May 8, 2015

 Exemption No. 11500

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0294

Ms. Dallice Tylee

Silver Fern Homes, LLC

285 Martin Drive

Boulder, CO 80305

Dear Ms. Tylee:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By undated letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an 

exemption. The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to 

conduct aerial videography and photography for hobby and recreational purposes, as well as,

marketing and promotional purposes in the real estate industry.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI Phantom 2 Vision+.
2

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Ms. Dallice Tylee is granted an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to 

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. 

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Ms. Dallice Tylee is hereafter referred to as the operator.
3

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations 

of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 
4

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 
5

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.
6

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.
7

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
§ 11.81 What information must I include in my petition for an exemption?

You must include the following information in your petition for an exemption and submit it to the FAA

as soon as you know you need an exemption.

(a) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax

number, telephone number, or e-mail address;

DALLICE TYLEE

Silver Fern Homes, LLC

285 Martin Drive, Boulder CO 80305

Phone: 303-746-6765

Email: dallice@silverfernhomes.com

(b) The specific section or the section of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption;

Following the Grant of Exemption No. 11138 in the matter of the Petition of Douglas Trudeau, Realtor,

and Regulatory Docket ID. FAA-2014-0481, Petitioner Dallice Tylee requests an exemption from the

same specific sections of 14 CFR:

1.61.113(a) and (b): PRIVATE PILOT PRIVILEGES and LIMITATIONS

2.63.13: APPLICABILITY

3.91.7(a): CIVIL AIRCRAFT WORTHINESS

4.91.119(c): MINIMUM SAFE ALTITUDES

5.91.121: ALTIMETER SETTINGS

6.91.151(a)(1): FUEL REQUIREMENTS

7.91.405(a): MAINTENANCE REQUIRED

8.91.407(a)(1): OPERATION AFTER MAINTENANCE REBUILDING ALTERATION

9.91.409(a)(1) and (2): INSPECTIONS

10.91.417(a) and (b): MAINTENANCE RECORDS

14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals: 

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of

necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed

operational area of the Petitioner's UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because the UAS meets (and

exceeds) an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is

authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49

U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to

exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size,

speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. The petitioners

UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such

certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on board pilots

or passengers, and given the size of the UAS, this Regulation is inapplicable. The FAA has previously

issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B,

10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827.
14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as the UAS utilizes

electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and

registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent

level of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and

registrations by Petitioner, Dallice Tylee.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of The Aircraft.

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to

certain specifications. UAS's are unmanned. They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station

on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficult to place on such

small aircraft with dimensions smaller that minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, the Petitioner

will mark her UAS in the largest possible lettering by placing the word “EXPERIMENTAL” on its

fuselage as required by 14 C.F.R. §45.29 (f) so that I the pilot, or anyone assisting as an

assistant/observer with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to

this regulation. Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167A and 10700.

14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to non-commercial operations.

Petitioner, Dallice Tylee, holds a private pilot license and a 3rd class medical certificate and has been

flying without incident since 2010. The petitioner believes she can achieve an equivalent level of safety

as achieved by current Regulations because her UAS does not carry any pilots or passengers. Further,

while helpful in understanding airspace regulations, laws and guidelines, a pilot license will not ensure

remote control piloting skills. The risks attended to the operation of my UAS is far less than the risk

levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, et seq. Thus, allowing the

Petitioner to operate the UAS and meet and exceed current safety levels in relation to 14 C.F.R.

§61.113 (a) & (b).

14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be

operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. The Petitioner's UAS will never operate at an altitude

greater than 200 AGL; safely below the standard of 400 AGL. The Petitioner will however operate the

UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to or

below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of

the UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved. 

14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.

See: Safety/Flight Manual (“Operating Documents”) - Section 333 Exemption Petition 

The above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to “have [the]

aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except

as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this

chapter. . . .” These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not,

therefore, apply to Petitioner, Dallice Tylee's UAS. However, as a safety precaution the Petitioner will

inspect the UAS before and after each flight.
(c) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief;

To allow petitioner Dallice Tylee to operate the commercially available DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION+

quad-copter unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial videography and photography for

hobby and recreational purposes. To also use it for marketing and promotional purposes in the real

estate industry. 

