alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 17, 2015

Mr. Michael Jon Turner

2099 Highway 6 Trail #2

Marengo, IA 52301

Dear Mr. Turner:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2768 on July 7, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
Before the First Division,

August 4, 1955

No. 59241.

protests 182955-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gorack Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sheepskin waste scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, were held dutiable at 7)4 percent under paragraph 1555, as modified by T. D. 51802, and the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, were held dutiable at 4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
No. 58706.

protests 219157-K and 218947-K (A) (New York).

#### Sammar Corporation and Amicale Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it wras held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18207 and #18208; PENNSYLVANIA Disaster Number PA-00137]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 09/28/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flash Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/09/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 09/28/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/27/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/28/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Berks. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Chester, Lancaster, Lebanon, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18207 6 and for economic injury is 18208 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-21903 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Mark A. Smith, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bion
Environmental Technologies, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 23, 2007


/s/ Mark A. Smith
Mark A. Smith
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF



THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bill Ferrari, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of Kamp-Rite Holdings Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Registrant"), for the twelve month period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |  |                                | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: April 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Bill Ferrari               | 
|                     |  | Name:  Bill Ferrari           
|                     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
No. 57732.

protest 191436-K (New York).

#### Lentheric, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The affidavit for free entry and the declaration of the foreign exporter were duly filed, but the certificate of exportation was not considered by the collector to have fully covered the merchandise. At the trial, Government counsel recommended that allowances be made in accordance with an amended memorandum of the collector. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: tom.hodges@pw.utc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:08:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Hodges

Springdale, AR 72764
Exhibit  32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)








My name is Crystal Coranes and I am the President and Chief Executive Officer of Eaglecrest Resources, Inc. (the “Company”).





I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-KA for the year ended January 31, 2011, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Eaglecrest Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.





CRYSTAL CORANES


Crystal Coranes


President and Chief Executive Officer


Eaglecrest Resources, Inc.





Date: February 20, 2012
No. P68/516.

protests 64/13882 and 64/13883 (Los Angeles).

#### Terra International Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(51 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual,

d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM’; OMNI

INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited

liability company,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

d/b/a ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware

Corporation, d/b/a ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;

SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,

1-X, 

Defendants.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NUMBER: 06-0204-JCC

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues

have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Pursuant to the Court’s May 15, 2007 Order (Dkt. No. 121), summary judgment has been

GRANTED to Defendants. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

 June 5, 2007 

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ C. Ledesma 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 122 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 1

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 122

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit
32.01



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE

SARBANES
OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ended February 29, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    July 30, 2020 | By: | /s/
    Keith J. McKenzie  
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                        |     | Keith
    J. McKenzie      
|                        |     | Chief
    Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE

SARBANES
OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ended February 29, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    July 30, 2020 | By: | /s/
    William E. Begley  
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                        |     | William
    E. Begley,     
|                        |     | Chief
    Financial Officer
March 1, 1961

No. 65223.

#### National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/6553-10549.

G.D. 2224. Motion of Government for rehearing granted by Judges Kao and Ford.

Lawrence, J., dissented.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of United States Oil and Gas Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Tawse, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May 2, 2011



/s/ Alex TawseAlex TawseChief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United States Oil and Gas Corp and will be retained by United States Oil and Gas Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is made solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and not for any other purpose
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Lopez Moran, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 981]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated July 29,1991 *(People v Moran,*175 AD2d 295), which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 20, 1987, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.