alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      21,136,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,632,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               91,174,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           136,435,000
<PP&E>                                      17,476,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             187,241,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       80,870,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       244,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,984,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,241,000
<SALES>                                    124,714,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           124,714,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              133,014,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (577,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,843,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,566,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,566,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,566,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARK FARRELL,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5832RBL

 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

 RETURN, § 2254 PETITION

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, and the General Order.

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Case 3:05-cv-05832-RBL Document 4 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05832-RBL Document 4 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 2
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







To the
Board of Directors of


Chardan
2008 China Acquisition Corp.





We
consent to the inclusion in the foregoing Annual Report on Form 20-F of our
report dated March 31, 2009 with respect to our audit of the financial
statements of Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp. as of December 31,
2008.





We
further consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts”
appearing in the Prospectus of such Registration Statement.





/s/
Jewett Schwartz Wolfe & Associates





Hollywood,
Florida


April 8,
2009















200 South
Park Road, Suite 150 • Hollywood, Florida 33021 • Main 954.922.5885 • Fax
954.922.5957 • www.jsw-cpa.com


Member –
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants • Florida Institute of
Certified Public Accountants


Private
Companies Practice Section of the AICPA • Registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board of the SEC
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1266 

CAF 12-00006, CAF 12-00077

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF ANDIE M., FREDERICK M. 

AND VONYEE M. 

--------------------------------------- 

ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

KIMBERLY M. AND ANDREW M., 

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

KELLY M. CORBETT, FAYETTEVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT ANDREW M. 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (KRISTEN MCDERMOTT OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT KIMBERLY M. 

GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SARA J. LANGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

JAMES E. CORL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, CICERO, FOR ANDIE M. AND 

VONYEE M. 

 

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Bryan

R. Hedges, J.), entered December 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, inter alia, transferred

guardianship and custody of Andie M. and Vonyee M. to petitioner.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent parents appeal from an order that, inter

alia, terminated their parental rights with respect to two of their

children pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b on the ground of

permanent neglect, committed the custody and guardianship of those

children to petitioner, and freed them for adoption. Contrary to

respondents’ contention, Family Court did not abuse its discretion in

declining to enter a suspended judgment (see Matter of Arella D.P.-D.,

35 AD3d 1222, lv denied 8 NY3d 809; Matter of Kyle S., 11 AD3d 935,

936). Although the record establishes that respondents had made

progress in improving, inter alia, the deplorable conditions and other

problems existing in the family home, the progress “was not sufficient

to warrant any further prolongation of the child[ren]’s unsettled

familial status” (Matter of Maryline A., 22 AD3d 227, 228). Under the

circumstances, freeing the children for adoption by the foster parents

with whom they had been residing was plainly in their best interests

(see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148; Matter of Arron
-2- 1266 

CAF 12-00006, CAF 12-00077

Brandend C., 267 AD2d 107, 108; Matter of Amanda R., 215 AD2d 220,

220-221, lv denied 86 NY2d 705). Finally, the court properly denied

posttermination visitation to respondents. It is now well settled

that a court lacks the authority to direct continuing contact between

parents and their children once parental rights have been terminated

pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b (see Matter of Hailey ZZ.

[Ricky ZZ.], 19 NY3d 422, 426, 437-438). 

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                                  ------------

                        EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT DESCRIPTION
                        --------------------------------


MICHAEL T. ADAMS
----------------

The Company agreed to continue Mr. Adams' employment as Executive Vice
President and Secretary.  Mr. Adams' current salary is $80,000 per year.  His
salary will be increased to $100,000 on January 1, 2002.  In connection with
his continued employment, Mr. Adams is to receive, subject to satisfactory
performance during the time periods described below, restricted common stock
in accordance with the following schedule:

                             Period           Shares
                      --------------------    ------
                      10/01/01 to 12/31/01    30,000
                      01/01/02 to 03/31/02    30,000
                      04/01/02 to 06/30/02    30,000
                      07/01/02 to 09/30/02    30,000
                      10/01/02 to 12/31/02    30,000
                      01/01/03 to 03/31/03    30,000
                      04/01/03 to 06/30/03    30,000
                      07/01/03 to 09/30/03    30,000



























                                    Page 36
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE October 10, 2023, ET, 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m.

