alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: butter012fly@37.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:59:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Magnini

Lubbock, TX 79423
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HIGH IMPACT NIDDK RC2 APPLICATIONS.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch,  National Institutes of Health,  6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7015, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-4721,                         *ryan.morris@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 27, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21771 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------


                      CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ITEC  Attractions,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul M.  Bluto,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/  Paul M. Bluto
------------------
Paul M. Bluto
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; Technologies/Innovations for Improving Minority Health and Eliminating Health Disparities.                    

*Date:*                         November 15-17, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIMHD, DEM II, Suite 800, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                              ( print page 67333)    

*Contact Person:*                         Jingsheng Tuo, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Research Administration, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-5953,                         *jingsheng.tuo@nih.gov.*

Dated: September 25, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21484 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

STANLEY ABRAMOW, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C06-116JLR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court having been notified of the settlement of this matter and it appearing that no

issue remains for the court’s determination,

IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with

prejudice and without costs to any party.

In the event settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case,

provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and

pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. 

DATED this 4th day of May, 2007.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00116-JLR Document 25 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

EDWARD T. (“TY”) GRAHAM,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC,

 Defendant.

 C05-1810 JLR

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable James L. Robart, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C05-1810 JLR and

bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 15th day of December, 2005

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01810-JLR Document 15 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 1
NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FREEMAN DECL. IN SUPPORT OF

DEFS' MOTION FOR FEES

[NO. CV06-0204JCC] - Page 1

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM';

OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a

Washington limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

NO. CV06-0204JCC

DECLARATION OF SPENCER

D. FREEMAN IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

I, Spencer D. Freeman, declare and testify as follows:

1. I am over eighteen years of age, competent to testify to the matters stated in

this declaration, and make this declaration based upon personal knowledge.

2. Since 1995, I have been an attorney licensed to practice in Washington

State. I am admitted to practice in the Western District of Washington and

regularly have cases in this district. 

3. My practice focuses on intellectual property and Internet-related litigation,

and I routinely represent clients in federal district court on technology

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 130 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 130

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 130 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER- [C05-5749-RBL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

MAXINE R. RIVENES

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5749-RBL

ORDER OF REMAND

Based on the stipulation of the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned

case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Administrative Law

Judge (ALJ) will evaluate the severity of Plaintiff's depression, panic disorder, and obesity. The

ALJ will also further evaluate the opinion of Zoran Brkanac, M.D. The ALJ will reassess

Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and, as necessary, obtain supplemental evidence from a

vocational expert.

Case 3:05-cv-05749-RBL Document 20 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER- [C05-5749-RBL]

This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds pursuant to sentence four of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court

.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry:

s/Karen L. Strombom

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ CAROL A. HOCH WSB # 9289

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Phone: 206-615-2684

Fax: 206-615-2531

carol.a.hoch@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05749-RBL Document 20 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67159.

protests 60/24624, 61/4321, and 62/9054 (New York).

#### Falcon Sales Company and J. J. Murphy & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ANDREE J. EMSLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEMWASHINGTON, a Washington corporation,

dba PROVIDENCE ST. PETER HOSPITAL

and dba PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON

REGIONAL SERVICES,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5012FDB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff brings claims alleging that she was forced to resign her position at Providence St.

Peter Hospital because of gender discrimination. Plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on January 20, 2005, which found no statutory violation and

advised Plaintiff that a lawsuit must be filed within 90 days. This lawsuit was filed on October 20,

2005 in State court, the complaint was amended to add Federal claims on December 15, 2005, and

Defendant timely removed the case on January 10, 2006. 

Defendant Providence Health System-Washington (PHS) argues that the Amended

Complaint should be dismissed because (1) Plaintiff failed to meet the statute of imitations for fiing a

Case 3:06-cv-05012-FDB Document 10 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

gender discrimination claim under Title VII, and (2) Defendant is exempt from Washington’s Law

Against Discrimination and, therefore, Plaintiff cannot state a claim for gender discrimination under

State law. 

