alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,010-03

EX P ARTE DAMIAN GA LVAN HERNANDEZ , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR13-0075- 02 IN THE 415T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM P ARK

ER COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p licant was convicted of driving while intox icated a

nd sentenc ed to ten year s’ imprisonment. Applicant conte nds, throug h a habe as application filed by another inmate as the petitioner, that his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assi s t an ce b ecause counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte-2-

Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960) , the trial cour t is the appropri at e fo ru m for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hearing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as t o wh ether Applicant

was denied his rig ht to a meaning ful appea l beca use Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. The trial court shall also make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to wh ether Applicant has approve d of the filing of this habea s application throug h an inmate-pe titioner. See Ex parte Rendon , 326 S.W .3d 221, 224 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The trial co u rt shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applica

nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues sh al l b e re s o l ved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order

. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: F ebrua

ry 25, 2015 Do not publish
Before the Third Division,

August 5, 1958

No. 62259.

#### Aristocrat Leather Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 313945-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of this rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 691 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 1, 2007.
Whereas for 23 years the all-volunteer Gulf Coast Wing and West Houston Squadron 
        of the Commemorative Air Force has performed in the Wings Over Houston 
        Airshow at Ellington Field in Houston, Texas;
Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow has been rated as one of the top events 
        of its kind in the Nation;
Whereas tens of thousands of people from southeast Texas and all over the United 
        States attend the event each year and experience the unique opportunity 
        to see the United States Air Force, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard 
        perform and to meet service members of the past and present;
Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow has helped to increase awareness and 
        appreciation for the United States Armed Forces and its active duty 
        members and veterans;
Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow serves to promote an understanding and 
        appreciation of military history through the reenactment of battles and 
        the acquisition, restoration, and display of vintage aircraft;
Whereas throughout its history, Wings Over Houston Airshow has benefitted local 
        and national charities, including the Wings Over Houston Airshow 
        Scholarship Program, the Texas Southern University Aviation Career 
        Academy, the Exchange Club of Sugar Land, and the Commemorative Air 
        Force aircraft restoration and flying historical programs;
Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow and its partners, including the Lone Star 
        Flight Museum, the Houston Airport System, the Clear Lake Area Chamber 
        of Commerce, the Bay Area Houston Convention and Visitors Bureau, the 
        Greater Houston Convention and Visitors Bureau, Destination League City, 
        and the cities of Houston, Kemah, Nassau Bay, Seabrook, and Webster, 
        have contributed to the economy and growth of southeast Texas; and
Whereas the Wings Over Houston Scholarship Program has promoted the importance 
        of math and science education by helping southeast Texas students pursue 
        college educations in the fields of aviation and aerospace: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends the Wings Over Houston 
Airshow for its great contribution to the appreciation, understanding, and 
future of the United States Armed Forces, the City of Houston, Texas, and 
Ellington Field.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/20/2010 2:29 PM

Subject: Re: RRI Energy Elrama Power Station Request

Attachments: pic03832.jpg; US EPA letter.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy's Elrama Power Plant. The

deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic03832.jpg)

 

 From: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." 

<KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Frank,

 Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, <DIANE.R.MARTINI@Sargentlundy.com>, "Macey, Francis 

E"

 <fmacey@rrienergy.com>, "Cunningham, Allison" <ACunningham@rrienergy.com>, "Snyder, 

Zane K"

 <ZKSnyder@rrienergy.com>, "Greek, Matt E." <MGreek@rrienergy.com>

 

 Date: 06/28/2010 10:54 AM 

 Subject: RRI Energy Elrama Power Station Request 

Dear Ms. Alicea,

Please see the attached request for a due date extension on the Steam

Electric Questionnaire from the RRI Energy Elrama power station. If you

have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

Rocco Tondo

RRI Energy

General Manager Elrama Station
office 330-505-4327

cell 330-301-2788

 (See attached file: US EPA letter.pdf)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                  SPARTA, INC.

