alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States

Department of Agriculture

Center for Nutrition

Policy and Promotion

FAT FREE

2

9

10 5

4

3

6

7

8

1 choose to eat some foods 

more or less often

 Choose more vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and 

fat-free or 1% milk and dairy products. Cut back on foods high 

in solid fats, added sugars, and salt.

 

find out what you need 

 Get your personalized plan by using the SuperTracker

 to identify your food group targets. Compare the foods 

you eat to the foods you need to eat.

sip smarter Drink water or other calorie-free 

 beverages, 100% juice, or fat-free 

milk when you are thirsty. Soda and other 

sweet drinks contain a lot of sugar and 

are high in calories.

compare foods

Check out the Food-A-Pedia to look up and compare 

 nutrition information for more than 8,000 foods.

make treats “treats,” 

not everyday foods

Treats are great once in a while. Just don’t make 

treat foods an everyday choice. Limit sweet treats to special 

occasions. 

get to know the foods you eat

Use the SuperTracker to find out what kinds of foods 

and how much to eat and to get tips and support for 

making better food choices. 

take your time 

Be mindful to eat slowly, enjoy the taste and 

textures, and pay attention to how you feel. Use 

hunger and fullness cues to recognize when to eat and 

when you’ve had enough.

use a smaller plate

 Use a smaller plate at meals to help with portion

control. That way you can finish your entire plate and 

feel satisfied without overeating.

if you eat out, choose healthier options

Check and compare nutrition information about 

the foods you are eating. Preparing food at home 

makes it easier to control what is in your meals.

satisfy your sweet tooth in a healthy way 

Indulge in a naturally sweet dessert dish—fruit! 

Serve a fresh fruit cocktail or a fruit 

parfait made with yogurt. For a hot dessert, 

bake apples and top with cinnamon.

enjoy your food, 

but eat less

10 tips to enjoying your meal 

You can enjoy your meals while making small adjustments to the amounts of food on your plate. 

Healthy meals start with more vegetables and fruits and smaller portions of protein and grains. And don’t forget

dairy—include fat-free or low-fat dairy products on your plate, or drink milk with your meal.

Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov for more information.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series

 

DG TipSheet No. 18

December 2011

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
No. 67547.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/24515 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of so-called “power packs,” composed wholly or in chief value of metal, used for electrically igniting and putting into operation an electrically operated mercury vapor lamp, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 398 

Recognizing the long and mutually-beneficial relationship between the United 

States and France and congratulating France’s President-elect Nicolas 

Sarkozy on his victory in the May 6, 2007, Presidential election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. BOUSTANY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the long and mutually-beneficial relationship between the United States and France and congratulating 

France’s President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy on his victory 

in the May 6, 2007, Presidential election. 

Whereas the United States and France share a long and mutually-beneficial relationship; 

Whereas La Fayette helped the American Continental Army 

plan the successful military strategy to defeat the British 

during the War of Independence; 

Whereas beginning in 1917, the armed forces of the United 

States and France fought side-by-side during World War 

I; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 398 IH 

Whereas beginning in 1941, the armed forces of the United 

States and France fought side-by-side during World War 

II; 

Whereas in 1949, France was one of the founding members 

of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and 

has continued to cooperate in multinational exercises to 

protect the European continent; 

Whereas in 1999, France worked with the United States and 

other allies to defeat Slobodan Milosevic, and has continued to be a key player in the peacekeeping forces in 

Kosovo; 

Whereas France continues to be an ally in the global war on 

terrorism; 

Whereas in 2003, France joined the multinational forces engaged in the conflict in Afghanistan to remove the 

Taliban government and to eliminate the safe haven provided to Al Qaeda; 

Whereas France has taken lead to reduce Syrian influence in 

Lebanon and help stabilize Lebanon’s democraticallyelected government; 

Whereas France joined the United Kingdom and Germany to 

form the EU–3 in an effort to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons capability; 

Whereas France is a major economic trading partner of the 

United States with nearly $1 billion worth of transactions 

per day; 

Whereas the French influence continues to be celebrated 

throughout South Louisiana whereby nearly 250,000 people claim French to be their principle language; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 398 IH 

Whereas on May 6, 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy was elected as the 

next President of France: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the long and mutually-beneficial 

3 relationship between the United States and France; 

