NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

STRIKE MEDIATION DEADLINE - 1

(CV06-0204JCC)

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a GORDONWORKS.COM’;

OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC, a Washington

limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC., a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

No. CV06-0204JCC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

STRIKE MEDIATION

DEADLINE

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs JAMES S. GORDON, Jr. and OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC (together,

“Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Defendants VIRTUMUNDO, INC.,

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., and SCOTT LYNN (collectively, “Defendants”), on the other

hand, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court strike the current deadline for

Rule 39.1 mediation set in the above-captioned action, pending the outcome of the

parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, namely Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 110 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 110

Dockets.Justia.com
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

STRIKE MEDIATION DEADLINE - 2

(CV06-0204JCC)

Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 53) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.

No. 98).

The parties believe mediation in the above-captioned matter is more likely to be

successful after the Court rules on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment. 

Consequently, the parties jointly request the current mediation deadline be stricken. The

parties request the Court reset the Rule 39.1 mediation deadline for a date which is thirty

(30) calendar days after this Court issues its order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment or Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, whichever is later.

DATED this ______ day of February, 2007.

NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

By:

Derek A. Newman, WSBA No. 26967

Roger M. Townsend, WSBA No. 25525

Attorneys for Defendants

iJUSTICE LAW, PC

By:

Robert J. Siegel, WSBA No. 17312

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 39.1 mediation deadline set in the

above-captioned action is stricken. The new Rule 39.1 mediation deadline is the date

which is thirty (30) calendar days after this Court issues its order on Plaintiffs’ Motion

for Partial Summary Judgment or Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, whichever

is later.

DATED this____ day of _________________, 2007.

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s/ Robert J. Siegel

For Evaluation Only.

Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004

Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 110 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 2 of 2