alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

GMEG - Geology and Geophysics

    - GMEG        - Staff 
    - Our Science
    - Projects
    - Products 
    - Links 
    - General Interest
    - GUMP

 

| Geology and Geophysics
**GMEG**scientists conduct geological and geophysical research in the  western United States, specializing in the following areas of research: 
- Geologic mapping and three-dimensional modeling of geologic framework
- Surficial geologic mapping and geomorphologic analysis
- Regional geophysics
- Energy resource assessments
- Earth surface processes and climate change
- Chronostratigraphy and paleontology

Our research supports long-term  goals of USGS programs in the categories of Hazards, Landscape, and Resource  Assessments**Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park (GUMP)**Geologic Maps of the San Francisco Bay RegionGeologic Maps of the Pacific Northwest RegionGeologic Maps of the Grand Canyon Region**Check our our G & G Seminar Series!** | G & G scientists studying faults and landscape features in Death Valley National Park |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/index.html		Page Contact Information: GMEG Webmaster				Page Last Modified: 17-Dec-2012@13:23
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT AND RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) UNDER THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, Richard N. Phegley, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smart & Final Inc. for the quarter ended June 13, 2004. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 20, 2004
 
/s/ Richard N. Phegley
  
Richard N. Phegley
  
Chief Financial Officer

 

2
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

CARLOS MARTINEZ JIMENEZ, 

Petitioner, 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NUMBER: C05-5736FDB

MARIA GUADALUPE LOZA LOZANO, 

Respondent,

O Decision by Court This action came on before the Court on Petitioners Amended Petition for Return of Child. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

Based on written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Petition is GRANTED. The Court will enter a separate order concerning RLJ’s return to Mexico. Respondent

shall not remove RLJ from the Western District of Washington pending RLJ’s return to Mexico.

RLJ shall be returned to Mexico on March 2, 2007. Petitioner shall pay and make arrangements for a direct flight

from Seattle to Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico for RLJ. Petitioner shall make all of RLJ’s flight arrangements.

Petitioner, through counsel, shall inform Respondent’s counsel of all necessary flight information for RLJ by

February 21, 2007. Respondent shall take RLJ to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on the day of RLJ’s

scheduled flight purchased by Petitioner and RLJ shall board the scheduled flight. Petitioner, through his counsel

of record, shall notify the Court of RLJ’s arrival in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico within 24 hours after RLJ’s

arrival. 

DATE: February 21, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

/s/ Rhonda Miller ___

(By) Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-05736-FDB Document 52 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc., a
company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith, President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 14, 2009                    /s/ Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION

OF COUNSEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

FRED GORDON and LESLIE GORDON, )

) No. C06-221RSL

Plaintiffs, ) 

v. )

) ORDER STRIKING NOTICE

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, ) OF WITHDRAWAL AND

LLC, et al., ) SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC’s

“Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel” (Dkt. #48). Under Local General Rule

2(g)(4)(A), “No attorney shall withdrawal an appearance in any cause, civil or criminal, except

by leave of court. Leave shall be obtained by filing a motion or a stipulation for withdrawal[.]” 

Defendant’s counsel did not obtain leave of court as required by this rule. Accordingly,

defendant’s notice of withdrawal (Dkt. #48) is hereby STRICKEN because it does not comply

with Local General Rule 2(g)(4)(A). Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC’s counsel is

strongly urged to comply with the local rules in any subsequent request for withdrawal.

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-00221-RSL Document 50 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION

OF COUNSEL -2-

DATED this 12th day of January, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00221-RSL Document 50 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,016
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     13,925
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,934
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,985
<LOANS>                                         42,728
<ALLOWANCE>                                        488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,366
<DEPOSITS>                                      72,767
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                462
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,980
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  80,366
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,175
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  537
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   312
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,024
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,003
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,021
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    533
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.98
<LOANS-NON>                                         17
<LOANS-PAST>                                       359
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   489
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  488
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 710 

Commemorating the 125th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Pechanga 

Indian Reservation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2007 

Mr. ISSA (for himself and Mrs. BONO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 125th Anniversary of the Establishment 

of the Pechanga Indian Reservation. 

Whereas for more than 10,000 years, the Pechanga Band of 

Luisen ̃o Indians have lived in, and been stewards of the 

Southern California region known today as the Temecula 

Valley; 

Whereas on June 27, 1882, an Executive Order by President 

Chester A. Arthur established the Pechanga Indian Reservation in the Temecula Valley on behalf of the 

Pechanga Band of Luisen ̃o Indians; 

Whereas the establishment of the Pechanga Indian Reservation initiated the formal government-to-government relationship between the Pechanga Band of Luisen ̃o Indians 

and the United States of America; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 710 IH 

Whereas the Pechanga people have a rich and deep-rooted 

history with a story of perseverance that serves as an inspiration to all Americans; 

Whereas the Pechanga people have overcome disease, invasion, prejudice, discrimination, droughts, fires, floods, 

and earthquakes to enter a new era marked by hope, 

equality, and self-sufficiency; 

Whereas the Pechanga People have made many contributions 

to California, and remain a vital part of the State’s history, culture, economy, and social fabric; 

Whereas we recognize and are grateful for the sacrifices that 

veteran’s and public servants of Pechanga have made to 

the United States of America and the State of California; 

and 

Whereas it is our hope that the relationship between the 

United States of America and the Pechanga Band, for 

the next 125 years, will be distinguished by dignity, 

friendship, and respect for Pechanga’s original natural 

rights, and the pursuit of common goals: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives does hereby commemorate the 125th anniver3 sary of the establishment of the Pechanga Indian Reserva4 tion and the beginning of a formal government-to-govern5 ment relationship between the Pechanga Band of Luisen ̃o 

6 Indians and the United States of America. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Before the Third Division,

March 23, 1967

No. P67/79.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 66/3667, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P67/338.

#### Mitsui *&*Co., Ltd. *v.*United States, protests 66/77868(A), 66/77867(C), and 66/77867(A) (New York).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of waterproof cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
TTM FACILITY: San Diego, CA

PROCESS OPERATION: Outerlayer Etcher

Process Tank Process Contents / Concentrations Temp. Volume Rinse Rate Dump Discharge Remarks

No. Step No. (0F) (Gal.) (GPM) Frequency Disposition

1 1 Etching Chamber 120 145 Not Dump & To spent etch Process tank Cleaning

applicable remake drum then Freq.: once per quarter

ammonium chloride 3% - 5% by wt. once/month offsite for Cleaning Chemistry:

ammonium hydroxide 0.5% - 2% by wt. recycling 10% Hydrochloric acid

tetraamine copper dichloride 20-26% by wt.

Worker Activity 2

2 A, B, C 2 Etcher Replenish Station Amb. 5/each Not Dump & To spent etch In operation fresh etch

applicable remake drum then fed from Replenisher

ammonium carbonate 3% - 4% by wt. once/month offsite for Module to etcher based

ammonium chloride 21% -24% by wt. recycling on specific gravity of 

ammonium hydroxide 21% - 24% by wt. (applies to drains only) etchant

3 A, B, C 3 Rinse Amb. 5/each 9 gal/hr Dump & On-site WWT system 3 station cascade

remake spray rinse station

once/month

NOTE: Miscellaneous wastewaters from the above process tanks include spills, leaks, equipment and floor washdowns, sample bottle contents and rinsing, PPE

(gloves, boots, etc) cleaning water, and safety shower/eyewash drainings that may flow into the trench serving this line and then into WW treatment system.

Fresh etch makeup

from drum

Unetched Etching Chamber 3 stage counter flow rinses Etched

Panels Panels

1 2A 2B 2C Rinse chambers 3A,3B&3C

Worker Activity 1 To Spent Etch Drum

Release 1

To On-site WWT System

Tetraamine copper dichloride 25 Kg/day Average

35 Kg/day Maximum

Replenisher chambers
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID GOULD,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-0032-RSL-JPD

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO

ENFORCE IRS SUBPOENA

The Court, having reviewed the Petitioner’s Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue

Service Summons, all papers and exhibits in support and in opposition to that motion, the

Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate

Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The Petitioner’s Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons against

the respondent (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED;

(3) If respondent chooses to assert a Fifth Amendment privilege, the assertion will

be raised on a document-by-document or question-by-question basis;

(4) Respondent is directed to comply with the summons no later than February 21,

Case 2:06-cv-00032-RSL Document 17 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2006, or on a date mutually agreed upon by the parties;

(5) Respondent’s Motion to Recuse All Federal Judges (Dkt. No. 9), and Motion

to Dismiss and Vacate (Dkt. No. 8), is DENIED; and

(6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

Donohue.

DATED this 6th day of March, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00032-RSL Document 17 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2
From: valerieltucker@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:46:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Valerie Tucker

New Philadelphia, OH 44663
Before the Second Division,

April 11, 1963

No. 67593.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 62/11419-12906, 62/11490-12951, and 62/11493-12954 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.