alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

JOSE ANGEL LOPEZ-AGUILAR ,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR06-5101 RBL

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 February 17, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cr-05101-RBL Document 23 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mineralresources of Johnstown, Pennsylvania and vicinity**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:447
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000959424
 
August 6, 2018
TP 7245E

1 of 1 

AD Number: CF-2015-18

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2015-18

ATA:

27

Effective Date:

16 July 2015 

Type Certificate:

A-131

Subject: 

Stall Protection System – Incorrect Calibration of Angle Of Attack (AOA) Transducers

Applicability:

Bombardier Inc.: 

Model CL-600-2C10 aeroplanes, serial numbers 10002 through 10999, 

Model CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 aeroplanes, serial numbers 15001 through 15990, 

Model CL-600-2E25 aeroplanes, serial numbers 19001 through 19990, 

equipped with AOA Transducers with Part Numbers (P/Ns) and Serial Numbers (S/Ns) included in 

Section 1A, Effectivity, of Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 670BA-27-069, Initial Issue, dated 

30 March 2015.

Compliance:

Within 2500 hours air time or 12 months, whichever occurs first, from the effective date of this AD, unless 

already accomplished.

Background:

It was discovered that a number of AOA transducers installed on Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-

2D15, CL-600-2D24 and CL-600-2E25 aeroplanes were incorrectly calibrated due to a quality control 

problem at both the production and repair facilities. Incorrect calibration of the AOA transducer could 

result in a late activation of the stick pusher.

This AD mandates the replacement of the incorrectly calibrated AOA transducers. 

Corrective Actions:

A. Replace the AOA transducer(s) in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

SB 670BA-27-069, Initial Issue, dated 30 March 2015, or later revisions approved by the Chief, 

Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

B. As of the effective date of this AD, it is prohibited for anyone to install the AOA Transducers with P/Ns 

and S/Ns included in Section 1A, Effectivity, of Bombardier SB 670BA-27-069, Initial Issue, dated 

30 March 2015.

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Philip Tang

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Issued on 3 July 2015

Contact:

Gordanko Jeremic, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 

or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME 3-31-98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         340,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     78,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               621,267
<PP&E>                                       6,735,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                 992,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,633,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          506,777
<BONDS>                                      3,579,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,859
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,251,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,633,522
<SALES>                                      2,410,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,193,101
<CGS>                                          790,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,219,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             254,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (253,905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (253,905)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CARL W. CUNNINGHAM 

Petitioner,

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5293FDB

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION 

 

 NOTED FOR: 

 AUGUST 12TH, 2005

This Habeas Corpus Action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR

4. Petitioner has filed a motion to dismiss the petition WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Dkt. # 13). 

Respondent does not oppose the motion. (Dkt. # 14). Accordingly, this petition should be

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A proposed order accompanies this report and

recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.

R. Civ. P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule

72(b), the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on August 12th, 2005, as noted in the

caption. 

Dated this 15th day of July, 2005. A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05293-FDB Document 15 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 1
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 13th day of July, 2007, I electronically 

filed the foregoing NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL,

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which

will send notification of such filing to the following:

Via Notice of Electronic Filing to:

Robert Siegel, Esq.

i.Justice Law, P.C.

Email: bob@ijusticelaw.com

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of

Washington that the forgoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on July 

13th, 2007, at Seattle, Washington.

________________________

Diana Au

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 140-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 140 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
From: bearandmaebel@fairpoint.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:37:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Lusk

Laurel Hill, FL 32567
Before the Third Division,

July 28, 1955

No. 59240.

protests 172382-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JONATHAN C. SAWYER,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5344RBL

 ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for a disposition hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial

Services Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision by using heroin.

The defendant appeared before the Honorable Monica J. Benton on August 18, 2005, and admitted the

allegation.

