alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form N-1A of our report dated May 30, 2008, relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights which appears in the March 31,
2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of Daily Income Fund, which is also
incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to
the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights", "Counsel and
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and "Financial Statements" in
such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    New York, New York
    July 29, 2008
Before the Third Division,

August 14, 1958

No. 62295.

#### Book of the Month Club, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 280496-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that if the certificate of exportation had been filed prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period provided for in section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1615, as amended, *supra.*In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2255 MOTION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DAVID J. KATHRENS,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1831-JCC

(CR03-515-JCC)

ORDER DISMISSING § 2255 MOTION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s § 2255 motion, the government’s response,

the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States

Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining record, does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s § 2255 motion (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED as untimely under 28

U.S.C. § 2255(1); and

(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to petitioner, to counsel

for respondent, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 2nd day of June, 2006.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01831-JCC Document 24 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 57023.

protests 798032-G and 48870-K (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., and J. H. Bleistein, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza Goldfield Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Janney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




BONANZA GOLDFIELD CORPORATIONBy:
/s/DavidJanneyDavid JanneyChief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2010
From: cherylepattison@dfn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:51:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

cheryle pattison

Roswell, NM 88201
No. 65188.

#### Amco Custom Brokerage Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/2249, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gloves or outerware of synthetic textile similar in use to knit or crocheted gloves or outerwear in chief value of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION, INC. FOR THE
SECOND QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000875612
<NAME> AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                          12,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (26,854)
<INVENTORY>                                    264,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               604,693
<PP&E>                                         227,756      
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,842     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,831,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          703,962
<BONDS>                                        850,000      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,831,966
<SALES>                                      2,769,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,769,949
<CGS>                                        2,502,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,502,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               285,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (64,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (64,822)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheInnoko gold-placer district, Alaska, with accounts of the central KuskokwimValley and the Ruby Creek and Gold Hill placers**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number: I19.3:410
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000958366
 
July 30, 2018
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification

In connection with the annual report of China Mass Media Corp. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Wang Lam Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1). the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2). the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2009



/s/    Eric Wang Lam
CheungName:

Eric Wang Lam CheungTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MAXINE R. RIVENES,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5749KLS

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record and to issue the Summonses.

DATED this 5th day of December, 2005.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05749-RBL Document 2 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 65207.

#### A. L. Bazzini Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 261973-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1147 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 126 ) IV-E-11 6 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/23/2008 7:21:47AM

Sheet 126 of 242P. 2 

### 01-25-9 4 05:23P MFRO MEPAEDS DANNARBO RTO AI RDOCKE T P006/00 9 

# A-ff M

MEMORANDUM TO : Onboar d Docke t A87-1 1 FROM J Steve n Silverman , Attorne yS*- RE : Telephon e Conversatio n wit hMichea l Sherman , Esq . O n Januar y4 , 1994 , I calle d Michea l Sherman , counse l fo r th e Gasolin e Marketer s Association . I tol d hi mtha t ther e ha d bee n discussion s betwee n Agenc yand automobil e industr yofficial s (al l documente d i n th e administrativ e record ) regardin g th e advisabilit yo f applyin g a n onboar d requiremen t t o trucks , an d i f so , when . I indicate d tha t th e automobil e industr yofficial s ar e arguing , a s the ydi d a t th e publi c hearin g an d i n thei r writte n comments , tha t Stag e l l control s mak e i t unnecessar yt o appl y onboar d t o trucks , and tha t ther e ha s bee n discussio n o f phasin g i n a n onboar d requiremen t fo r truck s o n a differen t (an d longer ) basi s tha n fo r cars . I als o invite d commen t fro mhi s group an d aske d hi mt o contac t AP I and NRD C (the othe r petitioner s i n th e Onboar d litigation) , whic hh e sai d h e woul d do .
No. P67/295.

#### Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States, protest 62/9337 (Tampa).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of parts of debarking machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62793.

#### C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc., and Bluefries N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312827-K (New York).

Donlon, Judge:

This protest is before us on a stipulation of counsel in open court, as follows:

> Mr. Schwartz: In this case, if the court please, the merchandise consisted of chocolate milk bars and bittersweet chocolate bars. These items were the subject of an appeal for reappraisement, the number of which was 237045-A, and that was decided by your Honor, Judge Donlon, on June 27, 1956, together with a number of other cases which were included in the same decision.

> In that decision the court held that the correct or proper dutiable value of the two items here in question was as follows: For the milk bars 95.74 Netherland guilders per carton; for the bittersweet bars 90.48 Netherland guilders per carton.

> In due course the entry was liquidated on October 17, 1956, and apparently by reason simply of inadvertence or clerical error the reappraised values were not used in liquidation of the entry.

> Our protest is directed against the assessment of duties on a value higher than the final appraised value.

> I would ask the Government to concede at this time that the facts which I have stated up to the present time are true and correct.

> Mrs. Ziff: We concede that.

> Judge Donlon: It is so stipulated?

> Mrs. Ziff: Yes, on the advice of the examiner concerned.

> Judge Donlon: The stipulation will be made of record.

> Mr. Schwartz: And I ask the Government to stipulate that the entry should be reliquidated on the basis of the reappraised values in accordance with the decision of Judge Donlon dated June 27, 1956.

Liquidation was on October 17, 1956, and protest was filed December 6, 1956. Thus, the issue is raised as to the legal effect of the liquidation.