                  EXHIBIT TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                               Three months ended March 31
                             --------------------------------
                                1998                 1997
                             -----------         ------------
<S>                          <C>                 <C>
Basic EPS

   Net income                $ 1,220,000         $   825,000
   Less accretion               (450,000)           (330,000)
                             -----------         -----------
                             $   770,000         $   495,000
                             ===========         ===========

 Shares outstanding            5,632,277           5,717,201

 Per share amounts           $      0.14         $      0.09
                             ===========         ===========



 Dilutive Effect

   Net income                $ 1,220,000         $   825,000
   Less accretion               (450,000)           (330,000)
                             -----------         -----------
                             $   770,000         $   495,000

 Shares outstanding            5,632,277           5,717,201
 Stock options                   124,737              73,022
 Deferred Stock                   68,858              48,590
                             -----------         -----------
                               5,825,872           5,838,813

    Per share amounts        $      0.13         $      0.08
                             ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
From: Bigsky1978@gmail.co

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:25:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Allison

Sanger, TX 76266
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE 1 

CR05-5733FDB

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

 JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NATHAN MILLER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5733FDB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DEADLINE

Upon motion of the defendant to continue the pretrial motions due date, the Court

finds that such a continuance would serve the ends of justice; therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial motions due date in this matter be

continued to January 31, 2006. 

DONE this 18th day of January, 2006.

AJUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Presented by:

___________________________ ____________________________

Russell V. Leonard Gregory Gruber

Assistant Federal Public Defender Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 3:05-cr-05733-RBL Document 20 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order for Dismissal

Evans (CR05-5841RDB)— 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )) NO. CR05-5841FDB ) Plaintiff, )) v. )) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL ROLF GERHARD EVANS, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________)

Pursuant to Rule 48 (a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by and through

David R. Jennings, the Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of

Washington, hereby dismisses the Indictment against ROLF GERHARD EVANS with

prejudice. ROLF GERHARD EVANS died on January 2, 2006, and thus is no longer able

to stand trial. This Order of Dismissal is not intended to serve as a release of any civil

liability on the part of the defendant Evans, or his estate.

DATED this 20th day of January, 2006.

A

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

United States District Court Judge

Presented by:

s/ David Reese Jennings 

DAVID REESE JENNINGS

Assistant United States Attorney

 

Case 3:05-cr-05841-FDB Document 19 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 1
(R.D. 11525)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 241-H.

(Decided May 23, 1968)

*Sharp, Solter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*E&usin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> _ IT IS HEREBY STIPUEATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market Value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5._ That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. _ That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> _ 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

*872Upon tbe agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164- of tbe Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for tbe merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and tbe purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned 'by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 749 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 749

 Expressing support for designation of a National Animal Rescue Day to 
   create awareness, educate, increase animal adoption, and increase 
   financial support for animal rescues throughout the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2007

 Mr. Andrews submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of a National Animal Rescue Day to 
   create awareness, educate, increase animal adoption, and increase 
   financial support for animal rescues throughout the United States.

Whereas between 6,000,000 to 8,000,000 cats and dogs are put into shelters every 
        year and between 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 are euthanized;
Whereas there are between 4,000 to 6,000 animal shelters throughout the United 
        States in need of pet supplies, medical supplies, blankets and towels, 
        cleaning supplies, food, and educational materials about owning a pet, 
        as well as information on how to provide the best pet match for a 
        family;
Whereas increased knowledge and awareness of animal rescue programs throughout 
        the United States will significantly reduce the number of cats and dogs 
        euthanized and reduce the number of animals returned to a shelter who 
        have been rescued;
Whereas a National Animal Rescue Day will reduce the problem of pet 
        overpopulation, provide animals with good homes, and create awareness as 
        well as financial and educational resources for the problems animal 
        shelters face each day; and
Whereas the first Saturday in October would be an appropriate day to designate 
        as National Animal Rescue Day and celebrate it through events, festivals 
        or Pawtographs signings which will increase revenues and pet adoptions 
        throughout the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of a National Animal Rescue Day to create awareness for 
animal rescue programs throughout the year, address the challenge of 
overpopulation through continued spaying and neutering of adopted pets, 
and bring Americans together as a Nation to support this common goal.
                                 <all>
```
No. 66545.

#### Armeatco Import et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/21403, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horsemeat similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66197, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0316.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:12PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 01/13/2010 10:48PM 

cc: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

Subject: RICE cost and reduction breakdown by HP range

Hi Cortney,

Attached is a spreadsheet with the breakdown of the estimated costs and reductions by HP 

range for the CI RICE NESHAP. I'll also be sending you the data for the MACT floors that 

Kevin Bromberg requested.

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0316.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
Case 3:06-cv-05004-RBL Document 29 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX B 

Jordan Cove’s Letter of Intent and the U.S. Coast Guard’s 

Waterway Suitability Report for the Jordan Cove Energy Project
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
From: kimandhobbes@hawaii.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:11:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Martin

Keaau, HI 96749