alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning 
Grants (R34 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) and NIAID SBIR Phase II 
Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U44 Clinical 
Trial Required).
    Date: December 5, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Samita Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2915, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1f0d0105180d420d02081e090d021f07152c020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e3d2f23273a2f602f202a3c2b2f203d25370e20272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 27, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21770 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the Second Division,

April 18, 1966

No. P66/35.

protests 60/12015, etc. (New York).

#### Daiichi Bussan Kaisha, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of waterproof cotton velveteen cloth similiar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Protest 60/8540, having been abandoned as to entries 752960, 752953, and 752939, and protest 61/16789, having been abandoned as to entries 799683, 827714, and 767021, were dismissed as to said entries. This case was formerly reported in Abstract 69795.
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 1 of 2

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 76 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 76-3 Filed 01/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
June 30, 1953

No. 57415.

Suit 4711.

#### Wilbur G. Hallauer *v.*United States.

Reap. Dec. 8045 affirmed March 11, 1953. C. A. D. 518.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1878 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 93 ) 11-1-2 3
Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/28/2008 1:21:24

PM Sheet 93 of 145

### P. 2



## > K*•*/ , 

# A-90-1 9 II-I-2 3

• » /CTV l ^ /STf c 

# U.S

. Small Busines s Administration , Office o f Advocacy iUl !

EP A AI R DOCKE T 

# Handboo k

of Smal l Busines s Dat a 198 8

A Publicatio n o

f th e Smal l Busines s Dat aBas eP. 3

Novembe r 1988 Fd r sale b y the Superintendent

o f Documents , U.S

. Government Printin g Office , Washington , D.C

. 2040 2

Librar y o f Congres s Cataloging-in-Publicatio

n Dat a Handbook of smal l busines s data

.
" A Publicatio n o

f th e small busines s dat abase. " 1

. Smal l business—Unite dStates—Statistics

. 2

. Smal l business—Unite dStates—Statistica l services

. I

. Unite dStates

. Smal l Busines s Administration

. Office of Advocacy

. HD2346.U5H3 7 198 8 338.6'42'097302 1 88-60037 9P. 4

30 2 HANDBOO K

O FSMAL

L BUSINES S DAT

A
Tabl e 9. 1 Classificatio no f Industr y Dominanc e b

y th e U.S . Smal l Busines s Administratio n Continue d

SI C Cod e Industr y Small-Business Dominate d Large-Business Dom i nate d Indeterminat e
24 4 Woo dcontainer s X 24 5 Woo dbuilding s andmobil e home s 245 1 Mobil e home s 24 9 Miscellaneou s woo dproduct s X 2 5 Furnitur e an d fixture s X 25 1 Househol dfurnitur e 251 1 Woo dhousehol dfurnitur e X 251 2 Upholstere dhousehol dfurnitur e 251 4 Meta l househol dfurnitur e X 251 5 Mattresse s an d bedspring s X 25 2 Offic e furnitur e 25 3 Publi c buildin g and relate dfurnitur e X 25 4 Partition s and fixture s X 25 9 Miscellaneou s furnitur e an d fixture s X 2 6 Pape r andallie dproduct s 26 1 Pul p mill s 26 2 Pape r mills , excep t buildin g pape r 26 3 Paperboar dmill s 26 4 Miscellaneou s converte dpape r

product s 264 1 Pape r coatin g an d glazin g 264 2 Envelope s X 264 3 Bags , excep t textil e bag s 26 5 Paperboar dcontainer s and boxe s 265 1 Foldin g paperboar dboxe s X 265 3 Corrugate dand soli dfibe r boxe s 265 4 Sanitar y

foo dcontainer s 2 7 Printin g and publishin g 27 1 Newspaper s 27 2 Periodical s 27 3 Book s 273 1 Boo k publishin g 273 2 Boo k printin g 27 4 Miscellaneou s publishin g X 27 5 Commercia l printin g X 275 1 Commercia l printing , letterpress X 275 2 Commercia l printing , lithographi c X 27 6 Manifol dbusines s form s 27 8 Blankbook s and bookbindin g X 27 9 Printin g trad e service s X 2 8 Chemical s andallie dproduct s 28 1 Industria l inorgani c chemical s 281 9 Industria l inorgani c chemicals , n.e.c . 28 2 Plastic s material s an d synthetic s 282 1 Plastic s material s and resin s 282 4 Organi c fibers , noncellulosi c 28 3 Drug s 283 4 Pharmaceutica l preparation s 28 4 Soap , cleaners , and toile t good s 284 1 Soa pand othe r detergent s 2842, 3 Polishing , sanitation , and finishin g preparation s 284 4 Toile t preparation s 28 5 Paint s and allie dproduct s 28 6 Industria l organi c chemical s 286 5 Cycli c crude s an d intermediate s 2861, 9 Gum , -wood , and industria l organi c chemicals , n.e.c . 28 7 -Agricultura l chemical s 28 9 Miscellaneou s chemica l product s X X X X X X X X X X
H. Res. 483 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 10, 2007. 

