alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








AMENDED SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE EXECUTED A POST-TERMINATION AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE IN THE FORM FILED AS EXHIBIT 10(p) TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2011 (this "Amended Schedule")


This Amended Schedule amends the Schedule of Executive Officers Who Have Executed a Post-Termination Agreement and Covenant Not to Compete that followed the form of Post-Termination Agreement and Covenant Not to Compete originally filed by Walmart Inc. (formerly Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) as Exhibit 10(p) to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, as filed on March 30, 2011 (the "Form Agreement"). This Amended Schedule is included pursuant to Instruction 2 of Item 601(a) of Regulation S-K for the purpose of setting forth the details in which the specific agreements executed in the form of the Form Agreement differ from the Form Agreement, in particular to set forth the persons who, with Walmart Inc. (formerly Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.), were parties to Post-Termination Agreements and Covenants Not to Compete in such form as of January 31, 2018.


	
			
	Executive Officer Who is a Party to such a Post-Termination Agreement and Covenant Not to Compete
	Date of Agreement
	Value of Restricted Stock Award Granted in Connection with Agreement

	Daniel J. Bartlett
	May 16, 2013
	Not Applicable

	M. Brett Biggs
	September 21, 2010
	$500,000

	David Chojnowski
	November 16, 2016
	Not Applicable

	Gregory Foran
	July 23, 2014
	Not Applicable

	John R. Furner
	May 7, 2011
	Not Applicable

	Jeffrey J. Gearhart
	June 11, 2013
	$1,500,000

	C. Douglas McMillon
	January 19, 2010
	$2,000,000

	Jacqueline P. Canney
	June 26, 2015
	Not Applicable

	Judith McKenna
	May 18, 2015
	Not Applicable
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         October 30, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ann Marie M. Brighenti, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-3100,                         *AnnMarie.Cruz@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21743 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. P67/116.

No. P67/117.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25665, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 62/1135 (Los Angeles).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64577.

#### Joseph C. Murray & Co. and Pacmarine Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/30715 and 59/30729 (New York).

*280Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
TDCJ Offender Details 

### Page 1 of2
Texas department of Criminal justice- h*muhbj New Offender Search 

# Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOB: Maximum Sentence Date: 

### Current Facility: 

### Projected Release Date: Parole Eligibility Date: OffenderVisitation Eligible: 03420723 01795333 SHOCKLEY.JOHN DAVID W M 1967-06-17 2046-01-26 GOREE 2046-01-26 2028-07-27 YES 

### Informationprovided is updatedonce daily duringweekdays and multiple times perday on visitation days. Because this information is subjectto change, family members and friends are encouraged to call the unitpriorto traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

# ParoleReviewInformation Offense History: Offense

Date Offense 

### Sentence ~ . ~ Kl Sentence (YY

# Date County CaseNo" MM-DD) T 

### T http://offender.tdcj .texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=03420723 6/24/2015
August 28, 1961

No. 66013.

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. *v.*United States,

protest 325053-K.

Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32.1

DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bruce Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the U.S. Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
February 27, 2009

By:

/s/ BRUCE DAVIS Bruce Davis Chief Executive Officer


---
No. 67579.

#### International Distributors, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/6548-16552 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 793 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 7, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3685) to prohibit employment discrimination 

on the basis of sexual orientation. The first reading of the 

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Education and Labor. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions of the bill are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill 

shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
2 

•HRES 793 EH 

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

Amendment number 3 in the report of the Committee on 

Rules may be withdrawn by its proponent before the question 

is put thereon. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill 

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3685 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid-
3 

•HRES 793 EH 

eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Executive Order S-15-002 WHEREAS, the rules identified in Enclosure A have been adopted or amended by the following air pollution control and air quality management districts (districts):

Monterey Bay Unified Air Quality Management District San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District South Coast Air Quality Management District Ventura County Air Pollution Control District WHEREAS, the districts are authorized by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 40001 to adopt and enforce the rules identified in Enclosure A; WHEREAS, the rules have been submitted to the Air Resources Board (ARB) for inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) as reasonably available control measures for limiting emissions of air pollutants within the districts; WHEREAS, ARB has determined that these rules are necessary to meet requirements of the federal Clean Air Act; and WHEREAS, ARB is authorized by H&SC sections 39601, 39602, and 41650 through 41652 to adopt district rules as revisions to the SIP. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ARB hereby adopts the districts' rules identified in Enclosure A as revisions to the SIP. I certify, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.102(f), that the rules identified in Enclosure A were adopted or amended after notice and public hearings as required by 40 CFR 51.102(a) and 51.102(d). 

### Executed in Sacramento, California, this 

## ~` day of ~~ 

### , 2015.

Richard W. Core`) Executive Officer
No. 62266.

