alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan FERMIN, Claimant-Appellant, 9,380 in United States Currency, Defendant.

Docket No. 00-6226.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 10, 2001.

Juan Fermín, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Jane A. Levine, Assistant United States Attorney; Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, on the brief, Jonathan S. Kolodner, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, for appellee.

Present CABRANES, PARKER and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Juan Fermín, *pro se,*appeals from a May 26, 2000 judgment of the District Court. The District Court found as a matter of fact that Fermín had failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the 9,380 dollars in United States currency at issue here were traceable to a source of legitimate income. We perceive no clear error in this finding.

We have considered Fermin’s other arguments and conclude that they are without merit.

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the District Court is therefore AFFIRMED, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Schwartz in his Opinion and Order dated May 25, 2000.
H. Res. 443 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 18, 2007. 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Regiment, the only Hispanic-segregated unit in United States military history, was mandated by Congress to be comprised primarily of Puerto 

Ricans; 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Regiment became better known as 

the Borinqueneers from the word Borinquen, the name 

that the native Taino Indians called Puerto Rico; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers, throughout their service in 

World War I, World War II, and, most notably, the Korean War, served with distinction; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers demonstrated their military 

prowess in Korea and earned the respect and admiration 

of their fellow soldiers and military authorities, most notably General Douglas MacArthur; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers were sent to battle on the front 

lines in Korea and participated in nine major campaigns 

during the Korean War; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers made valuable contributions to 

the war effort, including by suffering a tremendous number of casualties that was disproportionate to the population of Puerto Rico; 
2 

•HRES 443 EH 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers earned well-deserved praise, including two United States Presidential 

Unit Citations, a Meritorious Unit Commendation, and 

two Republic of Korea Unit Citations; 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Regiment 1st Battalion continues 

its fine tradition as an active unit in the Puerto Rico 

Army National Guard; and 

Whereas Puerto Ricans have continued to volunteer freely 

and serve in the Armed Forces and have served ably during wartime: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the service of the 65th Infantry 

Borinqueneers during the Korean War; 

(2) honors the people of Puerto Rico, who continue 

to serve and volunteer for service in the Armed Forces 

and make sacrifices for the country; and 

(3) commends all efforts to promote and preserve 

the history of the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 69697.

#### Parksmith Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 270515-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chinaware cups and saucers, not chiefly used as tableware, but chiefly used as souvenir articles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 59808.

#### Arke, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 229623-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
No. P66/62.

protest 64/1716 (New York).

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rotary lawn sprinklers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RICHARD ALLEN FABEL,

Defendant.

No. CR06-0041RSL

ORDER TO SEAL

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Fabel’s Motion to Seal.” (Dkt. #238). 

Defendant seeks to seal his Ex Parte Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum and

Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum because

these documents contain defense work product.

Having considered the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Fabel’s Ex

Parte Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum and Declaration of Counsel in Support of

Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum shall be filed under seal and allowed to remain

under seal.

DATED this 31st day of October, 2006

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 267 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 62820.

#### J. J. Hayes Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/6347 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO CONDUCT 

DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P. 32.2 

U.S. v. ROBERT V. KESLING, et al., Case No.: CR05-173RSM

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, 

v.

ROBERT V. KESLING,

Defendant, 

 

KUPALA TARA, 

Third-Party Claimant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-173RSM

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S

MOTION TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 32.2 AND

SETTING DATE FOR HEARING ON

PETITION OF KUPALA TARA

This matter having come before the Court on the Motion of the United States

requesting this Court for authorization to conduct discovery, and to set an ancillary

hearing date for January, 2008, or a date thereafter, and the Court having considered the

representations of counsel and the files and records herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(m), the United States and the petitioner may

conduct discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

\\

\\

\\

\\

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 75 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO CONDUCT 

DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P. 32.2 

U.S. v. ROBERT V. KESLING, et al., Case No.: CR05-173RSM

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an ancillary hearing will be set for the 

 22 day of January , 2008 at 10:00am , to litigate the petition of Kupala Tara. 

