alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report On Form 10-K
of Resource Group Inc. for the Year Ended February 28, 2009, I, Ken Greenlaw,
Chief Financial Officer of Resource Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended
      February 28, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the Year Ended February 28, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Resource Group, Inc.



|By:    | /s/ Ken
      Greenlaw 
|------ | -----------------------
|       | Ken Greenlaw           
|       | Chief Financial Officer
|       |                        
|       |                        
|Dated: | May 28, 2008           

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Research Resource for Systematic Reviews of Complementary and Integrative Health (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shiyong Huang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20817                         *shiyong.huang@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21615 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Before the Third Division,

April 23, 1969

No. P69/120.

protests 60/15310 and 60/15312 (New York).

#### Parksmith Corp. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and sau*1085cers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Com*pany, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Felicia.Jackson@prodigy.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:26:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Felicia Jackson

Fishers, IN 46038
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theoccurrence and uses of peat in the United States**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:728
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000958351
 
July 30, 2018
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.11.2


SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AGREEMENT




THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is made as of February 23, 2012 by and between DSW Leased Business Division LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“DSW Leased”), successor by assignment of DSW Inc., an Ohio corporation (“DSW”), each having a business address of 810 DSW Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43219, and Stein Mart, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Stein Mart”) with a business address of 1200 Riverplace Boulevard, Jacksonville, Florida 32207. 


Background


A.    DSW and Stein Mart entered into an Amended and Restated Supply Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2006 (the “Agreement”), whereby Supplier agreed to supply Merchandise to Stein Mart.  


B.    DSW and Stein Mart entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement, dated August 26, 2008, whereby the parties agreed to extend the term of the Agreement.




C.    DSW assigned to DSW Leased, its wholly-owned subsidiary, all of its right title and interest under the Agreement, effective as of January 27, 2012.


D.    The parties desire to further amend the Agreement on the terms set forth in this Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, each intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


1.     Definitions.  Defined terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


2.    Term.  Section 7.1 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following in lieu thereof:


7.1  Basic Term and Renewals.      The term of this Agreement shall commence on May 30, 2006 and shall continue until December 31, 2014 (the “Initial Term”). Upon the expiration of the Initial Term, this Agreement shall automatically be extended for additional periods of one (1) year each (each such period shall be referred to as a “Renewal Period”) unless either party gives the other written notice of its intent not to renew the Agreement at least two hundred and seventy (270) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or applicable Renewal Period. 


3.    Agreement in Effect.  Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


4.    Controlling Law.  This Amendment and all questions relating to its validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement (including, without limitation, provisions concerning limitations of actions), shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.
            
DSW LEASED BUSINESS DIVISION LLC


By:____________________
Title:__________________


STEIN MART, INC.


By:_____________________
Title:_____________________
From: wah39@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:13:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wayne Holley

Lakeland, FL 33801
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   |
| G.   Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal   executive officer)         |   |
|                                    |   |
|                                    |   |
| Circle Pines, Minnesota                 |   |
| April   11, 2007                        |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    36370
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1584
<INVENTORY>                                       2261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49973
<PP&E>                                          203573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   26805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  240424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         51486
<OTHER-SE>                                       31764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    240424
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 52012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    46931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2394
<INCOME-TAX>                                       946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: PROMULGATION OF FINANCIAL REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO 42 Pa.C.S. § 3502(a) : No. 429 : Judicial Administration Docket

**ORDER** PER CURIAM: And now, this 15 th day of October , 20 1 4 , it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10(c) of the Constitution of Pennsylvania and Section 3502(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 3502(a), that the Court Administrator of Pennsylvania is authorized to promulgate the attached Financial Regulations. The costs outlined in the Financial Regulations are effective as of **January 1, 20**  **1 5** 

. To the extent that notice of proposed rule
- making may be required by Pa.R.J.A. No.103, the immediate promulgation of the regulations is hereby found to be in the interests of eff icient administration. This Order is to be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b) and is effective immediately.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 ***

 

In connection with the Annual Report of One XL Corp., (the “Company”),on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”) pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),C. Lynn White, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

 

 

Date: September 13, 2011	

By:*/s/ C. Lynn White	*

C. Lynn White

President (Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial Officer)

 

*	This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates,is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023

- 1006

_____________________________

C YNDY R EED S TEWART
,
Appellant,

v.

M ADISON C OUNTY S CHOOL B OARD and F LORIDA S CHOOL B OARDS I NSURANCE T RUST
,
Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Jacquelyn L. Newman , Judge

.
Date of Accident: April 18, 2019

.

February 28, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

. See Moise v. Disney Pop Century Resort , 244 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

O STERHAUS
, C.J., and R OBERTS and R AY
, JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Natalie A. Cavallaro of Morgan & Morgan, Tallahassee, and Thomas Warren Sculco and Shannon McLin of Florida Appeals, Orlando, for Appellant.

Todd J. Sanders of Chartwell Law, Tallahassee

, for Appellees.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

CONTINUANCE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHARLES O’CAIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-0035-RSL-JPD

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for a continuance to

conduct further discovery in order to oppose the defendants’ respective motions for summary

judgment. Dkt. No. 32. Plaintiff asserts that defendants refused to answer his first set of

interrogatories. Id. Defendants Renggli and Guest filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion

arguing that they are entitled to immunity from discovery until the Court makes a

determination on the issue of qualified immunity. Dkt. No. 34. Additionally, those defendants

assert that “plaintiff has been supplied ample information to respond to defendants’ motions.” 

Id. Defendants King County and Manning did not file an opposition to plaintiff’s motion. 

However, in both his answer and his motion for summary judgment, defendant Manning asserts

that he is entitled to qualified immunity. Dkt. Nos. 21, 29. 

Having reviewed the parties’ papers and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS

as follows:

Case 2:06-cv-00035-RSL Document 36 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

CONTINUANCE

PAGE -2

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for continuance (Dkt. No. 32) is DENIED. The Supreme

Court has held that “[w]here the defendant seeks qualified immunity, a ruling on that issue

should be made early in the proceedings so that the costs and expenses of trial are avoided

where the defense is dispositive.” Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 200 (2001). Qualified

immunity is “immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability; and . . . it is effectively

lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial.” Id. (internal quotation and citation

omitted). In this case, defendants are entitled to present their arguments for qualified immunity

at the summary-judgment stage of the proceedings. 

(2) If this Court denies defendants’ motions for summary judgment, it will provide

 the parties with additional time to conduct discovery at that point. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for the

defendants, and to the Honorable Chief Judge Robert S. Lasnik.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00035-RSL Document 36 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Retrophin, Inc. (the Company), for the period ended
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2016 |  | /s/ Stephen Aselage          
|                    |  | Stephen Aselage              
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)