alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
    32.2CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        OF
        OAKRIDGE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
        PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
    connection with the Annual Report of Oakridge International Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on
    Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    "Report"), Lit Wai Sun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
    to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1)
    The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and(2)
    The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.  A
    signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oakridge International Corporation,
    and will be retained by Oakridge International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
    staff upon request./s/ Lit Wai Sun------------------------------------------Lit Wai SunChief Financial
    OfficerNovember 9, 2015
From: jpmurry@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:16:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Murry

Taylor, AR 71861
EXHIBIT 99.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bion Environmental
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certifies, that to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



------------------------------
David J. Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer
February 19, 2003
H. Res. 812 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 14, 2007. 

Whereas in late October 2007, a series of storms brought torrential rainfall to southern Mexico, especially the States 

of Tabasco and Chiapas, causing the Grijalva, Carrizal, 

and Puxcatan Rivers to overflow their banks; 

Whereas early reports have branded the resulting floods as 

the worst in Mexico in 50 years and Mexican President 

Calderon has called it ‘‘one of the worst natural disasters 

in the history of our country. Not only because of the size 

of the area affected, but because of the number of people 

affected’’; 

Whereas the flooding is estimated to have affected 1,000,000 

people so far; 

Whereas Mexico’s Federal Social Development Department 

now estimates that the homes of over 500,000 people 

were damaged or destroyed; 

Whereas more than 300,000 people are reported to still be 

trapped inside their homes or on their rooftops, with uncertain access to food, medicine, and safe drinking water; 

Whereas forecasts call for even more rain in the days ahead; 

Whereas the Governor of the State of Tabasco Andres 

Granier stated that 100 percent of the states crops were 
2 

•HRES 812 EH 

lost and that 80 percent of the State of Tabasco is under 

water; 

Whereas the capital of Tabasco, Villahermosa, has been particularly devastated, being compared to New Orleans 

after Hurricane Katrina; 

Whereas the flooding has hampered the capacity of Mexico’s 

oil industry; 

Whereas in the State of Chiapas, authorities have declared a 

state of emergency in 22 municipalities and at least 

7,000 people have been evacuated to shelters; 

Whereas Red Cross workers in Mexico have called for urgent 

supplies of water, food, and basic materials to assist in 

the rescue efforts; and 

Whereas health officials have begun warning against the serious possibility of cholera and waterborne diseases: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses its heartfelt sympathy for the victims 

of the devastating flooding affecting southern Mexico; 

(2) conveys its sincere support to the people and 

Government of Mexico; 

(3) urges the United States Government to immediately make available all appropriate assistance requested by the Mexican authorities; and 
3 

•HRES 812 EH 

(4) reaffirms its commitment to provide relief aid to 

the victims as the effects of the flooding continue to unfold. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 63849. protests 326329-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the *358subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58714.

protests 83126-K, etc. (New York).

#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk netting similar in all material respects to those involved in *John Heathcoat & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 145, C. D. 1223), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REMANDING

CASE TO STATE COURT- 1

USDC WD WA Cause No. CV05-5762 RBL

HON. RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRIAN McELROY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT

OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES;

WESTERN STATE HOSPITAL,

Defendants.

NO. CV05-5762 RBL

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

The parties have stipulated to dismissal of plaintiff’s federal claims without prejudice

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There being no other claims over which this

court has original jurisdiction, the parties hereby jointly move to remand all remaining state

Case 3:05-cv-05762-RBL Document 6 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REMANDING

CASE TO STATE COURT- 2

USDC WD WA Cause No. CV05-5762 RBL

law claims to state court, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1447 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), and

without costs to either party.

JOINTLY SUBMITTED this 3rd day of January, 2006.

MacDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS

By _/s/___________________________

Jesse Wing, WSBA #27751

705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500

Seattle, Washington 98104-1745

206.622.1604

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

By:_/s/______________________________

Suzanne Parisien, WSBA #24678

Office of Attorney General

Tort Claims Division

900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2200

Seattle, Washington 98164-1012

206.464.7352

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2006. 

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05762-RBL Document 6 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERTO LOPEZ-ANDRADE,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5242M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 December 29, 2005.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-mj-05242-JKA Document 7 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Because this matter can be decided on the memoranda, Jenks’ request for oral argument is

DENIED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD ALLEN FABEL, 

RODNEY ROLLNESS, 

JOSHUA BINDER, 

RICKY JENKS, and

PAUL FOSTER

Defendants.

Case No. CR06-041L

ORDER DENYING

RECONSIDERATION OF DETENTION

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Jenks’ “Motion to Reopen and for

Reconsideration of Detention Order” (Dkt. #388). Jenks argues that the Court should

reconsider its order of detention in light of the Government’s decision to dismiss the Laughlin

incident from the indictment. Though Jenks’ motion is proper given the changes to the

indictment, the Court nevertheless concludes that detention is still appropriate for all of the

other reasons offered in prior detention orders. See, e.g. Detention Order (Dkt. #83). 

Defendant Jenks’ motion (Dkt. #388) is DENIED.1

DATED this 30th day of January, 2007

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00041-RSL Document 452 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CELERINO CARRASCO,

 Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5104RJB

ORDER TO PROVIDE PROOF

OF SERVICE OR SHOW CAUSE

 After careful review of the record, the court hereby ORDERS:

(1) In relevant part, FRCP 4(m) provides:

Time limit for service. If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a

defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or upon

its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to

that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the

plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an

appropriate period.

The complaint in this matter was submitted on or about February 15, 2006, along with an

application to proceed in forma pauperis. At that time Plaintiff was in custody of the Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agency at the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma. The record reflects

that Plaintiff not been in custody of the ICE since February 28, 2006, when he was deported to Mexico. 

Based on his release, Plaintiff filed an updated application to proceed in forma pauperis as directed by the

Case 3:06-cv-05104-RJB Document 11 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

court and the court granted the application on June 22, 2006. The Complaint was technically filed by the

clerk on the following day, June 23, 2006. According to Rule 4(m) noted above, plaintiff was required to

properly serve defendants with a copy of the original complaint along with a summons and file the required

proof of service by not later than October 24, 2006. 

After reviewing the record, the court noted defendants have not filed an answer to Complaint. On

further review the court finds plaintiff has not filed proof of service of the original complaint or

summonses. Accordingly, it appears plaintiff may not have properly served the complaint in this matter.

Plaintiff shall file proof of service or show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of

prosecution by not later than November 22, 2006

DATED this 30th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05104-RJB Document 11 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 63384.

protest 230384-K (San Francisco).

#### The American Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel split rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The American Import Co.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 1894), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C 1350

In connection with the Special Financial Report of Gateway Pacific Bancorp (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 7, 2009



/s/    Frederick J. (Rick) MandelbaumFrederick J. (Rick) MandelbaumChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 58722.

protest 224665-K (New York).

#### American Basket Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, designated as item No. 33 on the invoice, was, in fact, baskets that are exclusively used in the manufacture of handbags, and that they are composed wholly of willow, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said item.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 417 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 417

Expressing no confidence in the performance of Attorney General Alberto 
     Gonzales, and urging the President to request his resignation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2007

 Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
  Mr. Boucher, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Ellison, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Thompson of 
    California, Mr. Ackerman, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Stark, Mr. Farr, Mr. 
Grijalva, and Mr. Fattah) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing no confidence in the performance of Attorney General Alberto 
     Gonzales, and urging the President to request his resignation.

Whereas at this critical time in the Nation's history when the American people 
        confront unprecedented challenges posed by global terrorism, when so 
        many critical issues remain to be addressed at home, and when it is 
        essential that the Nation has the service of an Attorney General who has 
        the full confidence of the American people to enforce the law, to defend 
        the United States from foreign and domestic threats, to prevent crime, 
        to seek punishment for those guilty of committing crimes, and to ensure 
        the fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans; and
Whereas Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has failed to adequately and properly 
        manage the Department of Justice and faithfully execute the duties of 
        his office, as reflected in his mismanagement of the dismissal of United 
        States attorneys, the conflicting and incomplete testimony before 
        Congress by the Attorney General and his top aides, and his inability to 
        assure the public that the laws of the Nation are being enforced in an 
        independent, nonpartisan, and judicious manner: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives and the American 
people have lost confidence in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and 
urge the President to request his resignation and to nominate a new 
candidate more capable of serving as the head of the Department of 
Justice.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

December 16, 1965

No. 69695.

#### Schick X-Ray Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/3331-13852 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of injectors or parts thereof, dedicated for use therewith, in chief value of metal, not laboratory apparatus, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Schick X-Ray Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 38, C.D. 2358), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         190,983
<SECURITIES>                                   591,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               841,636
<PP&E>                                          76,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,332)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,063,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          229,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           716
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,063,436
<SALES>                                        188,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,415
<CGS>                                           34,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
From: jeparker2007@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:48:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. It is not the Constitutional business of the federal government to mandate

anything about personal healthcare.

Sincerely,

Janice Parker

Hendersonville, NC 28792