DATED this 28 day of August , 2007. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

 /s/ Richard E. Cohen RICHARD E. COHEN

Assistant United States Attorney

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

206-553-2242

206-553-6934 (fax)

Richard.E.Cohen@usdoj.gov

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 75 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2
ex_108796.htm


EXHIBIT 10.20


 


 


 


COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS


 


 


On March 12, 2018, the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") recommended and the Board unanimously approved (i) the 2018 Executive Compensation Plan for our President and Chief Executive Officer , Mr. Pelrin, and our Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Regan, and (ii) grants of restricted stock to our non-employee directors (as defined below) under the Company’s 2014 Stock Plan.  The details of the 2018 Executive Compensation Plan and the restricted stock grants to non-employee directors were previously disclosed on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2018, and are incorporated herein by reference.



In addition, each of our executive officers receives our standard benefits package. Messrs. Pelrin and Regan are also parties to Change of Control Agreements with the Company that provide for the payment of certain benefits upon the executive's termination of employment following a change of control, as defined therein.



Directors who are not also our officers (each a "non-employee director") currently receive an annual retainer of $25,000 (Steven J. Abrams, Esq., Joseph W. Dews IV, William Kraut and, effective January 1, 2018, Robert E. Matthiessen). The Board Chairman is paid an additional annual retainer of $40,000 (Mr. Matthiessen) and the Lead Independent Director is paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000 (Mr. Kraut). The chairmen of the committees of the Board are paid an additional annual fee as follows: the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $20,000 (Mr. Kraut); the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Mr. Dews); and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Mr. Abrams). The members of the committees, other than the chairmen, are paid additional annual fees as follows: members of the Audit Committee are paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Messrs. Abrams and Dews), members of the Compensation Committee are paid an additional annual fee of $5,000 (Messrs. Kraut and Abrams), and members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are paid an additional annual fee of $5,000 (Messrs. Kraut and Dews). In addition, we reimburse non-employee directors' travel expenses and other costs associated with attending Board or committee meetings. We do not pay additional cash compensation to our executive officers for their service as directors.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Artepharm Global Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harpreet Sangha, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of April 15, 2010.

/s/ Harpreet Sangha 
Harpreet Sangha
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 20, 1955

No. 58710.

protest 234587-K (New York).

#### Gehrig, Hoban *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the papers not disclosing anything that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,278,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,089,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (281,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    178,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,454,000
<PP&E>                                      15,111,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,609,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,234,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,539,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       283,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,234,000
<SALES>                                      4,778,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,218,000
<CGS>                                        4,550,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,026,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                192,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000875385    
<NAME>                        Access Solutions International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US$
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         121,997
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50,304
<INVENTORY>                                    531,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               796,717
<PP&E>                                         1,654,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,102,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,316,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,713,508
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,119
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,599,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,316,220
<SALES>                                        303,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,195
<CGS>                                          75,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               685,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             82,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (764,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (764,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (764,132)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.51)
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofLife Nutrition Products, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael M. Salerno, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                                                                                                                                               
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2010 | Signature: /s/ Michael M. Salerno
Name: Michael M. Salerno
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

---
Exhibit
31.1




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      May 24, 2010
                By:

          /s/
            Nicholas D. GerberName:
                Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
                President
      and Chief Executive OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States Short Oil Fund,
LP
No. 56796.

#### Wessel, Ouval & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 171203-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JOSEPH R. KUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5735 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING

COMMISSIONER’S DECISION

Magistrate Judge J. Kelly Arnold recommends that the Court should conclude that Mr. Kus

was properly denied social security benefits because application of the proper legal standard and

substantial evidence support the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) finding that prior to July 17,

2003, Mr. Kus was not disabled. Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation contending (1)

the ALJ failed to give appropriate weight to the opinions of Plaintiff’s treating chiropractor, (2) the

ALJ failed to properly consider claimant’s testimony, (3) the ALJ improperly determined Plaintiff’s

residual functional capacity, (4) the ALJ failed to meet the burden of proof showing the Plaintiff can

perform work in the national economy, (5) Plaintiff is disabled pursuant to Medical-Vocational Rule

201.14, and (6) based on improperly rejected evidence, the Court should exercise its discretion to

remand this matter for an award of benefits. After carefully considering Plaintiff’s arguments against

Case 3:05-cv-05735-FDB Document 21 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

the analysis and authorities presented by the Magistrate Judge, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge did not err.

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint,, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge J. Kelly Arnold, Objections thereto, and the remaining record, does hereby find and

ORDER: 

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED; and 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant’s

counsel and to the Hon. J. Kelly Arnold..

DATED this18th day of September, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05735-FDB Document 21 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2