Plaintiff’s Complaints (original and amended) were not filed with the 90-day period identified

in the EEOC’s June 6, 2005 letter. (Lehmann Decl., Ex. 1.) Moreover, Washington’s Law Against

Discrimination exempts non-profit religious organizations from liability under the statute. RCW

49.60.040(3). PHS has established that it is an exempt religious organization by pointing to its

affiliation, stated purpose, and related data. See Farnam v. CRISTA Ministries, 116 Wn.2d 659,

677, 807 P.2d 830 (1991). See PHS Articles of Incorporation and PHS Corporate Bylaws, attached

as Exhibits 2 and 3 to Lehmann Decl. 

Plaintiff has filed no response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The Court may take this

lack of opposition as an admission that Defendant’s motion has merit. (Local Rule CR7(b)(2))

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Civil Rule

12(b)(6) [Dkt. # 7] is GRANTED and this cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DATED this 6th day of March, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05012-FDB Document 10 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 76-5291.

#### Joyner *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2021

No. 04-21-00169-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.I.T., J.J.T., AND R.A.T., III, CHILDREN

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00154

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

appellant's brief is due on or before July 26, 2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME 9-30-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         642,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               919,815
<PP&E>                                       5,315,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                 395,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,230,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,234,813
<BONDS>                                      6,195,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        213
<COMMON>                                         6,360
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,206,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,230,325
<SALES>                                        663,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,405,432
<CGS>                                          215,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,155,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             190,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,008
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Case No. 8,217.

#### LEHMER et al. v. SMITH.

[1 Cin. Law Bul. 45.]

Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio.

1876.

Bankruptcy — Effect upon Existing Contracts.

[A., a grain commission merchant, buys and agrees to hold oats for B. upon margins. Without the knowledge or consent of B., he sells the same, and very soon afterwards becomes bankrupt. Nearly a year thereafter suit is brought by B. against A.’s assignee in bankruptcy, claiming for the margin upon the oats at the valuation of the highest market price attained by oats down to the time of bringing suit. *Held,*that the bankruptcy of A. made it apparent that he could neither replace the commodity nor pay damages. Por this reason suit should have been entered at that time, and B. is therefore not entitled to any subsequent rise in price.]

[Error to the district court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.

The plaintiffs [James D. Lehmer and J. G. Isham] claimed that they were doing business in Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1873; that the bankrupt M. W. Stone was at that time a grain commission merchant; that he agreed to buy and hold for them, upon margins, in Chicago, 200.000 bushels of oats; that on the 28th day of September, 1873, he sold the oats in violation of his duty, and without their knowledge or consent. The defendant [Thos. G. Smith, assignee in bankruptcy of M. W. Stone] did not admit the fact as to the alleged unauthorized sale, but admitted a balance due plaintiffs, and denied that they had suffered damage, inasmuch as oats were lower during October and November, 1873, than at the date of sale. The main question, therefore, was upon the measure of damages.

Upon this question Judge Swing held, in the district court, that the measure of damages was the difference between the market price at the time when the plaintiffs learned that the sale had been made and the price at which the sale had been made. This discovery was on October 10, 1S73. On October IS, 1S73, Stone became bankrupt. There was no difference in price between *259October 16tb and October 18tb. The plaintiffs claimed, however, that they were entitled to the highest market price which oats attained down to the bringing of the suit, in the summer of 1874.

G. E. Pugh and D. W. Strickland, for plaintiffs.

Matthews, Ramsey & Matthews, for defendant.

EMMONS, Circuit Judge,

held that, in estimating the damages, no references could be had to the market at any time later than the date of the bankruptcy; that that was the date at which the plaintiffs knew that they would be obliged to sue, and that the policy of the law would not permit them to wait longer to take advantage of a further rise; that, even if the rule was as claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel, the plaintiffs in such actions were ordinarily allowed a reasonable time in which to sue; that such reasonable time would cease with the bankruptcy of the defendant, as it was then made apparent that he could neither replace the commodity or pay the damages. Judgment affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2024

NO. 03-23-00372-CV

Tae Hollenbeck, Appellant

v.

Extra Space Properties Two, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 14, 2023. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.