alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

July 24, 1957

No. 61077.

protests 243956-K, etc. (New York).

#### Julien Giguet, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
smsi-ex10252_229.htm



EXHIBIT 10.25.2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 

(ANDREW ARNO)

 

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 5, 2018, by and between Smith Micro Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ANDREW ARNO (“Holder”), and amends that certain Secured Promissory Note, dated August 24, 2017, issued by the Company to Holder in the principal amount of $75,000, under which $25,000 currently remains outstanding, as amended by that certain Amendment to Secured Promissory Note dated January 30, 2018  (the “Note”).  Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to such terms in the Note. 

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Maturity Date of the Note as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

Section 1.  Extension of Note.  Effective as of the date hereof, the Maturity Date of the Note is hereby extended to March 25, 2020.

 

Section 2.  Effect of Amendment.  Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, no other changes or modifications to the Note are intended or implied by this Amendment.  To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Note, the terms of this Amendment shall control.  

 

Section 3.  Miscellaneous.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and any of the parties to this Amendment may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart.  Facsimile and electronically copied signatures on this Amendment shall be deemed the equivalent of original signatures.  This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.  

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 



EXHIBIT 10.25.2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized representatives as of the date first written above.

 

COMPANY: 

SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.

 

By: /s/ Timothy C. Huffmyer

Name:  Timothy C. Huffmyer

Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

HOLDER:

 

 

/s/ Andrew Arno

Andrew Arno
No. 68164.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/911 (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO gauge railroad accessories similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
(the “Report”) of Green Stream Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2022, the undersigned
James C. DiPrima, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: August 18, 2022 | /s/ __James C. DiPrima_________________________                                         
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: James C. DiPrima
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director
|                       | (Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### Robert J. CASTELLINI, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7159.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 23, 2001.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion for remand,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for proceedings consistent with the decision in *Miley v. Principi*242 F.3d 1050 (Fed.Cir.2001).
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21841]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket Number USTR-2023-0008]


Cancellation of Public Hearing Concerning China's Compliance With 
World Trade Organization (WTO) Commitments

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) sought 
public comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report 
to Congress on China's compliance with its obligations as a Member of 
the World Trade Organization (WTO). USTR is canceling the public 
hearing that was scheduled to take place on October 4, 2023.

DATES: The public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2023 is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China 
Affairs at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42162a2d2f23316c036c0f2330362b2c02373136306c272d326c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f3b0700020e1c412e41220e1d1b06012f1a1c1b1d410a001f41080019">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 395-9625.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2023, the TPSC sought public 
comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report to 
Congress on China's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the 
WTO. See 88 FR 56117 (Aug 17, 2023). The notice included a September 
20, 2023 deadline for the submission of written comments and requests 
to testify at a public hearing that was scheduled to take place on 
October 4, 2023. In response to the request for comments, USTR received 
22 submissions. USTR also received three requests to participate in the 
public hearing, which subsequently were withdrawn. Therefore, USTR is 
canceling the October 4, 2023 public hearing.

Laura Buffo,
Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States 
Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2023-21841 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3390-F3-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1







Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 3 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
No. P69/98.

protests 60/12463, etc. (New York).

No. P69/99.

protests 60/18872, etc. (New York).

No. P69/100.

protests 62/18481, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States, Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States,

*1080Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of chenille animals similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Novelty Import*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 574, C.D. 3462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66055.

#### American Customs Brokg. Company, for acct. of Manufacturers Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 316809-K (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63217, the claim'of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7480
TAMMY LYNN MOORE, a/k/a Tammy Lynn ScottSmith, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JAMES N. LILLER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-368) Submitted: March 17, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tammy Lynn Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appelant seeks to appeal the district court's judgment ordersl denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and her post-judgment motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed therecord and the district court's judgment order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Liller , No. CA-97-368 (S.D.W. Va. Sept . 3 & Sept. 16, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER VACATING

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PETER TILTON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-0098RSL

ORDER VACATING ORDER 

TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On November 27, 2006, plaintiff filed

his opposition to the motion to dismiss that, taken as a whole, exceeded 50 pages in length. On

December 1, 2006, the Court issued an order to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for

failing to provide a chambers’ copy as required by the Court’s prior instructions. After issuing

the order, the Court learned that plaintiff had delivered a courtesy copy to the Court, but the

copy was not timely forwarded to chambers by the clerks’ office. The order to show cause (Dkt.

#58) 

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 69 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER VACATING

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

is now vacated in light of the timely receipt of the courtesy copy. 

