alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 2:05-cr-00400-RSL 

v. ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE 

RUSSELL J. BROWN, 

 

 Defendant. 

Based upon the Motion to Continue the Trial Date filed in 

the instant action, and the responsive pleadings filed by the 

parties, the Court finds (1) that the time limits set forth in 

the Speed Trial Act should be tolled from 13 February 2006 in 

light of the fact that it is not reasonable to adequately 

prepare for pretrial and trial proceedings within the time 

limits established by the Speedy Trial Act, (2) that the ends of 

justice are best served by tolling the time computation under 

the Speedy Trial Act, and (3) that in the instant case the 

interest of the public and the parties in a speedy trial is 

outweighed by the need for additional time to adequately prepare 

Case 2:05-cr-00400-RSL Document 21 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

for trial. Based upon the foregoing and for good cause shown, 

upon receipt of a affidavit from defendant waiving his rights to 

a speedy trial under the Speedy Trial Act from 13 February 2006 

through 1 September 2006, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Trial date for the jury trial in 

this case shall be continued from 3 April 2006 until the 24th 

day of July, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the granting of the continuance 

will toll the time computation under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 

U.S.C. 3161, from 13 February 2006 through 1 September 2006. 

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2006. 

 

 Robert S. Lasnik 

 United States District Judge

A

Presented by: 

s/ Gregory A. Robinson

Gregory A. Robinson 

 

Case 2:05-cr-00400-RSL Document 21 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60249.

petition 7191-R (New York).

#### Columbia Tire Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Prior to making entry, a member of the importing firm made an investigation abroad, the result of which convinced him that the invoiced prices represented the correct value of the merchandise, and he, accordingly, instructed the broker to make entry at those figures. Prior to appraisement and upon consultation between another member of the firm and the customs examiner who passed upon that class of merchandise, the firm agreed to seek further information from abroad. The information received was somewhat conflicting and, inasmuch as the members of the importing firm believed the entered prices were correct, it was decided to test the issue by way of an appeal for reappraisement, which was filed after the appraiser had made his return at a higher value. Subsequent information received from abroad confirmed the correctness of the appraised values, and the appeal for reappraisement was abandoned. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was, therefore, granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-K of Sync2
Networks Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Moore Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: December 6, 2012


/s/ John Moore
-----------------------------------
John Moore
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wing Kuen Ha, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Amico Games Corp. for the year ended August 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Amico Games Corp.






Dated: November 29, 2010




/s/Wing Kuen Ha


Wing Kuen Ha
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer and
 Principal Accounting Officer)
 Amico Games Corp.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Amico Games Corp. and will be retained by Amico Games Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL RAY EVANS,

Petitioner,

v.

SANDRA CARTER,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1770-MJP-MAT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, raising several procedural bars to the court’s

consideration of the petition. Petitioner has filed a response to the motion to dismiss, to which

he has attached two exhibits revealing that petitioner has already had one habeas petition

adjudicated by the court. Petitioner’s prior habeas petition was denied by the Honorable Franklin

D. Burgess on June 19, 1998. (See Doc. #15 in Evans v. Ducharme, Case No. C97-5483FDB).

Congress has limited habeas petitioners in general to one petition and has established strict

rules governing second or successive petitions: “A claim presented in a second or successive

habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be

Case 2:05-cv-01770-MJP Document 12 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PAGE -2

dismissed.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) (emphasis added). A claim presented in a second or

successive habeas corpus application that was not presented in a prior application shall be

dismissed unless the claim is based on a new rule of law that applies retroactively or the petition

is based on facts that could not have been discovered earlier. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). Before

filing a second or successive petition in the district court, a habeas petitioner must first seek

authorization from the appropriate circuit court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).

Here, there is nothing in the record to suggest that petitioner has received permission from

the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a second habeas petition in district court. Accordingly,

petitioner is ordered to SHOW CAUSE, no later than April 28, 2006, why his petition should not

be construed as a motion for authorization to file a second petition and transferred to the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration. See Circuit Rule 22-3. Failure to file a timely or

adequate response to this Order will result in the court transferring petitioner’s petition to the

Ninth Circuit. Respondent shall file a reply to petitioner’s response no later than one week after

receipt of petitioner’s response.

The Clerk shall RENOTE petitioner’s habeas petition for consideration on May 12, 2006.

The Clerk shall also send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the

Hon. Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 13th day of April , 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01770-MJP Document 12 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,385,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,821,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                    521,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,950,851
<PP&E>                                       1,867,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                 860,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,414,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,024,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,122
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,197,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,414,364
<SALES>                                      1,921,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,921,414
<CGS>                                          912,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  912,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                731,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                   210,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            521,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   521,322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        


</TABLE>
No. 68180.

#### James G. Wiley, a/c Sentora Hardware Distributors *v.*United States,

protest 61/18063 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that *288the merchandise consists of railway picks which are track tools of iron, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 641 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 641

Acknowledging the importance of understanding the history of the United 
      States of America and recognizing the need to foster civic 
                    responsibility in all citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2007

 Mr. McHenry submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Acknowledging the importance of understanding the history of the United 
      States of America and recognizing the need to foster civic 
                    responsibility in all citizens.

