alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: wrobben@tampabay.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:26:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marylou Robben

Homosassa, FL 34446
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Albert Horcher, Principal Accounting Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BioSpecifics Technologies, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other individuals who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting



Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/  Albert Horcher

Albert Horcher

Secretary, Treasurer and

Principal Accounting Officer
· 


 

se?
 

tnership 

S. 

ncy 

nt 

s the 

 makes it 

vices that 

formance. 

ertification 

a for 

o 

 through 

, EPA is 

onals and 

al level. 

The Smart Way
 

to Water-Efficient 

Landscapes
 

(866) WTR-SENS (987-7367) 

www.epa.gov/watersense watersense@epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 


100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper.
 Be a WaterSense® Partner 

April 2008 EPA-832-F-06-034 
ans are 

e on well 

erly irrigated 

t an average of 

ndscaping 

rdens. As 

ed for 

 that maintain 

y will grow. 

red for 

 conventional 

thin the next 

ds of the states 

rt on water, 

itions. 

 are already 

rigation 

talled, and 

eeds in mind. 

ution 

gation 

 the demand 

nals who 

 the terrains, 

ent irrigation. 

To help you prepare for these advances, EPA 

offers WaterSense, a partnership program designed to help homeowners and businesses improve water efficiency and reduce costs by promoting highperformance, waterefficient irrigation technologies and products for indoor and outdoor use. WaterSense also labels certified irrigation programs dedicated to advancing water efficiency techniques. Why Partner With WaterSense? If you are an irrigation professional and have been certified through a WaterSense labeled program, you may qualify to become a WaterSense partner. Becoming a partner is easy—all you need to do is join the program and EPA will send you the tools to start promoting your commitment to water-efficient irrigation. As a WaterSense partner, you have much to gain: •	 Distinguish yourself from the competition. 

All qualified WaterSense partners are listed on EPA’s Web site to make it easy for consumers to find a certified professional in their area. 

•	 Be in demand. Several green building 

programs, such as the LEED for Homes Rating System, include a preference for irrigation work done by WaterSense partners. 

• Receive tools 

to help you promote
 your services more
 

effectively. Use the
 WaterSense partner
 logo on business
 cards and in 
advertisements.
 

•	 Leverage EPA’s national campaign to 

promote water efficiency. WaterSense is working to educate consumers on the value of water-efficient products and services. 

•	 Demonstrate your commitment to water 

efficiency and the use of water-efficient irrigation practices. 

How to Partner First, make sure you have a current certification in a WaterSense labeled program. Only certified professionals in good standing with a WaterSense labeled program are eligible to be EPA partners. To see if your program is labeled, visit the WaterSense Web site at <www.epa.gov/watersense/partners>. If it is, you can also find a partnership application on the WaterSense Web site, or call the toll-free hotline, (866) WTR-SENS (987-7367). Join now! 

Visit our Web site at 

<

www.epa.gov/watersense> or contact 

your professional irrigation certification 

program today for more information 

about water-efficient irrigation.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION
IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901 AUG 102012 Mayor Robin R. Boyd City of Winslow 21 Williamson Avenue Winslow, Arizona 86047 Dear Mayor Boyd: Thank youfor yourinterest
in Arizon&s plan toaddress regional haze in protected national parks and wilderness areasas required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). We are responding

to yourletter dated July 20, 2012, requesting
anextension
of the public comment period and additional hearings. We agreetoextend the deadline for public comment and increase the number of public hearings
to provide additional opportunity
for review and comment
onthe regional haze plan for three power plants in Arizona (Apache Generating Station, Cholla Power Plant and Coronado Generating Station.) We will conduct two additional public hearings. On August 14, 2012, wewill hold anadditional hearing in Holbrook, Arizona,

at Holbrook High School, George Gardner Performing Arts Center, 455 N.8th Ave. from 6-8 PM. Note that EPA has changed the location from Northland Pioneer College
in order to accommodate more people. On August 15, 2012, wewill hold

a hearing
in Benson, Arizona,

atCochise College (Rooms 113 and 115) from 6-8 PM. These two hearings arein addition
tothe public hearing held in Phoenix on July 31, 2012. We have extended the public comment period by two weeks, for atotal of 60 days ending on September 18, 2012, but areunable to provide the 90 days that you requested. We areonan expedited schedule
to review and respond
toall public comments and to prepare

afinal determination

by the consent decree deadline of November
15, 2012. We did request moretime from the litigants but wereunsuccessful. We look forward
to working with youand other interested parties toaddress regional haze affecting national parks and wilderness areas.If youhave further questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director,

at 520-498-01
18. Sincerely, Jordan Air Division PrintedonRecyrled Paper
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

aes 80°30
4le00° 400
PORTAGE ALLIANCE LISBON ae
[ or) I
+n ! 37 FA soo lw
ie Gigs =~ M A HO noo *# ye
ead =
| ia 1 us
I nd
Sum & RINK | |
L ee = mil a - = =
= I say ae a
USA s 14 W45N 4
> Ss |
dB Bom |
ous on
Gz
| 32
|
‘VG ) L U M B | N A |
Bs
al
Re - eee Higeis le
| oe
sie |
a3 8
3 xn 26 I
eS a
‘ 2 |

|
Ig: |
1, Ore 3 22 a
2 a &:
1 a0. ae Ne
I par 7 ibs
CoA RR Go tok | Vi
| y
—-—/ HANCOCK
aa — \ |
| st FP rears ‘ sk
=
i [ ’ }
so-so L—*® | \ |} 4 0*30
Beis’ 80°30"

