alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex-10.7

 Exhibit 10.7
 

 

 CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
 

 This CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is dated as of May 15, 2016 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation (d/b/a Cornerstone Sustainable Energy), a Delaware corporation, (“CSE”) and Thomas Telegades (the “Consultant”), each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties” hereto.
 WHEREAS, CSE engaged the Consultant and entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 15, 2013 embodying the terms of such engagement; and
 WHEREAS, Consultant desires to continue providing services to CSE on the terms and conditions set forth therein and as amended herein,
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to renew said Agreement, amended as follows:
 

 A.
 Term.  Paragraphs 1.b. and 7 shall be amended as follows:
 

 The term of the Agreement shall be renewed for an additional three (3) year period, commencing on the Effective Date, and shall continue until terminated pursuant to Paragraph 7 below. 
 

 B.
 Compensation.  Paragraph 3 shall be amended as follows:
 

 Consultant shall receive no base compensation until, upon the determination of the CSE Board of Directors, CSE’s funding or revenues are adequate to pay Consultant any compensation.  Upon such determination, the Board of Directors shall determine the level of such compensation, which it may elect to change from time to time, otherwise subject to the terms of Paragraph 3.(a). 
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
 

 	 	
	 Consultant: 
	 __/s/ Thomas Telegades_____________

	  
	 Thomas Telegades

	  
	  

	 CSE:
	 __/s/ Wallace Baker________________

	  
	 Wallace Baker

	  
	 Chief Administrative Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

KIMBERLEE K. CUPPLES, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-818-MJB

)

v. ) ORDER AWARDING PLAINTIFF

) ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, ) TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

Commissioner of Social Security, ) JUSTICE ACT

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

The above-named parties have filed a stipulation for attorney’s fees and costs to be paid

by the Defendant pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412,

in the amount of $2,428.79 in attorney’s fees, $254.42 in costs for filing fee and photocopies,

and $63.35 in expenses for messenger service and postage, for a total of $2,746.56. Dkt. #18. 

The Court finds that the stipulated attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of

$2,746.56, is reasonable in light of the work performed and the result achieved.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel, Corrie Yackulic, is awarded attorney

fees in the amount of $2,428.79, costs of $254.42, and expenses of $63.35 pursuant to the

EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, for a total award of $2,746.56.

DATED this 22nd day of September, 2005.

A 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-00818-MJB Document 19 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 1
From: danpattersonjr@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:32:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Patterson

Slidell, LA 70461
EXHIBIT G 

Defendant Virtumundo, Inc.’s First Set of 

Interrogatories and Requests for Production 

to Plaintiff Omni Innovations, LLC 

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 102-8 Filed 01/23/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 102 Att. 7

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 102-8 Filed 01/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 

JAMES Q. WILKINSON, 

 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

ELDON VAIL, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. C05-5656JKA

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE 

 

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s First Motion in Limine regarding

segregation/allocation/apportionment of default among or between named defendants and plaintiff’s alleged

assailants. The court has reviewed plaintiff’s motion, defendant’s response, and plaintiff’s reply as well as the

files and records herein.

Plaintiff seeks damages under both state and federal law. Both parties focus their arguments on Tegman

v. Accident & Medical Investigations, Inc., 150 Wn.2d102, 75 P.3d 497 (2003); Welch v. Southland

Corporation, 134 Wn.2d.629, 952 P.2d 162(1998), and RCW 4.22.070.

This court has carefully reviewed the foregoing citations and considered them in the context of the

claims in this case and rules as follows:

1. Federal Claims. It does not appear that the relief sought by plaintiff is with regard to federal

claims. Nonetheless, out of an abundance of caution, the court grants plaintiffs motion to the extent it might

be interpreted to include federal claims.

2. State Law Claims. As state above, the court has carefully considered the authorities cited. As

applied to the facts in this case this court understands that Tegman might be subject to more than one 

Case 3:05-cv-05656-JKA Document 131 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

interpretation. The court notes that four Justices signed the opinion, four Justices dissented, and the remaining

Justice did not participate in the decision. This court’s reading of Tegman as applied to the parties in this case

is consistent with plaintiff’s reply (Doc#122) and the court adopts that portion of the brief commencing at page

2, line 14 thru page 3, line 16.

