alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000875385
<NAME> ACCESS SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          53,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,167
<INVENTORY>                                     98,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,133
<PP&E>                                         412,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 283,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 548,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,567,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,652
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,637,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   548,046
<SALES>                                        211,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,931
<CGS>                                          151,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,257)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,257)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Domingo De Jesus URBINA-MONCADA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40851.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

*327James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Christina Arellano-Villarreal, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Domingo De Jesus Urbina-Moncada (Urbina) appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. Urbina argues, for the first time on appeal, that the district court erred by enhancing his base offense level sixteen levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(vii), based on a determination that his prior conviction for transporting unlawful aliens was an alien smuggling offense. As Urbina concedes, his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Solis-Campozano,*312 F.3d 164, 167-68 (5th Cir.2002).

Also for the first time on appeal, Urbina argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in the light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Urbina concedes that this argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). *See United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000).

Urbina argues that the district court erred in sentencing him under a mandatory Sentencing Guidelines scheme. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756,160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court committed error that is plain in sentencing Urbina under a mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No.*05-5556); *United States v. Martinez-Lugo,*411 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir.2005). Urbina fails to meet his burden of showing that the district court’s error affected his substantial rights. *See Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d at 733-34; *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517); *see also United States v. Bringier,*405 F.3d 310, 317 n. 4 (5th Cir.2005), *328
      *petition for cert. filed*(July 26, 2005) (No. 05-5535).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. §1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In connection with the annual report of Circle Star Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Jonathan Pina, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  
  Dated: August 15, 2011                                                       By:  /s/ G. Jonathan Pina
 G. Jonathan Pina, Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Circle Star Energy Corp. and will be retained by Circle Star Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed September 18, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00715

- CV

____________ MAXIMILLIAN ROEMER , Appellant

V. CLUB OF THE ISLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0074654



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 24, 2015. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. T herefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before October 6, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellantfails to timely pay the filing fee in accorda nce with this order, the appeal will be

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-064 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 11

                             FILENE'S BASEMENT CORP.
                 STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                           May 2,        May 3,
                                           1998          1997
                                        ----------    ----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>       
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding             20,893,742    20,622,580

Assumed exercise of stock
  options net of treasury
  shares deemed to have been
  repurchased at an average

  market price for the period                   -        773,476
                                        ---------     ----------

Weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares
outstanding used for diluted

computations                            20,893,742    21,396,056
                                        ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 69

To correct the enrollment of the bill S. 830.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. JEFFORDS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of the bill S. 830.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 830)

3 to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and

4 the Public Health Service Act to improve the regulation

5 of food, drugs, devices, and biological products, and for

6 other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make

7 the following corrections:

8 (1) In section 119(b) of the bill:

9 (A) Strike paragraph (2) (relating to con10 forming amendments).
2

SCON 69 ATS

1 (B) Strike ‘‘(b) SECTION 505(j).—’’ and

2 all that follows through ‘‘‘(3)(A) The Secretary

3 shall’’ and insert the following:

4 ‘‘(b) SECTION 505(j).—Section 505(j) (21 U.S.C.

5 355(j)) is amended by adding at the end the following

6 paragraph:

7 ‘‘‘(9)(A) The Secretary shall’’.

8 (2) In section 125(d)(2) of the bill, in the mat9 ter preceding subparagraph (A), insert after ‘‘anti10 biotic drug’’ the second place such term appears the

11 following: ‘‘(including any salt or ester of the anti12 biotic drug)’’.

13 (3) In section 127(a) of the bill: In section

14 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

15 (as proposed to be inserted by such section 127(a)),

16 in the second sentence of subsection (d)(2), strike

17 ‘‘or other criteria’’ and insert ‘‘and other criteria’’.

18 (4) In section 412(c) of the bill:

19 (A) In subparagraph (1) of section 502(e)

20 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

21 (as proposed to be amended by such section

22 412(c)), in subclause (iii) of clause (A), insert

23 before the period the following: ‘‘or to prescrip24 tion drugs’’.
3

SCON 69 ATS

1 (B) Strike ‘‘(c) MISBRANDING.—Subpara2 graph (1) of section 502(e)’’ and insert the fol3 lowing:

4 ‘‘(c) MISBRANDING.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (1) of sec6 tion 502(e)’’.

7 (C) Add at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in

9 this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall

10 affect the question of the authority of the Secretary

11 of Health and Human Services regarding inactive

12 ingredient labeling for prescription drugs under sec13 tions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

14 other than section 502(e)(1)(A)(iii).’’.

15 (5) Strike section 501 of the bill and insert the

16 following:

17 ‘‘SEC. 501. EFFECTIVE DATE.

18 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in

19 this Act, this Act and the amendments made by this Act

20 shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of

21 this Act.

22 ‘‘(b) IMMEDIATE EFFECT.—Notwithstanding sub23 section (a), the provisions of and the amendments made

24 by sections 111, 121, 125, and 307 of this Act, and the

25 provisions of section 510(m) of the Federal Food, Drug,
4

SCON 69 ATS

1 and Cosmetic Act (as added by section 206(a)(2)), shall

2 take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.’’.

Æ
From: the.thorntons@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:16:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darwin Thornton

Tucson, AZ 85755
Before the Second Division,

February 16, 1961

No. 65160.

#### Korlis, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 289692-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

P-10-0246

Standard Review Draft 2/2/2011

ENGINEER: Prothero \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): y 

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview: SRER draft 2/2/11: Revised estimates based on new info from 

submitter in 1/25/2011 faxed letter.

SUBMITTER: UBE America Inc. (submitter)

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes LABEL: No

Gen Eqpt: vinyl or rubber gloves/ dust goggle / dust preventive clothing / local exhaust ventilation/ general 

mechanical ventilation.

Respirator: dust protective N100 mask.

Health Effects: corrosive to eyes / avoid skin contact / toxic if swallowed / may be harmful if inhaled.

TLV/PEL: - Cobalt - 1.5 % - TLV-TWA - ACGIH - Cobalt - 1.5 % - TLV-TWA Respirable particulate - ACGIH - 

Cobalt - 1.5 % - TLV-TWA inhalable particulate - ACGIH - Cobalt - 1.5 % - TWA PEL - OSHA

CRSS: (5/20/2010):

Chemical Name: Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

S-H2O: 0.000001 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 
MW: 0 0.0%<500 0.0%<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: Solid Mfg: NK: Import

Proc/Form: Solid End Use:

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns): (5/21/2010):

Migration to groundwater: Other (please specify)

PBT rating: P3 B3 T1

Health: 2, Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1, No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. Focus IRER Notes: 

The PB rating is P3B3; a full assessment is required.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

P2 REC:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No (0 criteria met)

P-10-0246

Number of Sites/Location: 1 submitter site(s) 

unknown site(s) 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 
P-10-0246

Number of Sites/Location: 1 submitter site(s) 

unknown site(s) 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 
P-10-0246

Number of Sites/Location: 1 submitter site(s) 

unknown site(s) 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

RELEASE TOTAL

 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 
P-10-0246

Number of Sites/Location: 1 submitter site(s) 

unknown site(s) 

Basis: 

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources 

to the same medium. 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Dermal:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
No. 69699.

#### Malt Diastase Co. *v.*United States,

protests 64/13417 and 65/1038 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dehydrated leek flakes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Corn Products Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 152, C.D. 2567), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-K/A of Sync2
Networks Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Moore Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: April 8, 2013


/s/ John Moore
-----------------------------------
John Moore
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5             
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-1-1997
<CASH>                                         4,820
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    46,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,678
<PP&E>                                         37,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,478
<BONDS>                                        6,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     49,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,071
<SALES>                                        32,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32,624
<CGS>                                          18,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                   426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.28
        


</TABLE>