alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

January 5, 1955

No. 58671.

petition 7124-R (Pittsburgh).

#### George S. Wisecarver *v.*United States,

Ekwall, Judge:

This is a petition seeking remission of additional duty assessed on an importation of articles of bronze, china, and glass, entered at the port of Pittsburgh, Pa. Said additional duties were assessed due to the fact that the goods were entered at values lower than the final appraised values. (Section 489, Tariff Act of 1930.) The importer, petitioner, who is an antique dealer, testified that he purchased the merchandise in Paris from dealers in that city; that he received an invoice for the same from the packer, who was to pack and forward the goods to Pittsburgh. Said private invoice did not contain an item for the cost of the packing. Petitioner turned over the invoice to his customs broker in the United States for the purpose of making entry, and, later on, upon receipt of the consular invoice, that also was transmitted to the broker. Petitioner admitted that he did not call the broker's attention to the omission of the item of cost of packing from the private invoice, nor did he inform the broker of the disparity between the two invoices, but his failure so to do was due to the fact that he overlooked that item. It further appears from the record that the petitioner showed all of his papers to a customs official who visited his place of business; that he had no intention of withholding any information from the Government or its officials and did not intend to defraud the revenue of the United States.

On cross-examination, counsel for respondent developed the fact that the item of packing was overlooked by petitioner, but not deliberately. Counsel for respondent stated at the close of the hearing that the subject matter of this petition had been investigated by a customs agent, and he read into the record the concluding paragraph of said agent’s report as follows:

> *256From the above it would appear that there was no intention on the part of the importer to defraud the revenue of the United States, but that the cost of the export packing had been inadvertently omitted from the value, since it was not shown on the pro forma invoice, and the consular invoice was not at hand at the time the entry was made.

It is, therefore, clear that the entry in this case at a value below that of the final appraisement was without intent to defraud or deceive the Government officials; that there was no attempt to conceal the facts from the Government officials. We, therefore, find that the petition should be and the same is hereby granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.                         *Note:*                         For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

      ( print page 67290)    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of General Counsel

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters (A21-01)

Management and Administrative Matters

*Additional Information:*

This meeting will be cancelled if the Commission is not open due to a funding lapse.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

                        Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                         *secretary@fec.gov,*                         at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-21715 Filed 9-27-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


September 15, 1997


Board of Directors
Software Spectrum, Inc.


As stated in Note A to the consolidated financial statements of Software
Spectrum, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the three months ended July 31, 1997, the
Company changed its accounting policy for recognizing maintenance revenue.
Previously, the Company recognized maintenance revenue ratably over the terms
of the maintenance contracts due to the customers right to cancel the contract
at any time during the contract period. As the Company has no material costs
associated with future performance under these contracts, effective May 1,
1997, the Company began recognizing maintenance revenue when invoiced because
it has concluded, based on historical trends, that cancellations of maintenance
contracts are not significant. Management believes the newly adopted accounting
principle is preferable in the circumstances because it more accurately
reflects the substance of the transactions. At your request, we have reviewed
and discussed with management the circumstances, business judgment, and
planning that formed the basis for making this change in accounting principle.

It should be recognized that professional standards have not been
established for selecting among alternative principles that exist in this area
or for evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles.
Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the Company's
compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose.

Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management's judgment that
the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. In
formulating this position, we are relying on management's business judgment and
planning, which we do not find unreasonable.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Software Spectrum,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to April 30,
1997. Accordingly, we are unable to express an opinion on whether the method of
accounting for the effect of the change is in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles or if the financial statements included in Part
I of this Form 10-Q are fairly presented.


Very truly yours,

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
H. Res. 736 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 16, 2007. 

Whereas the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics 

(NACA), and its successor agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), developed 

and sustained the world’s preeminent aeronautics research program after NACA’s formation in 1915; 

Whereas the speed of sound once presented a seemingly impenetrable and dangerous barrier to piloted flight; 

Whereas NACA, the U.S. Air Force, and Bell Aircraft undertook a joint project to develop and test the X–1 aircraft 

and achieve piloted supersonic flight; 

Whereas on the morning of October 14, 1947, an X–1 aircraft piloted by Captain Charles ‘‘Chuck’’ Yeager was 

dropped from a B–29 carrier aircraft and ‘‘broke the 

sound barrier’’ and achieved supersonic flight for the 

first time in history; 

Whereas this flight provided proof of the feasibility of piloted 

supersonic flight, and delivered the data required to improve high speed performance and develop technologies 

for advanced supersonic aircraft; and 

Whereas subsequent X-plane aeronautics research projects 

have built on the historic accomplishments of the X–1 
2 

•HRES 736 EH 

aircraft and achieved advances in a wide range of aeronautics research areas: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and honors the contributions of the 

scientists and engineers of NACA and its partners who 

pioneered the technologies to enable supersonic flight; 

(2) recognizes and honors the bravery of Charles 

Yeager, and the bravery of the many other test pilots 

who, sometimes at the cost of their lives, enabled the 

aeronautics developments that made that first supersonic 

flight possible; and 

(3) recognizes the importance of strong and robust 

aeronautics research activities to the well being of America. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 69293.

#### Vanguard Military Equipment Co. *v.*United States,

protest 63/13488 (New York).

*429Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of military insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P67/93.

