alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: sandb1998@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:03:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brandy McMillan

Louisville, MS 39339
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68121-68122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Savings and Loan 
Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et 
seq.) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 
CFR part 239), and

[[Page 68122]]

all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and 
loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, 
control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on whether the 
proposed transaction complies with the standards enumerated in the HOLA 
(12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of 
a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition 
of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 
10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise 
noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United 
States.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 2, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Brent B. Hassell, Assistant 
Vice President) P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ccfe3e1e1e9e2f8ffa2edfcfce0e5efedf8e5e3e2ffccfee5efe4a2eafeeea2e3feeb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f4d8dadad2d9c3c499d6c7c7dbded4d6c3ded8d9c4f7c5ded4df99d1c5d599d8c5d0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    1. Oconee Federal, MHC, and Oconee Federal Financial Corp., both of 
Seneca, South Carolina; to acquire control of Mutual Savings Bank, 
Hartsville, South Carolina.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-21857 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I, Marc Angell, Principal ExecutiveOfficer and Principal Financial Officer of Music of Your Life, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the annualreport on Form 10-K of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

 

Date: August 29, 202

 

/s/ Marc Angell	

Marc Angell

Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer
From: cowboyroy@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:17:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roy Stanton

Jensen Beach, FL 34957
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-04-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                      17,629,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,272,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 68,886,573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           101,418,730
<PP&E>                                     142,061,388
<DEPRECIATION>                            (41,235,798)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             214,150,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,199,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       316,522
<OTHER-SE>                                 170,457,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               214,150,136
<SALES>                                    112,561,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,561,439
<CGS>                                       74,666,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,746,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (337,685)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,486,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,681,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,805,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,805,032
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.18


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
      undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
      certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.




November
                  13, 2007/s/
                  Earl R. RefslandEarl
                R. Refsland
                President
                  & Chief Executive Officer
#### Linda HALVORSON, on behalf of Mark Halvorson, Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 Appellee.

No. 00-3692.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 2001.

Decided June 12, 2001.

*443Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

1

. Larry G. Massanari has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

PER CURIAM.

On behalf of her late husband Mark, Linda Halvorson appeals the district court’s2 decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We review that decision to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, including the new evidence submitted to the Appeals Council. *See Cunningham v. Apfel,*222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir.2000).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly determined Mark’s residual functional capacity, *see Anderson v. Shalala,*51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir.1995); and properly evaluated his credibility, *see Haggard v. Apfel,*175 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir.1999) (decision of ALJ who considers, but for good cause expressly discredits, claimant’s subjective complaints will not be disturbed). Further, we do not believe that the evidence concerning Mark’s demise was material to determining whether he was disabled before his insured status expired. *See Bergmann v. Apfel,*207 F.3d 1065, 1069 (8th Cir.2000) (material evidence is evidence relating to claimant’s condition for time period for which benefits were denied).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

2

. The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2399

JEAN MURAT MONTREVIL, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: September 11, 2009

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua E. Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, Julie M. Iversen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Jean Murat Montrevil, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for review. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) (2006), we lack jurisdiction, except as provided in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2006), to review the final order of removal of an alien convicted of certain enumerated crimes, including offenses covered in § 1182(a)(2) of the immigration statutes. Because Montrevil was found removable for having been convicted of a controlled substance offense pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), under § 1252(a)(2)(C), we have jurisdiction “to review factual determinations that trigger the jurisdiction-stripping provision, such as whether [Montrevil] [i]s an alien and whether []he has been convicted of [a controlled substance offense].” Ramtulla v. Ashcroft , 301 F.3d 202, 203 (4th Cir. 2002). Onc e we confirm these two factual determinations, then, under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D), we can only consider “constitutional claims or questions of law.”

See Mbea v. Gonzales , 482 F.3d 276, 278 n.1 (4th Cir. 2007).

Because we find that Montrevil is indeed an alien who has been convicted of a controlled substance offense, § 1252(a)(2)(C) divests us of jurisdiction over the petition for

23 review absent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law. Although Montrevil raises several questions of law in his petition for review, we find that his claims are squarely foreclosed by our recent decision in Zheng v. Holder , 562 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 2009). ∗ Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

∗ Additionally, to the extent that Montrevil argues that the Board committed legal error in finding that he failed to demonstrate changed country conditions, we find that the Board correctly concluded that Montrevil merely “assert[ed] a fear of a personal nature, not one relating to changes in Haiti.” See Zhang v. Att’y Gen. , __ F.3d __, 2009 WL 1856787 (11th Cir. June 30, 2009) (“An alien cannot circumvent the requirement of changed country conditions by demonstrating only a change in her personal circumstances.”).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter *Brown,*Appellant.

*[632*NYS2d *23]*

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered November 1, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*445Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court’s marshalling of the evidence for the jury was unbalanced, thereby depriving him of a fair trial. We conclude that the trial court properly marshaled the evidence necessary to explain its charge on identification *(see,*CPL 300.10 [2]; *People v Bell,*38 NY2d 116). The trial court fairly reviewed the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defendant in light of the volume of evidence proffered. The court pointed out inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and properly instructed the jury to consider these inconsistencies in its determination of witness credibility and the weight of the evidence. In addition, the court repeatedly informed the jury that it was the sole judge of the facts, the credibility of the witnesses, and the weight to be accorded to the evidence. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.
From: ne63erume@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:16:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Murane

Redding, CA 96002
From: dougshively@islcpa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:33:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doug Shively

, 92802-1706
No. 61074.

protest 277100-K.

#### Frederic Henjes, Jr., Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
February 24, 1959

No. 62791.

Suit 4931.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States.

C.D. 1872 affirmed November 17, 1958. C.A.D. 692.
ex_107983.htm


Exhibit 10.4.2


 


GEOVAX, INC.


SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT


 


This Salary Deferral Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of July 1, 2017 by and between GeoVax, Inc., a Georgia Corporation (the “Company”), and Farshad Guirakhoo (the “Employee”).


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee recognize that it is in the best interests of the Company, its shareholders, and its collective Employees to conserve the Company’s cash resources; and as part of its cash conservation measures, the Company has asked certain of its employees to accept salary reductions and/or deferrals; and


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee acknowledge that this Agreement has been entered into for the express purpose of conserving the Company’s cash resources and not for executive compensation tax planning purposes, and 


 


Whereas, Employee currently is currently earning an annualized gross salary of $250,000 (“Base Salary”); 


 


Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	
			1.

				
			Salary Deferral.

			
	 	Effective July 1, 2017, Employee agrees to accept a deferral of 25% of his Base Salary, which amount will be accrued and paid to Employee as described below.



 


	
			2.

				
			Discontinuance of Salary Reduction and/or Deferral

			
	 	Employee’s Salary Deferral pursuant to this Agreement shall end upon the occurrence of a significant event (to include financing, corporate partnership, etc., as determined solely by the Company) (the “Discontinuance Date”).



 


	
			3.

				
			Payment of Accumulated Deferred Salary.

			
	 	At the Discontinuance Date, the Company in its sole discretion will determine the form of payment to be made to Employee for the accumulated Deferred Salary. Such payment may be made in cash, in the form of Company Stock, or in a combination of cash and stock.



 


 


ACCEPTANCE


	 	 	 	 
	
			Employee

				 	 	
			Date

				 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Agreed:

				 	 	 	 
	 	
			GeoVax, Inc.

				 	 	 
	 	
			By: