alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF CONTINUANCE — 1

CR06-00069RSL 

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Robert S. Lasnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR06-00069RSL

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) ORDER OF CONTINUANCE

MARTIN LYNN GUITARD, )

NEIL BURT KIKUCHI, and )

JAMES RAYMOND ITO, )

)

Defendants. ) )

Before this Court is a Stipulated Motion to Extend the Pretrial Motions Deadline

and to Continue the Trial Date;

The Court finds, after a consideration of all relevant information and the

circumstances of this case, that the ends of justice would best be served by the granting

of this request for continuance. The ends of justice outweigh the best interests of the

public and the defendant in having the matter brought to trial sooner. 

The Court finds that the parties request to extend the deadline for pretrial

motions should be GRANTED. The pretrial motions deadline scheduled for April 6,

2006, is VACATED. The pretrial motions deadline is continued to June 8, 2006.

For all the reasons presented in the files and records herein, the Court finds that

the parties stipulated request to continue the trial should be GRANTED. The trial date

Case 2:06-cr-00069-RSL Document 71 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF CONTINUANCE — 2

CR06-00069RSL 

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

currently scheduled for May 22, 2006, is VACATED. Trial shall be rescheduled to 

September 25, 2006. 

Any and all period of delay resulting from the granting of this continuance, from

the date of the filing of the parties stipulated request on May 8, 2006, until the date of

the rescheduled trial, shall be excludable time pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,

Section 3161(h)(1)(F) and (h)(8)(A), and the Court makes the following findings:

a. That the failure to grant such a continuance in this case would be

likely to result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(i);

b. That it is in the defendants’ best interest to be aware of all of the

potential charges against them, and have the opportunity to negotiate settlements on all

of those charges;

c. That because of complicated discovery matters, including extensive

financial records, it may be unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial

proceedings or for the trial itself within the time limits established by Title 18, United

States Code, Section 3161. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED this 16th day of May, 2006

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00069-RSL Document 71 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





The undersigned certify that:



(1)    The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the accompanying Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 13, 2008

        /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. DrillPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)






Date:  November 13, 2008

        /s/Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. ShiremanVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)










---
From: harvestak@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:14:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Kurber II

Fairbanks, AK 99701
From: Beth Havlik

To: Aagenes, Jason D.

Cc: George Pruchnofski; Erik Boleman; Paul Taylor

Subject: FW: Cost data

Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:10:49 PM

Attachments: BART costs.pdf

Jason,

Dick provided the attached background info on his calculations. He did not use site-specific costs for

labor, natural gas, electricity, etc. He used a “common value,” which is typically within the range of costs

for that item within the taconite industry. The one exception was he obtained a vendor quote for caustic,

which was much lower than any of the site-specific costs. Except for electricity, compressed air, and

lime, the costs were all lower than the site-specific costs for Utac. The lower costs were in the range of

18%-639% lower than Utac’s site-specific costs. Comparisons to Utac’s costs are shown below. The

table Dick provided has the range of costs for the taconite industry and is attached.

Utac MPCA

Cost Element Site-Specific

 "Common

Value" Difference

%

Difference

Operating Labor $45.31 $37.00 -$8.31 -22%

Maintenance Labor $47.22 $40.00 -$7.22 -18%

Electricity $0.04 $0.05 $0.01 22%

Natural Gas $12.02 $9.26 -$2.76 -30%

Water $2.07 $0.28 -$1.79 -639%

Cooling Water $0.28 $0.08 -$0.20 -246%

Compressed Air $0.32 $0.32 $0.00 0%

Wastewater Disposal

Neutralization $3.13 $1.69 -$1.44 -85%

Lime $88.98 $90.00 $1.02 1%

Caustic $484.56 $240.00 -$244.56 -102%

Dick was reluctant to share the detailed math involved in his calculations. He did not prepare his

calculations with elaborate documentation to facilitate an independent review. He thought that sitting

down to talk through his calculations might work, but he is very busy on other projects and it would be at

least a week before he would have time for such a meeting. Let me know if you would like further

follow-up on Dick’s calculations.

Beth Havlik

952/832-2640 office

734/255-0269 mobile

From: Cordes, Richard [mailto:Richard.Cordes@state.mn.us] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:00 PM

To: Beth Havlik

Subject: Cost data

Beth -

Here are the cost data that I used in my calculations. See the "Common Value" column.

