alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**HYDRODYNEX, INC.**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with the periodic Report of HYDRODYNEX, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RONALD KUNISAKI, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 6, 2009

|        |                                                                                       |                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   |                                                                                  |
|   | By:                                                                         | /s/ Ronald Kunisaki |
|   | Ronald Kunisaki

Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer) |

In connection with the periodic Report of HYDRODYNEX, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICHARD KUNISAKI, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 6, 2009

|        |                                                                                                       |                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|   |                                                                                                  |
|   | By:                                                                                         | /s/ Richard Kunisaki |
|   | Richard Kunisaki

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Devroll Robinson, Also Known as Winston Robinson, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 88]

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), rendered May 20, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (two counts), driving while ability impaired and resisting arrest.

Defendant pleaded guilty to nine separate crimes as a result of drug-related activities he engaged in on four different occasions. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment on each crime, the longest of which was 3 to 15 years. Defendant asserts that because he has a drug problem and this is his first felony conviction, the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. We disagree. The record reveals that defendant continued to engage in drug-related activities even after his first arrest and, further, that defendant rejected an offer made by the prosecution of less substantial sentences. As a consequence, defendant pleaded guilty without having negotiated a specific sentence in connection with his plea. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Geography,geology, and mineral resources of the Fort Hall Indian reservation, Idaho**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:713
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957780
 
July 26, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

In Re NAPSTER, INC. COPYRIGHT

LITIGATION. CASE NO. C06-193JLR 

Related to C-MDL-00-1369MHP

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received a Motion to Limit the Discovery of Robert Glaser (Dkt. #

1) filed by RealNetworks, Inc. (“RealNetworks”) and noted for the court’s consideration

on February 10, 2006. The instant motion is related to a consolidated copyright action

pending before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, In

re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation, No. C-MDL-00-1369 MHP. 

In filing its motion, RealNetworks served only Hummer Winblad Venture

Partners, et al. (“Hummer Winblad”), the party seeking to depose Robert Glaser. As a

result, parties to the related copyright action have not received timely notice of

RealNetwork’s pending motion. Accordingly, the court renotes the motion for

consideration on Friday, February 24, 2006. Any opposition to the motion is due no later

than Tuesday, February 21, 2006. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(d). Any party to

the related copyright action seeking to participate in this matter must register with the

Case 2:06-cv-00193-JLR Document 8 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 1 of 2

In Re Napster Inc, Copyright Litigation Doc. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (“CM/ECF”). Parties may

register online at: www.wawd.uscourts.gov. The CM/ECF helpdesk is also available to

assist parties with electronic filing: 1-866-323-9293. Parties need not complete a pro hac

vice application. 

Filed and entered this 8th day of February, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00193-JLR Document 8 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Artistemployment in**
 
1994 | 1995
 
SuDoc Number:NF 2.20:
Item Number:0831-B-34 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957887
 
July 18, 2018
From: mbarz@crownoflifesa.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:04:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

As a citizen and as a pastor, I am writing to ask - in the strongest way possible - that you rescind

quickly and completely the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization

procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients.

If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these (such as ella and Plan B) can cause the abortion of an unborn child.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations (for example, Lutheran Social

Services of the South) that have conscience objections will be required to choose between either

violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Barz

San Antonio, TX 78258
AIR-09-331-E 

 August 25, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10120 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0673 

Mr. Emilio López Alemany 

Managing Director 

ELA Aviación, S.L. 

Pol. Ind. El Blanquillo 34 

14290 Fuente Obejuna 

Córdoba, Spain 

Dear Mr. Alemany: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 17, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of ELA Aviación, S.L. for an exemption from §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193 (e)(1) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would 

allow ELA Aviación, S.L. to produce and sell gyroplanes for certification under § 21.191(i) 

without previously having manufactured and assembled a gyroplane of the same make and 

model that has been issued a special airworthiness certificated in the light-sport category 

under § 21.190.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ELA Aviación, S.L. 

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10099 (copy 

enclosed), the FAA did not believe it is in the public interest to permit a manufacturer to sell a 

make and model of gyroplane (or aircraft kit), eligible for the issuance of an experimental 
2 

certificate in the light-sport category, if that manufacturer has not yet produced a gyroplane of 

that make and model that meets the accepted consensus standards. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of 

exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition ELA Aviación, S.L. for an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

K.C. Yanamura 

Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service 

Enclosure
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Coalresources of the Raton coal field, Colfax County, New Mexico**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:752
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000959125
 
August 2, 2018
Dolat Ventures, Inc. 10-K





Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Dolat Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Shmuel Dovid Hauck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 16th day of June, 2010.





/s/ Shmuel Dovid Hauck


Shmuel Dovid Hauck, Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 9,543.

#### MILBURNE v. KEARNES.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 77.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1802.

Pleading at Law — Amendment to Plea — Conditions upon Which Granted.

Leave to defendant to amend on payment of costs of the term or a continuance at the plaintiff’s option.

Trespass. Assault and battery. Leave was given to the defendant to strike out his plea of son assault demesne, and plead molli-ter manus imposuit, on payment of the costs of the term to this time, or a continuance at the option of the plaintiff.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Granch, Chief Judge.]

KILTY, Chief Judge,

absent.
Before the Second Division,

May 26, 1966

No. P66/72.

protests 65/11697, 65/11598, and 65/11599 (New York).

#### Ashear Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of handkerchiefs, not block-printed by hand, similar in all material respect to those the subject of *Ashear Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-052-CV

MICHAEL IRVIN	APPELLANT

V.

SHAWN VANDERGRIFT	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Michael Irvin appeals from the trial court’s February 6, 2008 order providing for sanctions against Irvin’s attorney, Larry Friedman.  On February 21, 2008, we notified the parties that we were concerned that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order for sanctions did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable, interlocutory order.  We indicated that this case could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if the parties did not show grounds for continuing the appeal by March 3, 2008.    

	By letter dated February 26, 2008, Irvin’s attorney, Carter Boisvert,2 informed us that he filed a notice of appeal because he intended to appeal the sanctions order once a final judgment was rendered and later decided to request mandamus relief as well.  Further, he agrees that this court cannot proceed with an appeal of the February 6, 2008 order until a final judgment is rendered.  	Accordingly, because the order dated February 6, 2008, is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order,3 we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.4

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  March 20, 2008
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 9

EXPLANATION

‘shown o

~

'
\\
2
‘
Re 5
8

yp #8 8B GB oth oe .
_
aa.

\

15. 30
Soe 200% 18% Yt

50, 3% << ad ee be ase 15, Be
ot BP 80 NP 100° 100 \ & 80"

— EON
< Nos

Aga of salon
tons,
WE: Kenney

MAP SHOWING LEAD AND ZINC CONTENT OF SOIL, CROW BRANCH AREA
m8 90 Fat

369614 O—56 (In pocket) NO. 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HARPAL SINGH SANGHA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-499 M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count I: Smuggling Aliens for Gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Count II: Transporting Illegal Aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance, 10/18/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required. 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(2) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserves the right to the possibility

Case 2:05-cr-00384-RSM Document 7 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

of a subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances. 

(3) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in

custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which

defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for

the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 18th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00384-RSM Document 7 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 66077.

#### Beck Distributing Corp. and Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/29127 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67273-67274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10102-000]


Watershed Ranch, LLC; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

    The license for the Springer Hydro No. 1 Project No. 10102 was 
issued for a period ending August 31, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 10102 is issued to 
Watershed Ranch, LLC for a period effective September 1, 2023, through 
August 31, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license for the project 
or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance 
of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on or 
before August 31, 2024, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Watershed Ranch, LLC is authorized to continue 
operation of the Springer Hydro No. 1 Project under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a subsequent 
license for the project or other

[[Page 67274]]

disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first.

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21505 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P