alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 468 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 468

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that officials of 
    local governments who are also members of the National Guard or 
Reserves and are deployed as part of their service in the Armed Forces 
      should be granted reasonable accommodation to fulfill their 
                 governmental duties while so deployed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

     Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that officials of 
    local governments who are also members of the National Guard or 
Reserves and are deployed as part of their service in the Armed Forces 
      should be granted reasonable accommodation to fulfill their 
                 governmental duties while so deployed.

Whereas every American citizen has the right to participate in government;
Whereas every American citizen constitutionally eligible to vote should not ever 
        have that right abridged;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces have served bravely and heroically in 
        Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom;
Whereas the stresses of these conflicts has led to multiple and extended 
        deployments for many members of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas modern technology has made it possible to actively participate in 
        government proceedings without being in physical attendance: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) officials of local governments who are also members of 
        the National Guard or Reserves and are deployed as part of 
        their service in the Armed Forces maintain their rights while 
        so deployed; and
            (2) local governments should make reasonable accommodations 
        to protect the right of members of the Armed Forces who also 
        serve as government officials to participate in governmental 
        proceedings while so deployed.
                                 <all>
```
From: jwd509@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:21:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

dolphine diaco

Lancaster, PA 17601
**~'ro~~te.**

\'\t-tet\**~** 

## ?'-'01'1<-**~b"<- \-\~+'-"e.r** **N~O** 

### EPA <"')o-**h~er@ ~a..-C:fJv** 

### Ck.v~,**{ll.,~ S't** **A"~.£,.. cs~i-s,**  

## " t

, (3JIUY 

## It /;,f-

, 

# ""+**Hv!J~** 

# a. I

## ~d 

# !EffrL h

## u~L**,** f21ac. k

(S,

## ())tt~k-er-- r

## CcJ~~ WAri**P~be-~1 .**  E-fA**,~,.,berH-.y.** WAri#P 

# erlt •,j"\1

## ~**~tofz.k l)~<** **"'r>~ '(a\~**  . filohlu< @dotXo< n• rq 

### CorY) 

## ;V{ a_ 

# r K 

# Se. (rC:Gr 

### V .?. G1A,. 

# s e ;-r-?:er.

### ,.\;-~ <?. {' '{

. ;j-ov



## f)qv;o/ 

## Tob1tf.S 

# [PA -+ohiq5

.

# tJ/q.,,~GJ~f1**, ~ov** **.** -Xl**<2-:~~ ch**  

## ccfJA

e \ c::.e D'("-cid,. kc_,..Ye,n 

# €? e.po..

. 

## cyv 

# An nQ_**!Ct~** 

### EPA lCtm. anf)e.Ci;**Q(/~** jo v



## tJ

## v~-**-"'** tJq 

# 4 ev.. 

# d A

## ~" 

# d '-"-'<1 e....- · V\ 

## e_ ay,.,

## ~ 

## ¥ o... · 

# <J "v

# I K**~** 

## s"" M Morn**Q..o'"f\~ ~r**  t"'Sfen '5 {'(1

### ~ 

# erVtf)

fYI etJtl

### ~ . (D f"'}**~ \Jc\.~**  

### l**Stt b~** **~~'en- \)0\.** **~** \ 

# e**Cv¢\'\Qn ca** **f)~ ~** **~t'V\..**

1\l**\~5C(l** S\ur\'f\a.J\1\**A:~l~'5f._,** 

### -A\**\~~(l-S\a..(~'\£tnnc!>aM~f'ICttt1Ch€m·~ ·u;tn** 

_

. .

'- r.,_

... t)**~\·c ~**  '" _- '-4.;

# r~**~\AI\;, ~...,e)**  &.:,l?, \

....... ,

• ve 

## AnJers" {)

e 

## fi-ve 

# 1"'

Yl 

### no. 

### fV1 or rq 

### l \ 

## I3?A 

# \-ew'>. ea" \ flf) 

### -eeq

,**~o** v**MAs~~ ~** **-E{J~ ~~** **._,j, ·** **te ~@_~** **~-~ov** 

### CPA**ft"1d~.so...,** 

### . S-/ev{**~** 

### epQ**~** j oV 

## f Pt\ f\vcwt. .)o"(

### ~ e(l'l.

·

### 5~v 

## Ef fV1



### £Ptl-**G<'~Mc; .** **'o1"-~\~** 

### e**<?..~·~ov** 

## SiHSc
No. 58276.