Dick Cordes, P.E.
Low High Unit Median Average "Common Value" 

Operating Labor $32.00 $61.00 $/hr $49.15 $49.60 $37.00 Union; also Maintenance Labor $32.00 $61.00 $/hr $60.00 $53.54 $40.00 Union; also Electricity $0.04 $0.06 $/kwh $0.051 $0.049 $0.051 Selected frNatural Gas $7.41 $12.81 $/mscf $9.2575 $9.6688 $9.2575 Selected frWater $0.08 $2.07 $/mgal $0.28 $0.55 $0.28 Selected frCooling Water $0.08 $0.28 $/mgal $0.28 $0.25 $0.08 Selected frCompressed Air $0.32 $0.32 $/mscf $0.32 $0.32 $0.32 Selected frWastewater Disposal Neutralization $1.69 $3.13 $/mgal $1.69 $1.93 $1.69 Selected frLime $88.98 $91.62 $/ton $90.565 $90.352 $90.000 Vendor; alsCaustic $305.96 $484.56 $/ton $305.96 $335.73 $240.00 Vendor

Range Statistics
Staff Engineer

Industrial Division

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

(651)296-8157 (phone)

(651)296-8717 (fax)

richard.cordes@pca.state.mn.us

<<BART costs.pdf>>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Peatdeposits of Maine**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:376
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000958399
 
July 31, 2018
DEPTOFTHANSPORWiON 

OST-2010-0046 

Secretary of the DOT 

Dear Sir: 

We wish to remain in our current time zone as it is our way of life. I don't 

want to watch the sun set at midnight on the 4* of July. Keep Mercer in 

Mountain Time Zone. 

Rural Mercer County Resident
Case No. 14,846.

#### UNITED STATES v. CONNER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 102.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1802.

Gaming—Owner op Table—Who may be Indicted.

1. Upon an indictment for keeping a gaming-table in a booth upon a race-field, contrary to the act of Maryland, it is not necessary to prove that the traverser was the owner.

2. He is equally guilty, whether he acted as principal, or agent, or servant of the owner.

Indictment for keeping a gaming-table, to game with dice, at a booth, on the race-field, contrary to an act of assembly of Maryland.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COU.RT

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and' appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser acted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

Quaere. See U. S. v. Voss [Case No. 16,828], and the cases there referred to.
No. 58257.

protest 183222-K (New York).

#### Joseph F. Mariano and Edward Rossi *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the machines consist of pastry machines, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, *314the same in all material respects, except the component material of chief value, as those the subject of *A. Tanzi Engineering Co.*and *Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 4, C. D. 1490), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Gerardo RAMOS-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 05-50037, 05-50095.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this consolidated appeal, Jose Gerardo Ramos-Garcia appeals only from his guilty-plea conviction for knowingly making a false statement on a resident alien application (No. 05-50095); Ramos-Garcia abandons any challenge with respect to the revocation of his supervised release relating to his prior illegal reentry conviction (No. 05-50037).

Ramos-Garcia contends that his sentence is invalid in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the sentencing judge applied the sentencing guidelines as if they were mandatory. We review for plain error. *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). To prevail under a plain error analysis, Ramos-Garcia must show, among other things, that the error prejudiced him by adversely affecting his substantial rights. *Id.*at 733.

Ramos-Garcia fails to establish that he would have received a lower sentence had the district court applied the sentencing guidelines as advisory rather than mandatory. *See id.*at 733-34. He thus fails to establish prejudice to his substantial rights. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 61078.

protests 297587-K, etc. (New York).

#### C. P. Stollberg and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*380Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel' that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

Cordes

Junction

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

Map 20

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Black Canyon Utility

Corridor

Cordes Junction

to

Black Canyon City

0 1 2 3

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Corridors Allocations

Utilty Corridor
Case 3:06-cv-05098-RBL Document 104 Filed 04/02/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 719 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 10, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3056) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to repeal the authority of the Internal Revenue Service to use private debt 
collection companies, to delay implementation of withholding taxes on government 
contractors, to revise the tax rules on expatriation, and for other purposes. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 
arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the 
bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 3056 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1040
PAUL DAVID SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCAMPBELL COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM; SOUTHERN VIRGINIA MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL; ANITA BALDEMOR, Doctor; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES; UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER; DEBRA GIDEON, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1043-R) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul David Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simpson v. Campbell County School Sys. , No. CA-96-1043-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 10, 1996). We deny Appellant's Petition for Summary Judgment.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: jajdrodden@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:05:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Rodden

Saint Charles, MO 63304
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GREGORY CLIFFORD PAIGE,

Petitioner, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent..

CASE NO. C06-5042RJB

 CR92-1781RJB

MINUTE ORDER RE: 

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE

NOW, on this 30th day of January, 2006, the Court directs the Clerk to enter the

following Minute Order:

Pursuant to the Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Sentence/Conviction

pursuant to 28: U.S.C. §2255, the United States shall file and serve an answer in

accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing §2255 Cases in United States

District Courts not later than March 3, 2006. 

The respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court and serve a

copy of the answer upon the petitioner or petitioner’s counsel. The answer, and all

further pleadings shall include both the civil and criminal case numbers supplied in

this order. 

 Any reply by the petitioner shall be filed and served on or before Friday,

March 17, 2006. 

The clerk shall note the 2255 motion on the court’s calendar for Monday, 

March 20, 2006.

The foregoing Minute Order entered by Dara Kaleel, by direction of the Honorable

ROBERT J. BRYAN, United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05042-RJB Document 3 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 1 of 1

Paige v. United States of America Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-066 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
Before the Second Division,

July 22, 1954

No. 58281.

protest 191761-K (Philadelphia) .

#### Hugh Neu Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lead scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and which is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.