alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

July 28, 1955

No. 59233.

protest 225000-K (Norfolk).

#### W. S. Parker Shipping Company *v.*United States,

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest consists of glazed wall tile, other than quarries or quarry tile or ceramic mosaic tile, valued at not more than 40 cents per square foot, and not wholly or in part of cement. It was assessed with duty at the rate of 10 cents per square foot under the provisions of paragraph 202 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as in force and effect immediately prior to the effective date of the rates of duty applicable to such merchandise pursuant to the notification of the President to the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52857. The protest claim is that the merchandise should have been assessed with duty at the lower rate applicable to merchandise entered on and after the said effective date, November 17, 1951.

The record establishes that the entry was filed on November 16, 1951, and estimated duties deposited as of that date. A delivery permit was issued but the same, was not unconditional in that it required ■ 10 percent of the merchandise covered by each invoice to be examined and measured on the wharf prior to release of the merchandise from customs custody. This was not accomplished until November 21, 1951, and the merchandise was released as of that date.

Pursuant to the Presidential notification published therein, T. D. 52857 provides that the rates of duty prescribed in said notification “will be applicable to articles which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date indicated for the respective item in the President’s letter.” The said effective date, in the case of articles such as those at bar, was November 17, 1951.

The sole issue before us, therefore, is whether the merchandise at bar was “entered for consumption” before, or on or after, November 17, 1951. The rule governing such cases was expressed by our appellate court in the case of *United States*v. *Mussman & Shafer, Inc.,*40 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 108, C. A. D. 506, and is to the effect that, in the absence of contrary statutory provision, goods are not “entered” for the purpose of determining the duties applicable thereto until the transaction of entry is complete by the payment of duties and the issuance of an unconditional delivery permit passing control of the goods to the importer or owner.

No contrary statutory provision appears herein, and it is clear that control of the goods did not pass to the importer or owner in this case until the required examination and measurement had been accomplished on November 21, 1951, *221that is to say, after November 17,1951. The duties applicable on that date'were 5 cents per square foot, but not less than 25 percent nor more than 35 percent ad valorem, under schedule XX of the Torquay Protocol.

Judgment will, therefore, issue sustaining the protest claim accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of TheWebDigest, Corp., (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Adelstein,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: March 15, 2011                  /s/ Steven Adelstein
                                      --------------------
                                      Steven Adelstein
                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                      Principal Executive Officer
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-6 Filed 02/01/10 Page 16 of 16
Before the First Division,

September 25, 1959

No. 63378.

protests 59/10858 and 59/11658 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 59260.

protests 253734-K, etc. (New York).

#### Herzman Scarfs, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to .those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
A

g

u

a

F r i a

R i v

e r

Tonto National Forest

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Black Canyon City

Cordes

Junction

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) conducts land use planning only

in the areas administered by BLM. BLM

has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation

of the State of Arizona.

Map 1

Agua Fria

National Monument

Special Area Designations

and National Register District

0 1 2

Miles

Interstate

Highway

Agua Fria

National Monument

Planning Area

Major Road

Minor Road

Major River, Streams or

Wash

Special Area Designation

Suitable Wild River

Suitable Scenic River

National Register District

Perry Mesa

National Register District

No warranty is made by BLM for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by

BLM, or to the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This information

may be updated without notification.

Land Status

BLM

Private

State

USFS

Agua Fria

National Monument

Phoenix

Flagstaff
#### In the Matter of Charles R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 480]

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated May 23, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 13, 1994, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committted acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the *514third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division for Youth for five years. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 13, 1994.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Before the Third Division,

March 9, 1959

No. 62818.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3851 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule (5b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: manyhands.tradingcompany@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:42:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Licciardi

Colorado Springs, CO 80907
Exhibit 4.8


 


APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.


 


Partial Assignment of Common Stock Purchase
Warrant


 


Reference is hereby made
to that certain (i) Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 21, 2016 (as amended on March 30, 2017 and October 17, 2017,
the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ApolloMed”),
Apollo Acquisition Corp., a California corporation, Network Medical Management, Inc., a California corporation (“NMM”)
and Kenneth Sim, M.D., as the Shareholders’ Representative, and (ii) Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of March 30,
2016 (the “Series B Warrant”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


 


Pursuant to Section 3.13
of the Merger Agreement, immediately prior to Closing, NMM, as the holder of the Series B Warrant, may make an in-kind distribution
to its shareholders on a pro rata basis of the Series B Warrant. In accordance therewith, NMM hereby assigns a pro rata portion
of the Series B Warrant for the right to purchase up to [_______] shares of common stock of ApolloMed and all rights evidenced
thereby, to:


 


	 	 	(“Transferee”) who was a shareholder of NMM immediately prior to the Closing and whose address is:


 


	 	 	.