BULLETIN 1003 PLATE 7

EXPLANATION

# Gos well
9% Show of gos
¥ Show of gos and show of oil
© Show of oi!

% Dry hole

S16 Thickness in feet

‘Stroy Clinton"sand
R25 Thickness in feet of the"red Clinton"sond
w30 Thickness in feet of the "white Clinton" sand

ute Thickness in feet of the “Clinton” sands
undifferentioted

pin Interbedded sand ond shole (broken sond
or shale ond shells of the driller)

N Not drilled through-well completed in
the sond

1 Top of “Clinton” sond recorded—no thickness
availoble

Amount of gos or oil indicated by the well symbol

Qo08 in metres clinton son
cas in thectintor” sands unditterentiated
@ Oil in the "white Clinton” sond

S&S Oi! in the "Clinton" sonds undifferentiated

st | | SX R|
& mR s Ss =
aa ‘< s s
< x Ra > >
S cS
S -
AREA SHOWN ON: AREA SHOWN ON
PLATES| 3,45 THIS PLAT!
co ¥
&. oa Pl =
“ K
Re sf - 2 |2
= & e ¢ s

MAP OF THE ALLIANCE, CARROLLTON, LISBON, SALINEVILLE, COLUMBIANA, AND
WELLSVILLE QUADRANGLES, OHIO, SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS

20 Mites
No. 56789.

#### A. Newberg *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 177696-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance wdth stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Shackman & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 1309), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
v396678kx102.htm




Exhibit 10.2







AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







           THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made January 7, 2013, by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Robert L. Recchia (the “Executive”).


 


           WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on January 2, 1996, January 3, 1997, December 9, 1998, December 23, 1999, June 8, 2000, March 14, 2001, December 21, 2001, July 8, 2002, January 9, 2004, January 11, 2005, May 24, 2007, December 23, 2008 and May 23, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”);







           NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.           Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:







“Commencing on January 1, 2013, with respect to each six month period ending on June 30 and December 31 thereafter during the Employment Period, the Executive shall be paid by the Corporation a semi-annual cash bonus in accordance with the performance targets (the “Targets”) set by the Board and/or the Compensation/Stock Option Committee (the “Committee”).  Such targets may be semi-annual, annual or a combination of both. The target annual cash bonus will be 100% of the Annual Base Salary (the “Target Award”).  The actual amount of the award shall range from zero to 130% of the Target Award based upon achievement of specified performance objectives as set by the Board and/or Committee.  Each such bonus shall be paid promptly after the end of the applicable performance period.”







2.           Section 5(a)(i)(2) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and any references in Section 5(a)(i) to “clause (2)” shall be deleted in their entirety.







3.           Section 5(a)(iii) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:


 


“(iii) in the event of Termination other than by reason of the Executive’s death or Disability, the Corporation shall pay to the Executive in a lump sum in cash within 30 days after the Date of Termination an amount equal to the Executive’s then current maximum annual bonus opportunity; and”







4.           All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


5.          This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.


 






  





  











  








           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above.


 



	  	
VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


	  	  
	  	
By:       /s/ Todd Wiseley                                                           


	  	
Name: Todd Wiseley


	  	
Title:  Secretary


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Robert L. Recchia                                                                 


	  	
Robert L. Recchia
From: barbsemeiks@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:46:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Semeiks

Coxsackie, NY 12051
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LESLIE COLEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5014JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is her responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05014-RBL Document 2 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1
Case *No.*7,674.

#### KELLY v. The PITTSBURGH.

[Detroit Post. June 8, 1868.]

Circuit Court, E. D. Michigan.

June Term. 1868.

Maritime Liens — Supplies Furnished on Credit op Vessel.

[Cited in The St. Joseph, Case No. 12,229.]

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Eastern district of Michigan.]

[This was a libel in rein to recover the amount alleged to be due the libellant Ann Kelly for supplies furnished the propeller Pittsburgh, the Western Transportation Company, claimants.]

Before SWAYXE, Circuit Justice.

Plaintiff, who is a resident of some insignificant port in Canada, furnished a quantity of wood to the propeller, and now claims a lien upon the vessel for the value of the supplies thus delivered. She testifies positively that the wood was furnished on the credit of the vessel, and not on the credit of the captain, and there is no proof to the contrary. The ordinary debts of the master are not a lien upon his vessel, but there is no question of the power of the master to create a lien for the purchase of supplies when such may be absolutely nec*271essary. When the owner of a vessel purchases ordinary supplies on credit it is presumed that he purchases them on his individual credit. But when the master finds himself in a foreign port without money, and is in need of supplies, whatever debts he may contract for such needful supplies are not considered individual obligations, but will constitute a lien upon his vessel. In this case the facts are such as to show the grounds for the existence of a lien. It is ordered that the decree of the court below dismissing the libel be reversed, and that a decree be entered in favor of libellant for •?202, with interest from Nov. 22, 1SCG, and the costs of this suit.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 765 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 23, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1483) to amend the Omnibus Parks and Public 
Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the authorization for certain national 
heritage areas, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, modified by the 
amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 1483 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 12

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 76 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-2 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 12 of 12