alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  10.6


 
















March 30, 2018













	TO:	
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
















Reference is hereby made to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018 (the "SPA"), between the undersigned and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to which the undersigned agreed to acquire at the Closing (as defined in the SPA) shares of common stock of the Company.  To induce the Company to enter into the SPA, the undersigned (i) agrees to vote all voting common stock of the Company over which the undersigned has voting control in favor of the next resolution presented to the shareholders of the Company to approve the issuance, in the aggregate, of more than 19.999% of the number of shares of common stock of the Company outstanding on the date of closing of, and as contemplated by, that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018 between the Company and Accelmed Growth Partners, L.P., a Cayman Island exempted limited partnership (the "Accelmed SPA"), as is required by the applicable rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Capital Market; and (ii) subject to the Closing under the SPA, waives any consent that may be required to be obtained by the Company from the undersigned, as holder of shares of the Company's Preferred Stock, prior to taking action on matters described in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 8 [Negative Covenants] of the Certificate of Designation of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.  Provided, that so long as the Major Stockholders (as defined in the Accelmed SPA) hold in the aggregate in excess of 20% of the Company's shares of capital stock on a fully diluted basis (assuming full conversion of Preferred Stock and exercise of all outstanding warrants and options), the foregoing waiver shall not apply to any new indebtedness that will result in the Company incurring a total outstanding debt for borrowed money in excess of $12 million. This agreement is given in consideration of, and as a condition to enter into the SPA and is not revocable by the undersigned.


 


 




Name of Stockholder: ________________________________________________________


Signature of Authorized Signatory of Stockholder: __________________________________


Name of Authorized Signatory: ____________________________________________________


Title of Authorized Signatory: _____________________________________________________
From: Mariesthippolyte@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:54:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marie St. Hippolyte

Millington, MD 21651
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           37648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 92760
<PP&E>                                          489462
<DEPRECIATION>                                   78533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1603310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1950343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      55035
<COMMON>                                        725362
<OTHER-SE>                                    17439290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1603310
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1971165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               58400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1971165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1970396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (769)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1971165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.030)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.030)


</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 20, 

2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00198-CV

CHRISTOPHER A. BRYAN AND MARIANNE MCBRIDE, Appellants 

V.

CHARLES ANDERSON AND C N C INDUSTRIES, LLC, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 11th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-51605 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 1, 2017. On July 10, 2017, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion 

is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00109-RSL Document 87 Filed 01/25/08 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                             621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,287
<INVENTORY>                                     74,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,104
<PP&E>                                         125,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,082
<BONDS>                                            372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                       (654)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,366
<SALES>                                        409,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               409,712
<CGS>                                          327,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               146,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (73,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (73,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (73,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.49)


</TABLE>
No. 63349.

protests 58/8913, etc. (New York).

#### The Wing On Co., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.,*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: eroberts56@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:54:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Roberts

Baton Rouge, LA 70818
From: danielle.mcburnett@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:10:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Danielle McBurnett

Chandler, AZ 85249
# 0

U.S. Department ofTransportation**Fed~ral** Aviation Administration



## MAR.ll2013

Mr. Richard S. Adler Certification Engineer Wipaire, Incorporated 1700 Henry Avenue- Fleming Fie]d South St Paul, 1vfN 55075 

### Dear Mr. Adler: Smli!ll Airplane Directorate 90 1Locust Street Kansas City, Missouri 64106



### This letter is to 

### infonn you that 

### we have received and 

### begun processing your petition for exemption. 

### It acknowledges receipt ofthe petition and describes 

### how we will process it.
We Have the Petition. We have received 

### your February**12~** 2013 petition 

### on behalfofWipaire, Incorporated (Wipaire) for an. exemption from§§ 23.3(a) and 135.113 ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (

### 14 CFR). This exemption, ifgranted, would allow Wipaire to 

### increase the number ofpassenger seats for the Cessna**Caravan~** model 208, and Grand Caravan, model 208B, airplanes to ten, while maintaining the Type Certification (TC) approved maximtun seats of**eleven~** including crew. We have added your petition to the public docket (No.**FAA-2013~0156)** and we are processing it. We wi11 contact you ifwe need additional information

.. How We Will Process the Petition A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63 (d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days before the proposed effective date ofthe exemption

..In addition, we publish a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to § 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it.We will advise you ofthe agency's final decision on yotu· petition as soon as possible. Ifyou have any questions 

### in the meantime. you may contact Mr. Mark James, (816)

### 329~4137. Sincerely,



### Earl Lawrence Manager, Small Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





David Lubin, the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of Entertainment Art, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 29, 2011


ENTERTAINMENT ART, INC.








By:      /s/ David Lubin


Name: David Lubin


Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and


Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SERVED: JANUARY 16, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF NORTHEASTERN AVIATION CORP. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1264
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA110030) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL
Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001 ONE COPY Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Eastern Region Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Peter Montemurro, GeneralManager Northeastern Aviation Corp., Respondent 8200 Republic Airport, Suite 8 Farmingdale, NY 11735 TEL: 631-756-4600 FAX: 631-756-0698 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-1264 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
No. 56781.

#### Henry Schwab Lapidary, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 183414-K (New York).

*341Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of Stonecrest One, Inc., (the “Company”), on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), George C. Critz,
III, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.




Date:
      September 28, 2009
            By:
            /s/ George C. Critz,
      IIIGeorge
      C. Critz, IIIPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer)





* This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
No. 61060.

protest 294839-K (New York).

#### Julien Giguet, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of- counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ROGER WHEELER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5764FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1 and #4) is GRANTED. 

Petitioner does not appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 7th day of March, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05764-FDB Document 5 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 1
From: mcmahonglen@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:09:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

GLen McMahon

Winsted, CT 06098