#### Daher Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 66/1973, etc. (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabius & Co., Inc.,*and *Daher Compamy, Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 605Page1 of 2May 31/2011TR5−151TEMPORARY REVISION NO.5−151INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30FACING PAGE 12REASON FOR ISSUE:To introduce a visual check of the torque box.ACTION:Add the task that follows to the list of Chapter 53 checks:NOTE:Recordthe incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONSand the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication.TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 605Page2 of 2May 31/2011TR5−151MAINTENANCEMANUAL − CH. 5REFERENCEZONEACCESSCHECKINTERVALCHAPTER 53 CHECKSDESCRIPTION53−10−00−198*Torque Box.Visual Check. 7800 T(Ref. PSP 612, Part 9, VC−53−10−81) LANDINGS1100 RLANDINGSPHASE-IN:For aircraft with 7300 Landings or less at the dateof TR 5-151 (May 31/2011), do this check no laterthan 7800 Landings.For aircraft with more than 7300 Landings butless than 8550 landings at the date of TR 5-151(May 31/2011), do this check within 500 Landingsor by Dec 31/2013 whichever occurs first.For aircraft with 8550 Landings or more at thedate of TR 5-151 (dated May 31/2011), do thischeck within 250 Landings or by Dec 31/2013whichever occurs first.310311312311−BB
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED


ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS


PCAOB
REGISTERED

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics,
Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated March 20, 2009 on our
audit of the financial statements of Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics, Inc. (A
Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and from inception on June 25, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 and from inception on June 25, 2007 through December 31, 2008,
and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”





/s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered


Moore
& Associates Chartered


Las
Vegas, Nevada


March 30,
2009







6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las
Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501
From: smythede@bizpost.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:40:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deborah Smythe

Cuba City, WI 53807
H. Res. 675 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

976) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

tax relief for small businesses, and for other purposes, with 

Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, 

without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by 

the chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or 

his designee that the House concur in each of the Senate 

amendments with the respective amendment printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 

equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce and the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption 
2 

•HRES 675 EH 

without intervening motion or demand for division of the 

question. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.12
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $50,000 and additional compensation as deemed appropriate for regular and special Board and Committee meetings held in excess of 20 meetings per annum.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Marine Holding Inc.'s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.5 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 696 

Expressing gratitude for the foreign guest laborers, known as Braceros, who 

worked in the United States during the period from 1942 to 1964. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2007 

Mr. COSTA (for himself and Mr. GRIJALVA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing gratitude for the foreign guest laborers, known 

as Braceros, who worked in the United States during 

the period from 1942 to 1964. 

Whereas because of a labor shortage resulting from the entry 

of the United States into World War II, the Federal Government issued contracts to Mexican, Canadian, Jamaican, and Puerto Rican citizens willing to cross into the 

United States to accept temporary employment; 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of these men and women, 

known as Braceros, labored in the Nation’s agricultural, 

transportation, and other industries during the period 

from 1942 to 1964; 

Whereas the first 1,500 Braceros arrived in California from 

Mexico City, Mexico, on September 29, 1942, to work in 

the sugar beet fields until December 24 of that year; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 696 IH 

Whereas thousands of Braceros labored on the Nation’s railroads, maintaining and expanding critical infrastructure 

for the transportation of food, equipment, and other valuable supplies during and after World War II; 

Whereas the heroic work effort of the Braceros has been recognized by many State and local governments around the 

Nation, but has not been recognized by the Federal Government; 

Whereas the Nation and the world owe a debt of gratitude 

for the contribution the Braceros made to the war effort 

that defeated fascism in Europe and Asia; 

Whereas more than 1,000,000 Braceros and their families or 

descendants are still United States residents or citizens; 

and 

Whereas September 29, 2007, is the 65th anniversary of the 

first arrival of Bracero guest workers in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses gratitude for the foreign guest la3 borers, known as Braceros, who worked in the 

4 United States during the period from 1942 to 1964; 

5 and 

6 (2) recognizes the Braceros for their contribu7 tions to the war effort during World War II, and for 

8 their hard work, which helped to keep the United 

9 States strong and prosperous during this challenging 

10 period. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
From: cmarcetti@aquapac.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:42:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cathy Marcetti

Stockton, CA 95207
SUPPLEMENT FOR
                   UNITED GOLD & GOVERNMENT FUND SHAREHOLDERS
          TO PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


     After the Board of Directors of United Gold & Government Fund, Inc. (the
"Fund") determined to hold a special joint shareholders meeting to consider the
proposals described in the attached Proxy Statement, the Board approved a
proposed reorganization of the Fund into United Asset Strategy Fund, Inc.  The
proposed reorganization is described in a separate proxy statement, which is
included in this mailing, for a separate meeting of Fund shareholders that has
been called for the purpose of voting on the reorganization.

     If the reorganization is approved by Fund shareholders, the Board of
Directors intends to proceed with the reorganization and does not intend to
implement any of the proposals contained in this Proxy Statement that were also
approved by Fund shareholders.


This Supplement is dated May 17, 1999.

<PAGE>
                                 SUPPLEMENT FOR
                   UNITED GOLD & GOVERNMENT FUND SHAREHOLDERS
          TO PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


     After the Board of Directors of United Gold & Government Fund, Inc. (the
"Fund") determined to hold a special joint shareholders meeting to consider the
proposals described in the Proxy Statement, the Board approved a proposed
reorganization of the Fund into United Asset Strategy Fund, Inc.  The
proposed reorganization will be considered at a special, separate meeting of
Fund shareholders that has been called for the purpose of voting on the
reorganization.

     If the reorganization is approved by Fund shareholders, the Board of
Directors intends to proceed with the reorganization and does not intend to
implement any of the proposals contained in the Proxy Statement that were also
approved by Fund shareholders.


This Supplement is dated May 17, 1999.
ALFRED J. BRYANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5176

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Robert Wheeler, Judge.

Alfred J. Bryant, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.