alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1007 PLATE 2

SPRING CREEK

ee ie
7
Vertical scale
g 15,000!
i
3
i
= 114,250"
+13,500°
12,750"
E
3
g i
Oo
=
: +12,000°
oO
g
i L
8
5
= -11,250°
+ 10,500’
WHITEROCKS CANYON ASHLEY CANYON, RED MOUNTAIN DIAMOND MOUNTAIN AND SPLIT MOUNTAIN 2
AND MOSBY GREEK AND STEINAKER DRAW LITTLE BRUSH CREEK (After U.S. Geological Survey
preliminary chart 16)
‘Thickness! I
Thick
j hickness sThickness 9750'
Upper
E Shale membey [i
2
a7 g 5
= | Frontier Sandstone member " !
— Lae shale member ried ad
akota sandstone 3 we bass
89
892' — Morrison formation
926
Lowe L
837
; 5
8 mil +8250"
miles ig| 8250
3 150° Curtis formation } I
107" Entrada sandstone nig gc vaiy
270
: 163° [
390° Carmel! formation 244! 170" oe
124’ 7500
G 720 L
s sG 855°
3 1028’ _ Navajo sandst |
at
ac
: .
: +6750)
232!
~ 234 6s" r
chinte formeti 6 -28-
260! ee) i
745°
| | a + 6000'
8 i for ation
< moerkoP °° L
© | 1120
tig" |
2 | 5250'
Co -
z ee [
Ss 195) }
z lal
w }1275' |
pa stOr®
ee + 4500'
120° -
908' P| 296! ;3750'
165° r
8s lyeper “e ==
96322 I
, : 348'
& a5 | 343° & | 3000!
ms s& : ‘
2 = 125! |
a
4
3 (anon ara z : l
= —5| 965' ==
976' ae — io
a
165° CAMBRIAN Thin-bedded limestone L
260!
: 1500!
is es ne 8 [-
: 7
§ z
‘ Z
3 Dolomitic limestone r
2 10-20 miles |
Z -750'
| 9-15 miles >| l
: ‘Sandy dolomite
= .
Qo
=
$
3 Coal
«
a
Gypsum
Glauconite
14-16 miles
Unconformity

CORRELATION CHART OF DETAILED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS FROM WHITEROCKS RIVER TO GREEN RIVER,
UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH

295163 O ~ 55 (In pocket) No. 2
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Georgia Papageorge, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 687]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 19,1994, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.

Claimant worked as a substitute teacher for the Harborfields School District from September 1987 to November 1991. In June 1991, she received a letter from the District advising her that she would be placed on the substitute teaching list for the 1991-1992 school year. Although she did not return the acknowledgment verifying her availability, she was nevertheless contacted by the teachers registry and worked a total of 11 days in the fall of 1991. Her last day of work was in November 1991. The Board found claimant ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because the District provided her with a reasonable assurance of employment during the 1991-1992 school year.

Claimant asserts that this decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. The District’s letter demonstrated its intent to utilize claimant’s services during the 1991-1992 school year and claimant’s failure to respond to the letter resulted in the District’s removal of her name from the list which was revised in December 1991. Claimant has failed to establish that the District’s offer of employment was not bona fide because it was experiencing budgetary problems. We have considered claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

*918White, J. P., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 6, 2012*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.129 Funding Corporations 1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 56 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 56

   Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony 
honoring Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope by conferring upon him the status of 
     an honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 1997

 Mr. Specter submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony 
honoring Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope by conferring upon him the status of 
     an honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on October 29, 
1997, for a ceremony to honor Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope by conferring 
upon him the status of an honorary veteran of the Armed Forces of the 
United States. Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 
prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of BlueStar Entertainment Technologies,Inc.  (the "Company") on Form  20-F for the  period  ending  June 30, 2011, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Erick Hansen,  ChiefExecutive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: January 17, 2012

 

/s/ Erick Hansen

Erick Hansen

Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

January 13, 1954

No. 57757.

protest 187760-K (New York).

#### Amicale Yarns, Inc. *v.*United States,

Oliver, Chief Judge:

In this suit, plaintiff alleges that liquidation of the entry “was premature, illegal and void in that notice of appraisement as required by Section 501 was not issued.” The statute involved, section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U. S. C. § 1501;, reads as follows:

> The collector shall give written notice of appraisement to the consignee, his agent, or his attorney, if (1) the appraised value is higher than the entered value, or (2) a change in the classification of the merchandise results from the appraiser’s determination of value.

The only evidence before us is a memorandum from the office of the collector of customs which was admitted at the time of trial on motion of plaintiff and without objection from defendant. That memorandum shows that plaintiff received no notice of appraisement.

*368The condition, as shown herein, was also presented in the case of *James H. Rhodes*& *Co.*v. *United States,*26 Cust. Ct. 424, Abstract 55525, affirmed in *United States*v. *James H. Rhodes & Co.,*40 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 1, C. A. D. 488. In disposing of the matter in the cited case, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals stated:

> We conclude that the failure to give the notice required had the effect of voiding the appraiser s appraisement and rendered the collector’s liquidation invalid. We, therefore, *approve*and *affirm*the action of the Customs Court in remanding the case to a single judge of that court to have the proper dutiable value of the merchandise involved determined in the manner provided by law. [Italics quoted.]