 


This Partial Assignment
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant is made effective immediately prior to the Closing.


 


	 	“NMM”	 
	 	 	 
	 	NETWORK MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 	 
	 	Name:	 	Thomas S. Lam, M.D.	 
	 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


The undersigned Transferee hereby accepts the
foregoing partial assignment and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Series B Warrant being assigned hereby.


 


	 	Dated:	 	 	 


 


	 	Transferee’s Signature:	 	 


 




    Partial Assignment of Series B Warrant


     


    

 


Exhibit A


Series B Warrant


 


See Attached


 




    Partial Assignment of Series B Warrant
No. 59782.

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 191185-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/244. —

#### Edwin Jay, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/17809, etc. (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of map measures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kaufman*& *Vinson Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Aurora Loan Services Logo] Depositor:  Structured Asset Securities Corporation

745 Seventh Avenue 8th Floor

New York, NY 10019
Trustee:      US Bank, N.A.
One Federal Street         3rd Floor         Boston  MA 02110




Securities Administrator:   Subject: Annual Officer's Certification Fiscal Year:  2008 Securitization: SARM 2008-2
I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the calendar year 2008: 1.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer as of and for the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2008 (the "reporting period") and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC









By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore Name:  E. Todd Whittemore Title:    Executive Vice President
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | February 16, 2016 | /s/Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | February 16, 2016 | /s/James A. Duensing |
|   |   | James A. Duensing |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JONATHAN CORY SAWYER,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5344RBL

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging that

the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, DAVID JENNINGS;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, LINDA SULLIVAN;

The Court having advised the defendant of the allegations in the Petition(s) filed by the U.S. Probation

Office; the defendant having been advised of the maximum potential sanction if the allegation(s) is/are

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable RONALD B. LEIGHTON

Date: SEPTEMBER 25, 2007

Time: 11:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. .

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

September 19, 2007.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold________________ J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05344-RBL Document 55 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

April 8, 1963

No. 67576.

#### Castelazo & Associates *v.*United States,

protest 61/6442 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of canoe paddles of wood, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Thenorthwest boundary of Texas**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:194
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000955892
 
July 18, 2018
Exhibit 32.2










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA

Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)





Circle Pines, Minnesota


July 13, 2011
No. P67/146.

#### S. Hiller & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protects 66/12059, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of disc tumbler padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21297]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[234A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A51010.999900]

Proclaiming Certain Lands as Reservation for Kalispel Indian 
Community of the Kalispel Reservation

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reservation proclamation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the Assistant Secretary--
Indian Affairs proclaimed approximately 20.06 acres, more or less, as 
an addition to the reservation of Kalispel Indian Community of the 
Kalispel Reservation.

DATES: This proclamation was made on September 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carla H. Clark, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, Acting Division Chief, Division of Real Estate Services, 1001 
Indian School Road NW, Box #44, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104, 
[email protected], (720) 424-3233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published in the exercise of 
authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant 
Secretary--Indian Affairs by part 209 of the Departmental Manual.
    A proclamation is issued in accordance with the Act of June 18, 
1934 (48 Stat. 984; 25 U.S.C. 5110) for the lands described below. The 
lands are proclaimed to be the Kalispel Reservation for the Kalispel 
Indian Community of the Kalispel Reservation in Pend Oreille County, 
Washington.

Parcel No.: 443205320003; 14962 HWY 211 Property (a.k.a. Gould 
Property)

103-T1025

    That portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 
of Section 5, Township 32 North, Range 44 E. W.M., Pend Oreille 
County, Washington, lying West of Highway 20 and East of Highway No. 
211 (formerly No. 6B).
    Situate in Pend Oreille County, Washington
    Containing 20.06 acres, more or less.

    The above described lands contain a total of 20.06 acres, more 
or less, which are subject to all valid rights, reservations, 
rights-of-way, and easements of record.

    This proclamation does not affect title to the lands described 
above, nor does it affect any valid existing easements for public 
roads, highways, public utilities, railroads and pipelines, or any 
other valid easements or rights-of-way or reservations of record.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-21297 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```