PLACE: Via Zoom.

STATUS: Meeting of the Board of Directors, open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
[ssquf] Call to Order
[ssquf] Overview of Meeting Rules by General Counsel
[ssquf] Approval of Minutes from June 6, 2023 meeting
[ssquf] 2024 Strategic Priorities Review
[ssquf] Adjournment

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Nicole Stinson, Associate General 
Counsel, (202) 683-7117 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a7babda0a7baa6a789a0a8afe7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff918c8b96918c9091bf969e99d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For Dial-in Information Contact: Nicole Stinson, Associate General 
Counsel, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f09e8384999e839f9eb0999196de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a34292e33342935341a333b3c743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Inter-American Foundation is holding this meeting under the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Nicole Stinson,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-21862 Filed 9-28-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
California Environmental Protection Agency 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

Executive Order S-14-013 

WHEREAS, the rules identified in Enclosure A have been adopted or amended by the 

following air pollution control and air quality management districts (districts): 

Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 

Butte County Air Quality Management District 

Feather River Air Quality Management District 

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District 

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 

South Coast Air Quality Management District 

WHEREAS, the districts are authorized by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) 

section 40001 to adopt and enforce the rules identified in Enclosure A; 

WHEREAS, the rules have been submitted to the Air Resources Board (ARB) for 

inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) as a reasonably available 

control measures for limiting emissions of air pollutants within the districts; 

WHEREAS, ARB has determined that these rules are necessary to meet requirements 

of the federal Clean Air Act; and 

WHEREAS, ARB is authorized by H&SC sections 39601 , 39602, and 41650 through 

41652 to adopt district rules as revisions to the SIP. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ARB hereby adopts the districts' rules identified in 

Enclosure A as revisions to the SIP. 

I certify, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1 02(f), that the rules identified in Enclosure A were 

adopted or amended after notice and public hearings as required by 40 CFR 51 .1 02(a) 

and 51.1 02(d). 

Executed in Sacramento, California, this & <-k day of Mv.e.hltuC, 2014. 

Execut1ve Off1cer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 57

     Congratulating Illinois State University as it celebrates its 
                           sesquicentennial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2007

   Mr. Weller of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. 
 Lipinski, Mr. Costello, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Hastert, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Hare, 
Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Roskam, Ms. Schakowsky, Mrs. Biggert, 
Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Rush, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Davis of Illinois, 
 Mr. Emanuel, and Ms. Bean) submitted the following resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Congratulating Illinois State University as it celebrates its 
                           sesquicentennial.

Whereas Illinois State University marks its sesquicentennial with a year-long 
        celebration, beginning with Founder's Day on February 15, 2007;
Whereas Illinois State Normal University was founded by Jesse W. Fell in 1857 as 
        Illinois' first public university and was established as a teacher 
        education institution;
Whereas Abraham Lincoln, then an attorney, drafted the bond that guaranteed that 
        the citizens of Bloomington, Illinois, would fulfill pledges to finance 
        the University;
Whereas more than 2,000 staff members provide outstanding support to the 
        educational mission of Illinois State University; and
Whereas Illinois State University has more than 165,000 alumni living around the 
        world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates Illinois 
State University as it celebrates its sesquicentennial.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Osteotech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard W. Bauer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                             /S/ Richard W. Bauer
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Richard W. Bauer
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)
                                             April 23, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
From: bobbysolberg@excite.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:07:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

robert solberg

Kaukauna, WI 54130
From: ddorsheimer@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:08:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dennis Dorsheimer

Montezuma, IA 50171
From: brandonisspecialandstuff@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:52:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Contraceptives should not be a mandatory thing to insure.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

BRANDON DIXON

Fort Worth, TX 76133