alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheFortymile quadrangle: Yukon-Tanana region, Alaska**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:375
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958381
 
July 30, 2018
## Pr opo s e d R u l e : M a n d a t o r y Re p o r t i n g o f p a r e n t c o m p a n y / N A I C S / c o g e n e r a t i o n C o m m un i ca t i o n D o c u m e n t a t i o n : e m a i l t o s t a k e h o l d e r s a b o u t a v a i l a b ili t y o f t h e p r o p o s e d r u l e t e x t

D at e S ta ff C o n ta ct I n fo r m a ti o n ( N am e , e m a i l

, p h o n e # ) N am e of O r g a n i z a ti o n ( A tta c h l i s t of a l l a t

t e n d ee s

n am e s a n d e m a il s i f p o ss i b l e ) S u m ma r y o f D i s c u ss i o n ( e

. g

. , a p p li c a b i l it y , r e p o r t i ng

r e qu i r e m e n t s , e t c

. ) W r i tt e n C o mm e n t s P r ov i d e d ?
D i d t h e y al s o s u b mi t

t o D o c k e t ? D at e

s e n t t o E PA CC D

3 / 23 Shana H

a r bou r H a r bou r

. s han a @ e pa

. gov ( 202 ) 566-2959 Ma r k B a t e m an

- -I W F

i na n ci a l
Ma r k B r a mm e r

- - Ri s k M

et r ic s N ic o l e D a r na l l

-- G M U
A m y D u v a ll

- -

A CS
P au l H i lt o n --Ca lv e r D i nah Ko e h le r

- - i n d

e p e nd e n t

, bu t c o n t r a c t s w it h t h e Con fe r e n ce B oa r

d
J a s on Mo rr i s on-- P a c i

f i c In s ti t u te L i nd e n e P a tt on

- - Z

u r i c k Re
H el e n S a h i

- - B a n k o

f A m e r ic a M i k e W a l l a c e

-- G R I
Ji m Cobu r

n-

- C E RE S
J a m e s Sa l o

-- Tr u c o s t P iet K l o p

-- W R I
Ma r k Coh e n-- R FF
Ji m B ud g e

-- S E C E

m a i l s e n t f

r o m Shan a H

a r bou r t o s t a ke h o l d

e rs f o ll o w i ng

r ele a s e o f t h e p r opo s e d r u le :

“ As s o m e o f yo u k n o w , I ' v e b e e n v e r y b u s y fo r t h e p a s t s i x

m o n t h s w r i t i ng ( w i t

h E P A ' s O ff

i ce o f A i r ) a p r o p o s e d r u l e

am e n d m e n t t o t

h e M a n d a t o r y G H G R e p o r t i ng R

u l e

. I n t h i s
p r o p o s e d r u l e a m e nd m e

n t

, E PA i s p r o p o s i ng t

h a t a l l r e p o r t e r s

s u b j ec t t o t h e M a n d at o r y G H G R e p o r t i n g R u l e p r ov i d e i n fo r m a ti o n o n t h ei r h i g h e s t

- l e v e l U

. S

. p a r e n t c o m p a n y , pr i ma r y a nd o t h e r a pp l i c a b l e NA IC S c o d e s , a n d t o i nd i ca t e

w h e t h e r o r n o t a n y o f t

h ei r r e p o r t e d em i ss i o n s c o m e f r o m a

c o g e n e r a t i o n u n i t

. T h i s p r o p o s e d r u l e a m e nd m e n t w il l a ll o w E PA a nd o t

h e r u s e r s of t h e d at a t o a g g r e g a

t e f a c il i t y

- le v e l d at a
t o t h e c o r p o r at e a n d s ec t o r

- l e v e l

.

T h e p r o p o s e d r u l e w a s j u s t r e l e a s e d t o d a y

. H e r e i s a l i nk t o
p r o p o s e d p r ea m b l e , r u l e t e x t a nd f a c t s h ee t:

h tt p :// w w w

. e p a

. g ov

/ c limat e c h a n g e

/ em i ss i o n s / s u b p a

r t/ c o r p _pa

r e n t

. h t ml

B e s t R e g a r d s , S h a n a H a r bo u r ” 

### N / A N

/ A
From: CDKFARM@GMAIL.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:18:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

CECIL KEISACKER

Lakota, ND 58344
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37033

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

AARON MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 609

Filed: August 25, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn, District Judge. 

