alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P66/89.

protest 61/8964 (Los Angeles).

#### Victor England Agencies, Inc., and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hanging paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England*Agencies, *Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 675 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 121
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 675

                          [Report No. 110-346]

 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
 (H.R. 976) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax 
          relief for small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2007

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
 (H.R. 976) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax 
          relief for small businesses, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 976) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for small 
businesses, and for other purposes, with Senate amendments thereto, and 
to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order 
except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion 
offered by the chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or his 
designee that the House concur in each of the Senate amendments with 
the respective amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendments and the 
motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 
one hour equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question.
                                                 House Calendar No. 121

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 675

                          [Report No. 110-346]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
 (H.R. 976) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax 
          relief for small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
From: bjptl@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:49:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brooks Jackson

Fort Wayne, IN 46885
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin CONWAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4742.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided July 10, 2001.

*179Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, NC, for appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kevin Conway, Jr., pled guilty to one count of aggravated sexual abuse of a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2242(2) (West 2000), and one count of theft of personal property of a value greater than $1000, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 661 (West 2000). The district court sentenced Conway to 218 months in prison. Conway appeals,* challenging his sentence on that ground that the district court erred in determining his criminal history category by relying on information in the presentence investigation report concerning his juvenile adjudications.

■ We find that Conway has had a fair opportunity to challenge the information concerning his juvenile record in the presentence report and has failed to show that the information was incorrect. Consequently, we affirm his sentence. *United States v. Inglesi,*988 F.2d 500, 502 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Conway’s plea agreement included an appeal waiver provision. However, because this provision was not discussed at his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 hearing and there is no other indication in the record that Conway understood the full significance of the waiver, we find that he did not waive his right to appeal. *United States v. Marin,*961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir.1992).
Case No. 7,641.

#### KEENE v. COOPER.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 215.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1820.

Writ or Inquiry — Plaintiff's Affidavit— Amount of Damages.

In executing a writ of inquiry in Alexandria, ■the plaintiff’s own affidavit may be read in evidence of the amount of the damages.

On executing the writ of inquiry in this cause, Mr. Taylor, for plaintiff, offered in evidence, to ascertain the amount of damages, the plaintiff's own affidavit.

Mr. Swann opposed it;

and said that the practice of the court was to allow it only in cases where the defendant does not contest the amount of damages.

Mr. Taylor, in reply.

If the rule be not uniform and general, the plaintiff cannot know when he may safely execute his writ of inquiry. There is no appearance of defendant upon the record.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief .Judge.]

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra.,)

said that the practice had been uniform in Virginia, and here, and permitted the plaintiff’s affidavit to be read.
# Fourth C ourt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 21, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00709

- CR

Kayro MORENO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CRS001128D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's brief was originally due on March 21, 2019. This court notified appellant's counsel of the deficiency on March 27, 2019 , but no response was filed. By order dated April 16, 2019, this appeal was abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. The trial court conducted the hearing, and a supplemental records were filed containing the trial court’s findings. The app eal is REINSTATED on the docket of the court. Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than thirty days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff ixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

d0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137932

NATHANIEL LIVINGSTON, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137932 COA: 288273 Washtenaw CC: 08-002301-PP WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
No. 62296.

#### Quon Hing Co. *v.*United States,

protest 309963-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 60311, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: lmacl505@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:37:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lisa Maclean

Plymouth, MI 48170
BEFORE THE FIRST DIVISION,

December 12, 1963

No. 68162.

#### Williams, Clarke Company *v.*United States,

protest 63/6005 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00254-CR

Robert TAYLOR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR10818

Honorable Sid Harle,1 Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 17, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 The Honorable Sid Harle, presiding judge of the 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, presided over 

the guilt/innocence phase of the appellant’s trial. The Honorable Dick Alcala, Senior District Judge, was assigned to 

preside over the punishment phase, and he assessed and imposed punishment.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Annual Report of IC Places, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Messineo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  IC PLACES, INC.  /s/:  Peter Messineo PETER MESSINEO, Chief Financial Officer  March 31, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ David E. Schreiman
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

OCEAN PEACE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES SEAFOODS, LLC,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-122JLR

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order

(Dkt. # 22). Plaintiff Ocean Peace, Inc. (“OP”) seeks to quash discovery concerning

alleged ownership of either OP or its vessel, the F/T OCEAN PEACE, by persons who

are not United States citizens. 

The Vessel Documentation Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 12101-124, establishes a system to

identify vessels flying the United States flag, provide evidence of their ownership, and

authorize vessels to engage in certain trades. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12102-10. 

Plaintiff has produced evidence that the United States Coast Guard has issued it a

certificate of documentation for the F/T OCEAN PEACE with operational endorsements

for fishing. In Myers v. AMERICAN TRIUMPH, the court noted that a vessel holding a

properly endorsed certificate of documentation has “conclusive evidence” of qualification

to be employed in the fishing trade. 260 F.3d 1067, 1069 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting 46

Case 2:06-cv-00122-JLR Document 38 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER – 2

U.S.C. § 12104(2)). The court held that a party may not attack the validity of the

certificate in a private action. Id. at 1070.

The discovery at issue is relevant solely to an impermissible attack on the validity

of the certificates issued to the OCEAN PEACE. This is so even though Defendant

claims to seek evidence relevant to the OCEAN PEACE’s fishing qualifications for future

years. Congress has placed responsibility for making such determinations with the

United States Coast Guard. Id. Defendant’s attempt to seek discovery relevant to such

issues in this action is therefore improper.

For these reasons, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order

(Dkt. # 22).

Dated this 16th day of August, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00122-JLR Document 38 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 141 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 774 

[Report No. 110–408] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend title XXI 

of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children’s Health 

Insurance Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2007 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) to amend 

title XXI of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3963) to amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to 

4 extend and improve the Children’s Health Insurance Pro5 gram, and for other purposes. All points of order against 

6 consideration of the bill are waived except those arising 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 774 RH 

1 under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be consid2 ered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 

3 bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

4 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

5 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

6 among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor7 ity member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

8 and the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

9 Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to 

10 recommit. 

11 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3963 pursuant 

12 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

13 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid14 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

15 the Speaker. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 141 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 774 

[Report No. 110

–408] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3963) 

ance Program, and for other purposes. extend and improve the Children’s Health Insurto amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to 

OCTOBER 24, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS