alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> FILENE'S BASEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR 
THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 2, 1997 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE 
AMOUNTS)
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-2-1997
<CASH>                                             475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    104,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,323
<PP&E>                                         135,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (72,934)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,003
<BONDS>                                          4,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,045
<SALES>                                        246,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,780
<CGS>                                          188,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    92
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                       553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Justin T. YOUNGMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30461.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 2005.

Decided Aug. 18, 2005.

Stephanie Whitaker, Esq., USSP — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter S. Schweda, Esq., Waldo & Schweda, Spokane, WA, for Defendants Appellant.

Before: THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Justin Youngman appeals his 51-month sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Youngman appeals the district court’s decision that he cannot collaterally attack a prior Washington State conviction and the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Application Note 6 to United States Sentencing Guideline § 4A1.2 does not confer an independent right to challenge a state court conviction collaterally.1 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s conclusion that Youngman may not collaterally attack his Washington State conviction.

Youngman raised a challenge to the then mandatory Sentencing Guidelines in the trial court. Because Youngman has been subjected to nonconstitutional sentencing error he may seek resentencing under the post-United *States v. Booker*sentencing system.2 Accordingly, we vacate Young-man’s sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with *Booker.*

Sentence VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. *United States v. Burrows,*36 F.3d 875, 885 (9th Cir.1994); *see United States v. Fondren,*54 F.3d 533, 534-35 (9th Cir.1994).

2

. - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2021

No. 04-21-00110-CV

IN RE GREAT PLAINS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI19936

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellee, Cynara Dolphy-Budd’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief 

is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended until August 25, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
NEWMAN & NEWMAN,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610

Seattle, Washington 98104

(206) 274-2800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECL. OF DEREK LINKE IN SUPP.

OF REP. TO RESP. TO DEFS.’

MOT. FOR SUMM. J. (CV06-0204JCC) - 1

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married

individual, d/b/a

‘GORDONWORKS.COM'; OMNI

INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington

limited liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware

corporation d/b/a

ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

corporation, d/b/a

ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT

LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X,

Defendants.

NO. CV06-0204JCC

DECLARATION OF DEREK LINKE

IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

I, Derek Linke, declare and testify as follows:

1. I am over eighteen years of age and am an attorney associated with counsel

for defendants in the above captioned action. I am competent to testify to the matters

stated in this declaration, and make this declaration from personal knowledge of those

matters.

2. As I stated in a previous Declaration (Dkt. No. 102), I assembled the Linke

Log from work product created by the contract attorneys. This process required my

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 109 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 109

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 109 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
"Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking"

Our company would like to apply for exemption to use our Phantom 3 drone to inspect communication 

towers at up to 1200 ft. Our company has been in business for 8 years now. We paint communication 

towers all over the U.S. We are the leading tower painting company in the U.S. With this drone footage 

we will be able to inspect our work and pass on to our customers. 

I have our IC id number:

IC:11805A-WM3231503

FCC ID: SS3-WM3231503

This is model GL300B

Thank you for your time.

Kind Regards,

Lindsey Mandolesi
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES Q. WILKINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELDON VAIL, et al,

Defendants.

 Case No. C05-5656JKA

MINUTE ORDER SETTING 

 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold, United

States Magistrate Judge: 

A pretrial conference will be held with the Honorable J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge, at

8:30 a.m. on April 27, 2007, at 1717 Pacific Avenue, Courtroom D, Tacoma, Washington 98402. 

Proposed joint jury instructions, joint statement of disputed instructions, if any, proposed voir dire, and

trial briefs are to be filed no later than April 23, 2005. 

The foregoing Minute Order entered by /s/ Allyson P. Swan , Deputy Clerk,

this April 13, 2007. 

Case 3:05-cv-05656-JKA Document 132 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

December 12, 1963

No. 68165.

#### Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 154515-K, etc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “G” consist of galvanometers and parts, the classification of which is claimed to be controlled by the principles of *United States*v. G. *L. Electronics, Inc., et al.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim at 15 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 353), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device was sustained. The items marked “L,” stipulated to consist of galvanometer parts, were held dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pairs and 25 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 226 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 226), as modified, *supra,*for lenses of glass, with the edges ground or beveled. The items marked “M,” stipulated to consist of galvanometer parts, were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 230(b) (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 230 (b)), as glass mirrors, not exceeding 144 square inches in size. The items marked “N,” stipulated to consist of nylon cap seals similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62051, were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 31(a) (2) (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 31(a) (2)), as modified by T.D. 51802, for cellulose acetate cap seals, by similitude under paragraph 1559 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 1559), as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of IC Places, Inc., or the Company, hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, or the Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By
/s/ Peter MessineoPeter MessineoChief Financial Officer

(Principal financial officer and Principal accounting officer)


Date March 29, 2011




The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,680,400
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,977,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                      33,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,073,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,693,967
<PP&E>                                         2,375,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,233,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,909,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,087,045
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          77,367
<OTHER-SE>                                    10,684,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,909,316
<SALES>                                        2,831,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,831,864
<CGS>                                          1,348,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,348,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  963,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                     290,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              673,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     673,791
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.17



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2
                                                                  ------------

                        EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT DESCRIPTION
                        --------------------------------


SHIRAD ALI
----------

The Company, pursuant to an employment arrangement, hired Mr. Ali as Vice
President of Engineering and Technical Support on April 23, 2001, subject to
a 90 day probationary period, for an annual salary of $90,000.  In connection
with his employment arrangement, Mr. Ali is to receive, subject to satisfactory
performance, restricted common stock in accordance with the below schedule:

                             Period           Shares
                      --------------------    ------
                      04/23/01 to 06/30/01    10,000
                      07/01/01 to 09/30/01    15,000
                      10/01/01 to 12/31/01    15,000
                      01/01/02 to 03/31/03    15,000
                      04/01/02 to 06/30/02    15,000
                      07/01/02 to 09/30/02    15,000
                      10/01/02 to 12/31/02    15,000






























                                    Page 24
No. 65208.

#### L. N. White & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 284218-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

September 1, 1955

No. 59269.

protests 175820-K, etc. (New York).

#### Duncan Gilmour & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respcets to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ORDER GRANTING 9-DAY EXTENSION OF EXPERT 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINE (C06-5056RJB) - 1

LAW OFFICES OF 

I. Mills Meyers Swartling 

1000 SECOND AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-1064

TELEPHONE (206) 382-1000 

FACSIMILE (206) 386-7343

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

Honorable Karen L. Strombom 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

 AT TACOMA 

 

DEAN McLAIN, as Personal Representative of the 

Estate of Jeffrey McLain, Deceased; RURI 

MURAKAMI; and MARK RITCHIE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

BRACKETT AERO FILTERS, INC.; BRACKETT 

AIRCRAFT COMPANY; BRACKETT AIRCRAFT 

COMPANY, INC. aka (formerly) BRACKETT 

AIRCRAFT SPECIALTIES, INC.; and THE NEW 

PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC., 

 Defendants. 

NO. C06-5056 KLS 

ORDER GRANTING 9-DAY 

EXTENSION OF EXPERT 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINE 

 

 This matter came on regularly for hearing before this Court on the foregoing unopposed 

motion. This Court reviewed the file and records herein and is otherwise advised in the premises, 

NOW, THEREFORE, 

Case 3:06-cv-05056-KLS Document 26 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING 9-DAY EXTENSION OF EXPERT 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINE (C06-5056RJB) - 2

LAW OFFICES OF 

I. Mills Meyers Swartling 

1000 SECOND AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-1064

TELEPHONE (206) 382-1000 

FACSIMILE (206) 386-7343

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all parties are to submit their FRCP 26(a)(2) expert 

witness disclosures no later than June 8, 2007 rather than May 30, 2007 as previously ordered. 

 DATED this 30th day of May, 2007. 

A

Karen L. Strombom 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 

Presented by: 

MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Piper Aircraft Company 

/s/ David M. Schoeggl

Frederick M. Meyers, 

WSBA # 1158 

fmeyers@mms-seattle.com

David M. Schoeggl 

WSBA 13635 

dschoeggl@mms-seattle.com

Caryn Geraghty Jorgensen 

WSBA # 27514 

cjorgensen@mms-seattle.com 

Case 3:06-cv-05056-KLS Document 26 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12194]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Bonnard's Worlds” at the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas; The Phillips Collection, Washington, District of Columbia; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-21480 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Before the Second Division,

August 11, 1955

No. 59248.

protest 230864-K (New York).

#### Importsales, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When this case was called for hearing, counsel foi the Government stated that the collector’s office had received a certificate of delivery (customs Form 3337), signed by a responsible official of a religious society; that there was no objection to receiving said certificate in evidence; and that said certificate had been received by the collector too late for him to review his decision. In the circumstances, defendant conceded that the classification claimed by plaintiff should be sustained. On the record presented and following Abstract 36045 and Bureau of Customs decision (T. D. 47016), the claim of the plaintiff for free entry under paragraph 1773 was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 703 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 4, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3648) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to exclude discharges of indebtedness on principal residences from gross 
income, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 
Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 3648 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```