Order revoking probation and requiring execution of unified six-year sentence 

with three-year determinate term for aggravated battery, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GRATTON, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Aaron Morales was convicted of aggravated battery, Idaho Code §§ 18-903, 18-

907(1)(a). The district court imposed a unified six-year sentence with a three-year determinate 

term, but after a period of retained jurisdiction, suspended the sentence and placed Morales on 

probation. Subsequently, Morales admitted to violating several terms of the probation, and the 

district court consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence. 

Morales appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion in failing to sua sponte 

reduce his sentences upon revoking probation.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). 

When we review a sentence that is ordered into execution following a period of 

probation, we will examine the entire record encompassing events before and after the original 

judgment. State v. Hanington, 148 Idaho 26, 29, 218 P.3d 5, 8 (Ct. App. 2009). We base our 

review upon the facts existing when the sentence was imposed as well as events occurring 

between the original sentencing and the revocation of probation. Id. 

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion in ordering execution of Morales’s original 

sentences without modification. Therefore, the order directing execution of Morales’s 

previously suspended sentence is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF

PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Yash Puri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
Such Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ecoark Holdings, Inc.



Date:
July 6, 2016



|/s/
    Yash Puri                 | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Yash
    Puri                     | 
|(Principal
    Financial Officer) |
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 629 

Extending the condolences and sympathy of the House of Representatives 

to the Government and the people of Greece for the grave loss of 

life and vast destruction caused by the devastating fires raging through 

Greece since June 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mrs. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. SPACE, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. WATSON, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. WEXLER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Extending the condolences and sympathy of the House of 

Representatives to the Government and the people of 

Greece for the grave loss of life and vast destruction 

caused by the devastating fires raging through Greece 

since June 2007. 

Whereas more than 3,000 forest fires have been recorded in 

Greece since June 2007; 

Whereas over a 10-day period, an estimated 4,000 people saw 

their homes destroyed by the wildfires, which razed dozens of villages, destroyed livestock and charred an estimated 469,000 acres of mostly forest and farmland; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 629 IH 

Whereas dozens of Greek families have lost their loved ones 

to the fires; 

Whereas thousands of Greeks have been left homeless and 

hundreds of thousands of acres of pristine forest have 

been destroyed; 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of mature olive trees, vineyards and thousands of animals perished in the flames; 

Whereas damage to the Greek economy is estimated at between $1,600,000,000 and $5,400,000,000; 

Whereas the United States and Greece have stood side by 

side in confronting world challenges throughout the 20th 

century, and will stand together in confronting this new 

challenge; and 

Whereas the United States, through its government, its people and its Greek-American community, has already extended significant support to the people of Greece during 

this difficult time: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) extends its condolences and sympathy to the 

3 Government and the people of Greece for the grave 

4 loss of life and vast destruction caused by the dev5 astating fires raging through Greece; 

6 (2) vows its full support and solidarity to a 

7 close friend, a strategic partner, and a longstanding 

8 ally in this painful and difficult hour; 

9 (3) fully supports the Administration’s initia10 tives to provide assistance and relief to the people of 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 629 IH 

1 Greece, including its pledge of $1,500,000 in aid as 

2 well as expert and technical assistance; 

3 (4) encourages public institutions, specialized 

4 agencies, as well as private citizens, to offer their re5 sources; and 

6 (5) expresses confidence that Greece and its 

7 people will succeed in overcoming the hardships in8 curred through this tragedy. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit
10.1


 


 


RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS


 


OF


 


ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.


 


The following is a
true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to
this meeting having been waived, held this 26th day of March, 2018;


 


WHEREAS there has been
presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company;


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders (62.17%) having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who
voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to §78.320 have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected:


 


PETER E. MADDOCKS as
Director & CFO


 


The Above qualified
person, having been nominated, has accepted his position as DIRECTORS and CFO of the Company.


 


Said Motion is hereby
passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.


 


 


Dated: 26th March, 2018.


 


 


_____________________


Peter Maddocks, on behalf of London
Pharma Holdings Ltd., Majority Shareholders
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with this Amended Annual Report of Energy
and Technology, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  George M.
Sfeir,, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
              Such
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31,
      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The information
      contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period
      ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Energy
      and Technology,
      Corp.
  By: /s/George M.
Sfeir,
 George M.
Sfeir,
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer
 Principal
Accounting Officer
 April 6,
2009
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Business Marketing Services, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Hans Pandeya, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company and also acting in the capacity as the
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
      Hans PandeyaHans
      PandeyaChief
      Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 31,
      2010/s/
      Hans PandeyaHans
      PandeyaPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMarch 31,
      2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEATING FIBRE INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-1986JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received the parties’ proposed stipulated protective order (Dkt.