Whereas we celebrate the 220th Anniversary of the signing of the Constitution of 
        the United States of America in September 2007;
Whereas historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence, the 
        Constitution of the United States of America, and the Bill of Rights 
        should be the foundations of an education in American history and the 
        guidelines for civic responsibility; and
Whereas every citizen has a duty to family, school, and community to participate 
        as civic leaders and promote the tenets embodied in our founding 
        documents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) acknowledges the importance of understanding the 
        history of the United States of America; and
            (2) recognizes the need to foster civic responsibility in 
        all citizens.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         349,860
<SECURITIES>                                   127,517
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,430
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               876,449
<PP&E>                                         229,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,126,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,410
<OTHER-SE>                                     533,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,126,827
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,196
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  488,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,937
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,714
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,955
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60217

Conference Calendar

 

GARY WALDEN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

K. Z. YUSUFF, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:02-CV-74-RG

--------------------

February 19, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Walden, federal prisoner # 06455-004, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court construed

Walden’s petition, which challenged the validity of his 1992

cocaine conspiracy convictions, as a motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 and dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.

Walden has not challenged in this court the district court’s

reasons for dismissing his complaint. Accordingly, it is as if
No. 02-60217

-2-

Walden had not appealed the judgment. See Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Walden’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
#### Yaakov M. VANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis DILLON, Nassau County District Attorney, Nassau County Police Department, John P. McKeon, Police Commissioner, John Doe, Jane Doe, Defendants, Dean Skelos, Senator, Bob Barra, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 00-7987.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 11, 2001.

*63Yaakov M. Vann, Long Beach, CA, pro se, on submission.

Robert H. Easton, Assistant Solicitor General, New York, on submission; Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Michael S. Belohlavek, Deputy Solicitor General, Mark Gimpel, Assistant Solicitor General, Robert H. Easton, Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief, for appellee.

Present JACOBS, LEVAL, Circuit Judges and MURTHA, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable J. Garvan Murtha, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Yaakov M. Vann appeals from the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

In December 1998, Vann made repeated harassing calls to the office of New York State Senator Dean Skelos. The Skelos aide who fielded the calls (Bob Barra) swore out a criminal complaint charging Vann with aggravated harassment. In May 1999, during the pendency of the harassment proceeding, Vann brought this action seeking damages for the alleged violation of his constitutional rights, and injunctive relief barring the prosecution of the harassment charge. In June 1999, the harassment charge was dismissed after Vann accepted adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and complied with the terms of the adjournment.

To the extent that Vann seeks an injunction against the prosecution of the harassment charge, his claim is moot. To the extent that he seeks damages, we have reviewed his claims and find them to be without merit for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 533 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 12, 2007.
    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2956) to require the Secretary of Defense 
to commence the reduction of the number of United States Armed Forces in Iraq to 
a limited presence by April 1, 2008, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the bill and against its consideration are waived except those arising 
under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) four hours of debate, with three hours 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Armed Services and one hour equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs; 
and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 2956 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officers of Nugent Engine Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and 2008
(the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert Smith
              By
      Robert Smith
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              March
      31, 2010
            /s/  Micheal Nugent
              By
      Micheal Nugent
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              March
      31, 2010
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 684 

Congratulating Shawn Johnson on her victory in becoming the 2007 World 

Artistic Gymnastics Champion in women’s gymnastics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 

Mr. BOSWELL (for himself, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. KING of Iowa, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mrs. CAPPS, and Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Shawn Johnson on her victory in becoming 

the 2007 World Artistic Gymnastics Champion in women’s gymnastics. 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won four gold medals at the 2007 

Pan American Games in Rio de Janiero for team competition, all around, uneven bars, and balance beam, as 

well as one silver medal for floor; 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won the 2007 Visa Championships 

in San Jose, California, to become the United States 

champion in gymnastics; 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won three gold medals at the 2007 

World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in Stuttgart, 

Germany, making her the 2007 world all-around chamVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:29 Sep 26, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR684.IH HR684

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 684 IH 

pion, one of only four American women to have achieved 

such recognition; and 

Whereas Shawn Johnson has brought great pride and honor 

to her family, friends, and the citizens of Iowa with her 

numerous accomplishments at the age of 15: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Shawn Johnson on her outstanding accomplish3 ment in becoming the 2007 World Gymnastics Champion 

4 in women’s gymnastics. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding, Inc. as of December 31, 2008.



|                                            |  |                   
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Name                                        |  | Where Incorporated
|Fresenius Kabi Pharmaceuticals Holding, LLC |  | Delaware          
|APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                   |  | Delaware          
|APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC                    |  | Delaware          
|Pharmaceuticals Partners of Canada, Inc.    |  | Ontario, Canada   
|APP Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing, LLC      |  | Puerto Rico