alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
ITEC ATTRACTIONS, INC. FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   23,483
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            45,556
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             145,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        459,227
<PP&E>                                                7,657,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,882,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7,169,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   712,556
<BONDS>                                               3,653,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  7,938
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,795,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7,169,144
<SALES>                                                 677,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        680,877
<CGS>                                                   622,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,116,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       74,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (510,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (510,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (510,099)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.06)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DENNIS BOUFFIOU,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF POUSLBO, a Washington State

Municipal Corporation; DONNA JEAN

BRUCE, Mayor of the City of Poulsbo; and

NANCY LIEN,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5718RJB

ORDER STRIKING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ORDER TO

COMPLY WITH

SUBPOENA DUCES

TECUM AS MOOT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Comply with Subpoena

Duces Tecum. Dkt. 13-1. The Court has considered the motion and the remainder of the file herein.

On July 31, 2006, Plaintiff filed the instant motion and noted it for consideration the same day. Id. 

The motion requests an order compelling Sound Employment Solutions, LLC to comply with a May 8,

2006 Subpoena Duces Tecum. Id. The May 8, 2006 Subpoena Duces Tecum commands Sound

Employment Solutions, LLC appear at a deposition on Tuesday, May 23, 2006. Dkt. 14, at 1. 

The motion should be stricken as moot. The Court can not order a party appear at a deposition

which was held two months ago. Moreover, pursuant to Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7(d)(3), this

motion should be noted for consideration “no earlier than the third Friday after filing and service of the

motion.” The Court also notes that there is no evidence in the record that this motion was served. 

Case 3:05-cv-05718-RJB Document 15 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum (Dkt. 13-1)

is STRICKEN AS MOOT. 

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any

party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 

DATED this 31ST day of July, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05718-RJB Document 15 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT E

LETTER DATED MARCH 13, 2007 TO

PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL FROM

DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-6 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 117 Att. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
SENT VIA EMAIL AND FACSIMILE

March 13, 2007

Robert J. Siegel

i.Justice Law, P.C.

1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 940

Seattle, WA 98101

Re: Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., United States District Court,

W. Dist. Wa., Case No. CV06-0204JCC

Dear Bob:

This follows up our conversation from last week regarding depositions in

the above referenced matter. Effective today, settlement discussions

have officially ended. (See Dkt. # 113). Accordingly, we need to arrange

for depositions to be conducted as soon as possible.

We requested the opportunity to depose the seven witnesses advanced

in support of your motion for summary judgment. (See Dkt. # 56-62). As

you are aware, these witnesses were not disclosed in your initial

disclosures. (See Dkt. # 25). 

Additionally, we request the opportunity to depose your expert witness,

Pete Resnick. Mr. Resnick was not disclosed until February 12, 2007. 

(See Dkt. 105). 

I look forward to working with you to find a mutually agreeable time and

place for the depositions. I can be reached directly at (206) 274-2825.

Regards,

NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

Roger Townsend

505 Fifth Avenue South

Suite 610

Seattle, Washington

98104

phone 206.274.2800

fax 206.274.2801

www.newmanlaw.com

info@newmanlaw.com

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 117-6 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER VACATING ORDER

REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL ADAM ASSENBERG, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

ANACORTES HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-1836L

ORDER VACATING ORDER

REGARDING INITIAL

DISCLOSURES

By order dated November 18, 2005, the Court referred this case to the Screening

Committee of this Court’s pro bono panel. The Court therefore VACATES its Order

Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. #10). The

Court will issue a new order regarding initial disclosures after the pro bono panel has

completed its review.

DATED this 21st day of November, 2005.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01836-RSL Document 14 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2017

p0321 

# Order

Clerk March 24, 2017

153049

KEITH TODD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 153049

COA: 323235

Wayne CC: 14

- 004589

- CZ

NBC UNIVERSAL (MSNBC),

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT and

A

- ONE LIMOUSINE,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On March 9, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to

appeal the December 10, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court,

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

B ERNSTEIN

, J., would reverse Part IV of the Court of Appeals judgment and

remand this case to the circuit court to hear the plaintiff’s motion to amend.
Exhibit
32.2







Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 3 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
2014 WI 105

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

CASE NO.: 2013AP2702-D

COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings 

Against Jerry R. Albert, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation,

 Complainant,

 v.

Jerry R. Albert,

 Respondent. 

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALBERT

OPINION FILED: August 20, 2014

SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 

ORAL ARGUMENT:

SOURCE OF APPEAL:

COURT:

COUNTY:

JUDGE:

JUSTICES:

CONCURRED:

DISSENTED:

NOT PARTICIPATING: 

ATTORNEYS:
2014 WI 105

NOTICE

This opinion is subject to further 

editing and modification. The final 

version will appear in the bound 

volume of the official reports. 

No. 2013AP2702-D

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings 

Against Jerry R. Albert, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation,

 Complainant,

 v.

Jerry R. Albert,

 Respondent.

