### 7569 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices

Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2054(a), to conduct studies and investigations relating to the causes and prevention of deaths, accidents, injuries, illnesses, other health impairments, and economic losses associated with consumer products. Section 5(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2054(b), further provides that the Commission may conduct research, studies and investigations on the safety of consumer products or test consumer products and develop product safety test methods and testing devices.

In order to better identify and evaluate the risks of product-related incidents, the Commission staff seeks to solicit consumer opinions and perceptions related to consumer product use, on a voluntary basis, through questions posted on the CPSC’s Consumer Opinion Forum. Through the forum, consumers will be able to answer questions and provide information regarding their experiences, opinions and/or perceptions on the use or pattern of use of a specific product or type of product. The Consumer Opinion Forum is intended for consumers, 18 years and older, who have access to the Internet and e-mail, who voluntarily register to participate through a participant registration process, and respond to the questions posted in the Consumer Opinion Forum. A link to the Consumer Opinion Forum login page is available on the CPSC Web site, http://

www.cpsc.gov. Consumers may link directly to the login page for the Consumer Opinion Forum at https:// www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/cof/login.aspx. When new questions are posted on the CPSC Web site, registered participants will be invited via e-mail to respond to various questions, but not more frequently than once every four weeks.

The information collected from the Consumer Opinion Forum will help inform the Commission’s evaluation of consumer products and product use by providing insight and information into consumer perceptions and usage patterns. Such information also may help the Commission in its efforts to support voluntary standards activities and help the staff identify areas regarding consumer safety issues that need additional research. In addition, based on the information obtained, the staff may be able to provide safety information to the public that is easier to read and is more easily understood by a wider range of consumers. For example, the staff may be able to propose new language or revisions to existing language in warning labels or manuals if the staff finds that certain warning language is perceived by many participants to be unclear or subject to misinterpretation. Finally, the Consumer Opinion Forum may be used to invite consumer opinions and feedback regarding the effectiveness of product recall communications and in determining what action consumers are taking in response to such communications and why they are taking those actions. This may help tailor future recall activities to increase the success of those activities. If this information is not collected, the Commission would not have available useful information regarding consumer experiences, opinions, and perceptions related to specific product use, which the Commission relies on in its ongoing efforts to improve the safety of consumer products on behalf of

consumers.

In the Federal Register of November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58610), the CPSC published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received.

Burden Estimates: During the past two years, 2,300 individuals have registered to participate in the Consumer Opinion Forum. Although the registration is still open, the Commission staff does not expect the number of registrants will exceed 5,000 over the next few years. The Commission staff estimates that each respondent will take 10 minutes or less to complete the one-time registration process. Based on that estimate, the registration burden is estimated to have been approximately 192 burden hours per year for 2,300 registrants.

The Commission staff further estimates that the amount of time required to respond to each set of questions on the Consumer Opinion Forum will be five minutes or less. The Commission staff foresees the possibility of up to four surveys per year. If, at the maximum, each respondent responds to four sets of questions in one year, the yearly burden would result in approximately 20 minutes per year for each respondent. Based on an estimated 44 percent response rate for 2,300 potential respondents, the annual burden could total 337 hours. If as many as 5,000 registrants respond, the Commission staff estimates that the annual burden could total approximately 733 hours per year (44 percent response rate for 5,000 potential respondents at five minutes per survey for four surveys).

The Commission staff estimates that the total estimated burden for new registrations and surveys, combined, will not exceed 925 hours annually (no more than 733 hours for four surveys per year, plus no more than 192 hours for new registrations). The Commission staff estimated the value of the time of respondents to this collection of information at $29.39 an hour. This is based on the 2009 U.S. Department of Labor Employer Costs for Employee Compensation. At this valuation, the estimated annual cost to the public of this information collection will be approximately $27,000 per year.

The Commission will expend approximately one month of professional staff time annually for preparing questions and analysis of responses for each survey. Assuming that four surveys will be conducted annually, (and four staff months) the total annual cost to the Federal government of the collection of information is estimated to be $55,360.

Dated: February 16, 2010. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–3295 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket ID: DOD–2010–HA–0014]**

**Proposed Collection; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by April 23, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods:


### 7570 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1160.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, Force Health Protection and Readiness, ATTN: Ms. Caroline Miner, 5113 Leesburg Pike, Suite 901, Falls Church, VA 22041, or call Force Health Protection and Readiness, at

703–578–8500 or 1–800–754–2132.

Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Department of Defense Addendum to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Federalwide Assurance for the Protection of Human Subjects; OMB Control Number 0720– TBD.

Needs and Uses: This form is a tool to help institutions with an existing Federalwide Assurance (FWA) approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to know about and acknowledge key DoD policies and requirements since the DHHS FWA does not identify DoD requirements.

Affected Public: Individuals. Annual Burden Hours: 5. Number of Respondents: 10. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Burden per Response: 30 Minutes.

Frequency: On Occasion.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Summary of Information Collection

This Addendum is for non-DoD institutions that already have a Federalwide Assurance (FWA) approved by DHHS and will be engaged in DoD-supported human subject research. Its purpose is help these institutions to know about and acknowledge key DoD policies and requirements as the DHHS FWA does not identify DoD requirements. Dated: February 16, 2010. Mitchell S. Bryman, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–3377 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Federal Advisory Committee; Military Leadership Diversity Commission**  **(MLDC); Meeting Cancellation**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Meeting notice; cancellation.

**SUMMARY :**  Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102–3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the Military Leadership Diversity Commission (MLDC) meeting that was scheduled for February 10–12, 2010, in Hampton, VA, has been canceled due to major snow storms affecting the eastern coast of the United States. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register on January 14, 2010 (75 FR 2114).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Master Chief Steven A. Hady, Designated Federal Officer, MLDC, at (703) 602–0838, 1851 South Bell Street, Suite 532, Arlington, VA, E-mail Steven.Hady@wso.whs.mil.

Dated: February 16, 2010. Mitchell S. Bryman, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–3379 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers** 

**Extension of the Public Comment Period for the Draft Environmental**  **Impact Statement for the Moffat Collection System Project, City and**  **County of Denver, Adams County, Boulder County, Jefferson County, and**  **Grand County, CO**

**AGENCY :**  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Omaha District is announcing a 16-day extension of the public comment period for the Moffat Collection System Project (Moffat Project) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS). The originally announced comment period ends on March 1, 2010, but has been extended until March 17, 2010. The original Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on Friday, October 30, 2009 (74 FR 56186) and included an initial 90-day comment period (October 30, 2009 to January 27, 2010). A second Notice of Availability announcing an extension of 32 days (January 27, 2010 to March 1, 2010) was issued on December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67180).

**DATES :**  Comments on the Draft EIS should be postmarked no later than March 17, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments on the Draft EIS should be sent to the attention of: Scott Franklin, Moffat EIS Project Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District—Denver Regulatory Office, 9307 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Littleton, CO 80128; via Fax at 303–979–0602; or via e-mail at moffat.eis@usace.army.mil.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  None.

Timothy T. Carey, Chief, Denver Regulatory Office.

[FR Doc. 2010–3338 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3720–58–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Navy**

**Notice of Public Hearings for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for**  **the Silver Strand Training Complex, San Diego, CA; Correction** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Navy, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of the Navy published a document in the Federal Register (75 FR 4537) of January 28, 2010, concerning public hearings on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Silver Strand Training Complex, San Diego, CA. The document contained incorrect dates.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Attention: Mr. Kent Randall, SSTC EIS Project Manager, 1220 Pacific Highway, Building 1, 5th Floor, San Diego, CA, 92132; or http://www.silver strandtrainingcomplexeis.com.

Correction

In the Federal Register (75 FR 4537) of January 28, 2010, on page 4537, in the third column, correct Dates and Addresses caption to read: