alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 1, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10121

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD BRANDON SUMMERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(6:03-CR-42-2-C)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Brandon Summers appeals his conviction and sentence

for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possessing a

firearm with an obliterated serial number. Summers pleaded guilty

but reserved the right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress

evidence obtained at a traffic stop of the car in which he was

riding and the right to appeal an incorrect application of the

sentencing guidelines. Summers contends that the stop was

unjustified in its inception and was unlawfully extended in its
2

scope; he also contends that he should have received an additional

one point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. 

The district court did not commit clear error by believing the

testimony of the arresting officer that he stopped the car because

of the driver’s failure to signal before turning. Hence, the

traffic stop was justified at its inception. See Whren v. United

States, 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996) (stop is reasonable if police have

probable cause to believe traffic violation has occurred); United

States v. Garza, 118 F.3d 278, 283 (5th Cir. 1997) (deferring to

district court’s findings as to credibility of witnesses), cert.

denied sub nom. Innocenio v. United States, 522 U.S. 1051 (1998).

Nor was the scope of the stop unlawfully extended. There was

“additional articulable, reasonable suspicion” for the detention.

See United States v. Valadez, 267 F.3d 395, 398 (5th Cir. 2001).

The officer was writing a citation to the vehicle’s driver, James

Baird, for failure to provide adequate proof of insurance. See

United States v. Shabazz, 993 F.2d 431, 437 (5th Cir. 1993)

(officer may request insurance papers and issue citation). The

officers also had a reasonable suspicion about Summers’ identity.

Unlike the driver, Summers did not produce a driver’s license or

other photographic identification. Summers was riding in a car

registered to Raymond Turner, and a man by that name was wanted on

a felony arrest warrant. 
3

Summers received a two-level reduction for acceptance of

responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) but contends that he

should have received an additional reduction under U.S.S.G. §

3E1.1(b). No reduction under that subpart is allowed unless the

Government moves for one; it did not do so. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)

and comment. (n.6).

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, Greg Curson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Ayers Exploration Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            the
      annual report on Form 10-K of Ayers Exploration Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ayers
      Exploration Inc.




Dated:
March 31, 2010




/s/ Greg
Curson


Greg
Curson


President,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial
Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.1


 





 








	 	11651
Central Parkway, Ste. 118


Jacksonville,
FLorida 32224





 


	 	 	March
        13, 2018

         

        Mr.
        Robert J. Guerra

         

        Dear
        Mr. Guerra,  

         

        We are pleased to offer you a seat on the Board of Directors of Drone Aviation Holding Corp., a Nevada
        corporation (the “Company”) for a term of two (2) years. Upon your execution of this letter agreement, you
        will have consented to your appointment, which will be contingent and dependent upon approval of the Director Agreement
        by the Board of Directors (such date, the “Appointment Date”).  

         

        For and in consideration of the services
        to be performed by you, the Company agrees to pay for your services as follows:  

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Fee:	An
    annual fee equal to $24,000 (“Annual Fee”), payable in equal monthly installments
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Annual bonus:	As
    determined by the Compensation Committee
	 	 	 	
	 	 	Restricted stock:	100,000
    options to purchase the Company’s unregistered common stock at an exercise price based on the greater of the closing
    price of the Company’s common stock on the Appointment Date or $1.00 (the “Options”). The Options shall
    vest 50% one year from the Appointment Date and the other 50% two years from the Appointment Date so long as you are a member
    of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Options will be exercisable at any time after they vest and prior to the four
    year anniversary of the Appointment Date. The Option shall be issued in compliance with all rules and regulations of the United
    States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the terms of a Stock Option Agreement to be provided by the Company.
    The Options granted to you shall be in effect subject to your continuous service as a member of the Board. In the event that
    your service is terminated prior to the two (2) year anniversary of the Appointment Date for any reason, all unvested options
    shall be forfeited. 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	You
        hereby also consent to the use of your name and biographical information in documentation prepared by the Company as it
        relates to your becoming a member of the Company’s Board  

         

        Kindly
        indicate your consent to the matters discussed herein by signing and returning a copy of this letter to us as soon as
        possible.  

