alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dcm777_7@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:28:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Matthews

Mount Airy, MD 21771
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21752]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) gives notice of the 
following meeting:

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, October 19, 2023, 12 p.m.-1:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: AmeriCorps, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20525. For health 
and safety reasons, this will be a virtual meeting.
    <bullet> To register for the meeting, please use this link: https://americorps.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_GyvUyskiTySJh46ViJR5mg.
    <bullet> Webinar ID: 161 080 7298 Passcode: 129418.
    <bullet> To participate by phone, call toll free: (833) 568-8864.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Opening Remarks by the Chair
II. CEO Report
III. Reflection of 9/11 Day of Service
IV. Oversight, Governance, and Audit Committee Report
V. Approval of Grant Plan
VI. Spotlight: AmeriCorps' 30th Anniversary
VII. Public Comment
VIII. Chair's Closing Remarks and Adjournment

    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of 
the Board may do so in writing or virtually. Submit written comments to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e1c111f0c1a3e1d100d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50323f31223410333e237e373f26">[email protected]</span></a> with the subject line: ``Comments for October 19, 2023, 
AmeriCorps Board Meeting'' no later than 5:00 p.m. (ET) October 14, 
2023. Individuals who would like to comment during the meeting will be 
given instructions for signing up when they join the meeting. Comments 
are requested to be limited to two minutes.
    AmeriCorps provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities, where needed.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Heather Leinenbach by telephone: 
(202) 489-5266 or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d3ded0c3d5f1d2dfc29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="debcb1bfacba9ebdb0adf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

Fernando Laguarda,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-21752 Filed 9-27-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 62812.

#### Geo. E. Athans Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 193171-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by protest 193171-K consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 1917), the claim at 20 cents per gallon under paragraph 744 as olives in brine, green, was sustained. The merchandise the subject of protests 193172-K and 182552-K, stipulated to be the same as that the subject of C.D. 1917, *supra,*was held dutiable at 15 cents per gallon under the provision in said paragraph 744, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52423), for olives in brine, green, not green in color, not pitted or stuffed, and not packed in airtight containers of glass, metal, or glass and metal.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 4 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 4

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Secretary Warren Christopher served as Secretary of State from 1993 
        until 1997, and maintained the tradition of that Office by representing 
        the international interests of the United States with great dignity, 
        grace, and ability;
Whereas Secretary Christopher, during his tenure as Secretary of State, engaged 
        in more international travel than any other Secretary of State in United 
        States history, reflecting his indefatigable commitment to advancing 
        peace and justice, protecting and promoting United States interests, and 
        preserving United States leadership in international affairs;
Whereas Secretary Christopher has played a key leadership role in United States 
        foreign policy achievements, including ending the war in Bosnia, 
        restoring an elected government in Haiti, and advancing peace in the 
        Middle East;
Whereas Secretary Christopher served with distinction as Deputy Secretary of 
        State from 1977 until 1981 and, among his accomplishments as Deputy 
        Secretary, is credited with skillfully negotiating the release of 
        American hostages in Iran;
Whereas Secretary Christopher has had a distinguished career in law and public 
        service in California;
Whereas Secretary Christopher, born in Scranton, North Dakota, is one of North 
        Dakota's most distinguished native sons and has always displayed the 
        quiet strength and work ethic associated with the people of the Great 
        Plains;
Whereas in 1997 Secretary Christopher leaves his position as the 63d Secretary 
        of State; and
Whereas Secretary Christopher has earned the respect and admiration of Congress 
        and the American people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress commends and thanks the Honorable Warren Christopher for 
his exemplary diplomatic service, and for his skillful and 
indefatigable efforts to advance peace and justice around the world.

            Passed the Senate January 22, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 4