4 and 

5 (2) congratulates France’s President-elect Nico6 las Sarkozy on his victory in the Presidential elec7 tion held on May 6, 2007. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 5 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 4, 2007.
    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 6) adopting the Rules of the House 
of Representatives for the One Hundred Tenth Congress. The resolution shall be 
considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of 
the question except as specified in sections 2 through 4 of this resolution.
    Sec. 2. The question of adopting the resolution shall be divided among five 
parts, to wit: each of its five titles. The portion of the divided question 
comprising title I shall be debatable for 30 minutes, equally divided and 
controlled by the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees. 
The portion of the divided question comprising title II shall be debatable for 
60 minutes, equally divided and controlled by the majority leader and the 
minority leader or their designees. The portion of the divided question 
comprising title III shall be debatable for 60 minutes, equally divided and 
controlled by the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees. 
The portion of the divided question comprising title IV shall be debatable for 
60 minutes, equally divided and controlled by the majority leader and the 
minority leader or their designees. The portion of the divided question 
comprising title V shall be debatable for 10 minutes, equally divided and 
controlled by the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees. 
Each portion of the divided question shall be disposed of in the order stated.
    Sec. 3. Pending the question of adopting the final portion of the divided 
question, it shall be in order to move that the House commit the resolution to a 
select committee with or without instructions. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the motion to commit to its adoption without 
intervening motion.
    Sec. 4. During consideration of House Resolution 6 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the resolution to a time designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 6, 2012*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.202 U.S. Deposits in Foreign Countries** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 68479.

protests 63/9682 and 63/10668 (Los Angeles).

#### Universal Enterprises *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N.*& *E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68963.

#### AMT Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 64/17897 (Detroit).

*335Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | Exhibit 35.4 |
|--------|--------------|

 

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-4

121 S. 13th Street, Suite 201

Lincoln, NE 68508

 

Pursuant to the May 16, 2008 letter agreement related to the Student Loan Servicing Agreement dated as of September 30, 1998 (as amended from time to time) by and between Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (“Great Lakes” and NHELP-I, Inc., which Servicing Agreement was amended pursuant to a letter amendment dated as of September 23, 2004, to include the Nelnet Student Loan Trusts (the “Servicing Agreement”), the undersigned here certifies that (a) a review of the activities of Great Lakes during the period ending December 31, 2008 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Great Lakes has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement, in all material respects, during such period.

 

Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.

 

/s/ MICHAEL J. NOACK______________

Michael J. Noack

Chief Servicing Officer

 

February 20, 2009
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ROBERTO RAMOS-SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 06-17M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Illegal reentry after Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance January 12, 2006

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant was not interviewed by Pretrial Services. He was born in Mexico.

There is no additional information available regarding his personal history, residence, family ties,

ties to this District, income, financial assets or liabilities, physical/mental health or controlled

substance use, if any.

(2) The defendant has a criminal record that includes prior deportation proceedings.

(3) An immigration detainer has been placed. Based on this, the defendant does not

Case 2:06-mj-00017-MAT Document 8 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

contest detention.

(4) The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance due to prior failure to appear,

unknown background information, and status as a citizen and native of Mexico. The defendant

poses a risk of danger due to his criminal record.

(5) There does not appear to be any condition or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings while addressing the danger

to other persons or the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-mj-00017-MAT Document 8 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 3 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerJuly
      21, 2009
From: detehu@gvec.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:26:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Desiree Huffman

Seguin, TX 78155
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALEXANDER SERGEY ZADORIN,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5803FDB

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, DAVID JENNINGS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, LINDA SULLIVAN;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable FRANKLIN D. BURGESS;

Date: AUGUST 31, 2007

Time: 10:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. .

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

August 16, 2007.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05803-RBL Document 54 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 1
|               | (1)                                  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                             |
|          | (2)                                  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|  Date:      May 15, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |                      |                     | /s/ A. William Allen,III     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | A.      William Allen, III   |
|                                                         |                      |      | Chief      Executive Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edward John BEACH, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 05-4431, 05-4432.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 23, 2005.

Aaron Edmund Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Interim United States Attorney, Kimlani S. Murray, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*201PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward John Beach seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss his trial counsel and adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his motion to suppress evidence at his criminal trial. Although Beach was found guilty after a jury trial of various drug crimes, he has not yet been sentenced. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000). The orders Beach seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal materials are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Case 2:06-cv-00175-MJP Document 24 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00175-MJP Document 24 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2