alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Parastoo MOGHADAR HAGHANI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71346, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Parastoo Moghadar Haghani, San Diego, CA, pro se.

CAS-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Patricia A. Smith, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*599Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Parastoo Moghadar Haghani, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the CAT. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Moghadar Haghani’s experiences did not rise to the level of persecution on account of her political opinion. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 961-62 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

We lack jurisdiction to review the remaining issues because Moghadar Haghani failed to raise them before the BIA. *See Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 1066, 1079 n. 5 (9th Cir.2004) (“Failure to raise an issue in an appeal to the BIA constitutes a failure to exhaust remedies with respect to that question and deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter”) (citations omitted).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case No. 8,791.

#### McFEELY v. DRYER.

[Cited in Collinson v. Teal, Case No. 3.020. Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit
32.2




Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 2 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 94 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 5

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 94

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 94 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 94 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 94 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 94 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 5 of 5
From: dotness@invisimax.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:03:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dorothy Ness

Sharon, ND 58277
Exhibit 32.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of Bion Environmental Technologies,
Inc., a company duly formed under the laws of Colorado (the "Company"), for
the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark A. Smith,
President (Chief Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 8, 2007                          /s/  Mark A. Smith
                                       Mark A. Smith
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
10


Exhibit 10.1

Written description of the loan agreement 




Loan Agreement Between:




Marat Asylbekov and Exent Corp.







Terms of the Loan Agreement:




1.

As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Asylbekov has loaned $224 to the Company, and may provide additional Loans to Exent Corp. from time to time to allow the Company to pay for future expenses, offering costs, filing fees and professional fees.




2.

The Loans are non-interest bearing, have no due date and payable to Mr. Asylbekov upon demand.




3.

Mr. Asylbekov does not have any obligation to provide Loans to Exent Corp. and may do so only if he wishes.




Marat Asylbekov

/s/ Marat Asylbekov
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MELISSA FERNANDEZ
, Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS A

. MELDRUM and CATHERINE MELDRUM

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 0604

[ July 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott R. Kerner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CA009612.

John R. Sutton of Sutton Pomares Law Group PA, South Miami, for appellant.

Justin C

. Carlin of The Carlin Law Firm, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Douglas A. Meldrum.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 66560.

#### Sol Westheimer Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/27780 and 60/27195 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of corsages with frosted bells similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65709, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C05-1633-RSL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ROLAND F. BEAVER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-1633-RSL

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision

in regard to Plaintiff’s applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II and

Supplemental Security Income disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be

REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative

proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the case will be

reassigned to a new administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ will further consider the opinion

Case 2:05-cv-01633-RSL-MJB Document 15 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C05-1633-RSL]

from treating physician, Alton Hart, M.D., and as necessary, will further consider Plaintiff’s

residual functional capacity. The ALJ will also consider Plaintiff’s ability to perform other work

at step five and address all vocational evidence in the record in the decision.

DATED this 27th day of February, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Recommended for Entry

this 22nd day of February, 2006:

s/ Monica J. Benton 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ STEPHANIE R. MARTZ WSB # 28636

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900

Seattle, WA 98104

Phone: (206) 615-2272

Fax: (206)615-2531

stephanie.martz@ssa.gov

Case 2:05-cv-01633-RSL-MJB Document 15 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Justin W. Shireman, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Systems, Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Registrant, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;


5.
        The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.






Date:  August 14, 2007
        
        /s/ Justin W. ShiremanJustin W. ShiremanVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)


---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES ALEXANDER BRUNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-93-F, CA-95-438-5-F)

Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Alexander Bruner, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Franklin Askins,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Bruner, Nos. CR-94-93-F;

CA-95-438-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 23, 1995). Regarding Appellant's claim

that the district court erred in proceeding under Rule 4 of the

Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, we find the claim meritless. We

note that the district court's order recognizes the discrepancy between the offense of conviction stated in the judgment (possession

of an explosive) and the offense Bruner actually pled guilty to

which was "attempt to possess." Order at 6-7. To remedy this inconsistency, we suggest that the district court amend the judgment to

reflect that Bruner was convicted of "attempt to possess" rather

than "possession of an explosive." We deny Appellant's motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
  Dated: March 16, 2011/s/ ROBERT M. AQUILINA