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 319173-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard Kunisaki, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hydrodynex Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 31a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  April 20, 2009



/s/ Richard Kunisaki



Richard Kunisaki

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
H. Res. 680 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 23, 2007. 

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans Memorial serves as a memorial to the 2,700,000 men and women in the United 

States Armed Forces who served in the designated war 

zone during the Vietnam Era; 

Whereas 58,256 men and women died while serving in South 

East Asia or as a result of their wounds or a service-connected disability; 

Whereas on Friday evening, September 7, 2007, the United 

States Park Police reported being notified of a light, oily, 

and unidentified substance that was spilled over portions 

of some of the names, panels, and paving stones of the 

Vietnam Veterans Memorial; 

Whereas at least 14 of the 140 inscribed panels of the Memorial Wall were damaged; and 

Whereas the National Park Service has determined that the 

damage was the result of an act of vandalism: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives condemns 

all attacks upon the memory of veterans and their service to 
2 

•HRES 680 EH 

the United States, as exemplified by the incident of vandalism of September 7, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 662 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 662

   Supporting the goals and ideals of National Assisted Living Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2007

 Ms. Hooley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the goals and ideals of National Assisted Living Week.

Whereas approximately one million people live in assisted living across the 
        United States;
Whereas the first of seventy-seven million Baby Boomers will begin to reach 
        retirement age in 2011;
Whereas an estimated 36,000 facilities provide the assisted living services used 
        by the elderly and those with disabilities in the United States;
Whereas assisted living is a long-term care service that fosters choice, 
        dignity, independence, and autonomy for the elderly and people with 
        disabilities across the United States; and
Whereas National Assisted Living Week highlights the privilege, value, and 
        responsibility of passing the legacies of the lives of the elderly and 
        those with disabilities down through the generations that care for and 
        love them: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Assisted 
        Living Week; and
            (2) urges all people of the United States--
                    (A) to visit friends and loved ones who reside at 
                assisted living facilities; and
                    (B) to learn more about assisted living services, 
                including how assisted living services benefit 
                communities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

October 20, 1966

No. P66/284. —

No. P66/285. —

No. P66/286. —

No. P66/287. —

#### Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/18774 and 63/19444 (Philadelphia). Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc., and Banner Hardware *v.*United States, protests 65/522 and 64/12275 (Philadelphia). Durst Industries, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/7229, etc. (New York). New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/24799, etc. (Los Angeles).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of council that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

Page - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ANDREW DOUGLAS ROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF

THE NAVY,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5041RJB 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY

DEFAULT 

Plaintiff requests judgment by default in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 because Defendant

failed to answer the complaint within twenty days after service. For the following reasons, this motion is

DENIED.

Plaintiff has not established sufficient grounds for judgment by default. Generally, default

judgments are disfavored and cases should be decided on their merits except in extreme cases. Mendoza v.

Wight Vineyard Management, 783 F.2d 941, 945-46 (9th Cir. 1986). Additionally, Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(e)

states that “judgment by default shall [not] be entered against the United States or an officer or agency

thereof unless the claimant establishes a claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court.” 

Plaintiff has filed a complaint but has not filed sufficient evidence with the Court establishing that he is

entitled to relief on the merits against Defendant, an officer of the United States. 

Additionally, Defendant has filed an answer to the complaint. Dkt. 6. Given the presumption

against default judgments against the United States, this answer precludes judgment by default.

Case 3:06-cv-05041-RJB Document 9-2 Filed 04/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

Page - 2 

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 

DATED this 5th day of April, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05041-RJB Document 9-2 Filed 04/05/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 619 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 619

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
whenever a bill or joint resolution is introduced that amends existing 
   law, the sponsor provide to the Clerk an electronic version of a 
               comparative print, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 2007

    Mr. Sali (for himself, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Franks of 
 Arizona, Mr. Goode, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Fortuno, Mr. 
 Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Paul, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
    Westmoreland, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Conaway, and Mr. Mack) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
whenever a bill or joint resolution is introduced that amends existing 
   law, the sponsor provide to the Clerk an electronic version of a 
               comparative print, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That rule XII of the House of Representatives is amended 
by adding at the end the following new clause:
``Comparative print
    ``9. (a) A bill or joint resolution that amends existing law may 
not be received or considered in the House unless the Member, Delegate, 
or Resident Commissioner presenting such measure also presents an 
electronic version of a comparative print of any part of the bill or 
joint resolution proposing to amend any statute and of the statute or 
part thereof proposing to be amended, showing by appropriate 
typographical devices the omissions and insertions proposed.
    ``(b) The Clerk shall post on his Internet website the electronic 
version of each comparative print presented under paragraph (a) as soon 
as practicable after it is presented.''.
    Sec. 2. The amendment made by the first section of this resolution 
shall take effect immediately before noon January 3, 2009.
                                 <all>
```