protest 224201-K (New York).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Larry Fitzwater <LFitzwater@lsb-okc.com>

Date: 01/16/2012 04:00PM

Cc: "Gershman, Lorraine" <Lorraine_Gershman@americanchemistry.com>

Subject: Nitric Acid 30-Day Rolling Average Data for NSPS Background

(See attached file: El Dorado Weak Acid Air Permit Section.pdf)

(See attached file: Cherokee Weak Acid Air Permit Section.pdf)

(See attached file: 2011 Cherokee Nitrogen #2 Acid Plant NOx Background Data for EPA 

NSPS.xlsx)

(See attached file: DMW hourly data with 30 day rolling 2011 FINAL (LP) (2).xlsx)

(See attached file: East hourly data with 30 day rolling 2011 FINAL BP.xlsx)

(See attached file: EPA 011312 Extended absorbtion.pdf)

(See attached file: Nitric Acid Info to Bill Neuffer at EPA 1-16-2012.docx)

Bill,

Here are the data files we promised to provide as background to our comments for the proposed 

nitric acid NSPS standard.

 Excerpts of the current Title V air permits for the referenced units are included.

 The Cherokee No.2 nitric acid unit and the El Dorado DMW nitric acid unit are Weatherly 

technology mono-pressure plant with extended absorption but no tertiary NOx abatement. 

 The El Dorado East and West nitric acid units are C&I Girdler Technology mono-pressure 

units with SCRs. The NOx data for these units are emission levels after SCR treatment.

The NOx levels prior to the SCR are typically in excess of 3,000 ppmv.

 The data are for tail gas stack emissions only and do not include the fugitives, storage and 

shipment facilities, etc.

 We did not submit data for our No.1 Cherokee acid unit (idle in 2011), the El Dorado Direct 

Strong Nitric (DSN) acid plant which uses Uhde technology to produce 98+% nitric acid, the 

Pryor Chemical Facility or the El Dorado Nitrogen Facility in Baytown, TX which EPA cites in 

the proposed NSPS.
 The Cherokee facility only had time to do daily data. PPMV NOx to pounds conversions are 

estimated by factor based on the most recent RATA test stack flow factor. They do not have 

a stack flow meter.

 The El Dorado facility has volumetric flow rate monitoring in the nitric acid tail gas stacks 

and used that data to convert from PPMV NOx to pounds. They had hourly data readily 

available.

Please call me if you have any questions. We appreciate your willingness to consider this 

additional data.

Larry

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged 

information intended solely for the addressee. Please do not open any attachments or read, copy, disclose or disseminate this email or any attachments unless you are the addressee. If you have received this transmission in error, please call immediately at 

(314) 991-2853 and ask to speak with the message sender. Also, please forward the message and any attachments back to the 

message sender and delete this transmission from your system. No waiver of any attorney-client or work product privilege is 

intended by the transmission of this message or any attachments.
From: TakeAction@GreatDayDan.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:34:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Statham

Keller, TX 76244
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ David E.