         

	 	 	 	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	/s/ Jay H. Nussbaum
	 	 	 	 	Jay
        H. Nussbaum,

        CEO
        and Chairman

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Accepted: ________________________________	Date: ____________________________________
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 


 





	 	main:904●834●4400


fax:904●834●4360


info@droneaviationcorp.com


www.DRONEAVIATIONCORP.COM
Exhibit
31.2




Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Howard
Mah, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.










Date:
      March 30, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Howard MahName:
              Title:
            Howard
      Mah
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
      Partner of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP
From: jsrickert@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:12:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jim Rickert

Utica, MI 48316
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


and
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)











My name
is Josey Sajan and I am the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Treasurer of
Imperial Resources, Inc. (the “Company”).





I hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, filed with
      the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2009
      (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
      Imperial Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the
      Report.











JOSEY
SAJAN


Josey
Sajan


Chief
Financial Officer and


Secretary
Treasurer


Imperial
Resources, Inc.





Date:  June
30, 2009











-1-
From: djolley71@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:29:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dwayne Jolley

Cache, OK 73527
No. P66/261. —

#### Louis Marx & Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/9328 (San Francisco).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of air horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies
Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|1. | The Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.                                                        

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification this 8TH day of November, 2010.

/s/ Thomas L.
WegmanThomas L. Wegman President, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Louis LECLEZIO; Wendy Leclezio, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-36190.

D.C. No. CV-98-01198-TSZ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2001.

Decided July 13, 2001.

Before B. FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Louis and Wendy Leclezio appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee First American Title Insurance Company on the Leclezios’ state tort claims for slander of title, tortious interference, and conspiracy to defraud. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. *Balint v. Carson City,*180 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc). Upon thorough review of the record, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Leclezios, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to First American because the Leclezios failed to provide evidence to support one or more essential elements of each of the intentional tort claims.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 48 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives by requiring 

transparency of record votes in the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2007 

Mr. DREIER (for himself, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Washington, and Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives by 

requiring transparency of record votes in the Committee 

on Rules. 

Whereas the Republican controlled 104th Congress adopted 

rules of the House requiring all committees to include in 

their reports accurate records of all recorded votes on 

measures and matters and any amendments thereto; 

Whereas the Democratically controlled 110th Congress adopted a rule waiving the reporting requirements concerning 

committee votes against reports from the Committee on 

Rules; 

Whereas during the period starting with the 104th Congress 

through the 109th Congress, the Committee on Rules 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 48 IH 

held 1,304 recorded votes that were accurately reflected 

in the reports of the Committee on Rules; 

Whereas the Committee on Rules has had a membership of 

only thirteen Members since the 98th Congress; 

Whereas clause 3(a)(2) of rule XIII provides for the filing of 

a supplemental committee report specifically for the purpose of correcting any errors in the depiction of recorded 

votes, should they occur; 

Whereas pursuant to clause 3(a)(2) of rule XIII, the layover 

requirements under clause 4 (three-day layover requirement for committee reports) and clause 6 (one-day layover requirement for privileged reports from the Committee on Rules) of rule XIII are not applicable to supplemental reports correcting errors in the depiction of recorded votes; 

Whereas committee reports provide essential legislative history by which to evaluate the actions of a committee; 

Whereas requiring the inclusion of accurate committee votes 

in committee reports provides the public with a permanent, official, and reliable record as to the actions of a 

committee on particular measures and matters; 

Whereas other methods of disclosure, such as the internet, 

lack the permanence required of legislative history; and 

Whereas committee reports are held in the National Archives 

and the Federal Depository Libraries to benefit future 

generations seeking accurate historical information on 

previous congressional action: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the second sentence of clause 3(b) of 

2 rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘a report by the Committee on 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 48 IH 

1 Rules on a rule, joint rule, or the order of business or 

2 to’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00153-MJP Document 30 Filed 10/30/2006 Page 1 of 1 Thomas v. Quinn Doc. 30

Dockets.Justia.com