alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 8,214.

#### LEHMAIER et al. v. MAXWELL.

[N. Y. Times,

Jan. 28, 1856.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Customs Duties — Appraisers—Penalty for Undervaluation — Protest.

[1. Reappraisers may be sworn by a deputy collector.]

[2. The penalty for undervaluation attaches whether the importer makes the addition to his invoice or not.]

[3. A notice that the appraisement is not satisfactory. and the importers will give evidence “if desired,” is not sufficient to entitle them to a reappraisement.]

[4. An appraisement becomes of no effect only when there is another appraisement. The remedy of an importer for the refusal of the collector to appoint a merchant appraiser is an a'etion on the case.] . ' ‘

The plaintiffs [John Lehmaier and others] made two importations of goods in the year 1852. They had purchased the first about two months before shipment, and the price in the invoice was the purchase price. On an appraisal and a reappraisal the value had been raised more than 10 per cent., and the penalty of 20 per cent, was accordingly exacted, and paid under protest. The protest was general, and specified but two exceptions to the reappraisal: First, that the re-appraisers were not sworn by [Hugh Maxwell] the collector; and, second, that the penalty cannot be exacted except where the importer has raised his invoice price on entry. The goods of the second importation were also appraised, and their value raised; the penalty exacted, and paid under protest. This protest was also general, but contained a notice as follows: “You should not refuse us the appraisement of a merchant appraiser, under the acts of 1823 [3 Stat. 729], 1830 [4 Stat. 409]. and 1832 [Id. 583].” The only evidence of such refusal is a letter of the plaintiffs to the defendant, in which they said: “The appraisement which has been made is not satisfactory, and, if desired, such evidence and statements will be produced to you as can be furnished to satisfy you of the fairness of our invoice.”

HELD BY

THE COURT

(INGERSOLL, District Judge).

That in the first case it was sufficient that the reappraisers were sworn by a deputy collector, and that the penalty attaches whether the importer makes the addition to his invoice or not. That in the second case the plaintiffs gave no absolute unconditional notice of dissatisfaction to the collector, which they must do to entitle them to a reappraisal, but only announced that they would give evidence, if the collect- or desired it; and as he had no desire on the subject, their appeal was in effect aban*251doned. [Bartlett v. Kane] 16 How. [57 U. S.] 263. But if the collector had refused to appoint a merchant appraiser, as claimed, still the appraisement was valid. It becomes of no effect only when there has been another appraisement; and the plaintiff’s remedy, if he had refused, would be by an action on the case against him for breach of duty. That neither of the protests, therefore, can avail the plaintiffs.

Verdict set aside, and judgment ordered for the defendant.
No. P67/110.

No. P67/111.

No. P67/112.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/15038, etc. (El Paso).

#### Bailey Mora Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/8387, etc. (El Paso).

#### Bailey Mora Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 63/8388, etc. (El Paso).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wood pine moldings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bailey-Mora Company, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 99 C.D. 2737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Alkermes,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James.
M. Frates, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/ James M. Frates
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        James M. Frates
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 14, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0277

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JOSHUA DONALD BURLEY,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Donald L. Harris, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2020

03/26/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0277
From: samuelsens@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:14:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Samuelsen

, 06027-0235
February 20, 1961

No. 65197.

Suit 5031.

#### United States *v.*Border Brokerage Co.

C.D. 2131 reversed November 17,1960. C.A.D. 754.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jeff Lamson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entertainment Art, Inc.;
 
 2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.          The small business issuer’s sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.          The small business issuer’s sole officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: June 19, 2012
 
 /s/ Jeff Lamson
 Chief Financial Officer
No. 68472.

protests 63/10698, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Carmichael Forwarding Service, Inc., a/c Intercontinental Supply & Manufacturing Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Bao, X

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer-

chandise consists of spits, forks, and other stove parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66689, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         145,099
<SECURITIES>                                   193,737
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               380,392
<PP&E>                                          25,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,921
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,941)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.38)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT - SANITIZED PMN: 10-0545, 0546 Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 11/10/2010 ENGINEER: Arnold \ DDH \ JAS PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE: Consolidated Set: P-10-545 and P-10-546.

OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: wear suitable gloves/ wear chemical safety goggles/ use only in well ventilated areas/ keep container tightly closed Respirator: no respirator recommendation provided in submission Health Effects: may be harmful if swallowed or inhaled/ may cause irritation to skin, eyes and respiratory tract TLV/PEL: none established.

CRSS : Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (09/21/2010): Migration to groundwater: unknown PBT rating: P3B1T1 Health: 1-2 Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC =) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. This is a consolidated set of two PMNs (P10-0545 and P10-0546).

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT-SANITIZED PMN: 10-0545, 0546 ManufacturingNumber of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note:

Air Output 2: days/yr from sites to: from: basis:

Incineration or land Output from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:
Inhalation: Exposure to Output 2: Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired?
Dermal:Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT-SANITIZED PMN: 10-0545, 0546 Processing/Use: Number of Sites/ Location: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note:

Air Output 2: to: from: basis:

Incineration or land Output to: from: basis:

Incineration Conservative: to: from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:Basis:
Inhalation: Exposure to Output 2: Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired?
Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                       3,052,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,703,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,000
<INVENTORY>                                    556,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,550,182
<PP&E>                                       1,891,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 889,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,329,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          516,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,126
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,620,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,329,352
<SALES>                                      4,014,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,014,375
<CGS>                                        1,882,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,882,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,588,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                   525,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,063,111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,063,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.7

CONSENT OF G. PETER MAH

I, G. Peter
Mah, P.Eng., Chief Operating Officer of Luna Gold Corp., hereby consent, for and on behalf of Luna Gold Corp.,to the references
to, and the use of any information derived from, the technical reports titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Mineraçăo
Aurizona S.A., Aurizona Mine” dated January 23, 2012 and the reserves portion of the “NI 43-101 Technical Report,
Aurizona Resource and Reserve Update, Brazil” dated April 29, 2013, but having an effective date of January 29, 2013 (the
“Reports”) in the annual report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2013 and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”) being filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
which Annual Report incorporates by reference and attaches as an exhibit the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. Annual Information Form for
the year ended December 31, 2013 which refers to information contained in the Reports.

I also consent
to the use of my name, including as an expert or “qualified person,” in connection with the Annual Report.

Date: March 10, 2014

| | /s/ G. Peter Mah              
| | ------------------------------
| | Name:  G. Peter Mah, P. Eng.  
| | Title: Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.23


Glenn Murphy's Compensation as Executive Chairman


On February 14, 2018, in connection with Mr. Murphy’s appointment as Executive Chairman, the Compensation Committee of lululemon’s board of directors approved an annual salary for Mr. Murphy in the amount of $500,000 per year, pro-rated for the time Mr. Murphy serves as Executive Chairman. This salary will be in lieu of any cash retainer and committee fees to which Mr. Murphy might otherwise be entitled in his role as a member of the board of directors or any committee thereof. Mr. Murphy also received a grant in stock options with a value of $500,000, which will vest over a three year period. While serving as Executive Chairman, Mr. Murphy will not be entitled to receive the annual equity awards to which non-employee directors are entitled under lululemon’s outside director compensation plan (currently an annual grant of restricted stock with a fair value at the time of grant of $125,000).
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00356

- CR

Glen Latel Powe a/k/a Glen Powe

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 372nd District Court

o f Tarrant County (1220720D )

May 22, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’ s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
STATEOFIDAHODEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY1410NorthHilton•Boise,Idaho83706•(208}373-0502www.deq.idaho.govDecember23,2015DennisMcLerran,RegionalAdministratorUSEPA,Region10MailCodeRA-1401200SixthAvenueSeattle,WA98101C.L."Butch"Otter,GovernorJohnH.Tippets,DirectorRE:SIPElementsfor2010S02andN02NAAQSUnderCleanAirActSections110(a)(2)DearMr.McLerran:PleasefindtheencloseddocumentationthatdemonstratesIdaho'sStateImplementationPlan(SIP)for"interstatetransport"elementsundersection110(a)(2)oftheCleanAirAct(CAA).TheIdahoDepmtmentofEnvironmentalQuality(DEQ)issubmittingdocumentationthatIdaho'sSIPcontainsprovisionsaddressingalltherequir'ementsoftheCAASection110(a)(2)(D)(i)interstatetransportrequirementsforthe2010sulfurdioxideand2010nitrogendioxideNAAQS.Apubliccommentperiodwasheldasrequiredby40CFR51.102beginningNovember20,2015throughDecember21,2015.ThepublichearingwasheldonDecember21,2015.Nocommentsortestimonywerereceivedduringthecommentperiod.ThestatefollowedallofIdaho'sproceduralrequirementsforthisSIPsubmission.Attachedisadocumententitled"InterstateTransportStateImplementationPlanfor2010N02and2010S02,"thatdemonstrateshowIdahodoesnotimpactthemaintenanceorattainmenttheseNAAQSinsmToundingstates.Alsoincludedasappendicesarecopiesofthe"CertificateofHearing"certifyingnomembersofthepublicattendedthehearing,copiesofthepublicnoticepublishedintheIdahoStatesmanandonDEQ'swebsite.Ifyouhaveanyfurtherquestionsorwouldlikeadditionalinformation,pleasecontactTiffanyFloyd,at(208)373-0552orTiffany.Floyd@deq.idaho.gov.Sincerely,DirectorEnclosurecc:TiffanyFloyd,AirQualityAdministratorPr1ntedonRecvctedPaper