Whereas Big Bend National Park is a scenic treasure of 

southwest Texas encompassing more than 800,000 acres; 

Whereas Big Bend National Park manages nearly one quarter of the approximately 1000 mile stretch of the Rio 

Grande River that also serves as the boundary between 

the United States and Mexico; 

Whereas along the boundary of the park, the flow of the Rio 

Grand River shifts from a southeasterly direction to the 

northeast, forming the bend after which the park is 

named; 

Whereas Big Bend National Park is unique because it covers 

a variety of different ecosystems ranging from the 

Chihuahuan Desert to the Chisos Mountains; 

Whereas Native people inhabited the area for thousands of 

years; 

Whereas many people have traversed the Big Bend region in 

the past 150 years, including Spanish explorers, Comanche Indians, Mexican settlers, and American ranchers; 

Whereas in 1933 the Texas Legislature, led by Everett 

Ewing Townsend, established the Texas Canyons State 

Park; 
2 

•HRES 483 EH 

Whereas later that year the park was expanded and renamed 

Big Bend State Park; 

Whereas Townsend later became known as the Father of Big 

Bend National Park; 

Whereas between 1934 and 1942 the Civilian Conservation 

Corps worked diligently to make the park suitable for 

visitors; and 

Whereas 63 years ago Big Bend National Park, ‘‘Texas’ Gift 

to the Nation’’, was officially established on June 12, 

1944: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 63rd anniversary of the founding 

of Big Bend National Park; and 

(2) honors the National Park Service for their service to the Big Bend region and Big Bend National Park. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Target Acquisitions I, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 2, 2011/s/ Geoffrey AlisonGeoffrey AlisonPrincipal Executive Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TARGET ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and will be retained by TARGET ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: June 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 118)]
[Notices]               
[Page 35122]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21jn10-159]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7066]

 
Announcement of Meetings of the International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee

    Summary: This notice announces meetings of the International 
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) to start preparations for 
the 2010 Plenipotentiary Conference of the International 
Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the 2011 ITU Radiocommunication 
Sector (ITU-R) World Radiocommunication Conference Preparatory Meeting.
    The ITAC will meet to begin preparation of advice for the U.S. 
government on the 2010 ITU Plenipotentiary Conference (Guadalajara, 
Mexico) on Thursday July 8, 2010, 2-4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at 
1120 20th Street, Washington, DC 20036. There will also be reports on 
recent meetings at ITU and OAS/CITEL (e.g. Study Group meetings, the 
ITU World Telecommunication Development Conference). For those people 
outside the Washington, DC metro area, a conference bridge will be 
provided.
    The ITAC will meet to begin preparation of advice for the U.S. 
government on the 2011 ITU-R World Radiocommunication Conference 
Preparatory Meeting on Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 2-4 p.m. Eastern 
Daylight Time, at 1200 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209. For those 
people outside the Washington, DC metro area, a conference bridge will 
be provided. People expecting to attend this meeting in person should 
advise the Department of State at najarianpb@state.gov or 202 647-7847.
    These meetings are open to the public as seating capacity allows. 
The public will have an opportunity to provide comments at this 
meeting. People desiring further information on these meetings or 
wishing to request reasonable accommodation may contact the Secretariat 
at minardje@state.gov or 202 647-5205.

    Dated: June 14, 2010.
Cecily C. Holiday,
International Communications & Information Policy, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-14911 Filed 6-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```
#### Abraham LALAWI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney-General, Respondent.

No. 04-2518, 05-1154.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 15, 2005.

Decided Aug. 8, 2005.

Armin A. Skalmowski, Alhambra, California, for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Brian E. Bentley, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*140Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Abraham Lalawi, a native and citizen of Indonesia who claims he is a Christian of Chinese ethnicity, seeks review of orders issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings (No. 04-2518) and denying his motion to reconsider that order (No. 05-1154). We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Lalawi’s motions. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2005).

We accordingly deny the petitions for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITIONS DENIED*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 797 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 797

  Referring the bill (H.R. 4038), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
 Rodriguez'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2007

 Mr. Filner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Referring the bill (H.R. 4038), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
 Rodriguez'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    The bill (H.R. 4038), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
Rodriguez'' and now pending in the House of Representatives, is 
referred to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
        United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the 
        earliest practicable date, providing--
                    (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that 
                are sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in the bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Adrian Rodriguez.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
  





 
 March     , 2018 

[Director’s name] 
 Dear
[                ], 
 You are receiving this notice because
you have been granted [                    ] shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (the
“Company”), effective as of [    ], 2018, pursuant to the Company’s 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). This grant of Shares is being made to you as consideration for your services to the
Company as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors [during the Company’s [2017] fiscal year]. The Shares subject to this grant are fully vested as of the grant date and will be credited to your brokerage account on record with the
Company as soon as practicable following the Company’s receipt of this executed letter. 
 By signing this letter, you are
acknowledging that you have received a copy of the Plan and have had an opportunity to review the Plan and agree to be bound by all the terms and provisions of the Plan, including without limitation Section 8.14 of the
Plan. 
 Please sign this letter and return it to
[                    ] as soon as possible and in no event later than ten days following the date hereof, and he may be contacted at
[                    ] should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	  

	Name:
	Title:
	
	  

	[Director’s name]
	
	  

	Date
From: karadeno@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:16:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kara Deno

Eureka, CA 95503
ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE 

Page 1

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

909 First Avenue, Suite 400 

Seattle, WA 98104-1061 

(206) 220-6885 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF 

WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 CASE NO. 2:06-cv-0045-RSM 

 ORDER APPROVING 

 CONSENT DECREE 

 The Court having considered the foregoing stipulated agreement of the parties, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT the foregoing Consent Decree be, and the same hereby is, approved as 

the final decree of this Court in full settlement of this action. This lawsuit is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party. The Court retains jurisdiction of this 

matter for purposes of enforcing the Consent Decree approved herein. 

DATED this 10th day of March, 2010. 

 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00045-RSM Document 450 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 1
From: ginny154@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:41:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ginny Malbon

Santa Cruz, CA 95062
From: cindysktt@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:56:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Skutt

, 48504-4824