alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:09:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ruth Getbehead

Wynantskill, NY 12198
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 749 

Expressing support for designation of a National Animal Rescue Day to 

create awareness, educate, increase animal adoption, and increase financial support for animal rescues throughout the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2007 

Mr. ANDREWS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of a National Animal 

Rescue Day to create awareness, educate, increase animal adoption, and increase financial support for animal 

rescues throughout the United States. 

Whereas between 6,000,000 to 8,000,000 cats and dogs are 

put into shelters every year and between 3,000,000 to 

4,000,000 are euthanized; 

Whereas there are between 4,000 to 6,000 animal shelters 

throughout the United States in need of pet supplies, 

medical supplies, blankets and towels, cleaning supplies, 

food, and educational materials about owning a pet, as 

well as information on how to provide the best pet match 

for a family; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 749 IH 

Whereas increased knowledge and awareness of animal rescue 

programs throughout the United States will significantly 

reduce the number of cats and dogs euthanized and reduce the number of animals returned to a shelter who 

have been rescued; 

Whereas a National Animal Rescue Day will reduce the problem of pet overpopulation, provide animals with good 

homes, and create awareness as well as financial and 

educational resources for the problems animal shelters 

face each day; and 

Whereas the first Saturday in October would be an appropriate day to designate as National Animal Rescue Day 

and celebrate it through events, festivals or Pawtographs 

signings which will increase revenues and pet adoptions 

throughout the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of a National Animal Rescue Day to create 

3 awareness for animal rescue programs throughout the 

4 year, address the challenge of overpopulation through con5 tinued spaying and neutering of adopted pets, and bring 

6 Americans together as a Nation to support this common 

7 goal. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT B

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 30

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 40 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000156

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000157

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000158

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 4 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000159

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 5 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000160

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 6 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000161

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 7 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000162

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 8 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000163

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 9 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000164

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 10 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000165

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 11 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000166

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 12 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000167

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 13 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000168

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 14 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000169

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 15 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000170

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 16 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000171

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 17 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000172

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 18 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000173

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 19 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000174

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 20 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000175

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 21 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000176

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 22 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000177

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 23 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000178

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 24 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000179

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 25 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000180

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 26 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000181

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 27 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000182

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 28 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000183

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 29 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL VM 000184

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 40-3 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 30 of 30
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CURTIS S. THOMPSON, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-1600RSL-MJB

)

v. )

)

DETECTIVE ROBERT SHILLING, et al., ) ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS

) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, the Report and Recommendation of the

Honorable Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Plaintiff’s complaint, and this action, are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

(3) Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED.

Case 2:05-cv-01600-RSL Document 14 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE - 1

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable

Monica J. Benton

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01600-RSL Document 14 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 359 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 359

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray 
    Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and 
                      commitment to young people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2007

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray 
    Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and 
                      commitment to young people.