FILED

AUG 20, 2014

Diane M. Fremgen

Clerk of Supreme Court

ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney publicly 

reprimanded. 

¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a reciprocal discipline matter. 

On December 9, 2013, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed 

a complaint and motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 

(SCR) 22.22 requesting that this court publicly reprimand 

Attorney Jerry R. Albert as reciprocal discipline identical to 

that imposed by the Arizona Supreme Court. 

¶2 Attorney Albert was admitted to practice law in 

Wisconsin in 1971. His Wisconsin law license is currently 
No. 2013AP2702-D 

2

suspended for failure to pay State Bar of Wisconsin dues. 

Attorney Albert is also admitted to practice law in Arizona. 

¶3 The OLR's complaint noted that on June 25, 2013, the 

Arizona Supreme Court reprimanded Attorney Albert for knowingly 

making a false statement by omission when he failed to tell the 

court that a question he planned to ask during a criminal trial 

was redacted so as to make it appear that the defendant had 

contradicted herself on the material point, when in fact she had 

not. The Arizona Supreme Court found that this act violated 

ER 3.3(a) and 8.4(d) of the Arizona Rules of Professional 

Conduct, Rule 42, Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. Attorney Albert admitted the 

allegation and agreed that a reprimand was appropriate.

¶4 Attorney Albert did not notify the OLR of the Arizona 

reprimand within 20 days of its effective date. 

¶5 On February 18, 2014, Attorney Albert filed a response 

to the OLR's complaint and motion, in which he stated that he 

did not object to the imposition of discipline reciprocal to 

that imposed in Arizona.

¶6 Under SCR 22.22(3), in reciprocal discipline matters, 

this court shall impose the identical discipline unless one of 

the enumerated exceptions is shown. There is no indication that 

any of those exceptions apply in this case. 

¶7 IT IS ORDERED that Jerry R. Albert is publicly 

reprimanded as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the 

Arizona Supreme Court.
No. 2013AP2702-D 

1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld,Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

 

The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA                              |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary       |
| (principal financial officer and principal accounting |
| officer)                                              |
|                                                  |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota                              |
|                                                  |
|                                                  |
| Date : April 14, 2008                            |

 

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 794 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 6, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3043) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and 
Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
    Sec. 2.  A motion to proceed to consideration of H.R. 3688 pursuant to 
section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 shall be in order only if offered by the 
Majority Leader or his designee.
    Sec. 3.  Upon receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting H.R. 3043, 
with a Senate amendment thereto, it shall be in order to take the same from the 
Speaker's table and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point 
of order, a motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or 
his designee that the House concur in such amendment. The Senate amendment and 
the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 61553.

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 305945-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# Amtsblatt C 122A/16.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 122A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 58. Jahrgang16. April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 122A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

58. Jahrgang16. April 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — Beamte der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 5/AD 7) mit Schwerpunkt juristische Recherche: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in bulgarischem Recht (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in deutschem Recht (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in kroatischem Recht (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in irischem Recht (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in litauischem Recht (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in slowakischem Recht (SK) — ( ABl. C 68 A vom 26.2.2015 ) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

2015/C 122A/01

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — Beamte der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 5/AD 7) mit Schwerpunkt juristische Recherche: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in bulgarischem Recht (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in deutschem Recht (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in kroatischem Recht (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in irischem Recht (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in litauischem Recht (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in slowakischem Recht (SK) — ( ABl. C 68 A vom 26.2.2015 )

( ABl. C 68 A vom 26.2.2015 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 16.4.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 122/1

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — Beamte der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 5/AD 7) mit Schwerpunkt „juristische Recherche“: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in bulgarischem Recht (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in deutschem Recht (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in kroatischem Recht (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in irischem Recht (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in litauischem Recht (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in slowakischem Recht (SK)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 68 A vom 26. Februar 2015
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

Auf Seite 2, Abschnitt I, Ziffer 3:

anstelle von:

„Anmeldefrist (einschließlich Validierung): 31. März 2015, 12 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Ortszeit.“

muss es heißen:

„Anmeldefrist (einschließlich Validierung): 9. April 2015, 12 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Ortszeit.“

---
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-01950-RSL Document 23-2 Filed 08/22/06 Page 12 of 12
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 798 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 798

Referring the bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ``For the relief of Francisco 
Rivera and Alfonso Calderon'', to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2007

 Mr. Filner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Referring the bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ``For the relief of Francisco 
Rivera and Alfonso Calderon'', to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    The bill (H.R. 4037), entitled ``For the relief of Francisco Rivera 
and Alfonso Calderon'' and now pending in the House of Representatives, 
is referred to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
        United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the 
        earliest practicable date, providing--
                    (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that 
                are sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in such bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Francisco Rivera and Alfonso 
                Calderon.
                                 <all>
```
No. 69301.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/22471, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger jointed molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Best Moulding Corporation*v. *United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest)*(51 CCPA, 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.