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Commending and thanking the Honorable Warren Christopher for his 
                exemplary service as Secretary of State.
```
Before the Second Division,

April 9, 1963

No. 67586.

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 317010-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered January 26, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01036-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.V., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-56612-2021

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. Appellant’s brief is currently due January 30, 2023. 

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for a thirty-day extension of time to 

file his brief. We DENY the motion and caution appellant that the appeal is 

subject to dismissal on February 10, 2023 should appellant’s brief not be filed. 

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
No. 63373.

protest 59/6907 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Rel: June 7, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2023-0800 Charles A. Childers v. Clothiel Mallory, by and her through her guardian, Brent A. Mallory (Appeal from Blount Circuit Court: CV-21-900140). SELLERS, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Wise, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur.
From: lmcjrmd@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:28:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

The government has gone too far. I write today to demand in the strongest way possible that you

rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you

to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and

have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing "free" insurance coverage

on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because nothing is free and some of these

can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also demand that you reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employees health insurance. If this mandate is enacted it will drive up costs and violate my

principles. Know with certainty that I will stop offering health coverage for my employes.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lloyd Charles Jr MD

Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
#### Jan C. RUST, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TMC HEALTHCARE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-15120.

D.C. No. CV-01-00432-CKJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Jan C. Rust appeals pro se the district court’s order denying her second motion for relief from the judgment dismissing her retaliation action against her former employer. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *see Casey v. Albertson’s, Inc.,*362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Rust’s motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) because Rust’s evidence did not establish that defendant committed fraud or misrepresentation in procuring the judgment. *See id.*at 1260-61. Furthermore, Rust’s second motion merely reargued issues that the court had already considered and rejected, *see Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Constr. Corp.,*248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir.2001), and the motion did not satisfy any other grounds for relief, *see School Dist. No. IJ, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 8

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 105

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 105 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 8 of 8
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                EXHIBIT 11
                         MERIS LABORATORIES, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 
                                                  Q3-96          YTD 9/96
                                               ------------    --------------  
<S>                                                <C>             <C>
Primary
   Earnings  
      Income (loss) applicable to common shares     ($5,986)       ($11,953)

   Shares
   Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                              8,011           7,998
   Primary earnings per common share
      Net income (Loss)                              ($0.75)         ($1.49)




Assuming full dilution
   Earnings
      Income (Loss) before extraordinary items      ($5,986)       ($11,953)
      Add after tax interest expense applicable
       to 10% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debt      283             834



   Net income (Loss)  adjusted                      ($5,703)       ($11,119)

   Shares
      Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                             8,011           7,998
      Assuming conversion of 10% convertible          3,188           3,188
      Assuming conversion of options reduced
       by the number of shares which could
       have been purchased with the proceeds 
       from exercise of such options                      0               0

      Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding  (adjusted)                11,199          11,186

   Earnings per common share assuming full dilution

      Net income (Loss)                              ($0.51)         ($0.99)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CAMERON PIERCE and PATRICIA

PIERCE, husband and wife; KAREN KIRBY,

a single woman; GREGORY SHERMAN and

PAULA SHERMAN, husband and wife,

MICHAEL LEPAGE and GERTRUDE

LEPAGE, husband and wife; on behalf of

themselves and a class of similarly situated

individuals,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC., a foreign

corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5835RJB

ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT NOVASTAR

MORTGAGE, INC.’S MOTION

TO STRIKE RICK ST. ONGE AS

A WITNESS

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant NovaStar Mortgage Inc.’s Motion to

Strike Rick St. Onge as a Witness (Dkt. 158). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in

support of and in opposition to the motion and the remainder of the file herein.

I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION

NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. moves to strike Rick St. Onge as a witness for the plaintiffs on

the grounds that this witness’ testimony constitutes opinion rather than fact and on the grounds

Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 191 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

Page 2

that this witness seeks to testify about the interpretation and application of statutes and

regulations. Dkt. 158 at 1-2. While the defendant raises several valid points with regard to this

witness’ anticipated testimony, it is impossible for the Court to rule on this issue in advance.

Rulings on matters raised in the motion are better suited for trial and depend upon the wording of

the questions put to the witness and the witness’ answers. The Court should therefore decline to

strike this witness.

II. ORDER

Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant NovaStar Mortgage Inc.’s Motion to Strike Rick St. Onge as

a Witness (Dkt. 158) is DENIED.

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel

of record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.

DATED this 30th day of April, 2007.AROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05835-RJB Document 191 Filed 04/30/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 66538.

#### William Shaland Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/14275 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic back scratehers the same in all material respects as those 'the subject of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 2218), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 446 

Honoring the life and accomplishments of Astronaut Walter Marty Schirra 

and expressing condolences on his passing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. 

ISSA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and accomplishments of Astronaut Walter 

Marty Schirra and expressing condolences on his passing. 

Whereas Walter Schirra was born on March 12, 1923, in 

Hackensack, New Jersey; 

Whereas as an exchange pilot with the 154th Fighter Bomber 

Squadron during the Korean War, he flew 90 combat 

missions in F–84E jets and was credited with downing 

at least one MIG fighter; 

Whereas on October 3, 1962, Walter Schirra became the fifth 

person to fly in space when he piloted Mercury 8 (Sigma 

7) on a six-orbit mission lasting 9 hours, 13 minutes and 

11 seconds; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 446 IH 

Whereas on December 15, 1965, Walter Schirra piloted Gemini 6A in what was the first attempted rendezvous by two 

manned spacecraft in earth orbit; 

Whereas on October 11, 1968, he concluded his third and 

final mission when he was launched as commander of 

Apollo 7, the first manned Apollo mission, making Commander Schirra the only astronaut to fly aboard Mercury, 

Gemini and Apollo spacecrafts; 

Whereas Commander Schirra was the recipient of many distinguished awards, including three distinguished flying 

crosses, two air medals, two NASA Distinguished Services Medals and induction into the National Aviation Hall 

of Fame; 

Whereas after he retired to San Diego in 1984, Wally dedicated much of his later years to working with children on 

connecting them to the amazing possibilities that a career 

on space exploration could provide, and as a tireless advocate for discovery, Wally was an inspirational figure for 

countless San Diegans; and 

Whereas Commander Schirra was an exemplary resident of 

the State of California where he resided in La Jolla until 

the time of his death on May 2, 2007: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life and accomplishments of As3 tronaut Walter Marty Schirra and expresses condo4 lences on his passing; and 

5 (2) recognizes the profound importance of As6 tronaut Schirra’s record as a pioneer in space explo7 ration and long-time contributor to NASA’s mission 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 446 IH 

1 as a catalyst to space exploration and scientific ad2 vancement in the United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
No. 67145.

protest 290170-K (New York).

#### Victor Machinery Exchange, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vises similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60909, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended March 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert C. Sepucha,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

May 12, 2003

/s/ Robert C. Sepucha
Robert C. Sepucha
Chief Executive Officer