Accordingly Plaintiff’s First Motion in Limine is Granted with regard to both state and federal claims.

Dated this 13th day of April, 2007.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold ______________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05656-JKA Document 131 Filed 04/13/07 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; ADRD Etiology.                    

*Date:*                         October 31, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Research Officer, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue (2N230), NIA/SRB,  Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 496-2879,                         *sandhya.sanghi@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21616 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 57752.

protest 209545-K (New York).

#### Friedman Mirror & Glass Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICHAEL CASSINI,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-153M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Loan Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1014).

Date of Detention Hearing: 04/05/2005

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant has told several people that he is not going back to prison. He has

shown a pattern of ignoring legal matters and a pattern of evasion. He has demonstrated an ability

to raise money quickly and using questionable means, thereby making him a substantial risk of

flight. 

Case 2:05-cr-00166-MJP Document 9 Filed 04/06/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 6th day of April, 2005.

s/JAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00166-MJP Document 9 Filed 04/06/05 Page 2 of 2
January 18, 1955

No. 58720.

Suit 4790.

#### Moscahlades Bros., Inc. *v.*United States.

Olives in Brine — Olives, Not Specially Provided for.- — C. D. 1534 reversed November 9, 1954. C. A. D. 575.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

VU DANG,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al.,

Respondents.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-76-JCC-MAT

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

Petitioner, through counsel, has filed a motion for temporary restraining order. (Dkt. #8).

Petitioner requests in his motion for temporary restraining order that this Court issue an order

directing that he be immediately released from the custody of the Immigration and Customs

Enforcement. The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, does

hereby ORDER:

(1) Petitioner has not demonstrated, as is required by Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, that he will suffer immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage before

respondent can be heard in opposition. The Court therefore construes petitioner’s motion as one

for preliminary injunction rather than as one for temporary restraining order and directs

Case 2:06-cv-00076-JCC-MAT Document 11 Filed 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 2

Dang v. Gonzales et al Doc. 11

Dockets.Justia.com
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

PAGE -2

respondents to file a response to the motion no later than Friday, February 10, 2006.

(2) Petitioner may file a reply in support of his motion not later than Monday, February

13, 2006. The motion will be deemed ripe for consideration on that date. The Court will also

consider at that time whether a hearing is necessary.

(3) The Clerk shall re-note petitioner’s motion for temporary restraining order (Dkt. #8)

on the Court’s calendar for consideration February 13, 2006.

(4) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to petitioner’s counsel, to the United States

Attorney’s Office, and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour.

DATED this 31st day of January , 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00076-JCC-MAT Document 11 Filed 01/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-02-0369-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

_________________________________

EX PARTE DARRICK MARCIANO KIZZEE

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

DISMISSAL

Proceeding pro se, Darrick Marciano Kizzee filed a notice of appeal from the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals’s dismissal of his application for writ of habeas corpus. By letter dated September 13,

2002, this Court requested that Kizzee show why this Court has jurisdiction to entertain his purported

appeal. Kizzee responded by filing a document entitled “Court’s Jurisdiction.” Although he cites several

legal authorities, Kizzee does not reference any authority establishing that this Court has jurisdiction to

hear an appeal of the dismissal by the higher court. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
| Exhibit                    32.2 |
|---------------------------------|

|   | 1. | The                    Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                    13(a) or                    15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                    as amended;                    and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,                    in all                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                    of                    the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                    ANTHONY J. GALICI                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anthony                    J. Galici                                     |
| Vice                    President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| July                    12, 2007                                         |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Patrick Lynch,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|G. Patrick. Lynch                          
|-------------------------------------------
|President and Chief
      Executive Officer
|(principal executive
      officer)        

Circle Pines, Minnesota January 11,
2008

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 817 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 154
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 817

                          [Report No. 110-447]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R 3074) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2007

    Mr. Arcuri, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R 3074) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3074) making appropriations for the Departments of Transportation, and 
Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 154

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 817

                          [Report No. 110-447]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R 3074) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```