The same conclusion applies herein. Accordingly, we hold the appraisement in question to be void and the liquidation based thereon to be invalid. Consistent with the provisions of section 2636 (d) of title 28, United States Code (the Judiciary and Judicial Procedure Act of 1948), which control the present situation, judgment will issue remanding the matter to a single judge of this court for the determination of value in the manner provided by law.
From: econn@essex1.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:20:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donald Conn

, 61064-9051
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mondas Minerals Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Bengfort, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of September, 2010.


/s/ Scott Bengfort
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 21 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 21

Dockets.Justia.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# AGENCY:

National Institutes of Health, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; extension of submission period.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH) published a Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 14, 2023. This document extends the date to submit Letters of Interest (LOIs) to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH.                    

# DATES:

The deadline to submit LOIs for NCI-ComboMATCH Laboratories, which published at 88 FR 55055 on August 14, 2023, is extended. LOIs should be submitted before 5 p.m. EST on October 31, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions about this request for LOIs should be directed to                         *NCICOMBOMATCHLabApps@nih.gov*                         or Benjamin Kim at                         *benjamin.kim@nih.gov*                         or by phone at (240) 276-5961.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 14, 2023, NIH published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    , FR Doc. 2023-17352, on pages 55055-55057. This notice extends the submission date for LOIs from September 30, 2023, to October 31, 2023.                

Lyndsay N. Harris,

Associate Director, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute.

[FR Doc. 2023-21758 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Orofino Gold Corp.  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period  ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Shi Long Ning, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has executed  this  certification  as of
September 3, 2010.


/s/ Shi Long Ning
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 29, 2010
    
    /s/ Donna T. GuerraDonna T. GuerraAssistant Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer
ORDER GRANTING EARLY TERMINATION OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSHUA BINDER,

Defendant.

Case No. CR06-41RSL

ORDER GRANTING EARLY

TERMINATION OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s “Renewed Motion for Early 

Termination of Supervised Release” (Dkt. # 1107). The Court, having reviewed the motion, 

response, records, and files herein, as well as the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), 

GRANTS defendant’s motion.

Mr. Binder initially moved for early termination of supervised release on July 5, 2022. 

Dkt. # 1100. The Court held a hearing on October 20, 2022, at which it commended Mr. Binder 

for his exemplary performance on supervised release but denied the motion. Dkt. # 1106. 

However, the Court indicated that if Mr. Binder continued to comply with the conditions of his 

supervised release without violations through March 2023, it would consider terminating 

supervision at that time. Id. The Court is pleased to learn that Mr. Binder has maintained his 

strong performance on supervision and is now satisfied that termination of supervised release is 

warranted by the conduct of the defendant and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 

3583(e)(1), 3553(a). 

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 1109 Filed 04/03/23 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING EARLY TERMINATION OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

For all of the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion for 

early termination of supervised release (Dkt. # 1107) is GRANTED. 

DATED this 3rd day of April, 2023.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 1109 Filed 04/03/23 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT D

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 39-5 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 4

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 39 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
1

23456789

A BC D E F 

EMAIL OPT_IN_TIME ID SURVEYDATE GENDER BIRTHDATE 

james@gordonworks.com 2:01 AM 145761186 2-Sep-03 M 30-Mar-51 RIC

jamila@gordonworks.com 3:26 PM 146689982 16-Sep-03 F 1-Jul-74 WAjonathan@gordonworks.com 3:14 PM 146690149 16-Sep-03 M 5-May-80 PAfaye@gordonworks.com 12:00 AM 146534790 11-Sep-03 F 31-May-53 RICjay@gordonworks.com 7:04 PM 146725017 9-Sep-03 M 9-Nov-78 RICemily@gordonworks.com 1:09 PM 147768416 21-Oct-03 RICmsm@gordonworks.com 12:00 AM 43436537 1-Jan-00jim@gordonworks.com 12:00 AM 117161239 1-Jan-00 RIC

CONFIDENTIAL 
1

23456789

H I J K L MNO

STATEID COUNTRYID POSTALCODE FIRSTNAME LASTNAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 MODDATE 

WA US 99352 JAMES GORDON 1419 JADWIN AVE WA 99362 JAMILA GORDON 7 ROOSEVELT WA 99301 JONATHAN GORDON WA US 99352 FAYE GORDON 1419 JADWIN AVE WA US 99352 JAY GORDON 1419 JADWIN AVE WA US 99352 EMILY ABBEY 651 MCMURAPT 307

22-Jul-02

WA US 99352 James Gordon 1419 JADWIN AVE 16-Jul-02 

CONFIDENTIAL 
1

23456789

Q R ST

TOTALBOUNCES INSERTEDDATE REWARD_UNSUB_DATE IP

3-Sep-03 15-Jul-04 4.5.74.214

29-Sep-03 15-Jul-04 4.5.74.21429-Sep-03 15-Jul-04 4.5.74.21427-Sep-03 28-Jan-04 4.5.74.21429-Sep-03 15-Feb-06 4.5.74.214

22-Oct-03 15-Feb-06 4.5.88.163

17-Dec-01 15-Feb-06

16-Jul-02 28-Jan-04

CONFIDENTIAL
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

phone: (206) 274-2800

fax: (206) 274-2801

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 15th day of September, 2006, I electronically 

filed the foregoing REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which

will send notification of such filing to the following:

Via Notice of Electronic Filing to:

Robert Siegel, Esq.

Email: bob@msfseattle.com

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of

Washington that the forgoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on

September 15th, 2006, at Seattle, Washington.

________________________

Diana Au

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 34-2 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 34 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com