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan, on May 3, 1920;
Whereas, in 1932, Robinson moved to New York City where he started boxing as an 
        amateur, going undefeated in 89 bouts, and winning the Golden Gloves 
        featherweight title in 1939;
Whereas, in 1940, he began boxing professionally and fought at New York City's 
        Madison Square Garden for the first time;
Whereas, in 1946, he won his first world title as a welterweight, and then held 
        the middleweight title for 5 years between 1951 and 1960;
Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series of exciting 
        matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965;
Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202 bouts with 109 
        knockouts;
Whereas Robinson's grace, speed, power, and mastery of the ring earned him 
        international acclaim as one of the greatest fighters in boxing history;
Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing Hall of Fame in 1967;
Whereas, in 1969, he established the Sugar Ray Robinson Youth Foundation; and
Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California, on April 12, 1989, 
        at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized as one of history's 
greatest professional boxers, whose dedication to boxing and commitment 
to young people have earned him a permanent place in sports history.
                                 <all>
```
CALPUFF Modeling Files for AEP Flint Creek

EPA identified a discrepancy in the visibility modeling results presented by AEP and reran the 

model for the 2003 model year. The 2003 visibility impact at Caney Creek for the LNB/OFA 

control scenario was adjusted to reflect the results of the EPA model run

Due to the file size of the CALPUFF modeling files, they are not available from the electronic 

docket. These files are available upon request. Please email your request to: Michael Feldman 

(feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 214-665-7200

Thank you
No. 63366.

protests 58/22332 and 58/22333 (New York).

#### Southern Leather Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Moulison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

















To the Board of Directors


OMA Enterprises Corp.











We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Form 10-K of our report dated March 25, 2009 with respect to our audit of the financial statements of OMA Enterprises Corp. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2008 and for the period from Inception (February 6, 2008) to December 31, 2008.











/s/  FRUMKIN, LUKIN & ZAIDMAN CPAs’, P.C.


FRUMKIN, LUKIN & ZAIDMAN CPAs’, P.C.


Rockville Centre, New York


July 24, 2009


---
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL

RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PROPET USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LLOYD SHUGART,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0186-MAT

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION

FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

OF ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

The Court previously denied an agreed motion to extend case deadlines upon finding that

the requested deadlines impinged upon the trial schedule. (Dkt. 25.) The parties now submit a

joint motion for partial reconsideration of the Court’s Order. (Dkt. 26.) In the current motion,

the parties withdraw their previous request for an extension of the deadline for dispositive motions

and restrict their request to extension of the deadlines for joining additional parties, designating

experts, and completing discovery. All of the requested deadlines predate the April 9, 2007 trial

date. Having considered this joint motion, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) The parties’ joint motion for partial reconsideration is GRANTED. The case

deadlines in this case are hereby modified as follows:

(a) Joining additional parties – December 30, 2006;

(b) Designating experts – February 6, 2007; and

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 27 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL

RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE -2

(c) Completing discovery – March 2, 2007.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for plaintiff and

defendant.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00186-MAT Document 27 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67564.

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States,

protest 62/7967 (Philadelphia).

*255Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber tree corsages similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HILARIO VALLE-MONTANO,

Defendant.

Case No. CR00-00439Z

INITIAL ORDER RE:

ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF

CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation

Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, Barb Sievers. 

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Linda Sullivan. 

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

 supervision, and the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s).

The court finds probable cause with regard to the allegation(s) and schedules a hearing on the

 petition to be held at the time and date below set forth before Judge Thomas S. Zilly:

Date of hearing: October 30, 2007

Time of hearing: 10:30am

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant:

( ) Be released on an appearance bond, subject to the terms and conditions set forth thereon.

(X) Be detained per defendant’s stipulation and Bureau of Immigration and Customs

Enforcement detainer pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

October 11, 2007.

__s/Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L. Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:00-cr-00439-TSZ Document 42 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 1
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

APRIL 6, 2016 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD33951 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent, 

 vs. 

 GARRY L. FILBECK, 

 Appellant.
Case 3:06-cr-05031-JKA Document 7 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-05031-JKA Document 7 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
4.4


 


	PA-01	SERIES
    A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK	**______**


 


 


	LAZYDAYS
    HOLDINGS, INC.






 





 


	INCORPORATED
    UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE	 	SEE
    REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 


TOTAL
AUTHORIZED ISSUE 105,000,000 SHARES


 


	100,000,000
    SHARES, PAR VALUE $0.0001 EACH, COMMON STOCK	 	5,000,000
    SHARES, PAR VALUE $0.0001 EACH, PREFERRED STOCK, 600,000
	 	 	SHARES
    DESIGNATED AS SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK


 


THIS
SECURITY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR THE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF ANY STATE IN RELIANCE
UPON AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), AND, ACCORDINGLY,
MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE
EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THIS SECURITY MAY BE PLEDGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT,
DATED AS OF 27, 2017, IN CONNECTION WITH A BONA FIDE MARGIN ACCOUNT WITH A REGISTERED BROKER-DEALER OR OTHER LOAN WITH A FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION THAT IS AN “ACCREDITED INVESTOR” AS DEFINED IN RULE 501(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR OTHER LOAN SECURED
BY SUCH SECURITIES.


 


This
is to certify that ____________________________________________________________________is the owner of 


_______________________________________________________________________________________________


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK OF LAZYDAYS HOLDINGS, INC. (the
“Corporation”)


 


transferable
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate,
properly endorsed.


 


The
Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional, or other special rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and of any other series of preferred
stock which the Corporation may establish, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers.


Dated:______________,
2018
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Amendment No.2 on Form 10-K for the year ending    June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof    (the "Report"), Sau Shan Ku, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies    to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.    906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    Oakridge International Corporation, and will be retained by Oakridge International    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    /s/ Sau Shan Ku
--------------------------
Sau Shan    Ku
Chief    Executive Officer
May 29,    2012 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. P66/48.

protests 60/28589, etc. (NewYork).

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “F” covered by the foregoing protests consist of statuary, sculptures, and/or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2.50 each, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), and that the items of merchandise marked “P” covered by the foregoing protests consist of framed wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnart*Imports, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 2531), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-00827-JCC Document 2 Filed 05/03/05 Page 13 of 13