# 41). For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES the stipulation.

Litigants often enter agreements regarding the confidentiality of documents they

exchange during discovery. The court encourages such agreements, as they are often

helpful in conducting discovery efficiently and without the intervention of the court. It is

another matter, however, to place the court’s imprimatur on such an agreement. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) governs the court’s power to enter protective orders. Rule

26(c) requires the moving party to show “good cause” before the court enters a protective

order. A stipulated “blanket” protective order, like the one the parties propose here, is

insufficiently specific to permit the court to determine if any party has met the

requirements of Rule 26(c). It also places discretion with the parties, rather than with the

Case 2:05-cv-01986-JLR Document 45 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

In the absence of such an agreement, it may be necessary during the course of litigation to

move for a contested protective order. When the court reviews such a motion, it will consider the

reasonableness of a party’s refusal to enter into an agreement when it determines whether to

award attorneys’ fees and sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(4).

MINUTE ORDER - 2

court. In addition, such “blanket” orders often exceed the scope of Rule 26(c). Again,

the court encourages the parties to arrive at their own agreements for the exchange of

discovery.1

 It merely declines to convert such agreements into an order of the court.

Filed and entered this 7th day of August, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01986-JLR Document 45 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C05-801-JLR]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ULYSSES FRANKLIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Civil No. C05-801-JLR

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in

regard to Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II and Supplement

Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to

the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence

four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will: 

• Further evaluate the nature and severity of Plaintiff’s mental impairment(s) and make a

finding regarding the severity limitations in each of the functional areas (activities of daily

living; social functioning; concentration, persistence, or pace; and episodes of

decompensation) with citation to the evidence of record;

• Explain the weight given to the opinions and medical evidence of Plaintiff’s treating

Case 2:05-cv-00801-JLR-JPD Document 19 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C05-801-JLR]

physicians, including Gerald Cavenee, Ph.D., and Karen Johnston, M.D.;

• Consider Plaintiff’s need for the use of a cane and its impact on his ability to perform

work-related activities;

• In accordance with SSR 96-7p, 20 C.F.R. § 404.929, 20 C.F.R. § 404.950(a), and 

Goldberg v. Kelly, 387 U.S. 254 (1970), allow Plaintiff to present lay witness testimony in

support of his claim, including the testimony of Ester Lockett;

• Determine whether Plaintiff’s impairments have improved and whether that improvement

related to Plaintiff’s ability to perform work pursuant to the eight-step medical

improvement regulation (20 C.F.R. § 404.1594).

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

s/James L. Robart

 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Recommended for Entry this

2d day of November, 2005.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ STEPHANIE R. MARTZ WSB # 28636

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900

Seattle, WA 98104

Phone: (206) 615-2272

Fax: (206)615-2531

stephanie.martz@ssa.gov

Case 2:05-cv-00801-JLR-JPD Document 19 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2
July, 28 2009

Carol Rushin, Acting Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency

- Region 8 80C-EISC 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 

### Re: Incorporation ofSubstantive Requirements by Reference in the Southern Ute IndianTribe/StateofColoradoEnvironmental Commission's Reservation Air Code Dear Ms. Rushin: I am writing at the request ofyour staffto let you know that it is the Tribe's intent to (1) recommend to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State ofColorado Environmental Commission that certain federal New SourcePerformance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP) be added to the Reservation Air Code and (2) submit an application to EPA to administer compliance with the NSPS and NESHAP once the Environmental Commission adopts them as part ofthe Reservation Air Code. You mayrecall that, in January 2009, the Tribe submitted a Part 70 Operating Permit Program and a Treatment As a State application to you. In its applications, the Tribe is seeking a delegation ofauthority to administer a Part 70 operating permitprogram on the Reservation. The substantive standards with which the major sources must comply, however, are not yet included in the ReservationAir Code that was recommendedbythe Tribe to the Environmental Commission and whichwas adopted bythe Environmental Commission. Those standards and requirements are federal standards and requirements and do not become Environmental Commission and Tribal standards and requirements until they are added to the Reservation AirCode and EPA delegates authority to the Tribe to administercompliance with those standards and requirements. It is part ofthe Environmental Commission's and Tribe's long-tenn plan for development ofthe Reservation Air Program for the NSPS and NESHAP to be incorporated byreference into the Reservation Air Code and we intend to pursue that incorporation, probably soon after development ofa minor sourcepermittingprogram for the Reservation. Ifyou have any questions, please contact the Southern Ute Indian Tribe AirQuality Program Manager at (970) 563-4705.

:

### Matthew J: 0,

### Chairman / 

### Southern'Ute Indian Tribal Council



### cc: Alexis North Elyana Sutin