Robert M. AquilinaChief Executive Officer/s/ CLYDE SWOGER

Clyde SwogerChief Financial Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 647 

Commending General David H. Petraeus for his exemplary service to the 

United States and for his leadership as Commander of the Multi-National 

Force—Iraq and condemning in the strongest possible terms the reprehensible efforts of certain persons questioning the honesty, integrity, 

and service of General Petraeus. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 

Mr. GINGREY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Commending General David H. Petraeus for his exemplary 

service to the United States and for his leadership as 

Commander of the Multi-National Force—Iraq and condemning in the strongest possible terms the reprehensible 

efforts of certain persons questioning the honesty, integrity, and service of General Petraeus. 

Whereas the appointment of General David H. Petraeus to 

be the Commander of the Multi-National Forces—Iraq 

was unanimously confirmed by the Senate on January 

26, 2007, and General Petraeus assumed command of 

the Multi-National Forces—Iraq on February 10, 2007; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 647 IH 

Whereas General Petraeus was called upon by the President 

to lead United States forces in Iraq at a critical point in 

the histories of both the United States and Iraq; 

Whereas General Petraeus has served the United States with 

honor and distinction for more 35 years, including as 

Commander of the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) 

during the first year of combat operations in Iraq; 

Whereas General Petraeus has received numerous awards and 

distinctions during his career, including the Defense Distinguished Service Medal, two awards of the Distinguished Service Medal, two awards of the Defense Superior Service Medal, four awards of the Legion of Merit, 

the Bronze Star Medal for valor, the State Department 

Superior Honor Award, the NATO Meritorious Service 

Medal, and the Gold Award of the Iraqi Order of the 

Date Palm; 

Whereas General Petraeus expressed in his report to Congress that his report and his testimony are his own, personal assessments of the current situation in Iraq; and 

Whereas certain partisan political organizations have sought 

to impugn the integrity of General Petraeus and call into 

question his service and loyalty to the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends General David H. Petraeus for 

3 his exemplary service to the United States and for 

4 his leadership as Commander of the Multi-National 

5 Force—Iraq; and 

6 (2) condemns in the strongest possible terms 

7 the reprehensible efforts of certain persons quesVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:41 Sep 11, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR647.IH HR647

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 647 IH 

1 tioning the honesty, integrity, and service of General 

2 Petraeus. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit 15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-157129) pertaining to the China Distance Education Holdings Limited Share Incentive Plan and the China Distance Education Holdings Limited 2008 Performance Incentive Plan of our report
dated December 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of China Distance Education Holdings Limited included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended September 30, 2010.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming              
|Shenzhen, the Peoples Republic of China

March 23,
2011
EX-4.02





 Exhibit 4.02 

 
 



 
 CLASS B COMMON STOCK INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE STATE OF INDIANA SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP
XXXXXX XX X THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE CLASS B COMMON STOCK OF NBHSA INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender
of this certificate properlyCOMMON endorsed. The holder hereof, by accepting this certificate, expressly assents to and is bound by all provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, and by the By-Laws of the Corporation, and all amendments thereto,
respectively from time to time to all of which reference is hereby made with the same force and effect as if the same were herein set forth in full. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar. WITNESS the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CHAIRMAN TREASURER













 



 
 A summary of the designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations applicable to each class of stock and the variations in
rights, preferences and limitations determined for each series (and the authority of the Board of Directors to determine variations for future series) of stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue will be furnished without charge to the
holder hereof, upon request submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations: UTMA CustodianTEN COM – as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act and not as
tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT
OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK
EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Areconnaissance of parts of northwestern New Mexico and northern Arizona**
 
Record | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:435
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959003
 
August 1, 2018