(d) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it

would benefit the public as a whole;

Residents of northern Colorado enjoy spectacular views which include the Rocky Mountains, city

lights and sunrises over the plains. A UAS is a quick, low cost and safe way to capture photographs and

short videos that promote both the area and showcase a property. The market is demanding of such

services from real estate agents and the petitioner is attempting to offer clients and the general public

such services while respecting and following FAA laws and guidelines.

The petitioner believes that her use of an UAS will pose no threat to the public given its small size and

lack of combustible fuel. The petitioner proposes that use of her UAS will minimize ecological impact

and promote education and economic growth in northern Colorado.

(e) The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which

you seek the exemption; 

Petitioner Dallice Tylee notes the FAA's findings in the Grant of Exemption No 11138 in the matter of

the petition of Douglas Trudeau, Realtor, and Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0481: The FAA finds

that a grant of exemption is in the pubic interest. The enhanced safety and reduced environmental

impact achieved using a UA with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no

passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this

exemption is in the public interest.

Petitioner Dallice Tylee submits the following representations of enhancements to current aerial

videography and photography for real estate: 

• My UAS weighs less than 5 pounds complete;

• I only operate my UAS below 200 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling set by the

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012);

• My UAS only operate for 10-15 minutes per flight; 

• I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power; 

• I pilot my UAS through remote control only by line of sight;

• I have a UAS assistant/observer at each flight, who also has the UAS in line of sight;

• The UAS has GPS a flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if

communication with the remote control pilot is lost;

• I actively analyze flight data and other sources of information to constantly update and enhance

safety protocols;

• I only operate in reasonably safe environment that are strictly controlled, are away from power

lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas and during daylight hours;
• I conduct extensive pre-flight inspections during which safety carries primary importance; 

• I always obtains all necessary permissions prior to operation; 

• I have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential danger. 

Petitioner Dallice Tylee is supplying:

• PHANTOM flying flowchart

• PHANTOM 2 Vision+ User Manual

• Flight Protocol and Safety Documents

Petitioner Dallice Tylee notes the Conditions and Limitations relative to the Grant of Exemption No.

11138 in the matter of the petition of Douglas Trudeau, Realtor, and Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-

0481 and will comply with the 33 items as listed in the Exemption. Petitioner Dallice Tylee has an

almost identical model Phantom 2 Vision +, with the only difference being the model this Petitioner

owns has a built-in video camera, rather than the removable Go-Pro option.

(f) A summary we can publish in the FEDERAL REGISTER, stating:

(I) The rule from which you seek the exemption; and

Following the Grant of Exemption No. 11138 in the matter of the Petition of Douglas Trudeau, Realtor,

and Regulatory Docket ID. FAA-2014-0481, Petitioner Dallice Tylee requests an exemption from the

same specific sections of 14 CFR:

1.61.113(a) and (b): PRIVATE PILOT PRIVILEGES and LIMITATIONS

2.63.13: APPLICABILITY

3.91.7(a): CIVIL AIRCRAFT WORTHINESS

4.91.119(c): MINIMUM SAFE ALTITUDES

5.91.121: ALTIMETER SETTINGS

6.91.151(a)(1): FUEL REQUIREMENTS

7.91.405(a): MAINTENANCE REQUIRED

8.91.407(a)(1): OPERATION AFTER MAINTENANCE REBUILDING ALTERATION

9.91.409(a)(1) and (2): INSPECTIONS

10.91.417(a) and (b): MAINTENANCE RECORDS

(II) A brief description of the nature of the exemption you seek:

Petitioner Dallice Tylee seeks an exemption for the purpose of using the PHANTOM 2 Vision + for

hobby, recreational and commercial photography and videography to provide real estate clients and the

general public with educational footage and to use such footage for marketing/promotional purposes.

The Petitioner notes the FAA's findings in the Grant of Exemption No 11138 in the matter of the

petition of Douglas Trudeau, Realtor, and Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0481: The FAA finds that

a grant of exemption is in the pubic interest. The enhanced safety and reduced environmental impact

achieved using a UA with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to

flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is

in the public interest.