alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (principal executive officer)         |
|                                  |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota              |
| April 14, 2009                   |

 

----
Case No. 8,204a.

#### LEECH et al. v. FRELIGH.2

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

April 21, 1875.

Copyright — Translations.

[Cited in 2 Morgan, Law of literature, 30G.]

[This was a bill for an injunction by Harry Harewood Leech, Felix G. de Fontaine, and Charles Dimetry against William G. Fre-ligh.]

Augustus Van Wyck, for plaintiff.

A. Oakley Hall, for defendant.

2

**[Nut previously reported.]

Before

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

Motion having been made by the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from publishing, printing, representing or performing “Round the World in Eighty Days,” a comedy drama adapted from the French of Jules Verne, and the said motion having come on regularly to be heard, and on reading and filing the notice of motion, bill of complaint and affidavits of plaintiffs attached, and af*239ter hearing Messrs. Van Wyck, of counsel for the plaintiff, for the motion, and A. Oakley Hall, of counsel for the defendant, in opposition thereto, it is ordered that said motion for a temporary injunction in the above-entitled cause be, and the same is hereby, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 461 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 69
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 461

                          [Report No. 110-176]

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
    Representative from the Twenty-fourth Congressional District of 
                                Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on House Administration, 
  reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
    Representative from the Twenty-fourth Congressional District of 
                                Florida.

    Resolved,  That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Twenty-fourth Congressional District of Florida 
is dismissed.
                                                  House Calendar No. 69

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 461

                          [Report No. 110-176]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
    Representative from the Twenty-fourth Congressional District of 
                                Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 6, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit
10.4


 


终止协议


Termination
Agreement


 


本终止协议(下称“本协议”)由下列各方于2018年3月20日在中华人民共和国(下称“中国”)
杭州签订:


This
Termination Agreement (this “Agreement”) has been executed by and among the following parties on March 20, 2018 in
Hangzhou, the People’s Republic of China (“China”or the “PRC”):


 


甲方:韩扣琳,为中国境内自然人,杭州龙运网络科技有限公司(“公司”)的股东,持有公司15%的股权(“股权”);


Party
A: Han Koulin, a natural person in China and one of the shareholders of Hangzhou Longyun Network Technology Co., Ltd. ("Company"),
holding 15% of equity interest of the Company ("Shareholding");


 


乙方:杭州昱曜网络科技有限公司,一家于中国杭州市注册成立的外商独资有限公司,其注册地址位于杭州市萧山经济技术开发区启迪路198号B1-901-11室;


Party
B: Hangzhou Yuyao Network Technology Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign owned enterprise with limited liability which is incorporated
and established in Hangzhou City, China, with its registered address at Room B1-901-11, 198 Qidi Road, Xiaoshan Economic and Technological
Development Zone, Hangzhou City;


 


在本协议中,甲方和乙方以下各称“一方”,合称“双方”。


In
this Agreement, each of Party A and Party B shall be referred to as a "Party" respectively, and they shall be collectively
referred to as the "Parties".


 


鉴于:甲方于2016年8月19日作出《授权委托书》,授权乙方在《授权委托书》的有效期内就其股权行使若干权利;


Whereas,
Party A issued a Power of Attorney authorizing Party B to exercise certain rights relating to Party A’s Shareholding during
the term of the Power of Attorney, dated as of August 19, 2016;


 


据此,双方经协商一致,达成如下协议:


Now,
therefore, through mutual discussion, the Parties have reached the following agreements:


 


	1.	双方特此同意终止《授权委托书》。自本协议生效之日起,《授权委托书》终止且不具有进一步的效力。



The
Parties hereby agree to terminate the Power of Attorney. Effective as of the date hereof, the Power of Attorney shall terminate
and be of no further force and effect.


 


	2.	本协议以中文和英文书就,一式两份,甲乙双方各持一份,具有同等效力;中英文版本如有冲突,应以中文版为准。



This
Agreement is written in both Chinese and English language in two copies, each Party having one copy with equal legal validity;
in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.


  


本页其余部分刻意留为空白


The
Remainder of this page is intentionally left blank


 




     


     


    

 


有鉴于此,双方已使得经其授权的代表于文首所述日期签署了本终止协议并即生效,以昭信守。


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Termination Agreement as of the date
first above written.


  


甲方:韩扣琳


Party
A:Han Koulin


 





	签字:	 	 
	By:	/s/ Han Koulin	 



  


乙方:杭州昱曜网络科技有限公司


Party
B:Hangzhou Yuyao Network Technology Co., Ltd.


 





	签字:	 	 
	By:	/s/ Han Yu	 
	姓名:	韩昱	 
	Name:	Han Yu	 
	职位:	法定代表人	 
	Title:	Legal Representative	 



   


 


2
**Exhibit 4.19**
No. P69/141.

protests 63/6947-13540, etc. (Chicago).

#### D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Be, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Seedman International Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58247.

protest 174602-K (Milwaukee).

