alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: marsha.vestal@aa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:06:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marsha Vestal

Dallas, TX 75204
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 787 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 6, 2007.
Whereas in the early morning of October 28, 2007, flames broke out at a beach 
        house in Ocean Isle Beach, North Carolina;
Whereas the fire spread quickly and took the lives of seven college students, 
        six attended the University of South Carolina and one went to Clemson 
        University: Lauren Mahon of Simpsonville, South Carolina; Allison Walden 
        of Chagrin Falls, Ohio; Travis Cale, Justin Anderson and Emily Yelton of 
        Greenville, South Carolina; William Rhea of Florence, South Carolina, 
        and Cassidy Pendley of Chapin, South Carolina;
Whereas 6 University of South Carolina students were injured while escaping the 
        flames and were treated at Brunswick Community Hospital;
Whereas local community members rushed to alert and assist emergency personnel 
        to support the students and their families in the aftermath of the 
        tragedy;
Whereas firefighters, paramedics, police officers, and other emergency personnel 
        from the surrounding communities responded quickly and worked bravely to 
        rescue the injured and extinguish the fire;
Whereas the State of North Carolina and local government officials responded to 
        the fire and its aftermath quickly, effectively, and compassionately;
Whereas the immediate outpouring of support, assistance and compassion from the 
        Nation and South Carolinians is greatly appreciated; and
Whereas the students, faculty, staff, and officials at Clemson University and 
        University of South Carolina have come together as a university 
        community to remember the fallen students and provide strength and 
        support to its respective campuses through this difficult time: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its deepest condolences to the families and friends of 
        Lauren Mahon, Allison Walden, Travis Cale, Justin Anderson, Emily 
        Yelton, William Rhea, and Cassidy Pendley; and offers its hope for the 
        quick and full recovery of those students who were injured in the fire;
            (2) expresses immense gratitude for the efforts of countless 
        emergency response personnel, local, State, and Federal officials, 
        health care providers, volunteers, and citizens who have been part of 
        the response; and
            (3) expresses its support for all of the students, faculty, 
        administration, and staff at the University of South Carolina and 
        Clemson University as they heal from this tragedy.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  This
        Certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
        September 30, 2006 of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp.
 
 The
        undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal Executive Officer
        and
        Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the “Company”),
        DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:
  1.
              The
                  Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
                  (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              Information
                  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and results of operation of the
                  Company.
  IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
        25th
        day of June, 2007.
  
 /s/
        Thomas L. Wegman
 Thomas
        L.
        Wegman
 President
 (Principal
        Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
  
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and will be retained by BioSpecifics
        Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or
        its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       19
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4175
<PP&E>                                            7532
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                        6919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13483
<SALES>                                           4480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4480
<CGS>                                             2450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (391)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.11)
From: backsandtax@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:00:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sam Jamieson

San Jose, CA 95130
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 79-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 4

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 79 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 79-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 79-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 79-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: February 14, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MARLENA SZYMASZEK, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1968RSL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On October 13, 2006, plaintiff

filed a motion for partial summary judgment that, taken as a whole, exceeds 50 pages in

length. (Dkt. #27). As of this date, a courtesy copy of these documents has not been

provided for chambers. 

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why she should not be sanctioned for

failure to comply with this Court’s Minute Order Setting Trial & Related Dates and the

Court’s May 26, 2006 Notice, both of which required courtesy copies of lengthy filings

for chambers. Plaintiff shall immediately deliver a paper copy of the motion and all

supporting documents, with tabs or other organizing aids as necessary and clearly marked

with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers,” to the Clerk’s Office. 

Case 2:05-cv-01968-RSL Document 29 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

Plaintiff shall respond to this order to show cause no later than five days from the date of

this Order. 

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01968-RSL Document 29 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 2
H. Res. 633 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 6, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2786) to reauthorize the programs for housing 

assistance for Native Americans. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 

9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions of the bill are waived. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be 

in order except those printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 
2 

•HRES 633 EH 

XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of 

debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by 

the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee and 

shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 

have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 2786 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

SEC. 3. House Resolutions 595, 596, 613, and 614 are 

laid upon the table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1852

LENTON CREDELLE BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BARBARA GIBSON, State of North Carolina, Human Resources; ERICA A. HOOKS, 

North Carolina Department of Public Safety, individually; JOSH STEINS, State of North 

Carolina; DENNIS DANIELS, Maury Correctional Superintendent, individually; GARY 

PARKS, Personnel Administrator, Maury Correctional, individually; JOHN GRAY, 

Lieutenant, Maury Correctional, individually; JOHN HERRING, Assistant 

Superintendent, Maury Correctional, individually; CAPTAIN WATSON, Maury 

Correctional, individually; JAMIE COBB, Captain, Maury Correctional, individually; 

CHRISTIAN THOMAS RUSSELL, Sergeant, Maury Correctional, individually; 

SYNDEY SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, Maury Correctional, individually; TIFFANY 

KERNER, NC DPS EEO Investigator, individually; GLORIA ELLERBE, NC DPS EEO 

Investigator, individually; JOHANNA FARR COOKE, Nurse, Vidant Medical, 

individually; THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MAURY CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION; VIDANT MEDICAL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00180-FL)

Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lenton Credelle Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Lenton Credelle Brown appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Brown v. Gibson, No. 

4:17-cv-00180-FL (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2019; July 25, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 21

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 32

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 32 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 21 of 21
No. 62799.

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 254362-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of;the plaintiffs was sustained.
Filed 10/16/13 P. v. M.Z. CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication o r ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
M.Z.,
Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B249330 (Super. Ct. No . 2013008623) (Ventura County)

M.Z. appeals a dispositi on order of the juvenile court committing him to a juvenile facility for 365 days. (Welf. and Inst. Code, § 602.) We appointed counsel to represent M. Z. in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues. On August 27, 2013, we advised M.Z. that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. On September 4, 2013, the United States Post al Service returned the letter as "Undeliverable" and "Unable
to Forward."
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 19, 2013, the prosecutor filed a Welfar e and Institutions Code section 602 petition alleging that M.Z. comm itted second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.) The petition also alleged that M.Z. committ ed the robbery to bene fit a criminal street gang, and that he personally used a deadly weapon, a knife, during the robbery. ( Id.
, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1), form er § 12022, subd. (b)(1).)2 On April 4, 2013, the j uvenile court held a contested adjudication hearing. During the proceedings, the prosecutor withdrew the criminal street ga ng and deadly weapon allegations. Victor Lopez testified at the adjudica tion hearing that on March 16, 2013, he walked on Main Street in Santa Paula, as he spoke with his wife on his cellular telephone. M.Z. and O.M. confronted Lope z and demanded the telephone. O.M. held a knife. Lopez surrendered the telephone and M.Z. and O.M. ran away. Lopez, with the assistance of his brot her, reported the robbery. Police officers
soon detained M.Z. and O.M. In a field show -up, Lopez identified M.Z. as one of the two minors who robbed him of his telephone. Following presentation of evidence a nd argument by the parties, the juvenile court sustained the allegations of the petition, and contin ued M.Z. as a ward of the court. On April 28, 2013, the court comm itted M.Z. to a juvenile fa cility for 365 days. The court awarded M.Z. credit for 34 days of confinemen t, ordered victim res titution, and imposed a $200 restitution fine.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that M. Z.'s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J. We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.3 David R. Worley, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura

________________ ______________

Shea S. Murphy, under appo intment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Appellant.