Schreiman
 - 27 -
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Osteotech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Jeffries,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                        /S/Michael J. Jeffries
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Jeffries
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer)
                                        August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
uo/^^/zai aID: m aiDJzamu D SHJ J rHijc : \jz / H I J 

# O U.S . Department o f Transportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 

## DEP!0-5''TTMQ ^ n \ Smal l Aiiplan c Diicctoiat c 90 1 Locus t

Stree t Kansa s City , Missour

i 6410 6

MA Y 2 4 201 0 Mr , Lelan dSno w President Air Tractor , inc . P.O . Box 48 5 Obey , T X 7637 4 Dea r Mr . Snow : Thi s letter i s t o infor myou tha t w e hav e receive d an d begun processin g you r petitio n fo

r exemption . I t

acknowledge s receip t

o f th e petitio n and describe s ho w w e wil l proces s i t W e Hav e th e Petitio n We'v e receive dyour

Apri l 23,2010 , petitio n on behal f o f Air Tractor , Inc , (Air

Tractor) for a n exemptio n from § 23.1001(b) , (c)(2 ) an d (c)(3 ) o f Titl e 14 , Code o f

Federa l Regulation s (1 4 CFR) . Thi s exemption , i f granted , woul d reliev e Air Tractor fromth e requirement

fo r th e fue l discharg e to b e clea

r o f th e airplane , an d th e requirement tha t n o fue l or fume s ente

r an y par t o f th e airplane , whe n usin g th e fue l jettisonin g syste

mon th e Air

Tracto r mode l AT

802/802 A We'v e adde dyour

petitio n to th e publi c docket (No . FAA-2010-0468 ) an d w e ar e processin g it . We wil l contac t

yo u i f w e nee dadditiona

l information . Ho w We'l l Proces s th e Petitio n A petitio n fo

r a n exemption , accordin g t o 1 4 CF R11.63(d) , mus t

b e sent to th e FA A at leas t 12 0 day s befor

e th e propose deffective date o f th e exemption . I n addition , w e publis h a summar y o f th e petitio n in th e Federa

l Register fo r publi c commen

t unless , accordin g t o 1 4 CF R11.87 , w e determin e tha t goo d caus e exist s fo

r no t publishin g it .

HiHI l M a itJO/zq/ztJit i 13:1 4 eiojz^jtitJ D SHL) rHUc .

W e wil l advis e yo

u o f th e agency' s fina

l decisio n o

n you r petitio n a s soo n a s possible . I f yo u hav e an y question s i n th e meantime , you ma y contac t Pete r L . Rous e a

t (816 ) 329-4135 . Sincerely , CO^Ki mSmit

h Manager , Smal l Airplan e Directorat e Aircraf t Certificatio n Servic e
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza Goldfield Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 18, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris Tomkinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |                               |                                        
|------------------ |  | --- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                   |  |     | BONANZA GOLDFIELD CORPORATION
|                   |  |     |                               |                                        
|September 16, 2009 |  | By: | /s/  CHRIS TOMKINSON         
|                   |  |     |                               | Chris Tomkinson
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-60500

_______________

ESTATE OF RAYMOND E. JONES, Deceased;

DOROTHY J. JONES, Independent Executrix;

and

DOROTHY J. JONES,

Petitioners-Appellants,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(23835-88)

_________________________

May 1, 1997

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the

record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude that

the Tax Court was correct in determining that the statute of

limitations did not run before the notice of deficiency was issued.

The determination of the Tax Court, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.11.2


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is made and effective as of December 6, 2017, by and between Intersections Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Michael R. Stanfield (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, made as of January 10, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.a of the Employment Agreement, Executive is entitled to an annual salary (the “Base Salary”) of $855,000; and 
WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to pay a portion of the Base Salary for 2018 in the form of an option to purchase common stock of the Corporation; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows.
1.Solely for 2018, $200,000 of the Base Salary shall be paid in the form of an option (the “Option”) to purchase 238,095 shares of the Corporation’s common stock under the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. The Option was granted on December 6, 2017 with an exercise price of $2.10 per share, and subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth in the stock option grant agreement attached hereto as Attachment A. The remainder of the 2018 Base Salary shall be paid in cash.
2.Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive’s Base Salary for all purposes under the Employment Agreement is $855,000.
3.Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with all of the terms and conditions thereof. From and after the date of this Amendment, all references to the term “Agreement” in this Amendment or the original Agreement shall include the terms contained in this Amendment.
4.The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous discussions, agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, that may have been made or entered into by or between the parties relating to the transactions contemplated hereby.
5.This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.  Signatures delivered by facsimile shall be effective for all purposes.
[Signatures on the following page]












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Agreement to be duly executed effective as of the date first written above.


INTERSECTIONS INC.
                	
		
	By:
	/s/ Ronald L. Barden

	      Name:
	Ronald L. Barden

	      Title:
	Chief Financial Officer






EXECUTIVE
                	
	
	/s/ Michael R. Stanfield

	Michael R. Stanfield






 

 











ATTACHMENT A


Form of Stock Option Agreement
No. 62269.

#### Western Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 319363-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.