#### M. E. Dey & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheesecloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 76, C. A. D. 466), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904; 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Completion of Panel Review in the matter of Certain 
Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico; Final Negative Injury 
Determination (Secretariat File Number: USA-MEX-2020-1904-04).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NAFTA Secretariat has received a consent motion filed on 
behalf of the Full Member Subgroup of the American Institute of Steel 
Construction, LLC, requesting the termination of panel review in the 
Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico; Final Negative Injury 
Determination (Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico IN) dispute. 
Given all the participants have agreed to the termination of panel 
review in this consent motion, and pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the NAFTA 
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (Rules), 
the Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico IN dispute has been 
terminated. As a result, and in accordance with Rule 78(a), notice is 
hereby given that panel review of the Fabricated Structural Steel from 
Mexico IN dispute has been completed effective September 28, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, 
NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of article 1904 of NAFTA provides 
a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations 
issued by the government of the United States, the government of 
Canada, and the government of Mexico. There are established Rules, 
which were adopted by the three governments and require Notices of 
Completion of Panel Review to be published in accordance with Rule 78. 
For the complete Rules, please see https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Texts-of-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/Article-1904.

    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Vidya Desai,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2023-21993 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ultimate Products Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, George Vogelei, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 14h day of July, 2011.   /s/ George VogeleiGeorge VogeleiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 744 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 5, 2007.
Whereas there are 195,871 Native American veterans in the United States;
Whereas Native Americans have participated for over 200 years in United States 
        military actions;
Whereas the participation of Native Americans in the War of 1812, the Civil War, 
        and the Spanish-America War was significant;
Whereas in World War I, it is estimated that more than 12,000 Native Americans 
        served the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas more than 44,000 Native Americans served in the Armed Forces during 
        World War II, in both the European and Pacific fronts, representing a 
        substantial portion of the 350,000 Native Americans then living in the 
        United States;
Whereas Native Americans fought in the Korean conflict, and more than 42,000 
        Native Americans fought in the Vietnam War, 90 percent of whom served as 
        volunteers;
Whereas Native Americans also provided significant contributions in the military 
        operations in Grenada and Panama and the Persian Gulf War in 1980s and 
        1990s; and
Whereas Native Americans should also be recognized for their participation in 
        Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes all Native American veterans who have served the 
        Nation with honor, pride, devotion, wisdom and strength for serving 
        their country and protecting their homeland; and
            (2) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation urging the 
        people of the United States to observe a day honoring Native American 
        veterans with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the First Division,

May 5, 1965

No. 69287.

#### Zenith Novelty Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/19784 (New York).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2015

No. 04-14-00562-CV

Jesus DE LOS SANTOS, Jr., Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Jesus Francisco 

De Los Santos, Deceased, and Juan De Los Santos, Individually,

Appellants

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-08-50394-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice1

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice2

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice3

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered the appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration, and the 

motion is DENIED.

 

1 Dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration without requesting a response. See Tex. R. App. P. 

49.2.

2 Dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration without requesting a response. See Tex. R. App. P. 

49.2.

3 Dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration without requesting a response. See Tex. R. App. P. 

49.2.
_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 58266.

petition 6977-R (Laredo).

#### The Gebhardt Chili Powder Company *v.*United States,

Ekwall, Judge:

This petition was filed under authority of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and seeks remission of additional duties assessed because of undervaluation of cured boneless muscle meat imported from Mexico and entered at the subport of Eagle Pass, Tex.

In support of the petition, petitioner called Burney D. Dixon, appraiser at Eagle Pass, and Gustavo Caballero, assistant manager of T. H. Gonzalez, customs broker, from whose testimony the following facts appear: Prior to filing the entry herein, Mr. Caballero conferred with Mr. Dixon and filed a submission sheet, giving such information as he had concerning the value of the merchandise. Entry was made on the basis of that information, but subsequently the appraiser notified him of an increase in value of similar merchandise, and an amended entry was prepared and filed. The merchandise was appraised at the amended value, but additional duties were assessed because the supplemental sum due on account of the increased value had not been paid. Mr. Caballero stated that the money had not been tendered through an oversight on his part, resulting from the fact that a number of amendments had been filed at the time, all of which involved refunds. When the matter came to his attention 2 or 3 days afterwards, it was too late, as the entry had already come under the observation of the appraiser.

Mr. Dixon stated that he did not believe that the failure to submit the money was deliberate or that there was any intent to deceive him or to defraud the revenue of the United States on the part of the importer or its agent. His opinion was based on his dealings with the broker for 5 years, during which time he had been very cooperative.

On the record presented, we hold that the petitioner, in making entry in this case, acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise.

The petition is, therefore, granted and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 2, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 2, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         894,105
<SECURITIES>                                10,700,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,321,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (179,959)
<INVENTORY>                                 19,111,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,527,408
<PP&E>                                      61,427,613
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,153,246)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,990,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,912,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,854
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,635,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,990,492
<SALES>                                     27,537,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,537,394
<CGS>                                       22,240,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,466,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,109,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,195,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,914,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,914,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.25
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: 23-101]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal for NASA Federal advisory committee.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the NASA Administrator has determined that renewal of the charter of International Space Station Advisory Committee is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on NASA by law. The renewed charter is for a two-year period ending September 27, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Patricia Diane Rausch, NASA Advisory Committee Management Officer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546; 202-358-4510 or                         *diane.rausch@nasa.gov.*

Patricia Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2023-21876 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
From: melanie@mtc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:38:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Melanie Clark

Mosinee, WI 54455