due to the fires; 

Whereas the effect of the wildfires on Southern California 

families and businesses is still being felt; 

Whereas thousands of firefighters from California and neighboring States and countries continue to respond to the 

fires, risking health and safety and exhibiting resilience 

and courage to rescue residents and fight the blazes; 
2 

•HRES 778 EH 

Whereas over 2,500 National Guardsmen and other active 

duty military personnel are actively engaged in supporting firefighters and relief operations; 

Whereas additional emergency personnel, such as law enforcement and medical personnel, have coordinated with local 

authorities and firefighters and have performed beyond 

the call of duty in the preservation and protection of 

human lives; 

Whereas hundreds of volunteers took time from their daily 

lives to help ensure that evacuated families are sheltered, 

clothed, fed, and emotionally comforted through this 

traumatic event; 

Whereas it is clear that the continued commitment and heroism exhibited by firefighters have saved countless lives, 

homes, and businesses; 

Whereas the people of California and the nation recognize 

that the dedication of firefighters will remain steadfast 

throughout the ongoing efforts; and 

Whereas a major Federal disaster declaration was issued on 

October 24, 2007: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and honors the heroic service, actions, and sacrifices of first responders, National 

Guardsmen, and law enforcement personnel, State and 

local officials, volunteers, and others who participated in 

responding to the October 21, 2007, outbreak of 

wildfires in Southern California; 
3 

•HRES 778 EH 

(2) expresses its commitment to the residents of 

Southern California as they begin to rebuild their community and their lives; and 

(3) vows its full support to and solidarity with the 

State of California. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PARAMJIT SINGH DHALIWAL,

Petitioner,

v.

KEN QUINN,

Respondent(s).

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-211-RSL-JPD

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

(1) Respondent’s motion for extension of time to respond to petitioner’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition is RE-NOTED for Friday, April 14, 2006. Petitioner is directed to file any

opposition to the motion no later than Wednesday, April 12, 2006. Respondent may file any

reply no later than the noting date. See Local Rule 7(d).

DATED this __10th_ day of April, 2006.

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of the Court

/s/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00211-RSL-JPD Document 8 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1
From: czeiser@sctray.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:14:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Zeiser

Signal Mountain, TN 37377
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MEGAN M. HOWARD and CHRISTOPHER

S. HOWARD, individually and on behalf of

their marital community,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5768 RJB

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE

SURREPLY BRIEF

This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion to File Surreply Brief (Dkt.

51). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of the motion and the file herein. The

motion fails to comply with Local Rule CR 7(g), which sets forth the procedure for filing a surreply

requesting to strike material contained in or attached to a reply brief, and should be denied on that

basis. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States’ Motion to File Surreply Brief (Dkt. 51) is DENIED.

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of

record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.

DATED this 11th day of October, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05768-RJB Document 53 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 1
From: tomaxg@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:12:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

This goes against our "we the people" Freedom of Religion. We will fight this on every level, and we will

win... count on it! The majority of the people of the United States- back "Right to Life", and yet the

government keeps trying to force us to kill babies... what is wrong with you people? No matter how you

try to package abortion, we will see through it, and we won't pay for others to have abortions... it is

against our Christian Faith!

Rev. Max Guthery

Sincerely,

Max Guthery

Hollywood, FL 33024
No. P66/191.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., and Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/20788 and 64/3933 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ace Importing Co., Inc. v. United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 468, Abstract 64185), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DAVID RICHARD ISRAEL,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C05-1714-TSZ

ORDER DISMISSING

§ 2254 PETITION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, all briefing

submitted by the parties, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler,

United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is

DISMISSED with prejudice; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to

Judge Theiler.

DATED this 27th day of December, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01714-TSZ Document 32 Filed 12/27/06 Page 1 of 1