DATED this 4th day of December, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00098-RSL Document 69 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alan Eubanks, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 946]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on or about January 6, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and *agree*with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the *347Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL D. MILAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5842FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO

CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND

FORWARD PAYMENTS

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), does

hereby find and ORDER. 

(1) Plaintiff’s declaration indicates he is unable to afford the court’s filing fee or give security

therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed as a pauper is GRANTED. As set forth below,

an initial partial filing fee will be collected, and plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of

20 percent of the preceding months income credited to his/her account until the full amount of the

filing fee is satisfied.

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and plaintiff’s approved application to proceed in forma

pauperis, the agency having custody of the above named plaintiff is directed to calculate an initial partial

filing fee equal to 20 percent of greater of -- the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the

average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the date

of this Order. The initial partial filing fee should be forwarded to the court clerk as soon as practicable.

Subsequently, if the prisoner’s account exceeds $10.00, each month the agency is directed to

Case 3:05-cv-05842-FDB Document 7 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

collect and forward payments equal to 20 percent of the prisoner’s preceding month’s income credited to

the prisoner’s account. In the event that the monthly payment would reduce the prisoner’s account below

$10.00, the agency should collect and forward only that amount which would reduce the prisoner’s

account to the $10.00 level. Please note that this $10.00 limit does not apply to the initial partial filing fee

described above. Finally, the monthly payments should be collected and forwarded to the court until the

entire filing fee ($250.00) for this matter has been paid.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this Order and the General Order, and a copy

of this Order along with a copy of plaintiff’s Acknowledgment and Authorization portion of the IFP

application to the attention of the inmate account manager (IFP account manager) at the Washington State

Department of Corrections.

DATED this 27th day of January, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold____________ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05842-FDB Document 7 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 63363.

protests 58/21415, etc. (New York).

#### L. A. Ferm Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### Kenneth Ford WISHON, Appellant, v. Mark RUPP, Sheriff Newton County, Arkansas; County Commissioners, Newton County, Arkansas; Jane Doe; John Doe, 1 through 10, Appellees.

No. 00-3140.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 3, 2001.

Decided July 11, 2001.

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Ford Wishon appeals from the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After de novo review, *see Dulany v. Carnahan,*132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir.1997), we conclude that the district court’s judgment was correct and should be affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Unites States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Exhibit 15.3

February 28, 2012

China Distance Education Holdings Limited

18/F., Xueyuan International Tower

No.1 Zhichun
Road, Haidian District

Beijing, China 100083

Subject: WRITTEN CONSENT OF AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED

We hereby consent to the references
to our name and our final appraisal reports (the Reports) addressed to the board of directors of China Distance Education Holdings Limited (the Holding Company), and to references to our valuation methodologies, assumptions
and conclusions associated with such Reports, in the annual report on Form 20-F of the Holding Company and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report) filed or to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We further
consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.

The Reports relate to valuations of the designated assets and
liabilities of a joint venture named Beijing Zhengbao Yucai Education Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhengbao Yucai) of which certain assets and liabilities were contributed by Beijing Yinglun Yucai Education Consulting Co., Ltd. as of
March 10, 2009 and the designated assets and liabilities of a joint venture named Zhejiang Champion Xinlixiang Education Management Co., Ltd. (Champion Xinlixiang) of which certain assets and liabilities were contributed by
Mr. Junnan Ye and Mr. Xiujie Hu from their Gaokao re-take business as of September 30, 2009 to serve the Holding Company as a basis for allocation of the purchase price to the various accounts for financial reporting purposes in
accordance with U. S. GAAP. In reaching our valuation conclusions, we relied on the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and other data provided by the Holding Company and its representatives. We did not audit or independently
verify such financial statements or other data and take no responsibility for the accuracy of such information. The Holding Company determined the fair value of the above-mentioned subjects and our valuation reports were used to assist the Holding
Company in reaching its determinations.

In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (the Act), nor do we admit that we are experts with
respect to any part of such Annual Report within the meaning of the term experts as used in the Act.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Yours faithfully,                   
|                                    
|/s/ AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED
|AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 4 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 5 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 6 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 7 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 8 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 9 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 10 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 11 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 12 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 13 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 14 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 15 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 16 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 17 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 18 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 19 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 20 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 21 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 22 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 23 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 24 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 25 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 26 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 27 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 28 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 29 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 30 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 31 of 32
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-3 Filed 02/01/10 Page 32 of 32
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(l)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calloway's Nursery, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

                                                   Dated: February 12, 2003

                                                   CALLOWAY'S NURSERY, INC.


                                                   /s/ James C. Estill
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   James C. Estill
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                                   /s/ Daniel G. Reynolds
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Daniel G. Reynolds
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



                                       22