On the facts stipulated, the protest is sustained. Judgment will be entered for plaintiff.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

G. MICHAEL STRAUSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONNA HAMILTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5772FDB

ORDER

 This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis and he has paid the full

filing fee. (Dkt. # 5). 

When plaintiff filed his application to proceed in forma pauperis he requested the United

States Marshals Service be ordered to serve his complaint. (Dkt. # 1). In February when plaintiff

responded to an order to show regarding his application for in forma pauperis status he again

included a request that the court order service be done for him. (Dkt. # 4). In March plaintiff sent

the court a letter asking for a ruling on his requests. (Dkt. # 8). In the future plaintiff will limit his

documents to one issue. A motion for court action should be clearly titled as a motion. 

The court routinely serves complaints for persons proceeding in forma pauperis and as

plaintiff notes the statute allows for orders of this nature. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma

Case 3:05-cv-05772-FDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 1 of 2

Strauss v. Hamilton et al Doc. 9

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

pauperis. He argues his current restraint creates a hardship on his ability to perfect service. The

hardship plaintiff complains of is one shared by all incarcerated or detained persons, but the statute

allowing the court to order service does not include this category as requiring service be performed

by the government. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

In his letter to the court plaintiff also requests return of his copies of the complaint and he

request summons be issued so he can perfect service. The clerks office is directed to return any

copies of the complaint in the court’s possession and issue summons to the plaintiff for each

named defendant. Plaintiff would have less then one month to perfect service and the court on its

own motion extends the deadline for perfection of service until May 5th, 2006.

As a final matter plaintiff complains that his case has been classified as a “550 prisoner Civil

Rights Action.” (Dkt. # 8). The court is aware that plaintiff is not a prisoner, however this

recording category is used for a number of different suits, not all of which involve prisoners. 

Plaintiff’s demand that the action be re-designated is DENIED

The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05772-FDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
U.S. v. Rodney Less Rollness, CR 06-041 RSL 

Order Resetting Briefing Schedule 

Page 1 of 1

	

 



	 

 !"#$$

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Petitioner, 

 vs. 

RODNEY LESS ROLLNESS, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CR 06-041 RSL 

ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Motion of the Parties to Reset the Briefing 

Schedule for the motion for reduction in sentence hereby states that IT IS ORDERED that the 

motion be granted. The briefing schedule shall be as follow: 

a. Any amended or supplement motion by counsel on behalf of the defendant should be 

filed on or before July 9, 2021; 

b. The government’s response to the motion should be filed on or before July 30, 2021; 

c. Any reply should then be filed on or before August 5, 2021 and the matter noted August 

6, 2021. 

DATED this 6th day of July, 2021. 

A

Robert S. Lasnik 

United States District Judge

Presented by: 

/s/ Anna M. Tolin 

Anna M. Tolin 

Tolin Law Firm
No. 57733.

protests 180616-K, etc. (New York).

#### John Alban *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

OCT 0 5 2016 

Mr. William V. O'Connor 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

Counsel to Airphrame, Corp. 

4200 Republic Plaza 

370 17th St. 

Denver, CO 80202 

Dear Mr. O'Connor: 

800 Independence Ave .. S W 

Washinglon. D.C. 20591 

Thank you for your July 22, 2016, letter on behalf of Airphrame, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner 

or operator) requesting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cancel Exemption No. 

12569A (Docket No. FAA-2015-2409). 

In Exemption No. 12569A, the operator was granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) 

and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121 , 91.15l(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary 

to conduct UAS operations. 

Your request for cancellation is hereby granted, effective OCT 0 5 2016 

?J 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flight Standards Service 
MORRISON I FOERSTER 

July 22, 2016 

Via First Class Mail 

Director John S. Duncan 

Flight Standards Services 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

12531 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE 

SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA 

92130-2040 

TELEPHONE: 858.720.5100 

FACSL\fLLE: 858.720.5125 

W\\\'W.i\IOFO.COM 

).IOitRI SON A tt'OE RSTER ll_.P 

BLIJISC, BL:HI'<, BRl SSLLS, DE'<\'I.R, 

HO'-.:C: ~U~G. LUSOos, LOS ANGELrtS, 

Nil \\ YO RK, SOKillliRS VIRGIN IA, 

P ;\LU ALTO, SAC RAllENTO, SAN OICCU, 

SA~ FRASCtSCO, SH.\~Gftt\t, SIS'GAPOIF.~ 

TU~VCI, \t'ASIH,GTOS. O,C, 

Writer's Direct Contact 

+I (858) 720.7932 

WOConnor@mofo.com 

Re: Airphrame, Inc., Exemption No. 12569, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2409 

Dear Director Duncan: 

I am writing to inform you that in light of the August 29, 2016 effective date of Part 107, 

Airphrame Inc., holder of FAA Exemption Number 12569 (and 12569A), has discontinued 

commercial sUAS operations in order to make the necessary preparations to transition to 

Part I 07. Therefore, to avoid any confusion as to the requirements for commercial 

operations, Airphrame hereby relinquishes and surrenders the above grant of exemption by 

the FAA, effective immediately. No future commercial sUAS operations will be conducted 

under the exemption by Airphrame or any third party operator. Future commercial 

operations, if any, will be conducted by Airphrame pursuant to Part 107 after it goes into 

effect next month. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

Very truly yours, 

1/t!~ William V. O'Connor 

sd-684572