The court has considered the arguments of the U. S. Attorney, Pretrial Services and defense

counsel. The request for placement in a halfway house is denied. The defendant was living in a “clean

and sober” house at the time of the offense; he was not reporting to pretrial services, and was unwilling

to accept halfway house placement at his hearing on August 18. This court has no confidence that the

4 days he has served in custody is sufficient to overcome the defendants need to detox and to re-enter

the methadone treatment program he voluntarily withdrew from while on bond.

ACCORDINGLY, it is ordered that defendants bond be revoked and that he be detained for

failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community pursuant

to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to Pretrial Services Office.

August 22, 2005.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold ______________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05344-RBL Document 20 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Proposed) Order Setting Trial Date - 1

U.S. v. Cook, et al (CR05-0424Z)

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Zilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-0424TSZ

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

) SETTING TRIAL DATE

WADE B. COOK, and )

LAURA M. COOK, )

)

Defendants. ) 

_______________________________________) 

The Court, having conducted status conferences on January 19, 2006, March 3,

2006, and April 4, 2006, concerning appropriate dates for trial and pretrial motions, and

having heard arguments of counsel and having considered the parties’ stipulation herein,

HEREBY ORDERS:

Trial of this matter shall be scheduled for January 16, 2007. The Court finds,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1361(8)(B)(ii), that this case is unusual and complex due to the

nature of the prosecution demonstrated by the large volume of discovery, the large

number of witnesses, the number of tax years involved, and the need for experts. In

addition, counsel for the defendants have several other trials already scheduled which

limits their availability. The continuance granted here is necessary to permit the

defendants’ continuity of counsel and lack of a continuance would deny those attorneys

time necessary for effective preparation for this criminal trial, taking into account the

Case 2:05-cr-00424-TSZ Document 67 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Proposed) Order Setting Trial Date - 2

U.S. v. Cook, et al (CR05-0424Z)

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

exercise of due diligence. As a result, it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation

for trial within the time limits established under the speedy trial act, 18 U.S.C. § 1361.

The Court therefore finds that the ends of justice served by continuing this trial

outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedier trial, and that

the period of delay resulting from this continuance, from March 13, 2006, until January

16, 2007, is exludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(8)(A).

It is so ordered.

Dated: April 7, 2006 

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Agreed and approved:

s/ Kurt P. Hermanns s/ Angelo Calfo and s/ Scott Schill * 

KURT P. HERMANNS ANGELO CALFO and SCOTT SCHILL

Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Wade B. Cook

s/ Robert Westinghouse s/ Jeffrey Robinson and s/ Amanda Lee * 

ROBERT WESTINGHOUSE JEFFREY ROBINSON and AMANDA LEE

Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Laura M. Cook

* per telephone authorization

Case 2:05-cr-00424-TSZ Document 67 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      729348 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1115716 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2184206 
<PP&E>                                       39997 
<DEPRECIATION>                               14118 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2477948 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1893915 
<BONDS>                                     695000 
<COMMON>                                  21920002 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2477948 
<SALES>                                    3105225 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3105225 
<CGS>                                      2254940 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               275999 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           13500 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         574286 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                561444 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04 
        

</TABLE>
No. P67/153.

No. P67/154.

No. P67/155.

#### B. Shackman & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/953 (New York).

#### Sol Westheimer Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/1838 (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros. (a div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) *v.*United States,

protest 65/19106 (New York).

*889OliteR, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ace Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 226, Abstract 67488), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS MICHAEL CORDERO, 

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5705BHS 

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office

alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, MATTHEW THOMAS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, COLIN FIEMAN;

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

supervision; the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s) and maximum potential sanction if

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable BENJAMIN H. SETTLE:

Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2010

Time: 9:00 AM

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office. This Order is entered

without prejudice to review.

August 25, 2010.

 s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05705-BHS Document 98 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of Sync2 Networks Corp, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Warren Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Warren GilbertName:
Warren GilbertTitle:
Chief Financial Officer/Principal Financial OfficerDate:
February 14, 2014





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sync2 Networks Corp and will be retained by Sync2 Networks Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]